Multiplexed LNP-mRNA vaccination against pathogenic coronavirus species

Extracellular vesicle-mediated VEGF-A mRNA delivery rescues ischaemic injury with low immunogenicity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lackluster results from recently completed gene therapy clinical trials of VEGF-A delivered by viral vectors have heightened the need to develop alternative delivery strategies. This study aims to demonstrate the pre-clinical efficacy and safety of extracellular vesicles (EVs) loaded with VEGF-A mRNA for the treatment of ischaemic vascular disease.

METHODS

After encapsulation of full-length VEGF-A mRNA into fibroblast-derived EVs via cellular nanoporation (CNP), collected VEGF-A EVs were delivered into mouse models of ischaemic injury. Target tissue delivery was verified by in situ analysis of protein and gene expression. Functional rescue was confirmed by in vivo imaging and histology. The safety of single and serial delivery was demonstrated using immune-based assays.

RESULTS

VEGF-A EVs were generated with high mRNA content using a CNP methodology. VEGF-A EV administration demonstrated expression of exogenous VEGF-A mRNA by in situ RNA hybridization and elevated protein expression by western blot, microscopy, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mice treated with human VEGF-A EVs after femoral or coronary artery ligation exhibited heightened neovascularization in ischaemic tissues with increased arterial perfusion and improvement in left ventricular function, respectively. Serial delivery of VEGF-EVs in injured skin showed improved wound healing with repeat administration. Importantly, as compared with adeno-associated viral and lipid nanoparticle VEGF-A gene therapy modalities, murine VEGF-A EV delivery did not trigger innate or adaptive immune responses at the injection site or systemically.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that VEGF-A EV therapy offers efficient, dose-dependent VEGF-A protein formation with low immunogenicity, resulting in new vessel formation in murine models of ischaemic vascular disease.

A meta-analysis on the immunogenicity of prototype, monovalent-adapted and bivalent vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 wildtype, Omicron BA.1 and Omicron BA.4/5 in healthy adults

Although COVID-19 is no longer classified as the first public health emergency, nevertheless, it still presents a serious menace to the health of the global population. Consequently, the development of COVID-19 vaccines possessing an optimal composition that can elicit broad-spectrum neutralizing responses against various SARS-CoV-2 variants is crucial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the immunogenicity of prototype, monovalent-adapted, and bivalent COVID-19 vaccines against prototype SARS-CoV-2, Omicron BA.1 variant, and Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant in healthy adults. We utilized 4 medical databases to retrieve original studies and employed the fixed effect model to estimate pooled neutralization titers. A total of 12 studies concerning 4581 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. We found that participants who received prototype, monovalent-adapted, and bivalent vaccines as a second booster significantly developed neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers against prototype SARS-CoV-2, Omicron BA.1 variant, and Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant, with monovalent-adapted and bivalent vaccines exhibiting a higher increment. Furthermore, the bivalent(Prototype/Omicron BA.1) recombinant protein vaccine exhibited the highest increment in neutralization titers(MD = 1.95; 95 %CI:0.78-3.12; p < 0.01) against the prototype SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron BA.4/5 subvariant compared to the other vaccine regimens. Interestingly, only individuals who received the monovalent (Omicron BA.1)-adapted mRNA vaccine as a second booster showed the highest increase in neutralization titers (MD:1.37; 95 %CI:0.50-2.24; p < 0.01) against the Omicron BA.1 variant compared to the other vaccine regimens. These findings showed that bivalent recombinant protein vaccines seem more immunogenic than bivalent mRNA vaccines, and bivalent vaccines might not be superior immunogens for induced strong protective immune responses compared to monovalent-adapted vaccines.

Novel mRNA vaccines induce potent immunogenicity and afford protection against tuberculosis

Introduction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), a disease with a severe global burden. The intractability of Mtb has prevented the identification of clear correlates of protection against TB and hindered the development of novel TB vaccines that are urgently required. Lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-formulated mRNA is a highly promising vaccine platform that has yet to be thoroughly applied to TB.

Methods

We selected five Mtb antigens (PPE15, ESAT6, EspC, EsxI, MetE) and evaluated their potential as LNP-formulated mRNA vaccines, both when each antigen was delivered individually, and when all five antigens were combined in a mix regimen (m-Mix).

Results

Each mRNA construct demonstrated unique cellular and humoral immunogenicity, and both m-Mix, as well as the single antigen EsxI, conferred significant protection in a murine Mtb challenge model. Whilst the potent immune responses of each mRNA were maintained when applied as a boost to BCG, there was no additional increase to the efficacy of BCG. Combination of m-Mix with a recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1), in a heterologous prime-boost delivery (C-m-Mix), appeared to result in increased protection upon murine Mtb infection, than either regimen alone.

Discussion

This work warrants further investigation of LNP-formulated mRNA vaccines for TB, whilst indicating the potential of m-Mix and C-m-Mix to progress to further stages of vaccine development.

mRNA vaccines contribute to innate and adaptive immunity to enhance immune response in vivo

Messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics have been widely employed as strategies for the treatment and prevention of diseases. Amid the global outbreak of COVID-19, mRNA vaccines have witnessed rapid development. Generally, in the case of mRNA vaccines, the initiation of the innate immune system serves as a prerequisite for triggering subsequent adaptive immune responses. Critical cells, cytokines, and chemokines within the innate immune system play crucial and beneficial roles in coordinating tailored immune reactions towards mRNA vaccines. Furthermore, immunostimulators and delivery systems play a significant role in augmenting the immune potency of mRNA vaccines. In this comprehensive review, we systematically delineate the latest advancements in mRNA vaccine research, present an in-depth exploration of strategies aimed at amplifying the immune effectiveness of mRNA vaccines, and offer some perspectives and recommendations regarding the future advancements in mRNA vaccine development.

A Cocktail of Lipid Nanoparticle-mRNA Vaccines Broaden Immune Responses against β-Coronaviruses in a Murine Model

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-coronavirus (CoV), Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 have seriously threatened human life in the 21st century. Emerging and re-emerging β-coronaviruses after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic remain possible highly pathogenic agents that can endanger human health. Thus, pan-β-coronavirus vaccine strategies to combat the upcoming dangers are urgently needed. In this study, four LNP-mRNA vaccines, named O, D, S, and M, targeting the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, Delta, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV, respectively, were synthesized and characterized for purity and integrity. All four LNP-mRNAs induced effective cellular and humoral immune responses against the corresponding spike protein antigens in mice. Furthermore, LNP-mRNA S and D induced neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, which failed to cross-react with MERS-CoV. Subsequent evaluation of sequential and cocktail immunizations with LNP-mRNA O, D, S, and M effectively elicited broad immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV. A direct comparison of the sequential with cocktail regimens indicated that the cocktail vaccination strategy induced more potent neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses against heterotypic viruses as well as broader antibody activity against pan-β-coronaviruses. Overall, these results present a potential pan-β-coronavirus vaccine strategy for improved preparedness prior to future coronavirus threats.

Nanotechnology's frontier in combatting infectious and inflammatory diseases: prevention and treatment

Inflammation-associated diseases encompass a range of infectious diseases and non-infectious inflammatory diseases, which continuously pose one of the most serious threats to human health, attributed to factors such as the emergence of new pathogens, increasing drug resistance, changes in living environments and lifestyles, and the aging population. Despite rapid advancements in mechanistic research and drug development for these diseases, current treatments often have limited efficacy and notable side effects, necessitating the development of more effective and targeted anti-inflammatory therapies. In recent years, the rapid development of nanotechnology has provided crucial technological support for the prevention, treatment, and detection of inflammation-associated diseases. Various types of nanoparticles (NPs) play significant roles, serving as vaccine vehicles to enhance immunogenicity and as drug carriers to improve targeting and bioavailability. NPs can also directly combat pathogens and inflammation. In addition, nanotechnology has facilitated the development of biosensors for pathogen detection and imaging techniques for inflammatory diseases. This review categorizes and characterizes different types of NPs, summarizes their applications in the prevention, treatment, and detection of infectious and inflammatory diseases. It also discusses the challenges associated with clinical translation in this field and explores the latest developments and prospects. In conclusion, nanotechnology opens up new possibilities for the comprehensive management of infectious and inflammatory diseases.

Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Delivery Carrier-Assisted Targeted Controlled Release mRNA Vaccines in Tumor Immunity

In recent years, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have attracted extensive attention in tumor immunotherapy. Targeting immune cells in cancer therapy has become a strategy of great research interest. mRNA vaccines are a potential choice for tumor immunotherapy, due to their ability to directly encode antigen proteins and stimulate a strong immune response. However, the mode of delivery and lack of stability of mRNA are key issues limiting its application. LNPs are an excellent mRNA delivery carrier, and their structural stability and biocompatibility make them an effective means for delivering mRNA to specific targets. This study summarizes the research progress in LNP delivery carrier-assisted targeted controlled release mRNA vaccines in tumor immunity. The role of LNPs in improving mRNA stability, immunogenicity, and targeting is discussed. This review aims to systematically summarize the latest research progress in LNP delivery carrier-assisted targeted controlled release mRNA vaccines in tumor immunity to provide new ideas and strategies for tumor immunotherapy, as well as to provide more effective treatment plans for patients.

CAR T cell therapy for patients with solid tumours: key lessons to learn and unlearn

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have been approved for use in patients with B cell malignancies or relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, yet efficacy against most solid tumours remains elusive. The limited imaging and biopsy data from clinical trials in this setting continues to hinder understanding, necessitating a reliance on imperfect preclinical models. In this Perspective, I re-evaluate current data and suggest potential pathways towards greater success, drawing lessons from the few successful trials testing CAR T cells in patients with solid tumours and the clinical experience with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. The most promising approaches include the use of pluripotent stem cells, co-targeting multiple mechanisms of immune evasion, employing multiple co-stimulatory domains, and CAR ligand-targeting vaccines. An alternative strategy focused on administering multiple doses of short-lived CAR T cells in an attempt to pre-empt exhaustion and maintain a functional effector pool should also be considered.

Vaccine-mediated protection against Merbecovirus and Sarbecovirus challenge in mice

The emergence of three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2003, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV in 2012, and SARS-CoV-2 in 2019-underlines the need to develop broadly active vaccines against the Merbecovirus and Sarbecovirus betacoronavirus subgenera. While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines protect against severe COVID-19, they do not protect against other sarbecoviruses or merbecoviruses. Here, we vaccinate mice with a trivalent sortase-conjugate nanoparticle (scNP) vaccine containing the SARS-CoV-2, RsSHC014, and MERS-CoV receptor-binding domains (RBDs), which elicited live-virus neutralizing antibody responses. The trivalent RBD scNP elicited serum neutralizing antibodies against bat zoonotic Wuhan Institute of Virology-1 (WIV-1)-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5, and MERS-CoV live viruses. The monovalent SARS-CoV-2 RBD scNP vaccine only protected against Sarbecovirus challenge, whereas the trivalent RBD scNP vaccine protected against both Merbecovirus and Sarbecovirus challenge in highly pathogenic and lethal mouse models. This study demonstrates proof of concept for a single pan-sarbecovirus/pan-merbecovirus vaccine that protects against three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses spanning two betacoronavirus subgenera.

Monovalent Omicron COVID-19 vaccine triggers superior neutralizing antibody responses against Omicron subvariants than Delta and Omicron bivalent vaccine

The continuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants poses a challenge to determine the optimal updated composition of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. The present study aimed to investigate the immunogenicity of the Delta monovalent vaccine, the Omicron monovalent vaccine, and the Delta and Omicron BA.1 bivalent vaccine. Three COVID-19 vaccines were designed using the heterologous DNA prime-protein boost strategy, with each vaccine containing either Delta receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein, Omicron RBD, or both Delta and Omicron antigens. Temporal serum antibody binding titers and neutralizing antibody titers induced by the three vaccines in New Zealand White rabbits were analyzed. To further dissect the vaccine elicited antibodies (mAb) responses at the molecular level, a panel of rabbit monoclonal antibodies (RmAbs) was generated by a high-throughput single B cell sorting and discovery pipeline and further comprehensively characterized. The Omicron monovalent vaccine induced higher antibody binding titers and neutralization activities than the Delta and Omicron bivalent vaccine. Four RmAbs with robust neutralization capacity were isolated from rabbits immunized with the Omicron or Delta monovalent vaccine. Notably, 9E11 isolated from the Omicron monovalent vaccine group neutralized all the Omicron subvariants with an IC50 value ranging from 1.5 to 503.6 ng/mL; thus, this vaccine could serve as a prophylactic and therapeutic intervention. Given the increasing incidence of COVID-19 cases due to the Omicron variant, RBD from the Omicron strain could serve as a candidate immunogen that can induce higher neutralization activities against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages.

Broad-spectrum pan-genus and pan-family virus vaccines

Although the development and clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated unprecedented vaccine success in a short time frame, it also revealed a limitation of current vaccines in their inability to provide broad-spectrum or universal protection against emerging variants. Broad-spectrum vaccines, therefore, remain a dream and challenge for vaccinology. This review will focus on current and future efforts in developing universal vaccines targeting different viruses at the genus and/or family levels, with a special focus on henipaviruses, influenza viruses, and coronaviruses. It is evident that strategies for developing broad-spectrum vaccines will be virus-genus or family specific, and it is almost impossible to adopt a universal approach for different viruses. On the other hand, efforts in developing broad-spectrum neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have been more successful and it is worth considering broad-spectrum antibody-mediated immunization, or "universal antibody vaccine," as an alternative approach for early intervention for future disease X outbreaks.

A new H9 influenza virus mRNA vaccine elicits robust protective immunity against infection

Avian influenza virus (AIV) poses a great threat to the poultry industry and public health. However commercial vaccines only provide limited immunity due to rapid virus mutation and rearrangement. Here, we developed an mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccine expressing AIV immunogenic protein hemagglutinin (HA) and also assessed its safety and immune-protection efficacy in vivo. Specifically, its safety was tested by inoculation of SPF chicken embryos and chicks, and there showed no clinical manifestations and pathological changes in both. As for the immune efficacy, the antibody titers, IFN-γ production levels, and viral loads in various organs were analyzed. The results showed that chickens in the mRNA-LNP-inoculated groups produced higher specific antibody titers compared with that in the control group by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Meanwhile, the ELISpot assay demonstrated that the expression of IFN-γ was markedly induced in the mRNA-LNP group, and the viral loads in multiple organs were decreased. In addition, HE shows no obvious pathomorphological changes in the lungs of the mRNA-LNP-inoculated group. While, there was severe inflammatory cell infiltration in the DMEM-treated group instead. Taken together, the vaccine prepared in this study was safe and could trigger potent cellular and humoral immune response to defend against virus infection.