Evaluation of the nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN)

Validity of a nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition in pediatric oncology patients is a serious clinical condition. There is a need for standardized nutrition screening in pediatric oncology patients, as nutrition screening can offer a simple method to identify children with cancer at risk of malnutrition. This study aimed to determine the validity of a Turkish version of nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN) in identifying the risk of malnutrition among children with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 78 children with cancer admitted to the pediatric hematology-oncology unit of a university hospital. In the first stage of this study, SCAN was translated into Turkish, and in the second stage, the validity of SCAN against pediatric Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (AND/ASPEN) malnutrition criteria were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients had a median age of 8.0 years (range, 2-18 years; IQR, 5-14 years), 61.5% were male, and 60.3% were diagnosed with leukemia. According to SCAN, 53.8% had high risk of malnutrition. Validation of SCAN against pediatric SGNA showed that SCAN has a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 94.5%, and accuracy of 96.1%.

CONCLUSION

The risk of malnutrition is common in children with cancer. The Turkish version of the SCAN is a simple, quick, and valid tool to determine the risk of malnutrition in children with cancer. Further research is needed to understand the impact of nutrition interventions on clinical outcomes in children at risk for malnutrition based on SCAN.

Internal validation of two nutritional screening tools in hospitalized children and adolescents with cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In cancer patients, malnutrition is associated with poorer treatment outcomes and prolonged hospital stays, negatively affecting prognosis and survival. This study aimed to evaluate the internal validity of the nutritional screening tools Nutrition Screening Tool for Childhood Cancer (SCAN) and Screening Tool Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGKids) in predicting nutritional risk in hospitalized pediatric cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study with pediatric cancer patients hospitalized between February and November 2019. ANPEDCancer was used as a reference to validate SCAN and STRONGKids due to its specificity in nutritional assessment for children and adolescents with cancer. Predictive values and agreement were analyzed. Patients were classified as at nutritional risk or not based on the tools. Nutritional status, anthropometric measures, biochemical markers, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 111 patients, 75.7 % (n = 84) were classified as at nutritional risk by SCAN, and 34.2 % (n = 38) as at high risk by STRONGKids. Patients at risk showed greater inadequacy in body composition measures and anthropometric indices. There was an association between nutritional risk as classified by the screening tools and the reduction of lean mass reserves (p = 0.039) and adipose tissue (p = 0.017). C-reactive protein was associated with nutritional risk only in STRONGKids, and with LOS only in SCAN. The agreement was 79.27 % for SCAN and 72.07 % for STRONGKids.

CONCLUSION

The SCAN demonstrated good precision in the nutritional screening of children with cancer, while STRONGKids was associated with inflamation.

Age-stratified validation and interrater reliability of the screening tool for nutritional risk for childhood cancer in hospitalized children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability, construct, and criterion validity of the screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN), stratified by age in oncology patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

Hospitalized children from birth to 18 years old, with an oncological diagnosis and expected length of stay (LOS) of >24 hours were included. Interrater and intrarrater agreements were used to evaluate the reliability of SCAN. Construct validity and criterion validity were explored in SCAN. Also, predictive validity was explored by comparing SCAN risk categories against LOS.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-four children were included in the study. The scores obtained after dietitians and physicians used SCAN showed good agreement (ICC = 0.80, 95%CI 0.71-0.86, P < 0.001). The intrarrater agreement within the evaluation of the same dietitian to the same group of patients was also good (ICC = 0.83, 95%CI 0.75-0.88, P < 0.001). After applying SCAN, 66.2% of participants scored >3 points, classified as at risk of malnutrition. The agreement observed when comparing the risk classification given by the tool with the malnutrition assessment using anthropometry variables as the criterion reference was fair (κ = 0.22, 95%CI 0.15-0.29, P < 0.001). Predictive validity indicated a slight agreement (κ = 0.16, 95%CI 0.08-0.25, P < 0.001) between malnutrition risk by SCAN and LOS. When assessing construct validity, comparing the scores given by SCAN with those provided by STRONGkids, a fair agreement was found (κ = 0.21, 95%CI 0.15-0.26, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that SCAN is a reliable and valid tool for detecting malnutrition in oncology pediatric patients upon hospital admission.

The evolution of nutritional care in children and young people with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most common paediatric malignancy in the world. Advances in treatment protocols have resulted in survival rates of >80% in most high-income countries (HIC); however, children and young people (CYP) with ALL continue to face significant nutrition-related challenges during treatment.

METHODS

This narrative review outlines the changing landscape of treatment and survivorship for CYP with ALL and the advances in nutrition knowledge that call for changes to clinical nutrition practice.

RESULTS

The incidence of ALL has remained stable in HIC; however, there have been significant advances in survival over the past 30 years. Overweight and obesity are increasingly prevalent in CYP with ALL at diagnosis, during treatment and in survivorship. Coupled with poor diet quality, high-energy and saturated fat intakes, altered eating behaviours and inactivity, this necessitates the need for a shift in nutrition intervention. Undernutrition remains a concern for CYP with high-risk treatment protocols where oral or enteral nutrition support remains a cornerstone of maintaining nutrition status.

CONCLUSIONS

With improved treatment protocols and high survival rates, a shift to focusing on diet quality, prevention of excessive weight gain and obesity during treatment and survivorship is necessary.

Nutritional Screening Tools in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is the most common type of malnutrition in industrialized countries, and it has a high associated morbidity. Despite the existence of various screening tools for its detection, there is currently no consensus in the literature on which one is the most appropriate for clinical use. The aim of this systematic review is to update the available evidence on pediatric nutritional screening tools and to compare their validity and applicability.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database, selecting articles related to nutritional screening tools in the pediatric population. A quality assessment was carried out using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 200 articles were identified, of which 11 were included in the review. They include a total of 9,573 patients (mean age of 6.7 years and 49% female) from different countries. Eight screening tools were found, and three of them were the most employed: the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids), the Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatric (STAMP), and the Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS). A high level of heterogeneity was observed among the selected studies without a gold standard for comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the heterogeneity, the PYMS seems to have the greatest capacity to detect pediatric patients at nutritional risk and should therefore be considered when choosing a nutritional screening tool.

Comparison of nutritional screening tools in pediatric oncology patients receiving chemotherapy treatment

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition in pediatric oncology patients is a complex and multifactorial process, and the most appropriate screening tool to determine the risk of malnutrition is not clear. The study aimed to compare the Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (StrongKids), Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), which are commonly used in the general pediatric population, with the Nutrition Screening Tool for Childhood Cancer (SCAN), which was specifically validated for pediatric cancer, in determining the risk of malnutrition.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 92 children aged 2-18 years who were admitted to the hematology-oncology unit and were receiving chemotherapy. The prevalence of nutritional risk was determined using the SCAN, StrongKids, PYMS, STAMP, and anthropometric assessments were performed. Sensitivity and specificity values, and the degree of agreement between screening tools were calculated.

RESULT

The SCAN identified nutritional risk in 69.6 % of the children. According to StrongKids, PYMS and STAMP, the high nutritional risk in children was 43.5 %, 56.5 % and 64.1 %, respectively. The sensitivity of STAMP (81.2 %) was higher than that of StrongKids (60.9 %) and PYMS (79.7 %). The specificity of StrongKids, PYMS and STAMP was 96.4 %, 96.4 %, and 75.0 %, respectively. There was substantial agreement between SCAN and PYMS.

CONCLUSION

PYMS has the best specificity and sensitivity in identifying patients at risk of malnutrition as determined by SCAN.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In addition to anthropometric measurements, population-specific or highly sensitive nutritional screening tools should be used to determine the risk of malnutrition.

[Risk of malnutrition and food insecurity in pediatric cancer patients. The NutriCare Study]

Introduction

Introduction: cancer and its treatments have been associated with poor nutritional status in children and adolescents. Objective: to establish the nutritional risk of pediatric patients and the degree of food and nutritional insecurity in the homes of children and adolescents with cancer who have been hospitalized in a high complexity pediatric oncology center. Methods: a prospective observational study conducted at the Fundación Hospital Pediátrico la Misericordia - HOMI. It included a sample of 41 children and adolescents aged 0 to 17 years and 11 months with a diagnosis of childhood cancer during the study period. The participants recruited during hospitalization had the application of the SCAN nutritional screening tool for childhood cancer, Spanish version, validated in HOMI and the Latin American and Caribbean Scale of Food and Nutritional Security - ELCSA, adapted and validated in Colombia. Results: 76 % (n = 31) of the patients were classified as "At risk of malnutrition" using the SCAN-SP nutritional screening tool. It was observed that 56 % of all households had a proportion of food insecurity, of which the classification of food insecurity was mild in 29 %, moderate in 20 % and severe in 7 % of households with children under 18 years of age. Conclusion: in the framework of the nutritional care process, it is important to take into account factors that include a complete nutritional risk assessment and evaluation that includes the measurement of food security.

Prospective validation of the nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Different nutritional screening tools have been proposed in childhood cancer, but none has shown convincing predictive capacity so far. The "nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN)" has been specifically designed for this population and provides an easy-to-use, promising approach to identify patients at risk of malnutrition. We aim to: 1. Validate the SCAN tool prospectively in identifying malnourished patients or those who required nutritional support 2. Validate the SCAN tool prospectively in predicting toxicities or outcome. 3. Compare performance of a pediatric screening tool (STRONGKIDS) with SCAN.

METHODS

Children in our center with a new diagnosis of cancer from August 2018 to May 2019 were offered to participate in the study. Measurements (SCAN questionnaire, weight, height, body-mass index (BMI), and mid upper-arm circumference (MUAC)) were taken at diagnosis and at regular intervals throughout therapy. The last measurement was taken 6 months after finishing the intensive treatment phase. SCAN score at diagnosis was validated prospectively against variables of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were recruited. When considering malnutrition during therapy the SCAN tool showed a sensitivity of 37.5% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%. Patients who required nutritional support were identified with a sensitivity of 50% and NPV of 62%. The SCAN tool was not able to predict increased toxicities, risk of relapse or decreased survival. The pediatric screening tool STRONGKIDS was unable to discriminate nutritional risk and labeled all 49 patients (100%) as medium or high-risk. Applying SCAN periodically during therapy increased sensitivity for identifying malnutrition to 87.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, applying the SCAN tool at diagnosis showed low sensitivity in identifying patients who go on to develop malnutrition during therapy. However, patients labeled as "not at risk" were unlikely to need nutritional support in the form of nasogastric tube or total parenteral nutrition. Using SCAN throughout therapy could be helpful in building awareness for malnutrition and successfully discriminates between patients who need further support and those who don't.

Developing a nutrition screening tool for children with cystic fibrosis ages 0 to 2 years: Children with cystic fibrosis nutrition screening tool

BACKGROUND

For children with cystic fibrosis (CF), achieving and maintaining optimal growth by the age of 2 years is critical for future health outcomes. A standardized nutrition screening is needed to identify growth problems, enable timely interventions, and improve nutritional outcomes for children (0 to 2 years) with CF. The purpose of this study was to develop a nutrition screening tool for children (0 to 2 years) with CF to identify nutrition risk at every clinical encounter.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was used to develop a nutrition screening tool to determine if nutrition interventions needed to change (at-risk) or continue (not at-risk). Retrospective data for pertinent nutrition factors were collected for 99 children attending an accredited CF clinic. The nutrition factors were compared to a dietitian assessment. A stepwise discriminant analysis determined weight-for-age (WFA) and weight-for-length (WFL) z-scores were significant. Then anthropometric data and corresponding dietitian assessment results were collected for children with CF attending two other accredited CF clinics (n = 29, n = 30). Discriminant analysis was used to determine sensitivity and specificity of the nutrition factors and to create a nutrition screening tool equation.

RESULTS

The nutrition screening model that included WFA z-score, LFA z-score, WFL z-score, and weight change velocity adequacy determined nutrition risk the best. The sensitivity was 89.7 %, specificity 83.2 %, NPV 93.3 %, and PPV 75.4 % for this model.

CONCLUSION

The nutrition screening tool equation developed in this study standardizes the process to identify children (0 to 2 years) with CF at nutrition risk. Further validation is needed.

Managing Undernutrition in Pediatric Oncology: A Consensus Statement Developed Using the Delphi Method by the Polish Society for Clinical Nutrition of Children and the Polish Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology

"Managing Undernutrition in Pediatric Oncology" is a collaborative consensus statement of the Polish Society for Clinical Nutrition of Children and the Polish Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. The early identification and accurate management of malnutrition in children receiving anticancer treatment are crucial components to integrate into comprehensive medical care. Given the scarcity of high-quality literature on this topic, a consensus statement process was chosen over other approaches, such as guidelines, to provide comprehensive recommendations. Nevertheless, an extensive literature review using the PubMed database was conducted. The following terms, namely pediatric, childhood, cancer, pediatric oncology, malnutrition, undernutrition, refeeding syndrome, nutritional support, and nutrition, were used. The consensus was reached through the Delphi method. Comprehensive recommendations aim to identify malnutrition early in children with cancer and optimize nutritional interventions in this group. The statement underscores the importance of baseline and ongoing assessments of nutritional status and the identification of the risk factors for malnutrition development, and it presents tools that can be used to achieve these goals. This consensus statement establishes a standardized approach to nutritional support, aiming to optimize outcomes in pediatric cancer patients.

Navigating nutrition as a childhood cancer survivor: Understanding patient and family needs for nutrition interventions or education

AIM

Nutrition challenges are common during childhood cancer treatment and can persist into survivorship, increasing the risk of non-communicable diseases. Evidence-based practice and implementation of nutrition interventions/education for childhood cancer survivors has been poorly investigated and may influence their future health. This study aimed to explore the nutrition interventions/education needs of childhood cancer survivors and the barriers and facilitators to delivering follow-up services in New Zealand.

METHODS

Semi structured interviews were conducted with childhood cancer survivors and/or their families (n=22) and health professionals (n=9) from a specialist paediatric oncology centre in New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed inductively using thematic analysis. A multi-level consensus coding methodology was used where each theme and associated subthemes were discussed with the study team for confirmation to ensure accurate coding and analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) the current survivorship care pathway does not provide adequate interventions/education, (2) weight and dietary changes are common challenges and (3) requirements for interventions/education in survivorship are varied. Common nutrition-related concerns included fussy eating/limited dietary intake, poor diet quality, difficulties with tube weaning, and challenges with weight gain. Participants expressed a desire for education on healthy eating alongside information about cancer-related nutrition issues, such as learned food aversions. A preference for clear referral pathways and multifaceted interventions tailored to individual patient needs was identified.

CONCLUSION

The trifecta of treatment side effects, negative feeding practices and poor messaging from health professionals creates a challenging environment to optimise nutrition. A stepped care model matching the intervention intensity with the childhood cancer survivors is required. Education for healthcare professionals will improve the delivery of timely interventions/education and monitoring practices.

[Validation of the nutritional screening tool for childhood cancer SCAN. Spanish version]

INTRODUCTION

the prevalence of undernutrition in the pediatric cancer population can vary considerably, an element that significantly influences the clinical outcome of patients. However, this is a potentially modifiable prognostic factor, which requires timely identification of nutritional risk to guide the nutritional care process.

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the operational performance of the Spanish version of the nutritional screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN) in the context of the validation process of this instrument in a high-complexity hospital in the city of Bogotá, Colombia.

METHODS

the methodological design for the validation of a diagnostic scale was followed. The final sample consisted of 96 patients between 0 and 17 years with cancer and hospitalized at the Children's Cancer Center of the HOMI Foundation in Bogota. The SCAN-SP was applied to each patient and a complete nutritional assessment (CNA) was performed as a gold standard to determine nutritional status.

RESULTS

82.3 % (n = 79) of patients were classified "at risk of malnutrition" by SCAN-SP and 69.8 % (n = 67) of the total sample had undernutrition. The evaluation of the operative performance of SCAN-SP against CNA showed excellent results: sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 59 %, PPV of 85 %, NPV of 100 %, positive likelihood ratio of 2.4, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.

CONCLUSION

the SCAN-SP scale performs well as a nutritional screening tool in pediatric cancer patients, so its use in clinical practice is recommended.

The emerging role of nutritional support in the supportive care of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents a potentially curative strategy for many oncological, hematological, metabolic, and immunological diseases in children. The continuous effort in ameliorating supportive care represents one of the cornerstones in the improvement of outcome in these patients. Nowadays, more than ever nutritional support can be considered a key feature. Oral feeding in the early post-transplant period is severely impaired because of mucositis due to conditioning regimen, characterized by, mainly by vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea. Gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), infections and associated treatments, and other medications, such as opioids and calcineurin inhibitors, have also been correlated with decreased oral intake. The consequent reduction in caloric intake combined with the catabolic effect of therapies and transplantation-related complications with consequent extended immobilization, results in a rapid deterioration of nutritional status, which is associated with decreased overall survival and higher complication rates during treatment. Thus, nutritional support during the early post-transplantation period becomes an essential and challenging issue for allo-HSCT recipients. In this context, the role of nutrition in the modulation of the intestinal flora is also emerging as a key player in the pathophysiology of the main complications of HSCT. The pediatric setting is characterized by less evidence, considering the challenge of addressing nutritional needs in this specific population, and many questions are still unanswered. Thus, we perform a narrative review regarding all aspects of nutritional support in pediatric allo-HSCT recipients, addressing the assessment of nutritional status, the relationship between nutritional status and clinical outcomes and the evaluation of the nutritional support, ranging from specific diets to artificial feeding.

Developing Ice Cream for Mucositis Management and Improving the Nutritional Support for Pediatric Cancer Patients

  Introduction: Mucositis is one of the main complications of cancer treatment, associated with several nutritional limitations and the ability to cause secondary infections. Cryotherapy is a low-cost treatment consistent with clinical practice guidelines for treating patients with mucositis. Objective: To develop and evaluate the acceptance of ice cream for the prevention and treatment of mucositis and nutritional support of pediatric cancer patients. Method: Based on knowledge about the side effects of chemotherapy (especially in oral and gastrointestinal mucositis) and the nutritional needs of pediatric cancer patients, a literature search for ingredients that could meet the study’s objectives was undertaken. Food Technology Laboratory of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu campus, and in partnership with Sorvetes Naturais ice cream shop in the municipality of Botucatu-SP, produced the ice cream. An acceptance test was applied in ten patients undergoing cancer treatment and 30 individuals in the control group using the 5-point mixed facial hedonic scale. Results: The final formula consisted of semi-skimmed lactose-free milk, extra virgin coconut oil, oat flour, honey, chamomile, Fortini® food supplement, demerara sugar, and stabilizer/emulsifier. 90% of patients undergoing cancer treatment rated the final product as “liked” or “loved it,” compared to 63% of the control group. Conclusion: Development of an ice cream that met the objectives of the study was possible through the choice of its composition. Honey and chamomile can favor the prevention of mucositis, and other ingredients offer the caloric density and protein supply.

Weight loss in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within the first 100 days: Its influencing factors and impact on clinical outcomes

Purpose/Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional status of children subjected to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in the first 100 days. Objectives were to clarify the effect of weight loss on clinical outcomes, and to analyze factors influencing weight loss.

Methods

Eighty pediatric patients receiving alloHSCT were enrolled in the study. Body mass index (BMI) z-scores and weight for age (WFA) z-scores were collected. A multivariate regression model was set up to investigate factors affecting weight loss. Post-transplant clinical outcomes relative to weight loss on 100 days after transplantation were analyzed.

Results

At admission, eight patients (10%) were underweight, the number had increased to 23 (30.67%) by 100 days post-HSCT. On day + 100, only nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN) scores ≥ 3 (OR: 4.474, 95% CI: 1.215, 16.472; P = 0.024) and acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) (OR: 9.915, 95% CI: 3.302, 29.771; P < 0.001) were regarded as significant influencing factors of weight loss. The Weight loss ≥ 5% group was associated with longer hospital stays (P = 0.001), greater cost of inpatient treatment (P = 0.001), and a higher incidence of 100-day re-admission and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (P = 0.03 and P = 0.033, respectively). Cumulative number of fever days (P = 0.023) and antibiotic use (P = 0.007) also increased significantly. The Weight loss ≥ 5% group had a significantly lower one-year overall survival rate compared with the Weight loss < 5% group (P = 0.015).

Conclusion

Pediatric patients' nutritional status declined significantly after HSCT. Weight loss within the first 100 days influenced short-term clinical outcomes and one-year overall survival.

Construction of a nutritional assessment tool for the pediatric cancer population (ANPEDCancer): content validation using the Delphi method

Objective:

To develop and establish content validation of a nutritional assessment tool for pediatric cancer patients using the Delphi method.

Methods:

A literature review was performed and the nutritional assessment in pediatrics and cancer construct was discussed with experts. Forty-six nutrition experts from Brazil with experience in oncology participated in the panel. Rounds were held to discuss and judge the items that should be included in this tool. With the aid of an algorithm, it was possible to simultaneously consider the adequacy, relevance and measurement of the items. The consensus was reached with an agreement equal to or greater than 80% among the experts.

Results:

From the 7 domains suggested by the literature, the first round generated 81 items, which were assessed for adequacy, relevance and the possibility of being measured in the routine of nutritional assessment, by specialists in the following two rounds. The percentage of specialists who responded to each round was high (above 90%) and the dropout rate between the stages was relatively low. After applying the algorithm, the ANPEDCancer tool had 36 items considered appropriate by specialists from the five different geographical regions of Brazil.

Conclusions:

The Delphi method allowed the construction and content validation of the nutritional assessment tool for children and adolescents with cancer, providing the first stage for use in the Brazilian hospital setting.

Nutritional assessment and dietetic resource for children and young people with cancer in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Both under- and overnutrition may have adverse impact on outcome of cancer in children and teenagers/young adults (CTYA). Previous studies confirm that screening for nutritional risk and detection of nutritional abnormality is inconsistently undertaken in practice.

METHODS

We undertook a survey of dietetic resource and nutritional assessment in CTYA principal treatment centres (PTC) in the United Kingdom. Responses were received from 95% children's and 69% TYA PTC.

RESULTS

Only 13/18 (72%) children's PTC, and one of 11 (9%) TYA PTC, met national standards for dietetic resource; one of 18 (6%) paediatric and six of 11(54%) TYA PTC had no such resource. While resources were greater in larger paediatric PTC, who were also most likely to undertake stem cell transplantation, resources in TYA PTC were too low to assess relationship to centre size. Most centres focused resources on inpatient care and <50% considered staffing adequate; 82% used nutritional screening tools but without consistency in the tool used. Weight and height were the principal method for assessment, but with inconsistency in the frequency of measurement and use in different clinical settings. Measures derived from weight and height, including body mass index (BMI), were inconsistently utilised. The use of arm anthropometry was rare despite evidence that use increases recognition of undernutrition. Detailed nutritional assessment was infrequently attempted.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to adequate nutritional assessment and treatment for all patients include resource limitations (particularly TYA), training for staff, and uncertainty about detailed assessment of nutritional status. There is a need to harmonise screening and assessment of nutritional status in CTYA with cancer.

Management of Nutritional Needs in Pediatric Oncology: A Consensus Statement

Malnutrition, intended as both overnutrition and undernutrition, is a common problem in children with cancer, impacting quality of life as well as survival. In addition, nutritional imbalances during childhood can significantly affect proper growth. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to this issue in the pediatric oncology population. To fill this gap, we aimed to provide practice recommendations for the uniform management of nutritional needs in children with cancer. Twenty-one clinical questions addressing evaluation and treatment of nutritional problems in children with cancer were formulated by selected members from four Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) centers and from the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group of Alliance Against Cancer. A literature search in PubMed was performed; during two consensus meetings, all recommendations were discussed and finalized using the nominal group technique. Members representing every institution voted on each recommendation. Finally, recommendations were approved by all authors.

Development and Validation of a New Screening Tool with Non-Invasive Indicators for Assessment of Malnutrition Risk in Hospitalised Children

There is no evidence of the most effective nutritional screening tool for hospitalized children. The present study aimed to develop a quick, simple, and valid screening tool for identifying malnutrition risk of hospital admission with non-invasive indicators. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Children`s nutritional baseline using a questionnaire, subjective malnutritional risk, and Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment were assessed on admission. Concurrent validity was assessed using American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics assessment and Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment tool. A new screening tool Simple Pediatric Nutritional risk Screening tool (SPENS) was developed, and sensitivity, specificity and reliability were evaluated. A total of 180 children aged from 1 month to 18 years were included (142 in the development phase and 38 in the validation phase). SPENS consist of four variables and shows almost perfect agreement with subjective malnutritional risk assessment (κ = 0.837) with high sensitivity and specificity (93.3% and 91.3% respectively). Compared with Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment and ASPEN and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics assessment, SPENS had sensitivity 92.9% and 86.7%, a specificity of 87.5% and 87.0%, and an overall agreement of 0.78 and 0.728, respectively. Due to the fast, simple, easy, and practical to use, screening the SPENS can be performed by nurses, physicians, and dieticians.

A Practical Approach to Identifying Pediatric Disease-Associated Undernutrition: A Position Statement from the ESPGHAN Special Interest Group on Clinical Malnutrition

ABSTRACT

Disease-associated undernutrition (DAU) is still common in hospitalized children and is generally accepted to be associated with adverse effects on disease outcomes; hence making proper identification and assessment essential in the management of the sick child. There are however several barriers to routine screening, assessment, and treatment of sick children with poor nutritional status or DAU, including limited resources, lack of nutritional awareness, and lack of agreed nutrition policies. We recommend all pediatric facilities to 1) implement procedures for identification of children with (risk of) DAU, including nutritional screening, criteria for further assessment to establish diagnosis of DAU, and follow-up, 2) assess weight and height in all children asa minimum, and 3) have the opportunity for children at risk to be assessed by a hospital dietitian. An updated descriptive definition of pediatric DAU is proposed as "Undernutrition is a condition resulting from imbalanced nutrition or abnormal utilization of nutrients which causes clinically meaningful adverse effects on tissue function and/or body size/composition with subsequent impact on health outcomes." To facilitate comparison of undernutrition data, it is advised that in addition to commonly used criteria for undernutrition such as z score < -2 for weight-for-age, weight-for-length, or body mass index <-2, an unintentional decline of >1inthese z scores over time should be considered as an indicator requiring further assessment to establish DAU diagnosis. Since the etiology of DAU is multifactorial, clinical evaluation and anthropometry should ideally be complemented by measurements of body composition, assessment of nutritional intake, requirements, and losses, and considering disease specific factors.

Subjective global nutritional assessment [SGNA] in children on chronic dialysis- A prospective observational study

Introduction:

Nutritional assessment in children undergoing chronic dialysis is challenging as no single objective reference tool is available. There is a need to explore the application of the subjective global nutritional assessment (SGNA) tool in these children. This study assessed the nutritional status of children on chronic dialysis using SGNA, evaluated the utility of SGNA parameters in the longitudinal assessment of nutrition, and compared the SGNA tool with other nutritional measures.

Methods:

Children 2-18 years of age on chronic dialysis for at least 1 month were prospectively studied over a period of 18 months with two follow-up visits at least 3 months apart. Malnutrition was diagnosed by SGNA (well-nourished, moderately, and severely malnourished), mid-arm circumference <5^th centile for age and gender, and serum albumin <3.8 g/l at baseline and follow-up.

Results:

In 41 children on dialysis (age: 124.8 ± 32 months), 73% had moderate or severe malnutrition by SGNA. Height for age (P = 0.008), weight for height (P = 0.004), dietary intake (P = 0.025) functional capacity (P = 0.001), loss of subcutaneous fat (P < 0.001), and muscle wasting (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the presence and severity of malnutrition. SGNA showed a poor agreement with MUAC and serum albumin. On follow-up, there was no significant change in the category of nutritional status (P = 0.63) and no individual SGNA parameter was associated with the presence or severity of malnutrition.

Conclusion:

Two-thirds of the children on chronic dialysis were diagnosed with moderate to severe malnutrition by SGNA, while the majority remained in the same category of nutritional status on follow-up. Only half of the parameters used for assessment were strongly associated with the presence and severity of malnutrition. SGNA showed a poor agreement with objective nutritional measures and was not responsive in identifying a change in the nutritional status on follow-up.

When Reality and Research Collide: Guidelines Are Essential for Optimal Nutrition Care in Pediatric Oncology

Nutritional problems are common in pediatric oncology due to the side effects of the disease and treatment. Nutrition intervention can be challenging, and little is known about the current clinical practice of registered dietitian nutritionists. An online questionnaire emailed to members of the pediatric, oncology nutrition, and clinical manager practice groups of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, consisted of items related to current nutrition practice. Our questionnaire results suggest that the field of pediatric oncology is employed with relatively new dietitians (62% had <5 y of experience). Many registered dietitian nutritionists (60%) are providing care across the cancer care continuum (standard therapy, transplant, and survivorship) versus specializing in a particular area. Approximately half (52%) felt that their center had inadequate staffing, many reporting little in the outpatient setting. Barriers to providing optimal patient care included inadequate staffing, lack of time for research initiatives, and lack of evidence-based guidelines. Future studies should determine follow-up guidelines and appropriate staffing ratios for nutrition care in pediatric oncology. Approaches should be developed to support less experienced dietitians. Collaboration between dietitians at different facilities will likely be key in developing essential evidence-informed guidelines.

Nutritional support practices and opinions toward gastrostomy use in pediatric bone marrow transplant centers: A national survey

OBJECTIVE

Previous surveys have shown deviations in nutritional practices from international guidelines during bone marrow transplant (BMT). Guidelines recommend enteral nutrition first-line and nasogastric tubes are the mainstay for its provision. Gastrostomies provide an alternative, yet their use is less common. This national survey investigated nutrition support practices in pediatric allogeneic BMT centers and compared clinicians' opinions on gastrostomy use. The aim of this study was to identify the national picture of nutritional support practices across pediatric allogeneic BMT centers, including use and opinions of dietitians, clinical nurse specialists, and physicians, toward gastrostomy feeding.

METHODS

An online survey was administered to 12 centers. The lead dietitian answered questions regarding nutritional counseling, screening, assessment, and interventions. Questions regarding current use, perceived advantages, and problems of gastrostomies were answered by the dietitian, lead clinical nurse specialist, and physician.

RESULTS

A 100% response rate was achieved from 12 centers (N = 36 clinicians). Nutritional counseling was provided in 92% of centers before and routinely throughout admission, 83% screened on and regularly throughout admission, 83% assessed nutritional status before transplant, and 92% used enteral nutrition first-line. Forty-two percent of the centers used gastrostomies. In those not using gastrostomies, 76% of clinicians felt some children should be offered a gastrostomy. Clinicians perceived less displacements (78%) and cosmetic appearance (69%) as the most common advantages of gastrostomies over nasogastric tubes. Risks associated with surgery (92%) and tube/stoma complications (58%) were the most common perceived problems.

CONCLUSIONS

A similar approach was shown on many aspects of nutritional support. Gastrostomy use divided opinion with differences in use and perceived advantages, but agreement on potential complications. Despite their risks, clinicians wanted to use gastrostomies more. Placement requires careful consideration of the risks, benefits, and family preferences.

Nutritional screening tool for critically ill children: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Nutritional screening tools (NSTs) are used to identify patients who are at risk of nutritional status (NS) deterioration and associated clinical outcomes. Several NSTs have been developed for hospitalized children; however, none of these were specifically developed for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of studies describing the development, application, and validation of NSTs in hospitalized children was conducted to critically appraise their role in PICU patients.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 11, 2020.

DATA EXTRACTION

The review included 103 studies that applied NSTs at hospital admission. The NST characteristics collected included the aims, clinical setting, variables, and outcomes. The suitability of the NSTs in PICU patients was assessed based on a list of variables deemed relevant for this population.

DATA ANALYSIS

From 19 NSTs identified, 13 aimed to predict NS deterioration. Five NSTs were applied in PICU patients, but none was validated for this population. NSTs did not include clinical, NS, laboratory, or dietary variables that were deemed relevant for the PICU population.

CONCLUSION

None of the available NSTs were found to be suitable for critically ill children, so a new NST should be developed for this population. AQ6.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020167898.

A study of validity and reliability for Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment in outpatient children with cerebral palsy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reproducibility, stability, internal consistency and the ability to grade malnutrition of Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) in outpatient children with cerebral palsy.

METHODS

This was a part of a larger, cross-sectional study (ChiCTR2000033869) at the outpatient of a tertiary hospital. The recruitment and data collection of children with Cerebral Palsy aged from 1 to 18 years were from August 2020 to March 2021. The concurrent validity, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of SGNA were tested. To analyze data, specificity, sensitivity, Kendall coefficient, Cohen's kappa coefficient, Spearman coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were used.

RESULTS

The agreement between SGNA and anthropometric data was moderate to strong (k = 0.540-0.821). The sensitivity (71.70% to 89.74%) and specificity (77.67% to 91.03%) of SGNA to identify participants with z-score ≤-2 were good. The sensitivity of SGNA to identify participants with weight for age z-score ≤-3 was poor (30.00%). The interrater reliability (k = 0.703) and test-retest reliability (k = 0.779) were good. The item of edema was with poor agreement to SGNA nutritional grades (r_s = 0.072), and after deleting it from SGNA, the Cronbach's α coefficient of SGNA increased from 0.736 to 0.871.

FINDINGS

SGNA is good at identifying malnourished outpatient children with cerebral palsy, with excellent reproducibility and short-time stability. However, the ability to grade malnutrition is unsatisfactory. For further application in this group, a more appropriate item should be designed to replace the item of edema.

Validity and Reliability of a Nutritional Screening Tool (SCAN) in Children Newly Diagnosed with Cancer

No standardized approach towards nutritional screening and assessment of pediatric oncology patients has been established. The nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN) has been previously published as an effective screening method. This is an observational cross-sectional study to assess the validity and reliability of the SCAN tool, compare it to the detection of undernutrition using standard measures of assessment, and determine the overall prevalence of malnutrition and micronutrients alterations in our cohort. We included children newly diagnosed with cancer in a pediatric tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain from August 2018 to May 2019. The following measurements were performed: SCAN questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, nutritional markers in blood, and micronutrient levels. A total of 49 patients were included. 22 patients (45%) were at risk of malnutrition according to the SCAN questionnaire. Four patients (8%) could be diagnosed with moderate undernutrition. These undernourished patients were distributed homogeneously among at-risk and not at-risk populations identified by the SCAN tool. Several micronutrient deficiencies were identified. We conclude that the SCAN questionnaire is an easy-to-use tool for everyday clinical practice. By not including anthropometric measurements it misses patients considered to be malnourished. Future data might help clarify if it is an effective tool in predicting a higher nutritional risk during the entire treatment course.

Different nutritional screening tools and recommended screening algorithm for pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death for children; however, appropriate nutritional status can positively affect disease progression and outcome. The aim of this study was to present our self-developed nutritional risk screening method, relate it to another validated tool and to objective bio-impedance measures. We intended to recommend a screening algorithm which can be used in our pediatric oncology facilities.

METHODS

We analysed data from 109 pediatric oncology patients (age 3-18) at the 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University between 2017 and 2018. The nutritional status was assessed by the Nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN), Nutrition risk screening for pediatric cancer (NRS-PC) our own self-developed screening tool and Bio-impedance analysis (InBody 720 and S10). Classifier properties for low muscle mass measured by Bio-impedance analysis were compared for SCAN and NRS-PC in the overall sample and in the different phases of the disease.

RESULTS

The AUC of 0.67 [95% CI:0.58,0.75] of the SCAN was significantly lower (Z = -2.46, p = 0.014) than in the case of the NRS-PC (AUC = 0.75 [95% CI:0.67,0.82]), indicating that NRS-PC has better classifier properties to identify children with lower muscle mass. No significant difference was found in the different phases of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we suggest screening high BMI patients first with NRS-PC. However, in case of low BMI bio-impedance measures provide more precise information on muscle mass and nutritional risk. Further data are needed to decide whether the NRS-PC is sensitive enough in normal BMI patients.

Nutritional Status at Diagnosis, During, and After Treatment in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

Purpose: Malnutrition is commonly observed during cancer treatment, while some cancer survivors are at risk of overweight and obesity. This study investigated nutritional status during and after treatment in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review of AYA diagnosed with cancer was conducted. Data were collected monthly during treatment, then annually for 3 years of follow-up. Results: Of 93 AYA, 8% were underweight at diagnosis versus 20% during treatment (p = 0.012). Forty-four percent experienced ≥5% loss of weight (LOW) during treatment, and 23% of those were not referred to a dietitian. While 47% were referred to a dietitian at some point during treatment, 77% did not have dietetic involvement in the month after reaching greatest percentage LOW. Different tumor types were associated with different risks of LOW. Eighty-six percent with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) and 86% with acute myeloid leukemia had ≥5% LOW during treatment, compared with 17% with Hodgkin lymphoma (p < 0.0001). In year 3 of follow-up, 36% of all AYA were overweight or obese versus 25% at diagnosis (p = 0.2). Overweight/obesity was more common in ALL/LL survivors than other tumor types (67% vs. 14%, p = 0.037). No patients had dietitian involvement in year 3 of follow-up. Conclusions: AYA, particularly those with ALL/LL, are at risk of significant weight loss during treatment and overweight and obesity during survivorship. Dietetic involvement was inconsistent in this cohort. These data may guide which diagnoses warrant preemptive dietetic input during treatment and highlight the importance of dietetic involvement in survivorship.

Implementation of a nutrition screening tool to improve nutritional status of children with cancer in Singapore's largest paediatric hospital

Poor nutritional status in children with cancer can impact treatment outcomes and mortality. Nutrition screening is a simple yet effective approach to identify malnutrition risk for early intervention. We aim to improve the identification of children with cancer at high risk of malnutrition, so that nutritional intervention and rehabilitation can commence early for these children. Our multidisciplinary team conducted a root cause analysis and concluded that the generic screening tool did not differentiate malnutrition risk for different cancer types, stage and intensity of treatment. Hence, a screening tool that considered the identified factors was tested for reliability and validity first. Subsequently, we used the Plan, Do, Study, Act model with two improvement cycles to put in place a systematic process to facilitate the implementation. The interventions included (1) instituting the tool in the electronic medical records and (2) direct referral to dietitian based on screening score.

We compared pre- and post-implementation cohorts and demonstrated better identification of nutritionally at-risk patients (36.4%–85.7%, p<0.001) with the new tool as well as improved timeliness of nutritional intervention (3 days to 1 day from admission, p=0.010). A lower malnutrition rate (17.4%–6.5%, p<0.001) in the postimplementation cohort was also demonstrated. Nutritional intervention within 48 hours of admission led to an overall positive weight change at 3 months (+2.68%, IQR: −1.14 to 9.09 vs −0.43%, −6.60 to 2.29; p=0.036) in the malnourished patients from both cohorts. Further studies will be conducted to evaluate the scale of the effectiveness of early intervention and close nutritional monitoring, in improving the nutritional status of children with cancer. The collaborative partnership among the doctors, nurses and dietitians has helped to streamline and simplify nutrition screening, making it an efficient and sustainable system in our hospital.

The Effect of Nutritional Support on the Disease Progression and Survival in Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumors

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death for children; however, appropriate nutritional status can positively affect survival. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent malnutrition risk screening and intensified nutrition support, provided by a professional team, promoted disease progression and survival in pediatric patients with solid tumors. 145 pediatric cancer patients (average age 6.3 ± 5.6 and 6.7 ± 5.4 years) with solid tumors undergoing chemotherapy participated in the study. Two 3-year periods were studied: 2009-2011 and 2012-2014. Patient characteristics and treatment protocols were identical, but in Period 2, with the foundation of our nutrition support team malnutrition risk screening was made mandatory upon every hospital admission. As a result of intensified nutrition support the time from diagnosis to completion of treatment (802 vs. 512 day, p < 0.001) and the need for antimycotic treatment reduced significantly (47.8% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.036). The total percentage of surviving children was 60.3% and 75.0% in Period 1 and 2 respectively. Decrease in weight-for-height percentile during treatment and central nervous system tumors are significant predictors of a less favorable survival. Malnutrition risk screening and intensified nutrition therapy have positive effects on nutritional status and therefore patient survival in pediatric cancer patients.

Comparison of malnutrition and malnutrition screening tools in pediatric oncology patients: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of malnutrition, to compare nutritional evaluation tools, and to highlight the importance of nutritional status in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

This study evaluated the nutritional status, based on height, weight, and midupper arm circumference, of 170 patients ages 5 months to 18 years who were hospitalized at the Ege University Hospital Pediatric Oncology Clinic. The prevalence of malnutrition was determined using the malnutrition screening tools, STRONGkids (SK) and Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS). Correlations, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values between the screening tools were calculated.

RESULTS

In all, 68.2% of the patients were diagnosed with a solid tumor. According to SK, 59.4% had a moderate risk of malnutrition, and 40.6% had a high risk. According to PYMS, 30.6% of patients had a low to moderate risk of malnutrition, and 69.4% had a high risk of malnutrition. Minimal agreement was noted between SK and PYMS (Kappa value: 0.40 and 0.18, respectively). The sensitivity of PYMS was higher than that of SK (92.68 and 78.05, respectively). In total, 22.9% of the patients had a body mass index of <5%, and 21.2% had a midupper arm circumference of <5.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings show that, in general, pediatric oncology patients have a high risk of malnutrition. Although SK and PYMS do not differ significantly, PYMS has higher sensitivity for detecting malnutrition. The nutritional status of pediatric oncology patients should be monitored using appropriate screening techniques throughout their treatment.

Optimization of nutrition support practices early after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Nutrition support is often required during hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) given the gastrointestinal toxicity that frequently precludes adequate protein-calorie intake. This article reviews the latest evidence for enteral versus parenteral nutrition in the adult and pediatric HCT population and addresses key considerations as well as barriers to implement this in practice. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists are key members of the interdisciplinary team to proactively manage enteral nutrition support to provide timely, adequate protein and calories to help prevent malnutrition, loss of lean body mass, and functional decline as well as provide evidence-based diet recommendations. This article also reviews emerging research supporting the role of luminal nutrients to maintain microbiotal diversity.

Assessment of nutritional status in children with cancer: A narrative review

A child's appropriate development stems in large part from proper nutrition. Malnutrition is an adverse prognostic factor in children with cancer, and its prevalence is highly variable. Currently, there is no standardized definition and assessment method of nutritional status in pediatric oncology. A complete nutritional assessment includes anthropometry, biochemical, clinical, and dietary assessments. In this article, we explore these methods and suggest practical approaches for pediatric cancer units depending on the levels of care that these can provide. We also advise on the monitoring and follow-up of children with cancer during and after treatment, and discuss potential areas for future research.

Nutritional Deficits In Children With Cancer: A Situation-Specific Theory

PURPOSE

To construct a situation-specific theory (SST) to represent nutritional deficits for assessing children with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The SST included the definition of key concepts, a pictorial scheme, propositions, causal relationships, and evidence for nursing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

It was possible to characterize the elements as antecedent and consequent clinical factors to allow for an understanding of the existing relationships between them and their temporality. These elements differed considerably from those included in NANDA International.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This study provides additional information so that nurses in clinical practice can infer the presence of nutritional deficits in children with cancer early, given the risk already inherent in the diagnosis of cancer and treatment.

Pediatric screening tools for malnutrition: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is ongoing interest in nutritional screening tools in pediatrics to facilitate the identification of children at risk for malnutrition who need further assessment and possible nutritional intervention. The choice for a specific tool depends on various factors. This review aims to provide an overview of recent progress in pediatric nutritional screening methods.

RECENT FINDINGS

We present recent studies about newly developed or adjusted tools, the applicability of nutritional screening tools in specific populations, and how to implement screening in the overall process of improving nutritional care in the pediatric hospital setting.

SUMMARY

Three new screening tools have been developed for use on admission to hospital: two for the mixed pediatric hospitalized population and one for infants. A simple weekly rescreening tool to identify hospital-acquired nutritional deterioration was developed for use in children with prolonged hospital stay. Different from most previous studies that only assessed the relationship between the nutritional risk score and anthropometric parameters of malnutrition, new studies in children with cancer, burns, and biliary atresia show significant associations between high nutritional risk and short-term outcome measures such as increased complication rate and weight loss. For implementation of a nutritional care process incorporating nutritional screening in daily practice, simplicity seems to be of great importance.

Perspective: Creating the Evidence Base for Nutritional Support in Childhood Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Priorities for Body Composition Research

There is a striking disparity in survival rates for children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with high-income countries (HICs). Many of the contributing factors are preventable, including the comorbidity of malnutrition. There are emerging data that malnutrition, as reflected in body composition changes, impacts survival of cancer. However, not enough priority is given to nutrition management of children with cancer, particularly in LMICs. The primary purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge on childhood cancer and body composition in LMICs and identify priorities for future research into the interlinking associations between cancer, body composition, and clinical outcomes for childhood cancer patients. Evidence will ensure feasible and effective nutrition management is prioritized in childhood cancer centers in LMICs and contribute to improving outcomes for children with cancer.

Nutrition during childhood cancer treatment: current understanding and a path for future research

Proper nutritional status during cancer therapy has been recognised as being integral to a variety of health outcome measures, including overall survival, treatment tolerance, and quality of life. The prevalence of malnutrition, defined by WHO as either undernutrition or overnutrition, among children and adolescents with cancer is reported to be as high as 75%. Yet, over the past two decades there have been limited advances in elucidating the underlying pathophysiological drivers of malnutrition in this population. This effect has resulted in a paucity of research aimed at improving nutritional assessment and intervention among this group. This Review presents an in-depth discussion of the role of nutritional status in paediatric cancer care, as well as evolving avenues of investigation that might propel personalised nutrition into a viable reality. Thus, nutritional science might facilitate individualised intervention strategies, and thereby help to optimise clinical outcomes for patients and survivors of childhood cancer.

Screening and assessment tools for early detection of malnutrition in hospitalised children: a systematic review of validation studies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to identify all currently available screening and assessment tools for detection of malnutrition in hospitalised children, and to identify the most useful tools on the basis of published validation studies.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched up to October 2017.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies in English that reported sensitivity, specificity and positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs) in the paediatric population were eligible for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently screened all of the studies identified, and extracted the data. The methodological qualities of the studies included were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

The 26 validation studies that met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review used eight screening and three assessment tools. The number of participants varied from 32 to 14 477. There was considerable variability in the chosen reference standards, which prevented direct comparisons of the predictive performances of the tools. Anthropometric measurements were used as reference standards in 16 of the identified studies, and full nutritional assessment in 5. The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) screening tool performed better than Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition and Screening Tool for Risk On Nutritional status and Growth when compared in terms of anthropometric measurements, especially for body mass index (Se=90.9, Sp=81.9) and triceps skinfold thickness (Se=80.0, Sp=75.0). However, low PPVs indicated the problem of overprediction of positive cases, which was typical for all of the studies that used anthropometric measurements as the reference standard.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review identifies the need for definition of the gold standard for validation of screening tools. Anthropometry measurements using WHO or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts should be considered as the possible reference standard in future validation studies. We would recommend the use of PYMS for hospitalised paediatric patients without chronic conditions, in combination with full nutritional assessment.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017077477.

Nutritional Screening Tools among Hospitalized Children: from Past and to Present

Increased awareness of the importance of nutrition among hospitalized children has increased the use of nutrition screening tool (NST). However, it is not well known the NST for hospitalized children. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the past and present state of adult and child NST and discuss the pros and cons of each NST.

Nutritional Assessment and Status of Hospitalized Infants

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition during infancy has long-term adverse consequences for both physical and psychological development. Early detection of malnutrition among hospitalized infants is essential to provide optimal nutrition support. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the nutritional status of hospitalized infants using 2 methods: the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) and anthropometric measurement. We also investigated diagnostic category associated with nutritional status, the mean anthropometric z scores, and explored the association between malnutrition and nutrition focused variables.

METHODS

Nutritional status of 110 hospitalized infants ages 31 days to 12 months was investigated using the SGNA and anthropometric measurements converted to z scores.

RESULTS

Utilizing the SGNA, 78 (70.9%) infants were classified as having normal nutritional status, 30 (27.3%) were moderately malnourished, and 2 (1.8%) were severely malnourished. The proportion of infants with acute malnutrition (weight-for-length z score <-2) was 16.4%, and chronic malnutrition (length-for-age z score <-2) was 3.6%. The mean anthropometric z scores of infants were significantly lower in infants identified as moderately and severely malnourished using the SGNA. Decrease in serial weight (odds ratio [OR] 44.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3-451.5), having prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 18.8; 95% CI: 1.5-234.7), and reduced nutrition-related functional capacity (OR 27.6; 95% CI 2.5-301.7) were associated with malnutrition after adjusting for sex, age, and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the method applied, cases of malnutrition amongst hospitalized infants were identified. The SGNA is a comprehensive approach to identifying malnutrition in hospitalized infants.

Screening and assessment tools for pediatric malnutrition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The ideal measures for screening and assessing undernutrition in children remain a point of discussion in literature. This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in the nutritional screening and assessment methods in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review focuses on two major topics that emerged in literature since 2015: the practical endorsement of the new definition for pediatric undernutrition, with a focus on anthropometric measurements and the search for a consensus on pediatric nutritional screening tools in different settings.

SUMMARY

Few analytical tools exist for the assessment of the nutritional status in children. The subjective global nutritional assessment has been validated by anthropometric as well as clinical outcome parameters. Nutritional screening can help in selecting patients that benefit the most from a full nutritional assessment. Two new screening tools have been developed for use in a general (mixed) hospital population, and one for a population of children with cancer. The value of screening tools in different disease-specific and outpatient pediatric populations remains to be proven.

A Framework for Adapted Nutritional Therapy for Children With Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Report From the SIOP PODC Nutrition Working Group

The utilization of adapted regimens for the treatment of pediatric malignancies has greatly improved clinical outcomes for children receiving treatment in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Nutritional depletion has been associated with poorer outcomes, increased abandonment of therapy, and treatment-related toxicities. Surveys have found that nutritional intervention is not incorporated routinely into supportive care regimens. Establishing nutritional programs based upon institutional resources may facilitate the incorporation of nutritional therapy into clinical care in a way that is feasible in all settings. We present a framework for establishing and monitoring of nutritional care based on the infrastructure of institutions in LMIC.

Causes of inadequate intake of nutrients during the treatment of children with chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the research was to explore nurses' perceptions of different causes of inadequate food intake in children treated with chemotherapy and to determine how often nurses identify these causes.

METHOD

Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Qualitative data were first gathered using semistructured interviews in a sample of six nurses and analysed by conventional content analysis. Based on the results of qualitative data and literature analysis, a 28-item questionnaire was developed and evaluated for its face validity in a sample of fifteen nurses. Questionnaires were then administered to twenty-seven nurses working at one pediatric oncology ward. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistic.

RESULTS

The major themes that emerge from the content analysis, describing nurses' perceptions of causes of inadequate food intake in children undergoing chemotherapy, were as follows: physiological causes of eating problems, psychological causes of eating problems, change in food selection, hospital food and individual counselling. 13 causes of inadequate food intake were identified from the questionnaire data. Pain due to mucositis was the most commonly identified cause of inadequate food intake in children, followed by nausea and vomiting, altered taste, loss of appetite and an altered smell. Psychological causes of eating problems are rarely identified.

CONCLUSION

Nurses identify most of the physiological and psychological causes of inadequate food intake in children treated with chemotherapy. The early identification and management by nurses of inadequate food intakes should be part of the curriculum for nurse education as well as part of treatment planning in clinical environment.