Acute Sleep Deprivation in the Thoracic Surgical Resident Does Not Affect Operative Outcomes

Great Debates-Shift Work Versus One Day at a Time: 12- Versus 24-Hour Call Duration in Acute Care Surgery

Optimal shift length for acute care surgery remains an ongoing debate that takes into consideration the impact of fatigue on performance, patient outcomes, and provider well-being. The data is conflicting on whether 12- or 24-hour calls are best. Proponents for the 24-hour shift model cite that it fosters superior continuity of care with fewer handoffs, enhances surgical training and does not negatively impact patient outcomes. Supporters of the 12-hour shift model cite enhanced focus, reduced errors, and promotion of patient safety without compromising training requirements or skill acquisition. A thorough look at the practice environment, frequency of calls, and handoff processes are needed to decide on whether a 12- or 24-hour call schedule will be utilized for trainees and attendings.

Does performing cardiac surgery after hours impact postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There has been concern regarding the safety of cardiac surgical intervention during off-hours. Sleep deprivation, resource limitations, and an increased case urgency have been postulated to increase off-hours surgical risk, although outcomes are inconsistent in the existing literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we review the literature comparing patients undergoing cardiac surgery during on and off-hours.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for literature published from January 2000-September 2023, comparing outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery during on and off-hours. Overall, 3540 manuscript titles and abstracts were screened and 11 articles were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall aggregate analysis indicated no significant differences in rates of in-hospital mortality(OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.41-2.63; P=0.93) and perioperative morbidity, including stroke (P=0.52), reoperation (P=0.92), major bleeding (P=0.10), and renal complications (P=0.55). Composite rates of sternal wound infection favored on-hours surgery (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although inferior outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery during off-hours have been noted, aggregate analysis largely revealed equivalent perioperative morbidity and mortality during on and off-hours surgery, although with the exclusion of one outlier study in-hospital mortality and reoperation favored on-hours surgery. Heterogeneity in outcomes is likely multifactorial, with surgical staff fatigue, patient preoperative risk, clinical setting, and resource limitations all contributing. Further investigation is required directly comparing emergent cardiac surgical intervention during on-hours and off-hours controlling for baseline surgical risk to elucidate the true impact of timing of surgery on postoperative outcomes.

Impact of sleep deficiency on surgical performance: a prospective assessment

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep deficiency can adversely affect the performance of resident physicians, resulting in greater medical errors. However, the impact of sleep deficiency on surgical outcomes, particularly among attending surgeons, is less clear.

METHODS

Sixty attending surgeons from academic and community departments of surgery or obstetrics and gynecology were studied prospectively using direct observation and self-report to explore the effect of sleep deprivation on patient safety, operating room communication, medical errors, and adverse events while operating under 2 conditions, post-call (defined as > 2 hours of nighttime clinical duties) and non-post-call.

RESULTS

Each surgeon contributed up to 5 surgical procedures post-call and non-post-call, yielding 362 cases total (150 post-call and 210 non-post-call). Most common were caesarian section and herniorrhaphy. Hours of sleep on the night before the operative procedure were significantly less post-call (4.98 ± 1.41) vs non-post-call (6.68 ± 0.88, P < .01). Errors were infrequent and not related to hours of sleep or post-call status. However, Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons ratings demonstrated poorer performance while post-call for situational awareness, decision-making, and communication/teamwork. Fewer hours of sleep also were related to lower ratings for situational awareness and decision-making. Decreased self-reported alertness was observed to be associated with increased procedure time.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep deficiency in attending surgeons was not associated with greater errors during procedures performed during the next day. However, procedure time was increased, suggesting that surgeons were able to compensate for sleep loss by working more slowly. Ratings on nontechnical surgical skills were adversely affected by sleep deficiency.

CITATION

Quan SF, Landrigan CP, Barger LK, et al. Impact of sleep deficiency on surgical performance: a prospective assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(4):673-683.

Effects of Sleep Deprivation, Non-Dominant Hand Employment, Caffeine and Alcohol Intake During Surgical Performance: Lessons Learned From the Retina Eyesi Virtual Reality Surgical Simulator

Purpose

Determine whether real-life surgical experience correlates with scores on a retina virtual simulator and the effects of various challenges on surgical performance.

Methods

The study was performed using the Eyesi Surgical Simulator, a virtual reality retina surgical simulator. Residents, fellows, and retina staff were assessed on surgical simulations to determine surgical skills. Participants were assigned baseline scores on speed, efficiency of movement, and ability to avoid retinal damage. After receiving their baseline scores, participants were challenged to use their non-dominant hand or to use the simulator after sleep deprivation or the intake of caffeine or alcohol.

Results

At baseline, junior residents had an average score of 943; senior residents, 1045; retina fellows, 1153; and surgical retina staff, 1161. A 12.5% overall improvement in scores was achieved when comparing baseline 1 to baseline 2; a major improvement was recorded in residents (14.5%) compared with fellows and retina staff (9.97%). A statistically significant difference was observed between residents and fellows (P = 0.027), as well as between residents and retina staff (P = 0.04). A significant decrease in performance (15.7%) was observed when the non-dominant hand was used (P = 0.043). Performance after sleep deprivation and alcohol intake decreased, but not with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.6 and P = 0.5, respectively). A trend toward increasing performance was observed after caffeine intake (6.1%; P = 0.06).

Conclusions

The retina virtual simulator is a novel teaching tool for retinal surgery. A significant association was observed between real surgical experience and the retina surgery virtual simulator results based on surgical experience.

Translational Relevance

An association between real surgical experience and retina surgery virtual simulator results was demonstrated. A complete training program with a cut-off threshold score should be validated for retina training programs.

Addressing Physician Burnout and Ensuring High-Quality Care of the Physician Workforce

Burnout in health care is a public health crisis. Burnout is a triad of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and feelings of reduced personal accomplishment. More than half of practicing physicians and trainees experience burnout, and the rates are increasing. This review highlights the current prevalence of burnout among U.S. physicians, especially obstetrician-gynecologists. We review personal and systemic risk factors for burnout, consequences of burnout, and proven interventions, especially at the systems level, to treat and prevent burnout.

Type A acute aortic dissection repair during night time: is it safe?

Background

Out-of-hours work is believed to lead to a higher complication rate and mortality after surgery. However, there is no data supporting this perception in type A acute aortic dissections (TAAD) repair. We present an observational study of prospectively collected data comparing operative outcomes and late survival of TAAD repair performed after hours versus regular daytime working hours.

Methods

A total of 196 patients undergoing emergency TAAD repair (mean age 59 ± 13 years, range 18-81, F/M 57/139) were included in the final analysis. Patients were stratified as daytime between 7 AM and 7 PM (n = 124), and night time between 7 PM and 7 AM (n = 72). Inverse propensity score (PS) weighting for modelling causal effects was used to assess the effect of time procedure on outcomes of interest.

Results

Overall 30-day mortality was 14.3% (28 patients). No significant differences were found between the night-time and day-time groups with regard to operative mortality (8.3% versus 17.3%; adjusted OR 0.35; 95%CI 0.12-1.04; P = 0.06), re-exploration (12.5% versus 9.7%; adjusted OR 2.09; 95%CI 0.72-6.07; P = 0.18) and neurological deficit (18.1% versus 16.9%; adjusted OR 0.91; 95%CI 0.33-2.54; P = 0.87). Long-term survival at mean 9 years follow-up was comparable between the two groups (adjusted log-rank P = 0.28).

Conclusions

Night-time surgical repair of TAAD when compared with day-time repair does not seem to be associated with a greater risk of surgical complications, operative mortality and long-term mortality.

Surgeon fatigue does not affect surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the effects of surgeon fatigue on postoperative mortality and postoperative complications after elective and non-elective surgeries.

METHODS

A database search was conducted for original articles published in PubMed between 2000 and 2020 with the keywords: "surgeon," "sleep deprivation," "sleep deprived," "fatigued," "mortality," "morbidity," and "outcomes." We selected articles that disclosed actual numbers of patients who underwent surgery by fatigued or rested surgeons, rates of postoperative mortality, or total postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 1427 articles identified, 16 met the selection criteria and were included. Eight of the 16 also included total postoperative complications. Analysis revealed no significant differences in the rates of postoperative mortality after elective and non-elective surgeries or total postoperative complications of elective surgeries or non-elective surgeries performed by fatigued vs. rested surgeons. The relative risks were 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.24], 1.08 (95% CI, 0.85-1.38), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.04), and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.67-1.28), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon fatigue does not affect the rates of postoperative mortality or total postoperative complications after elective surgeries and may have little to no effect on the rates of postoperative mortality or total postoperative complications after non-elective surgeries.

Factors Affecting Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review

Acute type A aortic dissection is a clinical emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates if not managed promptly in specialised and high-volume centres. The mortality rate is increased by 1% for each hour delay in management; however, with advancement in clinical practice, diagnostic imaging and clinician awareness, this has been dramatically reduced to below 30% in most international centres. Not only timing of recognition of the pathology, but also other factors can significantly affect outcomes of such critical pathology. This includes, but is not limited to, age, extent of the pathology, existence of connective tissue disorders, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and surgeon experience. This narrative review will focus on current clinical practice and the evidence behind optimising each factor to minimise adverse outcomes in such high-risk cohort.

Operation start time and long-term outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatic resection

Purpose

The objective of the current study was to examine the potential effects of surgery start times (morning vs. afternoon) on the long-term prognosis of patients after hepatic resection (HR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

All eligible patients were divided into 2 groups according to the start time of surgery: group M (morning surgery, 8 AM–1 PM) and group A (afternoon surgery, 1 PM–6 PM). Clinicopathologic and surgical parameters, as well as oncologic outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

In total, 231 patients were included in the study. There was no difference in age, body mass index, comorbidities, tumor size, tumor location, tumor stages, surgical procedures, or surgical margin between morning and afternoon surgery (all P > 0.05). In contrast, patients in group M experienced longer operation duration than those in group A (median, 240 minutes vs. 195 minutes, P = 0.004). However, no differences of overall survival were observed between morning and afternoon surgery groups in the whole cohort or stratified by surgical margin (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Surgery start times during the work day have no measurable influence on patient outcome following curative HR for HCC, indicating good self-regulation and professional judgment of surgeons for progressive fatigue during surgery.

Analysis of the Effects of Day-Time vs. Night-Time Surgery on Renal Transplant Patient Outcomes

Sleep deprivation and disruption of the circadian rhythms could impair individual surgical performance and decision making. For this purpose, this study identified potential confounding factors on surgical renal transplant patient outcomes during day and night. Our retrospective cohort study of 215 adult renal cadaver transplant recipients, of which 132 recipients were allocated in the “day-time” group and 83 recipients in the “night-time” group, primarily stratified the patients into two cohorts, depending on the start time. Within a 24 h operational system, “day-time” was considered as being from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and “night-time” from 8 p.m. to 8 a.m.. Primary outcomes examined patient and graft survival after three months and one year. Secondary outcomes included the presence of acute rejection (AR) and delayed graft function (DGF), as well as the rate of postoperative complications. In log-rank testing, “day-time” surgery was associated with a significantly higher risk of patient death (p = 0.003), whereas long-term graft survival was unaffected by the operative time of day. The mean cold ischemia time (CIT), which was 12.4 ± 5.3 h in the “night-time” group, was significantly longer compared to 10.7 ± 3.6 for those during the day (p = 0.01). We observed that “night-time” kidney recipients experienced more wound complications. From our single-centre data, we conclude that night-time kidney transplantation does not increase the risk of adverse events or predispose the patient to a worse outcome. Nevertheless, further research is required to explore the effect of fatigue on nocturnal surgical performance.

Emergency glioma resection but not hours of operation predicts perioperative complications: A single center study

OBJECTIVE

Physical and mental status of neurosurgeons may vary with emergency status and hours of operation, which may impact the outcome of patients undergoing surgery. This study aims to clarify the influence of these parameters on outcome after surgery in glioma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 477 nonemergency surgery (NES) and 30 emergency surgery (ES) were enrolled in this study. Using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, 97 pairs of procedures from NES group were generated and then classified as group M (morning procedures, 8:00 a.m-1:00 p.m) or group A (afternoon or night procedures, 1:00 p.m-8:00 p.m). 30 emergency procedures were classified into group ESa (daytime emergency surgery, 8:00 a.m-6:00 p.m) and group ESb (nighttime surgery procedures, 6:00 p.m-8:00 a.m the next day). Differences in intraoperative risk factors and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications, including death within 30 days (p = 0.004), neurological function deficit (p = 0.012), systemic infection (p < 0.001) were significant higher in emergency procedures. Intraoperative risk factors including blood loss (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p = 0.036) were also higher in emergency procedures than nonemergency procedures, although both procedures had comparable time duration (p = 0.337). By PSM analysis, patients in group M and group A were well matched and no significant difference of intraoperative risk factors and postoperative complications (all p > 0.05) were found. Furthermore, incidence of intraoperative risk factors and postoperative complications were similar in both groups ESa and ESb (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Emergency glioma resection is a very important risk factors of perioperative mortality and morbidity for patients. However, hours of operation did not necessarily predict postoperative mortality or morbidity, either in emergency or nonemergency glioma resection.

A review of current approaches for evaluating impaired performance in around-the-clock medical professionals

The need for data to study the relationship between fatigued healthcare professionals and performance outcomes is evident, however, it is unclear which methodology is most appropriate to provide these insights. To address this issue, we performed a systematic review of relevant articles by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases. The literature search identified 2960 unique references, of which 82 were identified eligible. The impact on performance was studied on clinical outcomes, medical simulation, neurocognitive performance, sleep quantification and subjective assessment. In general results on performance are conflicting; impairment, no effect, and improvement were found. This review outlines the various methods currently available for assessing fatigue-impaired performance. The contrasting outcomes can be attributed to three main factors: differences in the operationalisation of fatigue, incomplete control data, and the wide variety in the methods used. We recommend the implementation of a clinically applicable tool that can provide uniform data. Until these data become available, caution should be used when developing regulations that can have implications for physicians, education, manpower planning, and ‒ ultimately ‒ patient care.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Variability in Case Duration for Aortic Valve Replacement and Association With Hospital Facility Types

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there are no large-scale studies that compare differences in case duration of aortic valve replacements (AVRs). The primary objective of this study was to determine associations of hospital facility type, geographic location, case volume per year, and time of day with duration of valve replacement surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Data from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry.

PARTICIPANTS

National data from university and non-university hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All AVRs from the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry were identified from 2010 to 2014. Mean case duration for all AVRs was 360.8 ± 95.8 minutes and was presented based on facility type (university hospital, large community hospital, medium-sized community hospital, and other); US geographic region; time of day (cases performed after 5 pm and before 7 am v day shift); and case volume per year. A multivariable linear regression model was built to determine the association of various patient, procedural, and facility characteristics with case duration. University hospitals were associated with increased case duration for AVRs (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

With this large national database, the authors demonstrated that academic hospitals, time of day of the surgery, US region, and case volume per year for a facility are related to the case duration of AVRs.

Sleep deprivation in interventional cardiology: Implications for patient care and physician-health

The burden and impact of sleep deprivation on both patient care and on the health of interventional cardiologists is not well understood. Due to the nature of emergent procedures occurring in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, interventionalists are prone to suffer from acute and/or chronic sleep deprivation. Sleep deprivation has been associated with numerous adverse effects, such as impaired performance, cognitive deficits, reduced psychomotor vigilance, and workplace errors and injuries, among many others. Although sleep deprivation has been linked to more errors in trainees, there is paucity of data addressing outcomes in interventional cardiology. The purpose of this overview is to explore the possible impact of sleep deprivation on interventional cardiology in relation to patient care and physician health, and examine potential approaches to this issue.

Operation Start Times and Postoperative Morbidity from Liver Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgeons are likely to get progressively fatigued and work less effectively during the course of a normal workday. We sought to examine the effects of surgery start times (morning vs. afternoon) and workload of the surgeons on morbidity of patients after partial liver resection (LR).

METHODS

A total of 155 pairs of the patients from 383 patients undergoing LR were generated by propensity score analysis (PSM) according to the start times of surgery: group M (morning surgery, 8 a.m.-1 p.m.) and group A (afternoon surgery, 1 p.m.-6 p.m.). Patients in group A were further divided depending on whether or not the surgeons had performed other surgeries earlier in the day and the exact duration of the other surgeries before the afternoon surgery (≤180 and >180 min). The incidence and severity of postoperative complications were compared between different groups.

RESULTS

By using PSM analysis, the patients in group M and group A were well matched in basic characteristics. The incidence and severity of the postoperative complications were similar between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Whether the surgeons had performed other surgeries prior to the afternoon surgery seemed not affecting the postoperative outcome (all p > 0.05). Moreover, the duration of other surgeries the surgeons had performed did not have significant influence on the outcome of patients undergoing afternoon surgery (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery start times and workload of surgeons during working time did not measurably affect short-term outcomes of the patients. The negative findings might be a manifestation of professional judgment and self-regulation of the experienced physicians.

Impact of extended duty hours on medical trainees

Many studies on resident physicians have demonstrated that extended work hours are associated with a negative impact on well-being, education, and patient care. However, the relationship between the work schedule and the degree of impairment remains unclear. In recent years, because of concerns for patient safety, national minimum standards for duty hours have been instituted (2003) and revised (2011). These changes were based on studies of the effects of sleep deprivation on human performance and specifically on the effect of extended shifts on resident performance. These requirements necessitated significant restructuring of resident schedules. Concerns were raised that these changes have impaired continuity of care, resident education and supervision, and patient safety. We review the studies on the effect of extended work hours on resident well-being, education, and patient care as well as those assessing the effect of work hour restrictions. Although many studies support the adverse effects of extended shifts, there are some conflicting results due to factors such as heterogeneity of protocols, schedules, subjects, and environments. Assessment of the effect of work hour restrictions has been even more difficult. Recent data demonstrating that work hour limitations have not been associated with improvement in patient outcomes or resident education and well-being have been interpreted as support for lifting restrictions in some specialties. However, these studies have significant limitations and should be interpreted with caution. Until future research clarifies duty hours that optimize patient outcomes, resident education, and well-being, it is recommended that current regulations be followed.

No Circadian Variation in Surgeons' Ability to Diagnose Acute Appendicitis

OBJECTIVE

To examine if there were circadian variations in surgeons' ability to diagnose acute appendicitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective database study of all patients admitted to an acute surgical procedure under the potential diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a 4-year period. The day was divided into 2 time intervals, day to evening hours (08:00-23:59) and night hours (00:00-07:59). Relevant data regarding the admission and surgical procedures were categorized into these 2 time intervals.

SETTING

Department of Surgery at a Danish university hospital in Copenhagen.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2366 patients were included. There were no age limitations or selection in sex.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the ability to diagnose appendicitis in day-evening hours vs night hours (p = 0.391), nor was any significant difference found on weekdays (Monday-Thursday) vs weekends (Friday-Sunday) (p = 0.278). There were no differences in duration of the procedures, rate of conversion, or severity of postoperative surgical complications between the 2 groups. More patients underwent diagnostic imaging during day to evening hours compared with night hours (308 vs 46; p = 0.014). The use of imaging had no effect on the ability to diagnose appendicitis. Male sex showed a higher probability of the diagnosis being appendicitis compared with other or no pathology (odds ratio: 3.094; p < 0.001). Age between 40 and 80 years was significantly associated with a higher probability of the diagnosis being appendicitis compared with other or no pathology. The negative appendectomy rate was 10.5%.

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in the surgeons' ability to diagnose acute appendicitis during night hours compared with day to evening hours.

Effects of sleep hours and fatigue on performance in laparoscopic surgery simulators

BACKGROUND

Studies on a virtual reality simulator have demonstrated that sleep-deprived residents make more errors. Work-hour restrictions were implemented, among other reasons, to ensure enough sleep time for residents. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of sleep time, perceived fatigue, and experience on surgical performance. We hypothesized that performance would decrease with less sleep and fatigue, and that experienced surgeons would perform better than less experienced surgeons despite sleep deprivation and fatigue.

METHODS

Twenty-two surgical residents and attendings performed a peg transfer task on two simulators: the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Skills (FLS) trainer and the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST©), a virtual version of the FLS. Participants also completed questionnaires to assess their fatigue level and recent sleep hours. Each subject performed ten trials on each simulator in a counterbalanced order. Performance was measured using the FLS normalized scores and analyzed using a multiple regression model.

RESULTS

The multiple regression analysis showed that sleep hours and perceived fatigue were not covariates. No correlation was found between experience level and sleep hours or fatigue. Sleep hours and fatigue did not appear to affect performance. Expertise level was the only significant determinant of performance in both FLS and VBLaST©.

CONCLUSIONS

Restricting resident work hours was expected to result in less fatigue and better clinical performance. In our study, peg transfer task performance was not affected by sleep hours. Experience level was a significant indicator of performance. Further examination of the complex relationship between sleep hour, fatigue, and clinical performance is needed to support the practice of work-hour restriction for surgical residents.

Timing of elective surgery as a perioperative outcome variable: analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVES

The timing of major elective operations is a potentially important but rarely examined outcome variable. This study examined elective pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) timing as a perioperative outcome variable.

METHODS

Consecutive patients submitted to PD were identified. Determinants of 90-day morbidity (prospectively graded and tracked), anastomotic leak or fistula, and mortality, including operation start time (time of day), day of week and month, were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Operation start time was analysed as a continuous and a categorical variable.

RESULTS

Of the 819 patients identified, 405 (49.5%) experienced one or more complications (total number of events = 684); 90-day mortality was 3.5%. On multivariate analysis, predictors of any morbidity included male gender (P = 0.009) and estimated blood loss (P = 0.017). Male gender (P = 0.002), benign diagnosis (P = 0.002), presence of comorbidities (P = 0.002), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = 0.025), larger tumour size (P = 0.013) and positive resection margin status (P = 0.005) were associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leak or fistula. Cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities were the only variables associated with 90-day mortality. Variables pertaining to procedure scheduling were not associated with perioperative morbidity or mortality. Operation start time was not significant when analysed as a continuous or a categorical variable, or when stratified by surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative outcome after PD is determined by patient, disease and operative factors and does not appear to be influenced by procedure timing.

Follow-up on a national survey: american neurosurgery resident opinions on the 2011 accreditation council for graduate medical education-implemented duty hours

OBJECTIVE

We previously performed a nationwide survey of American neurosurgical residents before the initiation of the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education regulations, in which more than 70% indicated the proposed changes would negatively impact residency training. We sought to resurvey the resident population as to the actual changes that occurred to their programs after the 2011 standards went into effect.

METHODS

Surveys were mailed to every neurosurgery training program in the United States and Puerto Rico. Program directors and coordinators were asked to distribute surveys to their residents.

RESULTS

A total of 253 neurosurgery residents responded. Reported duty-hour violations were largely unchanged after the 2011 duty-hour changes. Sixty-percent of residents reported that they had underreported duty hours, with nearly 25% of respondents doing so on a weekly or daily basis. Most reported that the 2011 changes had not affected operative caseload, academic productivity, quality of life, or resident fatigue. The majority of residents disagreed or strongly disagreed that the PGY-1 16-hour limitation had a positive impact on first-year resident training (69%) or had improved patient safety (62%). Overall, the majority of respondents reported that the 2011 changes had a negative (35%) or negligible (33%) effect on residency training at their institution.

CONCLUSION

Respondents indicated that the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education regulations have had a smaller perceived effect on neurosurgical training programs than previously predicted. However, the majority of residents admitted to underreporting duty hours, with a quarter doing so on a regular basis. The 16-hour rule for interns remains unpopular.

Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine if the rate of major discrepancies between resident preliminary reports and faculty final reports increases during the final hours of consecutive 12-hour overnight call shifts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board exemption status was obtained for this study. All overnight radiology reports interpreted by residents on-call between January 2010 and June 2010 were reviewed by board-certified faculty and categorized as major discrepancies if they contained a change in interpretation with the potential to impact patient management or outcome. Initial determination of a major discrepancy was at the discretion of individual faculty radiologists based on this general definition. Studies categorized as major discrepancies were secondarily reviewed by the residency program director (M.H.S.) to ensure consistent application of the major discrepancy designation. Multiple variables associated with each report were collected and analyzed, including the time of preliminary interpretation, time into shift study was interpreted, volume of studies interpreted during each shift, day of the week, patient location (inpatient or emergency department), block of shift (2-hour blocks for 12-hour shifts), imaging modality, patient age and gender, resident identification, and faculty identification. Univariate risk factor analysis was performed to determine the optimal data format of each variable (ie, continuous versus categorical). A multivariate logistic regression model was then constructed to account for confounding between variables and identify independent risk factors for major discrepancies.

RESULTS

We analyzed 8062 preliminary resident reports with 79 major discrepancies (1.0%). There was a statistically significant increase in major discrepancy rate during the final 2 hours of consecutive 12-hour call shifts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that interpretation during the last 2 hours of 12-hour call shifts (odds ratio (OR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-3.21), cross-sectional imaging modality (OR 5.38, 95% CI 3.22-8.98), and inpatient location (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.02-3.20) were independent risk factors for major discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a single academic medical center, major discrepancies in resident preliminary reports increased significantly during the final 2 hours of consecutive 12-hour overnight call shifts. This finding could be related to either fatigue or circadian desynchronization. Discrimination of these two potential etiologies requires additional investigation as major discrepancies in resident reports have the potential to negatively impact patient care/outcome. Cross-sectional imaging modalities including computed tomography and ultrasound (versus conventional radiography), as well as inpatient location (versus Emergency Department location), were also associated with significantly higher major discrepancy rates.

Effect of fatigue on laparoscopic skills: a comparative historical cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fatigue has been shown to have a negative impact on surgical performance. However, there is a lack of research investigating its effect on laparoscopy, particularly in Australia. This study investigated whether fatigue associated with a surgeon's usual workday led to a measurable drop off in laparoscopic surgical skills as assessed on a laparoscopic simulator.

METHODS

A comparative study involving two cohorts was undertaken: a study group whose data were collected prospectively was compared to a historical control group. Participants were required to reach a predetermined level of proficiency in each laparoscopic task on either a FLS or LapSim simulator. The participants in the study cohort were re-tested approximately 1 month after completing 10 h of work. The participants in the historical non-fatigued group were re-tested approximately 1 month after reaching proficiency. Comparisons between cohorts were made using a 'decrease in score per day elapsed' value to account for the natural attrition in skills over time and the variability in testing times within and between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

The decrease in overall score per day elapsed for fatigued participants was significantly greater than for historical non-fatigued participants, irrespective of the simulator type. Fatigue had a greater impact on certain laparoscopic skills, including peg transfer and knot tying. Participants who self-reported higher level of fatigue demonstrated significantly better skills than those who self-reported lower levels.

CONCLUSION

Overall laparoscopic skill proficiency was reduced in the fatigued participants compared to the historical non-fatigued participants, with certain laparoscopic skills more affected than others.

Does sleep deprivation impair orthopaedic surgeons' cognitive and psychomotor performance?

BACKGROUND

Sleep deprivation may slow reaction time, cloud judgment, and impair the ability to think. Our purpose was to study the cognitive and psychomotor performances of orthopaedic trauma surgeons on the basis of the amount of sleep that they obtained.

METHODS

We prospectively studied the performances of thirty-two orthopaedic trauma surgeons (residents, fellows, and attending surgeons) over two four-week periods at an urban academic trauma center. Testing sessions used handheld computers to administer validated cognitive and psychomotor function tests. We conducted a multivariate analysis to examine the independent association between test performance and multiple covariates, including the amount of sleep the night before testing.

RESULTS

Our analysis demonstrated that orthopaedic surgeons who had slept four hours or less the night before the test had 1.43 times the odds (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.95; p = 0.03) of committing at least one error on an individual test compared with orthopaedic surgeons who had slept more than four hours the previous night. The Running Memory test, which assesses sustained attention, concentration, and working memory, was most sensitive to deterioration in performance in participants who had had four hours of sleep or less; when controlling for other covariates, the test demonstrated a 72% increase in the odds of making at least one error (odds ratio, 1.72 [95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.90]; p = 0.04). No significant decrease in performance with sleep deprivation was shown with the other three tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic trauma surgeons showed deterioration in performance on a validated cognitive task when they had slept four hours or less the previous night. It is unknown how performance on this test relates to surgical performance.

Duty-hour limits and patient care and resident outcomes: can high-quality studies offer insight into complex relationships?

Long hours are an accepted component of resident education, yet data suggest they contribute to fatigue that may compromise patient safety. A systematic review confirms that limiting duty hours increases residents' hours of sleep and improves objective measures of alertness. Most studies of operative experience for surgical residents found no effect, and there is evidence of a limited positive effect on residents' mood. We find a mixed effect on patient safety, although problems with supervision, rather than the limits, may be responsible or contibute; evidence of reduced continuity of care and reduced continuity in residents' clinical education; and evidence that increased workload under the limits has a negative effect on patient and resident outcomes. We highlight specific areas for research and offer recommendations for national policy.

Resident work hour reforms: implications regarding hip fracture surgery

BACKGROUND

Resident work hour reforms were developed by Aga Khan University Postgraduate Medical education committee in the year 2005. These reforms were implemented by the section of Orthopedics in winter 2006. We designed this study to determine if there is a difference in morbidity and mortality following Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation for intertrochanteric fracture patients before and after implementation of work hour reforms.

METHODS

Patients who underwent DHS fixation for inter-trochanteric fracture from January 2005 to December 2008 were included. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A included those patients who underwent DHS fixation prior to the implementation of work hour reforms and Group B patients had their hip fracture surgery after the implementation of these reforms.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 1.6±0.6 h and 1.3±0 h for group A and B patients respectively (p<0.001). There was no change in the rates of wound infection, length of hospital stay, post operative ambulation status, inadequate fixation, repeat surgeries and mortality in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Resident work hour reform was associated with a significant decrease in the mean operative time for patients undergoing DHS fixation. However morbidity and mortality following DHS fixation for Intertrochanteric fractures has not decreased after implementation of these reforms. Further research evaluating patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery following work-hour restrictions are needed. Moreover, the impact of these reforms on the educational and research activities of the residents also needs to be determined.

Surgeon fatigue: impact of case order on perioperative parameters and patient outcomes

PURPOSE

We tested the hypothesis that surgeon fatigue results in worse outcomes for laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy by comparing outcomes of sequentially scheduled procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified days when 2 procedures of the same type were performed by the same surgeon, including 72 laparoscopic and 340 robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies, and 110 percutaneous nephrolithotomies. Clinical data and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

For percutaneous nephrolithotomy multiple access (16% vs 9%, p = 0.2), transfusion (3.6% vs 5.4%, p = 0.5), complication (20% vs 18%, p = 0.5), residual fragment (53% vs 45%, p = 0.3), second look (38% vs 35% p = 0.4) and stone-free (86% vs 89% p = 0.3) rates did not differ for the first and second procedures. For laparoscopic prostatectomy nerve sparing (100% vs 97.1%, p = 0.5), operative complications (0% vs 0%, p = 0.7), drain requirement (36% vs 42%, p = 0.6) and lymphadenectomy (13.5% vs 25.7%, p = 0.16) rates were comparable. Positive margins (19.4% vs 36.1% p = 0.08), continence (66.7% vs 66.7%, p = 0.9), potency (58.3% vs 52.8%, p = 0.76) and prostate specific antigen recurrence (10.8% vs 20%, p = 0.45) did not significantly differ for the first and second procedures. For robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy operative complications (3% vs 3.5%, p = 0.8), drain requirement (7.7% vs 9.8%, p = 0.5), positive margins (41.7% vs 39.3%, p = 0.37), continence (78.6% vs 84.4%, p = 0.12), potency (51% vs 50%, p = 0.15) and prostate specific antigen recurrence (9.5% vs 11.6%, p = 0.2) did not significantly differ. Nerve sparing was more common in the second case cohort (86.9% vs 75.7%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite concern that surgeon fatigue may impact outcomes, our data suggests that performing several complex urological procedures consecutively is not associated with worse outcomes.

Does surgeon workload per day affect outcomes after pulmonary lobectomies?

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to evaluate whether the workload of a surgeon, including number of operations, operative time, or number of rooms per day, influenced patient morbidity or mortality after pulmonary lobectomy.

METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy at our institution during 2 years (2007-2009) by 6 surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeon workload per day and individual patient variables were evaluated. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for patient morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed 481 patients (269 men, 112 women) whose median age was 68 years (range, 20 to 94 years). Operative mortality occurred in 6 patients (1.25%), and morbidity occurred in 198 patients (41%). On univariate analysis, the total number of hours a surgeon operated per day was a significant predictor of complications (odds ratio, 1.032; p=0. 048) and length of stay (average increase of 0.17 days for each additional hour; p=0.004). There were multiple patient variables that were significant predictors of outcome. On multivariate analysis, which adjusted for patient variables, the total number of hours a surgeon operated per day remained a significant predictor of complications (odds ratio, 1.036; p=0.03) and increased length of stay (average increase of 0.16 days for each additional hour; p=0.006). On multivariate analysis, patient variables of age, forced expiratory volume In 1 second, and renal failure were significant predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of hours a surgeon operates per day is independently associated with an increased risk of complications when performing pulmonary lobectomies. This could be related to surgeon fatigue associated with longer operative days. However, other patient variables are also associated with outcome. The relationship among these factors needs to be better understood with larger-scale models on a multiinstitutional level.

Effects of fatigue on surgeon performance and surgical outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sleep deprivation and disturbances in circadian rhythms generally lead to poor performance, but is there a link in surgery? This review aimed to determine whether fatigue has an impact on surgeon performance or surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Current Contents and clinical trials databases. Inclusion of relevant studies was by application of a predetermined protocol and independent assessment by two reviewers. Each included study was critically appraised for its study quality according to the methods used for Cochrane Reviews. Data from included studies were extracted by one researcher using standardized data extraction tables developed a priori and checked by a second researcher.

RESULTS

From 823 potentially relevant studies, a total of 16 studies were included in this review: two randomized controlled trials, five non-randomized comparative studies and nine case series. Of five studies that directly measure clinical performance, three studies reported no significant difference as a result of sleep deprivation, while two studies found increases in complications or errors. Eleven studies assessed psychomotor skill performance using a variety of simulation-based methods when a participant was rested and/or fatigued. Two randomized controlled trials reported no significant differences, while the nine remaining studies reported mixed results. Surgical residents with less surgical training/experience appeared to be more affected than more senior residents.

CONCLUSION

There is little evidence, as yet, to inform the issue of the effect of fatigue on surgical performance.

Ethical issues in cardiac surgery

While ethical behavior has always been part of cardiac surgical practice, ethical deliberation has only recently become an important component of cardiac surgical practice. Issues such as informed consent, conflict of interest and professional self-regulation, among many others, have increasingly attracted the attention of cardiac surgeons. This article covers several broad topics of interest to cardiac surgeons and cardiologists and discusses several other topics more briefly. There is much uncertainty regarding what the future holds for cardiac surgical practice, research and culture and we also discuss the background of ethical issues to serve as a platform for envisioning what is to come.

Results of a national neurosurgery resident survey on duty hour regulations

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour standards that began July 2011 will further limit resident duty hours.

OBJECTIVE

To survey neurosurgery residents in the United States on duty hour violations under the current system and the predicted effects on education and patient safety of the new regulations.

METHODS

Surveys were mailed to every neurosurgery training program in the United States and Puerto Rico. Program directors and coordinators were asked to distribute surveys to their residents.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-seven neurosurgery residents mailed surveys back to the study center (34% response rate). More than one-third of respondents reported violating the 80-hour rule occasionally or frequently (36%). Thirty-one residents (8%) reported having been involved in a motor vehicle collision or life-threatening event and 20 (6%) reported having made a medical error resulting in patient harm after an extended shift. Eighty-three percent disagreed with the 16-hour proposed regulation for postgraduate year 1. The majority of respondents thought that the new standards will have a negative or strongly negative effect on their residency training (72%).

CONCLUSION

This national duty hour survey of neurosurgical residents reveals considerable concern over the new ACGME proposed standards. The majority of respondents believe that the new standards will have a negative effect on their residency training. Furthermore, this survey indicates an overwhelming negative attitude toward mandated duty hour regulations among neurosurgical residents. Duty hour violations reported in this survey may be a more honest depiction of true violations than previous surveys and are higher than expected.

Emerging ethical issues in pediatric surgery

With the rapid pace of technological advancement and changing political, social, and legal attitudes, physicians face new ethical dilemmas. For pediatric surgeons, these emerging issues affect our relationship with, and the care we provide, to our patients and their families. In this review, we explore issues related to professionalism in pediatric surgery practice, the value of apology, and the risks associated with sleep deprivation. Furthermore, we discuss how the imperative of patient safety presents an opportunity for specialty-driven effort to define standards for the surgical care of children and a responsible process for introducing surgical innovations. Finally, we remind pediatric surgeons of their ethical and professional duty to support clinical research, and advocate the acceptance of community equipoise as sufficient basis for enrolling children in clinical trials.

Differences in public belief and reality in the care of operative patients in a teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

The accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) restricts residents from working more than 80 hours per week averaged over a 4-week period. No such restriction exists, however, for attending surgeons. Little exploration has been done of the public's perception of the number of hours that surgeons work and how residents work with the staff surgeons at a teaching institution.

METHODS

A survey was designed to study the public's belief on surgeon work hours and habits. The survey also asked their opinion on resident involvement. All patients and accompanying persons arriving through the Surgicare Center for elective procedures older than age 18 were surveyed. The overall survey responses were calculated, and the results then were stratified by sex, age, race, and education.

RESULTS

Of the 1516 surveys distributed, 370 were completed and returned (24.4%). Of those responding, 91% believed that a work hour limit should be in place for surgeons, and 77% believed the limit should be 12 consecutive hours or less. Eighty-four percent of the population believed that limit should be in place on the hours/week that a surgeon works, and 68% believe that it should be 60 hours or less. Although 82% would reschedule if they knew their surgeon had less than 4 hours of sleep the night before their procedure, 79% trust their surgeon's judgment to cancel if he/she were too tired. Only 28% of those surveyed were aware whether a resident was involved in their care, and 14% were against resident involvement. Respondents also were asked if the attending surgeon deemed a resident capable, then what percent of the procedure should the resident be able to perform? Ninety-one percent of those surveyed believed that the attending should be present for the entire case, and 78% believed that they should not be able to schedule more than 1 procedure at any given time.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings illustrate a difference between the public's beliefs in regard to the hours a surgeon should be permitted to work and the reality of a surgeon's work life. Although the public may not be aware of the surgeon's schedule at a given time, they do trust the surgeon would cancel if too fatigued. The majority surveyed were not aware of resident involvement, but they trusted the attending surgeon's judgment with deciding how much of the actual procedure he/she could perform. With work-hour restrictions and resident involvement continuing to evolve, keeping the public informed should be a priority.