1
|
Haug N, Jänicke M, Kasenda B, Marschner N, Frank M. Quantifying bias due to missing data in quality of life surveys of advanced-stage cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-023-03588-7. [PMID: 38240915 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03588-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many studies on cancer patients investigate the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (QoL). Typically, QoL is measured longitudinally, at baseline and at predefined timepoints thereafter. The question is whether, at a given timepoint, patients who return their questionnaire (available cases, AC) have a different QoL than those who do not return their questionnaire (non-AC). METHODS We employed augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) to estimate the average QoL of non-AC in two studies on advanced-stage cancer patients. The AIPW estimator assumed data to be missing at random (MAR) and used machine learning (ML)-based methods to estimate answering probabilities of individuals at given timepoints as well as their reported QoL, as a function of auxiliary variables. These auxiliary variables were selected by medical oncologists based on domain expertise. We aggregated results both by timepoint and by time until death and compared AIPW estimates to the AC averages. Additionally, we used a pattern mixture model (PMM) to check sensitivity of our AIPW estimates against violation of the MAR assumption. RESULTS Our study included 1927 patients with advanced pancreatic and 797 patients with advanced breast cancer. The AIPW estimate for average QoL of non-AC was below the average QoL of AC when aggregated by timepoint. The difference vanished when aggregated by time until death. PMM estimates were below AIPW estimates. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that non-AC have a lower average QoL than AC. However, estimates for QoL of non-AC are subject to unverifiable assumptions about the missingness mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Haug
- iOMEDICO, Biostatistics, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
| | - Martina Jänicke
- iOMEDICO, Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Benjamin Kasenda
- University Hospital of Basel, Medical Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Melanie Frank
- iOMEDICO, Biostatistics, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li X, Zhong X, Xu H, Wang J, Liu X, Wang Y, He L, Ma J, Li G, Liu L. Survival analysis of palliative radiotherapy in patients with HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 14:1305429. [PMID: 38260126 PMCID: PMC10800428 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1305429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Whether radiotherapy can improve the long-term survival of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We launched this study to explore the effect of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients through anti-HER-2 targeted therapy + radiotherapy. Methods 488 HER-2 + metastatic breast cancer patients who received anti-HER2 targeted ± local radiotherapy from March 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a radiotherapy group (n=207) and a non-radiotherapy group (n=281) based on whether they received radiotherapy or not. 1: 1 propensity matching analysis was used to determine two groups of patients with similar baselines. Results Before matching, the radiotherapy group (n=207) had a median overall survival (mOS) of 51.7 months (48.8-63.8), which was superior to the non-radiotherapy group's (n=281) mOS of 33.9 months (27.9-39.9) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the radiotherapy group exhibited better 1-year (94.6% vs 83.9%), 3-year (70.8% vs 45.5%), and 5-year (43.3% vs 25.0%) survival rates compared to the control group. Propensity score matching analysis identified 135 pairs of baseline-matched patients. In the matched groups, the mOS was 57.2 (44.5-69.8) months in the radiotherapy group (n=135) and 34.1 (27.5-40.6) months in the non-radiotherapy group (n=135), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the radiotherapy group demonstrated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.2%, 71.5%, and 46.9%, respectively, while those in the non-radiotherapy group were 89.4%, 45.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the presence of brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and radiotherapy were identified as independent predictive factors significantly associated with OS. Conclusion In patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, radiotherapy was associated with better survival benefits compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueting Li
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongyu Xu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xianguo Liu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiayu Ma
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guanghua Li
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He JR, Li D, Zhang QX, Liu T, Ding Y, Wu CY, Chen SS, Chen JL. Inhibiting KLRB1 expression is associated with impairing cancer immunity and leading to cancer progression and poor prognosis in breast invasive carcinoma patients. Aging (Albany NY) 2023; 15:13265-13286. [PMID: 37988189 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between Killer cell lectin like receptor B1 (KLRB1) and cancer has been reported, but the roles of KLRB1 in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) has not been fully revealed. METHODS Our study utilized the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Plotter, and TIMER databases to investigate the expression and clinical relevance of KLRB1 in BRCA and to explore its roles and mechanism in BRCA progression using gene set enrichment analysis, CCK-8, migration, apoptosis, and western blotting. We examined the relationship between KLRB1 expression and the BRCA immune microenvironment, using data from TCGA, and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) databases and validated these findings in K-M Plotter databases. RESULTS A significant decrease of KLRB1 expression was observed in BRCA patients. BRCA patients with low KLRB1 levels were associated with older age, advanced disease stage, HER2-positivity, poor prognosis, and a decreased survival probability compared to the high-expression group. Increased KLRB1 expression levels were correlated with inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, as well as promotion of cell apoptosis, possible through regulation of the NF-κB, PI3K/AKT, and TNF signaling pathways. Moreover, the study also indicated that decreased KLRB1 expression correlated with tumor purity, immune score, and immune cell infiltration (B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells, among others), cell markers, and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION Decreased KLRB1 expression in BRCA is associated with poor prognosis and immune microenvironment. This study also highlights KLRB1 as a potential molecular marker for poor prognosis in BRCA patients, and therefore, it may provide clinical implications for the management of patients with BRCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Rong He
- Key Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Hubei Province, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, Hubei, China
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442012, Hubei, China
| | - Qun-Xian Zhang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442012, Hubei, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442012, Hubei, China
| | - Yu Ding
- Key Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Hubei Province, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, Hubei, China
| | - Chuang-Yan Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Shan-Shan Chen
- Key Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Hubei Province, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, Hubei, China
| | - Jiu-Ling Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keup C, Kimmig R, Kasimir-Bauer S. The Diversity of Liquid Biopsies and Their Potential in Breast Cancer Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5463. [PMID: 38001722 PMCID: PMC10670968 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Analyzing blood as a so-called liquid biopsy in breast cancer (BC) patients has the potential to adapt therapy management. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and other blood components mirror the tumoral heterogeneity and could support a range of clinical decisions. Multi-cancer early detection tests utilizing blood are advancing but are not part of any clinical routine yet. Liquid biopsy analysis in the course of neoadjuvant therapy has potential for therapy (de)escalation.Minimal residual disease detection via serial cfDNA analysis is currently on its way. The prognostic value of blood analytes in early and metastatic BC is undisputable, but the value of these prognostic biomarkers for clinical management is controversial. An interventional trial confirmed a significant outcome benefit when therapy was changed in case of newly emerging cfDNA mutations under treatment and thus showed the clinical utility of cfDNA analysis for therapy monitoring. The analysis of PIK3CA or ESR1 variants in plasma of metastatic BC patients to prescribe targeted therapy with alpesilib or elacestrant has already arrived in clinical practice with FDA-approved tests available and is recommended by ASCO. The translation of more liquid biopsy applications into clinical practice is still pending due to a lack of knowledge of the analytes' biology, lack of standards and difficulties in proving clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna Keup
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bartsch R, Rinnerthaler G, Petru E, Egle D, Gnant M, Balic M, Sliwa T, Singer C. Updated Austrian treatment algorithm for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2023:10.1007/s00508-023-02254-9. [PMID: 37682349 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-023-02254-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 15% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients have neither hormone receptors expression nor HER2 overexpression and/or HER2/neu gene amplification. This subtype of breast cancer is known as Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), and carries a significantly elevated risk of local and distant recurrence. In comparison with other breast cancer subtypes, there is a higher rate of visceral and brain metastases. The majority of metastases of TNBC are diagnosed within three years after initial breast cancer diagnosis. While there have been major advances in hormone-receptor- positive and in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease over the past two decades, only limited improvements in outcomes for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been observed. A group of Austrian breast cancer specialists therefore convened an expert meeting to establish a comprehensive clinical risk-benefit profile of available mTNBC therapies and discuss the role sacituzumab govitecan may play in the treatment algorithm of the triple-negative breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Third Medical Department with Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Edgar Petru
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 14, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Daniel Egle
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Cancer Center Tirol, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marija Balic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Thamer Sliwa
- 3rd Medical Department, Hematology and Oncology, Hanusch Hospital, Heinrich-Collin-Straße 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Singer
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardoso F, McCartney A, Ponti A, Marotti L, Vrieling C, Eniu A, Sousa B, Ripamonti C, Travado L, Spitz S, Jolly E, Curigliano G, Penault-Llorca F, Lecouvet F, Rubio IT, Biganzoli L. European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists/Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance quality indicators for metastatic breast cancer care. Eur J Cancer 2023; 187:105-113. [PMID: 37146504 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Improvement in the care of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can only occur if the adequate quality of care is implemented and verified, including access to multidisciplinary, specialised care given in accordance with high-quality guidelines. To this purpose, European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists and the Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance joined efforts to develop the first set of quality indicators (QI) specifically for MBC that should be routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres meet the required standards. METHODS A working group of multidisciplinary European experts in breast cancer met to discuss each identified QI, reporting the definition, the minimum and target standard for breast cancer centres to achieve, and the motivation for selection. The level of evidence was determined according to the short version of the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality classification. RESULTS QI to measure access to and involvement in multidisciplinary and supportive care, appropriate pathological characterisation of disease, systemic therapies and radiotherapy were developed with the consensus of the working group. CONCLUSIONS This is the first effort of a multistep project that aims to have QI for MBC routinely measured and evaluated to ensure that breast cancer centres achieve mandated standards in the care of patients with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Amelia McCartney
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy; School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Antonio Ponti
- CPO Piemonte, Turin and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Conny Vrieling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandru Eniu
- Oncology Pole, Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais, Switzerland; European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Berta Sousa
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Luzia Travado
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sabine Spitz
- EUPATI Austria and Europa Donna Austria, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Jolly
- Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Biganzoli
- "Sandro Pitigliani" Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miron AI, Anghel AV, Barnonschi AA, Mitre R, Liscu HD, Găinariu E, Pătru R, Coniac S. Real-World Outcomes of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer in Romania. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111938. [PMID: 37296790 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction in clinical practice of selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors improves the outcome of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). In Romania, the three available CDK 4/6 inhibitors (Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Ademaciclib) have been approved by the National Agency for Medicines (ANM) in 2019, 2020 and 2021. We conducted a retrospective study from 2019 to 2022 on 107 patients with metastatic breast cancer HR+ that have been treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in addition to hormone therapy in the Oncology Department of Colțea Clinical Hospital in Bucharest. The purpose of this study is to calculate the median progression-free survival (PFS) and to compare it with the median PFS from other randomized clinical trials. A key difference from other studies is that our study evaluated both patients with non-visceral mBC and patients with visceral mBC, as these two groups often have different outcomes. A total of 79.4% were postmenopausal patients and 20.6% were premenopausal; 42.1% had different stages at the beginning of disease and 57.9% presented newly metastatic disease. Median PFS was 17 months, unlike randomized clinical trials which reported a median PFS of 25.3 months. The combination of CDK 4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy is the golden standard treatment in HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, bringing a prolongation of survival for these patients. Our results show no major differences compared to randomized clinical trials, despite the smaller patient group. In order to have a picture of the efficacy of the treatment as close as possible to the real-world data, we believe that it would be very useful to have a collaboration between several oncology departments in different institutions to carry out a multi-center study on large groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea-Iuliana Miron
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandra-Valentina Anghel
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei-Alexandru Barnonschi
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ruxandra Mitre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Horia-Dan Liscu
- Department of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Estera Găinariu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Raluca Pătru
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Simona Coniac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Colțea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thill M, Zahn MO, Welt A, Stickeler E, Nusch A, Fietz T, Rauh J, Wetzel N, Kruggel L, Jänicke M, Marschner N, Harbeck N, Wöckel A, Decker T. Treatment and outcome in metastatic lobular breast cancer in the prospective German research platform OPAL. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:545-553. [PMID: 36807725 PMCID: PMC10036409 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06882-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence about routine treatment and outcome of patients with invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is limited, especially regarding metastatic disease. Here we present prospective real-world data of patients with metastatic ILC (mILC) as compared to patients with metastatic invasive ductal cancer (mIDC) receiving systemic therapy in routine care in Germany. METHODS Prospective data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with mILC (n = 466) and mIDC (n = 2100), recruited between 2007 and 2021 into the Tumor Registry Breast Cancer/OPAL were analyzed. RESULTS Compared to mIDCs, patients with mILC were older at start of first-line treatment (median 69 vs. 63 years) and had more often lower grade (G1/G2: 72.8% vs. 51.2%), hormone receptor (HR)-positive (83.7% vs. 73.2%) and less often HER2-positive (14.2% vs. 28.6%) tumors, which metastasized more frequently to the bone (19.7% vs. 14.5%) or peritoneum (9.9% vs. 2.0%), and less frequently to the lungs (0.9% vs. 4.0%). Median OS of patients with mILC (n = 209) and mIDC (n = 1158) was 30.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.3, 36.0] and 33.7 months [95% CI 30.3, 37.9], respectively. Multivariate survival analysis did not show a significant prognostic impact of the histological subtype [HR mILC vs. mIDC 1.18 (95% CI 0.97-1.42)]. CONCLUSION Overall, our real-world data confirm clinicopathological differences between mILC and mIDC breast cancer patients. Despite patients with mILC presenting with some favorable prognostic factors, ILC histopathology was not associated with a better clinical outcome in multivariate analysis, suggesting the need for more tailored treatment strategies for patients with the lobular subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M-O Zahn
- MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz, Goslar, Germany
| | - A Welt
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - E Stickeler
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - A Nusch
- Praxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Ratingen, Germany
| | - T Fietz
- Schwerpunktpraxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Singen, Germany
| | - J Rauh
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Innere Medizin, Witten, Germany
| | | | | | | | - N Marschner
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - A Wöckel
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie GbR, Ravensburg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luyendijk M, Blommestein H, Uyl-de Groot C, Siesling S, Jager A. Regulatory Approval, Reimbursement, and Clinical Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2256170. [PMID: 36795415 PMCID: PMC9936344 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.56170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that CDK4/6 inhibitors rapidly reached many eligible patients with metastatic breast cancer and were adopted gradually over time in the Netherlands. Adoption of innovative medicines may be further optimized, and better transparency of the availability of new medicines during different phases of the postapproval access pathway is needed. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study reviewed approval and reimbursement decisions of the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib and estimated the number of patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for these medicines compared with the actual use in clinical practice. The study used nationwide claims data that were obtained from the Dutch Hospital Data. Claims and early access data for patients with hormone receptor-positive and ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors from November 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, were included. IMPORTANCE The number of new cancer medicines that are being approved by regulatory agents is increasing exponentially. Yet little is known about the pace at which these medicines reach eligible patients in daily clinical practice during different phases of the postapproval access pathway. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Description of the postapproval access pathway, monthly number of patients who were treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice, and estimated number of patients who were eligible for treatment. Aggregated claims data were used, and patient characteristics and outcomes data were not collected. OBJECTIVE To describe the entire postapproval access pathway of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the Netherlands, from regulatory approval to reimbursement and to investigate the adoption of these medicines in clinical practice among patients with metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS Three CDK4/6 inhibitors have received European Union-wide regulatory approval for the treatment of HR-positive and ERBB2-negative metastatic breast cancer since November 2016. In the Netherlands, the number of patients who have been treated with these medicines increased to approximately 1847 (based on 1 624 665 claims over the entire study period) from approval to the end of 2021. Reimbursement for these medicines was granted between 9 and 11 months after approval. While awaiting reimbursement decisions, 492 patients received palbociclib, the first approved medicine of this class, via an expanded access program. By the end of the study period, 1616 patients (87%) were treated with palbociclib, whereas 157 patients (7%) received ribociclib, and 74 patients (4%) received abemaciclib. The CKD4/6 inhibitor was combined with an aromatase inhibitor in 708 patients (38%) and with fulvestrant in 1139 patients (62%). The pattern of use over time appeared to be somewhat lower compared with the estimated number of eligible patients (1847 vs 1915 in December 2021), especially in the first 2.5 years after approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Luyendijk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hedwig Blommestein
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pérez-Montero H, Lozano A, de Blas R, Sánchez JJ, Martínez E, Laplana M, Gil-Gil M, Garcia-Tejedor A, Pernas S, Falo C, Godino Ó, Pla MJ, Guedea F, Navarro-Martin A. Ten-year experience of bone SBRT in breast cancer: analysis of predictive factors of effectiveness. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:1756-1766. [PMID: 36645616 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03073-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on the benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases remain limited. The purpose of this study is to report our 10-year experience of bone SBRT, analyzing toxicity and prognostic factors for local control (LC); progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). METHODS/PATIENTS We analyzed all spine and non-spine bone SBRT performed in patients with BC during the 2012-2022 period at our institution. Treatments carried out with ablative intent in stereotactic conditions with dose/fraction ≥ 5 Gy in 5 or fewer sessions were considered. Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were recorded according to CTCAEv4. Risk factors were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS 60 bone SBRT treatments were performed during the study period. 75% were spine SBRT and 25% were non-spine SBRT (median BED4Gy was 80 Gy4). The median age was 52.5 years (34-79). The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm3 (0.5-39.4). The median follow-up was 32.4 months (1.2-101.7). 1 and 2 years LC were 92.9 and 86.6%, respectively. 1 and 2 years OS were 100 and 90.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) associated volume of the treated lesion ≥ 13 cm3 with worse LC (p = 0.046; HR 12.1, 95%CI = 1.1-140.3). In addition, deferring SBRT > 3 months after lesion diagnosis to prioritize systemic treatment showed a significant benefit, improving the 2 years LC up to 96.8% vs. 67.5% for SBRT performed before this period (p = 0.031; HR 0.1, 95%CI = 0.01-0.8). Hormonal receptors, the total number of metastases, and CA15-3 value were significantly associated with OS in MVA. During follow-up, three non-spine fractures (5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS According to our data, bone SBRT is a safe and effective technique for BC. Upfront systemic treatment before SBRT offers a benefit in LC. Therefore, SBRT should be considered after prior systemic treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodolfo de Blas
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan José Sánchez
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelyn Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amparo Garcia-Tejedor
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catalina Falo
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Godino
- Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Pla
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferrán Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Takada M, Yoshimura M, Kotake T, Kawaguchi K, Uozumi R, Kataoka M, Kato H, Yoshibayashi H, Suwa H, Tsuji W, Yamashiro H, Suzuki E, Torii M, Yamada Y, Kataoka T, Ishiguro H, Morita S, Toi M. Phase Ib/II study of nivolumab combined with palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Sci Rep 2022; 12:22397. [PMID: 36575361 PMCID: PMC9794767 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27048-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) can enhance the abscopal effect of immune checkpoint blockade. This phase I/II study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus RT in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer requiring palliative RT for bone metastases. Cohort A included luminal-like disease, and cohort B included both luminal-like and triple-negative disease refractory to standard systemic therapy. Patients received 8 Gy single fraction RT for bone metastasis on day 0. Nivolumab was administered on day 1 for each 14-day cycle. In cohort A, endocrine therapy was administered. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) of the unirradiated lesions. Cohorts A and B consisted of 18 and 10 patients, respectively. The ORR was 11% (90% CI 4-29%) in cohort A and 0% in cohort B. Disease control rates were 39% (90% CI 23-58%) and 0%. Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.1-6.1 months) and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.2-3.7 months). One patient in cohort B experienced a grade 3 adverse event. Palliative RT combined with nivolumab was safe and showed modest anti-tumor activity in cohort A. Further investigations to enhance the anti-tumor effect of endocrine therapy combined with RT plus immune checkpoint blockade are warranted.Trial registration number and date of registration UMIN: UMIN000026046, February 8, 2017; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03430479, February 13, 2018; Date of the first registration: June 22, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Takada
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan
| | - Michio Yoshimura
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kotake
- grid.414973.cDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan
| | - Ryuji Uozumi
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masako Kataoka
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hironori Kato
- grid.410835.bDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Hirofumi Suwa
- grid.413697.e0000 0004 0378 7558Department of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Wakako Tsuji
- grid.416499.70000 0004 0595 441XDepartment of Breast Surgery, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Yamashiro
- grid.416952.d0000 0004 0378 4277Department of Breast Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan
| | - Eiji Suzuki
- grid.410843.a0000 0004 0466 8016Department of Breast Surgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masae Torii
- grid.414936.d0000 0004 0418 6412Department of Breast Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yosuke Yamada
- grid.411217.00000 0004 0531 2775Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Kataoka
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Pathology, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishiguro
- grid.412377.40000 0004 0372 168XBreast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Morita
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masakazu Toi
- grid.258799.80000 0004 0372 2033Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lindman H, Wiklund F, Andersen KK. Long-term treatment patterns and survival in metastatic breast cancer by intrinsic subtypes - an observational cohort study in Sweden. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1006. [PMID: 36138404 PMCID: PMC9494782 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Longitudinal, real-world data on the management of metastatic breast cancer is increasingly relevant to understand breast cancer care in routine clinical practice. Yet such data are scarce, particularly beyond second- and third-line treatment strategies. This study, therefore, examined both the long-term treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in a regional Swedish cohort of female patients with metastatic breast cancer stratified by subtype in routine clinical practice during a recent eight-year period and correlation to current treatment guidelines. Methods Consecutive female patients with metastatic breast cancer clinically managed at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, during 2009–2016 and followed until the end of September, 2017 (n = 370) were included and, where possible, classified as having one of five, intrinsic subtypes: Luminal A; Luminal B; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/ estrogen receptor-positive (ER+); HER2+/estrogen receptor-negative (ER-); or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Treatment patterns and OS were estimated by subtype using time-to-event methods. Results A total of 352/370 patients with metastatic breast cancer (mean age 67.6 years) could be subtyped: 118 (34%) were Luminal A, 119 (34%) Luminal B, 31 (8%) HER2+/ER-, 38 (11%) HER2+/Luminal, and 46 (13%) TNBC. The median number of metastatic treatment lines was 3. Most patients were on active treatment during follow-up (80% of the observation period), except for patients with TNBC who were on treatment for 60% of the observation time. Overall, 67% of patients died whilst on treatment. Among all patients (n = 370), median OS was 32.5 months (95% CI = 28.2–35.7). The 5-year survival rate was highest for HER2+/Luminal (46%) patients, followed by Luminal B (29%), Luminal A (28%), HER2+/ER- (21%), and TNBC (7%). Increasing age and number of metastatic sites also predicted worse survival. Conclusions Metastatic breast cancer patients in Sweden, irrespective of subtype, generally receive active treatment until time of death. Survival varies considerably across subtypes and is also associated with patient characteristics. Regardless of differences in treatment patterns for Luminal A and B patients, long-term OS was the same. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10098-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Lindman
- Uppsala University Hospital, SE-753 09, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Effects of Chinese Herbal Formula on Immune Function and Nutritional Status of Breast Cancer Patients. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:5900024. [PMID: 35872927 PMCID: PMC9303106 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5900024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background. Chinese herbal formulas have certain effects on patients with breast cancer (BC). This article discussed the effect of Buqi Yangxue decoction on the immune function and nutritional status of BC patients and provided an evidence for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to improve the quality of life and curative effect of BC patients. Methods. 66 cases of BC patients were divided into control group (n =33) and Chinese herbal formula group (n =33). The control group was received with TE chemotherapy, and the Chinese herbal formula group was received with Buqi Yangxue decoction combined with TE chemotherapy. Nutritional status, immune function, TCM symptom quantitative score, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results. There was no difference in all indexes between the two groups before intervention. After 4 weeks, the nutritional indexes ALB, PA, TRF, and TP in Chinese herbal formula group were higher than those in control group, except HGb. CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ in both groups were sharply higher than before treatment, while CD8+ was dramatically lower, and the changes in Chinese herbal formula group were more obvious than those in control group. In Chinese herbal formula group, the levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM were sharply increased compared with control group. The TCM syndrome scores in both groups were decreased significantly after treatment, especially in Chinese herbal formula group. In addition, nausea and vomiting, inappetence, liver function impairment, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in both groups. There was no clear difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between Chinese herbal formula group and control group. Conclusion. Buqi Yangxue decoction can effectively improve the nutritional status and immune function of BC patients, which has important clinical significance for the later comprehensive treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cardoso F, Cella D, Velikova G, Harmer V, Schumacher-Wulf E, Rihani J, Casas A, Harbeck N. Quality-of-life methodology in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Current tools and perspectives for the future. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 102:102321. [PMID: 34852292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly recognized as important when evaluating cancer treatments. The use, reporting, and analysis of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), however, are not standardized in clinical trials and are often poorly implemented in clinical practice. We report the results of a systematic literature review (PubMed search: January 1, 2000 to August 15, 2020) of PROM use, reporting, and analysis in phase 3 clinical trials of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Further inspection of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor publications was performed to examine PROMs in the HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative setting. A total of 88 results were identified in the initial search; 32 were included in the final analysis. Among included studies, most (66%) had been published in the last 5 years (2015 to 2020). CDK4/6 inhibitors (38%) were the most common agents reported. No clear standard for PROM use, reporting, or analysis was found. The most common PROMs were European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30; 59%) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B; 34%). Important differences, among studies that reported them, ranged from 5 to 10 points for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and 8 points for the FACT-B total score. This review showed that a lack of clear consistency remains for PROM use, reporting, and analysis in phase 3 clinical trials of HR+ ABC. However, HRQOL is of high interest in the literature, including for CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - David Cella
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | - Ana Casas
- University Hospital Virgen del Rocio (HUVR), Sevilla, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Caswell-Jin JL, Callahan A, Purington N, Han SS, Itakura H, John EM, Blayney DW, Sledge GW, Shah NH, Kurian AW. Treatment and Monitoring Variability in US Metastatic Breast Cancer Care. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:600-614. [PMID: 34043432 DOI: 10.1200/cci.21.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment and monitoring options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are increasing, but little is known about variability in care. We sought to improve understanding of MBC care and its correlates by analyzing real-world claims data using a search engine with a novel query language to enable temporal electronic phenotyping. METHODS Using the Advanced Cohort Engine, we identified 6,180 women who met criteria for having estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative MBC from IBM MarketScan US insurance claims (2007-2014). We characterized treatment, monitoring, and hospice usage, along with clinical and nonclinical factors affecting care. RESULTS We observed wide variability in treatment modality and monitoring across patients and geography. Most women received first-recorded therapy with endocrine (67%) versus chemotherapy, underwent more computed tomography (CT) (76%) than positron emission tomography-CT, and were monitored using tumor markers (58%). Nearly half (46%) met criteria for aggressive disease, which were associated with receiving chemotherapy first, monitoring primarily with CT, and more frequent imaging. Older age was associated with endocrine therapy first, less frequent imaging, and less use of tumor markers. After controlling for clinical factors, care strategies varied significantly by nonclinical factors (median regional income with first-recorded therapy and imaging type, geographic region with these and with imaging frequency and use of tumor markers; P < .0001). CONCLUSION Variability in US MBC care is explained by patient and disease factors and by nonclinical factors such as geographic region, suggesting that treatment decisions are influenced by local practice patterns and/or resources. A search engine designed to express complex electronic phenotypes from longitudinal patient records enables the identification of variability in patient care, helping to define disparities and areas for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Natasha Purington
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Summer S Han
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Haruka Itakura
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Douglas W Blayney
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - George W Sledge
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Nigam H Shah
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fallowfield L, Boyle FM, Travado L, Kiely BE, Jewell P, Aubel D, Cardoso F. Gaps in Care and Support for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Report From the Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7:976-984. [PMID: 34156869 PMCID: PMC8457864 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although new therapeutic options continue to improve disease-related outcomes in advanced breast cancer (ABC), enhanced focus is needed to improve quality of life for patients currently living with ABC. METHODS In November 2019, a multidisciplinary workshop to explore patient perceptions of their information and support needs was held at the ABC Global Alliance Annual Meeting in Lisbon, Portugal. Ninety-two attendees from 27 countries participated in the workshop. RESULTS Several key unmet needs were identified and discussed in the workshop, including the following: (1) Significant patient knowledge gaps exist related to the diagnosis and management of ABC, and the availability of patient-focused information to support these gaps in knowledge remains limited. (2) The development of meaningful relationships between patients and health care professionals, and the role of patients in decision making, is often overlooked for patients with ABC. (3) Multidisciplinary care approaches are crucial for patients with ABC; however, these often lack effective coordination. (4) Access to clinical trials for ABC also remains limited. (5) Caregivers, friends, and family members do not receive sufficient guidance to support patients with ABC and manage their own well-being. CONCLUSION The variety of unmet needs explored in the workshop demonstrates that patients with ABC still face considerable challenges related to quality of care and support, which will not be resolved until tangible action is taken. Issues highlighted in the workshop should be prioritized by working groups to shape the development of community-based solutions. There is a need for the global community to act proactively to maximize awareness of these ongoing unmet needs and existing resources, while socializing and building new initiatives and resources that will help to close these gaps for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Fallowfield
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Frances M. Boyle
- Mater Hospital North Sydney, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luzia Travado
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Belinda E. Kiely
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Dawn Aubel
- Novartis AG, East Hanover, NJ
- Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chung WP, Yang CT, Chen HY, Su CY, Su HW, Ou HT. Treatment-associated survival outcomes in real-world patients with de novo metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Age as a significant treatment effect-modifier. J Formos Med Assoc 2021; 121:319-328. [PMID: 34006465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence for optimizing the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is lacking. This study assessed the utilization patterns of chemotherapy and associated survival outcomes in de novo mTNBC patients. METHODS Taiwan's cancer registry was utilized to extract study patients with newly-diagnosed breast cancer during 2011-2015 and confirmed metastatic triple-negative status. The patients' medical records (e.g., diseases, treatments) and death status were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Utilization of first-line chemotherapy regimens was analyzed and associated survival outcomes were assessed using Cox models. RESULTS 93.60% of the mTNBC patients (n = 297) received chemotherapy, where combination regimens (75.54%) were more common than single-agent regimens (24.46%) in the first-line setting. A non-statistically lower all-cause death associated with combination versus single-agent chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.830 [0.589, 1.168]) was observed. Age was identified as a significant effect-modifier in treatment-associated survival outcomes (p = 0.008); younger patients (aged < 40 and 40-59 years) versus older patients (aged ≥ 60 years) had a lower all-cause mortality when receiving combination versus single-agent chemotherapy. A lower all-cause mortality associated with taxane- versus non-taxane-based therapy was revealed among those on single-agent chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.557 [0.311, 0.999]). CONCLUSION Generally, single-agent and combination chemotherapies yielded comparable survival outcomes as the first-line treatment for de novo mTNBC. Younger patients may benefit more from combination regimens, in terms of better survival outcomes. Single-agent chemotherapy may be preferable as the first-line choice for elderly patients who are vulnerable to the toxicity of multiple chemotherapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Pang Chung
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Center of Applied Nanomedicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ting Yang
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Ying Chen
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yen Su
- Medical Division, Roche Products Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Wei Su
- Medical Division, Roche Products Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huang-Tz Ou
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yuan Y, Zhang S, Yan M, Yin Y, Song Y, Jiang Z. Chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in China: a real-world study. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:831. [PMID: 34164465 PMCID: PMC8184482 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-8252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Although endocrine therapy (ET) is the preferred option for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- MBC), chemotherapy (CT) is still commonly used. The objective of this real-world study was to present the actual choice of first-line treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC and evaluate the consistency with guidelines in China. Methods Patients with HR+/HER2- MBC between 1996 and September 2018 were identified from of the database of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC). The statistical description was conducted to present the first-line treatment. Factors influencing the prescription of ET or CT were obtained using univariate and multivariate analysis. The consistency of the actual treatment with the guideline of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC guideline) was evaluated. Results Of 1,877 patients, 662 (35.3%) received ET, and 1,215 (64.7%) received CT. ET proportion was only 25.4% in 1996-2005 and gradually increased to 44.6% in 2016-2018. Aromatase inhibitors (69% of ET) and taxane-based regimens (66% of CT) were the most commonly used ET and CT, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that patients with age ≥60, distant relapse-free interval (DRFI) ≥24 months, ER+/PR+, bone metastasis only, or progression on (neo)adjuvant ET were preferably chosen for ET as first-line treatment. Factors associated with preferring CT were de novo stage IV, liver or lung metastasis. 17.2% of patients (322 cases) who had neither visceral metastasis nor progression on (neo)adjuvant ET wrongly received CT instead of ET, which is inconsistent with CSCO BC guideline. More than half of patients receiving CT discontinued their initial treatment due to adverse events and other non-disease progression reasons. Conclusions Although high proportion of HR+/HER2- MBC patients received CT as first-line treatment in China, it is gratifying to see that the proportion of patients receiving ET has gradually increased. Our study revealed that 17.2% of patients were over-treated according to CSCO BC guideline, which may provide data to promote guideline adherence. The clinical application for ET should be appropriately expanded in first-line treatment, especially for patients without visceral disease and proof of endocrine resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yuan
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shaohua Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yongmei Yin
- Department of Breast Cancer, Jiangsu Province Hospital & The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuhua Song
- Department of Breast Cancer Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Zefei Jiang
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Antitumor Effects of a Sesquiterpene Derivative from Marine Sponge in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Mar Drugs 2021; 19:md19050244. [PMID: 33925873 PMCID: PMC8144972 DOI: 10.3390/md19050244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, the anti-proliferative effect of ilimaquinone, a sesquiterpene derivative from the marine sponge, in breast cancer cells was investigated. Ilimaquinone inhibited the proliferation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with IC50 values of 10.6 μM and 13.5 μM, respectively. Non-tumorigenic human breast epithelial cells were less sensitive to ilimaquinone than breast cancer cells. Flow cytometric and Western blot analysis showed that ilimaquinone induced S-phase arrest by modulating the expression of p-CDC-2 and p21. Ilimaquinone induces apoptosis, which is accompanied by multiple biological biomarkers, including the downregulation of Akt, ERK, and Bax, upregulation of p38, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, increased reactive oxygen species generation, and induced autophagy. Collectively, these findings suggest that ilimaquinone causes cell cycle arrest as well as induces apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer cells.
Collapse
|
20
|
Xing Y, Li Y, Hu B, Han F, Zhao X, Zhang H, Li Y, Li D, Li J, Jin F, Li F. PAK5-mediated AIF phosphorylation inhibits its nuclear translocation and promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis. Int J Biol Sci 2021; 17:1315-1327. [PMID: 33867848 PMCID: PMC8040471 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.58102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although p21 activated kinase 5 (PAK5) is related to the progression of multiple cancers, its biological function in breast cancer remains unclear. Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) is a vital apoptosis factor in mitochondria, which can be released from mitochondria and enter the nucleus, causing caspase-independent apoptosis. In this study, we reveal that PAK5 inhibits apoptosis by preventing the nuclear translocation of AIF. PAK5 inhibits the release of AIF from mitochondria in breast cancer cells by decreasing the mitochondria membrane permeability and increasing the membrane potential. Furthermore, PAK5 phosphorylates AIF at Thr281 site to inhibit the formation of AIF/importin α3 complex, leading to decrease AIF nuclear translocation. Functionally, we demonstrate that PAK5-mediated AIF phosphorylation promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells and accelerates the growth of breast cancer in vivo. Significantly, PAK5 and AIF expression in breast cancer are positively correlated with poor patient prognosis. PAK5 expression is negatively correlated with AIF nuclear translocation. These results suggest that PAK5-AIF signaling pathway may play an essential role in mammary tumorigenesis, providing a new therapeutic target for the treatment of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Xing
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Bingtao Hu
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Fuyi Han
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Hongyan Zhang
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Yanshu Li
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Danni Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jiabin Li
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Unit of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, North Nanjing Street, Heping District, 110001 Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Cell Biology, Key Laboratory of Cell Biology of National Health Commission of the PRC, Key Laboratory of Medical Cell Biology of Ministry of Education of the PRC, China Medical University, No.77, Puhe Road, Shenyang, 110122, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vrdoljak E, Gligorov J, Wierinck L, Conte P, De Grève J, Meunier F, Palmieri C, Travado L, Walker A, Wiseman T, Wuerstlein R, Alba E, Biurrún C, D'Antona R, Sola-Morales O, Ubaysi C, Ventura R, Cardoso F. Addressing disparities and challenges in underserved patient populations with metastatic breast cancer in Europe. Breast 2021; 55:79-90. [PMID: 33360479 PMCID: PMC7772562 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
People with metastatic breast cancer face many challenges and disparities in obtaining optimal cancer care. These challenges are accentuated in underserved patient populations across Europe, who are less likely to receive quality healthcare for reasons including socioeconomic inequalities, educational or cultural status, or geographic location. While there are many local and national initiatives targeted to address these challenges, there remains a need to reduce disparities and improve access to healthcare to improve outcomes, with a focus on multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement. In October 2019, a range of experts in metastatic breast cancer, including healthcare professionals, patient representatives, policymakers and politicians, met to discuss and prioritize the critical needs of underserved patient populations with metastatic breast cancer in Europe. Six key challenges faced by these communities were identified: the need for amplification of the metastatic breast cancer patient voice, better and wider implementation of high-quality guidelines for metastatic breast cancer, more collaboration between stakeholders, tailored support for patients from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds, improved data sharing, and work-related issues. The Expert Panel then conceived and discussed potential actionable goals to address each key challenge. Their conclusions present a set of interrelated approaches to address the different challenges and could serve as the basis for concerted improvement of the lives of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, Split, HR-21.000, Croatia.
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Medical Oncology Department, APHP Tenon, 4 Rue de La Chine, Paris, 75020, France.
| | | | - PierFranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto I.R.C.C.S., Via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35124, Italy.
| | - Jacques De Grève
- Departments of Genetics and Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel, Campus Jette Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.
| | - Françoise Meunier
- Federation of European Academies of Medicine, Rue d' Egmont 11, Brussels, 1000, Belgium.
| | - Carlo Palmieri
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Center NHS Foundation Trust, 66 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK.
| | - Luzia Travado
- Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal.
| | - Andrew Walker
- Salus Alba Limited, 20-23 Woodside Place, Glasgow, G3 7QL, United Kingdom.
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Applied Health Research Department, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, University Hospital Munich (LMU), CCC Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, D-81377, Germany.
| | - Emilio Alba
- University Hospital Virgen de La Victoria, Campus de Teatinos, S/N, Málaga, 29010, Spain.
| | - Concepción Biurrún
- Federación Española de Cáncer de Mama (FECMA), Carrer de Tusset 32, Barcelona, 08006, Spain.
| | - Rosanna D'Antona
- Europa Donna Italia, Via Conservatorio 15, Milano, 20122, Italy.
| | - Oriol Sola-Morales
- Health Innovation Technology Transfer 'Foundation (FHITT), Aragó 60 Ppal 1a, Barcelona, E-08015, Spain.
| | | | - Roberta Ventura
- ABC Global Alliance, C/o Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal.
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- ABC Global Alliance, C/o Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal; Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, Curigliano G, Aapro MS, André F, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bhattacharyya GS, Biganzoli L, Boyle F, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Cortés J, El Saghir NS, Elzayat M, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gelmon K, Gligorov J, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaufman B, Kaur R, Kiely BE, Kim SB, Lin NU, Mertz SA, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Prat A, Penault-Llorca F, Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Wiseman T, Xu B, Norton L, Costa A, Winer EP. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1623-1649. [PMID: 32979513 PMCID: PMC7510449 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 669] [Impact Index Per Article: 167.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Division of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Early Drug Development, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M S Aapro
- Breast Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | - F André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute & University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G S Bhattacharyya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Salt Lake City Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - L Biganzoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovo Ospedale di Prato - Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | - F Boyle
- The Pam McLean Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - M-J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortés
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quiron Group, Madrid & Barcelona, Spain; Department of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N S El Saghir
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - M Elzayat
- Europa Donna, The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Milan, Italy
| | - A Eniu
- Interdisciplinary Oncology Service (SIC), Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - L Fallowfield
- SHORE-C, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - P A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - K Gelmon
- Medical Oncology Department, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J Gligorov
- Breast Cancer Expert Center, University Cancer Institute APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - R Haidinger
- Brustkrebs Deutschland e.V., Munich, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - B Kaufman
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - R Kaur
- Breast Cancer Welfare Association Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - B E Kiely
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - S-B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - N U Lin
- Susan Smith Center for Women's Cancers - Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S A Mertz
- Metastatic Breast Cancer Network, Inverness, USA
| | - S Neciosup
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - B V Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S Ohno
- Breast Oncology Centre, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - O Pagani
- Medical School, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona; Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; University Clermont Auvergne/INSERM U1240, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - H S Rugo
- Breast Oncology Clinical Trials Education, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - G W Sledge
- Division of Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - C Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenburg, Halle, Germany
| | - D A Vorobiof
- Oncology Research Unit, Belong.Life, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - T Wiseman
- Department of Applied Health Research in Cancer Care, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - L Norton
- Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Costa
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy; European School of Oncology, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - E P Winer
- Susan Smith Center for Women's Cancers - Breast Oncology Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Karihtala P, Jääskeläinen A, Roininen N, Jukkola A. Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective single-centre cohort study in a Finnish University Hospital. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038798. [PMID: 33046470 PMCID: PMC7552835 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although novel early breast cancer prognostic factors are being continuously discovered, only rare factors predicting survival in metastatic breast cancer have been validated. The prognostic role of early breast cancer prognostic factors in metastatic disease also remains mostly unclear. DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective cohort study in a Finnish University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOMES 594 women with early breast cancer were originally followed. Sixty-one of these patients developed distant metastases during the follow-up, and their primary breast cancer properties, such as tumour size, nodal status, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor expression, grade, proliferation rate, histopathological subtype and breast cancer subtype were analysed as potential prognostic factors for metastatic disease. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, the presence of lymph node metastases at the time of early breast cancer surgery (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.09-4.31; p=0.027) and ER status (negative vs positive, HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.14-4.10; p=0.018) were significant predictors of survival in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm ER status as a primary prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, it also suggests that the presence of initial lymph node metastases could serve as a prognostic factor in recurrent breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peeter Karihtala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anniina Jääskeläinen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Nelli Roininen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Arja Jukkola
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Cancer Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
He T, Wang C, Tan Q, Wang Z, Li J, Chen T, Cui K, Wu Y, Sun J, Zheng D, Lv Q, Chen J. Adjuvant chemotherapy-associated lipid changes in breast cancer patients: A real-word retrospective analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e21498. [PMID: 32871996 PMCID: PMC7437760 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000021498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy may cause alterations in serum lipids in postoperative breast cancer (BC) patients, but the specific alterations caused by different chemotherapy regimens remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of serum lipids pre- and post-chemotherapy and to compare the side effects of different chemotherapy regimens on serum lipid.We retrospectively analysed the lipid profiles of 1934 consecutive postoperative BC patients who received one of the following chemotherapy regimens:The levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterols (TC), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) were significantly elevated in patients who received chemotherapy regimens above (P < .001). With respect to different chemotherapy regimens, FEC had less side effects on lipid profiles (TG (P = .006), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) (P < .001), and LDL-C (P < .001)) than TC regimen and AC-T and EC-T regimen. Also, the incidence of newly diagnosed dyslipidemia after chemotherapy was lower in FEC group than TC group and AC-T and EC-T group (P < .001). Additionally, the magnitude of the alterations in lipid profiles (TG, TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C) was greater in premenopausal patients than that of the postmenopausal patients (P = .004; P < .001; P = .002; P = .003, respectively). Moreover, after adjusting for multiple baseline covariates, anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens (AC-T and EC-T) were still statistically associated with a high level of TG (P = .004) and a low level of HDL-C (P = .033) after chemotherapy compared with FEC regimen. Also, body mass index (BMI) > 24 was associated with abnormal lipid profiles (TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C) post-chemotherapy compared with BMI ≤ 24 (P < .001; P = .036; P = .012; P = .048, respectively).BC patients receiving chemotherapy may have elevated lipid profiles, and anthracycline-based regimen had less side effects on lipid profiles compared with regimens containing taxane. Therefore, it is necessary to take lipid metabolism into consideration when making chemotherapy decisions and dyslipidemia prevention and corresponding interventions are indispensable during the whole chemotherapy period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao He
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Chengshi Wang
- Clinical Research Center for Breast Diseases, Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, and Department of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Qiuwen Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Zhu Wang
- Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis of Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Jiayuan Li
- West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Adrenal Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
| | - Kaijun Cui
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
| | - Yunhao Wu
- West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Jiani Sun
- West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Danxi Zheng
- West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Qing Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen Y, Wu N, Liu L, Dong H, Liu X. microRNA-128-3p overexpression inhibits breast cancer stem cell characteristics through suppression of Wnt signalling pathway by down-regulating NEK2. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 24:7353-7369. [PMID: 32558224 PMCID: PMC7339185 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging evidence has reported that dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) participated in the development of diverse types of cancers. Our initial microarray‐based analysis identified differentially expressed NEK2 related to breast cancer and predicted the regulatory microRNA‐128‐3p (miR‐128‐3p). Herein, this study aimed to characterize the tumour‐suppressive role of miR‐128‐3p in regulating the biological characteristics of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). CD44+CD24−/low cells were selected for subsequent experiments. After verification of the target relationship between miR‐128‐3p and NEK2, the relationship among miR‐128‐3p, NEK2 and BCSCs was further investigated with the involvement of the Wnt signalling pathway. The regulatory effects of miR‐128‐3p on proliferation, migration, invasion and self‐renewal in vitro as well as tumorigenicity in vivo of BCSCs were examined via gain‐ and loss‐of‐function approaches. Highly expressed NEK2 was found in breast cancer based on GSE61304 expression profile. Breast cancer stem cells and breast cancer cells showed a down‐regulation of miR‐128‐3p. Overexpression of miR‐128‐3p was found to inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion, self‐renewal in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo of BCSCs, which was further validated to be achieved through inhibition of Wnt signalling pathway by down‐regulating NEK2. In summary, this study indicates that miR‐128‐3p inhibits the stem‐like cell features of BCSCs via inhibition of the Wnt signalling pathway by down‐regulating NEK2, which provides a new target for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanwen Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Renji Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chongqing, China
| | - Nian Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Renji Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chongqing, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Renji Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chongqing, China
| | - Huaying Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Xinao Liu
- Clinical laboratory, Chongqing Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biganzoli L, Cardoso F, Beishon M, Cameron D, Cataliotti L, Coles CE, Delgado Bolton RC, Trill MD, Erdem S, Fjell M, Geiss R, Goossens M, Kuhl C, Marotti L, Naredi P, Oberst S, Palussière J, Ponti A, Rosselli Del Turco M, Rubio IT, Sapino A, Senkus-Konefka E, Skelin M, Sousa B, Saarto T, Costa A, Poortmans P. The requirements of a specialist breast centre. Breast 2020; 51:65-84. [PMID: 32217457 PMCID: PMC7375681 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This article is an update of the requirements of a specialist breast centre, produced by EUSOMA and endorsed by ECCO as part of Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) programme, and ESMO. To meet aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this article, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Biganzoli
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA); Breast Centre, AUSL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO); Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center-Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - David Cameron
- European Cancer Concord (ECC); University of Edinburgh Cancer Centre, IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Luigi Cataliotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Senonetwork Italia and Breast Centres Certification, Florence, Italy
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO); University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Maria Die Trill
- International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); ATRIUM: Psycho-Oncology & Clinical Psychology, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sema Erdem
- European Cancer Organisation Patient Advisory Committee (ECCO PAC); Europa Donna, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Fjell
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS); Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Romain Geiss
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG); Medical Oncology, Hôpital René Huguenin - Institut Curie, St. Cloud, France
| | - Mathijs Goossens
- European Cancer League (ECL); Centre for Cancer Detection (CvKO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christiane Kuhl
- European Society of Radiology (ESR); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lorenza Marotti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Florence, Italy
| | - Peter Naredi
- European Cancer Organisation (ECCO); Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Simon Oberst
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jean Palussière
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); Department of Imaging, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Antonio Ponti
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO) Piemonte, AOU Citta' Della Salute e Della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Isabel T Rubio
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO); Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Sapino
- European Society of Pathology (ESP); Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Marko Skelin
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Pharmacy Department, General Hospital Sibenik, Sibenik, Croatia
| | - Berta Sousa
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Pharmacy Department, General Hospital Sibenik, Sibenik, Croatia
| | - Tiina Saarto
- Flims Alumni Club (FAC); Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center-Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Campus Drie Eiken, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Claessens AKM, Ibragimova KIE, Geurts SME, Bos MEMM, Erdkamp FLG, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. The role of chemotherapy in treatment of advanced breast cancer: an overview for clinical practice. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 153:102988. [PMID: 32599374 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aims to evaluate the role of chemotherapy-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC), with the purpose to optimize selection, sequencing and duration of treatment with the currently available agents for clinical practice. Data from observational as well as randomized phase II and III studies were included. Chemotherapy yielded a median overall survival (OS) of 2 years in registration studies, with comparable efficacy of different agents. Combining chemotherapy agents did not yield OS improvement and caused greater toxicity compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Continuing chemotherapy till progression or unacceptable toxicity generated greater efficacy without detrimental impact on quality of life compared with a limited amount of cycles. In real-world studies, benefits after third-line chemotherapy were modest compared with first- and second-line. Furthermore, effects of previous chemotherapy predicted effects of next-line therapy in real-world. Physicians increasingly prescribed capecitabine or taxanes as first- or second-line chemotherapy over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk K M Claessens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, PO BOX 5500, 6130 MB Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.
| | - Khava I E Ibragimova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique E M M Bos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO BOX 2030, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Frans L G Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, PO BOX 5500, 6130 MB Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO BOX 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Welt A, Bogner S, Arendt M, Kossow J, Huffziger A, Pohlkamp C, Steiniger H, Becker U, Alashkar F, Kohl M, Wiesweg M, Richly H, Hense J, Scheulen ME, Schuler M, Seeber S, Tewes M. Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer: results from a 20-year study involving 1033 women treated at a single comprehensive cancer center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:1559-1566. [PMID: 32189107 PMCID: PMC7230039 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03184-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer have changed profoundly over the past 25 years. The outcome improved dramatically and was well quantified for early stage breast cancer (EBC). However, progress in the treatment of metastatic disease has been less convincingly demonstrated. We have studied survival data of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from a large academic cancer center over a period of 20 years. METHODS Data from 1033 consecutive MBC patients who were treated at the Department of Medical Oncology of the West German Cancer Center from January 1990 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed for overall survival (OS) and risk factors. Patients were grouped in 5-year cohorts, and survival parameters of each cohort were compared before and after adjustment for risk factors. RESULTS Overall survival of patients with MBC treated at specialized center has significantly improved from 1990 to 2010 (hazard ratio 0.7, 95%CI 0.58-0.84). The increments in OS have become less profound over time (median OS 1990-1994: 24.2 months, 1995-1999: 29.6 months, 2000-2004: 36.5 months, 2005-2009: 37.8 months). CONCLUSION Survival of patients with MBC has improved between 1990 and 2004, but less from 2005 to 2009. Either this suggests an unnoticed shift in the patient population, or a lesser impact of therapeutic innovations introduced in the most recent period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Welt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - Simon Bogner
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Marina Arendt
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Josef Kossow
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Herz-Jesu-Krankenhaus, Münster, Germany
| | - Antonia Huffziger
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Department of Medicine, Augusta Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Pohlkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Munich Leukemia Laboratory (MLL), München, Germany
| | - Heike Steiniger
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Practice for Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - Ute Becker
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Department of Medicine I, St. Bernhard Hospital, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany
| | - Ferras Alashkar
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marzena Kohl
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Practice for General Medicine, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Wiesweg
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Heike Richly
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Max E Scheulen
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Practice for General Medicine, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Siegfried Seeber
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Practice for Internal Medicine, Preventicum, Essen, Germany
| | - Mitra Tewes
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Marschner N, Zacharias S, Lordick F, Hegewisch-Becker S, Martens U, Welt A, Hagen V, Gleiber W, Bohnet S, Kruggel L, Dille S, Nusch A, Dörfel S, Decker T, Jänicke M. Association of Disease Progression With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Breast, Lung, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e200643. [PMID: 32154886 PMCID: PMC7064873 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Mortality, morbidity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are patient-relevant end points generally considered in the early benefit assessments of new cancer treatments. Progression-related end points, such as time to progression or progression-free survival, are not included, although patients and physicians testify to the detrimental association of disease progression with HRQoL. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of disease progression and HRQoL in 4 prevalent solid-cancer entities in routine clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study evaluated data from 4 prospective, nonintervention, multicenter registries collected between 2011 and 2018 in 203 centers in Germany. Patients' HRQoL was assessed regularly for up to 5 years. The change in HRQoL scores after disease progression was examined with linear mixed models, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Patients with metastatic breast, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer were recruited at the start of systemic first-line treatment. Data analysis was performed from February 2019 to April 2019. EXPOSURES All patients received systemic, palliative first-line treatment according to their physician's choice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was deterioration of HRQoL associated with disease progression, as measured by 4 validated questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version 4, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 version 3.0, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL version 1, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS More than 8000 questionnaires from 2314 patients with 2562 documented disease progressions were analyzed. In total, 464 patients had breast cancer (464 [100.0%] female; median [range] age, 61.6 [26.4-90.1] years), 807 patients had pancreatic cancer (352 [43.6%] female; median [range] age, 70.0 [39.0-93.0] years), 341 patients had lung cancer (118 [34.6%] female; median [range] age, 65.9 [28.4-88.2] years), and 702 patients had colorectal cancer (248 [35.3%] female; median [range] age, 66.9 [26.9-92.1] years). The first disease progression was associated with a statistically significant worsening of 37 of 45 HRQoL scales; for 17 of these scales, the worsening was clinically meaningful. Scale scores for appetite loss (pancreatic cancer, 10.2 points [95% CI, 6.8-13.5 points]; lung cancer, 10.8 points [95% CI, 5.4-16.2 points]; colorectal cancer, 8.8 points [95% CI, 5.5-12.2]; all P < .001), physical functioning (pancreatic cancer, 6.2 points [95% CI, 3.8-8.5 points]; lung cancer, 8.4 points [95% CI, 5.4-11.5 points]; colorectal cancer, 5.0 points [95% CI, 3.0-7.0 points]; all P < .001), and fatigue (pancreatic cancer, 5.5 points [95% CI, 3.0-7.9 points]; lung cancer, 7.7 points [95% CI, 4.3-11.1]; colorectal cancer, 4.5 points [95% CI, 2.1-6.9 points]; all P < .001) were most affected, irrespective of the type of cancer. The association with global HRQoL was most pronounced in lung cancer (6.7 points [95% CI, 3.5-9.9 points]; P < .001) and pancreatic cancer (5.4 points [95% CI, 3.3-7.5 points]; P < .001) and less in colorectal cancer (3.5 points [95% CI, 1.3-5.7 points]; P = .002) and breast cancer (2.4 points [95% CI, 1.0-3.9 points]; P = .001). The second progression was associated with an even larger decrease in HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that disease progression is associated with a deterioration in HRQoL among patients with metastatic breast, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer. This evidence highlights the importance of progression-related end points, such as time to progression and progression-free survival, as additional patient-relevant end points when evaluating the benefit of new treatments for patients with metastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Marschner
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Zacharias
- Kompetenzzentrum für klinische Studien Bremen, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Martens
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik Tumorforschung, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, OnkoZentrum, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Gleiber
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik I, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie/Allergologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Sabine Bohnet
- Med. Klinik III, Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lisa Kruggel
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Arnd Nusch
- Praxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Ratingen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Decker
- Studienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Martina Jänicke
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
He T, Yang W, Zhang X, Li P, Yang D, Wu Y, Fan Y, Xiang M, Huang Q, Chen J, Zhou R, Lv Q, Chen J. Comparative effectiveness of tamoxifen, toremifene, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane on lipid profiles in breast cancer patients: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e18550. [PMID: 31914031 PMCID: PMC6959941 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy is a vital portion of postoperative comprehensive treatment for breast cancer patients. In recent years, studies have shown that endocrine therapy has a certain impact on the serum lipids of breast cancer patients, and the changes of lipid profiles may bring a series of problems. However, very few studies focus on this issue to date. The results of these studies are inconsistent, and the influence of different adjuvant endocrine modalities on lipid profiles still remains controversial. In order to better explore this issue, we conduct this network meta-analysis. METHOD The protocol followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols. Three main databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) will be searched systematically for eligible randomized controlled trials without language restriction. In addition, a manual search of the references of relevant published studies will also be considered. Two reviewers will conduct studies selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment independently. The primary outcome is the variation of biochemical parameters - the serum lipid profiles (cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, low low-density lipoprotein). RESULTS The results will provide useful information about the side effects of different adjuvant endocrine drugs on lipid profiles in postoperative breast cancer patients (estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive). CONCLUSION The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019129850.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao He
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine
| | - Wenhao Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, West China Second Hospital/West China School of Medicine
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ping Li
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dandan Yang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yunhao Wu
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuan Fan
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine
| | - Mengya Xiang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qianqian Huang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Chen
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Runke Zhou
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, Ruddy K, Tsang J, Cardoso F. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:66. [PMID: 31548545 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1302] [Impact Index Per Article: 260.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women worldwide and is curable in ~70-80% of patients with early-stage, non-metastatic disease. Advanced breast cancer with distant organ metastases is considered incurable with currently available therapies. On the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease; molecular features include activation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, encoded by ERBB2), activation of hormone receptors (oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and/or BRCA mutations. Treatment strategies differ according to molecular subtype. Management of breast cancer is multidisciplinary; it includes locoregional (surgery and radiation therapy) and systemic therapy approaches. Systemic therapies include endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive disease, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive disease, bone stabilizing agents, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for BRCA mutation carriers and, quite recently, immunotherapy. Future therapeutic concepts in breast cancer aim at individualization of therapy as well as at treatment de-escalation and escalation based on tumour biology and early therapy response. Next to further treatment innovations, equal worldwide access to therapeutic advances remains the global challenge in breast cancer care for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- LMU Munich, University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCLMU), Munich, Germany.
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Javier Cortes
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain.,Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Kathryn Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Janice Tsang
- Hong Kong Breast Oncology Group, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Decker T, Marschner N, Muendlein A, Welt A, Hagen V, Rauh J, Schröder H, Jaehnig P, Potthoff K, Lerchenmüller C. VicTORia: a randomised phase II study to compare vinorelbine in combination with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus versus vinorelbine monotherapy for second-line chemotherapy in advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:637-647. [PMID: 31115844 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Improving the outcome of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer experiencing tumour progression following first-line chemotherapy remains an urgent medical need. The purpose of the VicTORia trial was to show superiority of everolimus in combination with vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced HER2 negative breast cancer. METHODS In this randomised phase II trial, 133 patients were recruited in 32 centres in Germany. Patients were randomised 1:1 to second-line chemotherapy either with vinorelbine plus everolimus (arm1) or vinorelbine alone (arm2). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS rate at 6 months, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Baseline PI3 K mutational status was determined in plasma samples. RESULTS Median progression-free survival was not different between arms (arm1 vs. arm2: 4.01 months, 95% CI 2.40-6.09 vs. 4.08, 95% CI 2.80-5.33). PFS rate at 6 months (arm1 vs. arm2: 39.4%, 95% CI 27.6-50.9% vs. 36.6%, 95% CI 24.6-48.6%), median OS (arm1 vs. arm2: 16.3 months, 95% CI 11.4-19.0 vs. 13.8 months, 95% CI 10.2-19.1) and ORR were not different between arms. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (50% vs. 40%), gastrointestinal toxicities (19.1% vs. 6.1%), and infections (19.1% vs. 7.7%). PI3 K mutational status was neither associated with PFS nor with OS. CONCLUSION Although well tolerated, the efficacy of everolimus and vinorelbine combination therapy was not superior to vinorelbine monotherapy. There was no correlation between PI3 K mutational status and efficacy. EudracCT No 2011-001024-38, ClinicalTrials.gov No NCT01520103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Elisabethenstraße 19, 88212, Ravensburg, Germany.
| | - Norbert Marschner
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie GbR, Wirthstraße 11c, 79110, Freiburg Im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Axel Muendlein
- VIVIT Labor, Campus V, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Volker Hagen
- St Johannes Hospital, Johannesstraße 9-13, 44137, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jaqueline Rauh
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Innere Medizin, Pferdebachstraße 29, 58455, Witten, Germany
| | - Helge Schröder
- AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Jaehnig
- ICRC-Weyer GmbH, Bölschestraße 35, 12587, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Potthoff
- iOMEDICO AG, Ellen-Gottlieb-Straße 19, 79106, Freiburg Im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Christian Lerchenmüller
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Steinfurter Straße 60B, 48149, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Marschner N, Trarbach T, Rauh J, Meyer D, Müller-Hagen S, Harde J, Dille S, Kruggel L, Jänicke M. Quality of life in pre- and postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis from the prospective MaLife project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 175:701-712. [PMID: 30868393 PMCID: PMC6534521 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05197-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Quality of life (QoL) plays an important role in recovery—especially after an incisive diagnosis such as breast cancer. Here, we present a comprehensive assessment of QoL for pre- and postmenopausal patients, starting from initial systemic treatment of early breast cancer until 3 years later, in patients from a so-called “real-world” setting. Methods 251 premenopausal and 478 postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer have been recruited into the longitudinal MaLife project within the prospective, multicentre, German Tumour Registry Breast Cancer between 2011 and 2015. The questionnaires FACT-G, FACT-Taxane, FACT-ES, EORTC QLQ-BR23, BFI and HADS were filled in at start of treatment (T0), 6, 12, 24 and 36 months later. The proportion of patients with clinically meaningful changes at 36 months was determined. Results This first interim analysis shows that the FACT-G global QoL improved over time regardless of the menopausal status. However, clinically meaningful decrease of social/family well-being (48–51%), arm symptoms (44–49%) and symptoms of neurotoxicity (55–56%) was frequently reported 3 years after start of treatment. Many premenopausal patients also reported a clinically meaningful worsening of endocrine symptoms (64%), emotional well-being (36%) and fatigue intensity (37%). Additionally, 3 years after start of treatment, 15% of the patients were classified as doubtful cases and 18% as definite cases of anxiety. Conclusions Despite improvements in global QoL, breast cancer survivors report worsened ailments 3 years after start of therapy. Follow-up care should distinguish between premenopausal patients needing special attention for emotional/menopausal issues, and postmenopausal patients needing particular care regarding physical concerns. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05197-whttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05197-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Marschner
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Wirthstrasse 11c, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Tanja Trarbach
- MVZ des Klinikums Wilhelmshaven, Zentrum für Tumorbiologie, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Johanna Harde
- Department of Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Lisa Kruggel
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martina Jänicke
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A, Papadopoulos E, Aapro M, André F, Harbeck N, Aguilar Lopez B, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Biganzoli L, Boers-Doets CB, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Diéras V, El Saghir NS, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Gelmon K, Johnston SRD, Kaufman B, Koppikar S, Krop IE, Mayer M, Nakigudde G, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Paluch-Shimon S, Penault-Llorca F, Prat A, Rugo HS, Sledge GW, Spence D, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Xu B, Norton L, Winer EP. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1634-1657. [PMID: 30032243 PMCID: PMC7360146 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 761] [Impact Index Per Article: 126.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- F Cardoso
- European School of Oncology (ESO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - E Senkus
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - A Costa
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - M Aapro
- Oncology Department, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | - F André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - B Aguilar Lopez
- Direction Office, ULACCAM (Union Latinoamericana Contra el Cáncer de la Mujer), Mexico DF, Mexico
| | - C H Barrios
- Department of Oncology, PURCS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute & University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Biganzoli
- European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) and Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovo Ospedale di Prato - Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy
| | | | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation and Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortés
- Department of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - V Diéras
- Gynaecology and Breast Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - N S El Saghir
- Breast Center of Excellence, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - A Eniu
- Breast Cancer Department, Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - L Fallowfield
- SHORE-C, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - P A Francis
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - K Gelmon
- Medical Oncology Department, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - B Kaufman
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - S Koppikar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | - I E Krop
- Breast Oncology Center Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Mayer
- Advanced BC.org, New York, USA
| | - G Nakigudde
- Advocacy Department, UWOCASO (Uganda Women's Cancer Support Organization), Kampala, Uganda
| | - B V Offersen
- European Society of Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) and Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology & Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S Ohno
- Cancer Institute Hospital, Breast Oncology Centre, Tokyo, Japan
| | - O Pagani
- Institute of Oncology of Southern Switzerland, Geneva University Hospitals, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Oncology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
| | - A Prat
- IDIBAPS (Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi iSunyer), Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumor, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H S Rugo
- Breast Oncology Clinical Trials Education, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - G W Sledge
- Oncology Division, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA
| | - D Spence
- Policy Department, Breast Cancer Network Australia, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - C Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenburg, Halle, Germany
| | - D A Vorobiof
- Oncology Department, Sandton Oncology Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - L Norton
- Breast Cancer Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - E P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Susan Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Breast Oncology Center, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment of 1650 patients with early breast cancer in routine care in Germany: data from the prospective TMK cohort study. Breast Cancer 2017; 25:275-283. [PMID: 29204847 PMCID: PMC5906523 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-017-0823-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several regimens for which efficacy was established in randomized controlled trials are recommended in current treatment guidelines for early breast cancer. However, knowledge on use and effectiveness of commonly administered chemotherapeutic agents in real-life care and across all breast cancer subtypes is limited. METHODS The prospective, multicentre German TMK cohort study (Tumour Registry Breast Cancer) recruited patients in 148 oncology outpatient-centres. Data from 1650 patients who completed adjuvant chemotherapy were analysed regarding treatment regimens and taxane use from 2007 to 2014. The association of patient characteristics with application of taxane-free regimens was examined with a multivariate regression model. RESULTS The preferred adjuvant treatment shifted from fluorouracil, anthracycline and cyclophosphamide containing regimens to anthracycline/taxane combinations. Taxane use increased for all subtypes, and the greatest rise was among node-negative patients. Older age, node-negativity, lower grading, HR-positive/HER2-negative subtype and earlier start year of therapy were significantly associated with taxane-free therapy. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy in Germany has been rising for every subtype. The increased taxane use reflects updated guideline recommendations over the past decade. Cohort studies like the TMK provide insight into real-life treatment of patients outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
36
|
Routine treatment and outcome of breast cancer in younger versus elderly patients: results from the SENORA project of the prospective German TMK cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 167:567-578. [PMID: 29030786 PMCID: PMC5790852 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4534-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Purpose There is an ongoing discussion about ‘undertreatment’ of breast cancer in elderly patients. Due to low accrual into clinical trials, level 1 evidence is scarce. We report prospective data of elderly patients with breast cancer treated by medical oncologists in Germany. Methods The SENORA project within the prospective cohort study TMK (Tumour Registry Breast Cancer) was conducted in 82 centres from 2007–2015. Among 2316 patients, half were enrolled with curative and half with palliative treatment intention. Overall, 478 patients (21%) were aged ≥ 70. Results In the adjuvant setting, elderly patients aged ≥ 70 had more advanced tumour stages at diagnosis and a higher prevalence of comorbidities than younger patients. Elderly patients received adjuvant chemotherapy less frequently, yet the 3-year disease-free survival was similar (86% vs. 88%). In the palliative setting, elderly patients more frequently received endocrine therapy and less frequently chemotherapy. Their median overall survival [24.9 months, 95% CI (confidence interval) 20.0–30.2] was significantly shorter than that of younger patients (39.7 months, 95% CI 34.9–44.2). A Cox proportional hazards model showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for: age ≥ 70 at start of therapy, negative HR- or HER2-status, higher number of metastatic sites, more comorbidities and high tumour grading at diagnosis. Conclusions Our results shed light on the routine treatment of elderly patients with breast cancer. A regression model demonstrated that age is but one of various prognostic factors determining the shorter overall survival of elderly patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Persistent impairments 3 years after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from the MaTox project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 165:721-731. [PMID: 28677012 PMCID: PMC5602000 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4365-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Although treatment for early breast cancer improved prognosis greatly, it can have significant long-term consequences, which must be considered during treatment decision. Methods 453 patients with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment intention were recruited into the MaTox project within the prospective, multicentre, population-based German TMK cohort study (Tumour Registry Breast Cancer) between 2008 and 2009. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on 26 treatment-related symptoms were assessed via a specifically designed questionnaire at 4 weeks, 6 months, 18 months and 3 years after start of systemic treatment. Results The results show that alterations in smell, taste and appetite were clearly improved 3 years after treatment. In contrast, post-surgical symptoms, restrictions in memory/attention, musculoskeletal system and polyneuropathy worsened substantially over time and were persistent after 3 years: 78% of the patients recorded impairment in memory, 73% muscle pain, 67% pain at the operated site and 57% paraesthesia in fingers or toes. A logistic regression model showed that risk factors for developing persistent paraesthesia symptoms were age, early paraesthesia symptoms and taxane-based therapy. Conclusions Our data show that most patients with breast cancer have persistent impairments negatively influencing their daily life even 3 years after treatment. Furthermore, we highlight areas requiring special attention in follow-up care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4365-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|