Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update

Population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy: A real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Levetiracetam is a widely used antiseizure drug in patients with refractory epilepsy due to its specific mechanism of action. This study aimed to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model (PopPK) to optimize levetiracetam dosing in patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

A total of 256 plasma concentrations of levetiracetam, obtained from 135 patients, were employed for PopPK model development, applying a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling methodology. Evaluation of the final model was performed by visually inspecting the goodness-of-fit plots generated, bootstrap resampling, and visual predictive check (VPC). In addition, 60 plasma concentrations, obtained from other 37 patients, were used for external validation of the developed model.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the pharmacokinetic profiles of levetiracetam. Between-patient variability (BPV) was included on apparent clearance (CL/F), and the residual error (RE) was modeled as proportional. The estimates for CL/F, apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F), and absorption rate constant (ka) of the final model were 3.73 L/h, 35.10 L, and 1.35 h-1, respectively. BPV associated with CL/F was 18.30%, and the proportional RE was 21.21%. The co-administration of other antiseizure drugs that are metabolic inducers, the glomerular filtration rate, and the body weight were identified as significant covariates for CL/F, whereas body surface area was the only covariate with significant impact on the Vd/F. The bootstrap, VPC, and external evaluation collectively validated the stability and predictive performance of the final model.

SIGNIFICANCE

A reliable PopPK model was successfully developed and validated, offering a valuable tool for tailoring levetiracetam dosing regimens and enhancing drug effectiveness and safety in adult patients with refractory epilepsy.

A new population pharmacokinetic model for dosing optimization of zonisamide in patients with refractory epilepsy

Zonisamide exhibits significant pharmacokinetic variability, demanding for the development of population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models to identify key factors influencing drug disposition. This study aimed to develop and validate a PopPK model to optimize zonisamide posology in patients with refractory epilepsy. A total of 114 plasma concentrations of zonisamide, obtained from 64 patients, were used for PopPK model development, employing the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. The final model was evaluated by visually inspecting the goodness-of-fit plots and the visual predictive check plot and by the bootstrap resampling method. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination was the one that best described the pharmacokinetic profile of zonisamide. Between-patient variability (BPV) was included on clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (Vd/F) and absorption rate constant (ka). The residual error (RE) was modeled as proportional. The final model estimates for CL/F, Vd/F and ka were 0.761 L/h, 48.10 L and 0.671 h⁻¹, respectively. The BPV associated with CL/F, Vd/F, and ka was 43.93%, 52.06%, and 91.27%, respectively, while the proportional RE was 7.18%. The concomitant administration of enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (EIASDs), included in the model as inducer drug load (INDDL), significantly accounted for BPV associated with CL/F and led to increased CL/F in patients receiving EIASDs compared to the others. Consequently, patients receiving EIASDs require higher daily doses of zonisamide to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations compared to those not treated with EIASDs. Model validation, using bootstrap and visual predictive checks, confirmed its stability and robustness, making it a valuable tool for individualized zonisamide dosing in adults with refractory epilepsy.

Investigating the Relationship Between Anti-seizure Medications and Bleeding Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature

Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) are specific types of anticonvulsants used to treat epileptic seizures. However, several studies have shown an association between ASMs and an increased risk of hematological disorders, such as thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia, and platelet function disorders leading to prolonged bleeding times. This review explores the existing literature on this topic, investigating a wide variety of ASMs, ranging from first-generation medications to newer ones. A comprehensive search was conducted on all the currently approved ASMs using PubMed and Google Scholar: review articles, clinical trials, meta-analysis, observational studies, case reports, and relevant animal studies were identified. We extracted 15 ASMs including valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, diazepam, clonazepam, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, topiramate, pregabalin, lacosamide, cannabidiol (CBD), and perampanel that contain considerable literature regarding different coagulopathies. An in-depth review of over 140 studies revealed a robust association between ASM-induced changes and the onset of bleeding disorders via several different mechanisms. Polytherapy, the use of multiple ASMs, also emerged as a significant risk factor for the development of coagulopathies. This review highlights the potential link between ASMs and bleeding disorders, emphasizing the importance of considering this risk during treatment planning. By understanding these associations, healthcare providers can optimize patient outcomes and minimize bleeding risks. Additionally, this review identifies the need for further research to bridge current knowledge gaps in clinical pharmacology related to ASMs and bleeding disorders.

Trends in prescription of anti-seizure medications in Japan between 2018 and 2021: A retrospective study using the National Database Open Data Japan

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to analyze anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescription trends in Japan, particularly among older adults and women of childbearing age, to inform future treatment strategies and optimize ASM selection criteria.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the National Database Open Data Japan for fiscal years (FY) 2018-2021, covering prescriptions across sex and 5-year age groups. We conducted data imputation for prescriptions under 1,000 units to maintain anonymity, calculated the estimated number of patients using standard adult maintenance doses, and adjusted for pediatric dosing using Augsberger's formula.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed a 7.6% increase in ASM usage, with a notable shift from older to newer ASMs, such as levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG). LEV and LTG prescriptions increased by 26.7% and 15.0% from FY 2018 to FY 2021, respectively, whereas older ASMs such as phenytoin, declined. Sex-specific analysis showed a higher LTG prescription rate among women, especially in adolescent and young adult cohorts, where the female-to-male prescription ratio increased from 1.65 to 1.85. Valproate (VPA) and LEV accounted for 57.0% of ASM prescriptions in older adults. The number of inpatient LTG prescriptions was notably lower than that of outpatient LTG prescriptions across age groups. Pediatric use of generics was lower than that in other age groups.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that newer ASMs are being used increasingly, with a significant proportion of VPA continuously prescribed among women of childbearing age. In older adults, VPA and LEV accounted for more than half of the ASM prescriptions. These findings are crucial for developing future treatment strategies and improving the ASM selection criteria.

Pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus and impact of concomitant antiseizure medications in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: A retrospective study of therapeutic drug monitoring data in Denmark and Norway

The mTOR-inhibitor everolimus is a precision drug with antiepileptogenic properties approved for treatment of epilepsy in persons with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in combination with other antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, the pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus is scarcely described, and the available information on pharmacokinetic interactions is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus in patients with TSC, and the impact of age, sex and comedication. In this retrospective observational study we used anonymized data from medical records of patients with TSC using everolimus in Norway and Denmark, 2012 to 2020. Long-term therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) identified inter-patient and intra-patient variability. The study included 59 patients, (36 females (61%)), median age 22 (range 3-59 years). Polytherapy was used in 50 patients (85%). The most frequently used ASMs were lamotrigine (n = 21), valproate (n = 17), and levetiracetam (n = 13). Blood concentrations of everolimus were measured in all patients. Pharmacokinetic variability of everolimus between patients was extensive, as demonstrated by a 24-fold variability from minimum-maximum concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios. The coefficient of variation (CV) for intra-patient (n = 59) and inter-patient variability (n = 47, ≥3 measurements) was 40% and 43%, respectively. The C/D-ratio of everolimus was 50% lower in 13 patients (22%) using enzyme-inducing ASMs compared to the 30 patients who did not (0.7 vs 1.4 ng/mL mg, P < .05). Age and sex were not significantly associated with changes in C/D-ratios of everolimus. Long-term TDM identified extensive variability in concentrations over time for everolimus both within and between patients, where comedication with enzyme-inducing ASMs was an important contributing factor. The findings suggest a need for TDM in patients with TSC treated with everolimus.

Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality.

METHODS

Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices.

RESULTS

The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches.

CONCLUSION

The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Sources of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability and clinical pharmacology studies of antiseizure medications in the pediatric population

Multiple treatment options exist for children with epilepsy, including surgery, dietary therapies, neurostimulation, and antiseizure medications (ASMs). ASMs are the first line of therapy, and more than 30 ASMs have U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of various epilepsy and seizure types in children. Given the extensive FDA approval of ASMs in children, it is crucial to consider how the physiological and developmental changes throughout childhood may impact drug disposition. Various sources of pharmacokinetic (PK) variability from different extrinsic and intrinsic factors such as patients' size, age, drug-drug interactions, and drug formulation could result in suboptimal dosing of ASMs. Barriers exist to conducting clinical pharmacological studies in neonates, infants, and children due to ethical and practical reasons, limiting available data to fully characterize these drugs' disposition and better elucidate sources of PK variability. Modeling and simulation offer ways to circumvent traditional and intensive clinical pharmacology methods to address gaps in epilepsy and seizure management in children. This review discusses various physiological and developmental changes that influence the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability of ASMs in children, and several key ASMs will be discussed in detail. We will also review novel trial designs in younger pediatric populations, highlight the role of extrapolation of efficacy in epilepsy, and the use of physiologically based PK modeling as a tool to investigate sources of PK/PD variability in children. Finally, we will conclude with current challenges and future directions for optimizing the efficacy and safety of these drugs across the pediatric age spectrum.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Sulthiame: The Impact of Age, Drug-Drug Interactions, and Biochemical Markers of Toxicity in Patients with Epilepsy

PURPOSE

Sulthiame is an antiseizure medication increasingly used for epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame in children and adults with epilepsy with respect to age, comedication, dose, serum concentration, and biochemical markers of toxicity in a clinical setting.

METHOD

Retrospective quantitative data from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway (2015-2021), were used.

RESULTS

TDM data from 326 patients (127 female/199 male) were included [mean age, 11.4 (range 2-44) years; mean weight, 41 (range 14-109) kg]. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in the concentration/(dose/body weight) (C/(D/kg)) ratio was 16-fold; intraindividual variability was up to 8-fold (coefficient of variation = 10%-78%). Young children (younger than 6 years) had a significantly lower C/(D/kg) ratio than older age groups ( P < 0.05). Various comedications did not significantly affect the C/(D/kg) ratio, possibly owing to the small sample size. However, CYP2C19-mediated inhibition by sulthiame was indicated because patients using clobazam and sulthiame (n = 28) had a 3.5-fold higher N-desmethylclobazam C/(D/kg) ratio than those using neutral comedication (n = 45; P < 0.001). Patients with pH values below the adjusted normal range (7.32-7.42; n = 15) had a 33% higher sulthiame concentration than those with normal pH values (n = 22; P < 0.05). Blood gas measurements, especially pH, may serve as markers of toxicity and can be used in combination with clinical data when toxicity is suspected.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the extensive intraindividual and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame, with age as a contributing factor. Sulthiame has clinically relevant interactions with clobazam. The use of TDM and pH as a biochemical marker may contribute to individualized and safe sulthiame treatment.

Development and Validation of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Levetiracetam to Predict Exposure and Dose Optimization in Pediatrics

Levetiracetam (Lev) is an antiepileptic drug that has been increasingly used in the epilepsy pediatric population in recent years, but its pharmacokinetic behavior in pediatric population needs to be characterized clearly. Clinical trials for the pediatric drug remain difficult to conduct due to ethical and practical factors. The purpose of this study was to use the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict changes in plasma exposure of Lev in pediatric patients and to provide recommendations for dose adjustment. A PBPK model of Lev in adults was developed using PK-Sim® software and extrapolated to the entire age range of the pediatric population. The model was evaluated using clinical pharmacokinetic data. The results showed the good fit between predictions and observations of the adult and pediatric models. The recommended doses for neonates, infants and children are 0.78, 1.67 and 1.22 times that of adults, respectively. Moreover, at the same dose, plasma exposure in adolescents was similar to that of adults. The PBPK models of Lev for adults and pediatrics were successfully developed and validated to provide a reference for the rational administration of drugs in the pediatric population.

Treatment of Bipolar Disorders in Older Adults: A Review

Background

Old age bipolar disorder has been an orphan of psychiatric research for a long time despite the fact that bipolar disorder (BD)-I and II together may affect 0.5-1.0% of the elderly. It is also unclear whether aetiology, course of illness and treatment should differ in patients with a first manifestation in older age and patients suffering from a recurrence of a BD known for decades. This narrative review will summarize the current state of knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment of BD in the elderly.

Methods

We conducted a Medline literature search from 1970 to 2021 using MeSH terms "Bipolar Disorder" × "Aged" or "Geriatric" or "Elderly". Search results were complemented by additional literature retrieved from examining cross references and by hand search in text books.

Summary of findings

Varying cut-off ages have been applied to differentiate old age from adult age BD. Within old age BD, there is a reasonable agreement of distinct entities, early and late-onset BD. They differ to some extent in clinical symptoms, course of illness, and some co-morbidities. Point prevalence of BD in older adults appears slightly lower than in working-age adults, with polarity of episodes shifting towards depression. Psychopharmacological treatment needs to take into account the special aspects of somatic gerontology and the age-related change of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence for commonly used treatments such as lithium, moodstabilizing antiepileptics, antipsychotics, and antidepressants remains sparse. Preliminary results support a role of ECT as well as psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in old age BD.

Conclusions

There is an obvious need of further research for all treatment modalities of BD in old age. The focus should be pharmacological and psychosocial approaches, as well as their combination, and the role of physical treatment modalities such as ECT.Appeared originally in Ann Gen Psychiatry 2021; 20:1.

Pharmacological aspects of antiseizure medications: From basic mechanisms to clinical considerations of drug interactions and use of therapeutic drug monitoring

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with epilepsy. Several new ASMs have recently been introduced to the market, making it possible to better tailor the treatment of epilepsy, as well as other indications (psychiatry and pain disorders). For this group of drugs there are numerous pharmacological challenges, and updated knowledge on their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties is, therefore, crucial for an optimal treatment outcome. This review focuses on educational approaches to the following learning outcomes as described by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE): To demonstrate knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug interactions with ASMs and with concomitant medications, and appropriate monitoring of ASM serum levels (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM). Basic principles in pharmacology, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinically relevant approaches to manage drug interactions are discussed. Furthermore, recent improvements in analytical technology and sampling are described. Future directions point to the combined implementation of TDM with genetic panels for proper diagnosis, pharmacogenetic tests where relevant, and the use of biochemical markers that will all contribute to personalized treatment. These approaches are clinically relevant for an optimal treatment outcome with ASMs in various patient groups.

Loss of normal Alzheimer's disease-associated Presenilin 2 function alters antiseizure medicine potency and tolerability in the 6-Hz focal seizure model

Introduction

Patients with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) experience seizures and subclinical epileptiform activity, which may accelerate cognitive and functional decline. Antiseizure medicines (ASMs) may be a tractable disease-modifying strategy; numerous ASMs are marketed with well-established safety. However, little information is available to guide ASM selection as few studies have rigorously quantified ASM potency and tolerability in traditional seizure models in rodents with EOAD-associated risk factors. Presenilin 2 (PSEN2) variants evoke EOAD, and these patients experience seizures. This study thus established the anticonvulsant profile of mechanistically distinct ASMs in the frontline 6-Hz limbic seizure test evoked in PSEN2-knockout (KO) mice to better inform seizure management in EOAD.

Methods

The median effective dose (ED50) of prototype ASMs was quantified in the 6-Hz test in male and female PSEN2-KO and wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice (3-4 months old). Minimal motor impairment (MMI) was assessed to estimate a protective index (PI). Immunohistological detection of cFos established the extent to which 6-Hz stimulation activates discrete brain regions in KO vs. WT mice.

Results

There were significant genotype-related differences in the potency and tolerability of several ASMs. Valproic acid and levetiracetam were significantly more potent in male KO than in WT mice. Additionally, high doses of valproic acid significantly worsened MMI in KO mice. Conversely, carbamazepine was significantly less potent in female KO vs. WT mice. In both male and female KO mice vs. WTs, perampanel and lamotrigine were equally potent. However, there were marked genotype-related shifts in PI of both carbamazepine and perampanel, with KO mice exhibiting less MMI at the highest doses tested. Gabapentin was ineffective against 6-Hz seizures in KO mice vs. WTs without MMI changes. Neuronal activation 90 min following 6-Hz stimulation was significantly increased in the posterior parietal association cortex overlying CA1 and in the piriform cortex of WT mice, while stimulation-induced increases in cFos immunoreactivity were absent in KO mice.

Discussion

Acute ASM potency and tolerability in the high-throughput 6-Hz test may be significantly altered with loss of normal PSEN2 function. Seizures in discrete EOAD populations may benefit from precisely selected medicines optimized for primary ASM pharmacological mechanisms.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Antiseizure and Psychiatric Medications

Antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases are frequently used in combination. In this context, pharmacokinetic interactions between these drugs may occur. The vast majority of these interactions are primarily observed at a metabolic level and result from changes in the activity of the cytochrome P450 (CYP). Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and barbiturates induce the oxidative biotransformation and can consequently reduce the plasma concentrations of tricyclic antidepressants, many typical and atypical antipsychotics and some benzodiazepines. Newer antiseizure medications show a lower potential for clinically relevant interactions with drugs for psychiatric disease. The pharmacokinetics of many antiseizure medications is not influenced by antipsychotics and anxiolytics, while some newer antidepressants, namely fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and viloxazine, may inhibit CYP enzymes leading to increased serum concentrations of some antiseizure medications, including phenytoin and carbamazepine. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions may be anticipated by knowledge of CYP enzymes involved in the biotransformation of individual medications and of the influence of the specific comedication on the activity of these CYP enzymes. As a general rule, these interactions can be managed by careful evaluation of clinical response and, when indicated, individualized dosage adjustments guided by measurement of drugs serum concentrations, especially if pharmacokinetic interactions may cause any change in seizure control or signs of toxicity. Further studies are required to improve predictions of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiseizure medications and drugs for psychiatric diseases providing practical helps for clinicians in the clinical setting.

Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios

Epilepsy represents a challenge in the management of patients with brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are one of the most frequent comorbidities in neuro-oncology and may be the debut symptom of a brain tumor or a complication during its evolution. Epileptogenic mechanisms of brain tumors are not yet fully elucidated, although new factors related to the underlying pathophysiological process with possible treatment implications have been described. In recent years, the development of new anti-seizure medications (ASM), with better pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer side effects, has become a paradigm shift in many clinical scenarios in neuro-oncology, being able, for instance, to adapt epilepsy treatment to specific features of each patient. This is crucial in several situations, such as patients with cognitive/psychiatric comorbidity, pregnancy, or advanced age, among others. In this narrative review, we provide a rationale for decision-making in ASM choice for neuro-oncologic patients, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each drug. In addition, according to current literature evidence, we try to answer some of the most frequent questions that arise in daily clinical practice in patients with epilepsy related to brain tumors, such as, which patients are the best candidates for ASM and when to start it, what is the best treatment option for each patient, and what are the major pitfalls to be aware of during follow-up.

Clinical Application of Pharmacokinetics to Appraise Adherence to Levetiracetam in Portuguese Epileptic Patients

Adherence to antiseizure drug treatment determines its effectiveness and safety, and consequently affects patients’ quality of life. Herein, we assessed adherence to levetiracetam in Portuguese patients with refractory epilepsy (n = 115), with resort to a pharmacokinetic drug monitoring approach. The pharmacokinetic parameters of levetiracetam in each patient were determined in steady-state while admitted to the hospital. Then, adherence was assessed by comparing the plasma concentration of the drug observed on the first day of hospitalization with the predicted plasma concentration, considering previously determined pharmacokinetic parameters. The rate of adherence was assessed according to gender, age, diagnosis, and antiseizure drug regimen. Among 115 enrolled patients, 49 (42.6%) were identified as non-adherent, 30 (26.1%) classified as under-consumers, and 19 (16.5%) as over-consumers. A relationship between adherence, daily dose and plasma concentrations was herein reported for the first time. Adherent patients received higher daily doses of levetiracetam [2500 (2000–3000) mg] than non-adherent over-consumers [1500 (1000–2000) mg] and non-adherent under-consumers [2000 (1500–3000) mg]. Higher average steady-state plasma concentrations of levetiracetam were found in non-adherent under-consumers [27.28 (15.33–36.36) mg/L], followed by adherent patients [22.05 (16.62–29.81) mg/L] and non-adherent over-consumers [17.50 (10.69–24.37) mg/L]. This study demonstrates that adherence (or lack thereof) influences the plasma concentrations of levetiracetam in steady-state and its pharmacological effects. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of educating patients to encourage adherence to therapy. Otherwise, the risk of developing toxic and subtherapeutic concentrations is undeniable, compromising the therapeutic effect and safety of treatment.

Analysis of influencing factors on monohydroxylated derivative of oxcarbazepine plasma concentration in children with epilepsy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the plasma concentration of monohydroxylated derivative (MHD) of oxcarbazepine (OXC) in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

We recruited 125 children with epilepsy who received OXC monotherapy. Among them, 16 single nucleotide polymorphisms were detected by MassARRAY genotyping technology to evaluate the influence of related factors on the plasma concentration of OXC monotherapy. MHD is the main active metabolite of OXC, and its plasma concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Bivariate correlation analysis revealed that concentration-dose ratio (CDR) increased with weight, and the corresponding maintenance dose decreased with weight (r=0.317, P=0.001 for CDR; r=-0.285, P=0.000 for OXC maintenance dose). The duration of seizure was found to be associated with CDR (0.90 ± 0.36 vs 0.74 ± 0.26 μg·kg/mg/mL for ≥6 years vs <1 year, P=0.028; 0.90 ± 0.36 vs 0.64 ± 0.21 μg·kg/mg/mL for ≥6 years vs 1-3 years, P=0.004; 0.90 ± 0.36 vs 0.69 ± 0.18 μg·kg/mg/mL for ≥6 years vs 3-6 years, P=0.031). The CDR of patients with ABCB1 rs1045642 mutation homozygous GG type is higher than heterozygous AG type (0.79 ± 0.30 vs 0.68 ± 0.20 μg·kg/mg/mL for AG vs GG, P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

This study clarified the association of weight, duration of seizure, and gene polymorphisms of ABCB1 rs1045642 with MHD plasma concentration in children with epilepsy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of newer generation antiseizure medications at the point of treatment failure

PURPOSE

The benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of newer generation antiseizure medications (ASM) has been little studied. A recent randomized study suggested that TDM at each medical visit did not bring a significant benefit, but the study did not investigate TDM in cases of treatment failure. Accordingly, we realized a post hoc analysis of this trial.

METHODS

We analyzed 282 TDMs in 136 patients. We compared TDM performed at visits after treatment failure versus without treatment failure, reporting the proportion of drug levels out of range and the prescriber's adherence to dosage recommendations according to measured drug levels.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in terms of proportion of out of range plasma drug levels (47% vs 50%, p = 0.7) or adherence of prescribers to the clinical pharmacologists' dosage recommendations (21% vs 30%, p = 0.6) between visits after treatment failure and visits without treatment failure, respectively. Knowledge of prior drug levels did not modify the results.

CONCLUSION

Systematic TDM at appointments following treatment failure showed similar results to TDM at visits without treatment failure. The prescribers' adherence with dosage recommendations was low in both cases. It is not clear whether better prescriber adherence would improve patient outcome. Furthermore, the ability to detect poor patient compliance is limited in a planned outpatient appointment. The study setting does not reflect on the general usefulness of TDM.

Treatment of bipolar disorders in older adults: a review

BACKGROUND

Old age bipolar disorder has been an orphan of psychiatric research for a long time despite the fact that bipolar disorder (BD)-I and II together may affect 0.5-1.0% of the elderly. It is also unclear whether aetiology, course of illness and treatment should differ in patients with a first manifestation in older age and patients suffering from a recurrence of a BD known for decades. This narrative review will summarize the current state of knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment of BD in the elderly.

METHODS

We conducted a Medline literature search from 1970 to 2021 using MeSH terms "Bipolar Disorder" × "Aged" or "Geriatric" or "Elderly". Search results were complemented by additional literature retrieved from examining cross references and by hand search in text books. Varying cut-off ages have been applied to differentiate old age from adult age BD. Within old age BD, there is a reasonable agreement of distinct entities, early and late-onset BD. They differ to some extent in clinical symptoms, course of illness, and some co-morbidities. Point prevalence of BD in older adults appears slightly lower than in working-age adults, with polarity of episodes shifting towards depression. Psychopharmacological treatment needs to take into account the special aspects of somatic gerontology and the age-related change of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence for commonly used treatments such as lithium, mood-stabilizing antiepileptics, antipsychotics, and antidepressants remains sparse. Preliminary results support a role of ECT as well as psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in old age BD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an obvious need of further research for all treatment modalities of BD in old age. The focus should be pharmacological and psychosocial approaches, as well as their combination, and the role of physical treatment modalities such as ECT.

Seizure freedom and plasma levels of newer generation antiseizure medications

OBJECTIVES

Contrary to older antiseizure medications (ASM), correlation between plasma levels and seizure freedom is not well defined for newer generation ASM. We assessed correlations between efficacy and newer generation ASM plasma levels in patients with epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma medication levels were measured over two years in consecutive patients taking lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, zonisamide, lacosamide, perampanel or pregabalin. Seizure freedom was defined as three times the longest inter-seizure pre-treatment interval, or at least one year. Each medication level was stratified according to its position in relation to its proposed reference range (below or in lower half vs upper half or above).

RESULTS

168 patients on stable therapy were included. ASM plasma levels of seizure-free patients were lower than those with ongoing seizures; 45/48 (93.7%) were in the lower half or below the reference ranges, compared to 86/106 (81.1%; p = .004). Lamotrigine plasma levels were significantly lower in seizure-free patients (median 2.4 mg/L range 0.4-6.5 mg/L, none above 6.5 mg/L) compared with those with ongoing seizures (5 mg/L, 0.5-14.2 mg/L; p < .0001). Levetiracetam showed similar results (7.2 mg/L, 1.6-15.1 mg/L; none above 15.1 mg/L in seizure-free patients vs 16.4 mg/L, 0.6-47.7 mg/L; p = .005). Demographics, epilepsy type and polytherapy did not influence the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy of newer generation ASMs seems to be reached at the lower part or at times even below the reference ranges in drug responsive patients; this could inform regarding titrations of these treatments.

Fenfluramine repurposing from weight loss to epilepsy: What we do and do not know

In 2020, racemic-fenfluramine was approved in the U.S. and Europe for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome, through a restricted/controlled access program aimed at minimizing safety risks. Fenfluramine had been used extensively in the past as an appetite suppressant, but it was withdrawn from the market in 1997 when it was found to cause cardiac valvulopathy. Available evidence indicates that appetite suppression and cardiac valvulopathy are mediated by different serotonergic mechanisms. In particular, appetite suppression can be ascribed mainly to the enantiomers d-fenfluramine and d-norfenfluramine, the primary metabolite of d-fenfluramine, whereas cardiac valvulopathy can be ascribed mainly to d-norfenfluramine. Because of early observations of markedly improved seizure control in some forms of epilepsy, fenfluramine remained available in Belgium through a Royal Decree after 1997 for use in a clinical trial in patients with Dravet syndrome at average dosages lower than those generally prescribed for appetite suppression. More recently, double-blind placebo-controlled trials established its efficacy in the treatment of convulsive seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and of drop seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, at doses up to 0.7 mg/kg/day (maximum 26 mg/day). Although no cardiovascular toxicity has been associated with the use of fenfluramine in epilepsy, the number of patients exposed to date has been limited and only few patients had duration of exposure longer than 3 years. This article analyzes available evidence on the mechanisms involved in fenfluramine-induced appetite suppression, antiseizure effects and cardiovascular toxicity. Despite evidence that stimulation of 5-HT_2B receptors (the main mechanism leading to cardiac valvulopathy) is not required for antiseizure activity, there are many critical gaps in understanding fenfluramine's properties which are relevant to its use in epilepsy. Particular emphasis is placed on the remarkable lack of publicly accessible information about the comparative activity of the individual enantiomers of fenfluramine and norfenfluramine in experimental models of seizures and epilepsy, and on receptors systems considered to be involved in antiseizure effects. Preliminary data suggest that l-fenfluramine retains prominent antiseizure effects in a genetic zebrafish model of Dravet syndrome. If these findings are confirmed and extended to other seizure/epilepsy models, there would be an incentive for a chiral switch from racemic-fenfluramine to l-fenfluramine, which could minimize the risk of cardiovascular toxicity and reduce the incidence of adverse effects such as loss of appetite and weight loss.

Safety considerations selecting antiseizure medications for the treatment of individuals with Dravet syndrome

Introduction: Management of individuals with Dravet Syndrome has evolved significantly over the past 10 years. Progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, the long-term outcome and possible consequences of inappropriate therapies, new drugs have been approved by the regulatory authorities and patients and families expressed their needs beyond seizures' control.Areas covered: The authors aimed at providing an overview of the main antiseizure medications used in Dravet syndrome with a particular focus on safety considerations. As the highly active phase of seizures takes place before the age of 5 years, the characteristics of antiseizure medications in infancy and childhood have also been considered due to their impact on antiseizure medication safety.Expert opinion: Recent treatments, evaluated via randomized clinical trials, are promising in terms of efficacy and safety in individuals with DS. However, the balance between expected benefits and risks taken must be accurately assessed on an individual basis. There is a lack of data to understand the needs of patients and families, a major point particularly in this population, where the evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond seizures is difficult due to cognitive delay and behavioral disorders and where this evaluation is coming almost exclusively from caregivers.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam has been widely used as a treatment option for different types of epilepsy in both adults and children. Because of its large between-subject variability, several population pharmacokinetic studies have been performed to identify its pharmacokinetic covariates, and thus facilitate individualised therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to provide a synopsis for population pharmacokinetic studies of levetiracetam and explore the identified influencing covariates.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to 30 June 2020. The information on study designs, target population, model characteristics, and identified covariates was summarised. Moreover, the pharmacokinetic profiles were compared among neonates, children, and adults.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, among which two involved neonates, four involved children, two involved both children and adults, and six involved adults only. The median value of apparent clearance for children (0.074 L/h/kg [range 0.038-0.079]) was higher than that for adults (0.054 L/h/kg [range 0.039-0.061]). Body weight was found to significantly influence the apparent clearance and volume of distribution, whereas renal function influenced the clearance. Likewise, coadministration with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (such as carbamazepine and phenytoin) increased the drug clearance by 9-22%, whereas coadministration with valproate acid decreased it by 18.8%.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam dose regimen is dependent on the body size and renal function of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in neonates and pregnant women.

Dosing Recommendations for Lamotrigine in Children: Evaluation Based on Previous and New Population Pharmacokinetic Models

Lamotrigine is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug with high interindividual variability in serum concentrations in children. The aims of this study were to evaluate the predictive performance of pediatric population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models published on lamotrigine, to build a new model with our monitoring data and to evaluate the current recommended doses. A validation cohort included patients treated with lamotrigine who had a serum level assayed during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). PPK models published in the literature were first applied to the validation cohort. We assessed their predictive performance using mean prediction errors, root mean squared errors, and visual predictive checks. A new model was then built using the data. Dose simulations were performed to evaluate the doses recommended. We included 270 lamotrigine concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 17.9 mg/L from 175 patients. The median (range) age and weight were 11.8 years (0.8-18 years) and 32.7 kg (8-110 kg). We tested 6 PPK models; most had acceptable bias and precision but underestimated the variability of the cohort. We built a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, allometric scaling, and effects of inhibitor and inducer comedications. In our cohort, 22.6% of trough concentrations were below 2.5 mg/L. In conclusion, we proposed a PPK model that can be used for TDM of lamotrigine in children. In our population, a high percentage of children had low trough concentrations of lamotrigine. As the intervals of recommended doses are large, we suggest aiming at the higher range of doses to reach the target concentration.

Retrospective Analysis of Pediatric and Adult Populations Using an LC-MS/MS Method for Oxcarbazepine/Eslicarbazepine Metabolite

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-epileptic drugs is important to manage seizure control in patients with epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine is a second-generation anti-epileptic drug approved for use in pediatric patients, and eslicarbazepine acetate is a newer generation drug used as adjunctive therapy and monotherapy for partial-onset (focal) seizures. While several second and third generation anti-epileptic drugs have broader therapeutic efficacy in patients, these drugs can still have severe side effects and variable interpatient pharmacokinetics. Consequently, there is a need for accurate and sensitive analytical methods to support therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHODS

An assay improvement for a LC-MS/MS method was developed for the major metabolite of oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine, licarbazepine (MHD), using a 13C-labeled form of the compound as the internal standard. Additionally, retrospective data analysis was used to compare the distribution of results observed in adult vs pediatric patients.

RESULTS

Accuracy and linearity across the analytical measuring range of 1 to 60 µg/mL was acceptable. Inter- and intra-run precision was less than 6% at 3 concentrations tested. The limit of detection was determined to be 0.5 µg/mL. Significant interference from hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, or 187 other potential interferences was not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved assay for MHD was appropriate for clinical use. Retrospective data analysis showed that pediatric and adult patients had a similar distribution of oxcarbazepine/eslicarbazepine metabolite concentrations in serum.

Simultaneous Determination of Lamotrigine, Topiramate, Oxcarbazepine, and 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine in Human Blood Plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS

Background:

Lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC) are commonly used antiepileptic drugs. The bioactivity and toxicity of these drugs were related to their blood concentrations which varied greatly among individuals and required to be monitored for dose adjustment. However, the commercial method for monitoring of these drugs is not available in China.

Methods:

A UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of LTG, TPM, OXC, and OXC active metabolite (10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine, MHD) was developed and validated according to the guidelines and applied in clinical practice.

Results:

he separation was achieved by using methanol and water (both contain 0.1% formic acid) at 0.4 mL/min under gradient elution within 3 min. For all analytes, the isotope internal standard was used; the selectivity was good without significant carry over; LTG and TPM were linear between 0.06 to 12 mg/L while OXC and MHD were linear between 0.03 to 6 mg/L, the upper limit could be 10-fold higher because 10-fold dilution with water did not affect the results; the intra-day and interday bias and imprecision were -13.11% to 5.42% and < 13.32%; the internal standard normalized recovery and matrix factor were 90.95% to 111.94% and 95.57% to 109.91%; and all analytes were stable under tested conditions. LTG and OXC-D4 shared two ion pairs m/z 257.1 > 212.0 and 257.1 > 184.0, and m/z 257.1 > 240.0 was suggested for OXC-D4 quantitation. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine- 13C3 shared three ion pairs m/z 259.0 > 214.0, 259.0 > 168.0 and 259.0 > 159.0, and m/z 259.0 > 144.9 was suggested for LTG-13C3 quantitation. CBZ had a slight influence on OXC analysis only at 0.225 mg/L (bias, 20.24%) but did not affect MHD analysis. Optimization of chromatography conditions was useful to avoid the influence of isobaric mass transitions on analysis. This method has been successfully applied in 208 patients with epilepsy for dose adjustment.

Conclusions:

An accurate, robust, rapid, and simple method for simultaneous determination of LTG, TPM, OXC, and MHD by UHPLC-MS/MS was developed, validated, and successfully applied in patients with epilepsy for dose adjustment. The experiences during method development, validation, and application might be helpful for other researchers.

Comparative analysis of the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate in older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), a once-daily oral anti-seizure drug (ASD), in older and younger adult patient populations.

METHODS

Two post-hoc pooled data analyses were performed: one from three Phase III studies in patients with focal (partial-onset) seizures who were taking 1-3 concomitant ASDs; the other from five Phase II studies in patients from non-epilepsy populations not taking other ASDs chronically and/or at a clinically-effective anti-seizure dose. The frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were calculated for the older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59 years) adults separately.

RESULTS

In the focal seizures study pool, 4.1 % of patients (58/1431) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 77.5 % in older ESL-treated patients and 72.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.495). For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs was 50.0 % in the older adults and 57.5 % in the younger adults (p = 0.531). The overall placebo-adjusted frequency of TEAEs was 27.5 % in older adults and 15.1 % in younger adults. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs dizziness, somnolence, headache, nausea, diplopia, blurred vision, and ataxia were ≥5 % higher, and frequencies of vomiting and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older than younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 15.0 % in older ESL-treated patients and 17.6 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.647); the frequency increased with increasing ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 5.6 % in older adults and 6.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.847). In the non-epilepsy study pool, 30.2 % of patients (515/1705) were aged ≥60 years. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 56.9 % in older ESL-treated patients and 58.8 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies were 14.9 % in older and 15.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients. The placebo-adjusted frequencies of the TEAEs nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and vertigo were ≥2 % higher in older adults, whereas somnolence was ≥2 % higher in younger adults. The overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 18.3 % in older ESL-treated patients and 12.1 % in younger ESL-treated patients (p = 0.003); frequencies were not related to ESL dose. For patients who received placebo, the overall frequency of TEAEs leading to discontinuation was 8.0 % in older adults and 5.6 % in younger adults (p = 0.407).

CONCLUSION

Analyses of adverse event data support the safety and tolerability of ESL in adults aged ≥60 years. In the limited number of older patients with focal seizures taking ESL plus concomitant ASDs (n = 40), the frequency of TEAEs was generally higher than in younger adults. However, in the non-epilepsy patient group (in which the number of older patients was ten times larger; 427 patients taking ESL without concomitant ASDs), no marked age-related TEAE differences were observed, suggesting that increased ASD load associated with adjunctive therapy may complicate treatment selection in older patients, due to risk of increased adverse events. As is common practice for all ASDs, balancing clinical response and tolerability is needed in this vulnerable group of patients.

Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Portuguese Refractory Epileptic Patients: Effect of Gender, Weight and Concomitant Therapy

Levetiracetam is a second-generation antiepileptic drug, widely used in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsy due to its pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Its pharmacokinetic monitoring is ascribed as useful to personalize its dosing regimen. The aim of the present study was to describe, for the first time, the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in Portuguese refractory epileptic patients. Therefore, a retrospective study was carried out on 65 Portuguese refractory epileptic patients (pharmacokinetic study: 48; validation study: 17) admitted to the Refractory Epilepsy Centre of the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. The pharmacokinetic parameters of levetiracetam were estimated by applying a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination analysis. Male patients showed higher distribution volume (Vd/F) and oral clearance (CL/F) than female patients (median Vd/F: 52.40 L in males and 38.60 L in females, p = 0.011; median CL/F: 4.71 L/h in males and 3.91 L/h in females, p = 0.028). Higher values of Vd/F (p = 0.026) and CL/F (p = 0.003) were also found in overweight patients relative to normal weight and obese patients. Carbamazepine was the co-administered antiepileptic drug that mostly affected the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam, increasing both Vd/F (61.30 L with carbamazepine and 39.10 L without carbamazepine, p = 0.007) and CL/F (6.71 L/h with carbamazepine and 3.91 L/h without carbamazepine, p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam was affected by gender, body mass index, and co-administration of carbamazepine. This study highlights the impact of several factors on the CL/ and Vd/F of levetiracetam when administered to refractory epileptic patients. The importance of its pharmacokinetic monitoring in clinical pharmacy stands out, thereby enabling the optimization of antiepileptic drug therapy.

Impact of ABCB1 Polymorphism on Levetiracetam Serum Concentrations in Epileptic Uygur Children in China

BACKGROUND

Interindividual variations in the efficacy of antiseizure medications make epilepsy treatment challenging. This is due to genetic factors such as gene polymorphisms in Adenosine-triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1). In this article, the impact of polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein-encoding gene, ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, and C3435T), on levetiracetam disposition was evaluated in Uygur Chinese children with epilepsy.

METHODS

MDR1 C3435T polymorphism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-fluorescence staining in situ hybridization. The χ test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the allelic and genotypic distribution of ABCB1, C1236T, G2677T, and C3435T between the drug-resistant and drug-responsive groups. Differences in steady-state and dose-corrected levetiracetam serum concentrations between the different genotypes were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Total 245 Uygur children with epilepsy were analyzed [drug-resistant, n = 117 (males:females = 53:64) and drug-responsive, n = 128 (males:females = 76:52)]. The frequency of ABCB1 C1236T, G2677T/A, and ABCB1 C3435T genotypes, alleles, haplotypes, or diplotypes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Significantly higher levetiracetam concentrations and serum concentration/body mass dose were seen in ABCB1 2677-GT, TT, GA, and AT genotypes and 3435-TT carriers compared with GG and CC carriers (P = 0.021 and P = 0.002 versus P = 0.001 and P = 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T may affect levetiracetam disposition and therapeutic efficacy in Uygur children with epilepsy. Genetic analysis could be a valuable tool for predicting the response to antiseizure medications before the start of treatment and could contribute to personalized medicine for Uygur children with epilepsy.

Comparison of ropivacaine with ropivacaine and fentanyl in continuous epidural analgesia for postherpetic neuralgia: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study

Continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) using local anesthetics is frequently used to control herpes zoster pain and prevent postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). However, few studies have been conducted to determine the efficacy of epidural drugs administered as CEA to manage PHN. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CEA with ropivacaine alone or with ropivacaine and fentanyl for controlling pain caused by PHN.We reviewed the medical records of 71 patients. We studied 2 groups: epidural ropivacaine (ER; CEA with ropivacaine alone; n = 44) and epidural ropivacaine and fentanyl (Epidural ropivacaine and fentanyl (ERF); CEA with ropivacaine and fentanyl; n = 27). To evaluate pain, a numeric rating scale (NRS) was evaluated at 6 time points: immediately before the procedure (baseline NRS score); 1 hour after the procedure; 14 days after the procedure; and 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. Complication rates were recorded during CEA. We also investigated whether additional invasive procedures were needed due to insufficient pain control during the 6-month follow-up period.After adjusting for confounding variables, there were no significant differences in the NRS scores between the 2 groups at any time point. The adjusted odds ratio for additional invasive procedures within 6 months after CEA was 1.03-times higher in the ERF group than in the ER group, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval: 0.33-3.23, P = .96). Rates of complication (dysuria, vomiting, nausea, itching sensation, and hypotension) during CEA were higher in the ERF group than in the ER group. However, the differences were not statistically significant.There was no difference in the management of pain in patients with PHN between the groups. Epidural administration of fentanyl with ropivacaine did not improve pain management when compared to ropivacaine alone. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of complications during CEA was higher in the opioid combination group.

Influence of dose and antiepileptic comedication on brivaracetam serum concentrations in patients with epilepsy

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on brivaracetam (BRV) trough serum concentrations. A total number of 368 routinely collected blood samples from 148 inpatients from Mara Hospital (Bethel Epilepsy Center) and von Bodelschwingh Foundation Bethel were retrospectively evaluated. Generalized estimation equations (GEEs) were used for statistical analysis. GEE analyses showed that BRV trough serum concentrations were significantly lower in patients with strong enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, and/or phenobarbital/primidone, -49%), but were not affected by concomitant intake of oxcarbazepine or eslicarbazepine. Age and gender did not have a significant effect. An alternative GEE model analyzing the BRV level-to-dose ratios yielded comparable results. Our results from routine therapeutic drug monitoring data indicate that the effect of enzyme-inducing AEDs on BRV serum concentrations is stronger than the 20%-30% reduction in BRV exposure previously reported in pharmacokinetics studies. Further research is necessary to evaluate these differences and to elucidate possible clinical consequences.

Tacrolimus treatment in childhood refractory nephrotic syndrome: A retrospective study on efficacy, therapeutic drug monitoring, and contributing factors to variable blood tacrolimus levels

Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive drug, was recommended by the 2012 KDIGO guidelines to treat nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children and adults. However, it has high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and exposure levels should be monitored, although there are no specified target concentrations. This retrospective study aimed to review efficacy and safety after concomitant treatment with tacrolimus and prednisone, and to identify factors that contribute to the variable blood-trough-concentration-to-dose (C₀/Dose) ratio in children with refractory NS (RNS). A 6-month therapy induced complete or partial remission in 95% of patients. One-year follow-up indicated a high remission rate and low nephrotoxicity. Under maintenance dosages, approximately 95% of the C₀ values were 2-7 ng/mL. Body weight (BW), age, CYP3A5 polymorphisms were the factors affecting the C₀/Dose ratio. The C₀/Dose ratio in patients with a BW of <20 kg was 1.5-fold than that in patients with BW of ≥40 kg. Moreover, the C₀/Dose ratio in patients aged 1-≤6 and 6-≤12 years was significantly lower than that in patients aged 12-≤18 years, by 25% and 48%, respectively. There were no significant association between CYP3A5 genotyping and C₀/Dose ratio in younger children (1-≤6 years), rather than older children (6-≤18 years). In conclusion, routine CYP3A5 genotyping should be considered in children aged over 6 years and exposure levels (C₀) of 2-7 ng/mL may be feasible when tacrolimus is combined with low-dose prednisone to treat childhood RNS.

Pharmacological Treatment of Epilepsy in Elderly Patients

The incidence and prevalence of epilepsy are highest in elderly people, and the etiologies of epilepsy in the elderly differ from those in other age groups. Moreover, diagnosing and treating epilepsy in elderly people may be challenging due to differences in clinical characteristics and physiological changes associated with aging. This review focuses on the pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in elderly patients.

Development and validation of an improved HPLC-UV method for simultaneous determination of lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine and its active metabolite 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine in human blood plasma and comparison with an UHPLC-MS/MS method

Lamotrigine (LTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) are first-line drugs for epilepsy treatment. Their large pharmacokinetics variabilities and relations between efficacy and toxicity and blood plasma concentration require routine monitoring for dose adjustment. In this study, we developed and validated a simple, accurate, and reliable method for simultaneous determination of LTG, OXC and 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbazepine (MHD) in human blood plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) with a simple one-step protein precipitation using methanol (1% acetic acid) and 15 min elution time under isocratic elution at 1 mL/min. Calibration range was 2.4 to 120 mg/L for LTG, OXC, and MHD. The intra-day and inter-day bias were − 8.84 to 4.18%, and the imprecision was less than 8.08% for all analytes. The internal standard (fluconazole) normalized recovery was 96.30 to 107.69% for LTG, 98.51 to 111.04% for MHD, and 95.04 to 109.86% for OXC. A total of 186 LTG samples and 25 MHD samples were used to evaluate the agreement between HPLC-UV and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) by Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot. The mean bias and the 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) of the two measurements were 0.575 mg/L and − 1.238 to 2.387 mg/L for LTG (n = 186) and − 1.222 mg/L and − 8.271 to 5.827 mg/L for MHD (n = 25), which indicated the UV method was comparable with the MS method for LTG and MHD analysis.

Effect of Age-Related Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine and Potential Implications for Maintenance Dose Optimisation in Future Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In this study, we evaluate the performance of allometric concepts to predict the implications of age and size on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine, and assess the dose rationale across different age groups from 0.2 to 91 years.

METHODS

An allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic model was developed using adolescent and adult data, taking into account the effect of comedications. Model parameters were then used to extrapolate lamotrigine pharmacokinetics to older adults (> 65 years), children (4-12 years) and infants and toddlers (0.2-2.0 years). In addition, simulations were performed to identify the implication of different doses and dosing regimens for each population, so as to ensure steady-state concentrations within a predefined reference range.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine was best described using a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, and valproic acid changed systemic clearance (CL) by + 76.5, + 129, and - 47.4%, respectively. Allometric principles allowed accurate extrapolation of disposition parameters to older adults and children older than 4 years of age. A maturation function was required to describe changes in exposure in younger patients. Compared with adults, a child aged 1.7 years has a 31.5% higher CL, after correcting for body weight. Patients > 65 years of age showed a decrease in CL of approximately 15%.

CONCLUSION

Population pharmacokinetic models are usually limited to a subgroup of patients, which may mask the identification of factors contributing to interindividual variability. The availability of an integrated model including the whole patient population provides insight into the role of age-related changes in the disposition of lamotrigine, and potential implications for maintenance dose optimisation in any future trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

According to GlaxoSmithKline's Clinical Trial Register, data from the GlaxoSmithKline studies LAM100034 and LEP103944, corresponding to ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00113165 and NCT00264615, used in this work, have been used in previous publications (doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000277698.33743.8b , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01274.x ).

Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions Associated with Old- and New- Generation Antiepileptic Drugs Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Adverse cutaneous drug reactions associated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are a serious problem in the clinical setting. New-generation AEDs have been reported to be better tolerated than old-generation forms; however, information about the risks of adverse cutaneous drug reactions to new-generation AEDs is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to clarify the association of AEDs with adverse cutaneous drug reactions using a spontaneous reporting database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Adverse event reports submitted to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency between April 2004 and January 2017 were analyzed. Based on reports of all adverse events, we obtained 4805 reports of adverse cutaneous drug reactions associated with AEDs, and calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for drug rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

RESULTS

Individual AEDs had variable signals for drug rash, SJS, and TEN. The strongest signals were detected for drug rash caused by lamotrigine (ROR 9.18, 95% CI 8.65-9.74), SJS caused by zonisamide (ROR 9.85, 95% CI 8.23-11.78), and TEN caused by phenobarbital (ROR 14.08, 95% CI 11.28-17.57).

CONCLUSION

There are clear differences in the risk of cutaneous reactions among AEDs, and further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Epilepsy: A 2018 Update

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Since 1989, 18 new AEDs have been licensed for clinical use and there are now 27 licensed AEDs in total for the treatment of patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, several AEDs are also used for the management of other medical conditions, for example, pain and bipolar disorder. This has led to an increasingly widespread application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs, making AEDs among the most common medications for which TDM is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the indications for AED TDM, to provide key information for each individual AED in terms of the drug's prescribing indications, key pharmacokinetic characteristics, associated drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions, and the value and the intricacies of TDM for each AED. The concept of the reference range is discussed as well as practical issues such as choice of sample types (total versus free concentrations in blood versus saliva) and sample collection and processing.

METHODS

The present review is based on published articles and searches in PubMed and Google Scholar, last searched in March 2018, in addition to references from relevant articles.

RESULTS

In total, 171 relevant references were identified and used to prepare this review.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM provides a pragmatic approach to epilepsy care, in that bespoke dose adjustments are undertaken based on drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. For the older first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and valproic acid), much data have accumulated in this regard. However, this is occurring increasingly for the new AEDs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, piracetam, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, sulthiame, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide).

Pharmacokinetic considerations for anti-epileptic drugs in children

Epilepsy is a chronic and debilitating neurological disease, with a peak of incidence in the first years of life. Today, the vast armamentarium of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) available make even more challenging to select the most appropriate AED and establish the most effective dosing regimen. In fact, AEDs pharmacokinetics is under the influence of important age-related factors which cannot be ignored. Areas covered: Physiological changes occurring during development age (different body composition, immature metabolic patterns, reduced renal activity) can significantly modify the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs (adsorption, volume of distribution, half-life, clearance), leading to an altered treatment response. We reviewed the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of AEDs used in children, focusing on age-related factors which are of relevance when treating this patient population. Expert opinion: To deal with this pharmacokinetic variability, physicians have at their disposal two tools: 1) therapeutic drug concentration monitoring, which may help to set the optimal therapeutic regimen for each patient and to monitor eventual fluctuation, and 2) the use of extended-release drug formulations, when available. In the next future, the development of 'ad-hoc' electronic dashboard systems will represent relevant decision-support tools making the AED therapy even more individualized and precise, especially in children.

Psychopharmacology and pharmacokinetics

The overall physiologic changes associated with aging lead to changes in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of many medications. This, in turn, leads to changes in the impact that a wide variety of medications have on older adults when compared to younger, healthy individuals. These pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations can cause either lesser or greater than expected responses to medication. Knowledge of the physiologic changes that are expected to occur in the elderly can help to identify medications that may require dose adjustments or that should be avoided, due to increased risk in this population. As a general principle, medications should be started at lower doses in the elderly with slow titration schedules to reduce the risk of adverse effects.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children and Adolescents

Selecting the most appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) or combination of drugs for each patient and identifying the most suitable therapeutic regimen for their needs is increasingly challenging, especially among pediatric populations. In fact, the pharmacokinetics of several drugs vary widely in children with epilepsy because of age-related factors, which can influence the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of the pharmacological agent. In addition, individual factors, such as seizure type, associated comorbidities, individual pharmacokinetics, and potential drug interactions, may contribute to large fluctuations in serum drug concentrations and, therefore, clinical response. Therapeutic drug concentration monitoring (TDM) is an essential tool to deal with this complexity, enabling the definition of individual therapeutic concentrations and adaptive control of dosing to minimize drug interactions and prevent loss of efficacy or toxicity. Moreover, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling integrated with dashboard systems have recently been tested in antiepileptic therapy, although more clinical trials are required to support their use in clinical practice. We review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and safety/tolerability profiles of the main AEDs currently used in children and adolescents, paying particular regard to issues of relevance when treating this patient population. Indications for TDM are provided for each AED as useful support to the clinical management of pediatric patients with epilepsy by optimizing pharmacological therapy.

Lamotrigine-Valproic Acid Interaction Leading to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

Lamotrigine (LTG) is currently indicated as adjunctive therapy for focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures and for treatment of bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain. A common concern with LTG in children is the frequency of appearance of skin rash. The intensity of this adverse effect can vary from transient mild rash to Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), which can be fatal mainly when LTG is coadministered with valproic acid (VPA). Hereby, we present the case of an 8-year-old boy who suffered from SJS and other complications two weeks after LTG was added to his VPA treatment in order to control his seizures. VPA is known to decrease LTG clearance via reduced glucuronidation. In this case, the minor elimination pathway of LTG would play a more important role, and the formation of an arene oxide metabolite would be enhanced. As this reactive metabolite is detoxified mainly by enzymatic reactions, involving microsomal epoxide hydrolase and/or GSH-S-transferases and these enzymes are polymorphically expressed in humans, arene oxide toxicity is increased when epoxide hydrolase or GSH-S-transferases is either defective or inhibited or a depletion of intracellular glutathione levels is taking place. VPA can cause inhibition of epoxide hydrolase enzymes and/or depletion of glutathione levels leading to adverse cutaneous reactions.