Interactions of galanin and arginine on growth hormone, prolactin, and insulin secretion in man

Combined galanin with insulin improves insulin sensitivity of diabetic rat muscles

Although administration of galanin or insulin alone may enhance insulin sensitivity and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) trafficking, their cooperative effect on insulin sensitivity is still unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the cooperative effect of both reagents compared with solitary treatment with galanin or insulin in type 2 diabetic rats. Galanin and/or insulin were injected singly or together into type 2 diabetic rats once a day for 15 days. The results indicated that coadministration of both reagents compared with treatment with galanin or insulin alone significantly increased glucose infusion rates in euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp tests, 2-deoxy-[(3)H]d-glucose contents, GLUT4 densities, and pAS160 and protein kinase C activity levels, but reduced blood glucose and insulin levels, as well as retinol-binding protein 4 contents, and did not affect Glut4 (Slc2a4) mRNA expression levels in myocytes. The changes in the ratios of GLUT4 immunoreaction in plasma membranes to total cell membranes of myocytes were higher in the coadministrative group compared with either the insulin or the galanin group. These results indicate that cooperation of the two hormones plays a synergic role to improve GLUT4 translocation and insulin sensitivity. This finding indicates the possibility of combining galanin with insulin with the aim of obtaining better antidiabetic efficacy than that of the canonical treatment with insulin alone.

Evaluation of the circadian profile of peripheral plasma galanin concentrations in normal subjects

Galanin administration can influence pituitary function principally resulting in an increase in GH secretion. However, the role of circulating GAL levels in human endocrine function is still unknown. In the present study we simultaneously measured the circadian profiles of GAL, ACTH and GH in peripheral blood of ten adult subjects. Plasma samples were collected through an intravenous catheter at 0800, 1200, 1600, 2000, 2200, 2400, 0200, 0400 hours. The results were statistically evaluated by the cosinor analysis technique. A significant circadian rhythm of both plasma ACTH (p < 0.001) and GH levels (p < 0.03) was found with acrophases occurring at 0753 hrs and 0131 hrs for ACTH and GH, respectively. On the contrary, no significant rhythm was found in plasma GAL levels, indicating that no correlations exist between GAL and either GH or ACTH circadian profiles. Furthermore, the simultaneous assay of both GAL and GH plasma levels during a nocturnal frequent sampling performed in four volunteers showed the presence of peaks in GAL levels which, however, were not concomitant to the peaks in GH levels. These data demonstrate the lack of rhythmicity in the circadian profile of plasma GAL levels in healthy human subjects. The role of GAL in human endocrine function remains unknown and these results suggest that, in spite of the well documented increase in plasma GH concentrations following the intravenous administration of GAL, physiologically circulating levels of GAL are likely not involved in the regulation of GH secretion.

Effects of galanin on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in anorexia nervosa

Galanin (GAL) elicits growth hormone (GH) release in normal subjects through interaction with hypothalamic somatostatin. GAL also stimulates GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion in vitro. In rats, GAL is able to stimulate prolactin (PRL) release, but this effect is not clear in humans. We have thus investigated GAL effects on GH and PRL release in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), known to have altered regulation of the GH-insulin-like growth factor axis and PRL dynamics, and compared the effects of GHRH and GAL on GH and PRL secretion in AN and normal healthy subjects. Eight women with AN (15 to 27 years; body mass index [BMI], 17 to 19.5 kg/m2) were treated with (1) GHRH 50 microg intravenous (IV) injection, (2) porcine GAL 500 microg infusion from -10 to +30 minutes, and (3) 135-minutes saline infusion as a control, respectively. Both peptides induced a significant increase in plasma GH in AN patients (peak level, 27.41 +/- 5.50 microg/L after GAL and 18.97 +/- 2.67 microg/L after GHRH). When data for AN patients and the control group were compared, GH peak levels after GAL were significantly higher in AN patients (27.41 +/- 5.50 v 13.64 +/- 2.32 microg/L), while GH peak levels after GHRH were not different between the 2 groups (18.97 +/- 2.67 v 15.98 +/- 3.88 microg/L). PRL levels significantly increased after both GHRH (peak, 11.70 +/- 2.80 microg/L) and GAL (peak, 18.02 +/- 5.10 microg/L) treatment in AN patients, but not in normal subjects. We conclude that GAL stimulates exaggerated GH release in AN patients as compared with normal controls, suggesting a dual hypothalamic interaction via both an increase in endogenous GHRH and a decrease in somatostatin secretion. Finally, GAL may act as a PRL secretagogue in AN patients.

Influence of galanin and serotonin on the endocrine response to Hexarelin, a synthetic peptidyl GH-secretagogue, in normal women

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic GH-secretagogue (GHS) which acts on specific receptors either at the pituitary or the hypothalamic level to stimulate GH release both in animal and in man. Like other GHS, HEX possesses also PRL-, ACTH- and cortisol (F)-releasing activity but the mechanisms underlying these effects are even less clear. On the other hand, galanin (GAL) and serotonin play an important role in the neural control of GH, PRL and ACTH secretion both in animal and in man. In order to study the interaction between HEX and GAL and to verify whether serotoninergic mechanisms underly the endocrine effects of GHS, in 12 normal young volunteers (24-30 yr) the following tests were performed: group A (N = 5), HEX (2.0 micrograms/kg i.v. at 0 min), GAL (15.0 micrograms/kg i.v. from 0 to 60 min) and HEX + GAL; group B (N = 7), HEX alone and preceeded by cyproeptadine (CYPRO, 8 mg os at -60 min). In group A, the GH response to HEX (1204.2 +/- 312.9 micrograms*min/L) was higher (p < 0.05) than that to GAL alone (305.6 +/- 35.5 micrograms*min/L) and was not modified by GAL co-administration (1021.8 +/- 249.9 micrograms*min/L). PRL secretion was increased to the same extent by HEX and GAL (507.9 +/- 81.1 and 743.0 +/- 164.7 micrograms*min/L) which showed no interaction (603.5 +/- 75.7 micrograms*min/L). HEX elicited an increase in both ACTH and F secretion (924.5 +/- 169.7 pg*min/ml and 6131.3 +/- 616.6 micrograms*min/L) while GAL had no effect when given alone (759.5 +/- 185.5 pg*min/ml and 5350.3 +/- 755.6 micrograms*min/L) and did not modify the effect of HEX (891.3 +/- 159.2 pg*min/ml and 5877.8 +/- 554.4 micrograms*min/L). In group B, the GH response to HEX (1636.4 +/- 267.5 micrograms*min/L) was blunted by CYPRO (1164.8 +/- 212.3 micrograms*min/L) but this difference did not attained statistical significance. On the other hand, CYPRO did not modify the HEX-induced PRL (599.5 +/- 129.2 vs 638.9 +/- 131.9 micrograms*min/L), ACTH (1282.8 +/- 222.0 vs 1330.2 +/- 347.0 pg*min/ml) and F response (4738.3 +/- 355.3 vs 4580.9 +/- 857.3 micrograms*min/L). Our present data demonstrate that Hexarelin has no interaction with galanin; thus thereotically, the stimulatory effect of GHS on GH and PRL secretion could involve, at least partially, a galanin-mediated mechanism. On the other hand, our data demonstrate that serotonin does not mediate the stimulatory effect of GHS on PRL, ACTH and cortisol; the intrinsic anticholinergic property of cyproeptadine could account for the trend toward its blunting effect on the GH response to Hexarelin.

Evaluation of circulating galanin levels after exercise-induced pituitary hormone secretion in man

The neuropeptide galanin (GAL) is widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems, anterior pituitary, and adrenal medulla. GAL is colocalized with corticotropin (ACTH) in the human pituitary and with epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) in chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla. The function of GAL in peripheral tissues is not known, although the presence of the peptide in corticotrophs and the adrenal gland suggest that it participates in stress responses. In the present study, we investigated whether GAL is cosecreted with ACTH during activation of corticotrophs by an acute physical exercise test. Circulating levels of GAL and pituitary hormones were measured in healthy exercise-tested and control male subjects. Blood samples were collected during basal conditions, maximal power output (MPO), and the recovery period. Control subjects were sampled during the resting condition. The pituitary response to exercise was characterized by a significant increase in ACTH plasma levels (peak value 13.28 +/- 2.19 v 6.68 +/- 1.01 pmol/L, P < .05) and growth hormone (GH) serum levels (peak value, 14.53 +/- 5.59 v 0.29 +/- 0.1 microg/L, P < .02), with the peak in hormone levels detected 15 minutes after the end of exercise. No change in circulating prolactin (PRL) levels was detected. An expected significant increase in plasma levels of both E (peak value, 1,574.41 +/- 403.31 v 267.44 +/- 60.03 pmol/L, P < .01) and NE (peak value, 7,275.25 +/- 955.80 v 961.51 +/- 168.40 pmol/L, P < .01) was also observed. Plasma GAL levels were not affected by the acute exercise test, with the levels being comparable to baseline during the exercise test and the recovery phase. At any sample time, GAL values were comparable between exercise-tested and control subjects. These data show that despite the colocalization of GAL and ACTH within the same pituitary cells, the two peptides are not coreleased in response to stress resulting from acute physical exercise. Furthermore, pituitary GAL seems not to be involved in the stimulation of GH secretion in exercise-tested subjects. The results also indicate that GAL is not coreleased with E or NE in response to the exercise-induced stress condition.

Evidence that galanin is a parasympathetic, rather than a sympathetic, neurotransmitter in the baboon pancreas

To determine whether galanin is a pancreatic sympathetic neurotransmitter regulating insulin secretion in the baboon, as it is in the dog, we evaluated galanin for inhibitory effects on insulin secretion in conscious baboons, determined if baboon pancreatic islets are innervated by galaninergic fibers using immunohistochemistry, and measured galanin content in the major sympathetic ganglion supplying the pancreas. Surprisingly, infusion of galanin (1 microgram/kg per min) had no effect on arginine-stimulated secretion of either insulin (71 +/- 14 vs. 88 +/- 17 microU/ml; P = NS) or glucagon (104 +/- 12 vs. 94 +/- 9 pg/ml; P = NS). By contrast, growth hormone secretion was markedly increased during galanin infusion. In the baboon celiac ganglion, no galanin immunoreactivity was detectable in sympathetic neuronal cell bodies by immunostaining and their content of galanin-like immunoreactivity, determined by radioimmunoassay, was only 3% of that in dog celiac ganglion (5.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 158 +/- 13 pmol/g; P < 0.001). By contrast, galanin immunoreactivity was observed in many nerve fibers in the baboon exocrine pancreas and occasionally in baboon pancreatic islets. Moreover, galanin content of the baboon pancreas was similar to that of dog (8.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.2 pmol/g; P = NS). The finding of galanin immunoreactivity in many neuronal cell bodies in baboon intrapancreatic ganglia suggests a parasympathetic source for these galaninergic fibers in the baboon. Together these data demonstrate that galanin is likely to be a parasympathetic neurotransmitter in the baboon pancreas, without major effects on insulin or glucagon secretion.

Galanin positively modulates prolactin secretion in normal women

It is widely accepted that, in man, galanin, a neuropeptide, has a clear GH-releasing effect while its stimulatory influence on PRL secretion is matter of debate. To clarify this point, in 6 normal young women (23-35 yr) in their early follicular phase, we studied the effect of galanin (pGAL, 80 pmol/kg. min infused i.v. over 60 min) on both basal and arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v. in 30 min), TRH (400 micrograms i.v. as a bolus at 0 min) or metoclopramide (MCP, 10 mg i.v. as a bolus at 0 min)-stimulated PRL secretion. GAL infusion failed to significantly increase basal PRL levels (peak vs baseline: 12.2 +/- 3.6 vs 8.7 +/- 1.2 micrograms/L) but counteracted the spontaneous PRL decrease observed during saline infusion (AUC: 1216.6 +/- 282.1 vs 672.0 +/- 94.5 micrograms.min/L; p < 0.05). GAL infusion clearly enhanced the PRL response to TRH (AUC: 5806.3 +/- 743.0 vs 3952.1 +/- 423.9 micrograms.min/L, p < 0.05) and ARG (AUC: 3676.8 +/- 382.6 vs 2638.9 +/- 287.0 micrograms.min/L, p < 0.05), respectively. On the other hand, GAL failed to modify the MCP-induced PRL response (AUC: 15409.5 +/- 2085.3 vs 14,787.9 +/- 2045.5 micrograms.min/L). The PRL response to MCP was higher than that to TRH (p < 0.01) which, in turn, was higher than that to ARG (p < 0.01). During GAL infusion, the PRL response to TRH or ARG remained lower (p < 0.01) than that after MCP administration. Thus, in conclusion, present data demonstrate that in normal women galanin enhances the PRL response to ARG and TRH but fails to modify that induced by dopamine receptor blockade with metoclopramide. Based on evidence that the inhibition of central dopaminergic activity inhibits the lactotrope responsiveness to dopaminergic antagonists or TRH, it is unlikely that galanin influences PRL secretion via inhibition of dopaminergic tone.

Interaction of salbutamol and galanin on both basal and growth hormone releasing hormone-stimulated growth hormone secretion in humans

Beta adrenergic receptors mediate the inhibitory influence of catecholamines on GH secretion in man, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To further clarify the role of beta adrenergic receptors in the neural control of GH secretion, in 7 normal females (age 21-27 yr) we studied the interaction of salbutamol (SAL 0.08 mg/kg orally), a beta 2-adrenergic agonist, with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and/or galanin (GAL 15 micrograms/kg i.v.), a neuropeptide endowed with a GH-releasing effect which is likely mediated by concomitant stimulation of GHRH- and inhibition of somatostatin-secreting neurons. SAL inhibited the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 282.6 +/- 102.7 vs 1083.6 +/- 176.5 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) and, although not significantly, that to GAL (263.9 +/- 103.7 vs 418.4 +/- 70.4 micrograms/l/h). GAL enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (2129.5 +/- 362.2 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) but SAL pretreatment inhibited this effect (1249.8 +/- 257.1 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.02) so that the GH response to the combined administration of GHRH, GAL and SAL overlapped with that to the neurohormone alone. In conclusion, our results show that the inhibitory influence of beta adrenergic activation on GH secretion overrides the stimulatory one of galanin. They strengthen the view that in man beta-adrenergic receptors and galanin modulate GH secretion having opposite influences aimed to balance the function of the GH-IGF-I axis.

Galanin infusion restores the blunted GH responses to GHRH administration during GH treatment in children with constitutional growth delay

GH responses to GHRH (in basal conditions), GHRH (after six months of recombinant GH therapy) and GHRH plus galanin administration (after GH therapy) were determined in six children with constitutional growth delay (CGD). Before treatment, GHRH administration caused a clear rise of GH levels (mean GH peak: 38.0 +/- 7.2 ng/ml); mean GH net incremental area under the curve/120 min (GH nAUC) was 2631.0 +/- 519.8 ng/ml/120 min. During GH treatment, both height velocity and IGF-I levels significantly increased from 4.3 +/- 0.1 cm/yr to 9.4 +/- 0.9 cm/yr (p < 0.001) and from 218.7 +/- 12.3 ng/ml to 328.0 +/- 28.2 ng/ml (p < 0.001), respectively. After 6 months of GH therapy, mean GH peak (21.7 +/- 2.2 ng/ml) and mean GH nAUC (847.7 +/- 109.8 ng/ml/120 min) after GHRH administration were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in basal conditions. Galanin infusion (10 micrograms/kg/bw) was able to completely restore the reduced GH responsiveness to GHRH administration. In fact, mean GH peak and mean GH nAUC after GHRH plus galanin were similar to those recorded after basal GHRH administration (GH peak: 37.5 +/- 4.0 ng/ml; GH nAUC: 2279.8 +/- 430.5 ng/ml/120 min). In conclusion, this study shows that the reduction of pituitary responsiveness to GHRH administration during GH treatment is not dependent on the depletion of the promptly GH releasable pool, since somatotroph refractoriness to GHRH can be overriden by the concomitant administration of galanin.

Galanin receptors in human hypothalamus: biochemical and structural analysis

Galanin receptors have been characterized in normal human hypothalamus using 125I-galanin binding assays. Competition experiments of porcine 125I-galanin binding to human hypothalamic membranes with native human, porcine and rat galanin (10(-11) M to 10(-8) M) gave comparable results with IC50 close to 0.1 nM. Scatchard analysis indicated one type of high affinity binding sites (Kd = 0.11 nM) with a capacity of 460 fmol/mg protein. Galanin-(1-15) and galanin-(2-29) inhibited tracer binding (IC50 = 1.5 nM), galanin-(3-29) and galanin-(10-29) being inactive. The galanin receptor antagonist, galantide, 10(-14) M to 10(-8) M, also strongly displaced binding of 125I-galanin to the human receptor (IC50 close to 0.15 nM). Guanine nucleotides (from 10(-8) M to 10(-4) M) decreased tracer binding to human membranes by increasing the dissociation of the galanin-receptor complexes. Structural analysis by covalent labelling indicated that the human galanin receptor behaves as a monomeric protein with a molecular mass of 54,000 daltons.

Canine, human, and rat plasma insulin responses to galanin administration: species response differences

Previous studies demonstrated that porcine galanin is a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion in many species but fails to alter human insulin secretion. To resolve whether this discrepancy was due to the use of a heterologous peptide or to a true species response difference, we studied the effect of a synthetic replicate of human galanin on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in rats, dogs, and humans. On administration into rats, human and rat galanin significantly inhibited glucose-induced insulin responses to a similar degree. Similarly, porcine and human galanin significantly elevated canine plasma glucose and inhibited canine plasma insulin responses. In contrast, plasma glucose and insulin responses to glucose administration in humans were unaltered by the addition of human galanin at or above the maximum effective dose employed in dogs. Possible effects of galanin administration were seen on human glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide responses to glucose at the highest dose of human galanin infused. We conclude that galanin probably does not play a major role in modulating human beta-cell function.

Effects of metoclopramide on the paradoxical growth hormone response to galanin in acromegaly

Galanin is able to enhance growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone stimulated GH secretion in normal man. In acromegaly circulating GH levels are elevated and the GH response to GHRH may be exaggerated. Galanin has been recently shown to decrease circulating GH levels in acromegaly. Dopaminergic drugs were the only previously known agents able to cause a paradoxical GH fall in acromegaly. Aim of our study was to investigate the effects of a potent central dopaminergic receptor blocker, metoclopramide (MCP), on the galanin-induced paradoxical GH secretion in acromegalic subjects. Two male and three female patients with active acromegaly (age range 44-66 years, body mass index range 24.6-28 Kg/m2) were studied after 45 min i.v. infusion of porcine galanin (0.5 mg in 100 ml of saline) from 0 to 45 min combined with a 60 min i.v. infusion of a) saline (100 ml) or b) MCP (10 mg in 100 ml of saline) from -15 to 45 min. After galanin, GH values fell from baseline (27.5 +/- 10 micrograms/L) to a mean nadir of 16.4 +/- 6.1 micrograms/L; after galanin + MCP, circulating GH levels were also decreased (mean nadir 17.3 +/- 8.1 micrograms/L) in all the patients with respect to baseline (23.6 +/- 9.7 micrograms/L). No significant differences were found in absolute or percent of baseline GH levels after galanin+saline vs galanin + MCP. Our results suggest that the paradoxical GH fall after galanin in acromegalic patients is not mediated through dopaminergic receptor. It can be hypothesized that galanin may interact at the pituitary level with its own receptors expressed by GH-secreting adenomatous cells.

Low-dose amino acid supplementation: no effects on serum human growth hormone and insulin in male weightlifters

Using a double-blind, crossover protocol, we studied the possible effects of a 4-day combined L-arginine, L-ornithine, and L-lysine supplementation (each 2 g/day, divided into two daily doses) on 24-hr level of serum human growth hormone (hGH) and insulin in 11 competitive weightlifters, ages 19 to 35 yrs. Three similar daily hGH peaks, seemingly preceded by a decrease in serum insulin concentration, were found during both amino acid and placebo supplementation. Supplementation did not affect the physiological variation of serum hGH concentration (treatment and treatment x time interaction: p = 0.43-0.55). Analogously, serum insulin levels were not higher after amino acid supplementation. Therefore the ergogenic value of low-dose oral amino acid supplementation in increasing hGH or insulin secretion seems questionable.

Enhanced prolactin responsiveness to galanin in patients with Cushing's disease

OBJECTIVE

Galanin is believed to play a role in the control of prolactin (PRL) secretion in the rat. Such a role is uncertain in humans where the neuropeptide is expressed by the corticotrophs. However, in clinical conditions of enhanced ACTH secretion, increased PRL levels are often observed. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of galanin infusion on serum PRL levels in patients with Cushing's disease and in control subjects. For comparison, the PRL responses to TRH and metoclopramide were also investigated in the same patients.

DESIGN

Four tests were performed: (a) 40-minute infusion of 0.3 micrograms/kg/min of galanin; (b) infusion of normal saline only; (c) metoclopramide test (10 mg as i.v. bolus); (d) TRH test (200 mg as i.v. bolus).

PATIENTS

Twenty-four normal subjects and nine patients suffering from active Cushing's disease were investigated.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum concentrations of PRL were measured by radioimmunoassay on blood samples collected before and for 90 minutes after drug or saline administration.

RESULTS

Serum baseline PRL levels were superimposable in normal subjects and in patients with Cushing's disease. In normal subjects, infusion of galanin induced a distinct PRL increase compared to saline (mean +/- SEM incremental areas 6514 +/- 2572 vs 540 +/- 571 mU/l/90 min, P = 0.05, respectively). In patients with Cushing's disease, galanin evoked a remarkable PRL rise with hormone levels which were significantly greater (P < 0.001) than those observed in the same patients after infusion of saline (21908 +/- 4180 vs 534 +/- 1556 mU/l/90 min) or after galanin administration in controls (P < 0.01). The PRL response to TRH and, much more so, to metoclopramide was significantly lower in patients with Cushing's disease than in normal subjects (42125 +/- 8000 vs 73181 +/- 7246 mU/l/90 min, P < 0.01 after TRH and 79095 +/- 27265 vs 229049 +/- 10602 mU/l/90 min, P < 0.01 after metoclopramide).

CONCLUSIONS

Galanin appears to be a specific, though weak, PRL secretagogue in normal subjects. The galanin-induced PRL release was significantly increased in patients with Cushing's disease. A number of hypothetical mechanisms may underlie the enhanced PRL reactivity to galanin in Cushing's disease. This finding together with the impaired PRL responsiveness to TRH and metoclopramide, also observed in this study, is a further example of a dysregulation of PRL secretion in patients with Cushing's disease.

Characterization of a high-affinity galanin receptor in the rat anterior pituitary: absence of biological effect and reduced membrane binding of the antagonist M15 differentiate it from the brain/gut receptor

Structure-activity studies demonstrate that galanin fragments 1-15 and 2-29 are fully active, whereas fragment 3-29 has been reported to be inactive, in a number of different in vivo models. M15, a chimeric peptide comprising galanin 1-13 and substance P5-11, has recently been found to be a potent galanin antagonist. Direct effects of galanin at the level of the pituitary have been defined, yet, paradoxically, a number of studies have been unable to demonstrate galanin binding to an anterior pituitary receptor. Porcine galanin stimulated prolactin release from dispersed rat anterior pituitary cells up to 180% +/- 12% (mean +/- SEM) of control secretion. The addition of a specific galanin antiserum caused a profound inhibition of basal prolactin release, maximal inhibition being 12% +/- 0.5% of control secretion. Addition of M15 produced no effect on basal or galanin-stimulated prolactin release. Galanin fragment 3-29 was fully active when compared to galanin 1-29. Fragments 5-29 and 8-29 stimulated prolactin release to a lesser extent and galanin 1-15, 10-29, and 20-29 had no significant prolactin-releasing activity. Using [mono(125I)iodo-Tyr26]galanin or porcine 125I-labeled Bolton-Hunter [mono(125I)iodo-Lys25]galanin, no anterior pituitary membrane binding was observed. In contrast, 125I-labeled Bolton-Hunter N-terminally labeled galanin allowed characterization of a single high-affinity anterior pituitary galanin receptor with a Kd of 4.4 +/- 0.34 nM and a Bmax of 79 +/- 8.3 fmol/mg of protein. The IC50 for porcine galanin was 0.51 +/- 0.04 nM but for M15 was in excess of 10 microM. Galanin 3-29 fully displaced the label with an IC50 of 0.96 +/- 0.7 nM. The IC50 for galanin 5-29 was 200 nM, whereas 8-29 and 1-15 were > 1 microM. Galanin 10-29 and 20-29 failed to displace the label. These data suggest the presence of a high-affinity pituitary galanin receptor, designated GAL-R2, in which region 3-10 and amino acid 25 are crucial for membrane binding and biological activity, in contrast to the known gut/brain galanin receptor (designated GAL-R1). A number of tissues known to bind or respond to galanin were screened. GAL-R2 would appear to be expressed only in the anterior pituitary and hypothalamus.

Nitric oxide inhibits resting sphincter of Oddi activity

The sphincter of Oddi has basal myogenic phasic activity that is modulated by neural and hormonal pathways. Stimulatory innervation to this organ is cholinergic, whereas the inhibitory pathways are unknown. Nitric oxide (NO), generated from L-arginine, relaxes gastrointestinal smooth muscle in vitro. We, therefore, hypothesized that resting sphincter of Oddi and duodenal motilities are regulated by a NO-mediated inhibitory pathway. In 23 anesthetized prairie dogs, systemic blood pressure and sphincter of Oddi and duodenal motilities were monitored during systemic infusion of N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase. L-NAME was infused alone and simultaneously with excess D- and L-arginine. L-NAME alone and L-NAME with D-arginine produced hypertension and increased sphincter of Oddi and duodenal motilities. L-arginine blocked these increases, suggesting that baseline sphincter of Oddi and duodenal motility regulation involves the generation of NO from L-arginine. We conclude that baseline sphincter of Oddi phasic activity is regulated by cholinergic stimulatory and NO-mediated inhibitory neural pathways.