Role of Predictive Value of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Later-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Chemotoxicity and Associated Risk Factors in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience multiple types of chemotoxicity affecting treatment compliance, survival, and quality of life (QOL). Prior research shows clinician-reported chemotoxicity (i.e., grading scales or diagnostic codes) predicts rehospitalization and cancer survival. However, a comprehensive synthesis of clinician-reported chemotoxicity is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine chemotoxicity's prevalence and risk factors in CRC.

METHODS

A systematic search from 2009 to 2024 yielded 30 studies for review, with 25 included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Pooled prevalences of overall, non-hematological, and hematological moderate-to-severe toxicities were 45.7%, 39.2%, and 25.3%, respectively. The most common clinician-reported chemotoxicities were gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (22.9%) and neuropathy or neutropenia (17.9%). Significant risk factors at baseline were malnutritional status, frailty, impaired immune or hepato-renal functions, short telomere lengths, low gut lactobacillus levels, age, female sex, aggressive chemotherapy, and low QOL. Age was associated with neutropenia (β: -1.44) and GI toxicity (β:1.85) (p-values < 0.01). Older adults (>65 y.o.) had higher prevalences of overall (OR: 1.14) and GI (OR: 1.65) toxicities, but a lower prevalence of neutropenia (OR: 0.65) than younger adults (p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the importance of closely monitoring and managing chemotoxicity in CRC patients receiving chemotherapy.

CONUT score as a predictor for anamorelin efficacy in patients with cancer cachexia receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Anamorelin is expected to improve cancer cachexia by increasing lean body mass (LBM) due to increased appetite and protein synthesis. However, the effect of anamorelin on cancer cachexia in real-world practice is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin and to identify predictors of efficacy on treatment with anamorelin.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cancer cachexia treated with chemotherapy between May 2021 and August 2022. Efficacy of anamorelin was evaluated using LBM, with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment defined as maintenance or an increase in LBM for 12 weeks. We examined factors associated with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment using a multivariable logistic model that included controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, an objective assessment of nutritional disorders, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which scores the cachexia status of cancer patients. To assess patient subjective quality of life (QOL) changes related to eating after starting anamorelin treatment, we used a questionnaire (QOL-ACD appetite-related items: Q8, 9, 11). Adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.

RESULTS

On analysis of data from 40 patients, 23 patients showed a 12-week sustained effective response to anamorelin (57.5%). At 12 weeks, LBM significantly increased by 1.63 ± 3.73 kg (mean ± SD). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that a low CONUT score was significantly associated with "12-week sustained effective response" to anamorelin treatment (adjusted odds ratio: 13.5, 95% confidence intervals: 2.2-84.2, P = 0.004). QOL assessment showed a trend toward increased appetite and enjoyment of meals after anamorelin initiation. Five patients (12.5%) had an increase in HbA1c of more than 1.0% during the 12 weeks after the start of anamorelin. No patient had QT interval prolongation or grade 3 or higher hepatic transaminase elevation.

CONCLUSION

Anamorelin may maintain or increase LBM with tolerable safety in patients with cancer cachexia undergoing chemotherapy. A low CONUT score, despite meeting criteria for cancer cachexia, is suggested as a predictor for the efficacy of anamorelin, indicating that patients with a low CONUT score may benefit from early introduction of anamorelin.

Evaluation of the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a post hoc analysis of the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK0110)

BACKGROUND

The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) combines serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin and was shown to predict survival in advanced cancer. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of mGPS on survival as well as its predictive value when combined with gender in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In XELAVIRI, mCRC patients were treated with either fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (sequential treatment arm; Arm A) or upfront combination of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab/irinotecan (intensive treatment arm; Arm B). In the present post hoc analysis, survival was evaluated with respect to the assorted mGPS categories 0, 1 or 2. Interaction between mGPS and gender was analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 421 mCRC patients treated in XELAVIRI, 362 [119 women (32.9%) and 243 men (67.1%)] were assessable. For the entire study population a significant association between mGPS and overall survival (OS) was observed [mGPS = 0: median 28.9 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9-33.6 months; mGPS = 1: median 21.4 months, 95% CI 17.6-26.1 months; mGPS = 2: median 16.8 months, 95% CI 14.3-21.2 months; P < 0.00001]. Similar results were found when comparing progression-free survival between groups. The effect of mGPS on survival did not depend on the applied treatment regimen (P = 0.21). In female patients, a trend towards longer OS was observed in Arm A versus Arm B, with this effect being clearly more pronounced in the mGPS cohort 0 (41.6 versus 25.5 months; P = 0.056). By contrast, median OS was longer in male patients with an mGPS of 1-2 treated in Arm B versus Arm A (20.8 versus 17.4 months; P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the role of mGPS as an independent predictor of OS regardless of the treatment regimen in mCRC patients receiving first-line treatment. mGPS may help identify gender-specific subgroups that benefit more or less from upfront intensive therapy.

Prognostic impact of severe neutropenia in colorectal cancer patients treated with TAS-102 and bevacizumab, addressing immortal-time bias

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported an association between severe neutropenia and long-term survival in patients treated with trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102). Because some of these studies failed to address immortality time bias, however, their findings should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, the association between severe neutropenia and survival in patients receiving TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab (Bmab) remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with colorectal cancer who received Bmab + TAS-102. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who developed grade ≥ 3 neutropenia during the treatment period and those who did not. To account for immortal time bias, we used two approaches, time-varying Cox regression and landmark analysis.

RESULTS

Median OS was 15.3 months [95% CI: 14.1-NA] in patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 10.0 months [95% CI: 8.1-NA] in those without. In time-varying Cox regression, onset grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly related to longer survival after adjustment for age and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. Additionally, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-day landmark analysis showed that grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was associated with longer survival after adjustment for age and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, with respective HRs of 0.30 [0.10-0.90], 0.65 [0.30-1.42], 0.39 [0.17-0.90], and 0.41 [0.18-0.95].

CONCLUSION

We identified an association between long-term survival and the development of severe neutropenia during the early cycle of Bmab + TAS-102 using an approach that addressed immortality time bias.

Biomarkers of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Efficacy

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is a newer generation chemotherapy that has been approved for the later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. The oral drug provides a modest benefit of prolongation of survival over placebo in pretreated patients with these cancers with acceptable toxicity. Studies have shown rare objective responses (2-4%), and the disease control rates were 44% in both colorectal and gastric cancer randomized trials. Thus, the majority of patients progress through treatment and are burdened by toxicities. To better characterize the sub-group of patients with a higher probability of benefit from trifluridine/tipiracil, predictive biomarkers have been sought using data from randomized trials as well as from non-randomized trials and real-world series. Biomarkers examined include clinical characteristics of the patients, laboratory tests, and tumor derived biomarkers. These studies show that early neutropenia on treatment, and ratios of leukocyte subsets, are potential biomarkers able to predict trifluridine/tipiracil benefit. Combinations of laboratory values and clinical characteristics and proteins involved in trifluridine transport and activation have been examined with initial positive results.

Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score: A Novel Prognostic Score for Patients with Resectable Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin in patients with resectable colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Seven-hundred-and-nineteen patients who underwent colorectal cancer resection in Hubei Cancer Hospital were included. Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition score (0–6) was constructed based on preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, Cox regression, and C-index were conducted to detect the prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score. The prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score in different subgroups by sex, location of tumor, pathologic stage, and KRAS mutation were also explored. The prognostic performance of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score was further compared with that of other traditional prognostic indicators.

Results

The median follow-up time was 40 months. High inflammation-immunity-nutrition score (>2 scores) presented worse survival, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 3.106 (2.202–4.380) for overall survival and 2.105 (1.604–2.764) for disease-free survival. Besides, the associations of high inflammation-immunity-nutrition score with overall survival were even stronger in cases with wild type KRAS, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 4.018 (2.355–6.854). Considering the AUCs, C-indices, and hazard ratios estimates, inflammation-immunity-nutrition score presented better prognostic performance than high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, prognostic nutrition index, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for overall survival.

Conclusion

Inflammation-immunity-nutrition score might serve as a powerful prognostic score in patients with colorectal cancer for overall survival, particularly in patients with wild type KRAS.

An Applicable Inflammation-Joined and Nutrition-Related Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic significance of a novel inflammation-joined and nutrition-related clinicopathological marker for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Various factors from preoperative fasting blood samples from 2471 patients with CRC were retrospectively analyzed. Factors related to prognosis were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, while the log-rank test was used to measure survival differences between groups.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that C-reactive protein (CRP)/mean corpuscular volume (MCV) ratio, TNM stage, differentiation, right-sided tumor, age, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and CRP level were significantly associated with poor prognosis in CRC. In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy is regarded as a protective factor. Elevation of CRP/MCV ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 1.535, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.121-2.104, P = 0.008), TNM stage (OR: 2.747, 95% CI: 2.175-3.469, P < 0.001), and differentiation (OR, 1.384; 95% CI, 1.150-1.666; P = 0.001) were prognostic risk factors in the multivariate analyses. Subgroup analysis showed that CRP/MCV, TNM staging system, and differentiation also independently affected survival in patients with lymph node-positive CRC. The nomogram based on these three indicators showed that CRP/MCV had a greater prognostic value and clinical significance for lymph node-positive patients with poorly differentiated tumors at the late stage.

CONCLUSION

A novel nomogram using the clinicopathologic index of inflammation and nutrition was constructed to predict the prognosis of CRC. Early interventions should be emphasized for advanced-stage patients with severe inflammation and poor nutritional status.

The Prognostic Value of New Index (LANR) Composed of Pre-operative Lymphocytes, Albumin, and Neutrophils in Patients With Resectable Colorectal Cancer

Background: Inflammatory factors and nutritional status are critical to the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of preoperative lymphocytes, albumin, and neutrophils (LANR) in patients with resectable colorectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 753 patients with pathologically diagnosed primary colorectal cancer were included in the study. The value of LANR was defined as follows: LANR, lymphocyte × albumin/neutrophil. The ROC curve, subgroup analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic value of LANR in overall survival and progression-free survival.

Results: The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 52–67 years). In overall survival, the area under the curve of LANR was 0.6276, and the HR (95% CI) was 0.551 (0.393–0.772). And in progression-free survival, the area under the curve of LANR was 0.5963, and the HR (95% CI) was 0.697 (0.550–0.884). The results indicate that preoperative LANR may be a reliable predictor of overall and progression-free survival in resectable colorectal cancer patients.

Conclusions: LANR is an important prognostic indicator for patients with resectable colorectal cancer, and it can also provide a reference for clinicians and patients to choose a treatment plan.

Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Predictor of Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which incorporates serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels, reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status. In this study, we evaluate the role of mGPS as a predictor of prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab therapy after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy between September 2013 and August 2019 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic factors associated with overall survival were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 26.4 months. The median progression-free survival and 1- and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 11.6 months, 48.9%, and 17.1%, respectively. The median overall survival and 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were not reached, 88.7%, and 62.3%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, mGPS at the time of nivolumab administration (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 95.7; P = .0004 [Score 1 vs. 0]; HR, 98.9; P = .0002 [Score 2 vs. 0]; and HR, 1.03; P = .971 [Score 2 vs. 1]) was extracted as the strongest predictor for overall survival followed by duration from diagnosis to treatment (P = .0001), lactate dehydrogenase (P = .0005), and lymphocyte count (P = .021). Overall survival curves were distinctly separated between mGPS Score 0 and mGPS Score 1 + 2, with median overall survival periods being not reached and 32.4 months, respectively (P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

mGPS was the strongest significant prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. This simple classification could be useful in clinical practice.

Impact of sarcopenia in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib is a key agent for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer. Sarcopenia represented by skeletal muscle depletion is closely related to frailty and predicts oncological prognoses. We hypothesized that sarcopenia negatively affects the time to treatment failure (TTF) or overall survival (OS) of patients treated with regorafenib.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients treated with regorafenib between May 2013 and April 2019 at our institution. The cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on baseline computed tomography (CT) was assessed to calculate the psoas muscle index (PMI). Sarcopenia was defined based on PMI cut-off values for Asian adults (6.36 cm²/m² for males and 3.92 cm²/m² for females).

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were analyzed. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 44.1%. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with poorer OS (median 3.2 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.031). Less 75% 1-Month Relative Dose Intensity patients experienced significantly shorter TTF and OS than the rest, as did patients receiving total regorafenib dose of < 3360 mg (median 3.1 and 9.4 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that sarcopenia was a significant predictor of prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia was a predictive marker of negative outcome for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib. Screening for sarcopenia can be used to identify patients more likely to benefit from regorafenib in routine clinical practice.

A Meta-Analysis of Glasgow Prognostic Score and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Biomarkers for Predicting Survival Outcome in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: Accumulative studies suggest the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) to be potential biomarkers; however, their prognostic value remains debatable. Our meta-analysis focused on assessing the accurate prognostic value of GPS and mGPS in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in addition to their effectiveness.

Methods: To investigate the relationship between mGPS/GPS and prognostic value in patients with RCC, we performed a comprehensive retrieval of relevant articles from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline up to February 1, 2020. STATA 15.0 software was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals for survival outcome, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A formal meta-analysis of these outcomes was performed.

Results: In total, 2,691 patients with RCC were enrolled from 15 cohort studies. Higher GPS/mGPS (GPS/mGPS of 2) indicated poorer OS, CSS, PFS, and RFS in patients with RCC. Similarly, medium GPS/mGPS (GPS/mGPS of 1) also had a significant association with poorer OS, CSS, PFS, and RFS but superior than higher GPS/mGPS in these patients.

Conclusion: GPS and mGPS are effective biomarkers for predicting prognosis in patients with RCC, and higher GPS and mGPS are closely related to inferior survival outcomes. More randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the promising value of GPS/mGPS in the future.

Prognostic scores for evaluating the survival benefit of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory analysis of the REGOTAS study

BACKGROUND

Although regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) has been recognized as a later-line standard treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), not all patients have beneficial outcomes. This study aimed to develop a prognostic scoring system for evaluating the overall survival (OS) benefit.

METHODS

Patients included in the REGOTAS study, which comprised 489 patients (regorafenib group: 199; FTD/TPI group: 290 patients), were evaluated. OS was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional model. The prognostic score was calculated using the worst four individual factors weighted by hazard ratio, and the total scores were categorized as low-, moderate-, and high-OS benefit.

RESULTS

The worst four factors in the regorafenib group were AST > 40 IU/dL (point, + 3), CRP ≥ 1.0 mg/dL (+ 2), number of metastatic organ site ≥ 3 (+ 2), and duration from initiation of 1st-line chemotherapy < 18 months (+ 2), while they were AST (+ 2), CRP (+ 2), CA19-9 > 37.0 U/mL (+ 2), and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (+ 2) in the FTD/TPI group. These corresponded to a total prognostic score of > 5, 2-4, and 0 points in the regorafenib group and 8, 2-6, and 0 points in the FTD/TPI group. The median OS in the low, moderate, and high OS benefit group was 3.3 (95% CI 3.0-3.7), 8.1 (95% CI 6.4-9.7), and 12.6 months (95% CI 10.6-14.6) in the regorafenib group and 2.8 (95% CI 2.0-3.5), 7.5 (95% CI 6.6-8.3), and 15.4 months (95% CI 9.7-21.2) in the FTD/TPI group.

CONCLUSION

These prognostic scores are useful for identifying patients with mCRC who will obtain survival benefits from these drugs.

Bevacizumab in Combination with TAS-102 Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Objective

TAS‐102 is effective for treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study determined whether combining bevacizumab (Bmab) with TAS‐102 improves clinical outcomes in refractory mCRC.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from Japanese patients with refractory mCRC who received TAS‐102 (35 mg/m², twice a day) with (T‐B group) or without Bmab (TAS‐102 monotherapy; T group) between July 2014 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were median time to treatment failure, overall response rate, and the incidence of adverse events. Clinical outcomes were compared using propensity score matched analysis.

Results

Data from 57 patients were analyzed (T‐B group: 21 patients, T group: 36 patients). Median OS was significantly longer in the T‐B group than the T group (14.4 months vs. 4.5 months, p < .001). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that combination therapy with Bmab was significantly correlated with OS. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed that the median OS was significantly longer in the T‐B group than the T group (14.4 months vs. 6.1 months, p = .006) and that there was a significant correlation between Bmab and OS. The incidence of hypertension (grade ≥2) as an adverse event was significantly higher in the T‐B group than the T group (23.8% vs. 0.0%, p = .005), whereas other adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS‐102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies.

Implications for Practice

Combining bevacizumab (Bmab) with TAS‐102 significantly improved overall survival and several prognostic indicators in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, with manageable toxicities. Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS‐102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

To determine whether combined treatment with bevacizumab improves clinical outcomes, this retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with or without bevacizumab in patients receiving TAS‐102 for metastatic colorectal cancer.