When Is Patient Behavior Indicative of Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Vs Reasonable Response to Digestive Disease?

Diet, nutraceuticals, and lifestyle interventions for the treatment and management of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) disorder of the gut-brain interaction and causes significant GI distress. The etiology of IBS is multifactorial, with food intolerances being a frequent contributing factor to IBS symptoms. Diet and lifestyle interventions are key components in comprehensive IBS care. In this review, we examine the current evidence-based dietary approaches for treating IBS. The low-FODMAP diet has the most robust data for improving overall symptom burden. In conjunction with guidance from a registered dietitian, certain patients may benefit from targeted dietary elimination of specific carbohydrates such as lactose or fructose or gluten. Among the nutraceuticals used to treat IBS, peppermint oil has sufficient evidence and appropriate safety data to recommend adjunctive use to reduce IBS symptoms. Although prebiotic and probiotic food sources may be beneficial to the microbiome, there is not enough evidence to support the routine use of prebiotic or probiotic supplements. Given the complexity of IBS, a holistic approach in which clinicians address a patients' diet, culture, sleep hygiene, exercise habits, and mental health may improve patients' overall quality of life.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Examining the Psychometric Evaluations of Disordered Eating Scales in Adults Living With Gastrointestinal Conditions

BACKGROUND

The scales used to assess disordered eating are often not validated in adults living with gastrointestinal conditions (i.e., gastrointestinal populations). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the psychometric evaluations (i.e., assessments of reliability and validity) of disordered eating scales in adult gastrointestinal populations and quantify the prevalence of disordered eating in both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal populations.

METHODS

We conducted a search of observational studies up to May 2024 that measured disordered eating using a scale in adults with a gastrointestinal condition. Psychometric evaluations of the scales were narratively reviewed. Prevalence rates of disordered eating were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

KEY RESULTS

Among 29 studies (overall medium risk of bias), 23 reported prevalences of disordered eating in gastrointestinal populations, and eight of these studies also reported prevalences in non-gastrointestinal populations. Only one out of 10 scales was developed and psychometrically evaluated in gastrointestinal populations, and 11 studies reported internal consistency (range α = 0.63 to α = 0.95). The prevalence of disordered eating was 33.2% (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.41; I2 = 97.34%) in gastrointestinal populations and 21.0% (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.32; I2 = 97.41%) in non-gastrointestinal populations. Subgroup analyses showed consistently high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The utilisation of current disordered eating scales for adults living with gastrointestinal conditions should be undertaken with caution, and there is a need for disordered eating scales to be developed and validated in this population.

Toward a Specific and Descriptive Definition of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Proposal for Updated Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) have been the source of confusion since its introduction to the DSM in 2013. In the current state, ARFID is diagnosed based on impairment, with no requirement that a specific pattern of behavioral or cognitive/affective symptoms be present. In this paper, we make the case for more positive etiologically based criteria for ARFID wherein Criterion A defines the psychopathology of ARFID. We propose a framework for DSM criteria involving food avoidance that is maintained by beliefs/hedonic reactions that are temporally close to and realistically/functionally associated with a specific food or eating occasion, characterized by one or more of the following expected aversive responses: disgust/distaste, anhedonia/uncomfortable fullness, and acute fear/panic. Our proposed Criterion B retains the four manifestations of impairment in the current definition as necessary, but not sufficient, for the ARFID diagnosis. When both Criteria A and B are met, our revised Criteria D (ARFID vs. other restrictive eating disorders) and E (ARFID vs. other medical/psychiatric conditions) state that ARFID should be diagnosed regardless of co-occurring/comorbid conditions. We discuss how this positive definition of ARFID would impact clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment, with specific considerations for differential diagnosis between ARFID and other eating disorders, other forms of psychopathology, and relevant medical conditions. Additionally, we discuss how it might enhance research opportunities by providing increasingly homogeneous samples through which researchers could better understand the etiological mechanisms of ARFID.

A Call to Action: Unraveling the Nuance of Adapted Eating Behaviors in Individuals With Gastrointestinal Conditions

The primary aim of this expert narrative review is to unravel the complexities of feeding and eating disorders in the gastroenterology practice setting. We aim to critically assess current assessment screening tools for eating and feeding disorders to gain a comprehensive understanding of how these tools may be misconstrued in the context of gastrointestinal conditions. Additionally, our objective is to highlight the potential for over-pathologizing and under-pathologizing eating behavior in this patient population. Further, we address the potential risk factors that gastroenterology clinicians should be aware of when assessing for disordered eating risk reduction. We hope to elucidate the "gray area" related to eating behaviors in patients with known physiological food intolerance such as FODMAP-related immune activation in irritable bowel syndrome and gluten-related reactions in celiac disease in the gut and beyond, that prompt behaviors that are deemed maladaptive in healthy individuals but may be at times adaptive responses in gastrointestinal conditions.

Beyond Depression and Anxiety in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Forging a Path Toward Emotional Healing

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic, often debilitating diseases characterized by inflammation of the digestive tract. IBDs affect up to 1% of the world's population and tend to be diagnosed in the second and third decades of life. In addition to physical burdens, IBDs have significant psychological manifestations stemming from bidirectional inflammatory and coping pathways and thus, are best understood from a biopsychosocial perspective. Though previous IBD literature has predominantly focused on traditional psychological comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression, recent studies have uncovered adjustment disorders, post-traumatic stress, and disordered eating as prevalent manifestations of the disease. This review will summarize the rates and postulated biopsychosocial mechanisms underlying these conditions to frame how cultivating resilience can protect against IBD symptoms and help forge a path toward emotional healing. We will also provide guidance to aid clinicians in screening for these conditions and creating a trauma-informed healthcare environment.

A Multicenter Study to Assess Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Disordered eating is frequently reported in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to describe the prevalence of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with IBD and to identify predictors of ARFID.

METHODS

Patients with IBD at 2 academic medical centers completed questionnaires including the ARFID subscale of the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire (PARDI-AR-Q), disease characteristics, and psychosocial variables. IBD disease activity was determined by a review of objective data within 90 days of survey completion.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-five participants completed the questionnaires (56% female, average age 47.60 years, 49.5% Crohn's disease (CD), 45.5% ulcerative colitis (UC)). Using the PARDI-AR-Q, 17.8% of the total sample screened positive for ARFID. ARFID+ respondents were younger, had shorter disease duration, and worse psychosocial functioning compared to ARFID-. A higher percentage of ARFID+ patients had objective disease activity compared to ARFID- (51% vs. 40%), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in ARFID rates between patients with CD compared to UC. In patients with inactive disease only, 16.3% screened positive for ARFID. In hierarchical logistic regression, the only significant predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD was GI-specific anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-center study, 16.3% of patients with inactive IBD met the criteria for ARFID, and 17.8% of all patients met the criteria regardless of objective disease activity. GI-specific anxiety was the only predictor of ARFID among patients with inactive IBD, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in IBD.

From Food Fears to Food Freedom: How Do We Best Manage Restrictive Eating in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Prior research has estimated the rates of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) to be between 10% and 54% in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recently published studies have questioned the ability of providers to differentiate the presence of ARFID in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and highlighted the relationship between ARFID and food literacy, which may reflect poor cognitive or psychological flexibility to navigate dietary restriction. We suggest the discourse around ARFID has neglected the neurological basis of fear conditioning as to how and why patients develop fear around eating in the setting of severe postprandial symptoms. In this review, we discuss the role of the amygdala in post-ingestive learning and how this needs to shape the approach to dietary liberalization for the highest likelihood of success. We provide specific strategies for practice when working with patients who experience significant fear of eating, including the framework for and development of appropriate exposure hierarchies to guide the reintroduction process. We encourage collaboration with dietitians and psychologists trained in gastroenterology when possible.

The Association of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Neurogastroenterology Disorders (Including Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction [DGBI]): A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurogastroenterology disorders like disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders often adopt restrictive diets to manage symptoms. Without professional guidance, these patients may risk developing avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), potentially affecting their physical and mental health.

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to explore the prevalence of ARFID in patients with neurogastroenterology disorders and vice versa, the direction of their association, potential risk factors, and available treatments.

METHODS

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Abstracts were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers.

KEY RESULTS

Eighteen studies met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of ARFID symptoms in neurogastroenterology patients ranged from 10% to 80%, while the prevalence of neurogastroenterology disorders and related GI symptoms in ARFID patients ranged from 7% to 60%. Findings on the direction of the association between eating difficulties and GI symptom occurrence were conflicting. Patients with ARFID-neurogastroenterology disorder overlap were more likely to be female, have a lower BMI, higher anxiety and depression levels, and poorer quality of life. Two small studies evaluating treatment for this overlap suggested promising effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

This review highlights heterogeneity in study designs and questions the suitability of ARFID assessment tools in this context. It also underscores gaps in understanding the underlying pathophysiology and treatment approaches. Future research should prioritize validating ARFID screening tools specific to this population and standardizing study methodologies. Improved understanding of this overlap will help healthcare professionals improve management strategies and patient outcomes.

Association between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder risk, dietary attitudes and behaviors among Chinese patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Restrictive eating behaviors are common among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which may may develop nutritional and/or quality of life impairments into avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of ARFID in Chinese patients with IBD, and to investigate the current perceptions and dietary behaviors of patients with and without ARFID.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in gastroenterology clinics of four tertiary hospitals in China. Patients with IBD were asked to complete a structured questionnaire including demographic characteristics, dietary attitudes and behaviors. The diagnosis of ARFID was established using Chinese version of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 483 patients with IBD completed the questionnaires, and 20.3% met clinical criteria for ARFID. The average score of ARFID was 21.9 (interquartile range = 17.0-26.0). Multivariable binary logistic regression results showed that patients with Crohn's disease (OR = 0.483, 95%CI = 0.280-0.835; p = 0.009), being in an active disease state (OR = 0.220, 95%CI = 0.123-0.392; p < 0.001), holding dietary attitudes regarding symptom control (OR = 2.431, 95%CI = 1.299-4.548; p = 0.005), and reporting a specific dietary history (OR = 27.158, 95%CI = 3.679-200.456; p = 0.001) were significant more likely to suffer from ARFID.

CONCLUSIONS

ARFID is a common problem among patients with IBD. The incidence of ARFID is particularly high among patients with Crohn's disease, during relapse, and those who hold restrictive dietary attitudes or have a history of specific diets. Therefore, it is imperative to prioritize routine screening and early identification of ARFID, especially among high-risk populations, in future research and clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100051539, on 26 September 2021.

Dietary assessments in individuals living with coeliac disease: key considerations

BACKGROUND

Coeliac disease (CeD) is a type of enteropathy characterised by an immune-mediated reaction to ingested gluten, resulting in impaired absorption of nutrients and symptoms such as bloating, abdominal cramping and diarrhoea. Currently, the only treatment for CeD is adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). The latest draft guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration recommends that dietitians experienced in CeD management evaluate patients during the screening and treatment period of CeD clinical trials to assess adherence to a GFD. However, there are currently no standardised guidelines on dietary assessment of patients with CeD on a GFD and there is a lack of widespread availability of expertise in this field.

METHODS

Based on the findings of a literature review conducted between April and September 2023, this article provides an overview of key points to consider in the nutritional and dietary assessment of patients with CeD who are following a GFD, with particular focus on the clinical trial setting.

RESULTS

Based on a consensus from dietitians and gastroenterologists experienced in treating patients with CeD, we present specific recommendations for registered dietitians who manage patients with CeD. We also describe the development of a simplified tool for assessment of adherence to a GFD, the Gluten-Free Adherence Survey, based on these recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines cover nutritional and dietary assessment of patients with CeD, physical assessments, intake of oats, environmental considerations and the disease burden.

Food-related quality of life driven by hypervigilance and anxiety around eating in organic gastrointestinal conditions

BACKGROUND

Food-related quality of life (FRQoL) measures the impact of diet, eating behaviours and food-related anxiety on quality of life. Patients often view food and eating as central to symptom management. This is the first study to examine FRQoL in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, celiac sprue, achalasia and eosinophilic oesophagitis.

METHODS

A total of 289 adults aged ≥18 years completed self-report measures evaluating the use of dietary treatment, FRQoL and other psychosocial outcomes. Principal component factor analysis evaluated potential subscales within the Food-Related Quality of Life Scale (FRQoL-29), to date validated only with a total score. Univariate analyses investigated differences in FRQoL based on diagnosis, whereas correlations and hierarchical regression identified relationships between FRQoL and psychosocial outcomes.

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed four subscales within the FRQoL-29, with hypervigilance around eating being the primary driver in total score. Patients reported substantial impacts of FRQoL, with those not using diet therapy scoring significantly higher for FRQoL than those on a diet with and without the support of a registered dietitian (RD). Both social (r = 0.41, p < 0.001) and physical (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) domains of health-related quality of life were higher in patients with greater FRQoL.

CONCLUSION

FRQoL is significantly degraded in patients with organic gastrointestinal illness diseases, and hypervigilance around food appears to contribute most to this. Use of dietary treatment and meeting with an RD were associated with lower FRQoL, though it is unclear if patients sought RD assistance before FRQoL declined. Future studies on the relationship between dietary treatment, RD support and FRQoL are warranted.

Assessing Fears of Negative Consequences in Children With Symptoms of Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Fear of Aversive Consequences (FOAC), such as choking or vomiting, is an important associated feature of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). However, the manifestation of FOAC in young children is poorly understood. This study aimed to describe the fears of children with ARFID symptoms and examine the concordance between parent and child ratings of fear.

METHOD

Child-reported FOAC was assessed using an interview designed for children between 6 and 10 years old, the Gustatory Avoidance and Gastrointestinal Stress Symptoms (GAGSS). Parents were administered a semi-structured diagnostic interview regarding their child's symptoms, the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Interview.

RESULTS

Among 68 children with ARFID diagnoses or symptoms (41.2% female, 85.3% White, mean age = 8.2 years, SD = 1.1 years; range 5.2-9.9 years), 91.2% of children endorsed at least one fear relative to 26.5% of parents. Among parent-child dyads, 36.8% disagreed about the child's fear of stomach pain (κ = 0.12) and 48.5% disagreed about the child's fear of vomiting, (κ = 0.08), both indicating low inter-rater reliability. On average, children endorsed 4.3 (SD = 2.3) fears out of 9 options. The most frequently endorsed fears were that food will "taste bad," (n = 43, 63.2%), "make you gag" (n = 37, 54.4%), and "look disgusting" (n = 36, 52.9%).

DISCUSSION

Findings highlight ways in which fear may manifest in children with ARFID that are not easily discernable by adults. Greater precision in depicting childhood fears may facilitate the earlier detection of problematic eating behaviors.

Prevalence of Eating Disorders Among Adults With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Goal:

To investigate the prevalence of eating disorder (ED) symptoms among Mexican adults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Background:

The relationship between IBS and EDs is complex, yet understudied, particularly in Latin America.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, 369 Mexican adults (18 to 69  y), comprising 133 IBS patients and 236 healthy controls (HCs), were evaluated using the Rome IV criteria, The Spanish version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (S-EDE-Q), the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Statistical analysis included the Student t test or the Wilcoxon Rank-sum test for group comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple comparisons, and logistic regression, with a significance threshold set at a P-value of <0.05.

Results:

IBS individuals were at an increased risk for clinically significant S-EDE-Q when compared with HCs (12.8% vs. 3.8%, odds ratio OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.5-8.5; P=0.001), especially among younger individuals. IBS individuals displayed a higher risk for dietary restraint and heightened concerns about eating, body shape, and weight. In addition, binge-eating episodes occurred more frequently within the IBS group. Notably, there were no significant differences in body mass index between individuals with clinically significant S-EDE-Q and those with normal scores. IBS individuals with severe symptoms had higher S-EDE-Q scores; furthermore, those with IBS and clinically significant S-EDE-Q exhibited higher levels of anxiety and depression.

Conclusions:

Our study reveals a significantly higher risk for ED in IBS individuals compared with HCs. This highlights the crucial importance of conducting ED screenings before dietary interventions, particularly among younger individuals and those displaying elevated levels of anxiety and depression.

Medical Comorbidities, Nutritional Markers, and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Youth With ARFID

OBJECTIVE

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is common among populations with nutrition-related medical conditions. Less is known about the medical comorbidity/complication frequencies in youth with ARFID. We evaluated the medical comorbidities and metabolic/nutritional markers among female and male youth with full/subthreshold ARFID across the weight spectrum compared with healthy controls (HC).

METHOD

In youth with full/subthreshold ARFID (n = 100; 49% female) and HC (n = 58; 78% female), we assessed self-reported medical comorbidities via clinician interview and explored abnormalities in metabolic (lipid panel and high-sensitive C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]) and nutritional (25[OH] vitamin D, vitamin B12, and folate) markers.

RESULTS

Youth with ARFID, compared with HC, were over 10 times as likely to have self-reported gastrointestinal conditions (37% vs. 3%; OR = 21.2; 95% CI = 6.2-112.1) and over two times as likely to have self-reported immune-mediated conditions (42% vs. 24%; OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.1-4.9). ARFID, compared with HC, had a four to five times higher frequency of elevated triglycerides (28% vs. 12%; OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 1.7-10.5) and hs-CRP (17% vs. 4%; OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 1.4-27.0) levels.

DISCUSSION

Self-reported gastrointestinal and certain immune comorbidities were common in ARFID, suggestive of possible bidirectional risk/maintenance factors. Elevated cardiovascular risk markers in ARFID may be a consequence of limited dietary variety marked by high carbohydrate and sugar intake.

Assessing Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) Symptoms Using the Nine Item ARFID Screen in >9000 Swedish Adults With and Without Eating Disorders

OBJECTIVE

The Nine Item ARFID Scale (NIAS) is a widely used measure assessing symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Previous studies suggest that individuals with eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns also have elevated scores on the NIAS. To further describe NIAS scores among individuals with diverse current and previous eating disorders, we characterized NIAS scores in a large sample of individuals with eating disorders and evaluated overlap in symptoms measured by the NIAS and the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) version 6.0.

METHOD

Our sample comprised 9148 participants from the Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative Sweden (EDGI-SE), who completed surveys including NIAS and EDE-Q. NIAS scores were calculated and compared by eating disorder diagnostic group using descriptive statistics and linear models.

RESULTS

Participants with current anorexia nervosa demonstrated the highest mean NIAS scores and had the greatest proportion (57.0%) of individuals scoring above a clinical cutoff on at least one of the NIAS subscales. Individuals with bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other specified feeding or eating disorder also demonstrated elevated NIAS scores compared to individuals with no lifetime history of an eating disorder (ps < 0.05). All subscales of the NIAS showed small to moderate correlations with all subscales of the EDE-Q (rs = 0.26-0.40).

DISCUSSION

Our results substantiate that individuals with eating disorders other than ARFID demonstrate elevated scores on the NIAS, suggesting that this tool is inadequate on its own for differentiating ARFID from shape/weight-motivated eating disorders. Further research is needed to inform clinical interventions addressing the co-occurrence of ARFID-related drivers and shape/weight-related motivation for dietary restriction.

Development and Management of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and Food Neophobia in Pediatric Patients with Food Allergy: A Comprehensive Review

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and food neophobia present significant challenges in pediatric healthcare, particularly among children with food allergies (FAs). These eating disorders, characterized by the persistent avoidance or restriction of food, can lead to severe nutritional deficiencies and psychosocial impairments. The presence of FAs further complicates these eating behaviors, as the fear of allergic reactions exacerbates avoidance and restrictive patterns. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge on ARFID and food neophobia, focusing on their definitions, characteristics, and the unique challenges they present in the context of FAs. The review explores the critical role of healthcare professionals, especially nurses, in integrating psychological and clinical care to improve outcomes for affected children. A multidisciplinary approach, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Family-Based Therapy (FBT), is emphasized as essential in addressing the complex needs of these patients. The review also highlights the need for standardized treatment protocols and further research on the long-term outcomes of these disorders, aiming to enhance therapeutic strategies and family support systems. Effective management of ARFID and food neophobia in the context of FAs requires a holistic and integrated approach to mitigate the profound impacts on a child's growth, development, and overall well-being.

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Are Not as Frequent as Other Eating Disorder Symptoms When Ulcerative Colitis Is in Remission

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recent studies have shown that up to 53% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] screen positive for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder [ARFID]. There is however concern that ARFID screening rates are over-inflated in patients with active disease. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of ARFID symptoms using the Nine Item ARFID Screen [NIAS], and to use another eating disorder measure, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 8 [EDE-Q8], to rule-out/characterise other eating disorder cognitive and behavioural symptoms.

METHODS

Participants included adults with UC who are enrolled in an ongoing cohort study with quiescent UC (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤2 or faecal calprotectin <150 µg/g with corticosteroid-free clinical remission for ≥3 months) at baseline. We used self-reported data on demographics, gastrointestinal medications, medical comorbidities, NIAS scores, and EDE-Q-8 scores.

RESULTS

We included 101 participants who completed the NIAS at their baseline cohort assessment [age 49.9 ± 16.5 years; 55% female]. Eleven participants [11%] screened positively for ARFID on at least one NIAS subscale [n = 8 male]. Up to 30 participants [30%] screened positive for other eating disorder symptoms [EDE-Q-8 Global ≥2.3]. Overall score distributions on the EDE-Q-8 showed that participants scored highest on the Weight Concern and Shape Concern subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with UC in remission, we found a low rate of ARFID symptoms by the NIAS but a high rate of positive screens for other eating disorder symptoms.

Experience of diet in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

AIM

To synthesise the dietary expesriences of patients with inflammatory bowel disease by reviewing relevant qualitative studies.

BACKGROUND

Diet plays a crucial role in the development and progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is no specific diet that can be recommended for all patients. We conducted a synthesis of qualitative studies to gain a comprehensive understanding of the dietary management experience of patients with IBD, aiming to provide better dietary guidance in the future.

DESIGN

A qualitative synthesis was conducted following the Thomas and Harden method and reported following the ENTREQ statement.

METHODS

Qualitative studies were systematically searched in five electronic databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. There was no time limit for publication, and all database searches were up to 10 May, 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument was utilised to appraise the quality of the included studies. Data for inclusion in articles were extracted and analysed using a thematic synthesis method.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 119 patients were eventually included. The studies were conducted in six different countries. Four major themes were identified: the diet of patients with IBD is completely different from the normal one; manage symptoms and live with the disease by modifying diet; psychological adjustment to eating (be frustrated; worried and afraid; feel ashamed; growth and resilience); barriers and challenges (barriers from perceived social support; conflicts between diet and nutrition; challenges from food hedonism and cravings).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD highlighted the distinction between their diet and the normal diet. Dietary modifications were used as a way to manage symptoms and live with the disease. In addition to physical symptoms, patients experienced diet-related psychological changes. Dietary modifications in patients with IBD encounters difficulties and challenges, necessitating prompt guidance and intervention. (1) The implementation of dietary modifications in patients with IBD encounters numerous obstacles and complexities, necessitating prompt guidance and intervention.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023391545).

Eating disorders, body image dissatisfaction and their association with gluten-free diet adherence among patients with celiac disease

BACKGROUND

Considering the higher prevalence of psychological problems in patients with Celiac disease (CD), the current study aims to assess the prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) and body image disturbance in patients with CD and examine the possible correlation between EDs, body image dissatisfaction and distortion, and gluten-free diet (GFD) adherence in these patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 217 patients with CD (18-55 years old) were recruited randomly from the CD registry database. EDs and body image issues were assessed using the 26-item Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26) and Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (FRS), respectively. Adherence to GFD was evaluated by the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EDs was 43.5%. Furthermore, the prevalence of body dissatisfaction and distortion was 65.9% and 41.1%, respectively. The logistic regression demonstrated a significant negative association between adherence to the GFD and EDs (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.11-3.91, P = 0.022). However, there was no significant association between following GFD and body image dissatisfaction (OR = 1.70, CI: 0.92-3.17, P = 0.090), and distortion (OR = 0.65, CI: 0.36-1.18, P = 0.163).

CONCLUSION

Considering the high prevalence of EDs in patients with CD and owing to the inverse association between EDs and GFD adherence, nutritionists should consider the psychological barriers in adhering to a GFD when consulting patients with CD.

Gastrointestinal diagnoses in patients with eating disorders: A retrospective cohort study 2010-2020

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are common in patients with eating disorders. However, the temporal relationship between GI and eating disorder symptoms has not been explored. We aimed to evaluate GI disorders among patients with eating disorders, their relative timing, and the relationship between GI diagnoses and eating disorder remission.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with an eating disorder diagnosis who had a GI encounter from 2010 to 2020. GI diagnoses and timing of eating disorder onset were abstracted from chart review. Coders applied DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders at the time of GI consult to determine eating disorder remission status.

RESULTS

Of 344 patients with an eating disorder diagnosis and GI consult, the majority (255/344, 74.2%) were diagnosed with an eating disorder prior to GI consult (preexisting eating disorder). GI diagnoses categorized as functional/motility disorders were most common among the cohort (57.3%), particularly in those with preexisting eating disorders (62.5%). 113 (44.3%) patients with preexisting eating disorders were not in remission at GI consult, which was associated with being underweight (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.46, p < 0.001) and increasing number of GI diagnoses (OR 0.47 per diagnosis, 95% CI 0.26-0.85, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Eating disorder symptoms precede GI consult for most patients, particularly in functional/motility disorders. As almost half of eating disorder patients are not in remission at GI consult. GI providers have an important role in screening for eating disorders. Further prospective research is needed to understand the complex relationship between eating disorders and GI symptoms.

Shared genetic influences between eating disorders and gastrointestinal disease in a large, population-based sample of adult women and men

BACKGROUND

Some preliminary research suggests higher rates of gastrointestinal disease in individuals with eating disorders (EDs). However, research is limited, and it remains unknown what etiologic factors account for observed associations. This was the first study to examine how EDs and dimensional ED symptoms (e.g. body dissatisfaction, binge eating) are phenotypically and etiologically associated with gastrointestinal disease in a large, population-based twin sample.

METHODS

Adult female (N = 2980) and male (N = 2903) twins from the Michigan State University Twin Registry reported whether they had a lifetime ED (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge-eating disorder) and completed a measure of dimensional ED symptoms. We coded the presence/absence of lifetime gastrointestinal disease (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease) based on responses to questions regarding chronic illnesses and medications. We first examined whether twins with gastrointestinal disease had higher rates of EDs and ED symptoms, then used correlated factors twin models to investigate genetic and environmental contributions to the overlap between disorders.

RESULTS

Twins with gastrointestinal disease had significantly greater dimensional ED symptoms (β = 0.21, p < 0.001) and odds of a lifetime ED (OR 2.90, p = 0.001), regardless of sex. Shared genetic factors fully accounted for the overlap between disorders, with no significant sex differences in etiologic associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity between EDs and gastrointestinal disease may be explained by overlap in genetic influences, potentially including inflammatory genes implicated in both types of disorders. Screening for gastrointestinal disease in people with EDs, and EDs in those with gastrointestinal disease, is warranted.

Psychometric properties of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) in Turkish children

BACKGROUND

The nine item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) is a short and practical assessment tool specific to ARFID with three ARFID phenotypes such as "Picky eating," "Fear," and "Appetite". This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish translation of the NIAS parent form and to investigate the relationship between ARFID symptoms and anxiety, depression symptoms, and eating behaviors in a sample of Turkish children.

METHOD

Parents were asked to provide their children's sociodemographic data and to complete the NIAS, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-Short (EDE-QS), Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ), and Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) scales.

RESULTS

The sample included 440 participants between 6 and 12 ages. Turkish NIAS demonstrated good internal consistency. The three-factor model of the Turkish NIAS was in an acceptable structure. The Turkish NIAS scale was shown to be valid and reliable. NIAS scores were shown to be higher in underweight participants. The NIAS-parent version subscales showed expected convergent and divergent validity with the CEBQ, EDEQ-S, and RCADS scales in children, except CEBQ emotional overeating and desire to drink subscales were correlated with NIAS.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the NIAS is valid and reliable in evaluating ARFID symptoms in children.

Dietary Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated food antigen-driven disease characterized by tissue eosinophilia and clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Medical and dietary therapies can be offered as treatment options in both pediatric and adult populations. Advances in nutritional research in EoE have produced different levels of dietary restriction, ranging from elimination of a single food group to more extensive restriction such as the two-food elimination diet, four-food elimination diet, or six-food elimination diet. Efficacy and outcomes vary for each level of restriction. The option of using dietary therapy allows clinicians to partner with patients in shared decision-making to balance the right level of food antigen restriction for the desired outcome. Key considerations when choosing dietary therapy hinge on patient preference and resources, food-related quality of life, and the ability to provide nutritional diversity and maintain nutritional parameters. This article highlights these considerations and offers clinical pearls to guide clinicians who wish to incorporate dietary therapy of EoE into their practice.

Evaluation and management of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

ABSTRACT

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an uncommon but complex eating disorder characterized by extreme picky eating without poor body image or fear of weight gain. Intake is limited by volume or variety of food, driven by fear of adverse consequences associated with ingestion, sensory sensitivities to food properties, or a lack of interest in eating. Avoidance or restriction of food intake can lead to low body weight or failure to thrive, nutritional deficiencies, reliance on enteral feeding, and psychosocial impairment. The presentation of ARFID varies depending on severity, variety, and volume of diet; therefore, medical evaluation should be comprehensive, should be tailored to patient needs, and should include screening for commonly co-occurring psychiatric conditions. Cognitive behavioral therapy and/or family-based therapy, in conjunction with pharmacotherapy and/or hospital refeeding, have demonstrated therapeutic benefit. Available literature is sparse and largely limited to children and adolescents. Additional studies are needed to evaluate therapeutic interventions, medical follow-up, and prognosis.

Eating Disorders in Youth with Chronic Health Conditions: Clinical Strategies for Early Recognition and Prevention

Youth with chronic health conditions face an elevated risk of eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors. Contributors to this phenomenon may include the unique threats faced by this vulnerable population to their body image, their relationships with food and eating, and their mental health and self-esteem. However, youth with chronic health conditions may also experience more severe medical complications and mortality from eating disorder behaviors because of the additional risks conveyed by their underlying conditions. In this review, clinical strategies are provided to support youth with chronic health conditions through early recognition of eating disorder behaviors and prompt referral to treatment, which is important for a better prognosis. Suggestions are also given to mitigate their risk of developing eating disorders by proactively addressing risk factors and offering thoughtful anticipatory guidance that promotes a positive relationship with food and eating.

Systematic Review of the Incidence and/or Prevalence of Eating Disorders in Individuals With Food Allergies

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases involving strict dietary adherence have been associated with an increased risk of eating disorders (EDs). This is the first systematic review investigating the rate of EDs among individuals with food allergies (FAs).

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence, prevalence, and types of EDs in individuals with FAs.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched 4 databases for studies published to January 2022 that reported the prevalence or incidence of EDs in samples with immunoglobulin E (IgE) or non-IgE-mediated allergy. Risk of bias was assessed and evidence qualitatively synthesized.

RESULTS

From 1,180 papers identified, 9 met inclusion criteria. There were 4,161 adult and pediatric participants with IgE-mediated FAs or eosinophilic esophagitis. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) or anorexia nervosa/bulimia nervosa were the main EDs identified. The prevalence of EDs in samples with FA ranged from 0.8% to 62.9%. Among studies investigating IgE-mediated FA (n = 6), the prevalence of anorexia nervosa and/or bulimia nervosa ranged from 17.6 to 61%, ARFID was 62.9%, and unspecified EDs was 0.8% to 6%. Among samples with eosinophilic esophagitis (n = 3), ARFID prevalence ranged from 4.5% to 51%. Most studies were limited by small sample size, possible selection bias, and lack of diagnostic EDs tools validated for food allergic populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Eating disorders appear prevalent in individuals with FA; however, prevalence estimates varied widely. Large studies with healthy control groups and validated measures to identify EDs in individuals with FA are needed to accurately determine the prevalence of EDs.

New approaches to diet therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An empiric step-up (2-4-6) elimination diet remains the most common dietary approach in clinical practice when treating eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, research in this field has fallen behind pharmacological therapy. This review aims to summarize novel approaches to dietary therapy for EoE.

RECENT FINDINGS

A first prospective multicenter study in 41 pediatric patients (mean age 9 years) has evaluated the efficacy of a cow's milk elimination diet. This dietary approach led to histological remission in 51% of patients, albeit a caveat is that up to 80% of patients were receiving concomitant therapy with proton pump inhibitors. In a series of 18 adult patients with documented milk-induced EoE, ingestión of 400 ml of sterilized milk (boiled for up to 20 min) daily for 8 weeks did not induce histologic relapse in two-thirds of patients.

SUMMARY

Milk elimination diet is effective in one-half of pediatric EoE patients and should likely be the first choice in children with EoE (within a step-up dietary approach). Promising data on tolerance of sterilized milk in adults with milk-induced EoE (66%) merit further replication in children, which may radically improve quality of life for patients and their caregivers.

The intersection between eating disorders and gastrointestinal disorders: a narrative review and practical guide

Eating disorders include a spectrum of disordered thinking patterns and behaviours around eating. There is increasing recognition of the bi-directional relationship between eating disorders and gastrointestinal disease. Gastrointestinal symptoms and structural issues might arise from eating disorders, and gastrointestinal disease might be a risk factor for eating disorder development. Cross-sectional research suggests that individuals with eating disorders are disproportionately represented among people seeking care for gastrointestinal symptoms, with avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder in particular garnering attention for high rates among individuals with functional gastrointestinal disorders. This Review aims to describe the research to date on the relationship between gastrointestinal disorders and eating disorders, highlight research gaps, and provide brief, practical guidance for the gastroenterology provider in detecting, potentially preventing, and treating gastrointestinal symptoms in eating disorders.

Food elimination diets in eosinophilic esophagitis: Practical tips in current management and future directions

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, antigen-mediated disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and an eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Seminal reports identified the role of food allergens in the pathogenesis of the disease by demonstrating that food avoidance could lead to the resolution of esophageal eosinophilia in EoE patients. Although pharmacological treatments for EoE are increasingly being investigated, the exclusion of trigger foods from the diet still represents a valuable option for patients to achieve and maintain disease remission without drugs. Food elimination diets are variegated, and one size does not fit all. Accordingly, before starting any elimination diet, patients' characteristics should be thoroughly evaluated, and a rigorous management plan should be defined. This review provides practical tips and considerations to succeed in the management of EoE patients undergoing food elimination diets, as well as recent advances and future perspectives on food avoidance strategies.

Identification and Management of Eating Disorders (including ARFID) in GI Patients

Eating disorders are characterized by cognitions (eg, fear of gastrointestinal symptoms around eating, overvaluation of body shape/weight) and behaviors (eg, dietary restriction, binge eating) associated with medical (eg, weight loss), and/or psychosocial impairments (eg, high distress around eating). With growing evidence for bidirectional relationships between eating disorders and gastrointestinal disorders, gastroenterology providers' awareness of historical, concurrent, and potential risk for eating disorders is imperative. In this conceptual review, we highlight risk and maintenance pathways in the eating disorder-gastrointestinal disorder intersection, delineate different types of eating disorders, and provide recommendations for the gastroenterology provider in assessing and preventing eating disorder symptoms..

Psychological Considerations for Food Intolerances: Celiac Sprue, Eosinophilic Esophagitis, and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity

Several chronic digestive conditions are physiologically based on food intolerance, including celiac disease, nonceliac gluten sensitivity, and eosinophilic esophagitis. Patients are expected to follow medically prescribed diets to eliminate identified food triggers to control symptoms. However, the psychological impacts of these dietary approaches are largely unaddressed in clinical practice. Hypervigilance and anxiety regarding food and symptoms, and disordered eating, may emerge and negatively affect outcomes. Clinicians working with pediatric and adult populations with food intolerances should be aware of these psychological comorbidities, and equally emphasize effective ways to help patients manage the mental and physical aspects of their condition.

Elevated fullness and bloating as correlates of eating pathology: Implications for screening

A minority of individuals with eating disorders report being asked about their eating by health care professionals; delayed detection of eating disorders may contribute to poorer outcomes. The current study investigated common meal-related gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e., elevated fullness and bloating) as correlates of eating pathology that may be more readily disclosed to health professionals and indicate the need to assess for eating pathology. The current study also tested the hypothesis that elevated fullness and bloating are more strongly linked to eating pathology among those with higher body dissatisfaction. 281 university students (70.1% female, 84.3% white) completed gastrointestinal symptom and eating pathology assessments. Elevated fullness and bloating were each associated with increased purging, restrictive eating behaviors, and likelihood of having an eating disorder. Elevated fullness and bloating were more strongly linked to purging and probable eating disorder diagnosis with higher, relative to lower, body dissatisfaction. However, body dissatisfaction did not moderate the relationship between gastrointestinal symptoms and restrictive eating behaviors. Results indicate that elevated fullness and bloating are correlates of eating pathology. Healthcare professionals should consider and/or assess for eating pathology when elevated fullness and bloating are reported; further assessment of body dissatisfaction may be helpful in identifying purging behaviors.

Current treatment options and long-term outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Dietary and pharmacological (proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical corticosteroids) therapies are effective for induction of clinical and histological remission of eosinophilic esophagitis. However, data evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety is limited.

AREAS COVERED

Since eosinophilic esophagitis is chronic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological features usually recur when successful treatments are stopped. In untreated patients, persistent esophageal eosinophilic inflammation may progress to fibrostenosis over time, giving place to strictures and narrow-caliber esophagi. This article comprehensively reviews available data on long-term maintenance of eosinophilic esophagitis with pharmacological and dietary treatment. It also discusses limitations re: available literature and outlines data gaps on adherence to therapy and monitoring disease activity in the long-term.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence indicates that long-term maintenance therapy may decrease the risk of esophageal stricture, food bolus impaction, and need for dilation in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Further knowledge on eosinophilic esophagitis phenotypes is needed to ascertain who will benefit best from sustained therapy. Unanswered questions include an adequate definition for sustained remission, best strategies for maintenance drugs and diets, enhancement of treatment adherence, and proper monitoring for long-term surveillance.

Psychological Considerations in the Dietary Management of Patients With DGBI

In this article, an expert team of 2 gastro-psychologists, a dietician, and an academic gastroenterologist provides insights into the psychological and social implications of evidence-based and "popular" dietary interventions in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We focus on practical approaches for evaluating a patient's appropriateness for a dietary intervention, considering the nutritional, psychological, behavioral, and social context in which a patient may find themselves managing their DGBI with dietary intervention. We also discuss how to identify risk factors for and symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, a growing concern in the DGBI population.

Nutritional and Psychological Considerations for Dietary Therapy in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The step-up empiric elimination diet, starting from one/two food groups of most local allergens remains the current gold standard for a dietary approach in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. Milk, followed by wheat and egg, is the most frequent food that triggers EoE in pediatric and adult patients. Elimination diets, with restrictions over four food groups, may be limited to highly motivated patients, in which nutritional counseling is recommended. Malnourishment is uncommon in EoE patients and likely multifactorial (concomitant gastrointestinal eosinophilic disorders or IgE-mediated food allergies, feeding difficulties, abnormal feeding behavior). Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in EoE children on highly restrictive diets was lately described and may warrant specific psychological support. As for adults, quality of life may be impaired by symptom severity and dietary restrictions, aside from recently reported food impaction-related specific anxiety in up to 43% of patients. Severe symptoms, feeding dysfunction, and diet restrictions may negatively influence psychosocial adjustment for patients and their caregivers.

Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Characteristics and Prevalence in Adult Celiac Disease Patients

Background and Aims

The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with celiac disease (CD) and assess metabolic complications, disease control, diet adherence, and correlation with symptom and quality-of-life metrics.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 137 adult patients with CD who completed an ARFID survey in the CD clinic between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, clinical results, standardized diet assessment, and results of Celiac Disease Symptom Diary and Impact of a Gluten-free Diet Questionnaire were reviewed. The primary outcome measured was the rate of suspected ARFID based on patient-reported survey responses.

Results

Seventy-eight patients (57%) met suspected ARFID criteria. There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index, micronutrient deficiencies, or bone disease in those with or without ARFID. Patients with ARFID did not have a difference in biopsy activity or better adherence to a gluten-free diet compared with non-ARFID patients. Food and social burden on Impact of a Gluten-free Diet Questionnaire was most predictive of ARFID.

Conclusion

ARFID is common and has a high impact in patients with CD. Although some eating behavior is certainly due to their CD, there was no distinct difference in disease control between those with or without suspected ARFID, suggesting these maladaptive behaviors are not necessary for disease control. We did not find increased metabolic complications, but this was a 2-year snapshot. We need to further understand the social and food impacts on patients who score high on this survey to prevent further deficiencies and impaired, long-term detrimental eating behaviors.