What is the Prevalence of Low Health Literacy in European Union Member States? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The effect of clinician-expressed empathy and nocebo-alleviating information on breast-cancer-patients' anxiety and side effects during active chemotherapy: A clinical feasibility study

Objective

We set up a pilot-study to investigate main and interaction effects of nocebo-alleviating information and clinician-expressed empathy delivered via a standardized information-video on breast cancer patients' psychological and side effect outcomes during chemotherapy. Additionally, we aimed to reflect on the feasibility of the intervention (acceptability, practicality and integration) to inform future - follow-up - studies.

Methods

Using a clinical proof-of-principle randomized controlled trial, female breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy viewed one of four videos, varying in the level of nocebo-alleviating information(+/-) and clinician-expressed empathy(+/-). Due to the small sample size (n = 27), descriptive and recruitment data were utilized to evaluate effects and reflect on feasibility.

Results

The interventions appeared to yield limited effects on our small sample. Feasibility reflections mainly focused on the practical level, such as the use of more generalizable videos and optimizing the flow.

Conclusion

The study showed limited effects of the video intervention. It revealed recruitment challenges, while acceptability was high after inclusion. Moving forward, face-to-face clinician-patient interactions remain important, while cautiously exploring the potential benefits of modern technological advancements, ensuring thorough testing of their effects before implementation.

Innovation

This study marks an innovative approach in utilizing digital interventions to enhance cancer patient outcomes within clinical settings.

Considering health literacy in communication about medications between nurses and patients with heart failure: A cross sectional observational study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the content, style, and initiation of medication-related discussions between nurses and patients to understand how nurses support patients with heart failure, especially those with inadequate health literacy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was conducted to observe medication-related conversations between nurses and patients with heart failure in four Dutch outpatient clinics. Conversations were audio-recorded and analyzed using MEDICODE, focusing on content, communication style (monologue or a dialogue), and initiation of the content themes. Health literacy was assessed using the NVS-D and the SBSQ. Results between health literacy groups were compared with descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients and 14 nurses participated in the study. Patients classified by one or both of the instruments as having inadequate health literacy (n = 33; 59 %) were generally older, had lower educational levels, and were more often accompanied by informal caregivers. Key themes discussed in the medication-related conversations included how the medication was identified ('medication designation), its dosage and instruction, main effects, side effects, attitude or emotions and other ('various') themes. The 'medication designation' theme was significantly more frequently discussed in the group with adequate health literacy, whereas 'attitude or emotions' and 'various themes' were more commonly discussed among those with inadequate health literacy. Most conversations were nurse-initiated and tended to be monologues, with nurses mainly serving as information providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses primarily initiated and dominated medication-related discussions with a focus on factual aspects of medication, while patients initiated more discussions about their concerns regarding medication. While there was overlap in the topics discussed, notable differences emerged between patients with adequate and inadequate health literacy.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Improving communication strategies, such as structuring conversations and adopting dialogic approaches may improve patients' engagement and understanding of medication use, leading to more effective management of their condition, particularly benefiting patients with lower health literacy.

Navigational health literacy and health service use among higher education students in Alentejo, Portugal - A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The navigational health literacy of higher education students is fundamental to effective health management and successful health navigation, thereby improving health outcomes and overall well-being. Assessing the general and navigational health literacy levels of these students is crucial for developing targeted interventions and facilitating informed decision-making on health-related issues. This study aimed to identify the levels of general and navigational health literacy, characterise access to and utilisation of healthcare services, and analyse the differences between the mean general and navigational health literacy indices and determinants among higher education students in the Alentejo region of southern Portugal.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted between 25 May and 12 September 2023 with 1979 higher education students. An online structured questionnaire comprising the Portuguese version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire - 16 items (HLS-EU-PT-Q16) and the Navigational Health Literacy Scale (HLS19-NAV), both from the European Consortium, was used. Sociodemographic data, presence of chronic disease, perceived health status, perceived availability of money for expenses, and healthcare access and utilisation variables were included. The study data were analysed using independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc Bonferroni test, followed by multiple linear regression analyses at a significance level of 0.05. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with both general and navigational health literacy. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Évora, and all participants provided written informed consent.

RESULTS

Most students (86.8%) exhibited limited general health literacy, while 13.2% demonstrated adequate health literacy. Inadequate navigational health literacy was observed in 73.4% of students. Students with lower mean general and navigational health literacy were more likely to have utilised health services. Students with chronic conditions, recent use of urgent or emergency services, and difficulties in accessing healthcare had lower health literacy. Conversely, those enrolled in health-related courses, those with good financial resources and those who had not used health services during their course had higher health literacy. In addition, lower navigational health literacy was found among displaced students, those with chronic conditions and those who had recently consulted a doctor. Higher navigational health literacy was associated with enrolment in health-related courses and adequate general health literacy.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the significant influence of demographic and academic factors on general and navigational health literacy among higher education students. The prevalence of limited general and navigational health literacy underscores a significant challenge for students, institutions, and health policy makers. Effective health literacy interventions should take these factors into account. Future research should examine longitudinal changes in health literacy and evaluate the impact of targeted educational programmes.

A Digital Outpatient Service With a Mobile App for Tailored Care and Health Literacy in Adults With Long-Term Health Service Needs: Multicenter Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with long-term health needs are often expected to actively participate in outpatient care, assuming that they have appropriate health literacy and digital health literacy. However, the association between participation in a digital outpatient service and health literacy remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate whether digital outpatient care for 6 months improved health literacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), digital/eHealth literacy, and the use of health care services compared with usual care.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter nonrandomized trial with 1 intervention arm and 1 control arm. Patients aged ≥18 years receiving outpatient care in the pain, lung, neurology, or cancer departments at 2 Norwegian university hospitals were allocated in a 1:2 ratio, favoring the intervention arm. The intervention arm received digital outpatient care using tailored patient-reported outcome measures, self-monitoring, and chats for timely contact with the outpatient clinic. Patient responses were assessed by health care workers via a dashboard with a traffic light system to draw attention to the most urgent reports. The control arm received usual care. The data were collected at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in health literacy according to the Health Literacy Questionnaire domain understanding health information well enough to know what to do from baseline to 6 months. The mean difference in change between the 2 treatment arms was the effect measure. The secondary outcomes were additional domains from the Health Literacy Questionnaire, digital/eHealth literacy, HRQoL, acceptability of the digital intervention, and health service use.

RESULTS

Overall, 162 patients were recruited, 55 (34%) in the control arm and 107 (66%) in the intervention arm, with a 17.3% attrition rate after 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, "understanding health information well enough to know what to do," between the arms at 6 months (mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.10; P=.53). After 3 months, the health literacy domains actively managing my own health (-0.15, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.00; P=.048) and understanding health information well enough to know what to do (-0.17, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.00; P=.03), as well as both physical (-3.29, 95% CI -5.62 to -0.96; P=.006) and mental HRQoL (-3.08, 95% CI -5.64 to -0.52; P=.02), improved in the digital outpatient intervention arm compared with the control arm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explored digital outpatient care. Although no statistical differences were observed in patients' health literacy after 6 months, our data indicate an improvement in health literacy domains and HRQoL at 3 months. The participants reported high satisfaction with the digital outpatient care intervention, and our findings highlight the potential of digital interventions in outpatient care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05068869; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05068869.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/46649.

Effectiveness of The Umbrella Collaboration Versus Traditional Umbrella Reviews for Evidence Synthesis in Health Care: Protocol for a Validation Study

BACKGROUND

The synthesis of evidence in health care is essential for informed decision-making and policy development. This study aims to validate The Umbrella Collaboration (TU), an innovative, semiautomatic tertiary evidence synthesis methodology, by comparing it with Traditional Umbrella Reviews (TUR), which are currently the gold standard.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether TU, an artificial intelligence-assisted, software-driven system for tertiary evidence synthesis, can achieve comparable effectiveness to TURs, while offering a more timely, efficient, and comprehensive approach. In addition, as a secondary objective, the study aims to assess the accessibility and comprehensibility of TU's outputs to ensure its usability and practical applicability for health care professionals.

METHODS

This protocol outlines a comparative study divided into 2 main parts. The first part involves a quantitative comparison of results obtained using TU and TURs in geriatrics. We will evaluate the identification, size effect, direction, statistical significance, and certainty of outcomes, as well as the time and resources required for each methodology. Data for TURs will be sourced from Medline (via PubMed), while TU will use artificial intelligence-assisted informatics to replicate the research questions of the selected TURs. The second part of the study assesses the ease of use and comprehension of TU through an online survey directed at health professionals, using interactive features and detailed data access.

RESULTS

Expected results include the assessment of concordance in identifying outcomes, the size effect, direction and significance of these outcomes, and the certainty of evidence. In addition, we will measure the operational efficiency of each methodology by evaluating the time taken to complete projects. User perceptions of the ease of use and comprehension of TU will be gathered through detailed surveys. The implementation of new methodologies in evidence synthesis requires validation. This study will determine whether TU can match the accuracy and comprehensiveness of TURs while offering benefits in terms of efficiency and user accessibility. The comparative study is designed to address the inherent challenges in validating a new methodology against established standards.

CONCLUSIONS

If TU proves as effective as TURs but more time-efficient, accessible, and easily updatable, it could significantly enhance the process of evidence synthesis, facilitating informed decision-making and improving health care. This study represents a step toward integrating innovative technologies into routine evidence synthesis practice, potentially transforming health research.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/67248.

Addressing Health Literacy

This JAMA Insights discusses personal and organizational health literacy and offers recommendations on how clinicians and health care institutions can improve their patients’ health literacy skills.

Multiple Symptoms Study 3 - An extended-role general practitioner clinic for patients with persistent physical symptoms: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

People with multiple and persistent physical symptoms have impaired quality of life and poor experiences of health care. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based Symptoms Clinic intervention in people with multiple and persistent physical symptoms.

Trial design

Pragmatic multicentre individually randomised parallel group clinical trial.

Methods

Participants: Recruitment was between December 2018 and December 2021 in four areas of the UK. Eligibility was based on electronic health records, healthcare use and multiple physical symptoms (PHQ-15 between 10 and 20) which were not due to other medical conditions. Intervention delivery changed from face to face to online in 2020 in response to the pandemic. Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive the Symptoms Clinic plus usual care (intervention) or usual care alone (control). The Symptoms Clinic is a short-term extended medical consultation-based intervention delivered over approximately 8 weeks. Objective: To test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an extended-role general practitioner 'Symptoms Clinic' for people with persistent physical symptoms. Outcome: The primary outcome measure was the PHQ-15 at 52 weeks post randomisation. Randomisation: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 using a centralised web-based system, stratified by study centre with random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Masking: It was not possible to mask participants to their allocation. Outcome assessors who handled patient-reported questionnaires were masked to allocation.

Results

Numbers randomised: 354 participants were randomised into the trial: 176 to the usual care group and 178 to the intervention group. Numbers analysed: 132 participants in the usual care group and 144 participants in the intervention group were included in the analysis representing 77.8% retention. Outcome: Mean (SD) PHQ-15 at baseline was 14.9 (3.0) in the control group and 15.0 (2.9) in the intervention group. At 52 weeks it was 14.1 (3.7) in the control group and 12.2 (4.5) in the intervention group. The between-group difference, adjusted for age, sex, baseline PHQ-15 and clinician effect was -1.82 (95% CI -2.67 to -0.97; p < 0.001) favouring the intervention. Harms: There were no significant between-group differences in the proportions of patients experiencing non-serious (-0.03, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.05) or serious (0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.07) adverse events. All serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to trial interventions. Economic evaluation: Cost-effectiveness analysis indicated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £15,751/QALY. Process evaluation: The intervention was delivered with high fidelity and was acceptable to patients. The intervention appeared to act through the hypothesised mechanism of explanation as a bridge from uncertainty about the cause to actions to manage symptoms. Limitations and further research: The intervention was delivered by a small number of GPs in long consultations. Further research should examine wider implementation and how to integrate elements of the intervention into shorter consultations.

Conclusions

The Symptoms Clinic delivered by specially trained GPs leads to a clinically meaningful improvement in physical symptoms at 52 weeks and is likely to be a cost-effective addition to current care.

Funding

This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 15/136/07.

Assessing the ability of ChatGPT to generate French patient-facing information to improve patient understanding in hand surgery

INTRODUCTION

The advent of artificial intelligence technologies, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, presents new opportunities to enhance physician-patient communication through tailored patient-facing medical information (PFI). Effective postoperative care is critical to successful patient outcomes in hand surgery, making it essential to deliver information in a clear, comprehensible, and accurate manner. This study aims to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT to generate accessible PFI to enhance patient understanding in hand surgery.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving five French hand surgeons and 28 non-medical individuals. Participants blindly evaluated PFI containing text and images generated by ChatGPT and Gemini compared to those provided by established organizations (EOs). The evaluations focused on three common hand surgeries: carpal tunnel syndrome, Dupuytren's disease, and synovial cyst. Hand surgeons evaluated PFI based on accuracy, clarity, comprehensiveness, and overall preference. Non-medical participants evaluated PFI based on clarity and overall preference. Surveys were used to capture these evaluations, allowing for a systematic and effective comparison between both sources. Readability was analyzed using six readability formulas, and Likert scale responses were statistically analyzed using paired t-tests.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in terms of accuracy between ChatGPT-generated text responses and EO-provided text responses. However, text responses provided by EOs were rated significantly higher in terms of comprehensiveness and clarity by hand surgeons. Interestingly, non-medical participants rated the clarity and overall preference of ChatGPT-generated text responses higher than those from EOs. EO-provided images were also significantly favored in terms of comprehensiveness and clarity by hand surgeons. Notably, 65% of non-medical participants preferred EO-provided images over AI-generated ones. Both sources, however, produced information that exceeded the recommended readability levels for patient comprehension.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the potential of AI-generated medical information to enhance patient understanding, particularly through the comprehensive nature of materials created by tools like ChatGPT. The divergence in preferences between hand surgeons and patients highlights the need to refine the accuracy, clarity, and relevance of AI-generated content to align with the standards upheld by healthcare professionals. Continued exploration in this area is crucial for optimizing patient education and communication, particularly in the context of postoperative care.

Examining the health literacy and health behaviours of children aged 8-11 in Wales, UK

Childhood is a period of significant formative development where knowledge, skills, and capacities for adequate health literacy are acquired, particularly within school settings. The new Curriculum for Wales (CfW), phasing in from September 2022 for learners aged 3-16 years, places statutory focus on health and well-being and school-level curriculum design, providing unprecedented opportunities to empower children as agents in making health-enhancing decisions. Designing, tracking, and evaluating impacts of the CfW on children's health literacy requires scalable monitoring tools; however, research efforts have focused on adolescent populations. This national-scale scoping and pilot study, the first to explore children's health literacy in Wales, piloted the Health Literacy for School-Aged Children (HLSAC-5) within the existing nationwide Health and Attainment of Pupils in Primary EducatioN (HAPPEN-Wales) health and well-being survey to examine the health literacy of children aged 8-11 (n = 2607) and explore associations between health literacy and health behaviours. Children's health literacy was categorized as low (22.6%), moderate (50.4%), and high (27.0%). Multinomial logistic regression analyses suggest high health literacy compared to low health literacy was associated with higher sleep [relative risk ratio (RRR): 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15], higher weekly physical activity (RRR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), fewer sedentary days per week (RRR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), and higher health-related well-being (RRR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.44). This study offers a sustainable measure of pre-adolescent children's health literacy and health behaviours and tracking of CfW impacts. This enables efforts to be tailored to person-centred (understanding children's health literacy needs), place-based (examining specific organizational health literacy context within schools and CfW design), and policy-focused approaches (re-energizing health literacy within current/emerging policies in Wales including the CfW).

Results of the process of implementation of ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations

OBJECTIVE

This quasi-experimental, non-randomized study described the process of implementing ISO 7101 subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy in specialty consultations, then determined the effects of implementation on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care.

METHOD

Implementation steps were outlined, nurses were trained and used a standardized health literacy checklist with patients. The HLS19-Q12 was used to calculate patients' general health literacy scores pre- and post-implementation of subclause 8.10.5. Paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined relationships between implementation, health literacy score, and quality of care perceived.

RESULTS

Mean general health literacy scores increased post-implementation from 66.35 to 76.29, as did the mean score of perception of quality of care received (M=3.87 to M=3.99). Wilcoxon test for both variables was significant (P<.001), and effect size was large (d≥0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ISO 7101, subclause 8.10.5 Health literacy had a positive, statistically significant impact on patient general health literacy scores and perceptions of quality of care. This is valuable information for healthcare management decision makers as they implement new standards and seek to improve patient health outcomes.

[Establishing and implementing the National Action Plan Health Literacy in Germany]

About ten years ago, studies on health literacy in Germany indicated that population health literacy was low. This prompted a group of distinguished experts to initiate the development of a National Action Plan for Health Literacy (NAP-HL) for Germany, modeled after those of other countries. This article explains the origins and development of the plan in Germany, provides an overview of the steps taken during its creation, and summarizes its content. Subsequently, the transfer strategy, including the three steps of diffusion, dissemination, and implementation, is discussed. The concluding assessment evaluates the plan's achieved impacts and critically reflects on the implementation strategy. Overall, numerous impulses were provided for agenda setting and the promotion of health literacy. The challenge remains to develop sustainable interventions for strengthening health literacy, accompanied by systematic research.

Health literacy and chronic disease: a comparison of somatic and mental illness

Background

Health literacy (HL) is increasingly recognized as essential for preventing and managing chronic illness but also for strengthening health resources and skills. However, studies on HL of people with chronic illness that adopt a multidimensional approach encompassing the three HL domains health care, disease prevention, and health promotion, remain scarce. This study aims to (a) compare HL across these three domains in individuals with chronic somatic illness, chronic mental illness and those without any chronic illness, (b) to explore where difficulties in managing health-related information occur and how these differ between groups, and (c) to analyze the relationship between demographic, social, and psychological factors and HL.

Methods

Data from a quantitative cross-sectional survey in Germany were stratified according to respondents with at least one chronic somatic illness, at least one chronic mental illness and without chronic illness. The survey was conducted by means of paper-assisted personal interviews. HL was measured in three domains health care, disease prevention and health promotion. Age, educational level, social status, financial resources, number of chronic illnesses, social support, and self-efficacy were included in the analysis as potential determinants of HL. Differences between groups were analyzed using bivariate statistics; multiple linear regressions were calculated to examine relationships between potential determinants and HL.

Results

Respondents with chronic mental illness showed lowest HL, followed by those with chronic somatic illness. Respondents without chronic illness achieved highest HL. This pattern was consistent across all three HL domains. Among all groups, HL was lowest in the domain of health promotion. Notable differences emerged in perceived difficulties, with respondents with mental illnesses reporting the most significant challenges. Self-efficacy and education level showed a positive association with HL across all groups, while social support was positively associated with HL among individuals with chronic mental illness. For respondents with chronic somatic illness, age was negatively associated with HL, whereas social status showed a positive association. Female respondents without chronic illness and those with chronic somatic illness demonstrated higher HL compared to male respondents.

Conclusion

This study advances the understanding of HL among individuals with chronic illness and highlights the need for a greater differentiation among disease groups and HL domains in future research. Particular attention should be paid to people with chronic mental illness, whose lower HL levels increase their vulnerability.

Health Literacy and Related Factors in Perioperative Patients: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Background

Perioperative patient health literacy influences postoperative recovery and self-management. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine perioperative patient health literacy levels and associated factors.

Methods

From August 2021 to January 2022, 187 patients undergoing surgery at an acute care hospital completed a self-administered questionnaire, based on the Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy (FCCHL) scale, to assess health literacy and related factors. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with health literacy.

Results

Out of 316 surveyed patients, 187 were included in the analysis. Over 70% of perioperative patients in this study were classified as having limited health literacy according to the FCCHL scale. These patients exhibited low communicative and critical health literacy. Factors significantly associated with patients' total health literacy scores included age, knowledge about diseases, education level, use of media about health and disease, and generalized self-efficacy.

Conclusion

Healthcare providers should recognize that perioperative patients generally possess low health literacy. Understanding factors influencing individual health literacy levels is essential to provide tailored support in the perioperative patient.

Health literacy, oral diseases, and contributing pathways: results from the Lifelines Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Health literacy (HL), the ability to deal with information related to one's health, may affect oral health via several routes. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the association of HL with oral diseases, and whether this association is mediated by oral health behaviour and dental care utilisation.

METHODS

We included 26,983 participants from the prospective multigenerational Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study to estimate the association between limited health literacy, and self-reported oral health outcomes (edentulism and gingivitis), and mediation by oral health behaviour and dental care utilisation. Structural equation modelling was used to assess HL's direct, indirect, and total effects on oral health outcomes.

RESULTS

Limited health-literate participants had increased odds of having poor oral health outcomes, i.e. edentulism (odds ratio: 1.41; 95 %-confidence interval: 1.24 to 1.58) and gingivitis (1.22; 1.14 to 1.30). After adjustment for age, income, and education, brushing behaviour and dental care utilization showed a significant mediation effect. Brushing behaviour mediated 7.4 % of the association between HL and edentulism and 6.7 % for gingivitis. Dental visits accounted for 38.0 % of the association between HL and edentulism and 16.4 % for gingivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited HL makes edentulism and gingivitis more likely, with poor oral health behaviour and inadequate dental care utilisation being important mediators. The findings suggest that interventions should focus on helping dental professionals recognize patients with limited HL and providing training in patient-centered communication to improve oral health outcomes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates that limited health literacy significantly increases the risk of edentulism and gingivitis, mediated by inadequate oral health behaviours and dental care utilization. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve HL, thereby enhancing oral health outcomes and reducing disparities in clinical dental practice.

Clusters of Patient Empowerment and Mental Health Literacy Differentiate Professional Help-Seeking Attitudes in Online Mental Health Communities Users

OBJECTIVES

Grounded in the Health Empowerment Model, which posits that health literacy and patient empowerment are intertwined yet distinct constructs, this study investigates how the interplay of these factors influences attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help in members of online communities for mental health (OCMHs). This while acknowledging the multidimensionality of patient empowerment, encompassing meaningfulness, competence, self-determination, and impact.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A cluster analysis of data gathered from 269 members of Italian-speaking OCMHs on Facebook has been performed.

RESULTS

Four profiles have been identified: dangerous self-managers (11.2%), effective self-managers (21.2%), disempowered (40.5%) and ambivalent empowered (27.1%). Clusters provided meaningful variations in help-seeking attitudes, also when controlling for depression and anxiety severity, F3, 265 = 11.910, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provided further evidence of the multidimensionality of patient empowerment. Considering the results, we discussed potential interventions aimed at enhancing the quality of OCMHs, tailoring to the unique characteristics of each cluster.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Administrators and moderators of mental health Facebook communities-whether expert-led by mental health professionals or peers-played a key role in this study. They provided valuable insights during the questionnaire design process to ensure the questions were both relevant and appropriate for community members. These administrators and moderators also actively facilitated participant recruitment by creating and sharing posts, either video- or text-based, on community homepages. Furthermore, after completing the questionnaire, participants were encouraged to comment on the Facebook posts where the survey link was shared, mentioning that they participated and inviting other members to take part. This approach aimed to foster a sense of involvement and further promoted the survey within the community.

Association between mobility decline and health literacy in older Japanese adults: Onjuku study

Decline in mobility is a global issue that must be addressed in rapidly aging societies. We aimed to clarify the association between locomotive syndrome (LS), a condition of decreased mobility and health literacy (HL) in community-dwelling Japanese adults aged ≥ 40 years. A descriptive survey was conducted in Onjuku Town, Japan, between 2019 and 2023. The participants performed LS risk tests, including the two-step test, stand-up tests and 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale, to assess mobility. They completed the 14-item health literacy scale to quantify the total HL and functional, communicative and critical HL subscales. Other participant characteristics, such as chronic diseases, bodily pain and physical activity, were also surveyed. The association between LS and HL was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for participant characteristics. We analyzed 492 participants with a median age of 71 years. The total HL score decreased as the LS stage increased, with 56, 54 and 51 points in stages 0, 1 and ≥ 2, respectively (p = 0.004). In the logistic regression analysis, a high total HL score was significantly associated with reduced odds of stage ≥ 2 LS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; p < 0.001). Furthermore, functional HL score had an independent association with stage ≥ 2 LS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; p = 0.009). Our results suggest that clinicians should provide HL education in addition to known preventive measures, such as promoting physical activity, as a holistic approach to decreased mobility.

Health Literacy and Acceptance of COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Vaccination in the European Union: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is becoming increasingly important in the field of public health as it contributes to individuals' social empowerment. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, preventive measures (mask usage, physical distancing, hand washing) and vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) shaped the degree of infection of the population, and their acceptance was associated with a multitude of factors, health literacy included. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the impact of all health literacy dimensions (namely, understanding, access, evaluation and application of health information) on accepting preventive measures and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 among adult European citizens.

METHODS

A literature search on three different databases was conducted from July 2022 to December 2022.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 154 articles were initially identified, which were rigorously assessed by two reviewers. Ten studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results showed that health literacy played an important role in accepting preventive measures and vaccination as well as in rating health information related to the coronavirus.

DISCUSSION

Health literacy is a positive predictor of coronavirus prophylaxis and could be incorporated into public health policies to appropriately control future health crises. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2025;9(1):e46-e55.].

Level of health literacy and associated factors among Jimma town public high school adolescent students: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the level of health literacy and its associated factors among Jimma town public high school adolescents, Jimma, Oromia, Southwest Ethiopia, 2023.

METHODS

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in June 2023 among 604 Jimma town public high school adolescents. A multistage sampling technique was employed to recruit study participants. A pretested self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Data was entered into epidata 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 26.0 for analysis. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with the level of health literacy. P-values less than 0.05 at 95% CI were used to declare statistically significant associations. The results were presented by text, tables and charts as necessary.

RESULTS

From 634 total sample size about 604 participated. About 317 (52.5%) were males. The age of participants ranged from 14 to 19 years, with a mean age of 16.95+1.52. The finding revealed that only 35.26% (95% CI; 31.44, 39.09) of participants had desired health literacy, while 64.74% of them had limited health literacy levels. Age of 18-19 [AOR = 3.99(2.41, 6.60): p<0.001], being in 11-12 grade level [AOR = 2.38(1.44, 3.95); p = 0.001], being from currently employed father [AOR = 4.20(1.98, 8.92); p<0.001] and being from currently employed mother [AOR = 4.54(2.82, 7.31); p<0.001] were factors positively associated with the level of desired health literacy.

CONCLUSION

Since a significant number of students in our study area had limited health literacy, we recommend schools to integrate a school health service that contains health education services. Moreover, efforts should be undertaken to raise adolescent health literacy for middle adolescents, early adolescents, and students whose families were not employed.

Lessons learned for pandemic preparedness in the neurodegenerative research and clinical fields: an advice report based on Parkinson's disease as an example

BACKGROUND

A sustainable pandemic preparedness strategy is essential to ensure equitable access to healthcare for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, it is vital to provide clinicians and researchers in the neurodegenerative disease fields with resources and infrastructure to ensure continuity of their work during a (health) crisis.

METHODS

We established an international collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and patient representatives from the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom. We co-created a pandemic preparedness plan primarily informed by examples from those affected by or working in the field of Parkinson's disease, with potential application to other neurodegenerative diseases or the general population. This plan builds upon insights and experiences from four population-based studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between March and November 2023, we organised two hybrid meetings in Bristol (United Kingdom) and Rotterdam (the Netherlands), and two online meetings.

RESULTS

Research recommendations included three core factors in questionnaire design during health crises: 1) using existing, validated questions, 2) questionnaire adaptability and flexibility, and 3) testing within and outside the research group. Additionally, we addressed burden of participation, and we advocated for robust data sharing practices, underlining the importance of regulatory measures extending beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. We also shared clinical perspectives, including strategies to mitigate social isolation; challenges in virtual versus in-person consultations; and systemic changes to recognise and prevent moral injury in healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSION

In this pandemic preparedness plan, we provide research and clinical recommendations tailored to the field of Parkinson's disease, with broader relevance to other neurodegenerative diseases and the general population. This establishes an essential framework for setting up new studies and safeguarding research and clinical practices when a new pandemic or other (health) crisis emerges.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Health Literacy Survey (HLS19-Q12) in secondary care specialty consultations

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to validate the HLS19-Q12 in Spain and in the Spanish language, as well as describe the sociodemographic profile and the general health literacy of the study population.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional.

METHODS

Factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were used to validate the Spanish version of the HLS19-Q12. Health literacy scores and associated categories were calculated using the scale factsheet, and the patient population sociodemographic profile was determined using frequency analysis.

RESULTS

The HLS19-Q12 used in Spain in the Spanish language was found to be both valid and reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). The sociodemographic profile was primarily male and aged, and the majority of patients were of Spanish origin and had diabetes. General patient health literacy was limited, with 60% of participants having general health literacy categorized as inadequate or problematic, and 40 % sufficient or excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validated the HLS19-Q12 in Spain, created a sociodemographic profile of the sample population, and calculated their health literacy scores. This contribution provides another valuable validated tool and associated data to the increasingly important field of health literacy.

Evaluation of health literacy level and personal factors in disease self-management of emergency department patients with chronic diseases

BACKGROUND

Effective disease management in individuals with chronic illnesses can improve their health outcomes and reduce repeated visits to emergency departments. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the factors affecting the health literacy levels and disease self-management skills of emergency department patients with chronic diseases.

METHOD

The data of the cross-sectional study was collected between July and December 2023. The study included 168 patients who applied to the emergency department of a university hospital. Data was collected using a Patient Description Form, Chronic Disease Self-Management Scale and Health Literacy Scale. Parametric and nonparametric tests, structural equation modelling and regression analysis were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

It was demonstrated that health literacy levels of the patients were an effectual factor on chronic disease self-management skills. Chronic Disease Self-Management levels of patients are affected by marital status, whom they are living with, chronic disease duration, educational status and health perception level. Personal factors affecting the Health Literacy levels of patients are age, chronic disease duration and educational status.

CONCLUSION

Consequently, essential strategies such as patient education should be planned and implemented to support patients' health literacy and, indirectly, escalate their disease self-management skills.

Associations between health literacy proficiencies and health-related quality of life and GP visits among young people in Norway: a population-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Despite globally increased attention from policymakers and being recognised as a critical determinant of health, health literacy (HL) research in young people (YP) remains limited. This study aims to describe HL in YP across person factors and explore the associations between HL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the number of visits to general practitioners (GP visits).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Population-based data collection applying country representative strata in Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

890 participants aged 16-25 years.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES

Rasch modelling and Wright's method were used to identify statistically distinct levels of HL proficiency. Multiple linear regression and negative binomial regression models were applied to explore the associations between HL and HRQoL, and between HL and GP visits, respectively.

RESULTS

Among YP, HL was statistically significantly associated with HRQoL and the number of GP visits, when adjusting for age, gender, education, self-perceived social status and financial deprivation. For every logit increase in HL, the number of GP visits decreased by 22%. Four statistically distinct levels of HL proficiency were identified for the 12-item HLS19-YP12 scale, started from a cut-point of 23, 30, 37 and 44 out of 48. Relatedly, 70% of respondents were observed at or below level 2 (30-36 points), indicating a varying lack of central skills. The span from lowest (1) to highest (4) HL level was associated with a decrease of 2.1 GP visits per year and an increase of .12 on the EQ-5D index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new empirical insights into the impact of HL in YP. Identified cut-points for the HLS19-YP12 may contribute to simplifying the process of adapting information and communication for various HL skills. The study also suggests the need for more efforts in HL policy and structural intervention development to enhance YP health and well-being.

The effect of nurse health literacy interventions on patient health literacy scores in specialty consultations: a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Patient health literacy (HL) affects health and wellbeing on both individual and population levels. The ability to receive, understand, manage and act upon health information can be positively influenced by nurses' use of HL strategies. This study examined the relationship between nurses' use of a HL checklist (intervention) and before and after patient HL scores, and the effects of frequency and types of strategies used in specialty consultations in Spain.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental, non-randomized study used the HLS19-Q12 to calculate HL scores for 149 patients. Calculations were performed both before and after a nursing intervention that consisted of using a HL checklist. Paired samples t-test assessed the difference between patient HL scores pre- and post-nurse intervention. Frequency analysis and Pearson correlation where used to examine frequencies of nursing HL strategies used and associations with HL scores.

RESULTS

The mean difference between the HLS19-Q12 scores before and after intervention was - 9.94, with a standard deviation of 11.50. There was a statistically significant effect of the intervention on HL score (t = -10.00, p < 0.001). No participant had HL classified as 'inadequate' after the nursing intervention. Verbal teach back method was the most frequent strategy used by nurses, and the use of a computer image was the most frequent visual aid.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a standardized HL intervention by nurses was shown to have a positive effect on patient general HL scores in specialty consultations in Spain. These results not only suggest that the use of a HL checklist can be an effective HL tool, but also reinforce the potential of nurses to make a positive impact on both individual and population health. Overall, these findings provide data that can be used by health systems, hospitals management, and nurse education programs to adopt strategies to improve patient HL and health outcomes, while potentially lowering costs and ineffective resource utilization related to inadequate HL.

Health literacy and the use of digital tools in older patients with cancer and their younger counterparts: A multicenter, nationwide study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate health literacy (HL), assess the use of digital tools/sources, and identify factors associated with low or moderate HL in older (aged ≥65) and younger (18-64) patients with cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multicenter study including patients with cancer was conducted in 26 centers in France. HL was assessed using the Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy (FCCHL) scale. Factors associated with low/moderate HL (score

RESULTS

The population comprised 669 patients aged 18-64 and 658 patients aged 65 + . The older patients used digital tools less than younger patients did. The median overall HL score was: 3.7 and 3.6, for younger and older patients respectively. The need for help to fill out the questionnaire was associated with low/moderate HL in both age groups. Then, older age and living in rural area were associated with low/moderate HL in younger patients only, and rare internet use in older patients.

CONCLUSION

This article highlights the importance of considering HL in care management, as well as whom patients may present higher risk of low HL.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

It is crucial to assess HL in patients with cancer, and then to seize every opportunity to enhance HL.

Collapse

Key Words

• Cancer
• Digital tools
• Internet use
• Literacy
• Older adults

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Elena Paillaud Université Paris Cité, Department of Geriatrics, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France; Paris Est Créteil University, INSERM, IMRB, F-94010 Creteil, France
Angéline Galvin Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene team, UMR, 1219, Bordeaux, France.
Solène Doublet Université Paris Cité, Department of Geriatrics, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France
Johanne Poisson Université Paris Cité, Department of Geriatrics, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France
Pierre Gay Université Paris Cité, Department of Geriatrics, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), F-75015 Paris, France
Christophe Perrin Centre Eugène Marquis, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes, France
Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Cochin Port-Royal, ARIANE, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
Thomas Grellety Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque, Bayonne, France
Diego Teyssonneau Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
Siavoshe Ayati Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dijon, France
Arnaud Saint-Lezer Centre hospitalier de Mont-de-Marsan, Mont-De-Marsan, France
Stéphane Culine Université Paris-Cité, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Saint-Louis, AP-HP Nord, Paris, France
Mylène Annonay Centre hospitalier de Martinique, Fort-De-France, France
Heidi Solem-Laviec Centre Francois Baclesse, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France
Rabia Boulahssass Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France; FHU OncoAge, Nice, France; University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
Capucine Baldini Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Achille Tchalla Centre hospitalier universitaire de Limoges, Geriatric medicine unit, Limoges, France
Caroline Lalet Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
Lucas Hue Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
Marina Pulido Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France
Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Epicene team, UMR, 1219, Bordeaux, France; Inserm CIC1401, Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France

Collapse

Health literacy friendly organizations - A scoping review about promoting health literacy in a surgical setting

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to describe interventions that promote health literacy in a surgical setting and identify knowledge gaps for future research.

METHODS

A scoping review with a systematic search was performed in Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science between January 1, 2012, and January 23, 2024. All screening was conducted using the Covidence software. In total, the search yielded 6 281 articles.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included in the results. Studies were heterogeneous regarding the type of health literacy measured, type of surgery, and type of intervention. Most interventions were educational to improve knowledge, decision making or health literacy through digital media, group sessions or consent forms. Most interventions had a positive impact on health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with limited health literacy may benefit from a variety of interventions. However, research in this area is sparse. Further research is needed into interventions that may be beneficial for patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Measure, evaluate and implement health literacy-friendly options to ensure people can make safe and sound decisions for their care. Researchers need to consider the type of health literacy investigated and the type of instrument used in the research.

From Health Communication to Health Literacy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Relevance and Strategies

Health literacy, the ability to obtain and comprehend health knowledge, is essential to promote health and reduce disparities. Health communication aims to improve health by ensuring an effective understanding and application of health information. Despite current challenges, there are many opportunities for improving communication in the health literacy practice. Promoting communication in health literacy is essential in empowering individuals, improving outcomes, and reducing healthcare disparities. Effective communication enables access, comprehension, and informed decision-making of individuals and communities regarding their health, strengthening their central role in promoting health literacy. This paper highlights the challenges and opportunities in today's world, especially in a post-pandemic era, dominated by infodemic and social media influencers, while providing solutions, encompassing professional training of health professionals on communication, digital skills, and an overarching strategy across health institutions. Translating knowledge into health-promoting behaviors and well-being can only be effective by accounting for communication in health literacy.

The effectiveness of visual-based interventions on health literacy in health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limited Health Literacy (HL) is an obstacle to accessing and receiving optimal health care and negatively impacts patients' quality of life, thus making it an urgent issue in the health care system. Visual-based interventions are a promising strategy to improve HL through the use of visual aids and pictorial materials to explain health-related concepts. However, a comprehensive summary of the literature on the topic is still scarce.

METHODS

To fill this gap, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to determine the effectiveness of visual-based interventions in improving comprehension of health related material in the clinical population. Independent studies evaluating the effectiveness of visual-based interventions on adults (> 18 years) and whose primary outcome was either health literacy (HL) or comprehension were eligible for the review. After a systematic literature search was carried out in five databases, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and thus were included. Most of the studies were randomized controlled trials and they focused on HL and health knowledge as outcomes.

RESULTS

The review and meta-analysis showed that visual-based interventions were most effective in enhancing the comprehension of health-related material compared to traditional methods. According to meta-analytic results, videos are more effective than traditional methods (Z = 5.45, 95% CI [0.35, 0.75], p < 0.00001) and than the employment of written material (Z = 7.59, 95% CI [0.48, 0.82], p < 0.00001). Despite this, no significant difference was found between video and oral discussion (Z = 1.70, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.53], p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that visual-based interventions, particularly the ones using videos, are effective for improving HL and the comprehension of health-related material.

The low health literacy in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Health literacy (HL) impacts people's health and well-being. In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), there are no general estimates of the prevalence of low HL. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of low HL among citizens of LAC and identify the tools used to measure it.

METHODS

We included observational studies quantifying the prevalence of low HL in people living in LAC. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, LILACS, PsycINFO, Redalyc, SciELO, Web of Science, PQDT, and the reference lists of the included studies in June 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted the selection, extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Meta-analysis of proportions using random effects models was used to summarize the prevalence of low HL estimated. This prevalence was measured in each study using different classification methods: word recognition items, reading and numeracy comprehension items, and self-reported comprehension items.

RESULTS

Eighty four studies involving 23,914 participants from 15 countries were included. We identified 23 tools to assess HL, and most of the studies were carried out in health services. The pooled prevalence of low HL were 44.02% (95%CI: 36.12-52.24) for reading and numeracy comprehension items, 50.62% (95%CI: 41.82-59.39) for word recognition items, and 41.73% (95%CI: 31.76-52.43) for self-reported comprehension items.

CONCLUSION

Despite the variability in the prevalence of low HL and a diversity of tools, the average of low HL is of concern. Almost half of the participants in the included studies have low HL. Most of the studies targeted users of healthcare services. Further research investigating the prevalence of low HL in the general population and actions focused on health education, communication, and information are necessary.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42021250286).

Clinician-Spoken Plain Language in Health Care Encounters: A Qualitative Analysis to Assess Measurable Elements

PURPOSE

Good communication and use of plain language in health care encounters improve outcomes, including emotional health, symptom resolution, and functional status. Yet there is limited research on how to measure and report spoken plain language, which is the use of familiar, clear language. The authors aimed to describe key, measurable elements of spoken plain language that can be assessed and reported back to clinicians for self-reflection.

METHOD

The authors conducted secondary analysis of transcripts from recorded encounters between breast cancer surgeons and patients with early-stage breast cancer. Two coders used a hybrid qualitative analysis with a framework based on U.S. Federal Plain Language Guidelines. To develop major themes, they examined (1) alignment with the Guidelines and (2) code frequencies within and across transcripts. They also noted minor themes.

RESULTS

From 74 transcripts featuring 13 surgeons, the authors identified 2 major themes representing measurable elements of spoken plain language: (1) clinicians had a propensity to use both explained and unexplained medical terms, and (2) clinicians delivered information using either short turns (one unit of someone speaking) with 1 topic or long turns with multiple topics. There were 3 minor themes that were not indicative of whether or not clinicians used spoken plain language. First, clinicians regularly used absolute risk communication techniques. Second, question-asking techniques varied and included open-ended, close-ended, and comprehension checks. Third, some clinicians used imagery to describe complex topics.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians' propensity to use medical terms with and without explanation and parse encounters into shorter or longer turns are measurable elements of spoken plain language. These findings will support further research on the development of a tool that can be used in medical education and other settings. This tool could provide direct and specific feedback to improve the plain language practices of clinicians in training and beyond.

A mobile app for chronic disease self-management for individuals with low health literacy: A multisite randomized controlled clinical trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a mobile app designed to improve chronic disease self-management in patients 40 years and older with low health literacy and who had at least one chronic health condition, and to assess the impact of delivering information at different levels of reading difficulty. A randomized controlled trial was completed at two sites. Individuals aged 40 years and older screened for low health literacy who had at least one chronic health condition were randomly assigned to a tailored information multimedia app with text at one of three grade levels. Four primary outcomes were assessed: patient activation, chronic disease self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, and medication adherence. All groups showed overall increases in activation, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, but no change in medication adherence. No between-group differences were observed. The mobile app may have been effective in increasing participants' levels of several psychosocial variables, but this interpretation can only be advanced tentatively in light of lack of control-experimental group differences. Reading difficulty level was not significantly related to outcomes.

The association between interactive health literacy and dietary behaviors among Chinese college students: a large-scale cross-sectional study

Background

The association between health literacy and healthy dietary behaviors has been explored in the European population. However, there is currently no evidence available specifically pertaining to Chinese college students particularly for interactive health literacy.

Aims

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between interactive health literacy (IHL) and dietary behaviors in Chinese college students.

Methods

This study included 11,856 Chinese college students (mean age = 18.8 years, SD = 1.2 years). We defined nine healthy dietary behaviors as consumption of water, egg, milk and milk products, vegetables, fruit, red meat, soy and soy products, seafood, and sugar-sweetened beverages. For each food group, participants who met the criterion for being a regular consumer of the item were assigned a score of 1, and otherwise were assigned a score of 0. Thus, the dietary behaviors score ranged from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating healthier dietary behaviors. We used the revised 28-item Chinese Adolescent Interactive Health Literacy Questionnaire (CAIHLQ) to evaluate IHL; a higher score on this scale indicates a greater health literacy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between IHL level and frequency of different numbers of dietary behaviors.

Results

After adjusting for sex, age, annual family income, place of residence, father's education level, and mother's education level, there was a clear and significant positive association between IHL and the likelihood of exhibiting diverse dietary behaviors. The adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of exhibiting given nine dietary behaviors with reference to tertile 1 according to categories of IHL was as follows: 1.055 (0.694, 1.603) for tertile 2 and 1.849 (1.269, 2.696) for tertile 3 (p for trend = 0.001). Similarly, there are significant positive associations between IHL and the likelihood of exhibiting 2-8 dietary behaviors, except for exhibiting any one dietary behavior. We further found that, in addition to the health awareness factor, there were significant positive associations between physical activity and nutrition factors, and healthier dietary behaviors. Further, there was a significant negative association between interpersonal relationships and dietary behavior.

Conclusion

The findings indicate a positive relationship between IHL and dietary behavior, such that the higher the level of IHL among college students, the healthier the dietary behavior they tend to adopt in their daily lives. These findings suggest the importance of developing stages of change-based educational interventions, which could help individuals with limited IHL to not only acquire necessary health-related knowledge but also to strengthen their motivation to engage in healthy dietary behaviors. Future studies should employ longitudinal prospective designs or randomized controlled trials to establish a causal association between IHL and healthy dietary behaviors.

Assessment of health literacy in a French emergency department

BACKGROUND

Health literacy (HL) has become a subject of major interest in public health worldwide. It is known to be linked to self-efficacy in care use and to global health status, and a non-negligible frequency of problematic or inadequate levels of HL in populations worldwide is reported. As this has yet to be evaluated in France, the present study aimed to evaluate the HL level of patients in a French emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional observational, single center study in the ED of the Lyon Sud hospital (Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France). The primary endpoint was the HL level of the patients determined according to the score obtained using the 16-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. The secondary endpoint was the identification of sociodemographic factors associated with the HL level.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included for analysis. 10% (95% CI [3%; 17%]) of the patients had an inadequate HL, 38% (95% CI [31%; 45%]) had a problematic HL, and 53% (95% CI [46%; 61%] had an adequate HL. In multivariate analysis, age and perceived health status were independent predictors of the HL level; OR =0.82 (95% CI [0.69; 0.97]; p=0.026) for a 10-year increase in age, and OR =1.84 (95% CI [1.22; 2.82]; p=0.004]).

CONCLUSIONS

The HL level of the patients in the ED studied herein was similar to that found in the population of France and other European countries and was influenced by age and perceived health status, which are both associated with care needs. It may be therefore interesting to explore in future studies how taking into consideration HL in the general population may lead to a better self-efficacy in care and optimize the use of the healthcare system.

Relationship between health literacy and health-related quality of life in Korean adults with chronic diseases

Inadequate health literacy is a risk factor for poor health outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). So far, the impact of health literacy on HRQoL has been examined for only a few chronic conditions. In this contribution, the relationship between health literacy and HRQoL in Korean adults with chronic conditions is examined using data of the cross-sectional Korea Health Panel Survey from 2021. Health literacy was measured with the 16-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) and HRQoL with the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression model was run for the EQ-5D index as the dependent variable. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented for responses to the individual EQ-5D items. 30.8%, 24.6%, and 44.6% of participants had inadequate, marginal, and adequate levels of health literacy, respectively. The EQ-5D index increases with marginal (B = 0.018, p<0.001) and adequate literacy (B = 0.017, p<0.001) compared to inadequate literacy. People with adequate or marginal literacy were more likely to report no problem with mobility (odds ration [OR] = 1.5; p<0.001), self-care (OR = 1.6; p<0.05), and usual activities (OR = 1.6 for adequate; OR = 1.4 for marginal; p<0.01) than those with inadequate literacy. Adequate health literacy was associated with an increased likelihood of having no problem with anxiety and depression (OR = 1.4; p<0.05). In conclusion, inadequate health literacy is prevalent among Korean adults with chronic diseases. Adequate health literacy is associated with better HRQoL and a protective factor for four dimensions of EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, usual activities, and anxiety/depression).

Patients' views on usefulness and effects of a risk communication tool for cardiovascular disease: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Failing to comprehend risk communication might contribute to poor treatment adherence. Using hypertension as a case, we investigated how a risk communication tool for patients with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease was perceived.

METHODS

As part of a large project featuring a randomised controlled trial in a general practice setting in the Region of Southern Denmark, we conducted a semi-structured individual interview study. The study included patients with hypertension who had used an intervention comprising a visual and dynamic cardiovascular risk communication tool, along with receiving recurring emails providing advice on a healthy lifestyle. The analyses were based on Malterud's Systematic Text Condensation.

RESULTS

This article focuses solely on the results of the interview study, which comprised a total of 9 conducted and analysed interviews. The IT setup had a major impact on adherence to the intervention. A positive impact was found when the IT setup was perceived as easy to use and accessible, while a negative impact was noted when it malfunctioned. The intervention increased patients' self-reported insight into risk of cardiovascular disease. Patients reported the intervention and their risk of cardiovascular disease to become less important to them when they had more severe comorbidities. The involved health professional was very important for treatment adherence when communicating risk visually. Patients expressed trust in their general practitioners, and the general practitioners' attitudes toward the intervention affected patients' perceptions of its usefulness. While the informants reported an increased awareness of their risk of cardiovascular disease, none of them felt more concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported an increase in their perceived insight into the risk of cardiovascular disease but not an increased concern. Our findings align with previous studies emphasizing the importance of patients' motivation as well as risk perception for adherence. General practitioners have an important role when implementing new tools for patients.

Comparing pain intensity rating scales in acute postoperative pain: boundary values and category disagreements

Pain intensity assessment scales are important in evaluating postoperative pain and guiding management. Different scales can be used for patients to self-report their pain, but research determining cut points between mild, moderate and severe pain has been limited to studies with < 1500 patients. We examined 13,017 simultaneous acute postoperative pain ratings from 913 patients taken at rest and on activity, between 4 h and 48 h following surgery using both a verbal rating scale (no, mild, moderate or severe pain) and 0-100 mm visual analogue scale. We determined the best cut points on the visual analogue scale between mild and moderate pain as 35 mm, and moderate and severe pain as 80 mm. These remained consistent for pain at rest and on activity, and over time. We also explored the presence of category disagreements, defined as patients verbally describing no or mild pain scored above the mild/moderate cut point on the visual analogue scale, and patients verbally describing moderate or severe pain scored below the mild/moderate cut point on the visual analogue scale. Using 30 and 60 mm cut points, 1533 observations (12%) showed a category disagreement and using 35 and 80 mm cut points, 1632 (13%) showed a category disagreement. Around 1 in 8 simultaneous pain scores implausibly disagreed, possibly resulting in incorrect pain reporting. The reasons are not known but low rates of literacy and numeracy may be contributing factors. Understanding these disagreements between pain scales is important for pain research and medical practice.

Quality of life among French breast cancer survivors in comparison with cancer-free women: the Seintinelles study

BACKGROUND

Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer survivors can be significantly affected in the long-term by various consequences resulting from differing levels of severity of cancer and its treatments. Our objective was to identify factors associated with HRQoL in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) and cancer-free women (CFWs).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in Seintinelles volunteers who answered online questionnaires between September 15, 2020 and February 5, 2021. HRQoL was measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire. We collected data on sociodemographic and health-related factors, lifestyle habits, coping mechanisms, locus of control, and health literacy. SAS version 9.4 statistical software was used for analyses. We performed descriptive analyses of the characteristics of the participants in each group and compared these characteristics between the two groups using the Chi2 test or the Student t-test. The adjusted means of the scores of different psychometric scales were calculated and compared using the method of least squares to fit general linear models (GLM) while adjusting for various factors. Multiple linear or multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated with WHOQOL-BREF scores, separately, in the two groups of participants.

RESULTS

The study involved 722 BCSs and 1359 CFWs aged 26-75 years. BCSs had significantly lower physical health scores and were less likely to be satisfied with their health compared to CFWs (59.5 vs. 63.2, p < 0.0001; and 56.5% vs. 75.2%, p = 0.002, respectively). In both groups, some common factors were positively associated with physical health (high financial level, being professionally active, normal BMI, good health status, alcohol consumption, higher values (> 22) of internal locus of control); or inversely associated (neurological and sleep problems, over two medical consultations/year). In BCSs, treatment by mastectomy or radiation therapy/brachytherapy, a short-time since diagnosis, current cancer therapy, and presence of sequalae were inversely associated with physical health. BCSs' health satisfaction was diminished with lower values of coping by positive thinking (≤ 14) and seeking social support (≤ 18).

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL can be improved by developing strategies that increase internal locus of control and coping (positive thinking, problem-solving and seeking social support), and through health literacy.

Global, regional and national trends in tuberculosis incidence and main risk factors: a study using data from 2000 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant progress over the years, Tuberculosis remains a major public health concern and a danger to global health. This study aimed to analyze the spatial and temporal characteristics of the incidence of tuberculosis and its risk factors and to predict future trends in the incidence of Tuberculosis.

METHODS

This study used secondary data on tuberculosis incidence and tuberculosis risk factor data from 209 countries and regions worldwide between 2000 and 2021 for analysis. Specifically, this study analyses the spatial autocorrelation of Tuberculosis incidence from 2000 to 2021 by calculating Moran's I and identified risk factors for Tuberculosis incidence by multiple stepwise linear regression analysis. We also used the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model to predict the trend of Tuberculosis incidence to 2030. This study used ArcGIS Pro, Geoda and R studio 4.2.2 for analysis.

RESULTS

The study found the global incidence of Tuberculosis and its spatial autocorrelation trends from 2000 to 2021 showed a general downward trend, but its spatial autocorrelation trends remained significant (Moran's I = 0.465, P < 0.001). The risk factors for Tuberculosis incidence are also geographically specific. Low literacy rate was identified as the most pervasive and profound risk factor for Tuberculosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the global spatial and temporal status of Tuberculosis incidence and risk factors. Although the incidence of Tuberculosis and Moran's Index of Tuberculosis are both declining, there are still differences in Tuberculosis risk factors across countries and regions. Even though literacy rate is the leading risk factor affecting the largest number of countries and regions, there are still many countries and regions where gender (male) is the leading risk factor. In addition, at the current rate of decline in Tuberculosis incidence, the World Health Organization's goal of ending the Tuberculosis pandemic by 2030 will be difficult to achieve. Targeted preventive interventions, such as health education and regular screening of Tuberculosis-prone populations are needed if we are to achieve the goal. The results of this study will help policymakers to identify high-risk groups based on differences in TB risk factors in different areas, rationalize the allocation of healthcare resources, and provide timely health education, so as to formulate more effective Tuberculosis prevention and control policies.

Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore

Background

Health literacy proficiency is essential for health care professionals to provide quality patient care. There is limited research exploring health literacy proficiency among undergraduate health science students.

Objectives

To determine health literacy among health science students in Singapore using the electronic Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).

Design

A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was conducted among undergraduate health science students.

Methodology

This study hypothesises that health literacy is influenced by gender, and it increases with the level of health science education, attributed to the increased exposure to the health care system and health care education as undergraduates progress through the years of study. Eligible students from the 4-year entry-level programmes of diagnostic radiography, dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, radiation therapy and speech and language therapy, aged from 21 to 50, were invited. Exclusion criteria were students who were no longer studying due to dropping out or having immediately graduated from these programmes and students in the accelerated programmes whose studies would be completed in less than 4 years.

Results

In total, 111 respondents (72 females and 37 males) completed surveys (response rate, 7.7%) returned from physiotherapy (n = 69), occupational therapy (n = 25), diagnostic radiography (n = 12) and dietetics (n = 5), with nil from radiation therapy and speech and language therapy. All participants were English literate. Female participants demonstrated higher HLQ with a mean total score of 30.67 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.61) versus male participants 29.83 (SD = 0.53). Year 2, 3 and 4 students generally scored higher than Year 1 across all nine HLQ scales. Overall, dietetics students had the highest total score on the HLQ, while the diagnostic radiography students had the lowest scores for all the nine HLQ scales.

Conclusion

This study established the health literacy level of health science students in Singapore. Gender and years of study influenced health literacy levels, supporting the hypothesis.

Correlation between Health and eHealth Literacy and a Healthy Lifestyle: A Cross-Sectional Study of Spanish Primary Healthcare Patients

BACKGROUND

Health literacy and eHealth literacy play a crucial role in improving a community's ability to take care of themselves, ultimately leading to a reduction in disparities in health. Embracing a healthy way of living is vital in lessening the impact of illnesses and extending one's lifespan. This research delves into the link between the health and eHealth literacy levels of individuals accessing primary healthcare services and investigates how this relates to adopting a health-conscious lifestyle.

METHODS

The approach involves a cross-sectional examination carried out at a healthcare facility in the Madrid region of Spain, focusing on adult patients who are in need of primary care nursing services. Health and eHealth literacy and a healthy lifestyle were measured using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), and the "PA100" questionnaire, respectively.

RESULTS

Only some of the dimensions of the HLQ and eHLQ were significantly related to a healthy lifestyle, predominantly with a very low or low relationship. Dimension three of the HLQ and dimension five of the eHLQ acquired more importance and were positioned as positive predictors of a healthy lifestyle.

CONCLUSIONS

This study helps comprehend the relationship between health and eHealth literacy and a healthy lifestyle, which provides information that contributes to understanding the factors that might have a higher impact on lifestyles.

Prevalence and determinants of health literacy among the adult population of Qatar

Introduction

Health literacy (HL) is both a direct determinant and a mediator of health outcomes. Research on the prevalence and determinants of HL in terms of its functional, communicative, and critical domains is scarce in the state of Qatar and its surrounding regions. Thus, this study aims to fill the knowledge gap in this area, estimate the levels of functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among the general adult population, and identify its determinants in the state of Qatar.

Methods

An analytical cross-sectional study with a disproportionate stratified random sampling technique was conducted in 2022. A representative sample of phone numbers was obtained from the Cerner database at Hamad Medical Corporation and approached via well-trained data collectors. A socio-demographic and health-relevant factor questionnaire and the validated All Aspects of Health Literacy scale (AAHLS) were used to collect the data on functional, communicative, and critical HL and their determinants. Descriptive analysis, independent sample t-test, ANOVA, and linear regression were used and yielded the outcomes on HL levels as low, adequate, and high in percentages and the HL determinants.

Results

A total of 770 participants were included. The study found that 41.5%, 29.3%, and 29.2% of them have adequate, high, and low overall HL levels consecutively. People who participated in the study are older adult, are of Arabic ethnicity, are of Qatari ethnicity, have a lower level of education, have close relatives with a lower level of education, have a lower income, are non-migrants, are not living within a family, sought medical care within the last week, and who do not know if they have a chronic disease or do not have lower overall HL levels compared to the other groups. After linear regression analysis, only the participant's level of education and "last time sought medical care within last week" variable predict the overall HL score.

Conclusion

Almost half of Qatar's adult population has an adequate HL level, comparable to the HL levels in other regions, despite the limitation in comparison due to variation in context and the HL measurement tools used. The possible determinants are amenable factors to focus on while designing HL interventions and providing healthcare.

Communication of benefits and harms in shared decision making with patients with limited health literacy: A systematic review of risk communication strategies

OBJECTIVES

Risk communication (RC), as part of shared decision making, is challenging with people with limited health literacy (LHL). We aim to provide an overview of strategies to communicate benefits and harms of diagnostic and treatment options to this group.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and PsycInfo. We included 28 studies on RC in informed/shared decision making without restriction to a health setting or condition and using a broad conceptualization of health literacy. Two researchers independently selected studies and one researcher performed data extraction. We descriptively compared findings for people with LHL towards recommendations for RC.

RESULTS

Health literacy levels varied in the included studies. Most studies used experimental designs, primarily on visual RC. Findings show verbal RC alone should be avoided. Framing of risk information influences risk perception (less risky when positively framed, riskier when negatively framed). Most studies recommended the use of icon arrays. Graph literacy should be considered when using visual RC.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited available evidence suggests that recommended RC strategies seem mainly to be valid for people with LHL, but more research is required.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

More qualitative research involving people with LHL is needed to gain further in-depth insights into optimal RC strategies.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID 275022.

Health behaviors according to the ability to understand health information in Korean adults

This study aimed to verify the relationship between the level of understanding of health information and health behaviors among Korean adults. In total, 228 984 adults who participated in the 2021 Korea Community Health Survey were included. Participants were divided into three groups according to age (19-44, 45-64 and 65+). The ability to understand verbal and written health information was included, and its association with health behaviors, including smoking, alcohol consumption and preventive health service uptake, was assessed. Associations between the ability to understand health information and health behaviors were analyzed using chi-squared tests and multiple logistic regression analyses. Approximately 22.7% and 20% of the participants responded that verbal and written health information were easy to understand, respectively, with significant differences by age group. Compared to those with easy-to-understand verbal health information, those with difficulty in understanding had a higher risk of current cigarette smoking and monthly drinking and were less likely to engage in more than moderate physical activity, walking, influenza vaccination in 1 year, cancer examination in 2 years and medical examination in 2 years. Difficulty in understanding or no interest in written health information was also associated with unhealthy behaviors. A strong ability to understand health information is related to positive health behaviors. However, there are differences in the associations by age group, which should be considered when establishing a health literacy improvement strategy. These findings could promote health literacy and ultimately contribute to helping individuals make better choices for positive health behaviors.

Pharmacotherapy literacy level and predictors of low literacy among diabetes mellitus type 2 patients in Serbia

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy literacy (PTHL) is a specific ability to safely access, appraise and understand the available information concerning medication and to calculate and act accordingly. The concept of PTHL is mostly unknown for the majority of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DMT2) patients in Serbia. With diabetes being one of the major public health problems in Serbia with a prevalence of 9.1%, this two-study research aims at constructing performance-based instrument and estimating the prevalence of PTHL levels and identification of predictors of low PTHL scores in patients with DMT2.

METHODS

Multistage study was performed to adapt the existing performance-based instrument (PTHL-SR) into specific questionnaire for DMT2 population (PTHL-DM instrument). PTHL levels were assessed through cross-sectional study categorising patients into groups of low, medium, and high PTHL levels. We considered 19 predictors for low PTHL scores, from sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviours and health characteristics, access to health-related information and empowerment-related indicators. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent predictors of low PTHL.

RESULTS

The final 15-item PTHL-DM instrument proved to have satisfactory reliability (KR20 = 0.475) and internal reliability [ICC for the whole instrument was 0.97 with 95% confidence intervals (0.95-0.99)]. Positive correlation (rho = 0.69) between PTHL-DM score (15 questions) and the total PTHL-SR score (14 questions) was also observed. It was demonstrated that the majority of 350 patients had low PTHL (62%), and only 5% high PTHL level. Mean score on PTHL-DM was 7.8 ± 2.3. Probability of low PTHL increased among smokers, patients with low interest in health and those who estimated their health as bad. Patients who used pharmacists as sourse of information were less likely to be pharmacotherapy illiterate. Combined therapy with insulin and Oral Hypoglycemic Agents was associated with higher PTHL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that specific PTHL-DM tool is objective, valid, and reliable. It was found that low level of PTHL prevailed among DMT2 patients. Medication literacy is influenced by age, residence, education, and family status. Patients with better health literacy also reported better health behaviours. Different patient empowerment programs and approaches aimed at raising PTHL would be essential to improve self-management and control of this widespread chronic disease in Serbia.

How can care managers strengthen health literacy among patients with common mental disorders? A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In order for persons with mental illness to be able to promote and preserve their health, sufficient knowledge about health is required. An effective means to improve the health of the patients is to strengthen their health literacy. The aim of this study was to explore how care managers work with health literacy in patients with common mental disorders to help them to better understand and manage their illness.

METHOD

A qualitative study was conducted, using written reports from 25 care managers regarding meetings with patients with common mental disorders in the primary care in a Swedish region. The care managers' reports were coded based on Sörensen's four dimensions for the domain "health care" and analysed deductively through systematic text condensation according to Malterud.

RESULTS

The care managers described how they worked strategically and continuously with follow-up and wanted to be responsive to the patients' stories. They confirmed the patients' feelings with the goal of creating increased interaction, thereby involving the patients in their own care. The care managers also worked actively to provide well-balanced care at an early stage. Using various tools such as self-assessment instruments, the care manager started from the patient's basic problem, gave support and discussed strategies based on the patient's condition and situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The care managers used multifaceted health literacy interventions. They worked in a person-centred, strategic and encouraging manner based on the patient's unique conditions, where sensitivity and adapted information were important aspects. The aim of the interventions was for the patients to become knowledgeable, gain new insights and work independently with their own health.

Validity and reliability of the swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires

BACKGROUND

Health Literacy is a crucial factor for health. In Europe, many people have limited health literacy (i.e. difficulties with accessing, understanding, appraising and using health information). This study aimed to evaluate the psychometrics of the Swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6, instruments that aims to assess health literacy.

METHODS

In this prospective psychometric study convenience sampling was used, which gave a study population of 347 Swedish-speaking adults. The psychometric evaluation included item distributional statistics, construct validity testing, and principal component analysis to assess structural validity. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was also investigated.

RESULTS

For the Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q16, no floor effects were detected but a ceiling effect was noted among 28% of the respondents. Construct validity was supported as four out of five expected correlations was confirmed (educational level, self-perceived health, electronic health literacy and HLS-EU-Q6). In terms of structural validity, the principal component analysis yielded a four-factor structure with most items loading significantly only to one factor. The Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q16 had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89, split-half reliability = 0.93) and test-retest reliability showed stability over time (Cohen's κ = 0.822). For the Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q6, neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed. Construct validity was supported as HLS-EU-Q6 correlated as our a priori stated hypothesis. The principal component analysis did not support the unidimensionality of the scale as a two-factor structure was identified. The Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q6 had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.77, split-half reliability = 0.80) and test-retest reliability showed stability over time (Cohen's κ = 0.812). According to the Swedish version of the HLS-EU-Q16, 71% of the participants were classified as having sufficient comprehensive health knowledge (CHL), while only 33% were classified as having this when the HLS-EU-Q6 was used.

CONCLUSIONS

The Swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 have acceptable psychometric properties, and based on the results we recommend its use to measure CHL. However, we are hesitant to use Sw-HLS-EU-Q6 in estimating different CHL levels and further studies need to be conducted to establish validity and accuracy of the thresholds of HLS-EU-Q6.

Relationships between stroke prevalence, health literacy, and oral health-related quality of life in middle-aged and older adults: a national survey study

BACKGROUND

Stroke may cause debilitating neurological deficiencies that result in motor, sensory, and cognitive deficits and poorer psychosocial functioning. Prior studies have provided some initial evidence for the significant roles of health literacy and poor oral health for old people. However, few studies have focused on the health literacy of individuals who had a stroke; therefore, the relationships between the health literacy and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among middle-aged and older adults who had a stroke are unknown. We aimed to assess the relationships between stroke prevalence, health literacy status, and OHRQoL in middle-aged and older adults.

METHODS

We retrieved the data from The Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging, a population-based survey. For each eligible subject, we gathered data in 2015 on age, sex, level of education, marital status, health literacy, the activity daily living (ADL), stroke history and OHRQoL. We evaluated the respondents' health literacy by using a nine-item health literacy scale and categorized their health literacy level as low, medium, or high. OHRQoL was identified based on the Taiwan version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-7T).

RESULTS

The final study contained 7702 community-based dwelling elderly people (3630 male and 4072 female) were analysis in our study. Stroke history was reported in 4.3% of participants, 25.3% reported low health literacy, and 41.9% had at least one ADL disability. Furthermore, 11.3% of participants had depression, 8.3% had cognitive impairment, and 3.4% had poor OHRQoL. Age, health literacy, ADL disability, stroke history, and depression status were significantly associated with poor OHRQoL after sex and marital status was adjusted. Medium (odds ratio [OR] = 1.784, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.177, 2.702) to low health literacy (OR = 2.496, 95% CI = 1.628, 3.828) was significantly associated with poor OHRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Base our study results, people with stroke history had poor OHRQoL. Lower health literacy and ADL disability were associated with worse QHRQoL. Further studies are necessary to define practical strategies for reducing the risk of stroke and oral health with constantly lower health literacy, thereby improving the quality of life and providing health care of older people.

A mobile app for chronic disease self-management for individuals with low health literacy: A multisite randomized controlled clinical trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a mobile app designed to improve chronic disease self-management in older adult patients with low health literacy and who had at least one chronic health condition, and to assess the impact of delivering information at different levels of reading difficulty.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was completed at two sites. Individuals 40 years of age and older screened for low health literacy who had at least one chronic health condition were randomly assigned to a tailored information multimedia app with text at one of three grade levels. Four primary outcomes were assessed: patient activation, chronic disease self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, and medication adherence.

Results

All groups showed overall increases in activation, self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, but no change in medication adherence. No between-group differences were observed.

Conclusions

The mobile app was effective in increasing participants' levels of several psychosocial variables, but reading difficulty level was not significantly related to outcomes.Registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT02922439.

Associations between Health Literacy, Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Case of Hong Kong

This study investigates how health literacy (HL) and trust in health information affected COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Chinese Hong Kong adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted in August 2022. A total of 401 participants completed the study. Participants completed a newly developed Hong Kong HL scale and self-reported their trust levels in health information from different resources. The proportions of early uptake of the first dose and booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine were 69.1% and 71.8%, respectively. The risk of delaying the first dose was higher among participants with inadequate functional HL (OR = 0.58, p = 0.015), adequate levels of two subdomains of critical HL (OR = 1.82, p = 0.013; OR = 1.91, p < 0.01), and low-level trust in health information from the government (OR = 0.57, p = 0.019). Respondents with adequate interactive HL (OR = 0.52, p = 0.014) and inadequate level of one subdomain of critical HL (OR =1.71, p = 0.039) were more likely to delay the booster dose. This negative association between critical HL and vaccination was suppressed by trust in health information from the government. This study shows that HL and trust in health information from the government are associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Efforts should be directed at providing tailored communication strategies with regard to people’s HL and increasing public confidence in health authorities to decrease vaccine hesitancy.

Case management and care expertise as a prevention approach for adults with intellectual disabilities (FaPP-MgB): study protocol for a randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adults with intellectual disabilities have a higher prevalence of unhealthy eating habits, stress, low levels of mobility, and comparable drug consumption as the general population. Consequently, they suffer from several chronic diseases earlier and more often, but there are fewer prevention and health promotion services including this population. The goal of this study is to determine if an advanced practice nursing approach in the community with home visits is an effective way to improve the health status of adults with intellectual disabilities.

METHODS

We will conduct a randomized-controlled trial with waiting list design in Hamburg, Germany. Inclusion criteria are diagnosis ICD F70-F79 and exclusion criteria are care level > 3 according to the German Social Code XI or being at the end-of-life. Participants will be block randomized. The intervention consists of advanced practice nurses performing case management, social space analysis, prevention planning, and counseling through four outreach home visits on nutrition, mobility, addiction, and stress. Comparison is usual care. The primary outcome is health status (WHODAS) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and resilience (RS-11) after 6 and 12 months. The calculated sample size is 256 with an estimated dropout of 30%. Raters and analysts will be blinded. Analysis will be performed using ANCOVAs.

DISCUSSION

By providing case management and utilizing their nursing expertise, advanced practice nurses will provide valuable input and guidance on prevention and health promotion for people with intellectual disabilities. They will close the gap between health and social care, which is prominent in Germany, through cooperation between the existing care sectors. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00028771 , registered 4 July 2022, Universal Trial Number: U1111-1277-0595.

Developing a Health Literacy Scale for adults in Hong Kong: A modified e-Delphi study with healthcare consumers and providers

INTRODUCTION

Health literacy (HL) refers to individuals' abilities to process and use health information to promote health. This study aimed to develop the first HL measurement tool for the Chinese Hong Kong population.

METHODS

A two-phase methodology was adopted. In Phase I, evidence synthesis with a deductive method was conducted to formulate the item list from the literature. In Phase II, a modified e-Delphi survey was conducted among stakeholders (i.e., healthcare providers and healthcare consumers) to confirm the content validity of the item list. The stakeholders were invited to rate the relevance of each draft item on a 4-point scale and provide suggestions for revisions, removal or adding new items.

RESULTS

In Phase I, a total of 34 items covering functional, interactive and critical HL were generated. In Phase II, to obtain a balanced view from experts and laypeople, healthcare professionals (n = 12) and consumers (n = 12) were invited to participate in the Delphi panel. The response rates of the three rounds were 100%. After the third round, the consensus was reached for 31 items, and no further comments for adding or revising items were received. All items exhibited excellent content validity (item content validity index: 0.79-1.00; K*: 0.74-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

A Health Literacy Scale for Hong Kong was developed. Compared with existing HL scales, the scale fully operationalized the skills involved in functional, interactive and critical HL. The Delphi study shows evidence supporting the high content validity of all items in the scale. In future studies, these items should undergo rigorous testing to examine their psychometric properties in our target population groups. By illuminating the details in the development process, this paper provides a deeper understanding of the scale's scope and limitations for others who are interested in using this tool.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Public as healthcare consumers, in addition to healthcare providers, were involved in developing a new HL scale for this study. The input from the public contributed to examining the scale's content validity by judging whether all items reflected the skills that they need to find and use health-related information in their daily life.