Impact of enteral nutrition interruptions on underfeeding in intensive care unit

Developing an ultrasound-guided enteral nutrition protocol for critically ill patients based on the Delphi method

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition is widely recommended in intensive care units, but its implementation is accompanied by some problems.

AIM

This study aimed to develop a current-evidence-based, operable and repeatable ultrasound-guided enteral nutrition (EN) programme for critically ill patients.

STUDY DESIGN

First, based on a literature review, we integrated guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review and clinical experimental studies on critically ill patients. Subsequently, after careful evaluation and selection of relevant EN management data, we formulated a preliminary draft of an ultrasound-guided EN protocol for critically ill patients. Based on feedback from Delphi experts, the protocol was revised, and the final version of the programme was constructed.

RESULTS

After two rounds of consultation, the expert opinions reached a consensus. The expert positive coefficient was 1.00, and the expert authority coefficient was 0.935. After the second round of consultation, the coefficient of variation for the importance score ranged from 0.04 to 0.19, and that for the feasibility score ranged from 0.04 to 0.21. The difference in Kendall harmony coefficients was statistically significant (p < .05). The final programme comprised four Level I, 15 Level II and 40 Level III projects.

CONCLUSIONS

The EN protocol for critically ill patients established in this study is comprehensive and feasible and can provide guidance for clinical practice.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study adopted the Delphi method to develop an ultrasound-guided EN programme for critically ill patients, providing a new protocol by which critical care nurses can implement EN. This protocol provides a reliable and comprehensive basis for ensuring the quality and safety of EN management in critically ill patients in the future.

Enteral Nutrition Interruptions in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Causes, and Nutritional Implications

Enteral nutrition interruptions (ENIs) are a major cause of inadequate nutrition goals in critically ill patients. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update on the various clinical and logistical reasons for ENIs and observe their nutritional implications. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched from the inception of each database until March 11, 2024. For data extraction, a structured checklist was used. The initial literature search yielded 522 results. In total, 26 studies were included, comprising 3067 participants. Among the included studies, there were 20 prospective studies, two before-and-after studies, one RCT, and three retrospective studies. The main reasons for ENI were high gastric residual volumes, nasogastric tube dysfunction, and diagnostic and surgical procedures. In conclusion, although the nutritional management of critically ill patients in the ICU has improved drastically, ENIs remain a major problem in clinical practice. Future research should consider different treatments and ICU protocols. Additionally, there is a need for standardized ENI definitions and standardized reporting of the evaluation of energy and/or protein requirements, objectively determining adequate intake, and reporting the causes, frequency, and duration of ENIs.

Impact of enteral nutrition initiated within 24 h of ECMO on nutritional status and inflammatory response in children

Objective

Malnutrition remains a significant issue in children undergoing ECMO. This study aimed to investigate the effects of initiating enteral nutrition (EN) within 24 h on the adequacy of nutrient intake, nutritional status, anabolic metabolism, and inflammatory markers in children receiving ECMO.

Methods

This was a prospective observational cohort study, including children receiving ECMO therapy at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University of China from April 2018 to August 2024. Patients were divided into early EN (EEN) and late EN (LEN) groups based on whether effective EN was initiated within 24 h after the start of ECMO. T-tests or Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to compare the clinical characteristics, serum total protein (TP), nutritional intake, serum cholinesterase (CHE), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the two groups. Linear mixed-effects models (LME) were applied to assess the effect of EEN on changes in CRP and CHE levels over time during ECMO.

Results

A total of 47 children were included in this study, with 24 patients (51.1%) successfully receiving EEN. The PRISM3 score was higher in the LEN group (P = 0.016). The majority of children in the EEN group had pneumonia or ARDS (P < 0.001). The average daily energy and protein intake, as well as their adequacy, was higher in the EEN group compared to the LEN group (P < 0.001), although the EEN group experienced more frequent interruptions in EN (P < 0.05). Serum TP levels in the EEN group were higher than those in the LEN group during the first 3 days of ECMO (P < 0.05). The median CHE levels were higher, and the median CRP levels were lower in the EEN group compared to the LEN group (P < 0.05). LME analysis showed a significant interaction effect between EEN and time on CRP and CHE levels (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Successfully initiating EN within 24 h significantly improves the nutritional status of children receiving ECMO, promotes hepatic anabolic metabolism, and reduces inflammatory responses. This study provided new insights and data support for nutritional therapy strategies in children on ECMO.

Assessment for Enteral Feeding Intolerance by Critical Care Nurses: A National Survey

BACKGROUND

Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) occurs in more than one-third of mechanically ventilated patients, yet the cause of this gastrointestinal dysfunction remains unclear. Assessment and diagnostic criteria are often vague and subjective leading to inaccurate recognition or diagnosis of EFI. Nurses are often unsure or unaware of appropriate assessment methods.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this descriptive study was to determine current practice for assessment of EFI among critical care nurses.

METHODS

A national survey to explore EFI assessment practices was conducted with critical care nurses at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses National Teaching Institute conference in 2022. Nurses completed a 19-item survey to determine assessment practices for EFI among critical care nurses.

RESULTS

A total of 344 nurses completed the survey. The majority of nurses practiced direct care at the bedside for adult critical care patients, held a bachelor's degree, had 6 to 15 years of nursing experience, and held specialty certification. There was variability among responses to the practice questions in the survey. Seventy-eight percent of the nurses were aware of and had cared for patients with EFI. EFI was assessed by 84% of participants. The most common assessment criterion for EFI was nausea and vomiting. The majority (81%) of respondents measured gastric residual volume routinely or sometimes.

DISCUSSION

This study shows assessment of EFI is not standardized among nurses. This study identifies a need for education about EFI given the lack of understanding of EFI. Findings from this study can be used to inform future research to develop best methods for assessing the presence of EFI.

Prediction model of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with acute stroke

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis of stroke patients is greatly threatened by malnutrition. However, there is no model to predict the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized stroke patients. This study developed a predictive model for identifying high-risk malnutrition in stroke patients.

METHODS

Stroke patients from two tertiary hospitals were selected as the objects. Binary logistic regression was used to build the model. The model's performance was evaluated using various metrics including the receiver operating characteristic curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, clinical decision curve, and risk stratification.

RESULTS

A total of 319 stroke patients were included in the study. Among them, 27% experienced malnutrition while in the hospital. The prediction model included all independent variables, including dysphagia, pneumonia, enteral nutrition, Barthel Index, upper arm circumference, and calf circumference (all p < 0.05). The AUC area in the modeling group was 0.885, while in the verification group, it was 0.797. The prediction model produces greater net clinical benefit when the risk threshold probability is between 0% and 80%, as revealed by the clinical decision curve. All p values of the Hosmer test were > 0.05. The optimal cutoff value for the model was 0.269, with a sensitivity of 0.849 and a specificity of 0.804. After risk stratification, the MRS scores and malnutrition incidences increased significantly with escalating risk levels (p < 0.05) in both modeling and validation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a prediction model for malnutrition in stroke patients. It has been proven that the model has good differentiation and calibration.

Causes and impacts of interrupted enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition due to interruption of enteral nutrition remains a prevalent issue in the intensive care unit (ICU).

AIM

This study aimed to determine the frequency and causes of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI)and its impact on implementing enteral nutrition.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial (N = 2772). This secondary analysis included patients in the ICU for at least 72 h and receiving total enteral nutrition. The causes of ENI were defined as (1) feeding intolerance, (2) diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and (3) others. Multiple linear regression analyses investigated the association between ENI and nutrition intake.

RESULTS

A total of 1331 patients were included for analysis. Approximately 18.63% of the patients experienced at least one episode of ENI. The main cause of ENI was diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Energy intake was 17.54 ± 6.85 versus 16.64 ± 7.06 (p = .065) among patients with and without ENI, and the protein intake was 0.69 ± 0.27 versus 0.64 ± 0.27 (p = .016). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that ENI was significantly associated with diminishing energy and protein intake (B = -1.012, 95% CI -1.857 to -0.167, p = .019; B = -0.050, 95% CI -0.083 to -0.017, p = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this multicentre study about ENI, the incidence of interruptions in enteral nutrition was 18.6%, with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures being the leading causes. The occurrence of interruptions in the delivery of enteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the nutritional intake of critically ill patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Critical care nurses should establish comprehensive nutrition support protocols and strengthen the training of department nurses, equipping them with the skills to effectively prevent and manage ENI. This is essential for actively achieving feeding goals and improving the outcomes of ICU patients.

Personalized Nutrition in the Pediatric ICU: Steering the Shift from Acute Stress to Metabolic Recovery and Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Nutrition significantly impacts the outcomes of critically ill children in intensive care units (ICUs). Due to the evolving metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immunological disorders associated with severe illness or trauma, there are dynamically changing phases of energy needs requiring tailored macronutrient intake.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the changing dietary needs from the acute phase through recovery, provide recommendations for implementing evidence-based strategies to ensure adequate energy and nutrient provision in pediatric ICUs, and optimize patient outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE-PubMed database was conducted, focusing on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews related to the nutrition of critically ill children. The study highlights recent guidelines using the GRADE approach, supplemented by relevant adult studies, current clinical practices, challenges, gaps in knowledge, and future directions for research aimed at improving nutritional interventions.

RESULTS

Early personalized, incremental enteral feeding helps mitigate the negative energy balance during the acute phase, aids organ function restoration in the stabilization phase, and supports growth during the recovery phase and beyond. Conversely, early full nutritional support, high protein doses, or isolated micronutrient administration have not demonstrated benefits due to anabolic resistance in these patients. Moreover, early parenteral nutrition during the acute phase may suppress autophagy and lead to worse outcomes. Accurate assessment of nutritional status and monitoring of daily energy and protein needs are crucial.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong evidence supports the establishment of a dedicated nutritional team and the implementation of individualized nutritional protocols in the ICU to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill children.

Educational intervention with nursing professionals reduces interruption of enteral nutritional support

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of educational intervention on the occurrence of factors that interfere with the caloric-protein supply to critical and non-critical patients undergoing enteral nutritional therapy.

METHOD

This is an intervention, a field experiment without a control group, carried out in a teaching hospital in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Three training cycles were carried out with nursing professionals over 57 weeks, covering the same content. The data collected were divided into pre-intervention and intervention periods. Interference in caloric-protein support was analyzed based on the evaluation of days with non-conforming nutritional supply and the occurrence of factors that led to non-conformities.

RESULTS

Following interventions, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the number of non-conforming and inadequate days (nutritional supply < 80%), the frequency of occurrence of interfering factors and non-conformities caused by failure to follow the vomiting protocol.

CONCLUSION

The educational intervention was an effective strategy to increase the quality of the therapy evaluated, especially from the fifth day of enteral nutritional therapy onwards.

Enteral nutrition: An underappreciated source of patient safety events

Enteral nutrition (EN) therapies are prescribed for patients not able to maintain adequate nutrition through the oral route. Medical errors and close calls associated with the provision of EN therapy leading to actual and potential patient harm have been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the number, type, and severity of safety events related to the provision of EN therapies reported to a national database and provide workable recommendations from the literature to improve safety. An interdisciplinary team queried the National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) Joint Patient Safety Reporting (JPSR) system using keywords related to EN therapy use. The team reviewed the number, type, and severity of reported events and safety codes as categorized by the NCPS and then thematically classified the narratives using the Medication Use Process (MUP). Our query revealed 1227 safety events related to the EN keywords. Thematic analysis of the top five event subtypes (n = 1030) revealed that there were 691 EN safety reports directly related to an MUP step, and the majority fell into the steps of administering (31%), followed by monitoring (28%), dispensing (26%), prescribing (11%), and transcription (4%), with many events involving more than one MUP step. Safety events associated with the provision of EN therapies leading to patient harm have been reported to the JPSR system. To improve safety related to EN use, modifications to prescribing, transcribing/documenting, dispensing, administering, and monitoring of prescribed EN therapies are needed.

Cognitive influencing factors of ICU nurses on enteral nutrition interruption: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of clinically avoidable enteral nutrition interruptions is high. ICU nurses, as the implementers and monitors of enteral nutrition, have a close relationship between their cognitive level of enteral nutrition interruption and the incidence of enteral nutrition interruption. The level of ICU nurses' cognition of enteral nutrition interruption and the key factors influencing the level of ICU nurses' cognition of enteral nutrition interruption are not known.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the cognitive level of ICU nurses on enteral nutrition interruption and delve into the key factors that affect their cognitive level from the perspective of management.

DESIGN

A sequential explanatory mixed methods research design was used.

METHODS

With the convenience sampling method, an online survey questionnaire was distributed to ICU nurses in Chongqing, and 336 valid questionnaires were collected. After the survey, ICU managers were invited to participate in qualitative interviews, in which 10 participants from five hospitals completed face-to-face individual semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The survey found that ICU nurses had a good level of cognition towards enteral nutrition interruption but poor knowledge about the definition, causes, and consequences of enteral nutrition interruption, as well as negative attitudes toward active learning, assessment, and communication. And the longer work time in the ICU, joining the nutrition team, receiving systematic training, and acquiring relevant knowledge from academic journals more frequently were favorable to improving ICU nurses' knowledge level of enteral nutrition interruption. Personal interviews further identified the key factors affecting their cognitive level, including (1) lack of knowledge, (2) lack of proactive thinking, (3) lack of enteral nutrition management programs, and (4) lack of quality management tools for enteral nutrition interruption.

CONCLUSION

Although ICU nurses demonstrate a relatively high level of cognition, there is still room for improvement. ICU administrators must take specific measures to improve the knowledge of ICU nurses, especially in non-tertiary hospitals, in order to prevent nurse-induced enteral nutrition interruption in all ICUs and improve medical quality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Increasing the Volume of Delivered Enteral Feeds Using a Volume-Based Feeding Protocol in a Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic malnutrition is a significant burden to patients, clinicians, and health care systems. Compared with well-nourished patients, underfed patients (those who receive less than 80% of their daily energy requirement) have more adverse outcomes related to nutritional status. Volume-based protocols allow for catch-up titrations, are consistently superior to rate-based protocols, and can be implemented in most settings.

LOCAL PROBLEM

This project was conducted in an 8-bed neuroscience intensive care unit in which up to 41% of patients who required enteral feeding were underfed.

METHODS

This quality improvement clinical practice change project used a before-and-after design to evaluate (1) the effect of implementing a volume-based feeding protocol on the delivery of enteral feeds and (2) the effect of a nutrition-based project on staff members' attitudes regarding nutrition in critical care. The effectiveness of a volume-based feeding titration protocol was compared with that of a rate-based feeding protocol for achieving delivery of at least 80% of prescribed nutrition per 24-hour period. Staff members' attitudes were assessed using a survey before and after the project.

RESULTS

During 241 enteral feeding days (n = 40 patients), the percentage of delivered enteral feeding volume and the percentage of days patients received at least 80% of the prescribed volume increased after volume-based feeding was implemented. After project implementation, 74 staff members reported increased emphasis on nutrition delivery in their practice and a higher level of agreement that nutrition is a priority when caring for critically ill patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a volume-based feeding protocol with supplemental staff education resulted in improved delivery of prescribed enteral feeding.

Association between nutrition intake and muscle mass in adult inpatients receiving nutrition support: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the association between muscle mass variation, estimated by different equations, during hospitalization with the energy and protein intake and clinical and nutrition outcomes of patients using nutrition support.

METHODS

A prospective observational study with patients older than 18 years in use of enteral and/or parenteral nutrition therapy and monitored by the Nutritional Therapy Committee between December 14, 2021, and December 14, 2022. Data were collected from the electronic records and were applied in 11 equations to estimate the four different portions of muscle mass of patients receiving nutrition support at the beginning and the end of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients were evaluated, with a median age of 61.0 (49.0-69.75) years, and 106 were women (40.6%). According to the nutrition diagnosis, several participants had severe malnutrition (39.5%). The most muscle mass estimation equations indicated a reduction of muscle mass during hospitalization. All patients presented negative energy and protein balances during hospitalization, but greater protein intake increased the lean soft tissue. Also, the greater the number of infections, metabolic complications, and scheduled diet interruption, the greater was the chance of losing muscle mass.

CONCLUSION

There can be an association between the variation in muscle mass and energy and protein intake during hospitalization of patients using nutrition support. In addition, variation in muscle mass was associated with complications from nutrition support. The results emphasize the importance of anthropometric measurements to estimate muscle mass when other methods are not available.

The mode and timing of administrating nutritional treatment of critically ill elderly patients in intensive care units: a multicenter prospective study

Introduction

Critically ill patients are more susceptible to malnutrition due to their severe illness. Moreover, elderly patients who are critically ill lack specific nutrition recommendations, with nutritional care in the intensive care units (ICUs) deplorable for the elderly. This study aims to investigate nutrition treatment and its correlation to mortality in elderly patients who are critically ill in intensive care units.

Method

A multiple-center prospective cohort study was conducted in China from 128 intensive care units (ICUs). A total of 1,238 elderly patients were included in the study from 26 April 2017. We analyzed the nutrition characteristics of elderly patients who are critically ill, including initiated timing, route, ways of enteral nutrition (EN), and feeding complications, including the adverse aspects of feeding, acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI), and feeding interruption. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out the impact of nutrition treatment on a 28-day survival prognosis of elderly patients in the ICU.

Result

A total of 1,238 patients with a median age of 76 (IQR 70-83) were enrolled in the study. The Sequential Organ Failure (SOFA) median score was 7 (interquartile range: IQR 5-10) and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II was 21 (IQR 16-25). The all-cause mortality score was 11.6%. The percentage of nutritional treatment initiated 24 h after ICU admission was 58%, with an EN of 34.2% and a parenteral nutrition (PN) of 16.0% in elderly patients who are critically ill. Patients who had gastrointestinal dysfunction with AGI stage from 2 to 4 were 25.2%. Compared to the survivors' group, the non-survivors group had a lower ratio of EN delivery (57% vs. 71%; p = 0.015), a higher ratio of post-pyloric feeding (9% vs. 2%; p = 0.027), and higher frequency of feeding interrupt (24% vs. 17%, p = 0.048). Multivariable logistics regression analysis showed that patients above 76 years old with OR (odds ratio) 2.576 (95% CI, 1.127-5.889), respiratory rate > 22 beats/min, and ICU admission for 24 h were independent risk predictors of the 28-day mortality study in elderly patients who are critically ill. Similarly, other independent risk predictors of the 28-day mortality study were those with an OR of 2.385 (95%CI, 1.101-5.168), lactate >1.5 mmol/L, and ICU admission for 24 h, those with an OR of 7.004 (95%CI, 2.395-20.717) and early PN delivery within 24 h of ICU admission, and finally those with an OR of 5.401 (95%CI, 1.175-24.821) with EN delivery as reference.

Conclusion

This multi-center prospective study describes clinical characteristics, the mode and timing of nutrition treatment, frequency of AGI, and adverse effects of nutrition in elderly ICU patients. According to this survey, ICU patients with early PN delivery, older age, faster respiratory rate, and higher lactate level may experience poor prognosis.

Adequate calorie and protein administration via enteral nutrition may contribute to improved 30-day survival in patients with solid tumors at nutritional risk

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer receiving adequate enteral nutrition (EN) have improved clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, discrepancies may exist between the amounts prescribed and received. This study aimed to investigate: (1) the receiving exclusive EN, (2) the relationship between inadequacy and unfavorable outcomes, and (3) the impact of inadequate EN administration on the survival of patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study included hospitalized patients with solid tumors who exclusively received EN and were evaluated using data extracted from electronic medical records. Nutritional risk was evaluated using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS - 2002). EN adequacy was assessed from days 3-7 of hospitalization. Calorie and protein delivery by EN was classified as adequate (≥80 % of EN administration) or inadequate (<80 % of EN administration). Data were analyzed using dispersion and Bland-Altman plots, Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were evaluated (63.9 ± 13.1 years of age, 67.5 % male, 32.5 % with head and neck cancer, and 86.8 % at nutritional risk). During the 5-day evaluation period, only 14 % of the patients received the mean volume, proteins, and calories according to the EN prescription. A relationship was observed between inadequate EN (<80 %) and 30-day in-hospital mortality. This result was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p = 0.020), which showed a survival benefit in patients at nutritional risk who received adequate calories and protein.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant caloric and protein deficits related with EN. Furthermore, adequate calorie and protein administration could contribute to improved survival in patients with cancer who are at a risk of malnutrition, however, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm whether adequate calorie administration could contribute to improved survival.

Enhanced exclusive enteral nutrition delivery during the first 7 days is associated with decreased 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with normal lactate level: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EN) is often observed during the first week of ICU admission because of the extra costs and safety considerations for early parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to assess the association between nutrition intake and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients receiving exclusive EN.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized clinical trial that assesses the effect of implementing a feeding protocol on mortality in critically ill patients. Patients who stayed in the ICUs for at least 7 days and received exclusive EN were included in this analysis. Multivariable Cox hazard regression models and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess the relationship between the different doses of EN delivery and 28-day mortality. Subgroups with varying lactate levels at enrollment were additionally analyzed to address the potential confounding effect brought in by the presence of shock-related hypoperfusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 1322 patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) daily energy and protein delivery during the first week of enrollment were 14.6 (10.3-19.6) kcal/kg and 0.6 (0.4-0.8) g/kg, respectively. An increase of 5 kcal/kg energy delivery was associated with a significant reduction (approximately 14%) in 28-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.865, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.768-0.974, P = 0.016). For protein intake, a 0.2 g/kg increase was associated with a similar mortality reduction with an adjusted HR of 0.868 (95% CI 0.770-0.979). However, the benefits associated with enhanced nutrition delivery could be observed in patients with lactate concentration ≤ 2 mmol/L (adjusted HR = 0.804 (95% CI 0.674-0.960) for energy delivery and adjusted HR = 0.804 (95% CI 0.672-0.962) for protein delivery, respectively), but not in those > 2 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

During the first week of critical illness, enhanced nutrition delivery is associated with reduced mortality in critically ill patients receiving exclusive EN, only for those with lactate concentration ≤ 2 mmol/L.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN12233792, registered on November 24, 2017.

Understanding nursing perspective towards barriers to the optimal delivery of enteral nutrition in intensive care settings

BACKGROUND

The management process of Enteral Nutrition (EN) typically involves the interaction between a team of health care practitioners. Nurses being the closest to the patients, have crucial responsibilities and play a major role in feeding delivery along with other medical treatments. This study was conducted to investigate the perception of the nurses working in adult and paediatric intensive care Units (ICUs) regarding the EN barriers and identify the factors that influenced their perception.

METHODS

The data in this cross-sectional study was collected via online survey between 15 October 2021 and January 2022. All nurses working in adult or paediatric ICUs across Saudi Arabia were eligible to participate. The tool used for the data collection was adapted from Cahill et al. (2016) and then reviewed and modified by the researchers. The survey collected information about the demographics of the nurses, and it included 24 potential EN barriers where the participants were asked to rate their importance on a scale from 1 to 5. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the variables, univariant analysis were performed to compare the perceptions of the nurses regarding the EN barriers based on their characteristics followed by stepwise linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 136 nurses working in adult and paediatric ICUs were included in this study. The results showed that the most important barriers as perceived by the nurses was "Frequent displacement of feeding tube, requiring reinsertion" [3.29 ± 1.28], "Delays in initiating motility agents in patients not tolerating enteral nutrition" [3.27 ± 1.24] and "Enteral formula not available on the unit". [3.27 ± 1.24]. Our results showed that the responses of the participants statistically varied based on their work settings, gender, region, and educational level for some items in the survey (P-value ≤ 0.05). In the regression analysis, gender was the only variable statistically influenced the total Likert rating scores of the participants (r = -0.213, p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

This study identified several barriers that exist in the nursing practice of EN in critical care settings. There are distinct differences in the perception of the nurses to these barriers based on their characteristics. Understanding such differences is important for implementing future strategies for units that needed the most help in prioritizing EN delivery.

Preprocedural fasting policies for patients receiving tube feeding: A national survey

BACKGROUND

Patients who are critically ill frequently accrue substantial nutrition deficits due to multiple episodes of prolonged fasting prior to procedures. Existing literature suggests that, for most patients receiving tube feeding, the aspiration risk is low. Yet, national and international guidelines do not address fasting times for tube feeding, promoting uncertainty regarding optimal preprocedural fasting practice. We aimed to characterize current institutional fasting practices in the United States for patients with and without a secure airway, with variable types of enteral access, for representative surgical procedures.

METHODS

The survey was distributed to a purposive sample of academic institutions in the United States. Reponses were reported as restrictive (6-8 h preprocedurally) or permissive (<6 h or continued intraprocedurally) feeding policies. Differences between level 1 trauma centers and others, and between burn centers and others, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The response rate was 40.3% (56 of 139 institutions). Responses revealed a wide variability with respect to current practices, with more permissive policies reported in patients with secure airways. In patients with a secure airway, Level 1 trauma centers were significantly more likely to have permissive fasting policies for patients undergoing an extremity incision and drainage for each type of feeding tube surveyed.

CONCLUSIONS

Current hospital policies for preprocedural fasting in patients receiving tube feeds are conflicting and are frequently more permissive than guidelines for healthy patients receiving oral nutrition. Prospective research is needed to establish the safety and clinical effects of various fasting practices in tube-fed patients.

Mid-to-long-term outcomes with image-guided placement of de novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes are advantageous in children that require prolonged supplemental nutrition. However, few institutions place these devices at the time of initial feeding tube placement. We aim to build upon our previously published initial experience with this procedure to study mid-to-long-term outcomes of pediatric patients who have had de novo, image-guided, percutaneous low-profile GJ tube placement.

METHODS

All de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placements at a single children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and March 2021. Technical parameters, including fluoroscopy time, tube size, technical success, and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and transition to gastric/oral feeds were analyzed.

RESULTS

64 de novo low-profile GJ tubes were successfully placed in 65 patients (mean age: 4.6 years, median: 1, range: 0.2-19; mean pre-procedural weight: 16.8 kg, median: 8.2, range: 4.4-66.7). Average clinical follow-up 23.4 months (range: 0.1-75, median 10.4). Average weight gain was 6.1 kg. Average increase in weight percentile was 7.3%. 19 (19/64; 29.7%) patients had conversion from GJ to G tube. 11 (11/64; 17.2%) patients had their enteric tube removed completely. There were 7 minor complications (7/65; 10.7%), most common being excessive skin irritation (6/7) and 9 major complications (9/65; 13.8%), most common being tube dislodgment within the first 30 days (6/9).

CONCLUSIONS

These results further support that de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placement is technically feasible and efficacious in children requiring post-pyloric nutritional supplementation with a favorable safety profile.

Using Machine-Learning to Assess the Prognostic Value of Early Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The association between gastrointestinal intolerance during early enteral nutrition (EN) and adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients is controversial. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) markers during early ICU stays and to predict early EN failure using a machine learning (ML) approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from adult patients admitted to Beilinson Hospital ICU between January 2011 and December 2018 for more than 48 h and received EN. Clinical data, including demographics, severity scores, EFI markers, and medications, along with 72 h after admission, were analyzed by ML algorithms. Prediction performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) of a ten-fold cross-validation set.

RESULTS

The datasets comprised 1584 patients. The means of the cross-validation AUCROCs for 90-day mortality and early EN failure were 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.74), respectively. Gastric residual volume above 250 mL on the second day was an important component of both prediction models.

CONCLUSIONS

ML underlined the EFI markers that predict poor 90-day outcomes and early EN failure and supports early recognition of at-risk patients. Results have to be confirmed in further prospective and external validation studies.

Optimizing enteral nutrition delivery by implementing volume-based feeding protocol for critically ill patients: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

This study aims to provide an updated assessment of the efficacy of optimized enteral nutrition (EN) delivery by implementing the volume-based feeding (VBF) protocol in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We updated our previous literature retrieval with no language restrictions. The inclusion criteria were:1) Participants: Critically ill patients (Patients who was admitted in ICU; 2) Intervention: The VBF protocol was adopted for EN administration; 3) Comparison: The rate-based feeding (RBF) protocol was adopted for EN administration; 4) Major outcomes: EN nutrition delivery. The exclusion criteria included participants aged < 18 years, duplicated literature, animal and cellular experiments, and studies lacking any of the outcomes mentioned in the inclusion criteria. The databases included MEDLINE (through PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure.

RESULT

Sixteen studies involving a total of 2896 critically ill patients are included in the updated meta-analysis. Compared with the previous meta-analysis, nine new studies were added that included 2205 more patients. The VBF protocol significantly improved energy (MD = 15.41%, 95% CI: [10.68, 20.14], p < 0.00001) and protein (MD = 22.05%, 95% CI: [10.89, 33.22], p = 0.0001) delivery. The patients in the VBF group stayed in the ICU for a shorter time (MD = 0.78, 95% CI: [0.01, 1.56], p = 0.05). The VBF protocol did not increase the risk of death (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: [0.85, 1.24], p = 0.76) or prolong the mechanical ventilation duration (MD = 0.81, 95% CI: [-0.30,1.92], p = 0.15). In addition, the VBF protocol did not affect EN complications, such as diarrhea (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: [0.73, 1.15], p = 0.43), emesis (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: [0.76, 1.99], p = 0.41), feeding intolerance (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: [0.63, 2.09], p = 0.66), and gastric retention (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: [0.16, 1.30], p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that the VBF protocol significantly improved calorie and protein delivery in critically ill patients with no additional risk.

How do guideline recommended energy targets compare with measured energy expenditure in critically ill adults with obesity: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients with obesity have unique and complex nutritional needs, with clinical practice guidelines conflicting regarding recommended energy targets. The aim of this systematic review was to 1) describe measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) reported in the literature and; 2) compare mREE to predicted energy targets using the European (ESPEN) and American (ASPEN) guideline recommendations when indirect calorimetry is not available in critically ill patients with obesity.

METHODS

The protocol was registered apriori and literature was searched until 17th March, 2022. Original studies were included if they reported mREE using indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients with obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Group-level mREE data was reported as per the primary publication using mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range]. Where individual patient data was available, Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between guideline recommendations and mREE targets (i.e. ASPEN for BMI 30-50, 11-14 kcal/kg actual weight compared to 70% mREE and ESPEN 20-25 kcal/kg adjusted weight compared to 100% mREE). Accuracy was assessed by the percentage (%) of estimates within ±10% of mREE targets.

RESULTS

After searching 8019 articles, 24 studies were included. mREE ranged from 1607 ± 385 to 2919 [2318-3362]kcal and 12-32kcal/actual body weight. For the ASPEN recommendations of 11-14 kcal/kg, a mean bias of -18% (-50% to +13%) and 4% (-36% to +44%) was observed, respectively (n = 104). For the ESPEN recommendations 20-25 kcal/kg, a bias of -22% (-51% to +7%) and -4% (-43% to +34%), was observed, respectively (n = 114). The guideline recommendations were able to accurately predict mREE targets on 30%-39% occasions (11-14 kcal/kg actual) and 15%-45% occasions (20-25 kcal/kg adjusted), for ASPEN and ESPEN recommendations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measured energy expenditure in critically ill patients with obesity is variable. Energy targets generated using predictive equations recommended in both the ASPEN and ESPEN clinical guidelines have poor agreement with mREE and are frequently not able to accurately predict within ±10% of mREE, most commonly underestimating energy needs.

Factors Associated with Interruptions of Enteral Nutrition and the Impact on Macro- and Micronutrient Deficits in ICU Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Feeding interruptions in critical care patients are often unjustified. We aimed to determine the causes, duration, and frequency of enteral nutrition interruptions (ENIs) and to assess macronutrients and antioxidant deficits according to European Society of Parenteral Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) guidelines.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients admitted for more than 48 h with an inability to orally eat from April to December 2019. The type of enteral nutrition, the number of calories administered, the time of feeding initiation, the reasons for delaying feeding, and the causes for ENI were recorded.

RESULTS

81 patients were enrolled, with a median duration of ENIs of 5.2 (3.4-7.4) hours/day. Gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring-a highly controversial practice-was the most common cause of ENI (median duration 3 (2.3-3) hours/day). The mean energy intake was 1037 ± 281 kcal/day, while 60.5% of patients covered less than 65% of the total energy needs (1751 ± 295 kcal/day, according to mean Body Mass Index (BMI)). The median daily protein intake did not exceed 0.43 ± 0.3 gr/kg/day of the actual body weight (BW), whereas ESPEN recommends 1.3 gr/kg/day for adjusted BW (p < 0.001). The average administration of micronutrients and antioxidants (arginine, selenium, zinc, vitamins) was significantly less than the dietary reference intake (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ENIs lead to substantial caloric, protein, and antioxidant deficits.

Association between early nutrition support and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients: the FRANS prospective nutrition cohort study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines suggest the introduction of early nutrition support within the first 48 h of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients who cannot eat. In that context, we aimed to describe nutrition practices in the ICU and study the association between the introduction of early nutrition support (< 48 h) in the ICU and patient mortality at day 28 (D28) using data from a multicentre prospective cohort.

METHODS

The 'French-Speaking ICU Nutritional Survey' (FRANS) study was conducted in 26 ICUs in France and Belgium over 3 months in 2015. Adult patients with a predicted ICU length of stay > 3 days were consecutively included and followed for 10 days. Their mortality was assessed at D28. We investigated the association between early nutrition (< 48 h) and mortality at D28 using univariate and multivariate propensity-score-weighted logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1206 patients were included. Early nutrition support was administered to 718 patients (59.5%), with 504 patients receiving enteral nutrition and 214 parenteral nutrition. Early nutrition was more frequently prescribed in the presence of multiple organ failure and less frequently in overweight and obese patients. Early nutrition was significantly associated with D28 mortality in the univariate analysis (crude odds ratio (OR) 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.34) and propensity-weighted multivariate analysis (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.10). In subgroup analyses, this association was stronger in patients ≤ 65 years and with SOFA scores ≤ 8. Compared with no early nutrition, a significant association was found of D28 mortality with early enteral (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) but not early parenteral nutrition (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective cohort study, early nutrition support in the ICU was significantly associated with increased mortality at D28, particularly in younger patients with less severe disease. Compared to no early nutrition, only early enteral nutrition appeared to be associated with increased mortality. Such findings are in contrast with current guidelines on the provision of early nutrition support in the ICU and may challenge our current practices, particularly concerning patients at low nutrition risk. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02599948. Retrospectively registered on November 5th 2015.

Acute liver injury in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: Narrative review

In recent years, humanity has been confronted with a global pandemic due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has caused an unprecedented health and economic crisis worldwide. Apart from the respiratory symptoms, which are considered the principal manifestations of COVID-19, it has been recognized that COVID-19 constitutes a systemic inflammatory process affecting multiple organ systems. Across the spectrum of organ involvement in COVID-19, acute liver injury (ALI) has been gradually gaining increasing attention by the international scientific community. COVID-19 associated liver impairment can affect a considerable proportion of COVID-19 patients and seems to correlate with the severity of the disease course. Indeed, COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) run a greater risk of developing ALI due to the severity of their clinical condition and in the context of multi-organ failure. The putative pathophysiological mechanisms of COVID-19 induced ALI in ICU patients remain poorly understood and appear to be multifactorial in nature. Several theories have been proposed to explain the occurrence of ALI in the ICU setting, such as hypoperfusion and ischemia due to hemodynamic instability, passive liver congestion as a result of congestive heart failure, ischemia-reperfusion injury, hypoxia due to respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation itself, sepsis and septic shock, cytokine storm, endotheliitis with concomitant coagulopathy, drug-induced liver injury, parenteral nutrition and direct cytopathic viral effect. It should be noted that no specific therapy for COVID-19 induced ALI exists. Therefore, the therapeutic approach lies in preventive measures and is exclusively supportive once ALI ensues. The aim of the current review is to scrutinize the existing evidence on COVID-19 associated ALI in ICU patients, explore its clinical implications, shed light on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and propose potential therapeutic approaches. Ongoing research on the particular scientific field will further elucidate the pathophysiology behind ALI and address unresolved issues, in the hope of mitigating the tremendous health consequences imposed by COVID-19 on ICU patients.

Barriers to Delivery of Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Settings in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study of the Perceptions of Health Care Providers Working in Adult and Paediatric ICUs

Background and Aims

Achieving optimal nutrition prescription is challenging in critically ill patients. Many factors can hinder the adequate delivery of enteral nutrition (EN) in intensive care units (ICUs). In this study, we aim to describe EN barriers and compare the perceptions of health care practitioners working in adult and paediatric ICUs regarding these barriers.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, data were collected via online survey. All physicians, dietitians, and nurses working in adult or paediatric ICUs across Saudi Arabia were eligible to participate. The survey contained 24 potential EN barriers and participants were asked to rate their importance on a scale from 1 to 5. A total Likert rating score of the 24 items was later calculated.

Results

We recruited 244 health care providers working in adult and paediatric ICUs. The most important perceived barriers were "Delay in physician ordering EN initiation" (3.33 ±1.32), and 'Waiting for dietitians to assess patients' (3.22 ±1.20). There was a statistical difference between the responses of health care providers based on their work settings for the following items; "Nurses failing to progress feeds according to feeding protocol" (p=0.006) and 'Feeding being held too far prior procedures or operating-room visits' (p=0.021). Profession significantly influenced the total Likert rating score of the 24 items (r=-0.234, p=0.001).

Conclusion

This study identified some barriers of EN delivery in ICUs and showed that participants' perceptions regarding these barriers were influenced by their roles. These findings shed light on the nutritional practices in Saudi hospitals and identify areas of improvement in EN practice and advancements in the field of critical care nutrition in the region.

Fasting practices of enteral nutrition delivery for airway procedures in critically ill adult patients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

There is limited understanding of fasting practices and reported safety concerns for airway procedures in critically ill adults.

OBJECTIVE

To describe fasting practices including safety concerns for airway procedures in critically ill adult patients in the reported literature.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies conducted in adult critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN) and undergoing an airway procedure (endotracheal intubation, endotracheal extubation, and tracheostomy) were included if EN fasting practices and/or prespecified nutrition and clinical outcomes were reported.

METHODS

A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from 2000 to January 19, 2022. Results are presented via narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, with only one randomised control trial (RCT). Twelve studies reported on fasting practices with varied EN fasting durations (0-34 h) and two reported data on nutrition adequacy. Three studies investigated continued EN in one study arm and four studies minimised fasting duration by including gastric suctioning prior to the airway procedure. Safety concerns primarily related to aspiration events (61%) were reported in nine studies.

CONCLUSION

In the reported literature, there is wide variation in EN fasting practices for airway procedures in critically ill patients with limited evidence to inform practice.

Enteral nutrition interruptions in critically ill patients: A prospective study on reasons, frequency and duration of interruptions of nutritional support during ICU stay

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Enteral Nutrition (EN) may be interrupted due to various reasons in the setting of intensive care unit (ICU) care. This study aimed to investigate the reasons, frequency, and duration of EN interruptions in critically ill patients within the first 7 days of ICU stay.

METHODS

A total of 122 critically ill patients (median age: 63 years, 57% were males) initiating EN within the first 72 h of ICU admission and continued EN for at least 48 h during ICU stay were included in this observational prospective study conducted at a Medical ICU. Patients were followed for hourly energy intake as well as the frequency, reason, and duration of EN interruptions, for the first seven nutrition days of ICU stay or until death/discharge from ICU.

RESULTS

The median APACHE II score was 22 (IQR, 17-27). The per patient EN interruption frequency was 2.74 and the median total EN interruption duration was 960 (IQR, 105-1950) minutes. The most common reason for EN interruption was radiological procedures (91 episodes) and the longest duration of EN interruption was due to tube malfunctions (1230 min). Target energy intake were achieved on the 6th day at a maximum rate of 89.4%. Logistic regression showed that there was relationship between increased mortality and patients with ≥3 EN interruptions (OR: 6.73 (2.15-30.55), p = 0.004) after adjusting for confounding variables (age and APACHE II score). According to Kaplan Meier analysis, patients with ≥3 EN interruptions had significantly lower median survival times than patients with <3 EN interruptions (24.0 (95% CI 8.5-39.5) vs 18.0 (95% CI 13-23) days, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

During the first week of EN support, the most common reason of EN interruptions was related to radiological procedures and the longest EN interruptions was due to feeding tube malfunctions. There was relationship between ≥3 EN interruptions and increased mortality.

Interruptions to Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Background

Malnourishment has been linked with increased morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. The current study aimed to assess the factors contributing to the interruption of enteral nutrition so that preventive measures can be formulated to avoid the malnourishment of critically ill patients.

Methodology

A prospective, observational study was conducted at the Department of Intensive Care Unit, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, between November 2020 and May 2021. All patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) during the study period aged between 18 and 80 years, who remained admitted in the medical ICU for at least 72 hours were included in the study. Those who had ileostomy or colostomy were excluded from the study. Diagnostic categories were defined as surgical and medical. Data on clinical parameters including admitting diagnosis and airway-related issues were recorded in a predefined proforma.

Results

The mean duration of enteral nutrition interruption in males was 13.96 ± 13.12 days while that of females, 12.48 ± 12.43 days. Non-invasive ventilation dependency was significantly associated with an interruption in enteral nutrition (p=0.002). The mean duration of interruption of enteral nutrition was not correlated with airway issues (p=0.569). However, the mean duration of interruption of enteral nutrition was significantly lower in patients who underwent spontaneous breathing trials with T-piece (p = 0.032). Those who were advised nil per oral before surgery had a significantly longer duration of enteral nutrition interruption (p < 0.0001) with a mean length of 30.18 ± 5.83 days. The duration of enteral nutrition interruption was significantly longer in patients who had tracheostomy than those who did not have a tracheostomy (26.3 ± 6.34 vs. 9.54 ± 11.61 days) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The present study revealed that at least three-forth of the patients admitted in ICUs had documented orders to the interruption of enteral nutrition. The most significant causes that correlated with interruptions to enteral nutrition were non-invasive ventilation dependency, tracheostomy, spontaneous breathing trials with T-piece, and orders of nil per oral before surgery.

How much underfeeding can the critically ill adult patient tolerate?

Critical illness leads to significant metabolic alterations that should be considered when providing nutritional support. Findings from key randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that underfeeding (<70% of energy expenditure [EE]) during the acute phase of critical illness (first 7 days of intensive care unit [ICU] admission) may not be harmful and could instead promote autophagy and prevent overfeeding in light of endogenous energy production. However, the optimal energy target during this period is unclear and full starvation is unlikely to be beneficial. There are limited data regarding the effects of prolonged underfeeding on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, but recent studies show that oral food intake is suboptimal both in the ICU and following discharge to the acute care setting. It is hypothesized that provision of full nutrition (70-100% of EE) may be important in the recovery phase of critical illness (>7 days of ICU admission) for promoting recovery and rehabilitation; however, studies on nutritional intervention delivered from ICU admission through hospital discharge are needed. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative synthesis of the existing literature on metabolic alterations experienced during critical illness and the impact of underfeeding on clinical outcomes in the critically ill adult patient.

[Critical deficiencies of energy and protein with a high provision of non-nutritional calories after one week in an intensive care unit]

INTRODUCTION

nutritional therapy is essential for the treatment of critically ill patients, although its right application fails frequently, which increases the risk for undernutrition and complications.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the nutritional adequacy of patients with enteral nutritional support in an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

a cohort study was conducted including adults admitted to the ICU with enteral support and stay ≥ 7 days. Demographic data, severity of the disease, and clinical and nutritional scores, including IL-6 levels and body composition, were evaluated at admission. Nutritional intake was recorded daily in relation to the target intake according to international guidelines, for calculation of caloric and protein deficiencies.

RESULTS

in all, 26 from 132 admitted patients were included. Their probability of mortality was 20-25 % due to disease severity by APACHE (16.6 ± 6.02) and SOFA (8 ± 4.4). Undernutrition risk was 5.6 ± 1.09 by NRS-2002 and 4.3 ± 1.2 by angle phase. Caloric deficiency was -674 kcal/day, with 13 % proteins (28 ± 11.5 g/d) and 42 % lipids, including 17.5 % of non-nutrient calories from propofol. NUTRIC was significantly associated with percentages of the caloric prescription at days 3 and 7 (R2 = 0.21, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

patients had a caloric/protein deficit with critical protein deficit of -85.2 g/day, and an inadequate proportion between protein calories and non-protein calories, increasing their risk of complications.

Feasibility of achieving different protein targets using a hypocaloric high-protein enteral formula in critically ill patients

Background and aims

Combining energy and protein targets during the acute phase of critical illness is challenging. Energy should be provided progressively to reach targets while avoiding overfeeding and ensuring sufficient protein provision. This prospective observational study evaluated the feasibility of achieving protein targets guided by 24-h urinary nitrogen excretion while avoiding overfeeding when administering a high protein-to-energy ratio enteral nutrition (EN) formula.

Methods

Critically ill adult mechanically ventilated patients with an APACHE II score > 15, SOFA > 4 and without gastrointestinal dysfunction received EN with hypocaloric content for 7 days. Protein need was determined by 24-h urinary nitrogen excretion, up to 1.2 g/kg (Group A, N = 10) or up to 1.5 g/kg (Group B, N = 22). Variables assessed included nitrogen intake, excretion, balance; resting energy expenditure (REE); phase angle (PhA); gastrointestinal tolerance of EN.

Results

Demographic characteristics of groups were similar. Protein target was achieved using urinary nitrogen excretion measurements. Nitrogen balance worsened in Group A but improved in Group B. Daily protein and calorie intake and balance were significantly increased in Group B compared to Group A. REE was correlated to PhA measurements. Gastric tolerance of EN was good.

Conclusions

Achieving the protein target using urinary nitrogen loss up to 1.5 g/kg/day was feasible in this hypercatabolic population. Reaching a higher protein and calorie target did not induce higher nitrogen excretion and was associated with improved nitrogen balance and a better energy intake without overfeeding. PhA appears to be related to REE and may reflect metabolism level, suggestive of a new phenotype for nutritional status.

Trial registration 0795-18-RMC.

Nutritional response and clinical complications in patients with post-pyloric and gastric enteral tubes

ABSTRACT Objective The present study assessed the differences in nutritional markers (albumin, transferrin, total body fat, and body mass index) and clinical complications (diarrhea, vomiting, and diet interruptions) associated with enteral nutrition. Methods This is an open-label, randomized, two-arm parallel-group controlled clinical trial. Out of 105 patients assessed for eligibility, 35 adult patients were randomly divided into two groups and followed for 28 days. The sample comprised a heterogeneous group of severely ill individuals initially treated in the intensive care units. Neurological conditions (i.e., strokes and brain tumours) were the most common reasons for hospitalization. Patients had one singularity: the clinical need for exclusive enteral nutrition therapy. One group received the diet via gastric tube and the other via a post-pyloric tube. Results The groups presented increases in the calories prescribed and administered, as well as reduced diet discontinuation. Although similar values were observed up to day 21, the post-pyloric group showed increased albumin levels compared to the gastric group on Day 28. Transferrin levels increased over time in both groups. Conclusion There were no differences in the complications recorded between groups, albeit serum albumin significantly increased in the post-pyloric group.