Estimation of the Prevalence of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review and Data from a Physician Survey

An adaptive Bayesian randomized controlled trial of traditional Chinese medicine in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: Rationale and study design

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a progressive and lethal condition with few effective treatment options. Improvements in quality of life for patients with PPF remain limited even while receiving treatment with approved antifibrotic drugs. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has the potential to improve cough, dyspnea and fatigue symptoms of patients with PPF. TCM treatments are typically diverse and individualized, requiring urgent development of efficient and precise design strategies to identify effective treatment options. We designed an innovative Bayesian adaptive two-stage trial, hoping to provide new ideas for the rapid evaluation of the effectiveness of TCM in PPF. An open-label, two-stage, adaptive Bayesian randomized controlled trial will be conducted in China. Based on Bayesian methods, the trial will employ response-adaptive randomization to allocate patients to study groups based on data collected over the course of the trial. The adaptive Bayesian trial design will employ a Bayesian hierarchical model with "stopping" and "continuation" criteria once a predetermined posterior probability of superiority or futility and a decision threshold are reached. The trial can be implemented more efficiently by sharing the master protocol and organizational management mechanisms of the sub-trial we have implemented. The primary patient-reported outcome is a change in the Leicester Cough Questionnaire score, reflecting an improvement in cough-specific quality of life. The adaptive Bayesian trial design may be a promising method to facilitate the rapid clinical evaluation of TCM effectiveness for PPF, and will provide an example for how to evaluate TCM effectiveness in rare and refractory diseases. However, due to the complexity of the trial implementation, sufficient simulation analysis by professional statistical analysts is required to construct a Bayesian response-adaptive randomization procedure for timely response. Moreover, detailed standard operating procedures need to be developed to ensure the feasibility of the trial implementation. Please cite this article as: Zhang C, Nie YS, Zhang CT, Yang HJ, Zhang HR, Xiao W, Cui GF, Li J, Li SJ, Huang QS, Yan SY. An adaptive Bayesian randomized controlled trial of traditional Chinese medicine in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: Rationale and study design. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(2): 138-145.

Impact of disease duration on systemic clinical profile in Sjogren's syndrome

BACKGROUND

Primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by lymphocyte infiltration of the exocrine glands. Disease duration plays a pivotal role in evaluating the development of SS. In this study, we aimed to clarify the clinical manifestations of pSS across various stages of its progression, thereby offering critical insights for early diagnosis and targeted management strategies for Sjogren's Syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 3,978 patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome (mean [SD] age: 53.1[24] years) from Peking University People's Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. We classified patients into five distinct groups based on the duration of the syndrome: T0 (≤ 1 year), T1 (> 1 year, ≤ 5 years), T2 (> 5 years, ≤ 10 years), T3 (> 10 years, ≤ 20 years), and T4 (> 20 years).

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant increase in the percentage of pSS patients with white blood cell (WBC) decrease, specifically: T0 (9.23%), T1 (15.40%), T2 (22.62%), T3 (20.22%), T4 (26.45%). The decreases in hemoglobin (HGB) and platelet (PLT) were also robustly associated with extended disease duration (p < 0.0001). Simultaneously, systemic involvements aggravated with disease progression as incidence rates of skin, joint, lung, and nervous system were strikingly increased in each group. The findings also indicated that patients with long-term pSS exhibit a higher likelihood of developing comorbid conditions, such as diabetes and tumors. In summary, disease duration serves as a crucial determinant for the prognosis of patients with pSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, early identification of symptoms and initiation of therapies are imperative for mitigating the risk of significant complications in pSS patients.

Evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease in patients treated with JAK inhibitors: a MAJIK-SFR cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the course of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) in France on treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) using the MAJIK-SFR registry.

METHODS

Prospective national multicentre observational study identifying patients with RA-ILD from the MAJIK-SFR registry. Pulmonary assessment data were collected at JAKi initiation and follow-up visits (6 months, 12 months and a median of 21 months postinclusion), including chest high-resolution CT (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), acute exacerbations of ILD, respiratory infections and lung cancers.

RESULTS

We enrolled 42 patients (26 women, 62%) with RA-ILD with a mean age of 61±13 years and a mean disease duration of 16±10 years. Compared with the 778 RA patients without ILD from the MAJIK registry, RA-ILD patients were older, displayed more severe and active disease and had more prevalent comorbidities. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia accounted for 46% and 43% of the chest HRCT ILD patterns, respectively. No significant changes in FVC and DLCO were observed during the follow-up period. Chest HRCT lesions remained stable in 69% of patients. Progressive ILD was identified in 8 patients (19%). 16 (38%) respiratory tract infections were observed. Only one acute regressive exacerbation of ILD was noted, and no lung cancer was diagnosed. No deaths occurred. JAKi was discontinued in 17 patients including 8 for inefficacy on joint involvement and 5 for intolerance.

CONCLUSION

The analysis indicates stability of RA-ILD in patients treated with JAKi. The tolerance profile of JAKi in this higher risk population did not reveal new safety signal.

Pulmonary rehabilitation in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

 Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the major contributor to mortality in between chronic lung diseases. ILD originates from voluminous pathophysiological factors. One of the reasons is connective tissue diseases (CTD). According to experts, patients with CTD-ILD may have a stable disease activity and not need conventional treatment. Also, with pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), these patients may benefit from improving clinical outcomes and regression in mortality. However, the characteristics of these patients and whether they have stable disease activity in practice are not known.

METHODS

 The systematic review was performed via the AI-powered tool with six databases to conduct literature research. The methodologic quality of the studies, risk of bias, and level of evidence were assessed.

RESULTS

According to the final four included studies PR benefit moderate levels of evidence for lung functions and diffusion capacity, functional capacity, quality of life, dyspnea severity, and fatigue level. However, there was limited evidence for respiratory, and peripheral muscle strength for CTD-ILD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature shows that the use of PR for CTD-ILDs wasn't widespread. Our findings suggest that PR can be used in CTD-ILDs to recover clinical parameters like, lung functions, quality of life, dyspnea severity, and fatigue level. More comprehensive studies should be conducted to reveal the effect of the PR in the evidence-based frame.

Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Antifibrotics in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background/Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most severe complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Real-world data on antifibrotic treatment are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotic agents in patients with progressive fibrosing RA-ILD. Methods: A longitudinal, retrospective, observational study was conducted on a cohort of RA-ILD patients treated with either nintedanib or pirfenidone. The data collected included pulmonary function test (PFT) results, adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and drug retention. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included; 25 (92.5%) initiated nintedanib, while two initiated pirfenidone. The median follow-up duration was 25 months (IQR 7-27). The mean decline in %pFVC and %pDLCO from ILD diagnosis to the initiation of antifibrotic therapy were -8.9% and -14.8%, respectively. After 6 months of treatment, most patients achieved stabilization in PFT: a ∆%pFVC of +1.2% (p = 0.611 compared with baseline) and a ∆%pDLCO of +3.9% (p = 0.400). Eighteen patients completed one year of therapy, with a modest improvement in %pFVC (+4.7%; p = 0.023) and stabilization in %pDLCO (-3.8%; p = 0.175). This trend persisted among the nine patients who completed 2 years of treatment (%pFVC +7.7%; p = 0.037 and %pDLCO -2.2%; p = 0.621). During the follow-up period, 15% of patients died, and 4% underwent lung transplantation. Adverse events occurred in 81% of patients, leading to discontinuation in 18.5% of cases. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal events and hepatitis, leading to a permanent dose reduction of 40% for nintedanib and 14% for pirfenidone. A second antifibrotic agent was prescribed for 18.5% of the patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 63% of the total cohort remained on antifibrotic therapy. Conclusions: According to our results, antifibrotic initiation was associated with a modest improvement in the trajectory of %pFVC and stabilization in %pDLCO. The discontinuation rate in our cohort (37%) was higher than that reported in clinical trials but similar to that reported in previously published real-world studies.

Moving forward in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Screening

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of developing interstitial lung disease compared to the general population, a complication that is associated with significant morbidity and high mortality. Given its frequency and severity, ILD should always be considered during both the initial assessment and follow-up of RA patients. However, there is currently no consensus on which RA patients should be screened for ILD. In recent years, several scientific societies have developed specific screening proposals. According to the recommendations of the Spanish, American, and Austrian rheumatology societies, it is not necessary to screen all individuals with RA, and it should be tailored to each patient based on clinical risk factors. In contrast, the Portuguese Societies of Rheumatology and Pulmonology advocate for systematic screening of all RA patients. Risk factors for the development of ILD in RA patients are well identified, and several screening tools for RA-ILD based on these risk factors have been developed. However, all of these tools still require further validation. To address this issue, the ANCHOR-RA study, a multinational cross-sectional initiative, has been launched to develop a multivariable model for predicting RA-ILD, which could provide valuable guidance for screening practices in clinical settings. In addition to certain biochemical and genetic predictive markers, lung ultrasound appears to be a useful screening tool. When combined with clinical evaluation and risk factor assessment, it can help identify which patients require a thoracic HRCT evaluation, which remains the gold standard for confirming an ILD diagnosis.

The impact of time from ILD diagnosis to referral to the transplant center on the probability of inclusion in the transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is a therapeutic option for patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether time from ILD diagnosis to referral to a transplant center influences the probability of being included in the transplant waiting list.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including all ILD patients evaluated as lung transplantation (LT) candidates at a lung transplant center between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2022. The primary endpoint was the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list according to the time elapsed from diagnosis to referral to the transplant center.

RESULTS

A total of 843 lung transplant requests were received, of which 367 (43.5%) were associated with ILD. Thirteen patients were excluded because they did not attend the first visit, whereas another 11 were excluded because some information was missing. As a result, our final sample was composed of 343 patients. The median time from diagnosis to referral was 29.4 (10.9 - 61.1) months. The overall probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 29.7%. By time from diagnosis to referral, the probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 48.1% for the patients referred 〈 6 months from diagnosis; 27.5% for patients referred 6 to 24 months from diagnosis; and 25.8% for patients referred 〉 24 months from diagnosis (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Early referral to a lung transplant center seemed to increase the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list. Further research is needed in this topic.

An App Platform-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Outpatients With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Rationale: Outpatients with interstitial lung disease often experience serious symptoms, yet infrequently receive palliative care. Objective: To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of a mobile application (PCplanner) in an outpatient setting. Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among adults with interstitial lung disease in a single-center academic clinic. Clinical outcomes included change in Needs at the End-of-Life Screening Tool (NEST) scale between baseline and 3 months as well as frequency of advance care planning discussions and referrals to palliative care services. Results: Observed feasibility outcomes were similar to targeted benchmarks including randomization rates (82.1% vs 80%) and retention (84.8% vs 80%). Mean NEST scores between the intervention and control group were 38.9 (SD, 18.9) vs 41.5 (SD, 20.5) at baseline, 34.6 (SD, 18.9) vs 33.6 (SD, 19.4) at 1 month after clinic visit, 40.5 (SD, 21.6) vs 35.3 (SD, 25.0) at 3 months after clinic visit. Changes in NEST scores between baseline and 3 months showed no difference in the primary outcome (P = 0.481, 95% CI [-8.45, 17.62]). Conclusion: Among patients with interstitial lung disease, a mobile app designed to focus patients and clinicians on palliative care principles demonstrated evidence of feasibility. Although changes in self-reported needs were similar between intervention and control groups, more patients in the intervention group updated their advance directives and code status compared to the control group. Clinical Trial Registration: Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) NCT05095363. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05095363.

Pathological mechanisms and novel drug targets in fibrotic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a diverse group of conditions characterized by inflammation and fibrosis in the lung. In some patients with ILD, a progressive fibrotic phenotype develops, which is associated with an irreversible decline in lung function and a poor prognosis.

MAIN BODY

The pathological mechanisms that underlie this process culminate in fibroblast activation, proliferation, and differentiation into myofibroblasts, which deposit extracellular matrix proteins and result in fibrosis. Upstream of fibroblast activation, epithelial cell injury and immune activation are known initiators of fibrosis progression, with multiple diverse cell types involved. Recent years have seen an increase in our understanding of the complex and interrelated processes that drive fibrosis progression in ILD, in part due to the advent of single-cell RNA sequencing technology and integrative multiomics analyses. Novel pathological mechanisms have been identified, which represent new targets for drugs currently in clinical development. These include phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and other molecules that act on intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling, as well as inhibitors of the autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid axis and  α v  integrins. Here, we review current knowledge and recent developments regarding the pathological mechanisms that underlie progressive fibrotic ILD, including potential therapeutic targets.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the pathological mechanisms that drive progressive fibrosis in patients with ILD has expanded, with the role of alveolar endothelial cells, the immune system, and fibroblasts better elucidated. Drugs that target novel mechanisms hold promise for expanding the future therapeutic armamentarium for progressive fibrotic ILD.

Cancer and pulmonary fibrosis risks in patients with dermatomyositis and polymyositis: A retrospective cohort study

Background

This study assessed the risks of developing pulmonary fibrosis and cancer and whether patients are at risk of acquiring subsequent cancer after pulmonary fibrosis development.

Methods

From the claims data of 22 million insured people, we identified 1461 patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and 1058 with polymyositis (PM) diagnosed in 1996-2016 and 50,380 comparison individuals without pulmonary fibrosis and cancer at baseline, matched by sex and age. Incident pulmonary fibrosis and cancer in each cohort were assessed at the end of 2016. We further followed up individuals with and without pulmonary fibrosis to assess the subsequent development of cancer.

Results

The cancer incidence was 2.6-fold higher in the DM/PM groups combined than in comparisons (135.3 vs. 52.1 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 3.11 (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-3.58). The incidence was lower in patients with PM than in those with DM (81.3 vs. 176 per 10,000 person-years), with an aHR of 0.39 (95 % CI = 0.29-0.54). The likelihood of developing pulmonary fibrosis was 92 times higher in the PM/DM groups combined than in comparisons (37.9 vs. 0.41 per 10,000 person-years; aHR 84.0 (95 % CI = 49.5-143). The incidence was 1.44-fold higher in patients with PM than in those with DM (46.1 vs. 32.0 per 10,000 person-years), but the difference was not significant. Further analysis showed that in 2452 patients with myositis without pulmonary fibrosis, 234 (9.5 %) had cancer, whereas no cancer was identified in 67 patients with pulmonary fibrosis (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Patients with PM and DM are at great risk of developing cancer and pulmonary fibrosis. Patients who develop pulmonary fibrosis might be at low risk of developing cancer. The complexity of cancer risk interplaying between patients with and without pulmonary fibrosis has clinical relevance and deserves further investigation. Patients who are free of pulmonary fibrosis deserve close monitoring to reduce subsequent cancer risk.

Nintedanib combined with immunosuppressive agents improves forced vital capacity in connective tissue disease-associated PF-ILD: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

In 2020, Nintedanib (NTB), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was the first drug approved worldwide for treating progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of NTB in Japanese patients with CTD-associated PF-ILD in a real-world setting, as there are few reports on this topic. We also evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with NTB and immunosuppressive agents (IS).

METHODS

CTD-associated PF-ILD patients receiving NTB at our institution were included in this retrospective study. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NTB, we investigated changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) (%), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (%), monthly change in FVC (%/month), serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels (U/mL) before and after NTB treatment, and adverse events (AEs) during NTB treatment. Moreover, to evaluate the efficacy of the NTB + IS combination therapy, we divided the patients into two groups: one received only NTB (NTB group), and the other received both NTB and IS (NTB + IS group) following the diagnosis of CTD-associated PF-ILD. We analyzed the differences in the changes of these variables between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with CTD-associated PF-ILD were included. After NTB treatment, there were no significant deteriorations in FVC (%) and DLCO (%), while the monthly change in FVC (%/month) significantly increased (p < 0.001). The changes in FVC (%) and the monthly change in FVC (%/month) were significantly greater in the NTB + IS group than in the NTB group. Following NTB treatment, the mean serum KL-6 levels significantly decreased (p < 0.001). AEs associated with NTB in this study were similar to those in previous clinical trials, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that NTB is an effective medication for slowing the progression of CTD-associated PF-ILD in real-world settings. NTB + IS combination therapy for CTD-associated PF-ILD may be more effective than NTB alone in slowing the progression of CTD-associated PF-ILD.

Antifibrotic therapy in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: a review of recent advances

INTRODUCTION

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a manifestation of a heterogenous group of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses, defined as non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) progressive fibrotic ILD meeting at least two of the following criteria in the previous 12 months: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) more than or equal to 5% and/or absolute decline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) more than or equal to 10% and/or radiological progression.

AREAS COVERED

The authors subjectively reviewed a synthesis of literature from PubMed to identify recent advances in the diagnosis and characterisation of PPF, treatment recommendations, and management challenges. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advances and highlights future directions for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of PPF.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in defining the criteria for PPF diagnosis and licensing of treatment are likely to support further characterisation of the PPF patient population and improve our understanding of prevalence. The diagnosis of PPF remains challenging with the need for a specialised ILD multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. The evidence base supports the use of immunomodulatory therapy to treat inflammatory ILDs and antifibrotic therapy where PPF develops. Treatment needs to be tailored to the specific underlying disease and determined on a case-by-case basis.

Interstitial lung disease: a review of classification, etiology, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) refer to a heterogeneous and complex group of conditions characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, or both, in the interstitium of the lungs. This results in impaired gas exchange, leading to a worsening of respiratory symptoms and a decline in lung function. While the etiology of some ILDs is unclear, most cases can be traced back to factors such as genetic predispositions, environmental exposures (including allergens, toxins, and air pollution), underlying autoimmune diseases, or the use of certain medications. There has been an increase in research and evidence aimed at identifying etiology, understanding epidemiology, improving clinical diagnosis, and developing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in the field of interstitial lung diseases.

[Pulmonary fibrosis after a new coronavirus infection - versions and controversies: A review]

Fibrosis is a dynamic process characterized by a typical cascade of events as a result of overexpressed repair of connective tissue in response to injury, and manifested by excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix. The development of fibrosis is a determining factor in the pathogenesis, clinical course and prognosis of many diseases, among which interstitial lung diseases occupy a special place. According to a large Russian registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04492384), in a third of patients with COVID-19, the volume of lung parenchyma involvement exceeds 50% (CT 3-4). The rapid growth in the number of patients who have had a coronavirus infection with lung damage has raised the issues of its long-term consequences to the number of the most relevant in internal medicine of the current time. Often, in the outcome of a coronavirus infection, patients retain clinical and functional changes that are similar to interstitial lung diseases of a different origin, the prognosis of which is determined by the development of interstitial fibrosis and the rate of its progression. This article is an attempt to consider topical issues of fibrogenesis in patients who have undergone a new coronavirus infection through the prism of polar data on immunobiology, clinical course and prognosis.

Compare three diagnostic criteria of progressive pulmonary fibrosis

Background

In patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), a progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) typically demonstrates worsening respiratory symptoms, lung function decline and continuing fibrosis. The goal of this study was to compare the three different diagnostic criteria of PPF.

Methods

Except for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), all consecutive adult patients with fibrotic ILD were retrospectively examined for the three predefined diagnostic criteria of PPF. The three criteria assessed the disease progression in preceding 6 (0.5-year), 12 (1-year) and 24 (2-year) months respectively. The clinical characteristics, decline in predicted percent of forced vital capacity (FVC%) and survival of three groups were compared, followed by determination of risk factors for mortality.

Results

We identified 246 patients by 0.5-year standard, 154 patients by 1-year standard and 281 patients by 2-year standard. Among them, 95% of patients in 1-year group were also included in 2-year group. The average 1-year decline in FVC% was -1.0%, -2.7%, and -4.1% for 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year group respectively. The 4-year survival rate was 74% in 0.5-year group, 66% in 1-year group, and 62% in 2-year group. In multivariate Cox model, only baseline predicted percent diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO%) <50% was correlated with mortality, with a hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% CI: 1.1-10.6, P=0.03).

Conclusions

In the current situations, both the 1- and 2-year criterion are the reasonable choice to define PPF both in researches and clinical practice, and DLCO% is an independent predictor for mortality of PPF.

Linking inflammation and angiogenesis with fibrogenesis: Expression of FXIIIA, MMP-9, and VEGF in oral submucous fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Interplay of Factor XIIIa (FXIIIa), a transglutaminase, responsible for cross-linking of matrix proteins, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), a gelatinase, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), an angiogenic inducer, were studied in relation to fibrogenesis and disease progression in oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical expression of markers was studied in 60 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of OSMF and 20 normal oral mucosal tissues. FXIIIa was studied quantitatively while MMP-9 and VEGF were assessed semi-quantitatively. Expression was compared with histopathological grades of OSMF.

RESULTS

FXIIIa expression significantly increased in OSMF (p-value 0.000). However, expression decreased and cells became quiescent with increasing grades (p-value 0.000). MMP-9 (p-value epithelium 0.011, p-value connective tissue 0.000) and VEGF expression (p-value epithelium 0.000, connective tissue 0.000) increased in OSMF. A negative correlation between FXIIIa and MMP-9 (-0.653) in early grade (p-value of 0.021) and a positive correlation between FXIIIa and VEGF (0.595) (p-value of 0.032) was found in the moderate grade OSMF. Regression analysis showed a significant association (p<0.01) of FXIIIa in OSMF and with increasing grades of OSMF.

CONCLUSION

FXIIIa may play a crucial role in initiation of fibrosis in OSMF. MMP-9 may have a diverse role to play in OSMF as a regulator of fibrosis. VEGF may show an angio-fibrotic switch and contribute to fibrosis in OSMF. These cytokines may show altered function and can contribute to fibrosis and chronicity of disease due to changes in the microenvironment. Tissue stiffness in OSMF itself creates an environment that enhances the chronicity of the disease.

The usual Interstitial pneumonia pattern in autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) is characterized by progression of lung parenchyma that may be observed in various autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), including rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue diseases. From a diagnostic point of view, a UIP pattern related to ARDs may display imaging and pathological features able to distinguish it from that related to IPF, such as the "straight-edge" sign at HRCT and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates at histologic specimens. Multidisciplinary approach (MDD), involving at least pulmonologist, rheumatologist and radiologist, is fundamental in the differential diagnosis process, but MDD is also required in the evaluation of severity, progression and response to treatment, that is based on the combination of changes in symptoms, pulmonary function trends, and, in selected patients, serial CT evaluation. Differently from IPF, in patients with ARDs both functional evaluation and patient-reported outcomes may be affected by systemic involvement and comorbidities, including musculoskeletal manifestations of disease. Finally, in regards to pharmacological treatment, immunosuppressants have been considered the cornerstone of therapy, despite the lack of solid evidence in most cases; recently, antifibrotic drugs were also proposed for the treatment of progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF. In ARD-ILD, the therapeutic choice should balance the need for the control of systemic and lung involvements with the risk of adverse events from multi-morbidities and -therapies. Purpose of this review is to summarize the definition, the radiological and morphological features of the UIP pattern in ARDs, together with risk factors, diagnostic criteria, prognostic evaluation, monitoring and management approaches of the UIP-ARDs.

Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identification of 'progressive pulmonary fibrosis' using chest CT: a narrative review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), with incidence and prevalence variously assessed in the literature but reported in up to 30% of patients, with higher frequency in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Recent years have seen a growing interest in the pulmonary manifestations of ILD-CTDs, mainly due to the widening of the use of anti-fibrotic drugs initially introduced exclusively for IPF, and radiologists play a key role because the lung biopsy is very rarely used in these patients where the morphological assessment is essentially left to imaging and especially HRCT. In this narrative review we will discuss, from the radiologist's point of view, the most recent findings in the field of ILD secondary to SSc and RA, with a special focus about the progression of disease and in particular about the 'progressive pulmonary fibrosis' (PPF) phenotype, and we will try to address two main issues: How to predict a possible evolution and therefore a worse prognosis when diagnosing a new case of ILD-CTDs and how to assess the progression of an already diagnosed ILD-CTDs.

Pulmonary fibrosis: from pathogenesis to clinical decision-making

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) encompasses a spectrum of chronic lung diseases that progressively impact the interstitium, resulting in compromised gas exchange, breathlessness, diminished quality of life (QoL), and ultimately respiratory failure and mortality. Various diseases can cause PF, with their underlying causes primarily affecting the lung interstitium, leading to their referral as interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). The current understanding is that PF arises from abnormal wound healing processes triggered by various factors specific to each disease, leading to excessive inflammation and fibrosis. While significant progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of PF, its pathogenesis remains elusive. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the latest insights into PF pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and future perspectives.

Anti-fibrotic effects of nintedanib on lung fibroblasts derived from patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases (PF-ILDs)

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib has been recently approved for the treatment of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs) that manifest a progressive fibrosis phenotype other than Idiopathic pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). Nintedanib reduces the development of lung fibrosis in various animal models resembling features of PF-ILD and in vitro, it inhibits the fibrosing phenotype of human lung fibroblasts (HLFs) isolated from patients with IPF. To get insight on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive the clinical efficiency of nintedanib in patients with non-IPF PF-ILD, we investigated its effects on the fibrosing functions of HLFs derived from patients with PF-hypersensitivity pneumonitis (PF-HP, n = 7), PF-sarcoidosis (n = 5) and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE, n = 4). HLFs were treated with nintedanib (10 nM-1 μM) and then stimulated with PDGF-BB (25-50 ng/ml) or TGF-β1 (1 ng/ml) for 24-72 h to assess proliferation and migration or differentiation. At nanomolar concentrations, nintedanib reduced the levels of PDGF receptor and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, the proliferation and the migration of PF-HP, PF-sarcoidosis and PPFE HLFs stimulated with PDGF-BB. Moreover, nintedanib also attenuates the myofibroblastic differentiation driven by TGF-β1 but only when it is used at 1 μM. The drug reduced the phosphorylation of SMAD2/3 and decreased the induction of collagen, fibronectin and α-smooth muscle actin expression induced by TGF-β1. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that nintedanib counteracts fundamental fibrosing functions of lung fibroblasts derived from patients with PF-HP, PF-sarcoidosis and PPFE, at concentrations previously reported to inhibit control and IPF HLFs. Such effects may contribute to its clinical benefit in patients suffering from these irreversible ILDs.

Defining the pathway to timely diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease: a US Delphi survey

INTRODUCTION

Timely diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is limited by obstacles in the current patient pathway. Misdiagnosis and delays are common and may lead to a significant burden of diagnostic procedures and worse outcomes. This Delphi survey aimed to identify consensus on the key steps that facilitate the patient journey to an accurate ILD diagnosis and appropriate management in the US.

METHODS

A modified Delphi analysis was conducted, comprising three online surveys based on a comprehensive literature search. The surveys spanned five domains (guidelines, community screening, diagnosis, management and specialist referral) and were completed by a panel of US physicians, including primary care physicians and pulmonologists practising in community or academic settings. A priori definitions of consensus agreement were median scores of 2-3 (agree strongly/agree), with an IQR of 0-1 for questions on a 7-point Likert scale from -3 to 3, or ≥80% agreement for binary questions.

RESULTS

Forty-nine panellists completed the surveys and 62 statements reached consensus agreement. There was consensus agreement on what should be included in the primary care evaluation of patients with suspected ILD and the next steps following workup. Regarding diagnosis in community pulmonology care, consensus agreement was reached on the requisition and reporting of high-resolution CT scans and the appropriate circumstances for holding multidisciplinary discussions. Additionally, there was consensus agreement on which symptoms and comorbidities should be monitored, the frequency of consultations and the assessment of disease progression. Regarding specialist referral, consensus agreement was reached on which patients should receive priority access to ILD centres and the contents of the referral package.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings clarify the most common issues that should merit further evaluation for ILD and help define the steps for timely, accurate diagnosis and appropriate collaborative specialty management of patients with ILD.

Survival and acute exacerbation for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: 5-year follow-up analysis of a prospective multi-institutional patient registry

OBJECTIVE

Few prospective cohort studies with relatively large numbers of patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF) of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) have been described. We aimed to assess disease progression and cause of death for patients with non-IPF IIPs or IPF under real-life conditions.

METHODS

Data were analysed for a prospective multi-institutional cohort of 528 IIP patients enrolled in Japan between September 2013 and April 2016. Diagnosis of IPF versus non-IPF IIPs was based on central multidisciplinary discussion, and follow-up surveillance was performed for up to 5 years after patient registration. Survival and acute exacerbation (AE) were assessed.

RESULTS

IPF was the most common diagnosis (58.0%), followed by unclassifiable IIPs (35.8%) and others (6.2%). The 5-year survival rate for non-IPF IIP and IPF groups was 72.8% and 53.7%, respectively, with chronic respiratory failure being the primary cause of death in both groups. AE was the second most common cause of death for both non-IPF IIP (24.1%) and IPF (23.5%) patients. The cumulative incidence of AE did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.36), with a 1-year incidence rate of 7.4% and 9.0% in non-IPF IIP and IPF patients, respectively. We found that 30.2% and 39.4% of non-IPF IIP and IPF patients, respectively, who experienced AE died within 3 months after an AE event, whereas 55.8% and 66.7% of such patients, respectively, died within 5 years after registration.

CONCLUSION

Closer monitoring of disease progression and palliative care interventions after AE are important for non-IPF IIP patients as well as for IPF patients.

Impact of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease on healthcare use: association between fvc decline and inpatient hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Many types of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may transition to progressive chronic-fibrosing ILDs with rapid lung function decline and a negative survival prognosis. In real-world clinical settings, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures demonstrating progressive decline may be linked to negative outcomes, including increased risks of costly healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Thus, we assessed the relationship between rate of decline in lung function and an increase in HRU, specifically inpatient hospitalization, among patients with chronic fibrosing ILD.

METHODS

This study utilized electronic health records from 01-Oct-2015 to 31-Oct-2019. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) had ≥ 2 fibrosing ILD diagnosis codes, clinical activity for ≥ 15 months, and ≥ 2 FVC tests occurring 6 months apart. Patients with missing demographic data, IPF, or use of nintedanib or pirfenidone were excluded. Two groups were defined by relative change in percent of predicted FVC (FVC% pred) from baseline to 6 months: significant decline (≥ 10%) vs. marginal decline/stable FVC (decrease < 10% or increase). The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of an inpatient hospitalization 6 months after the first FVC value. Descriptive and multivariable analysis was conducted to examine the impact of FVC decline on occurrence of inpatient hospitalization.

RESULTS

The sample included 566 patients: 13% (n = 75) with significant decline and 87% (n = 491) with marginal decline/stable FVC; their mean age (SD) was 65 (13.7) years and 56% were female. Autoimmune diagnoses were observed among 40% of patients with significant decline, and 27% with marginal decline/stable FVC. The significant decline group had better lung function at baseline than the marginal/stable group. For patients with FVC% <80% at baseline, reduction of FVC% ≥10% was associated with significantly increased odds of an inpatient hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; confidence interval [CI] 1.17, 6.94 [p = 0.021]).

CONCLUSION

Decline in FVC% ≥10% was associated with increased odds of inpatient hospitalization among patients with reduced lung function at baseline. These findings support the importance of preserving lung function among patients with fibrosing ILD.

Clinical significance of high monocyte counts for the continuous treatment with nintedanib

BACKGROUND

Nintedanib is now widely used to treat interstitial lung disease (ILD). Adverse events, which occur in not a few patients, make it difficult to continue nintedanib treatment, but the risk factors for adverse events are not well understood.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 111 patients with ILDs treated with nintedanib and investigated the factors involved in starting dosage reduction, withdrawal, or discontinuation within 12 months, even with appropriate symptomatic treatment. We also examined the efficacy of nintedanib in reducing the frequency of acute exacerbations and the prevention of pulmonary function reduction.

RESULTS

Patients with high monocyte counts (> 0.454 × 109/L) had a significantly higher frequency of treatment failure, such as dosage reduction, withdrawal, or discontinuation. High monocyte count was as significant a risk factor as body surface area (BSA). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in the frequency of acute exacerbations or the amount of decline in pulmonary function within 12 months between the normal (300 mg) and reduced (200 mg) starting dosage groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study results indicate that patients with higher monocyte counts (> 0.454 × 109/L) should very careful about side effects with regard to nintedanib administration. Like BSA, a higher monocyte count is considered a risk factor for nintedanib treatment failure. There was no difference in FVC decline and frequency of acute exacerbations between the starting doseage of nintedanib, 300 mg and 200 mg. Considering the risk of withdrawal periods and discontinuation, a reduced starting dosage may be acceptable in the patients with higher monocyte counts or small body sizes.

Efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The clinical spectrum of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) ranges from asymptomatic findings on radiographic imaging to a rapidly progressive illness leading to respiratory failure and death. The treatment is always challenging due to the paucity of proven effective treatments. Nintedanib and pirfenidone are recently approved antifibrotics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic agents in the treatment of CTD-ILD and RA-ILD.

METHODS

Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared pirfenidone or nintedanib with placebo in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. The primary outcome was the change in forced vital capacity (FVC). The odds ratio or risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for categorical data, and the mean difference with 95% CI was estimated for continuous data. The I² statistic was used to assess heterogeneity, and meta-analysis was performed when possible.

RESULTS

Ten studies with a total of 880 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of these, four studies were included in the meta-analysis. According to the pooled result, the annual decline of FVC was significantly decreased in the antifibrotic agent arm compared to that in the placebo arm (MD 70.58 mL/yr, 95% CI 40.55 to 100.61).

CONCLUSION

This review suggests a potential benefit and safety of antifibrotic treatment in slowing the decline of FVC in patients with CTD-ILD and RA-ILD. Further large-sample, random-controlled, high-quality trials are needed to provide more evidence in the decision-making regarding the use of antifibrotics in this group of patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42022369112; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Interstitial lung disease associated with inflammatory myositis: Autoantibodies, clinical phenotypes, and progressive fibrosis

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis is generally diagnosed when interstitial lung disease progression occurs in the absence of any other cause, and a subset of patients with myositis and associated interstitial lung disease may develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Numerous autoantibodies (e.g., against tRNA-synthetase, MDA5, Ro52) increase the risk of this clinical feature in myositis and we speculate that serum biomarkers, sought using the most sensitive laboratory techniques available (i.e., immunoprecipitation) may predict pulmonary involvement and allow the early identification of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. We herein provide a narrative review of the literature and also present original data on pulmonary fibrosis in a cohort of patients with myositis and serum anti-Ro52 with interstitial lung disease. Our results fit into the previous evidence and support the association between anti-Ro52 and signs of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with inflammatory myositis. We believe that the combination of available and real-life data has significant clinical relevance as a paradigm of serum autoantibodies that prove useful in determining precision medicine in rare connective tissue diseases.

Nintedanib for non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis: 12-month outcome data from a real-world multicentre observational study

Background

Nintedanib slows lung function decline for patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) in clinical trials, but the real-world safety and efficacy are not known.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, standardised data were collected from patients in whom nintedanib was initiated for PPF between 2019 and 2020 through an early-access programme across eight centres in the United Kingdom. Rate of lung function change in the 12 months pre- and post-nintedanib initiation was the primary analysis. Symptoms, drug safety, tolerability and stratification by interstitial lung disease subtype and computed tomography pattern were secondary analyses.

Results

126 patients were included; 67 (53%) females; mean±sd age 60±13 years. At initiation of nintedanib, mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 1.87 L (58% predicted) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D _LCO) was 32.7% predicted. 68% of patients were prescribed prednisolone (median dose 10 mg) and 69% were prescribed a steroid-sparing agent. In the 12 months after nintedanib initiation, lung function decline was significantly lower than in the preceding 12 months: FVC -88.8 mL versus -239.9 mL (p=0.004), and absolute decline in D _LCO -2.1% versus -6.1% (p=0.004). Response to nintedanib was consistent in sensitivity and secondary analyses. 89 (71%) out of 126 patients reported side-effects, but 86 (80%) of the surviving 108 patients were still taking nintedanib at 12 months with patients reporting a reduced perception of symptom decline. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusion

In PPF, the real-world efficacy of nintedanib replicated that of clinical trials, significantly attenuating lung function decline. Despite the severity of disease, nintedanib was safe and well tolerated in this real-world multicentre study.

Clinical Characteristics and Disease Course of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Patients in a Real-World Setting

Background and Objectives: This single-center retrospective study was conducted to describe clinical characteristics and the disease course of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with fibrosing ILD (IPF, non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD), and non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF)) treated between 2014 and 2017. Patients were followed annually from the first visit until the end of the study period in 2019. Data were collected from the Turku University Hospital data lake and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 591 patients formed the patient cohort: 110 had IPF, 194 F-ILD, 142 PPF, and the remaining 145 patients were uncertain, F-ILD-U, whose disease progression nature could not be confirmed by FVC measurements. There were more males in each patient group and median age of the groups was similar, although there were younger patients in the PPF, F-ILD, and F-ILD-U groups. PPF patients had more UIP pattern than F-ILD patients. Exposure-related ILDs were clearly the most found ILD diagnoses for both PPF and F-ILD, followed by unclassifiable IIP. Baseline FVC % predicted reduction in every group was moderate. Half of the patients in each group had comorbidities, and the most common were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic lower respiratory diseases; F-ILD-U patients had malignant diseases as well. IPF patients had less medications than the other groups. Glucocorticoids were the most used medication in all patient groups. More PPF and F-ILD patients remained in the follow-up than IPF and F-ILD-U patients. Similarly, mortality of F-ILD-U was the highest, followed by IPF. Evolvement of lung function, oxygen use, and number of acute hospitalizations were similar for IPF and PPF patients whereas the corresponding results were always better for F-ILD patients. Conclusions: The disease course of IPF and PPF was similar, and PPF patient amount exceeded the amount of IPF patients.

Pulmonary Fibrosis and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Prospective Registry of Interstitial Lung Diseases in Eastern Siberia

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are part of a large heterogeneous group of diseases that differ in many ways (in their cause, clinical presentation, and response to therapy, etc.), but there are similar pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of the inflammation and/or fibrosis of the lungs. Currently, several criteria for pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) are proposed, and the information on the prevalence and characteristics of these conditions is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spectrum of PF and PPF according to the registry of patients with ILD in eastern Siberia. Materials and methods: The study included patients with ILD from all of the medical institutions in the Irkutsk region (eastern Siberia). Each case of ILD (n = 270) was reviewed by a multidisciplinary discussion panel. The ILD patient registry included information on the clinical findings, history, pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and histological findings. The follow-up period for the patients varied from 1 to 5 years. Results: Pulmonary fibrosis was detected by HRCT in 104 patients with ILD (38.5%). PF was present in 100% of the patients with IPF and SS-ILD, in 90.9% of the patients with CHP, in 71.4% of the patients with NSIP, and in 60% of the patients with RA-ILD. Sixty-two patients met the criteria for PPF (23.0% of the entire ILD cohort and 59.6% of the patients with PF). PPF occurred most often in the patients with IPF, CHP, IPAF, and SSc-ILD: 100%, 72.7%, 40%, and 38.5% of them, respectively. The variables associated with fibrosis progression included Velcro crackles (OR 18.3, p < 0.001) and late diagnosis (OR 4.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis are common in patients with ILD. The high mortality rate of PPF dictates the need for the active, early detection of a progressive fibrosing course of a wide range of ILD and suggests that further studies assessing the effectiveness of the interventions might be warranted.

SER-SEPAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease. Part 1: Epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop multidisciplinary recommendations to improve the management of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD).

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified by a panel of rheumatologists and pneumologists selected based on their experience in the field. Systematic reviews of the available evidence were conducted, and evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Specific recommendations were made.

RESULTS

Six PICO questions were selected, three of which analysed the incidence and prevalence of RA-ILD, associated risk factors, and predictors of progression and mortality. A total of 6 specific recommendations on these topics, structured by question, were formulated based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first official SER-SEPAR document with specific recommendations for RA-ILD management developed to resolve some common clinical questions and facilitate decision-making for patients.

Interstitial lung diseases

Over 200 interstitial lung diseases, from ultra rare to relatively common, are recognised. Most interstitial lung diseases are characterised by inflammation or fibrosis within the interstitial space, the primary consequence of which is impaired gas exchange, resulting in breathlessness, diminished exercise tolerance, and decreased quality of life. Outcomes vary considerably for each of the different interstitial lung diseases. In some conditions, spontaneous reversibility or stabilisation can occur, but unfortunately in many people with interstitial lung disease, especially in those manifesting progressive pulmonary fibrosis, respiratory failure and death are a sad reality. Over the past 3 years, the field of interstitial lung disease has had important advances, with the approval of drugs to treat systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, interstitial lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension, and different forms of progressive pulmonary fibrosis. This Seminar provides an update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, disease course, and management of the interstitial lung diseases that are most frequently encountered in clinical practice. Furthermore, we describe how developments have led to a shift in the classification and treatment of interstitial lung diseases that exhibit progressive pulmonary fibrosis and summarise the latest practice-changing guidelines. We conclude with an outline of controversies, uncertainties, and future directions.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nintedanib for Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD)

OBJECTIVES

Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is characterised by increased pulmonary fibrosis, lung function decline, acute exacerbations, decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Nintedanib may slow down disease progression, but long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib in comparison to placebo, both on top of usual care in patients with PF-ILD.

METHODS

An individual PF-ILD patient simulation model was created, using data and extrapolations from the nintedanib and placebo arms of the INBUILD trial. Clinical outcomes (mortality, exacerbations, lung transplants), economic outcomes (direct and indirect costs) and the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib over a 10-year time horizon were forecasted using the Netherlands as a case example. Disease progression was driven by lung function decline, with forced vital capacity (FVC) health states ranging from < 40 to ≥ 110 FVC of % predicted. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter assumptions on the cost-effectiveness and to test model robustness.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year follow-up, nintedanib gained an average of 1.31 discounted life years and an average of 0.87 discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €60,690 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed cost variations had a minor impact on the ICER. Results were mainly driven by mortality probabilities and disease-related utilities. Scenario analyses indicated most sensitivity to the time horizon and lung transplantation costs.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with nintedanib could result in considerable health gains for patients with PF-ILD and can be considered cost-effective under the common willingness-to-pay threshold.

Epidemiology and real-life experience in progressive pulmonary fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), characterized by relentless disease progression from the time of diagnosis, is part of a larger group of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). A proportion of patients with non-IPF ILDs may develop, despite conventional treatment, a progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), also referred to as ILD with a progressive fibrosing phenotype (PF-ILD). These patients experience worsening of respiratory symptoms, decline in lung function, and early mortality. The goal of this review is to describe the epidemiology and recent real-life cohorts of PF-ILD, with implications for management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The relatively new concept of PF-ILD has aroused active clinical research over the past years. To understand risk factors for progression and the real burden of the disease is crucial to improve management. In the last 2 years, different cohort studies have addressed these questions. They showed that almost one-third of the non-IPF fibrotic ILD patients develop PF-ILD or PPF.

SUMMARY

Emerging data show similarities in prognosis between patients with IPF or with non-IPF PF-ILD patients. Early detection and appropriate treatment of this group of patients is a priority. Further research is needed to identify risk factors of progression, to clarify the assessment of progression in clinical practice, for a better management of patients with PF-ILD in a real-world setting.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Management of progressive pulmonary fibrosis associated with connective tissue disease

INTRODUCTION

: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent and severe complication of connective tissue disease (CTD).

AREAS COVERED

: In this narrative review, we update the most relevant differential characteristics of fibrotic ILD associated with CTD (CTD-ILD) and propose a diagnostic and therapeutic approach based on a review of the articles published between 2002 and 2022 through PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

: The subset of ILD, mainly the radiological/histological pattern and the degree of fibrotic component, usually determines the prognosis and therapeutic strategy for these patients. Some patients with CTD-ILD can develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) with severe deterioration of lung function, rapid progression to chronic respiratory failure, and high mortality. PPF has been described in many CTDs, mainly in systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, and requires a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach to improve patient outcomes.

Care patterns of patients with chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a progressive phenotype

Background

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) include a variety of parenchymal lung diseases. The most common types of ILDs are idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), autoimmune ILDs and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). There is limited real world data on care patterns of patients with chronic fibrosing ILDs with a progressive phenotype other than IPF. Therefore, the aim of this study is to describe care patterns in these patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used claims data from 2015 to 2019 from the Optum Research Database. The study population included adults (≥ 18 years old) with at least two diagnosis codes for fibrosing ILD during the identification period (1OCT2016 to 31DEC2018). A claim-based algorithm for disease progression was used to identify patients likely to have a progressive fibrotic phenotype using progression proxies during the identification period. Index date was the first day of progression proxy identification after fibrosing ILD diagnosis. Patients were required to have continuous enrollment for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index date. Patients with an IPF diagnosis were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the patient population and care patterns.

Results

11,204 patients were included in the study. Mean age of the patient population was 72.7 years, and 54.5% were female. Unclassified ILDs (48.0%), HP (25.2%) and autoimmune ILDs (16.0%) were the most common ILD types. Other respiratory conditions were prevalent among patients including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (58.9%), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (25.0%) and pulmonary hypertension (9.8%). During baseline, 65.3% of all patients had at least one pulmonology visit, this proportion was higher during follow-up, at 70.6%. Baseline and follow-up use for HRCT were 39.9% and 48.8%, and for pulmonary function tests were 43.7% and 48.5% respectively. Use of adrenal corticosteroids was higher during follow-up than during baseline (62.5% vs. 58.0%). Anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive medication classes were filled by a higher percentage of patients during follow-up than during baseline.

Conclusions

Comprehensive testing is essential for diagnosis of a progressive phenotype condition, but diagnostic tests were underutilized. Patients with this condition frequently were prescribed anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive medications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01953-9.

A systematic review on the economic burden of interstitial lung disease and the cost-effectiveness of current therapies

Background

The economic burden of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unknown, limiting informed resource allocation and planning. We sought to conduct the first systematic review on the direct, indirect, and overall costs associated with ILD and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of current therapies globally.

Methods

We conducted systematic reviews of ILD disease cost studies and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) using MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases between 2000 and 2020. We compared ILD costs between countries according to the share of costs towards each country’s respective gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Costs are reported in 2020 USD.

Results

We identified 25 disease cost studies and 7 CEAs. The direct medical costs ranged between $1824 and $116,927 annually per patient (median $32,834; 14–180% of GDP per capita in Western countries). The leading drivers of direct costs were inpatient (55%), outpatient (22%), and medication costs (18%), based on pooled estimates. Annual indirect costs ranged from $7149 to $10,902 per employed patient (median $9607; 12–23% of GDP per capita). Among the 7 CEAs, only 1 study (14%) showed an ILD therapy (ambulatory oxygen) was cost-effective compared to best supportive care.

Conclusion

The direct and indirect costs associated with ILD are consistently high in all countries with available data, with cost-effectiveness profiles of new therapies generally undesirable. Globally, the median total direct cost for ILD equates to 51% of a country’s GDP per capita and has been increasing over time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01922-2.

Developing a conceptual model of symptoms and impacts in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures

Background

An understanding of the experience of patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is needed to select appropriate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment effect in clinical trials.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to develop a preliminary conceptual model of the symptoms experienced by patients with PF-ILD and the impacts the disease has on them. An online survey and consensus meetings were then conducted with 12-14 stakeholders (patients, clinicians, regulatory and payer advisors) to refine the conceptual model and critically appraise how key concepts should be measured by PROMs. PROMs assessed included Living with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis, the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire, Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Dyspnoea/Fatigue) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Results

The literature review identified 36 signs/symptoms and 43 impacts directly or indirectly related to pulmonary aspects of PF-ILD. The most relevant symptoms identified by participants included shortness of breath on exertion, fatigue and cough; relevant impacts included effects on physical functioning, activities of daily living and emotional wellbeing. These are presented in a conceptual model. Consensus opinion was that existing PROMs need further modification and validation before use in clinical trials.

Conclusions

The conceptual model improves understanding of the symptoms and impacts that living with PF-ILD has on patients' wellbeing. It can help to inform the choice of PROMs in clinical trials and highlight aspects to assess in the clinical care of patients with PF-ILD.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, short version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The Burden of Progressive-Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

Despite conventional treatment, a proportion of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients develop a progressive phenotype known as "fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype" (PF-ILD), characterized by worsening respiratory symptoms, decline in lung function, and early mortality. This review describes the epidemiology, and the humanistic and economic burden of PF-ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF PF-ILD). A structured review of the literature was conducted, using predefined search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE, and supplemented with gray literature searches. The search identified 3,002 unique articles and an additional 3 sources were included from the gray literature; 21 publications were included. The estimated prevalence of non-IPF PF-ILD ranges from 6.9 to 70.3/100,000 persons and the estimated incidence from 2.1 to 32.6/100,000 person-years. Limited evidence demonstrates that PF-ILD has a significant impact on patients' quality of life, affecting their daily lives, psychological well-being, careers, and relationships. PF-ILD is also associated with significant economic burden, demonstrating higher healthcare resource use and direct costs compared with the non-progressive phenotype, and indirect costs, which include job losses. This review indicates that PF-ILD places a considerable humanistic burden on both patients and caregivers, and a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems, patients, and society.

The Role of Radiology in Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease

In this article, we describe the role of radiology for diagnosis and follow-up of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). Patients with PF-ILD are at increased risk for early death without treatment. Clinical diagnosis of PF-ILD has been described in the literature. This manuscript reviews the radiographic diagnosis of PF-ILD and the unique CT characteristics associated with specific types of fibrosis. Ultimately, we believe that radiology has the potential to recognize progression early and thus make an important contribution to the multidisciplinary discussion for this important diagnosis.

Epidemiology of interstitial lung diseases and their progressive-fibrosing behaviour in six European countries

The PERSEIDS study aimed to estimate incidence/prevalence of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD), other non-IPF F-ILDs and their progressive-fibrosing (PF) forms in six European countries, as current data are scarce. This retrospective, two-phase study used aggregate data (2014-2018). In Phase 1, incident/prevalent cases of ILDs above were identified from clinical databases through an algorithm based on codes/keywords, and incidence/prevalence was estimated. For non-IPF F-ILDs, the relative percentage of subtypes was also determined. In Phase 2, a subset of non-IPF F-ILD cases was manually reviewed to determine the percentage of PF behaviour and usual interstitial pneumonia-like (UIP-like) pattern. A weighted mean percentage of progression was calculated for each country and used to extrapolate incidence/prevalence of progressive-fibrosing ILDs (PF-ILDs). In 2018, incidence/105 person-years ranged between 9.4 and 83.6 (ILDs), 7.7 and 76.2 (F-ILDs), 0.4 and 10.3 (IPF), 6.6 and 71.7 (non-IPF F-ILDs), and 0.3 and 1.5 (SSc-ILD); and prevalence/105 persons ranged between 33.6 and 247.4 (ILDs), 26.7 and 236.8 (F-ILDs), 2.8 and 31.0 (IPF), 22.3 and 205.8 (non-IPF F-ILDs), and 1.4 and 10.1 (SSc-ILD). Among non-IPF F-ILDs, sarcoidosis was the most frequent subtype. PF behaviour and UIP-like pattern were present in a third of non-IPF F-ILD cases each and hypersensitivity pneumonitis showed the highest percentage of progressive behaviour. Incidence of PF-ILDs ranged between 2.1 and 14.5/105 person-years, and prevalence between 6.9 and 78.0/105 persons. To our knowledge, PERSEIDS is the first study assessing incidence, prevalence and rate of progression of ILDs across several European countries. Still below the threshold for orphan diseases, the estimates obtained were higher and more variable than reported in previous studies, but differences in study design/population must be considered.