Prevalence and outcome of malnutrition in pediatric patients with chronic diseases: Focus on the settings of care

The Low Sensitivity and Specificity of a Nutrition Screening Tool in Real Circumstances in a Tertiary Care Hospital Setting

Nutrition screening is an essential process to detect children at risk of malnutrition during hospitalization and provide appropriate nutrition management. STRONGkids is a nutrition screening tool which has been implemented in a tertiary-care hospital service in Bangkok, Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of STRONGkids in the real-situation setting. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of hospitalized pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years from January to December 2019 were reviewed. Those with incomplete medical records and re-admission within 30 days were excluded. Nutrition risk scores and clinical data were collected. Anthropometric data were calculated to Z-score based on the WHO growth standard. The sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of STRONGkids were determined against malnutrition status and clinical outcomes. In total, 3914 EMRs (2130 boys, mean age 6.22 ± 4.72 years) were reviewed. The prevalence of acute malnutrition (BMI-for-age Z-score < -2) and stunting (height-for-age Z-score < -2) were 12.9 and 20.5%. SEN and SPE of STRONGkids against acute malnutrition were 63.2 and 55.6%, stunting values were 60.6 and 56.7%, and overall malnutrition values were 59.8 and 58.6%. STRONGkids had low SEN and SPE to detect nutrition risks among hospitalized children in a tertiary-care setting. Further actions are required to improve the quality of nutrition screening in hospital services.

Prevalence and economic cost of malnutrition in Italy: A systematic review and metanalysis from the Italian Society of Artificial Nutrition and Metabolism (SINPE)

OBJECTIVES

Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is a major public health issue with dramatic consequences on outcomes. However, in Italy a comprehensive and updated overview on national prevalence, in both the adult and pediatric populations, and its burden on the health care environment, is missing. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the available evidence regarding the prevalence of DRM in Italy from pediatric to adult and older ages, and to project its global costs on the health care system.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search for articles on epidemiology of DRM in Italy published up to June 2021. Studies reporting data on the prevalence of DRM in community-dwelling individuals with chronic diseases, nursing home patients, and hospitalized patients (medical, surgery, and oncology patients), were selected for inclusion. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using published criteria. An epidemiologic meta-analysis to obtain an aggregate estimate of prevalence of DRM was performed and a model for estimating the cost of illness, based on the application of epidemiologic results to official national hospitalization data, and attribution of relevant unit costs in the national context was constructed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies reporting on the prevalence of DRM in Italian populations were included in the final selection; meta-analytical pooling yields mean prevalence estimates of about 50% and 30% in adult and pediatric hospitalized populations, respectively, with even higher findings for residents of long-term care facilities. Modeled projections of DRM-attributable yearly economic effects on the Italian health care system exceed 10 billion € in base case analysis, with the most optimistic estimate still exceeding 2.5 billion €.

CONCLUSION

Although comparable in magnitude to data from previous studies in analogous international settings, the diffusion and effects of DRM in the Italian setting is impressive. Increased awareness of these data and proactive fostering of clinical nutrition services are warranted, as prompt identification and treatment of malnutrition have been shown to effectively improve clinical and economic results.

Malnutrition and immune cell subsets in children undergoing kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition, including obesity and undernutrition, among children is increasing in prevalence and is common among children on renal replacement therapy. The effect of malnutrition on the pre-transplant immune system and how the pediatric immune system responds to the insult of both immunosuppression and allotransplantation is unknown. We examined the relationship of nutritional status with post-transplant outcomes and characterized the peripheral immune cell phenotypes of children from the Immune Development of Pediatric Transplant (IMPACT) study.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients from the IMPACT study were classified as having obesity, undernutrition, or normal nutrition-based pre-transplant measurements. Incidence of infectious and alloimmune outcomes at 1-year post-transplantation was compared between nutritional groups using Gray's test and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model. Event-free survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups. Differences in immune cell subsets between nutritional groups over time were determined using generalized estimating equations accounting for the correlation between repeated measurements.

RESULTS

We did not observe that nutritional status was associated with infectious or alloimmune events or event-free survival post-transplant. We demonstrated that children with obesity had distinct T-and B-cell signatures relative to those with undernutrition and normal nutrition, even when controlling for immunosuppression. Children with obesity had a lower frequency of CD8 Tnaive cells 9-month post-transplant (p < .001), a higher frequency of CD4 CD57 + PD1- T cells, and lower frequencies of CD57-PD1+ CD8 and CD57-PD1- CD8 T cells at 12-month transplant (p < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with obesity have distinct immunophenotypes that may influence the tailoring of immunosuppression.

Association of nutritional status with clinical outcomes of critically ill pediatric patients with complex chronic conditions

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is a high prevalence of children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). However, information on the nutritional status (NS) of this specific population is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the NS of critically ill pediatric patients with CCCs and to relate it to clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of children admitted to a PICU over a 4-year period. We classified NS according to body mass index-for-age (BMI/A) and height-for-age (H/A) z-scores, using the World Health Organization (WHO) growth curves as a reference. We recorded the presence of CCC according to the definition proposed by Feudtner et al. Severity on admission was measured using the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2). We assessed the following outcomes: mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome during PICU stay, and PICU length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

We included 1753 children in the study. Presence of CCC accounted for 49.8% (873) of the sample. Among children with CCCs, 61.7% (539) had appropriate weight, 19.8% (173) were underweight, and 18.4% (161) were overweight. H/A was considered inadequate in 32.2% (281) of patients with CCCs, a higher rate than in those without CCCs (25.3%; 132) (p < 0.001). Regarding outcomes, underweight children had more organ dysfunctions and prolonged LOS. The association only remained for prolonged LOS when adjusting for confounders. Although underweight children had a higher PIM2-predicted risk of mortality, there was no significant difference in actual mortality between the three NS groups (p = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of nutritional inadequacies in patients with CCCs were high. Underweight was independently associated with prolonged LOS in children with CCC.

Development and Validation of a New Screening Tool with Non-Invasive Indicators for Assessment of Malnutrition Risk in Hospitalised Children

There is no evidence of the most effective nutritional screening tool for hospitalized children. The present study aimed to develop a quick, simple, and valid screening tool for identifying malnutrition risk of hospital admission with non-invasive indicators. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Children`s nutritional baseline using a questionnaire, subjective malnutritional risk, and Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment were assessed on admission. Concurrent validity was assessed using American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics assessment and Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment tool. A new screening tool Simple Pediatric Nutritional risk Screening tool (SPENS) was developed, and sensitivity, specificity and reliability were evaluated. A total of 180 children aged from 1 month to 18 years were included (142 in the development phase and 38 in the validation phase). SPENS consist of four variables and shows almost perfect agreement with subjective malnutritional risk assessment (κ = 0.837) with high sensitivity and specificity (93.3% and 91.3% respectively). Compared with Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment and ASPEN and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics assessment, SPENS had sensitivity 92.9% and 86.7%, a specificity of 87.5% and 87.0%, and an overall agreement of 0.78 and 0.728, respectively. Due to the fast, simple, easy, and practical to use, screening the SPENS can be performed by nurses, physicians, and dieticians.

Pediatric malnutrition screening and assessment tools: Analyzing the gaps

Pediatric healthcare professionals know that children who are malnourished have worse clinical outcomes than do their well-nourished peers. The body of evidence in the literature on the topic of pediatric malnutrition (PMN) is growing and supports this conclusion. The goal of this article is to present the current state of practice related to PMN screening, the use of malnutrition risk screening (MNRS) tools, malnutrition assessment, and the use of malnutrition assessment tools. The purpose is also to discuss best practice for MNRS and assessment and to consider the gaps in practice where additional work is needed.

Assessing the Effect of Nutrition Therapy on Rehospitalization Rate in Malnourished Pediatric Patients With Chronic Diseases

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is common among hospitalized children with chronic diseases and increases hospital care needs. The aim of this study is to estimate the clinical consequences of nutrition therapy (NT) after discharge.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all pediatric inpatients with diagnosis of malnutrition hospitalized at our center from January 2017 to February 2018 was conducted. Malnutrition was assessed according to body mass index (BMI) z-score, routinely recorded in patient's files. The treatment group consists of all patients referred to nutrition assessment and treated by the clinical nutrition team; all the other patients not receiving NT are selected as the control group. The effect of NT on rehospitalization rates, length of stay (LOS), and emergency room (ER) visits was estimated for the total cohort and in a propensity score (PS) matched sample.

RESULTS

277 malnourished pediatric inpatients were enrolled and analyzed. NT was prescribed in 111 patients (40%). Rehospitalization rate was lower in the treated group (rate ratio [RR] = 0.797; 95% CI, 0.630-1.009); particularly, nonelective hospital admissions are considerably lower (RR = 0.556; 95% CI, 0.325-0.952). The strength of this association increased in the PS-matched sample. There is no clear evidence of NT's effect on ER visits (RR = 0.892; 95% CI, 0.580-1.373) or LOS per episode (Δ = 1.46 days; 95% CI, -3.39 to 6.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Detecting and treating malnutrition seems to promptly improve the patients' clinical course after discharge, reducing the number of subsequent hospitalizations, particularly nonelective ones, probably caused by unresolved, ongoing malnutrition.

A Decision Aid for Nutrition Support is Acceptable in the Pediatric Hospital Setting

PURPOSE

Incorporating a Decision Aid (DA) about nutrition support into the general pediatric healthcare setting may improve parent and patient understanding about the risks and benefits of nutrition support options. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability and usability of our newly developed DA for parents of children in the general pediatric healthcare setting who require nutrition support.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were 18 parents with a child who had received nutrition support; and 12 Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) involved in pediatric nutrition support discussions. Parents' and HCPs' ratings of acceptability and feasibility of the booklet, and parents' perceived knowledge acquisition after reading the booklet were assessed.

RESULTS

Parents were satisfied with the DA, reporting that it was an appropriate length and unbiased. Most parents felt the DA was relevant to their decision-making, improved understanding, and would recommend it to other parents. HCPs felt that the booklet clearly described the essential information for nutrition support options, but less certain of the booklets' impact on parent decision-making. Regardless, most HCPs would recommend the booklet to other clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Our decision aid appears to be acceptable and useful for parents deciding on nutrition support for their child in the general pediatric hospital setting.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A DA may facilitate shared decision-making through improved understanding of the risks and benefits of different nutrition support options in the pediatric setting. Further evaluation is required with specific pediatric conditions, to determine the effectiveness for parents actively deciding on their child's nutrition support.

Weight as a Risk Factor for Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVES

To explore the hypothesis that obesity is associated with increased mortality and worse outcomes in children who are critically ill.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Angina, and Epidemiology study, a prospective, multinational observational study. Patients between 3 months and 25 years across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America were recruited for 3 consecutive months. Patients were divided into 4 groups (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese) on the basis of their BMI percentile for age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 3719 patients were evaluated, of whom 542 (14%) had a primary diagnosis of sepsis. One thousand fifty-nine patients (29%) were underweight, 1649 (44%) were normal weight, 423 (11%) were overweight, and 588 (16%) were obese. The 28-day mortality rate was 3.6% for the overall cohort and 9.1% for the sepsis subcohort and differed significantly by weight status (5.8%, 3.1%, 2.2%, and 1.8% for subjects with underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity, respectively, in the overall cohort [P < .001] and 15.4%, 6.6%, 3.6%, and 4.7% in the sepsis subcohort, respectively [P = .003]). In a fully adjusted model, 28-day mortality risk was 1.8-fold higher in the underweight group versus the normal weight group in the overall cohort and 2.9-fold higher in the sepsis subcohort. Patients who were overweight and obese did not demonstrate increased risk in their respective cohorts. Patients who were underweight had a longer ICU length of stay, increased need for mechanical ventilation support, and a higher frequency of fluid overload.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are underweight make up a significant proportion of all patients in the PICU, have a higher short-term mortality rate, and have a more complicated ICU course.

Association of Controlling Nutritional Status Score With 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated whether the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score could predict clinical outcomes in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Information was obtained from medical records and via telephone calls. Patients were divided into three groups: normal (CONUT score 0-1; n=278), mild-moderate (score 2-4; n=418), and severe (score ≥5; n=55) groups.

RESULTS

During the 24.6±12 months follow-up, MACEs were observed in 65 (8.7%) patients. The incidence of MACEs was 6.1%, 5.5%, and 45.5% in the normal, mild-moderate, and severe group, respectively (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with a CONUT score ≥5 had the significantly highest rate of MACE, myocardial re-infarction, and vessel revascularisation. In three Cox proportional hazard models, the CONUT scores were unexceptionally associated with MACE, even after adjusting all other variables (hazard ratio, 12.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.09-28.7; p<0.001). The C-statistic of the CONUT score for the prediction of MACE was 0.692 (95% CI, 0.613-0.771; p<0.001), which is close to that of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.

CONCLUSIONS

The nutritional status evaluated by the CONUT score can independently predict clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, which suggests that active nutritional management is meaningful for these patients after PCI.