Review: The tale of the Finnish pig tail - how to manage non-docked pigs?

Industry stakeholders attitudes and beliefs about tail biting and docking in pigs - A case study in Switzerland and Spain

BACKGROUND

Tail docking is still widely used in major European pig-producing countries despite efforts to ban it. The present study aimed to understand the attitudes and beliefs of pig farming professionals in Spain and Switzerland regarding tail biting and tail docking. For this, n = 275 Swiss, and n = 87 Spanish participants completed an online questionnaire regarding the issue of tail biting and docking in pigs and their attitudes and beliefs.

RESULTS

Spanish participants predominantly kept docked pigs (n = 70, 80 %), whereas Swiss participants kept undocked pigs (n = 271, 99 %). While tail biting occurrences in the last two years were reported by most participants (n = 301, 83 %), the attitudes towards them differed: Spanish participants found the management of tail biting more challenging than Swiss participants. In addition, Spanish participants considered welfare to be better for docked pigs than for undocked pigs, whereas Swiss participants perceived the welfare of undocked pigs to be better. Similarly, Spanish participants showed a strong perception of lower production risks for docked pigs than for undocked pigs, a perception that could not be found in Swiss participants. Overall, Swiss participants saw more advantages in keeping long-tailed pigs and more possibilities to prevent tail biting than Spanish participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that Spanish pig-farming professionals' attitudes towards tail docking are dominated by the conviction that docking is a necessity that lowers production risks and ensures animal welfare. Future efforts attempting to enforce the prohibition on tail docking should not only attempt to overcome structural barriers, but also focus on communicating with and changing the perceptions of pig farming professionals. By tackling the reluctance to try non-docking, producers can gain more experience and confidence with raising long-tailed pigs. To create sustainable changes in tail-docking practices, in addition to optimising the environment for pigs, communication should focus on changing attitudes and reducing risk perceptions.

Part II: understanding pain in pigs-pain assessment in pigs with spontaneously occurring diseases or injuries

BACKGROUND

Pain in pigs needs to be managed and treated to the benefit of individual pigs. It is imperative for veterinarians and farmers to assure that pigs do not suffer from unnecessary pain that can be relieved. This review focusses on pain related to spontaneously occurring diseases and injuries since this topic is often neglected. The aim is to identify ways to accelerate knowledge and evidence in this area to prevent painful conditions in pigs in the future.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted with results from a search of the electronic databases VetSearch and CABI Rxiv. The findings of selected publications are narratively synthesized and reported orienting on the PRISMA ScR guideline.

RESULTS

The results emphasize that pigs experience pain due to spontaneously occurring diseases and injuries, but systematic knowledge about this topic is scarce. More research is especially needed for rare diseases (such as UTIs). Moreover, research conducted about the topic pain in pigs should involve standardized protocols to document, analyse and share results on pain detection beyond a projects' timeframe. The findings of this review suggest that such a protocol would comprise validated pain identification measures over time and in relation to administered pain treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study invite veterinary practitioners to reconsider in each pig patient whether pain and related indicators are present, how to handle the situation and document the process to ensure the welfare of individual compromised pigs.

Impact of Nutritional Strategies to Prevent Post-Weaning Diarrhoea on Performance, Behaviour, and Microbiota in Piglets from Organic Farming

Organic livestock farming is committed to high environmental and animal welfare standards, although pathologies such as post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) may appear. The main objective of this study was to assess nutritional strategies to prevent PWD in organic piglets. A total of 134 weaned piglets were fed one of three diets: high crude protein (17.8%, HCP), low crude protein (16.8%, LCP), and low crude protein supplemented with liquid whey (LCP+W). Piglets were assessed weekly for four weeks on the following parameters: diarrhoea incidence, additional health parameters, average daily gain, and behaviour. Faecal samples were taken to analyse the intestinal microbiota composition. Data were analysed using LMM and GLMM models and Shannon and Whittaker indexes. No significant effect of diet on diarrhoea incidence was found, but the LCP+W diet increased average daily gain. Pigs fed the LCP+W diet presented a lower percentage of drinking and negative social behaviour compared with the HCP diet, and LCP pigs presented higher exploration compared with HCP. In addition, LCP+W piglets showed a higher abundance of the beneficial genus Frisingicoccus. Although liquid whey did not reduce diarrhoea incidence, the benefits found in growth, microbiota composition, and reduced negative social behaviour indicate that it could be an optimal supplement to organic diets.