Prospective observations on stopping prolonged venom immunotherapy

Long-term impact of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy on clinical course, immune parameters, and psychosocial aspects

BACKGROUND

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is highly efficient in subjects suffering from IgE-mediated allergy to hymenoptera venom (HV), and VIT results in substantial improvement of quality of life (QoL). However, VIT-induced tolerance may be lost over time after cessation of treatment, putting patients at risk of re-sting anaphylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To study the effect of VIT on maintenance of HV tolerance we evaluated the natural history of 54 patients who were treated with VIT up to 29 years ago, with a special focus on re-stings and their subsequent course. Furthermore, we analyzed HV-specific IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody titers. Finally, we assessed the long-term impact of VIT on various psychosocial aspects like dealing with hymenoptera exposures, daily life activities, self-assurance, and personal environment.

RESULTS

29 (53.7%) subjects experienced at least one re-sting after stopping VIT, with 23 (79%) showing no systemic reaction (SR). Eleven of these (37.9%) took emergency drugs as a safety measurement. Six individuals (21%) showed loss of tolerance experiencing an anaphylactic reaction. No difference in HV-specific IgE, IgG4, or IgG antibody concentrations was noticed among the different patients. Subjects who tolerated a re-sting without applying emergency drugs felt least affected in their social-behavioral leisure activities when hymenoptera were around or by anxiety for new stings.

CONCLUSION

VIT leads to long-term tolerance in the majority of HV-allergic patients, however, ~ 1/5 may lose protection over time, arguing for continued follow-up on VIT-treated subjects and keeping them equipped with an emergency kit. Notably, VIT also results in a lasting, strong impact on self-assurance and sense of well-being in individuals who tolerated a re-sting without employing emergency drugs, which emphasizes the need to use them only in case of systemic symptoms after stopping successful VIT.

Natural history and long-term follow-up of Hymenoptera allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Information on the natural history of hypersensitivity reactions is helpful for deciding which patient urgently needs a venom immunotherapy (VIT).

RECENT FINDINGS

The frequency of self-reported systemic allergic reactions (SAR) to Hymenoptera stings is approximately 3-7% in the Northern Hemisphere. About 25% of SAR are severe (anaphylactic shock). Fatal sting reactions are very rare. The most important risk factor for severe insect sting anaphylaxis is mast cell disease. Other risk factors are higher age, vespid venom allergy (in contrast to honeybee venom allergy), repeated stings, male sex, and treatment with ACE inhibitors. Preceding large local reactions seem not to play a risk factor for subsequent SAR.

SUMMARY

The majority of risk factors for severe anaphylaxis are not modifiable. For patients presenting with well defined risk factors for a very severe or even fatal anaphylaxis, VIT is of utmost importance, and they should be performed for the rest of their life. Sting challenge tests are required to identify patients in whom treatment was ineffective. Those patients, who did not receive VIT although presenting with a firm indication, or in whom VIT was stopped, require yearly monitoring to teach preventive measures and to renew the emergency kit.

Venom immunotherapy in patients with allergic reactions to insect stings

INTRODUCTION

Allergy to Hymenoptera (Apis mellifera, Vespula species, Polistes species, Vespa crabro) venom can be safely and effectively treated by venom immunotherapy (VIT), which in the 40 years since its introduction has been able to prevent reactions to stings, and to treatment as well, though systemic reactions, occasionally severe, are possible. Areas covered: We reviewed the recent literature on VIT by searching in PubMed for the terms 'venom immunotherapy' and 'Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy' to highlight the current status of VIT and the likely development in the coming years. Expert commentary: VIT, provided the correct choice of the venom and adequate venom preparations and maintenance doses are used, is a treatment of great value in preventing systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings. A 5-year duration ensures a prolonged tolerance to stings following VIT discontinuation, unless patients suffer from mastocytosis. In fact, due to reports of fatal reactions after stopping VIT, patients with mastocytosis, or with very severe reactions to stings, need an indefinite duration of treatment.

When can immunotherapy for insect sting allergy be stopped?

BACKGROUND

Stings by Hymenoptera (honey bees, vespids, ants) can cause systemic allergic reactions (SARs). Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is highly effective and reduces an allergic patient's risk of a recurrent SAR to less than 5-20%. The risk of a recurrent SAR to a re-sting decreases the longer VIT is continued. The recommended duration of VIT is at least 3 to 5 years.

RISK FACTORS

Risk factors for recurrent SARs to a sting after stopping VIT have been identified and discussed: Recommendations concerning stopping VIT: For patients without any of the identified risk factors, VIT should be continued for 5 rather than 3 years. In patients with definite risk factors, a longer duration of VIT has to be discussed before stopping it. In mast cell disorders, VIT for life is recommended. Because of the residual risk of SARs after VIT, all patients are advised to carry an epinephrine autoinjector indefinitely and to continue to take measures to avoid Hymenoptera stings.

Determinants of venom-specific IgE antibody concentration during long-term wasp venom immunotherapy

Background

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an effective treatment for subjects with systemic allergic reactions (SR) to Hymenoptera stings, however there are few studies concerning the relevance of the venom specific IgE changes to decide about VIT cessation. We assessed IgE changes during a 5-year VIT, in patients stung and protected within the first 3 years (SP 0–3) or in the last 2 years (SP 3–5), and in patients not stung (NoS), to evaluate possible correlations between IgE changes and clinical protection.

Methods

Yellow jacket venom (YJV)-allergic patients who completed 5 years of VIT were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline IgE levels and after the 3rd and the 5th year of VIT were determined; all patients were asked about field stings and SRs.

Results

A total of 232 YJV-allergic patients were included and divided into the following groups: 84 NoS, 72 SP 0–3 and 76 SP 3–5. IgE levels decreased during VIT compared to baseline values (χ² = 346.029, p < 0.001). Recent vespid stings accounted for significantly higher IgE levels despite clinical protection. IgE levels after 5 years of VIT correlated significantly with Mueller grade (F = 2.778, p = 0.012) and age (F = 6.672, p = 0.002). During follow-up from 1 to 10 years after VIT discontinuation, 35.2 % of the contacted patients reported at least one field sting without SR.

Conclusions

The yellow jacket-VIT temporal stopping criterion of 5 years duration did not result in undetectable IgE levels, despite a long-lasting protection. A mean IgE decrease from 58 to 70 % was observed, and it was less marked in elderly patients or in subjects with higher Mueller grade SR.

Management of insect sting hypersensitivity: an update

Reactions to Hymenoptera insect stings are common. While most are self-limited, some induce systemic allergic reactions or anaphylaxis. Prompt recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of these reactions are important for improving quality-of-life and reducing the risk of future sting reactions. This review summarizes the current recommendations to diagnose and treat Hymenoptera sting induced allergic reactions and highlights considerations for various populations throughout the world.

Long-term outcome after venom immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There have been a limited number of studies examining the outcome after discontinuing venom immunotherapy (VIT), all of which showed continued protection in the great majority of patients. Several different criteria have been proposed to select patients to stop treatment based on immunologic and clinical factors. Specific high-risk factors have been reported from these published reports. There have been very few reports of the outcome more than 5 years after stopping VIT and virtually none on patients who had discontinued treatment for more than 10 years. This review will summarize the published evidence for current guidelines and recommendations, with emphasis on long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been a paucity of studies of VIT in recent years, particularly regarding long-term outcomes. These studies have raised questions about whether the long-term outcome is different with less than 3 years than with more than 3 years of treatment. Recent studies have confirmed the roughly 15% chance of systemic reaction to a sting after stopping VIT and the low risk (<3%) of a severe reaction. New and meaningful observations have been made in several reports regarding the increased risk of relapse, and even death, in patients with mastocytosis or elevated baseline serum tryptase, who had discontinued VIT.

SUMMARY

This review incorporates old and new observations that provide the basis for the guidelines and practice parameters on discontinuing VIT.

Practice of venom immunotherapy in the United Kingdom: a national audit and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only effective treatment for prevention of serious allergic reactions to bee and wasp stings in sensitized individuals. However, controversies exist relating to diagnosis, indications for treatment and treatment schedules. We audited current practice of VIT in the United Kingdom to evaluate adherence to international guidelines.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was sent to all clinicians practising immunotherapy identified on the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology website. Eighty-six questionnaires were sent and 53 responses (61.6%) were received. Of these, 48 (85%) carried out VIT at their centre.

RESULTS

Skin prick tests (SPT) and serum venom-specific IgE (SSIgE) were equally preferred as first-line investigation. Fifty percent of the respondents perform intradermal tests if both SPT and SSIgE are negative. While 8% of respondents commence VIT in patients with negative SSIgE and a history of severe reaction, 57% prefer to repeat the tests in 6-12 months if serum tryptase is elevated. If the insect responsible is uncertain and SSIgE is detected against bee and wasp venoms, 22% of the respondents will desensitize to both while 32% initiate treatment against the venom with the higher SSIgE. A protocol of weekly up-dosing for 12 weeks is preferred for induction and only 25% of respondents have ever used rush or ultra-rush protocols. Three years is thought to be optimum duration of VIT by most (56%). Eleven percent perform sting challenges at the end of treatment. Although 47% measure SSIgE at the end of treatment, only 3% use these results as a basis for discontinuing VIT.

CONCLUSION

Currently there is considerable variation in the diagnosis and management of hymenoptera venom allergy in the United Kingdom. This audit has demonstrated that the current international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hymenoptera venom allergy are not being followed by UK allergy practitioners.

Mastocytosis and Hymenoptera venom allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mastocytosis is a rare disease characterized by increased mast cells in skin and/or internal organs. We evaluate the impact of mastocytosis on diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy who suffer from mastocytosis develop life-threatening sting reactions more often than those who do not. When patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy were systematically examined for mastocytosis, it was found to be represented to an abnormally high extent. Most patients with mastocytosis tolerate venom immunotherapy with no or only minor systemic symptoms. Venom immunotherapy was found to be marginally less effective in patients with mastocytosis than in those without evidence of mast cell disease (defined as absent cutaneous mastocytosis combined with a serum tryptase concentration of <11.4 microg/l). Several deaths from sting reactions were reported in patients with mastocytosis after venom immunotherapy was stopped. These patients should have venom immunotherapy for the rest of their lives.

SUMMARY

Patients suffering from mastocytosis and Hymenoptera venom allergy are at risk from a particularly severe sting anaphylaxis. They need optimal diagnosis and treatment. In patients presenting with Hymenoptera venom allergy, screening tests by measurement of serum tryptase concentration, and a careful skin examination, are highly recommended.

Prevention and treatment of hymenoptera venom allergy: guidelines for clinical practice

Based on the knowledge of the living conditions and habitat of social Aculeatae a series of recommendations have been formulated which can potentially greatly minimize the risk of field re-sting. After a systemic sting reaction, patients should be referred to an allergy specialist for evaluation of their allergy, and if necessary venom immunotherapy (VIT). An emergency medical kit should be supplied, its use clearly demonstrated and repeatedly practised until perfected. This should be done under the supervision of a doctor or a trained nurse. Epinephrine by intramuscular injection is regarded as the treatment of choice for acute anaphylaxis. H1-antihistamines alone or in combination with corticosteroids may be effective in mild to moderate reactions confined to the skin and may support the value of treatment with epinephrine in full-blown anaphylaxis. Up to 75% of the patients with a history of systemic anaphylactic sting reaction develop systemic symptoms once again when re-stung. Venom immunotherapy is a highly effective treatment for individuals with a history of systemic reaction and who have specific IgE to venom allergens. The efficacy of VIT in yellow jacket venom allergic patients has been demonstrated also by assessing health-related quality of life. If both skin tests and serum venom specific IgE turn negative, VIT may be stopped after 3 years. After VIT lasting 3-5 years, most patients with mild to moderate anaphylactic symptoms remain protected following discontinuation of VIT even with positive skin tests. Longer term or lifelong treatment should be considered in high-risk patients. Because of the small but relevant risk of re-sting reactions, in these patients, emergency kits, including epinephrine auto-injectors, should be discussed with every patient when stopping VIT.

Immunotherapy for allergic asthma

Specific allergen immunotherapy is an effective treatment of allergic asthma. Double-blind studies provide proof of benefit, although seasonal or intermittent asthma consistently responds better than perennial asthma. Advantages of immunotherapy compared with most pharmacotherapies include modification of the natural history of allergic disease, reduction of need for chronic medication, and treatment of both upper and lower airway disease simultaneously. Improvements in immunotherapy occurred in the later portion of the twentieth century because of enhanced understanding of immunotherapy's mechanism of action, recognition of the dose effect, and improved quality and consistency of allergen vaccines. Purified inhibitors of specific mediators of the allergic response, products of biotechnology, will probably lead to improvements of immunotherapy of asthma in the twenty-first century. The future of immunotherapy and other immunomodulation of allergic asthma is promising.

Survey of patients after discontinuing venom immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Venom immunotherapy rapidly reduces the risk of a systemic sting reaction in adults from 30% to 70% to less than 2%. When venom immunotherapy is stopped after 5 years or longer, the risk of a systemic sting reaction is 5% to 15% during the first few years after stopping treatment. It is uncertain whether systemic sting reactions will occur more than 5 years after discontinuing venom immunotherapy and whether treatment can be safely stopped in some patients after less than 5 years.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to estimate the risk of systemic reaction to a sting 10 years after discontinuing treatment and the relative risk after 3 years of treatment compared with that after 5 years or more of treatment.

METHODS

Among all patients who had venom immunotherapy at our center, we identified 395 patients who stopped treatment: some had dropped out of therapy early (6-24 months), some stopped after 3 to 4 years, and most completed 5 years or more of venom immunotherapy and were advised to stop by the allergist (many as part of our reported studies of discontinuing venom immunotherapy).

RESULTS

Contact was made with 194 patients, including telephone interviews for sting history and requests to visit the office for skin testing and blood sampling. Of these patients, 74 had been included in our original study of patients who had 5 years or more of venom immunotherapy and had sting challenges after 1 to 5 years off venom immunotherapy, as previously reported. Of the 74 in that original study, 61 were reached for this survey, and 30 reported recent stings, with 5 systemic sting reactions. Another 133 patients who had stopped venom immunotherapy were reached: 82 had 5 or more years of venom immunotherapy, 20 had 3 to 4 years of venom immunotherapy, and 31 had less than 2 years of venom immunotherapy. Of 51 patients stung from this group, 27 had 5 or more years of venom immunotherapy (no systemic sting reactions), and 24 had less than 5 years of venom immunotherapy (3 systemic sting reactions). We have now observed a total of 113 patients who had 5 or more years of venom immunotherapy and were stung after stopping. Sixteen (14%) had systemic sting reactions; most were mild, but 4 were severe. Systemic sting reactions occurred in 12 (10.7%) of 112 patients stung in the first 4 years off venom immunotherapy and 5 (10%) of 50 stung more than 5 years off venom immunotherapy. In 4 of 8 patients with current systemic sting reactions, the skin test response was negative, although the venom-IgE response was positive at the previous encounter. All systemic sting reactions were similar in pattern and severity to prevenom immunotherapy reactions in the same patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the risk of systemic sting reactions when venom immunotherapy is stopped after 5 years or longer remains in the reported range of 5% to 15% in the 5 to 10 years after stopping venom immunotherapy. This risk of systemic sting reactions does not seem to decrease over time, unlike the progressive decline in immunologic markers (skin test and venom-IgE responses). To prospectively assess the risk of recurrent systemic sting reactions, there is a need for sting challenge studies of patients who have been off venom immunotherapy for 5 to 10 years and patients who have stopped venom immunotherapy after just 3 to 4 years treatment.

Discontinuing venom immunotherapy: extended observations

BACKGROUND

Our studies of discontinuing venom immunotherapy after at least 5 years have led to the conclusion that the residual risk of a systemic reaction to a sting was in the range of 5% to 10% in adults, and no severe or life-threatening reaction occurred with 270 challenge stings in 74 patients after 1 to 5 years without venom immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to extend our observation of patients who discontinue venom immunotherapy over 5 to 10 years and to determine which patients are at higher risk for a reaction.

METHODS

Patients who discontinued venom immunotherapy were surveyed for 3 consecutive years to determine the frequency of systemic reactions to field stings and the fate of venom sensitivity. The evaluation included the 74 patients previously studied (group 1) and 51 additional patients followed after stopping therapy in our clinical center (group 2).

RESULTS

Of the original 74 patients, 11 had field stings again after 3 to 7 years without venom immunotherapy, with one systemic reaction (dyspnea). Of the 51 patients in the other group, 15 were stung, of whom four (26%) had systemic reactions, including respiratory symptoms requiring epinephrine. Review of group 1 and group 2 revealed that half of the patients who had systemic reactions to a sting after stopping venom immunotherapy had a history of a systemic reaction occurring during venom immunotherapy (to an injection or a sting). Systemic reactions occurred in three patients who had negative skin test reactions; all three had very low but detectable venom-specific serum IgE antibody levels as determined by RAST and had a history of systemic reactions during venom immunotherapy. Greater severity of the pretreatment reaction was not associated with higher frequency of reaction to stings after stopping therapy but was associated with greater severity if a reaction did occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Venom immunotherapy (yellow jacket/mixed vespid) in adults can be discontinued after 5 to 6 years with a 5% to 10% residual risk of a systemic reaction. Risk factors may include history of a systemic reaction during venom immunotherapy, persistent strongly positive skin test sensitivity, and the severity of the pretreatment reaction.

The frequency and clinical significance of specific IgE to both wasp (Vespula) and honey-bee (Apis) venoms in the same patient

BACKGROUND

Changeover from Phadebas RAST to Pharmacia AutoCAP increased double-positivity to both honey-bee and common wasp (vespula) venom in our patients.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the frequency of IgE double-positivity, its clinical relevance and utility in investigating potentially allergic patients.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-two patients with hymenoptera allergy were tested using RAST (n = 51) and AutoCAP (n = 131) assays over 4 years. Patients had a history of reactions to vespulae (22), honey-bee (10) and unidentified hymenoptera (vespinae) (7).

RESULTS

After changing from RAST to AutoCAP double-positivity increased from 10 (5/ 51) to 30% (39/131) (P < 0.01). RAST and CAP assays gave similar median class results (vespula = 3, honey-bee = 2). Thirty-six CAP patients had systemic reactions of Mueller grade II and above. In vespula-allergic double-positive subjects, high CAP classes (> or = class 3) to honey-bee were common (30%). In 25% the CAP classes were equal. In honey-bee-allergic subjects, all vespula venom CAP IgE was low titre (class 1 or 2) and 20% were equal for both venoms. In 43% of vespinae-allergic patients the CAP class was equal to both (class 2 and 3). In contrast, intradermal skin test double-positivity was uncommon. Double-negative skin test results were common in the CAP double-positive population (22% of honey-bee-allergic, 13% of vespula-allergic and 43% of vespinae-allergic patients). Vespula allergic patients have higher bee-venom IgE than vice versa. Twenty-seven per cent of CAP double-positive patients (representing 8% of all venom allergic patients tested over this period) had equal class IgE to both venoms which was not helpful in diagnosis. Combination of skin testing and CAP is unhelpful in only 5/37 (14%) of patients with double-positive serology.

CONCLUSION

If used in isolation CAP may be misleading, especially if only one venom is tested. Identification of the causative venom must utilize both clinical history and skin testing in these double-positive patients, and challenge testing if indicated.

Natural history of Hymenoptera venom sensitivity in adults

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic studies of Hymenoptera venom allergy in adults show a prevalence of positive venom skin test results, RASTs of 15% to 25%, or both, but most such individuals have had no systemic reactions to stings. The clinical significance and natural history of this apparently common sensitivity is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the natural history of venom sensitization by observing the rate of decrease or increase in sensitivity in normal adults over 5 to 10 years. The clinical significance of these findings is related to the frequency of systemic reactions to stings during the period of observation.

METHODS

Serial observations were planned in 520 volunteers and randomly selected subjects. Two follow-up visits were attempted, once after 2 to 3 years and again after 5 to 9 years, to perform repeat venom skin tests and RASTs and to review any history of interim stings and their outcomes.

RESULTS

Follow-up visits were conducted with 398 subjects (375 early visits and 205 late visits). Overall, in the 398 subjects with one or more visits after a mean of 4 years, skin test responses changed from positive to negative in 44 of 98 (45%) and from negative to positive in 27 of 309 (8.7%) of the subjects. Skin test responses changed from positive to negative in 29 of 87 (33%) subjects after 2.5 years and in 43 of 54 (80%) after 6.8 years. Even when the skin test response became negative, venom-specific IgE remained positive in 11 of 29 (38%) subjects after 2.5 years and in 13 of 43 (30%) after 6.8 years. The rate of loss of sensitivity was 12% per year, similar to retrospective estimates. Skin test sensitivity to venoms disappears more rapidly in these subjects without symptoms (half-life, 4 years) than in patients receiving venom immunotherapy (half-life, 7 years). Skin test responses changed from negative to positive in 23 of 288 (8%) subjects after 2.5 years and in 9 of 151 (6%) after 6.8 years. Insect stings caused no reaction in 120 subjects with a negative skin test response, but 17% (11 of 65) of subjects with a positive skin test response (but with a negative history) had systemic reactions when stung. There was no difference between the early and late visits in the frequency of systemic reactions reported. The risk may be higher than 17% for the specific individuals (67% after 2.5 years and 20% after 6.8 years) whose positive skin test responses persist for years. This risk is lower than that of patients with a positive history (50%) but higher than that of "normal" adults or venom-treated patients (<2%). It is still not clear whether any subset of adults with a positive skin test response but a negative history can be identified, in whom the risk of systemic sting reaction would justify venom immunotherapy even before any reaction occurs.

CONCLUSION

Asymptomatic venom sensitization in adults is common but transient, disappearing at the rate of 12% per year. However, the risk of a systemic reaction to a subsequent sting is significant in adults without symptoms but with positive venom skin test responses (17%) and may be higher when skin test sensitivity does persist for years.

Immunotherapy with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. V. Duration of the efficacy of immunotherapy after its cessation

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) using a standardized mite extract is effective and safe when administered under optimal conditions. However, the duration of its effectiveness after cessation of treatment remains unknown. Forty asthmatic subjects who had received SIT with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) extract under the same protocol were studied. All had received SIT for a period of 12-96 months and were not receiving pharmacologic treatment. The FEV1 was within normal range in all patients. After cessation of treatment, patients were followed for up to 3 years at 6-month intervals. The patient was considered to have relapsed when symptoms of asthma and/or rhinitis occurred and/or when pulmonary function tests were impaired. Skin tests with increasing concentrations of Der p were carried out before and at the end of SIT. Forty-five percent of the patients did not relapse. The duration of efficacy of SIT was related to the duration of SIT itself (P < 0.04). Most patients who did not relapse had a decrease in skin test reactivity at the end of SIT, whereas most patients who relapsed did not show any change (P < 0.003). The duration of efficacy of SIT after its cessation depends upon the duration of SIT and may be predicted by the effect of SIT on skin tests.

Discontinuing venom immunotherapy: outcome after five years

BACKGROUND

The clinical and immunologic consequences of discontinuing venom immunotherapy are not well-defined. To determine which patients can safely stop treatment, we accepted all volunteers who had completed at least 5 years of maintenance venom immunotherapy regardless of the severity of the historical sting reaction, the persistence of venom skin test sensitivity, or any other variable.

METHODS

Sting challenge was performed every 1 to 2 years after therapy was stopped; and venom-specific skin tests were performed, and IgE antibody levels were measured.

RESULTS

Systemic symptoms occurred after challenge in eight of 270 stings (3%), in seven of 74 patients (10%); only two reactions were clinically significant. Venom skin test results became negative in 28% after 5 years of venom immunotherapy (at the time of discontinuation) and were negative in 56% to 67% of patients after 2 to 4 years without venom immunotherapy. There was a parallel decrease in the venom-specific IgE antibody levels. Challenge stings did not prevent the progressive decline in sensitivity, nor did they increase the risk of sting reaction even after two sequential stings 1 month apart.

CONCLUSIONS

Venom immunotherapy can be safely discontinued after 5 years of maintenance therapy in virtually all patients, with the possible exception of those in whom the level of venom sensitivity has not declined during therapy. Venom sensitivity decreases with time even after venom therapy is stopped. Insect stings do not cause re-sensitization, and there was no increased risk from sequential stings. There appears to be a late-onset, non-IgG-mediated mechanism for long-term suppression of allergic sensitivity by prolonged high-dose venom immunotherapy.

The regulation of IgG4. 1. An immunoassay to detect bee venom specific IgG4 subclass levels

Serum IgG consists of 4 subclasses designated IgG1-4. IgG subclasses have differing structures and different functions. The levels of antigen specific immunoglobulin in each of the subclasses is difficult to quantitate accurately but may be of significant diagnostic and therapeutic value. IgG4 constitutes approximately 4% of total IgG level in the serum. We describe an immunoassay which is highly sensitive and specific for IgG4 directed against bee venom. The assay can be performed in a routine diagnostic laboratory enhancing its value as a clinical tool. It is potentially useful in identifying patients who fail to respond to standard immunotherapy with bee venom. This immunoassay format can also be adapted to other antigens.

Clinical correlation of the venom-specific IgG antibody level during maintenance venom immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy is associated with a significant increase of specific IgG antibodies that have been suggested as a mechanism of action and as a marker of efficacy for immunotherapy. The value of venom-specific IgG antibody determinations as a measure of clinical protection against sting anaphylaxis has been difficult to prove in individual patients. We performed 211 insect sting challenges in 109 patients over a 4-year period to determine the significance of venom IgG levels 3 micrograms/ml or lower. Systemic symptoms occurred in only 1.6% of those with venom IgG more than 3 micrograms/ml, but in 16% of those with less than 3 micrograms/ml IgG, and notably in 26% of patients with low venom IgG who had received less than 4 years of treatment. The venom IgG level had no predictive value in patients who had received more than 4 years of therapy. Honeybee sting data were inconclusive because of the small number of subjects. We conclude that low venom-specific IgG levels are associated with an elevated risk of treatment failure during the first 4 years of immunotherapy with yellow jacket or mixed vespid venoms.

Allergen immunotherapy. Review of efficacy and current practice

The modern use of allergen immunotherapy is described. Evidence for efficacy in inhalant allergy and insect sting allergy is reviewed. Current indications for allergen immunotherapy are discussed.

Clinical and immunologic follow-up of patients who stop venom immunotherapy

We prospectively studied 51 self-selected Hymenoptera sting-sensitive patients to determine (1) whether a minimal or optimal duration for venom immunotherapy (VIT) exists and (2) whether clinical or immunologic parameters exist that are predictive of clinical immunity after VIT was stopped. After 2 to 10 years of VIT, all patients had deliberate sting challenges (DSCs) from live insects. If DSCs were tolerated, patients voluntarily stopped VIT and returned annually for repeat venom skin tests (VSTs) and DSCs. In most patients, it was possible to monitor VST and venom-specific antibody (Ab) levels before and after VIT was stopped. One-year after VIT, VST and venom-specific IgE and IgG Ab level results were variable; 49 patients tolerated DSC, whereas two patients exhibited generalized reactions. These two patients had pre-VIT histories of grade IV field-sting reactions and had received VIT for 2 years and 4 years, respectively. The short-term (1 year) risk of recurrence of clinical allergy to stings after VIT was higher in patients who had experienced grade IV field-sting reactions before VIT versus patients experiencing grade I to III reactions before VIT (2/15, 13% versus 0/36, 0%) and higher in patients who had received VIT for less than 5 years versus patients who received VIT for 5 or more years (2/20, 10% versus 0/31, 0%). We suggest that VIT should be continued for 5 years in patients with pre-VIT field-sting reactions of grade IV severity. VST and venom-specific Ab results do not reliably predict the outcome of DSC or the subsequent clinical course in individual patients stopping VIT.

Anaphylaxis

Anaphylactic reactions are acute medical emergencies characterized by the abrupt onset of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress from bronchoconstriction or laryngeal edema, urticaria, and angioedema. These clinical manifestations may occur singly or in any combination. Inciting stimuli are diverse, ranging from penicillin, Hymenoptera venom, and radiographic contrast media to exercise. The pathogenesis usually involves interaction of an antigen with specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies on the surface of mast cells or basophils, which then results in the release of chemical mediators from intracytoplasmic granules and the generation of arachidonic acid metabolites, including prostaglandin D2, and leukotrienes B4, C4, D4, and E4, at the cell membrane. Mediator release from mast cells and basophils may also be stimulated by non-IgE mechanisms, such as complement activation or direct mast cell/basophil activation. Mast cell and basophil—derived mediators have a panoply of effects, including vasodilatation, increased vascular permeability, smooth muscle contraction, airway mucous gland hypersecretion, and chemotaxis of neutrophils and eosinophils. These cellular events result in the observed clinical features. Effective treatment depends on prompt recognition of the clinical syndrome of anaphylaxis, interruption of antigen exposure and absorption when feasible, and administration of appropriate medication. Epinephrine is the drug of first choice for all of the manifestations of anaphylaxis. Adjunctive therapy with oxygen, fluid, H1 and H2 antihistamines, bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and other vasopressors is frequently necessary. Prevention of recurrence is vital. The roles of patient education, skin testing, pretreatment, and desensitization are reviewed.

Frequency of booster injections of allergoids

In 1982, 43 ragweed-sensitive patients receiving maintenance injections of full doses of ragweed allergoid were selected for a study of the immunologic and clinical efficacy of booster injections only four times a year. These patients had participated for 2 to 7 years as part of a trial of mixes of up to four allergoids to common pollens in the mid-Atlantic area tailored to each patient's skin test sensitivity. They were divided into a group (21 patients) to receive injections every 3 months and a group (22 patients) to receive injections about every 6 weeks (eight injections per year). Patients were rerandomized after 1 year so that half of each original group switched to the alternate treatment, and this program was continued until after the ragweed season of 1985. Thirty-four patients were still under study the last year. Doses, per injection, were 100 allergoid units (1 allergoid unit equals 100 PNU) of each allergen in the mixture. Symptom scores during the 8 weeks of each of the four ragweed seasons were not significantly higher in the 3-month treated group. IgG antibody levels to Amb a I (antigen E) were followed until early 1984 and were not significantly different in the two groups, even though the 6-week treated patients received a two times higher cumulative dose per year. Rates of local and systemic reactions (percent of injections eliciting reactions) were not different in the groups, which means that the 3-month treated group had about half as many reactions by virtue of taking half as many injections.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)