1
|
Szilagyi PG, Duru OK, Casillas A, Ong MK, Vangala S, Tseng CH, Albertin C, Humiston SG, Clark E, Ross MK, Evans SA, Sloyan M, Fox CR, Lerner C. Text vs Patient Portal Messaging to Improve Influenza Vaccination Coverage: A Health System-Wide Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:519-527. [PMID: 38497955 PMCID: PMC10949147 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Increasing influenza vaccination rates is a public health priority. One method recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others is for health systems to send reminders nudging patients to be vaccinated. Objective To evaluate and compare the effect of electronic health record (EHR)-based patient portal reminders vs text message reminders on influenza vaccination rates across a health system. Design, Setting, and Participants This 3-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 7, 2022, to April 30, 2023, among primary care patients within the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) health system. Interventions Arm 1 received standard of care. The health system sent monthly reminder messages to patients due for an influenza vaccine by portal (arm 2) or text (arm 3). Arm 2 had a 2 × 2 nested design, with fixed vs responsive monthly reminders and preappointment vs no preappointment reminders. Arm 3 had 1 × 2 design, with preappointment vs no preappointment reminders. Preappointment reminders for eligible patients were sent 24 and 48 hours before scheduled primary care visits. Fixed reminders (in October, November, and December) involved identical messages via portal or text. Responsive portal reminders involved a September message asking patients about their plans for vaccination, with a follow-up reminder if the response was affirmative but the patient was not yet vaccinated. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was influenza vaccination by April 30, 2023, obtained from the UCLA EHR, including vaccination from pharmacies and other sources. Results A total of 262 085 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.1 [20.7] years; 237 404 [90.6%] adults; 24 681 [9.4%] children; 149 349 [57.0%] women) in 79 primary care practices were included (87 257 in arm 1, 87 478 in arm 2, and 87 350 in arm 3). At the entire primary care population level, none of the interventions improved influenza vaccination rates. All groups had rates of approximately 47%. There was no statistical or clinically significant improvement following portal vs text, preappointment reminders vs no preappointment reminders (portal and text reminders combined), or responsive vs fixed monthly portal reminders. Conclusions and Relevance At the population level, neither portal nor text reminders for influenza vaccination were effective. Given that vaccine hesitancy may be a major reason for the lack of impact of portal or text reminders, more intensive interventions by health systems are needed to raise influenza vaccination coverage levels. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05525494.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G. Szilagyi
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - O. Kenrik Duru
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Alejandra Casillas
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Michael K. Ong
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
| | - Chi-Hong Tseng
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
| | - Christina Albertin
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | - Emma Clark
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Mindy K. Ross
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Sharon A. Evans
- Department of Information Services and Solutions, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael Sloyan
- Department of Information Services and Solutions, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Craig R. Fox
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
- Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Carlos Lerner
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children’s Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prieto-Campo Á, Batista AD, Magalhães Silva T, Herdeiro MT, Roque F, Figueiras A, Zapata-Cachafeiro M. Understanding vaccination hesitation among health professionals: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Public Health 2024; 226:17-26. [PMID: 37980837 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In terms of vaccination, people trust healthcare professionals (HCPs) more than any other source of information. They are the cornerstone of vaccination as they can move undecided populations not only towards vaccination but also towards non-vaccination. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and barriers associated with own vaccination and patient recommendation in HCPs. STUDY DESIGN This study incorporated a systematic review. METHODS A systematic review of studies published from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2020, was conducted by searching PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases. Qualitative studies reporting outcomes related to knowledge, attitudes, or barriers related to vaccination/recommendation by healthcare personnel were included. The guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed. RESULTS From a total of 2916 studies identified, 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. Some of the factors cited by the HCP that may contribute to vaccine hesitancy were (a) concerns regarding safety or efficacy of vaccines (23 articles); (b) time constraints (21 articles); (c) lack of knowledge about the vaccination/vaccine (19 articles); (d) costs (13 articles); (e) distrust of pharmaceutical industry (8 articles); and (f) considering oneself insusceptible (7 articles), stock shortage (7 articles), lack of personnel (5 articles), and feelings of unnecessary vaccination (5 articles). CONCLUSIONS Our review suggests that interventions to combat vaccine hesitancy should increase HCP education on vaccine efficacy and safety, as well as intervene on health system factors such as cost and time per visit. In this way, we could tackle the problem of vaccine hesitancy, which seriously threatens global public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Á Prieto-Campo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15786, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - A D Batista
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - T Magalhães Silva
- Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - M T Herdeiro
- Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - F Roque
- Research Unit for Inland Development, Polytechnic of Guarda (UDI-IPG), Avenida Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, no. ° 50, 6300-559, Guarda, Portugal; Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior (CICS-UBI), Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506, Covilhã, Portugal; Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico da Guarda Rua da Cadeia, 6300-035, Guarda, Portugal.
| | - A Figueiras
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15786, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - M Zapata-Cachafeiro
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15786, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública-CIBERESP), Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Regan AK. Text messages modestly increase influenza vaccination rates and timeliness of vaccination among children and teens at risk of severe influenza. J Pediatr 2023; 261:113546. [PMID: 37741684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
|
4
|
O’Leary ST, Campbell JD, Ardura MI, Banerjee R, Bryant KA, Caserta MT, Frenck RW, Gerber JS, John CC, Kourtis AP, Myers A, Pannaraj P, Ratner AJ, Shah SS, Bryant KA, Hofstetter AM, Chaparro JD, Michel JJ, Kimberlin DW, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH, Bernstein HH, Cardemil CV, Farizo KM, Kafer LM, Kim D, López Medina E, Moore D, Panagiotakopoulos L, Romero JR, Sauvé L, Starke JR, Thompson J, Wharton M, Woods CR, Frantz JM, Gibbs G. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2023-2024. Pediatrics 2023; 152:e2023063773. [PMID: 37641884 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This technical report accompanies the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics for the routine use of influenza vaccine and antiviral medications in the prevention and treatment of influenza in children during the 2023-2024 season. The rationale for the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for annual influenza vaccination of all children without medical contraindications starting at 6 months of age is provided. Influenza vaccination is an important strategy for protecting children and the broader community against influenza. This technical report summarizes recent influenza seasons, morbidity and mortality in children, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccination coverage, and provides detailed guidance on vaccine storage, administration, and implementation. The report also provides a brief background on inactivated and live-attenuated influenza vaccines, available vaccines this season, vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding, diagnostic testing for influenza, and antiviral medications for treatment and chemoprophylaxis. Strategies to promote vaccine uptake are emphasized.
Collapse
|
5
|
Reiter PL, Gower AL, Kiss DE, Shoben AB, Katz ML, Bauermeister JA, Paskett ED, McRee AL. Efficacy of the Outsmart HPV Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase HPV Vaccination among Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:760-767. [PMID: 36958851 PMCID: PMC10239352 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is recommended for young adults, yet many young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YGBMSM) remain unvaccinated. We report the efficacy of Outsmart HPV, a web-based HPV vaccination intervention for YGBMSM. METHODS From 2019 to 2021, we recruited YGBMSM in the United States who were ages 18-25 and unvaccinated against HPV (n = 1,227). Participants were randomized to receive either: (i) Outsmart HPV content online and monthly interactive text reminders (interactive group); (ii) Outsmart HPV content online and monthly unidirectional text reminders (unidirectional group); or (iii) standard information online about HPV vaccine (control group). Regression models compared study groups on HPV vaccination outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 33% of participants reported initiating the HPV vaccine series and 7% reported series completion. Initiation was more common among participants in the interactive group compared with the control group [odds ratio (OR) = 1.47, 98.3% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.11]. Completion was more common among participants in both the interactive group (OR = 3.70, 98.3% CI: 1.75-7.83) and unidirectional group (OR = 2.26, 98.3% CI: 1.02-5.00) compared with the control group. Participants who received Outsmart HPV content reported higher levels of satisfaction with online content compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS Outsmart HPV is an efficacious and acceptable HPV vaccination intervention for YGBMSM. Future efforts are needed to determine how to optimize the intervention and disseminate it to settings that provide services to YGBMSM. IMPACT Outsmart HPV is a promising tool for increasing HPV vaccination among YGBMSM with the potential for wide dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L. Reiter
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Amy L. Gower
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Dale E. Kiss
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Abigail B. Shoben
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Mira L. Katz
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - José A. Bauermeister
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Annie-Laurie McRee
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
- Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy: Scope, Influencing Factors, and Strategic Interventions. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023; 70:227-241. [PMID: 36841592 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
Influenza vaccination rates in children are suboptimal. One underlying reason is influenza vaccine hesitancy. Tools such as the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines survey and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale can be used to measure influenza vaccine hesitancy. The adapted Increasing Vaccination Model from Brewer and colleagues can help identify factors that influence influenza vaccine hesitancy, motivation, and uptake. Several strategies can be used to address influenza vaccine hesitancy, which we discuss further in this review.
Collapse
|
7
|
Currie GE, Totterdell J, Bowland G, Leeb A, Peters I, Blyth CC, Waddington C, Marsh JA, Snelling TL. The AuTOMATIC trial: a study protocol for a multi-arm Bayesian adaptive randomised controlled trial of text messaging to improve childhood immunisation coverage. Trials 2023; 24:97. [PMID: 36750833 PMCID: PMC9904255 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07097-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While most Australian children are vaccinated, delays in vaccination can put them at risk from preventable infections. Widespread mobile phone ownership in Australia could allow automated short message service (SMS) reminders to be used as a low-cost strategy to effectively 'nudge' parents towards vaccinating their children on time. METHODS AuTOMATIC is an adaptive randomised trial which aims to both evaluate and optimise the use of SMS reminders for improving the timely vaccination of children at primary care clinics across Australia. The trial will utilise high levels of digital automation to effect, including eligibility assessment, randomisation, delivery of intervention, data extraction and analysis, thereby allowing healthcare-embedded trial delivery. Up to 10,000 parents attending participating primary care clinics will be randomised to one of 12 different active SMS vaccine reminder content and timing arms or usual practice only (no SMS reminder). The primary outcome is vaccine receipt within 28 days of the scheduled date for the index vaccine (the first scheduled vaccine after randomisation). Secondary analyses will assess receipt and timeliness for all vaccine occasions in all children. Regular scheduled analyses will be performed using Bayesian inference and pre-specified trial decision rules, enabling response adaptive randomisation, suspension of any poorly performing arms and early stopping if a single best message is identified. DISCUSSION This study will aim to optimise SMS reminders for childhood vaccination in primary care clinics, directly comparing alternative message framing and message timing. We anticipate that the trial will be an exemplar in using Bayesian adaptive methodology to assess a readily implementable strategy in a wide population, capable of delivery due to the levels of digital automation. Methods and findings from this study will help to inform strategies for implementing reminders and embedding analytics in primary health care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR: ACTRN12618000789268 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E. Currie
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - James Totterdell
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Grahame Bowland
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Alan Leeb
- SmartVax, c/o Illawarra Medical Centre, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Ian Peters
- SmartVax, c/o Illawarra Medical Centre, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Chris C. Blyth
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.410667.20000 0004 0625 8600Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.1012.20000 0004 1936 7910School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Claire Waddington
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julie A. Marsh
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Thomas L. Snelling
- grid.414659.b0000 0000 8828 1230Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.410667.20000 0004 0625 8600Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA Australia ,grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA Australia ,Menzies School of Public Health, Darwin, NT Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Argyris YA, Nelson VR, Wiseley K, Shen R, Roscizewski A. Do social media campaigns foster vaccination adherence? A systematic review of prior intervention-based campaigns on social media. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS 2023; 76:101918. [PMID: 36438457 PMCID: PMC9675434 DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the importance of large-scale campaigns to facilitate vaccination adherence. Social media presents unique opportunities to reach broader audiences and reduces the costs of conducting national or global campaigns aimed at achieving herd immunity. Nonetheless, few studies have reviewed the effectiveness of prior social media campaigns for vaccination adherence, and several prior studies have shown that social media campaigns do not increase uptake rates. Hence, our objective is to conduct a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of social media campaigns and to identify the reasons for the mixed results of prior studies. Our methodology began with a search of seven databases, which resulted in the identification of 92 interventions conducted over digital media. Out of these 92 studies, only 15 adopted social media campaigns for immunization. We analyzed these 15 studies, along with a coding scheme we developed based on reviews of both health interventions and social media campaigns. Multiple coders, who were knowledgeable about social media campaigns and healthcare, analyzed the 15 cases and obtained an acceptable level of inter-coder reliability (> .80). The results from our systematic review show that only a few social media campaigns have succeeded in enhancing vaccination adherence. In addition, few campaigns have utilized known critical success factors of social media to induce vaccination adherence. Based on these findings, we discuss a set of research questions that informatics scholars should consider when identifying opportunities for using social media to resolve one of the most resilient challenges in public health. Finally, we conclude by discussing how the insights drawn from our systematic reviews contribute to advancing theories, such as social influence and the health belief model, into the realm of social media-based health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Anna Argyris
- Department of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Victoria R Nelson
- Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Kaleigh Wiseley
- Department of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Ruoyu Shen
- Department of Media & Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Alexa Roscizewski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Düzgün MV, İşler Dalgıç A. The Effect of Interventions on the Prevention of Parental Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. GÜNCEL PEDIATRI 2022. [DOI: 10.4274/jcp.2022.13334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
10
|
Stockwell MS, Shone LP, Nekrasova E, Wynn C, Torres A, Griffith M, Shults J, Unger R, Ware LA, Kolff C, Harris D, Berrigan L, Montague H, Localio AR, Fiks AG. Text Message Reminders for the Second Dose of Influenza Vaccine for Children: An RCT. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2022056967. [PMID: 35965283 PMCID: PMC9592065 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Among children requiring 2 influenza doses in a given season, second dose receipt nearly halves the odds of influenza. Nationally, many children do not receive both needed doses. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of text message reminders with embedded interactive educational information versus usual care on receipt and timeliness of the second dose of influenza vaccine. METHODS This trial took place over the 2017 to 2018 and 2018 to 2019 influenza seasons among 50 pediatric primary care offices across 24 states primarily from the American Academy of Pediatrics' Pediatric Research in Office Settings practice-based research network. Caregiver-child dyads of children 6 months to 8 years in need of a second influenza vaccination that season were individually randomized 1:1 into intervention versus usual care, stratified by age and language within each practice. Intervention caregivers received automated, personalized text messages, including educational information. Second dose receipt by April 30 (season end) and by day 42 (2 weeks after second dose due date) were assessed using Mantel Haenszel methods by practice and language. Analyses were intention to treat. RESULTS Among 2086 dyads enrolled, most children were 6 to 23 months and half publicly insured. Intervention children were more likely to receive a second dose by season end (83.8% versus 80.9%; adjusted risk difference (ARD) 3.8%; 95% confidence interval [0.1 to 7.5]) and day 42 (62.4% versus 55.7%; ARD 8.3% [3.6 to 13.0]). CONCLUSIONS In this large-scale trial of primary care pediatric practices across the United States, text message reminders were effective in promoting increased and timelier second dose influenza vaccine receipt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa S Stockwell
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY
- Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Laura P Shone
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL
| | - Ekaterina Nekrasova
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Chelsea Wynn
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | | - Miranda Griffith
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL
| | - Justine Shults
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Chelsea Kolff
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY
- Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Donna Harris
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL
| | - Lindsay Berrigan
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather Montague
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL
- American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine, Lisle, IL
| | - A Russell Localio
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alexander G Fiks
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tang W, Gunn HJ, Kwok S, Comulada WS, Arnold EM, Swendeman D, Fernández MI. Response Patterns to Weekly Short Message Service Health Surveys Among Diverse Youth at High Risk for Acquiring HIV. AIDS Behav 2022; 26:2229-2241. [PMID: 35018546 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-021-03569-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
HIV researchers use short messaging service (SMS)-based surveys to monitor health behaviors more closely than what would be possible with in-person assessment. Benefits are tempered by nonresponse to completing surveys. Understanding response patterns and their associated study participant characteristics would guide more tailored use of SMS-based surveys for HIV studies. We examined response to weekly 7-item SMS surveys administered as part of an HIV prevention trial. Using Mixture hidden Markov models (MHMM), we identified the underlying response patterns shared by subgroups of participants over time and quantified the association between these response patterns and participant characteristics. Three underlying response patterns were identified; responders, responders with phone-related errors, and non-responders. Non-responders versus responders were more likely to be younger, male, cis-gender, Black and Latinx participants with histories of homelessness, incarceration, and social support service utilization. Responders with phone-related errors compared to non-responders were more likely to be Black, Latinx, female, students, and have a history of incarceration and social support service utilization. More nuanced results from MHMM analyses better inform what strategies to use for increasing SMS response rates, including assisting in securing phone ownership/service for responders with phone-related errors and identifying alternative strategies for non-responders. Actively collecting and monitoring non-delivery notification data available from SMS gateway service companies offers another opportunity to identify and connect with participants when they are willing but unable to respond during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenze Tang
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stephen Kwok
- UCLA Center for Community Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - W Scott Comulada
- UCLA Center for Community Health, 10920 Wilshire Blvd Suite 350, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weyers S, Höhmann A, Götz S, Kreffter K. Reminder system for health screening in early childhood - an analysis regarding different social circumstances. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21:438. [PMID: 34620138 PMCID: PMC8496056 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02917-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children with a low socio-economic position (SEP) participate in prevention and health examinations less often. In order to increase participation, reminder systems have been implemented in Germany since 2009. The aim of the study is to investigate whether this implementation is associated with an increased participation in health examination in early childhood for children in disadvantaged social circumstances. Methods We used data from the school enrolment examination from 2002 to 2017 from the city of Duesseldorf (n = 64,883 children). With a trend analysis we observed health examination over time and we compared rates of children after implementation of the reminder system (2010 or later) to those who were not exposed to the programme (earlier than 2010). Health examination was measured by participation in the last examination before school entry (“U9”) documented by paediatricians. Social circumstances included neighbourhood deprivation (very high to very low), migration background (foreign first language vs. German) and family status (one-parent vs. two-parent families). Poisson regression estimated adjusted Prevalence Ratios (PR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of U9 participation by reminder system exposure, both for the total population and within groups of social circumstances. Based on that, we calculated adjusted participation rates (predictive margins) by reminder system exposure for the different social circumstances. Results Participation rates increased slightly, but gradually over time. The probability of U9 participation for children exposed to the reminder system is 1.04-fold (1.03–1.04 CI) compared to children who were not exposed to it. The association of the reminder system and U9 participation differs according to social circumstances. Adjusted prevalences increased the most in the group of children from very deprived neighbourhoods, ranging from 84.3 to 91.4% (PR = 1.07; 1.03–1.10 CI); in all language groups; more in children from one-parent families ranging from 82.4 to 88.9% (PR = 1.07; 1.05–1.09 CI). Conclusion Our results suggest that reminder systems have a moderate impact on the participation in health examinations in early childhood in the general population. In vulnerable groups, however, they could make a difference. Reminder systems should be combined with further activities of tailored prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Weyers
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Annika Höhmann
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Simon Götz
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katharina Kreffter
- Institut für Medizinische Soziologie, Centre for Health and Society, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eze P, Lawani LO, Acharya Y. Short message service (SMS) reminders for childhood immunisation in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-005035. [PMID: 34290051 PMCID: PMC8296799 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Childhood vaccine delivery services in the low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are struggling to reach every child with lifesaving vaccines. Short message service (SMS) reminders have demonstrated positive impact on a number of attrition-prone healthcare delivery services. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SMS reminders in improving immunisation coverage and timeliness in LMICs. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, CNKI, PsycINFO and Web of Science including grey literatures and Google Scholar were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that evaluated the effect of SMS reminders on childhood immunisation and timeliness in LMICs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 assessment tool for RCTs and Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool for non-RCTs. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to generate pooled estimates of risk ratio (RR). Results 18 studies, 13 RCTs and 5 non-RCTs involving 32 712 infants (17 135 in intervention groups and 15 577 in control groups) from 11 LMICs met inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates showed that SMS reminders significantly improved childhood immunisation coverage (RR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.21; I2=90.4%). Meta-analysis of 12 included studies involving 25 257 infants showed that SMS reminders significantly improved timely receipt of childhood vaccines (RR=1.21; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.30; I2=87.3%). Subgroup analysis showed that SMS reminders are significantly more effective in raising childhood immunisation coverage in lower middle-income and low-income countries than in upper middle-income countries (p<0.001) and sending more than two SMS reminders significantly improves timely receipt of childhood vaccines than one or two SMS reminders (p=0.040). Conclusion Current evidence from LMICs, although with significant heterogeneity, suggests that SMS reminders can contribute to achieving high and timely childhood immunisation coverage. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021225843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Eze
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lucky Osaheni Lawani
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yubraj Acharya
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hofstetter AM, Opel DJ, Stockwell MS, Hsu C, deHart MP, Zhou C, Mangione-Smith RM, Englund JA. Influenza-Related Knowledge, Beliefs, and Experiences Among Caregivers of Hospitalized Children. Hosp Pediatr 2021; 11:815-832. [PMID: 34272235 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-003459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Caregivers frequently decline influenza vaccine for their hospitalized child. In this study, we aimed to examine factors impacting their influenza vaccine decision-making. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of children hospitalized at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between November 2017 and April 2018. The survey assessed influenza-related knowledge, beliefs, experiences, and vaccine hesitancy. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between survey responses and child influenza vaccination status at admission (already vaccinated versus not yet vaccinated this season) and, among caregivers with vaccine-eligible children, influenza vaccine acceptance (versus declination) for their child during hospitalization. RESULTS Caregivers (N =522; 88.9% response rate) were mostly non-Hispanic white (66.9%) and English-speaking (97.7%). At admission, 63.2% of children were already vaccinated this season. The caregiver view that influenza vaccination is important for their child's health was the strongest positive predictor of having an already vaccinated child (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-4.05); vaccine hesitancy was the strongest negative predictor (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50-0.75). Among caregivers with vaccine-eligible children, 30.3% accepted influenza vaccine for their hospitalized child. Their belief regarding the child health benefits of influenza vaccination was associated with vaccine acceptance during hospitalization (aOR: 6.87; 95% CI: 3.38-13.96). Caregiver vaccine hesitancy and agreement that children with mild illness should delay vaccination negatively impacted vaccine acceptance (aOR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25-0.62; aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20-0.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We identified key factors impacting influenza vaccine decision-making among caregivers of hospitalized children, a critical step to improving uptake in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika M Hofstetter
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington .,Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas J Opel
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa S Stockwell
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.,Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Clarissa Hsu
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - M Patricia deHart
- Office of Immunization and Child Profile, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington
| | - Chuan Zhou
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Janet A Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kempe A, Stockwell MS, Szilagyi P. The Contribution of Reminder-Recall to Vaccine Delivery Efforts: A Narrative Review. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21:S17-S23. [PMID: 33958086 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Reminders, alerting patients to the need for vaccines that will be due in the future, and recall messages, informing patients about vaccines that are overdue, have been shown to improve immunization rates for children and adolescents in numerous systematic reviews. Therefore, reminder and recall interventions (R/R) are recommended by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services for increasing immunization rates on the basis of strong evidence. R/R messages can be delivered by mail (letter or postcard), via personal or auto-dialer phone calls, by text or e-mail or via patient-portals and can simply be alerts to action or can include educational material with the aim of motivating patients to seek vaccination. R/R has also been shown to be a relatively low-cost intervention with high cost-effectiveness compared with other recommended strategies. However, although R/R as a strategy is consistently effective and cost-effective overall, there is wide variation in the impact of R/R by 1) modality of how it is delivered, 2) the targeted vaccine, 3) the age group, and 4) whether the R/R is conducted centrally by a health system or Immunization Information System or by individual practices. This narrative review summarizes the literature about effectiveness of R/R within each of these categories. We also discuss limitations of R/R, with a focus on the potential impact of parental vaccine hesitancy in blunting its effectiveness and problems with data integrity, on which R/R relies. We also discuss challenges to sustaining R/R efforts, including potential methods of funding for R/R efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Kempe
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado (A Kempe), Aurora, Colo; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine (A Kempe), Aurora, Colo.
| | - Melissa S Stockwell
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (MS Stockwell), New York, NY; Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (MS Stockwell), New York, NY
| | - Peter Szilagyi
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles (P Szilagyi)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Staras SAS, Richardson E, Merlo LJ, Bian J, Thompson LA, Krieger JL, Gurka MJ, Sanders AH, Shenkman EA. A feasibility trial of parent HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based motivational interviewing. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:109. [PMID: 33422047 PMCID: PMC7797089 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a sequential approach of parent-targeted HPV vaccine reminders and phone-based Motivation Interviewing (MI). Methods In 2016, we selected all 11- to 12-year-old boys and girls seen in one clinic whose vaccine records did not include the HPV vaccine (n=286). By gender, we individually randomized parents of adolescents to an interactive text message (74 girls and 45 boys), postcard reminder (46 boys and no girls because of previously demonstrated efficacy), or standard care group (75 girls and 46 boys). Reminders were sent with medical director permission and a HIPAA waiver. Two months after reminders, among the adolescents whose vaccine records still did not include the HPV vaccine, we selected a gender-stratified random sample of 20 parents for phone-based MI. We assessed the percentage of deliverable messages, the percentage of parents’ responding to the interactive text message, parent acceptability of receiving a text message, and MI parent responsiveness and interviewer competence (MI Treatment Integrity Coding system). Results Nearly all messages were deliverable (98% of postcards and 74% of text messages). Six of the 88 parents (7%) receiving text messages scheduled an appointment through our interactive system. The acceptability survey response rate was 37% (38/102). Respondents were favorable toward vaccine reminders for all parents (82%). Among 20 sampled parents, 17 were reached by phone of whom 7 completed MI, 4 had or were getting the HPV vaccine for their child, and 5 expressed disinterest. Across the 7 MI calls, the interviewer was rated 100% MI adherent and scored an average 4.19 rating for Global Spirit. Conclusion Without providing explicit consent to receive vaccine-related messages, parents nonetheless found postcards and interactive text messages acceptable. Centralizing MI to phone calls with trained staff was acceptable to parents and resulted in highly MI-adherent interviews. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-10132-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A S Staras
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. .,The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Eric Richardson
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Lisa J Merlo
- The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Lindsay A Thompson
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Matthew J Gurka
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ashley H Sanders
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,The Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ganapathy S, de Korne DF, Chong NK, Car J. The Role of Text Messaging and Telehealth Messaging Apps. Pediatr Clin North Am 2020; 67:613-621. [PMID: 32650857 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article focuses on the role of text messaging and messaging applications, discusses technical and legal issues, and reviews current examples of the application of text messaging in the clinical adult and pediatric practice. Reviews of current examples of text messaging in adult and pediatric practice show uptake has been increasing substantially in recent years. In pediatric care text messaging has been used for behavior intervention and outcomes tracking. Although applications are promising, the potential of nonsynchronic messaging in the formal delivery of care is still in the neonatal phase compared with its grown-up existence in day-to-day modern life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sashikumar Ganapathy
- KK Women's & Children's Hospital, 100, Bukit Timah Road 229899 Singapore; Duke-NUS School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dirk F de Korne
- Duke-NUS School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore; Medical Innovation & Care Transformation, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Care & Welfare, SVRZ Cares in Zeeland, Middelburg, SVRZ, Koudekerkseweg 143, Middelburg 4335 SM, Netherlands. https://twitter.com/dirkdekorne
| | - Ng Kee Chong
- KK Women's & Children's Hospital, 100, Bukit Timah Road 229899 Singapore; Duke-NUS School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Josip Car
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Clinical Sciences Building, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Palmer MJ, Henschke N, Bergman H, Villanueva G, Maayan N, Tamrat T, Mehl GL, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fønhus MS, Free C. Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving maternal, neonatal, and child health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD013679. [PMID: 32813276 PMCID: PMC8477611 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of poor maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) accounts for more than a quarter of healthy years of life lost worldwide. Targeted client communication (TCC) via mobile devices (MD) (TCCMD) may be a useful strategy to improve MNCH. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of TCC via MD on health behaviour, service use, health, and well-being for MNCH. SEARCH METHODS In July/August 2017, we searched five databases including The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase. We also searched two trial registries. A search update was carried out in July 2019 and potentially relevant studies are awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials that assessed TCC via MD to improve MNCH behaviour, service use, health, and well-being. Eligible comparators were usual care/no intervention, non-digital TCC, and digital non-targeted client communication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, although data extraction and risk of bias assessments were carried out by one person only and cross-checked by a second. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 trials (17,463 participants). Trial populations were: pregnant and postpartum women (11 trials conducted in low-, middle- or high-income countries (LMHIC); pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV (three trials carried out in one lower middle-income country); and parents of children under the age of five years (13 trials conducted in LMHIC). Most interventions (18) were delivered via text messages alone, one was delivered through voice calls only, and the rest were delivered through combinations of different communication channels, such as multimedia messages and voice calls. Pregnant and postpartum women TCCMD versus standard care For behaviours, TCCMD may increase exclusive breastfeeding in settings where rates of exclusive breastfeeding are less common (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.06 to 1.59; low-certainty evidence), but have little or no effect in settings where almost all women breastfeed (low-certainty evidence). For use of health services, TCCMD may increase antenatal appointment attendance (odds ratio (OR) 1.54, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.96; low-certainty evidence); however, the CI encompasses both benefit and harm. The intervention may increase skilled attendants at birth in settings where a lack of skilled attendants at birth is common (though this differed by urban/rural residence), but may make no difference in settings where almost all women already have a skilled attendant at birth (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.94; low-certainty evidence). There were uncertain effects on maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity because the certainty of the evidence was assessed as very low. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC (e.g. pamphlets) TCCMD may have little or no effect on exclusive breastfeeding (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.07; low-certainty evidence). TCCMD may reduce 'any maternal health problem' (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.79) and 'any newborn health problem' (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.06) reported up to 10 days postpartum (low-certainty evidence), though the CI for the latter includes benefit and harm. The effect on health service use is unknown due to a lack of studies. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication No studies reported behavioural, health, or well-being outcomes for this comparison. For use of health services, there are uncertain effects for the presence of a skilled attendant at birth due to very low-certainty evidence, and the intervention may make little or no difference to attendance for antenatal influenza vaccination (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.58), though the CI encompasses both benefit and harm (low-certainty evidence). Pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV TCCMD versus standard care For behaviours, TCCMD may make little or no difference to maternal and infant adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (low-certainty evidence). For health service use, TCC mobile telephone reminders may increase use of antenatal care slightly (mean difference (MD) 1.5, 95% CI -0.36 to 3.36; low-certainty evidence). The effect on the proportion of births occurring in a health facility is uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. For health and well-being outcomes, there was an uncertain intervention effect on neonatal death or stillbirth, and infant HIV due to very low-certainty evidence. No studies reported on maternal mortality or morbidity. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC The effect is unknown due to lack of studies reporting this comparison. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication TCCMD may increase infant ARV/prevention of mother-to-child transmission treatment adherence (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.48; low-certainty evidence). The effect on other outcomes is unknown due to lack of studies. Parents of children aged less than five years No studies reported on correct treatment, nutritional, or health outcomes. TCCMD versus standard care Based on 10 trials, TCCMD may modestly increase health service use (vaccinations and HIV care) (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence); however, the effect estimates varied widely between studies. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC TCCMD may increase attendance for vaccinations (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.28; low-certainty evidence), and may make little or no difference to oral hygiene practices (low-certainty evidence). TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication TCCMD may reduce attendance for vaccinations, but the CI encompasses both benefit and harm (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.20; low-certainty evidence). No trials in any population reported data on unintended consequences. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effect of TCCMD for most outcomes is uncertain. There may be improvements for some outcomes using targeted communication but these findings were of low certainty. High-quality, adequately powered trials and cost-effectiveness analyses are required to reliably ascertain the effects and relative benefits of TCCMD. Future studies should measure potential unintended consequences, such as partner violence or breaches of confidentiality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Palmer
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Tigest Tamrat
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garrett L Mehl
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Caroline Free
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Palmer MJ, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Maayan N, Bergman H, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fønhus MS, Tamrat T, Mehl GL, Free C. Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 8:CD013680. [PMID: 32779730 PMCID: PMC8409381 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) worldwide is substantial, disproportionately affecting those living in low- and middle-income countries. Targeted client communication (TCC) delivered via mobile devices (MD) (TCCMD) may improve the health behaviours and service use important for sexual and reproductive health. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of TCC via MD on adolescents' knowledge, and on adolescents' and adults' sexual and reproductive health behaviour, health service use, and health and well-being. SEARCH METHODS In July/August 2017, we searched five databases including The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase. We also searched two trial registries. A search update was carried out in July 2019 and potentially relevant studies are awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of TCC via MD to improve sexual and reproductive health behaviour, health service use, and health and well-being. Eligible comparators were standard care or no intervention, non-digital TCC, and digital non-targeted communication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, although data extraction and risk of bias assessments were carried out by one person only and cross-checked by a second. We have presented results separately for adult and adolescent populations, and for each comparison. MAIN RESULTS We included 40 trials (27 among adult populations and 13 among adolescent populations) with a total of 26,854 participants. All but one of the trials among adolescent populations were conducted in high-income countries. Trials among adult populations were conducted in a range of high- to low-income countries. Among adolescents, nine interventions were delivered solely through text messages; four interventions tested text messages in combination with another communication channel, such as emails, multimedia messaging, or voice calls; and one intervention used voice calls alone. Among adults, 20 interventions were delivered through text messages; two through a combination of text messages and voice calls; and the rest were delivered through other channels such as voice calls, multimedia messaging, interactive voice response, and instant messaging services. Adolescent populations TCCMD versus standard care TCCMD may increase sexual health knowledge (risk ratio (RR) 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23 to 1.71; low-certainty evidence). TCCMD may modestly increase contraception use (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.35; low-certainty evidence). The effects on condom use, antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, and health service use are uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. The effects on abortion and STI rates are unknown due to lack of studies. TCCMD versus non-digital TCC (e.g. pamphlets) The effects of TCCMD on behaviour (contraception use, condom use, ART adherence), service use, health and wellbeing (abortion and STI rates) are unknown due to lack of studies for this comparison. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication The effects on sexual health knowledge, condom and contraceptive use are uncertain due to very low-certainty evidence. Interventions may increase health service use (attendance for STI/HIV testing, RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.40; low-certainty evidence). The intervention may be beneficial for reducing STI rates (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.33; low-certainty evidence), but the confidence interval encompasses both benefit and harm. The effects on abortion rates and on ART adherence are unknown due to lack of studies. We are uncertain whether TCCMD results in unintended consequences due to lack of evidence. Adult populations TCCMD versus standard care For health behaviours, TCCMD may modestly increase contraception use at 12 months (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.48) and may reduce repeat abortion (RR 0.68 95% CI 0.28 to 1.66), though the confidence interval encompasses benefit and harm (low-certainty evidence). The effect on condom use is uncertain. No study measured the impact of this intervention on STI rates. TCCMD may modestly increase ART adherence (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.32, low-certainty evidence, and standardised mean difference 0.44, 95% CI -0.14 to 1.02, low-certainty evidence). TCCMD may modestly increase health service utilisation (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.31; low-certainty evidence), but there was substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 85%), with mixed results according to type of service utilisation (i.e. attendance for STI testing; HIV treatment; voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC); VMMC post-operative visit; post-abortion care). For health and well-being outcomes, there may be little or no effect on CD4 count (mean difference 13.99, 95% CI -8.65 to 36.63; low-certainty evidence) and a slight reduction in virological failure (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). TCCMD versus non-digital TCC No studies reported STI rates, condom use, ART adherence, abortion rates, or contraceptive use as outcomes for this comparison. TCCMD may modestly increase in service attendance overall (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.35, low certainty evidence), however the confidence interval encompasses benefit and harm. TCCMD versus digital non-targeted communication No studies reported STI rates, condom use, ART adherence, abortion rates, or contraceptive use as outcomes for this comparison. TCCMD may increase service utilisation overall (RR: 1.71, 95% CI 0.67-4.38, low certainty evidence), however the confidence interval encompasses benefit and harm and there was considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 72%), with mixed results according to type of service utilisation (STI/HIV testing, and VMMC). Few studies reported on unintended consequences. One study reported that a participant withdrew from the intervention as they felt it compromised their undisclosed HIV status. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS TCCMD may improve some outcomes but the evidence is of low certainty. The effect on most outcomes is uncertain/unknown due to very low certainty evidence or lack of evidence. High quality, adequately powered trials and cost effectiveness analyses are required to reliably ascertain the effects and relative benefits of TCC delivered by mobile devices. Given the sensitivity and stigma associated with sexual and reproductive health future studies should measure unintended consequences, such as partner violence or breaches of confidentiality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa J Palmer
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Tigest Tamrat
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Garrett L Mehl
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Free
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Text Message Quality Improvement Project for Influenza Vaccine in a Low-Resource Largely Latino Pediatric Population. J Healthc Qual 2020; 41:362-368. [PMID: 30829884 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Children with asthma are targeted for influenza vaccine because of their vulnerability to complications, particularly those with low income or family preference for Spanish language. We used text messaging to encourage caregivers to vaccinate. Participants were children (aged >6 months), predominantly low income and Latino, with an asthma diagnosis attending a pediatric clinic. Interactive text messages that described the vaccine and how to make an appointment were sent to parents in English or Spanish, January 2016 to April 2017. Year 1 messages were evaluated by the investigators considering vaccination results and evidence in the literature. Improvements for Year 2 included timing of message, clarity of message, and using the family language of preference. Messages went to 398 (Year 1) and 485 (Year 2) families. Sixty-four percent of families preferred English; 35% preferred Spanish. Children in Spanish-speaking families were significantly more likely than children in English-speaking families to be vaccinated, 66% versus 46%. Text messaging is a straightforward, low-cost health promotion strategy with potential to improve child health. Quality improvement efforts in outpatient settings with low-income and limited English proficiency families are needed. mHealth strategies may help address the needs of vulnerable populations. SQUIRE V.2.0 guidelines were used for manuscript writing and reporting.
Collapse
|
21
|
Szilagyi PG, Albertin C, Casillas A, Valderrama R, Duru OK, Ong MK, Vangala S, Tseng CH, Rand CM, Humiston SG, Evans S, Sloyan M, Lerner C. Effect of Patient Portal Reminders Sent by a Health Care System on Influenza Vaccination Rates: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180:962-970. [PMID: 32421168 PMCID: PMC7235900 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Importance Influenza vaccination rates across the US are low. Because few practices send patient reminders for influenza vaccination, a scalable patient reminder system is needed. Objective To evaluate the effect of patient reminders sent via a health care system's electronic health record patient portal on influenza vaccination rates. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic, 4-arm randomized clinical trial was performed from October 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019, across the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) health care system. A total of 164 205 patients in 52 primary care practices who had used the patient portal within 12 months were included. Interventions Patients due for an influenza vaccine were sent a letter via the patient portal of the health care system reminding them about the importance of influenza vaccination, safety of the vaccine, and morbidity associated with influenza. Patients were randomized within primary care practices to 1 of 4 study groups (no reminder [n = 41 070] vs 1 reminder [n = 41 055], 2 reminders [n = 41 046], or 3 reminders [n = 41 034]). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was receipt of 1 or more influenza vaccines as documented in the electronic health record, which was supplemented with influenza vaccination data from external sources (eg, pharmacies). Secondary outcomes were influenza vaccination rates among subgroups and influenza vaccinations self-reported by patients in reply to the portal-based query as having been received elsewhere. Results A total of 164 205 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [19.6] years; 95 779 [58.3%] female) were randomly allocated to 1 of the 4 study arms. In the primary analysis across all ages and not including patient self-reported vaccinations in reply to portal reminders, influenza vaccination rates were 37.5% for those receiving no reminders, 38.0% for those receiving 1 reminder (P = .008 vs no reminder), 38.2% for those receiving 2 reminders (P = .03 vs no reminder), and 38.2% for those receiving 3 reminders (P = .02 vs no reminder). In the secondary analysis not including patient self-reported vaccinations, among adults aged 18 to 64 years (vaccination rates: 32.0% in the control group, 32.8% in the 1-reminder group, 32.8% in the 2-reminder group, and 32.8% in the 3-reminder group; P = .001), male patients (vaccination rates: 37.3% vs 38.3%, 38.6%, and 38.8%; P = .001), non-Hispanic patients (vaccination rates: 37.6% vs 38.2%, 38.3%, and 38.2%; P = .004), and those who were not vaccinated in the prior 2 years (vaccination rates: 15.3% vs 15.9%, 16.3%, and 16.1%; P < .001), vaccination rates were higher in the portal reminder groups than in the control group; the findings in these 3 subgroups mirrored the findings in the entire population. When self-reported vaccinations received elsewhere were included, influenza vaccination rates were 1.4 to 2.9 percentage points higher in the portal reminder groups, with a dose-response effect (0 reminders: 15 537 [37.8%]; 1 reminder: 16 097 [39.2%]; 2 reminders: 16 426 [40.0%]; and 3 reminders: 16 714 [40.7%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Generic patient portal reminders were effective in minimally increasing influenza vaccination rates, but more intensive or more targeted patient motivational strategies appear to be needed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03666026.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G. Szilagyi
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Mattel Children's Hospital, UCLA
| | - Christina Albertin
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Mattel Children's Hospital, UCLA
| | | | - Rebecca Valderrama
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Mattel Children's Hospital, UCLA
| | - O. Kenrik Duru
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
| | - Michael K. Ong
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
- Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
| | - Chi-Hong Tseng
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA
| | - Cynthia M. Rand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | | | - Sharon Evans
- Department of Information Services and Solutions, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael Sloyan
- Department of Information Services and Solutions, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Carlos Lerner
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Mattel Children's Hospital, UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reiter PL, Gower AL, Kiss DE, Malone MA, Katz ML, Bauermeister JA, Shoben AB, Paskett ED, McRee AL. A Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Intervention for Young Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e16294. [PMID: 32130192 PMCID: PMC7063529 DOI: 10.2196/16294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men experience several disparities related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, including high incidence rates of anal cancer. Although the HPV vaccine is currently recommended for young adults, HPV vaccine coverage is modest among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YGBMSM). Objective We describe the design and methods for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to rigorously evaluate Outsmart HPV, a population-targeted, individually tailored, Web-based HPV vaccination intervention for YGBMSM. The RCT is designed to determine the efficacy of the intervention, the mechanism by which the intervention has an effect (ie, mediation), and whether efficacy varies by participant characteristics (ie, moderation). Methods Outsmart HPV was previously developed and pilot-tested. This study is a 3-arm prospective RCT that will enroll a projected 1995 YGBMSM who are aged 18 to 25 years, live in the United States, and have not received any doses of the HPV vaccine. Participants will be recruited by means of paid advertisements on social media sites and randomized to receive (1) standard information on the Web about HPV vaccine (control group), (2) Outsmart HPV content on the Web with monthly unidirectional vaccination reminders sent via text messages, or (3) Outsmart HPV content on the Web with monthly interactive vaccination reminders sent via text messages. Participants will complete Web-based surveys at 4 time points during the study: baseline, immediately after engaging with Web-based content, 3 months after randomization, and 9 months after randomization. Primary outcomes will include both HPV vaccine initiation (ie, receipt of 1 or more doses of the HPV vaccine) and completion (receipt of all 3 doses recommended for this age range). We will examine constructs from the intervention’s theoretical framework as potential mediators and demographic and health-related characteristics as potential moderators of intervention effects. Results The institutional review board at The Ohio State University has approved the study. Materials have been developed and finalized for all study groups. Recruitment for the RCT began in fall 2019. Conclusions If shown to be efficacious, Outsmart HPV has the potential to fill an important gap by promoting HPV vaccination among a population at increased risk of HPV infection and HPV-related disease. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04032106; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04032106 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/16294
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Reiter
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States.,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Amy L Gower
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Dale E Kiss
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Molly A Malone
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States.,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jose A Bauermeister
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Abigail B Shoben
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, United States.,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.,The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Annie-Laurie McRee
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guidry JP, Austin LL, O’Donnell NH, Coman IA, Lovari A, Messner M. Tweeting the #flushot: Beliefs, Barriers, and Threats During Different Periods of the 2018 to 2019 Flu Season. J Prim Care Community Health 2020; 11:2150132720932722. [PMID: 33089738 PMCID: PMC7585887 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720932722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Influenza epidemics happen every year, with more than 8 million severe cases in 2017. The most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza is vaccination. In recent years, misinformation regarding vaccines abounds on social media, but the flu vaccine is relatively understudied in this area, and the current study is the first 1 to explore the content and nature of influenza information that is shared on Twitter, comparing tweets published in the early flu season with those posted in peak flu season. Using a quantitative content analysis, 1000 tweets from both parts of the flu season were analyzed for use of Health Belief Model (HBM) variables, engagement, and flu vaccine specific variables. Findings show several promising opportunities for health organizations and professionals: HBM constructs were present more frequently than in previous, related studies, and fewer vaccine-hesitant tweets appear to be present. However, the presence of high barriers to flu vaccine uptake increased significantly from early to peak season, including an increase in the mention of conspiracy theories. Flu vaccine related tweets appear to vary in misinformation level and density throughout the flu season. While this should be confirmed by further studies over multiple flu seasons, this a finding that should be considered by public health organizations when developing flu vaccine campaigns on social media.
Collapse
|
24
|
Domek GJ, Contreras-Roldan IL, Bull S, O'Leary ST, Bolaños Ventura GA, Bronsert M, Kempe A, Asturias EJ. Text message reminders to improve infant immunization in Guatemala: A randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 2019; 37:6192-6200. [PMID: 31492475 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Millions of infants worldwide remain under-immunized and at risk for unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Text messaging may offer a low-cost solution. We aimed to evaluate text message reminders to improve infant immunization in Guatemala. METHODS A randomized clinical trial was conducted at four public health clinics in rural and urban Guatemala. Infants ages six weeks to six months presenting for the first visit of the primary immunization series were randomly and equally allocated to an intervention or usual care group. Intervention participants were sent three text reminders before the second and third vaccine visits. The main outcome was timeliness of the second and third visits of the primary immunization series. RESULTS Of 1088 families approached for enrollment between March to November 2016, 871 were eligible and 720 (82.7%) participated; only 54 families did not own a cell phone. Due to country-wide vaccine shortages, visit completion was used as a proxy for overall immunization coverage. In intention to treat analysis, both intervention and usual care groups had high rates of visit completion, but intervention participants presented on the scheduled date more often (151 [42.2%] of 358 intervention vs. 111 [30.7%] of 362 usual care participants for visit 2, p = 0.001, and 112 [34.0%] of 329 intervention vs. 90 [27.0%] of 333 usual care participants for visit 3, p = 0.05). Intervention caregivers were significantly more likely to want to receive future text message reminders for vaccines and other appointments and were more willing to pay for these reminders. CONCLUSION Caregivers who were sent text message reminders in urban and rural Guatemala were less delayed for their child's immunization visits and reported high user satisfaction. Text message reminders may be an effective tool to increase infant vaccination coverage in low-income settings by reminding parents to vaccinate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02567006 at clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen J Domek
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, B065, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, A090, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 310, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Ingrid L Contreras-Roldan
- Center for Health Studies, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, 18 Av. 11-95, Zona 15, Vista Hermosa III, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Sheana Bull
- Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, A090, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 310, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, B119, 13001 E. 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Sean T O'Leary
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, B065, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, F443, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 300, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Michael Bronsert
- Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, A090, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 310, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, F443, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 300, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Allison Kempe
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, B065, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, F443, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 300, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Edwin J Asturias
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, B065, 13123 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, A090, 13199 E. Montview Blvd., Suite 310, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, B119, 13001 E. 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Esteban-Vasallo M, Domínguez-Berjón M, García-Riolobos C, Zoni A, Aréjula Torres J, Sánchez-Perruca L, Astray-Mochales J. Effect of mobile phone text messaging for improving the uptake of influenza vaccination in patients with rare diseases. Vaccine 2019; 37:5257-5264. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
26
|
Tull F, Borg K, Knott C, Beasley M, Halliday J, Faulkner N, Sutton K, Bragge P. Short Message Service Reminders to Parents for Increasing Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates in a Secondary School Vaccine Program: A Randomized Control Trial. J Adolesc Health 2019; 65:116-123. [PMID: 30879881 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In Victoria (Australia), the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is delivered within a state-wide secondary school vaccine program, administered by local government. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that sending a short message service (SMS) reminder to parents who had consented to their child's receiving the HPV vaccine would lead to greater uptake of the vaccine within the program. The secondary aim was to assess the effect of self-regulatory versus motivational message content in the SMS. METHODS A randomized control trial design was used across 31 schools within seven local government areas. Parents of 4,386 consented adolescents were randomized into three study conditions: motivational SMS versus self-regulatory SMS versus no SMS. Follow-up extended beyond the final school visit to the end of the calendar year to capture those who may have attended a catch-up vaccination session. RESULTS On the day of the final school visit, 85.71% of consented students in the control condition received the HPV vaccine, compared with 88.35% (2.64% point increase) in the motivational message condition, and 89.00% (3.29% point increase) in the self-regulatory message condition, χ2 (2, N = 4,386) = 8.31, p = .016. Both intervention messages were similarly effective at increasing vaccination rates. This effect was maintained in the extended follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The trial findings supported the hypothesis that SMS reminders to parents/guardians would lead to greater uptake of the HPV vaccine in adolescents participating in school-based vaccination. Also, this effect was observed whether we used a motivational or self-regulatory message framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617001307392). Registration Date: September 12, 2017. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fraser Tull
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Kim Borg
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cameron Knott
- Behavioural Insights Unit, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Victorian State Government, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Megan Beasley
- Immunisation Section, Health Protection Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, Victorian State Government, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Justin Halliday
- Public Sector Innovation, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Victorian State Government, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Faulkner
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Sutton
- Immunisation Section, Health Protection Branch, Department of Health and Human Services, Victorian State Government, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Bragge
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gianfredi V, Moretti M, Lopalco PL. Countering vaccine hesitancy through immunization information systems, a narrative review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15:2508-2526. [PMID: 30932725 PMCID: PMC6930057 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1599675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunization is one of the most important public health interventions to contrast infectious disease; however, many people nowadays refuse vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is due to several factors that influence the complex decision-making process. Information technology tools might play an important role in vaccination programs. In particular, immunization information systems (IISs) have the potential to improve performance of vaccination programs and to increase vaccine uptake. This review aimed to present IIS functionalities in order to counter VH. In detail, we analyzed the automatic reminder/recall system, the interoperability of the system, the decision support system, the web page interface and the possibility to record adverse events following immunization. IIS could concretely represent a valid instrument to increase vaccine confidence, especially trust in both health-care workers and decision makers. There are not enough trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIS to counter VH. Further researches might focalize on this aspect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Gianfredi
- Post-Graduate School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Massimo Moretti
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Unit of Public Health, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Lopalco
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bekkat-Berkani R, Romano-Mazzotti L. Understanding the unique characteristics of seasonal influenza illness to improve vaccine uptake in the US. Vaccine 2018; 36:7276-7285. [PMID: 30366802 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Seasonal influenza results in substantial morbidity, mortality and socio-economic burden. The US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends vaccination of everyone over 6 months of age, but coverage remains substantially below the Healthy People 2020 target of 70% in most age groups. Influenza is different from other vaccine-preventable diseases in several ways that influence vaccine uptake. Although the incidence of most vaccine-preventable diseases is low, there is a perception that these diseases result in significant illness or death. In contrast, seasonal influenza has a relatively high incidence, but there is an incorrect perception of a lower disease severity. The vaccine effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines is less than other routine vaccines, varies from season to season between northern and southern hemispheres, and can be low in some seasons. It is also not well recognized that vaccination can attenuate the severity of influenza illness. Finally, the need for annual vaccination is perceived as a burden to busy people. Understanding these differences from the perspective of caregivers and vaccinees might help to improve influenza vaccine uptake. Presenting vaccine effectiveness in terms of clinical outcomes that have the most impact might help to overcome the perceptions that influenza is a non-serious disease and that the vaccine is not effective. The benefits of disease attenuation need to be emphasized in terms of reduced mortality, hospitalization, absenteeism and disruption to daily life. Innovative communication strategies should be adopted, including stronger recommendations from and to healthcare providers, continuous patient education, and social media initiatives employing more emotional and narrative approaches than traditionally used. Finally, access to seasonal influenza vaccination needs to be improved, and barriers such as cost and inconvenience removed. Multiple initiatives have already been successful. The remaining challenge is to translate individual successes into public health policies with corresponding funding and implementation.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kumar D, Hemmige V, Kallen MA, Street RL, Giordano TP, Arya M. The Role of Text Messages in Patient-Physician Communication about the Influenza Vaccine. JOURNAL OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICINE 2018; 7:55-59. [PMID: 30687410 PMCID: PMC6347375 DOI: 10.7309/jmtm.7.2.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic minorities face disparities in receiving the influenza vaccination. A text message intervention could deliver personalized and timely messages to counsel patients on asking their physician for the vaccination. AIMS We assessed whether patients would be receptive to influenza vaccination text messages. METHODS Participants were recruited from a sample of low-income, racial and ethnic minority primary care patients. Participants completed a self-administered survey. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS There were 274 patients who participated and answered the questions of interest, of whom 70% were racial and ethnic minorities and 85% owned a cell phone. Thirty-six percent reported they had never received an influenza vaccination recommendation from their physician. However, 84% would be comfortable asking their physician for the influenza vaccination. Of cell phone-owning participants who would be comfortable asking their physician about the influenza vaccination, 80% would also be comfortable receiving a text message reminder. CONCLUSION Text messages may be an acceptable channel to prompt patients to discuss the annual influenza vaccination with their physicians. Text messaging is a feasible tool to engage patients in their health and improve annual influenza vaccination rates among low-income, racial and ethnic minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Disha Kumar
- School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A
| | - Vagish Hemmige
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, U.S.A
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, 3411 Wayne Avenue, Suite 4H, Bronx, NY 10467, U.S.A
| | - Michael A Kallen
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E Chicago Ave, Chicago, IL 60611 U.S.A
| | - Richard L Street
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, U.S.A
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd (Mailstop 152), Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A
- Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, 4234 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, U.S.A
| | - Thomas P Giordano
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, U.S.A
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd (Mailstop 152), Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A
| | - Monisha Arya
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, U.S.A
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd (Mailstop 152), Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Newall A, Chen C, Wood J, Stockwell M. Within-season influenza vaccine waning suggests potential net benefits to delayed vaccination in older adults in the United States. Vaccine 2018; 36:5910-5915. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Revised: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
31
|
Kolff CA, Scott VP, Stockwell MS. The use of technology to promote vaccination: A social ecological model based framework. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14:1636-1646. [PMID: 29781750 PMCID: PMC6067841 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1477458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccinations are an important and effective cornerstone of preventive medical care. Growing technologic capabilities and use by both patients and providers present critical opportunities to leverage these tools to improve vaccination rates and public health. We propose the Social Ecological Model as a useful theoretical framework to identify areas in which technology has been or may be leveraged to target undervaccination across the individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and society levels and the ways in which these levels interact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea A Kolff
- a Department of Pediatrics , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.,b Department of Population and Family Health , Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York , NY , USA
| | - Vanessa P Scott
- a Department of Pediatrics , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.,c NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital , New York , NY , USA
| | - Melissa S Stockwell
- a Department of Pediatrics , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.,b Department of Population and Family Health , Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.,c NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schwebel FJ, Larimer ME. Using text message reminders in health care services: A narrative literature review. Internet Interv 2018; 13:82-104. [PMID: 30206523 PMCID: PMC6112101 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the extensive use of mHealth behavior change interventions, questions remain about the use of technology-based reminders in delivering health care services. Text messaging, or short message service (SMS), is one reminder method that has been extensively researched. Most SMS-reminder research is distributed across a range of health care outcomes. The aim of this article is to systematically review the aggregate impact of these reminders on overall health care outcomes. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted and yielded 2316 articles. Studies were included if they used SMS reminders to support patient health care outcomes. Study methodology was aligned with the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. RESULTS Following screening, 162 articles met inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 93 investigated medical compliance reminders and 56 investigated appointment reminders. The review found that nearly all the SMS-reminder studies helped improve patient medical compliance and appointment reminders. Additionally, researchers reported numerous benefits from using SMS reminders, including ease of use, relative inexpensiveness, and rapid and automated message delivery. Minimal risks were reported and most participants found the reminders to be acceptable. DISCUSSION Text messages appear to be an effective reminder mechanism to promote improved patient appointment and medical compliance. Reminders should continue to be evaluated and improved to determine the most effective timing and frequency of messages for improving outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank J. Schwebel
- University of Washington, Department of Psychology, 119A Guthrie Hall Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195-1525, United States of America,Corresponding author.
| | - Mary E. Larimer
- University of Washington, Department of Psychology, 119A Guthrie Hall Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195-1525, United States of America,University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45th, Suite 300, Office 312, Box 354944, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jacobson Vann JC, Jacobson RM, Coyne‐Beasley T, Asafu‐Adjei JK, Szilagyi PG. Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1:CD003941. [PMID: 29342498 PMCID: PMC6491344 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003941.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization rates for children and adults are rising, but coverage levels have not reached optimal goals. As a result, vaccine-preventable diseases still occur. In an era of increasing complexity of immunization schedules, rising expectations about the performance of primary care, and large demands on primary care providers, it is important to understand and promote interventions that work in primary care settings to increase immunization coverage. One common theme across immunization programs in many nations involves the challenge of implementing a population-based approach and identifying all eligible recipients, for example the children who should receive the measles vaccine. However, this issue is gradually being addressed through the availability of immunization registries and electronic health records. A second common theme is identifying the best strategies to promote high vaccination rates. Three types of strategies have been studied: (1) patient-oriented interventions, such as patient reminder or recall, (2) provider interventions, and (3) system interventions, such as school laws. One of the most prominent intervention strategies, and perhaps best studied, involves patient reminder or recall systems. This is an update of a previously published review. OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various types of patient reminder and recall interventions to improve receipt of immunizations. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to January 2017. We also searched grey literature and trial registers to January 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series evaluating immunization-focused patient reminder or recall interventions in children, adolescents, and adults who receive immunizations in any setting. We included no-intervention control groups, standard practice activities that did not include immunization patient reminder or recall, media-based activities aimed at promoting immunizations, or simple practice-based awareness campaigns. We included receipt of any immunizations as eligible outcome measures, excluding special travel immunizations. We excluded patients who were hospitalized for the duration of the study period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. We present results for individual studies as relative rates using risk ratios, and risk differences for randomized trials, and as absolute changes in percentage points for controlled before-after studies. We present pooled results for randomized trials using the random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS The 75 included studies involved child, adolescent, and adult participants in outpatient, community-based, primary care, and other settings in 10 countries.Patient reminder or recall interventions, including telephone and autodialer calls, letters, postcards, text messages, combination of mail or telephone, or a combination of patient reminder or recall with outreach, probably improve the proportion of participants who receive immunization (risk ratio (RR) of 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23 to 1.35; risk difference of 8%) based on moderate certainty evidence from 55 studies with 138,625 participants.Three types of single-method reminders improve receipt of immunizations based on high certainty evidence: the use of postcards (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.30; eight studies; 27,734 participants), text messages (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.44; six studies; 7772 participants), and autodialer (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.32; five studies; 11,947 participants). Two types of single-method reminders probably improve receipt of immunizations based on moderate certainty evidence: the use of telephone calls (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.54; seven studies; 9120 participants) and letters to patients (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.38; 27 studies; 81,100 participants).Based on high certainty evidence, reminders improve receipt of immunizations for childhood (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.29; risk difference of 8%; 23 studies; 31,099 participants) and adolescent vaccinations (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.42; risk difference of 7%; 10 studies; 30,868 participants). Reminders probably improve receipt of vaccinations for childhood influenza (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.99; risk difference of 22%; five studies; 9265 participants) and adult influenza (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.43; risk difference of 9%; 15 studies; 59,328 participants) based on moderate certainty evidence. They may improve receipt of vaccinations for adult pneumococcus, tetanus, hepatitis B, and other non-influenza vaccinations based on low certainty evidence although the confidence interval includes no effect of these interventions (RR 2.08, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.78; four studies; 8065 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Patient reminder and recall systems, in primary care settings, are likely to be effective at improving the proportion of the target population who receive immunizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie C Jacobson Vann
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillSchool of NursingCarrington HallChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA27599‐7460
| | - Robert M Jacobson
- Mayo ClinicPediatric and Adolescent Medicine200 First Street, SWRochesterMinnesotaUSA55905‐0001
| | - Tamera Coyne‐Beasley
- University of North CarolinaGeneral Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Josephine K Asafu‐Adjei
- University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Nursing120 North Medical Drive, 2005 Carrington HallChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA27599
| | - Peter G Szilagyi
- University of California Los AngelesDepartment of Pediatrics90024Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA90024
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Frew PM, Lutz CS. Interventions to increase pediatric vaccine uptake: An overview of recent findings. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 13:2503-2511. [PMID: 28949819 PMCID: PMC5703404 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1367069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 07/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Although much is known about factors contributing to variation in pediatric immunization uptake, there is a need for synthesis of effective vaccine promotion strategies. With growing public health concern on how to best sustain high pediatric immunization rates, and improve where the rates are suboptimal, this review offers evidence gathered from several studies on the achievement of these goals. We identified and analyzed reported findings on childhood (primarily ≤ 7 years) immunization outcomes from tested intervention strategies that focused on parents, guardians, and caregivers, as well as providers, clinics/practices, and communities. The findings suggest that targeted and tailored interventions offer substantial possibilities, especially in a combined manner. We describe promising intervention models that have been operationalized with success and provide evidence for scalability across contexts. Moreover, they are sensitive to parents' and providers' needs, are feasibly integrated in daily clinical practice, and account for broader community concerns and issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula M. Frew
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Chelsea S. Lutz
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Text message reminders for vaccination of adolescents with chronic medical conditions: A randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 2017; 35:4554-4560. [PMID: 28736201 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many adolescents with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) are at risk of vaccine-preventable infection, yet are frequently under-vaccinated. Text message reminders, particularly those with embedded educational information, have been shown to increase general pediatric vaccination. Their use has not been studied specifically among adolescents with CMCs. METHODS Eligible parents of adolescents with CMCs receiving care at one of 4 academically-affiliated pediatric clinics and requiring human papillomavirus (first dose), influenza, and/or pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines were randomized in 4 consecutive cohorts to receive text message vaccine reminders with or without embedded educational information ("educational" vs. "plain" arm, respectively). Educational reminders, including one interactive message, addressed infection risk, vaccine safety/efficacy, and physician recommendations. Up to 5 weekly and 2 booster reminders were sent (October 2014-January 2015). Receipt of any needed vaccine and missed vaccination opportunities by 4, 12, and 24weeks after the initial reminder were compared between arms. RESULTS Of randomized parents (n=295), 175 (59.3%) were Spanish-speaking; most had adolescents with CMCs who were 13-17years (n=229; 77.6%) and publically insured (n=272; 92.5%). Baseline demographics and parental vaccine beliefs were similar between arms. More adolescents in the plain vs. educational reminder arm received any needed vaccine by 4weeks (31.9% vs. 22.7%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.47, 95% CI 1.01-2.14), but not by 12 or 24weeks. Plain reminders were noted in post hoc analyses to have a greater effect than educational reminders in certain sub-populations, including 11-12year-olds and those sent the initial reminder in early fall. Fewer adolescents in the plain vs. educational reminder arm had a missed vaccination opportunity by 4weeks (10.9% vs. 41.3%; aRR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.60), but not by 12 or 24weeks. CONCLUSION Plain text message vaccine reminders appear to have a positive effect compared to educational ones in the short-term and for certain families. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02231957 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
|
36
|
Seeber L, Conrad T, Hoppe C, Obermeier P, Chen X, Karsch K, Muehlhans S, Tief F, Boettcher S, Diedrich S, Schweiger B, Rath B. Educating parents about the vaccination status of their children: A user-centered mobile application. Prev Med Rep 2017; 5:241-250. [PMID: 28127527 PMCID: PMC5257187 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Parents are often uncertain about the vaccination status of their children. In times of vaccine hesitancy, vaccination programs could benefit from active patient participation. The Vaccination App (VAccApp) was developed by the Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, enabling parents to learn about the vaccination status of their children, including 25 different routine, special indication and travel vaccines listed in the WHO Immunization Certificate of Vaccination (WHO-ICV). Between 2012 and 2014, the VAccApp was validated in a hospital-based quality management program in Berlin, Germany, in collaboration with the Robert Koch Institute. Parents of 178 children were asked to transfer the immunization data of their children from the WHO-ICV into the VAccApp. The respective WHO-ICV was photocopied for independent, professional data entry (gold standard). Demonstrating the status quo in vaccine information reporting, a Recall Group of 278 parents underwent structured interviews for verbal immunization histories, without the respective WHO-ICV. Only 9% of the Recall Group were able to provide a complete vaccination status; on average 39% of the questions were answered correctly. Using the WHO-ICV with the help of the VAccApp resulted in 62% of parents providing a complete vaccination status; on average 95% of the questions were answered correctly. After using the VAccApp, parents were more likely to remember key aspects of the vaccination history. User-friendly mobile applications empower parents to take a closer look at the vaccination record, thereby taking an active role in providing accurate vaccination histories. Parents may become motivated to ask informed questions and to keep vaccinations up-to-date.
Collapse
Key Words
- ED, emergency department
- Electronic health records
- Immunization
- Mobile health
- Patient education
- Patient empowerment
- QM, quality management
- RSV, respiratory syncytial virus
- SOP, standard operating procedure
- VAccApp, Vaccination App, a mobile application for vaccination histories
- VPD, vaccine-preventable disease
- Vaccination history
- ViVI, Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative
- WHO, World Health Organization
- WHO-ICV, International Certificate of Vaccination, issued by the World Health Organization
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Seeber
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tim Conrad
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Freie University, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Hoppe
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany; Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Freie University, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Patrick Obermeier
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Karsch
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Susann Muehlhans
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Tief
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sindy Boettcher
- National Reference Center for Poliomyelitis and Enteroviruses, Robert Koch Institute, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Diedrich
- National Reference Center for Poliomyelitis and Enteroviruses, Robert Koch Institute, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Brunhilde Schweiger
- National Reference Center for Influenza, Robert Koch Institute, Seestr. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Barbara Rath
- Department of Pediatrics, Charité University Medical Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative, Berlin, Germany; The University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG51PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Crocker-Buque T, Edelstein M, Mounier-Jack S. Interventions to reduce inequalities in vaccine uptake in children and adolescents aged <19 years: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017; 71:87-97. [PMID: 27535769 PMCID: PMC5256276 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-207572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-income countries, substantial differences exist in vaccine uptake relating to socioeconomic status, gender, ethnic group, geographic location and religious belief. This paper updates a 2009 systematic review on effective interventions to decrease vaccine uptake inequalities in light of new technologies applied to vaccination and new vaccine programmes (eg, human papillomavirus in adolescents). METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ASSIA, The Campbell Collaboration, CINAHL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Eppi Centre, Eric and PsychINFO for intervention, cohort or ecological studies conducted at primary/community care level in children and young people from birth to 19 years in OECD countries, with vaccine uptake or coverage as outcomes, published between 2008 and 2015. RESULTS The 41 included studies evaluated complex multicomponent interventions (n=16), reminder/recall systems (n=18), outreach programmes (n=3) or computer-based interventions (n=2). Complex, locally designed interventions demonstrated the best evidence for effectiveness in reducing inequalities in deprived, urban, ethnically diverse communities. There is some evidence that postal and telephone reminders are effective, however, evidence remains mixed for text-message reminders, although these may be more effective in adolescents. Interventions that escalated in intensity appeared particularly effective. Computer-based interventions were not effective. Few studies targeted an inequality specifically, although several reported differential effects by the ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS Locally designed, multicomponent interventions should be used in urban, ethnically diverse, deprived populations. Some evidence is emerging for text-message reminders, particularly in adolescents. Further research should be conducted in the UK and Europe with a focus on reducing specific inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Crocker-Buque
- Health Protection Research Unit in Immunisation, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Michael Edelstein
- Department of Immunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Sandra Mounier-Jack
- Health Protection Research Unit in Immunisation, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|