Upadacitinib Was Efficacious and Well-tolerated Over 30 Months in Patients With Crohn's Disease in the CELEST Extension Study

Pediatric Case of Crohn Disease, Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy, and Atopic Dermatitis

A few studies have reported immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) complications in pediatric patients with Crohn disease (CD). Additionally, reports of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) complicating CD with IgAN are rare. In this case report, we review the case of a 10-year-old boy with CD later complicated by IgAN and severe AD at various time points. In his treatment course, he required multiple concurrent therapies, including upadacitinib and infliximab, to achieve remission for all 3 conditions. This case reports successful simultaneous treatment with separate agents in a pediatric case of CD complicated by severe AD.

Induction with upadacitinib in Crohn's disease: real-world experience from an early-access program in Greece

Background

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, approved for the management of Crohn's disease (CD) by the United States Food & Drug Administration. In Greece, upadacitinib was initially available through an early-access program. Our goal was to describe the real practice experience.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate-to-severe CD. The primary endpoint was clinical response, defined as a reduction ≥3 in the Harvey-Bradshaw index. Secondary endpoints included biochemical improvement. Outcomes were assessed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks.

Results

A total of 24 CD patients received upadacitinib and were included in the analysis. Their mean age was 42.2 years (range 24-63). Eleven patients (45.8%) had ileocolonic CD and 5 (20.8%) CD colitis. Fourteen patients had active extraintestinal manifestations. The majority of patients (19/24) had ≥3 failed biologics. All of them had failed treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor and 19 (79%) with ustekinumab. At 12 weeks, nearly all patients achieved a clinical response (85%). Of 13 patients with C-reactive protein >5 mg/L at baseline, 11 (84.6%) achieved normalization by week 8. Adverse events occurred in 3 patients (14.2%).

Conclusion

In a small cohort of resistant CD patients, the short-term clinical efficacy of upadacitinib was high.

Biosimilars versus biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and targeting strategies using drug delivery systems

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multifactorial illness with a climbing prevalence worldwide. While biologics are commonly prescribed especially for severe cases, they may worsen patients' outcomes due to financial burden. Consequently, there has been an increased focus on biosimilars to improve overall disease outcomes by maintaining similar efficacy and safety while minimizing the cost of therapy. Infliximab-dyyb was the first biosimilar approved by US-FDA for IBD. Since that, the US-FDA approved 14 biosimilars with different mechanisms of action and different routes of administration for IBD patients (four infliximab biosimilars, nine adalimumab biosimilars, and most recently one ustekinumab biosimilar). It should be noted that more biologics are in the pipeline as golimumab and natalizumab patents are set to expire in the near future, and biosimilars are now in pre-clinical to phase 3 trials. Different studies have evaluated biologics' effectiveness and safety and concluded that the majority of available biosimilars are efficacious and have similar adverse effect profiles compared to their reference biologics. It is worth mentioningthat post-marketing surveillance reports revealed some risks associated with biosimilars which should be taken into consideration in future research and clinical trials to avoid health hazards. Most biologics and biosimilars are administered parenterally which results in several drawbacks such as raised risk of infections, hypersensitivity, autoimmunity, development of malignancies, liver toxicity as well as worsening of heart failure. Several drug delivery systems based on passive and active targeting mechanisms are under active investigation to overcome these limitations. This review sheds light on the emergence of biologics and biosimilars as alternatives in IBD management, the differences between them, challenges and risks, and future perspectives in IBD therapy and new trends in drug delivery systems.

Upadacitinib for Induction of Remission in Paediatric Crohn's Disease: An International Multicentre Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

There are scarce data available on upadacitinib in children with Crohn's disease (CD).

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib as an induction therapy in paediatric CD.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective study between 2022 and 2024 of children treated with upadacitinib for induction of remission of active CD conducted in 30 centres worldwide affiliated with the IBD Interest and Porto group of the ESPGHAN. We recorded demographic, clinical and laboratory data and adverse events (AEs) at week 8 post-induction. The analysis of the primary outcome was based upon the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.

RESULTS

We included 100 children (median age 15.8 [interquartile range 14.3-17.2]). All were previously treated with biologic therapies including 89 with ≥ 2 biologics. At the end of the 8-week induction period, we observed clinical response, clinical remission and corticosteroid- and exclusive enteral nutrition-free clinical remission (CFR) in 75%, 56% and 52%, respectively. By the end of induction, 68% had achieved normalisation of C-reactive protein, and 58% had faecal calprotectin (FC) < 150 mcg/g. There was combined CFR and FC remission in 13/31 children with available data at 8 weeks (13% of the ITT population). AEs were recorded in 24 children; the most frequent was acne in 12. Two AEs (severe acne and hypertriglyceridemia) led to discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib is an effective induction therapy for refractory paediatric CD. Efficacy should be weighed against the potential risks of AEs.

Cancer Risk in IBD Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors: Reassuring Evidence from Trials and Real-World Data

The advent of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, has significantly widened the therapeutic options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These agents offer the advantage of oral administration and have demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission. However, concerns regarding their safety have emerged, particularly concerning cardiovascular and infectious complications, which appear more pronounced in patients with pre-existing risk factors such as older age, smoking, or comorbidities. While these risks are better understood, the potential association between JAK inhibitors and malignancies remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Current data from randomised controlled trials, pooled and integrated analyses, and real-world studies provide conflicting evidence regarding cancer risk. Notably, studies in patients with rheumatologic diseases treated with JAK inhibitors have contributed additional insights into long-term safety outcomes. Despite the uncertainty surrounding malignancy risks, it is likely that predisposing factors, including older age, smoking history, and long-standing IBD with chronic inflammation, play a more substantial role in cancer development than JAK inhibitor therapy alone. This paper reviews safety data from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies, focusing on cancer risk in patients treated with JAK inhibitors for IBD. We also review evidence from rheumatology studies, highlighting the need for individualised risk assessment and close monitoring to optimise the safety profile of these medications in clinical practice.

Dual Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic and complex autoimmune conditions. Despite the advancements in biologics and small molecules, the therapeutic ceiling persists, posing significant treatment challenges and contributing to the concept of difficult-to-treat IBD. Dual-targeted therapy (DTT), combining two biologic agents or biologics with small molecules, has emerged as a novel approach to address this unmet need by targeting multiple inflammatory pathways simultaneously. Evidence suggests that DTT holds promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes, especially in patients with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. Safety data, while consistent with monotherapy profiles, highlight the importance of vigilant monitoring for infections and other adverse events. Continued research and high-quality trials are crucial to defining optimal DTT regimens and broadening its clinical applicability. This review explores the efficacy and safety of DTT in IBD, reporting data from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and real-world studies.

Long-term adverse event risks of oral JAK inhibitors versus immunomodulators: a literature review

The long-term adverse event risks associated with oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors compared to broader immunomodulators are poorly understood, with limited comparative studies available. This study aims to assess the long-term adverse event risks of oral JAK inhibitors compared to broader immunomodulators in dermatology. A PubMed search included terms such as specific drug names and "adverse events," "long-term safety," "malignancy," "cardiovascular events," and/or "infections." Included were studies with over one year of medication exposure reporting adverse events. A total of 25 studies were included, comprising 19 clinical trials and 6 cohort studies, representing greater than 100,000 patient years of data. We found comparable long-term incidence rates of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and serious infections between oral JAK inhibitors and broader immunomodulators. Oral JAK inhibitors demonstrated lower incidence rates of NMSC and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but higher rates of herpes zoster virus (HZV) infections compared to non-JAK medications. Study limitations include variations in underlying diseases, age, and comorbidities between studies introducing patient population heterogeneity. Overall, oral JAK inhibitors may be viable long-term treatment options given their comparable safety profile to broader immunomodulators currently used in dermatology. However, monitoring for HZV infections may be warranted. These findings aid clinicians in making informed treatment decisions and prioritizing patient safety.

Single-center Experience With Upadacitinib for Adolescents With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective JAK inhibitor approved for adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) and with positive phase 3 data for Crohn's disease (CD). Pediatric off-label use is common due to delays in pediatric approvals; real-world data on UPA are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series study of adolescents (12-17 years) with inflammatory bowel disease IBD on UPA. The primary outcome was postinduction steroid-free clinical remission (SF-CR) defined as Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI) or Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI) ≤10. Secondary outcomes include postinduction clinical response (decrease ≥12.5 in PUCAI/PCDAI), postinduction C-reactive protein (CRP) normalization, 6-month SF-CR, and intestinal ultrasound response and remission. Adverse events were recorded through last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (9 CD, 10 UC, 1 IBD-U; 55% female; median age 15 years, 90% ≥2 biologics) were treated with UPA for ≥12 weeks (median 51 [43-63] weeks). Upadacitinib was used as monotherapy in 55% and as combination with ustekinumab and vedolizumab in 35% and 10%, respectively. Week 12 SF-CR was achieved in 75% (15/20) and 80% (16/20) with CRP normalization. About 3/4 (14/19) achieved SF-CR at 6 months. Adverse event occurred in 2 patients (10%): Cytomegalovirus colitis requiring hospitalization and hyperlipidemia requiring no treatment. In the 75% with ultrasound monitoring, response and remission were achieved in 77% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While awaiting pediatric registration trials, our data suggest that UPA is effective in inducing and maintaining SF-CR in adolescents with highly-refractory IBD with an acceptable safety profile.

Upadacitinib in Patients With Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease

Upadacitinib has recently been approved for treating Crohn’s disease (CD). Here, we report on the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in a cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat CD being cared for at clinical centers across Italy.

Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Crohn's Disease: An Updated Systematic Review

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that significantly impacts patient quality of life. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, in the treatment of CD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, yielding seven studies published between 2020 and 2024, encompassing 1,481 patients. The review includes randomized controlled trials, post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials, and observational studies. Findings consistently demonstrate upadacitinib's superiority over placebo in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, achieving endoscopic response, and normalizing inflammatory markers. Notably, upadacitinib showed rapid symptom relief, with clinical remission observed as early as five to six days after treatment initiation. Efficacy was observed across various patient populations, including those with prior biologic failure. Long-term studies indicated sustained clinical and endoscopic improvements, with remission rates maintained for up to 30 months. Upadacitinib also demonstrated effectiveness in real-world, treatment-refractory cohorts. Safety profiles were generally consistent with those of other JAK inhibitors. Common adverse events included infections, particularly herpes zoster, and laboratory abnormalities such as neutropenia and elevated creatine kinase. Serious adverse events were infrequent, although careful monitoring is warranted. This review suggests that upadacitinib is a promising treatment option for moderate to severe CD, offering rapid and sustained efficacy with an acceptable safety profile.

[Small Molecule Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: JAK Inhibitors and S1PR Modulators]

Small molecules, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs), are promising new treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Small molecules exhibit more predictable pharmacokinetics than biologics, are less likely to induce immune responses, and can be administered orally. JAK inhibitors function by blocking the activity of JAK enzymes, which prevents the subsequent phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), while upadacitinib is approved for UC and Crohn's disease. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors can increase the risk of herpes zoster, cancer, major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism. S1PRMs bind to S1PRs, particularly S1PR1, on lymphocytes. This interaction inhibits lymphocytes from exiting the lymph nodes and migrating to the gut, thereby reducing inflammation and the immune response in the intestinal mucosa. Ozanimod and etrasimod are S1PRMs approved for the treatment of UC, but they can cause side effects such as bradycardia, conduction disorder, and macular edema. Overall, JAK inhibitors and S1PRMs offer significant benefits in managing IBD, although their potential side effects require careful monitoring.

Anti-IL23/12 agents and JAK inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease

IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract with increasing incidence worldwide. Multiple factors, such as genetic background, environmental and luminal factors, and mucosal immune dysregulation, have been implicated in the cause of IBD, although the cause of the disease remains unknown. IL-12 and IL-23 and their downstream signaling pathways participate in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Early and aggressive treatment with biologic therapies or novel small molecules is needed to decrease complications and the need for hospitalization and surgery. The landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment has tremendously improved with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs. Several novel biologics and small molecule drugs targeting IL-12 and IL-23 and their downstream targets have shown positive efficacy and safety data in clinical trials, and several drugs have been approved for the treatment of IBD. In the future, numerous potential emerging therapeutic options for IBD treatment are believed to come to the fore, achieving disease cure.

A Practical guide to selecting and using new Crohn's disease therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review details the three new agents, including two novel mechanisms of action, approved to treat Crohn's disease in recent years. We review efficacy, safety, prescribing information, and available data on positioning these new therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risankizumab and upadacitinib are novel mechanisms of action approved to treat moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Risankizumab targets the cytokine interleukin-23. Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for use in individuals who have previously failed or are intolerant to an anti-TNF agent. Subcutaneous infliximab provides a novel method of administering maintenance dosing of a longstanding and efficacious therapy.

SUMMARY

Risankizumab has shown efficacy in both biologic naïve and biologic experienced populations. The SEQUENCE trial shows superiority of risankizumab over ustekinumab for disease response in patients who have previously failed an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent. Upadacitinib has shown good efficacy in clinical trials even in the setting of a mandated steroid taper during induction. Subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy appears noninferior to i.v. infliximab and shows good treatment persistence in real world transitions. Additional data is needed to better understand how to position these therapies.

Biologics and small molecules treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients with comorbid conditions and special populations: an Italian perspective

This comprehensive review offers a detailed look at atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment in Italy, focusing primarily on the use of biologics and small molecules. In response to advancing knowledge of AD's causes and treatments, there's a global need for updated guidelines to provide physicians with a more comprehensive clinical perspective, facilitating personalized treatment strategies. Dupilumab, a groundbreaking biologic, gained approval as a significant milestone. Clinical trials demonstrated its ability to significantly reduce AD severity scores, with an impressive 37% of patients achieving clear or nearly clear skin within just 16 weeks of treatment. Real-world studies further support its efficacy across various age groups, including the elderly, with a safety profile akin to that of younger adults. Tralokinumab, a more recent approval, shows promise in clinical trials, particularly among younger populations. However, its real-world application, especially in older individuals, lacks comprehensive data. Janus Kinases inhibitors like Upadacitinib, Baricitinib, and Abrocitinib hold substantial potential for AD treatment. Nevertheless, data remains limited for patients over 75, with older adults perceived to carry a higher risk profile. Integrated safety analyses revealed individuals aged 60 and above experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events and malignancies, underscoring the need for cautious consideration. While these therapies offer promise, especially among younger patients, further research is essential to determine their safety and efficacy in various populations, including pediatric, geriatric, and those with comorbidities. Biologics and small molecules are improving AD treatment, as shown in this review.

Approach to loss of response to advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Remarkable progress over the last decade has equipped clinicians with many options in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinicians now have the unique opportunity to provide individualized treatment that can achieve and sustain remission in many patients. However, issues of primary non-response (PNR) and secondary loss of response (SLOR) to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapies remains a common problem. Specific issues include the choice of optimization of therapy, identifying when dose optimization will recapture response, establishing optimal dose for escalation and when to switch therapy.

AIM

To explores the issues of PNR and SLOR to non-TNFi therapies.

METHODS

This review explores the current evidence and literature to elucidate management options in cases of PNR/SLOR. It will also explore potential predictors for response following SLOR/PNR to therapies including the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

RESULTS

In the setting of PNR and loss of response to alpha-beta7-integrin inhibitors and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 inhibitors dose optimization is a reasonable option to capture response. For Janus kinase inhibitors dose optimization can be utilized to recapture response with loss of response.

CONCLUSION

The role of TDM in the setting of advanced non-TNFi therapies to identify patients who require dose optimization and as a predictor for clinical remission is not yet established and this remains an area that should be addressed in the future.

Ozanimod Differentially Impacts Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Ozanimod showed efficacy and safety in the phase 2 STEPSTONE study conducted in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.

AIMS

This analysis assessed the effects of ozanimod on circulating lymphocytes in Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Patients received ozanimod 0.92 mg for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte subtypes were evaluated using multicolor flow analysis on blood samples collected before treatment and on Week 12. Absolute lymphocyte count changes were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Disease activity changes and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at Week 12, and associations with lymphocyte subtype levels were assessed using Spearman's correlation and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Reductions in median total T, Th, and cytotoxic T cells occurred at Week 12 (45.4%-76.8%), with reductions in most subtypes of 47.5% to 91.3% (P < 0.001). CD8+ terminally differentiated effector memory cells were largely unaffected (median change, - 19%; P = 0.44). Reductions in median total B cells occurred at Week 12 (76.7%), with reductions in subtypes of 71.4% to 81.7% (P < 0.001). Natural killer and monocyte cell counts were unchanged. Greater baseline levels and changes in nonswitched memory B cells were significantly associated with clinical, endoscopic, and histologic efficacy (P < 0.05, all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Ozanimod reduced circulating levels of all B-cell and most T-cell subsets but not monocytes or natural killer cells. Key subsets relevant to immune surveillance were not reduced, supporting the low risk of infection and malignancy with ozanimod in chronic inflammatory diseases. Levels of nonswitched memory B cells were associated with efficacy, providing a potential marker for ozanimod response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02531113, EudraCT: 2015-002025-19.

Rescue therapy with upadacitinib in medically refractory pediatric ulcerative colitis

Approved options for advanced therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are approved in adult IBD, their benefit in pediatric populations is not yet delineated. We present a 13-year-old female patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to numerous therapies and courses of prednisone that ultimately responded to a JAK inhibitor. Initial treatment consisted of 5-aminosalicylate and azathioprine. This was changed to adalimumab due to persistent symptoms. Repeat colonoscopy revealed pancolitis, thus she was transitioned to vedolizumab. She was hospitalized twice for uncontrolled symptoms on vedolizumab and subsequent scope showed continued pancolitis. As a result, she transitioned to ustekinumab without symptomatic relief after adjusting to monthly dosing. The family declined colectomy, opting to exhaust all medical therapies. Upadacitinib was started and her symptoms resolved within 1 week, and she remains in steroid-free remission. This case illustrates the possible role of JAK inhibitors in extensively refractory pediatric UC patients before colectomy.

Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinases (JAK) are enzymes involved in signaling pathways that activate the immune system. Upadacitinib, an oral small molecule, is the first JAK inhibitor approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD), following successful phase II and III trials. Compared to other JAK inhibitors, upadacitinib has a high selectivity toward JAK1. This characteristic could improve its efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the available knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for CD.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of newer targeted small molecules drug, including JAK inhibitors, marked a significant advancement in terms of effectiveness. In fact, the oral administration, the rapid absorption, the excellent bioavailability and the short serum time of maximum concentration are some of the advantages compared to biologics. The selective inhibition of JAK1 by upadacitinib allows for high efficacy while maintaining a reliable safety profile.

Managing Risks with Newer Oral Small Molecules in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) is challenging; thus, the need for newer therapeutic options with an oral route of administration has led to the development of novel small molecules drugs (SMDs). We aim to highlight the most common Adverse events (AEs) associated with SMDs and recommendations on monitoring for AEs before and during treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

SMDs, such as Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, have been associated with laboratory abnormalities, infections, and risk of thromboembolic events. Therefore, oral agents with greater selectivity in JAK inhibition, such as tofacitinib and upadacitinib, were later developed. Ozanimod and etrasimod, S1PR agonists, require closer safety profile monitoring by clinicians. Multiple therapies have been recently developed with variable efficacy. However, they have been associated with AEs, and some require close monitoring prior to and during therapy. Clinicians should highlight these adverse events to patients while reassuring the safety profile of these novel SMDs for IBD is favorable.

Choosing Therapy for Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

The availability of approved therapies for Crohn's disease has significantly increased over the past decade. To choose the appropriate therapy for the patient, ideally head to head studies, and data on positioning could help the provider individualize the decision. Due to the paucity of head-to-head trial data, we turn to network meta-analysis and real-world studies to help guide our treatment choices. Ultimately, the best approach is to consider each patient on an individual basis, taking into consideration the characteristics of their disease, individual risk factors, extra-intestinal manifestations, co-morbid conditions, patient age, cost, and personal preferences. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic as well as small molecule therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. We have summarized the evidence in relation to factors such as efficacy, fistulizing disease, pregnancy, infection risk, and co-existing conditions.

Dual-Targeted Therapy with Upadacitinib and Ustekinumab in Medically Complex Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ongoing efforts to break the therapeutic ceiling in inflammatory bowel disease include combination therapy approaches. Dual-targeted therapy (DTT) has been reported in case reports and small case series. This report describes our experience with ustekinumab (UST) and upadacitinib (UPA) as DTT in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, we reviewed medical records of patients with CD treated with combined UST and UPA between April 2021 and July 2022. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) ≤ 4, and clinical response was defined as decrease in HBI ≥ 3 or physician's assessment of clinical response.

RESULTS

We identified 10 CD patients treated with UST/UPA, with median follow-up period of 10 months (interquartile range (IQR) 7.3-12). Median age was 35.5 years (IQR 28.3-43.8) and median number of prior biologic treatment exposures was 4 (IQR 4-5). Indications for UST/UPA were active CD (n = 6), extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) (n = 2), and both active CD and EIM (n = 2). Five of six patients with active CD achieved clinical remission with UST/UPA. Two patients with active EIM (joint pain) achieved resolution of their symptoms. One patient exhibited improvement in both conditions. Three patients developed mild respiratory symptoms and one experienced bowel obstruction. Two patients developed nausea resulting in de-escalation of treatment interval or discontinuation altogether.

CONCLUSION

Based on our case series, combination therapy with UST and UPA may be effective and appears safe in refractory Crohn's disease and for patients with co-existing extraintestinal manifestations.

Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT and real-world observational studies

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib, a novel and selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, has demonstrated promising efficacy in managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, our primary aim was to comprehensively assess the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profile of upadacitinib in the treatment of patients with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature search across prominent databases, including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, to identify pertinent studies providing insights into the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in IBD. The primary endpoint was the achievement of clinical remission, while secondary endpoints encompassed clinical response, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and the evaluation of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis of nine studies, we categorized results by study type. Clinical remission rates were: RCTs 36 % (95 % CI = 30-42 %), real-world studies 25 % (95 % CI = 1-49 %), retrospective studies 40 % (95 % CI = 24-56 %), cohort studies 55 % (95 % CI = 25-85 %). Clinical response rates were: RCTs 61 % (95 % CI = 55-67 %), real-world studies 42 % (95 % CI = 14-70 %), cohort studies 65 % (95 % CI = 57-73 %). Endoscopic remission rates were: RCTs 19 % (95 % CI = 15-24 %), cohort studies 29 % (95 % CI = 5-52 %). Endoscopic response rates were: RCTs 41 % (95 % CI = 36-47 %), cohort studies 57 % (95 % CI = 31-83 %). Incidence rate for any AEs: IBD 69 % (95 % CI = 63-76 %), UC 65 % (95 % CI = 57-74 %), CD 75 % (95 % CI = 67-82 %).

CONCLUSION

Cumulative data from real-world studies and trials confirm the efficacy of upadacitinib in IBD induction and maintenance, with consistent safety. However, further long-term studies are needed to understand its sustained effectiveness and safety.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Conventional Immunosuppression to Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic, recurrent inflammatory diseases with partly understood etiology and pathogenesis. The course of IBD, both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is characterized by periods of relapse and remission with the possible occurrence of extraintestinal manifestations.

SUMMARY

During the last decades, therapeutic goals in IBD evolved toward endoscopic remission and mucosal healing creating the need for early administration of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). DMAs include conventional immunosuppressants (thiopurines, methotrexate), biologic drugs (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, and anti-IL-12/23 monoclonal antibodies), and small molecules (JAK inhibitors, S1P receptor modulators). Patients with aggressive course of disease and risk factors for poor prognosis should be treated with biologic therapy early, while conventional immunomodulators should be used in those with milder course of disease in the absence of risk factors.

KEY MESSAGES

Challenges in the treatment of IBD patients include the choice of effective yet safe drug and prevention or overcoming loss of response.

Upadacitinib in Crohn's Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety

Crohn's disease (CD) presents a formidable challenge as a chronic inflammatory condition. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively assess upadacitinib, a novel Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, regarding its efficacy, safety, and mechanistic insights in CD treatment. A thorough search of electronic databases identified studies investigating upadacitinib's impact on CD patients. Study characteristics, efficacy outcomes (clinical remission and endoscopic response), safety profiles, and mechanistic insights were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using established tools. The synthesis of three studies consistently demonstrated improvements in clinical remission rates and endoscopic outcomes in upadacitinib-treated patients. Adverse events, such as herpes zoster, intestinal perforation, non-melanoma skin cancer, adjudicated cardiovascular events, and anemia, were reported, necessitating vigilant safety monitoring. Upadacitinib emerges as a promising therapeutic option for CD, supported by its observed clinical benefits and mechanistic implications. However, safety concerns underscore the importance of careful patient selection. These findings contribute to the ongoing discussion surrounding personalized treatment approaches for CD, emphasizing the need for further research to confirm its enduring efficacy and safety.

Mimicry of microbially-derived butyrate reveals templates for potent intestinal epithelial HIF stabilizers

Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids, including butyrate (BA), have multiple beneficial health effects. In the colon, BA concentrations range from 10 to 20 mM and up to 95% is utilized as energy by the mucosa. BA plays a key role in epithelial-barrier regulation and anti-inflammation, and regulates cell growth and differentiation, at least in part, due to its direct influence on stabilization of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). It remains unclear whether BA is the optimal metabolite for such a response. In this study, we explored metabolite mimicry as an attractive strategy for the biological response to HIF. We discovered that 4-mercapto butyrate (MBA) stabilizes HIF more potently and has a longer biological half-life than BA in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). We validated the MBA-mediated HIF transcriptional activity through the induction of classic HIF gene targets in IECs and enhanced epithelial barrier formation in vitro. In-vivo studies with MBA revealed systemic HIF stabilization in mice, which was more potent than its parent BA metabolite. Mechanistically, we found that MBA enhances oxygen consumption and that the sulfhydryl group is essential for HIF stabilization, but exclusively as a four-carbon SCFA. These findings reveal a combined biochemical mechanism for HIF stabilization and provide a foundation for the discovery of potent metabolite-like scaffolds.

The Future of Advanced Therapies for Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Pediatric Crohn's disease commonly presents with moderate-to-severe intestinal inflammation with a greater risk of complications if remission is not achieved. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have offered the possibility of deep and durable remission; however, many children do not respond or no longer respond over time. Further, some children do not require broader systemic immunosuppression to achieve remission and are better served by an alternative treatment strategy. Proper utilization of advanced biologic and small-molecule therapies, which have become available for adult patients since anti-tumor necrosis factor medications, is paramount for tighter disease control for a large proportion of children. Newer advanced therapies such as anti-integrin and anti-interleukin biologics, and several small-molecule agents capitalize on various mechanisms through narrower immunologic targets and reduced immunogenicity. Given limited regulatory approvals of these agents for use in children with Crohn's disease, clinicians continue to rely on data extrapolated from clinical trials in adult patients, sparse pediatric studies, and a growing real-world experience for treatment selection and optimization. In this article, we discuss currently available treatment options, pipeline drugs, and relevant data as they pertain to some of the most pressing clinical challenges faced in treating pediatric Crohn's disease.

An Assessment of Comparative Medication Durability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With and Without Co-morbid Psoriasis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and/or Enteropathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for many co-morbid diseases. However, little is known about durability of IBD medications in patients with co-morbid diseases.

AIMS

Determine medication durability in IBD patients with and without psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and/or enteropathic arthropathy.

METHODS

All patients with at least three ICD-9 or 10 diagnoses for IBD were included in the cohort. The risk factors of interest were a co-morbid diagnosis of psoriasis (IBD-Ps), rheumatoid arthritis (IBD-RA), and/or enteropathic arthritis (IBD-EA). Medication durability was defined as days of medication use, calculated using order start and stop dates from the electronic medical record. Significant differences were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test, as appropriate, for categorical variables. Boxplots were constructed for graphical interpretation of results.

RESULTS

In the psoriasis group, there were 481 patients with 831 medication exposures [131 IBS-Ps (16%), 700 IBD only (84%)]. The median days of medication use were numerically higher in the IBD-Ps group for all therapies [anti-TNF: 1109 vs 861 (p = 0.17); anti-IL-12/23: 984 vs 834 (p = 0.33); JAKi: 682 vs 230 (p = 0.13)], anti-TNF/IM: 370 vs 202 (p = 0.57), except anti-integrin therapy [214 vs 470 (p = 0.08)]. When restricting to UC only, patients with co-morbid again Ps had a significantly shorter duration on anti-integrin therapy (84 vs 456 days, p = 0.02). While not reaching statistical significance, there was a distinctly longer medication duration on JAKi therapy (910 vs 317, p = 0.10). When restricting to patients with CD only, no results reached statistical significance though there was a trend towards longer anti-TNF durability in CD-Ps (1340 vs 1000 days, p = 0.098). There were no differences in medication durability in IBD-RA or IBD-EA patients.

DISCUSSION

Larger studies investigating medication durability of JAKi and anti-integrin therapy in IBD patients with psoriasis would be beneficial given noteworthy trends towards increased and decreased durability, respectively.

Dual-Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic systemic immune-mediated disorder. The disease is triggered and perpetuated by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition, dysregulated immune responses, and environmental factors. Pediatric IBD is considered to be more aggressive compared with adult-onset IBD, and commonly requires more intensive pharmacological and surgical treatments. Although the use of targeted therapy, such as biologic therapy and small molecule therapy, is on the rise, there are children with IBD who are refractory to all current therapeutic options. For them, a combination of biologic agents or a biologic agent with small molecules as dual-targeted therapy (DTT) may be a possible therapeutic option. The main indications for DTT are high inflammatory burden and refractoriness to standard therapy, extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, adverse effects of therapy, and co-existing immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Several combination therapies were described for pediatric refractory IBD. The main ones were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab (VDZ), anti-TNF and ustekinumab (UST), VDZ and UST, and biologic agents with tofacitinib. DTT exhibits high efficacy, with high rates of clinical response and remission as well as biomarker remission. The data on endoscopic and radiologic remission are scarce. Most of the adverse effects reported under DTT were mild; however, the serious ones that had been observed mandate a profoundly cautious approach when considering it. Triple immunosuppressive therapy and combinations of biologics with emergent therapies such as selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and anti-interleukin-23 agents, are potential future regimens for children with IBD who are refractory to current therapeutic options. This review provides an update of publications on these issues.

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Treatment Landscape

The therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed considerably over the past two decades, owing to the development and widespread penetration of targeted therapies, including biologics and small molecules. While some conventional treatments continue to have an important role in the management of IBD, treatment of IBD is increasingly moving towards targeted therapies given their greater efficacy and safety in comparison to conventional agents. Early introduction of these therapies-particularly in persons with Crohn's disease-combining targeted therapies with traditional anti-metabolite immunomodulators and targeting objective markers of disease activity (in addition to symptoms), have been shown to improve health outcomes and will be increasingly adopted over time. The substantially increased costs associated with targeted therapies has led to a ballooning of healthcare expenditure to treat IBD over the past 15 years. The introduction of less expensive biosimilar anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies may bend this cost curve downwards, potentially allowing for more widespread access to these medications. Newer therapies targeting different inflammatory pathways and complementary and alternative therapies (including novel diets) will continue to shape the IBD treatment landscape. More precise use of a growing number of targeted therapies in the right individuals at the right time will help minimize the development of expensive and disabling complications, which has the potential to further reduce costs and improve outcomes.

The evolving role of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are a new class of oral therapies for the treatment of moderate-severe ulcerative colitis with additional potential for the treatment of moderate-severe Crohn's disease. In contrast to biologic therapies JAKi provide the opportunity for non-immunogenic once or twice daily oral therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Janus Kinase inhibitors for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease based on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical trial and real-world data regarding safety and efficacy; focusing on regulatory approvals in the U.S. and Europe.

EXPERT OPINION

Janus Kinase inhibitors are considered among the 'advanced therapies' for IBD and are approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in adults with pending approvals for Crohn's disease in the U.S. JAKi offer non-immunogenic, oral options for patient not responding to other conventional agents but, have been 'restricted' by the FDA to patients with inadequate response to TNF blockers. JAKi offer rapidly acting oral alternatives to biologic agents for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis where the risks of cardiovascular and thrombotic events noted in rheumatoid arthritis have not been observed in IBD clinical trials. Nevertheless, monitoring of infections (primarily herpes zoster) and risk factors for cardiovascular and thrombotic complications is appropriate.

Review article: Risk of cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving small molecule drugs

BACKGROUND

In the context of an ageing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, cardiovascular comorbidities become particularly relevant. Novel small molecule drugs (SMDs) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe IBD have been recently approved, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators. Data from rheumatoid arthritis population have raised concerns about the risk of cardiovascular events with the use of tofacitinib, which was extrapolated to other immune-mediated diseases and other JAK inhibitors. S1P receptor modulation has been associated with potential cardiovascular events, especially bradycardia and cardiac conduction abnormalities.

AIM

To review the incidence of cardiovascular events with the use of SMDs in patients with IBD and to provide practical recommendations on mitigation strategies.

METHODS

Published literature was reviewed; recommendations were synthesised by experts in both cardiovascular diseases and IBD.

RESULTS

Evidence from the IBD population does not indicate a higher risk of cardiovascular events with tofacitinib and other JAK inhibitors. The risk is higher in patients with intermediate to high cardiovascular risk. S1P modulators may be associated with a dose-dependent, first-dose effect, transient risk of conduction abnormalities (bradycardia and AV block). Screening and monitoring of cardiovascular risk factors should be done in all patients with IBD. Risk stratification for cardiovascular disease should be performed before starting treatment with SMDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence of both JAK inhibitors and S1P modulators indicates a reassuring safety profile of SMDs from the cardiovascular perspective in the overall IBD population. Efforts should be made to identify patients with IBD at a higher risk of cardiovascular events.

Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

In recent years, better knowledge of the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has led to a relevant expansion of the therapeutic arsenal for these conditions. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a family of small molecules that block one or more of the intracellular tyrosine kinases, including JAK-1, JAK-2, JAK-3 and TYK-2. Tofacitinib, a non-selective small molecule JAK inhibitor, and upadacitinib and filgotinib, which are selective JAK-1 inhibitors, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis. Compared to biological drugs, JAK inhibitors have a short half-life, rapid onset of action, and no immunogenicity. Both clinical trials and real-world evidence support the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IBD. However, these therapies have been linked with multiple adverse events (AEs) including infection, hypercholesterolemia, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancy. While early studies recognized several potential AEs, post-marketing trials have shown that tofacitinib may increase the risk of thromboembolic diseases and major cardiovascular events. The latter are seen in patients aged 50 years or older with cardiovascular risk factors. Hence, the benefits of treatment and risk stratification need to be considered when positioning tofacitinib. Novel JAK inhibitors with a more selective effect on JAK-1 have proven to be effective in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, offering a potentially safer and efficacious therapeutic option to patients, including those with previous non-response to other therapies such as biologics. Nevertheless, long-term effectiveness and safety data are required.

Selective JAK1 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, also known as jakinibs, are third-generation oral small molecules that have expanded the therapeutic options for the management of chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, has spearheaded the new JAK class for IBD treatment. Unfortunately, serious adverse effects, including cardiovascular complications such as pulmonary embolism and venous thromboembolism or even death from any cause, have been reported for tofacitinib. However, it is anticipated that next-generation selective JAK inhibitors may limit the development of serious adverse events, leading to a safer treatment course with these novel targeted therapies. Nevertheless, although this drug class was recently introduced, following the launch of second-generation biologics in the late 1990s, it is breaking new ground and has been shown to efficiently modulate complex cytokine-driven inflammation in both preclinical models and human studies. Herein, we review the clinical opportunities for targeting JAK1 signaling in the pathophysiology of IBD, the biology and chemistry underpinning these target-selective compounds, and their mechanisms of actions. We also discuss the potential for these inhibitors in efforts to balance their benefits and harms.

Landscape of new drugs and targets in inflammatory bowel disease

Although the therapeutic armamentarium of Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) physicians has expanded rapidly in recent years, a proportion of patients remain with a suboptimal response to medical treatment due to primary no response, loss of response or intolerance to currently available drugs. Our growing knowledges of IBD pathophysiology has led to the development of a multitude of new therapies over time, which may, 1 day, be able to address this unmet medical need. This review aims to provide physicians an update of emerging therapies in IBD by focusing on drugs currently in phase 3 clinical trials. Among the most promising molecules are anti-IL-23, JAK-inhibitors, anti-integrins and S1P modulators. While the results in terms of efficacy and safety are fairly clear for some classes, the question of safety remains more uncertain for other classes. Molecules at a more preliminary stage of development (phase 1 and 2), one of which may 1 day offer an optimal benefit-risk ratio, will also be presented as well as their respective mechanisms of action.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease beyond tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: novel biologics and small-molecule drugs

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, have increased in Asia and developing countries. In the past two decades, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have revolutionized the treatment of IBD, in part by decreasing the rates of complications and surgery. Although anti-TNF agents have changed the course of IBD, there are unmet needs in terms of primary and secondary non-responses and side effects such as infections and malignancies. Novel biologics and small-molecule drugs have been developed for IBD, and the medical treatment options have improved. These drugs include sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators and anti-integrins to block immune cell migration, and cytokine and Janus kinase inhibitors to block immune cell communications. In this review, we discuss the approved novel biologics and small-molecule drugs, including several of those in the late stages of development, for the treatment of IBD.