Trends in pregnancy labeling and data quality for US-approved pharmaceuticals

The exclusion of pregnant women from an Ebola vaccine trial in Boende, western DRC: Perceptions of female participants who became pregnant and community members

Pregnant women are often underrepresented in clinical trials. However, there is a growing push for more inclusion after multiple disease outbreaks, like COVID-19, Zika, and Mpox disproportionately affected them. Qualitative research has primarily focused on the experiences of pregnant women who choose to participate or decline participation in trials. To our knowledge, there has been no research on the perspectives of those who were excluded from trials upon becoming pregnant. To address this gap, we explored the views of women excluded from a phase 2 Ebola vaccine trial, as well as those of the broader community in Boende, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Through individual interviews and focus group discussions, we found that protecting the foetus was paramount for the women, leading to general acceptance of their exclusion from the trial. Trust in trial organisers' knowledge, and the absence of an active Ebola outbreak at the time of the trial, may have supported this acceptance. Community perceptions generally aligned with those of the excluded women interviewed. However, the exclusion seemed to have impacted the decision to participate for a proportion of women of reproductive age. This was observed when some interviewed women reported declining participation in the trial due to their desire to conceive during the trial period. This study illustrates how women made pragmatic decisions regarding trial participation within the decision space available to them. Our findings seem to support established norms of special care for safety during pregnancy and echo sentiments described elsewhere in the literature. These results, coupled with the growing demands for the inclusion of pregnant women, highlight the necessity of finding a balance between prioritising the safety of women and their foetuses, and the autonomy of pregnant women, enabling them to make informed choices through comprehensible informed consent processes.

Validated UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of melatonin receptor agonists and dual orexin receptor antagonists in human plasma and breast milk: Application to quantify suvorexant and lemborexant in clinical samples

Pharmaceutical care is important for mental health during the perinatal period, which is often characterized by insomnia. In recent years, prescriptions of melatonin receptor agonists (MRAs) and dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) for insomnia have increased; however, their use during the perinatal period has scarcely been reported. In the present study, we developed a UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of ramelteon, its metabolite M-II, suvorexant, and lemborexant in human plasma and breast milk to accumulate information on the safety and transfer of MRAs and DORAs into breast milk. Samples of MRAs (ramelteon and M-II) in plasma and breast milk were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with ethyl acetate. For DORAs (suvorexant and lemborexant), LLE with ethyl acetate was applied to plasma samples. For breast milk samples, significant ion suppression was observed for LLE with ethyl acetate. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges capable of removing phospholipids improved the matrix effects. Finally, protein precipitation with methanol and an SPE cartridge, InertSep® Phospholipid Remover, were selected for breast milk sample preparation. An ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column was used for analyte separation. MRAs and DORAs were eluted using isocratic and gradient elution, respectively, and analyzed using electrospray ionization in the positive mode with multiple reaction monitoring. The range of calibration curve for MRAs and DORAs was 0.1-25 and 0.5-50 ng/ml, respectively. Both the plasma and breast milk samples exhibited good linearity over this range. The method was validated by evaluating its accuracy and precision, matrix effect, recovery, carry-over, stability, and dilution integrity. The validated method was successfully applied to clinical samples donated by breastfeeding women and the milk/plasma (M/P) ratio and relative infant dose (RID) of lemborexant (one case) and suvorexant (two cases) were estimated. The M/P ratio of lemborexant was <1, and the RID was 1.05 %. The M/P ratio of suvorexant was <0.1, and RID was 0.11-0.20 %. This method will be useful for future studies evaluating the safety of these drugs during breastfeeding.

Trends in Patient Representation in Low Back Pain Pharmacological Randomized Clinical Trials, 2011 to 2020: A Systematic Review

Low back pain (LBP) significantly affects global health, with associated detrimental outcomes such as physical impairment, emotional distress, and exacerbated mental health symptoms. This study evaluated the representation of marginalized groups, including racialized, gender minority, pregnant/lactating, and elderly individuals in randomized controlled trials for pharmacological interventions treating LBP from 2011 to 2020. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL in December 2021, and 139 studies were eligible. Most trials (n = 113, 81%) reported participant sex; however, no study collected data on sexual and gender minorities, and the majority (n = 99, 71%) excluded pregnant/lactating individuals. Most trials (n = 105, 76%) reported no data on participant race or ethnicity. We limited within-country analyses of race and ethnicity to US-based trials because US-based trials were more likely to report race and/or ethnicity (48%) compared to non-US-based trials (8%). Black participants were the only racialized group whose composition was comparable to US Census estimates. About half (n = 73, 53%) of all trials had an upper age limit for eligibility (range: 40-85 years old) and 24% (n = 33) excluded adults aged >65 years. Our findings confirm that trials for pharmacological LBP interventions underreport demographic data, and the trials that include this data have unrepresentative samples. There is an urgent need for more inclusive and representative patient samples to ensure generalizability and equitable benefits. Standardizing demographic data reporting and integrating community-based participatory research methods can help foster inclusive research practices. This review was registered with prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO), ID 296017. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review investigates patient representation in pharmacological-based clinical trials for low back pain, LBP, the most prevalent pain condition worldwide. Improvements in reporting demographic data and recruiting diverse participant populations-across different racialized, gender and sexual minority, and age groups-will help clinical research generalizability and provide equitable benefits.

Maternal Ezetimibe Concentrations Measured in Breast Milk and Its Use in Breastfeeding Infant Exposure Predictions

BACKGROUND

Lactating mothers taking ezetimibe, an antihyperlipidemic agent, may be hesitant to breastfeed despite the known benefit of breastfeeding to both mother and infant. Currently, no data exist on the presence or concentration of ezetimibe and its main active metabolite, ezetimibe-glucuronide (EZE-glucuronide), in human breast milk.

METHODS

Voluntary breast milk samples containing ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide were attained from lactating mothers taking ezetimibe as part of their treatment. An assay was developed and validated to measure ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide concentrations in breast milk. A workflow that utilized a developed and evaluated pediatric physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, the measured concentrations in milk, and weight-normalized breast milk intake volumes was applied to predict infant exposures and determine the upper area under the curve ratio (UAR).

RESULTS

Fifteen breast milk samples from two maternal-infant pairs were collected. The developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay showed an analytical range of 0.039-5.0 ng/mL and 0.39-50.0 ng/mL for ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide, respectively. The measured concentrations in the breast milk samples were 0.17-1.02 ng/mL and 0.42-2.65 ng/mL of ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide, respectively. The evaluated pediatric PBPK model demonstrated minimal exposure overlap in adult therapeutic dose and breastfed infant simulated area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24). Calculated UAR across infant age groups ranged from 0.0015 to 0.0026.

CONCLUSIONS

PBPK model-predicted ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide exposures and UAR suggest that breastfeeding infants would receive non-therapeutic exposures. Future work should involve a 'mother-infant pair study' to ascertain breastfed infant plasma ezetimibe and EZE-glucuronide concentrations to confirm the findings of this work.

Evaluating strength of recommendations for commonly administered medications in lactating women

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the data on medications for lactating people in the LactMed database and evaluate the strength of the data for the most commonly administered medications in lactating women.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all medications in the LactMed database in 12/2020 was performed. Each medication was classified into one of three categories: absent data, minimal-moderate data, strong data pertaining to safety in lactation. No data was defined as no available research studies associated with the medication. Minimal-moderate data was defined as absent research studies in one or more of the four LactMed categories: maternal drug levels, infant drug levels, effects on infants, effects on lactation, or if data was limited to a case report or observational study. Strong data was classified as availability of research studies in all four LactMed categories with data derived from pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, cohort, case control, or randomized control studies. Additionally, the most commonly used medications in lactating women as defined by prior literature were analyzed for strength of data.

RESULTS

1408 medications were evaluated: 714 (51%) had no associated data, 664 (47%) had minimal-moderate data, and 30 (2%) had strong data. Maternal drug level category had the highest proportion of rigorous supportive data while the effect on lactation category had the least supportive data. Of the most common mediations used in lactating women, sex hormones (contraception) and the nervous system medication classes had the most robust supportive data while respiratory, blood forming organs, and galactogogues had the weakest supportive data.

CONCLUSION

There is significant variability and dearth in the quality of data guiding recommendations for use of medications in lactation providing numerous opportunities for research.

Availability of Safe and Effective Therapeutic Options to Pregnant and Lactating Individuals Following the United States Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule

OBJECTIVE

To explore the extent and type of pregnancy and lactation data of newly approved prescription drugs and assess whether the presented recommendations are data-driven, as required by the US Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule implemented in 2015.

STUDY DESIGN

In this descriptive analysis, we reviewed pregnancy and lactation data of all new molecular entities approved between 2001 and 2020 in their most updated labeling. Information was collected regarding the pregnancy and lactation risk statements, the source of pregnancy and lactation data, and the design and methods of pregnancy and lactation studies in the labeling.

RESULTS

Of the 422 new molecular entities, the key advisory statement for use of 133 (32%) drugs in pregnancy and 194 (46%) drugs in lactation were classified as "against use." Less than 2% of all drugs had a key advisory statement that supported their use during pregnancy or lactation. The sources of data regarding use in pregnancy were studies in human and animals in 46 (11%) and 348 (82%) drugs, respectively. For use during lactation, data included studies in human and animals in 23 (5%) and 251 (59%) drugs, respectively. The key advisory recommendation was consistent with the available human information in 4 (8%) drugs in pregnancy and 3 (13%) drugs in lactation. Prescription drug labeling contains limited data to support informed decision-making for the use of prescription drugs during pregnancy/lactation. Close collaboration among stakeholders is required to enhance the availability of data in this population.

Safety of medicines during breastfeeding - from case report to modeling : A contribution from the ConcePTION project

INTRODUCTION

Despite many research efforts, current data on the safety of medicines during breastfeeding are either fragmented or lacking, resulting in restrictive labeling of most medicines. In the absence of pharmacoepidemiologic safety studies, risk estimation for breastfed infants is mainly derived from pharmacokinetic (PK) information on the medicine. This manuscript provides a description and a comparison of the different methodological approaches that can yield reliable information on medicine transfer into human milk and the resulting infant exposure.

AREA COVERED

Currently, most information on medicine transfer in human milk relies on case reports or traditional PK studies, which generate data that can hardly be generalized to the population. Some methodological approaches, such as population PK (popPK) and physiologically-based PK (PBPK) modeling, can be used to provide a more complete characterization of infant medicine exposure through human milk and simulate the most extreme situations, while decreasing the burden of sampling in breastfeeding women.

EXPERT OPINION

PBPK and popPK modeling are promising approaches to fill the gap of knowledge in medicine safety in breastfeeding, as illustrated with our escitalopram example.

Core Data Elements for Pregnancy Pharmacovigilance Studies Using Primary Source Data Collection Methods: Recommendations from the IMI ConcePTION Project

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The risks and benefits of medication use in pregnancy are typically established through post-marketing observational studies. As there is currently no standardised or systematic approach to the post-marketing assessment of medication safety in pregnancy, data generated through pregnancy pharmacovigilance (PregPV) research can be heterogenous and difficult to interpret. The aim of this article is to describe the development of a reference framework of core data elements (CDEs) for collection in primary source PregPV studies that can be used to standardise data collection procedures and, thereby, improve data harmonisation and evidence synthesis capabilities.

METHODS

This CDE reference framework was developed within the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) ConcePTION project by experts in pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology, medical statistics, risk-benefit communication, clinical teratology, reproductive toxicology, genetics, obstetrics, paediatrics, and child psychology. The framework was produced through a scoping review of data collection systems used by established PregPV datasets, followed by extensive discussion and debate around the value, definition, and derivation of each data item identified from these systems.

RESULTS

The finalised listing of CDEs comprises 98 individual data elements, arranged into 14 tables of related fields. These data elements are openly available on the European Network of Teratology Information Services (ENTIS) website ( http://www.entis-org.eu/cde ).

DISCUSSION

With this set of recommendations, we aim to standardise PregPV primary source data collection processes to improve the speed at which high-quality evidence-based statements can be provided about the safety of medication use in pregnancy.

Developmental Toxicity Studies: The Path towards Humanized 3D Stem Cell-Based Models

Today, it is recognized that medicines will eventually be needed during pregnancy to help prevent to, ameliorate or treat an illness, either due to gestation-related medical conditions or pre-existing diseases. Adding to that, the rate of drug prescription to pregnant women has increased over the past few years, in accordance with the increasing trend to postpone childbirth to a later age. However, in spite of these trends, information regarding teratogenic risk in humans is often missing for most of the purchased drugs. So far, animal models have been the gold standard to obtain teratogenic data, but inter-species differences have limited the suitability of those models to predict human-specific outcomes, contributing to misidentified human teratogenicity. Therefore, the development of physiologically relevant in vitro humanized models can be the key to surpassing this limitation. In this context, this review describes the pathway towards the introduction of human pluripotent stem cell-derived models in developmental toxicity studies. Moreover, as an illustration of their relevance, a particular emphasis will be placed on those models that recapitulate two very important early developmental stages, namely gastrulation and cardiac specification.

Developing evidence-based guidelines for the safety of symptomatic drugs in multiple sclerosis during pregnancy and breastfeeding: A systematic review and Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is frequently diagnosed in people of reproductive age, many of whom will become pregnant following diagnosis. Although many women report an improvement in symptoms and relapses during pregnancy, symptoms such as fatigue and spasticity are commonly reported and can worsen. Prescribing medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding presents unique challenges and guidance on the use of symptomatic therapies is limited.

OBJECTIVES

This paper aims to provide a consensus on the current evidence base to facilitate informed decision-making and optimise pre-conception counselling.

METHODS

A list of most commonly prescribed medications for symptom management in MS was created using pregnancy and MS-related READ codes in the Welsh GP Dataset, followed by a review by MS neurologists.

RESULTS

A final list of 24 medications was generated for review. Searches were performed on each medication, and evidence graded using standardised criteria. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and distributed to experts in the field and revised according to feedback using modified Delphi criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the safety of symptomatic therapies during pregnancy and breastfeeding for general practitioners and specialist teams working with people with MS who are hoping to embark on pregnancy or are currently pregnant. Individual risk-benefit ratios should be considered during pre-conception counselling to optimise symptom burden and minimise harm to both parent and child.

A Comparison of FDA and EMA Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have robust collaboration and dialogue around the need for data and the inclusion of pregnant and lactating individuals in clinical trials. Despite this collaboration, the two agencies have their own standards for the format and content of labeling for these populations. To understand these differences, the pregnancy and lactation labeling sections for 31 approved drugs were compared, and trends were assessed for use of language concordance and discordance related to use during pregnancy and lactation between the 2 agencies. Further analysis evaluated the presence of human data included in the labeling. The EMA and the FDA had high discordance between pregnancy and lactation labeling language, in 68% and 71% of labeling, respectively, and only 10% of pregnancy labeling and 16% of lactation labeling include human data. Concordance in labeling language is not the norm but occurs when there is a sizeable body of human data, animal data suggesting a particular safety issue, drug mechanism of action information, or disease-specific considerations. This study highlights the need for more human data to inform prescribing decisions in these populations. The results also suggest that there is an opportunity for alignment in labeling across regions.

Addressing maternal medication use during breastfeeding using clinical resources and a novel physiologically based pharmacokinetic model-derived metric: A qualitative study

Introduction

Breastfeeding has major benefits to the maternal-infant dyad and yet healthcare providers have expressed uncertainty about advocating breastfeeding when mothers are taking medications. The tendency for some providers to be more cautious in their advising approach is likely a consequence of limited, unfamiliar, and unreliable existing information on medication use during lactation. A novel risk metric termed the Upper Area Under the Curve Ratio (UAR) was developed to overcome existing resource shortcomings. However, the perception and use of the UAR in practice by providers is not known. The aim of this study was to understand existing resource use and potential UAR use in practice, their advantages and disadvantages, and areas of improvement for the UAR.

Methods

Healthcare providers mainly practicing in California with experience advising on medication use during lactation were recruited. One-on-one semi-structured interviews that included questions on current practices when advising medication use during breastfeeding, and approaches to a given a scenario with and without information about the UAR were conducted. The Framework Method was applied for data analysis to construct themes and codes.

Results

Twenty-eight providers representing multiple professions and disciplines were interviewed. Six main themes emerged: (1) Current Practice Approaches, (2) Advantages of Existing Resources, (3) Disadvantages of Existing Resources, (4) Advantages of the UAR, (5) Disadvantages of the UAR, and (6) Strategies to Improve the UAR. Overall, 108 codes were identified that illustrated theme topics ranging from a general lack of metric use to the realities of advising. A workflow describing current practice approaches connected all other themes. Almost all disadvantages of existing resources could be overcome by advantages of other resources and the UAR. Several improvements to the UAR were identified to address its shortcomings.

Conclusion

Through interviews with providers who use resources to advise on medication use during breastfeeding, an improved understanding of current practice approaches and accessed resources was ascertained. Ultimately, it was found that the UAR would confer multiple benefits over existing resources, and improvements of the UAR were identified. Future work should focus on implementing the suggested recommendations to ensure optimal uptake of the UAR to improve advising practices.

Current safety concerns about the use of antiseizure medications in pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Given the high prevalence of epilepsy in women of childbearing potential (15 million out of 50 million people worldwide), antiseizure medication (ASM) use in pregnancy is common. Identifying the safest and most effective ASM to use during pregnancy is often difficult, but also crucially important. The challenge is to balance two needs: maintaining seizure control while minimizing teratogenicity.

AREAS COVERED

This review looks at seizure- and treatment-related risks to mother and fetus during pregnancy, existing healthcare information programmes, strengths and pitfalls of the main pregnancy registries, known and supposed pharmacokinetic changes during gestation, the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring, and safety concerns. Articles and related content were screened on available publications after January 2000.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of newer ASMs during pregnancy is still limited, as shown by the paucity of data collected by different pregnancy registries. Choosing these medications can be challenging, partly due to unknown pharmacokinetic modifications in pregnancy, an aspect that serum drug monitoring might help to clarify. The safest treatment is chosen also taking into account the woman's needs, concerns and wishes, but adequate pre-pregnancy counseling is necessary to properly inform her about personal and fetal risks related both to seizures and to medications.

An inventory of European data sources to support pharmacoepidemiologic research on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children following medication exposure in pregnancy: A contribution from the ConcePTION project

BACKGROUND

Studies on medication safety in pregnancy are increasingly focusing on child neurodevelopmental outcomes. Establishing neurodevelopmental safety is complex due to the range of neurodevelopmental outcomes and the length of follow-up needed for accurate assessment. The aim of this study was to provide an inventory of European data sources for use in pharmacoepidemiologic studies investigating neurodevelopment following maternal medication exposure.

METHOD

The EUROmediSAFE inventory of data sources in Europe for evaluating perinatal and long-term childhood risks associated with in-utero exposure to medication was updated by contacting colleagues across 31 European countries, literature review and internet searches. Included data sources must record at least one neurodevelopmental outcome and maternal medication use in pregnancy must be available, either in the data source itself or through linkage with another data source. Information on the domain of neurodevelopment, measure/scale used and the approach to measurement were recorded for each data source.

RESULTS

Ninety data sources were identified across 14 countries. The majority (63.3%) were created for health surveillance and research with the remaining serving administrative purposes (21.1% healthcare databases,15.6% other administrative databases). Five domains of neurodevelopment were identified-infant development (36 data sources,13 countries), child behaviour (27 data sources, 10 countries), cognition (29 data sources, 12 countries), educational achievement (20 data sources, 7 countries), and diagnostic codes for neurodevelopmental disorders (42 data sources, 11 countries). Thirty-nine data sources, in 12 countries, had information on more than one domain of neurodevelopment.

CONCLUSION

This inventory is invaluable to future studies planning to investigate the neurodevelopmental impact of medication exposures during pregnancy. Caution must be used when combining varied approaches to neurodevelopment outcome measurement, the age of children in the data source, and the sensitivity and specificity of the outcome measure selected should be borne in mind.

Sociodemographic variation in prescriptions dispensed in early pregnancy in Northern Ireland 2010–2016

Aim

To establish the prevalence of prescriptions dispensed in early pregnancy by maternal age and area deprivation, for women who gave birth in Northern Ireland (NI) 2011–2016.

Study design

Population-based linked cohort study.

Methods

The NI Maternity System (NIMATS) database was used to identify all births to resident mothers in NI between 2011 and 2016. Prescriptions dispensed between the last menstrual period (LMP) and the first antenatal care visit (mean 10.7 weeks) (2010–2016) were extracted from the Enhanced Prescribing Database (EPD) which records all prescriptions dispensed by pharmacists in NI. EPD data were linked to NIMATS using the mother’s Health and Care Number. Maternal deprivation based on the NI Multiple Deprivation Measure 2017 was linked using the mother’s postcode.

Results

The cohort included 139,687 pregnancies resulting in live or stillbirths to 106,206 women. A medication was dispensed in 63.5% of pregnancies, and in 48.7% of pregnancies excluding supplements (vitamins, iron, and folic acid). Folic acid was the most commonly dispensed medication (33.1%). Excluding supplements, the mean number of medications was 1.1, with 4.2% having ≥5 medications. The most common non-supplement medications were antibiotics (13.1%), antiemetics (8.7%), analgesics (6.9%), hormonal medications (6.9%) and antidepressants (6.1%). Younger women (<20 years) had more antibiotics while older women (40+ years) had more antidepressants, cardiovascular, antihypertensives, anticoagulant medications and thyroxine. The proportion of women living in the most deprived areas with prescriptions for antidepressants, sedatives, tranquilisers, analgesics, and anti-epileptic medications was double the proportion of women with these medications in the least deprived areas.

Conclusion

Half of all pregnant women in NI were dispensed a non-supplement medication between LMP and the first antenatal care visit. Younger and older mothers and those living in the most deprived areas were more likely to have medications dispensed. More antidepressants were dispensed in areas of social deprivation.

Experiences and Perspectives of Marketing Authorisation Holders towards Medication Safety Monitoring during Pregnancy: A Pan-European Qualitative Analysis

Although marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) are involved in monitoring medication safety, it was unclear how they experience their role and current monitoring activities in pregnancy. Therefore, a qualitative study using online focus groups with MAHs and the Belgian umbrella organisation of MAHs was conducted in June–July 2021. In total, 38 representatives of nine organisations participated. Overall, participants reported multiple difficulties with data collection, including underreporting, collection of incomplete information, and loss to follow-up. The limited number of high-quality data collected, the unknown denominator and the lack of comparator data complicate MAHs’ data processing activities, preventing them to timely provide evidence in the pregnancy label. Three ‘conflicts’ inherent to the specific position of MAHs were identified explaining the difficulties they experience, i.e., (1) mistrust from patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs); (2) MAHs’ legal obligations and regulatory framework; (3) MAHs’ position outside the healthcare context. To overcome these barriers, MAHs suggested that data registration should occur in close collaboration with patients and HCPs, organised within the healthcare context and performed by using a user-friendly system. In conclusion, the reported difficulties and underlying conflicts of MAHs highlight the need for more effective, collaborative data collection strategies to generate new evidence on this topic.

From Inception to ConcePTION: Genesis of a Network to Support Better Monitoring and Communication of Medication Safety During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

In 2019, the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) funded the ConcePTION project-Building an ecosystem for better monitoring and communicating safety of medicines use in pregnancy and breastfeeding: validated and regulatory endorsed workflows for fast, optimised evidence generation-with the vision that there is a societal obligation to rapidly reduce uncertainty about the safety of medication use in pregnancy and breastfeeding. The present paper introduces the set of concepts used to describe the European data sources involved in the ConcePTION project and illustrates the ConcePTION Common Data Model (CDM), which serves as the keystone of the federated ConcePTION network. Based on data availability and content analysis of 21 European data sources, the ConcePTION CDM has been structured with six tables designed to capture data from routine healthcare, three tables for data from public health surveillance activities, three curated tables for derived data on population (e.g., observation time and mother-child linkage), plus four metadata tables. By its first anniversary, the ConcePTION CDM has enabled 13 data sources to run common scripts to contribute to major European projects, demonstrating its capacity to facilitate effective and transparent deployment of distributed analytics, and its potential to address questions about utilization, effectiveness, and safety of medicines in special populations, including during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and, more broadly, in the general population.

The impact of pregnancy on antihypertensive drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics: current status and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are rising in prevalence, and increase risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Physiologic changes occur during pregnancy that alter drug pharmacokinetics. However, antihypertensive drugs lack pregnancy-specific dosing recommendations due to critical knowledge gaps surrounding the extent of gestational changes in antihypertensive drug pharmacokinetics and underlying mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review (1) summarizes currently recommended medications and dosing strategies for non-emergent HDP treatment, (2) reviews and synthesizes existing literature identified via a comprehensive Pubmed search evaluating gestational changes in the maternal pharmacokinetics of commonly prescribed HDP drugs (notably labetalol and nifedipine), and (3) offers insight into the metabolism and clearance mechanisms underlying altered HDP drug pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. Remaining knowledge gaps and future research directions are summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

A series of small pharmacokinetic studies illustrate higher oral clearance of labetalol and nifedipine during pregnancy. Pharmacokinetic modeling and preclinical studies suggest these effects are likely due to pregnancy-associated increases in hepatic UGT1A1- and CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism and lower bioavailability. Accordingly, higher and/or more frequent doses may be needed to lower blood pressure during pregnancy. Future research is needed to address various evidence gaps and inform the development of more precise antihypertensive drug dosing strategies.

Antihistamine use during breastfeeding with focus on breast milk transfer and safety in humans: A systematic literature review

Current data on use of antihistamines during breastfeeding and risks to the breastfed infant are insufficient. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of studies measuring the levels of antihistamines in human breast milk, estimating the exposure for breastfed infants and/or reporting possible adverse effects on the breastfed infant. An additional aim was to review the antihistamine product labels available in the European Union (EU) and the United States. We searched seven online databases and identified seven human lactation studies that included 25 mother-infant pairs covering cetirizine, clemastine, ebastine, epinastine, loratadine, terfenadine and triprolidine. In addition, one study investigated the impact of chlorpheniramine or promethazine on prolactin levels among 17 women, and one study investigated possible adverse drug reactions in 85 breastfed infants exposed to various antihistamines. The relative infant dose was below 5% for all antihistamines, ranging from 0.3% for terfenadine to 4.5% for clemastine. Most product labels of the 10 antihistamines with available information in both the EU and the United States reported lack of evidence and recommended to avoid use during breastfeeding. The knowledge gap on antihistamines and lactation is extensive, and further human studies are warranted to ensure optimal treatment of breastfeeding women with allergy.

Knowledge, Information Sources, and Institutional Trust of Patients Regarding Medication Use in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Objective: The objective of our study is to characterize the knowledge, information sources, and institutional trust of patients regarding medication use in pregnancy. Materials and methods: We conducted a review of three databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. We included observational studies and knowledge assessments that examined the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs or information sources of pregnant patients related to medication use during pregnancy. Extraction was completed by two independent reviewers, outcomes were summarized descriptively, and appraisal was conducted. Results: Of the 1359 search results, 34 studies met inclusion criteria. Thus, our systematic review encompasses the beliefs of 11,757 pregnant participants. In most studies, participants described apprehension regarding potential risks to the fetus and the inadequacy of safety information. Across the 23 knowledge assessments, the majority of studies reported patient misconceptions about prescription medication in pregnancy. The most preferred information source was a healthcare provider. However, many participants expressed frustration, mistrust, and skepticism regarding physician knowledge. A common source of mistrust was due to perceived physician self-interest as well as a lack of education tailored to pregnancy. Consequently, informal sources of information were also popular. Conclusion: There is a need to improve the health literacy and trust among pregnant patients regarding drug prescribing. There are modifiable risk factors for mistrust that require further attention.

Drug development research in pregnant and lactating women

Pregnant and lactating women are considered "therapeutic orphans" because they generally have been excluded from clinical drug research and the drug development process owing to legal, ethical, and safety concerns. Most medications prescribed for pregnant and lactating women are used "off-label" because most of the clinical approved medications do not have appropriate drug labeling information for pregnant and lactating women. Medications that lack human safety data on use during pregnancy and lactation may pose potential risks for adverse effects in pregnant and lactating women as well as risks of teratogenic effects to their unborn and newborn babies. Federal policy requiring the inclusion of women in clinical research and trials led to considerable changes in research design and practice. Despite more women being included in clinical research and trials, the inclusion of pregnant and lactating women in drug research and clinical trials remains limited. A recent revision to the "Common Rule" that removed pregnant women from the classification as a "vulnerable" population may change the culture of drug research and drug development in pregnant and lactating women. This review article provides an overview of medications studied by the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units Network and Centers and describes the challenges in current obstetrical pharmacology research and alternative strategies for future research in precision therapeutics in pregnant and lactating women. Implementation of the recommendations of the Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women can provide legislative requirements and opportunities for research focused on pregnant and lactating women.

Trends and associated maternal characteristics of antidiabetic medication use among pregnant women in South Korea

The prevalence of diabetes during pregnancy and the need for the treatment are increasing. We aimed to investigate antidiabetic medications (ADM) use among pregnant women and their characteristics. Using Korea’s nationwide healthcare database, we included women aged 15–49 years with births during 2004–2013. The prevalence and secular trend of ADM use were assessed in 3 periods: pre-conception period, first trimester, and second/third trimesters. To compare maternal characteristics between pregnancies with and without ADM prescription, we used the χ² or Fisher’s exact test and Cochran-Armitage trend test. The prescription patterns analyzed by calendar year, age, insurance type, income, area, and medical institution. Of 81,559 pregnancies, 222 (0.27%) and 305 (0.37%) were exposed ADM during pre-conception and pregnancy periods, respectively. ADM prescriptions increased significantly by an 11.3-fold in second/third trimesters, while a 2.9-fold in first trimester. ADM use is more prevalent in women aged older and living in urban areas. Metformin was most used in the pre-conception period, while insulins were most during pregnancy. About 0.4% of women received ADM during pregnancy; a rate was lower than that in western countries. Non-recommended medications were more common in first trimester, which warrants pregnancy screening for women taking ADM.

Evaluation of Drug Labels Following the 2015 Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule

IMPORTANCE

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), implemented in 2015, includes information on pregnancy, lactation, and women and men with reproductive potential.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the drugs that have adhered to the new PLLR format; to shed light on the continued need for implementation of pregnancy, lactation, and reproduction into clinical studies; and to evaluate how many new therapeutic products have human and animal data specific to pregnancy and lactation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study of 290 new therapeutic drugs reviewed labeling data for newly FDA-approved therapeutic products from January 2010 to December 2019. Therapeutic products submitted on or after June 30, 2015, were required to be in PLLR format; those approved from June 30, 2007, to June 29, 2015, had until June 30, 2019, to be in PLLR format. Approval data and subsequent labeling revision were evaluated for pregnancy and lactation data (human and animal), pregnancy registry, black-box warnings, and inclusion of PLLR labeling format.

EXPOSURES

Date of new drug approval by FDA.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Compliance with PLLR; presence of animal or human data; presence of pregnancy registries; and presence of information regarding female and male reproductive potential.

RESULTS

A total of 290 new molecular entities or therapeutic products were approved by the FDA between 2010 and 2019 in 19 categories. Black-box warnings occurred in 89 drugs (30.7%; 95% CI, 25.4%-36.3%), with 3 (3.4%; 95% CI, 0.7%-9.5%) involving pregnancy. All products submitted after June 30, 2015, were in PLLR format; however, of the 138 submitted between 2010 and that date, 45 (32.6%; 95% CI, 24.9%-41.1%) were not in PLLR format by June 30, 2019. During the 10 years of data analyzed, significantly more were in PLLR format (P for trend < .001). Most approved therapeutic products have pregnancy data derived from animal studies (260 products; 89.7%; 95% CI, 85.6%-92.9%) but only 31 (10.7%; 95% CI, 7.4%-14.8%) derived data from human studies. Only 148 therapeutic products (51.0%; 95% CI, 45.1%-56.9%) had any data associated with lactation, 143 (49.3%; 95% CI, 43.4%-55.2%) originating from animal studies and 8 (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-5.4%) from human studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this study show that with the implementation of PLLR in the last decade, new therapeutic products were in compliance with the new rules; however, more than one-third of labels remain out of PLLR compliance. Human data on pregnancy and lactation are available in less than 20% of new product labeling.

Challenges in conducting clinical research studies in pregnant women

Maternal mortality and morbidity continue to rise in the United States. Despite these trends there are limited novel interventions to investigate and improve these metrics, partly due to research protocol limitations which restrict participation of pregnant women. Inclusion of pregnant women in research studies is integral to the process of obtaining important information regarding the safety and efficacy of therapeutics or interventions to improve maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. While significant changes in research practices have resulted in an increase of female participants, there remains a paucity of research trials directly targeting pregnant and lactating women. This article provides an overview of issues surrounding inclusion of pregnant or breastfeeding women in research studies, and includes historical perspectives, navigating concerns over safety profile, considerations for appropriate development, and future perspectives.

Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges

For the past several years, the implementation of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing has become widespread in several centers and clinical practice settings. PGx testing may be ordered at the point-of-care when treatment is needed or in advance of treatment for future use. The potential benefits of PGx testing are not limited to adult patients, as children are increasingly using medications more often and at earlier ages. This review provides some background on the use of PGx testing in children as well as mothers (prenatally and post-natally) and discusses the challenges, benefits, and the ethical, legal, and social implications of providing PGx testing to children.

Factors influencing the recruitment of lactating women in a clinical trial involving direct oral anticoagulants: a qualitative study

Background Robust human data on medication use during lactation is scarce. With increasing medication use in postpartum women, it is important to conduct clinical lactation studies measuring the excretion of drugs in human milk and generate evidence. We plan to conduct a clinical lactation study, involving the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Objective This study aimed to identify factors influencing lactating women's clinical trial participation and to improve the design of a proposed DOACs clinical lactation study. Setting Lactating women in London, UK. Methods Three focus groups were conducted in lactating women with differing experiences of being prescribed anticoagulants during puerperium. Main outcome measures Thematic framework approach was used to analyse and identify key themes, using NVivo version 11. Results Eight breastfeeding mothers participated. Women's decision-making on clinical trial participation was largely influenced by the lactation stage and previous breastfeeding experience. The concern of harm to their infant caused by the test medication or interruption of lactation were the predominant barriers to potential participation. Around 6 months following the birth of their infant and second-time mothers appeared to be more amenable to clinical trial participation. The provision of home visits for the execution of the study was highly recommended. Conclusion Our findings suggest that lactating women would participate in a clinical trial during the breastfeeding period, if the timing is right and if the woman is an experienced mother. Home visits will be provided in our proposed DOACs clinical lactation study.

Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women

Pregnant women have been called therapeutic orphans because data supporting common interventions, medications, health teaching, and models of care are meager. The generation of quality evidence benefits from proactive approaches that ensure ethical standards are met to protect participants. The purpose of this article is to differentiate among health care, quality improvement, and research and to discuss ethical involvement of women who are pregnant and potentially childbearing in these initiatives. Health care is provided to protect and improve individual health. Quality improvement aims to enhance delivery of care for all those receiving care in particular settings. Research, whether retrospective or prospective, is designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge. This review includes vignettes to distinguish between research, quality improvement, and case study dissemination and to highlight the value of publication of information with applicability beyond a single site. As a community, perinatal care providers will be able to contribute more evidence to guide care if they err on the side of seeking institutional review board approval for activities that examine the care and outcomes of pregnant women and the fetus. Traditional research activities, including clinical trials, remain crucial. However, to fill gaps in knowledge, we must expedite our ability to report informative cases, examine clinical data, share lessons learned during quality improvement campaigns, and publish and disseminate these findings. Accelerating improvements in care demands expansion of the evidence base.

Evaluation of the Safety of Drugs and Biological Products Used During Lactation: Workshop Summary

This report serves as a summary of a 2-day public workshop sponsored by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the safety of drugs and biological products used during lactation. The aim of the workshop was to provide a forum to discuss the collection of data to inform the potential risks to breastfed infants with maternal use of medications during lactation. Discussions included the review of current approaches to collect data on medications used during lactation, and the considerations for future approaches to design and guide clinical lactation studies. This workshop is part of continuing efforts to raise the awareness of the public for women who choose to breastfeed their infants.

A qualitative study on acceptable levels of risk for pregnant women in clinical research

BACKGROUND

There is ambiguity with regard to what counts as an acceptable level of risk in clinical research in pregnant women and there is no input from stakeholders relative to such research risks. The aim of our paper was to explore what stakeholders who are actively involved in the conduct of clinical research in pregnant women deem an acceptable level of risk for pregnant women in clinical research. Accordingly, we used the APOSTEL VI study, a low-risk obstetrical randomised controlled trial, as a case-study.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective qualitative study using 35 in-depth semi-structured interviews and one focus group. We interviewed healthcare professionals, Research Ethics Committee members (RECs) and regulators who are actively involved in the conduct of clinical research in pregnant women, in addition to pregnant women recruited for the APOSTEL VI case-study in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Three themes characterise the way stakeholders view risks in clinical research in pregnant women in general. Additionally, one theme characterises the way healthcare professionals and pregnant women view risks with respect to the case-study specifically. First, ideas on what constitutes an acceptable level of risk in general ranged from a preference for zero risk for the foetus up to minimal risk. Second, the desirability of clinical research in pregnant women in general was questioned altogether. Third, stakeholders proposed to establish an upper limit of risk in potentially beneficial clinical research in pregnant women in order to protect the foetus and the pregnant woman from harm. Fourth and finally, the case-study illustrates that healthcare professionals' individual perception of risk may influence recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals, RECs, regulators and pregnant women are all risk adverse in practice, possibly explaining the continuing underrepresentation of pregnant women in clinical research. Determining the acceptable levels of risk on a universal level alone is insufficient, because the individual perception of risk also influences behaviour towards pregnant women in clinical research. Therefore, bioethicists and researchers might be interested in changing the perception of risk, which could be achieved by education and awareness about the actual benefits and harms of inclusion and exclusion of pregnant women.

Improvements in Clinical Trials Information Will Improve the Reproductive Health and Fertility of Cancer Patients

There are a number of barriers that result in cancer patients not being referred for oncofertility care, which include knowledge about reproductive risks of antineoplastic agents. Without this information, clinicians do not always make recommendations for oncofertility care. The objective of this study was to describe the level of reproductive information and recommendations that clinicians have available in clinical trial protocols regarding oncofertility management and follow-up, and the information that patients may receive in clinical trials patient information sheets or consent forms. A literature review of the 71 antineoplastic drugs included in the 68 clinical trial protocols showed that 68% of the antineoplastic drugs had gonadotoxic animal data, 32% had gonadotoxic human data, 83% had teratogenic animal data, and 32% had teratogenic human data. When the clinical trial protocols were reviewed, only 22% of the protocols reported the teratogenic risks and 32% of the protocols reported the gonadotoxic risk. Only 56% of phase 3 protocols had gonadotoxic information and 13% of phase 3 protocols had teratogenic information. Nine percent of the protocols provided fertility preservation recommendations and 4% provided reproductive information in the follow-up and survivorship period. Twenty-six percent had a section in the clinical trials protocol, which identified oncofertility information easily. When gonadotoxic and teratogenic effects of treatment were known, they were not consistently included in the clinical trial protocols and the lack of data for new drugs was not reported. Very few protocols gave recommendations for oncofertility management and follow-up following the completion of cancer treatment. The research team proposes a number of recommendations that should be required for clinicians and pharmaceutical companies developing new trials.

Inhibition by tadalafil of contractility of isolated nonpregnant human myometrium

Objective:

To investigate the inhibitory effect of tadalafil on the contractility of isolated nonpregnant human myometrium.

Materials and Methods:

The ability of tadalafil (25, 40, and 63 μM) to inhibit 55 mM KCl-induced contractility of isolated nonpregnant human myometrium was studied. The ability of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide (10 μM) and the calcium-sensitive potassium channel (BKCa) blocker iberiotoxin (100 nM) to reverse the inhibitory effect of 40 μM tadalafil on 55 mM KCl-induced myometrial contractility was also studied.

Results:

Tadalafil produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of myometrial contractility that was statistically significant at 40 and 63 μM concentrations of tadalafil. The inhibition by tadalafil of myometrial contractility was statistically significantly reversed by the concurrent administration of glibenclamide and iberiotoxin.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that tadalafil inhibits human myometrial contractility by opening ATP-sensitive potassium channels and BKCa channels. The opening of these channels could have been due to the action of raised intracellular levels of cGMP due to inhibition of PDE-5 by tadalafil. The results suggest that tadalafil could be investigated for use in clinical conditions requiring relaxation of the myometrium.

Changes to Pregnancy and Lactation Risk Labeling for Prescription Drugs

Safe medication use by women during pregnancy and lactation is an area of concern for women and their health care providers. In December 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule on new labeling changes, which go into effect in June 2015 and eliminate the current letter system of A-D, X. The new labeling will include a summary of risks to using the medication during pregnancy and lactation, and supporting data and relevant information to assist health care providers in counseling pregnant and lactating women.

Should pregnant women be included in phase IV clinical drug trials?

Relatively few drugs, especially those recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, have published human pregnancy experience. Although all drugs contain animal reproduction data, these are usually not predictive of human risk. Clinical trials in pregnant women are rarely conducted because of ethical and legal concerns, and it may be many years before sufficient observational data are collected to guide clinical treatment decisions. Because many of these drugs will be used in pregnancy, human data are needed shortly after the drugs come to the market. Lack of human data leads to uncertainty over whether a drug can be safely prescribed for a pregnant patient. Unless there are compelling scientific and ethical reasons to exclude them, pregnant women should be included in phase IV clinical trials (postmarketing studies to obtain additional information, including the risks, benefits, and optimal use of a drug). This paper examines how physicians currently counsel pregnant women when there are no human data and proposes an alternative method in which knowledge regarding risks associated with the use of drugs during pregnancy can be enhanced in a clinical trial setting.

Epidemiology of medications use in pregnancy

The use of prescribed and over-the-counter medications in pregnancy is on the rise. Many women become pregnant at an older age and with preexisting medical conditions that require pharmacotherapy. In addition, pregnancy is associated with profound changes in the physiology of virtually every organ in the body, which affect medications' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Despite all of these, pregnant women are still considered therapeutic orphans, as the majority of current therapeutics were never studied in pregnancy. The goals of this review are to synthesize the available information regarding the epidemiology of medications use and the state of drug research in pregnancy, in an effort to highlight the need for pharmacologic research in pregnancy.

Special population considerations and regulatory affairs for clinical research

Special populations, including women (non-pregnant and pregnant), pediatrics, and the elderly, require additional consideration with regard to clinical research. There are very specific regulatory laws, which protect these special populations, that need to be understood and adhered to in order to perform clinical research. This review provides a broad overview of some of the physiological differences in special populations and discusses how these differences may affect study design and regulatory considerations. These various special populations, with respect to regulatory affairs, are clearly defined within the Code of Federal Regulations. The definition of "special population" exists to provide enhanced awareness of their vulnerabilities, thereby allowing the creation of regulatory guidance aimed to decrease injury or outright harm. Currently, progress is being made to be more inclusive of special populations in clinical trials. This reflects changing attitudes towards drug information, with it being more representative of those patients that will ultimately be prescribed or exposed to the therapy. However, all research undertaken in these populations should be performed in a manner that ensures all protections of each participant are upheld.