What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis

Extended oral antibiotics in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: An update

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a significant healthcare and economic burden after joint replacement surgery. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) has been highlighted as a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective measure to mitigate the risk of infection against the increasing demands for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Several studies have demonstrated substantial reductions in PJI rates, particularly among high-risk populations receiving a 7-day course of antibiotics, mainly with use of cefadroxil. Conversely, other studies have found no significant differences or even increased infection rates, highlighting concerns over antimicrobial resistance, Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), and other antibiotic-related adverse events. Additionally, recent trends show a substantial rise in EOAP utilization across the United States, demonstrating need for clear and evidence-based guidelines. There is a need for high quality randomized controlled trials to help identify optimal patient selection criteria, antibiotic type, and duration to effectively balance the benefits of EOAP against potential risks. Although there is limited evidence of significant antibiotic associated complications with the use of EOAP, care should be utilized prior to widespread adoption with antibiotic stewardship in mind.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Centers of Excellence: Moonshot or Misstep? A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Members

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) centers of excellence (COEs) have been discussed as an innovative model to improve health care quality and value in treating PJI. A national network of regional PJI centers may have the ability to improve patient outcomes, standardize treatment protocols, accelerate research, and provide economies of scale while caring for this patient population with complex needs. This study surveyed perceptions toward establishing a PJI COE among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS).

METHODS

A 16-question survey was approved by the AAHKS Advocacy Committee and distributed to all 2,529 fellow-level members of AAHKS. Study results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. There were 626 survey responses (24.8% response rate).

RESULTS

More than two-thirds of survey participants (69%) reported that they would consider participation in some form of PJI COE. Most surgeons believe managing PJI is a cost to their hospital system. The top concern among respondents was that PJI COE may become a "dumping ground" for inappropriate referrals. Participants reported financial concerns regarding the possibility that establishing such a program may trigger a reevaluation of reimbursement for primary total joint arthroplasty procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Although primary total joint arthroplasty is a target of national health care cost containment efforts, PJI is yet to be addressed. This gives AAHKS the opportunity to prospectively advocate for reform. A PJI COE designed to perform a high volume of infection revision procedures may be advantageous in providing the specialized and longitudinal care required by PJI patients. The AAHKS surgeons expressed interest and reservations in the establishment of PJI COEs that can inform future policy.

The health-economic burden of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections in Europe : a comprehensive analysis following primary arthroplasty

Aims

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose significant challenges to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. The aim of this study was to estimate the health-economic burden of reimbursement payment in Europe for PJIs following primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Methods

The calculation was based on health-economic modelling using data on primary hip and knee arthroplasties for the year 2019 from the Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) and published infection rates to estimate the total number of hip and knee PJIs in 30 European countries. Revision procedures were stratified into: 1) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR); 2) one-stage exchange; and 3) two-stage revision procedures. The cases were then multiplied by the respective healthcare system reimbursement payments. Payment data were acquired from a survey of 13 countries (Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey, and the UK) and extrapolated for the remaining countries.

Results

In 2019, a total of 2,048,778 primary total joint replacements were performed (total hip arthroplasty (THA) = 1,147,316 and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) = 901,462), with an estimated 20,416 cases of PJIs (11,131 hip and 9,285 knee) in Europe. This results in an estimated total reimbursement burden of €346,262,026 for European healthcare systems. The breakdown for hip PJI reimbursement was €197,230,953 (€9,751,962 for DAIR procedures, €45,135,894 for one-stage revisions, and €142,343,097 for two-stage revisions). For knee PJIs, the analysis yielded a total reimbursement of €149,031,073 (€9,335,075 for DAIR procedures, €48,058,479 for one-stage revisions, and €91,637,518 for two-stage revisions).

Conclusion

This is the first study to evaluate the health-economic burden of PJIs in Europe, revealing a substantial impact on healthcare systems with an estimated case load of 20,414 cases and overall reimbursement of €346,262,026 for primary THAs and TKAs performed in 2019.

Hospital Financial Burden of Surgical Procedures for Periprosthetic Total Hip Arthroplasty Infection

Background

For reimbursement purposes, current coding fails to reflect the true complexity and resource utilization of hospital encounters for surgeries performed to treat periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection. Therefore, when compared to aseptic revisions, we sought to determine (1) Is length of stay (LOS) longer for septic surgeries? (2) Are septic procedures more expensive? and (3) How do different surgical procedures for infection compare with aseptic revisions on hospital LOS and charges?

Methods

Retrospective chart review of 596 unilateral THA reoperations (473 patients) performed at a single institution (January 2015 to November 2020). Demographics, professional (ie, physicians), and technical (ie, room, implants) hospital charges per case were compared between 6 different surgery types: (1) aseptic revision (control; n = 364); (2) debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (n = 11); (3) explantation (n = 145); (4) spacer exchange (n = 7); (5) 2-stage reimplantation (n = 59); and (6) 1-stage reimplantation (n = 10).

Results

Overall, septic surgeries (n = 232) had longer LOS (mean 6.3 vs 3.3 days, P < .001) and 43% higher total charges (P < .001), vs aseptic revisions. Particularly, explantations had longer LOS (7.1 vs 3.3 days) and 56% higher total charges (both P < .001). When compared to aseptic revisions, proportional total charges for septic procedures were debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention +29%, P = .4; explantation +56%, P < .001; spacer exchange +69%, P = .008; 2-stage reimplantation +11%, P = .659; and 1-stage reimplantation +46%, P = .06.

Conclusions

Some surgical procedures performed to treat periprosthetic THA infection are associated with longer LOS and significantly higher hospital charges when compared to aseptic revisions. Reimbursement adjustment is needed as current coding for septic reoperations does not reflect actual hospital resource consumption and this situation may limit access to patient care.

Cost Effectiveness of Fixation Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Predictive Markov Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) have been historically managed with revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has been proposed as an alternative option for reasons including lower cost and surgical time. The purpose of this study was to, therefore, create a Markov model to assess the cost effectiveness of ORIF versus rTHA for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures and evaluate various inflection points for varying costs and outcome measures.

METHODS

A Markov model was built using discrete and mutually exclusive health states of the hypothetical patient with Vancouver B2 PPF. A decision tree was created on possible outcomes for each health state, using probabilities defined in the recent PPF literature. Direct costs and quality-adjusted life-years for each surgery and complication state were also collected. One-way and two-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to better understand the effect of 1 to 2 variables on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

The hypothetical patient with a Vancouver B2 PPF that was treated with rTHA incurred a cost of $52,559.64 with an effectiveness of 0.71. When treated with ORIF, the cost was $47,371.97 with an effectiveness of 0.38. The incremental cost and effectiveness of rTHA over ORIF were found to be $5,187.67 and 0.33, respectively. The cost of rTHA, the cost of ORIF, and the effectiveness of ORIF were the most influential variables in the model. On two-way sensitivity analysis, rTHA was more cost effective than ORIF within realistic healthcare parameters.

DISCUSSION

From the payer perspective, we estimate that rTHA is more cost effective than ORIF for the treatment of Vancouver B2 PPFs within certain cost and quality-of-life parameters.

Comorbidities in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: When Is It Okay to Say No?

Preoperative optimization of modifiable risk factors for total hip and knee arthroplasty remains a foundational cornerstone in reducing postoperative complications and enhancing patient outcomes. With an increasing prevalence of high-risk comorbidities among total joint arthroplasty patients with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2), uncontrolled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7.5%), and active smoking and tobacco use, many joint arthroplasty surgeons face complex ethical decisions when surgical intervention poses a higher risk for potential harm. Creating definitive numerical cutoffs may lead to access-to-care issues with a difficult balance between helping and harming patients.

Regional Periprosthetic Joint Infection Centers: The Time Has Come for a Paradigm Change in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a rare, yet devastating complication with high mortality rates, unpredictable treatment outcomes, and high costs. The purpose of this study was to determine 90-day and 1-year mortality rates at a specialized PJI center, assess the impact of delayed referral to a PJI center on outcomes, and determine the cost of PJI treatment prior to referral to a PJI center.

METHODS

A review of our institution's PJI registry was performed to identify patients who had a chronic PJI treated with a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty at our PJI Center from 2017 to 2021. Patients not referred from an external location were excluded. Mortality at 90 days and 1 year was collected. The date of infection diagnosis until the date of referral was recorded. Outcomes were documented as failure of treatment at the final clinical follow-up. The number and type of prior infection treatments were documented for each patient. The estimated cost was calculated using established PJI literature.

RESULTS

There were 172 patients (182 joints) who met inclusion criteria during this timeframe. The 90-day and 1-year mortality rates were 0 and 3.9%, respectively. There was a higher failure rate in patients referred >90 days after the diagnosis of chronic PJI (23 versus 11%, P = 0.031). The total cost of PJI treatment prior to referral for this group of patients was $6.9 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a specialized PJI referral center leads to lower mortality rates, improved outcomes, and decreased cost for the health-care system.

Main Operating Room Versus Field Sterility in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Evidence

Introduction: Many of the guidelines that are generally accepted as main operating room best practices are not evidence based. They are based on the concept that if some sterility is good, more must be better. They are not derived from evidence-based sterility. Evidence-based sterility is the study of which of our various sterility practices increase or decrease our infection rates, as opposed to guidelines based on how many bacteria are in the operating room. Methods: This article adds the most important evidence we could find that is not included in the first paper on evidence-based sterility in hand surgery published in 2019. In this review, we also balance the evidence with common sense opinion. Results: The 21st century has seen a rapid rise in the number and reports of hand surgery procedures performed with field sterility outside the main operating room. There is now an abundance of good evidence to support that the rate of infection is not higher when many hand operations are performed with field sterility in minor procedure rooms. Conclusion: Moving hand surgery out of the main operating room to minor procedure rooms should be supported by healthcare providers. The higher cost, increased solid waste, and inconvenience of main operating room surgery are not justifiable for many procedures because it does not reduce the risk of postoperative infection.

The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems

Objectives

To assess the effect of adjuvant antibiotic-loaded hydrogel application on the primary stability of implanted uncemented hip stems.

Design

Biomechanical study.

Setting

An electro-mechanic material test system (#5866, Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) equipped with a 10-kN load cell was used. A staircase loading protocol was applied via quasi-static ramped compression loading at 0.005 mm/s and six different load levels between 500 N and 3000 N in 500 N intermittent load increase steps.

Participants

12 artificial femora were prepared and received a collarless uncemented standard offset stem (Corail; DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland).

Interventions

The two groups were prepared with or without the antibiotic-loaded hydrogel.

Main outcome measures

Construct stiffness was determined from the recorded load-displacement curves and stem subsidence was measured via motion tracking.

Results

Construct stiffness (control: 4176±240 N/mm; intervention: 4588±448 N/mm) was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.076). Stem subsidence increased significantly over the increasing load levels in each separate group (p≤0.002) and remained not significantly different between the groups (p=0.609).

Conclusions

The application of antibiotic-loaded hydrogel was associated with non-inferior performance in terms of primary uncemented hip stem stability. This finding makes the prospect of adjuvant antibiotic-loaded hydrogel application potentially feasible; however, it requires further investigations prior to translation in the clinical practice.

Estimation of two-year hospital costs of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection treatments using activity-based costing

Aims

Our aim was to estimate the total costs of all hospitalizations for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) by main management strategy within 24 months post-diagnosis using activity-based costing. Additionally, we investigated the influence of individual PJI treatment pathways on hospital costs within the first 24 months.

Methods

Using admission and procedure data from a prospective observational cohort in Australia and New Zealand, Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups were assigned to each admitted patient episode of care for activity-based costing estimates of 273 hip PJI patients and 377 knee PJI patients. Costs were aggregated at 24 months post-diagnosis, and are presented in Australian dollars.

Results

The mean cost per hip and knee PJI patient was $64,585 (SD $53,550). Single-stage revision mean costs were $67,029 (SD $47,116) and $80,063 (SD $42,438) for hip and knee, respectively. Two-stage revision costs were $113,226 (SD $66,724) and $122,425 (SD $60,874) for hip and knee, respectively. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in hips and knees mean costs were $53,537 (SD$ 39,342) and $48,463 (SD $33,179), respectively. Suppressive antibiotic therapy without surgical management mean costs were $20,296 (SD $8,875) for hip patients and $16,481 (SD $6,712) for knee patients. Hip patients had 16 different treatment pathways and knee patients had 18 treatment pathways. Additional treatment, episodes of care, and length of stay contributed to substantially increased costs up to a maximum of $369,948.

Conclusion

Treating PJI incurs a substantial cost burden, which is substantially influenced by management strategy. With an annual PJI incidence of 3,900, the cost burden would be in excess of $250 million to the Australian healthcare system. Treatment pathways with additional surgery, more episodes of care, and a longer length of stay substantially increase the associated hospital costs. Prospectively monitoring individual patient treatment pathways beyond initial management is important when quantifying PJI treatment cost. Our study highlights the importance of optimizing initial surgical treatment, and informs treating hospitals of the resources required to provide care for PJI patients.

Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, the benefit of EAP remains controversial. For this investigation, both oral and intravenous antibiotic protocols were included in the EAP group.

METHODS

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Ovid Embase, Elton B. Stephens CO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were queried for literature comparing outcomes of primary and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who were treated with either ≤24 hours of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (standard of care [SoC]) or >24 hours of EAP. The primary outcome was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A pooled relative-risk random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was implemented to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 18 studies with a total of 19,153 patients included. There was considerable variation in antibiotic prophylaxis protocols with first-generation cephalosporins being the most commonly implemented antibiotic for both groups. Patients treated with EAP were 35% less likely to develop PJI relative to the SoC (P = .0004). When examining primary TJA, patients treated with EAP were 39% and 40% less likely to develop a PJI for TJA (P = .0008) and THA (P = .02), respectively. There was no significant difference for primary TKA (P = .17). When examining aseptic revision TJA, EAP led to a 36% and 47% reduction in the probability of a PJI for aseptic revision TJA (P = .007) and aseptic revision TKA (P = .008), respectively; there was no observed benefit for aseptic revision THA (P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that patients treated with EAP were less likely to develop a PJI relative to those treated with the SoC for all TJA, primary TJA, primary THA, aseptic revision TJA, and aseptic revision TKA. There was no significant difference observed between EAP and SoC for primary TKA or aseptic revision THA.

What Is the True Impact of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis on Mortality?

BACKGROUND

Mortality is a quality indicator that may affect expenditures. Revisions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are, on average, more expensive and exhibit higher morbidity than aseptic revisions, although reimbursement is similar. Therefore, we sought to determine (1) impact on mortality rates of revision total hip and/or knee arthroplasty performed for PJI diagnosis (septic) versus aseptic revisions, at any point in time, and (2) mortality predictors among PJI patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 978 consecutive patients who underwent revision at a single institution (January 2015 to November 2020). All revisions were evaluated, and it was determined whether patients had a revision for PJI at any point in time or not. Two groups were compared: (1) patients with septic revision(s) (n = 350) and (2) patients who only underwent aseptic revision(s) (n = 628). Demographics and mortality status at latest follow-up (mean 3 years, range: 0 to 18 years, from first revision ever) were assessed. Mortality status was also separately assessed among patients who exclusively had hip revision(s), or solely knee revision(s), or both. Multivariate regression analysis (Cox) was used to determine whether PJI diagnosis was an independent mortality predictor. Among PJI patients, potential mortality predictors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 65 patients died (6.6%). The septic cohort had significantly more men and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class-IV patients. Mortality rates were 10.9% and 4.3% (P < .0001) for septic and aseptic revision groups, respectively. After controlling for sex, ASA, and number of revisions, PJI diagnosis was a significant mortality predictor (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 4.7, P = .001). Among PJI patients, age (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.08, P = .009) and ASA (HR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.67 to 9.67, P = .002) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a revision due to PJI diagnosis was associated with 2.5 times increased mortality. Therefore, more accurate coding capturing the complexity and morbidity of revisions for PJI diagnosis is needed.

Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip

Aims

The number of revision arthroplasties being performed in the elderly is expected to rise, including revision for infection. The primary aim of this study was to measure the treatment success rate for octogenarians undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to a younger cohort. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality.

Methods

Patients undergoing one- or two-stage revision of a primary THA for PJI between January 2008 and January 2021 were identified. Age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), McPherson systemic host grade, and causative organism were collated for all patients. PJI was classified as 'confirmed', 'likely', or 'unlikely' according to the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria. Primary outcomes were complications, reoperation, re-revision, and successful treatment of PJI. A total of 37 patients aged 80 years or older and 120 patients aged under 80 years were identified. The octogenarian group had a significantly lower BMI and significantly higher CCI and McPherson systemic host grades compared to the younger cohort.

Results

The majority of patients were planned to undergo two-stage revision, although a significantly higher proportion of the octogenarians did not proceed with the second stage (38.7% (n = 12) vs 14.8% (n = 16); p = 0.003). Although there was some evidence of a lower complication rate in the younger cohort, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.065). No significant difference in reoperation (21.6% (n = 8) vs 25.0% (n = 30); p = 0.675) or re-revision rate (8.1% (n = 3) vs 16.7% (n = 20); p = 0.288) was identified between the groups. There was no difference in treatment success between groups (octogenarian 89.2% (n = 33) vs control 82.5% (n = 99); p = 0.444).

Conclusion

When compared to a younger cohort, octogenarians did not show a significant difference in complication, re-revision, or treatment success rates. However, given they are less likely to be eligible to proceed with second stage revision, consideration should be given to either single-stage revision or use of an articulated spacer to maximize functional outcomes.

Antibiotic-Loaded Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylenes

The occurrence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after total joint replacement constitutes a great burden for the patients and the healthcare system. Antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is often used in temporary spacers during antibiotic treatment. PMMA is not a load-bearing solution and needs to be replaced by a functional implant. Elution from the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) bearing surface for drug delivery can combine functionality with the release of clinically relevant doses of antibiotics. In this study, the feasibility of incorporating a range of antibiotics into UHMWPE is investigated. Drug stability is assessed by thermo-gravimetric analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Drug-loaded UHMWPEs are prepared by compression molding, using eight antibiotics at different loading. The predicted intra-articular concentrations of drugs eluted from UHMWPE are above minimum inhibitory concentration for at least 3 weeks against Staphylococci, which are the major causative bacteria for PJI. The antibacterial efficacy is confirmed for samples covering 2% of a representative knee implant in vitro over 72 h, showing that a small fraction of the implant surface loaded with antibiotics may be sufficient against Staphylococci.

Current Concepts on the Clinical and Economic Impact of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a common procedure performed throughout the entire world in hopes of alleviating debilitating hip or knee pain. The projected number of TJAs performed in the United States alone is projected to exceed 1.9 million by 2030 and 5 million by 2040. With the significant increase in TJA performed, more periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are likely to be encountered. PJIs are a devastating complication of TJA. The economic and clinical burden must be understood and respected to minimize occurrence and allow optimal patient outcomes.

Bacteria Living in Biofilms in Fluids: Could Chemical Antibiofilm Pretreatment of Culture Represent a Paradigm Shift in Diagnostics?

Biofilms are multicellular aggregates of bacteria immersed in an extracellular matrix that forms on various surfaces, including biological tissues and artificial surfaces. However, more and more reports point out the fact that even biological fluids and semifluid, such as synovial liquid, blood, urine, or mucus and feces, harbor "non-attached" biofilm aggregates of bacteria, which represent a significant phenomenon with critical clinical implications that remain to be fully investigated. In particular, biofilm aggregates in biological fluid samples have been shown to play a relevant role in bacterial count and in the overall accuracy of microbiological diagnosis. In line with these observations, the introduction in the clinical setting of fluid sample pretreatment with an antibiofilm chemical compound called dithiothreitol (DTT), which is able to dislodge microorganisms from their intercellular matrix without killing them, would effectively improve the microbiological yield and increase the sensitivity of cultural examination, compared to the current microbiological techniques. While other ongoing research continues to unveil the complexity of biofilm formation in biological fluids and its impact on infection pathogenesis and diagnosis, we here hypothesize that the routine use of a chemical antibiofilm pretreatment of fluid and semi-solid samples may lead to a paradigm shift in the microbiological approach to the diagnosis of biofilm-related infections and should be further investigated and eventually implemented in the clinical setting.

Dual Surgical Setup Associated with Reduced Infection Recurrence for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty After Two-Stage Exchange

INTRODUCTION

Two-stage exchange (TSE) is the gold standard for the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee in the United States. Failure of treatment can have devastating consequences for the patient, including poor functional outcomes, multiple further surgeries, and increased mortality. Several factors associated with infection recurrence have previously been identified in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a dual surgical setup was associated with reduced risk of recurrence after TSE for PJI.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between January 2000 and December 2021 to isolate patients who underwent TSE after total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Failure was defined as infection recurrence requiring surgical intervention. Demographic factors (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists status), preoperative comorbidities (hypertension, cardiac disease, diabetes status, depression diagnosis, pulmonary disease), operating surgeon, single versus dual setup, hospital setting, use of long-term antibiotics postoperatively after TSE, aspiration data, and infecting organism were compared between cohorts using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were identified who underwent TSE after diagnosis of PJI. The mean follow-up was 67.84 (range, 13 to 236) months. Dual setup (odds ratio, 0.13; confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.52; P = 0.0122) was found to be an independent predictive variable associated with a lower risk of infection recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of a dual surgical setup is a low-cost modifiable risk factor associated with a lower risk of recurrence of after TSE of the hip and knee for PJI.

A Pilot Study Using a Standardized Method of Measuring Distress Demonstrates Higher Levels in Septic Revisions

Background

Combined Orthopaedic Infectious Disease Clinics facilitate care for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients similar to multidisciplinary care in cancer centers. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network developed a standardized distress thermometer (DT) to measure distress in cancer patients. We propose using this tool to assess distress in PJI patients.

Methods

In this pilot study, a retrospective review of patients treated in our combined clinic over 2 years was conducted. In addition to providing information surrounding their treatment, patients completed a questionnaire and DT, adapted with permission from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. DT scores were compared to a chronologically collected matched aseptic control group.

Results

There were 122 patients in the septic group and 40 patients in the aseptic group. On a scale of 0-10 (10, the highest level of distress), the septic group reported a mean DT score of 6.18 (±3.2), which was significantly higher than the aseptic mean score of 3.33 (±2.06) [P < .0001]. Over 75% of patients in the septic group reported a DT score ≥4, the cutoff used in most cancer centers to warrant additional support. Twenty-one percent of the septic group (26/122) reported extreme distress (defined as a score ≥10) compared to 0/40 of aseptic patients.

Conclusions

Patients treated for PJI experience significantly higher levels of distress compared to aseptic revision patients. More attention is needed to measure and clinically address distress. Improved screening for distress would allow us to provide more comprehensive care and possibly improve compliance, outcomes, and resources available for the treatment of PJI patients.

Frequent microbiological profile changes are seen in subsequent-revision hip and knee arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection

A proportion of patients with hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) undergo multiple revisions with the aim of eradicating infection and improving quality of life. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiology cultured from multiply revised hip and knee replacement procedures to guide antimicrobial therapy at the time of surgery. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients were retrospectively identified from databases at two specialist orthopaedic centres in the United Kingdom between 2011 and 2019. Patient were included who had undergone repeat-revision total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) for infection, following an initial failed revision for infection. Results: A total of 106 patients were identified. Of these patients, 74 underwent revision TKR and 32 underwent revision THR. The mean age at first revision was 67 years (SD 10). The Charlson comorbidity index was ≤  2 for 31 patients, 3-4 for 57 patients, and ≥  5 for 18 patients. All patients underwent at least two revisions, 73 patients received three, 47 patients received four, 31 patients received five, and 21 patients received at least six. After six revisions, 90 % of patients had different organisms cultured compared with the initial revision, and 53 % of organisms were multidrug resistant. The most frequent organisms at each revision were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (36 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (19 %). Fungus was cultured from 3 % of revisions, and 21 % of infections were polymicrobial. Conclusion: Patients undergoing multiple revisions for PJI are highly likely to experience a change in organism, with 90 % of patients having a different organism cultured by their sixth revision. It is therefore important to administer empirical antibiotics at each subsequent revision, taking into account known drug resistance from previous cultures. Our results do not support the routine use of empirical antifungals.

Nanocomposite orthopaedic bone cement combining long-acting dual antimicrobial drugs

Antibiotic loaded bone cements are widely used in total joint replacement (TJR); despite many limitations such as a burst release which leads to antibiotic concentration below inhibitory levels and possibly contributing to the selection of antibiotic resistant strains. In order to address such limitations and to simultaneously address antibiotic resistance and short-term antimicrobial activity, we developed a nanocomposite bone cement capable of providing a controlled release of antimicrobial agents from bone cement to act as prophylaxis or treatment against prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Gentamicin and chlorhexidine were loaded in combination on silica nanoparticles surface using layer-by-layer coating technique (LbL) combining hydrolysable and non-hydrolysable polymers. The drug release from the nanocomposite continued for >50 days at concentrations higher than the commercial formulation containing the same amount of antimicrobial drugs, where burst release for few days were observed. Moreover, the nanocomposite bone cement showed superior antimicrobial inhibition without adversely affecting the mechanical properties or the ability of osteoblasts to grow. In vivo experiments with an infected bone lesion model along with mass-spectrometric analysis also provided further evidence of efficacy and safety of the implanted nanocomposite material as well as its prolonged drug eluting profile. The developed nanocomposite bone cement has the potential to reduce PJIs and enable treatment of resistant established infections; moreover, the newly developed LbL based nano-delivery system may also have wider applications in reducing the threat posed by antimicrobial resistance.

Operating room disinfection: operator-driven ultraviolet 'C' vs. chemical treatment

Background

In operating room (OR) surfaces, Nosocomial pathogens can persist on inanimate surfaces for long intervals and are highly resistant to traditional surface cleaning.

Aim

This study compares traditional chemical operating room terminal disinfection to a unique operator-driven device that emits germicidal UV light at short distance onto vertical and horizontal surfaces.

Methods

A randomized crossover analogous protocol assigned 40 end-of-day operating rooms into either group A (chemical then UVC treatments) or group B (UVC then chemical treatments). Initial Staphylococcal cultures were obtained prior to disinfection treatment, after the first treatment, and after the second treatment at 16 most commonly contaminated sites to represent overall room contamination. Success was defined as no growth and failure as 1 or more colony forming units. Thoroughness of chemical treatment vs UVC treatment was compared and used to determine if the second treatment was additive to the first treatment within each group.

Findings

The operator driven UVC device outperformed chemical treatment in reducing the number of contaminated sites in the OR by more than half (P<0.001). Operator-driven UVC reduced contaminated sites after chemical treatment by nearly half (P<0.001). In contrast, chemical treatment after operator-driven UVC did not significantly reduce the number of contaminated sites. The mean employee time of disinfection for chemical treatment was 49 minutes and for the operator-driven UVC emitter 7.9 minutes (P<0.001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that addition of an operator-driven UVC emitter to OR rooms between cases could be helpful in overall decreasing the number of contaminated sites.

Visceral Fat as a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Visceral obesity, a strong indicator of chronic inflammation and impaired metabolic health, has been shown to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between visceral fat area (VFA) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 484 patients who had undergone a total hip or knee arthroplasty was performed. All patients had a computed tomography scan of the abdomen/pelvis within two years of their TJA. Body composition data (ie, VFA, subcutaneous fat area, and skeletal muscle area) were calculated at the Lumbar-3 vertebral level via two fully automated and externally validated machine learning algorithms. A multivariable logistic model was created to determine the relationship between VFA and PJI, while accounting for other PJI risk factors. Of the 484 patients, 31 (6.4%) had a PJI complication.

RESULTS

The rate of PJI among patients with VFA in the top quartile (> 264.1 cm2) versus bottom quartile (< 82.6 cm2) was 5.6% versus 10.6% and 18.8% versus 2.7% in the total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate model, total knee arthroplasty patients with a VFA in the top quartile had a 30.5 times greater risk of PJI than those in the bottom quartile of VFA (P = .0154).

CONCLUSION

VFA may have a strong association with PJI in TJA patients. Using a standardized imaging modality like computed tomography scans to calculate VFA can be a valuable tool for surgeons when assessing risk of PJI.

Short Course of Oral Antibiotic Treatment After Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Appears to Decrease Early Reinfection

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence has suggested a benefit to extended postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics after two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. We sought to determine reinfection rates with and without a short course of oral antibiotics after two-stage exchange procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip or knee. Patients were excluded if they failed a prior two-stage exchange, had positive cultures at reimplantation, prolonged intravenous antibiotics postoperatively, and/or life-long suppression. This resulted in 444 reimplantations (210 hips and 234 knees). Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the duration of oral antibiotics after reimplantation: no antibiotics (102), ≤2 weeks (266), or >2 weeks (76). The primary endpoint was reinfection within 1 year of reimplantation.

RESULTS

Within 1 year of reimplantation, there were 34 reinfections. In the no-antibiotic, ≤ 2-week, and >2-week cohorts the reinfection rates were 14.1, 7.0, and 6.4%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression showed a reduced reinfection rate in the ≤2-week cohort relative to no antibiotics (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38, P = .01). While the smaller cohort with >2 weeks of antibiotics did not significantly reduce the reinfection rate (HR: 0.41, P = .12), when combined with the ≤2-week cohort, use of oral antibiotics had an overall reduction of the reinfection rate (HR: 0.39, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the hypothesis that a short course of oral antibiotics after reimplantation decreases the 1-year reinfection rate. Future randomized studies should seek to examine the efficacy of different durations of oral antibiotics to reduce reinfection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

Targeting of Periprosthetic Muscles for the Ultrasonographic Screening of Hip Abnormalities in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty Patients

BACKGROUND

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) patients require subsequent annual screening for postoperative complications. Ultrasonography may be useful for this purpose but lacks a screening protocol for hips. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography for detecting postoperative complications in HRA patients using a screening protocol that specifically targets periprosthetic muscles.

METHODS

We enrolled 45 hips from 40 HRA patients with a mean follow-up period of 8.2 years. MRI and ultrasonography scans were simultaneously conducted at follow-up. The ultrasonography assessments were conducted on the anterior part of the hip that targets iliopsoas, sartorius, rectus femoris, lateral with anterior superior and inferior iliac spine (ASIS and AIIS) as bony landmarks, and the lateral and posterior parts that target fascia tensor, short rotators, and gluteus minimus, medius, and maximus with greater trochanter and ischial tuberosity as bony landmarks. The accuracy of diagnosing postoperative abnormalities and the visibility of periprosthetic muscles were compared between these two modalities.

RESULTS

Both MRI and ultrasonography detected an abnormal region in eight cases comprising two infections, two pseudotumors, and four patients with greater trochanteric bursitis. Among these cases, four hips required implant removal. The increase in anterior space, measured as the distance between the iliopsoas and resurfacing head, was a good indicator for the abnormal mass in these four HRA cases. In the assessment of periprosthetic muscles, MRI showed a much lower visibility than ultrasonography in the iliopsoas (6.7% vs. 100%), gluteus minimus (6.7% vs. 88.9%), and short rotators (8.8% vs. 71.4%) due to implant halation.

CONCLUSIONS

By targeting periprosthetic muscles, ultrasonography can detect postoperative complications as effectively as MRI assessments in HRA patients. Ultrasonography has superior visibility in the periprosthetic muscles of HRA patients, indicating its utility for the screening of small legions in these cases which may not be visible by MRI.

Zirconia-Toughened Alumina Ceramic Wear Particles Do Not Elicit Inflammatory Responses in Human Macrophages

Ten percent of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) require revision surgery. One of the reasons for THA are wear particles released from the implants that can activate the immune defense and cause osteolysis and failure of the joint implant. The discrepancies between reports on toxicity and immunogenicity of the implant materials led us to this study in which we compared toxicity and immunogenicity of well-defined nanoparticles from Al2O3, zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), and cobalt chrome (CoCr), a human THP-1 macrophage cell line, human PBMCs, and therefrom-derived primary macrophages. None of the tested materials decreased the viability of THP-1 macrophages nor human primary macrophages at the 24 h time point, indicating that at concentrations from 0.05 to 50 µm3/cell the tested materials are non-toxic. Forty-eight hours of treatment of THP-1 macrophages with 5 µm3/cell of CoCr and Al2O3 caused 8.3-fold and 4.6-fold increases in TNF-α excretion, respectively, which was not observed for ZTA. The comparison between THP-1 macrophages and human primary macrophages revealed that THP-1 macrophages show higher activation of cytokine expression in the presence of CoCr and Al2O3 particles than primary macrophages. Our results indicate that ZTA is a non-toxic implant material with no immunogenic effects in vitro.

Treating Hepatitis C Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty is Cost Effective: A Markov Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) have high complication rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Advances in HCV therapy now enable clinicians to eradicate the disease, however, its cost effectiveness from an orthopaedic perspective remains to be demonstrated. We sought to conduct a cost effectiveness analysis comparing no therapy to direct acting antiviral therapy (DAA) prior to THA among HCV positive patients.

METHODS

A Markov model was utilized to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating HCV with DAA prior to THA. The model was powered with event probabilities, mortality, cost and quality adjusted life-year values for patients with and without HCV that were obtained from the published literature. This included treatment costs, successes of HCV eradication, incidences of superficial or periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), probabilities of utilizing various PJI treatment modalities, PJI treatment success/failures, and mortality rates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY.

RESULTS

Our Markov model indicates that in comparison to no therapy, DAA prior to THA is cost-effective for HCV positive patients. THA in the setting of no therapy and DAA added 8.06 and 14.39 QALYs at a mean cost of $28,800 and $115,800. The ICER associated with HCV DAA in comparison to no therapy was $13,800/QALY, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis-C treatment with DAA prior to THA is cost-effective at all current drug list prices. Given these findings, strong consideration should be given to treating patients for HCV prior to elective THA.

Partial Two-Stage Exchange for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Treatment to Take into Account

INTRODUCTION

Two-stage revision is the gold standard for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The removal of well-fixed implants, especially the femoral component, can be extremely difficult and additional osteotomies may be needed, which is time-consuming and results in bone stock loss. When the femoral stem is osseointegrated, there is no clear indication for the use of partial two-stage revision. The primary objective was to assess infection eradication after surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective study of specific case series. A total of eight patients with a chronic uncemented PJI, in the setting of complex revision surgeries, were treated with partial two-stage revision, which included selective retention of the well-fixed femoral component and complete acetabular removal. Stem retention was carried out regardless of the bacteria or associated comorbidities.

RESULTS

All patients were re-revision cases with at least two previous surgeries (range, 2-4). Complex revisions were performed in five cases (non-articulated spacer) and simple revisions in three cases (articulated spacer). The minimum follow-up time was 24 months (range, 24-132 months). The infection eradication rate at final follow-up was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Partial two-stage reconstruction is a promising technique for the treatment of chronic PJI in patients with a well-fixed stem and complex re-revision acetabular procedures. Further prospective studies and prolonged follow-ups are required to confirm our results.

Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature

The two-stage revision arthroplasty is a common treatment option for chronic periprosthetic infection (PJI). The time to reimplantation (TTR) reported in the literature varies substantially from a few days to several hundred days. It is hypothesized that longer TTR could be associated with worse infection control after second stage. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection in clinical studies published until January 2023. Eleven studies investigating TTR as a potential risk factor for reinfection met the inclusion criteria (ten retrospective and one prospective study, published 2012-2022). Study design and outcome measures differed notably. The cutoff points above which TTR was regarded as "long" ranged from 4 to 18 weeks. No study observed a benefit for long TTR. In all studies, similar or even better infection control was observed for short TTR. The optimal TTR, however, is not yet defined. Larger clinical studies with homogeneous patient populations and adjustment for confounding factors are needed.

Cost Drivers in Two-Stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection With an Antibiotic Coated Cement Hip Spacer

BACKGROUND

The current gold standard for treating chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a 2-stage revision arthroplasty. There has been little investigation into what specific patient and operative factors may be able to predict higher costs of this treatment.

METHODS

An institutional electronic health record database was retrospectively queried for patients who developed a PJI after a total hip arthroplasty, and underwent removal of the prosthesis and implantation of an antibiotic-impregnated articulating hip cement spacer. Patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and post-operative complications were collected. Total costs were captured through an internal accounting database through 2 years post-operatively. Negative binomial regressions were utilized for multivariable analyses. A total of 55 hips with PJI were available for cost analyses.

RESULTS

A comorbidity index score was associated with a 70% increase (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.7 [1.18-2.5], P = .003) in total costs at 2-years. Illicit drug use was associated with a 70% increase in costs at 1-year post-operatively (OR 1.7 [1.18-2.5], P = .003). Metal-on-poly liners were associated with a 22% decrease in cost at 2-years post-operatively when compared to Cement-on-Bone articulating spacers, and Metal-on-poly -constrained liners accounted for 38% lower costs at 1-year (OR 0.62 [0.44-0.87], P = .004). Use of an intraoperative extended trochanteric osteotomy was associated with a 46 and 61% increase in cost at 1-year (OR 1.46 [1.14-1.89]) and 2-years (OR 1.61 [1.26-2.07], P < .001) post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Age, comorbidity index score, drug use, and extended trochanteric osteotomy were associated with increased costs of PJI treatment. This may be used to improve reimbursement models and target areas of cost savings.

Synovial Fluid Absolute Neutrophil Count and Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio are not Superior to Polymorphonuclear Percentage in Detecting Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Serum and synovial biomarkers are currently used to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown promise as an inexpensive test in diagnosing infection, but there are no reports of synovial NLR or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) for diagnosing chronic PJI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of both markers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 730 patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty and subsequent aspiration was conducted. Synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%), synovial NLR, synovial ANC, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum WBC, serum PMN%, serum NLR, and serum ANC had their utility in diagnosing PJI examined by area-under-the-curve analyses (AUC). Pairwise comparisons of AUCs were performed.

RESULTS

The AUCs for synovial WBC, PMN%, NLR, and ANC were 0.84, 0.84, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively. Synovial fluid ANC was a superior marker to synovial NLR (P = .027) and synovial WBC (P = .003) but not PMN% (P = .365). Synovial NLR was inferior to PMN% (P = .006) but not different from synovial WBC (P > .05). The AUCs for serum ESR, CRP, WBC, PMN%, NLR, and ANC were 0.70, 0.79, 0.63, 0.72, 0.74, and 0.67, respectively. Serum CRP outperformed all other serum markers (P < .05) except for PMN% and NLR (P > .05). Serum PMN% and NLR were similar to serum ESR (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Synovial ANC had similar performance to PMN% in diagnosing chronic PJI, whereas synovial NLR was a worse diagnostic marker. The lack of superiority to synovial PMN% limits the utility of these tests compared to established criteria.

Early Total Hip Arthroplasty is a Cost-Effective Treatment for Severe Radiographic Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Over an Individual's Lifetime

BACKGROUND

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) causes degenerative changes warranting total hip arthroplasty (THA) in approximately 50% of patients by age 60 years. For severe SCFE, a reorienting intertrochanteric osteotomy (ITO) following in situ pinning (ISP) can decrease impingement with hip flexion, but by altering proximal femoral geometry, complicates subsequent conversion THA. We hypothesized that increasing implant survivorship would affect the most cost-effective treatment strategy (ISP followed by ITO [ISP + ITO] with later THA versus ISP alone [ISPa] with earlier THA) over a patient's lifetime.

METHODS

A state-transition Markov model was constructed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of either ISPa or ISP + ITO over a 60-year time horizon for children who have severe, stable SCFE. Transition probabilities associated with implant and native hip survivorship, state utilities, and costs were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses assessed the model robustness. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were compared to a societal willingness to pay (WTP) of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

Over a 60-year horizon, ISPa was costlier ($291,836) than ISP + ITO ($75,227) but achieved overall better outcomes (51.4 QALYs ISPa versus 48.7 QALYs ISP + ITO), rendering ISPa cost-effective with an ICER of $80,980/QALY. Implant survivorship and time horizon were sensitive variables.

CONCLUSION

Based upon current implant performance, ISPa with subsequent earlier THA is cost-effective when considering an individual's life expectancy and thereby deserves consideration in patients who have severe SCFE. Without clear level 1 clinical data, our economic model considers a difficult problem, while providing families and clinicians with a framework for understanding treatment options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic and decision analysis, Level III.

The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Failed Partial Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty are expanding. Despite the lower published infection rates for UKA and patello-femoral arthroplasty than total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and diagnostic thresholds for commonly utilized tests have not been investigated recently. Thus, this study evaluated if diagnostic thresholds for PJI in patients who had a failed partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) align more closely with previously reported thresholds specific to UKA or the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection.

METHODS

We identified 109 knees in 100 patients that underwent PKA with eventual conversion to total knee arthroplasty within a single healthcare system from 2000 to 2021. Synovial fluid nucleated cell count and synovial polymorphonuclear percentage in addition to preoperative serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student's t-tests between septic and aseptic cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Youden's index were used to assess diagnostic performance and the optimal cutoff point of each test.

RESULTS

Synovial nucleated cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage, and serum C-reactive protein demonstrated excellent discrimination for diagnosing PJI with an area under the curve of 0.97 and lower cutoff values than the previously determined UKA specific criteria. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rateESR demonstrated good ability with an area under the curve of 0.89.

CONCLUSION

Serum and synovial fluid diagnostic thresholds for PJI in PKAs align more closely with the thresholds established by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting as compared to previously proposed thresholds specific to UKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

What Is the Inpatient Cost of Hip Replacement? A Time-Driven Activity Based Costing Pilot Study in an Italian Public Hospital

The emphasis on value-based payment models for primary total hip replacement (THA) results in a greater need for orthopaedic surgeons and hospitals to better understand actual costs and resource use. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) is an innovative approach to measure expenses more accurately and address cost challenges. It estimates the quantity of time and the cost per unit of time of each resource (e.g., equipment and personnel) used across an episode of care. Our goal is to understand the true cost of a THA using the TDABC in an Italian public hospital and to comprehend how the adoption of this method might enhance the process of providing healthcare from an organizational and financial standpoint. During 2019, the main activities required for total hip replacement surgery, the operators involved, and the intraoperative consumables were identified. A process map was produced to identify the patient's concrete path during hospitalization and the length of stay was also recorded. The total inpatient cost of THA, net of all indirect costs normally included in a DRG-based reimbursement, was about EUR 6000. The observation of a total of 90 patients identified 2 main expense items: the prosthetic device alone represents 50.4% of the total cost, followed by the hospitalization, which constitutes 41.5%. TDABC has proven to be a precise method for determining the cost of the healthcare delivery process for THA, considering facilities, equipment, and staff employed. The process map made it possible to identify waste and redundancies. Surgeons should be aware that the choice of prosthetic device and that a lack of pre-planning for discharge can exponentially alter the hospital expenditure for a patient undergoing primary THA.

Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether patient reported outcomes improve after single stage versus two stage revision surgery for prosthetic joint infection of the hip, and to determine the cost effectiveness of these procedures.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

High volume tertiary referral centres or orthopaedic units in the UK (n=12) and in Sweden (n=3), recruiting from 1 March 2015 to 19 December 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

140 adults (aged ≥18 years) with a prosthetic joint infection of the hip who required revision (65 randomly assigned to single stage and 75 to two stage revision).

INTERVENTIONS

A computer generated 1:1 randomisation list stratified by hospital was used to allocate participants with prosthetic joint infection of the hip to a single stage or a two stage revision procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary intention-to-treat outcome was pain, stiffness, and functional limitations 18 months after randomisation, measured by the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and joint infection. The economic evaluation (only assessed in UK participants) compared quality adjusted life years and costs between the randomised groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 71 years (standard deviation 9) and 51 (36%) were women. WOMAC scores did not differ between groups at 18 months (mean difference 0.13 (95% confidence interval -8.20 to 8.46), P=0.98); however, the single stage procedure was better at three months (11.53 (3.89 to 19.17), P=0.003), but not from six months onwards. Intraoperative events occurred in five (8%) participants in the single stage group and 20 (27%) in the two stage group (P=0.01). At 18 months, nine (14%) participants in the single stage group and eight (11%) in the two stage group had at least one marker of possible ongoing infection (P=0.62). From the perspective of healthcare providers and personal social services, single stage revision was cost effective with an incremental net monetary benefit of £11 167 (95% confidence interval £638 to £21 696) at a £20 000 per quality adjusted life years threshold (£1.0; $1.1; €1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

At 18 months, single stage revision compared with two stage revision for prosthetic joint infection of the hip showed no superiority by patient reported outcome. Single stage revision had a better outcome at three months, fewer intraoperative complications, and was cost effective. Patients prefer early restoration of function, therefore, when deciding treatment, surgeons should consider patient preferences and the cost effectiveness of single stage surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry ISRCTN10956306.

Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties

Periprosthetic infections (PPIs) are a serious concern in total knee and hip arthroplasty, and they have an increasing incidence. To prevent PPI, preoperative skin disinfection, as a key element of antisepsis, represents an important part of infection prevention. However, no specific antiseptic agent is endorsed by the relevant guidelines. The purpose of this retrospective, not randomized study was to investigate the difference in the residual bacteria load between an approved antiseptic with an alcohol-based solution with additional benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and an alcohol-based solution with additional octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) at two different time periods. In 200 consecutive patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty, skin samples from the surgical sites were collected after skin disinfection with BAC (100 g solution contain: propan-2-ol 63.0 g, benzalkonium chloride 0.025 g) or OCT (100 g solution contain: octenidine dihydrochloride 0.1 g, propan-1-ol, 30.0 g, propan-2-ol 45.0 g) (100 patients per group). Following the separation of cutis and subcutis and its processing, culture was performed on different agar plates in aerobic and anaerobic environments. In the case of bacteria detection, the microbial identification was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and the number of contaminated samples was compared between the groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of the type of disinfectant, BMI, age, sex, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, skin disorders, smoking status, and localization of skin samples on positive bacteria detection. A total of 34 samples were positive for bacteria in the BAC group, while only 17 samples were positive in the OCT group (p = 0.005). Disinfectant type was the only significant parameter in the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.006). A significantly higher contamination rate of the subcutis was shown in the BAC group compared to the OCT group (19 vs. 9, p = 0,003). After the change from BAC to OCT in preoperative skin cleansing in the hip and knee areas, the number of positive cultures decreased by 50%, which might have been caused by a higher microbicidal activity of OCT. Therefore, the use of OCT in preoperative cleansing may reduce the risk of PPI in hip and knee surgery. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the effect and to evaluate if it reduces the risk of PPI.

Secuenciación de próxima generación para la detección de patógenos en cirugía de cadera: experiencia y viabilidad diagnóstica en un centro de atención terciaria de la Argentina

Introducción: El diagnóstico rápido y definitivo con identificación del patógeno es fundamental cuando hay una infección periprotésica. La secuenciación de próxima generación permite identificar el ADN en un germen determinado en poco tiempo. Hasta donde sabemos, no hay reportes sobre su empleo para el manejo de la infección periprotésica en Sudamérica. Nuestro objetivo fue demostrar la viabilidad diagnóstica de las muestras obtenidas de una serie de pacientes operados en Buenos Aires, Argentina, y analizadas con la técnica de secuenciación de próxima generación. Materiales y Métodos: Se analizó a una serie prospectiva de 20 pacientes sometidos a cirugía de revisión séptica y aséptica de cadera desde diciembre de 2019 hasta marzo de 2020. Se obtuvieron muestras intraoperatorias de líquido sinovial, tejido profundo y canal endomedular, que fueron enviadas para su análisis al laboratorio NexGen Microgen. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 17 pacientes, porque tenían una muestra apta para analizar. Los resultados se recibieron dentro de las 72 h de la cirugía. En un caso, el resultado de la secuenciación de próxima generación informó un germen distinto del identificado en los cultivos posoperatorios de partes blandas, esto permitió corregir la antibioticoterapia. En otro, esta técnica identificó Parabacteroides gordonii en una revisión aséptica, en otro, Morganella morganii, a partir de cultivos negativos en una revisión en un tiempo. Conclusión: Se demostró la viabilidad diagnóstica con la secuenciación de próxima generación, se pueden obtener resultados de microorganismos patógenos dentro de las 72 h posteriores a la cirugía en pacientes con infección periprotésica y cultivos negativos.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Infection Prevention after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Recent investigations have shown that closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) decreases the rate of postoperative wound complications following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we used a break-even analysis to determine whether ciNPWT is a cost-effective measure for reducing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after revision TKA. The cost of ciNPWT, cost of treatment for PJI, and baseline infection rates following revision TKA were collected from institutional data and the literature. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) in infection rate necessary for cost-effectiveness was calculated using break-even analysis. Using our institutional cost of ciNPWT ($600), this intervention would be cost-effective if the initial infection rate of revision TKA (9.0%) has an ARR of 0.92%. The ARR needed for cost-effectiveness remained constant across a wide range of initial infection rates and declined as treatment costs increased. The use of ciNPWT for infection prevention following revision TKA is cost-effective at both high and low initial infection rates, across a broad range of treatment costs, and at inflated product expenses.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty in High-Risk Patients

BACKGROUND

Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in patients at high risk for infection. However, the cost-effectiveness of this practice is not clear. In this study, we used a break-even economic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of routine extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis for PJI prevention in high-risk TJA patients.

METHODS

Baseline PJI rates in high-risk patients, the cost of revision arthroplasty for PJI, and the costs of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were obtained from the literature and institutional purchasing records. These variables were incorporated in a break-even economic model to calculate the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in infection rate necessary for extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis to be cost-effective. ARR was used to determine the number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis with Cefadroxil in patients at high risk for PJI was cost-effective at an ARR in baseline infection rate of 0.187% (NNT = 535) and 0.151% (NNT = 662) for TKA and THA, respectively. Cost-effectiveness was preserved with varying costs of antibiotic regimens, PJI treatment costs, and infection rates.

CONCLUSION

The use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce PJI rates in patients at high risk for infection following TJA and appears to be cost-effective. However, the current evidence supporting this practice is limited in quality. The use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis should be weighed against the possible development of future antimicrobial resistance, which may change the value proposition.

Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures

INTRODUCTION

Evidence demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes across the various surgical approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, high-quality contemporary data regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk between direct anterior approach (DAA) and other (THA) approaches is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated PJI rates reported in the literature between the DAA and other approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five online databases were queried for all studies published from January 1st, 2000 through February 17th, 2021 that reported PJI rates between DAA and other surgical approaches. Studies reporting on primary THAs for osteoarthritis (OA) and that included PJI rates segregated by surgical approach were included. Articles reporting on revision THA, alternative THA etiologies, or minimally invasive techniques were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models were utilized to evaluate the pooled effect of surgical approach on infection rates. Validated risk of bias and methodological quality assessment tools were applied to each study. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of analyses.

RESULTS

28 articles reporting on 653,633 primary THAs were included. No differences were found between DAA cohorts and combined other approaches (OR: 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.21; p = 0.67) as well as segregated anterolateral approach cohorts (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.06; p = 0.13). However, DAA patients had a significantly reduced risk of infection compared to those undergoing posterior (OR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.74; p < 0.0001) and direct lateral (OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65; p < 0.00001) approaches.

CONCLUSION

The DAA to primary THA had comparable or lower PJI risk when compared to other contemporary approaches. The results of the most up-to-date evidence available serve to encourage adult reconstruction surgeons who have already adopted the DAA. Additionally, orthopaedic surgeons considering adoption or use of the direct anterior approach for other reasons should not be dissuaded over theoretical concern for a general increase in the risk of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Microbial resistance to nanotechnologies: An important but understudied consideration using antimicrobial nanotechnologies in orthopaedic implants

Microbial resistance to current antibiotics therapies is a major cause of implant failure and adverse clinical outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Recent developments in advanced antimicrobial nanotechnologies provide numerous opportunities to effective remove resistant bacteria and prevent resistance from occurring through unique mechanisms. With tunable physicochemical properties, nanomaterials can be designed to be bactericidal, antifouling, immunomodulating, and capable of delivering antibacterial compounds to the infection region with spatiotemporal accuracy. Despite its substantial advancement, an important, but under-explored area, is potential microbial resistance to nanomaterials and how this can impact the clinical use of antimicrobial nanotechnologies. This review aims to provide a better understanding of nanomaterial-associated microbial resistance to accelerate bench-to-bedside translations of emerging nanotechnologies for effective control of implant associated infections.

Prevention of Orthopedic Prosthetic Infections Using Evidence-Based Surgical Site Infection Care Bundles: A Narrative Review

Background: The number of primary/revision total joint replacements (TJR) are expected to increase substantially with an aging population and increasing prevalence of comorbid conditions. The 30-day re-admission rate, in all orthopedic specialties, is 5.4% (range, 4.8%-6.0%). A recent publication has documented that the surgical site infection (SSI) infection rate associated with revision total knee (rTKR, 15.6%) and revision total hip (rTHR, 8.6%) arthroplasties are four to seven times the rate of the primary procedures (2.1%-2.2%). These orthopedic infections prolong hospital stays, double re-admissions, and increase healthcare costs by a factor of 300%. Methods: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library publications, which reported the infection risk after TKR and THR, was undertaken (January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2021). The search also included documentation of evidence-based practices that lead to improved post-operative outcomes. Results: The evidence-based approach to reducing the risk of SSI was grouped into pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative periods. Surgical care bundles have existed within other surgical disciplines for more than 20 years, although their use is relatively new in peri-operative orthopedic surgical care. Pre-admission chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) showers/cleansing, staphylococcal decolonization, maintenance of normothermia, wound irrigation, antimicrobial suture wound closure, and post-operative wound care has been shown to improve clinical outcome in randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses. Conclusions: Evidence-based infection prevention care bundles have improved clinical outcomes in all surgical disciplines. The significant post-operative morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost, associated with SSIs after TJR can be reduced by introduction of evidence-based pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative interventions.

A Decision Support Framework for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Two Modeling Approaches

Today, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the leading indications for revision surgery and the most ominous complication in artificial joint patients. The current state of the art for treating PJI requires the development of methods for planning the costs at different scales to facilitate the selection of the best treatment methods. In this paper, we perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for strategies related to the treatment of PJI using a composite decision support modeling framework. Within the framework, two models are implemented: a detailed discrete-event probabilistic model based on the decision tree approach and a dynamic Markov model with generalized states. The application of the framework is demonstrated on the dataset which was provided by the Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden. The analyzed dataset contains 600 patient records divided into two groups (retrospective group, based on old records, and prospective group, based on real-time follow-up). The cost-effectiveness of treatment methods was compared based on associated costs and QALY units gained, with the mentioned two indicators calculated using two models independently from each other. As a result, two comparative rankings of cost-effectiveness of PJI treatment methods were presented based on the model output.

Hepatitis C virus infection increases the risk of adverse outcomes following joint arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Whether hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients are at risk for increased complications and long hospital stay following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. Therefore we performed a meta-analysis aiming to answer the following question: (1) are there differences in postoperative complications including joint infection and mortality between patients with or without hepatitis C following TJAs? (2) Are patients without HCV be associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower readmission rate, higher function scores, lower revision and reoperation rates than patients with HCV?

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to pool data and quantitatively assessing the association between HCV infection and risks for adverse postoperative outcomes. A systematic search of all published studies concerning HCV and TJA was performed in five bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) was accomplished according to the classification of adverse events, subgroup analyses were performed based on surgery type.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible observational studies were included with a sample size of 9,788,166 patients. Overall pooled data revealed the increased risk of overall complications, including medical and surgical complications, in HCV-positive patients undergoing TJA compared with than in HCV-negative people (OR 1.57; 95%CI: 1.44-1.71 [p<0.00001]). Joint infections were highly common in HCV-positive patients undergoing lower-extremity TJA (OR 2.06; 95%CI: 1.73-2.47 [p<0.00001]). Furthermore, HCV infections were associated with high rates of reoperations and revisions (OR 1.47; 95%CI: 1.40-1.55 [p<0.00001]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hepatitis C have an increased risk of adverse outcomes post-TJA and a high risk of reoperation and revision that is partially attributed to postoperative complications, particularly joint infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic review and meta-analysis.

On the value and limitations of incorporating a "clean phase" into the surgical treatment of prosthetic joint infections - an illustrative cadaveric study using fluorescent powder

Purposes

A septic revision of an artificial joint is routinely split up in a so-called dirty phase and a clean phase. The measures taken to initiate the start of the clean phase vary significantly between musculoskeletal infection centers. We performed simulations of one-step exchanges of infected THAs and sought to 1) determine the effect of different clean phase protocols on the sterile field, and 2) determine whether or not it is possible to re-implant the new prosthesis completely clean.

Methods

Nine fresh frozen cadaveric hips were used and primary THA was undertaken via a direct anterior approach. Before implantation of the components varying amounts of fluorescent powder (GloGerm) were deposited, simulating bacterial infection. Second, a one-step exchange was performed via a posterolateral approach. After implant removal, debridement, and lavage, randomization determined which clean phase protocol was followed, i.e. no, some or full additional measures. Finally, the new prosthesis was re-implanted.

In order to determine the effect of different clean phase protocols on contamination of the sterile field standardized UV light-enhanced photographs were obtained of 1) the gloves, 2) the instrument table, 3) the drapes, and 4) the wound and these were ranked on cleanliness by a blinded panel of hip surgeons.

In order to determine whether or not it is possible to re-implant the prosthesis completely clean, the implant was taken out again at the end of the one-step exchange and inspected for contamination under UV light.

Results

The gloves, the instrument table, the drapes and the wound were significantly cleaner after a clean phase using full additional measures compared to partial or no additional measures (p < 0.000). Partial measures were able to reduce some of the contamination of the gloves and the wound, but had no effect on the drapes and the instrument table. All re-implanted implants were contaminated with some amount of fluorescent powder at the end of the one-step exchange.

Conclusions

We advise to incorporate a clean phase with full additional measures into the surgical treatment of prosthetic joint infections, as partial measures seem to be a poor compromise.

Level of evidence

Not applicable (cadaveric study).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-022-00467-x.

Vancomycin Soaking Is Highly Cost-Effective in Primary ACLR Infection Prevention: A Cost-Effectiveness Study

BACKGROUND

Although presoaking grafts in vancomycin has been demonstrated to be effective in observational studies for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) infection prevention, the economic benefit of the technique is uncertain.

PURPOSE

To 1) determine the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin presoaking during primary ACLR to prevent postoperative joint infections and 2) to establish the break-even cost-effectiveness threshold of the technique and determine its cost-effectiveness across various international health care settings.

STUDY DESIGN

Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to determine cost-effectiveness and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of additional vancomycin presoaking compared with intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis alone. A repeated search of the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, using the same criteria as a recent meta-analysis, was completed. A repeated meta-analysis of 9 cohort studies (level 3 evidence) was completed to determine the odds ratio of infection with vancomycin presoaking compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. Estimated costs of the vancomycin technique, treatment of infection, and further surgery were sourced from local hospitals and literature. Transitional probabilities for further surgery, including revision reconstruction and primary arthroplasty, were obtained from the literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and a 1-way sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the ACLR infection rate break-even threshold for which the vancomycin technique would be no longer cost-effective.

RESULTS

The vancomycin soaking technique provides expected cost savings of $660 (USA), A$581 (Australia), and €226 (Spain) per patient. There was an improvement in the quality-adjusted life-years of 0.007 compared with intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis alone (4.297 vs 4.290). If the infection rate is below 0.014% with intravenous antibiotics alone, the vancomycin wrap would no longer be cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

The vancomycin presoaking technique is a highly cost-effective method to prevent postoperative septic arthritis after primary ACLR.

The Potential Value of Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possibility of obtaining more accurate information from routine blood tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Between 2017 and 2018, a total of 246 patients who underwent total hip or knee revision surgery were included in this study. There were 146 females and 100 males, and the mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 12.75 years. Laboratory parameters erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, plasma fibrinogen, serum white blood cell (WBC), and calculable ratio markers were collected. Based on leukocytes (monocyte count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count), platelet count, and mean platelet volume Inflammation-related ratio markers were calculated, which including monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and platelet to mean platelet volume ratio (PMR). Follow-up of all studied cases for at least 1 year. The diagnostic value of the markers based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The most optimal combinations of blood markers were selected by the prediction models. Statistical analyses and prediction models were performed using R software.

RESULTS

Of the 246 patients, 125 were diagnosed with PJI and 121 with aseptic loosening. A higher rate of patients underwent revision surgery due to hip prosthesis loosening in the aseptic loosening group (74.4%) compared to the PJI group (45.6%, P < 0.001). ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for classical markers, fibrinogen was 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805-0.901), ESR was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.785-0.887) and CRP was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.773-0.878). Followed by the PMR, PLR, NLR and MLR, which showed promising diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.791, 0.785, 0.736, and 0.733. The AUCs of the ratio markers were higher than those of D-dimer (0.691;95% CI, 0.6243-0.7584) and serum WBC (0.622; 95% CI, 0.552-0.691). After the predictive model calculation, AUC was up to 0.923 (95% CI, 0.891-0.951) when plasma fibrinogen combined with MLR and PMR and interpreted excellent discriminatory capacity with a sensitivity of 86.40% and a specificity of 84.17%. The new combination significantly increases the accuracy and reliability of the diagnosis of PJI (P < 0.001). The AUC increased to 0.899 (95% CI, 0.861-0.931; P = 0.007) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.880-0.946; P < 0.001), followed by CRP and ESR, respectively. All plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with both PMR and MLR achieved the highest specificity (89.17%) and PPV (85.34%).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance greatly improved when plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with ratio markers.

Septic Failure After One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: Microbiological Implications

BACKGROUND

The microbiological implications of septic failure after 1-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip remain unclear.

METHODS

Information was gathered on comorbidities, previous procedures, preoperative and postoperative microbiology results, methods of detection, and antibiotic resistance patterns, for all patients, who developed septic failure after 1-stage exchange for PJI of the hip performed at our institution during 2001-2017.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were identified. Septic failure was diagnosed a mean of 1.7 (standard deviation 2.3, range 0-11.8) years later. Although the spectrum of microorganisms was similar to preoperative, in the majority of patients (55%), the initial microorganism(s) was (were) replaced by (a) totally different microorganism(s). Overall, there was a decrease in the number of polymicrobial PJIs. The number of patients with high virulent microorganisms decreased significantly from 52 to 36 (P = .034). The number of PJIs due to gram-negative pathogens remained similar (11 vs 14, P = .491). The number of rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, fluoroquinolone-resistant streptococci, enterococci, and fungi changed from 8 to 15, 0 to 2, 7 to 3, and 1 to 2, respectively, but these changes did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The majority of reinfections is caused by different infecting bacteria, hence it is essential to perform a new diagnostic workup and not base treatment decisions (solely) on historical cultures. We were furthermore unable to irrefutably prove that, from a microbiological point of view, septic failure after 1-stage exchange comes with increased challenges. Given the time interval to failure, we propose that a longer follow-up of these patients is needed, than previously suggested.