Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: A 5-year prospective study

Oral Anticancer Therapies: Addressing Nonadherence in Patients With Breast Cancer

This review aims to investigate the issue of treatment nonadherence and to present the available strategies to improve adherence to oral treatments in breast cancer. A literature search was conducted to contextualise the issue of nonadherence, investigate the reasons behind nonadherence, and demonstrate strategies to address treatment nonadherence in breast cancer. Findings indicate that adherence rates decrease while discontinuation rates increase with increasing lengths of breast cancer treatment course. Lack of adherence is proven to be detrimental to treatment outcomes. Patients struggle to adhere to treatment due to inadequate relationships with healthcare providers, lack of information, psychological distress, and side effects. Healthcare providers should evaluate patient's experience to provide the necessary support. Following this assessment, healthcare providers may recommend interventions addressing patient knowledge, psychological distress or side effects. Treatment adherence remains an issue for oral therapeutics in breast cancer. After patient assessment, healthcare providers can offer personalised strategies to improve treatment adherence. The most crucial interventions address patient knowledge, psychological distress, and side effects.

Optimizing the Use of Personal Values to Promote Medication Adherence: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Affective and Behavioral Responses to Theory-Driven Domain Congruent Versus Incongruent Values Approaches

BACKGROUND

Self-affirmation theory (SAT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) embody competing approaches to leveraging personal values to motivate behavior change but are rarely compared in the domain of health behavior. This study compares these theory-driven values-based interventions for promoting medication adherence.

PURPOSE

To compare affective and behavioral responses to competing values-based medication adherence interventions.

METHODS

In this three-armed randomized trial, participants with cancer (n = 95) or diabetes (n = 97) recruited online using Prolific and prescribed daily oral medication for that disease completed a one-session online writing intervention leveraging (1) a domain incongruent (DI) value, where the value was not connected to medication adherence; (2) a domain congruent (DC) value, where the value was connected to adherence; or (3) a control condition, focused on medication adherence procedures.

RESULTS

There were no main effects of conditions on reported medication adherence at the 1-month follow-up. During the intervention, positive affect was higher in the values conditions than control (p < .001), and trended higher in DI versus DC (p = .054). Negative affect did not vary between the values and control groups (p = .093) but was lower in DI versus DC (p = .006). Improvements in positive affect over the course of the intervention were associated with increased adherence behavior for individuals who started with low levels of positive affect (p = .003). Disease type did not moderate findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with SAT, focusing on DI values led to more positive and less negative affect than connecting values directly to behavior in a threatening domain such as chronic illness. For some participants, increases in positive affect predicted greater adherence.

Social Characteristics and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

PURPOSESocial characteristics, including cohabitation/marital status and socioeconomic position (SEP)-education level, employment status, and income-influence breast cancer prognosis. We investigated the impact of these social characteristics on adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) from treatment initiation to 5 years after diagnosis.METHODSWe assembled a nationwide, population-based cohort of premenopausal women diagnosed in Denmark with stage I-III, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer during 2002-2011. We ascertained prediagnostic social characteristics from national registries. AET adherence was based on information from the Danish Breast Cancer Group and operationalized as (1) adherence trajectories (from group-based trajectory modeling) and (2) early discontinuation. We computed odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% CI to estimate the association of cohabitation and SEP with AET adherence using multinomial and logistic regression models adjusted according to directed acyclic graphs.RESULTSAmong 4,353 patients, we identified three adherence trajectories-high adherence (57%), slow decline (36%), and rapid decline (6.9%). Compared with cohabiting women, those living alone had higher ORs of slow (1.26 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.46]) or rapid decline (1.66 [95% CI, 1.27 to 2.18]) versus high adherence. The corresponding ORs for women not working versus employed women were 1.22 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.45) and 1.76 (95% CI, 1.30 to 2.38). For early discontinuation (17%), the ORs were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.78) for living alone and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.78) for women not working.CONCLUSIONAdherence to AET was lower among women living alone or unemployed than cohabiting or employed women, respectively. These women may benefit from support programs to enhance AET adherence.

Phase Ia/b Study of Giredestrant ± Palbociclib and ± Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Giredestrant is an investigational next-generation, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We present the primary analysis results of the phase Ia/b GO39932 study (NCT03332797).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ER+, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy received single-agent giredestrant (10, 30, 90, or 250 mg), or giredestrant (100 mg) ± palbociclib 125 mg ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Detailed cardiovascular assessment was conducted with giredestrant 100 mg. Endpoints included safety (primary), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy.

RESULTS

As of January 28, 2021, with 175 patients enrolled, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Adverse events (AE) related to giredestrant occurred in 64.9% and 59.4% of patients in the single-agent ± LHRH agonist and giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohorts, respectively (giredestrant-only-related grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 4.5% of patients across the single-agent cohorts and 3.1% of those with giredestrant + palbociclib). Dose-dependent asymptomatic bradycardia was observed, but no clinically significant changes in cardiac-related outcomes: heart rate, blood pressure, or exercise duration. Clinical benefit was observed in all cohorts (48.6% of patients in the single-agent cohort and 81.3% in the giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohort), with no clear dose relationship, including in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Giredestrant was well tolerated and clinically active in patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Results warrant further evaluation of giredestrant in randomized trials in early- and late-stage ER+ breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer

PURPOSE

Mammography screening has increased the detection of subcentimeter breast cancers. The prognosis for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancers is excellent; however, the necessity of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is uncertain.

METHODS

We evaluated the effectiveness of adjuvant ET in patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2012. Standard ET was administrated after surgery. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Adjuvant ET was administered to 3991 (83%) of the 4758 eligible patients (1202 T1a [25.3%] and 3556 T1b [74.7%], diseases). The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The 9-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 1.5% with ET and 2.6% without ET (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93). In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for distant metastasis were no history of ET, mastectomy, high-grade, and lymphatic invasion. The 9-year overall survival was 97.0% and 94.4% with and without ET, respectively (adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83). In addition, adjuvant ET reduced the incidence of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer (9-year rates; 1.1% vs. 6.9%; sHR, 0.17, and 1.9% vs. 5.2%; sHR, 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis was favorable in patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative T1a/bN0M0 breast cancer. Furthermore, adjuvant ET reduced the incidence of distant metastasis with minimal absolute risk difference. These findings support considering the omission of adjuvant ET, especially for patients with low-grade and no lymphatic invasion disease.

Neoadjuvant palbociclib plus either giredestrant or anastrozole in oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer (coopERA Breast Cancer): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The development of more potent selective oestrogen receptor antagonists and degraders (SERDs) that can be orally administered could help to address the limitations of current endocrine therapies. We report the primary and final analyses of the coopERA Breast Cancer study, designed to test whether giredestrant, a highly potent, non-steroidal, oral SERD, would show a stronger anti-proliferative effect than anastrozole after 2 weeks for oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, postmenopausal women were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had clinical T stage (cT)1c to cT4a-c (≥1·5 cm within cT1c) oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; and baseline Ki67 score of at least 5%. The study was conducted at 59 hospital or clinic sites in 11 countries globally. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to giredestrant 30 mg oral daily or anastrozole 1 mg oral daily on days 1-14 (window-of-opportunity phase) via an interactive web-based system with permuted-block randomisation with block size of four. Randomisation was stratified by cT stage, baseline Ki67 score, and progesterone receptor status. A 16-week neoadjuvant phase comprised the same regimen plus palbociclib 125 mg oral daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, for four cycles. The primary endpoint was geometric mean relative Ki67 score change from baseline to week 2 in patients with complete central Ki67 scores at baseline and week 2 (window-of-opportunity phase). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04436744) and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 4, 2020, and June 22, 2021, 221 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (n=112; median age 62·0 years [IQR 57·0-68·5]) or anastrozole plus palbociclib group (n=109; median age 62·0 [57·0-67·0] years). 15 (7%) of 221 patients were Asian, three (1%) were Black or African American, 194 (88%) were White, and nine (4%) were unknown races. At data cutoff for the primary analysis (July 19, 2021), the geometric mean relative reduction of Ki67 from baseline to week 2 was -75% (95% CI -80 to -70) with giredestrant and -67% (-73 to -59) with anastrozole (p=0·043), meeting the primary endpoint. At the final analysis (data cutoff Nov 24, 2021), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29 [26%] of 112 in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group vs 29 [27%] of 109 in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group) and decreased neutrophil count (17 [15%] vs 16 [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in five (4%) patients in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group and in two (2%) patients in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group. There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient died due to an adverse event in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (myocardial infarction).

INTERPRETATION

Giredestrant offers encouraging anti-proliferative and anti-tumour activity and was well tolerated, both as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib. Results justify further investigation in ongoing trials.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Investigation of Factors Affecting Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Adherence and persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) are seldom maintained among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) survivors, despite the significant clinical benefits of long-term AHT. As the factors influencing adherence to AHT remain unclear, this study aimed to comprehensively identify such factors and classify them into specific dimensions.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for qualified articles. The search mainly focused on three components: early-stage (0-III) BC, oral AHT administration, and adherence to AHT, with keywords derived from MeSH and entry terms. The factors identified were then classified into six categories based on a modified WHO multidimensional model.

RESULTS

Overall, 146 studies were included; the median sample size was 651 (range, 31-40,009), and the mean age of the population was 61.5 years (standard deviation, 8.3 years). Patient- and therapy-related factors were the most frequently investigated factors. Necessity/concern beliefs and self-efficacy among patient-related factors were consistently related to better adherence than depression. Although drug side effects and medication use cannot be modified easily, a refined prescription strategy for the initiation and switching of AHT is likely to increase adherence levels.

CONCLUSION

An effective psychological program that encourages positive views and beliefs about medication and management strategies for each therapy may be necessary to improve adherence to AHT. Social support and a sense of belonging can be enhanced through community participation and social media for better adherence to AHT. Patient-centered communication and appropriate recommendations by physicians may be attributable to better adherence outcomes. Findings from systematically organized factors that influence adherence to AHT may contribute to the establishment of intervention strategies to benefit patients with early-stage BC to achieve optimal health.

Assessing Adherence to Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) increases overall survival (OS). A lack of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy is common, 31.0-73.0% of women discontinue endocrine treatment before 5 years. The aim of the study was to assess adherence to HT in routine clinical practice in patients assisted at the Clinical Oncology Department of the Hospital de Clinicas - Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay.

METHODS

Patients treated with HT for stage 0-III BC between 2017 and 2019 were included. The medication possession (MPR) rate was calculated using pharmacy records, and the Morisky-Green Scale was applied to assess adherence. Adherent patients were those with MPR ≥ 0.80 and who correctly answered the Morisky-Green treatment adherence questionnaire. The association of adherence with polypharmacy, treatment, and patient characteristics was assessed using simple logistic models. The associations between qualitative variables and adherence were assessed using simple logistic regression model or Fisher's exact test. The association between quantitative variables and adherence was assessed using the Student's t-test. The odds ratio (OR) for non-adherence to treatment and its 95% confidence interval were estimated.

RESULTS

Totally, 118 patients were included; 65.2% were treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), 36.0% presenting polypharmacy. The adherence rate at the end of 2 years was 81.0 %; and it was associated with age (P = 0.03, OR = 0.96 for non-adherence), with adherent and non-adherent patients having a mean age of 65.0 and 60.3 years, respectively; however, adherence was not associated with polypharmacy, territory of origin, marital status, living alone, level of education, occupation, or stage. The adherence profile was similar for both drugs, but homemakers and retired women showed greater adherence to AI.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to HT was assessed in real life, with 19.0% of the patients not adhering to the treatment, despite the known benefit for OS, being a well-tolerated treatment, and being provided free of charge. Older patients were associated with being more adherent. The results show the need of the Pharmacy Service and Department of Clinical Oncology Medical Oncology combining efforts to develop coordinated strategies and interventions to increase adherence, given the impact that this may have on patients' OS.

Survival benefits associated with being adherent and having longer persistence to adjuvant hormone therapy across up to five years among U.S. Medicare population with breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess associations between adherence to and persistence with adjuvant hormone therapy and mortality among older women with breast cancer.

METHODS

The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data linked with U.S. Medicare claims was used. This study included older women diagnosed with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from 2009 through 2017. Adherence was defined as having proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 0.80. Persistence was defined as having no discontinuation, i.e., no break of ≥ 180 continuous days. Length of persistence was calculated as time from therapy initiation to discontinuation. Cox models with time-dependent covariates were used to assess associations between adherence and persistence with mortality.

RESULTS

This study included 25,796 women. Adherence rates were 78.1 percent, 75.2 percent, 72.4 percent, 70.0 percent, and 61.5 percent from year 1 to year 5 after hormone therapy initiation. Persistence rates were 87.5 percent, 81.7 percent, 77.1 percent, 72.9 percent, and 68.9 percent through cumulative intervals of 1 year up to 5 years. Adherence was associated with all-cause mortality but not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality. Persistent women had lower risk of all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality. Each additional year of persistence had additional contributions to survival benefits (11% decreased risk of all-cause mortality and 37% decreased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the detrimental effect of nonadherence to adjuvant hormone therapy across up to 5 years on all-cause survival in older U.S. women. It also reveals the survival benefits associated with having longer persistence across up to 5 years.

Compliance to adjuvant endocrine therapy and survival in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Data on compliance to adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) is mainly reported from prospective clinical trials or from smaller retrospective cohorts without correlation to outcome.

AIMS

To determine compliance to adjuvant ET and the impact on survival in a population-based series of patients with early breast cancer (BC) advised ET.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1090 consecutive patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) stage I-III BC diagnosed from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2003 from one health care region of Sweden were included. Data on tumour, type of ET, compliance, reason for termination and outcome were collected. Statistical analyses were calculated with patients in three groups.

RESULTS

72 patients were excluded leaving 1018 patients with a HR+ stage I to III BC for analyses. The most common ET was tamoxifen (n = 751, 73.8%). At the last follow up (31 Dec 2019) with a median follow-up of 18 years (interquartile range 16-22) 228 (22.4%) patients had a relapse. 71.1% of the included patients were compliant to endocrine therapy. Older patients ≥74 years had lower compliance, 61% compared with 75% in the other age groups (≤50 years and 51-73 years) (p < 0001), other parameters including type of ET were not associated with compliance. Low compliance remained as an independent risk factor in multivariate analyses for lower relapse-free survival, HR=1.83, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.52-2.19, p < 0.001 and for time to BC death, HR=2.69, 95%CI 1.82-3.98, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients compliant to adjuvant ET have an improved survival.

Adherence to endocrine therapy in early breast cancer in relation to Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype: a comparison between pharmacy dispensation data and medical records

PURPOSE

Suboptimal adherence to adjuvant endocrine treatment (AET) is an important clinical concern. A correlation between CYP2D6 activity and tamoxifen discontinuation has been described. The main aim of this study was to investigate the consistency between pharmacy dispensation data and medical records on adherence to AET.

METHODS

Adherence was calculated for patients with at least 4.5 years of follow up and was defined as Medical Possession Rate ≥ 80%. Subgroup analyses were performed based on menopausal status, recurrence risk and CYP2D6 activity.

RESULTS

In 86% of the 1235 included patients the consistency between the two sources of information was within 80-125%. Poor consistency, < 80%, was most frequent in the premenopausal/ high-risk group and CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers (PMs). Among 899 patients with at least 4.5 years follow up, 72% were adherent to tamoxifen based on pharmacy dispensation data, compared with 77% as reported by medical records. When including patients who switched to aromatase inhibitors after tamoxifen, adherence increased to 82% and 88%, respectively. Adherence did not differ by menopausal status or risk for recurrence. CYP2D6 PMs had poorer adherence (54%) to tamoxifen compared to patients with the highest CYP2D6 activity (83%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a good consistency between medical records and pharmacy dispensing data on the use of AET. Adherence to AET was adequate, especially when including switch to aromatase inhibitors. Surprisingly, CYP2D6 PMs had low adherence to tamoxifen, despite a likely reduced risk of side effects according to previous data.

Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces breast cancer recurrence and mortality of women with hormone-receptor-positive tumors, but poor adherence remains a significant problem. The aim of this study was to analyze AET side effects and their impact on adherence to treatment.

METHODS

A total of 373 breast cancer patients treated with AET filled out a specific questionnaire during their follow up visits at the Breast Unit of our Centre.

RESULTS

Side effects were reported by 81% of patients, 84% of those taking tamoxifen and 80% of those taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). The most common side effect in the tamoxifen group was hot flashes (55.6%), while in the AI group it was arthralgia (60.6%). The addition of GnRH agonists to both tamoxifen and AI significantly worsened all menopausal symptoms. Overall, 12% of patients definitively discontinued AET due to side effects, 6.4% during the first 5 years and 24% during extended therapy. Patients who had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy reported a significantly lower discontinuation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

AET side effects represent a significant problem in breast cancer survivors leading to irregular assumption and discontinuation of therapy. Adherence to AET may be improved by trustful patient-physician communication and a good-quality care network.

5-year adherence to adjuvant endocrine treatment in Dutch women with early stage breast cancer: A population-based database study (2006-2016)

BACKGROUND

Hormonal receptor (HR) positive breast tumors are common. Adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) with tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) is beneficial depending on the stage of the tumor. Despite the fact that AHT has been shown to improve survival and recurrence, Dutch adherence rates, which were mostly dependent on Tamoxifen prescriptions until 2006, plummeted from 80% after one year to 50% after five years. Nonadherence with AHT reduces its effectiveness. This research presents more recent adherence statistics (from 2006 to 2016), on a larger sample (7,996 vs 1,451), as well as factors that influence AHT adherence. In addition to tamoxifen data, AIs are now included.

OBJECTIVE

As low use of adjuvant endocrine therapy is a potentially important and modifiable risk factor for poor outcome, it is important to monitor the rate as an indicator of women's burden of disease and the direction of adherence trends.

METHODS

The Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) was used to find women with early-stage breast cancer who started AHT within a year of surgery and were linked to the PHARMO Database Network (n = 8,679). The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to measure AHT adherence five years after treatment was started, with a 60-day gap between refills as our primary outcome. Furthermore, the Medication Possession Rate (MPR) was determined using a cutoff of ≥80%. Analysis was performed on influential factors of adherence.

RESULTS

The proportion of persistent women declined over time to reach 46.6% at the end of the fifth year and 53.3% of the women had a MPR ≥80% during the fifth year. Older and being diagnosed in 2006-2010 were associated with AHT adherence.

CONCLUSION

Dutch 5-year AHT adherence appears to remain poor. Improving AHT adherence in HR+ breast cancer survivors is a critical medical need.

Revisiting agency and medical health technology: actor network theory and breast cancer survivors' perspectives on an adherence tool

Purpose

Optimal treatment adherence is critical in the management of breast cancer patients/survivors taking hormonal therapy. However, lack of adherence is common. Many technologies have been developed to encourage medication intake, such as reminders on phones or digital pills, with varying degrees of success.

Methods

To explore the role of technology in medical adherence requires a framework that considers all complexities of technology, from software to the end user's beliefs. Actor Network Theory (ANT) defines technology based on its technical, social, and abstract components. We conducted three focus groups, which we analyzed using a thematic analysis to determine topics in breast cancer survivors' discussions of these technologies. We also conducted a deductive content analysis using ANT concepts as codes.

Results

In discussing the use of technology to improve medical adherence, participants had an empowering view of technology (48.8%) a neutral one (41.5%) or a disempowering view (9.8%). When it comes to their medication adherence, breast cancer survivors taking hormonal therapy perceived technology as something on which they could assert agency while their own agency dictated their adherence behaviors.

Conclusions

In line with a non-technologically deterministic view of medical technologies, this finding shows that technology can be both constraining and enabling, depending on the specific context of human use. This networked understanding of technology in terms of social dynamics has relevant implications in designing interventions that use technology to improve adherence.

Systematic adaptation of the adherence improving self-management strategy to support breast cancer survivors' adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy: An intervention mapping approach

OBJECTIVE

Non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for breast cancer leads to increased recurrence and mortality risk and healthcare costs. Evidence on feasible, effective AET adherence interventions is scarce. This paper describes the systematic adaptation of the cost-effective adherence improving self-management strategy (AIMS) for patients with HIV to AET for women after breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

We followed the intervention mapping protocol for adapting interventions by conducting a needs assessment, reviewing target behaviours and determinants, reassessing behaviour change methods and adapting programme content. Therefore, we performed a literature review, consulted behavioural theory and organised nine advisory board meetings with patients and healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

Non-adherence occurs frequently among AET users. Compared to HIV treatment, AET is less effective, and AET side effects are more burdensome. This drives AET treatment discontinuation. However, the key determinants of non-adherence are largely similar to HIV treatment (e.g. motivation, self-regulation and patient-provider relationship); therefore, most strategies in AIMS-HIV also seem suitable for AIMS-AET. Modifications were required, however, regarding supporting patients with coping with side effects and sustaining treatment motivation.

CONCLUSION

AIMS seems to be a suitable framework for adherence self-management across conditions and treatments. Intervention mapping offered a transparent, systematic approach to adapting AIMS-HIV to AET.

Adesão à Terapia Hormonal Adjuvante com Tamoxifeno e Anastrozol utilizando ARMS-12 e MMAS-4

Introdução: Entre os canceres de mama, aproximadamente 75% das mulheres são receptores hormonais positivos, sendo estas mais propensas a responderem a hormonioterapia com anastrozol e tamoxifeno. Apesar de eficazes, apresentam taxas significativas de não adesão. Objetivo: Avaliar a adesão a terapia hormonal adjuvante com tamoxifeno e anastrozol em pacientes atendidos nos Ambulatórios da Mastologia e de Quimioterapia do Hospital São Paulo entre os anos de 2019 e 2020. Método: Estudo transversal com 102 mulheres, realizado entre os meses de setembro de 2019 e marco de 2020. A adesão a terapia hormonal adjuvante foi avaliada utilizando-se as escalas Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) e Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale of 12 items (ARMS-12). Resultados: A média de idade foi de 61,5 anos (59,3-63,6). Entre as pacientes, 27,7% faziam uso de tamoxifeno e 72,3% de anastrozol. Relataram desconforto em relação ao uso do medicamento 84,4%, sendo as ondas de calor (42,2%) e as dores articulares (55,9%) os mais frequentes. A escala de ARMS>12 foi pontuada por 79,2%; cerca de 90% das mulheres pontuaram a MMAS-4 até dois pontos, porém não houve diferença significativa entre os tipos de hormônios utilizados para escalas de adesão (p=0,815 e p=0,489). Conclusão: A adesão a hormonioterapia observada foi relativamente baixa, independentemente da endocrinoterapia, podendo essas pacientes estarem em risco de inadequação quanto a resposta clínica.

Factors influencing five-year adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: A systematic review

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to determine the rate and identify correlates of adherence and persistence over five years of treatment with adjuvant endocrine therapy in female breast cancer patients.

Methods

Relevant articles were identified from Medline, Embase, AMED, PsycINFO, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and APA PsycArticles. Studies that measured patient adherence in the implementation or persistence phase for a period of at least five years using objective or multiple measures of adherence and investigated correlates of adherence were included. The titles, abstracts and full articles were screened and reviewed by two authors and any discrepancies were discussed with a third author.

Results

Twenty-six studies were included. Mean rate of adherence at five-year for implementation phase was 66.2% (SD = 17.3%), and mean persistence was 66.8% (SD = 14.5%). On average, adherence decreased by 25.5% (SD = 9.3%) from the first to fifth year. Higher rate of adherence was observed through self-report in comparison to database or medical record. Older age, younger age, higher comorbidity index, depression and adverse effects were associated with lower adherence. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors, received chemotherapy, and prior medication use were associated with improved adherence.

Conclusion

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy decreased from the first to fifth year of treatment. On average, one-third of patients were not adherent to treatment by the fifth year. Nineteen recurring factors were found to be significantly associated with long-term adherence in multiple studies. Further research using objective or multiple measures of adherence are needed to improve validity of results.

•

On average, adherence fell by 25.5% from the first to the fifth year of treatment.

•

Self-reported adherence may overestimate patient adherence.

•

Nineteen recurring factors were associated with adherence.

•

Having adverse effects was negatively associated with adherence.

Current Landscape: The Mechanism and Therapeutic Impact of Obesity for Breast Cancer

Obesity is defined as a chronic disease induced by an imbalance of energy homeostasis. Obesity is a widespread health problem with increasing prevalence worldwide. Breast cancer (BC) has already been the most common cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer death in women worldwide. Nowadays, the impact of the rising prevalence of obesity has been recognized as a nonnegligible issue for BC development, outcome, and management. Adipokines, insulin and insulin-like growth factor, sex hormone and the chronic inflammation state play critical roles in the vicious crosstalk between obesity and BC. Furthermore, obesity can affect the efficacy and side effects of multiple therapies such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, immunotherapy and weight management of BC. In this review, we focus on the current landscape of the mechanisms of obesity in fueling BC and the impact of obesity on diverse therapeutic interventions. An in-depth exploration of the underlying mechanisms linking obesity and BC will improve the efficiency of the existing treatments and even provide novel treatment strategies for BC treatment.

Management and outcomes of men diagnosed with primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Fewer than 1% of all breast cancers occur in men. As a result, a distinct lack of data exists regarding the management and outcomes in this cohort.

METHODS

Any male patient with pathologically confirmed breast cancer diagnosed between August 2000 and October 2017 at either Massachusetts General Hospital or Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and their affiliate satellite locations were included. Primary chart review was used to assess clinical and pathologic characteristics. Patient and treatment variables were reported via descriptive statistics. Local-regional failure (LRF), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

100 patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 112 months (range 1-220 months). Approximately 1/3 of patients experienced at least a 3-month delay to presentation. 83 patients ultimately underwent mastectomy as definitive surgical treatment. 46 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, and 37 patients received chemotherapy. Of 82 hormone receptor-positive patients with invasive cancer, 94% (n = 77) received endocrine therapy. Of the fifty-eight patients who underwent genetic testing, 15 (26%) tested positive. The 5-year OS, BCSS, DFS, and LRF rates were 91.5%, 96.2%, 86%, and 4.8%, respectively. Delay to presentation was not associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Male breast cancer remains a rare diagnosis. Despite this, the majority of patients in this study received standard of care therapy and experienced excellent oncologic outcomes. Penetration for genetic testing improved over time.

Endocrine therapy and radiotherapy use among older women with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

To examine patterns of radiotherapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) use, associations between RT omission and ET adherence, and associations among ET and RT use and disease recurrence in older women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

Women age 65 and older diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer between 2005 and 2018 and who did not undergo mastectomy were included. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the trends in practice patterns over time and by age. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate the probability of ET discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess associations between recurrence and ET/RT.

RESULTS

Of the 484 enrolled patients, 47.9% patients underwent RT and initiated ET, 27.4% received ET alone, 10.2% received RT alone, and 13.8% patients received neither. Older patients had a higher probability of receiving ET alone or neither ET nor RT (both p < 0.001). The probability of initiating ET was greater among patients who underwent RT than those who omitted RT (p < 0.001). Regardless of RT status (RT or no RT), initiation and continuation of ET may be associated with reduced risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Patients who opt for no adjuvant therapy, or who do not tolerate ET, are at increased risk of disease recurrence if they omit RT. Clinicians should consider the likelihood a patient will adhere to ET prior to recommending omission of RT.

Potentially Modifiable Factors Associated with Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, suboptimal adherence and persistence to AET remain important clinical issues. Understanding factors associated with adherence may help inform efforts to improve use of AET as prescribed. The present systematic review examined potentially modifiable factors associated with adherence to AET in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42019124200). All studies were included, whether factors were significantly associated with adherence or results were null. This review also accounted for the frequency with which a potentially modifiable factor was examined and whether univariate or multivariate models were used. This review also examined whether methodological or sample characteristics were associated with the likelihood of a factor being associated with AET adherence. A total of 68 articles were included. Potentially modifiable factors were grouped into six categories: side effects, attitudes toward AET, psychological factors, healthcare provider-related factors, sociocultural factors, and general/quality of life factors. Side effects were less likely to be associated with adherence in studies with retrospective or cross-sectional than prospective designs. Self-efficacy (psychological factor) and positive decisional balance (attitude toward AET) were the only potentially modifiable factors examined ≥10 times and associated with adherence or persistence ≥75% of the time in both univariate and multivariate models. Self-efficacy and decisional balance (i.e., weight of pros vs. cons) were the potentially modifiable factors most consistently associated with adherence, and hence may be worth focusing on as targets for interventions to improve AET adherence among breast cancer survivors.

Degree of Early Estrogen Response Predict Survival after Endocrine Therapy in Primary and Metastatic ER-Positive Breast Cancer

Endocrine therapy is the gold-standard treatment for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Although its clear benefit, patient compliance is poor (50-80%) due to its long administration period and adverse effects. Therefore, a predictive biomarker that can predict whether endocrine therapy is truly beneficial may improve patient compliance. In this study, we use estrogen response early gene sets of gene set enrichment assay algorithm as the score. We hypothesize that the score could predict the response to endocrine therapy and survival of breast cancer patients. A total of 6549 breast cancer from multiple patient cohorts were analyzed. The score was highest in ER-positive/HER2-negative compared to the other subtypes. Earlier AJCC stage, as well as lower Nottingham pathological grade, were associated with a high score. Low score tumors enriched only allograft rejection gene set, and was significantly infiltrated with immune cells, and high cytolytic activity score. A low score was significantly associated with a worse response to endocrine therapy and worse survival in both primary and metastatic breast cancer patients. The hazard ratio was double that of ESR1 expression. In conclusion, the estrogen response early score predicts response to endocrine therapy and is associated with survival in primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Predicting adjuvant endocrine therapy initiation and adherence among older women with early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

The CALGB 9343 trial demonstrated that women age 70 or older with early-stage, estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer (BC) may safely forgo radiation therapy (RT) and be treated with breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) alone. However, most patients in this population still undergo RT in part because AET adherence is low. We sought to develop a predictive model for AET initiation and adherence in order to improve decision-making with respect to RT omission.

METHODS

Women ages 70 and older with early-stage, ER + BC were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Comorbidities, socioeconomic measures, prescription medications, and demographics were collected as potential predictors. Bivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with AET initiation and adherence. Stepwise selection of significant predictors was used to develop logistic regression classifiers for initiation and adherence. Model performance was evaluated using the c-statistic and other measures.

RESULTS

11,037 patients met inclusion criteria. Within the cohort, 8703 (78.9%) patients initiated AET and 6685 (60.6%) were adherent to AET over 1 year. Bivariate predictors of AET initiation were similar to predictors of adherence. The best AET initiation and adherence classifiers were poorly predictive with c-statistics of 0.65 and 0.60, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The best models in the present study were poorly predictive, demonstrating that the reasons for initiation and adherence to AET are complex and individual to the patient, and therefore difficult to predict. Initiation and adherence to AET are important factors in decision-making regarding whether or not to forgo adjuvant RT. In order to better formulate treatment plans for this population, future work should focus on improving individual prediction of AET initiation and adherence.

Text Messaging to Increase Compliance with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer

Many breast cancer patients do not complete long-term hormonal therapies. Text messaging emerged as a tool to enhance medication compliance, but a trial of twice-weekly text message reminders (published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology) failed to improve adherence. The results, however, pave the way for 2nd generation texting approaches.

Why individual-level interventions are not enough: Systems-level determinants of oral anticancer medication adherence

Nonadherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs) in the United States is as low as 33% for some cancers. The reasons for nonadherence to these lifesaving medications are multifactorial, yet the majority of studies focus on patient-level factors influencing uptake and adherence. Individually based interventions to increase patient adherence have not been effective, and this warrants attention to factors at the payor, pharmaceutical, and clinical systems levels. Based on the authors' research and clinical experiences, this commentary brings fresh attention to the long-standing issue of OAM nonadherence, a growing quality-of-care issue, from a systems perspective. In this commentary, the key driving factors in pharmaceutical and payor systems (state and federal laws, payor/insurance companies, and pharmaceutical companies), clinical systems (hospitals and providers), and patient contexts that have trickle-down effects on patient adherence to OAMs are outlined. In the end, the authors' recommendations include examining the influence of laws governing OAM drug pricing, OAM supply, and provider reimbursement; reducing the need for prior authorization of long-approved OAMs; identifying cost-effective ways for providers to monitor nonadherence; examining issues of provider bias in OAM prescriptions; and further elucidating in which contexts patients are likely to be able to adhere. These recommendations offer a starting point for an examination of the chain of systems influencing patient adherence and may help to finally resolve persistently high levels of OAM nonadherence.

Prevalence of the co-prescription of tamoxifen and CYP2D6 inhibitors in Saudi population: A cross sectional study

Consumption of Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibiting drugs along with tamoxifen treatment results in decrease in plasma concentration of endoxifen, the major active tamoxifen metabolite. Simultaneous use of CYP2D6 inhibitors, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSIs), as well as lesser tamoxifen adherence may negatively impact tamoxifen efficacy in patients with breast cancer. The objective of our study was to assess the co-prescription of CYP2D6 inhibitors and tamoxifen use and also to relate concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use and tamoxifen adherence to breast cancer in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All patients treated for breast cancer who had at least one tamoxifen prescription in their electronic medical records (EMRs) from June 2015 to June 2017 were included. Patients who had other adjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded from the study. In total, 499 patients (25 males and 474 females) with breast cancer using tamoxifen were included. Our study was purely observational study revealed that prescription of weak inhibitors with tamoxifen increased in the second year as opposed to decrease in the prescription of strong inhibitors. Also, a substantial percentage of patient population were found to be non-adherent to the tamoxifen therapy in this study.

Comorbidity and polypharmacy in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer sufferers are aged ≥ 65 years, but research has focused infrequently on elderly patients with the majority of cancer. We aimed not only to determine the frequency of comorbidity and polypharmacy, but also to present the discrepiancies in elderly versus non-elderly patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 352 female patients aged over 18 years, 252 non-elderly and 100 elderly, followed-up in the oncology department of a tertiary hospital between January 2016 and September 2019 were retrospectively screened. Demographic data, comorbidity and medications of the patients were recorded hospital data processing system. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of ≥ 5 different medications.

RESULTS

The most common four chronic diseases in both non-elderly and elderly groups were muscle-joint-bone disease, gastrointestinal diseases, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The most common four prescribed drugs were NSAID, adjuvant endocrine therapy, PPI, and vitamin D or/and calcium in non-elderly group while those were ACEI-ARB, PPI, NSAID, and diuretics in elderly one. The frequency of polypharmacy was 50% (n = 126) in the non-elderly patients and 74% (n = 74) in the elderly ones. These were considered statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean number of prescription medication categories reported was 5.02 (SD = 2.90; range 0-14) in non-elderly group whereas those was 6.83 (SD = 3.18; range 0-15) in elderly one (p < 0.001). The mean of ages were 47.9 years (without polypharmacy) and 51.3 years (with polypharmacy) in non-elderly patients while those are, respectively, 70.9 years and 74.7 years in elderly ones. These were considered statistically significant (respectively; p = 0.006, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

We first gained to raise awareness in the literature of comorbidity and polypharmacy in patients with breast cancer and to compare between the elderly and non-elderly participants. For the effectiveness of cancer treatment, importance in geriatric population, attention to drug-drug interaction, such studies should be considered during clinical practice.