Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma levels in Chinese vs. non-Chinese psychiatric patients

Ethnic and cultural factors in psychopharmacology

Barring a few exceptions (such as rauwolfia), most of the psychiatric medications have been developed in the West, especially the USA, the UK and Europe. Their safety trials have been conducted in the populations living in these parts of the world. Although these drugs are used all over the world there is a limited research to determine accurate pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles across different ethnic groups. Hence, clinicians usually adopt a ‘universalist style’ (seeing every condition and treatment as similar) of managing psychiatric illnesses, but this appears to neglect the information from the emerging literature which advocates a relativist approach to pharmacotherapy (see Lin et al 1995 for review). Anthropologists have encountered ‘phenomenological absolutism’ in a general tendency of people from one culture to perceive and value other cultures in terms unconsciously based upon their own, but phenomenologically experienced as absolute and universally applicable (also known as ethnocentrism). In addition to ethno-biological determinants of drug response, there are significant cultural factors: the concurrent use of pluralistic health systems, alternative therapies and folk remedies which might support, hinder or complicate pharmacotherapy and treatment adherence. In this paper we highlight some key factors of which clinicians need to be aware. These include pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic principles, and application of these principles in pharmacological management of psychiatric conditions. Ethnic differences in pharmacodynamics are most clearly demonstrated in the greater sensitivity to a variety of drugs in Caucasians than in Asians or in African–Caribbeans.

A Review of Agents for Palliative Sedation/Continuous Deep Sedation: Pharmacology and Practical Applications

Continuous deep sedation at the end of life is a specific form of palliative sedation requiring a care plan that essentially places and maintains the patient in an unresponsive state because their symptoms are refractory to any other interventions. Because this application is uncommon, many providers may lack practical experience in this specialized area and resources they can access are outdated, nonspecific, and/or not comprehensive. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence- and experience-based reference that specifically addresses those medications and regimens and their practical applications for this very narrow, but vital, aspect of hospice care. Patient goals in a hospital and hospice environments are different, so the manner in which widely used sedatives are dosed and applied can differ greatly as well. Parameters applied in end-of-life care that are based on experience and a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of those medications will differ from those applied in an intensive care unit or other medical environments. By recognizing these different goals and applying well-founded regimens geared specifically for end-of-life sedation, we can address our patients' symptoms in a more timely and efficacious manner.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily quetiapine extended release in patients with schizophrenia switched from other antipsychotics: an open-label study in Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenic patients is common and associated with symptom relapse and poorer long-term outcomes. The risk factors for treatment non-adherence include dosing frequency and complexity. Besides, slower dose titration in an acute schizophrenic episode may lead to attenuated efficacy. Therefore, the convenient dosage regimen and rapid initiation scheme of quetiapine extended release (XR) were expected to provide better effectiveness and promote adherence in patients with schizophrenia. This study was implemented to assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily quetiapine XR in schizophrenic patients with switched from other antipsychotics which were suboptimal due to insufficient efficacy or tolerability.

METHODS

This was a 12-week, open-label study conducted in the Chinese population in Taiwan. Patients who had a score of 4 (moderate) or greater on any of the 7 items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Symptom Subscale and needed to switch from previous antipsychotics were recruited. Quetiapine XR was administered at 300 mg on day 1, 600 mg on day 2 and up to 800 mg after day 2. From day 8 until the end of the study, the dose of quetiapine XR was adjusted within 400-800 mg per day, depending on the clinical response and tolerance of the patients. The variable of the primary outcome was the change from baseline to Week 12 in PANSS total and subscale scores. Secondary outcome was the baseline-to-endpoint difference in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores of the participants.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were recruited and 55.7% of them completed the study. The mean changes in the PANSS total score and CGI-S score showed significant improvement (-18.4, p < .001 and -1.0, p < .001, respectively). Four patients (6.7%) experienced adverse events including headache, exacerbation of psychosis and dysuria. The use of concomitant anticholinergics decreased from 15.0% to 8.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our investigation implicated that quetiapine XR was an effective and well tolerated alternative for Chinese schizophrenic patients with previous suboptimal treatment. Future large-scale studies are warranted to validate our results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02142556 . Registered 15 May 2014.

Will tomorrow's medicines work for everyone?

Throughout much of the world, 'race' and 'ethnicity' are key determinants of health. For example, African Americans have, by some estimates, a twofold higher incidence of fatal heart attacks and a 10% higher incidence of cancer than European Americans, and South Asian- or Caribbean-born British are approximately 3.5 times as likely to die as a direct result of diabetes than are British of European ancestry. The health care that people receive also depends on 'race' and 'ethnicity'. African Americans are less likely to receive cancer-screening services and more likely to have late-stage cancer when diagnosed than European Americans. Health disparities such as these are one of the greatest social injustices in the developed world and one of the most important scientific and political challenges.

Haloperidol in palliative care

Haloperidol is one of 20 'essential' medications in palliative care. Its use is widespread in palliative care patients. The pharmacology of haloperidol is complex and the extent and severity of some of its adverse effects, particularly extrapyramidal adverse effects (EPS), may be related to the route of administration. Indications for the use of haloperidol in palliative care are nausea and vomiting and delirium. Adverse effects include EPS and QT prolongation. Sedation is not a common adverse effect of haloperidol. It is important that palliative care practitioners have a comprehensive understanding of the indications, doses, adverse effects and pharmacology of haloperidol. This review is intended to address these issues.

Cultural aspects of psychosis in the elderly

The elderly population is rapidly growing and increasing in diversity. Furthermore, mental disorders are common in this population. Elderly patients are at increased risk for developing psychotic symptoms. Consequently, clinicians must increase their awareness of culture and its effect on psychosis in the elderly. This article briefly reviews the components of cultural assessments, cultural issues pertaining to diagnosis and treatment, and culture-bound syndromes. Some studies have demonstrated ethnic differences in the presention, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of psychotic disorders in the elderly. These differences may be explained by factors including clinicians' bias, cultural distance between patients and clinicians, culturally biased diagnostic instruments, stereotypes of psychopathology, and biological and other environmental factors. However, some studies have not documented ethnic differences in diagnosing and treating psychotic disorders. Appropriate assessments and diagnoses include patients' and clinicians' ethnic and cultural contexts. Rigorous methodological research is needed to further evaluate the prevalence and treatment of psychotic disorders in ethnic minority elders.

Olanzapine in Chinese treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia: an open-label, prospective trial

The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia has still not been clearly resolved. In addressing this issue, the current report presents an open-label, prospective, 13 week trial with olanzapine use in Chinese schizophrenic patients who were resistant to more than two different classes of antipsychotics during a minimal 4 week treatment period for each antipsychotic drug at adequate dosage. Fifty-one inpatients were recruited after a cross-titration period and given 10-25 mg of olanzapine daily, without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Brief Psychotic Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, the Simpson-Angus scale, and the Barnes Akathisia Scale. The olanzapine-treated patients showed significant improvement in both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia by the end of the study. Overall, 20 of 51 (39.2%) responded to 10-25 mg of olanzapine per day as measured by the BPRS and CGI scores. Five patients dropped out due to the worsening of their psychotic symptoms, two patients discontinued owing to poor drug compliance, and the remaining patient complained of a lack of efficacy. Extrapyramidal side-effects were mild, and anticholinergic medications required has decreased. The present open study suggests that olanzapine may be effective and well-tolerated in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Further double-blinded trials are needed to confirm this result.

A review and assessment of potential sources of ethnic differences in drug responsiveness

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E5 guidelines were developed to provide a general framework for evaluating the potential impact of ethnic factors on the acceptability of foreign clinical data, with the underlying objective to facilitate global drug development and registration. It is well recognized that all drugs exhibit significant inter-subject variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacologic response and that such differences vary considerably among individual drugs and depend on a variety of factors. One such potential factor involves ethnicity. The objective of the present work was to perform an extensive review of the world literature on ethnic differences in drug disposition and responsiveness to determine their general significance in relation to drug development and registration. A few examples of suspected ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics were identified. The available literature, however, was found to be heterologous, including a variety of study designs and research methodologies, and most of the publications were on drugs that were approved a long time ago.

Reversible metabolism of drugs

Many drugs undergo reversible metabolism. The basis of our understanding of this process is the reversible metabolism of prednisone (PD)-prednisolone (PL). The pharmacokinetics of reversible metabolism requires the use of four area under the curve values integrated into four equations for clearance (CL). Other variables, such as linear versus non-linear disposition, can play important roles in reversible metabolism. Of recent interest is the reversible metabolism of haloperidol which consists of an interconversion process between the parent drug haloperidol (HL) and its reduced metabolite (RH). However, the interconversion of HL-RH differs from the PD-PL model in that, whereas PD and PL are both active, RH is considered to be a therapeutically inactive, possibly toxic, metabolite. This article reviews the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of HL and RH and the possible clinical effects that can result from this reversible metabolism.

Potent inhibition of CYP2D6 by haloperidol metabolites: stereoselective inhibition by reduced haloperidol

AIMS

We evaluated the inhibitory effect of haloperidol and its metabolites on CYP2D6 activity in order to better understand the potential role of these metabolites in drug interactions involving haloperidol.

METHODS

The inhibitory effects of haloperidol and five of its metabolites on dextrorphan formation from dextromethorphan, a marker probe of CYP2D6 activity, were measured in human liver microsomal preparations. Apparent kinetic parameters for enzyme inhibition were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the data.

RESULTS

Racemic reduced haloperidol and its metabolite, RHPTP competitively inhibited dextromethorphan O-demethylation with estimated Ki values (0.24 microM and 0.09 microM, respectively) that were substantially lower than that of haloperidol (0.89 microM). The inhibitory effect of S(-)-reduced haloperidol was more potent than the R(+)-enantiomer, with estimated Ki values of 0.11 microM and 1.1 microM, respectively. The pyridinium metabolite of haloperidol, HPP+ inhibited the enzyme activity noncompetitively with a Ki value of 0.79 microM. The N-dealkylated metabolites of haloperidol (FBPA and CPHP) had a diminished inhibitory potency. While FBPA showed no notable inhibitory effect on dextrorphan formation, CPHP showed moderate competitive inhibition with a Ki value of 20.9 microM.

CONCLUSIONS

The principal metabolites of haloperidol inhibit CYP2D6, suggesting that they might contribute to the inhibitory effects of the drug. Reduced haloperidol seems to inhibit CYP2D6 activity in an enantioselective manner with the physiologically occurring S(-) enantiomer being more potent.

Factors affecting serum haloperidol level assessed by longitudinal therapeutic monitoring

1. Since the development of a kit for the assay of haloperidol by enzyme immunoassay, therapeutic monitoring of haloperidol has been utilised in Japan for several years. By retrospectively analysing the accumulated data, this study was carried out to investigate the factors affecting haloperidol level. Especially, the effects of enzyme-inducing comedications were analysed in relation to serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level, which has been measured simultaneously with haloperidol. Serum haloperidol level measurements were obtained from medical records of inpatients on multiple medications (n = 102). For each subject, average haloperidol level was computed during the same prescription and doses. The effects of age, sex, smoking status, and the coadministration of carbamazepine and barbiturates (including phenobarbital, amobarbital and pentobarbital) were analysed using correlation, between-group comparison and multiple regression analysis. Separately, the effect of comedications on haloperidol and GGT levels were analysed individually in a small number of patients (n = 5) who had received those comedications intermittently. Significant lowering of serum haloperidol level by the coadministration of carbamazepine and/or barbiturates was observed. The coadministration was also correlated with the elevated GGT level in between-group comparison. In the separate analysis, the change in haloperidol level was correlated with the change in GGT level in some individuals but not in others. None of the other clinical factors investigated in the study showed significant effect on haloperidol level. This study suggests that the lowering of haloperidol level and the elevation of GGT level may often occur coincidentally by the coadministration of enzyme-inducing drugs. However, whether there is a causal relationship between these phenomena and whether elevated serum GGT level could serve as a clinically useful marker need to be clarified by further basic pharmacological research.

Pharmacogenetics and psychopharmacotherapy

Response to drugs can vary between individuals and between different ethnic populations. The biological (age, gender, disease and genetics), cultural and environmental factors which contribute to these variations are considered in this review. The most important aspect is the genetic variability between individuals in their ability to metabolize drugs due to expression of 'polymorphic' enzymes. Polymorphism enables division of individuals within a given population into at least two groups, poor metabolisers (PMs) and extensive metabolisers (EMs) of certain drugs. The two most extensively studied genetic polymorphisms are those involving cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and CYP2C19. CYP2D6 metabolizes a number of antidepressants, antipsychotics, beta-adrenoceptor blockers, and antiarrhythmic drugs. About 7% of Caucasians and 1% of Asians are PMs of CYP2D6 substrates. CYP2C19 enzyme participates in the metabolism of omeprazole, propranolol and psychotropic drugs such as hexobarbital, diazepam, citalopram, imipramine, clomipramine and amitriptyline. The incidence of PMs of CYP2C19 substrates is much higher in Asians (15-30%) than in Caucasians (3-6%). Variations in metabolism of psychotropic drugs result in variations in their pharmacokinetic parameters. This may lead to clinically significant intra- and inter-ethnic differences in pharmacological responses. Such variations are discussed in this review. Differential receptor-mediated response may play a role in ethnic differences in responses to antipsychotics and tricyclic antidepressants, but such pharmacodynamic factors remain to be systematically investigated. The results of studies of ethnic differences in response to psychopharmacotherapy appear to be discrepant, most probably due to limitations of study design, small sample size, inadequately defined study sample, and lack of control of confounding factors. The clinical value of understanding pharmacogenetics is in its use to optimize therapeutic efficacy, to prevent toxicity of those drugs whose metabolism is catalysed by polymorphic isoenzymes, and to contribute to the rational design of new drugs. Finally, applications and impact of pharmacogenetics in the field of psychopharmacotherapy are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol: an update

Haloperidol is commonly used in the therapy of patients with acute and chronic schizophrenia. The enzymes involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol include cytochrome P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase and uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase. The greatest proportion of the intrinsic hepatic clearance of haloperidol is by glucuronidation, followed by the reduction of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol and by CYP-mediated oxidation. In studies of CYP-mediated disposition in vitro, CYP3A4 appears to be the major isoform responsible for the metabolism of haloperidol in humans. The intrinsic clearances of the back-oxidation of reduced haloperidol to the parent compound, oxidative N-dealkylation and pyridinium formation are of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the same enzyme system is responsible for the 3 reactions. Large variation in the catalytic activity was observed in the CYP-mediated reactions, whereas there appeared to be only small variations in the glucuronidation and carbonyl reduction pathways. Haloperidol is a substrate of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor, as well as a stimulator, of CYP2D6. Reduced haloperidol is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and inhibitor of CYP2D6. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur between haloperidol and various drugs given concomitantly, for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, venlafaxine, buspirone, alprazolam, rifampicin (rifampin), quinidine and carteolol. Overall, drug interaction studies have suggested that CYP3A4 is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol in humans. Interactions of haloperidol with most drugs lead to only small changes in plasma haloperidol concentrations, suggesting that the interactions have little clinical significance. On the other hand, the coadministration of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin or quinidine affects the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol to an extent that alterations in clinical consequences would be expected. In vivo pharmacogenetic studies have indicated that the metabolism and disposition of haloperidol may be regulated by genetically determined polymorphic CYP2D6 activity. However, these findings appear to contradict those from studies in vitro with human liver microsomes and from studies of drug interactions in vivo. Interethnic and pharmacogenetic differences in haloperidol metabolism may explain these observations.

Dose-dependent reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios: influence of patient-related variables

Plasma reduced haloperidol (RH) concentrations or RH to haloperidol (HL) ratios have been suggested to be important in determining the clinical efficacy and extrapyramidal side effects of HL. In this study, we measured the steady-state plasma HL and RH levels by high performance liquid chromatography and analyzed the effects of various variables (dose, gender, age, and body weight) on RH/HL ratios in four dose groups of Chinese schizophrenic inpatients: 10 mg/day (n = 84), 20 (n = 111), 30 (n = 29), and 60 (n = 55). In addition, the polymorphic distribution of RH/HL ratios, suggested by previous investigators, was further tested in each dosage group (for controlling the potential dosage effect on RH/HL ratios). As a result, both age and body weight could influence RH/HL ratios. Each year increase in age (after adjusting the effects of gender, body weight, and dosage) would elevate the RH/HL ratio by 0.0067 (P < 0.0001). On the other hand, after adjusting gender, age, and dosage effects, each kg increment in body weight would decrease the RH/HL ratio by 0.0044 (P < 0.01). Gender did not influence the ratio. Furthermore, the high dosage groups had higher RH/HL ratios (even with other variables being controlled). In comparison with the 10 mg group, the 60 mg group exhibited a higher mean RH/HL ratio by 0.84 (P < 0.0001) and the 30 mg group did by 0.31 (P < 0.0001). The 20 mg group was almost equal to the 10 mg group in RH/HL ratios. Besides, at each dosage group, the frequency distribution of RH/HL ratios seemed to be predominantly unimodal with a small proportion of extreme outliers. The results of this study clearly indicate that aging or a high dose (> or = 30 mg/day) of HL could raise the plasma RH/HL ratio, while an increasing body weight would reduce that. In contrast, gender does not affect the ratios.

Dextromethorphan phenotyping and haloperidol disposition in schizophrenic patients

This study examined the relationship between the metabolic ratios of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan, haloperidol disposition, and the incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in schizophrenic patients. Eighteen schizophrenic patients were phenotyped with a test dose of dextromethorphan prior to the initiation of haloperidol treatment. The metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan was determined in each patient. Patients were treated with oral haloperidol 10 mg/day for 2 weeks. Blood samples for haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were obtained at week 2 of haloperidol treatment. Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma concentrations were assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Significant correlations of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan metabolic ratios vs. plasma haloperidol concentrations, reduced haloperidol concentrations, and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios were found (r = 0.726, P = 0.0007; r = 0.782, P = 0.0001; and r = 0.619, P = 0.006, respectively). Ten patients who experienced extrapyramidal side effects had higher reduced haloperidol concentrations and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios than the other patients (2.49 +/- 1.42 [S.D.] ng/ml vs. 1.10 +/- 0.46 ng/ml, P = 0.014 and 0.287 +/- 0.102 vs. 0.192 +/- 0.065, P = 0.030). The former also had a trend to have higher haloperidol concentrations and dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios than the latter (8.04 +/- 2.91 ng/ml vs. 5.83 +/- 1.79 ng/ml, P = 0.066 and 0.023 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.011 +/- 0.010, P = 0.077). Phenotyping patients has the potential to assist clinicians in predicting plasma drug concentrations during the subsequent neuroleptic drug treatment. Further research with phenotyping and psychotropic drug metabolism in psychiatric patients is needed.

Blood levels of reduced haloperidol versus clinical efficacy and extrapyramidal side effects of haloperidol

1. The studies of relationships between blood levels of reduced haloperidol HL (RH) and clinical efficacy in haloperidol (HL)-treated patients have yielded variable results. On the other hand, the contribution of RH upon HL's extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) had been suggested in animal models as well as in preliminary clinical studies with limited subjects. 2. This study explored the relationships between blood drug levels and clinical effects and EPS of HL in 48 Chinese acutely exacerbated schizophrenic inpatients. After a single-blind placebo period of one week, the patients were treated with a fixed dose 10 mg of HL for two weeks. Steady-state levels of HL and RH in plasma (n = 48) and in red blood cells (RBC) (n = 37) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. 3. The mean RH/HL ratio in RBC in the Chinese (0.55) is lower than that in non-Chinese patients as reported in the literature (> 2), so is the RH/HL ratios in plasma. 4. No significant relationship emerged between percent improvement in BPRS total score and any of drug indices (HL, RH, sum of two compounds (HL+RH), and RH/HL ratio) in plasma and in RBC. Furthermore, the responders did not differ significantly from the nonresponders in each drug index. 5. Plasma RH levels were significantly higher in 30 patients experiencing EPS compared with the other 18 patients (mean 2.14 +/- 1.71 (S.D.) ng/ml vs. 1.38 +/- 0.37 ng/ml, p < 0.05). No significant differences in other drug indices were noted between subjects with or without EPS.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between buspirone and haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia

The pharmacokinetic interaction between buspirone and haloperidol was evaluated in schizophrenic patients in two different groups. In both groups, haloperidol doses (10-40 mg/day) remained constant for 6 weeks before the addition of buspirone 10 mg three times daily. Serial blood samples were obtained from the 11 patients in group I at baseline (before addition of buspirone) and after administration for 24 hours. The pharmacokinetic parameters of haloperidol were determined alone and with coadministration of buspirone. In group II, buspirone 10 mg three times daily was added to treatment with haloperidol in 27 patients. Blood samples were obtained before addition of buspirone and at weeks 2 and 6 of treatment with buspirone. Samples were obtained 10 to 12 hours after administration of the evening dose and before the morning dose. Haloperidol and its metabolite, reduced haloperidol (RH), were assayed by means of high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of haloperidol were not found in group I; a mean increase in the half-life (t1/2) of haloperidol from 21.5 to 28.1 hours was observed, but this finding was not statistically significant. Under steady-state conditions, plasma levels of haloperidol in the patients in group II did not change significantly from baseline to week 6. Plasma concentrations of RH remained unaltered in both groups. The results indicate that coadministration of buspirone does not markedly affect the pharmacokinetics or plasma concentrations of haloperidol.

Interethnic differences in drug metabolism: influence of genetic and environmental factors on debrisoquine hydroxylation phenotype

Genetic and environmental factors are determinants of the interindividual and interethnic variability in drug metabolism. The metabolism of several important drugs (e.g. haloperidol) cosegregates with that of debrisoquine. Thus, interethnic differences in debrisoquine hydroxylation polymorphism (CYP2D6) might be partly responsible for the variation in haloperidol disposition between races. The influence of tobacco, ethanol, caffeine, gender, and oral contraceptive use on the debrisoquine metabolic ratio (MR) has been analyzed in 633 Spanish healthy volunteers. MR was also determined in panels of healthy volunteers. 18 smokers were studied during a tobacco abstinence period, and 31 women three times during the same menstrual cycle. Among EMs, debrisoquine MR was significantly (P < 0.05) lower during smoking cessation (mean antilog +/- SD, 0.48 +/- 0.29) compared to a smoking period (0.61 +/- 0.23). During the lutheal phase of the menstrual cycle, debrisoquine MR was also significantly (P < 0.01) lower (0.33 +/- 0.41) compared to the ovulatory-phase (0.41 +/- 0.34) and the phase before ovulation (0.44 +/- 0.36). Among EMs, it is suggested that debrisoquine MR may be modified by tobacco smoking and sexual hormones. The clinical relevance of these findings remains unclear.

Ketone reductase activity and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios in haloperidol-treated schizophrenic patients

Twenty schizophrenic patients were treated with a fixed haloperidol (HL) dose of 20 mg/day for 4 weeks. The conversion of HL to its reduced metabolite (reduced haloperidol, RH) occurs via the ketone reductase enzyme. RH is also converted back to HL by the cytochrome P450 2D6 isozyme. Ketone reductase activity can be measured in red blood cells. Plasma HL and RH levels were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and during weeks 2 and 4 of HL therapy. Seventeen of 20 patients had ketone reductase values < 3. A significant correlation between ketone reductase and RH/HL plasma ratios was observed at week 4 in these 17 patients. Patients with ketone reductase activity < 3 could represent a subgroup of patients that metabolize HL differently. The wide interpatient variability observed with HL and RH plasma levels in HL-treated patients could reflect differences in ketone reductase activity and the metabolic status of debrisoquin hydroxylase (cytochrome P450IID6) in psychiatric patients.

Intra- and interethnic variability in reduced haloperidol to haloperidol ratios

Steady-state haloperidol and reduced haloperidol concentrations were measured in 250 schizophrenic patients from 4 ethnic groups: 39 Blacks, 66 Caucasians, 82 Chinese, and 63 Mexican Americans. The distribution of the reduced haloperidol to haloperidol concentration (RH/HL) ratios was bimodal in all ethnic groups, with the antimode determined by probit plot as 0.46, 0.51, 0.36, and 0.76, respectively. With these antimodes, the proportion of patients with low RH/HL ratios were 41%, 42%, 73%, and 57% in the four ethnic groups, respectively. Compared with the other three ethnic groups, in the Chinese patients the ratio was lower. The mean RH/HL ratio in the Chinese was 0.34 compared with 0.81 to 0.87 in the non-Chinese groups. In 53 patients who were treated with two or more haloperidol dosage regimens, steady-state haloperidol and reduced haloperidol drug concentrations obtained from the different regimens were positively correlated with the haloperidol dose (R = .79 and R = .62, respectively). Our data suggest not only the existence of a bimodal distribution in the RH/HL ratio, but also that the antimode separating the low and high ratio subgroups is different among the various ethnic groups.

Participation in and outcome of treatment for major depression among low income Asian-Americans

This study examined the relationship of four aspects of psychiatric treatment (use of medication, client-therapist ethnic match, treatment in an Asian-specific clinic, and professional therapist) to participation in treatment and outcome of treatment in low income Asian-American clients (n = 273) of the Los Angeles County mental health system who were diagnosed with major depression. Based on cultural responsiveness theory, the study tested the hypothesis that use of medication in treatment would have the greatest effect on participation and outcome followed, in order, by client-therapist ethnic match, treatment in an Asian-specific clinic, and treatment by a professional therapist. The hypotheses were largely supported: treatment with medication had a significant relationship to total number of treatment sessions (participation) and improvement in the admission-discharge Global Assessment Scale (GAS) score (outcome). Treatment by a therapist of the same ethnicity as the client and treatment in an agency designated to provide services to Asian clients both had significant relationships to the number of treatment sessions but not to GAS score improvement. Four covariates included in the analysis and treatment by a professional therapist had no relationship to either of the dependent variables.

Comparison of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma levels in four different ethnic populations

1. Plasma haloperidol and reduced haloperidol concentration were measured in four ethnic populations. 2. Plasma samples were obtained under steady-state conditions and obtained 10-12 hours post bedtime dose and prior to the morning dose. 3. Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma levels were assayed by radioimmunoassay and liquid chromatography. 4. A wide interpatient variability between haloperidol dose and plasma concentration was observed for each ethnic group. 5. The Chinese group differed from the other ethnic populations. 6. A nonlinear relationship was observed between haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma levels in each ethnic group. Further, the relationship of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol plasma levels differed for each ethnic group. These results suggest that various ethnic groups could metabolize haloperidol and reduced haloperidol differently.

Reduced haloperidol: a factor in determining the therapeutic benefit of haloperidol treatment?

One of the metabolic pathways of haloperidol (HAL) is the reduction of the molecule at the benzylic ketone to form an alcohol metabolite, known as reduced HAL (RHAL). The basic and clinical pharmacology of RHAL is the subject of this review. The investigation of RHAL in biological samples has been suggested to be important, as the reduced metabolite can be reconverted back to the parent drug and is shown to be 20-50% as potent as HAL in some in vivo neuroleptic tests. Nevertheless, the metabolic reduction/oxidation cycle of the drug is unbalanced. The interconversion process largely favours the reduction of HAL to RHAL but not vice versa. The RHAL/HAL ratios are dose and time dependent. The higher the dose or the longer the duration of treatment, the greater the ratio. The results concerning relationship between plasma RHAL level or RHAL/HAL ratio and clinical response are inconsistent, yet interesting. Some studies in schizophrenic patients have suggested a diminished therapeutic response to HAL when elevated plasma RHAL concentrations or RHAL/HAL ratios are presented. However, this finding has not been replicated by other investigations. Possible interference by RHAL with HAL at dopamine receptors thus reducing the effectiveness of HAL treatment has been suggested by some authors. Measurements of RHAL as well as HAL plasma concentrations for evaluating drug level-clinical response might be necessary in psychiatric patients.

Dose-dependent reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios in schizophrenic patients

Plasma haloperidol (HAL) and reduced HAL (RHAL) concentrations were measured in 113 Chinese schizophrenic patients. Daily doses of HAL ranged from 8 to 65 mg. Samples were obtained under steady-state conditions and drawn 10-12 hours after the bedtime dose and before the morning dose. In all, 313 blood samples were collected. Multiple samples were obtained at the same doses in 63 patients and at two or three different doses in 31 patients. HAL and RHAL concentrations were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. Interpatient variation in plasma HAL levels at a given dosage was up to sixfold. However, there was a high positive correlation between plasma levels and daily dosages with the equation of HAL plasma level (ng/ml) = 0.88 x dosage (mg/day) -0.56 or 46.0 x dosage (mg/day/kg) + 0.28. The expected values are about 15-55% higher than those obtained from non-Chinese patients as reported in the literature. The RHAL/HAL ratios were dose-dependent. The greater the dose used, the higher the ratio. An upper therapeutic limit of plasma HAL level is suggested to be 25 ng/ml, which can be achieved at dosages about 30 mg/day in most Chinese patients. Based upon the dose-dependent increase in RHAL/HAL ratios, the importance of RHAL in determining the therapeutic benefit of HAL treatment is discussed.