1
|
Zeitouni M, Dorvillius E, Sulman D, Procopi N, Beaupré F, Devos P, Barthélémy O, Rouanet S, Ferrante A, Chommeloux J, Hekimian G, Kerneis M, Silvain J, Montalescot G. Levosimendan in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Refractory to Dobutamine Weaning. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2025; 25:249-258. [PMID: 39432228 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00683-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examines the effects of levosimendan in patients refractory to dobutamine weaning. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to dobutamine weaning failure admitted between 2010 and 2022. Patients treated with another type of dobutamine alone were compared with those treated with levosimendan in combination with dobutamine. Successful inotrope withdrawal was defined as survival without catecholamine support, transplant, or definitive ventricular assist device at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS Among 349 patients with cardiogenic shock and failure to withdraw from dobutamine, levosimendan was administered in combination with dobutamine in 114 patients, and another type of dobutamine alone was administered in 235 patients. At 30 days, successful inotrope withdrawal occurred in 46 (43.4%) patients taking levosimendan plus dobutamine versus 24 (10.5%) patients in the dobutamine-only group (weighted odds ratio [OR] 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-9.38; p < 0.001), with similar results at 90 days (weighted OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.22-11.78; p < 0.001). Levosimendan + dobutamine was associated with lower 30-day mortality (weighted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; p = 0.01), with no difference at 90 days (weighted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-1.14; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION Adding levosimendan to dobutamine may improve inotrope withdrawal success and reduce 30-day mortality in patients with initial weaning failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Zeitouni
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Elodie Dorvillius
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - David Sulman
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Niki Procopi
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Frederic Beaupré
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Perrine Devos
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Barthélémy
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Rouanet
- Statistician Unit, StatEthic, ACTION Study group, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Arnaud Ferrante
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Juliette Chommeloux
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, CEDEX, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Hekimian
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, CEDEX, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Kerneis
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Johanne Silvain
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beaini H, Chunawala Z, Cheeran D, Araj F, Wrobel C, Truby L, Saha A, Thibodeau JT, Farr M. Cardiogenic Shock: Focus on Non-Cardiac Biomarkers. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2024; 21:604-614. [PMID: 39078556 DOI: 10.1007/s11897-024-00676-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine the evolving multifaceted nature of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the context of non-cardiac biomarkers that may improve CS management and risk stratification. RECENT FINDINGS There are increasing data highlighting the role of lactate, glucose, and other markers of inflammation and end-organ dysfunction in CS. These biomarkers provide a more comprehensive understanding of the concurrent hemo-metabolic and cellular disturbances observed in CS and offer insights beyond standard structural and functional cardiac assessments. Non-cardiac biomarkers both refine the diagnostic accuracy and improve the prognostic assessments in CS. Further studies revolving around novel biomarkers are warranted to support more targeted and effective therapeutic and management interventions in these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi Beaini
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
| | - Zainali Chunawala
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Cheeran
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Dallas Veteran's Administration Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Faris Araj
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Wrobel
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Truby
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amit Saha
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer T Thibodeau
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Maryjane Farr
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
- Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jung C, Wernly B, Masyuk M, Kelm M, Freund A, Pöss J, Desch S, Schneider S, Akin I, Schlesinger S, Schrage B, Zeymer U, Thiele H. A Bayesian reanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:701-708. [PMID: 39268887 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS), and multivessel disease remains controversial. The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial compared culprit lesion-only vs. immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), providing important data but leaving efficacy questions unresolved. To address lingering uncertainties and gain deeper insights, we performed a Bayesian reanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a Bayesian re-analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial data using non-informative, sceptical, and enthusiastic priors. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals were calculated. We defined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as RR < 0.84. We performed subgroup analyses for key patient characteristics and assessed secondary outcomes and safety endpoints. Probabilities of benefit, achieving MCID, and harm were computed. Results are presented as median RR with probabilities of effect sizes. Bayesian reanalysis showed a median RR of 0.82 (95% HPD 0.66-1.04) with a non-informative prior, indicating a 95% probability of benefit and 59% probability of achieving MCID. Subgroup analyses revealed potentially stronger effects in males (RR 0.78, 73% probability of MCID), patients without diabetes (RR 0.76, 79% probability of MCID), and those with non-anterior ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI; RR 0.74, 76% probability of MCID). Secondary outcomes suggested potential benefits in mortality (RR 0.85) and need for renal replacement therapy (RR 0.72) but increased risks of recurrent MI (RR 2.84) and urgent revascularization (RR 2.88). CONCLUSION Our Bayesian reanalysis provides intuitive insights by quantifying probabilities of treatment effect sizes, offering further evidence favouring the culprit lesion-only PCI strategy in AMI patients with CS and multivessel disease. The analysis demonstrates a high probability of overall benefit, with a notable chance of achieving a minimally clinically important difference, particularly in specific subgroups. These findings not only support the consideration of culprit lesion-only PCI in certain patient populations but also underscore the need for careful risk-benefit assessment. Furthermore, our hypothesis-generating subgroup analyses, which show varying probabilities of achieving MCID, illuminate promising avenues for future targeted investigations in this critical patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf (CARID), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernhard Wernly
- Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Oberndorf, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Maryna Masyuk
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Malte Kelm
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf (CARID), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Anne Freund
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Janine Pöss
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Ibrahim Akin
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinic Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabrina Schlesinger
- Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Düsseldorf, München-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martínez León A, Bazal Chacón P, Herrador Galindo L, Ugarriza Ortueta J, Plaza Martín M, Pastor Pueyo P, Alonso Salinas GL. Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4841. [PMID: 39200983 PMCID: PMC11355768 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multifactorial clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion that could be associated with multisystem organ failure, presenting a diverse range of causes and symptoms. Despite improving survival in recent years due to new advancements, CS still carries a high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. Recent research has focused on improving early detection and understanding of CS through standardized team approaches, detailed hemodynamic assessment, and selective use of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, leading to better patient outcomes. This review examines CS pathophysiology, emerging classifications, current drug and device therapies, standardized team management strategies, and regionalized care systems aimed at optimizing shock outcomes. Furthermore, we identify gaps in knowledge and outline future research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaia Martínez León
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Bazal Chacón
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Heath Sciences Department, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA-NUP), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lorena Herrador Galindo
- Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - Julene Ugarriza Ortueta
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Plaza Martín
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Av Ramón y Cajal 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Pablo Pastor Pueyo
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Av Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198 Lleida, Spain;
| | - Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN-NOU), Calle de Irunlarrea, 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (A.M.L.); (P.B.C.); (J.U.O.)
- Navarrabiomed (Miguel Servet Foundation), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Heath Sciences Department, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA-NUP), 31006 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schaubroeck H, Thiele H. Residual ischaemia in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does complete revascularization hold the key? EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:535-536. [PMID: 38768306 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Schaubroeck
- Intensive Care Department, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zeymer U, Heer T, Ouarrak T, Akin I, Noc M, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Thiele H. Current spectrum and outcomes of infarct-related cardiogenic shock: insights from the CULPRIT-SHOCK registry and randomized controlled trial. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:335-346. [PMID: 38349233 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We analysed consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who were enrolled into the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized controlled trial (RCT) and those with exclusion criteria who were included into the accompanying registry. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 1075 patients with infarct-related CS were screened for CULPRIT-SHOCK in 83 specialized centres in Europe; 369 of them had exclusion criteria for the RCT and were enrolled into the registry. Patients were followed over 1 year. The mean age was 68 years and 260 (25%) were women. 13.5%, 30.9%, and 55.6% had one-vessel, two-vessel, and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively. Significant left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis was present in 8.0%. 54.2% of the patients had cardiac arrest before admission. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 patency of the infarct vessel after percutaneous coronary intervention was achieved in 83.6% of all patients. Mechanical circulatory support was applied in one-third of patients. Total mortality after 30 days and 1 year was 47.6% and 52.9%. Mortality after 1 year was highest in patients with LM coronary artery stenosis (63.5%), followed by three-vessel (56.6%), two-vessel (49.8%), and one-vessel CAD (38.6%), respectively. Mechanical complications were rare (21/1008; 2.1%) but associated with a high mortality of 66.7% after 1 year. CONCLUSION In specialized centres in Europe, short- and long-term mortality of patients with infarct-related CS treated with an invasive strategy is still high and mainly depends on the extent of CAD. Therefore, there is still a need for improvement of care to improve the prognosis of infarct-related CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Zeymer
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Tobias Heer
- Department of Cardiology, München Klinik Neuperlach, Academic Teaching Hospital, LMU University of Munich, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737 Munich, Germany
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- Department of Cardiology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marko Noc
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Janina Stepinska
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Keith Oldroyd
- Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pranas Serpytis
- Department of Cardiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Giles Montalescot
- Department of Cardiology, ACTION Study Group, Sorbonne Université Paris 6, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Cardiology, Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Christiaan Vrints
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Obradovic D, Loncar G, Zeymer U, Pöss J, Feistritzer HJ, Freund A, Jobs A, Fuernau G, Desch S, Ceglarek U, Isermann B, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Büttner P, Thiele H. Impact of anaemia and iron deficiency on outcomes in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:448-457. [PMID: 38084483 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Anaemia and iron deficiency (ID) are common comorbidities in cardiovascular patients and are associated with a poor clinical status, as well as a worse outcome in patients with heart failure and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheless, data concerning the impact of anaemia and ID on clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are scarce. This study aimed to assess the impact of anaemia and ID on clinical outcomes in patients with CS complicating AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS The presence of anaemia (haemoglobin <13 g/dl in men and <12 g/dl in women) or ID (ferritin <100 ng/ml or transferrin saturation <20%) was determined in patients with CS due to AMI from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Blood samples were collected in the catheterization laboratory during initial percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical outcomes were compared in four groups of patients having neither anaemia nor ID, against patients with anaemia with or without ID and patients with ID only. A total of 427 CS patients were included in this analysis. Anaemia without ID was diagnosed in 93 (21.7%), anaemia with ID in 54 study participants (12.6%), ID without anaemia in 72 patients (16.8%), whereas in 208 patients neither anaemia nor ID was present (48.9%). CS patients with anaemia without ID were older (73 ± 10 years, p = 0.001), had more frequently a history of arterial hypertension (72.8%, p = 0.01), diabetes mellitus (47.8%, p = 0.001), as well as chronic kidney disease (14.1%, p = 0.004) compared to CS patients in other groups. Anaemic CS patients without ID presence were at higher risk to develop a composite from all-cause death or renal replacement therapy at 30-day follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23-6.62, p < 0.001) than CS patients without anaemia/ID. The presence of ID in CS patients, with and without concomitant anaemia, did not increase the risk for the primary outcome (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.64-2.13, p = 0.64; and OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59-1.73, p = 0.54; respectively) within 30 days of follow-up. In time-to-event Kaplan-Meier analysis, anaemic CS patients without ID had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.52-2.89, p < 0.001), as well as for death from any cause (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.36-2.65, p < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy during 30-day follow-up (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.69-5.31, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Concomitant anaemia without ID presence in patients with CS at hospital presentation is associated with higher risk for death from any cause or renal replacement therapy and the individual components of this composite endpoint within 30 days after hospitalization. ID has no relevant impact on clinical outcomes in patients with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Obradovic
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Goran Loncar
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Dedinje', University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen and Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Janine Pöss
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hans-Josef Feistritzer
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne Freund
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Jobs
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Clinic for Internal Medicine II, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Uta Ceglarek
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Berend Isermann
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephan von Haehling
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medicine Gottingen (UMG), Gottingen, Germany
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Büttner
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goyal A, Shahbaz H, Jain H, Fatima L, Abbasi HQ, Ullah I, Sheikh AB, Sohail AH. The impact of chronic total occlusion in non-infarct related arteries on patient outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI superimposed with cardiogenic shock: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol 2024; 49:102237. [PMID: 38042227 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is defined as a near-total blockage of a coronary artery and often occurs in arteries that are not directly responsible for the event, known as non-infarct-related arteries (NIRA). Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complication of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) that carries significant mortality. We performed a meta-analysis to find an association between mortality in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI that have superimposed CS, with the presence of CTO in the NIRA. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till October 2023 to retrieve studies that compare the presence of CTO with the absence of CTO in NIRA in STEMI with CS patients undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoints were risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and repeat myocardial infarction (MI). Forest plots were generated using the random effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) with a 95 % confidence interval. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS 5 observational studies with a total of 5186 patients (1031 with CTO in NIRA and 4155 with no CTO in NIRA) were included. The presence of CTO in NIRA was associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality [OR: 3.10; 95 % CI: 1.52, 6.32; p < 0.002], and ACM [OR: 2.37; 95 % CI: 1.83, 3.08; p < 0.00001]. The odds of repeat MI were comparable between the two groups [OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 0.03, 74.36, p = 0.81]. CONCLUSIONS The presence of CTO in the NIRA serves as an independent indicator of unfavorable clinical outcomes including increased risk of 30-day mortality and all-cause mortality. The risk of repeat MI was comparable between the two groups. Large-scale, multicenter trials are warranted to identify the most effective management approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Goyal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Haania Shahbaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hritvik Jain
- Department of Internal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)-Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Laveeza Fatima
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Irfan Ullah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Abu Baker Sheikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Faro DC, Laudani C, Agnello FG, Ammirabile N, Finocchiaro S, Legnazzi M, Mauro MS, Mazzone PM, Occhipinti G, Rochira C, Scalia L, Spagnolo M, Greco A, Capodanno D. Complete Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndromes With Multivessel Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:2347-2364. [PMID: 37821180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Multivessel disease (MVD) affects approximately 50% of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is significantly burdened by poor outcomes and high mortality. It represents a clinical challenge in patient management and decision making and subtends an evolving research area related to the pathophysiology of unstable plaques and local or systemic inflammation. The benefits of complete revascularization are established in hemodynamically stable ACS patients with MVD, and guidelines provide some reference points to inform clinical practice, based on an evidence level that is solid for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and less robust for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. However, several areas of uncertainty remain, such as the optimal timing for complete revascularization or the best guiding strategy for intermediate stenoses. We performed a systematic review of current evidence in the field of percutaneous revascularization in ACS and MVD, also including future perspectives from ongoing trials that will directly compare different timing strategies and investigate the role of invasive and noninvasive guidance techniques. (Complete percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease; CRD42022383123).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Cristiana Faro
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudio Laudani
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federica Giuseppa Agnello
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Nicola Ammirabile
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simone Finocchiaro
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Legnazzi
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Sara Mauro
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Placido Maria Mazzone
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Occhipinti
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Carla Rochira
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Scalia
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Spagnolo
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Greco
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tindale A, Cretu I, Meng H, Panoulas V. Complete revascularization is associated with higher mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, multi-vessel disease and shock defined by hyperlactataemia: results from the Harefield Shock Registry incorporating explainable machine learning. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2023; 12:615-623. [PMID: 37309061 PMCID: PMC10519804 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Revascularization strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease varies according to the patient's cardiogenic shock status, but assessing shock acutely can be difficult. This article examines the link between cardiogenic shock defined solely by a lactate of ≥2 mmol/L and mortality from complete vs. culprit-only revascularization in this cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients presenting with STEMI, multi-vessel disease without severe left main stem stenosis and a lactate ≥2 mmol/L between 2011 and 2021 were included. The primary endpoint was mortality at 30 days by revascularization strategy for shocked patients. Secondary endpoints were mortality at 1 year and over a median follow-up of 30 months. Four hundred and eight patients presented in shock. Mortality in the shock cohort was 27.5% at 30 days. Complete revascularization (CR) was associated with higher mortality at 30 days [odds ratio (OR) 2.1 (1.02-4.2), P = 0.043], 1 year [OR 2.4 (1.2-4.9), P = 0.01], and over 30 months follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) 2.2 (1.4-3.4), P < 0.001] compared with culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (CLOP). Mortality was again higher in the CR group after propensity matching (P = 0.018) and inverse probability treatment weighting [HR 2.0 (1.3-3.0), P = 0.001]. Furthermore, explainable machine learning demonstrated that CR was behind only blood gas parameters and creatinine levels in importance for predicting 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION In patients presenting with STEMI and multi-vessel disease in shock defined solely by a lactate of ≥2 mmol/L, CR is associated with higher mortality than CLOP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tindale
- Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, UB9 6JH, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, UB9 6JH, London, UK
| | - Ioana Cretu
- College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Hongying Meng
- College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Vasileios Panoulas
- Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Road, Harefield, UB9 6JH, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, UB9 6JH, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zeymer U, Alushi B, Noc M, Mamas MA, Montalescot G, Fuernau G, Huber K, Poess J, de Waha-Thiele S, Schneider S, Ouarrak T, Desch S, Lauten A, Thiele H. Influence of Culprit Lesion Intervention on Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock With Cardiac Arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:1165-1176. [PMID: 36948733 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac arrest (CA) is common in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to identify the characteristics and outcomes of culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of patients with infarct-related CS stratified according to CA in the CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) randomized trial and registry. METHODS Patients with CS with and without CA from the CULPRIT-SHOCK study were analyzed. All-cause death or severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30 days and 1-year death were assessed. RESULTS Among 1,015 patients, 550 (54.2%) had CA. Patients with CA were younger, more frequently male, had lower rates of peripheral artery disease, a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min, and left main disease, and they presented more often with clinical signs of impaired organ perfusion. The composite of all-cause death or severe renal failure within 30 days occurred in 51.2% of patients with CA vs 48.5% in non-CA patients (P = 0.39) and 1-year death in 53.8% vs 50.4% (P = 0.29), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, CA was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01-1.59). In the randomized trial, culprit lesion-only PCI was superior to immediate multivessel PCI in patients both with and without CA (P for interaction = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS More than 50% of patients with infarct-related CS had CA. These patients with CA were younger and had fewer comorbidities, but CA was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality. Culprit lesion-only PCI is the preferred strategy, both in patients with and without CA. (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock [CULPRIT-SHOCK]; NCT01927549).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Zeymer
- Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany; Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| | - Brunilda Alushi
- Department of Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Standort Berlin, Germany
| | - Marko Noc
- University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Gilles Montalescot
- Sorbonne Université Paris 6, ACTION study group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria
| | - Janine Poess
- Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Steffen Schneider
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu J, Wang Y, Li C, Ji H, Zhao W, Tong Q, Zhang M. Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:992456. [PMID: 36505378 PMCID: PMC9731335 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.992456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early revascularization of the culprit vessel is the most effective treatment for reducing the risk of mortality from acute STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock. However, the most recent trends and impact of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization on in-hospital outcomes are unknown. Methods The National Inpatient Sample was queried from October 2015 to 2019 for hospitalizations with STEMI. The impact of multivessel PCI on in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without cardiogenic shock was evaluated. Results Of 624,605 STEMI hospitalizations treated with PCI, 12.5% were complicated by cardiogenic shock. Among hospitalizations without cardiogenic shock, 15.7% were treated by multivessel PCI, which declined from 20.8% in 2015 to 13.9% in 2019 (P trend < 0.001). Multivessel and culprit-only PCI had similar rates of In-hospital mortality (2.4 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.027) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; 7.4 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.072). Among hospitalizations with cardiogenic shock, 22.1% were treated by multivessel PCI, which declined from 29.2% in 2015 to 19.4% in 2019 (P trend < 0.001). Multivessel PCI was associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality (30.9 vs. 28.4%, p < 0.001) and MACCE (39.9 vs. 36.5%, p < 0.001) than culprit-only PCI. Conclusion The frequency of multivessel PCI for STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock is declining. Multivessel PCI is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes for STEMI with cardiogenic shock but not for STEMI without cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- Department of Translational Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yonggang Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chenguang Li
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Honglei Ji
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wenyi Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Linyi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Linyi, China
| | - Qian Tong
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China,*Correspondence: Qian Tong,
| | - Mingyou Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China,Mingyou Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Böhme M, Desch S, Rosolowski M, Scholz M, Krohn K, Büttner P, Cross M, Kirchberg J, Rommel KP, Pöss J, Freund A, Baber R, Isermann B, Ceglarek U, Metzeler KH, Platzbecker U, Thiele H. Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80:1545-1556. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
14
|
Fitzgerald S, Thiele H. Primary and Rescue PCI in STEMI. Interv Cardiol 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119697367.ch13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT Despite advances in early revascularization, percutaneous hemodynamic support platforms, and systems of care, cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with a mortality rate higher than 50%. Several risk stratification models have been derived since the 1990 s to identify patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. Still, limited information is available on the differences between scoring systems and their relative applicability to both acute myocardial infarction and advanced decompensated heart failure CS. Thus, we reviewed the similarities, differences, and limitations of published CS risk prediction models and herein discuss their suitability to the contemporary management of CS care.
Collapse
|
16
|
Xiong B, Yang H, Yu W, Zeng Y, Han Y, She Q. Multivessel vs. Culprit Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:735636. [PMID: 35497976 PMCID: PMC9051032 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.735636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicating by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) compared to culprit vessel-only PCI (CO-PCI) for the treatment, only in patients with STEMI with CS. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Studies assessed the efficacy outcomes of short (in-hospital or 30 days)/long-term mortality, cardiac death, myocardial reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and safety outcomes of stroke, bleeding, acute renal failure with MV-PCI vs. CO-PCI in patients with STEMI with CS were included. The publication bias and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in short- and long-term mortality in patients treated with MV-PCI compared to CO-PCI group [odds ratio (OR) = 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92–1.48; OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58–1.28]. Similarly, there were no significant differences in cardiac death (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44–1.00), myocardial reinfarction (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.77–2.00), repeat revascularization (OR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40–1.42), bleeding (OR = 1.53; 95% CI, 0.53–4.43), or stroke (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.90–2.23) between the two groups. There was a higher risk in acute renal failure (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04–1.69) in patients treated with MV-PCI when compared with CO-PCI. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that there may be no significant benefit for patients with STEMI complicating CS treated with MV-PCI compared with CO-PCI, and patients are at increased risk of developing acute renal failure after MV-PCI intervention.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Adaptive design methods are intended to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and are relevant to evaluating interventions in dialysis populations. We sought to determine the use of adaptive designs in dialysis clinical trials and quantify trends in their use over time. Study Design We completed a novel full-text systematic review that used a machine learning classifier (RobotSearch) for filtering randomized controlled trials and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Setting & Study Populations We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov using sensitive dialysis search terms. Selection Criteria for Studies We included all randomized clinical trials with patients receiving dialysis or clinical trials with dialysis as a primary or secondary outcome. There was no restriction of disease type or intervention type. Data Extraction & Analytical Approach We performed a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a completed a narrative synthesis of the data. Results 57 studies, available as 68 articles and 7 ClinicalTrials.gov summaries, were included after full-text review (initial search, 209,033 PubMed abstracts and 6,002 ClinicalTrials.gov summaries). 31 studies were conducted in a dialysis population and 26 studies included dialysis as a primary or secondary outcome. Although the absolute number of adaptive design methods is increasing over time, the relative use of adaptive design methods in dialysis trials is decreasing over time (6.12% in 2009 to 0.43% in 2019, with a mean of 1.82%). Group sequential designs were the most common type of adaptive design method used. Adaptive design methods affected the conduct of 50.9% of trials, most commonly resulting in stopping early for futility (41.2%) and early stopping for safety (23.5%). Acute kidney injury was studied in 32 trials (56.1%), kidney failure requiring dialysis was studied in 24 trials (42.1%), and chronic kidney disease was studied in 1 trial (1.75%). 27 studies (47.4%) were supported by public funding. 44 studies (77.2%) did not report their adaptive design method in the title or abstract and would not be detected by a standard systematic review. Limitations We limited our search to 2 databases (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov) due to the scale of studies sourced (209,033 and 6,002 results, respectively). Conclusions Adaptive design methods are used in dialysis trials but there has been a decline in their relative use over time.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gao G, Feng L, Fu J, Li Y, Huo Z, Zhang L, Wang L, Niu H, Kang L, Zhang J. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score on myocardial injury and salvage in STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective observational study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2021; 21:591. [PMID: 34886799 PMCID: PMC8656094 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02395-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SYNTAX score (SS) was shown to positively correlate with postprocedural myocardial injury in patients after elective coronary artery intervention, but evidence about the association of SS with myocardial salvage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is still needed. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of SS for myocardial injury and salvage assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients. METHODS This single-center retrospective study consecutively enrolled STEMI patients who had undergone primary PCI within 12 h from symptom onset. Both angiography and CMR were performed during hospitalization, and patients were divided into low SS (SS ≤ 22), mediate-high SS (SS > 22) groups. Correlation and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 149 STEMI patients (96 low SS, 53 mediate-high SS) were included. In terms of myocardial injury parameters, there was a positive correlation (p < 0.001, Spearman r = 0.292) between SS and infarct size (IS), and a negative correlation (p < 0.001, Spearman r = - 0.314) between SS and myocardial salvage index (MSI). In the multivariable model, SS (> 22 as categorical variable, OR = 2.245, 95% CI [1.002-5.053], p = 0.048; as continuous variable, OR = 1.053, 95% CI [1.014-1.095], p = 0.008) was significantly associated with high IS (≥ mean 35.43). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of SS for high IS and low MSI (≤ median 28.01) were 0.664 and 0.610. CONCLUSIONS In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, SYNTAX score positively correlated with infarct size and negatively with myocardial salvage, indicating an independent predictive value of the myocardial injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangren Gao
- Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Lianrong Feng
- Department of Neurology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinguo Fu
- Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhaoyang Huo
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Heping Niu
- Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Liqing Kang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Freund A, Pöss J, de Waha-Thiele S, Meyer-Saraei R, Fuernau G, Eitel I, Feistritzer HJ, Rubini M, Huber K, Windecker S, Montalescot G, Oldroyd K, Noc M, Zeymer U, Ouarrak T, Schneider S, Baran DA, Desch S, Thiele H. Comparison of risk prediction models in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:890-897. [PMID: 34529043 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Several prediction models have been developed to allow accurate risk assessment and provide better treatment guidance in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS). However, comparative data between these models are still scarce. The objective of the study is to externally validate different risk prediction models in infarct-related CS and compare their predictive value in the early clinical course. METHODS AND RESULTS The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II Score, the CardShock score, the IABP-SHOCK II score, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) classification were each externally validated in a total of 1055 patients with infarct-related CS enrolled into the randomized CULPRIT-SHOCK trial or the corresponding registry. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Discriminative power was assessed by comparing the area under the curves (AUC) in case of continuous scores. In direct comparison of the continuous scores in a total of 161 patients, the IABP-SHOCK II score revealed best discrimination [area under the curve (AUC = 0.74)], followed by the CardShock score (AUC = 0.69) and the SAPS II score, giving only moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.63). All of the three scores revealed acceptable calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The SCAI classification as a categorical predictive model displayed good prognostic assessment for the highest risk group (Stage E) but showed poor discrimination between Stages C and D with respect to short-term-mortality. CONCLUSION Based on the present findings, the IABP-SHOCK II score appears to be the most suitable of the examined models for immediate risk prediction in infarct-related CS. Prospective evaluation of the models, further modification, or even development of new scores might be necessary to reach higher levels of discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Freund
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Janine Pöss
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Roza Meyer-Saraei
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Georg Fuernau
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans-Josef Feistritzer
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maria Rubini
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital, and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Gilles Montalescot
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Keith Oldroyd
- Golden Jubilee National Hospital and University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Marko Noc
- University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Medizinische Klinik B, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Germany.,Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (Foundation IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (Foundation IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (Foundation IHF), Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - David A Baran
- Sentara Heart Hospital, Advanced Heart Failure Center, Norfolk, USA
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ringel C, Dittrich J, Gaudl A, Schellong P, Beuchel CF, Baber R, Beutner F, Teren A, Engel C, Wirkner K, Thiele H, Büttner P, Löffler M, Scholz M, Thiery J, Ceglarek U. Association of plasma trimethylamine N-oxide levels with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and factors of the metabolic syndrome. Atherosclerosis 2021; 335:62-67. [PMID: 34583200 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The association of plasma trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and its determinants, as well as the role of TMAO as a predictor for short and long-term mortality, is still under discussion. We investigated associations between four plasma metabolites of the TMAO pathway and different clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis, diabetes determinants, and risk of short and long-term mortality in patients with stable ASCVD, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS), and DM in three independent cohorts. METHODS TMAO and its dietary precursors were simultaneously quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a total of 2655 participants of the German Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Heart study, LIFE-Adult study, and the European Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK) multicenter trial. Associations with ASCVD manifestations, metabolic syndrome, 30-day mortality of patients with AMI and CS, and long-term mortality of subjects with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were analyzed. RESULTS TMAO plasma levels were not independently associated with stable ASCVD. Elevated TMAO plasma concentrations were independently associated with obesity (odds ratio, 1.23; p < 0.01) and DM (odds ratio, 1.37; p < 0.001) in LIFE-Heart. The latter association was confirmed in LIFE-Adult. We found no association of TMAO plasma levels with short-term mortality in patients with AMI and CS. However, TMAO plasma levels were independent predictors of long-term mortality in patients with suspected CAD (hazard ratio, 1.24; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Potential proatherogenic mechanisms of TMAO seem to have no short-term effect in AMI. Presented associations with diabetes mellitus and obesity suggest that TMAO might have a functional role in metabolic syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Ringel
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Dittrich
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Gaudl
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paul Schellong
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Carl Friedrich Beuchel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ronny Baber
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Frank Beutner
- Department of Internal Medicine / Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andrej Teren
- Department of Internal Medicine / Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kerstin Wirkner
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine / Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Petra Büttner
- Department of Internal Medicine / Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Struempellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Löffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Scholz
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Haertelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Joachim Thiery
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Uta Ceglarek
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; LIFE - Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pazdernik M, Gramegna M, Bohm A, Trepa M, Vandenbriele C, De Rosa S, Uzokov J, Aleksic M, Jarakovic M, El Tahlawi M, Mostafa M, Stratinaki M, Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Gubareva E, Duplyakova P, Chacon-Diaz M, Refaat H, Guerra F, Cappelletti AM, Berka V, Westermann D, Schrage B. Regional differences in presentation characteristics, use of treatments and outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock: Results from multicenter, international registry. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2021; 165:291-297. [PMID: 34421120 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2021.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent evidence about cardiogenic shock (CS) characteristics, treatment and outcome does not represent a global spectrum of patients and is therefore limited. The aim of this study was to investigate these regional differences. METHODS To investigate regional differences in presentation characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients treated with all types of cardiogenic shock (CS) in a single calendar year on a multi-national level. Consecutive patients from 19 tertiary care hospitals in 13 countries with CS who were treated between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled in this study. RESULTS In total, 699 cardiogenic shock patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 440 patients (63%) were treated in European hospitals and 259 (37%) were treated in Non-European hospitals. Female patients (P<0.01) and patients with a previous myocardial infarction (P=0.02) were more likely to present at Non-European hospitals; whereas older patients (P=0.01) and patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure (P<0.01) were more likely to present at European hospitals. Vasopressor use was more likely in Non-European hospitals (P=0.04), whereas use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more likely in European hospitals (P<0.01). Despite adjustment for relevant confounders, 30-day in-hospital mortality risk was comparably high in CS patients treated in European vs. Non-European hospitals (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.84-1.39, P=0.56). CONCLUSION Despite marked heterogeneity in characteristics and treatment of CS patients, including fewer use of MCS but more frequent use of vasopressors in Non-European hospitals, 30-day in-hospital mortality did not differ between regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Pazdernik
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mario Gramegna
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Allan Bohm
- National Cardiovascular Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Maria Trepa
- Centro Hospitalar Universitario do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Jamol Uzokov
- Republican Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Center of Therapy and Medical Rehabilitation, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
| | - Milica Aleksic
- Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milana Jarakovic
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hesham Refaat
- Cardiology Department, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt
- Al Jahra Hospital, Al Jahra, Kuwait
| | - Federico Guerra
- Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Vojtech Berka
- Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hauguel-Moreau M, Barthélémy O, Farhan S, Huber K, Rouanet S, Zeitouni M, Guedeney P, Hage G, Vicaut E, Zeymer U, Desch S, Thiele H, Montalescot G. Culprit lesion location and outcomes in patients with multivessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a core laboratory analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. EUROINTERVENTION 2021; 17:e418-e424. [PMID: 32894227 PMCID: PMC9725066 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-20-00561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critical culprit lesion locations (CCLL) such as left main (LM) and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) are associated with worse clinical outcome in myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock (CS). AIMS We aimed to assess whether CCLL identify a subgroup of patients with poorer prognosis when presenting with CS. METHODS In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, a core laboratory reviewed all coronary angiograms to identify CCLL. A CCLL was defined as a culprit lesion with a >70% diameter stenosis of the LM, LM equivalent (>70% diameter stenosis of both proximal LAD and proximal circumflex), proximal LAD or last remaining vessel. We evaluated the primary study endpoint of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial according to CCLL. RESULTS A total of 269 (43%) out of 626 patients eligible for this analysis had a CCLL. Death or renal replacement therapy within 30 days, death within 30 days and death within one year were significantly higher in the CCLL than in the non-CCLL group (58.4% vs 43.4%, p<0.001, 55.8% vs 39.5%, p<0.001, 61.0% vs 44.5%, p<0.001, respectively). This was consistent after adjustment for baseline and angiographic characteristics. No interaction with the randomisation group (culprit lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI) was found. CONCLUSIONS CCLL is frequent in CS and independently associated with worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the revascularisation strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01927549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Hauguel-Moreau
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 bld de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Olvier Barthélémy
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Serdar Farhan
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminen hospital and Sigmund Freund University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Michel Zeitouni
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Paul Guedeney
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Georges Hage
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Eric Vicaut
- ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière (Ap-HP), Paris, France
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Heart Centre Ludwigshafen, Department of Cardiology, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Centre Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Centre Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barthélémy O, Rouanet S, Brugier D, Vignolles N, Bertin B, Zeitouni M, Guedeney P, Hauguel-Moreau M, Hage G, Overtchouk P, Akin I, Desch S, Vicaut E, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Montalescot G. Predictive Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:144-155. [PMID: 33446307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hemodynamically stable patients, complete revascularization (CR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a better prognosis in chronic and acute coronary syndromes. OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the extent, severity, and prognostic value of remaining coronary stenoses following PCI, by using the residual SYNTAX score (rSS), in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS The CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) trial compared a multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) strategy with a culprit lesion-only PCI (CLO-PCI) strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who presented with MI-related CS. The rSS was assessed by a central core laboratory. The study group was divided in 4 subgroups according to tertiles of rSS of the participants, thereby isolating patients with an rSS of 0 (CR). The predictive value of rSS for the 30-day primary endpoint (mortality or severe renal failure) and for 30-day and 1-year mortality was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Among the 587 patients with an rSS available, the median rSS was 9.0 (interquartile range: 3.0 to 17.0); 102 (17.4%), 100 (17.0%), 196 (33.4%), and 189 (32.2%) patients had rSS = 0, 0 < rSS ≤5, 5 < rSS ≤14, and rSS >14, respectively. CR was achieved in 75 (25.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3% to 30.5%) and 27 (9.3%; 95% CI: 6.2% to 13.3%) of patients treated using the MV-PCI and CLO-PCI strategies, respectively. After multiple adjustments, rSS was independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio per 10 units: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.01) and 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio per 10 units: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.07). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with multivessel disease and MI-related CS, CR is achieved only in one-fourth of the patients treated using an MV-PCI strategy. and the residual SYNTAX score is independently associated with early and late mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Barthélémy
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | | | - Delphine Brugier
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Vignolles
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Bertin
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Michel Zeitouni
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Paul Guedeney
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Marie Hauguel-Moreau
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Georges Hage
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Pavel Overtchouk
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- First Department of Medicine, Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Leipzig Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Eric Vicaut
- ACTION Study Group, Clinical Research Unit, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Leipzig Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166 Cardiology Institute, University of the Sorbonne, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paradies V, Waldeyer C, Laforgia PL, Clemmensen P, Smits PC. Completeness of revascularisation in acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel disease. EUROINTERVENTION 2021; 17:193-201. [PMID: 34167938 PMCID: PMC9725070 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-20-00957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
A significant proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have multivessel disease (MVD). Despite the abundance of clinical trials in this area, several questions regarding the procedure of complete coronary revascularisation remain unanswered. This state-of-the-art review summarises the latest evidence on complete revascularisation (CR) in this subset of patients and critically appraises clinical decision making based on non-culprit lesion (NCL) assessment. Future areas of research are put into perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Paradies
- Department of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Multivessel Intervention in Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial Outcomes in the PL-ACS Registry. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091832. [PMID: 33922373 PMCID: PMC8122818 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was a comparison of culprit-lesion-only (CL-PCI) with the multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) in terms of 30-day and 12-month mortality in a national registry. Methods: Patients from the PL-ACS registry with MI and CS were analyzed. Patients meeting the criteria of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were divided into two groups: CL-PCI and MV-PCI groups. Results: Of the 3265 patients in the PL-ACS registry with MI complicated by CS, the criteria of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were met by 2084 patients (63.8%). The CL-PCI was performed in 883 patients, and MV-PCI was performed in 1045 patients. After the propensity score matching analysis, 617 well-matched pairs were obtained. In a 30-day follow-up, death from any cause occurred in 49.3% in the CL-PCI group and 57.0% in the MV-PCI group (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.58–0.92, p = 0.0081). After 12 months, the rate of mortality was 62.5% in the CL-PCI group and 68.0% in the MV-PCI group (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84–1.01, p = 0.066). Conclusions: The results confirm the validity of CULPRIT-SHOCK findings in a national registry and current guideline-recommended strategy of revascularization limited to the infarct-related artery.
Collapse
|
26
|
Schibilsky D, Delmas C, Bonello L, Hunziker P. Cardioprotective shock management: monitoring and supportive therapies. Eur Heart J Suppl 2021; 23:A3-A9. [PMID: 33815008 PMCID: PMC8005889 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/suab001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is a highly lethal syndrome, leading to rapid death or secondary multiorgan damage, but current shock therapies, including mechanical support devices, also have a significant side effect profile. The overarching goal of shock therapy is ensuring long-term survival with good quality of life. This implies averting death, modifying the disease course by promoting heart recovery and avoiding additional cardiac damage, protecting other organs, and circumventing complications. Monitoring and supportive therapies are subordinate to these goals. Rather than merely following preconceived notions, the rapid evolution in mechanical support technology requires iterative and critical review of the benefits of current procedures, protocols and drugs in view of their overall contribution to the therapeutic goals. This article discusses various monitoring and supportive pharmaceutical modalities typically used in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Schibilsky
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heartcenter Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University Freiburg, Breisacher Str. 153, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Clement Delmas
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Laurent Bonello
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Patrick Hunziker
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 5, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Complete Revascularization in Patients With STEMI and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Beneficial? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-020-00887-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
28
|
Impact of chronic total occlusion and revascularization strategy in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: A subanalysis of the culprit-shock trial. Am Heart J 2021; 232:185-193. [PMID: 33253678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of coronary artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) and its management with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI) related cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. METHODS This is a pre-specified analysis from the culprit-lesion-only PCI vs multivessel PCI in CS (CULPRIT-SHOCK) trial which randomized patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS to a culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI strategy. CTO was defined by central core-laboratory evaluation. The independent associations between the presence of CTO and adverse outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were assessed using multivariate logistics models. RESULTS A noninfarct related CTO was present in 157 of 667 (23.5%) analyzed patients. Patients presenting with CTO had more frequent diabetes mellitus or prior PCI but less frequently presented with ST segment elevation MI as index event. The presence of CTO was associated with higher rate of death at 30 days (adjusted Odds ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.60). Rate of death at 1 year was also increased but did not reach statistical significance (adjusted Odds ratio 1.62; 95%CI 0.99-2.66). Compare to immediate multivessel PCI, a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI was associated with lower rates of death or renal replacement therapy at 30 days in patients with and without CTO (Odds ratio 0.79 95%CI 0.42-1.49 and Odds ratio 0.67 95%CI 0.48-0.96, respectively), without significant interaction (P = .68). CONCLUSIONS In patients with MI-related CS and multivessel disease, the presence of CTO is associated with adverse outcomes while a strategy of culprit-lesion-only PCI seems beneficial regardless of the presence of CTO.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kochar A, Varshney AS, Wang DE. Residual SYNTAX Score After Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock: When Is Complete Complete? J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:156-158. [PMID: 33446308 PMCID: PMC8244621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ajar Kochar
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Anubodh S Varshney
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David E Wang
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clinical Outcomes According to ECG Presentations in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the Culprit Lesion Only PCI vs Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock Trial. Chest 2020; 159:1415-1425. [PMID: 33248059 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of ECG presentations of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cardiogenic shock is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION In myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, is there a difference in the outcomes and effect of revascularization strategies between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and left bundle branch block myocardial infarction (LBBBMI) vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Cardiogenic shock patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with NSTEMI or LBBBMI were compared with STEMI patients for 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality. The interaction between ECG presentation and the effect of revascularization strategies on outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS Of 665 cardiogenic shock patients analyzed, 55.9% demonstrated STEMI, 29.3% demonstrated NSTEMI, and 14.7% demonstrated LBBBMI. Patients differed in mean age (68.0 years in STEMI patients, 71.0 years in NSTEMI patients, and 73.5 years in LBBBMI patients; P = .015), cardiovascular risk factors, and angiographic severity. No difference was found in the 30-day risk of death between NSTEMI and STEMI patients (48.7% vs 43.0%; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.67; P = .85), nor between LBBBMI and STEMI patients (59.2% vs 43.0%; aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.73-2.34; P = .36). Although the univariate risk of death by 1 year was higher in NSTEMI and LBBBMI patients compared with STEMI patients, ECG presentation was not an independent risk factor of mortality after adjustment (NSTEMI vs STEMI: 56.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.76-1.92; P = .42; LBBBMI vs STEMI: 69.4% vs 46.8%; aOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.89-2.84; P = .12). ECG presentation did not modify the effect of the revascularization strategy on 30-day and 1-year mortality (P = .91 and P = .97 for interaction). INTERPRETATION In patients with cardiogenic shock, NSTEMI and LBBBMI presentations reflect higher-risk profiles than STEMI presentations, but are not independent risk factors of mortality. ECG presentations did not modify the treatment effect, supporting culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention as the preferred strategy across the AMI spectrum.
Collapse
|
31
|
Robles-Zurita JA, Briggs A, Rana D, Quayyum Z, Oldroyd KG, Zeymer U, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S, Thiele H. Economic evaluation of culprit lesion only PCI vs. immediate multivessel PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2020; 21:1197-1209. [PMID: 33029668 PMCID: PMC7561561 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01235-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial compared two treatment strategies for patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: (a) culprit vessel only percutaneous coronary intervention (CO-PCI), with additional staged revascularisation if indicated, and (b) immediate multivessel PCI (MV-PCI). METHODS A German societal and national health service perspective was considered for three different analyses. The cost utility analysis (CUA) estimated costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) based on a pre-trial decision analytic model taking a lifelong time horizon. In addition, a within trial CUA estimated QALYs and costs for 1 year. Finally, the cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) used the composite primary outcome, mortality and renal failure at 30-day follow-up, and the within trial costs. Econometric and survival analysis on the trial data was used for the estimation of the model parameters. Subgroup analysis was performed following an economic protocol. RESULTS The lifelong CUA showed an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), CO-PCI vs. MV-PCI, of €7010 per QALY and a probability of CO-PCI being the most cost-effective strategy > 64% at a €30,000 threshold. The ICER for the within trial CUA was €14,600 and the incremental cost per case of death/renal failure avoided at 30-day follow-up was €9010. Cost-effectiveness improved with patient age and for those without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The estimates of cost-effectiveness for CO-PCI vs. MV-PCI have been shown to change depending on the time horizon and type of economic evaluation performed. The results favoured a long-term horizon analysis for avoiding underestimation of QALY gains from the CO-PCI arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Antonio Robles-Zurita
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
| | - Andrew Briggs
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Dikshyanta Rana
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK
| | - Zahidul Quayyum
- BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Keith G Oldroyd
- West of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Klinikum Ludwigshafen and Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sag CM, Zeymer U, Ouarrak T, Schneider S, Montalescot G, Huber K, Fuernau G, Freund A, Feistritzer HJ, Desch S, Thiele H, Maier LS. Effects of ON-Hours Versus OFF-Hours Admission on Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Results From the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:e009562. [PMID: 32883104 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.120.009562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is highly complex, and outcomes may depend on the time of hospital admission and subsequent intervention (ie, ON-hours versus OFF-hours). The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) demonstrated superior outcome for culprit-lesion-only versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel disease, and cardiogenic shock. However, it is unknown whether the time of hospital admission affects the overall outcome of these high-risk patients. METHODS We analyzed patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with respect to the time of hospital admission. We divided patients in ON-hours and OFF-hours groups and further stratified them according to their individual revascularization strategy. Outcome measures consisted of a composite end point of death or renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and mortality within 1 year. RESULTS Out of 686 patients randomized in the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, 444 patients (64.7%) presented during ON-hours, whereas 242 patients (35.3%) presented during OFF-hours. Death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days occurred to a similar extent in patients admitted during ON-hours (51.0%) and OFF-hours (50.0%; P=0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality was not affected by the time of hospital admission (54.4% ON-hours versus 51.7% OFF-hours, P=0.49). Regardless of admission time, patients had a benefit from culprit-lesion-only as compared to immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The composite end point at 30 days occurred in 45.1% versus 57.6% of patients admitted ON-hours and in 47.7% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (Pinteraction=0.29). Death within 1 year occurred in 49.4% versus 60.0% of patients admitted during ON-hours and in 51.4% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (Pinteraction=0.20). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, the risk of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days, and mortality at 1 year did not differ significantly according to the time of hospital admission. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01927549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Martin Sag
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany (C.M.S., L.S.M.)
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Institut fuer Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., T.O., S.S.)
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Institut fuer Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., T.O., S.S.)
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Institut fuer Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., T.O., S.S.)
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- Sorbonne University, ACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Paris, France (G.M.)
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria (K.H.)
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Luebeck, Germany (G.F.)
| | - Anne Freund
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (A.F., H.-J.F., S.D., H.T., L.S.M.)
| | - Hans-Josef Feistritzer
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (A.F., H.-J.F., S.D., H.T., L.S.M.)
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (A.F., H.-J.F., S.D., H.T., L.S.M.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (A.F., H.-J.F., S.D., H.T., L.S.M.)
| | - Lars S Maier
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany (C.M.S., L.S.M.).,Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (A.F., H.-J.F., S.D., H.T., L.S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vergara R, Vignini E, Ciabatti M, Migliorini A, Valenti R, Antoniucci D. Long-Term Mortality Comparison of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock and Treated With Culprit-Only or Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2020; 22:10-15. [PMID: 32605903 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine whether, in a real word context of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), multivessel disease (MVD) and cardiogenic shock (CS), the successful treatment with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) of only culprit lesions (OC-PCI) is associated with better long-term mortality rates than multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) of all significant lesions. METHODS From our registry of all consecutive patients admitted for AMI between January 1995 and December 2016 we selected those presenting with CS and MVD successfully treated with p-PCI, and compared those who underwent OC-PCI against MV-PCI, either during the p-PCI (MV-pPCI) or by staged revascularization (Staged-PCI) during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause death. RESULTS Among 4210 patients with AMI, 406 (9.6%) presented CS (Killip class IV). A total of 292 patients had MVD. Of them, 252 (86.3%) were successfully treated with p-PCI, 159 patients with OC-PCI and 93 with MV-PCI, either in the same (n = 29) or staged procedure (n = 64). At 2-year follow-up the overall mortality was 47.6%, lower in MV-PCI group (37.6% vs 53.5% in OC-PCI, p = 0.019). Diabetes (HR = 1.50, 1.01-2.22), three vessel disease (HR = 1.49, 1.02-2.17) and basal left ventricular ejection fraction <15% (HR = 3.39, 2.41-6.27) were independent predictors of mortality, while MV-PCI was the only variable associated with improved survival (HR = 0.54, 0.36-0.81). CONCLUSIONS In this real world registry of AMI patients with MVD presenting CS, MV-PCI was associated with better long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Vergara
- Division of Cardiology, Careggi-Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Elisa Vignini
- Division of Cardiology, Careggi-Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Renato Valenti
- Division of Cardiology, Careggi-Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Guedeney P, Thiele H, Kerneis M, Barthélémy O, Baumann S, Sandri M, de Waha-Thiele S, Fuernau G, Rouanet S, Piek JJ, Landmesser U, Hauguel-Moreau M, Zeitouni M, Silvain J, Lattuca B, Windecker S, Collet JP, Desch S, Zeymer U, Montalescot G, Akin I. Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Am Heart J 2020; 225:60-68. [PMID: 32497906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use and impact of transradial artery access (TRA) compared to transfemoral artery access (TFA) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS were randomized to a strategy of culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI. Arterial access was left at operator's discretion. Adjudicated outcomes of interest were the composite of death or renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between the arterial access and outcomes. RESULTS Among the 673 analyzed patients, TRA and TFA were successfully performed in 118 (17.5%) and 555 (82.5%) patients, respectively. Compared to TFA, TRA was associated with a lower 30-day rate of death or RRT (37.3% vs 53.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.96), a lower 30-day rate of death (34.7% vs 49.7%; aOR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96), and a lower 30-day rate of RRT (5.9% vs 15.9%; aOR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). No significant differences were observed regarding the 30-day risks of type 3 or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding and stroke. The observed reduction of death or RRT and death with TRA was no longer significant at 1 year (44.9% vs 57.8%; aOR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.50-1.45 and 42.4% vs 55.5%, aOR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.46-1.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS, TRA may be associated with improved early outcomes, although the reason for this finding needs further research.
Collapse
|
35
|
Prognostic Impact of Active Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction, Results from the Culprit-Shock Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061976. [PMID: 32599815 PMCID: PMC7356113 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the use and prognostic impact of active mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in a large prospective contemporary cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND Although increasingly used in clinical practice, data on the efficacy and safety of active MCS devices in patients with CS complicating AMI are limited. METHODS This is a predefined subanalysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized trial and prospective registry. Patients with CS, AMI and multivessel coronary artery disease were categorized in two groups: (1) use of at least one active MCS device vs. (2) no active MCS or use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) only. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or renal replacement therapy at 30 days. RESULTS Two hundred of 1055 (19%) patients received at least one active MCS device (n = 112 Impella®; n = 95 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); n = 6 other devices). The primary endpoint occurred significantly more often in patients treated with active MCS devices compared with those without active MCS devices (142 of 197, 72% vs. 374 of 827, 45%; p < 0.001). All-cause mortality and bleeding rates were significantly higher in the active MCS group (all p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the use of active MCS was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-5.9; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, active MCS devices were used in approximately one fifth of patients. Patients treated with active MCS devices showed worse outcome at 30 days and 1 year.
Collapse
|
36
|
Freund A, Jobs A, Lurz P, Feistritzer HJ, de Waha-Thiele S, Meyer-Saraei R, Montalescot G, Huber K, Noc M, Windecker S, Zeymer U, Ouarrak T, Schneider S, Thiele H, Desch S. Frequency and Impact of Bleeding on Outcome in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:1182-1193. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
37
|
Prognostic Value of SYNTAX Score in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:1198-1206. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
38
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cardiogenic shock remains beside sudden cardiac death the most outcome relevant complication of acute myocardial infarction. Over the last two decades as confirmation of the benefit of early revascularization no further relevant improvement in outcome could be achieved. Biomarkers are important for diagnosis, monitoring, and management in cardiogenic shock patients. RECENT FINDINGS A bunch of different biomarkers have been associated with prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock. In routine use standard parameters such as serum lactate or serum creatinine are still most important in monitoring these patients. These established markers outperformed novel markers in prognostic impact in recent trials. SUMMARY Biomarkers serve as important treatment targets and may help physicians in therapeutic decision-making. Furthermore, the complex pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock may be better understood by investigation of different biomarkers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Outcomes Associated with Respiratory Failure for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030860. [PMID: 32245139 PMCID: PMC7141492 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infraction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the provision of MV in this specific high-risk population. METHODS Patients with CS complicating AMI and multivessel coronary artery disease from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial were included. We explored 30 days of clinical outcomes in patients not requiring MV, those with MV on admission, and those in whom MV was initiated within the first day after admission. RESULTS Among 683 randomized patients included in the analysis, 17.4% received no MV, 59.7% were ventilated at admission and 22.8% received MV within or after the first day after admission. Patients requiring MV had a different risk-profile. Factors independently associated with the provision of MV on admission included higher body weight, resuscitation within 24 h before admission, elevated heart rate and evidence of triple vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS Requiring MV in patients with CS complicating AMI is common and independently associated with mortality after adjusting for covariates. Patients with delayed MV initiation appear to be at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify the optimal timing of MV in this high-risk population.
Collapse
|
40
|
Rubini Gimenez M, Zeymer U, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S, Ouarrak T, Poess J, Meyer-Saraei R, Schneider S, Fuernau G, Stepinska J, Huber K, Windecker S, Montalescot G, Savonitto S, Jeger RV, Thiele H. Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:e008537. [PMID: 32151161 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.119.008537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are more likely to suffer and die from cardiogenic shock (CS) as the most severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. Data concerning optimal management for women with CS are scarce. Aim of this study was to better define characteristics of women experiencing CS and to the influence of sex on different treatment strategies. METHODS In the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (The Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock), patients with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to one of the following revascularization strategies: either percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary end point was composite of death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30 days. We investigated sex-specific differences in general and according to the revascularization strategies. RESULTS Among all 686 randomized patients included in the analysis, 24% were women. Women were older and had more often diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency, whereas they had less often history of previous acute myocardial infarction and smoking. After 30 days, the primary clinical end point was not significantly different between groups (56% women versus 49% men; odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.91-1.84]; P=0.15). There was no interaction between sex and coronary revascularization strategy regarding mortality and renal failure (Pinteraction=0.11). The primary end point occurred in 56% of women treated by the culprit-lesion-only strategy versus 42% men, whereas 55% of women and 55% of men in the multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention group. CONCLUSIONS Although women presented with a different risk profile, mortality and renal replacement were similar to men. Sex did not influence mortality and renal failure according to the different coronary revascularization strategies. Based on these data, women and men presenting with CS complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease should not be treated differently. However, further randomized trials powered to address potential sex-specific differences in CS are still necessary. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01927549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rubini Gimenez
- From the Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Germany (M.R.G., S.D., H.T.).,Cardiology Department, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (M.R.G., R.V.J.)
| | | | - Steffen Desch
- From the Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Germany (M.R.G., S.D., H.T.).,German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany (S.D., R.M.-S., G.F.)
| | - Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology/ Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Germany (S.d.W.-T., J.P., R.M.-S., G.F.)
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (T.O., S.S.)
| | - Janine Poess
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology/ Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Germany (S.d.W.-T., J.P., R.M.-S., G.F.)
| | - Roza Meyer-Saraei
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany (S.D., R.M.-S., G.F.).,Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology/ Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Germany (S.d.W.-T., J.P., R.M.-S., G.F.)
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (T.O., S.S.)
| | - Georg Fuernau
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany (S.D., R.M.-S., G.F.).,Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology/ Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Germany (S.d.W.-T., J.P., R.M.-S., G.F.)
| | | | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminenhospital and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria (K.H.)
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland (S.W.)
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- Department of Cardiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut de Cardiologie (AP-HP), hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France (G.M.)
| | | | - Raban V Jeger
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland (M.R.G., R.V.J.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- From the Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Germany (M.R.G., S.D., H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chen J, He Y, Hao Y, Yu X, Zhang G, Zhu J, Yao Y. Transthoracic echocardiography compared with coronary angiography for patients with cardiogenic shock: A prospective cohort study. Exp Ther Med 2019; 18:4698-4706. [PMID: 31772642 PMCID: PMC6861891 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is the most severe form of acute heart failure. The aim of the current study was to investigate correlations between diagnostic parameters and the estimated ejection fraction in patients with cardiogenic shock. A total of 2,445 patients with acute myocardial infarction were subjected to coronary angiograms and standard 2D transthoracic echocardiography. Information for culprit vessel(s) and mitral regurgitation were collected. The Spearman's correlation test was used to assess the correlation between diagnostic parameters and estimated ejection fractions at a 95% confidence level. The angiographically-derived numbers of culprit vessels had a significant correlation with mitral regurgitation (r=0.907; P=0.034). The echocardiographically-derived mitral regurgitation was significantly correlated with the numbers of culprit vessels (r=0.896; P=0.04). Positive correlation was established between angiographically- and echocardiographically-measured left ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.356; P=0.045). The numbers of culprit vessels (P=0.058) and mitral regurgitation (r=0.99; P=0.001) were similar for angiography and echocardiography. Echocardiography- and angiography-derived results were correlated with the estimated ejection fractions of patients with cardiogenic shock. However, there is a substantial difference in the procedures of the two operational techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianmei Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P.R. China
| | - Yanping He
- Department of Intensive Care, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 400021, P.R. China
| | - Yuanyuan Hao
- Department of The Functional Check, Hospital of Beijing The Hui People, Beijing 100853, P.R. China
| | - Xie Yu
- Department of Intensive Care, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 400021, P.R. China
| | - Guifang Zhang
- Department of Intensive Care, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 400021, P.R. China
| | - Jun Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 400021, P.R. China
| | - Yonggang Yao
- Department of Intensive Care, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing 400021, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zeitouni M, Barthélémy O, Hauguel-Moreau M, Guedeney P, Rouanet S, Hage G, Overtchouk P, Brugier D, Vignolles N, Kerneis M, Silvain J, Collet JP, Vicaut E, Desch S, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Montalescot G. Investigator Versus Core Laboratory Evaluation of Coronary Flow and Related Mortality in the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:e008296. [DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.119.008296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Zeitouni
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Olivier Barthélémy
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Marie Hauguel-Moreau
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Paul Guedeney
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | | | - Georges Hage
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Pavel Overtchouk
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Delphine Brugier
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Nicolas Vignolles
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Mathieu Kerneis
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Johanne Silvain
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Jean-Philippe Collet
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | - Eric Vicaut
- ACTION Study Group, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpital Lariboisière (AP-HP), Paris, France (E.V.)
| | - Steffen Desch
- Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Germany (S.D., H.T.)
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (S.D., H.T.)
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Germany (S.D., H.T.)
- Leipzig Heart Institute, Germany (S.D., H.T.)
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION (Allies in Cardiovascular Trials Initiatives and Organized Networks) Study Group, INSERM UMRS_1166, Institut de cardiologie (Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris), Paris, France (M.Z., O.B., M.H.-M., P.G., G.H., P.O., D.B., N.V., M.K., J.S., J.-P.C., G.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wijntjens GW, Fengler K, Fuernau G, Jung C, den Uil C, Akin S, van de Hoef TP, Šerpytis R, Diletti R, Henriques JP, Šerpytis P, Thiele H, Piek JJ. Prognostic implications of microcirculatory perfusion versus macrocirculatory perfusion in cardiogenic shock: a CULPRIT-SHOCK substudy. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2019; 9:108-119. [PMID: 31517505 DOI: 10.1177/2048872619870035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After early revascularisation, restoration of macrocirculatory perfusion parameters is the primary objective in the management of cardiogenic shock complicated acute myocardial infarction. Nevertheless, vital organ perfusion may be compromised at the systemic microcirculatory level, even in patients with preserved macrohaemodynamics. Microvascular perfusion was shown to have independent prognostic value for early mortality. The present study aims to compare the prognostic value of microcirculatory versus macrocirculatory perfusion parameters. METHODS This substudy of the culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock (CULPRIT-SHOCK) trial examined the sublingual capillary network using videomicroscopy post-percutaneous coronary intervention to determine the proportion of perfused capillaries (<20 µm) and perfused capillary density. Thirty-day follow-up was performed to obtain the occurrence of a combined clinical endpoint of all-cause death and renal replacement therapy. RESULTS Videomicroscopy measurements were performed in 66 patients. There was a significant adjusted association between microcirculatory perfusion parameters and the combined clinical endpoint (proportion of perfused capillaries: P=0.020; perfused capillary density: P=0.035), whereas there was no significant adjusted association between macrocirculatory perfusion parameters and the combined clinical endpoint (systolic blood pressure: P=0.205). Normotensive patients with compromised microcirculatory perfusion parameters had a higher risk of the combined clinical endpoint than normotensive patients with preserved microcirculatory perfusion parameters (proportion of perfused capillaries: Breslow P=0.014; perfused capillary density: Breslow P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS There is a significant and independent association between microcirculatory perfusion parameters perfused capillary density and proportion of perfused capillaries and the combined clinical endpoint of all-cause death and renal replacement therapy at 30 days follow-up. In patients with loss of haemodynamic coherence between microcirculatory and macrocirculatory perfusion parameters, microcirculatory perfusion parameters confer dominant prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karl Fengler
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University Hospital, Germany
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University of Luebeck, Germany
| | - Christian Jung
- Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Corstiaan den Uil
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Sakir Akin
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands.,Department of Intensive Care, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Tim P van de Hoef
- Heart Center, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, The Netherlands
| | - Rokas Šerpytis
- Clinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Vilnius University, Lithuania
| | - Roberto Diletti
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - José Ps Henriques
- Heart Center, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, The Netherlands
| | - Pranas Šerpytis
- Clinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Vilnius University, Lithuania
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University Hospital, Germany
| | - Jan J Piek
- Heart Center, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Udesen NJ, Møller JE, Lindholm MG, Eiskjær H, Schäfer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Wachtell K, Thiele H, Engstrøm T, Hassager C. Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial. Am Heart J 2019; 214:60-68. [PMID: 31176289 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The DanGer Shock trial test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) mechanical circulatory support with Impella CP transvalvular microaxial flow pump improves survival in patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) compared to conventional guideline-driven treatment. This paper describes the rationale and design of the randomized trial, in addition to the baseline characteristics of the population screened and enrolled so far. METHODS The DanGer Shock study is a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial in patients with AMICS randomized 1:1 to Impella CP or current guideline-driven therapy with planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients comatose after out of hospital cardiac arrest are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized immediately following shock diagnosis. Among patients randomized to receive Impella CP, the device is placed prior to angioplasty. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality at 180 days. Baseline characteristics of patients screened and randomized in the DanGer Shock as of June 2018 are compared with 2 contemporary AMICS studies. RESULTS As of end of June 2018, 314 patients were screened and 100 patients were randomized. Patients had median arterial lactate of 5.5 mmol/L (interquartile range 3.7-8.8 mmol/L), median systolic blood pressure of 76 mmHg (interquartile range 70-88 mmHg), and median LV ejection fraction of 20% (interquartile range 10%-30%). CONCLUSION The DanGer Shock trial will be the first adequately powered randomized trial to address whether mechanical circulatory LV support with Impella CP can improve survival in AMICS. Baseline characteristics of the first 100 randomized patients indicate a population in profound cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Junker Udesen
- Department of Cardiology and Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jacob Eifer Møller
- Department of Cardiology and Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | | | - Hans Eiskjær
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andreas Schäfer
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany
| | - Nikos Werner
- Department of Cardiology, Universitaetsklinikum Bonn - I. Medizinische Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lene Holmvang
- Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lisette Okkels Jensen
- Department of Cardiology and Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Junker
- Department of Cardiology and Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Schmidt
- Department of Cardiology and Anesthesiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Thomas Engstrøm
- Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Hassager
- Heart Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Feistritzer HJ, Desch S, Zeymer U, Fuernau G, de Waha-Thiele S, Dudek D, Huber K, Stepinska J, Schneider S, Ouarrak T, Thiele H. Prognostic Impact of Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:e007661. [DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.118.007661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Josef Feistritzer
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (H.-J.F., S.D., H.T.)
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (H.-J.F., S.D., H.T.)
| | - Uwe Zeymer
- Klinik für Innere Medizin/Kardiologie, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z.)
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., S.S., T.O.)
| | - Georg Fuernau
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (G.F., S.d.W.-T.)
| | - Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (G.F., S.d.W.-T.)
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Second Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital Krakow, Poland (D.D.)
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria (K.H.)
| | | | - Steffen Schneider
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., S.S., T.O.)
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany (U.Z., S.S., T.O.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (H.-J.F., S.D., H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of critical end-organ hypoperfusion primarily due to cardiac dysfunction. This condition is the most common cause of death in patients affected by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Despite early revascularization, prompt optimal medical therapy, and up-to-date mechanical circulatory supports, mortality of patients with CS remains high.The objective of this review is to summarize epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options of CS in light of the new European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations. The latest European guidelines on myocardial revascularization have reviewed the previous guidelines with respect to early multivessel revascularization and routine use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with AMI-related CS.Most of the current evidences come partly from randomized trials, but mostly from observational registries because of the difficulty to test different treatments in this life-threatening clinical setting.Some of the latest studies highlight the potential crucial benefit of newly introduced mechanical circulatory support devices, although evidences are not sufficient to definitely assess the benefit/risk ratio of the different systems.Many questions remain unanswered in this field, and further trials are advocated to better elucidate the best medical, reperfusion, and circulatory support approaches aimed to improve the poor prognosis of patients with CS after AMI.
Collapse
|
47
|
Xenogiannis I, Tajti P, Burke MN, Chavez I, Gössl M, Mooney M, Poulose A, Sorajja P, Traverse J, Wang Y, Brilakis ES. Coronary revascularization and use of hemodynamic support in acute coronary syndromes. Hellenic J Cardiol 2019; 60:165-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|
48
|
[Acute myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : ESC guidelines 2017]. Herz 2019; 42:728-738. [PMID: 29119223 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-017-4641-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
This article gives an update on the management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) according to the recently released European Society of Cardiology guidelines 2017 and the modifications are compared to the previous STEMI guidelines from 2012. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains the preferred reperfusion strategy. New guideline recommendations relate to the access site with a clear preference for the radial artery, use of drug-eluting stents over bare metal stents, complete revascularization during the index hospitalization, and avoidance of routine thrombus aspiration. For periprocedural anticoagulation during PCI, bivalirudin has been downgraded. Oxygen treatment should be administered only if oxygen saturation is <90%. In cardiogenic shock, intra-aortic balloon pumps should no longer be used. New recommendations are in place with respect to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients without bleeding events during the first 12 months. Newly introduced sections cover myocardial infarction with no relevant stenosis of the coronary arteries (MINOCA), the introduction of new indicators for quality of care for myocardial infarction networks and new definitions for the time to reperfusion.
Collapse
|
49
|
Souza Júnior JMD, Kulchetscki RM, Linhares Filho JPP, Lima EG, Serrano Junior CV. CULPRIT-SHOCK study. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2019; 64:783-786. [PMID: 30672997 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.09.783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction concomitant with the presence of multivessel disease has been studied in several recent studies with the purpose of defining the need, as well as the best moment to approach residual lesions. However, such studies included only stable patients. The best therapeutic approach to cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome, however, remains controversial, but there are recommendations from specialists for revascularization that include non-event related injuries. Recently published, the CULPRIT-SHOCK study showed benefit of the initial approach only of the injury blamed for the acute event, in view of the multivessel percutaneous intervention, in the context of cardiogenic shock. In this perspective, the authors discuss the work in question, regarding methodological questions, limitations and clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rodrigo Melo Kulchetscki
- . Cardiology Residents of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Gomes Lima
- . Department of Atherosclerosis, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fuernau G, Beck J, Desch S, Eitel I, Jung C, Erbs S, Mangner N, Lurz P, Fengler K, Jobs A, Vonthein R, de Waha-Thiele S, Sandri M, Schuler G, Thiele H. Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2019; 139:448-457. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.032722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Fuernau
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T), University of Luebeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung [DZHK]), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T)
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Johannes Beck
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Steffen Desch
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T), University of Luebeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung [DZHK]), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T)
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Ingo Eitel
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T), University of Luebeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung [DZHK]), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T)
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Christian Jung
- Medical Faculty, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany (C.J.)
| | - Sandra Erbs
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Norman Mangner
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Philipp Lurz
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Karl Fengler
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Alexander Jobs
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T), University of Luebeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung [DZHK]), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T)
| | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics and Center for Clinical Trials (R.V.), University of Luebeck, Germany
| | - Suzanne de Waha-Thiele
- Medical Clinic II (Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine), University Heart Center Luebeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T), University of Luebeck, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung [DZHK]), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Luebeck, Germany (G.F., S.D., I.E., A.J., S.d.W.-T)
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Marcus Sandri
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Gerhard Schuler
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig–University Hospital, Germany (G.F., J.B., S.D., I.E., S.E., N.M., P.L., K.F., S.d.W.-T, M.S., G.S., H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|