1
|
Kjaergaard U, Lund A, Redda M, Kristensen MH, Aastrup M, Bøgh N, Sivesgaard K, Ohliger MA, Vigneron DB, Bertelsen LB, Alstrup AKO, Hansen ESS, Mortensen FV, Laustsen C. Regional quantification of metabolic liver function using hyperpolarized [1- 13C] pyruvate MRI. Sci Rep 2025; 15:10482. [PMID: 40140493 PMCID: PMC11947255 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93725-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Assessment of liver function is essential before partial hepatectomy to predict the risk of post hepatectomy liver failure, a severe and life-threatening complication. Traditional methods have focused on expected future liver remnant (FLR) volume estimation. However, liver volume does not always correlate with function. We suggest that metabolism might be a better surrogate for function than volume. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the metabolic changes in a porcine model of partial portal vein ligation (PVL) using hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging (HP-MRI). Specifically, we sought to quantify and compare the pyruvate metabolism in the FLR and the deportalized liver (DL).Six pigs underwent PVL. HP-MRI with [1-13C] pyruvate was performed at baseline, post-surgery, and 1 week after surgery. Metabolic conversion was quantified with kinetic modelling of the rate constants of pyruvate to lactate (kPL) and pyruvate to alanine (kPA). Mean kPL was increased in FLR compared to DL at post-surgery and 1 week after surgery (P = 0.002), while kPA was unaltered (P = 0.761). These findings indicate a metabolic shift towards glycolysis in the FLR. This non-invasive metabolic imaging technique could serve as a powerful tool for evaluation of regional liver function prior to partial hepatectomy and consequently improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uffe Kjaergaard
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Surgery, Section for HPB Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
- Department of Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark.
| | - Andrea Lund
- Department of Surgery, Section for HPB Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
| | - Mohsen Redda
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Malene Aastrup
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nikolaj Bøgh
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Sivesgaard
- Department of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael A Ohliger
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel B Vigneron
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lotte Bonde Bertelsen
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aage Kristian Olsen Alstrup
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Frank Viborg Mortensen
- Department of Surgery, Section for HPB Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Laustsen
- MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sangro B, Argemi J, Ronot M, Paradis V, Meyer T, Mazzaferro V, Jepsen P, Golfieri R, Galle P, Dawson L, Reig M. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2025; 82:315-374. [PMID: 39690085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tabrizian P, Pero A, Schwartz M. Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 2025; 29:59-72. [PMID: 39608958 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2024.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
Hepatic resection has long been considered the preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when feasible, but its role, as well as the outcomes is evolving rapidly. This article explores the impact of the changing demographics of HCC, reviews current criteria for resection, considers the roles of liver transplantation and nonsurgical locoregional therapies vis-a-vis resection, highlights the potential of new systemic therapies (particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors) to improve outcomes, details the common complications associated with resection, and discusses recurrence of HCC after resection and its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parissa Tabrizian
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Adriana Pero
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinders MTM, Smits MJL, van Erpecum K, de Bruijne J, Bruijnen RCG, Sprengers D, de Man R, Vegt E, IJzermans JNM, Lam MGEH, Braat AJAT. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy and liver function changes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with 166Ho-radioembolization : HBS in HCC treated with holmium-166. EJNMMI Res 2025; 15:2. [PMID: 39786516 PMCID: PMC11717772 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01196-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To study the feasibility of hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) to improve selection and planning of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with holmium-166 (166Ho)-microspheres radioembolization. RESULTS Thirty-one patients with HCC were included and treated with 166Ho- radioembolization as part of a prospective phase 2 study. Twenty-seven patients were eligible for analysis, 67% had a cirrhotic liver morphology on imaging, 70% had multifocal disease and 51% had bilobar disease. None of the patients had clinical signs of liver decompensation (Child Pugh ≤ B7, median MELD 9 or ALBI - 2.55). Global and regional hepatic function was based on manual delineation of HBS using 200 MBq 99mTc-mebrofenine, acquired during screening and approximately three months after 166Ho-radioembolization, referred to as liver clearance rate (LCR). In line with LCR at baseline, a significant correlation was found between LCR and lab results, including bilirubin, albumin, ALT, MELD-score, and ALBI-score (p < 0.05) during follow-up. HBS showed a significant decrease in median LCR (-16%; p = 0.0017) and volume (-17%; p = 0.0027) in the treated liver, without a significant increase in the non-treated liver. Median relative change in overall LCR in non-cirrhotics was 0% (range - 23-33%), in cirrhotics - 10% (range - 40 - 19%; p = 0.40). CONCLUSION HBS showed that hepatic function and volume significantly decreased in parts of the liver treated with 166Ho-microspheres radioembolization in patients with HCC. Cirrhotic patients do not seem to have the capacity to increase hepatic function in the treated part of the liver. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry name: Clinicaltrials.gov. TRIAL NUMBER NCT03379844. Date of registration: 21 November 2017. Trial URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03379844?cond=hcc&term=hepar primary&rank=1#study-overview .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot T M Reinders
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten J L Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Karel van Erpecum
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Utrecht University - University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 100, Utrecht, 3500 GA, the Netherlands
| | - Joep de Bruijne
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Utrecht University - University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 100, Utrecht, 3500 GA, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Dave Sprengers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands
| | - Rob de Man
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, the Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gundavda KK, Patkar S, Varty GP, Shah N, Velmurugan K, Goel M. Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2025; 15:102401. [PMID: 39286759 PMCID: PMC11402310 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health burden. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the curative treatment of HCC, and recent years have witnessed notable advancements aimed at refining surgical techniques and improving patient outcomes. This review presents a detailed examination of the recent innovations in HCC surgery, highlighting key developments in both surgical approaches and adjunctive therapies. Advanced imaging technologies have revolutionized preoperative assessment, enabling precise tumour localization and delineation of vascular anatomy. The use of three-dimensional rendering has significantly augmented surgical planning, facilitating more accurate and margin-free resections. The advent of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgical techniques has ushered in an era of minimal access surgery, offering patients the benefits of shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times, while enabling equivalent oncological outcomes. Intraoperative innovations such as intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and fluorescence-guided surgery have emerged as valuable adjuncts, allowing real-time assessment of tumour extent and aiding in parenchyma preservation. The integration of multimodal therapies, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, has allowed for 'bio-selection' and shown the potential to optimize patient outcomes. With the advent of augmented reality and artificial intelligence (AI), the future holds immense potential and may represent significant strides towards optimizing patient outcomes and refining the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaival K Gundavda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gurudutt P Varty
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Niket Shah
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Karthik Velmurugan
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bakos A, Libor L, Urbán S, Géczi T, Bukva M, Hőhn J, Lázár G, Nagy A, Farkas I, Sipka G, Pávics L, Besenyi Z. Dynamic [ 99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin SPECT/CT in preoperative planning of liver resection: a prospective study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:30305. [PMID: 39638819 PMCID: PMC11621425 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81331-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At least 20% of the future liver remnant must function properly after liver tumor resection to avoid post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin scintigraphy and SPECT are unique noninvasive, quantitative methods for evaluating liver function via hepatocellular bilirubin clearance. AIM To evaluate the value of dynamic [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin SPECT/CT parameters for predicting clinically relevant PHLF according to the ISGLS criteria. METHODS Thirty-five patients underwent dynamic [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin SPECT/CT imaging to determine the FLR volumetric rate, functional volume rate, total liver filtration and FLR filtration. On the same day, two-dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) was used to assess parenchymal fibrosis in the FLR. The quantitative dynamic SPECT parameters were compared with the relevant clinical scores and ICG. RESULTS The total liver filtration was inversely correlated with the ICG-R15 and MELD-Na score. Twenty-four patients underwent major liver resection due to an adequate FLR rate and did not die within 90 days after the procedure. ROC analysis revealed that the FLR filtration was a significant predictor of PHLF. The best cutoff value for FLR filtration was 2.72%/min/m2. CONCLUSION Dynamic [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin SPECT/CT is an essential tool for selecting patients at risk of clinically relevant PHLF after liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamária Bakos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
| | - László Libor
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Szabolcs Urbán
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tibor Géczi
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Mátyás Bukva
- Department of Immunology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - József Hőhn
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - György Lázár
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - András Nagy
- Department of Radiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - István Farkas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gábor Sipka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Pávics
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Besenyi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pantea R, Bednarsch J, Schmitz S, Meister P, Heise D, Ulmer F, Neumann UP, Lang SA. The assessment of impaired liver function and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:779-794. [PMID: 39688572 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2442573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impairment of liver function strongly limits the therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the assessment of liver function is key to finding the appropriate therapy for patients suffering from this disease. Furthermore, preexisting liver dysfunction has a negative impact on the prognosis of patients in addition to the malignant potential of HCC. Hence, defining the optimal treatment of patients with HCC requires a comprehensive examination with liver function being a crucial part of it. AREAS COVERED This review will provide an overview of the currently existing methods for evaluating the liver function in patients with HCC. Assessment of liver function includes scoring systems but also functional and technical methods. In addition, the role of these tests in different treatment facilities such as liver resection, transplantation, interventional and systemic therapy is summarized. EXPERT OPINION A comprehensive pretherapeutic assessment of the liver function includes laboratory-based scoring systems, as well as imaging- and non-imaging-based functional tests. Combining diverse parameters can help to improve the safety and efficacy of HCC therapy particularly in patients with compromised liver function. Future research should focus on optimizing pretherapeutic assessment recommendations for each therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Pantea
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sophia Schmitz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Phil Meister
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniel Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Ulmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulf Peter Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sven Arke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Korda DA, Bibok A, Doros A, Horvathy D, Hahn O, Kokas B, Pekli D, Meltzer AZ, Szijarto A, Nadasdy-Horvath D, Deak PA. Initial experience with Double-vein Embolization in Hungary. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 13:100613. [PMID: 39639858 PMCID: PMC11618029 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2024] [Revised: 11/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In recent years several new techniques have emerged to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomies. We aimed to summarize our initial experience with Double-vein Embolization as the first center in Hungary. Methods Between March 2023 and August 2024 a total of 16 Double-vein Embolization procedures were performed in Semmelweis University. Future liver remnant volume was calculated based on computed tomography scans obtained within 4 weeks prior and 2-3 weeks after the procedure. Tc-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy results were available for 12/16 patients. Results Technical success rate was 100 %. No major complication was observed. Successful resection rate was 93.8 %. One patient died due to post-hepatectomy liver failure. Future liver remnant volume and ratio increased significantly after the procedure compared to baseline (433.1 ± 163.8 cm3 vs. 603.5 ± 201.8 cm3, p < 0.0001 and 27.2 ± 6.5 % vs. 37 ± 8.8 %, p < 0.0001, respectively). Future liver remnant clearance improved significantly 1 and 2 weeks after the procedure (1.68 ± 0.58 %/min/m2 vs. 2.44 ± 0.64 %/min/m2 and 2.39 ± 0.31 %/min/m2, respectively). Mean function gain was 50.6 % after one week and 60.1% after two weeks, respectively. Discussion Volumetric and functional outcomes in the present study are comparable with results reported in the literature. Our findings provide further evidence that Double-vein Embolization is a safe procedure that offers sufficient volumetric and functional gain in most candidates for liver resection. However, further studies are needed to define the exact place of this new technique in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Adam Korda
- Semmelweis University, Department of Interventional Radiology, Határőr út 18, Budapest H-1122, Hungary
| | - Andras Bibok
- Semmelweis University, Department of Interventional Radiology, Határőr út 18, Budapest H-1122, Hungary
| | - Attila Doros
- Semmelweis University, Department of Interventional Radiology, Határőr út 18, Budapest H-1122, Hungary
| | - Denes Horvathy
- Semmelweis University, Department of Interventional Radiology, Határőr út 18, Budapest H-1122, Hungary
| | - Oszkar Hahn
- Semmelweis University, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Üllői út 78, Budapest H-1082, Hungary
| | - Balint Kokas
- Semmelweis University, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Üllői út 78, Budapest H-1082, Hungary
| | - Damjan Pekli
- Semmelweis University, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Üllői út 78, Budapest H-1082, Hungary
| | - Anna Zsofia Meltzer
- Semmelweis University, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Üllői út 78, Budapest H-1082, Hungary
| | - Attila Szijarto
- Semmelweis University, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Üllői út 78, Budapest H-1082, Hungary
| | | | - Pal Akos Deak
- Semmelweis University, Department of Interventional Radiology, Határőr út 18, Budapest H-1122, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Akhaladze DG, Rabaev GS, Tverdov IV, Merkulov NN, Uskova NG, Talypov SR, Krivonosov AA, Grachev NS. Central Liver Segments Resections vs Extended Hepatectomies in Children: Single-Center Experience. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59:161927. [PMID: 39368854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central liver segments resection (CLSR) still is not widely used in pediatric surgery due to its technical difficulty, whereas this procedure is widely spread as a parenchyma sparing approach of centrally located liver tumors in adults. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes of CLSR in comparison with extended hepatectomy (EH) in children with different liver tumors. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who received CLSR (n = 14) and EH (n = 44) from June 2017 to December 2023 was applied. Patient's characteristics, preoperative, intra- and postoperative data were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS Preoperative CT-volumetry showed that future liver remnant volume was higher in CLSR group compared to EH (FLR-V; (54 ± 29 (40-91) % vs 40 ± 12 (17-73) %, p = 0.016). The intraoperative blood loss (200 [90-1150] (20-3000) ml vs 100 [30-275] (10-9000) ml, p = 0.088) and transfusion volume (310 [85-590] (0-1860) ml vs 150 [0-310] (0-4770) ml, p = 0.484) were similar in both groups, while operation time was longer in CLSR group (420 [320-595] (145-785) min vs 280 [203-390] (125-710) min), p = 0.011). There was no difference in biliary leakage (3 (21.4 %) vs 12 (27.3 %); p = 0.479), other complications (4 (28.6 %) vs 5 (11.4 %), p = 0.198) and complications ≥ IIIb by Clavien-Dindo (2 (14.3 %) vs 8 (18.2 %), p = 0.385) postoperatively. CONCLUSION CLSRs allow to preserve more healthy liver parenchyma compared to EH with similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. «Extended mesohepatectomy» allows to achieve R0 resection when central liver tumor extends on the left lateral and/or right posterior section. TYPE OF STUDY Retrospective Comparative Study (Level of Evidence III).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry G Akhaladze
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Gavriil S Rabaev
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation; University Medical Centre Corporate Fund, National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, 010000, Astana, 32 Turan Str., Kazakhstan.
| | - Ivan V Tverdov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay N Merkulov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Natalia G Uskova
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Sergey R Talypov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Anatoliy A Krivonosov
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay S Grachev
- Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 117997, Moscow, 1 Samory Mashela Str., Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Adam JP, Lapuyade B, Debordeaux F, Tlili G, Chiche L, Laurent C. Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:9205-9220. [PMID: 39230854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The regenerative capacities of the liver and improvements in surgical techniques have expanded the possibilities of resectability. Liver resection is often the only curative treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, despite the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This serious complication (with a 50% mortality rate) can be avoided by better assessment of liver volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to understand and assess clinical, biological, and imaging predictors of PHLF risk, as well as the various hypertrophy techniques, to achieve an adequate FLR before hepatectomy. METHOD We reviewed the state of the art in liver regeneration and FLR hypertrophy techniques. RESULTS The use of new biological scores (such as the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index + albumin-bilirubin [APRI+ALBI] score), concurrent utilization of 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy (HBS), or dynamic hepatocyte contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for liver volumetry helps predict the risk of PHLF. Besides portal vein embolization, there are other FLR optimization techniques that have their indications in case of risk of failure (e.g., associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, liver venous deprivation) or in specific situations (transarterial radioembolization). CONCLUSION There is a need to standardize volumetry and function measurement techniques, as well as FLR hypertrophy techniques, to limit the risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Boubaddi
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France.
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Arthur Marichez
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Lapuyade
- Radiology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frederic Debordeaux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ghoufrane Tlili
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurence Chiche
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Coubeau L, Fontaine A, Ciccarelli O, Bonaccorsi E, Derudder M, Dahqvist G, Marique L, Reding R, Leclercq IA, Dili A. In-depth Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Volumetric Assessment of the Resection and Partial Liver Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy-Type Auxiliary Liver Transplantation in Noncirrhotic Setting: Are We Simply Dealing With a Transplant Model of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy? Ann Surg 2024; 280:753-762. [PMID: 39109424 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID) procedure involves left hepatectomy with orthotopic implantation of a left lobe and right portal vein ligation. This technique induces volumetric graft increase, allowing for a right completion hepatectomy within 15 days. Notably, there is a lack of data on the hemodynamics of small-for-size grafts exposed to portal overflow without triggering small-for-size syndrome. METHODS A prospective single-center protocol included 8 living donors and 8 RAPID noncirrhotic recipients. Comprehensive clinical and biological data were collected, accompanied by intraoperative arterial and portal flow and pressure measurements. Early kinetic growth rate (eKGR%) and graft function were assessed using computed tomography and 99Tc-mebrofenin scintigraphy on postoperative days 7 and 14. Findings were compared with retrospective data from 13 left living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. RESULTS The median Graft-body weight ratio was 0.41% (interquartile range: 0.34-0.49), markedly lower than in LDLT. However, there was no significant difference in eKGR between RAPID and LDLT grafts. Sequential analysis revealed variable eKGR per day: 10.6% (7.8-13.2) in the first week and 7.6% (6-9.1) in the second week posttransplantation. Indexed portal flow (indexed portal vein flow) was significantly higher in RAPID compared with left LDLT ( P = 0.01). No hemodynamic parameters were found to correlate with regeneration speed. We modulated portal flow in 2 out of 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the first report of hemodynamic and volumetric data for the RAPID technique. Despite initial graft volumes falling below conventional LDLT recommendations, the study highlights acceptable clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Coubeau
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alix Fontaine
- Laboratory of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eliano Bonaccorsi
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Max Derudder
- Laboratory of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Géraldine Dahqvist
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lancelot Marique
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Raymond Reding
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle A Leclercq
- Laboratory of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Dili
- Laboratory of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kimura K, Minagawa R, Yamaoka T, Izumi T, Takahashi YU, Nakanishi M, Tokunaga T, Matsuda D, Nobuto Y, Yano H, Kajiwara Y, Honma K, Nagata S, Minami K, Nishizaki T. Transileocolic Portal Vein Embolization Increases Remnant Liver Volume After Major Hepatectomy. In Vivo 2024; 38:2761-2766. [PMID: 39477424 PMCID: PMC11535930 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Transileocolic portal vein embolization (TIPE) may reduce the risk of liver failure after massive hepatectomy. However, convincing evidence of its usefulness in this regard is yet to be reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the use of TIPE after massive hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twelve patients who underwent TIPE were included. Pre- and postoperative liver volumetry was determined using a 3D simulator with computed tomography. RESULTS After TIPE, the percent change in total liver volume was 104.0%±13.1% (p=0.08). Conversely, the percent increase in remnant liver volume (ml)/total liver volume (ml) and remnant liver volume (ml)/standard liver volume (ml) was 122.9%±18.6% (p<0.001) and 132.2%±19.6% (p<0.001), respectively. TIPE operation time was 125±84.6 min, with minimal blood loss in all cases. Postoperative hospitalization duration during TIPE was 4.5±2.6 days. No TIPE-related complications occurred in any patient. CONCLUSION TIPE is beneficial and safe when preoperative volumetry indicates that the remaining liver volume is inadequate and inoperable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan;
| | - Ryosuke Minagawa
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Terutoshi Yamaoka
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Takuma Izumi
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Y U Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Nakanishi
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Takayuki Tokunaga
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Daisuke Matsuda
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Yoshinari Nobuto
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiroko Yano
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Kajiwara
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kenichi Honma
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Nagata
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Minami
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishizaki
- Department of Surgery, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dempsey PJ, Farrelly C, Cronin CG, Fenlon HM. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1602-1618. [PMID: 39078288 PMCID: PMC11417391 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has transformed over the past 2 decades. Advances in surgical techniques, systemic therapies, and local treatments have resulted in a paradigm shift. Disease that would once have been considered terminal is now frequently treated aggressively with both a disease-free and overall survival benefit. In line with the expanding range of treatment options, there has been an increase in the volume and complexity of imaging required in the management of these patients to ensure optimal patient selection and outcome. The radiologist plays a pivotal role in interpreting these studies, conveying the relevant information and informing the discussion at multidisciplinary team meetings. The purpose of this review is to provide an update for radiologists on the current surgical management of patients with CRLM highlighting specific imaging information that is required by the multidisciplinary team when assessing resectability and/or the need for additional liver-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Dempsey
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Cormac Farrelly
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Carmel G Cronin
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| | - Helen M Fenlon
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin D07, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vaghiri S, Prassas D, Kalmuk S, Buehler G, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Knoefel WT, Dizdar L, Alexander A. Comparative study of short-and long-term results in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing surgical resection: does the extent and side of resection really affect outcome? Minerva Surg 2024; 79:419-429. [PMID: 38953755 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.24.10326-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of perihilar carcinoma (pCCA) is still subject of ongoing debate. To provide more clarity, this study was conducted to evaluate outcomes related to the side and extent of heatectomy in patients with pCAA. METHODS A total of 32 patients with curative resection for pCCA were identified from our prospective database. Short-and long-term clinical outcome data and histopathological results were compared between right-sided (R-H) and left-sided (L-H) hepatectomy. RESULTS Nine patients (28.13%) underwent left-sided hepatectomy while a right-sided hepatectomy was accomplished in 23 patients (71.87%). In the R-H group hepatic conditioning of the future liver remnant (FLR) prior to extended resection was necessary in 13 cases (56.52%), and simultaneous pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 5 patients (21.74%). The arterial and portal venous reconstruction rates were 17.39% and 11.11% (P=1.00), and 60.87% and 33.33% (P=0.243) in the R-H and L-H groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in short-term morbidity and mortality between both groups were observed. The rate of R0 resections was comparable (R-H: 78.26% versus L-H: 66.67%; P=0.654) resulting in similar long-term overall and disease-free survival rates after right-and left hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS In patients with pCCA, both right- and left-sided resections appear to be safe and feasible options with similar postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes. Consecutively, the ideal surgical approach should be patient-tailored based on anatomical considerations and the functional future liver capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Vaghiri
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Prassas
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum Essen, Philippusstift, Teaching Hospital of Duisburg-Essen University, Essen, Germany
| | - Sinan Kalmuk
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Geoffrey Buehler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Nadja Lehwald-Tywuschik
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfram T. Knoefel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany -
| | - Levent Dizdar
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Alexander
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bilhim T, Böning G, Guiu B, Luz JH, Denys A. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Portal Vein Embolization and Double Vein Embolization/Liver Venous Deprivation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:1025-1036. [PMID: 38884781 PMCID: PMC11303578 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03743-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practices for performing liver regeneration therapies prior to major hepatectomies, including portal vein embolization, double vein embolization and liver venous deprivation. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It encompasses all clinical and technical details required to perform liver regeneration therapies, revising the indications, contra-indications, outcome measures assessed, technique and expected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Bilhim
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José; Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, SAMS Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Georg Böning
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - José Hugo Luz
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arntz PJW, Olthof PB, Korenblik R, Heil J, Kazemier G, van Delden OM, Bennink RJ, Damink SWMO, van Dam RM, Schadde E, Erdmann JI. Effect of Sarcopenia on the Increase in Liver Volume and Function After Portal Vein Embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:642-649. [PMID: 38416177 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03676-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sarcopenia is associated with a decreased kinetic growth rate (KGR) of the future liver remnant (FLR) after portal vein embolization (PVE). However, little is known on the increase in FLR function (FLRF) after PVE. This study evaluated the effect of sarcopenia on the functional growth rate (FGR) after PVE measured with hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS). METHODS All patients who underwent PVE at the Amsterdam UMC between January 2005 and August 2017 were analyzed. Functional imaging by HBS was used to determine FGR. Liver volumetry was performed using multiphase contrast computed tomography (CT). Muscle area measurement to determine sarcopenia was taken at the third lumbar level (L3). RESULTS Out of the 95 included patients, 9 were excluded due to unavailable data. 70/86 (81%) patients were sarcopenic. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, sarcopenia (p = 0.009) and FLR volume (FRLV) before PVE (p = 0.021) were the only factors correlated with KGR, while no correlation was found with FGR. 90-day mortality was similar across the sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic group (4/53 [8%] versus 1/11 [9%]; p = 1.000). The resection rates were also comparable (53/70 [75%] versus 11/16 [69%]; p = 0.542). CONCLUSION FGR after PVE as measured by HBS appears to be preserved in sarcopenic patients. This is in contrast to KGR after PVE as measured by liver volumetry which is decreased in sarcopenic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3b, cohort and case control studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J W Arntz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Remon Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roelof J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vaghiri S, Prassas D, Mustafov O, Kalmuk S, Knoefel WT, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Alexander A, Dizdar L. Which factors predict tumor recurrence and survival after curative hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma? Results from a European institution. BMC Surg 2024; 24:101. [PMID: 38589847 PMCID: PMC11003056 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02399-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High tumor recurrence and dismal survival rates after curative intended resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still concerning. The primary goal was to assess predictive factors associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a subset of patients with HCC undergoing hepatic resection (HR). METHODS Between 08/2004-7/2021, HR for HCC was performed in 188 patients at our institution. Data allocation was conducted from a prospectively maintained database. The prognostic impact of clinico-pathological factors on DFS and OS was assessed by using uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Survival curves were generated with the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS The postoperative 1-, 3- and 5- year overall DFS and OS rates were 77.9%, 49.7%, 41% and 72.7%, 54.7%, 38.8%, respectively. Tumor diameter ≥ 45 mm [HR 1.725; (95% CI 1.091-2.727); p = 0.020], intra-abdominal abscess [HR 3.812; (95% CI 1.859-7.815); p < 0.0001], and preoperative chronic alcohol abuse [HR 1.831; (95% CI 1.102-3.042); p = 0.020] were independently predictive for DFS while diabetes mellitus [HR 1.714; (95% CI 1.147-2.561); p = 0.009), M-Stage [HR 2.656; (95% CI 1.034-6.826); p = 0.042], V-Stage [HR 1.946; (95% CI 1.299-2.915); p = 0.001, Sepsis [HR 10.999; (95% CI 5.167-23.412); p < 0.0001], and ISGLS B/C [HR 2.008; (95% CI 1.273-3.168); p = 0.003] were significant determinants of OS. CONCLUSIONS Despite high postoperative recurrence rates, an acceptable long-term survival in patients after curative HR could be achieved. The Identification of parameters related to OS and DFS improves patient-centered treatment and surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Vaghiri
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Prassas
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum Essen, Philippusstift, Teaching Hospital of Duisburg-Essen University, Huelsmannstrasse 17, 45355, Essen, Germany
| | - Onur Mustafov
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sinan Kalmuk
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - Nadja Lehwald-Tywuschik
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Alexander
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Levent Dizdar
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Bldg. 12.46, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hua Y, Yu C. Research progress on asialoglycoprotein receptor-targeted radiotracers designed for hepatic nuclear medicine imaging. Eur J Med Chem 2024; 269:116278. [PMID: 38479165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) specifically recognizes glycans terminated with β-d-galactose or N-acetylgalactosamine. Its exclusive expression in mammalian hepatocytes renders it an ideal hepatic-targeted biomarker. To date, ASGPR-targeted ligands have been actively developed for drug delivery and hepatic imaging. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the progress achieved to-date in the field of developing ASGPR-targeted nuclear medicine imaging (NMI) radiotracers, highlighting the recent advancements over the last decade in terms of structure, radionuclides and labeling strategies. The biodistribution patterns, imaging characteristics, challenges and future prospective are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqi Hua
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, No. 1000, Hefeng Road, Wuxi, 214000, China; Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No. 1800, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214000, China
| | - Chunjing Yu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, No. 1000, Hefeng Road, Wuxi, 214000, China; Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No. 1800, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heil J, Augath M, Kurtcuoglu V, Hohmann J, Bechstein WO, Olthof P, Schnitzbauer AA, Seebeck P, Schiesser M, Schläpfer M, Beck-Schimmer B, Schadde E. Assessment of liver function by gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI in a model of rapid liver regeneration in rats. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:521-529. [PMID: 38185541 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This animal study investigates the hypothesis of an immature liver growth following ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) by measuring liver volume and function using gadoxetic acid avidity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in models of ALPPS, major liver resection (LR) and portal vein ligation (PVL). METHODS Wistar rats were randomly allocated to ALPPS, LR or PVL. In contrast-enhanced MRI scans with gadoxetic acid (Primovist®), liver volume and function of the right median lobe (=future liver remnant, FLR) and the deportalized lobes (DPL) were assessed until post-operative day (POD) 5. Liver functionFLR/DPL was defined as the inverse value of time from injection of gadoxetic acid to the blood pool-corrected maximum signal intensityFLR/DPL multiplied by the volumeFLR/DPL. RESULTS In ALPPS (n = 6), LR (n = 6) and PVL (n = 6), volumeFLR and functionFLR increased proportionally, except on POD 1. Thereafter, functionFLR exceeded volumeFLR increase in LR and ALPPS, but not in PVL. Total liver function was significantly reduced after LR until POD 3, but never undercuts 60% of its pre-operative value following ALPPS and PVL. DISCUSSION This study shows for the first time that functional increase is proportional to volume increase in ALPPS using gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Mark Augath
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vartan Kurtcuoglu
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Hohmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Petra Seebeck
- Zurich Integrative Rodent Physiology (ZIRP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ) Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Schläpfer
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Beck-Schimmer
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ) Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Magistri P, Guidetti C, Catellani B, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic ALPPS for primary and metastatic liver tumours: short-term outcomes versus open approach. Updates Surg 2024; 76:435-445. [PMID: 38326663 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is one of the strategies available for patients initially unresectable. High risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality limited its application and diffusion. We aimed to analyse short-term outcomes of robotic ALPPS versus open approach, to assess safety and reproducibility of this technique. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia on patients that underwent ALPPS between January 2015 and September 2022 was conducted. The main aim of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic approach, either full robotic or only first-stage robotic, compared to a control group of patients who underwent open ALPPS in the same Institution. 23 patients were included. Nine patients received a full open ALPPS (O-ALPPS), 7 received a full robotic ALPPS (R-ALPPS), and 7 underwent a robotic approach for stage 1, followed by an open approach for stage 2 (R + O-ALPPS). PHLF grade B-C after stage 1 was 0% in all groups, rising to 58% in the R + O-ALPPS group after stage 2 and remaining 0% in the R-ALPPS group. 86% of R-ALPPS cases were discharged from the hospital between stages 1 and 2, and median total in-hospital stay and ICU stay favoured full robotic approach as well. This contemporary study represents the largest series of robotic ALPPS, showing potential advantages from full robotic ALPPS over open approach, resulting in reduced hospital stay and complications and lower incidence of 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Parker JA, Tahir MM, Whitmarsh SR, Sarwar A. Free mebrofenin clearance. Nucl Med Commun 2024; 45:175-180. [PMID: 38165160 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if three new simplified equations for measurement of free mebrofenin clearance give similar results to the equations defined by Ekman et. al ., and to evaluate the properties of all four methods. Regional mebrofenin clearance has been used to predict future remnant liver function and liver failure after regional liver therapy, such as partial hepatic resection. METHODS The means, standard deviations, and correlations of the free mebrofenin clearance measured by the Ekman method and the three simplified methods were compared in a consecutive series of 26 studies in 20 patients. The fractional change in the blood and free mebrofenin activities were compared, and integrals of normalized blood and free mebrofenin ("effective times") were compared. RESULTS The average percent free mebrofenin clearance for the Ekman and the first, second and third simplified methods were 13.62 ± 2.88%/min, 12.98 ± 2.97%/min, 12.52 ± 2.81%/min and 15.03 ± 2.27%/min, respectively. The correlations of the new methods with Ekman were 0.97, 0.93 and 0.93. The fractional changes during the measurement interval for the blood and free mebrofenin activities were 0.381 ± 0.065 and 0.329 ± 0.062, difference 0.052, P < 0.5. The integrals of normalized blood and free mebrofenin activities were 2.566 ± 0.160 min and 2.661 ± 0.158 min, difference of 0.094 min and P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS The results of the three new methods were similar to the Ekman method. The first simplified method was identified as the lead method for clinical validation in a larger population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Anthony Parker
- Nuclear Medicine and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Andel D, van den Bent L, Ernest Hendrik Lam MG, Johannes Smits ML, Molenaar IQ, de Bruijne J, Laclé MM, Kranenburg O, Max Borel Rinkes IH, Hagendoorn J. 90Y-/ 166Ho- 'Radiation lobectomy' for liver tumors induces abnormal morphology and impaired drainage of peritumor lymphatics. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:100981. [PMID: 38298739 PMCID: PMC10827593 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims High-dose unilobar radioembolization, or 'radiation lobectomy' (RL), is an induction therapy that achieves contralateral future liver remnant hypertrophy while simultaneously irradiating the tumor. As such, it may prevent further growth, but it is unknown whether RL affects intrahepatic lymphatics, a major route via which liver tumors disseminate. Methods This was a case-control study conducted at University Medical Center Utrecht. The study compared lymph vessels in livers that had undergone RL (cases) with those in livers that had not undergone RL (controls). Histological samples were acquired from patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between 2017 and 2022. Lymph vessel morphology was analyzed by two researchers using podoplanin, a protein that is expressed in lymphatic endothelium. In vivo liver lymph drainage of radioembolized livers was assessed using intraoperative liver lymphangiography (ILL): during liver surgery, patent blue dye was injected into the liver parenchyma, followed by inspection for staining of perihepatic lymph structures. ILL results were compared to a previously published cohort. Results Immunohistochemical analysis on post-RL tumor tissues from ten patients with CRLM and nine patients with HCC revealed aberrant morphology of irradiated liver lymphatics when compared to controls (n = 3 per group). Irradiated lymphatics were tortuous (p <0.05), thickened (p <0.05) and discontinuous (p <0.05). Moreover, post-RL lymphatics had larger lumens (1.5-1.7x, p <0.0001), indicating lymph stasis. ILL revealed diminished lymphatic drainage to perihepatic lymph nodes and vessels in irradiated livers when compared to non-radioembolized controls (p = 1.0x10-4). Conclusions Radioembolization impairs peritumoral lymph vessel function. Further research is needed to evaluate if radioembolization impairs tumor dissemination via this route. Impact and implications Unilobar radioembolization can serve as an alternative to portal venous embolization for patients who are considered unresectable due to an insufficient future liver remnant. This research suggests that radioembolization impairs the function of peritumoral liver lymph vessels, potentially hindering dissemination via this route. These findings provide support for considering unilobar radioembolization over standard portal venous embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte van den Bent
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Leonard Johannes Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joep de Bruijne
- Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miangela Marie Laclé
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inne Hildbrand Max Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Translational Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ziogas IA, Gleisner AL. Resection Versus Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How to Offer the Best Modality. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:113-127. [PMID: 37953031 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Liver resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay of treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patient comorbidities, tumor resectability, and perioperative morbidity and mortality risk, specifically of post-hepatectomy liver failure, are determining factors when deciding between liver resection and liver transplantation in patients who do not have an obvious contraindication to either treatment. Liver resection is preferred in patients without cirrhosis, and it may be a reasonable choice in patient with cirrhosis but preserved liver function and no portal hypertension if the size and function of the future liver remnant are appropriate, especially if organ availability is scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. https://twitter.com/IA_Ziogas
| | - Ana L Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fabritius MP, Garlipp B, Öcal O, Puhr-Westerheide D, Amthauer H, Geyer T, Holzgreve A, Ricke J, Kupitz D, Grosser OS, Omari J, Pech M, Seidensticker M, Grawe F, Seidensticker R. Assessing regional hepatic function changes after hypertrophy induction by radioembolisation: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:15. [PMID: 38282160 PMCID: PMC10822831 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00409-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare Gd-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) as imaging-based liver function tests after unilateral radioembolisation (RE) in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies. METHODS Twenty-three patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI within a prospective study (REVoluTion) were evaluated. REVoluTion was a prospective open-label, non-randomised, therapy-optimising study of patients undergoing right-sided or sequential RE for contralateral liver hypertrophy at a single centre in Germany. MRI and hepatobiliary scintigraphy were performed before RE (baseline) and 6 weeks after (follow-up). This exploratory subanalysis compared liver enhancement on hepatobiliary phase MRI normalised to the spleen (liver-to-spleen ratio (LSR)) and the muscle (liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR)) with mebrofenin uptake on HBS for the total liver (TL) and separately for the right (RLL) and left liver lobe (LLL). RESULTS Mebrofenin uptake at baseline and follow-up each correlated significantly with LSR and LMR on MRI for TL (≤ 0.013) and RLL (≤ 0.049). Regarding the LLL, mebrofenin uptake correlated significantly with LMR (baseline, p = 0.013; follow-up, p = 0.004), whereas with LSR, a borderline significant correlation was only seen at follow-up (p = 0.051; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION LSRs and LMR correlate with mebrofenin uptake in HBS. This study indicates that Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and 99mTc-labelled mebrofenin HBS may equally be used to assess an increase in contralateral liver lobe function after right-sided RE. RELEVANCE STATEMENT MRI may be a convenient and reliable method for assessing the future liver remnant facilitating treatment planning and monitoring of patients after RE-induced hypertrophy induction. KEY POINTS • Both MRI and HBS can assess liver function after RE. • Liver enhancement on MRI correlates with mebrofenin uptake on HBS. • MRI might be a convenient alternative for estimating future liver remnants after hypertrophy induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Garlipp
- General Surgery, Otto Von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dennis Kupitz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Oliver S Grosser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
- Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jazan Omari
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-Von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Banerjee A, Hariharan D. History of liver surgery. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0237. [PMID: 38919867 PMCID: PMC11199012 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
|
28
|
Smet H, Martin D, Uldry E, Duran R, Girardet R, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Denys A, Halkic N, Demartines N, Melloul E. Tc-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy to assess future liver remnant function before major liver surgery. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1312-1319. [PMID: 37638473 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Assessment of liver function is paramount before hepatectomy. This study aimed to assess future liver remnant function (FLR-F) using hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and to compare it to FLR volume (FLR-V) in the prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The impact of volume and function gains were also assessed in patients undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) or liver venous deprivation (LVD). METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing major hepatectomy between 02/2018 and 09/2021 with preoperative HBS were included. FLR-V was expressed as percentage of total liver volume and analyzed using preoperative computed tomography. FLR-V and FLR-F gains after embolization were expressed in percentage. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare both methods in predicting PHLF. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included. PVE and LVD were performed in 4 (11%) and 28 patients (78%), respectively. Overall, PHLF occurred in eight patients (22%). FLR-F gain after embolization showed significant ability to predict PHLF (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.789), with cut-off value of 150% showing a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 1.00. CONCLUSION Preoperative HBS shows a high sensitivity to predict PHLF when HBS is performed twice to measure the function gain after venous embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héloïse Smet
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Martin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Uldry
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rafaël Duran
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Girardet
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - John O Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nermin Halkic
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Melloul
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Della Corte A, Santangelo D, Augello L, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Canevari C, Gusmini S, Guazzarotti G, Palumbo D, Chiti A, Aldrighetti L, De Cobelli F. Single-Center Retrospective Study Comparing Double Vein Embolization via a Trans-Jugular Approach with Liver Venous Deprivation via a Trans-Hepatic Approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1703-1712. [PMID: 37704862 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03538-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare safety, technical and clinical outcomes of double vein embolization (DVE) via a trans-jugular approach with liver venous deprivation (LVD) via a trans-hepatic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing simultaneous portal and hepatic veins embolization in view of a major hepatectomy (June 2019-November 2022). Hepatic vein embolization was performed either by transjugular plug (DVE) or by transhepatic plug followed by glue injection (LVD). Inclusion criteria were availability of pre-procedural CT scan, and availability of CT scans acquired 10 days and 25 days post-procedure. Comparative data included complication rate, fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), Future Liver Remnant volume and function increase (FLR-V and FLR-F increase, respectively) and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-six patients (n = 14 DVE; n = 22 LVD) were included. No baseline significant differences were observed among the two groups. One grade-3 complication (2.8%) was observed in the LVD group; one case of technical failure (2.8%) was observed in the DVE group. Fluoroscopy time and DAP were similar between DVE and LVD (29 ± 17.7 vs. 25 ± 8.2 min, p = 0.97; 105.1 ± 63.5 vs. 143.4 ± 79.5 Gy·cm2, p = 0.15). No differences arose at either time-point in FLR-V increase (46.7 ± 23.1% vs. 48.2 ± 28.2%, 52.9 ± 30.9% vs. 53.2 ± 29%, respectively, p = 0.9). FLR-F increase also did not differ significantly (62.8 ± 55.2 vs. 67.4 ± 57.5, p = 0.9). No differences in drop-out rate from surgery were observed. (28.6% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.93). One case of grade-B post-hepatectomy liver failure (2.8%) was observed in the LVD group. CONCLUSION LVD via transhepatic approach and DVE via transjugular approach seem equally safe and effective. Level of Evidence Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Della Corte
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Domenico Santangelo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Augello
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carla Canevari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Gusmini
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Guazzarotti
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Palumbo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arntz P, Olthof PB. Assessment of liver function before major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1588-1589. [PMID: 37531456 PMCID: PMC10638528 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Arntz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Arntz PJW, Deroose CM, Marcus C, Sturesson C, Panaro F, Erdmann J, Manevska N, Moadel R, de Geus-Oei LF, Bennink RJ. Joint EANM/SNMMI/IHPBA procedure guideline for [ 99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy SPECT/CT in the quantitative assessment of the future liver remnant function. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1131-1144. [PMID: 37394397 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this joint EANM/SNMMI/IHPBA procedure guideline is to provide general information and specific recommendations and considerations on the use of [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) in the quantitative assessment and risk analysis before surgical intervention, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) or before and after liver regenerative procedures. Although the gold standard to estimate future liver remnant (FLR) function remains volumetry, the increasing interest in HBS and the continuous request for implementation in major liver centers worldwide, demands standardization. METHODS This guideline concentrates on the endorsement of a standardized protocol for HBS elaborates on the clinical indications and implications, considerations, clinical appliance, cut-off values, interactions, acquisition, post-processing analysis and interpretation. Referral to the practical guidelines for additional post-processing manual instructions is provided. CONCLUSION The increasing interest of major liver centers worldwide in HBS requires guidance for implementation. Standardization facilitates applicability of HBS and promotes global implementation. Inclusion of HBS in standard care is not meant as substitute for volumetry, but rather to complement risk evaluation by identifying suspected and unsuspected high-risk patients prone to develop post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and post-SIRT liver failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J W Arntz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charles Marcus
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christian Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery & Transplantation, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, School of Medicine, 34000, Montpellier, France
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nevena Manevska
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, Acad Isak S. Tadzer, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Renee Moadel
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Primavesi F, Maglione M, Cipriani F, Denecke T, Oberkofler CE, Starlinger P, Dasari BVM, Heil J, Sgarbura O, Søreide K, Diaz-Nieto R, Fondevila C, Frampton AE, Geisel D, Henninger B, Hessheimer AJ, Lesurtel M, Mole D, Öllinger R, Olthof P, Reiberger T, Schnitzbauer AA, Schwarz C, Sparrelid E, Stockmann M, Truant S, Aldrighetti L, Braunwarth E, D’Hondt M, DeOliveira ML, Erdmann J, Fuks D, Gruenberger T, Kaczirek K, Malik H, Öfner D, Rahbari NN, Göbel G, Siriwardena AK, Stättner S. E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1331-1347. [PMID: 37572099 PMCID: PMC10480040 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. CONCLUSION These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Vivévis AG—Visceral, Tumour and Robotic Surgery, Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary–pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Section of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Damian Mole
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III and CD-Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Paul Gerhardt Stift, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France
- CANTHER Laboratory ‘Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies’ UMR-S1277, Team ‘Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance’, Lille, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Clinic Favoriten, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Göbel
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Marino R, Ratti F, Della Corte A, Santangelo D, Clocchiatti L, Canevari C, Magnani P, Pedica F, Casadei-Gardini A, De Cobelli F, Aldrighetti L. Comparing Liver Venous Deprivation and Portal Vein Embolization for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Is It Time to Shift the Focus to Hepatic Functional Reserve Rather than Hypertrophy? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4363. [PMID: 37686638 PMCID: PMC10486473 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Among liver hypertrophy technics, liver venous deprivation (LVD) has been recently introduced as an effective procedure to combine simultaneous portal inflow and hepatic outflow abrogation, raising growing clinical interest. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of LVD for preoperative optimization of future liver remnant (FLR) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), especially when compared with portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Between January 2013 and July 2022, all patients diagnosed with PHC and scheduled for preoperative optimization of FTR, through radiological hypertrophy techniques, prior to liver resection, were included. FTR volumetric assessment was evaluated at two distinct timepoints to track the progression of both early (T1, 10 days post-procedural) and late (T2, 21 days post-procedural) efficacy indicators. Post-procedural outcomes, including functional and volumetric analyses, were compared between the LVD and the PVE cohorts. Results: A total of 12 patients underwent LVD while 19 underwent PVE. No significant differences in either post-procedural or post-operative complications were found. Post-procedural FLR function, calculated with (99m) Tc-Mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy, and kinetic growth rate, at both timepoints, were greater in the LVD cohort (3.12 ± 0.55%/min/m2 vs. 2.46 ± 0.64%/min/m2, p = 0.041; 27.32 ± 16.86%/week (T1) vs. 15.71 ± 9.82%/week (T1) p < 0.001; 17.19 ± 9.88%/week (T2) vs. 9.89 ± 14.62%/week (T2) p = 0.034) when compared with the PVE cohort. Post-procedural FTR volumes were similar for both hypertrophy techniques. Conclusions: LVD is an effective procedure to effectively optimize FLR before liver resection for PHC. The faster growth rate combined with the improved FLR function, when compared to PVE alone, could maximize surgical outcomes by lowering post-hepatectomy liver failure rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Marino
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (R.M.); (F.R.); (L.C.)
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (R.M.); (F.R.); (L.C.)
| | - Angelo Della Corte
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.D.C.); (D.S.); (F.D.C.)
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Santangelo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.D.C.); (D.S.); (F.D.C.)
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Clocchiatti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (R.M.); (F.R.); (L.C.)
| | - Carla Canevari
- Nuclear Medicine Department, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (C.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Patrizia Magnani
- Nuclear Medicine Department, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (C.C.); (P.M.)
| | - Federica Pedica
- Pathology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | | | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.D.C.); (D.S.); (F.D.C.)
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.D.C.); (D.S.); (F.D.C.)
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Milana F, Famularo S, Diana M, Mishima K, Reitano E, Cho HD, Kim KH, Marescaux J, Donadon M, Torzilli G. How Much Is Enough? A Surgical Perspective on Imaging Modalities to Estimate Function and Volume of the Future Liver Remnant before Hepatic Resection. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2726. [PMID: 37685264 PMCID: PMC10486462 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is the first curative option for most hepatic primary and secondary malignancies. However, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents a non-negligible postoperative complication, embodying the most frequent cause of hepatic-related mortality. In the absence of a specific treatment, the most effective way to deal with PHLF is its prevention through a careful preoperative assessment of future liver remnant (FLR) volume and function. Apart from the clinical score and classical criteria to define the safe limit of resectability, new imaging modalities have shown their ability to assist surgeons in planning the best operative strategy with a precise estimation of the FLR amount. New technologies leading to liver and tumor 3D reconstruction may guide the surgeon along the best resection planes combining the least liver parenchymal sacrifice with oncological appropriateness. Integration with imaging modalities, such as hepatobiliary scintigraphy, capable of estimating total and regional liver function, may bring about a decrease in postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging with hepatobiliary contrast seems to be predominant since it simultaneously integrates hepatic function and volume information along with a precise characterization of the target malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Milana
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Simone Famularo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Michele Diana
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Photonics Instrumentation for Health, iCube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Elisa Reitano
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jacques Marescaux
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital, 28100 Novara, NO, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Andel D, Lam MGEH, de Bruijne J, Smits MLJ, Braat AJAT, Moelker A, Vegt E, Ruiter SJS, Noordzij W, Grazi G, Vallati GE, Bennink RJ, van Delden OM, Kranenburg OW, Ijzermans JNM, Nijkamp MW, Erdmann JI, Sciuto R, Hagendoorn J, Borel Rinkes IHM. Dose finding study for unilobar radioembolization using holmium-166 microspheres to improve resectability in patients with HCC: the RALLY protocol. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:771. [PMID: 37596578 PMCID: PMC10436405 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11280-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High dose unilobar radioembolization (also termed 'radiation lobectomy')-the transarterial unilobar infusion of radioactive microspheres as a means of controlling tumour growth while concomitantly inducing future liver remnant hypertrophy-has recently gained interest as induction strategy for surgical resection. Prospective studies on the safety and efficacy of the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm are lacking. The RALLY study aims to assess the safety and toxicity profile of holmium-166 unilobar radioembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant. METHODS The RALLY study is a multicenter, interventional, non-randomized, open-label, non-comparative safety study. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are considered ineligible for surgery due to insufficiency of the future liver remnant (< 2.7%/min/m2 on hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan will be included. A classical 3 + 3 dose escalation model will be used, enrolling three to six patients in each cohort. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated treated non-tumourous liver-absorbed dose (cohorts of 50, 60, 70 and 80 Gy). Secondary objectives are to evaluate dose-response relationships, to establish the safety and feasibility of surgical resection following unilobar radioembolization, to assess quality of life, and to generate a biobank. DISCUSSION This will be the first clinical study to assess the unilobar radioembolization-surgery treatment algorithm and may serve as a stepping stone towards its implementation in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register NL8902 , registered on 2020-09-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daan Andel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, PO BOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joep de Bruijne
- Department Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten L J Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of HPB & Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gianluca Grazi
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulio E Vallati
- Interventional Radiology, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Roel J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Onno W Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, PO BOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N M Ijzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten W Nijkamp
- Department of HPB & Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosa Sciuto
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, PO BOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Cancer Center, PO BOX 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Horisberger K, Rössler F, Oberkofler CE, Raptis D, Petrowsky H, Clavien PA. The value of intraoperative dynamic liver function test ICG in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing staged hepatectomy: a pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:264. [PMID: 37403000 PMCID: PMC10319685 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02983-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the predictive value of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) test in patients undergoing staged hepatectomy. METHODS We analyzed intraoperative ICG measurements of future liver remnant (FLR), preoperative ICG, volumetry, and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in 15 patients undergoing associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Main endpoints were the correlation of intraoperative ICG values to postoperative complications (Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®)) at discharge and 90 days after surgery, and to postoperative liver function. RESULTS Median intraoperative R15 (ICG retention rate at 15 min) correlated significantly with CCI® at discharge (p = 0.05) and with CCI® at 90 days (p = 0.0036). Preoperative ICG, volumetry, and scintigraphy did not correlate to postoperative outcome. ROC curve analysis revealed a cutoff value of 11.4 for the intraoperative R15 to predict major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity. No patient with R15 ≤ 11 developed major complications. CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests that intraoperative ICG clearance determines the functional capacity of the future liver remnant more accurately than preoperative tests. This may further reduce the number of postoperative liver failures, even if it means intraoperative abortion of hepatectomy in individual cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Horisberger
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Fabian Rössler
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- vivèvis AG - Visceral, Tumor and Robotic Surgery Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri Raptis
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss HPB Center Zurich, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chaurasiya K, Kireeva E, Yadgarov M, Akhaladze D, Likar Y. Role of Preoperative Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy in Children Requiring Liver Resection. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:581-585. [PMID: 37272978 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The risk of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains an important concern following major liver resection. Assessment of future remnant liver function (FRLF) by hepatobiliary scintigraphy has shown its significance to prevent PHLF after major liver resection in adults with a threshold value of FRLF greater than 2.7%/min per m2. However, such data for pediatric patients were not published. METHODS A total of 77 pediatric patients with liver tumors who underwent 1-stage liver resection were included in this study. Assessment of FRLF, future remnant liver volume (FRLV), and the ratio of remnant liver volume to body weight (RLV-BWR) was performed before the surgery. RESULTS All patients had RLV-BWR values of more than 0.5%/kg. Future remnant liver volume values ranged from 19% to 89%, and FRLF values ranged from 1.8% to 31.8%/min per m2. Only 7 of 77 patients had FRLV values less than 25%, but their FRLF values exceeded 2.7%/min per m2. Two patients developed grade A and grade B PHLF. CONCLUSION Future remnant liver volume and the RLV-BWR can be used in most pediatric patients for the assessment of liver before hepatectomy. According to our data, implementation of FRLF assessment using hepatobiliary scintigraphy can be most beneficial for children with FRLV of less than 25%. The cutoff value of FRLV greater than 25% can be slightly decreased with minimal risk of developing PHLF. However, to establish a new cutoff value for FRLV in children, further prospective studies including larger numbers of patients with FRLV of less than 25% are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailash Chaurasiya
- From the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Serenari M, Ratti F, Guglielmo N, Zanello M, Mocchegiani F, Lenzi J, Colledan M, Mazzaferro V, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Cescon M, Di Benedetto F, Massani M, Grazi G, Valle RD, Vivarelli M, Ettorre GM, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5285-5294. [PMID: 36976422 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2012, Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has encountered several modifications of its original technique. The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the trend of ALPPS in Italy over a 10-year period. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors affecting the risk of morbidity/mortality/post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS Data of patients submitted to ALPPS between 2012 and 2021 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry and evaluation of time trends was performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2021, a total of 268 ALPPS were performed within 17 centers. The number of ALPPS divided by the total number of liver resections performed by each center slightly declined (APC = - 2.0%, p = 0.111). Minimally invasive (MI) approach significantly increased over the years (APC = + 49.5%, p = 0.002). According to multivariable analysis, MI completion of stage 1 was protective against 90-day mortality (OR = 0.05, p = 0.040) as well as enrollment within high-volume centers for liver surgery (OR = 0.32, p = 0.009). Use of interstage hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and biliary tumors were independent predictors of PHLF. CONCLUSIONS This national study showed that use of ALPPS only slightly declined over the years with an increased use of MI techniques, leading to lower 90-day mortality. PHLF still remains an open issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Guglielmo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2 - Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gianluca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hoogteijling TJ, Sijberden JP, Primrose JN, Morrison-Jones V, Modi S, Zimmitti G, Garatti M, Sallemi C, Morone M, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic Right Hemihepatectomy after Future Liver Remnant Modulation: A Single Surgeon's Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2851. [PMID: 37345188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (L-RHH) is still considered a technically complex procedure, which should only be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers. Future liver remnant modulation (FLRM) strategies, including portal vein embolization (PVE), and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), might increase the surgical difficulty of L-RHH, due to the distortion of hepatic anatomy, periportal inflammation, and fibrosis. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of L-RHH after FLRM, when compared with ex novo L-RHH. METHODS All consecutive right hemihepatectomies performed by a single surgeon in the period between October 2007 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of L-RHH after FLRM and ex novo L-RHH were compared. RESULTS A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 33 underwent FLRM. Patients undergoing FLRM prior to L-RHH were most often male (93.9% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001), had an ASA-score >2 (45.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.006), and underwent a two-stage hepatectomy (45.5% vs. 3.8% p < 0.001). L-RHH after FLRM was associated with longer operative time (median 360 vs. 300 min, p = 0.008) and Pringle duration (31 vs. 24 min, p = 0.011). Intraoperative blood loss, unfavorable intraoperative incidents, and conversion rates were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and 30-day overall and severe morbidity rates. Radical resection margin (R0) and textbook outcome rates were equal. One patient who underwent an extended RHH in the FLRM group deceased within 90 days of surgery, due to post-hepatectomy liver failure. CONCLUSION L-RHH after FLRM is more technically complex than L-RHH ex novo, as objectified by longer operative time and Pringle duration. Nevertheless, this procedure appears safe and feasible in experienced hands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijs J Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Victoria Morrison-Jones
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sachin Modi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Garatti
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Claudio Sallemi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Mario Morone
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25124 Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Calderon Novoa F, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Goransky J, Mazza O, Sánchez Claria R, de Santibañes M. Pushing the Limits of Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: How Far Can We Go? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072113. [PMID: 37046774 PMCID: PMC10093442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Calderon Novoa
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Jeremias Goransky
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Oscar Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Martín de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hepatobiliary scintigraphy to predict postoperative liver failure after major liver resection; a multicenter cohort study in 547 patients. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:417-424. [PMID: 36759303 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to analyze the predictive value of Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major liver resection with a comparison to assessment of liver volume in a multicenter cohort. METHODS Patients who underwent liver resection after HBS were included from six centers. Remnant liver volume was calculated from CT images. PHLF was scored and graded according to the grade B/C ISGLS criteria. RESULTS In 547 patients PHLF incidence was 10% (56/547) and 90-day mortality rate 8% (42/547). Overall predictive value of remnant liver function was 0.66 (0.58-0.74) and similar to that of remnant volume (0.63 (0.72). For biliary tumors, a function cut-off of 2.7%/min/m2 and 30% volume cut-off resulted in a PHLF rate 12% and 13%, respectively. While an 8.5%/min (4.5%/min/m2) function cut-off resulted in 7% PHLF for those with a function above the cutoff while a 40% volume cutoff still resulted in 14% PHLF rate. In the multivariable analyses for PHLF, liver function was predictive but liver volume was not. CONCLUSION The current study shows that preoperative liver function assessment using HBS is at least as predictive for PHLF as liver volume assessment, and likely has several advantages, particularly in the high-risk sub-group of biliary tumors.
Collapse
|
42
|
Prediction of left lobe hypertrophy after right lobe radioembolization of the liver using a clinical data model with external validation. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20718. [PMID: 36456637 PMCID: PMC9715713 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25077-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), right-sided radioembolization (RE) with Yttrium-90-loaded microspheres is an established palliative therapy and can be considered a "curative intention" treatment when aiming for sequential tumor resection. To become surgical candidate, hypertrophy of the left liver lobe to > 40% (future liver remnant, FLR) is mandatory, which can develop after RE. The amount of radiation-induced shrinkage of the right lobe and compensatory hypertrophy of the left lobe is difficult for clinicians to predict. This study aimed to utilize machine learning to predict left lobe liver hypertrophy in patients with HCC and cirrhosis scheduled for right lobe RE, with external validation. The results revealed that machine learning can accurately predict relative and absolute volume changes of the left liver lobe after right lobe RE. This prediction algorithm could help to estimate the chances of conversion from palliative RE to curative major hepatectomy following significant FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang Y, Strazzabosco M, Madoff DC. Locoregional Therapy in the Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Is There Sufficient Evidence to Guide Current Clinical Practice? Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1741-1750. [PMID: 36255606 PMCID: PMC10878124 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01338-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) carries a dismal prognosis and, despite increasing incidence, still lacks effective treatments. In this scenario, locoregional therapies (LRT) are gaining interest as they may be effective at local tumor control and complementary to surgical and non-surgical approaches. In this article, we will review the evolving role of LRT performed by interventional radiologists in the management of iCCA. RECENT FINDINGS Accumulating retrospective evidence indicates that ablative therapies and transarterial embolizations are of benefit for iCCA with unresectable disease, demonstrating promising safety profiles and prolonged or comparable survival outcomes compared to systemic therapy and surgery. Additionally, for surgical candidates, portal ± hepatic venous embolization can improve the safety of hepatectomy by inducing preoperative hypertrophy of the non-involved liver lobe. LRTs are playing an increasingly important role in the multimodal treatment of iCCA from various perspectives with reduced toxicity relative to traditional treatments. To expand the scope of applications for LRTs in this setting, future prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm their efficacy and advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mario Strazzabosco
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bell R, Begum S, Prasad R, Taura K, Dasari BVM. Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021018. [PMID: 36465356 PMCID: PMC9714434 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. METHOD An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy "Post hepatectomy liver failure", "flow modulation", "small for size flow syndrome", "portal vein embolization", "dual vein embolization", "ALPPS" and "staged hepatectomy" to identify all articles published relating to this topic. RESULTS Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. CONCLUSION The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Saleema Begum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sparrelid E, Olthof PB, Dasari BVM, Erdmann JI, Santol J, Starlinger P, Gilg S. Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2022; 6:6840812. [PMID: 36415029 PMCID: PMC9681670 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF. METHODS A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022. RESULTS Uniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited. DISCUSSION Strict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonas Santol
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Viennese Health Network, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Stefan Gilg
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bell RJ, Hakeem AR, Pandanaboyana S, Davidson BR, Prasad RK, Dasari BVM. Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:zrac131. [PMID: 36398754 PMCID: PMC9673134 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to compare progression to surgery, extent of liver hypertrophy, and postoperative outcomes in patients planned for major hepatectomy following either portal vein embolization (PVE) or dual vein embolization (DVE) for management of an inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches. Articles comparing PVE with DVE up to January 2022 were included. Articles comparing sequential DVE were excluded. ORs, risk ratios, and mean difference (MD) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models for meta-analysis. RESULTS Eight retrospective studies including 523 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics between the groups, specifically, age, sex, BMI, indication for resection, and baseline FLR (ml and per cent) were comparable. The percentage increase in hypertrophy was larger in the DVE group, 66 per cent in the DVE group versus 27 per cent in the PVE group, MD 39.07 (9.09, 69.05) (P = 0.010). Significantly fewer patients failed to progress to surgery in the DVE group than the PVE group, 13 per cent versus 25 per cent respectively OR 0.53 (0.31, 0.90) (P = 0.020). Rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure 13 per cent versus 22 per cent (P = 0.130) and major complications 20 per cent versus 28 per cent (Clavien-Dindo more than IIIa) (P = 0.280) were lower. Perioperative mortality was lower with DVE, 1 per cent versus 10 per cent (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION DVE seems to produce a greater degree of hypertrophy of the FLR than PVE alone which translates into more patients progressing to surgery. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Abdul R Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Raj K Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Quantitative Assessment of Liver Impairment in Chronic Viral Hepatitis with [99mTc]Tc-Mebrofenin: A Noninvasive Attempt to Stage Viral Hepatitis-Associated Liver Fibrosis. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58101333. [PMID: 36295494 PMCID: PMC9612220 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58101333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives—Chronic viral hepatitis B and C infections are one of the leading causes of chronic liver impairment, resulting in liver fibrosis and liver cirrhosis. An early diagnosis with accurate liver fibrosis staging leads to a proper diagnosis, thus tailoring correct treatment. Both invasive and noninvasive techniques are used in the diagnosis and staging of chronic liver impairment. Those techniques include liver biopsy, multiple serological markers (as either single tests or combined panels), and imaging examinations, such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance elastography. Nuclear medicine probes may also be employed in staging liver fibrosis, although the literature scarcely reports this. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether a dynamic liver scintigraphy with [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin has any value in staging or grading chronic liver damage. Materials and Methods—We prospectively enrolled patients with chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection referred for liver biopsy. All patient underwent dynamic liver scintigraphy with 99mTc-mebrofenin prior to liver biopsy. Dynamic liver scintigraphy was performed immediately after intravenous tracer injection for 30 min scanning time. Multiple scintigraphy parameters were calculated (whole liver lobe and focal area time to peak (TTP), 30 min to peak ratio (30/peak), whole lobe and focal area slope index in 350 s (slope_350). Liver biopsy took place shortly after imaging. Results—We found that many dynamic scintigraphic parameters are positively or negatively associated with different stages of liver fibrosis. The main parameters that showed most value are the ratio between 30 min and the peak of the dynamic curve (30/peak_dex (ratio)), and liver clearance corrected for body surface area and liver area (LCL_m2_dm2 (%/min/m2/dm2)). Conclusions—Our present study proves that conducting dynamic liver scintigraphies with [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin has potential value in staging liver fibrosis. The benefits of this method, including whole liver imaging and direct imaging of the liver function, provide an advantage over presently used quantitative imaging modalities.
Collapse
|
48
|
Heil J, Schiesser M, Schadde E. Current trends in regenerative liver surgery: Novel clinical strategies and experimental approaches. Front Surg 2022; 9:903825. [PMID: 36157407 PMCID: PMC9491020 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver resections are performed to cure patients with hepatobiliary malignancies and metastases to the liver. However, only a small proportion of patients is resectable, largely because only up to 70% of liver tissue is expendable in a resection. If larger resections are performed, there is a risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Regenerative liver surgery addresses this limitation by increasing the future liver remnant to an appropriate size before resection. Since the 1980s, this surgery has evolved from portal vein embolization (PVE) to a multiplicity of methods. This review presents an overview of the available methods and their advantages and disadvantages. The first use of PVE was in patients with large hepatocellular carcinomas. The increase in liver volume induced by PVE equals that of portal vein ligation, but both result only in a moderate volume increase. While awaiting sufficient liver growth, 20%–40% of patients fail to achieve resection, mostly due to the progression of disease. The MD Anderson Cancer Centre group improved the PVE methodology by adding segment 4 embolization (“high-quality PVE”) and demonstrated that oncological results were better than non-surgical approaches in this previously unresectable patient population. In 2012, a novel method of liver regeneration was proposed and called Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). ALPPS accelerated liver regeneration by a factor of 2–3 and increased the resection rate to 95%–100%. However, ALPPS fell short of expectations due to a high mortality rate and a limited utility only in highly selected patients. Accelerated liver regeneration, however, was there to stay. This is evident in the multiplicity of ALPPS modifications like radiofrequency or partial ALPPS. Overall, rapid liver regeneration allowed an expansion of resectability with increased perioperative risk. But, a standardized low-risk approach to rapid hypertrophy has been missing and the techniques used and in use depend on local expertise and preference. Recently, however, simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) appears to offer both rapid hypertrophy and no increased clinical risk. While prospective randomized comparisons are underway, PVE/HVE has the potential to become the future gold standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marc Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ), Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
- Correspondence: Erik Schadde
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, et alKorenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Coubeau L, Iesari S, Henry P, D'Abadie P, Vanbuggenhout A, Reding R. Insights in living-donor liver transplantation associated with two-stage total hepatectomy: First case in neuroendocrine tumor metastases and functional assessment techniques. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:392-395. [PMID: 34503925 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Coubeau
- Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Samuele Iesari
- Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Paulina Henry
- Service d'anatomo-pathologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe D'Abadie
- Service de médecine nucléaire, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanbuggenhout
- Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Raymond Reding
- Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Pôle de Chirurgie Expérimentale et Transplantation, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|