Factor-independent activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription. I. Kinetic analysis of the roles of the upstream activator region and supercoiling on transcription of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro

The alarmone (p)ppGpp regulates primer extension by bacterial primase

Primase is an essential component of the DNA replication machinery, responsible for synthesizing RNA primers that initiate leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Bacterial primase activity can be regulated by the starvation-inducible nucleotide (p)ppGpp. This regulation contributes to a timely inhibition of DNA replication upon amino acid starvation in the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Here, we characterize the effect of (p)ppGpp on B. subtilis DnaG primase activity in vitro. Using a single-nucleotide resolution primase assay, we dissected the effect of ppGpp on the initiation, extension, and fidelity of B. subtilis primase. We found that ppGpp has a mild effect on initiation, but strongly inhibits primer extension and reduces primase processivity, promoting termination of primer extension. High (p)ppGpp concentration, together with low GTP concentration, additively inhibit primase activity. This explains the strong inhibition of replication elongation during starvation which induces high levels of (p)ppGpp and depletion of GTP in B. subtilis. Finally, we found that lowering GTP concentration results in mismatches in primer base pairing that allow priming readthrough, and that ppGpp reduces readthrough to protect priming fidelity. These results highlight the importance of (p)ppGpp in protecting replisome integrity and genome stability in fluctuating nucleotide concentrations upon onset of environmental stress.

Chromosomal Organization and Regulation of Genetic Function in Escherichia coli Integrates the DNA Analog and Digital Information

In this article, we summarize our current understanding of the bacterial genetic regulation brought about by decades of studies using the Escherichia coli model. It became increasingly evident that the cellular genetic regulation system is organizationally closed, and a major challenge is to describe its circular operation in quantitative terms. We argue that integration of the DNA analog information (i.e., the probability distribution of the thermodynamic stability of base steps) and digital information (i.e., the probability distribution of unique triplets) in the genome provides a key to understanding the organizational logic of genetic control. During bacterial growth and adaptation, this integration is mediated by changes of DNA supercoiling contingent on environmentally induced shifts in intracellular ionic strength and energy charge. More specifically, coupling of dynamic alterations of the local intrinsic helical repeat in the structurally heterogeneous DNA polymer with structural-compositional changes of RNA polymerase holoenzyme emerges as a fundamental organizational principle of the genetic regulation system. We present a model of genetic regulation integrating the genomic pattern of DNA thermodynamic stability with the gene order and function along the chromosomal OriC-Ter axis, which acts as a principal coordinate system organizing the regulatory interactions in the genome.

Bacterial transcription during growth arrest

Bacteria in most natural environments spend substantial periods of time limited for essential nutrients and not actively dividing. While transcriptional activity under these conditions is substantially reduced compared to that occurring during active growth, observations from diverse organisms and experimental approaches have shown that new transcription still occurs and is important for survival. Much of our understanding of transcription regulation has come from measuring transcripts in exponentially growing cells, or from in vitro experiments focused on transcription from highly active promoters by the housekeeping RNA polymerase holoenzyme. The fact that transcription during growth arrest occurs at low levels and is highly heterogeneous has posed challenges for its study. However, new methods of measuring low levels of gene expression activity, even in single cells, offer exciting opportunities for directly investigating transcriptional activity and its regulation during growth arrest. Furthermore, much of the rich structural and biochemical data from decades of work on the bacterial transcriptional machinery is also relevant to growth arrest. In this review, the physiological changes likely affecting transcription during growth arrest are first considered. Next, possible adaptations to help facilitate ongoing transcription during growth arrest are discussed. Finally, new insights from several recently published datasets investigating mRNA transcripts in single bacterial cells at various growth phases will be explored. Keywords: Growth arrest, stationary phase, RNA polymerase, nucleoid condensation, population heterogeneity.

The dormancy-specific regulator, SutA, is intrinsically disordered and modulates transcription initiation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Though most bacteria in nature are nutritionally limited and grow slowly, our understanding of core processes like transcription comes largely from studies in model organisms doubling rapidly. We previously identified a small protein of unknown function, SutA, in a screen of proteins synthesized in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during dormancy. SutA binds RNA polymerase (RNAP), causing widespread changes in gene expression, including upregulation of the ribosomal RNA genes. Here, using biochemical and structural methods, we examine how SutA interacts with RNAP and the functional consequences of these interactions. We show that SutA comprises a central α-helix with unstructured N- and C-terminal tails, and binds to the β1 domain of RNAP. It activates transcription from the rrn promoter by both the housekeeping sigma factor holoenzyme (Eσ⁷⁰ ) and the stress sigma factor holoenzyme (Eσ^S ) in vitro, but has a greater impact on Eσ^S . In both cases, SutA appears to affect intermediates in the open complex formation and its N-terminal tail is required for activation. The small magnitudes of in vitro effects are consistent with a role in maintaining activity required for homeostasis during dormancy. Our results add SutA to a growing list of transcription regulators that use their intrinsically disordered regions to remodel transcription complexes.

Regulatory Elements Located in the Upstream Region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum rosR Global Regulator Are Essential for Its Transcription and mRNA Stability

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii is a soil bacterium capable of establishing a symbiotic relationship with clover (Trifolium spp.). Previously, the rosR gene, encoding a global regulatory protein involved in motility, synthesis of cell-surface components, and other cellular processes was identified and characterized in this bacterium. This gene possesses a long upstream region that contains several regulatory motifs, including inverted repeats (IRs) of different lengths. So far, the role of these motifs in the regulation of rosR transcription has not been elucidated in detail. In this study, we performed a functional analysis of these motifs using a set of transcriptional rosR-lacZ fusions that contain mutations in these regions. The levels of rosR transcription for different mutant variants were evaluated in R. leguminosarum using both quantitative real-time PCR and β-galactosidase activity assays. Moreover, the stability of wild type rosR transcripts and those with mutations in the regulatory motifs was determined using an RNA decay assay and plasmids with mutations in different IRs located in the 5′-untranslated region of the gene. The results show that transcription of rosR undergoes complex regulation, in which several regulatory elements located in the upstream region and some regulatory proteins are engaged. These include an upstream regulatory element, an extension of the -10 element containing three nucleotides TGn (TGn-extended -10 element), several IRs, and PraR repressor related to quorum sensing.

Mechanism of transcription initiation and promoter escape by E. coli RNA polymerase

To investigate roles of the discriminator and open complex (OC) lifetime in transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP; α₂ββ'ωσ⁷⁰), we compare productive and abortive initiation rates, short RNA distributions, and OC lifetime for the λP_R and T7A1 promoters and variants with exchanged discriminators, all with the same transcribed region. The discriminator determines the OC lifetime of these promoters. Permanganate reactivity of thymines reveals that strand backbones in open regions of long-lived λP_R-discriminator OCs are much more tightly held than for shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. Initiation from these OCs exhibits two kinetic phases and at least two subpopulations of ternary complexes. Long RNA synthesis (constrained to be single round) occurs only in the initial phase (<10 s), at similar rates for all promoters. Less than half of OCs synthesize a full-length RNA; the majority stall after synthesizing a short RNA. Most abortive cycling occurs in the slower phase (>10 s), when stalled complexes release their short RNA and make another without escaping. In both kinetic phases, significant amounts of 8-nt and 10-nt transcripts are produced by longer-lived, λP_R-discriminator OCs, whereas no RNA longer than 7 nt is produced by shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. These observations and the lack of abortive RNA in initiation from short-lived ribosomal promoter OCs are well described by a quantitative model in which ∼1.0 kcal/mol of scrunching free energy is generated per translocation step of RNA synthesis to overcome OC stability and drive escape. The different length-distributions of abortive RNAs released from OCs with different lifetimes likely play regulatory roles.

Strength and Regulation of Seven rRNA Promoters in Escherichia coli

The model prokaryote Escherichia coli contains seven copies of the rRNA operon in the genome. The presence of multiple rRNA operons is an advantage for increasing the level of ribosome, the key apparatus of translation, in response to environmental conditions. The complete sequence of E. coli genome, however, indicated the micro heterogeneity between seven rRNA operons, raising the possibility in functional heterogeneity and/or differential mode of expression. The aim of this research is to determine the strength and regulation of the promoter of each rRNA operon in E. coli. For this purpose, we used the double-fluorescent protein reporter pBRP system that was developed for accurate and precise determination of the promoter strength of protein-coding genes. For application of this promoter assay vector for measurement of the rRNA operon promoters devoid of the signal for translation, a synthetic SD sequence was added at the initiation codon of the reporter GFP gene, and then approximately 500 bp-sequence upstream each 16S rRNA was inserted in front of this SD sequence. Using this modified pGRS system, the promoter activity of each rrn operon was determined by measuring the rrn promoter-directed GFP and the reference promoter-directed RFP fluorescence, both encoded by a single and the same vector. Results indicated that: the promoter activity was the highest for the rrnE promoter under all growth conditions analyzed, including different growth phases of wild-type E. coli grown in various media; but the promoter strength of other six rrn promoters was various depending on the culture conditions. These findings altogether indicate that seven rRNA operons are different with respect to the regulation mode of expression, conferring an advantage to E. coli through a more fine-tuned control of ribosome formation in a wide range of environmental situations. Possible difference in the functional role of each rRNA operon is also discussed.

Synthetic biology outside the cell: linking computational tools to cell-free systems

As mathematical models become more commonly integrated into the study of biology, a common language for describing biological processes is manifesting. Many tools have emerged for the simulation of in vivo synthetic biological systems, with only a few examples of prominent work done on predicting the dynamics of cell-free synthetic systems. At the same time, experimental biologists have begun to study dynamics of in vitro systems encapsulated by amphiphilic molecules, opening the door for the development of a new generation of biomimetic systems. In this review, we explore both in vivo and in vitro models of biochemical networks with a special focus on tools that could be applied to the construction of cell-free expression systems. We believe that quantitative studies of complex cellular mechanisms and pathways in synthetic systems can yield important insights into what makes cells different from conventional chemical systems.

Advances and computational tools towards predictable design in biological engineering

The design process of complex systems in all the fields of engineering requires a set of quantitatively characterized components and a method to predict the output of systems composed by such elements. This strategy relies on the modularity of the used components or the prediction of their context-dependent behaviour, when parts functioning depends on the specific context. Mathematical models usually support the whole process by guiding the selection of parts and by predicting the output of interconnected systems. Such bottom-up design process cannot be trivially adopted for biological systems engineering, since parts function is hard to predict when components are reused in different contexts. This issue and the intrinsic complexity of living systems limit the capability of synthetic biologists to predict the quantitative behaviour of biological systems. The high potential of synthetic biology strongly depends on the capability of mastering this issue. This review discusses the predictability issues of basic biological parts (promoters, ribosome binding sites, coding sequences, transcriptional terminators, and plasmids) when used to engineer simple and complex gene expression systems in Escherichia coli. A comparison between bottom-up and trial-and-error approaches is performed for all the discussed elements and mathematical models supporting the prediction of parts behaviour are illustrated.

A proximal promoter element required for positive transcriptional control by guanosine tetraphosphate and DksA protein during the stringent response

The alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) acts as both a positive and a negative regulator of gene expression in the presence of DksA, but the underlying mechanisms of this differential control are unclear. Here, using uspA hybrid promoters, we show that an AT-rich discriminator region is crucial for positive control by ppGpp/DksA. The AT-rich discriminator makes the RNA polymerase-promoter complex extremely stable and therefore easily saturated with RNA polymerase. A more efficient transcription is achieved when the RNA polymerase-promoter complex is destabilized with ppGpp/DksA. We found that exchanging the AT-rich discriminator of uspA with the GC-rich rrnB-P1 discriminator made the uspA promoter negatively regulated by ppGpp/DksA both in vivo and in vitro. In addition, the GC-rich discriminator destabilized the RNA polymerase-promoter complex, and the effect of ppGpp/DksA on the kinetic properties of the promoter was reversed. We propose that the transcription initiation rate from promoters with GC-rich discriminators, in contrast to the uspA-promoter, is not limited by the stability of the open complex. The findings are discussed in view of models for both direct and indirect effects of ppGpp/DksA on transcriptional trade-offs.

Assays for transcription factor activity

Transcription factors interact at promoters to modulate the transcription of genes. This chapter describes three in vitro methods that can be used to monitor their activity: transcript assays, abortive initiation assays, and potassium permanganate footprinting. These techniques have been developed using bacterial systems, and can be used to study the kinetics of transcription initiation, and hence to unravel regulatory mechanisms.

Fine structure of the promoter-sigma region 1.2 interaction

We recently proposed that a nontemplate strand base in the discriminator region of bacterial promoters, the region between the -10 element and the transcription start site, makes sequence-specific contacts to region 1.2 of the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP). Because rRNA promoters contain sequences within the discriminator region that are suboptimal for interaction with sigma1.2, these promoters have the kinetic properties required for regulation by the RNAP-binding factors DksA and ppGpp. Here, we use zero-length cross-linking and mutational, kinetic, and footprinting studies to map RNAP interactions with the nontemplate strand bases at the junction of the -10 element and the discriminator region in an unregulated rRNA promoter variant and in the lambdaP(R) promoter. Our studies indicate that nontemplate strand bases adjacent to the -10 element bind within a 9-aa interval in sigma1.2 (residues 99-107). We also demonstrate that the downstream-most base on the nontemplate strand of the -10 hexamer cross-links to sigma region 2, and not to sigma1.2. Our results refine models of RNAP-DNA interactions in the promoter complex that are crucial for regulation of transcription initiation.

Rapid responses of ribosomal RNA synthesis to nutrient shifts

A major challenge in systems biology is to integrate our mechanistic understanding of gene regulation to predict quantitatively how cells will respond to environmental changes. Living cells respond rapidly to the availability of nutrients in part by altering production of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), a limiting component in the biosynthesis of ribosomes. Studies of rRNA transcription by the RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli have identified regulatory roles for guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), the initiating nucleotide, and the protein DksA. To what extent findings from in vitro studies can be used to quantitatively predict in vivo responses to changing nutrient environments is unknown. We developed a mechanistic mathematical model for rRNA transcriptional responses to such changes. Our model accounts for binding of RNAP to its rRNA promoter to form a closed complex, isomerization from a closed complex to an open complex, reversible incorporation of the initiating NTP (iNTP), transcript elongation, and clearance of the promoter. Further, the model incorporates interactions between ppGpp and DksA with transcription intermediates, and it includes an empirical correction to account for salt effects. The model biophysical parameters were determined using 33 single- and multi-round transcription experiments spanning 487 in vitro measurements. By incorporating in vivo measurements of ppGpp and ATP, the model correctly predicted rRNA production rates for cellular responses to nutrient upshifts, downshifts, and outgrowth into fresh medium. Inclusion of DksA was essential in all three cases. Our work provides a foundation for using data-driven computational models to predict the kinetics of in vivo transcriptional responses.

Electrostatic properties of promoter recognized by E. coli RNA polymerase Esigma70

A comparative analysis of electrostatic patterns for 359 sigma70-specific promoters and 359 nonpromoter regions on electrostatic map of Escherichia coli genome was carried out. It was found that DNA is not a uniformly charged molecule. There are some local inhomogeneities in its electrostatic profile which correlate with promoter sequences. Electrostatic patterns of promoter DNAs can be specified due to the presence of some distinctive motifs which differ for different promoter groups and may be involved as signal elements in differential recognition of various promoters by the enzyme. Some specific electrostatic elements which are responsible for modulating promoter activities due to ADP-ribosylation of RNA polymerase alpha-subunit were found in far upstream regions of T4 phage early promoters and E. coli ribosomal promoters.

Structural perspective on mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases

High-resolution crystallographic structures of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) have increased our understanding of transcriptional mechanisms. Based on a thorough review of the literature, we have compiled the mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases, many of which having been generated and studied prior to the publication of the first high-resolution structure, and highlighted the positions of the altered amino acids in the structures of both the prokaryotic and eukaryotic enzymes. The observations support many previous hypotheses on the transcriptional process, including the implication of the bridge helix and the trigger loop in the processivity of RNAP, the importance of contacts between the RNAP jaw-lobe module and the downstream DNA in the establishment of a transcription bubble and selection of the transcription start site, the destabilizing effects of ppGpp on the open promoter complex, and the link between RNAP processivity and termination. This study also revealed novel, remarkable features of the RNA polymerase catalytic mechanisms that will require additional investigation, including the putative roles of fork loop 2 in the establishment of a transcription bubble, the trigger loop in start site selection, and the uncharacterized funnel domain in RNAP processivity.

Control of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli: a systems biology approach

The first part of this review contains an overview of the various contributions and models relating to the control of rRNA synthesis reported over the last 45 years. The second part describes a systems biology approach to identify the factors and effectors that control the interactions between RNA polymerase and rRNA (rrn) promoters of Escherichia coli bacteria during exponential growth in different media. This analysis is based on measurements of absolute rrn promoter activities as transcripts per minute per promoter in bacterial strains either deficient or proficient in the synthesis of the factor Fis and/or the effector ppGpp. These absolute promoter activities are evaluated in terms of rrn promoter strength (V(max)/K(m)) and free RNA polymerase concentrations. Three major conclusions emerge from this evaluation. First, the rrn promoters are not saturated with RNA polymerase. As a consequence, changes in the concentration of free RNA polymerase contribute to changes in rrn promoter activities. Second, rrn P2 promoter strength is not specifically regulated during exponential growth at different rates; its activity changes only when the concentration of free RNA polymerase changes. Third, the effector ppGpp reduces the strength of the rrn P1 promoter both directly and indirectly by reducing synthesis of the stimulating factor Fis. This control of rrn P1 promoter strength forms part of a larger feedback loop that adjusts the synthesis of ribosomes to the availability of amino acids via amino acid-dependent control of ppGpp accumulation.

Unique roles of the rrn P2 rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli

In bacteria, genes are often expressed from multiple promoters to allow for a greater spectrum of regulation. Transcription of rRNA genes in Escherichia coli uses two promoters, rrn P1 and rrn P2. Under the conditions examined previously, the P1 and P2 promoters were regulated in response to many of the same changes in nutritional conditions. We report here that rrn P2 promoters play unique roles in rRNA expression during transitional situations. rrn P2 promoters play a dominant role in rRNA synthesis as cells enter into and persist in stationary phase. rrn P2 promoters also play a role in the rapid increases in rRNA synthesis that occur during outgrowth from stationary phase and during the initial stages of rapid shifts to richer media. We demonstrate that rrnB P2 directly senses the concentrations of guanosine 5'-disphosphate 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp) and the initiating nucleoside triphosphate (iNTP), thereby accounting, at least in part, for the observed patterns of regulation. Our work significantly extends previous information about the regulators responsible for control of the rrn P2 promoters and the relationship between the tandem rRNA promoters.

Fis stabilizes the interaction between RNA polymerase and the ribosomal promoter rrnB P1, leading to transcriptional activation

It has been shown that Fis activates transcription of the ribosomal promoter rrnB P1; however, the mechanism by which Fis activates rrnB P1 transcription is not fully understood. Paradoxically, although Fis activates transcription of rrnB P1 in vitro, transcription from the promoter containing Fis sites (as measured from rrnB P1-lacZ fusions) is not reduced in a fis null mutant strain. In this study, we further investigated the mechanism by which Fis activates transcription of the rrnB P1 promoter and the role of Fis in rRNA synthesis and cell growth in Escherichia coli. Like all other stringent promoters investigated so far, open complex of rrnB P1 has been shown to be intrinsically unstable, making open complex stability a potential regulatory step in transcription of this class of promoters. Our results show that Fis acts at this regulatory step by stabilizing the interaction between RNA polymerase and rrnB P1 in the absence of NTPs. Mutational analysis of the Fis protein demonstrates that there is a complete correlation between Fis-mediated transcriptional activation of rrnB P1 and Fis-mediated stabilization of preinitiation complexes of the promoter. Thus, our study indicates that Fis-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase-rrnB P1 preinitiation complexes, presumably at the open complex step, contributes prominently to transcriptional activation. Furthermore, our in vivo results show that rRNA synthesis from the P1 promoters of several rRNA operons are reduced 2-fold in a fis null mutant compared with the wild type strain, indicating that Fis plays an important role in the establishment of robust rRNA synthesis when E. coli cells are emerging from a growth-arrested phase to a rapid growth phase. Thus, our results resolve an apparent paradox of the role of Fis in vitro and in vivo in the field.

The downstream DNA jaw of bacterial RNA polymerase facilitates both transcriptional initiation and pausing

Regulation of RNA polymerase during initiation, elongation, and termination of transcription is mediated in part by interactions with intrinsic regulatory signals encoded in the RNA and DNA that contact the enzyme. These interactions include contacts to an 8-9-bp RNA:DNA hybrid within the active-site cleft of the enzyme, contacts to the melted nontemplate DNA strand in the vicinity of the hybrid, contacts to exiting RNA upstream of the hybrid, and contacts to approximately 20 bp of duplex DNA downstream of the active site. Based on characterization of an amino acid substitution (G1161R) and a deletion (Delta1149-1190) in the jaw domain of the bacterial RNA polymerase largest subunit (beta'), we report here that contacts of the jaw domain to downstream DNA at the leading edge of the transcription complex contribute to regulation during all three phases of transcription. The results provide insight into the role of the jaw domain-downstream DNA contact in transcriptional initiation and pausing and suggest possible explanations for the previously reported isolation of the jaw mutants based on reduced ColEI plasmid replication.

Kinetic properties of rrn promoters in Escherichia coli

How do bacteria adapt and optimize their growth in response to different environments? The answer to this question is intimately related to the control of ribosome bio-synthesis. During the last decades numerous proposals have been made to explain this control but none has been definitive. To readdress the problem, we have used measurements of rRNA synthesis rates and rrn gene dosages in E. coli to find the absolute transcription rates of the average rrn operon (transcripts per min per operon) at different growth rates. By combining these rates with lacZ expression data from rRNA promoter-lacZ fusions, the abolute activities of the isolated rrnB P1 and P2 promoters were determined as functions of the growth rate in the presence and absence of Fis and of the effector ppGpp. The promoter activity data were analyzed to obtain the relative concentrations of free RNA polymerase, [R(f)], and the ratio of the Michaelis-Menten parameters, V(max)/K(m) (promoter strength), that characterize the promoter-RNA polymerase interaction. The results indicate that changes in the basal concentration of ppGpp can account for all growth-medium dependent regulation of the rrn P1 promoter strength. The P1 promoter strength was maximal when Fis was present and the level of ppGpp was undetectable during growth in rich media or in ppGpp-deficient strains; this maximal strength was 3-fold reduced when Fis was removed and the level of ppGpp remained undetectable. At ppGpp levels above 55 pmol per cell mass unit (OD(460)) during growth in poor media, the P1 promoter strength was minimal and not affected by the presence or absence of fis. The half-maximal value occurred at 20 pmol ppGpp/OD(460) and corresponds to an intracellular concentration of about 50 microM. In connection with previously published data, the results suggest that ppGpp reduces the P1 promoter strength directly, by binding RNA polymerase, and indirectly, by inhibiting the synthesis of Fis.

The TRTGn motif stabilizes the transcription initiation open complex

The effect on transcription initiation by the extended -10 motif (5'-TRTG(n)-3'), positioned upstream of the -10 region, was investigated using a series of base substitution mutations in the alpha-amylase promoter (amyP). The extended -10 motif, previously referred to as the -16 region, is found frequently in Gram-positive bacterial promoters and several extended -10 promoters from Escherichia coli. The inhibitory effects of the non-productive promoter site (amyP2), which overlaps the upstream region of amyP, were eliminated by mutagenesis of the -35 region and the TRTG motif of amyP2. Removal by mutagenesis of the competitive effects of amyP2 resulted in a reduced dependence of amyP on the TRTG motif. In the absence of the second promoter, mutations in the TRTG motif of amyP destabilized the open complex and prevented the maintenance of open complexes at low temperatures. The open complex half-life was up to 26-fold shorter in the mutant TRTG motif promoters than in the wild-type promoter. We demonstrate that the amyP TRTG motif dramatically stabilizes the open complex intermediate during transcription initiation. Even though the open complex is less stable in the mutant promoters, the region of melted DNA is the same in the wild-type and mutant promoters. However, upon addition of the first three nucleotides, which trap RNAP (RNA polymerase) in a stable initiating complex, the melted DNA region contracts at the 5'-end in a TRTG motif promoter mutant but not at the wild-type promoter, indicating that the motif contributes to maintaining DNA-strand separation.

rRNA promoter activity in the fast-growing bacterium Vibrio natriegens

The bacterium Vibrio natriegens can double with a generation time of less than 10 min (R. G. Eagon, J. Bacteriol. 83:736-737, 1962), a growth rate that requires an extremely high rate of protein synthesis. We show here that V. natriegens' high potential for protein synthesis results from an increase in ribosome numbers with increasing growth rate, as has been found for other bacteria. We show that V. natriegens contains a large number of rRNA operons, and its rRNA promoters are extremely strong. The V. natriegens rRNA core promoters are at least as active in vitro as Escherichia coli rRNA core promoters with either E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) or V. natriegens RNAP, and they are activated by UP elements, as in E. coli. In addition, the E. coli transcription factor Fis activated V. natriegens rrn P1 promoters in vitro. We conclude that the high capacity for ribosome synthesis in V. natriegens results from a high capacity for rRNA transcription, and the high capacity for rRNA transcription results, at least in part, from the same factors that contribute most to high rates of rRNA transcription in E. coli, i.e., high gene dose and strong activation by UP elements and Fis.

Interaction of the alpha-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with DNA: rigid body nature of the protein-DNA contact

The alpha-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase plays an important role in the activity of many promoters by providing a direct protein-DNA contact with a specific sequence (UP element) located upstream of the core promoter sequence. To obtain insight into the nature of thermodynamic forces involved in the formation of this protein-DNA contact, the binding of the alpha-subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase to a fluorochrome-labeled DNA fragment containing the rrnB P1 promoter UP element sequence was quantitatively studied using fluorescence polarization. The alpha dimer and DNA formed a 1:1 complex in solution. Complex formation at 25 degrees C was enthalpy-driven, the binding was accompanied by a net release of 1-2 ions, and no significant specific ion effects were observed. The van't Hoff plot of temperature dependence of binding was linear suggesting that the heat capacity change (Deltac(p)) was close to zero. Protein footprinting with hydroxyradicals showed that the protein did not change its conformation upon protein-DNA contact formation. No conformational changes in the DNA molecule were detected by CD spectroscopy upon protein-DNA complex formation. The thermodynamic characteristics of the binding together with the lack of significant conformational changes in the protein and in the DNA suggested that the alpha-subunit formed a rigid body-like contact with the DNA in which a tight complementary recognition interface between alpha-subunit and DNA was not formed.

Contributions of UP elements and the transcription factor FIS to expression from the seven rrn P1 promoters in Escherichia coli

The high activity of the rrnB P1 promoter in Escherichia coli results from a cis-acting DNA sequence, the UP element, and a trans-acting transcription factor, FIS. In this study, we examine the effects of FIS and the UP element at the other six rrn P1 promoters. We find that UP elements are present at all of the rrn P1 promoters, but they make different relative contributions to promoter activity. Similarly, FIS binds upstream of, and activates, all seven rrn P1 promoters but to different extents. The total number of FIS binding sites, as well as their positions relative to the transcription start site, differ at each rrn P1 promoter. Surprisingly, the FIS sites upstream of site I play a much larger role in transcription from most rrn P1 promoters compared to rrnB P1. Our studies indicate that the overall activities of the seven rrn P1 promoters are similar, and the same contributors are responsible for these high activities, but these inputs make different relative contributions and may act through slightly different mechanisms at each promoter. These studies have implications for the control of gene expression of unlinked multigene families.

Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing

We have previously shown that the activity of the Escherichia coli rRNA promoter rrnB P1 in vitro depends on the concentration of the initiating nucleotide, ATP, and can respond to changes in ATP pools in vivo. We have proposed that this nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) sensing might contribute to regulation of rRNA transcription. To test this model, we have measured the ATP requirements for transcription from 11 different rrnB P1 core promoter mutants in vitro and compared them with the regulatory responses of the same promoters in vivo. The seven rrnB P1 variants that required much lower ATP concentrations than the wild-type promoter for efficient transcription in vitro were defective for response to growth rate changes in vivo (growth rate-dependent regulation). In contrast, the four variants requiring high ATP concentrations in vitro (like the wild-type promoter) were regulated with the growth rate in vivo. We also observed a correlation between NTP sensing in vitro and the response of the promoters in vivo to deletion of the fis gene (an example of homeostatic control), although this relationship was not as tight as for growth rate-dependent regulation. We conclude that the kinetic features responsible for the high ATP concentration dependence of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro are responsible, at least in part, for the promoter's regulation in vivo, consistent with the model in which rrnB P1 promoter activity can be regulated by changes in NTP pools in vivo (or by hypothetical factors that work at the same kinetic steps that make the promoter sensitive to NTPs).

A Mutation in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit that destabilizes the open complexes formed at the phage phi 29 late A3 promoter

Regulatory protein p4 from Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 activates the viral late A3 promoter mainly by stabilizing the binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to it as a closed complex. This requires an interaction between protein p4 residue Arg120 and the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the RNAP alpha subunit. Several acidic residues of the alpha-CTD, considered as plausible targets for p4 residue Arg120, were individually changed into alanine. In addition, a truncated alpha subunit lacking the last four residues, two of which are acidic, was obtained. The modified alpha subunits were purified and reconstituted into RNAP holoenzyme in vitro. Protein p4 was found to be unable to activate the late A3 promoter when residue Glu297 of the alpha subunit was changed to Ala, a modification that did not impair transcription from several other promoters. Interestingly, protein p4 could stabilize the modified RNAP at the A3 promoter as a closed complex, although the open complexes formed were unstable and did not proceed to elongation complexes. Our results indicate that the change of the alpha residue Glu297 into Ala destabilizes the open complexes formed at this promoter, but not at other promoters. Considered in the context of earlier findings indicating that the RNAP alpha-CTD may participate in the transition from closed to intermediate complexes at some other promoters, the new results expand and clarify our view of its role in transcription initiation.

Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro

To determine the role of ppGpp in both negative and positive regulation of transcription initiation during exponential growth in Escherichia coli, we examined transcription in vivo and in vitro from the growth-rate-dependent rRNA promoter rrnB P1 and from the inversely growth-rate-dependent amino acid biosynthesis/transport promoters PargI, PhisG, PlysC, PpheA, PthrABC, and PlivJ. rrnB P1 promoter activity was slightly higher at all growth-rates in strains unable to synthesize ppGpp (deltarelAdeltaspoT) than in wild-type strains. Consistent with this observation and with the large decrease in rRNA transcription during the stringent response (when ppGpp levels are much higher), ppGpp inhibited transcription from rrnB P1 in vitro. In contrast, amino acid promoter activity was considerably lower in deltarelAdeltaspoT strains than in wild-type strains, but ppGpp had no effect on amino acid promoter activity in vitro. Detailed kinetic analysis in vitro indicated that open complexes at amino acid promoters formed much more slowly and were much longer-lived than rrnB P1 open complexes. ppGpp did not increase the rates of association with, or escape from, amino acid promoters in vitro, consistent with its failure to stimulate transcription directly. In contrast, ppGpp decreased the half-lives of open complexes at all promoters, whether the half-life was seconds (rrnB P1) or hours (amino acid promoters). The results described here and in the accompanying paper indicate that ppGpp directly inhibits transcription, but only from promoters like rrnB P1 that make short-lived open complexes. The results indicate that stimulation of amino acid promoters occurs indirectly. The accompanying paper evaluates potential models for positive control of amino acid promoters by ppGpp that might explain the requirement of ppGpp for amino acid prototrophy.

Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. II. Models for positive control based on properties of RNAP mutants and competition for RNAP

Strains containing ppGpp, a nucleotide whose synthesis is dependent on the RelA and SpoT proteins of Escherichia coli, display slightly lower rRNA promoter activity and much higher amino acid biosynthesis/transport promoter activity than deltarelAdeltaspoT strains. In the accompanying paper, we show that ppGpp directly inhibits rRNA promoter activity in vitro by decreasing the lifetime of the rrn P1 open complex. However, ppGpp does not stimulate amino acid promoter activity in vitro. We show here that RNA polymerase (RNAP) mutants, selected to confer prototrophy to deltarelAdeltaspoT strains, mimic the effects of ppGpp on wild-type RNAP. Based on the positions of the mutant residues that confer prototrophy in the structure of core RNAP, we suggest molecular models for how the mutants, and by analogy ppGpp, generally decrease the lifetime of open complexes. We show that amino acid promoters require higher concentrations of RNAP for function in vitro and in vivo than control promoters, and are more sensitive to competition for RNAP in vivo than control promoters. Furthermore, we show that the requirement of an amino acid promoter for ppGpp in vivo can be alleviated by increasing its rate-limiting RNAP-binding step. Our data are consistent with a previously proposed passive model in which ppGpp inhibits stable RNA synthesis directly by reducing the lifetime of the rrn P1 open complex, liberating enough RNAP to stimulate transcription from amino acid promoters. Our data also place considerable constraints on models invoking hypothetical factors that might increase amino acid promoter activity in a ppGpp-dependent fashion.

UPs and downs in bacterial transcription initiation: the role of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition

In recent years, it has become clear that promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase involves interactions not only between core promoter elements and the sigma subunit, but also between a DNA element upstream of the core promoter and the alpha subunit. DNA binding by alpha can increase transcription dramatically. Here we review the current state of our understanding of the alpha interaction with DNA during basal transcription initiation (i.e. in the absence of proteins other than RNA polymerase) and activated transcription initiation (i.e. when stimulated by transcription factors).

The G+C-rich discriminator region of the tyrT promoter antagonises the formation of stable preinitiation complexes

RNA polymerase forms a highly stable preinitiation complex at many prokaryotic promoters in the absence of ribonucleotides. These are often characterised by the longevity of the DNA strand-separated (open) complex in the presence of heparin. In contrast, such complexes are notoriously unstable at the promoters for rRNA and tRNA under similar conditions. The high G+C content within the DNA-melting region of these promoters has been implicated in this seemingly anomalous behaviour. Here, we used rapid-pulse UV laser photo-footprinting to monitor the transient structural intermediates formed at the Escherichia coli tyrT promoter. Promoter derivatives with A+T for G/C base substitutions within the G+C-rich discriminator region (-7 to -1) augmented the stability of complexes on both linear fragments and supercoiled plasmid DNA. Analysis of the lifetime of the preinitiation complexes as a function of the discriminator sequence reveals a direct relationship between the A+T content of the DNA-melting region and the stability of the ensuing complex. Our results are consistent with the premise that a G/C block to DNA-untwisting and/or DNA-melting operates to prevent the formation of the stable isomers that are implicated in most other transcription initiation pathways.

Separate contributions of UhpA and CAP to activation of transcription of the uhpT promoter of Escherichia coli

Activation of promoters by multiple transcription factors might occur through favorable contacts of the activators with themselves or RNA polymerase, or by changes in DNA geometry that enhance formation of the transcription complex. Transcription of the Escherichia coli uhpT gene, encoding the organophosphate transporter, requires the response regulator UhpA and is stimulated by the global regulator protein CAP. CAP binds to the uhpT promoter at a single site, centered at -103.5 bp relative to the start of transcription, and UhpA binds to multiple sites between positions -80 and -32. Overexpression of UhpA did not reduce the degree of CAP stimulation of uhpT-lacZ expression, showing that CAP action is more complex than enhancement of the binding of UhpA. Footprinting experiments demonstrated that UhpA and CAP modestly stimulated each other's binding to the uhpT promoter, but did not affect the positioning of the binding sites. An in vitro transcription system was used to examine the contribution of each transcription factor at the uhpT promoter. Action of UhpA and CAP proteins was not affected by template supercoiling. Kinetic analyses of productive and abortive initiation showed that CAP acted both to stabilize by fivefold the open promoter complexes formed in the presence of UhpA and to enhance by twofold the rate of their formation. These results indicate that open complex formation requires UhpA and that CAP stabilizes the open complex.

A- and T-tract-mediated intrinsic curvature in native DNA between the binding site of the upstream activator NtrC and the nifLA promoter of Klebsiella pneumoniae facilitates transcription

The nif promoters of Klebsiella pneumoniae must be activated by proteins bound to upstream sequences which are thought to interact with the sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme by DNA looping. NifA is the activator for most of the promoters, and integration host factor (IHF) mediates the DNA looping. While NtrC is the activator for the nifLA promoter, no IHF appears to be involved. There are two A tracts and one T tract between the upstream enhancer and the nifLA promoter. This DNA segment exhibits anomalous electrophoretic mobility, suggesting intrinsic sequence-induced curvature in the DNA. On the one hand, mutation of the A tracts or T tract individually or together, or deletion of the A tracts and the T tract reduces the anomaly; on the other hand, creation of two additional A tracts enhances the anomaly. Intrinsic curvature in the DNA has been confirmed by circular permutation analysis after cloning the DNA fragment in the vector pBend 2 and also by electron microscopy. Computer simulation with the DNA base sequence is also suggestive of intrinsic curvature. A transcriptional fusion with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene of the DNA fragment containing the nifLA promoter and the wild-type or the mutated upstream sequences was constructed, and in vivo transcription in K. pneumoniae and E. coli was monitored. There was indeed very good correlation between the extent of intrinsic curvature of the DNA and transcription from the promoter, suggesting that DNA curvature due to the A tracts and the T tract was necessary for transcription in vivo from the nifLA promoter of K. pneumoniae.

Bacterial promoter architecture: subsite structure of UP elements and interactions with the carboxy-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

We demonstrate here that the previously described bacterial promoter upstream element (UP element) consists of two distinct subsites, each of which, by itself, can bind the RNA polymerase holoenzyme alpha subunit carboxy-terminal domain (RNAP alphaCTD) and stimulate transcription. Using binding-site-selection experiments, we identify the consensus sequence for each subsite. The selected proximal subsites (positions -46 to -38; consensus 5'-AAAAAARNR-3') stimulate transcription up to 170-fold, and the selected distal subsites (positions -57 to -47; consensus 5'-AWWWWWTTTTT-3') stimulate transcription up to 16-fold. RNAP has subunit composition alpha(2)betabeta'sigma and thus contains two copies of alphaCTD. Experiments with RNAP derivatives containing only one copy of alphaCTD indicate, in contrast to a previous report, that the two alphaCTDs function interchangeably with respect to UP element recognition. Furthermore, function of the consensus proximal subsite requires only one copy of alphaCTD, whereas function of the consensus distal subsite requires both copies of alphaCTD. We propose that each subsite constitutes a binding site for a copy of alphaCTD, and that binding of an alphaCTD to the proximal subsite region (through specific interactions with a consensus proximal subsite or through nonspecific interactions with a nonconsensus proximal subsite) is a prerequisite for binding of the other alphaCTD to the distal subsite.

Bacillus subtilis sequence-independent DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein Hbsu negatively controls its own synthesis

Transcription of the hbs gene under vegetative growth condition is subject to repression when cells enter in late exponential phase. We have determined the sites at which transcription of the hbs gene initiates in vitro. On a supercoiled template, transcription of the hbs gene is initiated by sigmaARNAP at two overlapping hbs promoters (P1 and P3). We have demonstrated that highly purified Hbsu protein acts as a repressor of its own synthesis. The binding of the sequence-independent DNA-binding and DNA-bending Hbsu protein does not seem to exclude sigmaARNAP from the promoters. In this report we show that Hbsu, in vitro, does not repress transcription by a mere steric hindrance on sigmaARNAP binding.

Transcription activation by CooA, the CO-sensing factor from Rhodospirillum rubrum. The interaction between CooA and the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase

CooA, a member of the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) family, is a CO-sensing transcription activator from Rhodospirillum rubrum that binds specific DNA sequences in response to CO. The location of the CooA-binding sites relative to the start sites of transcription suggested that the CooA-dependent promoters are analogous to class II CRP-dependent promoters. In this study, we developed an in vivo CooA reporter system in Escherichia coli and an in vitro transcription assay using RNA polymerases (RNAP) from E. coli and from Rhodobacter sphaeroides to study the transcription properties of CooA and the protein-protein interaction between CooA and RNAP. The ability of CooA to activate CO-dependent transcription in vivo in heterologous backgrounds suggested that CooA is sufficient to direct RNAP to initiate transcription and that no other factors are required. This hypothesis was confirmed in vitro with purified CooA and purified RNAP. Use of a mutant form of E. coli RNAP with alpha subunits lacking their C-terminal domain (alpha-CTD) dramatically decreased CooA-dependent transcription of the CooA-regulated R. rubrum promoter PcooF in vitro, which indicates that alpha-CTD plays an important role in this activation. DNase I footprinting analysis showed that CooA facilitates binding of wild-type RNAP, but not alpha-CTD-truncated RNAP, to PcooF. This facilitated binding provides evidence for a direct contact between CooA and alpha-CTD of RNAP during activation of transcription. Mapping the CooA-contact site in alpha-CTD suggests that CooA is similar but not identical to CRP in terms of its contact sites to the alpha-CTD at class II promoters.

Upstream A-tracts increase bacterial promoter activity through interactions with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

Upstream A-tracts stimulate transcription from a variety of bacterial promoters, and this has been widely attributed to direct effects of the intrinsic curvature of A-tract-containing DNA. In this work we report experiments that suggest a different mechanism for the effects of upstream A-tracts on transcription. The similarity of A-tract-containing sequences to the adenine- and thymine-rich upstream recognition elements (UP elements) found in some bacterial promoters suggested that A-tracts might increase promoter activity by interacting with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). We found that an A-tract-containing sequence placed upstream of the Escherichia coli lac or rrnB P1 promoters stimulated transcription both in vivo and in vitro, and that this stimulation required the C-terminal (DNA-binding) domain of the RNAP alpha subunit. The A-tract sequence was protected by wild-type RNAP but not by alpha-mutant RNAPs in footprints. The effect of the A-tracts on transcription was not as great as that of the most active UP elements, consistent with the degree of similarity of the A-tract sequence to the UP element consensus. A-tracts functioned best when positioned close to the -35 hexamer rather than one helical turn farther upstream, similar to the positioning optimal for UP element function. We conclude that A-tracts function as UP elements, stimulating transcription by providing binding site(s) for the RNAP alphaCTD, and we suggest that these interactions could contribute to the previously described wrapping of promoter DNA around RNAP.

RNA polymerase mutants that destabilize RNA polymerase-promoter complexes alter NTP-sensing by rrn P1 promoters

Mutations in Escherichia coli rpoB or rpoC, selected for the ability to confer prototrophy on relA spoT strains, were found to affect transcription from rrn P1 promoters. Two mutant strains (beta RH454 and beta' delta 215-220) reduced transcription of rrn P1 core promoter-lacZ fusions but not of control promoter-lacZ fusions. Purified mutant RNAPs formed complexes with rrn P1 promoters that were much less stable than those formed by wild-type RNAP and required high concentrations of the initiating NTP for efficient rrn P1 transcription. The instability of the rrn P1 core promoter complexes with the mutant RNAPs and their altered regulatory properties support a recently proposed model for the control of rRNA transcription by changing concentrations of the initiating NTPs. We further suggest that destabilization of promoter complexes by the mutant RNAPs mimics effects of ppGpp, decreasing or increasing transcription depending on the kinetic properties of the specific promoter.

The mediator for stringent control, ppGpp, binds to the beta-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of transcription of rRNA in Escherichia coli upon amino acid starvation is thought to be due to the binding of ppGpp to RNA polymerase. However, the nature of this interaction still remains obscure.

RESULTS

Here, the azido-derivative of ppGpp was synthesized from azido-GDP and [gamma-32P]ATP by way of the phosphate transfer reaction of the RelA enzyme. The product was subsequently characterized by one and two-dimensional chromatography. The resulting compound [32P]azido-ppGpp, where the azido group is attached to the base moiety, was purified to homogeneity and was photo-crosslinked to Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. SDS-PAGE analysis of the azido-ppGpp-bound enzyme, tryptic digestion and Western blot analysis suggested that azido-ppGpp binds to the beta-subunit of RNA polymerase.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of the beta-subunit were labelled with azido-ppGpp in the native enzyme. However, under denaturing conditions only the C-terminal part from amino acid residue 802 to residue 1211/1216/1223 was predominantly crosslinked to azido-ppGpp. The excess of unlabelled ppGpp competes with azido-ppGpp for binding to the enzyme. azido-ppGpp inhibits single-round transcription at the stringent promoter like rrnBP1. In addition, ribosomal protein genes were also found to be inhibited by N3ppGpp. On the other hand, transcription at the lac UV5 promoter remained unaffected upon the addition of azido-ppGpp.

The supercoiling sensitivity of a bacterial tRNA promoter parallels its responsiveness to stringent control

In Salmonella typhimurium, expression of the hisR locus, a tRNA operon, decreases upon inhibiting DNA gyrase. Here, the hisR promoter dependence on negative DNA supercoiling was examined in vivo and in vitro. Mutant analysis showed the sequence determinants of this dependence to lie in the region between the -10 box and the transcription start site. As with most promoters subject to stringent control, this portion of the hisR promoter is C-G-rich. Replacing a C/G bp with T/A at position -7 partially relieves the supercoiling response while changing the sequence between -5 and + 1 (-CCCCCG-) for -GTTAA- abolishes the response in vitro and in vivo. The relief of the supercoiling dependence closely correlates with increased promoter susceptibility to melting in vivo and a lesser requirement for initiating nucleotides in the formation of stable initiation complexes in vitro. Studies in isoleucine-starved cells showed that such sequence changes mitigate and abolish the hisR promoter response to stringent control, respectively. The data presented suggest that the hisR promoter's sensitivity to stringent regulation arises from the same physical property that confers supercoiling sensitivity, i.e. resistance to melting. We propose that the stringent control mechanism acts by hampering the ability of RNA polymerase to melt the DNA helix.

The rpoB mutants destabilizing initiation complexes at stringently controlled promoters behave like "stringent" RNA polymerases in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, stringently controlled genes are highly transcribed during rapid growth, but "turned off" under nutrient limiting conditions, a process called the stringent response. To understand how transcriptional initiation at these promoters is coordinately regulated, we analyzed the interactions between RNA polymerase (RNAP) (both wild type and mutants) and four stringently controlled promoters. Our results show that the interactions between RNAP and stringently controlled promoters are intrinsically unstable and can alternate between relatively stable and metastable states. The mutant RNAPs appear to specifically further weaken interactions with these promoters in vitro and behave like "stringent" RNAPs in the absence of the stringent response in vivo, constituting a novel class of mutant RNAPs. Consistently, these mutant RNAPs also activate the expression of other genes that normally require the response. We propose that the stability of initiation complexes is coupled to the transcription of stringently controlled promoters, and this unique feature coordinates the expression of genes positively and negatively regulated by the stringent response.

Transcription regulation by initiating NTP concentration: rRNA synthesis in bacteria

The sequence of a promoter determines not only the efficiency with which it forms a complex with RNA polymerase, but also the concentration of nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) required for initiating transcription. Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA (rrn P1) promoters require high initiating NTP concentrations for efficient transcription because they form unusually short-lived complexes with RNA polymerase; high initiating NTP concentrations [adenosine or guanosine triphosphate (ATP or GTP), depending on the rrn P1 promoter] are needed to bind to and stabilize the open complex. ATP and GTP concentrations, and therefore rrn P1 promoter activity, increase with growth rate. Because ribosomal RNA transcription determines the rate of ribosome synthesis, the control of ribosomal RNA transcription by NTP concentration provides a molecular explanation for the growth rate-dependent control and homeostatic regulation of ribosome synthesis.

Guanosine 3',5'-bis(diphosphate) (ppGpp)-dependent inhibition of transcription from stringently controlled Escherichia coli promoters can be explained by an altered initiation pathway that traps RNA polymerase

An in vitro analysis was performed to investigate the inhibitory mechanism of the global regulatory substances guanosine 3',5'-bis(diphosphate) (ppGpp) and guanosine 3'-diphosphate 5'-triphosphate (pppGpp) during initiation of transcription. Three promoters with well known differential ppGpp sensitivities in vivo were studied: the Escherichia coli rrnB P2 promoter that is only weakly ppGpp dependent; a P2 base change variant (P2F) that confers both stringent and growth rate regulation; and the completely unregulated PtacI promoter. The in vivo ppGpp dependency for all three promoters was verified in vitro in multiple round transcription reactions, reflecting a combination of the effects at initiation, promoter clearance, and elongation. In the main part of our study, we concentrated on the contribution of initiation complex formation to the overall inhibition of transcription. Kinetic measurements of complex association and dissociation revealed that at sensitive promoters (p)ppGpp triggered an alternative initiation pathway by RNA polymerase. This involved the stabilization of the initial closed complexes, and impeded open complex formation. Subsequently formed ternary complexes were structurally altered. Based on the above findings, we propose a model which suggests that ppGpp-altered RNA polymerases are preferentially bound and enter the alternative pathway. Thus, discrimination is obtained at early steps of initiation, which causes efficient inhibition at later steps of the transcription cycle probably involving promoter clearance and elongation.

rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli

The synthesis of ribosomal RNA is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria. There are multiple mechanisms that determine the rate of rRNA synthesis. Ribosomal RNA promoter sequences have evolved for exceptional strength and for regulation in response to nutritional conditions and amino acid availability. Strength derives in part from an extended RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognition region involving at least two RNAP subunits, in part from activation by a transcription factor and in part from modification of the transcript by a system that prevents premature termination. Regulation derives from at least two mechanistically distinct systems, growth rate-dependent control and stringent control. The mechanisms contributing to rRNA transcription work together and compensate for one another when individual systems are rendered inoperative.

Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

The control of rRNA synthesis in response to both extra- and intracellular signals has been a subject of interest to microbial physiologists for nearly four decades, beginning with the observations that Salmonella typhimurium cells grown on rich medium are larger and contain more RNA than those grown on poor medium. This was followed shortly by the discovery of the stringent response in Escherichia coli, which has continued to be the organism of choice for the study of rRNA synthesis. In this review, we summarize four general areas of E. coli rRNA transcription control: stringent control, growth rate regulation, upstream activation, and anti-termination. We also cite similar mechanisms in other bacteria and eukaryotes. The separation of growth rate-dependent control of rRNA synthesis from stringent control continues to be a subject of controversy. One model holds that the nucleotide ppGpp is the key effector for both mechanisms, while another school holds that it is unlikely that ppGpp or any other single effector is solely responsible for growth rate-dependent control. Recent studies on activation of rRNA synthesis by cis-acting upstream sequences has led to the discovery of a new class of promoters that make contact with RNA polymerase at a third position, called the UP element, in addition to the well-known -10 and -35 regions. Lastly, clues as to the role of antitermination in rRNA operons have begun to appear. Transcription complexes modified at the antiterminator site appear to elongate faster and are resistant to the inhibitory effects of ppGpp during the stringent response.

Instability of Rickettsia prowazekii RNA polymerase-promoter complexes

The Rickettsia prowazekii sigma factor was overexpressed, purified, and used to reconstitute RNA polymerase holoenzyme species. R. prowazekii RNA polymerase-promoter complexes were unstable and remained dissociable and heparin sensitive under conditions in which the corresponding Escherichia coli complexes were not. The R. prowazekii core played the major role in determining heparin sensitivity.

Complete sequences and organization of the rrnA operon from campylobacter jejuni TGH9011 (ATCC43431)

The rrnA ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operon of Campylobacter jejuni (Cj) TGH9011 (ATCC43431) was cloned and sequenced to completion. rRNAs were then characterized by primer extension and S1 nuclease mapping analysis. The secondary structure models of Cj 16S and 23S rRNAs were constructed, and the models were compared to the corresponding models from other eubacterial rRNA. The analysis presented a typical 5'-promoter-16S-tRNAs-23S-5S-terminator-3' prokaryotic rRNA operon structure. However, an unusual organization of the intercistronic tRNAs was observed where the two tRNAs, tRNA(Ala) and tRNA(Ile), were present in the order 5'-16S-tRNA(Ala)-tRNA(Ile)-23S-3', which is opposite of the typical 5'-16S-tRNA(Ile)-tRNA(Ala)-23S-3' structure observed in other bacteria.