Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and risk of coronary events in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort study

Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is inversely associated with mortality in a UK population of cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Significant advancements in treatment and care, as well as early detection, have contributed to an increase in cancer survival rates. Recently, the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health proposed the "planetary health diet" but to date, no study has investigated the potential associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality in cancer survivors. To determine whether higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower risk for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

METHODS

Data from the prospective UK Biobank study were used. Information from UK Biobank's Touchscreen questionnaire was used to develop a score reflecting adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet reference diet score with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

RESULTS

Within 25,348 cancer survivors, better adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was inversely related to all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-0.99), 1 unit increase) and cancer mortality (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00), while mostly null associations were observed for major cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest the adoption of the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.

Adherence to EAT-Lancet diet, biological aging, and life expectancy in the UK Biobank: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet diet was proposed to nurture human health and support environmental sustainability. However, the interactions between EAT-Lancet diet, biological aging, and life expectancy have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the associations of adherence to EAT-Lancet diet pattern with biological aging and life expectancy, as well as the potential modifying effect of genetic susceptibility.

METHODS

Data from the UK Biobank cohort study were analyzed. The EAT-Lancet diet index was calculated using 24-h dietary recall data to assess adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were constructed to evaluate genetic risk of biological aging. Multivariable linear regression and flexible parametric survival models were used to investigate the association of EAT-Lancet diet index with biological aging acceleration and with residual life expectancy, respectively. Mediation analysis was used to identify potential mediators.

RESULTS

Among 141,562 included participants (56.02 ± 7.94 y; 45.12% male), those with higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet were significantly associated with a slower pace of biological aging [for Stubbendorff EAT-Lancet diet index: KDM-BA acceleration: -1.37 y, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.51, -1.24; PhenoAge acceleration: -0.93 y, 95% CI: -1.00, -0.86; comparing extreme quartiles, both P < 0.001]. At age 45, participants with the highest adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet also gained 1.13 y of life expectancy than those with the lowest adherence. Similar patterns were observed when we used the Knuppel EAT-Lancet diet index. Adiposity indices, particularly waist-to-height ratio, mediated 29.31%-35.40% of this association. No significant interaction was found between EAT-Lancet diet and genetic risks. The protective effects remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses and across different subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is linked to delayed biological aging and increased life expectancy, regardless of genetic predisposition. This suggests that promoting this sustainable dietary pattern could serve as a practical nutritional strategy for enhancing healthy longevity.

Temporal trends in the planetary health diet index and its association with cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic diseases: A comprehensive analysis from global and individual perspectives

BACKGROUND

Diet plays a critical role in human health and environmental sustainability, particularly in cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic (CKM) diseases. However, the variations in the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) across populations, regions, and over time, as well as its association with CKM disease burdens, remain insufficiently explored.

METHODS

We assessed PHDI scores using data from 185 countries (1990-2018) from the Global Dietary Database, examining demographic characteristics and temporal trends. The Global Burden of Disease Study was used to evaluate the associations between PHDI and CKM disease burdens, including incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years. CKM syndrome was defined by the American Heart Association. Individual-level data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were also used to assess the impact of PHDI on CKM risks and mortality.

RESULTS

From 1990 to 2018, while overall PHDI scores remained relatively stable between sexes, the composition of PHDI scores shifted across different age groups. In 2018, the mean PHDI score was 42.80 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 42.49-46.50) for males and 44.65 (95% UI 44.53-47.82) for females. Higher PHDI scores were observed among females, older adults, urban residents, individuals with higher education, and those from South Asia. Globally, consumption of red/processed meat, saturated oils/trans fats, and added sugars substantially exceeded the EAT-Lancet Commission's reference values. Higher PHDI scores were generally associated with lower CKM disease burdens, although these associations varied by disease subtype. In individual-level analysis, including 45,460 NHANES participants (weighted mean age: 47.21 years, 51.4% female), each 10-point increase in PHDI was linked to a 13.7% reduction in stage 3/4 CKM syndrome risk, an 11.1% reduction in stage 4 CKM syndrome risk, and lower incidences and mortality rates for cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, and chronic kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

From 1990 to 2018, significant changes occurred in the components of the PHDI, with notable variations by demographics and region. Higher PHDI scores may reduce CKM disease burdens, warranting further investigation into specific disease subtypes.

Associations of the EAT-Lancet reference diet with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and its severity: A multicohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The EAT-Lancet Commission devised a globally sustainable dietary pattern to jointly promote human health and sustainability. However, the extent to which this diet supports metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has not yet been assessed. This study aimed to investigate the association between the EAT-Lancet diet and the risk of MASLD and its severity.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This prospective multicohort study included 15,263 adults from the Tianjin Chronic Low-grade Systemic Inflammation and Health (TCLSIH) cohort, 1137 adults from the Guangzhou Nutrition and Health Study (GNHS) cohort, and 175,078 adults from the UK Biobank. In addition, 228 Chinese adults from the Prospective Epidemic Research Specifically of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (PERSONS) with biopsy-proven MASLD were included. An EAT-Lancet diet index was created to reflect adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. The TCLSIH cohort recorded 3010 MASLD cases during 53,575 person-years of follow-up, the GNHS cohort documented 624 MASLD cases during 6454 person-years of follow-up, and the UK Biobank developed 1350 MASLD cases during 1,745,432 person-years of follow-up. In multivariable models, participants in the highest tertiles of the EAT-Lancet diet index had a lower risk of MASLD compared with those in the lowest tertiles (TCLSIH: HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.96; GNHS: HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.98; UK Biobank: HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.85). Moreover, liver-controlled attenuation parameter decreased with increasing the diet index in individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD (β = -5.895; 95% CI: -10.014, -1.775).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was inversely associated with the risk of MASLD as well as its severity.

Association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and risk of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: A cohort study

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and the incidence of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 7525 individuals with T2D who were free of diabetic microvascular complications (including diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy) at baseline from the UK Biobank cohort. Dietary data were collected via a web-based 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire. The EAT-Lancet diet index, ranging from 0 to 14 points, was constructed based on the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the relationship between the EAT-Lancet diet index and the incidence of microvascular complications among individuals with T2D.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 12.58 years, 1217 participants developed diabetic microvascular complications. After adjusting for potential confounders, participants in the highest adherence group of the EAT-Lancet diet index had a significantly lower risk of developing microvascular complications (hazard ratio: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.88) compared to those in the lowest adherence group. Subtype analyses for incident diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy yielded consistent results. Additionally, each 1-point increase in the EAT-Lancet diet index was associated with an 8% lower risk of microvascular complications. These findings remained robust across several sensitivity analyses and nearly all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate a significant inverse association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and the risk of microvascular complications in individuals with T2D.

Associations between the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet and incident dementia

BACKGROUND

The impact of the environmentally sustainable EAT-Lancet diet on dementia risk remains poorly understood. The aim was to investigate associations between the EAT-Lancet diet and incident dementia.

METHODS

Associations of the EAT-Lancet diet with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD) were investigated among 25,898 participants from the Malmö Diet and Cancer study, Sweden. Participants aged 45-73 years were recruited for the baseline examination between 1991 and 1996, and the mean follow-up time was 18 years. To assess robustness of estimations, we used seven previously constructed EAT-Lancet diet scores. Multi-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed, with results presented per 10 % in increment scores. Additionally, we explored the potentially modifying effect of APOE ε4 status in this context.

RESULTS

With one of the scores, higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with a reduced risk of AD and all-cause dementia. Moreover, the results suggest an interplay between the EAT-Lancet diet and APOE ε4 status. A risk-reducing effect was observed among APOE ε4 non-carriers with three of the scores in relation to AD, and with five of the scores in relation to all-cause dementia. No associations were observed among APOE ε4 carriers, or in relation to VaD.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate a risk reducing effect of adhering to the EAT-Lancet diet among APOE ε4 non-carriers, and no negative effects on dementia risk were detected. Future studies should consider the potentially modifying effect of APOE ε4 status, and the implications of methodological differences in measuring adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet.

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet in Portugal and its associations with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors

PURPOSE

The Planetary Health Diet (PHDiet) proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission is expected to bear health and environmental benefits. This study assesses adherence to the PHDiet in Portuguese adults and its associations with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. For that, an adapted PHDiet score was computed, and its construct validated.

METHODS

Data from the National Food and Physical Activity Survey 2015-2016 were used for this analysis, covering a representative sample of 3852 adults with two non-consecutive dietary interviews (8-15 days apart). Adherence to the PHDiet was measured through a score (ranging from 0 to 140), afterwards divided into terciles (T1-T3). Multinomial regression models were used (i) to assess the construct validity through associations with diet quality based on WHO recommendations and diet environmental impact using greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and land use (LU); (ii) to investigate associations between adherence to the PHDiet and socioeconomic and lifestyle characteristics. The prevalence of consumption of PHDiet components above/below the recommendations was estimated.

RESULTS

Adherence to the PHDiet was generally low (36.0, 95% CI 35.4-36.6), with high consumption of meat and added sugars and low consumption of pulses, nuts, and whole grains. Higher PHDiet scores were found for diets with lower environmental impact (GHGE: ORT1vsT3:1.31; 95% CI 1.26; 1.37; LU: ORT1vsT3:1.25; 95% CI 1.21; 1.29), lower animal protein intake levels (ORT1vsT3:1.11; 95% CI 1.06; 1.16) and higher diet quality (ORT1vsT3:0.70; 95% CI 0.68; 0.72), verifying the construct validity. Men (ORT1vsT3:1.32; 95% CI 1.12; 1.55), intermediate-educated individuals (ORT1vsT3:1.43; 95% CI 1.16; 1.75), and those facing food insecurity (ORT1vsT3:1.79; 95% CI 1.36; 2.38) had higher odds of having lower scores.

CONCLUSION

Low adherence to the PHDiet is associated with several socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. This highlights the need to implement targeted public health policies that encourage shifts towards a healthier and more sustainable dietary pattern.

Association between planetary health diet and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study from the UK Biobank

AIMS

The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) prioritizes the well-being of both individuals and the planet but has yielded mixed results on cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between the PHDI and risk of CVD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cohort of 118 469 individuals aged 40-69 years from the UK Biobank, who were free of CVD at 2009-12 and followed up to 2021. The PHDI was calculated using at least two 24-h dietary assessments and included 14 food groups, with a possible range from 0 to 130 points. Cardiovascular disease incidence was defined as primary myocardial infarction or stroke and obtained from clinical records and death registries. During a 9.4-year follow-up, 5257 incident cases of CVD were ascertained. When comparing the highest (89.9-128.5 points) vs. the lowest (21.1-71.1 points) quartile of PHDI adherence, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 0.86 (0.79, 0.94) for CVD, 0.88 (0.80, 0.97) for myocardial infarction, and 0.82 (0.70, 0.97) for stroke. The association was linear until a plateau effect was reached at 80 points of adherence to PHDI. Results remained robust when excluding participants with type 2 diabetes, including only those with three or more diet assessments, or excluding CVD cases in the first 3 years of follow-up. The food group components of the PHDI more strongly associated with a reduced CVD risk were higher consumption of whole grains, whole fruits, and fish and lower consumption of added sugars and fruit juices.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of middle-aged and older British adults, adherence to the PHDI was associated with a lower risk of CVD. These results provide empirical evidence that this dietary pattern, thought to be environmentally sustainable, benefits cardiovascular health.

A comparative study of the EAT-Lancet diet and the Mediterranean diet in relation to neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance

BACKGROUND

The impact of the sustainable EAT-Lancet planetary health diet on brain and cognitive health remains unclear. This study compared the impact of the EAT-Lancet diet with the well-established cognitive-beneficial Mediterranean diet (MeDi) in relation to neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance among older adults.

METHODS

The study included 615 dementia-free 70-year-olds from the Swedish population-based Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort study. Dietary adherence was measured with EAT-Lancet diet and MeDi scores. Neuroimaging measures included cortical thickness, hippocampal volume, small vessel disease, and deep learning-derived brain age. Cognitive performance was assessed with a global cognitive composite score.

RESULTS

In multi-adjusted models, higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with higher total mean cortical thickness, and thicker cortex in Alzheimer's disease-signature regions, while a higher adherence to the MeDi was associated with better cognitive performance.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate the beneficial effects of both the EAT-Lancet and the MeDi on brain health.

HIGHLIGHTS

There were no indications of detrimental effects of adhering to the EAT-Lancet diet. Adhering to the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet was associated with thicker cortex. Results confirm links between the Mediterranean diet and better cognitive function.

Iron insight: exploring dietary patterns and iron deficiency among teenage girls in Sweden

PURPOSE

This observational study examined the relationship between self-reported dietary patterns-omnivore, pescatarian, vegetarian, and vegan-and iron status among Swedish teenage girls. Additionally, we compared the consumption of various food groups in relation to iron status.

METHODS

Data were collected from 475 female high school students in Malmö and Lund, Sweden, using questionnaires on dietary habits, iron supplementation, and demographic factors. Participants were classified into dietary groups: 347 omnivores, 38 pescatarians, 27 non-consumers of red meat, 60 vegetarians and 3 vegans. Blood samples were analysed for ferritin and haemoglobin levels to determine iron status. Iron deficiency was defined as ferritin < 15 µg/L, and anaemia as haemoglobin < 110 g/L if < 19 years and < 117 g/L if ≥ 19 years. ANOVA and logistic regression were used to compare biomarker levels and the prevalence of iron deficiency and anaemia across dietary groups.

RESULTS

Omnivores had the highest estimated ferritin levels (19.6 µg/L), which was significantly higher than pescatarians (14.7 µg/L, p = 0.03), and vegans/vegetarians (10.9 µg/L, p < 0.001). Overall 38.1% of participants were iron deficient. Vegetarians/vegans and pescatarians were significantly more likely to be iron deficient (69.4%, p < 0.001 and 49.4%, p-value 0.016, respectively) compared to omnivores (30.5%). Lower red meat consumption and higher intake of vegetarian patties and legumes were linked to an increased risk of iron deficiency. Anaemia prevalence (haemoglobin < 110 g/L if < 19 years and < 117 g/L if ≥ 19 years) was 3% across all dietary groups.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a higher prevalence of iron deficiency among Swedish teenage girls adhering to plant-based diets. Public health strategies should promote balanced diets that ensure adequate iron intake and absorption while considering environmental sustainability. Regular screening and targeted dietary recommendations are essential for supporting the health of this population.

Association of the EAT-Lancet diet, serial measures of serum proteome and gut microbiome, and cardiometabolic health: a prospective study of Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet diet was reported to be mutually beneficial for the human cardiometabolic system and planetary health. However, mechanistic evidence linking the EAT-Lancet diet and human cardiometabolic health is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the role of blood proteins in the association between the EAT-Lancet diet and cardiometabolic health and explore the underlying gut microbiota-blood protein interplay.

METHODS

Our study was based on a prospective cohort including 3742 Chinese participants enrolled from 2008-2013 with serum proteome data repeatedly measured ≤3 times (Nproteome = 7514) and 1195 with gut metagenomic data measured ≤2 times over 9 y (Nmicrobiota = 1695). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable linear regression were used to explore the associations of the EAT-Lancet diet (assessed by semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire) with serum proteins and gut microbes. Linear mixed-effect model and logistic regression were used to examine the associations of selected proteins with 11 cardiometabolic risk factors and 4 cardiometabolic diseases, respectively. Mediation analysis was used to identify potential mediation effects. Multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) age of enrolled participants was 58.4 (6.1) y (31.6% men). The EAT-Lancet diet was prospectively associated with 4 core proteins, including α-2-macroglobulin (A2M) (pooled β: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.2), retinol-binding protein 4 (pooled β: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24, -0.04), TBC1 domain family member 31 (pooled β: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.22, 0), and adenylate kinase 4 (pooled β: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.3, -0.08). The identified proteins were prospectively associated with cardiometabolic diseases (pooled odds ratio ranged from 0.8-1.18) and risk factors (pooled β ranged from -0.1 to 0.12), mediating the association between the EAT-Lancet diet and blood triglycerides. We then identified 5 gut microbial biomarkers of the EAT-Lancet diet, and discovered a potential gut microbiota-blood protein interplay (EAT-Lancet diet→Rothia mucilaginosa→A2M) underlying the EAT-Lancet diet-cardiometabolic health association.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents key molecular evidence to support the role of EAT-Lancet diet adherence in promoting cardiometabolic health.

How Do the Indices based on the EAT-Lancet Recommendations Measure Adherence to Healthy and Sustainable Diets? A Comparison of Measurement Performance in Adults from a French National Survey

Background

Measuring adherence to EAT-Lancet recommendations for healthy and sustainable diets is challenging, leading to diverse methods and a lack of consensus on standardized metrics. Available indices vary mainly in scoring systems, food components, units, energy adjustments, and cut-off points.

Objectives

To evaluate and compare the measurement performance of 9 dietary indices for assessing adherence to EAT-Lancet reference diet.

Methods

This cross-sectional study utilized repeated 24-h dietary recall data from 1723 adults in the French Third Individual and National Study on Food Consumption Survey (INCA3, 2014-2015). Sociodemographic, nutritional, and environmental variables were analyzed to assess the validity and reliability of dietary indices.

Results

The 4 indices assessing their food components with proportional scoring captured dietary variability, were less dependent on energy intake and converged to a large extent with nutritional indicators. Although the 3 binary indices showed a stronger correlation with environmental indicators, 1 proportional index converged with both domains. Indices had valid unidimensional structures, meaning that the combination of food components within each index accurately reflected the same construct, supporting the use of total scores. Furthermore, the indices differed between sociodemographic groups, demonstrating concurrent-criterion validity. Higher scores were associated with higher nutritional quality and lower environmental impact, but with unfavorable results for zinc intake, vitamin B12, and water use. A low concordance rate (32%-43%) indicated that indices categorized individuals differently.

Conclusions

Researchers must align study objectives with the applicability, assumptions, and significance of chosen indices. Indices using proportional scoring allow a global understanding of dietary health and sustainability, being advantageous in precision-focused research (for example, clinical trials or epidemiological research). Conversely, indices based on binary scoring offer a simplified perspective, serving as valuable tools for surveys, observational studies, and public health. Recognizing their strengths and limitations is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of diets and their implications.

The Role of the Planetary Diet in Managing Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review

Introduction: The planetary health diet, introduced by the EAT-Lancet Commission, aims to address global health and sustainability challenges by promoting a plant-based diet with reduced consumption of animal-sourced foods. This diet not only contributes to environmental sustainability but also offers significant health benefits, including prevention and management of abdominal obesity, carbohydrate metabolism disorders, dyslipidemia, and elevated blood pressure. These metabolic disorders are components of metabolic syndrome, a cluster of risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Objectives: This narrative review aims to gather the most recent findings on the impact of the planetary diet on individual components of metabolic syndrome and on the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Methods: The available research on the topic was identified via searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Results: Abdominal obesity, a major risk factor for a range of chronic diseases, can be effectively mitigated by adhering to plant-based dietary patterns, which have been shown to reduce waist circumference and improve overall cardiometabolic health. Furthermore, the planetary diet plays a crucial role in reducing the risk of type-2 diabetes and improving glycemic control, with specific dietary components such as whole grains and fiber, demonstrating positive effects on blood glucose levels. This diet is additionally associated with favorable lipid profiles, including lower levels of LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol, which are critical in the prevention of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Conclusions: These multiple benefits highlight that the planetary diet may be an effective strategy for managing and preventing metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. However, further research is needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and applicability across diverse populations.

Sustainable, planetary healthy dietary patterns are associated with lower 20-year incidence of cardiovascular disease: the ATTICA study (2002-2022)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Nutrition epidemiology research scarcely focuses on the relationship between dietary patterns that are beneficial for both planet and human health. This study aimed to examine the association between adherence to a sustainable, planetary-healthy dietary pattern, i.e., the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet (EAT-LD), and 20-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, in a Mediterranean population.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Τhe ATTICA study is a prospective cohort study with a baseline phase in 2002 and 3 consecutive follow-ups (in 2006, 2012, 2022). The EAT-Lancet Index (EAT-LI) and the MedDietScore scales were calculated based on previously published guidelines to assess the adherence to the respective dietary pattern. The current sample consisted of 1,988 Greek adults initially free-of-CVD at baseline. The development of a cardiovascular event was assessed throughout the 20-year period (WHO-ICD-10 classification).

RESULTS

The 20-year incidence of CVD was 3600 cases/10,000 individuals (95%Confidence Interval-CI: 3506 to 3695/10,000). Median (interquartile range) values for EAT-LI and MedDietScore were 17 (6.2) out of possible 42 points and 27 (2.9) out of possible 55 points, respectively. Both diet scales were inversely associated with 20-year CVD incidence [Hazard Ratio-HR (95% CI) per 1 point (of possible 42 points) of EAT-LI: 0.83 (0.77-0.90) and per 1 point (of possible 55 points) of MedDietScore: 0.90 (0.84-0.93)].

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight that diets that are good for planetary health, are also healthy for humans. Promoting diets that are culturally acceptable, economically viable, easily accessible, planet-friendly, and sustainable should be a key strategy for enhancing both public and planetary health.

Examining the link between adherence to the planetary health diet pattern and mortality in the us: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Though the Planetary Health Diet (PHD) is designed to enhance both human and environmental health, there is limited understanding of how adherence to PHD influences the risk of mortality in the general US adult population. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the Planetary Health Diet Index for the United States (PHDI-US) and mortality among adults in the overall population of the United States.

METHODS

The PHDI-US comprises 16 components, assigned scores ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores signifying a greater level of adherence to the PHD. Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey spanning 2005 to 2018, with mortality data linked through December 2019.

RESULTS

This study encompassed 30,521 participants (mean [SD] age, 47.02 [17.01] years; 14,817 males [48.0%]). Over an average follow-up period of 8.50 years, there were 3,706 recorded deaths. In the adjusted multivariable model, individuals in the highest quintile of PHDI-US exhibited a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.75), cardiovascular disease mortality (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97), cancer mortality (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89), and other-cause mortality (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.72) compared to those in the lowest quintile.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to a PHD pattern was associated with lower mortality risk in the general US adult population.

Association between the EAT-Lancet Diet, Incidence of Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality: Results from a Swiss Cohort

BACKGROUND

An unhealthy diet is a major contributor to several noncommunicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of death worldwide. Additionally, our food system has significant impacts on the environment. The EAT-Lancet Commission has recommended a healthy diet that preserves global environmental resources.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and the incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a Swiss cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the CoLaus/PsyCoLaus cohort study (N = 3866). Dietary intake was assessed using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. The EAT-Lancet adherence score was calculated based on the recommended intake and reference intervals of 12 food components, ranging from 0 to 39 points. Participants were categorized into low-, medium-, and high-adherence groups according to score tertiles. We used Cox Proportional Hazards regressions to assess the association among diet adherence, incident cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 7.9 y (SD: ±2.0 y), 294 individuals (7.6%) from our initial sample experienced a first cardiovascular event, and 264 (6.8%) died. Compared with the low-adherence group, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.17) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.98) for the medium-adherence and high-adherence groups, respectively (P-trend = 0.04). We observed no association between adherence groups and cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

In a Swiss cohort, high adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with a potential 30% lower risk of overall mortality. However, it is not associated with cardiovascular events.

Planetary Health Diet and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) Cohort

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Noncommunicable diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD), represent a significant global public health challenge, with unhealthy diets as a major risk factor. This study investigates the association between adherence to the Planetary Health Diet proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission and CVD risk.

METHODS

Utilizing data from the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort, which included 18,656 participants (mean age 38 years; 61% women), we assessed dietary intake using a validated food frequency questionnaire and the Planetary Health Diet Index to evaluate adherence (range 0-42). CVD was defined as new-onset stroke, myocardial infarction, or CVD death.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up time of 11.5 years, 220 cases of CVD were identified. Higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet revealed no statistically significant reduction in CVD risk associated with the diet. Cox proportional hazard models indicated a trend towards lower CVD risk in the highest adherence quartile, but this did not reach significance (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.18, p-trend = 0.127). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these results. Discrepancies in previous studies highlight the complexity of dietary assessments and underscore the need for standardized scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large Spanish cohort, adherence to the Planetary Health Diet showed no significant reduction in CVD risk. Further research is needed to reach a consensus on the operational definition of the Planetary Health Diet and to clarify the relationship between diet and CVD risk.

Global adherence to a healthy and sustainable diet and potential reduction in premature death

The Planetary Health Diet (PHD), also known as the EAT-Lancet reference diet, was developed to optimize global dietary quality while keeping the environmental impacts of food production within sustainable planetary boundaries. We calculated current national and global adherence to the PHD using the Planetary Health Dietary Index (PHDI). In addition, we used data on diet and mortality from three large US cohorts (n = 206,404 men and women, 54,536 deaths) to estimate the total and cause-specific mortality among adults 20 y of age and older that could be prevented by shifting from current diets to the reference PHD. The PHDI varied substantially across countries, although adherence was universally far from optimal (mean PHDI = 85 out of 140). By improving the global PHDI to 120, approximately 15 million deaths (27% of total deaths) could be prevented annually. Estimates of preventable deaths due to this shift ranged from 2.5 million for cardiovascular diseases to 0.7 million for neurodegenerative diseases. Our analysis suggests that adopting healthy and sustainable diets would have major direct health benefits by reducing mortality due to multiple diseases and could contribute substantially to achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. These numbers of preventable deaths are based on evidence that human biology is similar across racial and ethnic groups, but the exact numerical estimates should be interpreted with caution because some assumptions used for the calculations build on limited data. Refinement of these estimates will be possible when additional regional data on diet and mortality become available.

Health outcomes, environmental impacts, and diet costs of adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet in China in 1997-2015: a health and nutrition survey

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a global reference dietary pattern. Although research on the EAT-Lancet reference diet and its associations with mortality, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, dietary environmental impacts, and cost of diets is increasing, studies done in low-income and middle-income countries remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the health outcomes, environmental impacts, and dietary costs of adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet in China.

METHODS

In this health and nutrition survey study, 16 029 participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey cohort (1997-2015) were included at baseline. All-cause mortality was reported by family members and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes was self-reported. 3-day 24 h recall was used to assess adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet (Eat-Lancet Diet Index [ELDI]), diet-related environmental impacts (greenhouse-gas emissions [GHGE]), total water use (TWU), land use, and dietary costs in each survey round. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the ELDI-score were obtained by Cox models with time-varying covariates, adjusted for potential confounders. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to assess the association of environmental impacts and dietary costs to the ELDI score.

FINDINGS

During a median follow-up of 9·86 years, 803 new cases of incident type 2 diabetes, 563 new cases of cardiovascular disease, and 908 cases of all-cause mortality were recorded. At baseline, the ELDI score ranged from 9·4 points to 110·8 points on a scale of 0 to 140, with a mean of 55·3 points (SD 11·8). With each SD increase in the ELDI score, there was an 8% decreased risk of mortality (95% CI 2·2-14·1), a 16·1% decreased risk of cardiovascular disease (9·2-20·3), and a 25·3% decreased risk of type 2 diabetes (19·5- 28·4). Each SD increase in the index was associated with a decrease of 2·2% (95% CI -2·6 to -1·8) in GHGE, 2·3% (-2·6 to -2·0) in land use, no association with TWU, but an increase in diet costs of 3·3% (2·8 to 3·8).

INTERPRETATION

High adherence to the ELDI was associated with a lower risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. However, the association with diet-related GHGE and land use was modest, and adherence was also linked to higher diet costs. The study advocates for the integration of sustainable indicators into future Chinese dietary guidelines. Additionally, policy measures such as agricultural subsidies on fruit and vegetable and carbon taxes on red meat are recommended to increase affordability, reduce environmental impact, and enhance the overall sustainability of dietary practices in China.

FUNDING

The China Scholarship Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Emerging EAT-Lancet planetary health diet is associated with major cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: A global systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission promoted a plant-based diet, emphasizing its potential to enhance human health and environmental sustainability. Nevertheless, a thorough evaluation of health benefits associated with EAT-Lancet diet requires robust statistical backing. This synthesis seeks to compile evidence related to the effects of the EAT-Lancet diet on major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted utilizing data from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and medRxiv, covering the period from January 2019 to October 8, 2024. We included all cohort and case-control studies that investigated the association between the emerging EAT-Lancet diet and outcomes such as diabetes, CVD, all-cause mortality, and cancer. Summary effect size estimates are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and were analyzed using random-effects models. Study heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic and I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify potential sources of variability, while publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

We identified 28 publications that included a total of over 2.21 million participants. Adhering to the EAT-Lancet dietary patterns was negatively associated with diabetes, CVD (mortality), all-cause mortality, and cancer (mortality), with HRs of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.65-0.92), 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.81-0.87), 0.83 (95 % CI: 0.78-0.89), and 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed for diabetes (I2 = 94.0 %), all-cause mortality (I2 = 85.5 %), and cancer incidence (I2 = 79.3 %). Importantly, no evidence of publication bias was found for any of the clinical outcomes analyzed. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results across various dietary scoring systems for CVD mortality, all-cause mortality, and cancer.

CONCLUSION

Following the EAT-Lancet diet was significantly associated with reduced odds of diabetes, CVD, cancer and mortality. These findings are clinically important, highlighting the beneficial effects of the recent EAT-Lancet diet on various health outcomes.

Adherence to EAT-Lancet reference diet and risk of premature coronary artery diseases: a multi-center case-control study

BACKGROUND

In 2019, a globally sustainable dietary pattern that primarily emphasizes the consumption of plant-based foods was proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission. However, there is limited evidence regarding the association of this diet with coronary events.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet (ELD) and premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) risk and its severity.

METHODS

This multi-center, case-control study was conducted within the framework of the Iran premature coronary artery disease (I-PAD). A total of 3185 participants aged under 70 years in women and 60 years in men were included. Cases were those whose coronary angiography showed stenosis ≥ 75% in at least one vessel or ≥ 50% in the left main artery (n = 2033), while the controls had normal angiography results (n = 1152). Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Logistic regression was utilized to examine the association between ELD and presence of PCAD.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals in the first quartile, those in the highest quartile of ELD (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.39; P for trend < 0.001) and ELD calculated with minimum intake (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.52; P < 0.001) had lower risk of PCAD. Individuals in the highest quartile of adherence to the ELD and ELD with minimum intake had 78% and 72% lower risk of having severe PCAD compared with those in the lowest quartile, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An inverse association was observed between adherence to the ELD and PCAD risk and its severity. Large-scale prospective cohort studies are required to confirm these findings.

Evaluating the diet in Germany with two indices focusing on healthy eating and planetary healthy eating using nationwide cross-sectional food intake data from DEGS1 (2008-2011)

PURPOSE

To improve sustainability, adjustments to current diets are necessary. Therefore, limited planetary resources are considered within the healthy reference diet proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission. The agreement with nationwide food intake was evaluated with two indices which reflect this reference and German food intake recommendations.

METHODS

A healthy eating index (HEI-MON) reflecting the dietary guidelines of the German nutrition society and a planetary healthy eating index (PHEI-MON) reflecting the healthy reference diet were developed, with scores from 0 to 100. Both indices were applied to data from a nationally representative sample of the German population aged 18-79 years for which data from a 53-item food frequency questionnaire are available.

RESULTS

Mean scores for the indices were 53 for HEI-MON and 39 for PHEI-MON. A better adherence to either guideline could be found among women, persons of older age as well as persons with higher education level. The sub-scores for HEI-MON showed high agreement with the recommendations for side dishes, fruit/nuts, (processed) meat and cereals, but low agreement with the recommendations for free sugar and vegetables/legumes. PHEI-MON sub-scores were highest for poultry, fruits and potatoes, and lowest for nuts, red meat and legumes. High scores in one index do not necessarily correspond to high scores in the other index. Individuals with more plantbased diets had higher scores in both indices, while high sugar and meat consumption led to lower scores.

CONCLUSIONS

More plant-based diets are crucial for individual and planetary health. Both indices reflect such diets which consider already health and sustainability aspects. At an individual level, the scores for both indices may differ considerably, but overall there is a huge potential in the population to adapt to a diet more in line with both guidelines.

The EAT-Lancet Diet Index Is Associated with Lower Obesity and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in the Multiethnic Cohort

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet Commission has developed dietary recommendations, named the EAT-Lancet diet, to promote healthy nutrition and sustainable food production worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

We developed an adapted score for the EAT-Lancet diet for participants of the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study and its relation with incidence of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

The MEC includes 5 ethnic groups followed since 1993-1996. Anthropometric characteristics and dietary intake were assessed by questionnaire at cohort entry (Qx1) and 10 y later (Qx3). To create the EAT-Lancet index (range: 0-48 points), a 3-point scoring system for 16 food groups standardized to 2500 kcal/d was applied. T2D cases were identified through repeated self-reports and administrative data. In a prospective design, obesity at Qx3 and T2D incidence were evaluated using Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) while adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Among 193,379 MEC participants, the overall mean of the EAT-Lancet index score was 25 ± 4 points and 46,140 new T2D cases were identified. Higher adjusted means were observed in females than males, in participants of Japanese American and Native Hawaiian ancestry, and in those with healthy weight than overweight or obese. Obesity was lower in cohort members with higher EAT-Lancet scores (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.79 for tertile 3 compared with 1). Although T2D incidence was 10% lower among participants in the highest (27-42 points) compared with the lowest (9-23 points) EAT-Lancet index tertile (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.92), the association was attenuated after BMI adjustment (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). This inverse association with T2D was restricted to African American and European American participants.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the hypothesis that adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is related to a lower risk of obesity, which may be partially responsible for the small reduction in T2D incidence.

Using salience and availability to promote sustainable and healthy food choices in hospital cafeterias

Sustainable diets can achieve considerable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and improvements in human health, but changing dietary behavior remains a challenge. We assessed the impacts of two behavioral insights strategies on bridging the intention-action gap related to sustainable and healthy food choices amongst hospital cafeteria patrons. In a pilot survey of hospital staff (N = 1,165), 56% identified limited awareness and availability of sustainable food as barriers to purchasing, although 46% were extremely willing to try sustainable dishes. We examined increasing salience (Study 1), varying availability (Study 2a), and decreasing availability (Study 2b) on sustainable and healthy dish purchases in three hospital cafeterias. Each study ran for seven weeks from March to April, 2023. In total, 10,616 dishes were purchased. In Study 1, increasing salience was associated with significant uptake of sustainable and healthy dishes, but the effect disappeared once the salience intervention was removed. In Study 2a, increasing availability of sustainable dishes corresponded to a significant increase in purchases of sustainable dishes, while decreasing availability in Study 2b followed a downward trend in purchases, suggesting that availability drove dietary choices. We recommend hospitals consider these choice architecture interventions to support the adoption of sustainable and healthy diets.

The EAT-Lancet diet associated cardiovascular health parameters: evidence from a Brazilian study

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet diet is a diet aimed at promoting population and planetary health from the perspective of sustainable diets in terms of environmental and health aspects. This study aimed to assess the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cardiometabolic risk factors among adults and elderly individuals in a capital city in the northeastern region of Brazil.

METHODS

This is an analytical cross-sectional observational study from a population-based sample conducted between 2019 and 2020, involving 398 non-institutionalized adults and elderly people, of both sexes from "Brazilian Usual Consumption Assessment" study (Brazuca-Natal). There was a 38% response rate due to the suspension of data collection due to the covid-19 pandemic, but According to the comparative analysis of socioeconomic and demographic variables between the surveyed and non-surveyed sectors, losses were found to be random (p = 0.135, Little's MCAR test). Socioeconomic and lifestyle data, anthropometric measurements, and dietary consumption were collected. We used the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) and the Cardiovascular Health Diet Index (CHDI) for cardiovascular health to assess adherence to the diet's sustainability. The evaluated cardiometabolic parameters included fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. We also assessed the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia. For the data analyses, sample weights and the effect of the study design were taken into account. Pearson's chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of frequencies. Multiple linear regression models assessed the associations between PHDI and CHDI and its components and the cardiometabolic parameters.

RESULTS

The mean PHDI was 29.4 (95% CI 28.04:30.81), on a total score ranging from 0 to 150 points and the mean CHDI was 32.63 (95% CI 31.50:33.78), on a total score ranging from 0 to 110 points. PHDI showed a significant positive association with the final CHDI score and components of fruits, vegetables, and legumes, and a negative association with Ultra-processed Food (UPF) (p < 0.05). Notably, among the most consumed UPF, the following stand out: "packaged snacks, shoestring potatoes, and crackers" (16.94%), followed by margarine (14.14%). The PHDI exhibited a significant association with diabetes and dyslipidemia, as well as with systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and LDL-C.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that adopting the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with the improvement of key cardiovascular health indicators.

Plant-based diets-impacts of consumption of little or no animal-source foods on human health

The world, in 2024, faces both climate and biodiversity crises, and the food system does contribute significantly to these crises. For some, the solution is simple - intakes of animal source foods (ASFs) should be considerably reduced, and consumption of plant-source foods (PSFs) should be greatly increased. Advocates for such a dietary transformation express confidence that plant-based diets will not only benefit planetary health, but will provide nutrient adequacy for all, and will also result in considerable protection from chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, as described in this perspective, the dramatic reductions in ASFs, entailed by many plant-based diets, will worsen already prevalent micronutrient and protein deficiencies. The protections provided by plant-based diets against NCDs appear to be more strongly associated with reduced intakes of calories and salt, and increased intakes of fruit, vegetables, nuts and whole grains, rather than with reduced intakes of ASFs. Any possible absolute adverse effects of red and processed meat consumption on NCDs are very small and uncertain. Other ASFs either appear to have no impact on NCDs (poultry meat and eggs), or are associated with protections against obesity, cardiovascular events, brain disorders and some cancers (seafood and dairy). Rigorous randomized controlled trials of all newly proposed environmentally-protective plant-based diets are required, so as to provide clear-cut evidence of micronutrient and protein adequacy, with or without, supplementation, fortification and/or biofortification. In the meantime, dietary guidelines should advise moderating excessive consumption, rather than substantially limiting or excluding ASFs from the human diet.

Association Between Adherence to EAT-Lancet Diet and Risk of Hypertension: An 18-Year National Cohort Study in China

OBJECTIVE

The EAT-Lancet Commission has proposed an EAT-Lancet diet (ELD), also known as a planetary health diet (PHD), which is environmentally sustainable and promotes human health. However, the association between this diet and the risk of hypertension remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether adherence to ELD was associated with a lower risk of hypertension.

METHODS

11,402 adults without hypertension at baseline from the China Health and Nutrition Survey were included. The PHD score was used to evaluate ELD adherence, with higher scores reflecting better compliance. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Additionally, a subgroup analysis was performed to identify the possible effect modifiers, and a mediation analysis was conducted to explore the mediation effects of anthropometric measurements on the association between ELD and hypertension.

RESULTS

A total of 3993 participants (35%) developed hypertension during 93,058 person-years of follow-up. In the covariate-adjusted model, hypertension risk was reduced in the highest quartile participants compared to the lowest quartile of the PHD score (adjusted HR: 0.79, 95%CI: 0.71-0.87; P-trend < 0.001), which remained significant after sensitivity analysis. Notably, the association was also observed in isolated systolic hypertension, isolated diastolic hypertension, and systolic-diastolic hypertension. Subgroup analysis revealed that the inverse association between the PHD score and hypertension risk was more pronounced in nonsmokers and high-sodium intake consumers than in smokers and low-sodium consumers (P-interaction < 0.05). Additionally, mediation analysis revealed that 23.3% of the association between the PHD score and hypertension risk was mediated by the waist-to-height ratio.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that a higher adherence to ELD is associated with a lower risk of hypertension. These results emphasize that ELD may serve as a potential strategy to prevent hypertension.

Planetary health diet and cardiovascular disease: results from three large prospective cohort studies in the USA

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems proposed a Planetary Health Diet that seeks to optimise both chronic disease prevention as well as global environmental health. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between a dietary index based on the Planetary Health Diet and risk of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We included women from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS I; 1986-2016), women from the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II; 1991-2017), and men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; 1986-2016) who were free of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes at baseline. Dietary data were collected every 4 years using a validated, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was based on 15 food groups: whole grains, vegetables, fruit, fish and shellfish, nuts and seeds, non-soy legumes, soy foods, and unsaturated oils were scored positively; starchy vegetables, dairy, red or processed meat, poultry, eggs, saturated fats and trans fat, and added sugar received negative scores. Scores for each food group were summed to get a total score of 0-140. Higher scores indicated greater adherence to the PHDI. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariates to evaluate the association between PHDI score, cumulatively averaged, and incident cardiovascular disease (defined as fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke), adjusting for demographic, health, and lifestyle confounders in all participants with available data. Cohort-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted fixed effects meta-analyses.

FINDINGS

Of the 62 919 women included from the NHS I, 88 535 women included from the NHS II, and 42 164 men included from the HPFS, a total of 9831 cases of cardiovascular disease were confirmed over 4 541 980 person-years of follow-up. Mean PHDI scores ranged from 60·7 (SD 5·1) to 90·6 (5·3) in the lowest versus highest quintile in NHS I, 55·6 (4·9) to 86·3 (6·3) in NHS II, and 59·6 (5·9) to 94 (5·9) in HPFS. In the multivariable-adjusted meta-analysis, participants in the highest quintile of PHDI score had a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease than did those in the lowest quintile (hazard ratio [HR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·78-0·89]; p-trend <0·0001). When we examined cardiovascular disease subtypes, the highest quintile of PHDI was also associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease (HR 0·81 [95% CI 0·74-0·88]; p-trend <0·0001) and total stroke (HR 0·86 [0·78-0·95]; p-trend=0·0004) compared with the lowest quintile.

INTERPRETATION

We found that adherence to the Planetary Health Diet, designed to be a more environmentally sustainable dietary pattern, was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in three large cohorts of men and women in the USA. These observations support the Planetary Health Diet as a promising strategy to promote both human and planetary health.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health.

Adherence to a planetary health diet, genetic susceptibility, and incident cardiovascular disease: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

The influence of adherence to a planetary health diet (PHD) proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission on cardiovascular disease (CVD) is inconclusive. Besides, whether genetic susceptibility to CVD can modify the association of PHD with CVD remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the association between adherence to PHD and CVD, and to evaluate the interaction between PHD and genetic predisposition to CVD.

METHODS

This study included 114,165 participants who completed at least two 24-h dietary recalls and were initially free of CVD from the UK Biobank. PHD score was calculated to assess adherence to PHD. Genetic risk was evaluated using the polygenic risk score. Incidence of total CVD, ischemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), and stroke were identified via electronic health records. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 9.9 y, 10,071 (8.8%) incident CVD cases were documented. Compared with participants with the lowest adherence to PHD, HRs (95% CIs) for total CVD, IHD, AF, HF, and stroke among those with the highest adherence were 0.79 (0.74, 0.84), 0.73 (0.67, 0.79), 0.90 (0.82, 0.99), 0.69 (0.59, 0.82), and 0.88 (0.75, 1.04), respectively. No significant interaction between the genetic risk of CVD and PHD was observed. Participants with high genetic risk and low PHD score, as compared with those with low genetic risk and high PHD score, had a 48% (95% CI: 40%, 56%) higher risk of CVD. The population-attributable risk (95% CI) of CVD for poor adherence to PHD ranged from 8.79% (5.36%, 12.51%) to 14.00% (9.00%, 18.88%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that higher adherence to PHD was associated with lower risk of total CVD, IHD, AF, and HF in populations across all genetic risk categories.

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet reduces the risk of head and neck cancers in 101,755 American adults: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the EAT-Lancet diet (ELD) and head and neck cancers (HNCs) in 101,755 Americans enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

ELD score was calculated to assess participant's adherence to ELD. Cox hazard regression models were utilised to evaluate the association of ELD and dietary components with HNC risk. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots were employed to explore the linearity of the relationships. Predefined subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential effect modifiers and to assess the stability of the findings, respectively.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 8.84 years, 279 cases of HNCs, including 169 cases of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers and 110 cases of laryngeal cancer were recorded. This study observed a dose-response negative correlation between ELD and HNCs (hazard ratio [HR]Q4 vs Q1: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34, 0.80; P-trend = 0.003; HRper SD increment: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.91), and oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers (HRQ4 vs Q1: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.88; P-trend = 0.008; HRper SD increment: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.92). Analysis using RCS plots indicated a significant linear association between adherence to the ELD and reduced risk of HNCs and oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers (P-nonlinearity > 0.05). Subgroup analysis did not reveal significant interaction factors (P-interaction > 0.05), and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this study. Additionally, negative correlations were found between the consumption of fruits and whole grains and HNCs (fruits: HRQ4 vs Q1: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.84; P-trend = 0.010; whole grains: HRQ4 vs Q1: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.97; P-trend = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to ELD contributes to the prevention of HNCs.

The EAT-Lancet Diet Index, Plasma Proteins, and Risk of Heart Failure in a Population-Based Cohort

BACKGROUND

The landmark EAT-Lancet Commission proposed that a planetary health diet is comprised mainly of plant-based foods. However, studies examining whether this diet is associated with heart failure (HF) are currently lacking. In addition, the potential proteomics mechanism on the association between diet and HF warrants further elucidation.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to both examine the association between the EAT-Lancet diet index and risk of HF and identify plasma proteins underlying such an association.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 23,260 participants. HF cases during the follow-up were identified through the Swedish national register. An EAT-Lancet diet index (score range: 0-42) was created to assess adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. In a subcohort (n = 4,742), fasting plasma proteins were quantified.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 25.0 years, 1,768 incident HF cases were documented. After adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, diabetes, hypertension, use of lipid-lowering drugs, and body mass index, the HR per 3-point increase of the EAT-Lancet diet index was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97). This association was robust in several sensitivity analyses. Among the included 136 plasma proteins, a total of 8 proteins (AM, GDF15, IL-6, TIM, CTSD, CCL20, FS, and FUR) were both inversely associated with the EAT-Lancet diet index and positively associated with risk of HF; the overall proteomic score mediated 9.4% (95% CI: 2.2%-32.1%) of the association.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with a lower risk of HF. The identified eight plasma proteins provide information on potential pathways mediating such an association.

Planetary Health Diet Index and risk of total and cause-specific mortality in three prospective cohorts

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a healthy dietary pattern that, along with reductions in food waste and improved agricultural practices, could feed the increasing global population sustainably. We developed a Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) to quantify adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess associations between PHDI and total and cause-specific mortality in 3 prospective cohorts of males and females in the United States.

METHODS

We followed 66,692 females from the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2019), 92,438 females from the Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2019), and 47,274 males from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2018) who were free of cancer, diabetes, and major cardiovascular diseases at baseline. The PHDI was calculated every 4 y using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using multivariable proportional-hazards models.

RESULTS

During follow-up, we documented 31,330 deaths among females and 23,206 among males. When comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of PHDI, the pooled multivariable-adjusted HRs were 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75, 0.80] for all-cause mortality (P-trend < 0.0001). The PHDI was associated with lower risk of deaths from cardiovascular diseases (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.91), cancer (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.95), respiratory diseases (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.59), and neurodegenerative diseases (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.78). In females, but not males, the PHDI was also significantly associated with a lower risk of deaths from infectious diseases (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.76). PHDI scores were also associated inversely with greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts.

CONCLUSIONS

In 3 large United States-based prospective cohorts of males and females with up to 34 y of follow-up, a higher PHDI was associated with lower risk of total and cause-specific mortality and environment impacts.

What factors influence sustainable and healthy diet consumption? A review and synthesis of literature within the university setting and beyond

Globally, typical dietary patterns are neither healthy nor sustainable. Recognizing the key role of dietary change in reducing noncommunicable disease risk and addressing environmental degradation, it is crucial to understand how to shift individuals toward a sustainable and healthy diet (SHD). In this literature review, we introduced the concept of a SHD and outlined the dietary behaviors necessary to transition toward SHD consumption; we reviewed the literature on factors that may influence sustainable (and unsustainable) dietary behaviors in adults; and we developed a novel scoring system to rank factors by priority for targeting in future research. Given the significant potential to promote a sustainable and healthy dietary transition on the university campus-where factors that may impact dietary behaviors can be targeted at all levels of influence (i.e., individual, interpersonal, environmental, policy)-we narrowed our focus to this setting throughout. Aided by our novel scoring system, we identified conscious habitual eating, product price, food availability/accessibility, product convenience, self-regulation skills, knowledge of animal ethics/welfare, food promotion, and eating norms as important modifiable factors that may influence university students' dietary behaviors. When scored without consideration for the university population, these factors were also ranked as highest priority, as was modified portion sizes. Our findings offer insight into factors that may warrant attention in future research aimed at promoting SHDs. In particular, the high-priority factors identified from our synthesis of the literature could help guide the development of more personalized dietary behavioral interventions within the university setting and beyond.

The association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cognitive ageing

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet commission has proposed a dietary pattern that is both sustainable and healthy. However, the impact of this diet on cognition in older adults remains unexplored. Therefore, we examined the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cognitive ageing.

METHODS

We used data from a previous intervention study involving cognitively healthy community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was calculated using a recently published index and a 190-item food frequency questionnaire. Global and domain-specific cognitive functioning were assessed at baseline and after 2 years using a neuropsychological test battery. Multivariate-adjusted linear regression was conducted to examine associations between EAT-Lancet diet adherence and cognitive functioning (n = 630) and 2-year change (n = 302).

RESULTS

Greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with better global cognitive functioning (β per SD = 3.7 points [95% CI]: 0.04 [0.00, 0.08]) and slower rate of decline (β per SD [95% CI]: 0.05 [0.02, 0.08]). With respect to domain-specific functioning, beneficial associations were observed cross-sectionally for executive functioning (P < 0.01), and longitudinally for change in executive functioning (P < 0.01) and attention and working memory (P < 0.01). The degree of adherence to the EAT-Lancet was not associated with (changes in) information processing speed or episodic memory.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with better global cognitive functioning and slower cognitive decline among cognitively healthy older adults. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess the potential benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for the ageing population in a broader context.

Are the 2019 Canada's Food Guide Recommendations on Healthy Food Choices Consistent with the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet from Sustainable Food Systems?

BACKGROUND

The diet proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission, which supports both health and environmental sustainability, provides an opportunity to assess the sustainability of food-based dietary guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the alignment of the 2019 Canada's Food Guide (CFG) with the EAT-Lancet diet. To do so, an index assessing adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was developed and evaluated.

METHODS

Data from 1147 adults were used from the cross-sectional PRÉDicteurs Individuals, Sociaux et Environnementaux (PREDISE) study conducted between 2015 and 2017 in the province of Québec. The EAT-Lancet Dietary Index (EAT-I) was developed to evaluate adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet. Adherence to the 2019 CFG was assessed using the Healthy Eating Food Index (HEFI)-2019. Associations between the HEFI-2019 score and component scores and the EAT-I score were examined using linear regression models.

RESULTS

The mean EAT-I score (/80) in this population was 33.4 points [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.2, 34.6]. EAT-I scores were consistent with expected differences in diet quality between females and males (+6.9 points, 95% CI: 4.8, 9.0) and between adults aged 50-65 y and 18-34 y (+4.3 points, 95% CI: 1.6, 7.0). The mean HEFI-2019 (/80) score was 44.9 points (95% CI: 44.1, 45.7). The HEFI-2019 was strongly associated with the EAT-I (ß = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.80). Among the 10 components of the HEFI-2019, components such as the whole-grain foods (ß =4.01, 95% CI: 3.49, 4.52), grain foods ratio (ß =3.65, 95% CI: 3.24, 4.07), plant-based protein foods (ß =2.41, 95% CI: 2.03, 2.78), and fatty acids ratio (ß =3.12, 95% CI: 2.72, 3.51) showed the strongest associations with the EAT-I.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that recommendations in the 2019 CFG are largely coherent with the EAT-Lancet diet underscoring the complementarity and compatibility of the 2019 CFG for sustainability and health promotion purposes.

Association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet sustainable reference diet and cardiovascular health among European adolescents: the HELENA study

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a global reference diet to promote healthy diets within planetary boundaries. Studies evaluating the associations between the reference diet with health outcomes among adolescents are scarce. Thus, our aim was to assess the association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and cardiovascular health among European adolescents.

METHODS

Data from the HELENA study were used. Usual dietary intake was assessed using two 24-h dietary recalls and adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was assessed using the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI), a 16-component index that ranges from 0 to 150 points. Cardiovascular health was assessed through the seven-component Ideal Cardiovascular Health (ICH) score: never smoked, eutrophic body mass index, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, healthy dietary pattern, low blood pressure, low fasting plasma glucose, and low total cholesterol. Total ICH score was categorized into ideal (5-7) and non-ideal (0-4).

RESULTS

A 10-point increment in the PHDI was associated with a lower probability of a non-ideal ICH status (OR 0.84, [95% CI: 0.75, 0.94]) among European adolescents, after adjusting for age, sex, socio-economic status, and total energy intake. Furthermore, a 10-point increment in the PHDI was associated with lower probability of high blood pressure (OR: 0.87 [0.79, 0.96]) and a lower probability of high blood cholesterol (OR: 0.88 [0.78, 0.99]).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that a higher PHDI may be associated with a better cardiovascular health status among European adolescents.

Global trends and research hotspots of EAT-Lancet diet: a bibliometric analysis

The EAT-Lancet diet is a groundbreaking and comprehensive dietary framework that has garnered significant attention in the fields of nutrition, sustainability, and public health. We aimed to conduct a bibliometric study to investigate current status and hotspots in the field of EAT-Lancet diet based on the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database, and the documents of EAT-Lancet diet published from Jan 1, 2019 to Sep 1.2023 were extracted. The bibliometric and visualized analysis were performed by VOSviewer 1.6.16 and WOSCC Online Analysis Platform. In total, 155 documents from 62 journals were included, and 735 authors from 389 institutions and 53 countries/regions contributed to the field of EAT-Lancet diet. The most productive countries/regions, institutions, authors, and journals were the USA, Wageningen University & Research, Johan Rockström, and Nutrients, respectively. The first high-cited document was published in Lancet and authored by Willett et al. in 2019. This is also the first study about EAT-Lancet diet. The article firstly proposed the "EAT-Lancet Diet" emphasizing balanced, plant-based eating to improve human health while addressing environmental concerns. In conclusion, in the field of EAT-Lancet diet, the main research hotspots and frontiers are the adaptation of EAT-Lancet diet, the composition of EAT-Lancet diet, and the benefits of EAT-Lancet diet for human health. The number of research on the EAT-Lancet diet is currently limited. There is a pressing need for further studies to broaden our understanding of the EAT-Lancet diet and its potential to enhance human health.

APOE Genotype Modifies the Association between Midlife Adherence to the Planetary Healthy Diet and Cognitive Function in Later Life among Chinese Adults in Singapore

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear if adherence to the planetary healthy diet (PHD), designed to improve human and environmental health, is associated with better cognitive function in aging, and if this association differs by apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the association between the PHD pattern and risk of poor cognitive function, and to further assess whether the APOE ε4 allele could modify this association.

METHODS

The study included 16,736 participants from the Singapore Chinese Health Study. The PHD score was calculated using data from a validated 165-item food frequency questionnaire at baseline (1993-1998), with higher scores indicating greater adherence to the PHD. Cognitive function was assessed by the Singapore-modified Mini-Mental State Examination at follow-up 3 visits (2014-2016). A subset of 9313 participants had APOE genotype data. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 2397 (14.3%) cases of poor cognitive function. In the total population, OR (95% CI) of poor cognitive function for each one-SD increment in the PHD score was 0.89 (0.85, 0.93). Carriers of APOE ε4 allele had increased risk of poor cognitive function (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.61). There was a significant interaction between the PHD score and the APOE ε4 allele (P-interaction = 0.042). Each one-SD increment in the PHD score was significantly associated with lower risk of poor cognitive function (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) in non-carriers of APOE ε4 allele, but not in APOE ε4 allele carriers (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Midlife adherence to the PHD was associated with reduced risk of poor cognitive function in later life. However, this was not observed in carriers of APOE ε4 allele who had higher risk of poor cognitive function.

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with a reduced risk of incident cancer and all-cause mortality in UK adults

Food systems have been identified as significant contributors to the global environmental emergency. However, there is no universally agreed-upon definition of what constitutes a planetary healthy, sustainable diet. In our study, we investigated the association between the EAT-Lancet reference diet, a diet within the planetary boundaries, and incident cancer, incident major cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was associated with lower incident cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR]continuous: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-0.99]) and lower all-cause mortality (HR continuous: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99), while mostly null associations were detected for major cardiovascular event risk (HR continuous: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.01). Stratified analyses using potentially modifiable risk factors led to similar results. Our findings, in conjunction with the existing literature, support that adoption of the EAT-Lancet reference diet could have a benefit for the prevention of non-communicable diseases.

Association between adherence to Eat-Lancet diet and incidence and mortality of lung cancer: A prospective cohort study

Previous research has shown that adhering to the Eat-Lancet diet (ELD) is associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases and mortality. However, the associations between ELD and lung cancer incidence and mortality are unclear. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective cohort study involving 101,755 adults from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial in the USA. The ELD score was utilized to assess compliance with the ELD, with higher scores indicating greater compliance. We employed Cox regression analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of ELD score with the incidence and mortality of lung cancer and its subtypes. In addition, sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of our findings. In total, 1706 cases of lung cancer and 1217 lung cancer-associated deaths were recorded during the study period. Our analysis revealed that higher ELD scores were significantly associated with a reduced incidence (HRQuartile 4 vs. Quartile 1 : 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.89; ptrend  = 0.001) and mortality (HRQuartile 4 vs. Quartile 1 : 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.93; ptrend  = 0.005) of lung cancer in a dose-response manner (all pnonlinearity  > 0.05). The reliability of these results was supported by sensitivity analyses. Notably, these associations were primarily observed in non-small-cell lung cancer. In conclusion, our findings suggest that adherence to the ELD may be associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer incidence and mortality.

The Association between the EAT-Lancet Diet and Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Several studies have explored the association between diabetes and the EAT-Lancet diet. Thus, the objective of our study was to conduct a systematic review to analyze and summarize all clinical studies concerning the association between diabetes and the EAT-Lancet diet. We undertook a comprehensive search of the Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases up to 15 August 2023. All clinical studies concerning the association between diabetes and the EAT-Lancet diet were summarized and analyzed. In total, our systematic review included five studies of four prospective studies and one cross-sectional study, encompassing 259,315 participants. All the included studies were evaluated as high quality. The outcomes from all studies indicated that adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was correlated with a reduced risk of diabetes. In conclusion, the EAT-Lancet diet may be an effective dietary intervention for diabetes. Nevertheless, the number of studies examining the association between diabetes and the EAT-Lancet diet is limited. Further high-quality studies are required to expand our understanding of the benefits of the EAT-Lancet diet for patients with diabetes.

Compliance with the EAT-Lancet diet and risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study in 98,415 American adults

Background

The EAT-Lancet diet (ELD) is a recommended dietary pattern for achieving simultaneous improvements in both individual health and environmental sustainability. While research on the association between ELD and colorectal cancer (CRC) remains scarce, the potential impact of nutrition on CRC prevention and progression is a topic of growing interest. This study aims to investigate the relationship between adherence to the ELD and the risk of CRC, shedding light on the role of nutrition in CRC prevention.

Methods

A total of 98,415 participants were included. A Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) was used to collect dietary information, and an ELD score was used to assess adherence to ELD. Higher scores indicated greater adherence. Cox hazard regression analyses were conducted to examine whether there were associations between the ELD score and CRC risk. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to further explore the dose-response association between the ELD score and CRC incidence. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential modifiers that interacted with ELD on CRC incidence, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the established association.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 8.82 years, a total of 1,054 CRC cases were documented. We found a statistically significant correlation between the ELD score and CRC risk (Q4 vs. Q1: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; P for trend = 0.034) after adjusting for potential confounders. No statistically significant associations were discovered between ELD adherence and CRC by anatomical site. Subgroup analyses found no interactional factor, sensitivity analyses, and the RCS model showed a robustness and linearity association (P-linearity >0.05).

Conclusion

We concluded that adherence to ELD contributes to the prevention of CRC.

The EAT-Lancet diet, genetic susceptibility and risk of atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

The EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a global reference diet with both human health benefits and environmental sustainability in 2019. However, evidence regarding the association of such a diet with the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is lacking. In addition, whether the genetic risk of AF can modify the effect of diet on AF remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet diet with the risk of incident AF and examine the interaction between the EAT-Lancet diet and genetic susceptibility of AF.

METHODS

This prospective study included 24,713 Swedish adults who were free of AF, coronary events, and stroke at baseline. Dietary habits were estimated with a modified diet history method, and an EAT-Lancet diet index was constructed to measure the EAT-Lancet reference diet. A weighted genetic risk score was constructed using 134 variants associated with AF. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 22.9 years, 4617 (18.7%) participants were diagnosed with AF. The multivariable HR (95% CI) of AF for the highest versus the lowest group for the EAT-Lancet diet index was 0.84 (0.73, 0.98) (P for trend < 0.01). The HR (95% CI) of AF per one SD increment of the EAT-Lancet diet index for high genetic risk was 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) (P for interaction = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet index was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident AF. Such association tended to be stronger in participants with higher genetic risk, though gene-diet interaction was not significant.