A Review of Monkeypox Ocular Manifestations and Complications: Insights for the 2022 Outbreak

Ocular Manifestations of Mpox and Other Poxvirus Infections: Clinical Insights and Emerging Therapeutic and Preventive Strategies

Poxvirus infections, particularly those caused by the monkeypox virus, have emerged as significant public health threats. Ocular manifestations constitute a severe potential clinical complication associated with these infections, potentially resulting in permanent visual impairment in afflicted patients. This review aimed to examine the clinical spectrum of ocular manifestations associated with mpox and other poxvirus infections and to evaluate current management strategies alongside emerging therapeutic interventions and prevention strategies. A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases to identify studies reporting ocular involvement in poxviral infections. Ocular involvement in poxviral infections ranges from mild conjunctivitis and eyelid lesions to severe keratitis with potential vision loss. Mpox-related ocular manifestations are more prevalent in unvaccinated and immunocompromised individuals. Although early antiviral intervention and supportive care are critical, clinical outcomes vary considerably across viral clades. Emerging evidence indicates that tecovirimat may reduce lesion severity, although its impact on accelerating recovery remains limited. Moreover, vaccine strategies, particularly the MVA-BN (JYNNEOS) vaccine, appear to decrease ocular complications, despite regional disparities in access and implementation. Ocular complications pose a significant clinical challenge in mpox and related poxviral infections. This review highlights the need for early diagnosis and integrated treatment approaches that combine antiviral therapy, supportive care, and targeted vaccination. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and assess the long-term outcomes in diverse patient populations.

Possible viral agents to consider in the differential diagnosis of blepharoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND

Blepharoconjunctivitis poses a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse etiology, including viral infections. Blepharoconjunctivits can be acute or chronic, self-limiting, or needing medical therapy.

AIM

To review possible viral agents crucial for accurate differential diagnosis in cases of blepharoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for records relating to viral blepharoconjunctivitis. The search string generated was "("virally"[All Fields] OR "virals"[All Fields] OR "virology"[MeSH Terms] OR "virology"[All Fields] OR "viral"[All Fields]) AND "Blepharoconjunctivitis"[All Fields]".

RESULTS

A total of 24 publications were generated from the search string. Reference lists from each relevant article were also searched for more information and included in this review. Viral etiologies such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are frequently implicated. Adenoviral infections manifest with follicular conjunctivitis and preauricular lymphadenopathy, often presenting as epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. HSV and VZV infections can result in herpetic keratitis and may exhibit characteristic dendritic corneal ulcers. EBV, although less common, can cause unilateral or bilateral follicular conjunctivitis, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Other potential viral agents, such as enteroviruses and molluscum contagiosum virus, should also be considered, especially in pediatric cases.

CONCLUSION

Prompt recognition of these viral etiologies is essential for appropriate management and prevention of complications. Thus, a thorough understanding of the clinical presentation, epidemiology, and diagnostic modalities is crucial for accurate identification and management of viral blepharoconjunctivitis.

Mpox Virus and its ocular surface manifestations

The Mpox virus (MPXV) is the causative agent of human Mpox disease - a debilitating rash illness similar to smallpox. Although Clade I MPXV has remained endemic to West and Central Africa, Clade II MPXV has been responsible for many outbreaks worldwide. The most recent outbreak in 2022 resulted from the rapid spread of a new clade of MPXV, classified into Clade IIb - a distinct lineage from the previously circulating viral strains. The rapid spread and increased severity of Mpox disease by the Clade IIb strain have raised the serious public health imperative of better understanding the host and viral determinants during MPXV infection. In addition to typical skin rashes, including in the periorbital area, MPXV causes moderate to severe ophthalmic manifestations - most commonly, ocular surface complications (e.g., keratitis, conjunctivitis, blepharitis). While ocular manifestations of Clade I Mpox within the Congo basin have been well-reported, global incidence trends of ocular Mpox cases by Clade IIb are still emerging. Given the demonstrated ability of all MPXV strains to auto-inoculate ocular tissue, alongside the enhanced transmissibility of the Clade IIb virus, there is an urgent need to elucidate the mechanisms by which MPXV causes ocular anomalies. In this review, we discuss the viral and genomic structures of MPXV, the epidemiology, and pathology of systemic and ocular Mpox, as well as potential prophylactic and therapeutic interventions.

Ocular Complications of Mpox: Evolving Understanding and Future Directions

Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), has been endemic in regions of Central and Western Africa. In 2022, the global spread of the clade IIb MPXV led to a multinational outbreak, primarily affecting sexual transmission networks among men who have sex with men. Despite interventions, new cases have continued to emerge. In Africa, the spread of a novel strain of clade I MPXV, clade Ib, has prompted a Public Health Emergency of International Concern designation by the World Health Organization in August 2024. This article provides an updated overview of the epidemiology, systemic, and ocular manifestations, highlighting the clinical features, diagnostic testing, and implications relevant to ophthalmologists and eye care providers, including infection prevention and control measures. The ocular manifestations of mpox primarily involve the ocular surface and anterior segment, with presentations ranging from conjunctivitis to severe, vision-threatening keratitis and uveitis. While the 2022 to 2024 Clade IIb outbreak has shown a lower incidence of ocular involvement compared with previous outbreaks, the potential for significant visual morbidity remains. Treatment involves both systemic and topical therapies, with tecovirimat being the primary systemic option, though its efficacy and ophthalmic bioavailability remain under investigation. Ongoing surveillance and research are essential to further understand the epidemiology and ophthalmic features of mpox and, ultimately, to optimize prevention and treatment strategies for patients.

A Severe and Prolonged Case of Ocular Monkeypox Without Systemic Manifestations

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to present a rare case of prolonged and severe ocular monkeypox virus infection in the absence of systemic manifestations.

METHODS

This was a single case report.

RESULTS

A 60-year-old man, having been symptomatic for 9 days, presented with several umbilicated, ulcerated papules on the left cheek, left side of the nose, and left upper eyelid, along with marked follicular conjunctivitis and multiple conjunctival ulcerations. Two weeks after presentation, he developed an irregular, 360° circumferential opacity in the peripheral cornea that progressed to a large epithelial defect with corneal thinning. Although the initial eyelid lesions and conjunctivitis quickly resolved, the patient experienced nonresolving corneal inflammation manifest with peripheral corneal thinning, epithelial defects, and stromal keratitis. Four months after presentation, with the presumptive diagnosis of peripheral ulcerative keratitis, the patient was treated with intravenous steroids and immunosuppressive treatment, after which the ocular surface inflammation improved. However, the inflammation recurred 12 weeks later, and the patient developed severe perilimbal necrotizing conjunctivitis, followed by recurrence of ulcerated nodular eyelid lesions. Eight months after presentation, nucleic acid amplification tests from eyelid lesion swabs returned positive for nonvariola Orthopoxviruses , which led to the diagnosis of mpox. Within 2 weeks of beginning antiviral treatment with systemic tecovirimat and cidofovir and topical trifluridine, the eyelid lesions, conjunctivitis, and corneal inflammation resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an unusual and challenging case of ocular mpox with severe ocular surface inflammation including peripheral corneal thinning and epithelial defects, without systemic disease. Initiation of antiviral treatment resulted in a quick resolution of the ocular disease.

Monkeypox: A Viral Zoonotic Disease of Rising Global Concern

Monkeypox (mpox) is a rare viral zoonotic disease, endemic to Central and West Africa, caused by the monkeypox virus, an orthopoxvirus similar to the variola virus (smallpox). Although sporadic travel-associated cases have historically occurred outside Africa, in May 2022, mpox began spreading globally in multiple nonendemic countries across several continents. In 2024, there has been an increase in globally reported confirmed cases of mpox and deaths from mpox, making it a public health emergency of international concern. The reasons for the unusual global spread are under investigation but likely relate to increased travel and waning population immunity to orthopoxviruses. Transmission now appears to be mainly through close, intimate contact, especially among men who have sex with men. Mpox is usually a self-limited disease. Although limited approved antiviral treatments are available, such as tecovirimat, which the European Medicines Agency approved in January 2022 for the treatment of mpox, their widespread availability and effectiveness in the current outbreak remain to be investigated. Public health control measures include surveillance, case identification/isolation, contact tracing, and targeted vaccination of contacts at high risk of exposure. However, challenges remain in curtailing the current unprecedented outbreak. Critical knowledge gaps include animal reservoir(s) responsible for initial spillover events, viral mutations that may enhance transmissibility, optimal diagnostics for noninvasive specimens, effective antiviral therapies, next-generation vaccines providing longer-term immunity, and building global capacity for outbreak response. This review summarizes the current literature on mpox virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostics, treatment, prevention, and public health control measures. Ongoing investigation and research are needed to better understand mpox’s evolving epidemiology, pathogenicity, transmissibility, and ecology to guide strategies for containing the outbreak and preventing future global emergence.

Monkeypox Presenting as Periorbital Cellulitis: A Case Report

Monkeypox, a viral disease caused by the monkeypox virus is well known for its characteristic rash with macular, papular, and vesicular stages. Although the skin is one of the most affected organs by monkeypox, the virus can also impact the respiratory, ophthalmologic, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal systems, among others. It is extremely common for the disease to begin with flu-like symptoms in the prodromal phase before cutaneous manifestations emerge. Here, we describe a unique case of monkeypox infection in which a patient first presented with periorbital cellulitis before any characteristic skin findings appeared. The source of the infection was unknown and the patient recovered without any complications to date. This odd presentation of monkeypox reiterates the need for a detailed evaluation of patients with a similar presentation.

Monkeypox-related ophthalmic disease

Monkeypox (Mpox) is an acute febrile rash illness caused by the Mpox virus. The ongoing international outbreak since mid-2022 has spread worldwide, including Taiwan. Ocular involvement in Mpox infection is uncommon, including external and ocular surface lesions. Here, we describe a man who developed unilateral blepharoconjunctivitis and preseptal cellulitis, followed by the appearance of skin symptoms 6 days after the ocular manifestations. Samples taken from his oropharynx and skin lesions tested positive for the Mpox virus through a polymerase chain reaction test. He was hospitalized for isolation with topical lubricant, antibiotic, and acyclovir eye ointment until the skin lesions healed. However, on the day of discharge, punctate epithelial keratitis was observed in the same eye. The corneal lesion also tested positive for the Mpox virus. His keratitis progressed to dendritic ulceration, and treatment with tecovirimat was initiated. Initially, his corneal ulcer responded well to tecovirimat, but 12 days later, it deteriorated along with cells in the anterior chamber. To treat his condition, low-dose steroid and ganciclovir eye drops were administered. Eventually, the patient experienced resolution of the corneal lesion, leaving a scar.

Mpox-Related Ophthalmic Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study in a Single Center in Mexico

Mpox-related ophthalmic disease has been reported as infrequent. We retrospectively describe the ocular manifestations present in 11 of 100 patients with confirmed mpox; 9 were people with HIV. We suggest that an ophthalmological evaluation should be performed in all patients with ocular symptoms or moderate and severe mpox disease.

A Case of Sustained Viral Shedding of Mpox With Ocular Involvement Resulting in Vision Loss

Mpox, caused by infection with Monkeypox virus, usually presents as a mild, self-limited illness in immunocompetent persons that resolves within 2-4 weeks. Serious complications have been reported when mpox lesions involve vulnerable anatomic sites, such as the eye, and in those with substantial immunosuppression. We describe a patient with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection and sustained viral shedding of mpox with ocular involvement, which resulted in vision loss.

[Monkeypox: case series]

Introduction

the recent mpox outbreak was considered an international public health emergency.

Objective

describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of mpox in a hospital in the province of Buenos Aires.

Methods

case series study in patients ≥15 years of age in the Dermatology service of the Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos "San Martín" in La Plata between August and November 2022.

Results

10 patients were included. The mean age of presentation was 35 years. Seven of the patients were men and the remaining three were women. Most of them presented risky sexual intercourse as an epidemiological history. Pseudopustules were observed in 70% of the patients and all had genital, gluteal or perianal lesions. The complications observed were: local edema, proctitis, conjunctivitis and pharyngitis.

Conclusion

we present 3 female patients out of a total of 24 women reported in the country, which represent only 2% of mpox infections in Argentina. In most cases we observe pseudopustules, an elementary lesion recently described for this entity. One patient presented ocular involvement, a complication reported in 1% of cases in the current outbreak.

Monkeypox Virus Immune Evasion and Eye Manifestation: Beyond Eyelid Implications

Monkeypox virus (MPXV), belonging to the Poxviridae family and Orthopoxvirus genus, is closely related to the smallpox virus. Initial prodromal symptoms typically include headache, fever, and lymphadenopathy. This review aims to detail various ocular manifestations and immune evasion associated with the monkeypox viral infection and its complications, making it appropriate as a narrative review. Common external ocular manifestations of MPXV typically involve a generalized pustular rash, keratitis, discharges, and dried secretions related to conjunctival pustules, photophobia, and lacrimation. Orthopoxviruses can evade host immune responses by secreting proteins that antagonize the functions of host IFNγ, CC and CXC chemokines, IL-1β, and the complement system. One of the most important transcription factors downstream of pattern recognition receptors binding is IRF3, which controls the expression of the crucial antiviral molecules IFNα and IFNβ. We strongly recommend that ophthalmologists include MPXV as part of their differential diagnosis when they encounter similar cases presenting with ophthalmic manifestations such as conjunctivitis, blepharitis, or corneal lesions. Furthermore, because non-vaccinated individuals are more likely to exhibit these symptoms, it is recommended that healthcare administrators prioritize smallpox vaccination for at-risk groups, including very young children, pregnant women, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals, especially those in close contact with MPXV cases.

Clinical features and diagnostic challenges of mpox (monkeypox) outbreak in Malta: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

In May of 2022, an mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) outbreak was reported from countries where the disease is not endemic, rising worldwide concern. Malta, the smallest European Union member state, faced unique challenges, with high infection rates compared to the rest of Europe. The aim of the study is to describe the clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and unique demographics of mpox patients diagnosed in Malta.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of medical records of all mpox cases recorded from May to September 2022. Demographic data, sexual behaviors and practices, travel history, comorbidities, and HIV status were investigated.

RESULTS

In the study period, we recorded 33 mpox cases, 97% of them were male, in the age group 30-39 (39%). Ninety percent were gay or bisexual men and 76% non-Maltese. The most common clinical presentations included skin rash (78%), lymphadenopathy (71%), anogenital lesions (67%), and fever (67%). Twenty-seven percent of the patients were people living with HIV. In terms of coinfection with STIs, 27% of patients tested positive for gonorrhea, 12% for syphilis, 15% for chlamydia, 9% for herpes simplex virus, and 3% for hepatitis C virus.

CONCLUSION

The results shed light on unique challenges faced by the local sexual health clinic and call for more resources in response to the global emerging of infectious diseases.

Monkeypox-Associated Manifestations and Complications Involving the Eye: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Previous and Current Outbreaks

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to pool the prevalence rate of monkeypox-associated eye manifestations and/or complications during the current and previous outbreaks.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On August 7, 2022, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles. We included all studies that reported the involvement of the eye (either as a manifestation or a complication) among patients with monkeypox. The primary outcome included pooling the effect size (ES) of reported manifestations and complications, and the secondary outcome included the conduct of a subgroup analysis based on the timing of the monkeypox outbreak (before vs. during 2022).

RESULTS

Eleven studies reporting 3179 monkeypox-confirmed cases were included. Eye manifestations included conjunctivitis, corneal, conjunctival, and eyelid lesions, photophobia, and eye pain. Compared with previous monkeypox outbreaks, the current outbreak revealed much lower rates of ocular involvement in terms of conjunctivitis (ES=1%; 95% CI: 0%-1% vs. ES=17%; 95% CI: 11%-22%), corneal and conjunctival lesions (ES=1%; 95% CI: 0%-2% vs. ES=13%; 95% CI: 4%-22%), and eyelid lesions (ES=1%; 95% CI: 0%-4% vs. ES=13%; 95% CI: 5%-28%). Monkeypox-associated eye complications were reported only in the previous outbreaks which included keratitis (ES=4%; 95% CI: 3%-6%), corneal ulceration (ES=4%; 95% CI: 2%-5%), unilateral (ES=3%; 95% CI: 1%-4%) and bilateral blindness (ES=0%; 95% CI: 0%-2%), and impaired vision (ES=4%; 95% CI: 1%-8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmic manifestations and complications are common among monkeypox-confirmed cases. Although these data are mainly related to previous outbreaks, health care workers should familiarize themselves with these signs to provide better care for monkeypox patients.

Demographic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Characteristics of Human Monkeypox Disease Pre- and Post-2022 Outbreaks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: In early May 2022, an increasing number of human monkeypox (mpox) cases were reported in non-endemic disparate regions of the world, which raised concerns. Here, we provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of mpox-confirmed patients presented in peer-reviewed publications over the 10 years before and during the 2022 outbreak from demographic, epidemiological, and clinical perspectives. (2) Methods: A systematic search was performed for relevant studies published in Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 1 January 2012 up to 15 February 2023. Pooled frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using the random or fixed effect model due to the estimated heterogeneity of the true effect sizes. (3) Results: Out of 10,163 articles, 67 met the inclusion criteria, and 31 cross-sectional studies were included for meta-analysis. Animal-to-human transmission was dominant in pre-2022 cases (61.64%), but almost all post-2022 reported cases had a history of human contact, especially sexual contact. The pooled frequency of MSM individuals was 93.5% (95% CI 91.0-95.4, I2: 86.60%) and was reported only in post-2022 included studies. The male gender was predominant in both pre- and post-2022 outbreaks, and the mean age of confirmed cases was 29.92 years (5.77-41, SD: 9.38). The most common clinical manifestations were rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and malaise/fatigue. Proctalgia/proctitis (16.6%, 95% CI 10.3-25.6, I2: 97.76) and anal/perianal lesions (39.8%, 95% CI 30.4-49.9, I2: 98.10) were the unprecedented clinical manifestations during the 2022 outbreak, which were not described before. Genitalia involvement was more common in post-2022 mpox patients (55.6%, 95% CI 51.7-59.4, I2: 88.11). (4) Conclusions: There are speculations about the possibility of changes in the pathogenic properties of the virus. It seems that post-2022 mpox cases experience a milder disease with fewer rashes and lower mortality rates. Moreover, the vast majority of post-2022 cases are managed on an outpatient basis. Our study could serve as a basis for ongoing investigations to identify the different aspects of previous mpox outbreaks and compare them with the current ones.