Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Toxicities after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Threshold to Guide Preemptive Therapy in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Correlation With Cytomegalovirus Disease

A systematic review of randomized and observational studies from 2013 to 2023 demonstrated that antiviral preemptive therapy started at cytomegalovirus viral load thresholds between 2 and 3 log10 IU/mL was associated with similar cytomegalovirus disease rates. Thus, viral thresholds in this range appear to effectively protect patients not receiving prophylaxis.

Acute kidney injury during autologous stem cell transplantation in light chain amyloidosis with kidney involvement and their impact on prognosis

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a complication related to important organ dysfunction during autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. This study aims to validate the risk factors of AKI during different periods of ASCT and the impact of AKI on long-term outcomes. 302 patients with AL amyloidosis and kidney involvement who underwent ASCT were included. The procedures from stem cell mobilization to 30 days after transplantation were categorized into four periods: Period 0 (stem cell mobilization and harvest), Period 1 (preparation), Period 2 (conditioning and transplantation), and Period 3 (engraftment). The incidence of AKI during ASCT was 27.15% (0.66% in Period 0, 6.62% in Period 1, 15.23% in Period 2, and 6.95% in Period 3). The major causes of AKI were capillary leak syndrome in Period 0, ganciclovir or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in Period 1, high-dose melphalan in Period 2, and engraftment syndrome in Period 3. AKI in different periods had distinct risk factors and predictive models. AKI was a risk factor for both kidney survival and overall survival (OS). Even recovered AKI reduced 10-year kidney survival from 91.7% to 68.4% (p = 0.002) and 10-year OS from 91.1% to 77.7% (p = 0.005).

Cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus conventional antiviral therapies for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus infection with or without genotypic resistance: A US perspective

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; valganciclovir/ganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) for post-transplant refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with or without resistance. A two-stage Markov model was designed using data from the SOLSTICE trial (NCT02931539), real-world multinational observational studies, and published literature. Stage 1 (0-78 weeks) comprised clinically significant CMV (csCMV), non-clinically significant CMV (n-csCMV), and dead states; stage 2 (78 weeks-lifetime) comprised alive and dead states. Total costs (2022 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for the maribavir and IAT cohorts. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Compared with IAT, maribavir had lower costs ($139 751 vs $147 949) and greater QALYs (6.04 vs 5.83), making it cost-saving and more cost-effective. Maribavir had higher acquisition costs compared with IAT ($80 531 vs $65 285), but lower costs associated with administration/monitoring ($16 493 vs $27 563), adverse events (AEs) ($11 055 vs $16 114), hospitalization ($27 157 vs $33 905), and graft loss ($4516 vs $5081), thus making treatment with maribavir cost-saving. Maribavir-treated patients spent more time without CMV compared with IAT-treated patients (0.85 years vs 0.68 years), leading to lower retreatment costs for maribavir (cost savings: -$42 970.80). Compared with IAT, maribavir was more cost-effective for transplant recipients with refractory CMV, owing to better clinical efficacy and avoidance of high costs associated with administration, monitoring, AEs, and hospitalizations. These results can inform healthcare decision-makers on the most effective use of their resources for post-transplant refractory CMV treatment.

Associations between Different Antivirals and Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury in Adults with Herpes Zoster

Key Points

Background

To examine the association of use of different antivirals with hospital-acquired AKI among Chinese adults with herpes zoster.

Methods

This study selected 3273 adult patients who received antiviral therapy for herpes zoster during hospitalization from the China Renal Data System. We identified and staged AKI using patient-level serum creatinine data according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. We compared the relative risks of hospital-acquired AKI among patients treated with different antivirals using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Among 3273 patients, 1480 (45%), 681 (21%), 489 (15%), and 623 (19%) were treated with acyclovir/valacyclovir, ganciclovir, penciclovir/famciclovir, and foscarnet, respectively. During the follow-up period, a total of 111 cases of hospital-acquired AKI occurred, predominantly classified as AKI stage 1. The cumulative incidences of hospital-acquired AKI were 5%, 3%, 3%, and 1% in the patients receiving acyclovir/valacyclovir, ganciclovir, penciclovir/famciclovir, and foscarnet, respectively. Compared with acyclovir/valacyclovir, penciclovir/famciclovir/ganciclovir and foscarnet were associated with a lower risk of hospital-acquired AKI, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.94) and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.63), respectively. Compared with intravenous acyclovir, intravenous penciclovir/ganciclovir and foscarnet were associated with a lower risk of hospital-acquired AKI with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.98) and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.76), respectively. The associations were consistent across various subgroups and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Among antiviral therapies for herpes zoster, we found different risks of hospital-acquired AKI among the patients receiving different antivirals, in particular, those administered intravenously. Among intravenous antivirals, acyclovir was associated with the highest risk of hospital-acquired AKI, followed by penciclovir/ganciclovir and foscarnet. Confirmation studies with large samples from other populations are warranted.

Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir With Valganciclovir

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia may limit the use of valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A phase 2 study indicated efficacy of maribavir with fewer treatment-limiting toxicities than valganciclovir.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT were stratified and randomized 1:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or valganciclovir (dose-adjusted for renal clearance) for 8 weeks with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary hypothesis of noninferiority margin of 7.0%). The key secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint with no findings of CMV tissue-invasive disease at week 8 through week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among patients treated (273 maribavir; 274 valganciclovir), the primary endpoint of noninferiority of maribavir was not met (maribavir, 69.6%; valganciclovir, 77.4%; adjusted difference: -7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14.98, -.36; lower limit of 95% CI of treatment difference exceeded -7.0%). At week 16, 52.7% and 48.5% of patients treated (maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively) maintained CMV viremia clearance without tissue-invasive disease (adjusted difference: 4.4%; 95% CI: -3.91, 12.76). With maribavir (vs valganciclovir), fewer patients experienced neutropenia (16.1% and 52.9%) or discontinued due to TEAEs (27.8% and 41.2%). Discontinuations were mostly due to neutropenia (maribavir, 4.0%; valganciclovir, 17.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although noninferiority of maribavir to valganciclovir for the primary endpoint was not achieved based on the prespecified noninferiority margin, maribavir demonstrated comparable CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02927067 [AURORA].

Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Single center Canadian data

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Letermovir is a novel antiviral agent that prevents CMV reactivation in alloHCT patients, with limited data regarding influence on post-alloHCT outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 273 alloHCT recipients, 158 in the non-letermovir cohort (NLC), and 115 in the cohort using letermovir prophylaxis (LC). Patients that received letermovir were CMV-seropositive and met criteria for high risk of CMV reactivation.

RESULTS

Median start of letermovir was 21 days post-alloHCT, median duration of prophylaxis was 86 days. Letermovir prophylaxis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in first CMV reactivation (at 200 days post 63.9% in the NLC vs. 35.7% in the LC; p < .001). On univariate analysis at 1 year, overall survival (OS) for NLC was 79.6% and 79.5% for LC (p = .54). Non relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year for NLC was 12% and 12.3% for LC (p = .69). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 1 year was 13.9% for NLC versus 17.1 for the LC (p = .27). On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts for OS, NRM, and CIR.

CONCLUSIONS

Letermovir prophylaxis started at day +21 post-alloHCT reduced CMV reactivation, with no impact on posttransplant outcomes.

At-Home Foscarnet Administration in Patients with Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Unicentric, Safe, and Feasible Program

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a relevant cause of morbimortality in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Foscarnet (FCN) is an effective drug against CMV administered intravenously and usually on an inpatient basis. The Home Care Unit (HCU) for hematologic patients at our hospital designed an at-home FCN administration model to avoid the hospitalization of patients requiring FCN treatment. This study analyzes whether the at-home administration of FCN is as safe and effective as its hospital administration. We collected and compared demographic, clinical, analytical, and economic data of patients with CMV infection post-allo-HCT who received FCN in the hospital (n = 16, 17 episodes) vs. at-home (n = 67, 88 episodes). The proportions of patients with cured CMV infections were comparable between the two groups (65.9% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.395). The median duration of FCN treatment was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 9-23) and 14 (IQR 11-19) days in the HCU and inpatient cohorts, respectively (p = 0.692). There were no significant differences in the FCN toxicities between groups except for hypocalcemia (26.1% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.007), which was more prevalent in the inpatient cohort. A significant cost-effectiveness was found in the HCU cohort, with a median savings per episode of EUR 5270. It may be concluded that home administration of FCN is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient therapeutic option for patients with CMV infection and disease.

A new direction for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis among transplant recipients: Benefits and nonviral outcomes of letermovir use as primary CMV prophylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Letermovir has changed the game of primary prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and more recently, solid organ transplant recipients. This is largely due to letermovir's similar efficacy in protecting against CMV reactivation and disease, along with its superior safety profile, notably reduced myelotoxicity, and lack of renal dose adjustment compared to standard agents like valganciclovir. This review will describe the potential benefits and clinical considerations of letermovir as prophylaxis among transplant recipients, with a focus on recent evidence describing nonviral outcomes of CMV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence has demonstrated improved safety (e.g., less myelosuppression) and tolerability with no difference in rates of CMV infection or disease in kidney transplant recipients given letermovir compared to valganciclovir. Real-world studies and meta-analyses in HSCT populations have explored various nonviral outcomes with letermovir use. Letermovir prophylaxis was associated with reduced mortality, lower rates of graft versus host disease, delayed CMV immune reconstitution, improved tolerability with extended durations, and decreased healthcare utilization.

SUMMARY

Letermovir is an effective antiviral agent for CMV prevention and has demonstrated enhanced safety, which may allow for extended durations of primary prophylaxis among transplant recipients along with other improved clinical outcomes by mitigating the indirect effects of CMV.

Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes current knowledge of ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (ValGCV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, highlighting the likely contribution from host genetic factors to interpatient variability. The evidence and challenges surrounding optimization of drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are examined, with recommendations made.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmacokinetic studies of current dosing guidelines have shown high interindividual and intraindividual variability of GCV concentrations. This is sometimes associated with a slow decline in cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load in some transplant recipients. A high incidence of GCV-associated myelosuppression has limited the use of this drug in the transplant setting. Patient groups identified to benefit from GCV TDM include pediatric patients, cystic fibrosis with lung transplantation, obese with kidney transplantation, and patients with fluctuating renal function or on hemodialysis. The emergence of refractory resistant CMV, particularly in immune compromised patients, highlights the importance of appropriate dosing of these antivirals. Host genetic factors need to be considered where recently, two host genes were shown to account for interpatient variation during ganciclovir therapy. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring has been shown to improve target antiviral-level attainment. The use of TDM may guide concentration-based dose adjustment, potentially improving virological and clinical outcomes. However, evidence supporting the use of TDM in clinical practice remains limited and further study is needed in the transplant cohort.

SUMMARY

Further studies examining novel biomarkers are needed to guide target concentrations in prophylaxis and treatment. The use of TDM in transplant recipients is likely to improve the clinical efficacy of current antivirals and optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.

QuantiFERON-CMV and monitor predict cytomegalovirus, mortality, and graft-versus-host disease in transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most prevalent infection in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) and QuantiFERON-Monitor (QFM) assays were used to test whether immune-competent adult allogeneic HSCT recipients with CMV-specific T cells can control CMV infection or reactivation. Our data demonstrated a significant correlation between CMV infection measured by CMV-antigenemia test and QF-CMV results, graft versus host disease (GvHD), and mortality rates. The QF-CMV test revealed that CMV-specific T cells with higher interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release were correlated with lower CMV infection rates. There was a significant negative association between QF-CMV results, GvHD, and mortality rates. Data showed that a one-unit rise in IFN-γ was linked with a 12.7% reduction in GvHD and a 20.7% reduction in the mortality odds ratio. In addition, a negative correlation was found between QF-M results and CMV infection, with the QFM test predicting protection against CMV infection by 1.9%. This is one of the few studies establishing the QF-CMV test's predictive value for GvHD and mortality, its use to monitor HSCT patients for pre-emptive therapy, and the use of the QFM test to predict CMV infection and mortality in HSCT patients. Thus, these assays could be utilized to optimize preventive and pre-emptive therapy procedures to reduce transplant recipient adverse effects and posttransplant therapy costs.

Emergence of human CMV-induced NKG2C+ NK cells is associated with CD8+ T-cell recovery after allogeneic HCT

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with the expansion of a mature NKG2C+FcεR1γ- natural killer (NK) cell population. The exact mechanism underlying the emergence of NKG2C+ NK cells, however, remains unknown. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) provides an opportunity to longitudinally study lymphocyte recovery in the setting of CMV reactivation, particularly in patients receiving T-cell-depleted (TCD) allografts. We analyzed peripheral blood lymphocytes from 119 patients at serial time points after infusion of their TCD allograft and compared immune recovery with that in samples obtained from recipients of T-cell-replete (T-replete) (n = 96) or double umbilical cord blood (DUCB) (n = 52) allografts. NKG2C+ NK cells were detected in 92% (45 of 49) of recipients of TCD HCT who experienced CMV reactivation. Although NKG2A+ cells were routinely identifiable early after HCT, NKG2C+ NK cells were identified only after T cells could be detected. T-cell reconstitution occurred at variable times after HCT among patients and predominantly comprised CD8+ T cells. In patients with CMV reactivation, recipients of TCD HCT expressed significantly higher frequencies of NKG2C+ and CD56neg NK cells compared with patients who received T-replete HCT or DUCB transplantation. NKG2C+ NK cells after TCD HCT were CD57+FcεR1γ+ and degranulated significantly more in response to target cells compared with the adaptive the NKG2C+CD57+FcεR1γ- NK cell population. We conclude that the presence of circulating T cells is associated with the expansion of a CMV-induced NKG2C+ NK cell population, a potentially novel example of developmental cooperation between lymphocyte populations in response to viral infection.

Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and disease burden of cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients in selected countries outside of Europe and North America: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease impacts morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This systematic review summarized data on the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-HCT outside of Europe and North America.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies and treatment guidelines in HCT recipients across 15 selected countries from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East (search period: 1 January 2011-17 September 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatments, refractory, resistant CMV, and burden.

RESULTS

Of 2708 references identified, 68 were eligible (67 studies and one guideline; 45/67 studies specific to adult allogeneic HCT recipients). The rates of CMV infection and disease within 1 year of allogeneic HCT were 24.9%-61.2% (23 studies) and 2.9%-15.7% (10 studies), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 19.8%-37.9% of cases (11 studies). Up to 10% of HCT recipients died of CMV-related causes. In all countries, first-line treatment for CMV infection/disease involved intravenous ganciclovir or valganciclovir. Conventional treatments were associated with serious adverse events such as myelosuppression (10.0%) or neutropenia only (30.0%, 39.8%) and nephrotoxicity (11.0%) (three studies), frequently leading to treatment discontinuation (up to 13.6%). Refractory CMV was reported in 2.9%, 13.0%, and 28.9% of treated patients (three studies) with resistant CMV diagnosed in 0%-10% of recipients (five studies). Patient-reported outcomes and economic data were scarce.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CMV infection and disease post-HCT is high outside of North America and Europe. CMV resistance and toxicity highlight a major unmet need with current conventional treatments.

Cost Effectiveness of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Compared with Pre-Emptive Therapy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients in the United States

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis with the option for subsequent pre-emptive therapy (PET) for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared with a PET-only scenario in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients in the United States over a 10-year time horizon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A publicly available decision tree model was constructed using a commercial third-party payer perspective to simulate an allo-HCT recipient's clinical trajectory in the first-year post-transplant, followed by entry to a Markov model to simulate years 2 through 10. Clinical inputs and utility estimates were derived from published literature. Costs were derived from published literature and US Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule drug pricing. Outcomes assessed included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), direct medical costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

Compared with PET alone, letermovir prophylaxis was projected to increase life-years per person (4.99 vs. 4.70 life-years), and increase QALYs (3.29 vs. 3.08) and costs (US$83.411 vs. US$70,698), yielding an ICER of US$59,356 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated our model was sensitive to mortality (ICER: $164,771/QALY) and utility (letermovir ICER: $117,447/QALY; PET ICER: $107,290/QALY) in the first-year post-transplant. In 57.1% of the PSA simulations, letermovir was a cost-effective option using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Letermovir prophylaxis is cost effective compared with PET alone with a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis results indicate future research is required to understand the impact of mortality and quality of life in the first-year post-transplant to arrive at a conclusive decision on letermovir adoption.

Effective CMV prophylaxis with high-dose valaciclovir in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell recipients at a high risk of CMV infection

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Universal antiviral prophylaxis with letermovir is effective but unsubsidized in Australia. Valaciclovir demonstrates anti-CMV activity in high doses, but few current real-world studies explore its use as primary prophylaxis in high-risk patients post-alloHSCT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of alloHSCT recipients at high risk of clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi), defined as a plasma CMV DNA viral load of >400 IU/ml requiring preemptive therapy, or CMV disease. High-risk recipients were CMV seropositive and underwent T-cell depleted, haploidentical or umbilical cord stem-cell transplants. Consecutive patients transplanted from July 2018 to January 2020, treated with valaciclovir 2 g TDS from day +7 to +100 (HD-VALA), were compared to a historical cohort (July 2017-June 2018) who only received preemptive CMV therapy, and standard valaciclovir (SD-VALA) for varicella/herpes prophylaxis. We compared incidence of and time to cs-CMVi.

RESULTS

In the SD-VALA cohort (n = 27, median CMV follow-up duration 259 days), 23/27 (85%) developed cs-CMVi at a median of 39 days. For the HD-VALA cohort (n = 35, median CMV follow-up duration 216 days), 19/35 (54%) developed cs-CMVi, at a median of 68 days. Time to cs-CMVi was significantly longer in HD-VALA cohort (p < .0001). On multivariate analysis, HD VALA reduced the risk of cs-CMVi (HR 0.32, p = .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In alloHSCT recipients at high risk for cs-CMVi, HD-VALA resulted in lower cumulative reactivation, and delayed reactivation, reducing requirement for preemptive CMV therapy in the early post-engraftment period.

Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients: newly approved additions to our armamentarium

BACKGROUND

The burden that cytomegalovirus (CMV) portends for haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients cannot be understated. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir have successfully been used for prevention and treatment of CMV infections, although with serious side effects such as leucopenia and some development of resistance. Until recently, available therapies for ganciclovir-resistant CMV have significant toxicities. Although advances have been made in the field, the unmet medical needs for effective and well-tolerated therapies are significant.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to summarise the current and emerging CMV antiviral drugs and discusses future perspectives in the field.

SOURCES

We searched for relevant articles with pertinent keywords: "Cytomegalovirus OR CMV", "Transplant" and "Antiviral". Articles published after 2019 were given preference. Articles were reviewed by the authors for relevance and impact to the subject of interest.

CONTENT

We outline in this review current advances in prophylaxis of CMV infection with letermovir, breakthrough CMV infections while on or after prophylaxis, the development of resistant and refractory CMV infections, and the newly approved anti-CMV agent, maribavir, in haematopoietic and solid-organ transplant recipients.

IMPLICATIONS

Prevention of CMV infections after transplant has improved greatly over the past few years. Despite major advancements, breakthrough CMV infections and development of refractory and resistant CMV infections remain major complications post transplantation. We highlight emerging therapeutics that tolerably and effectively prevent and treat CMV infections, especially refractory and resistant cases.

Real-World Outcomes Associated With Letermovir Use for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Background

A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world observational studies was conducted to summarize the impact of letermovir cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis (PP) among adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients.

Methods

Systematic searches in Medline/PubMed, Embase, and conferences (from database inception to October 2021) were conducted to identify studies for inclusion. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates on the relative effectiveness of letermovir PP compared to controls.

Results

Forty-eight unique studies (N = 7104 patients) were included, most of which were comparative, single-center, and conducted in the United States. Letermovir PP was associated with statistically significant reduction in odds of CMV reactivation (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 0.13 and 0.24; P < .05), clinically significant CMV infection (pOR, 0.09 and 0.19; P < .05), and CMV disease (pOR, 0.31 and 0.35; P < .05) by day +100 and day +200 after allo-HCT, respectively. Letermovir PP was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause (pOR, 0.73; P < .01) and nonrelapse mortality (pOR, 0.65; P = .01) beyond day 200 after allo-HCT.

Conclusions

Letermovir for CMV PP was effective in reducing the risk of CMV-related complications overall and mortality beyond day 200 among adult allo-HCT recipients.

Risk factor analysis for cytomegalovirus reactivation under prophylaxis with letermovir after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Letermovir has been approved as a novel cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there are still insufficient data to properly evaluate the real-world role of letermovir, and the risk factors for CMV reactivation under letermovir prophylaxis have not been clarified.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients under prophylaxis with or without letermovir who underwent allogeneic HSCT between March 2012 and December 2019. In August 2018, letermovir was added to the clinical practice at our institution for the prophylaxis of CMV reactivation in allogeneic HSCT recipients. Patients who underwent HSCT without prophylactic letermovir from March 2012 until September 2018 served as a historical control.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) was significantly lower in the letermovir group than in the historical control group not receiving letermovir (30.2% vs. 71.6%, p < .05, at 100 days). In addition, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day 500 was significantly lower in the letermovir group (4.7% vs. 19.8%, p < .05). We then performed a risk factor analysis for developing CS-CMVi in the letermovir group. The only significant factor identified by this multivariable analysis was transplantation from a CMV seronegative donor to a seropositive recipient (Hazard ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval 1.14-6.68, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CS-CMVi and NRM in a real-world setting and that the CMV serostatus of the donor remained as a risk factor for CS-CMVi even under letermovir prophylaxis.

Clinical and healthcare burden of disease associated with cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - A retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

CMV infection is a common complication in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated the association of clinically significant CMV (CS-CMV) infection with clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in allogeneic HSCT patients in Finland.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adult patients who received their first allogeneic HSCT between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, at the Turku University Hospital. Data were collected from the hospital data lake. Clinical and healthcare outcomes were investigated at one year and mortality up to three years.

RESULTS

The study included 251 patients. CMV seroprevalence was 69.7%. CS-CMV infection occurred in 59.0% of the patients, and of those, 14.2% had ≥2 infections. The median time to CS-CMV infection was 34.5 days (Q₁ -Q₃ , 27.0-45.0). Recipient and donor seropositivity, and lymphoproliferative diseases were associated with higher, and HLA identical sibling donors with lower CS-CMV infection risk. CS-CMV infection was not associated with mortality in three years of follow-up. One hundred thirty-three (89.8%) and 75 (72.8%) patients with and without CS-CMV infection, respectively, were readmitted to the hospital. Patients with CS-CMV infection had more hospital readmissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.73, p = .005) and patients with one CS-CMV infection (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.94, p = .005) or ≥2 infections had longer length of hospital stay (IRR 2.71, 95% CI 1.76-4.35, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

CMV seroprevalence is relatively high among Finnish allogeneic HSCT patients. CS-CMV infection was common and associated with a higher readmission rate and longer length of hospital stay.

Immunoprofiling reveals cell subsets associated with the trajectory of cytomegalovirus reactivation post stem cell transplantation

Human cytomegalovirus reactivation is a major opportunistic infection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and has a complex relationship with post-transplant immune reconstitution. Here, we use mass cytometry to define patterns of innate and adaptive immune cell reconstitution at key phases of human cytomegalovirus reactivation in the first 100 days post haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Human cytomegalovirus reactivation is associated with the development of activated, memory T-cell profiles, with faster effector-memory CD4⁺ T-cell recovery in patients with low-level versus high-level human cytomegalovirus DNAemia. Mucosal-associated invariant T cell levels at the initial detection of human cytomegalovirus DNAemia are significantly lower in patients who subsequently develop high-level versus low-level human cytomegalovirus reactivation. Our data describe distinct immune signatures that emerged with human cytomegalovirus reactivation after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and highlight Mucosal-associated invariant T cell levels at the first detection of reactivation as a marker that may be useful to anticipate the magnitude of human cytomegalovirus DNAemia.

Human cytomegalovirus is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant patients and multiple immune cells types are critical during infection and reactivation. Here the authors assess the immune cell compartments of haematopoietic stem cell recipients in the early period post transplantation and identify key features of effector memory CD4⁺ T cells and mucosal associated invariant T cells in this context.

The changing impact of cytomegalovirus among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients during the past decade: A single institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

With advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the need for cytomegalovirus (CMV) surveillance persists.

METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis on the impact of CMV with preemptive therapy in 1,065 alloHCT patients with donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity from 2009-2019.

RESULTS

51% developed clinically significant CMV infection (CMV-CSI); 6.5% had CMV disease. In multivariate analysis stratified by serostatus and preparative regimen the use of ATG (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.42, P < 0.001) was associated with development of CMV-CSI. Median length of stay for index hospitalization was longer in patients with CMV-CSI (27 d vs 25 d, respectively; P = .002), as were rates (32.9% vs 17.7%; P < .001) and duration (9 d vs 6 d; P < .001) of rehospitalization, and median total inpatient days (28 d vs 26 d; P < .001). Patients with CMV-CSI had higher rates of neutropenia (47% vs 20%; P < .001) and transfusion support (PRBC, median 5 vs 3; P < .001; platelets, median 3 vs 3; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive therapy does not negate the impact of CMV-CSI on peri-engraftment toxicity and healthcare utilization. This cohort represents a large single center study on the impact of CMV in the pre-letermovir era and serves as a real-world comparator for assessing the impact of future prophylaxis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis on 1-Year Mortality After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive (R+) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a survival disparity compared with CMV-seronegative recipient/donor (R-D-) pairs. We hypothesized that primary letermovir prophylaxis (LET) may abrogate this disparity. We investigated the relationship between LET and mortality at 1 year post-HCT.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included adult R-D- or R+ patients who received HCT pre-LET (between 1 January 2013 through 15 December 2017) and post-LET (between 16 December 2017 through December 2019). R+ were categorized by LET receipt as R+/LET or R+/no-LET. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of LET with all-cause mortality at 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

Of 848 patients analyzed, 305 were R-D-, 364 R+/no-LET, and 160 R+/LET. Because of similar mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .76-2.18]; P = .353]) between pre-LET/R-D- and post-LET/R-D-, R-D- were combined into 1 group. Compared with R-D-, the aHR for mortality was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01-1.93) for R+/no-LET and 0.89 (95% CI, .57-1.41) for R+/LET. Among R+, LET was associated with decreased risk of death (aHR, 0.62 [95% CI, .40-.98]); when conventional HCT and T-cell depleted HCT were analyzed separately, the aHR was 0.86 (95% CI, .51-1.43) and 0.21 (95% CI, .07-.65), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year post-HCT, LET was associated with closing the mortality disparity between R-D- and R+. Among all R+, LET was associated with decreased mortality, driven by 79% reduced incidence of death in T-cell depleted HCT.

American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series: #4 - Cytomegalovirus treatment and management of resistant or refractory infections after hematopoietic cell transplantation

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) partnered with its Transpl. Infect. Dis. Special Interest Group (TID-SIG) to update its 2009 compendium-style infectious disease guidelines for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A new approach was employed with the goal of better serving clinical providers by publishing each standalone topic in the infectious diseases series as a concise format of frequently asked questions (FAQ), tables, and figures. Adult and pediatric infectious diseases and HCT content experts developed and answered FAQs. Topics were finalized with harmonized recommendations that were made by assigning an A through E strength of recommendation paired with a level of supporting evidence graded I through III. The fourth topic in the series focuses on the management and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistant and refractory infections. The diagnosis, definitions of resistant and refractory CMV, risk factors, virological genotypes and treatment algorithms are reviewed.

Human herpes virus 6 DNAemia is associated with worse survival after ex vivo T-cell depleted hematopoietic cell transplant

BACKGROUND

We examined the correlation between persistent HHV-6 DNAemia (p-HHV-6) and absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC), platelet counts (PLT) and all-cause mortality the 1-year after ex vivo T-cell depleted (TCD) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of adult TCD HCT recipients 2012-2016 prospectively monitored for plasma HHV-6 by qPCR from day +14 post-HCT (D+14) through D+100. P-HHV-6 was defined as ≥2 consecutive values of ≥500 copies/mL by D+100. PLT and ALC were compared between patients with and without p-HHV-6 using mixed model analysis of variance. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the impact of p-HHV-6 on 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Of 312 patients, 83 (27%) had p-HHV-6 by D+100. P-HHV-6 was associated with lower ALC and PLT in the first year post-HCT. In multivariable models, p-HHV-6 was associated with higher mortality by 1-year post-HCT (adjusted hazard ratio 2.97, 95% confidence intervals: 1.62-5.47, P=0.0005), after adjusting for age, antiviral treatment, and ALC at D+100.

CONCLUSIONS

P-HHV-6 was associated with lower ALC and PLT in the first year post-HCT. P-HHV-6 was an independent predictor of mortality in the first year after TCD HCT.

Safety and efficacy of intravenously administered cidofovir in adult haematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cidofovir for the treatment of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viral infections following allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study including adult HCT recipients who received ≥1 dose of IV-administered cidofovir for any dsDNA viral infection from 2006 to 2019. The objectives were to describe the rate of and risk factors for nephrotoxicity and virological response by the end of treatment (EOT).

RESULTS

We included 165 patients from nine centres. Cidofovir was administered at 5 mg/kg/week (N = 115; 69.7%), 1 mg/kg/week (18; 10.9%), 3 mg/kg/week (12; 7.3%) or 1 mg/kg three times/week (11; 6.7%). Cidofovir was administered for adenovirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK virus infection in 75 (45.5%), 64 (38.8%) and 51 (30.9%) patients, respectively. Among 158 patients with renal function data at baseline and EOT, 40 (25.3%) developed nephrotoxicity. In multivariable analyses, age (OR 1.04; P = 0.05), weight (OR 1.05; P = 0.01), CMV infection (OR 3.6; P = 0.02), liposomal amphotericin B (OR 8.06; P = 0.05) and IV voriconazole/posaconazole (OR 13.0; P = 0.003) were predictors of nephrotoxicity. Creatinine concentration was significantly higher at EOT (1.16 ± 0.95 mg/dL) compared with baseline (0.91 ± 0.39 mg/dL; P < 0.001), but improved by 2 weeks (0.91 ± 0.84 mg/dL; P = 0.007) and 4 weeks (0.96 ± 0.89 mg/dL; P = 0.03) post-EOT. Median viral load significantly declined for patients with adenovirus DNAaemia by EOT (P < 0.0001) and for patients with CMV DNAaemia by EOT + 4 weeks (P = 0.003), but not for patients with BK virus DNAaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

One in four HCT recipients treated with IV cidofovir developed largely reversible nephrotoxicity. Careful selection of patients and close follow-up of renal function may minimize toxicity.

Prediction of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation by Recipient Cytomegalovirus-IgG Titer before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity is known to be a risk factor for CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We explored the association of CMV-IgG titer of recipients with CMV reactivation after allo-HCT and developed a model for predicting CMV reactivation for the purpose of identifying a high-risk group. In addition, we evaluated the impact of CMV-IgG titer on survival outcomes and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 309 patients who achieved neutrophil engraftment after allo-HCT and evaluated whether pretransplantation recipient CMV-IgG titer was associated with transplantation outcomes, including CMV reactivation. Using the best cutoff value determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we divided the study cohort into 3 groups: high-titer, low-titer, and negative. CMV reactivation occurred most frequently in the high-titer group, followed by the low-titer and negative groups (81%, 37%, and 16%, respectively, at 180 days after allo-HCT; P < .01). In a multivariate analysis, recipient CMV-IgG titer was significantly associated with subsequent CMV reactivation (hazard ratio [HR], 9.31 in the high-titer group [P < .01] and 2.91 in the low-titer group [P = .023]). CMV diseases were observed exclusively in the high-titer group. Overall survival (OS) was lower in the high-titer group compared with the other 2 groups (2-year OS, 56%, 60%, and 80%, respectively; P = .075), whereas the cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse were not significantly different among the 3 groups. In multivariate analyses, CMV-IgG titer was not associated with increased risks of these outcomes, although CMV reactivation itself was identified as a risk factor for NRM (HR, 3.05; P = .002). Our data demonstrate that a higher titer of recipient CMV-IgG is predictive of CMV reactivation after allo-HCT. Further investigation is needed to determine how to apply these results to prophylactic or preemptive strategies against CMV, considering recipient CMV-IgG titer for effective risk stratification.

CMV viral load kinetics predict CMV end-organ disease and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)

BACKGROUND

We investigated the association between time-averaged area under the curve (AAUC) of CMV viral load (VL) by D100 and overall survival (OS) at one-year post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study, including patients receiving HCT between 2010.6 and 2017.12 from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. AAUC was calculated for patients with detected VL. Patients were categorized into "non-controllers" (Q4) and "controllers" (Q1-3) using the highest AAUC quartile as cutoff. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox models were used to estimate the association between AAUC and OS. Patients with non-detected CMV VL were categorized into "elite-controllers" (R+ or R-/D+) and "R-/D-".

RESULTS

The study (N=952) included 282 controllers, 93 non-controllers, 275 elite-controllers, and 302 R-/D-. OS was 80.1% and 58.1% for controllers and non-controllers, respectively. In multivariable models, non-controllers had worse OS versus controllers (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.65, 95% CI 1.71-4.12). In landmark analyses, CMV controllers had similar OS as elite-controllers (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.83-1.91) or R-/D- (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1.5).

CONCLUSION

CMV non-controllers had worse OS at one-year post-HCT. CMV controllers had similar OS as elite-controllers or R-/D-. Future studies are needed to validate our AAUC cutoff across different cohorts and CMV management strategies.

Systematic review and subgroup analysis of the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs among patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and has also been indicated to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Remdesivir has been authorized for the treatment of COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of AKI in different subgroups was also investigated.

METHODS

A thorough search was performed to find relevant studies in PubMed, Web of Science, medRxiv and EMBASE from 1 Jan 2020 until 1 June 2020. The systematic review was performed using the meta package in R (4.0.1).

RESULTS

A total of 16,199 COVID-19 patients were included in our systematic review. The pooled estimated incidence of AKI in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 10.0% (95% CI: 7.0-12.0%). The pooled estimated proportion of COVID-19 patients who needed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was 4% (95% CI: 3-6%). According to our subgroup analysis, the incidence of AKI could be associated with age, disease severity and ethnicity. The incidence of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients being treated with remdesivir was 7% (95% CI: 3-13%) in a total of 5 studies.

CONCLUSION

We found that AKI was not rare in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of AKI could be associated with age, disease severity and ethnicity. Remdesivir probably did not induce AKI in COVID-19 patients. Our systematic review provides evidence that AKI might be closely associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, which should be investigated in future studies.

Impact of Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Hospitalizations and Cost after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia occurs in 40% to 80% of CMV-seropositive (R+) recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The preemptive therapy (PET) strategy has reduced the risk of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) and associated mortality but may lead to substantial healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Real-world data on the economic impact of PET is relevant for the evaluation of alternative strategies for CMV management. We examined the impact of clinically significant CMV treated with PET on inpatient length of stay (LOS), number of readmissions, and associated costs from day 0 through day 180 post-HCT. This was a retrospective study of R+ adults who underwent peripheral blood or marrow allogeneic HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between March 2013 and December 2017. Patients were routinely screened for CMV by qPCR and received PET according to institutional standards of care. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and hospital databases. Itemized cost data per patient were obtained from the Vizient database, adjusted to 2017 dollars using inflation indices. Study outcomes included HCRU evaluated by inpatient LOS and inpatient cost in patients who received PET for clinically significant CMV (PET group) compared with those who did not receive PET (no PET group) and the frequency and cost of CMV-related readmissions compared with non CMV-related readmissions. We used generalized linear models to examine the incremental HCRU and costs associated with PET controlling for other potential factors. Of 357 patients, PET was initiated in 208 (58.3%), at a median of 35 days after HCT. By day 180, 23 patients (6.4%) had developed CMV EOD and 3 (.8%) had died of CMV. Compared with the no PET group, the PET group had a longer LOS for HCT admission (P = .0276), longer total LOS by day 180 (P = .0001), a higher number of readmissions (P = .0001), a higher mean inpatient cost for HCT admission ($189,389 versus $151,646; P = .0133), and a higher total inpatient cost ($297,563 versus $205,815; P < .0001). Among PET recipients, CMV-related readmissions were associated with higher mean cost per episode compared with non CMV-related readmissions ($165,455 versus $89,419; P = .005). CMV-related readmissions comprised 40.6% of total all-cause readmissions and incurred 55.9% of total all-cause readmission costs in PET recipients. Our data show that patients treated with currently available PET had greater inpatient HCRU and cost, by day 180 compared with patients who did not receive PET. The cost of CMV-related readmissions accounted for 56% of total readmission cost among PET recipients. Future studies are needed to examine the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for CMV management.