A brief history of anti-VEGF for the treatment of ocular angiogenesis

Effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGF therapies for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), a leading cause of vision loss. A comprehensive search of 6 databases identified 17 RCTs involving 4,272 eyes. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as visual acuity, ETDRS letter scores, central retinal thickness (CRT), and adverse events, with follow-up of at least 6 months. Anti-VEGF therapy showed significant efficacy, with a pooled mean difference (MD) of 15.14 ETDRS letters (95% CI: 14.24-16.03, p < 0.001). Over 12 months, patients were 2.87 times more likely to achieve gains of >15 ETDRS letters (OR 2.87, 95% CI: 2.21-3.72). CRT decreased by MD of -350 µm (95% CI: -0.363 to -0.338, p < 0.001). Safety analysis revealed reduced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (OR 0.88, p = 0.035) with no significant systemic risks. Intraocular pressure elevation (OR 1.924, p < 0.001) warrants monitoring. Subgroup analysis highlighted faricimab as most effective, with aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab providing substantial benefits. Anti-VEGF therapy is an effective, safe cornerstone for managing ME in RVO. Further research should explore biomarkers and combination treatments to refine therapeutic approaches.

Trabeculectomy Augmented with Anti-VEGF Improves Surgical Outcomes in Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TOPIC

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare trabeculectomy augmented with anti-VEGF and trabeculectomy without anti-VEGF for the treatment of glaucoma in an adult population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Trabeculectomy has long been established as the 'gold standard' surgical procedure in the management of glaucoma when medical and laser options are deemed to be inadequate but has variable success due to fibrosis and scarring at the surgical site. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been investigated as adjuncts to improve surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents compared to traditional agents in enhancing trabeculectomy success, intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, and medication reduction.

DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42025636060). A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science for randomised controlled trials comparing trabeculectomy with and without anti-VEGF agents in glaucoma. Primary outcomes included complete and qualified success rates as well as mean IOP reduction and reduction in IOP-lowering medications. Follow-up periods were 6, 12, and 24 months. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies comprising 1,002 patients were included in the analysis. At 12 months, trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C (MMC) and anti-VEGF demonstrated significantly higher odds of achieving complete success (OR = 1.90, 95% CI [1.16, 3.10], p = 0.01). Specifically, intracameral or intravitreal bevacizumab was associated with improved odds of complete success at 12 months, with the 1.25 mg dose yielding a notable benefit (OR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.06, 2.36], p = 0.03). Additionally, trabeculectomy with MMC and bevacizumab significantly reduced the requirement for IOP-lowering medications (MD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.09, 0.60], p = 0.008). A risk-of-bias assessment classified eleven studies as low risk and five with some concerns.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF agents improve trabeculectomy outcomes when used with Mitomycin-C, enhancing complete success rates and reducing medication needs. This analysis underscores the potential of anti-VEGF therapy as a valuable adjunct, though further research with standardised protocols is essential to strengthen these findings.

Müller cells trophism and pathology as the next therapeutic targets for retinal diseases

Müller cells are a crucial retinal cell type involved in multiple regulatory processes and functions that are essential for retinal health and functionality. Acting as structural and functional support for retinal neurons and photoreceptors, Müller cells produce growth factors, regulate ion and fluid homeostasis, and facilitate neuronal signaling. They play a pivotal role in retinal morphogenesis and cell differentiation, significantly contributing to macular development. Due to their radial morphology and unique cytoskeletal organization, Müller cells act as optical fibers, efficiently channeling photons directly to the photoreceptors. In response to retinal damage, Müller cells undergo specific gene expression and functional changes that serve as a first line of defense for neurons, but can also lead to unwarranted cell dysfunction, contributing to cell death and neurodegeneration. In some species, Müller cells can reactivate their developmental program, promoting retinal regeneration and plasticity-a remarkable ability that holds promising therapeutic potential if harnessed in mammals. The crucial and multifaceted roles of Müller cells-that we propose to collectively call "Müller cells trophism"-highlight the necessity of maintaining their functionality. Dysfunction of Müller cells, termed "Müller cells pathology," has been associated with a plethora of retinal diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, vitreomacular disorders, macular telangiectasia, and inherited retinal dystrophies. In this review, we outline how even subtle disruptions in Müller cells trophism can drive the pathological cascade of Müller cells pathology, emphasizing the need for targeted therapies to preserve retinal health and prevent disease progression.

Update in the Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN)

Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) includes a variety of ocular surface tumors ranging from mild epithelial dysplasia to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. OSSN is one of the most frequent non-pigmented malignancies of the ocular surface. Debate persists between surgical excision and medical management concerning the optimal regimen for OSSN treatment, with surgical excision continuing to be the recognized standard of care in contemporary medicine. Medical and conservative therapy techniques have advanced significantly in recent years, leading to widespread use in everyday ophthalmology practice. This study aims to look into the efficacy of current treatment options for conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma and to evaluate the available evidence for the most up-to-date approach for the management of the disease.

Resveratrol Supplementation in Wet AMD: Association With Fewer Intravitreal Injections and Reduced Macular Fibrosis

Purpose

To evaluate the 2-year outcomes of resveratrol oral supplement given as an adjunctive treatment in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that were treated with intravitreal injections of aflibercept.

Patients and Methods

In our retrospective study, 50 treatment-naïve patients suffering from wet-AMD were included. They were assigned to two subgroups of 25 patients each. Every participant was treated according to "Pro Re Nata" protocol; 3 monthly intravitreal injections of 2.0 mg aflibercept were applied followed by injections according to need. The patients in the second group also consumed daily two tablets of resveratrol enriched oral supplement (60 mg of resveratrol in total). For 2 years, the patients were monthly assessed with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and OCT-angiography. The main endpoints were the change of BCVA, the number of anti-VEGF injections, the change of central foveal thickness values, and the expansion or new development of fibrosis.

Results

Between the studied groups, no significant differences were detected in the baseline demographic and clinical data (p>0.05 for all). Over the 24-month study period, both BCVA and central foveal thickness values did not differ significantly between the two groups. As for the number of applied injections, they were significantly fewer in the group of patients that were treated with the resveratrol supplement (9.32±1.37 vs 7.40±1.88, p<0.001). Notably, the frequency of fibrosis progression was significantly lower in the resveratrol group (p=0.04).

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings suggest that resveratrol oral supplement could be considered as a useful adjunctive aid to the established treatment in cases suffering from wet AMD, highlighting the superiority of the combination treatment regimen, since it was accompanied by lower rates of both intravitreal aflibercept injections and progression of macular fibrosis.

Choroidal thickness after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness in the world and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections have been the standard of care for the wet/neovascular variant since 2004. Currently, there are conflicting reports regarding its effect on the choroid, which supplies outer retina with oxygen and other nutrients. We synthesize available information of anti-VEGF on choroidal thickness (CT) in treatment-naïve typical neovascular AMD patients during the initial 12-week loading phase. We found 43 studies involving 1901 eyes from 1878 patients were included. Meta-analysis of 35 studies reporting CT at baseline and after 12 weeks suggested a significant decrease in CT with anti-VEGF treatment. A greater mean change with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab was found in subgroup analyses of sub-foveal CT in types 1 and 2 macular neovascularization. The long-term consequences of reduced CT in neovascular AMD remain unclear and require further targeted studies.

Adopting Interventional Glaucoma Via Sustained-Release Therapies: The Wide-Ranging Impact of Procedural Pharmaceuticals in Ophthalmology

Topical medical therapy is the most common approach to the treatment of many ocular conditions. While effective, topical therapy has numerous important limitations. Eye drops can have unpleasant or even dangerous side effects, are often difficult to self-administer, and the application of multiple drops per day, possibly from multiple different bottles, can be burdensome. Perhaps the most important limitation of topical medical therapy is non-adherence, a complex multifactorial behavior that increases the risk of poor outcomes associated with undertreatment. There is growing interest in a class of therapeutics termed "procedural pharmaceuticals" (PPs), which remove the responsibility of self-dosing from patients. An array of PPs are available for the treatment of a variety of ocular conditions, such as those for glaucoma, retina, and cataract surgery; and many more will emerge in coming years. A paradigm shift away from patient-administered therapy toward provider-administered therapy will have important implications for both providers and patients. This paper explores the impact that PPs have had, and will have, on the clinical practice of ophthalmology.

Crocus sativus (saffron) and age-related macular degeneration

Background

Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) leads to impaired vision and potential blindness. Globally, it accounts for approximately 9% of vision loss cases, and a projected 288 million individuals will be affected by 2040. Current treatments have limitations such as variable effectiveness, high costs, and potential side effects. Additionally, atrophic ARMD management remains challenging. As saffron has shown promising neuroprotective and antioxidant effects by potentially delaying disease progression, this study aims to review the mechanistic, pre-clinical, and clinical evidence of the effects, safety, and tolerability of saffron in ARMD treatment.

Methods

The Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles was applied in this narrative review. To find relevant literature, the syntax "(saffron OR crocus) AND (retin* OR "geographic atrophy" OR "choroidal neovascular*" OR "macular degeneration")" was searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Pre-clinical and clinical original investigations of the effects of saffron in ARMD along with the eligible studies cited in their reference lists were identified and included.

Results

Saffron and its active compounds, crocin and crocetin, have shown promising results in improving visual function and delaying ARMD progression. Several clinical studies have found that daily supplementation with 20-50 mg of saffron or 5-15 mg of crocin for 3-12 months significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and retinal function as measured by electroretinogram and microperimetry, with benefits observed in both dry and wet forms of ARMD. The effects were independent of genetic risk factors and maintained during the follow-up periods, suggesting the potential role of saffron as a long-term treatment option. Saffron reduces ARMD progression via anti-angiogenic, neuroprotective, and antioxidant mechanisms. Moreover, saffron is safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

Although further research is needed to confirm long-term safety and efficacy, current evidence supports the use of saffron or crocin supplements as a safe and tolerable adjunct therapy for ARMD management.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has become the mainstay of treatment in many retinal diseases. The comparative efficacy and safety of newer bispecific anti-VEGF/angiopoietin 2 (Ang2) agents in the treatment paradigm versus widely used monospecific anti-VEGF agents remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify comparative observational studies and randomized controlled trials published from 2015 to Jul 2024. With assessment by three independent reviewers, original English peer-reviewed full-text articles evaluating faricimab versus monospecific anti-VEGF agent(s) in FDA-indicated retinal disease with data on at least one set of efficacy and/or safety outcomes for each treatment arm and a minimum 3-month follow-up period were included. Data were appraised using the Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools, PRISMA, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. All outcomes were collected at the last follow-up. Random effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals were conducted to calculate weighted mean differences and risk ratios. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), change in central subfield thickness (CSFT, μm), and presence of retinal fluid were primary endpoints; ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Across 13 studies, in the context of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO), 2,226 eyes received anti-VEGF monotherapy and 3,022 received faricimab. Final and change in BCVA were similar between treatment groups. Faricimab was associated with a significantly higher reduction in CSFT in DME and RVO eyes but not in nAMD eyes. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in BCVA between faricimab and anti-VEGF monotherapy in nAMD, DME, and RVO. While faricimab offered superior improvement in CSFT at the final follow-up for DME and RVO eyes, this effect was not seen in nAMD eyes. Future studies are needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of faricimab for retinal vascular disease.

Trends in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Original Medicare Part B Claims in the United States, 2014-2019

PURPOSE

To characterize trends in use of and expenditure for the intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab among the population enrolled in Original Medicare from 2014 to 2019.

METHODS

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to extract Medicare Part B fee-for-service outpatient injection claims data submitted by ophthalmologists. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between reimbursement, ophthalmologist availability, and agent administration rate.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2019, 17,588,995 intravitreal injection claims were filed by 4218 US ophthalmologists. Medicare costs for anti-VEGF injections increased from 2.51 B USD in 2014 to 4.02 B USD in 2019. Increased state-level ophthalmologist availability and incremental increases in average reimbursement amounts were found to be significantly associated with a 6.8-fold variation in 2019 overall anti-VEGF injection rates across states.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare injection rates and costs for anti-VEGF injections have both increased between 2014 and 2019, largely driven by increased aflibercept use. There is a significant association between ophthalmologist availability and anti-VEGF injection rate on the state level, suggesting access to care may contribute to the observed state-level disparities in intravitreal injection rates. Further characterization of factors contributing to the state-level variation in injection rates of individual anti-VEGF agents may help inform interventions promoting equitable access to and use of these drugs.

Clinical Outcomes and Experiences with Prefilled Syringes Versus Vials for Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Treatments: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been the standard treatment for retinal diseases for almost two decades. These treatments are administered via intravitreal injection using single-use vials or prefilled syringes (PFS). In this systematic review, we evaluate health care resource use and clinical outcomes and experiences with PFS for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2015 to February 8, 2024 to identify literature reporting outcomes regarding procedural efficiency, health care resource use, patient and clinician experiences, and safety for currently approved anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab) administered using PFS. Comparators were vial-based injections of the same anti-VEGFs.

RESULTS

A total of 36 publications met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic literature review; the majority were non-randomized studies, with a small number of reviews, case series, survey studies, and opinion articles. Publications reported that preparation times were significantly shorter for PFS (40.3-57.9 s) versus vials (ranibizumab, 62.8-98.0 s; aflibercept, 71.9-79.5 s), with no differences in product stability between PFS and vials. Clinicians expressed a preference for PFS and thought PFS were faster, easier to use, and had increased safety versus vials. Publications consistently reported significantly lower rates of endophthalmitis per injection with PFS versus vials (ranibizumab PFS, 0-0.02%; aflibercept PFS, 0.01-0.02%; ranibizumab vial, 0.02-0.05%; aflibercept vial, 0.02-0.06%). Four publications reported increased rates of transient vision loss after aflibercept PFS injection versus vial-based injection. No publications reported outcomes regarding health care resource use or patient experiences.

CONCLUSION

The available literature supports the increased procedural efficiency of PFS versus vial-based intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs. PFS are positively perceived by clinicians and have a safety benefit in the form of a decreased risk of endophthalmitis versus vials.

Real-world evidence for brolucizumab efficacy in age-related macular degeneration and central serous chorioretinopathy patients

Real-world studies concerning different populations are valuable and bring new information regarding different regimens of Brolucizumab injections and their adverse reactions. The present study investigates the efficacy of a pro-re-nata regimen (PRN) for neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD). Separate from the main statistics we report the use of Brolucizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). A retrospective observational single-center study was conducted on 82 eyes treated with Brolucizumab between 2021 and 2023, for nAMD. Patients were injected at intervals of at least 2 months after the loading phase. In 9 (3-20) months follow-up, only 0.26 % adverse reactions were noticed, with good resolution of retinal fluid (significant reduction of CST on SD-OCT, -72.50μ, p < 0.05), especially for subretinal fluid. 54 % of the eyes remained fluid-free. The interval of injection (INTOI, a parameter calculated by averaging the results of the division of the follow-up period to the number of injections received by each patient) was 2.68 (corresponding to an injection interval of 11 weeks). This could become an important parameter for the characterization of Brolucizumab and any other anti-VEGF therapy and could provide a more precise interval of injection in the future. Four patients also received Brolucizumab for the treatment of chronic CSC (3 doses each). All showed good response, 3 of them remaining fluid-free.

Real-World Weekly Efficacy Analysis of Faricimab in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Objectives: This study entailed a weekly analysis of real-world data (RWD) on the safety and efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) faricimab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: A retrospective, single-centre clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland, approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich, Switzerland. Patients with nAMD were included. Data from patient charts and imaging were analysed. The safety and efficacy of the first faricimab injection were evaluated weekly until 4 weeks after injection. Results: Sixty-three eyes with a complete 4-week follow-up were enrolled. Six eyes were treatment-naïve; fifty-seven eyes were switched to faricimab from another treatment. Neither group showed signs of retinal vasculitis during the 4 weeks after injection. Central subfield thickness (CST) and volume (CSV) showed a statistically significant decrease compared to the baseline in the switched group (CST: p = 0.00383; CSV: p = 0.00702) after 4 weeks. The corrected visual acuity returned to the baseline level in both groups. The macular neovascularization area decreased in both groups, but this was not statistically significant. A complete resolution of sub- and intraretinal fluid after 4 weeks was found in 40% (switched) and 75% (naïve) of the treated patients. Conclusions: The weekly follow-ups reflect the structure-function relationship beginning with a fast functional improvement within two weeks after injection followed by a return to near-baseline levels after week 3. The first faricimab injection in our cohort showed a high safety profile and a statistically significant reduction in macular oedema in switched nAMD patients.

A TRP to Pathological Angiogenesis and Vascular Normalization

Uncontrolled angiogenesis underlies various pathological conditions such as cancer, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Hence, targeting pathological angiogenesis has become a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer and neovascular ocular diseases. However, current pharmacological treatments that target VEGF signaling have met with limited success either due to acquiring resistance against anti-VEGF therapies with serious side effects including nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular-related adverse effects in cancer patients or retinal vasculitis and intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection in patients with AMD or PDR. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel strategies which can control multiple aspects of the pathological microenvironment and regulate the process of abnormal angiogenesis. To this end, vascular normalization has been proposed as an alternative for antiangiogenesis approach; however, these strategies still focus on targeting VEGF or FGF or PDGF which has shown adverse effects. In addition to these growth factors, calcium has been recently implicated as an important modulator of tumor angiogenesis. This article provides an overview on the role of major calcium channels in endothelium, TRP channels, with a special focus on TRPV4 and its downstream signaling pathways in the regulation of pathological angiogenesis and vascular normalization. We also highlight recent findings on the modulation of TRPV4 activity and endothelial phenotypic transformation by tumor microenvironment through Rho/YAP/VEGFR2 mechanotranscriptional pathways. Finally, we provide perspective on endothelial TRPV4 as a novel VEGF alternative therapeutic target for vascular normalization and improved therapy. © 2024 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 14:5389-5406, 2024.

Short-term effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term effects (hours-days) of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-arm, interventional clinical series. Eyes with DME and 3-9 injections of ranibizumab without a good response were included. Patients underwent a single IDI. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, complete ophthalmic evaluation, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were performed at baseline, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month. The main outcomes were change in central retinal thickness (CRT) on SD-OCT and BCVA.

RESULTS

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Mean CRT decreased after treatment from 515.87 µm ± 220.00 µm at baseline to 489.60 µm ± 176.53 µm after 2 h (p = 0.126), and 450.13 µm ± 163.43 at 24 h (p = 0.006). Change in BCVA was from 0.85 ± 0.44 logMAR baseline to 0.58 ± 0.37 log MAR at 1 month (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes treated with IDI showed significant decrease in CRT detectable 1 day after injection. In some patients, the effect could be observed 3 h post-implantation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05736081 . Registered 20 February 2023, Retrospectively registered.

Investing in vision: Innovation in retinal therapeutics and the influence on venture capital investment

Since the groundbreaking approval of the first anti-VEGF therapy in 2004, the retinal therapeutics field has undergone a remarkable transformation, witnessing a surge in novel, disease-modifying therapeutics for a broad spectrum of retinal diseases, extending beyond exudative VEGF-driven conditions. The surge in scientific advancement and the pressing, unmet, medical need have captured the attention of venture capital investors, who have collectively invested close to $10 billion in research and development of new retinal therapeutics between 2004 and 2023. Notably, the field of exudative diseases has gradually shifted away from trying to outcompete anti-VEGF therapeutics towards lowering the overall treatment burden by reducing injection frequency. Simultaneously, a new era has emerged in the non-exudative field, targeting prevalent conditions like dry AMD and rare indications such as Retinitis pigmentosa. This has led to promising drug candidates in development, culminating in the landmark approval of Luxturna for a rare form of Retinitis pigmentosa. The validation of new mechanisms, such as the complement pathway in dry AMD has paved the way for the approvals of Syvovre (Apellis) and Izervay (Iveric/Astellas), marking the first two therapies for this condition. In this comprehensive review, we share our view on the cumulative lessons from the past two decades in developing retinal therapeutics, covering both positive achievements and challenges. We also contextualize the investments, strategic partnering deals, and acquisitions of biotech companies, pharmaceutical companies venture capital investors in retinal therapeutics, respectively. Finally, we provide an outlook and potentially a forward-looking roadmap on novel retinal therapeutics, highlighting the emergence of potential new intervention strategies, such as cell-based therapies, gene editing, and combination therapies. We conclude that upcoming developments have the potential to further stimulate venture capital investments, which ultimately could facilitate the development and delivery of new therapies to patients in need.

Comparative Efficacy of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) Agents and Corticosteroids in Managing Diabetic Retinopathy-Associated Diabetic Macular Edema: A Meta-Analysis and Comprehensive Systematic Review

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant condition linked to diabetes that can result in visual loss. In recent times, there has been a notable change in the desire for treatment, with a shift toward anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy and intravitreal steroids while moving away from conventional laser therapies. This comprehensive meta-analysis explicitly compares the efficacy of two therapies for DME: anti-VEGF therapy and corticosteroid. We conducted a thorough search using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify publications that compare the effects of anti-VEGF therapy and corticosteroid implants on DME. Using Review Manager 5.0 (RevMan), we incorporated data from nine research studies, which involved a total of 877 people. The group was split into two factions: 453 patients were administered corticosteroids, while 466 patients underwent treatment with anti-VEGF therapy. Our investigation demonstrated that both corticosteroid and anti-VEGF therapy positively improved the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduced the central macular thickness (CMT). Nevertheless, comparing the mean BCVA on the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale revealed no statistically significant changes between the two treatments. This indicates considerable inconsistency, as evidenced by the weighted mean difference (WMD) of -0.13 (-0.41, 0.16) with a P-value of 0.39 and an I2 value of 99%. In addition, both treatments improved BCVA compared to the initial measurement. However, there was no statistically significant benefit for corticosteroid over anti-VEGF therapy, as indicated by the WMD of 0.03 (-0.07, 0.13) with a P-value of 0.55 and an I2 value of 80%. The examination of the average CMT also yielded findings that lacked statistical significance, displaying a significant amount of variation (WMD -36.37, 95% confidence interval [-127.52, 54.78], P = 0.43, I2 = 98%). Remarkably, there were no significant alterations among the anti-VEGF therapy group despite a rise in CMT from the initial measurement. The main conclusion drawn from our research is that corticosteroid demonstrates encouraging immediate enhancements in BCVA and CMT. However, anti-VEGF therapy seems to provide more significant long-term advantages. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the corticosteroid group had a greater susceptibility to acquiring elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and the possibility of glaucoma.

Glycosylation differences of an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody (PRO-169) and its extensive comparison with Bevacizumab

PRO-169 is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody developed by Laboratorios Sophia that shares its sequence with Bevacizumab (BVZ); though, PRO-169 is intended for intravitreal administration. In this study, analytical characterization showed that PRO-169 had glycosylation differences in comparison to BVZ reference product (RP); since it had more content of G1F, G2F, sialic acid and high mannose. Further investigation was performed to evaluate if differences between both products would affect the efficacy and safety profile of PRO-169. PRO-169 had no alteration in its in vitro biological activity; moreover, no cytotoxicity or immunogenicity concerns should be expected as demonstrated by different orthogonal methods at analytical, in vitro and in vivo assays. These results support moving to the clinical testing of PRO-169 since no major complications will be expected with its clinical use for the treatment of ophthalmic diseases.

The role of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection in peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy: A systematic review

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have revolutionized the field of ophthalmology, and their use in a variety of retinal diseases is growing. One target disease is peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, a disease that is uncommon and poorly understood. Despite this, there are numerous studies and case reports outlining the potential role of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF medicines to treat it. As such, an evidence-based understanding of its risk-benefit profile is vital. We performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for published studies and case reports relating to the use of anti-VEGF injections in peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Anti-VEGF was first used in 2010 to aid in the management of peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy. Since then, it has been increasingly used to manage this disease. Other potential management strategies, including laser photocoagulation, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and vitrectomy are explored and compared with anti-VEGF where possible. Anti-VEGF appears to be an effective therapy in managing peripheral exudative hemorrhagic chorioretinopathy, especially when there is an exudative threat to the macula.

Treat-and-extend dosing of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis

Intravitreal injections of antiangiogenic agents are pivotal in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The comparative efficacy and safety of treat-and-extend (T&E) versus bimonthly, monthly, and pro re nata (PRN) dosing remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language RCTs reporting on efficacy and/or safety outcomes of dosing regimens of anti-VEGF agents in nAMD was performed. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters) at last follow-up represented the primary endpoint, while central subfield thickness (CSFT, μm), injection burden, and ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints. A random effects meta-analysis was performed, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Across six RCTs, 781 T&E-, 663 monthly-, 130 PRN-, and 123 bimonthly treated eyes were included. Mean changes in BCVA and CSFT at last follow-up were similar between T&E versus monthly (WMD, -0.62 letters; 95% CI, -2.12 to 0.87; P = 0.41; WMD, 5.30 microns; 95% CI, -10.67 to 21.26; P = 0.52, respectively), bimonthly (WMD, 1.68 letters; 95% CI, -3.55 to 6.91; P = 0.53; WMD, -18.91 microns; 95% CI, -46.41 to 8.60; P = 0.18, respectively), and PRN (BCVA WMD, 1.08 letters; 95% CI, -2.95 to 5.11; P = 0.60) regimens. T&E was associated with a reduced injection burden versus monthly (WMD, -4.52 injections; 95% CI, -6.66 to 2.39; P < 0.001) but higher injection burden versus PRN (WMD, 1.81 injections; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.51; P < 0.001) dosing. There was no significant difference in safety outcomes amongst comparators. There was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between T&E, bimonthly, monthly, and PRN dosing. T&E resulted in fewer injections versus monthly and fewer clinic visits versus PRN.

INTRAOCULAR INFLAMMATION INCIDENCE AFTER INTRAVITREAL BROLUCIZUMAB INJECTION FOR EXUDATIVE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

PURPOSE

We evaluated the clinical outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) injected with brolucizumab in our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

A retrospective case series for which clinical records of all eyes that received intravitreal brolucizumab at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between December 1, 2019, and April 1, 2021, were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 345 eyes of 278 patients who received 801 brolucizumab injections. IOI was detected in 16 eyes of 13 patients (4.6%). In those patients, baseline Logarithm of Minimu Angle of Resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity was 0.32 0.2 (20/42), while it was 0.58 0.3 (20/76) at IOI presentation. The mean number of injections among eyes experiencing IOI was 2.4, and the interval between the last brolucizumab injection and IOI presentation was 20 days. There was no known case of retinal vasculitis. Management of IOI included topical steroids in seven eyes (54%), topical and systemic steroids in five eyes (38%), and observation in one eye (8%). Best-corrected visual acuity returned to baseline and inflammation resolved in all eyes by the last follow-up examination.

CONCLUSION

Intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab injection for neovascular AMD was not uncommon. Inflammation resolved in all eyes by the last follow-up visit.

One-year outcomes of resveratrol supplement with aflibercept versus aflibercept monotherapy in wet age-related macular degeneration

AIM

To determine the one-year outcomes of resveratrol oral supplement in patients suffering from wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

Fifty naïve and previously untreated patients suffering from wet AMD, were randomly assigned in two subgroups of 25 patients each. All the participants were treated with 3 monthly intravitreal injections of 2.0 mg aflibercept (IAIs) followed by injections "according to need", while in one group the patients also received daily two tablets of resveratrol oral supplement. Prior to treatment initiation, a complete ophthalmological examination, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and contrast sensitivity evaluation, optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and OCT angiography (OCTA), was performed to every participant, while all of them completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire, in order to assess their quality of life (QoL) status. The patients were assessed monthly for 1y with FAF, and OCT or OCTA; the main endpoints were the number IAIs, the changes in BCVA, in contrast sensitivity, and in patients' QoL status.

RESULTS

No significant differences were present between the groups regarding the baseline demographic and clinical data. Over the 12-month period, a similar number of IAIs was applied in both groups (4.52±1.00 vs 4.28±0.90, P=0.38), while the rest of the clinical data also did not differ significantly after the completion of the study period. However, for HADS Depression (11.88±2.51 vs 8.28±1.54, P<0.001) and HADS Anxiety (11.92±2.52 vs 7.76±1.51, P<0.001) questionnaires values, the score was significantly better in patients who received resveratrol supplements. Moreover, a statistically significant difference was detected in the mean change from baseline values of contrast sensitivity (0.17±0.19 vs 0.35±0.24, P=0.005), HADS Depression (0.08±1.38 vs -3.88±1.48, P<0.001), and HADS Anxiety (0.36±1.98 vs -5.12±2.70, P<0.001) scores, in favour of the patients treated with resveratrol supplements.

CONCLUSION

The resveratrol oral supplement is a complementary treatment in cases of wet AMD, highlighting its effectiveness in improving patients' QoL status.

The Biosimilar Paradox: How Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Biosimilars Could Increase Patient and Overall Health Care Costs

PURPOSE

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications for intraocular use are a major and increasing cost, and biosimilars may be a means of reducing the high cost of many biologic medications. However, a bevacizumab biosimilar, which is currently pending Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval (bevacizumab-vikg), paradoxically may increase the cost burden of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, because off-label repackaged drugs may no longer be allowed per the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA). We aimed to investigate the potential impact of biosimilars on costs in the United States.

DESIGN

Cost analysis of anti-VEGF medications.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare data from October 2022 and previously published market share data from 2019.

METHODS

Average sales prices (ASPs) of ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab were calculated from Medicare allowable payments. The ASPs of biosimilars were calculated from wholesale acquisition costs from a representative distributor. The cost of an intraocular bevacizumab formulation is modeled at $500/1.25-mg dose and $900/1.25-mg dose.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs of anti-VEGF drugs to Medicare Part B and patients.

RESULTS

If an intraocular bevacizumab biosimilar were to be priced at $500, costs to Medicare would increase by $457 million from $3.01 billion to $3.47 billion (15.2% increase). Patient responsibility would increase by $117 million from $768 million to $884 million. Similarly, if intraocular bevacizumab were priced at $900, Medicare costs would increase by $897 million to $3.91 billion (29.8% increase), and patient responsibility would increase by $229 million to $997 million. If bevacizumab were $500/dose, switching all patients currently receiving ranibizumab or aflibercept to respective biosimilars would compensate for only 28.8% of the increased cost. Current prices of ranibizumab and aflibercept biosimilars would have to decrease by an aggregate of 15.7% to $616.80/injection, $1027.97/injection, and $1436.88/injection for ranibizumab 0.3 mg, ranibizumab 0.5 mg, and aflibercept, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An FDA-approved bevacizumab biosimilar for ophthalmic use could increase costs to the health care system and patients, raising concerns for access. This increase would not be offset by ranibizumab and aflibercept biosimilar use at current prices. These data support the need for an exemption of section 503B of the DQSA and continued use of repackaged off-label bevacizumab.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Medicare Part B Spending on Macular Degeneration Treatments Associated With Manufacturer Payments to Ophthalmologists

Importance

Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) therapies aflibercept and ranibizumab are among the highest-cost Medicare Part B drugs, even though off-label use of lower-cost bevacizumab is clinically noninferior. Payments from manufacturers of these ARMD therapies to ophthalmologists are hypothesized to be factors in ophthalmologists' therapeutic choice, controlling for ophthalmologist and patient characteristics.

Objective

To assess the association between manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists and choice of ARMD treatment as well as to identify ophthalmologist-level characteristics associated with prescribing lower-cost ARMD therapies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study of longitudinal (2013-2019) Medicare Part B data was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022. Ophthalmologists prescribing aflibercept (manufactured by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc), rabinizumab, or bevacizumab (both manufactured by Genentech Inc) for ARMD treatment of Medicare Part B beneficiaries were included. Data on manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were obtained from the Open Payments database.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the percentage of bevacizumab prescribed by ophthalmologists among all ARMD therapies. Regression analysis assessed variation in bevacizumab prescribing by acceptance of manufacturer payments as well as by ophthalmologist and patient characteristics. Ophthalmologist characteristics were duration of practice and Medicare Administrative Contractor region, and patient characteristics were aggregated at the ophthalmologist level and included mean beneficiary age, percentage of dual-eligible beneficiaries, mean beneficiary risk score, and percentage of White beneficiaries. Savings were estimated by projecting the change in bevacizumab use had ophthalmologists not accepted manufacturer payments, controlling for all ophthalmologist and patient characteristics and comparing with observed use and costs.

Results

A total of 21 584 ophthalmologists (18 489 males [85.7%]) were included. Ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments were significantly less likely to prescribe bevacizumab (28.0% [95% CI, 24.6%-42.5%] of patients) compared with those who did not accept manufacturer payments (45.8% [95% CI, 44.5%-47.1%]). Ophthalmologists who saw dual-eligible beneficiaries had greater bevacizumab prescribing (50.0% [95% CI, 40.6%-68.3%] in the highest quartile vs 36.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-38.8%] in the lowest quartile; β coefficient, 0.139; P < .001), while those who saw patients with higher mean beneficiary risk scores had lower bevacizumab use (38.0% [95% CI, 23.7%-44.1%] in the highest quartile vs 48.2% [95% CI, 45.5%-50.8%] in the lowest quartile; β coefficient, -0.102, P < .001). Had ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments prescribed ARMD drugs as those who did not accept payments, Medicare spending on these treatments would have been $642 779 703.08 lower from 2013 to 2019, a 2.0% savings.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that drug manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were associated with selection of higher-cost therapies for ARMD, which is a factor in increased Medicare and patient spending. Development of manufacturer payment models that encourage ophthalmologists to choose lower-cost therapies are needed.

Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Retinal Disorders

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are key mediator of retinal and choroidal neovascularization as well as retinal vascular leakage leading to macular edema. As such, VEGF plays an important role in mediating visually significant complications associated with common retinal disorders such as diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion, and age-related macular degeneration. Various drugs that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF therapies) have been developed to minimize vision loss associated with these disorders. These drugs are injected into the vitreous cavity in a clinic setting at regular intervals. This article provides an overview of the various anti-VEGF drugs used in ophthalmology and the common retinal conditions that benefit from this therapy.

Vascular Signalling

In all vertebrates, closed blood and open lymph circulatory systems are essential for the delivery of nutrients and oxygen to tissues, waste clearance, and immune function [...].

Efficacy of ranibizumab combined with photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: A meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

Ranibizumab addition may benefit to improve the efficacy in patients with diabetic retinopathy than only photocoagulation, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of ranibizumab addition on efficacy for diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of ranibizumab addition on patients with diabetic retinopathy for this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for diabetic retinopathy, ranibizumab addition showed significantly increased number of neovascularization area reduction (OR = 4.20; 95% CI = 1.47-12.02; P = .007) and reduced fluorescein leakage (MD = -2.53; 95% CI = -3.31 to -1.75; P < .00001), but showed no obvious impact on neovascularization area (MD = -1.80; 95% CI = -3.68 to 0.08; P = .06), photocoagulation retreatment (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.47-2.27; P = .94) or adverse events (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.49-4.29; P = .50).

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab combined with photocoagulation is effective to improve efficacy for diabetic retinopathy.

PERK Inhibition Suppresses Neovascularization and Protects Neurons During Ischemia-Induced Retinopathy

Purpose

Retinal ischemia is a common cause of a variety of eye diseases, such as retinopathy of prematurity, diabetic retinopathy, and vein occlusion. Protein kinase RNA-activated-like endoplasmic reticulum (ER) kinase (PERK), one of the main ER stress sensor proteins, has been involved in many diseases. In this study, we investigated the role of PERK in ischemia-induced retinopathy using a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR).

Methods

OIR was induced by subjecting neonatal pups to 70% oxygen at postnatal day 7 (P7) followed by returning to room air at P12. GSK2606414, a selective PERK inhibitor, was orally administrated to pups right after they were returned to room air once daily until 1 day before sample collection. Western blot, immunostaining, and quantitative PCR were used to assess PERK phosphorylation, retinal changes, and signaling pathways in relation to PERK inhibition.

Results

PERK phosphorylation was prominently increased in OIR retinas, which was inhibited by GSK2606414. Concomitantly, PERK inhibition significantly reduced retinal neovascularization (NV) and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss, restored astrocyte network, and promoted revascularization. Furthermore, PERK inhibition downregulated the recruitment/proliferation of mononuclear phagocytes but did not affect OIR-upregulated canonical angiogenic pathways.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that PERK is involved in ischemia-induced retinopathy and its inhibition using GSK2606414 could offer an effective therapeutic intervention aimed at alleviating retinal NV while preventing neuron loss during retinal ischemia.

Ocular Vascular Diseases: From Retinal Immune Privilege to Inflammation

The eye is an immune privileged tissue that insulates the visual system from local and systemic immune provocation to preserve homeostatic functions of highly specialized retinal neural cells. If immune privilege is breached, immune stimuli will invade the eye and subsequently trigger acute inflammatory responses. Local resident microglia become active and release numerous immunological factors to protect the integrity of retinal neural cells. Although acute inflammatory responses are necessary to control and eradicate insults to the eye, chronic inflammation can cause retinal tissue damage and cell dysfunction, leading to ocular disease and vision loss. In this review, we summarized features of immune privilege in the retina and the key inflammatory responses, factors, and intracellular pathways activated when retinal immune privilege fails, as well as a highlight of the recent clinical and research advances in ocular immunity and ocular vascular diseases including retinopathy of prematurity, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy.

Extracellular Matrix Regulation of Vascular Morphogenesis, Maturation, and Stabilization

The extracellular matrix represents a critical regulator of tissue vascularization during embryonic development and postnatal life. In this perspective, we present key information and concepts that focus on how the extracellular matrix controls capillary assembly, maturation, and stabilization, and, in addition, contributes to tissue stability and health. In particular, we present and discuss mechanistic details underlying (1) the role of the extracellular matrix in controlling different steps of vascular morphogenesis, (2) the ability of endothelial cells (ECs) and pericytes to coassemble into elongated and narrow capillary EC-lined tubes with associated pericytes and basement membrane matrices, and (3) the identification of specific growth factor combinations ("factors") and peptides as well as coordinated "factor" and extracellular matrix receptor signaling pathways that are required to form stabilized capillary networks.

Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: Ophthalmology and Diabetology Treatment Aspects

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies have become the standard of care in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME), resulting in a remarkable decrease in disease-related vision loss. However, the need for regular injections places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and the healthcare system and improvements in vision may not be maintained long term. As a result of its drying potency and duration of action, brolucizumab, an intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy approved for the treatment of nAMD and DME, could decrease injection frequency for patients and provide an efficacious treatment; however, balancing its benefits and risks can be challenging. There have been reports of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients treated with brolucizumab, which, if left untreated, may result in severe vision loss. Recent evidence, however, indicates that early recognition of IOI and prompt and aggressive systemic corticosteroid treatment in response to posterior segment involvement can lead to favorable outcomes in these relatively rare but severe cases. A series of consensus meetings were conducted in 2022 between Swiss medical retina experts and diabetologists, discussing the current data for brolucizumab and exploring various challenges to its use, including the associated risk of IOI. The outcome is a collation of practical insights and guidance for ophthalmologists on the use of brolucizumab in patients with nAMD and DME, including patient selection and assessment, treatment regimen and monitoring, and the recognition and management of adverse events.

Impact of COVID-19 Confinement on Quality of Life of Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Two-Wave Panel Study

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in developed countries. Intravitreal injections of antiangiogenic agents (anti-VEGF) can stop vision loss in the neovascular form of the disease (nAMD). The aim of this study was to assess the general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a cohort of patients with nAMD treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and to detesrmine to what extent their HRQoL was affected by COVID-19. This was an observational, analytical, and longitudinal study performed with a two-wave panel survey. Clinical outcomes, HRQoL, and tangible support were evaluated. In the final survey, changes in living conditions and medical visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic were also examined. Of the 102 patients initially interviewed in the before-COVID survey, 24 were lost after 30 months of follow-up. In the initial assessment, the mean health index was 0.73 ± 0.2. The EQ VAS score worsened at the final survey (p = 0.048). Patients needing treatment in both eyes (p = 0.007) and with lower levels of bilateral visual acuity (p = 0.018) reported an increase in social support at the final survey. In conclusion, patients perceived a worsening in HRQoL after confinement. However, patients enjoyed good social support that improved in the after-COVID survey.

"One stone and two birds" strategy to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration by a novel retinoid drug, EYE-101

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a typical pathological feature of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and has become a major cause of vision loss in the elderly. Current therapies require repeated intraocular injections of anti-VEGF drugs by inhibiting endothelial angiogenic effects, which is painful and may cause adverse effects on normal vascular and neuronal functions. Herein, we designed a novel retinoid drug, EYE-101, determined its therapeutic effects on CNV, and clarified the anti-angiogenic mechanism. The results show that administration of EYE-101 did not cause obvious cytotoxicity and ocular tissue toxicity at the concentrations less than 5 μM. Topical administration of EYE-101 could reduce choroidal sprouting, suppress laser-induced CNV formation, and decrease pericyte coverages on ocular vessels. Administration of EYE-101 also suppressed endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation and reduced pericyte proliferation, migration, recruitment towards endothelial cells. EYE-101 exerted its anti-angiogenic effects by targeting endothelial cells and pericytes via antagonizing Wnt/β-catenin signaling and PDGF signaling. Thus, EYE-101 administration may offer an"one stone and two birds" strategy for the prevention and treatment of ocular neovascular disorders.

Novel therapies for proliferative retinopathies

Proliferative retinopathies, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, are a special health issue due to their contribution to irreversible blindness. Although the promoting conditions and physiopathology of proliferative retinopathies are different, these feature a highly detrimental angiogenesis driven by the overproduction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This article describes the mechanism of action of ocular antiangiogenic therapies currently found in clinical development. Systems classify accordingly as (a) novel anti-VEGF systems, (b) molecules targeting non-VEGF pathways, and (c) gene therapies. Whereas most therapies are designed to neutralize VEGF, there is a significant set of products with diverse complexity and mechanism of action. Anti-VEGF therapies are still the most studied approach to tackle angiogenesis. Therapies targeting non-VEGF pathways, however, are highlighted because they could be an option for patients nonresponsive to anti-VEGF therapies. Finally, gene therapy is a promissory technology platform but still is subject to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

Transcription factor Foxp1 is essential for the induction of choroidal neovascularization

Background

The exudative form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is characterized by abnormal blood vessel growth, which is stimulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) released from retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The angiogenic behaviors of vascular endothelial cells in vitro depend on forkhead box protein P1 (Foxp1), a transcription repressor widely expressed in human and murine tissues during development. In this study, we aimed to determine whether loss of Foxp1 affects laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in mouse.

Methods

Eye-selective deletion of Foxp1 was obtained by crossing Foxp1^flox/flox with Six3-Cre mice. Laser photocoagulation was delivered to six- to eight-week-old mice to induce CNV. The expression of Foxp1 and Cre was determined by immunofluorescence in cryostat sections of the eyes. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and B4 isolectin staining were applied to analyze the leakage, bulge height, and area of CNV lesions, respectively. RPE-choroid tissues were isolated for the determination of VEGF and pigment epithelium derived factor (PEDF) by Western blotting.

Results

Foxp1 was expressed in retinal ganglion cells, RPE, and the choroidal endothelial cells. Laser photocoagulation increased the number of Foxp1⁺-endothelial cells and induced CNV. Six3-Cre reduced Foxp1 expression in RPE but not the endothelium, leading to a lower level of VEGF in the RPE-choroid. Foxp1 knockout inhibited pathological angiogenesis and vascular leakage of the laser-induced CNV lesions.

Conclusions

Foxp1 regulates the expression of VEGF in the RPE, and inhibition of Foxp1 could potentially be a novel strategy for the prevention and therapy of neovascularization related to AMD.

Topical Nanoemulsion of an Runt-related Transcription Factor 1 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Pathologic Ocular Angiogenesis

Purpose

To test the efficacy of runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) inhibition with topical nanoemulsion containing Ro5-3335 (eNano-Ro5) in experimental ocular neovascularization.

Design

Preclinical experimental study.

Participants

In vitro primary culture human retinal endothelial cell (HREC) culture. C57BL/6J 6- to 10-week-old male and female mice.

Methods

We evaluated the effect of eNano-Ro5 in cell proliferation, cell toxicity, and migration of HRECs. We used an alkali burn model of corneal neovascularization and a laser-induced model of choroidal neovascularization to test in vivo efficacy of eNano-Ro5 in pathologic angiogenesis in mice. We used mass spectrometry to measure penetration of Ro5-3335 released from the nanoemulsion in ocular tissues.

Main Outcome Measures

Neovascular area.

Results

RUNX1 inhibition reduced cell proliferation and migration in vitro. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed detectable levels of the active RUNX1 small-molecule inhibitor Ro5-3335 in the anterior and posterior segment of the mice eyes. Topical treatment with eNano-Ro5 significantly reduced corneal neovascularization and improved corneal wound healing after alkali burn. Choroidal neovascularization lesion size and leakage were significantly reduced after treatment with topical eNano-Ro5.

Conclusions

Topical treatment with eNano-Ro5 is an effective and viable platform to deliver a small-molecule RUNX1 inhibitor. This route of administration offers advantages that could improve the management and outcomes of these sight-threatening conditions. Topical noninvasive delivery of RUNX1 inhibitor could be beneficial for many patients with pathologic ocular neovascularization.

Alpinumisoflavone ameliorates choroidal neovascularisation and fibrosis in age-related macular degeneration in in vitro and in vivo models

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of vision loss in the elderly population. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody therapy is applicable to neovascularisation of AMD; however, the prevention of fibrosis after anti-VEGF monotherapy is an unmet medical need. Subretinal fibrosis causes vision loss in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) even with anti-VEGF therapy. We report the anti-fibrotic and anti-neovascularisation effects of alpinumisoflavone (AIF), an isoflavonoid derived from unripe Maclura tricuspidata fruit, in in vitro and in vivo models. For in vitro study, we treated H₂O₂ or THP-1 conditioned media (TCM) following activation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line (ARPE-19). Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) was induced by laser photocoagulation in mice, immediately followed by intravitreal administration of 25 μg AIF. CNV area and fibrosis were measured 7 days after laser photocoagulation. AIF showed anti-fibrosis and anti-neovascularisation effects in both the models. The laser induced CNV area was reduced upon AIF administration in nAMD mouse model. Additionally, AIF decreased the levels of the cleaved form of crystallin alpha B (CRYAB), a chaperone associated with VEGF stabilisation and fibrosis. Our results demonstrate a novel therapeutic application of AIF against neovascularisation and fibrosis in nAMD.

Polymeric biomaterials in the treatment of posterior segment diseases

Polymeric biomaterials are biological or synthetic substances which can be engineered to interact with biological systems for the diagnosis or treatment of diseases. These biomaterials have immense potential for treating eyes diseases, particularly the retina—a site of many inherited and acquired diseases. Polymeric biomaterials can be engineered to function both as an endotamponade agent and to prevent intraocular scarring in retinal detachment repair surgeries. They can also be designed as a drug delivery platform for treatment of retinal diseases. Finally, they can be used as scaffolds for cellular products and provide non-viral gene delivery solutions to the retina. This perspective article explains the role of polymeric biomaterials in the treatment of retinal conditions by highlighting recent advances being translated to clinical practice. The article will also identify potential hurdles to clinical translation as future research directions in the field.

Simultaneous Release of Aflibercept and Dexamethasone from an Ocular Drug Delivery System

PURPOSE

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) are the current standard of care for patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). There is a growing subset of patients that does not respond to anti-VEGF monotherapy treatment. Some patients, however, do respond to combination therapy of corticosteroids and anti-VEGF. This treatment requires monthly/bimonthly injections of anti-VEGF and semi-annual injections of corticosteroid. A drug delivery system (DDS) that simultaneously releases multiple drugs could benefit these patients by reducing the number of injections. The purpose of this study was to characterize the simultaneous release of aflibercept and dexamethasone from a biodegradable microparticle- and nanoparticle-hydrogel DDS.

METHODS

Dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticles and aflibercept-loaded microparticles were created using modified single- and double-emulsion techniques, respectively. Then, microparticles and nanoparticles were embedded into a thermoresponsive, biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)-co-(L-lactic acid) diacrylate (PEG-PLLA-DA)-N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) hydrogel DDS. Drug release studies and characterization of DDS were conducted with varying doses of microparticles and nanoparticles.

RESULTS

The combination aflibercept-loaded microparticle- and dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticle- hydrogel (Combo-DDS) achieved a total release time of 224 days. Small decreases were seen in swelling ratio and equilibrium water content for Combo-DDS compared to monotherapy aflibercept-loaded microparticle-hydrogel DDS (AFL-DDS) and monotherapy dexamethasone-loaded nanoparticle-hydrogel DDS (DEX-DDS). Bioactivity of aflibercept was maintained in Combo-DDS compared to AFL-DDS.

CONCLUSIONS

The Combo-DDS was able to extend and control the release of both aflibercept and dexamethasone simultaneously from a single DDS. This may eliminate the need for separate dosing regiments of anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for wet AMD patients.

Glial-mediated neuroinflammatory mechanisms in age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by photoreceptor and retinal pigment epithelium loss often complicated by neovascularization and is one of the leading causes of irreversible vision loss worldwide. However, the precise pathophysiology of AMD remains to date unclear, and there is a dearth of effective therapies for the early stages of the disease. A growing body of evidence has identified microglia-mediated neuroinflammation as a key driver of neuronal damage in AMD, presenting a novel avenue for the development of pharmacological agents targeting this cell population. The local microglial response interacts with other glia as well as engages in crosstalk with peripheral immunological niches. This article presents a review of the current evidence regarding the involvement of glia in the pathophysiology of AMD, an overview of the key immune circuits and effector mechanisms shown to be active in AMD, and potential therapeutic avenues targeting glial involvement.

Identifying Genetic Biomarkers Predicting Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections in Diabetic Macular Edema

Intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the front-line treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME); however, treatment response varies widely. This study aimed to identify genetic determinants associated with anti-VEGF treatment response in DME. We performed a genome-wide association study on 220 Australian patients with DME treated with anti-VEGF therapy, genotyped on the Illumina Global Screening Array, and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. The primary outcome measures were changes in central macular thickness (CMT in microns) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA in ETDRS letters) after 12 months. Association between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes and DME outcomes were evaluated by linear regression, adjusting for the first three principal components, age, baseline CMT/BCVA, duration of diabetic retinopathy, and HbA1c. Two loci reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) for association with increased CMT: a single SNP on chromosome 6 near CASC15 (rs78466540, p = 1.16 × 10−9) and a locus on chromosome 12 near RP11-116D17.1 (top SNP rs11614480, p = 2.69 × 10−8). Four loci were significantly associated with reduction in BCVA: two loci on chromosome 11, downstream of NTM (top SNP rs148980760, p = 5.30 × 10−9) and intronic in RP11-744N12.3 (top SNP rs57801753, p = 1.71 × 10−8); one near PGAM1P1 on chromosome 5 (rs187876551, p = 1.52 × 10−8); and one near TBC1D32 on chromosome 6 (rs118074968, p = 4.94 × 10−8). In silico investigations of each locus identified multiple expression quantitative trait loci and potentially relevant candidate genes warranting further analysis. Thus, we identified multiple genetic loci predicting treatment outcomes for anti-VEGF therapies in DME. This work may potentially lead to managing DME using personalized treatment approaches.

Observational outcomes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients following treatment with ranibizumab, panretinal laser photocoagulation or combination therapy - The non-interventional second year follow-up to the PRIDE study

PURPOSE

Ranibizumab monotherapy showed stronger effects on area of retinal neovascularization (NV) reduction while offering better visual acuity (VA) results than panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) monotherapy during the first 12 months of the PRIDE study. The second year of PRIDE was an observational, non-interventional follow-up, performed to evaluate long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients under real-life conditions, prior to the approval of ranibizumab for PDR.

METHODS

Seventy-three PDR patients (28 from the ranibizumab group; 20 from the PRP group; 25 from the combination group) were included in the observational follow-up phase and treated at the investigators discretion. Visual acuity (VA) measurements and retinal imaging were performed at Months 12, 18 and 24.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) NV area in the ranibizumab monotherapy and combination follow-up groups increased from 3.16 ± 4.30 mm² and 1.13 ± 2.78 mm² at Month 12 to 6.09 ± 10.79 mm² and 2.14 ± 4.41 mm² at Month 18 and 10.00 ± 17.63 mm² and 3.26 ± 7.05 mm² at Month 24, respectively. In the PRP follow-up group, NV area declined from 5.44 ± 14.55 mm² at Month 12 to 1.22 ± 1.67 mm² at Month 18, but increased again to 4.05 ± 11.66 mm² at Month 24. During the observational phase, only 2 (6;8) patients in the ranibizumab (PRP;combination) follow-up group were treated with anti-VEGF medications, while 17 (6;10) patients received PRP laser therapy.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of ranibizumab treatment in PDR patients may result in an increase of NV area and VA loss. Tight monitoring of disease activity and continued treatment beyond the first year is needed to maintain disease control.

Review of Studies Comparing Panretinal Photocoagulation and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in the Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is among the leading causes of blindness at the global level. A review of studies between 2015 and 2018 found that about 1.7% of the general population with any type of diabetes mellitus suffered from proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Since the 1960s, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been the mainstay of treatment for PDR. During this period, PRP has been credited with a significant degree of success and a relatively low complication rate. However, the advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with the beginning of the new millennium provided a treatment modality that was noninferior to PRP. A decade-long period of comparisons and debates between these two treatment modalities repeatedly favored anti-VEGF over PRP, as studies demonstrated that the former provided potentially superior outcomes to PRP. The aim of this review is to briefly discuss and compare the relevant studies and evidence supporting these two treatments.

Visual acuity and progression of macular atrophy in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF for age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

Whether intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) cause retinal atrophy is still a subject of debate. We reported 13 eyes that received several injections of anti-VEGF for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with good visual acuity despite geographic atrophy on imaging.

METHODS

This is a case series study conducted at Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University. Patients of three retina specialists with wet AMD who received six or more intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs with visual acuity of 20/60 or better and incomplete RPE and outer retina atrophy (iRORA) or complete RPE and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA) were enrolled in this case series. Different imaging modalities were reviewed by three retina specialists comparing the baseline with the most recent exam.

RESULTS

About 13 eyes of 10 patients met the selection criteria. Eleven eyes were classified as iRORA and 2 as cRORA. Despite the development of macular atrophy on imaging after an average of 38.1 injections, eyes maintained stable visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

The discrepancy between structural and functional findings in this cohort suggests that patients treated by anti-VEGF drugs exhibit divergent clinical outcomes for currently unknown reasons. The authors propose anti-VEGF may affect melanosomes within RPE without disrupting RPE and photoreceptors function completely. This requires further investigation.

Gene-Based Therapeutics for Acquired Retinal Disease: Opportunities and Progress

Acquired retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy rank among the leading causes of blindness and visual loss worldwide. Effective treatments for these conditions are available, but often have a high treatment burden, and poor compliance can lead to disappointing real-world outcomes. Development of new treatment strategies that provide more durable treatment effects could help to address some of these unmet needs. Gene-based therapeutics, pioneered for the treatment of monogenic inherited retinal disease, are being actively investigated as new treatments for acquired retinal disease. There are significant advantages to the application of gene-based therapeutics in acquired retinal disease, including the presence of established therapeutic targets and common pathophysiologic pathways between diseases, the lack of genotype-specificity required, and the larger potential treatment population per therapy. Different gene-based therapeutic strategies have been attempted, including gene augmentation therapy to induce in vivo expression of therapeutic molecules, and gene editing to knock down genes encoding specific mediators in disease pathways. We highlight the opportunities and unmet clinical needs in acquired retinal disease, review the progress made thus far with current therapeutic strategies and surgical delivery techniques, and discuss limitations and future directions in the field.

Switching to aflibercept versus continuing bevacizumab for treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a one-year comparative observational study

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of a treatment algorithm that allows for switching treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes to aflibercept with continuing bevacizumab.

METHODS

Retrospective study of nAMD patients who initiated treatment in 2012 (aflibercept unavailable) and 2018 (aflibercept available). Eyes were included in the case of residual macular fluid after a minimum of 4 monthly bevacizumab injections. Only eyes in the 2018 group could then switch to aflibercept.

RESULTS

The study included 40 eyes from 2012 and 88 eyes from 2018. Patient characteristics were similar across the groups at baseline and 4 months. In 2018, 59 eyes (67%) were switched to aflibercept after 4 months. Mean change in BCVA from 4 months to one year was +2.8 letters in 2018 versus -1.7 letters in 2012 (p = 0.043). Mean change in BCVA from baseline to one year was +9.4 letters in 2018 (p < 0.001) and +4.4 letters in 2012 (p = 0.073). Mean change in CRT from 4 months to one year was -36 µm in 2018 versus -23 µm in 2012 (p = 0.373). Mean change in CRT from baseline to one year was -100 µm in 2018 (p < 0.001) and -75 µm in 2012 (p < 0.001). Mean number of injections given in one year was 11.8 in 2018 versus 10.4 in 2012 (p < 0.001). After one year, a majority of eyes in both groups still received treatment at 4-week intervals.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that the possibility of switching eyes with treatment-resistant nAMD to aflibercept leads to a modest visual benefit compared with continuing first-line bevacizumab therapy.

Anti-VEGF therapies for age-related macular degeneration: a powerful tactical gear or a blunt weapon? The choice is ours

Purpose

Blindness and vision loss are still frequent disabilities associated with a relevant impact on health care and quality of life, and a high economic burden. Supranational programs established by the World Health Organization (WHO), International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (IAPB), and World Health Assembly (WHA) aim at reducing avoidable visual impairment. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and other retinal diseases are well known causes of visual disability. Since more than a decade, intravitreal agents are available for the treatment of these diseases. The aim of this study is to review whether pharmacotherapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs has led to a decrease in the prevalence of blindness with emphasis on AMD and different countries. A brief analysis of other factors correlated to changes in the rate of blindness is also presented.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus web platforms were used to identify relevant studies on epidemiology of blindness and vision impairment, the influence of intravitreal therapies, and the existence of different vision care models. Additional data and material was searched in web internet accessed by the web browser Firefox.

Results

Age-standardized prevalence of blindness secondary to AMD has started to decline as testified by a number of studies in different countries. This is due to the adoption of anti-VEGF therapy and its adequate management. The frequency of treatment and regimens applied are indirect signs of successful treatment. Local rules and regulations may represent an obstacle.

Conclusions

This review shows that by implementing existing health care systems and dispensing adequate therapies in the field of retinal diseases, the prevalence of blindness due to these conditions can decline.