Evaluation of a new third generation anti-HIV-1/anti-HIV-2 assay with increased sensitivity for HIV-1 group O

Developments in the Diagnostic Techniques of Infectious Diseases: Rural and Urban Prospective

Objectives:

Diagnostics is the first step for the treatment and eradication of infectious microbial diseases. Due to ever evolving pathogens and emerging new diseases, there is an urgent need to identify suitable diagnostic techniques for better management of each disease. The success rate of specific diagnostic technique in any population depends on various factors including type of the microbial pathogen, availability of resources, technical expertise, disease severity and degree of epidemic of disease in the area. One of the important tasks of the policy makers is to identify and implement suitable diagnostic techniques for specific regions based on their specific requirements. In this review we have discussed various techniques available in the literature and their suitability for the target population based on above mentioned criteria.

Methods:

Diagnostic techniques evaluation of well documented representative microbial diseases; Tuberculosis (bacterial), Malaria (parasitic) and HIV (viral) were included in the study. Identification and collection of information and data was performed focusing on the diagnostic techniques used from the scientific publications from Pubmed, Science Access, Scopus, EMBASE and several regional databases. WHO and CDC database for Tuberculosis, Malaria and HIV were also included. These techniques were compared with respect to the financial resource availability, expertise and management, functional capacity, pathogen virulence and degree of epidemic in the population.

Results and Conclusion:

In case of Tuberculosis, ELISA and colorimetric techniques are successful in rural and urban communities with 80% – 90% sensitivity. Genotyping and SNP analysis are useful in drug resistant strains. Parasitic disease Malaria also follows the same trend with diagnostic techniques like RDTs being common in both population with fast results and around 90% sensitivity. STD disease like HIV however shows slight different trends due to urgent need of interference in rural epidemics of the disease. Rapid and sensitive immunotechniques like dipsticks and agglutination with almost 100% sensitivity are used in both rural and urban areas. For the confirmation further tests are done like protein Western and NAAT. Advance techniques could be the option for higher epidemic area, drug resistance and disease research, while rapid techniques would be suitable for low income areas and POC facilities. Therefore, suitability of the diagnostic techniques for better management depends not only on the financial resources and assessment skills of a community but sometimes on the disease itself. We have further discussed the technological improvements for specific settings (rural/urban) based on the past research for better management of diseases, which could be implemented for the understanding of understudied and newly emerging diseases.

Evaluation of five simple rapid HIV assays for potential use in the Brazilian national HIV testing algorithm

Since 2005, the Department of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) and Viral Hepatitis under the Health Surveillance Secretariat in Brazil's Ministry of Health has approved a testing algorithm for using rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests in the country. Given the constant emergence of new rapid HIV tests in the market, it is necessary to maintain an evaluation program for them. Conscious of this need, this multicenter study was conducted to evaluate five commercially available rapid HIV tests used to detect anti-HIV antibodies in Brazil. The five commercial rapid tests under assessment were the VIKIA HIV-1/2 (bioMérieux, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), the Rapid Check HIV 1 & 2 (Center of Infectious Diseases, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil), the HIV-1/2 3.0 Strip Test Bioeasy (S.D., Kyonggi-do, South Korea), the Labtest HIV (Labtest Diagnóstica, Lagoa Santa, Brazil) and the HIV-1/2 Rapid Test Bio-Manguinhos (Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). A total of 972 whole-blood samples were collected from HIV-infected patients, pregnant women and individuals seeking voluntary counselling and testing who were recruited from five centers in different regions of the country. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. The results were compared with those obtained using the HIV algorithm used currently in Brazil, which includes two enzyme immunoassays and one Western blot test. The operational performance of each assay was also compared to the defined criteria. A total of 972 samples were tested using reference assays, and the results indicated 143 (14.7%) reactive samples and 829 (85.3%) nonreactive samples. Sensitivity values ranged from 99.3 to 100%, and specificity was 100% for all five rapid tests. All of the rapid tests performed well, were easy to perform and yielded high scores in the operational performance analysis. Three tests, however, fulfilled all of the prerequisites established previously by the Department of STDs, AIDS and Viral Hepatitis: the HIV-1/2 3.0 Strip Test Bioeasy, the Rapid Check HIV 1 & 2 and the VIKIA HIV-1/2. Three of the five tests evaluated (the HIV-1/2 3.0 Strip Test Bioeasy, the Rapid Check HIV 1 and 2 and the VIKIA HIV-1/2) performed as well as the reference assays and fulfilled the requirements for use in the Brazilian national algorithm.

Use of an acute seroconversion panel to evaluate a third-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus-specific antibodies relative to multiple other assays

A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)/HIV-2 antibody screening assay, the Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 PLUS O EIA, was compared to several established screening or confirmatory tests using an acute HIV seroconversion panel. The HIV-1/HIV-2 PLUS O EIA showed an improved sensitivity over all tested antibody screening methods, and detected antibody in 7 of 19 specimens found to be negative by a first-generation EIA but positive for the presence of HIV RNA.

High prevalence of HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection among injection drug users in the southeastern region of Yunnan, China

The southeastern region of Yunnan province is a key site for drug trafficking and HIV-1 infection spread from the west of Yunnan and Laos to southeastern China. To investigate the prevalence of HIV-1 infection and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection among injection drug users (IDUs) in southeastern Yunnan, three cohorts of 285 addicts, including 242 IDUs and 43 oral drug users, living in the cities of Gejiu and Kaiyuan and the county of Yanshan were studied. HIV-1 and HCV infections were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and/or polymerase chain reaction. Data on the age, sex, risk behavior, drug use history, employment, ethnic background, and marriage status were obtained by interview. The overall prevalence of HIV-1 infection was 71.9%. The rate of HCV coinfection among 138 HIV-1-infected IDUs was 99.3%. Most HIV-infected IDUs were 20 to 35 years old (86.7%) and were ethnic Han (75.9%), suggesting that the epidemic in Yunnan is no longer confined to non-Han ethnic minorities. HIV prevalence in female IDUs (81.2%) was significantly higher than in male IDUs (68.2%) ( p <.05). The prevalence of HIV infection reached 68.4% after 1 year of injection drug use. Needle/syringe sharing is the major high risk factor for the spread of HIV-1 and HCV infections. Large-scale educational campaigns are urgently needed to reduce the spread of HIV and HCV infection in these regions.

Improved performance of seroconversion with a 4th generation HIV antigen/antibody assay

Recently a new fourth generation microELISA for large scale blood screening has been described in which HIV p24 Ag detection was integrated in an anti-HIV-1/-2 and anti-HIV-1 group O assay based on a direct assay format: (Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II Ag/Ab (Van Binsbergen et al., (1998)). When compared to the third generation a-HIV assay (Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O), the seroconversion window was narrowed with more than one week. A more precise window estimation based on seroconversion series with short sampling time intervals of up to 7 days, is described in parallel with that for the single HIV p24 Ag assay. It was found with 10 relevant seroconversion series that the HIV p24 Ag assay closes the seroconversion window with 6.2 days as compared to the 3rd generation a-HIV assay, while a window reduction of 4 days was found with Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II Ag/Ab. These seroconversion data show that with the new assay two-thirds of the current p24 Ag window is closed. There was no statistical difference in seroconversion sensitivity between the HIV p24 Ag and the new assay format. An extended evaluation of the new assay with subtype HIV-1 M and group O p24 Ag strains and with anti-HIV antibodies obtained from individuals infected with different HIV-1 subtypes showed that all subtypes of HIV-1 M and HIV-1 group O p24 antigen were detected as well as of HIV antibody.

Rapid assay for simultaneous detection and differentiation of immunoglobulin G antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2

A rapid immunodiagnostic test that detects and discriminates human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections on the basis of viral type, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) group M, HIV-1 group O, or HIV-2, was developed. The rapid assay for the detection of HIV (HIV rapid assay) was designed as an instrument-free chromatographic immunoassay that detects immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to HIV. To assess the performance of the HIV rapid assay, 470 HIV-positive plasma samples were tested by PCR and/or Western blotting to confirm the genotype of the infecting virus. These samples were infected with strains that represented a wide variety of HIV strains including HIV-1 group M (subtypes A through G), HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2 (subtypes A and B). The results showed that the HIV genotype identity established by the rapid assay reliably (469 of 470 samples) correlates with the HIV genotype identity established by PCR or Western blotting. A total of 879 plasma samples were tested for IgG to HIV by a licensed enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (470 HIV-positive samples and 409 HIV-negative samples). When they were tested by the rapid assay, 469 samples were positive and 410 were negative (99.88% agreement). Twelve seroconversion panels were tested by both the rapid assay and a licensed EIA. For nine panels identical results were obtained by the two assays. For the remaining three panels, the rapid assay was positive one bleed later in comparison to the bleed at which the EIA was positive. One hundred three urine samples, including 93 urine samples from HIV-seropositive individuals and 10 urine samples from seronegative individuals, were tested by the rapid assay. Ninety-one of the ninety-three urine samples from HIV-seropositive individuals were found to be positive by the rapid assay. There were no false-positive results (98.05% agreement). Virus in all urine samples tested were typed as HIV-1 group M. These results suggest that a rapid assay based on the detection of IgG specific for selected transmembrane HIV antigens provides a simple and reliable test that is capable of distinguishing HIV infections on the basis of viral type.

Strongly enhanced sensitivity of a direct anti-HIV-1/-2 assay in seroconversion by incorporation of HIV p24 ag detection: a new generation vironostika HIV Uni-Form II

The clinical sensitivity of the current anti-HIV assays is based for an important part on their reactivity with seroconversion panels. The most sensitive assay closes the seroconversion window as much as possible, thereby reducing the risk of transmitting false negative donations obtained from individuals infected recently. Because of the absence of anti-HIV antibodies during the early phase of infection, the seroconversion window can be narrowed partially by detection of HIV p24 Ag. To achieve this, the highest affinity anti-p24 binding antibodies were selected with BlAcore and applied in a direct assay format. To achieve optimal conditions for the anti-HIV part of the assay the HIV specific antigens viral HIV-1 gp160, HIV-2 gp36 and HIV-1 group O gp41 peptides were used. These antigens and antibodies were applied for microELISA coating as well as in the conjugate pearl, which is present in the well of the microELISA plate. The (analytical) anti-HIV-1/-2 and anti-HIV-1 group O sensitivity of this new assay, Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II Ag/Ab, is at least at the level of the current Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O. When compared to the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O, the seroconversion window is narrowed by 1-2 weeks due to the incorporation of HIV p24 Ag detection. The level of reactivity of the anti-HIV and HIV Ag detection part can be improved by about a factor 2 by applying continuous shaking during sample incubation. Initial studies suggested that the specificity of the assay is identical to that of the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O, namely > 99.9%. Monitoring of proper execution of the assay handling steps was facilitated by implementing a purple dye in the conjugate pearl. Colourless specimen diluent changes into a green fluid upon dissolving of the conjugate pearl and turns subsequently into blue/purple upon sample addition. These visual changes can also be determined by spectrophotometric measurement at 620 nm.

Group O human immunodeficiency virus-1 infections

Human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV), the cause of AIDS, have remarkable genetic diversity. Among the HIV-1 viruses are the "major" (group M) HIV-1 subtypes and genetic "outliers" that have been designated as group O viruses. Group O viruses are most prevalent in parts of Africa, although they have also been reported in Europe and the United States and are associated with AIDS. Because group O viruses are so highly divergent, tests designed to detect group M viruses may be unreliable in the diagnosis of group O infection. Modification of these tests are needed to protect the safety of the blood supply.

Reactivity of a new HIV-1 group O third generation A-HIV-1/-2 assay with an unusual HIV-1 seroconversion panel and HIV-1 group O/group M subtyped samples

It was shown previously that about 97% of the anti-HIV-1 group O strain-positive samples were detected by crossreaction with native HIV-1 gp160 (Van Binsbergen et al., Evaluation of a new third generation anti-HIV-1/anti-HIV-2 assay with increased sensitivity for HIV-1 group O, J. Virol. Methods 60 (1996) 131-137). Fourteen out of 17 new anti-HIV-1 group O positive samples, selected with the Enzygnost HIV-1/2 plus assay, were already reactive when tested with HIV-1 gp160. When tested by the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O microELISA all 17 samples were reactive, demonstrating the necessity to implement an HIV-1 group O-specific antigen in the assay. On the other hand, it was surprisingly found that 40 out of 43 (93%) of anti-HIV-1 group M-positive samples, belonging to strain A, B, C, D, E or F, were detected by crossreaction with the HIV-1 group O (strain ANT70) synthetic peptide incorporated in the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O. Only HIV-1 subtype D-positive samples did not react with this peptide, presumably because of the presence of a histidine residue in the immunodominant region of HIV-1 subtype D gp41. Both crossreactions make the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O microELISA also sensitive for anti-HIV-1-positive samples originating from different geographical regions and resulting from different HIV-1 subtype infections. With an unusual seroconversion panel in which p24 Ag was present persistently, many anti-HIV-1/-2 assays produce alternating positive/negative results in anti-HIV antibody-positive bleeds. It was shown that the use of viral p24 and gp160 in a direct sandwich, allowing detection of anti-HIV IgG and IgM, explains the identification of all anti-HIV-positive bleeds by the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O. The high sensitivity of the plus O assay was confirmed with clinical samples of a so-called anti-HIV-1 low titer panel. The specificity of the Vironostika HIV Uni-Form II plus O determined in five blood transfusion centers, based on 135070 tests, was 99.97%.