Value of Genetic Testing for the Prediction of Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Genotype and arrhythmic risk in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a rare variant of HCM, often considered to have a benign prognosis. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and genetic predisposition of apical HCM with non-apical HCM.

METHODS

We included 195 patients with HCM who underwent next-generation sequencing at two tertiary centres in South Korea (2017-2024). The primary outcome was a composite of lethal arrhythmic events (LAE), including death, ventricular arrhythmia, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation and appropriate ICD shock. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as new-onset atrial fibrillation, ischaemic stroke, heart failure hospitalisation, septal reduction therapy or heart transplant.

RESULTS

Of the 195 patients, 67 (34.4%) had apical HCM. Patients with apical HCM were older at diagnosis and had lower maximal left ventricular wall thickness compared with non-apical HCM. Disease-causing variants were less frequent in apical HCM (20.9% vs 46.9%, p<0.001). MYBPC3 and MYH7 variants were less common in apical HCM (50.0%) than in non-apical HCM (75.0%). MACE occurred less frequently in apical HCM (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.75), but no difference was observed in LAE (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.08). The presence of disease-causing variants was independently associated with LAE (adjusted HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.44 to 4.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Although apical HCM is associated with less hypertrophy and lower genetic yield, it is not entirely benign. The presence of disease-causing variants is an important predictor of arrhythmic risk, underscoring the value of genetic testing in all HCM patients, regardless of phenotype.

Haematological setpoints are a stable and patient-specific deep phenotype

The complete blood count (CBC) is an important screening tool for healthy adults and a common test at periodic exams. However, results are usually interpreted relative to one-size-fits-all reference intervals1,2, undermining the precision medicine goal to tailor care for patients on the basis of their unique characteristics3,4. Here we study thousands of diverse patients at an academic medical centre and show that routine CBC indices fluctuate around stable values or setpoints5, and setpoints are patient-specific, with the typical healthy adult's nine CBC setpoints distinguishable as a group from those of 98% of other healthy adults, and setpoint differences persist for at least 20 years. Haematological setpoints reflect a deep physiologic phenotype enabling investigation of acquired and genetic determinants of haematological regulation and its variation among healthy adults. Setpoints in apparently healthy adults were associated with significant variation in clinical risk: absolute risk of some common diseases and morbidities varied by more than 2% (heart attack and stroke, diabetes, kidney disease, osteoporosis), and absolute risk of all-cause 10 year mortality varied by more than 5%. Setpoints also define patient-specific reference intervals and personalize the interpretation of subsequent test results. In retrospective analysis, setpoints improved sensitivity and specificity for evaluation of some common conditions including diabetes, kidney disease, thyroid dysfunction, iron deficiency and myeloproliferative neoplasms. This study shows CBC setpoints are sufficiently stable and patient-specific to help realize the promise of precision medicine for healthy adults.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiac condition with potential for severe complications including sudden cardiac death. Early diagnosis allows appropriate risk stratification and prompt intervention to minimise the potential for adverse outcomes. The implications of poorly coordinated screening are significant, either missing relatives at high-risk or burdening low-risk individuals with a diagnosis associated with reduced life expectancy. We aim to guide clinicians through the diagnostic pathway through to novel treatment options. Several conditions mimic the condition, and we discuss the phenocopies and how to differentiate from HCM.

RECENT FINDINGS

We summarise the latest developments informing clinical decision making in the modern era of myosin inhibitors and future gene editing therapies. Early identification will enable prompt referral to specialist centres. A diagnostic flowchart is included, to guide the general cardiology and heart failure clinician in important decision making regarding the care of the HCM patient and importantly their relatives at risk. We have highlighted the importance of screening because genotype-positive/phenotype-negative patients are likely to have the most to gain from novel therapies.

Phenotypic spectrum of the first Belgian MYBPC3 founder: a large multi-exon deletion with a varying phenotype

Background

Variants in the MYBPC3 gene are a frequent cause of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) but display a large phenotypic heterogeneity. Founder mutations are often believed to be more benign as they prevailed despite potential negative selection pressure. We detected a pathogenic variant in MYBPC3 (del exon 23-26) in several probands. We aimed to assess the presence of a common haplotype and to describe the cardiac characteristics, disease severity and long-term outcome of mutation carriers.

Methods

Probands with HCM caused by a pathogenic deletion of exon 23-26 of MYBPC3 were identified through genetic screening using a gene panel encompassing 59 genes associated with cardiomyopathies in a single genetic center in Belgium. Cascade screening of first-degree relatives was performed, and genotype positive relatives were further phenotyped. Clinical characteristics were collected from probands and relatives. Cardiac outcomes included death, heart transplantation, life-threatening arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization or septal reduction therapy. Haplotype analysis, using microsatellite markers surrounding MYBPC3, was performed in all index patients to identify a common haplotype. The age of the founder variant was estimated based on the size of the shared haplotype using a linkage-disequilibrium based approach.

Results

We identified 24 probands with HCM harbouring the MYBPC3 exon 23-26 deletion. Probands were on average 51 ± 16 years old at time of clinical HCM diagnosis and 62 ± 10 years old at time of genetic diagnosis. A common haplotype of 1.19 Mb was identified in all 24 probands, with 19 of the probands sharing a 13.8 Mb haplotype. The founder event was estimated to have happened five generations, or 175-200 years ago, around the year 1830 in central Flanders. Through cascade screening, 59 first-degree relatives were genetically tested, of whom 37 (62.7%) were genotype positive (G+) and 22 (37.3%) genotype negative (G-). They were on average 38 ± 19 years old at time of genetic testing. Subsequent clinical assessment revealed a HCM phenotype in 19 (51.4%) G+ relatives. Probands were older (63 ± 10 vs. 42 ± 21 years; p < 0.001) and had more severe phenotypes than G+ family members, presenting with more symptoms (50% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.002), arrhythmia (41.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.014), more overt hypertrophy and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (43.5% vs. 3.0%; p < 0.001). Male G+ relatives more often had a HCM phenotype (78.6% vs. 34.8%; p = 0.010) and were more severely affected than females. At the age of 50, a penetrance of 78.6% was observed, defined as the presence of HCM in 11 of 14 G+ relatives with age ≥50 years. Overall, 20.3% of all variant carriers developed one of the predefined cardiac outcomes after a median follow-up of 5.5 years with an average age of 50 (±21) years.

Conclusion

A Belgian founder variant, an exon 23-26 deletion in MYBPC3, was identified in 24 probands and 37 family members. The variant is characterized by a high penetrance of 78.6% at the age of 50 years but has variable phenotypic expression. Adverse outcomes were observed in 20.3% of patients during follow-up.

Relationship Between Genotype Status and Clinical Outcome in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is complex, and the relationship between genotype status and clinical outcome is incompletely resolved.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed a large international HCM cohort to define in contemporary terms natural history and clinical consequences of genotype. Consecutive patients (n=1468) with established HCM diagnosis underwent genetic testing. Patients with pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variants were considered genotype positive (G+; n=312; 21%); those without definite disease-causing mutations (n=651; 44%) or variants of uncertain significance (n=505; 35%) were considered genotype negative (G-). Patients were followed up for a median of 7.8 years (interquartile range, 3.5-13.4 years); HCM end points were examined by cumulative event incidence. Over follow-up, 135 (9%) patients died, 33 from a variety of HCM-related causes. After adjusting for age, all-cause and HCM-related mortality did not differ between G- versus G+ patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.46-1.31]; P=0.37; HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.38-2.30]; P=0.87, respectively). Adverse event rates, including heart failure progression to class III/IV, heart transplant, or heart failure death, did not differ (G- versus G+) when adjusted for age (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.26]; P=0.58), nor was genotype independently associated with sudden death event risk (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.88-2.21]; P=0.16). In multivariable analysis, age was the only independent predictor of all-cause and HCM-related mortality, heart failure progression, and sudden death events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large consecutive cohort of patients with HCM, genotype (G+ or G-) was not a predictor of clinical course, including all-cause and HCM-related mortality and risk for heart failure progression or sudden death. G+ status should not be used to dictate clinical management or predict outcome in HCM.

Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using established clinical variables and genetic information

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The cardiac societies of Europe and the United States have established different risk models for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The aim of this study is to validate current SCD risk prediction methods in a German HCM cohort and to improve them by the addition of genotype information.

METHODS

HCM patients without prior SCD or equivalent arrhythmic events ≥ 18 years of age were enrolled in an expert cardiomyopathy center in Germany. The primary endpoint was defined as SCD/-equivalent within 5 years of baseline evaluation. 5-year SCD-risk estimates and recommendations for ICD implantations, as defined by the ESC and AHA/ACC guidelines, were analyzed. Multivariate cox proportional hazards analyses were integrated with genetic findings as additive SCD risk.

RESULTS

283 patients were included and followed for in median 5.77 years (2.92; 8.85). A disease-causing variant was found in 138 (49%) patients. 14 (5%) patients reached the SCD endpoint (5-year incidence 4.9%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows significantly lower overall SCD event-free survival for patients with an identified disease-causing variant (p < 0.05). The ESC HCM Risk-SCD model showed an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.79; p < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 0.29 (95% CI 0.08-0.58) and specificity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88) for a risk estimate ≥ 6%/5-years. By comparison, the AHA/ACC HCM SCD risk stratification model showed an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.65-0.76; p = 0.003) with a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.66-0.998) and specificity of 0.28 (95% CI 0.23-0.34) at the respective cut-off. The modified SCD Risk Score with genetic information yielded an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81; p < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.57-0.98) and specificity of 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.74). The number-needed-to-treat (NNT) to prevent 1 SCD event by prophylactic ICD-implantation is 13 for the ESC model, 28 for AHA/ACC and 9 for the modified Genotype-model.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the performance of current risk models in clinical decision making. The integration of genetic findings into current SCD risk stratification methods seem feasible and can add in decision making, especially in borderline risk-groups. A subgroup of patients with high SCD risk remains unidentified by current risk scores.

The challenge of risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical, genetic and imaging insights from a quaternary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the commonest genetic cardiomyopathy and may result in sudden cardiac death (SCD). Clinical risk stratification scores are utilised to estimate SCD risk and determine potential utility of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHODS

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCM from a quaternary HCM service were defined according to clinical characteristics, genetic profiles and cardiac imaging results. European Risk-SCD score and American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Score were calculated. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

380 patients with HCM were followed up for a median of 6.4 years. 18 patients (4.7%) experienced cardiac arrest, with predictive factors being younger age (37.2 vs 54.4 years, p = 0.0041), unexplained syncope (33.3% vs 9.4%, p = 0.007), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (50.0% vs 12.7%, p < 0.0001), increased septal thickness (21.5 vs 17.5 mm, p = 0.0003), and presence of a sarcomeric gene mutation (100.0% vs 65.8%, p = 0.038). The Risk-SCD and AHA/ACC scores had poor agreement (kappa coefficient 0.38). Risk-SCD score had poor sensitivity (44.4%), classifying 55.6% of patients with cardiac arrest as low-risk but was highly specific (93.7%). AHA/ACC risk score did not discriminate between groups significantly. 20 patients (5.3%) died, with most >60-year-olds having a non-cardiac cause of death (p = 0.0223).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights limited (38%) agreement between the Risk-SCD and AHA/ACC scores. Most cardiac arrests occurred in ostensibly low or medium-risk patients under both scores. Appropriate ICD selection remains challenging. Incorporating newer risk markers such as HCM genotyping and myocardial fibrosis quantification by cardiac MRI may assist future risk refinement.

State-of-the-art document on optimal contemporary management of cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies represent significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Over the past decades, a progress has occurred in characterization of the genetic background and major pathophysiological mechanisms, which has been incorporated into a more nuanced diagnostic approach and risk stratification. Furthermore, medications targeting core disease processes and/or their downstream adverse effects have been introduced for several cardiomyopathies. Combined with standard care and prevention of sudden cardiac death, these novel and emerging targeted therapies offer a possibility of improving the outcomes in several cardiomyopathies. Therefore, the aim of this document is to summarize practical approaches to the treatment of cardiomyopathies, which includes the evidence-based novel therapeutic concepts and established principles of care, tailored to the individual patient aetiology and clinical presentation of the cardiomyopathy. The scope of the document encompasses contemporary treatment of dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It was based on an expert consensus reached at the Heart Failure Association online Workshop, held on 18 March 2021.

Review of Contemporary Invasive Treatment Approaches and Critical Appraisal of Guidelines on Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a heterogeneous disease with different clinical presentations, albeit producing similar dismal long-term outcomes if left untreated. Several approaches are available for the treatment of HOCM; e.g., alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and surgical myectomy (SM). The objectives of the current review were to (1) discuss the place of the standard invasive treatment modalities (ASA and SM) for HOCM; (2) summarize and compare novel techniques for the management of HOCM; (3) analyze current guidelines addressing HOCM management; and (4) offer suggestions for the treatment of complex HOCM presentations.

METHODS

We searched the literature and attempted to gather the most relevant and impactful available evidence on ASA, SM, and other invasive means of treatment of HOCM. The literature search yielded thousands of results, and 103 significant publications were ultimately included.

RESULTS

We critically analyzed available guidelines and provided context in the setting of patient selection for standard and novel treatment modalities. This review offers the most comprehensive analysis to-date of available invasive treatments for HOCM. These include the standard treatments, SM and ASA, as well as novel treatments such as dual-chamber pacing and radiofrequency catheter ablation. We also account for complex pathoanatomic presentations and current guidelines to offer suggestions for tailored care of patients with HOCM. Finally, we consider promising future therapies for HOCM.

CONCLUSIONS

HOCM is a heterogeneous disease associated with poor outcomes if left untreated. Several strategies for treatment of HOCM are available but patient selection for the procedure is crucial.

Diagnostic validity and clinical utility of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study summarises the diagnostic validity and clinical utility of genetic testing for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and their at-risk relatives.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Library databases from inception through 2 March 2020. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were prespecified for individual sarcomere genes, presence/absence of pathogenic variants, paediatric and adult cohorts, family history, inclusion of probands, and variant classification method. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool.

Results

A total of 132 articles met inclusion criteria. The detection rate based on pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was significantly higher in paediatric cohorts compared with adults (56% vs 42%; p=0.01) and in adults with a family history compared with sporadic cases (59% vs 33%; p=0.005). When studies applied current, improved, variant interpretation standards, the adult detection rate significantly decreased from 42% to 33% (p=0.0001) because less variants met criteria to be considered pathogenic. The mean difference in age-of-onset in adults was significantly earlier for genotype-positive versus genotype-negative cohorts (8.3 years; p<0.0001), MYH7 versus MYBPC3 cohorts (8.2 years; p<0.0001) and individuals with multiple versus single variants (7.0 years; p<0.0002). Overall, disease penetrance in adult cohorts was 62%, but differed significantly depending on if probands were included or excluded (73% vs 55%; p=0.003).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first, to our knowledge, to collectively quantify historical understandings of detection rate, genotype-phenotype associations and disease penetrance for HCM, while providing the answers to important routine clinical questions and highlighting key areas for future study.

Role of genetic testing in cardiomyopathies: Α primer for cardiologists

Recent advances in cardiovascular genetics have transformed genetic testing into a valuable part of management of families with inherited cardiomyopathies. As novel mutations have been identified, understanding when to consider genetic testing has emerged as an important consideration in the management of these cases. Specific genetic testing has a paramount importance in the risk stratification of family members, in the prognosis of probands at higher risk of a serious phenotype expression, and finally in the identification of new mutations, all of which are discussed in this review. The indications for each type of cardiomyopathy are described, along with the limitations of genetic testing. Finally, the importance of public sharing of variants in large data sets is emphasized. The ultimate aim of this review is to present key messages about the genetic testing process in order to minimize potential harms and provide suggestions to specialized clinicians who act as a part of a multidisciplinary team in order to offer the best care to families with inherited cardiomyopathies.

Genetic Testing in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited heart disease with an estimated prevalence of up to 1 in 200 individuals. In the majority of cases, HCM is considered a Mendelian disease, with mainly autosomal dominant inheritance. Most pathogenic variants are usually detected in genes for sarcomeric proteins. Nowadays, the genetic basis of HCM is believed to be rather complex. Thousands of mutations in more than 60 genes have been described in association with HCM. Nevertheless, screening large numbers of genes results in the identification of many genetic variants of uncertain significance and makes the interpretation of the results difficult. Patients lacking a pathogenic variant are now believed to have non-Mendelian HCM and probably have a better prognosis than patients with sarcomeric pathogenic mutations. Identifying the genetic basis of HCM creates remarkable opportunities to understand how the disease develops, and by extension, how to disrupt the disease progression in the future. The aim of this review is to discuss the brief history and recent advances in the genetics of HCM and the application of molecular genetic testing into common clinical practice.

Risk Prediction Models and Scores in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has historically been linked with sudden cardiac death (SCD). Currently, it is well established that only a subset of patients is at the highest risk stratum for such a catastrophic event. Detection of patients belonging to this high-risk category can allow for timely defibrillator implantation, changing the natural history of HCM. Inversely, device implantation in patients deemed at low risk leads to an unnecessary burden of device complications with no apparent protective benefit. Previous studies have identified a series of markers, now considered established risk factors, with genetic testing and newer imaging allowing for the detection of novel, highly promising indices of increased risk for SCD. Despite the identification of a number of risk factors, there is noticeable discrepancy in the utility of such factors for risk stratification between the current American and European guidelines. We sought to systematically review the data available on these two approaches, presenting their rationale and respective predictive capacity, also discussing the potential of novel markers to augment the precision of currently used risk stratification models for SCD in HCM.

From Hypertrophy to Heart Failure: What Is New in Genetic Cardiomyopathies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the recent advances in the research and clinical care of patients with the major phenotypes of inherited cardiomyopathies-hypertrophic, dilated, and arrhythmogenic. Developments in genetics, risk stratification, therapies, and disease modeling will be discussed.

RECENT

Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools which incorporate genetic and genomic data are being steadily incorporated into the routine clinical care of patients with genetic cardiomyopathies. Human pluripotent stem cells are a breakthrough model system for the study of genetic variation associated with inherited cardiovascular disease. Next-generation sequencing technology and molecular-based diagnostics and therapeutics have emerged as valuable tools to improve the recognition and care of patients with hypertrophic, dilated, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Improved adjudication of variant pathogenicity and management of genotype-positive/phenotype-negative individuals are imminent challenges in this realm of precision medicine.

Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Insights from Genetic Analysis and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

The role of genetic testing over the clinical and functional variables, including data from the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) risk stratification remains unclear. A retrospective genotype–phenotype correlation was performed to analyze possible differences between patients with and without likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants. A total of 371 HCM patients were screened at least for the main sarcomeric genes MYBPC3 (myosin binding protein C), MYH7 (β-myosin heavy chain), TNNI3 (cardiac troponin I) and TNNT2 (cardiac troponin T): 203 patients had at least an LP/P variant, 23 patients had a unique variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and 145 did not show any LP/P variant or VUS. During a median 5.4 years follow-up, 51 and 14 patients developed heart failure (HF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) or SCD-equivalents events, respectively. The LP/P variant was associated with a more aggressive HCM phenotype. However, left atrial diameter (LAd), circulatory power (peak oxygen uptake*peak systolic blood pressure, CP%) and ventilatory efficiency (C-index = 0.839) were the only independent predictors of HF whereas only LAd and CP% were predictors of the SCD end-point (C-index = 0.738). The present study reaffirms the pivotal role of the clinical variables and, particularly of those CPET-derived, in the HCM risk stratification.

Contemporary Insights Into the Genetics of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Toward a New Era in Clinical Testing?

Genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an established clinical technique, supported by 30 years of research into its genetic etiology. Although pathogenic variants are often detected in patients and used to identify at-risk relatives, the effectiveness of genetic testing has been hampered by ambiguous genetic associations (yielding uncertain and potentially false-positive results), difficulties in classifying variants, and uncertainty about genotype-negative patients. Recent case-control studies on rare variation, improved data sharing, and meta-analysis of case cohorts contributed to new insights into the genetic basis of HCM. In particular, although research into new genes and mechanisms remains essential, reassessment of Mendelian genetic associations in HCM argues that current clinical genetic testing should be limited to a small number of validated disease genes that yield informative and interpretable results. Accurate and consistent variant interpretation has benefited from new standardized variant interpretation guidelines and innovative approaches to improve classification. Most cases lacking a pathogenic variant are now believed to indicate non-Mendelian HCM, with more benign prognosis and minimal risk to relatives. Here, we discuss recent advances in the genetics of HCM and their application to clinical genetic testing together with practical issues regarding implementation. Although this review focuses on HCM, many of the issues discussed are also relevant to other inherited cardiac diseases.

Increased Myocardial Oxygen Consumption Precedes Contractile Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Caused by Pathogenic TNNT2 Gene Variants

Background

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is caused by pathogenic sarcomere gene variants. Individuals with a thin‐filament variant present with milder hypertrophy than carriers of thick‐filament variants, although prognosis is poorer. Herein, we defined if decreased energetic status of the heart is an early pathomechanism in TNNT2 (troponin T gene) variant carriers.

Methods and Results

Fourteen individuals with TNNT2 variants (genotype positive), without left ventricular hypertrophy (G+/LVH−; n=6) and with LVH (G+/LVH+; n=8) and 14 healthy controls were included. All participants underwent cardiac magnetic resonance and [¹¹C]‐acetate positron emission tomography imaging to assess LV myocardial oxygen consumption, contractile parameters and myocardial external efficiency. Cardiac efficiency was significantly reduced compared with controls in G+/LVH− and G+/LVH+. Lower myocardial external efficiency in G+/LVH− is explained by higher global and regional oxygen consumption compared with controls without changes in contractile parameters. Reduced myocardial external efficiency in G+/LVH+ is explained by the increase in LV mass and higher oxygen consumption. Septal oxygen consumption was significantly lower in G+/LVH+ compared with G+/LVH−. Although LV ejection fraction was higher in G+/LVH+, both systolic and diastolic strain parameters were lower compared with controls, which was most evident in the hypertrophied septal wall.

Conclusions

Using cardiac magnetic resonance and [¹¹C]‐acetate positron emission tomography imaging, we show that G+/LVH− have an initial increase in oxygen consumption preceding contractile dysfunction and cardiac hypertrophy, followed by a decline in oxygen consumption in G+/LVH+. This suggests that high oxygen consumption and reduced myocardial external efficiency characterize the early gene variant–mediated disease mechanisms that may be used for early diagnosis and development of preventive treatments.

Protein Quality Control Activation and Microtubule Remodeling in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disorder. It is mainly caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomere proteins. Mutant forms of these highly abundant proteins likely stress the protein quality control (PQC) system of cardiomyocytes. The PQC system, together with a functional microtubule network, maintains proteostasis. We compared left ventricular (LV) tissue of nine donors (controls) with 38 sarcomere mutation-positive (HCMSMP) and 14 sarcomere mutation-negative (HCMSMN) patients to define HCM and mutation-specific changes in PQC. Mutations in HCMSMP result in poison polypeptides or reduced protein levels (haploinsufficiency, HI). The main findings were 1) several key PQC players were more abundant in HCM compared to controls, 2) after correction for sex and age, stabilizing heat shock protein (HSP)B1, and refolding, HSPD1 and HSPA2 were increased in HCMSMP compared to controls, 3) α-tubulin and acetylated α-tubulin levels were higher in HCM compared to controls, especially in HCMHI, 4) myosin-binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) levels were inversely correlated with α-tubulin, and 5) α-tubulin levels correlated with acetylated α-tubulin and HSPs. Overall, carrying a mutation affects PQC and α-tubulin acetylation. The haploinsufficiency of cMyBP-C may trigger HSPs and α-tubulin acetylation. Our study indicates that proliferation of the microtubular network may represent a novel pathomechanism in cMyBP-C haploinsufficiency-mediated HCM.

Long-term outcome of conservative and invasive treatment in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Background and objective: Treatment for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) can be either conservative or invasive (alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and myectomy). As there is no clear consensus on the long-term effects of these different strategies, the aim was to compare the long-term outcome in a large tertiary referral university hospital. Methods: We retrospectively included 106 HOCM patients. Twenty-nine (27.4%) patients were treated conservatively, 25 (23.6%) underwent ASA and 52 (49.0%) myectomy. Endpoints were all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD)-related events (including SCD, aborted SCD and appropriate ICD shocks). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used. Results: The mean follow-up period was 7.7 ± 4.9 years. Overall, there was no significant difference in survival between the three treatment strategies (p = 0.7). Annual rates of SCD-related events at 5 years and the complete follow-up period were significantly higher (p = 0.034) after conservative treatment (4.9%/year and 2.7%/year, respectively) compared to ASA (0.9%/year, 0.5%/year) and myectomy (1.0%/year, 0.6%/year). Independent predictors of SCD-related events were: conservative treatment (HR 10.66; 1.88-60.55), a known mutation (HR 9.36; 1.43-61.20), left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) > 30 mm (HR 6.48; 1.05-39.92) and non-sustained VT (HR 16.82; 2.29-123.29). Invasive treatment resulted in a significant higher proportion of patients requiring pacing (p = 0.033). Conclusions: Long-term mortality rates for patients with HOCM are similarly low between treatment groups. However, conservative treatment was associated with SCD-related events, as were known mutations, increased LVWT and non-sustained VT. Invasive treatment was associated with a higher need for implantation of a pacemaker.

Effect of Gender and Genetic Mutations on Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Gender has been proposed to impact the phenotype and prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Our aims were to study gender differences in the clinical presentation, phenotype, genotype, and outcome of HC. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 1,007 patients with HC (62% male, 80% genotyped) evaluated between 1977 and 2017. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. At first evaluation, female patients presented more often with symptoms (43% vs 35%, p = 0.01), were older than male patients (56 ± 16 vs 49 ± 15 years, p <0.001), and more frequently had hypertension (38% vs 27%, p <0.001), left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (37% vs 27%, p <0.001), and impaired left ventricular systolic (17% vs 11%, p = 0.01) and diastolic (77% vs 62%, p <0.001) function. Overall, the genetic yield was similar between genders (54% vs 51%, p = 0.4); however, in patients ≥70 years, the genetic yield was less in women (15% vs 36%, p = 0.03). During 6.8-year follow-up (interquartile range 3.2 to 10.9), female gender was not independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.25 [0.91 to 1.73]), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.22 [0.83 to 1.79]), heart failure-related mortality (HR 1.77 [0.95 to 3.27]), or sudden cardiac death (SCD) and/or aborted SCD (HR 0.75 [0.44 to 1.30]). Interventions and nonfatal clinical events did not differ between the genders. In conclusion, female patients with HC present at a more advanced age with a different clinical, phenotypic, and genetic status. There is no independent association between female gender and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure-related mortality, or SCD.

The genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is most commonly transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait, caused by mutations in genes encoding cardiac sarcomere proteins^1–3. Other inheritable causes of the disease include mutations in genes coding for proteins important in calcium handling or that form part of the cytoskeleton^4–6. At present, the primary clinical role of genetic testing in HCM is to facilitate familial screening to allow the identification of individuals at risk of developing the disease^7,8. It is also used to diagnose genocopies, such as lysosomal^9–11 and glycogen storage disease which have different treatment strategies, rates of disease progression and prognosis^12–14. The role of genetic testing in predicting prognosis is limited at present, but emerging data suggest that knowledge of the genetic basis of disease will assume an important role in disease stratification^15–17 and offer potential targets for disease-modifying therapy in the near future¹⁸.

Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy: a clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to provide updated guidance for the genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy and for an approach to manage secondary findings from cardiomyopathy genes. The genetic bases of the primary cardiomyopathies (dilated, hypertrophic, arrhythmogenic right ventricular, and restrictive) have been established, and each is medically actionable; in most cases established treatments or interventions are available to improve survival, reduce morbidity, and enhance quality of life.

METHODS

A writing group of cardiologists and genetics professionals updated guidance, first published in 2009 for the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), in a collaboration with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Each recommendation was assigned to teams of individuals by expertise, literature was reviewed, and recommendations were decided by consensus of the writing group. Recommendations for family history, phenotype screening of at-risk family members, referral to expert centers as needed, genetic counseling, and cardiovascular therapies, informed in part by phenotype, are presented in the HFSA document.

RESULTS

A genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy is indicated with a cardiomyopathy diagnosis, which includes genetic testing. Guidance is also provided for clinical approaches to secondary findings from cardiomyopathy genes. This is relevant as cardiomyopathy is the phenotype associated with 27% of the genes on the ACMG list for return of secondary findings. Recommendations herein are considered expert opinion per current ACMG policy as no systematic approach to literature review was conducted.

CONCLUSION

Genetic testing is indicated for cardiomyopathy to assist in patient care and management of at-risk family members.

Prognostic significance of anterior mitral valve leaflet length in individuals with a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy gene mutation without hypertrophic changes

Purpose

Previous studies suggest that anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL) elongation is a primary phenotypic feature in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Our aim was to assess AMVL length in individuals with HCM gene mutations and in healthy controls and to identify predictors of the development of HCM during follow-up.

Methods

A total of 133 HCM mutation carriers and 135 controls underwent cardiac examination including electro- and echocardiography. AMVL length was measured in the parasternal long axis and apical three chamber view during diastole. Univariate and multivariable cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of HCM.

Results

There were no significant differences between HCM mutation carriers and controls regarding age and sex. In the parasternal long axis view, AMVL length was similar in mutation carriers and controls (24 ± 4 vs 24 ± 4 mm, p = 0.8). In the apical three chamber view, AMVL were shorter in mutation carriers (29 ± 4 vs 30 ± 4 mm, p = 0.02). When averaged for both views, AMVL length was similar in mutation carriers and controls (27 ± 3 vs 27 ± 3 mm, p = 0.2). During 5.8 ± 3.0 years follow-up, 13 (14%) HCM mutation carriers developed HCM. Pathological Q wave (hazard ratio 9.89, p = 0.004), E/e′ ratio (hazard ratio 2.52, p = 0.001), and maximal wall thickness (hazard ratio 2.15, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of HCM. AMVL length was not predictive of the development of HCM.

Conclusions

AMVL length is similar in HCM mutation carriers and controls. AMVL length is not predictive of the development of HCM, in contrast to pathological Q wave, E/e′ ratio, and maximal wall thickness.

Genetic testing in cardiomyopathies: an update on indications and benefits

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As rapid genetic testing has become increasingly accessible in a timely fashion, more genetic mutations are identified in inherited conditions such as cardiomyopathies. Understanding when to consider genetic testing is an important part of the management of patients whose presentations vary from decompensated heart failure to sudden cardiac death.

RECENT FINDINGS

We describe the benefits of genetic testing for risk stratification of family members, prognostication of probands, and identification of novel disease-causing mutations and examine the possible role of genetic predisposition in seemingly acquired cardiomyopathies such as peripartum and anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy.

SUMMARY

Genetic screening for the recognition of family members who have inherited a cardiomyopathy is important, and testing may identify patients at higher risk of sudden death. However, genetic testing does have its limitations, such as the identification of variants of unknown significance that often complicate the clinical picture.

[Genetic tests in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Benefits, limitations, and applications in clinical practice]

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the most common monogenic heart disease. Its phenotypic expression is quite variable. In up to 60% of the cases, mutations are described in the genes coding for cardiac sarcomer proteins. Massive sequencing of deoxyribonucleic acid makes it possible to discover new genes responsible for the disease, but it has the disadvantage of discovering numerous variants of uncertain significance in these patients. The strategy used, especially when they do not segregate with the disease, is one of the challenges of genetics. Pathogenicity criteria may help to catalogue this variant. The genetic tests on the index case a diagnosis to be made, and the possibility of cascading to first degree relatives. The presence or not of a positive genotype in the relatives will determine the subsequent follow-up guidelines. The appearance of a positive genotype is a poor prognosis regardless of the type of mutation.

Genetic Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy-A Heart Failure Society of America Practice Guideline

This guideline describes the approach and expertise needed for the genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy. First published in 2009 by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), the guideline has now been updated in collaboration with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). The writing group, composed of cardiologists and genetics professionals with expertise in adult and pediatric cardiomyopathy, reflects the emergence and increased clinical activity devoted to cardiovascular genetic medicine. The genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy is a rapidly emerging key clinical priority, because high-throughput sequencing is now feasible for clinical testing and conventional interventions can improve survival, reduce morbidity, and enhance quality of life. Moreover, specific interventions may be guided by genetic analysis. A systematic approach is recommended: always a comprehensive family history; an expert phenotypic evaluation of the proband and at-risk family members to confirm a diagnosis and guide genetic test selection and interpretation; referral to expert centers as needed; genetic testing, with pre- and post-test genetic counseling; and specific guidance as indicated for drug and device therapies. The evaluation of infants and children demands special expertise. The approach to managing secondary and incidental sequence findings as recommended by the ACMG is provided.

Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Individuals With a MYBPC3 (Myosin-Binding Protein C) Founder Mutation

BACKGROUND

MYBPC3 (Myosin-binding protein C) founder mutations account for 35% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cases in the Netherlands. We compared clinical characteristics and outcome of MYBPC3 founder mutation (FG+) HCM with nonfounder genotype-positive (G+) and genotype-negative (G-) HCM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 680 subjects: 271 FG+ carriers, 132 G+ probands with HCM, and 277 G- probands with HCM. FG+ carriers included 134 FG+ probands with HCM, 54 FG+ relatives diagnosed with HCM after family screening, 74 FG+/phenotype-negative relatives, and 9 with noncompaction or dilated cardiomyopathy. The clinical phenotype of FG+ and G+ probands with HCM was similar. FG+ and G+ probands were younger with less left ventricular outflow tract obstruction than G- probands, however, had more hypertrophy, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. FG+ relatives with HCM had less hypertrophy, smaller left atria, and less systolic and diastolic dysfunction than FG+ probands with HCM. After 8±6 years, cardiovascular mortality in FG+ probands with HCM was similar to G+ HCM (22% versus 14%; log-rank P=0.14), but higher than G- HCM (22% versus 6%; log-rank P<0.001) and FG+ relatives with HCM (22% versus 4%; P=0.009). Cardiac events were absent in FG+/phenotype-negative relatives; subtle HCM developed in 11% during 6 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical phenotype and outcome of FG+ HCM was similar to G+ HCM but worse than G- HCM and FG+ HCM diagnosed in the context of family screening. These findings indicate the need for more intensive follow-up of FG+ and G+ HCM versus G- HCM and FG+ HCM in relatives.