A single untimed plasma drug concentration measurement during low-level HIV viremia predicts virologic failure

The prevalence of low-level viraemia and its association with virological failure in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Low-level viraemia (LLV) following antiretroviral therapy (ART) in people living with HIV (PLWH) has not received sufficient attention. To the determine the prevalence of LLV and its association with virological failure (VF), we systematically reviewed evidence-based interventions for PLWH. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 22 May 2024. Cohorts with samples sizes smaller than 1000 in size were excluded. Data from 16 cohort studies, encompassing 13,49,306 PLWH, revealed a pooled prevalence of LLV of 13.81%. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) identified the following risk factors for LLV: viral load (VL) ≥ 105 copies/mL at baseline (1.79, 1.11-2.88), AIDS-defined illness at baseline (1.24, 1.10-1.40), and protease inhibitor-based regimen at ART initiation (1.53, 1.45-1.62) are the risk factors for LLV. Conversely, CD4 count ≥200 cells/μL at baseline (0.90, 0.82-0.98), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen (0.81, 0.68-0.96) and the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimen (0.60, 0.42-0.85) were associated with a reduced risk of LLV. Pooling the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and the 95% CI, we found that LLV increased the risk of VF with rising VL among 96,711 PLWH (aHR 2.77, 95% CI 2.03-3.76) and increased the risk of all-cause mortality at high VL levels among 14,229 PLWH (aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16-2.37). Therefore, the prevalence of LLV in PLWH should not be overlooked. This study aims to guide better management strategies to improve clinical outcomes in patients with LLV.

Acquired Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance in Rhode Island, USA, 2004-2021

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquired drug resistance (ADR) compromises antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

We aggregated all HIV-1 protease-reverse transcriptase-integrase sequences over 2004-2021 at the largest HIV center in Rhode Island and evaluated ADR extent, trends, and impact using Stanford Database tools. Trends were measured with Mann-Kendall statistic, and multivariable regressions evaluated resistance predictors.

RESULTS

Sequences were available for 914 ART-experienced persons. Overall ADR to any drug decreased from 77% to 49% (-0.66 Mann-Kendall statistic); nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 65% to 32%, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors 53% to 43%, and protease inhibitors 28% to 7% (2004-2021), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors 16% to 13% (2017-2021). Multiclass resistance decreased from 44% to 12% (2-class) and 12% to 6% (3-class). In 2021, 94% had at least one 3-drug or 2-drug one-pill-once-daily (OPOD) option. Males and those exposed to more ART regimens were more likely to have ≥2-class resistance, and higher regimen exposure was also associated with fewer OPOD options.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive analyses within a densely-sampled HIV epidemic over 2004-2021 demonstrated decreasing ADR. Continued ADR monitoring is important to maintain ART success, particularly with rising INSTI use in all lines of therapy and 2-drug and long-acting formulations.

Managing low-level HIV viraemia in antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

HIV-1 management has advanced significantly with antiretroviral therapy (ART), yet challenges persist, including low-level HIV-1 viraemia (LLV). LLV presents a complex scenario, with varied definitions in the literature, reflecting uncertainties in its clinical interpretation. Questions arise regarding the underlying mechanisms of LLV, whether it signifies ongoing viral replication or stems from other factors. This study aimed to systematically review strategies for LLV management, providing insights into optimal clinical approaches.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health were searched for relevant literature on LLV management. We included studies published between 2004 and 2024, assessing interventions such as ART modification, genotypic resistance testing, adherence assessment, performing therapeutic drug monitoring, testing for chronic coinfections and assessing the viral reservoir via HIV DNA quantification. Meta-analyses were conducted where feasible.

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 48 eligible records. Findings indicated limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of ART regimen modification in achieving virological suppression among individuals with LLV. However, studies assessing genotypic resistance testing revealed a significant association between resistance-associated mutations and virological suppression during LLV. Adherence to ART emerged as a critical determinant of treatment efficacy, with interventions showing promise in achieving viral suppression. The clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in managing LLV remained inconclusive. Gaps in the literature were identified regarding follow-up scheduling, managing concurrent chronic infections and assessing inflammatory markers in LLV management.

CONCLUSIONS

While ART modification may not consistently achieve virological suppression, genotypic resistance testing may offer insights into treatment outcomes. Adherence to ART emerged as a crucial factor, necessitating tailored interventions. However, further research is needed to elucidate the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring and other management strategies. The study highlights the importance of ongoing research to refine therapeutic approaches and improve patient outcomes in LLV management.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024511492.

Management of low-level HIV viremia during antiretroviral therapy: Delphi consensus statement and appraisal of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

While antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective, detection of low levels of HIV-1 RNA in plasma is common in treated individuals. Given the uncertainties on the topic, we convened a panel of experts to consider different clinical scenarios, producing a Delphi consensus to help guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A panel of 17 experts in infectious diseases, virology and immunology rated 32 statements related to four distinct scenarios: (1) low-level viremia during stable (≥6 months) first-line ART (≥2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements 50-500 copies/mL); (2) a viral blip during otherwise suppressive ART (a HIV-1 RNA measurement 50-1000 copies/mL with adjacent measurements <50 copies/mL); (3) low-level viral rebound during previously suppressive ART (≥2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements 50-500 copies/mL); (4) residual viremia during suppressive ART (persistent HIV-1 RNA quantification below 50 copies/mL). A systematic review, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement, informed the 32 statements. The Delphi procedure was modified to include two voting rounds separated by a moderated group discussion. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations-based recommendations were developed.

RESULTS

Overall, 18/32 statements (56.2%) achieved a strong consensus, 3/32 (9.4%) achieved a moderate consensus and 11/32 (34.4%) did not achieve a consensus. Across the four scenarios, the panel unanimously emphasised the importance of implementing specific interventions prior to considering therapy changes, including assessing adherence, testing for genotypic drug resistance and scheduling more frequent follow-up visits. Strategies indicated in selected circumstances included therapeutic drug monitoring, quantifying total HIV-1 DNA and evaluating concomitant chronic infections.

CONCLUSIONS

While acknowledging the many uncertainties about source, significance and optimal management of low-level viremia during ART, the findings provide insights to help harmonise clinical practice. There is a need for well-designed randomised studies assessing different interventions to manage low-level viremia and future research regarding its definition.

Prevalence and predictors of persistent low-level HIV viraemia: a retrospective cohort study among people receiving dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy in Southern Nigeria

Background

Persistent low-level viraemia (PLLV) is a risk factor for virologic failure among people receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Objectives

We assessed the prevalence and predictors of PLLV among individuals receiving Dolutegravir-based ART in southern Nigeria.

Design

This retrospective cohort study used routine program data from electronic medical records of persons receiving Dolutegravir-based first-line ART in 154 PEPFAR/USAID-supported health facilities in Akwa Ibom and Cross Rivers states, Nigeria.

Methods

Clients on first-line Dolutegravir-based ART ⩾6 months, who had a viral load result in the 12 months preceding October 2021 (baseline), and a second viral load result by September 2022 were included. Persons with low-level viraemia (LLV) (viral load 51-999 copies/ml) received additional adherence support. The outcome analysed was PLLV (two consecutive LLV results). Indices were summarized using descriptive statistics, and predictors of PLLV were determined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

In total, 141,208 persons on ART were included, of which 63.3% (n = 89,944) were females. The median age was 36 [29-44] years, median ART duration was 19 [11-42] months. At the end of the study, 10.5% (14,759/141,208) had initial LLV, 90.1% (13,304/14,759) of which attained undetectable viral load (⩽50 copies/ml), and 1.1% (163/14,759) transitioned to virologic failure (⩾1000 copies/ml) by the end of the study. PLLV prevalence was 0.9% (1292/141,208). Increasing ART duration [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.008; p < 0.001] and viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml) before initial LLV (aOR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.50-2.00; p < 0.001) were positively associated with PLLV, while receipt of tuberculosis preventive therapy reduced the likelihood of PLLV (aOR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.10-0.94; p = 0.039).

Conclusion

PLLV was uncommon among individuals receiving dolutegravir-based ART and was associated with longer ART duration, prior viral suppression, and non-receipt of tuberculosis preventive therapy. This strengthens recommendations for continuous adherence support and comprehensive health services with ART, to prevent treatment failure.

Drug Resistance Profile Among HIV-1 Infections Experiencing ART with Low-Level Viral Load in Guangdong China During 2011-2022: A Retrospective Study

Background

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) efficiently reduces the morbidities and mortalities caused by HIV-1 infection and prevents the HIV epidemic. However, virologic failure (VF) occurs in some patients receiving ART experience, especially increases in those patients with intermittent or persistent low-level viremia (LLV). The presence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in LLV was a strong predictor of subsequent VF. The data on drug resistance (DR) or DRMs for HIV-1 infections at low-level viral load (LLVL) are limited in China.

Objective

To monitor the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance and to evaluate the risk factors associated with drug resistance in LLVL HIV-1 infections during ART in Guangdong, China.

Methods

Plasma samples with LLVL during ART in Guangdong Province between Jan 2011 and Dec 2022 were subjected to a modified reverse-transcription PCR with a pre-step of virus concentration by ultracentrifugation before extraction and the Sanger sequencing. Then, the genotypic resistance test was performed and DR was analyzed by the Stanford HIVDB program. Finally, DR-associated factors were identified by logistic regression analysis.

Results

We found that CRF01_AE (53.57%) and CRF07_BC (25.07%) were the dominant HIV-1 genotypes in LLVL in Guangdong between 2011 and 2022 but that the percentage of CRF01_AE showed a trend of decrease over time. M46 (1.49%), M184 (30.91%), and K103 (21.46%) were the dominant PI-, NRTI-, and NNRTI-associated mutations, respectively. The total DR rate was 47.06%. Specifically, PI (3.71%) showed a significantly lower DR rate than NNRTI (40.74%) and NRTI (34.14%). Duration of ART, initial ART regimen, ethnicity, and WHO clinical stages were associated with DR.

Conclusion

The drug resistance rate among the LLVL during ART in Guangdong, China is high. The risk factors associated with HIV drug resistance should be seriously considered for better control.

Transcriptome analysis of CD4+ T cells from HIV-infected individuals receiving ART with LLV revealed novel transcription factors regulating HIV-1 promoter activity

Some HIV-infected individuals receiving ART develop low-level viremia (LLV), with a plasma viral load of 50-1000 copies/mL. Persistent low-level viremia is associated with subsequent virologic failure. The peripheral blood CD4+ T cell pool is a source of LLV. However, the intrinsic characteristics of CD4+ T cells in LLV which may contribute to low-level viremia are largely unknown. We analyzed the transcriptome profiling of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells from healthy controls (HC) and HIV-infected patients receiving ART with either virologic suppression (VS) or LLV. To identify pathways potentially responding to increasing viral loads from HC to VS and to LLV, KEGG pathways of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were acquired by comparing VS with HC (VS-HC group) and LLV with VS (LLV-VS group). Characterization of DEGs in key overlapping pathways showed that CD4+ T cells in LLV expressed higher levels of Th1 signature transcription factors (TBX21), toll-like receptors (TLR-4, -6, -7 and -8), anti-HIV entry chemokines (CCL3 and CCL4), and anti-IL-1β factors (ILRN and IL1R2) compared to VS. Our results also indicated activation of the NF-κB and TNF signaling pathways that could promote HIV-1 transcription. Finally, we evaluated the effects of 4 and 17 transcription factors that were upregulated in the VS-HC and LLV-VS groups, respectively, on HIV-1 promoter activity. Functional studies revealed that CXXC5 significantly increased, while SOX5 markedly suppressed HIV-1 transcription. In summary, we found that CD4+ T cells in LLV displayed a distinct mRNA profiling compared to that in VS, which promoted HIV-1 replication and reactivation of viral latency and may eventually contribute to virologic failure in patients with persistent LLV. CXXC5 and SOX5 may serve as targets for the development of latency-reversing agents.

Influencing factors and adverse outcomes of different virologic rebound states in antiretroviral treated HIV/AIDS patients

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) aims to inhibit HIV replication, decrease CD4 T cell loss, and immune function recovery in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the infection. Treatment should also, improve quality of life and control HIV spread. However, incomplete viral suppression still occurs during ART. Viral suppression and virological failure (VF) thresholds vary between studies in terms of virological rebound (VR) states using different detection thresholds. Further understanding of influencing factors and adverse outcomes in various VR states should provide important guidance for HIV treatment.

HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing Using Sanger and Next-Generation Sequencing in Adults with Low-Level Viremia in China

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to determine drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) in HIV-1 patients with low-level viremia (LLV) and explored the performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting HIV DRMs by using LLV samples.

METHODS

Overall, 80 samples with LLV were amplified and sequenced using a commercial Sanger sequencing (SS) genotyping kit. Furthermore, 51 samples successfully sequenced using SS were simultaneously subjected to NGS. Genotyping success rates of various viremia categories by two sequencing methods were calculated. Stanford HIV-1 drug-resistance database (HIVdb version 8.9) was used to analyze the DRMs. In the NGS assay, a threshold of 5% was considered for reporting low-frequency variants, and the DRMs detected using SS and NGS were compared.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of PR/RT regions was 88.1% (67/80) using SS and 86.3% (44/51) using NGS. Furthermore, a significant linear trend was noted between viral load and the genotyping success rate. A total of 38.8% (26/67) participants harbored at least one mutation, as revealed through SS. Moreover, the prevalence of DRMs in persistent LLV was significantly higher than that in intermittent LLV (62.1% vs. 21.1%; P < 0.05). A total of 69 DRMs were detected using the two sequencing methods at the threshold of 5%. Moreover, 10 DRMs missed by SS were detected using NGS, whereas 8 DRMs missed by NGS were detected by SS.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that the genotyping resistance testing is necessary to guide antiretroviral therapy optimization in LLV patients.

Impact of low-level viremia with drug resistance on CD4 cell counts among people living with HIV on antiretroviral treatment in China

Background

Maintaining plasma HIV RNA suppression below the limit of quantification is the goal of antiretroviral therapy (ART). When viral loads (VL) remain in low-level viremia (LLV), or between 201 and 999 copies/mL, the clinical consequences are still not clear. We investigated the occurrence of LLV with drug resistance and its effect on CD4 cell counts in a large Chinese cohort.

Methods

We analysed data of 6,530 ART-experienced patients (42.1 ± 10.9 years; 37.3% female) from the China’s national HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) surveillance database. Participants were followed up for 32.9 (IQR 16.7–50.5) months. LLV was defined as the occurrence of at least one viral load (VL) measurement of 50–200 copies/mL during ART. Outcomes were drug resistance associated mutations (DRAM) and CD4 cell counts levels.

Results

Among 6530 patients, 58.0% patients achieved VL less than 50 copies/mL, 27.8% with VL between 50 and 999 copies/mL (8.6% experienced LLV), and 14.2% had a VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL. Of 1818 patients with VL 50–999 copies/mL, 182 (10.0%) experienced HIVDR, the most common DRAM were M184I/V 28.6%, K103N 19.2%, and V181C/I/V 10.4% (multidrug resistance: 27.5%), and patients with HIVDR had a higher risk of CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/μL (AOR 3.8, 95% CI 2.6–5.5, p < 0.01) comparing with those without HIVDR. Of 925 patients with VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL, 495 (53.5%) acquired HIVDR, the most common DRAM were K103N 43.8%, M184I/V 43.2%, M41L 19.0%, D67N/G 16.4%, V181C/I/V 14.5%, G190A/S 13.9% and K101E 13.7% (multidrug resistance: 75.8%), and patients with HIVDR had a higher risk of CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/μL (AOR 5.8, 95% CI 4.6–7.4, p < 0.01) comparing with those without HIVDR.

Conclusion

Persistent with VL 50–999 copies/mL on ART is associated with emerging DRAM for all drug classes, and patients in this setting were at increased risk of CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/μL, which suggest resistance monitoring and ART optimization be earlier considered.

Emtricitabine triphosphate in dried blood spots predicts future viremia in persons with HIV and identifies mismatch with self-reported adherence

OBJECTIVE

Emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP) in dried blood spots (DBS), a measure of short-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, is associated with viral suppression in persons with HIV (PWH). However, its ability to predict future viremia remains unknown.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort (up to three visits in 48 weeks).

METHODS

PWH receiving TDF/FTC-based ART had DBS and HIV viral load obtained at routine clinical visits. FTC-TP in DBS was dichotomized into quantifiable vs. below the limit of quantification (BLQ). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of future viremia (≥20 copies/ml at next study visit) was estimated according to FTC-TP at the current visit. To assess for possible interactions, additional models adjusted for tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) in DBS and 3-day self-reported adherence.

RESULTS

Data from 433 PWH (677 paired DBS/HIV viral load samples) were analyzed. The aOR [95% confidence interval (CI)] for future viremia for BLQ vs. quantifiable FTC-TP was 3.4 (1.8--6.5; P = 0.0002). This diminished after adjusting for TFV-DP [aOR 1.9 (0.9--4.1); P = 0.090]. Among PWH reporting 100% 3-day adherence, the odds of future viremia were 6.0 times higher [(1.8--20.3); P = 0.001] when FTC-TP was BLQ vs. quantifiable. Among participants (n = 75) reporting less than 100% adherence, BLQ FTC-TP in DBS was not predictive of future viremia [aOR 1.3 (0.4--4.6); P = 0.96].

CONCLUSION

Nonquantifiable FTC-TP in DBS predicts future viremia and is particularly informative in PWH reporting perfect adherence. As point-of-care adherence measures become available, mismatches between objective and subjective measures, such as FTC-TP in DBS and self-report, could help clinicians identify individuals at an increased risk of future viremia.

Untimed Efavirenz Drug Levels After Switching From Brand to Generic Formulations: A Short Communication

BACKGROUND

In British Columbia, antiretrovirals are distributed at no cost to patients via a publicly funded program, using generic formulations if available. A generic efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF (EFV-FTC-TDF) combination pill became available in April 2018. The authors compared EFV untimed drug levels in subjects switching from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF.

METHODS

Archived plasma HIV viral load samples were identified for consenting participants who switched from brand to generic EFV-FTC-TDF; 3 preswitch and 2-3 postswitch samples, collected ≥1 month apart were assessed for each subject. "Untimed" EFV concentrations with unknown dosing and collection time were assessed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Participants' mean, minimum, and maximum EFV levels were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Participants with EFV levels in the range associated with lower risks of virologic failure and central nervous system toxicity (1000-4000 ng/mL), preswitch and postswitch, were enumerated.

RESULTS

EFV levels were assessed in 297 preswitch and 249 postswitch samples from 99 participants, having exposure to brand and generic EFV for a median of 103 (Q1-Q3: 87-116) and 10.3 (Q1-Q3: 8.9-11.7) months, respectively. The final brand sample was collected at a median of 98 days preswitch; the first generic sample was collected at a median of 133 days postswitch. No significant differences were observed in participant mean EFV levels before (median 1968 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1534-2878 ng/mL) and after (median 1987 ng/mL; Q1-Q3: 1521-2834 ng/mL) switch (P = 0.85). Eighty participants had mean EFV levels within the 1000-4000 ng/mL range on the brand drug, of which 74 remained within this range postswitch.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences between untimed EFV levels in patients switching from the brand to generic EFV combination pill. Given the long elimination half-life of EFV, untimed drug levels may be a convenient way to estimate product bioequivalence.

Prevalence of drug resistance mutations in HIV-infected individuals with low-level viraemia under combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational study in a tertiary hospital in Northern Taiwan, 2017-19

BACKGROUND

Effective ART is crucial for combating the HIV pandemic. Clinically, plasma viral load monitoring to achieve virological suppression is the guide for an optimal ART. The presence of low-level viraemia (LLV) below the definition level of virological failure is a risk factor for ART failure. However, there is no treatment consensus over LLV yet, mainly due to the limitation of standard HIV-RNA genotyping and the resultant insufficient understanding of LLV characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To better profile drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and the associated factors in cases experiencing LLV.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted from 2017 to 2019. HIV-DNA was used as an alternative to HIV-RNA for HIV genotyping coupled with deep sequencing for ART-naive and ART-failure cases, as well as those with LLV.

RESULTS

Eighty-one ART-naive, 18 ART-failure and 16 LLV cases received HIV genotyping in the study. Three-quarters (12/16) of cases experiencing LLV harboured DRMs. Cases with LLV had higher prevalence of DRMs to NNRTIs than the ART-naive group (69% versus 20%, P < 0.001), but lower DRM prevalence to NRTIs than the ART-failure group (25% versus 61%, P < 0.001). Approximately half of the LLV cases had issues of suboptimal ART compliance/ART interruption, and 68.8% (11/16) did not display drug resistance to their ART at the time of LLV.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV DRM profiles in LLV cases were significantly different to those in ART-naive and ART-failure cases. Approaches to consolidate ART compliance and early exploration of potential ART resistance may be needed for cases experiencing LLV episodes.

Persistent low-level viraemia in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients is not linked to viral resistance or inadequate drug concentrations

OBJECTIVES

To assess genotypic sensitivity scores (GSSs), plasma antiretroviral concentrations (PACs) and immunovirological outcomes at Week 96 (W96) in patients with persistent low-level viraemia (LLV).

METHODS

On 1 January 2017, we analysed data from patients on three-drug regimens with persistent LLV defined as at least two consecutive plasma viral loads (pVLs) between 21 and 200 copies/mL (including one pVL of ≥50 copies/mL), at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. Outcomes were: GSS, PACs and HIV-DNA load at study entry; and virological status and proportion of patients with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) at W96.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included, with median age of 52.6 years (IQR 45.2-57.9), last CD4 count of 658 cells/mm3 (IQR 462-909) and total ART duration of 10.2 years (IQR 5.7-15.2). LLV duration was 14.0 months (IQR 5.5-22.3). GSS was 3 in 46/57 (81%) patients and PACs were adequate in 53/57 (93%) patients. Median total HIV-DNA was 2.65 log10 copies/106 cells (IQR 2.44-2.86). During follow-up, 26/57 (46%) had experienced ART modifications. At W96, 38/57 (67%) patients remained with LLV, 15/60 (26%) had achieved confirmed pVL of <20 copies/mL and 4/57 (7%) had virological failure. The four virological failures were due to three ART interruptions and one incomplete adherence (selection of Y181C RAM). No factors (patient characteristics at study entry, GSS, PACs, total HIV-DNA load and ART modification) were associated with W96 viral outcome, except for time from HIV diagnosis and the LLV duration at study entry.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of patients harbouring LLV had no resistance to ART and adequate PACs. Two-thirds of these patients remained with this LLV status.

Persistent Low-level Viremia While on Antiretroviral Therapy Is an Independent Risk Factor for Virologic Failure

BACKGROUND

Whether persistent low-level viremia (pLLV) predicts virologic failure (VF) is unclear. We used data from the US Military HIV Natural History Study (NHS), to examine the association of pLLV and VF.

METHODS

NHS subjects who initiated combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) after 1996 were included if they had 2 or more VLs measured with a lower limit of detection of ≤50 copies/mL. VF was defined as a confirmed VL ≥200 copies/mL or any VL >1000 copies/mL. Participants were categorized into mutually exclusive virologic categories: intermittent LLV (iLLV) (VL of 50-199 copies/mL on <25% of measurements), pLLV (VL of 50-199 copies/mL on ≥25% of measurements), high-level viremia (hLV) (VL of 200-1000 copies/mL), and continuous suppression (all VL <50 copies/mL). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between VF and LLV; hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) are presented.

RESULTS

Two thousand six subjects (median age 29.2 years, 93% male, 41% black) were included; 383 subjects (19%) experienced VF. After adjusting for demographics, VL, CD4 counts, ART regimen, prior use of mono or dual antiretrovirals, and time to ART start, pLLV (3.46 [2.42-4.93]), and hLV (2.29 [1.78-2.96]) were associated with VF. Other factors associated with VF include black ethnicity (1.33 [1.06-1.68]) and antiretroviral use prior to ART (1.79 [1.34-2.38]). Older age at ART initiation (0.71 [0.61-0.82]) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (0.68 [0.51-0.90]) or integrase strand transfer inhibitor use (0.26 [0.13-0.53]) were protective.

CONCLUSION

Our data add to the body of evidence that suggests persistent LLV is associated with deleterious virologic consequences.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel

Background

Contemporary antiretroviral therapies (ART) and management strategies have diminished both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment failure and the acquired resistance to drugs in resource-rich regions, but transmission of drug-resistant viruses has not similarly decreased. In low- and middle-income regions, ART roll-out has improved outcomes, but has resulted in increasing acquired and transmitted resistances. Our objective was to review resistance to ART drugs and methods to detect it, and to provide updated recommendations for testing and monitoring for drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals.

Methods

A volunteer panel of experts appointed by the International Antiviral (formerly AIDS) Society–USA reviewed relevant peer-reviewed data that were published or presented at scientific conferences. Recommendations were rated according to the strength of the recommendation and quality of the evidence, and reached by full panel consensus.

Results

Resistance testing remains a cornerstone of ART. It is recommended in newly-diagnosed individuals and in patients in whom ART has failed. Testing for transmitted integrase strand-transfer inhibitor resistance is currently not recommended, but this may change as more resistance emerges with widespread use. Sanger-based and next-generation sequencing approaches are each suited for genotypic testing. Testing for minority variants harboring drug resistance may only be considered if treatments depend on a first-generation nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Different HIV-1 subtypes do not need special considerations regarding resistance testing.

Conclusions

Testing for HIV drug resistance in drug-naive individuals and in patients in whom antiretroviral drugs are failing, and the appreciation of the role of testing, are crucial to the prevention and management of failure of ART.

Monotypic low-level HIV viremias during antiretroviral therapy are associated with disproportionate production of X4 virions and systemic immune activation

OBJECTIVE

During effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), low-level plasma viremias (LLV) (HIV RNA >30-1000 copies/ml) can be detected intermittently. We hypothesized that systemic inflammation is associated with LLV either as the cause or result of the production of virions from clonally expanded cells.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of HIV-infected ART-naive Peruvians enrolled prior to ART and followed for 2 years. Plasma HIV RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) HIV DNA concentrations were quantified pre-ART from individuals whose plasma HIV RNA was ART-suppressed. Inflammatory biomarker concentrations were measured pre and during ART. Single-genome amplification (SGA) derived HIV env and pol genotypes from pre-ART and LLV specimens. Antiretroviral levels during ART assessed adherence. Statistical associations and phylogenetic relationships were examined.

RESULTS

Among 82 participants with median plasma HIV RNA less than 30 copies/ml, LLV were detected in 33 of 82 (40%), with a LLV median HIV RNA of 73 copies/ml. Participants with vs. without LLV had significantly higher pre-ART plasma HIV RNA (P < 0.001) and PBMC HIV DNA (P < 0.007); but, during ART, their antiretroviral drug levels were similar. LLV env sequences were monotypic in 17 of 28 (61%) and diverse in 11 of 28 (39%) participants. Those with the monotypic vs. diverse LLV pattern had elevated hsCRP and sCD163 (P = 0.004) and LLV with more X4 variants (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In individuals with monotypic LLV sequences, higher levels of pre-ART HIV DNA and RNA, systemic inflammation and X4 viruses suggest an interaction between inflammation and the production of virions from proliferating infected cells, and that naïve T cells may be a source of LLV.

Relationship between untimed plasma lopinavir concentrations and virological outcome on second-line antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Resource constraints in low and middle-income countries necessitate practical approaches to optimizing antiretroviral therapy outcomes. We hypothesised that an untimed plasma lopinavir concentration (UPLC) at week 12 would predict loss of virological response in those taking lopinavir as part of a second-line antiretroviral regimen.

METHODS

We measured plasma lopinavir concentration at week 12 on stored samples from the SECOND-LINE study. We characterized UPLC as: detectable and optimal (≥1000 μg/l); detectable but suboptimal (≥25 to < 1000 μg/l); and undetectable (<25 μg/l). We used Cox regression to explore the relationship between UPLC and loss of virological response over 48 weeks and backwards stepwise logistic regression to explore the relationship between UPLC and other predictors of virological failure at week 48.

RESULTS

At week 48, we observed virological failure in 15/32 (47%) and 53/485 (11%) of patients with undetectable and detectable UPLC, respectively, P < 0.001. Both suboptimal [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-5.62; P = 0.001], and undetectable (adjusted HR 3.55; 95% CI 1.89-6.64; P < 0.001) UPLC were associated with higher rates of loss of virological response over 48 weeks. In multivariate analysis, an independent association with virological failure at week 48 and undetectable UPLC was observed after adjustment (odds ratio 5.48; 95% CI 2.23-13.42; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In low and middle-income countries implementing a public health approach to antiretroviral therapy treatment, an untimed plasma drug concentration may provide a practical method for early identification of patients with inadequate medication adherence and facilitate timely corrective interventions to prevent virological failure.

Effect of HIV-1 low-level viraemia during antiretroviral therapy on treatment outcomes in WHO-guided South African treatment programmes: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) that enables suppression of HIV replication has been successfully rolled out at large scale to HIV-positive patients in low-income and middle-income countries. WHO guidelines for these regions define failure of ART with a lenient threshold of viraemia (HIV RNA viral load ≥1000 copies per mL). We investigated the occurrence of detectable viraemia during ART below this threshold and its effect on treatment outcomes in a large South African cohort.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we included HIV-positive adults registered between Jan 1, 2007, and May 1, 2016, at 57 clinical sites in South Africa, who were receiving WHO-recommended ART regimens and viral load monitoring. Low-level viraemia was defined as the occurrence of at least one viral load measurement of 51-999 copies per mL during ART. Outcomes were WHO-defined virological failure (one or more viral load measurement of ≥1000 copies per mL) and switch to second-line ART. Risks were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models.

FINDINGS

70 930 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 67 644 received first-line ART, 1476 received second-line ART, and 1810 received both. Median duration of follow-up was 124 weeks (IQR 56-221) for patients on first-line ART and 101 weeks (IQR 51-178) for patients on second-line ART. Low-level viraemia occurred in 16 013 (23%) of 69 454 patients, with an incidence of 11·5 per 100 person-years of follow-up (95% CI 11·4-11·7), during first-line ART. Virological failure during follow-up occurred in 14 380 (22%) of 69 454 patients on first-line ART. Low-level viraemia was associated with increased hazards of virological failure (hazard ratio [HR] 2·6, 95% CI 2·5-2·8; p<0·0001) and switch to second-line ART (HR 5·2, 4·4-6·1; p<0·0001]) compared with virological suppression of less than 50 copies per mL. Risk of virological failure increased further with higher ranges and persistence of low-level viraemia.

INTERPRETATION

In this large cohort, low-level viraemia occurred frequently and increased the risk of virological failure and switch to second-line ART. Strategies for management of low-level viraemia need to be incorporated into WHO guidelines to meet UNAIDS-defined targets aimed at halting the global HIV epidemic.

FUNDING

None.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of boosted PIs in HIV-positive patients: undetectable plasma concentrations and risk of virological failure

Background

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiretroviral drugs is performed in selected HIV-positive patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undetectable plasma concentrations of ritonavir and boosted PIs and to evaluate the association between those and the 48 week risk of virological failure.

Methods

A TDM registry study and a retrospective follow-up study were conducted. Plasma concentrations were measured through validated methods. According to PI and ritonavir concentrations, patients were stratified as adherent, partially non-adherent or non-adherent. Virological outcome was evaluated 48 weeks afterwards.

Results

The TDM registry study included 2468 samples collected from 723 patients (68.1% male, median age 43.5 years). Eighty-seven samples (3.5%, 74 patients) and 68 samples (2.8%, 52 patients) were in the partially non-adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; more patients on atazanavir/ritonavir (7.9%) versus darunavir/ritonavir (2% twice daily and 1.9% once daily) and lopinavir/ritonavir (1.5%; P  <   0.001) were observed in the partially non-adherent group. Two hundred and ninety patients were included in the follow-up study (64.1% male, median age 40 years). Patients in the adherent group had a higher chance of viral control [81.9% (167/204)] versus the partially non-adherent group and the non-adherent group [71.7% (33/46) and 53.1% (17/32), respectively; P  =   0.001]. Based on multivariate analysis, baseline HIV RNA >50 copies/mL ( P  <   0.001), genotypic susceptibility score ≤2 ( P  =   0.001), lower nadir CD4 cell count ( P  =   0.003) and not being in the adherent group ( P  =   0.029) were independent predictors of HIV RNA >50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.

Conclusions

The measurement of PI and ritonavir plasma levels can uncover incomplete compliance with treatment; TDM may represent a useful tool for identifying patients in need of adherence-promoting interventions.

HIV treatment simplification to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) plus darunavir: a pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

As a simplification strategy for treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who have achieved virologic suppression on a multi-drug, multi-class antiretroviral regimen, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of once-daily elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) with darunavir.

METHODS

A single arm, open-label 48-week study was conducted of regimen simplification to E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir 800 mg daily from stable therapy including two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, and an integrase inhibitor. Participants had plasma HIV viral load consistently < 200 copies/mL for ≥ 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min, and no genotypic resistance to major components of the study regimen. Plasma viral load was measured at weeks 2 and 4, then every 4 weeks throughout the study. Safety laboratory assessments were conducted at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Antiretroviral drug concentrations were measured at baseline and once ≥ 2 weeks after the regimen change.

RESULTS

Ten HIV-infected adults (8 male and 2 female; median age 50.5 years) were enrolled. All maintained virologic suppression on the new regimen for 48 weeks. One subject experienced a decrease in eGFR from 62 mL/min at baseline to 52 mL/min at week 12; study medications were continued and his eGFR remained stable (50-59 mL/min) thereafter. No subjects discontinued study medications for renal function changes or other adverse events. Darunavir trough concentration were lower on the new regimen than on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg (n = 5; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite low darunavir trough concentrations, treatment simplification to a two-pill, once-daily regimen of E/C/F/TDF plus darunavir was safe and effective for 48 weeks among 10 selected treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02199613) on July 22, 2014.

Effect of Rifampin on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Oral Cabotegravir in Healthy Subjects

Drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral medications and rifampin complicate the treatment of HIV and tuberculosis coinfection. This study evaluated the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of oral cabotegravir, an integrase strand transfer inhibitor being investigated for long-acting treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. This was a phase I, single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence crossover study in healthy adults. The objective was to evaluate the effect of steady-state rifampin on the single-dose plasma pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir. Subjects received a single oral dose of cabotegravir (30 mg) on day 1 followed by plasma sampling on days 1 to 8. Treatment with once-daily oral rifampin (600 mg) occurred on days 8 to 28. Subjects received a second dose of 30 mg cabotegravir on day 21 followed by pharmacokinetic sampling on days 21 to 28. Fifteen subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Rifampin decreased the cabotegravir area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity and the half-life by 59% and 57%, respectively, whereas oral clearance was increased 2.4-fold. The maximum concentration of cabotegravir in plasma was unaffected by coadministration with rifampin. All adverse events were mild in severity, with chromaturia attributed to rifampin observed in all subjects. Rifampin induction of cabotegravir metabolism resulted in increased cabotegravir oral clearance and significantly decreased cabotegravir exposures. Rifampin is expected to increase cabotegravir clearance following long-acting injectable administration. Concomitant administration of rifampin with oral and long-acting formulations of cabotegravir is not recommended currently without further study. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02411435.).

Efficacy and safety of "unboosting" atazanavir in a randomized controlled trial among HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir DF

OBJECTIVES

To assess safety and efficacy of a switch to unboosted atazanavir (ATV) among HIV-infected adults receiving ATV/ritonavir (r) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

HIV-infected adults with viral load (VL) <40 copies/mL at screening and <150 copies/mL consistently for ≥3 months while receiving a regimen including ATV/r and TDF were randomized to continue ATV/r 300/100 mg daily (control) or change to ATV 400 mg daily (switch), while maintaining their TDF backbone. The primary outcome was proportion of subjects without treatment failure (regimen switch or VL > 200 copies/mL twice consecutively) at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty participants (46 male, median age 47 years) were randomized, 25 to each arm. At week 48, treatment success occurred in 76% in the control arm and 92% in the switch arm (ITT, p = 0.25). ATV trough levels at week 9 were higher in controls (median 438 ng/mL) than in the switch arm (median 124 ng/mL) (p = 0.003), as was total bilirubin at week 48 (median 38 μmol/L and 28 μmol/L, respectively; p = 0.02). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased in the control arm (p = 0.007), but did not change in the switch arm. At week 48, eGFR was higher in the switch arm (median 96 mL/min) than in the control arm (median 85 mL/min) (p = 0.035), but the arms were similar with respect to fasting glucose, C-reactive protein, and lipid parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from ATV/r to unboosted ATV appears to be safe and effective in selected virologically suppressed patients receiving TDF-containing regimens, and may have favorable effects on bilirubin and renal function.