Follow-up strategies for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with or without adjuvant imatinib after surgery

English version of Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) issued by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2022 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been published in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2014 and 2017. A specialized team independent of the working group for the revision performed a systematic review. Since GIST is a rare type of tumor, clinical evidence is not sufficient to answer several clinical and background questions. Thus, in these guidelines, we considered that consensus among the experts who manage GIST, the balance between benefits and harms, patients' wishes, medical economic perspective, etc. are important considerations in addition to the evidence. Although guidelines for the treatment of GIST have also been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), there are some differences between the treatments proposed in those guidelines and the treatments in the present guidelines because of the differences in health insurance systems among countries.

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging

PURPOSE

To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning-based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

Among the compared models, SegNeXt-ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This two-stage SegNeXt-ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance.

Utility and costs of surveillance imaging for low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the optimal surveillance approach in patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors, resulting in inconsistent and arbitrary approaches to surveillance in this population. In this study, we reviewed our institutional approach to surveillance in patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the costs associated with detecting recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult patients treated for low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors at our institution from 2010 to 2019. Data collected included patient and tumor characteristics, surgical management, and postoperative follow-up. Surveillance-related expenses were calculated using estimates of average costs obtained from our institution. A cost analysis was performed to evaluate estimated yearly costs based on the surveillance strategy used.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients included. The mean age at diagnosis was 63.9 (±12.5) years. The primary tumor was typically in the stomach (73%; n = 44). Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast was the most common surveillance modality (total = 226 scans). No recurrences were identified. Median follow-up duration was 49.0 (interquartile range = 19.5-61.5) months. The mean number of surveillance images per patient was 4 (±2.6). Surveillance imaging was obtained more frequently than just annually in 83% (n = 50) of patients, with an estimated yearly cost of $2,840.77 (interquartile range = $2,273.62-$3,895.92) and no detection of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In this study population, patients with low- and very low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors underwent frequent imaging studies for surveillance with little yield and at substantial cost. Further multi-institutional studies on practice patterns and outcomes of surveillance are warranted to better inform standardized surveillance recommendations.

Pancreatic Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft tissue sarcomas that originate from the mesenchymal cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Extra-GISTs (EGISTs) are caused by sites outside the gastrointestinal tract. We reported a case of EGIST of the pancreas in a 51-year-old woman. Enhanced CT scan showed a rounded, slightly hypointense focus in the head of the pancreas and the right pars compacta of the descending duodenum. Routine laboratory and endocrine tests were unremarkable. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery. The diagnosis of EGIST was confirmed through histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. The tumor was found to be CD117+, CD34+, and DOG+ with a high risk of malignancy. No recurrence was observed during the nine-month postoperative follow-up.

Long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours without adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common intra-abdominal sarcoma. Risk classification systems, commonly the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, identify tumour properties relating to patient outcomes. However, owing to limited long-term evidence, most guidelines recommend up to 10-year follow-up for all risk groups except very low-risk GIST.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study included patients who had complete resection of primary, non-metastatic GIST from three Scandinavian sarcoma centres: Gothenburg (2004-2020), Stockholm (2000-2019), and Oslo (2000-2017). Medical records were reviewed for clinical details regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and recurrence-free and disease-specific survival evaluated.

RESULTS

The total cohort consisted of 1213 patients with GIST. High-risk patients and those treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The remaining 649 patients were included in the present analysis: 118 with very low-, 381 with low-, and 150 with intermediate-risk GISTs. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100, 98.5, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.246). Disease-specific survival rates 10 years after surgery were 100, 98.4, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.262).

CONCLUSION

Patients with completely resected non-high-risk GISTs have an excellent long-term outcome, irrespective of risk group. Follow-up programmes to detect disease recurrences in these patients are probably not indicated.

Guideline-Based Follow-Up Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Low Risk of Recurrence: A Report From the Italian Sarcoma Group

Importance

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) follow-up is recommended by international guidelines, but data on the role of follow-up in patients with low relapse risk are missing. For these patients, the potential benefit of anticipating recurrence detection should be weighed against psychological burden and radiologic examination loads in terms of costs and radiation exposure.

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of guideline-based follow-up in low-risk GIST.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving Italian Sarcoma Group reference institutions evaluated patients with GIST who underwent surgery between January 2001 and June 2019. Median follow-up time was 69.2 months. Data analysis was performed from December 15, 2022, to March 20, 2023. Patients with GIST at low risk according to Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria were included provided adequate clinical information was available: primary site, size, mitotic index, surgical margins, and 2 or more years of follow-up.

Exposures

All patients underwent follow-up according to European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the number of tests needed to identify a relapse according to ESMO guidelines follow-up plan. Secondary outcomes included relapse rate, relapse timing, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), GIST-specific survival (GIST-SS), postrelapse OS, secondary tumor rates, and theoretical ionizing radiation exposure. An exploratory end point, new follow-up schedule proposal for patients with low-risk GIST according to the observed results, was also assessed.

Results

A total of 737 patients (377 men [51.2%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 [range, 18-86] years) with low-risk GIST were included. Estimated 5-year survival rates were 95.5% for DFS, 99.8% for GIST-SS, and 96.1% for OS. Estimated 10-year survival rates were 93.4% for DFS, 98.1% for GIST-SS, and 91.0% for OS. Forty-two patients (5.7%) experienced disease relapse during follow-up (9 local, 31 distant, 2 both), of which 9 were detected after 10 or more years. This translated into approximately 1 relapse detected for every 170 computed tomography scans performed, with a median radiation exposure of 80 (IQR, 32-112) mSv per patient. Nongastric primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.14-3.83; P = .02), and KIT mutation (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.05-7.27; P = .04) were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Second tumors affected 187 of 737 patients (25%), of which 56 were detected during follow-up and represented the primary cause of death in these patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study on patients affected by low-risk GISTs, the risk of relapse was low despite a follow-up across 10 or more years. These data suggest the need to revise follow-up schedules to reduce the anxiety, costs, and radiation exposure of currently recommended follow-up strategy.

SEOM-GEIS clinical guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (2022)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common malignant neoplasm of mesenchymal origin, and a paradigmatic model for a successful rational development of targeted therapies in cancer. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with activity against KIT/PDGFRA in both localized and advanced stages has remarkably improved the survival in a disease formerly deemed resistant to all systemic therapies. These guidelines are elaborated by the conjoint effort of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS) and provide a multidisciplinary and updated consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of GIST patients. We strongly encourage that the managing of these patients should be performed within multidisciplinary teams in reference centers.

Jejunal gist simulating a uterine myoma: A case report

INTRODUCTION

A small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. The manifestation of bleeding is a diagnostic challenge and could present as a life-threatening situation that needs urgent intervention.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

64-year-old woman consulted for episodes of melena and anemia. The upper and lower endoscopies were not diagnostic. Capsule endoscopy (CE) revealed a probable jejunal hemangioma, however double-balloon enteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) did not show any intestinal nodule but MRI show a pelvic mass apparently related to the uterus confirmed by a gynecologist. Even so, the patient returned with melena, and a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan again identified a pelvic mass, highlighting that its vascularization drained into the superior mesenteric territory and seemed to invade the jejunum, with active bleeding, suspicious for jejunal GIST. A laparotomy was performed to remove the jejunal mass. Histopathology and immunohistochemical studies confirmed the diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

Bleeding is a common symptom in small bowel GISTs but its diagnoses could be difficult because its location. In most cases, gastroscopy and colonoscopy are not useful and CE or imaging studies are necessary to find the cause of bleeding. Moreover, it has recently proved that bleeding is a prognostic risk factor because it is related to tumor rupture and tumor invasion of blood vessels.

CONCLUSION

In this case, bleeding caused by small bowel GIST was misdiagnosed in endoscopic procedures and the clinical management was delayed. CT angiography was the most effective investigation to detect the source of bleeding.

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumour of the transverse mesocolon mimicking giant ovarian cystic neoplasm

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours which are most commonly found along the gastrointestinal tract. They are more rarely found in an extragastrointestinal location and typically present late due to only vague symptoms from mass effect. There are very few case reports of GIST arising within the transverse mesocolon. We report a case of a large cystic transverse mesocolic GIST which preoperative imaging concluded was likely of ovarian origin. This resulted in an abrupt change in the surgical management intraoperatively, but fortunately, an R0 resection was still achieved. This serves as an important lesson to keep the differential diagnosis broad when dealing with large cystic abdominal masses. The tumour was found to be KIT wild type, with a platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha D842V mutation identified, conferring intrinsic resistance to imatinib.

Radiomics signatures based on contrast-enhanced CT for preoperative prediction of the Ki-67 proliferation state in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the Ki-67 proliferation state in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) using radiomics prediction signatures based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study involved 103 patients (48 men and 55 women, mean age 61.1 ± 10.6 years) who had pathologically confirmed GISTs after curative resection, including 63 with low Ki-67 proliferation level (Ki-67 labeling index ≤ 6%) and 40 with high Ki-67 proliferation level (Ki-67 labeling index > 6%). Radiomics features of the delineated lesions were preoperatively extracted from three-phase CE-CT images, including the arterial, venous, and delayed phases. The most relevant features were selected to construct the radiomics signatures using a logistic regression algorithm. Significant demographic characteristics and semantic features on CT were selected to develop a nomogram along with the optimal radiomics feature. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive performance of radiomics signatures.

RESULTS

Ten quantitative radiomics features (two first-order and eight texture features) were selected to construct radiomics signatures. The radiomics signature based on the three-phase CE-CT images showed better predictive performance than that based on the single-phase CE-CT images, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.92) and F1 score of 82% in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.63-0.95) and F1 score of 75% in the testing dataset. The nomogram showed good calibration.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics signatures using CE-CT images are generalizable and could be used in clinical practice to determine the proliferation state of Ki-67 in GISTs.

An Unusual Case of Suspected Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Complicated by Streptococcus Intermedius Pyogenic Liver Disease

A gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract often known to express c-KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα). Among all GI tract cancers, they account for less than 1% of cases. Most patients become symptomatic in the later stages of the tumor's course, often presenting with insidious anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding and metastasis. The recommended management of solitary GIST is surgery, while larger or metastatic tumors that express c-KIT are managed with imatinib as either neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Due to the progression of these tumors, they are at times associated with systemic anaerobic infection, which is an indication of malignancy workup. In this case report, we discuss a 35-year-old woman who was discovered to have GIST with possible hepatic metastasis complicated by pyogenic liver disease due to Streptococcus intermedius and the diagnostic challenge of differentiating between infection and tumor.

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Experience from a tertiary care center in a low resource country

Objectives

The aim of this retrospective study was to review the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of GISTs treated surgically at our center over the past decade.

Material and Methods

We undertook a 12-year retrospective review of our experience in treating this condition with a focus on long-term outcomes of treated patients in a resource-constrained environment. Incomplete follow-up information continues to be a major problem with studies conducted in low resource settings, and in order to overcome this, we undertook telephonic contact with patients or their relatives to get the necessary information about their clinical status.

Results

Fifty-seven patients with GIST underwent surgical resection during this period of time. The stomach was the most common organ involved in the disease, with 74% of the patients. Surgical resection was the main treatment approach, with R0 resection possible in 88%. Nine percent of the patients were given Imatinib as neoadjuvant treatment and 61% were offered the same, as adjuvant therapy. The duration of adjuvant treatment changed from one year to three years over the study period. Pathological risk assessment categorized the patients as Stage I, 33%; Stage II, 19%; Stage III, 39%; and Stage IV, 9%. Of the 40 patients who were at least three years from surgery, 35 were traceable giving an 87.5%, overall three-year survival. Thirty-one patients (77.5%) were confirmed to be disease-free at three years.

Conclusion

This is the first report of mid-long-term outcomes of the multimodality treatment of GIST from Pakistan. Upfront surgery continues to be the main modality. OS & DFS in resource-poor environments can be similar to those seen in a better-structured healthcare setting.

Imaging Properties and Tumor Targeting of 68Ga-NeoBOMB1, a Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist, in GIST Patients

Background: Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are molecular imaging targets in multiple malignancies. Recently, NeoBOMB1, a 68Ga-labelled antagonist to GRPRs, was developed for PET. Here we report the outcome of a Phase I/IIa clinical trial (EudraCT 2016-002053-38) describing diagnostic properties and covariates influencing uptake of 68Ga-NeoBOMB1 in oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Methods: Nine patients with advanced GIST using PET/CT (computed tomography) were included. After kit-based 68Ga-NeoBOMB1 preparation with a licensed 68Ge/68Ga generator, 3 MBq/kg body weight were injected intravenously. PET/CT included dynamic and static PET scans 5, 12 and 18 min and 1, 2, and 3−4 h post injection (first six patients) and static PET scans 2 and 3−4 h post injection (last three participants). Tumor targeting was assessed on a per-lesion and per-patient basis. Results: Six patients showed visible radiotracer uptake in at least one tumor lesion. Seventeen out of 37 tumor lesions exhibited significant 68Ga-NeoBOMB1 uptake (median SUVmax 11.8 [range 2.8−51.1] 2 h p.i. and 13.2 [range 2.5−53.8] 3−4 h p.i) and improved lesion-to-background contrast over time. Five lesions (13.5%) were identified only by 68Ga-NeoBOMB1-PET, with no correlation on contrast-enhanced CT. Three patients showed no radiotracer accumulation in any lesions. Tracer uptake correlated with male sex (p < 0.0001), higher body mass index (p = 0.007), and non-necrotic lesion appearance (p = 0.018). There was no association with whole-lesion contrast enhancement, hepatic localization, mutational status, or disease duration. Conclusions: 68Ga-NeoBOMB1-PET exhibits variable tumor uptake in advanced-stage GIST patients, correlating with lesion vitality based on CT contrast uptake, opening the possibility of a theragnostic approach in selected cases.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal in the muscularis propria are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Multiple modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, ultrasonography, digital subtraction angiography, and endoscopy, have been performed to evaluate GISTs. CT is most frequently used for diagnosis, staging, surveillance, and response monitoring during molecularly targeted therapy in clinical practice. The diagnosis of GISTs is sometimes challenging because of the diverse imaging findings, such as anatomical location (esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, colorectum, appendix, and peritoneum), growth pattern, and enhancement pattern as well as the presence of necrosis, calcification, ulceration, early venous return, and metastasis. Imaging findings of GISTs treated with antineoplastic agents are quite different from those of other neoplasms (e.g. adenocarcinomas) because only subtle changes in size are seen even in responsive lesions. Furthermore, the recurrence pattern of GISTs is different from that of other neoplasms. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality, describes imaging findings obtained before and after treatment, presents a few cases of complicated GISTs, and discusses recent investigations performed using CT and MRI to predict histological risk grade, gene mutations, and patient outcomes.

Current update on molecular cytogenetics, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are thought to arise from precursors of the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs can arise anywhere in the GI tract, but most commonly originate from the stomach and small intestine. The majority of GISTs occur as a result of activating mutations in two receptor protein tyrosine kinases: KIT and/or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α. Mutational analyses allow for predicting patient prognosis and treatment response. Clinical presentations can vary from no symptoms, typical in the case of small incidentally found tumors, to GI bleeding, abdominal discomfort, and ulcer-related symptoms when the tumor is enlarged. Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of these tumors with multiphasic computed tomography serving as the imaging modality of choice. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography can serve as imaging adjuncts in lesion characterization, especially with liver metastases, and subsequent staging and assessment for treatment response or recurrence. Surgical resection is the preferred management for small GISTs, while tyrosine kinase inhibitors − imatinib mesylate and sunitinib malate − serve as crucial molecular-targeted therapies for locally advanced and metastatic GISTs. This review article highlights the clinical presentation, pathology and molecular cytogenetics, imaging features, and current management of GISTs.

Paraneoplastic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumor with cutaneous metastasis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with cutaneous metastasis is very rare. As a result, cutaneous GISTs have not been well characterized. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is also a rare symptom among paraneoplastic nephritic syndromes (PNS).

CASE SUMMARY

In this case report, we describe a patient with cutaneous metastatic GIST accompanied by nephrotic syndrome occurring as a malignancy-associated PNS, for whom symptomatic treatment was ineffective, but clinical remission was achieved after surgery. Moreover, the patient has a missense mutation in NPHP4, which can explain the occurrences of GIST and FSGS in this patient and indicates that the association is not random.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported case of a GIST with cutaneous metastasis accompanied by nephrotic syndrome manifesting as a PNS.

Recurrence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor 12 years after repeat hepatectomies for liver metastases: report of a case

No consensus has been reached on the postoperative treatment and follow-up duration for high-risk malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We herein report a case of recurrent liver metastasis from gastric GIST in a patient who had been receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate for 10 years. A 78-year-old woman underwent local gastrectomy for a 20-cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 25/50 high-power fields (HPF) 17 years before. Partial hepatectomy for recurrent liver metastases was repeatedly performed 14 and 12 years before. After the second hepatectomy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate was given for 10 years, during which no recurrence was observed. Two years after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, computed tomography revealed a 2-cm hepatic tumor; thus, laparoscopic partial hepatectomy was performed. Histopathological findings revealed a liver metastasis of gastric GIST with a mitotic count of 20/50 HPF and MIB-1 labeling index of 20%. Mutation analysis of the KIT gene revealed an exon 11 mutation. The patient is currently undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib mesylate. The combination of surgery and long-term adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk malignant GIST and liver metastases may be effective to achieve a good prognosis.

Prognostic Value of Bleeding in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Background:

Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common clinical manifestation of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. It is of great significance to the prognosis of patients. But the results are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between gastrointestinal bleeding and clinical prognosis in patients with GIST.

Methods:

A systematic literature search was performed in Pumbed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, VIP and wanfang databases with the pattern of unlimited languages. 12 studies with 2781 individuals were included in the final analysis. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival/disease-free survival (RFS/DFS) and related factors affecting bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were extracted. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for in the meta-analysis.

Results:

A total of 12 articles were included in the study, including 2781 patients with GIST, including 845 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. The OS of GIST patients with gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly worse (HR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.13-5.73, P = 0.025). But there was no significant difference in RFS between gastrointestinal bleeding patients and non-bleeding patients (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.70-2.61, P = 0.371). Further analysis of the related factors of GI bleeding in GIST patients was observed, besides the aging factor (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.69-1.50, P = 0.929), Small intestinal stromal tumor (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41-0.76, P < 0.001), tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.20-3.63, P = 0.009), Mitotic index ≥ 5/50 HPF (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.11-2.49, P = 0.014) and tumor rupture (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.0-3.82, P = 0.026) all increased the risk of GI bleeding in patients with GIST.

Conclusions:

The OS of GIST patients with GI bleeding was worse than non-GI bleeding, but had no significant effect on RFS. Nevertheless the aging factor, the location of GIST in the small intestine, tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, Mitotic index ≥ 5/50 HPF and tumor rupture all increased the risk of GI bleeding in patients with GIST.

A nationwide survey on esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors at accredited institutions by the Japan Esophageal Society

BACKGROUND

As esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are very rare, their clinicopathological features remain obscure. We conducted a nationwide survey to clarify the characteristics of these tumors and to establish a consensus on their diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

The clinicopathological information of patients with esophageal GISTs who underwent treatment between January 2010 and June 2016 at the accredited institutions by the Japan Esophageal Society was collected via a questionnaire method and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (29 men and 22 women; median age, 68 years) were recruited from 31 institutions. Diagnosis was triggered most frequently during screening and other disease scrutiny. Symptoms were seen only in 17 patients: highest in 11 patients with dysphagia. Thirty-five patients underwent surgery alone; 15 patients, surgery with imatinib therapy; and one patient, endoscopic resection. The tumors preferentially occurred in the lower and middle parts of the thoracic esophagus, with a median size of 36.5 mm. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant imatinib therapies were performed in seven and eight patients, respectively. Administration of imatinib 400 mg/day was the standard regimen. Postoperative follow-up observations were conducted mostly via computed tomography (CT) scans every 3 or 6 months until 5 years after surgery. The tumors recurred in ten patients within 5 years postoperatively (high risk, 38.5%; intermediate risk, 20%; low risk, 0%; very low risk, 0%; three cases of relapse with an unknown risk assessment). A patient with a high-risk GIST died from the tumor 54 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide survey revealed the current status of esophageal GISTs in Japan and provided important information for making a consensus on the treatment and follow-up method.

Utility of noncontrast MRI in the detection and risk grading of gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

Background

Recently developed adjuvant therapies for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) have been shown to improve patient survival. Guidelines currently recommend contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for GIST detection and surveillance. Patients with moderate-to-high risk GISTs require more frequent surveillance due to a higher 5-year recurrence rate. Our study aimed to compare noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with CECT for GIST detection, and evaluate volumetric apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) for risk stratification of GIST.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 83 patients with histopathologically confirmed GISTs for lesion detection efficiency analysis between noncontrast MRI and matched CECT studies. A 5-point scale was used by two independent reviewers to determine if the lesion was present or absent. Another cohort, comprising 28 patients with pathologically confirmed primary GISTs, was further screened for risk stratification, with a comparison of volumetric ADC parameters between the pathologically very-low-to-low risk and moderate-to-high risk GIST patients.

Results

For identifying GISTs, the sensitivity and specificity of noncontrast MRI were 83.6% and 89.3% for reader 1 respectively, and 81.8% and 92.9% for reader 2 respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of CECT were 76.4% and 89.3% for reader 1 respectively, and 76.4 and 78.6% for reader 2 respectively. Tumor volumetric ADC histogram parameters, including ADC_max, ADC_stdev, 90^th and 95^th percentiles, inhomogeneity, and entropy, were positively correlated with a higher risk grade of GIST (r=0.421-0.758). The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed ADC_max achieved the highest area under the curve value of 0.938 for discriminating very-low-to-low risk versus moderate-to-high risk GISTs.

Conclusions

Noncontrast MRI was an efficient technique for identifying GIST patients. The combination of CECT and noncontrast MRI can improve the reliability of diagnosis. For patients with contraindications to CECT, noncontrast MRI may be a comparable alternative. Volumetric ADC histogram parameters may be useful in differentiating very-low-to-low risk from moderate-to-high risk primary GISTs.

Individualized Management of Blood Concentration in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor, and surgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of the disease, but since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib (IM), the prognosis of the disease has undergone revolutionary changes. According to the current version of the guidelines, most GIST patients receive a fixed dose without taking into account their own individual differences, resulting in a wide difference in blood concentration, adverse reactions and prognosis. With more studies on the relationship between blood drug concentrations and prognosis, the concept of individualized therapy has been paid more attention by researchers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has also been made available for the research field of GIST targeted therapy. How to reduce the incidence of drug resistance and adverse reactions in patients with GISTs has become the focus of the current research. This article reviews the common monitoring methods and timing of TKIs blood concentration, the reasonable range of blood drug concentration, the toxic or adverse effects caused by high blood drug concentration, some possible factors affecting blood drug concentration and recent research progress, in order to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy of individual blood drug concentration, improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the adverse effects as much as possible.

Efficacy of Long-Term Adjuvant Therapy With Imatinib Mesylate After Extensive Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine With Peritoneal Metastases: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Although most patients with advanced GISTs benefit from imatinib mesylate (IM) as standard targeted therapy, the optimal duration of adjuvant IM for GIST patients with high risk of recurrence who underwent surgical resection remains unknown. In this article, we present a case of a ruptured GIST of the small intestine accompanied by peritoneal metastases, which was effectively treated by surgical procedure followed by long-term adjuvant therapy with IM. Surgical resection was performed for the ruptured small intestinal GIST, and multitude of peritoneal metastases were cauterized. The patient received adjuvant therapy with IM (400 mg/day) for 12 years without an interruption or a dose change. Peritoneal metastatic recurrence was observed by the follow-up computed tomography scan obtained 12 years after surgery, and surgical resection of the recurrent GIST was performed. The molecular examination indicated a KIT exon 11 deletion mutation in both the primary GIST and recurrent GIST. An additional point mutation was observed in the recurrent GIST in exon 17 that caused resistance to IM. The present case might indicate that extensive removal of the tumor cells through surgery and long-term administration of IM without an interruption or a dose change were important for achieving improved recurrence-free survival in patients with ruptured GISTs of the small intestine with peritoneal metastases.

Primary extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) of the mesentery: Case report and review of literature

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent <1% of all gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are mesenchymal tissue neoplasm arising outside the GI tract. This rare group comprises only 5% of all GISTs. This case demonstrates a rare entity in a patient with non-specific symptoms, a large tumor size and unremarkable past personal and family history.

Presentation of case

We present a 45-year old man with non-specific symptoms who was diagnosed with a primary EGIST arising in the small bowel mesentery after surgery. The tumor was not compromising the GI tract and it was completely resected. The tumor was sent for pathological examination that confirmed the diagnosis. Histological examination revealed a 15 cm in diameter mass, comprised of spindle cells and high mitotic activity. Treatment with imatinib mesylate was initiated.

Discussion

There have been only a few previous reports of EGISTs arising from the small bowel mesentery. It is believed that EGISTs originate from cells with similar pathological characteristics and biological behaviour as the intestinal cells of Cajal. Such tumors are associated with poorer prognosis, lager tumor size and younger presentation than their GI counterparts. The preferred treatment is complete surgical resection. The addition of specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib mesylate is recommended for high risk patients. Even though morphological and immunohistochemical similarities between GISTs and EGISTs are described, their pathogenesis, incidence, genetic background, complications and prognosis are not completely known because they are extremely rare.

Conclusion

EGISTs are very rare tumors which originate from cells outside the GI tract and are associated with a more aggressive biological behavior than their GI counterparts. These tumors may grow without any clinical implications and should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with an abdominal mass. Further studies are needed due to lack of large patient cohort studies and long-term follow-up regarding the prognosis and management of this rare pathology.

•

EGISTs are extremely rare. They represent only 5% of all GISTs, which comprises only <0.05% of all GI tumors.

•

High index of suspicion in patients with nonspecific symptoms and the presence of an abdominal mass is necessary.

•

The preferred treatment is a complete surgical resection in low-risk patients.

•

Clinicopathologic parameters and clinical implications are not yet described in literature.

Preoperative CT feature of incomplete overlying enhancing mucosa as a high-risk predictor in gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the CT finding of overlying enhancing gastric mucosa (OEGM) can be used to predict risk stratifications by observing CT features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and CT features within pathologically demonstrated GISTs were retrospectively reviewed. Risk stratifications were classified into non-high group and high-risk group according to the modified National Institutes of Health criteria. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed in order to determine significant predictors for high-risk stratification. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, subgroup analysis, and pathologic-radiologic correlation analysis were all executed.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients were finally enrolled as test subjects. Within the univariate analysis, high-risk tumors tended to have a larger diameter, irregular shape, exophytic growth pattern, present necrosis, incomplete OEGM, tumor vessels, heterogeneous enhancement, and present rupture. According to ROC curve analysis, incomplete OEGM showed the largest area under curve values for diagnosing lesions (0.835; 95% CI, 0.766-0.904; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the incomplete OEGM was the strongest independent predictor for high-risk stratification of gastric GISTs (OR = 21.944; 95% CI, 4.344-110.863; p < 0.001). Within the subgroup analysis, incomplete OEGM was more frequently associated with tumors size > 10 cm, irregular shape, exophytic growth pattern, high mitotic count, and disrupted mucosa on pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

The CT feature of incomplete OEGM is an independent predictive factor for high-risk stratification of gastric GISTs and strongly correlated with pathological mucosal changes.

KEY POINTS

• Preoperative CT features can be helpful in assessment of risk stratifications of gastric GISTs. • OEGM is an independent predictor for high-risk stratification of gastric GISTs. • Incomplete OEGM likely indicates high-risk stratification of gastric GISTs.

Fibrinogen/Albumin Ratio Index Is an Independent Prognosis Predictor of Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients After Surgical Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Background: Nutritional status, systemic inflammation, and coagulation mechanism are closely related to tumor progression. Herein, we examined the role of fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio index (FARI) in the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and developed a novel nomogram predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 357 GIST patients admitted at the gastrointestinal surgery of the Beijing Hospital from January 2008 to January 2018 and underwent curative resection. FARI was calculated as fibrinogen level (g/L) /albumin level (g/L). The cutoff point of FARI was set using the point with the largest Youden index on the receiver operating characteristic curve with the 5-years recurrence-free survival as an endpoint. We used the Kaplan-Meier approach and multivariable Cox regression model to study the impact of FARI on recurrence-free survival. Finally, we developed a nomogram based on tumor size, location, mitotic index, and FARI to predict RFS. The nomogram was assessed by calculating concordance probabilities and testing calibration of predicted RFS with observed RFS. Concordance probabilities were also compared with the National Institute of Health (NIH) risk classification system.

Results: The ROC curve revealed that the best cutoff point of the FARI was set as 0.08. The patients were classified into the FARI-high (≥0.08) and FARI-low (<0.08) groups. FARI was significantly associated with age, size of the tumor, NIH risk category, and Mitotic Index (all P < 0.05). FARI was weakly associated with NLR and PLR. FARI and PNI had a weak negative association. Multivariate analysis showed that the NIH risk category and FARI were independent prognostic predictors for worse outcomes concerning RFS in GIST patients. In the high-risk subgroup, patients with low FARI also had a more prolonged RFS than patients with high FARI (P < 0.05). The nomogram had a concordance probability of 0.802 (SE 0.025). Nomogram predictions were well-calibrated. Concordance probabilities of the nomogram were better than NIH risk classification system [0.802 [0.025] vs. 0.737 [0.024], p < 0.01].

Conclusion: We established that preoperative FARI is a novel serum biomarker to predict the prognosis after surgical resection of GISTs. The nomogram incorporating FARI could be used to help the decision-making of clinical treatment.

Prognostic Indicators for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are potentially malignancies that can occur anywhere in the digestive tract. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib have proven effective since the discovery of KIT and PDGFRA. The current version of NCNN, ESMO and EURACAN guidelines recognized that the three main prognostic factors are the mitotic rate, tumor size and tumor site. In addition, tumor rupture is also recognized as an independent risk factor. However, recent evidence shows that various types of gene mutations are associated with prognosis, and influencing factors such as gastrointestinal bleeding and high Ki67 index have been associated with poor prognosis. It shows that the current risk classification is still insufficient and controversial. With the emergence of more and more lack mutation in KIT/PDGFRA GISTs (KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs) or drug resistance genes, primary and secondary drug resistance problems are caused, which makes the treatment of late or metastatic GIST face challenges. Therefore, this article will review the clinicopathological characteristics of GIST, the special molecular subtypes and other factors that may affect prognosis. We will also explore reliable prognostic markers for better postoperative management and improve the prognosis of patients with GIST.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine: Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment Research

In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the small intestine have been a hot topic due to their rarity and non-specific clinical manifestations. With the development of gene and imaging technology, surgery, and molecular targeted drugs, the diagnosis and treatment of GISTs have achieved great success. For a long time, radical resection was prioritized to treat GISTs of the small intestine. At present, preoperative tumor staging is a novel treatment for unresectable malignant tumors. In addition, karyokinesis exponent is the sole independent predictor of progression-free survival of GISTs. The DNA, miRNA, and protein of exosomes have also been found to be biomarkers with prognostic implications. The research on the treatment of GISTs has become a focus in the era of precision medicine, ushering in the use of standardized, normalized, and individualized treatment.

MITIGATE-NeoBOMB1, a Phase I/IIa Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Imaging of 68Ga-NeoBOMB1, a Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist, in GIST Patients

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are potential molecular imaging targets in a variety of tumors. Recently, a ⁶⁸Ga-labeled antagonist to GRPRs, NeoBOMB1, was developed for PET. We report on the outcome of a phase I/IIa clinical trial (EudraCT 2016-002053-38) within the EU-FP7 project Closed-loop Molecular Environment for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ('MITIGATE') (grant agreement no. 602306) in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Methods: The main objectives were evaluation of safety, biodistribution, dosimetry, and preliminary tumor targeting of ⁶⁸Ga-NeoBOMB1 in patients with advanced tyrosine-kinase inhibitors-treated GIST using PET/CT. Six patients with histologically confirmed GIST and unresectable primary lesion or metastases undergoing an extended protocol for detailed pharmacokinetic analysis were included. ⁶⁸Ga-NeoBOMB1 was prepared using a kit procedure with a licensed ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga generator. ⁶⁸Ga-NeoBOMB1 (3 MBq/kg of body weight) was injected intravenously, and safety parameters were assessed. PET/CT included dynamic imaging at 5, 11, and 19 min as well as static imaging at 1, 2, and 3-4 h after injection for dosimetry calculations. Venous blood samples and urine were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Tumor targeting was assessed on a per-lesion and per-patient basis. Results: ⁶⁸Ga-NeoBOMB1 (50 μg) was prepared with high radiochemical purity (yield > 97%). Patients received 174 ± 28 MBq of the radiotracer, which was well tolerated in all patients over a follow-up period of 4 wk. Dosimetry calculations revealed a mean effective dose of 0.029 ± 0.06 mSv/MBq, with the highest organ dose to the pancreas (0.274 ± 0.099 mSv/MBq). Mean plasma half-life was 27.3 min with primarily renal clearance (mean 25.7% ± 5.4% of injected dose 4 h after injection). Plasma metabolite analyses revealed high stability; metabolites were detected only in the urine. In 3 patients, a significant uptake with increasing maximum SUVs (SUV_max at 2 h after injection: 4.3-25.9) over time was found in tumor lesions. Conclusion: This phase I/IIa study provides safety data for ⁶⁸Ga-NeoBOMB1, a promising radiopharmaceutical for targeting GRPR-expressing tumors. Safety profiles and pharmacokinetics are suitable for PET imaging, and absorbed dose estimates are comparable to those of other ⁶⁸Ga-labeled radiopharmaceuticals used in clinical routine.

Heterogeneity of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor on texture analysis: DWI texture as potential biomarker of overall survival

PURPOSE

To determine if texture features of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) on MRI of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (mGIST) have correlation with overall survival (OS).

METHOD

Fifty-one GIST patients with metastatic lesions who received imatinib targeted therapy were included. Texture features of the largest metastatic lesion were analyzed using inhouse software. Three types of texture features were assessed: fractal features, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features, and gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) features. The features were extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Histogram analysis was performed on ADC maps. Patients were followed up until death. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the correlation of texture features with OS. The curves of the high- and low-risk groups were compared using log-rank test. The prognostic efficacy of the predictors was assessed by calculating the concordance probability.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 43.5 months (range, 3.97-120.90 m). Four DWI and three ADC texture features showed significant correlation with OS on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). DWI_L_GLCM_maximum_probability [hazard ratio (HR): 2.062 (1.357-3.131)], ADC_H_GLRLM_mean [HR: 2.174 (1.457-3.244)], and ADC_O_GLCM_cluster_shade [HR: 1.882 (1.324-2.674)] were identified as representative prognostic indicators. The optimum threshold levels for these three features were 1.19×100, 1.71×10 and 2.19×0.1, respectively. Neither histogram analysis values nor fractal features revealed significant correlation with survival status (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Texture features of the mGIST on DWI exhibited correlation with overall survival. High-grade heterogeneity was associated with poor prognosis.

Excision of a Large Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour Following 16 Months of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Imatinib (Case Report)

Introduction

Although the standard treatment for stromal tumours is surgery, in locally advanced forms, it is often necessary to achieve tumour downstaging to improve surgical outcomes. Neoadjuvant treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib, has been shown to be effective in several studies, but the duration of this treatment is still a subject of debate.

Case report

We report a case of a large GIST of the stomach in a 51-year-old patient with atypical presentation that was initially unresectable. Neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib for 16 months resulted in a good response, allowing secondary surgical excision.

Conclusion

Imatinib in neoadjuvant therapy should be continued as long as there is a good response and tolerance to the medication to obtain tumour downsizing compatible with carcinologic excision.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40487-019-00101-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Imaging surveillance of gastrointestinal stromal tumour: current recommendation by National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Medical Oncology-European Reference Network for rare adult solid cancers

Imaging plays an active role in the surveillance of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Risk stratification schemes, based on size, mitotic count, and anatomical site of origin of the GIST, help in planning preoperative and postoperative imaging strategies especially in determining the frequency and duration of surveillance; however, there is no clear consensus on the optimal imaging strategies in patients with GISTs who are completely cured by surgery and patients who are at risk of recurrence. In addition, current surveillance protocols depend on the resectability of the primary tumour and presence of metastatic disease. The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the role of the different imaging methods for surveillance of GISTs, focusing on the guidelines recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Medical Oncology - European Network for Rare adult solid Cancers, and to propose practical guidelines for surveillance of GISTs for various risk categories.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Stomach and Esophagus

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly as a result of c-kit or PDGFRA proto-oncogene mutations. Surgical resection is an important component of treatment. However, molecular profiling of GISTs has provided many insights into adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy options. Imatinib, the most frequently studied medical therapy, has been shown in numerous studies to provide benefit to patients in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Interval imaging is an important component of the treatment of GISTs and national surveillance recommendations should be followed.

PRE-OPERATIVE GASTRIC GIST DOWNSIZING: THE IMPORTANCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Introduction:

Gastric gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) are a rare and usually asymptomatic neoplasm that can present as abdominal mass in more advanced scenarios. Since surgical resection is the main aspect of the treatment, locally advanced tumors require multivisceral resection and, therefore, higher postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Objective:

To perform a review the literature on the topic, with emphasis on the neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods:

Literature review on the Medline database using the following descriptors: gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neoadjuvant therapy, imatinib mesylate and molecular targeted therapy.

Results:

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone for the treatment of GISTs; however, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved survival as an adjuvant therapy. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy have been described in the treatment of locally advanced tumors in order to avoid multivisceral resection.

Conclusion:

Despite surgical resection remains as the most important aspect of the treatment of GISTs, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown to both improve survival and resectability, respectively.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Optimal Surgical Treatment of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic characteristics of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were unclear and the optimal surgical procedure for duodenal GIST remains poorly defined. We aimed to analyze clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes based on the surgical procedure, and recommend optimal surgical treatment for duodenal GIST.

METHODS

From July 2000 to April 2017, 118 patients with localized duodenal GIST underwent curative surgical resection at a single institution. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 94.9 and 79.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the mitotic count was a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS. Limited resection (LR) was performed in 20 patients with GIST in the first or fourth portion of the duodenum. Both LR and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were performed in 98 patients with GIST in second or third portion of the duodenum. The patients in the LR group had less late complications than in the PD group and no postoperative newly developed diabetes mellitus. The minimally invasive LR (MI-LR) group had a shorter duration of surgery and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

LR is a feasible and effective surgical treatment for patients with small-sized and antimesenteric-sided duodenal GIST in terms of late complications and postoperative diabetic complications. MI-LR has better perioperative outcomes than open LR. Therefore, we should consider MI-LR as an optimal surgical treatment for selected patients with duodenal GIST.

Imaging pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are extremely rare in children. Imaging plays a key role in staging and monitoring therapy (surgical and with tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The vast majority of articles addressing imaging of GIST base on adults and are based on CT. The subtype "pediatric GIST" - if at all - is only mentioned in a dependent clause. Although the imaging features in children and adults are similar, histology, clinical course and thus imaging approach are different.

METHODS

A PubMed search using the search terms "Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, GIST, WT GIST, children, pediatric, carney's triad, imaging, staging, follow-up, MRI, CEUS, ultrasonography, Positron emission tomography" was conducted. Studies that reported on laparoscopy, endoscopy and surgical techniques only were excluded.

RESULTS

Based on our selective literature review, we present alternative radiological imaging strategies using MRI, contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and PET-CT to stage and follow-up pediatric GIST patients. As pediatric GIST often is a chronic disease, minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation is mandatory.

CONCLUSION

MRI, contrast enhanced ultrasound and PET-CT instead of CT are the imaging modalities to evaluate pediatric GIST.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic review LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal tract. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal located within the muscle layer and are characterized by over-expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT. Pathologically, diagnosis of a GIST relies on morphology and immunohistochemistry [KIT and/or discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1 (DOG1) is generally positive]. The prognosis of this disease is associated with the tumor size and mitotic index. The standard treatment of a GIST without metastasis is surgical resection. A GIST with metastasis is usually only treated by tyrosine kinase inhibitors without radical cure; thus, early diagnosis is the only way to improve its prognosis. However, a GIST is usually detected as a SEL during endoscopy, and many benign and malignant conditions may manifest as SELs. Conventional endoscopic biopsy is difficult for tumors without ulceration. Most SELs have therefore been managed without a histological diagnosis. However, a favorable prognosis of a GIST is associated with early histological diagnosis and R0 resection. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are critical for an accurate diagnosis of SELs. EUS-FNA is safe and effective in enabling an early histological diagnosis and adequate treatment. This review outlines the current evidence for the diagnosis and management of GISTs, with an emphasis on early management of small SELs.

Management of hemorrhage in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are relatively common mesenchymal tumors. They originate from the wall of hollow viscera and may be found in any part of the digestive tract. The prognosis of patients with stromal tumors depends on various risk factors, including size, location, presence of mitotic figures, and tumor rupture. Emergency surgery is often required for stromal tumors with hemorrhage. The current literature suggests that stromal tumor hemorrhage indicates poor prognosis. Although the optimal treatment options for hemorrhagic GISTs are based on surgical experience, there remains controversy with regard to optimum postoperative management as well as the classification of malignant potential. This article reviews the biological characteristics, diagnostic features, prognostic factors, treatment, and postoperative management of GISTs with hemorrhage.

Asian consensus guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: what is the same and what is different from global guidelines

There are some disparities between the clinical practice and profiles of cancer in Asia and those in Europe & North America. In Asia, surgical oncologists still have a major role in the multidisciplinary therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), whereas medical oncologists hold this status in the West. Although the incidence of clinical GIST is considered similar between the two areas, small gastric GISTs are more frequently treated by surgery in East Asia compared with Europe & North America. The diagnosis and treatment of small submucosal tumors (SMTs), including GIST, is important in Asian clinical practice guidelines for GIST. Most items of Asian and Western GIST guidelines are very similar. There are slight differences between the two guidelines in the degree of recommendation, which may come from disparities of clinical practice and available medicines. Importantly, most clinical evidence in the GIST guidelines has been established by clinical trials conducted in Western countries, and the number of clinical trials is still limited in Asia, suggesting that Asian GIST patients may have limited access to investigational drugs after standard therapy. Finally, both Asian and Western GIST guidelines are well-harmonized in some parts, and their contents may reflect the medical circumstances of each region.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract associated with high rates of malignant transformation. Most GISTs present asymptomatically. They are best identified by computed tomography (CT) scan and most stain positive for CD117 (C-Kit), CD34, and/or DOG-1. There have been many risk stratification classifications systems which are calculated based on tumor size, mitotic rate, location, and perforation. The approaches to treating GISTs are to resect primary low-risk tumors, resect high-risk primary or metastatic tumors with imatinib 400 mg daily for 12 months, or if the tumor is unresectable, neoadjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily followed by surgical resection is recommended. Sunitinib is required for KIT exon 9, 13, and 14 mutations, while ponatinib is used for exon 17 mutations and regorafenib for highly refractory tumors. High-risk tumors should be monitored for recurrence with serial abdominal CT scans. Radiofrequency ablation has shown to be effective when surgery is not suitable. Newer therapies of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and endoscopic ultrasound alcohol ablation have shown promising results. This report addresses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, histologic diagnosis, classification and risk stratification, staging and grading, surgical treatment, adjuvant treatment, and metastasis of GISTs.

Texture analysis of CT images in predicting malignancy risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

AIM

To explore the role of texture analysis of computed tomography (CT) images in predicting the malignancy risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with histopathologically confirmed GISTs underwent preoperative CT. Texture analysis was performed on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT images, respectively. Fourteen CT texture parameters were obtained and compared among GISTs at different malignancy risks with one-way analysis of variance or independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations between CT texture parameters and malignancy risk were analysed with Spearman's correlation test. Diagnostic performance of CT texture parameters in differentiating GISTs at low/very low malignancy risk was tested with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Three parameters on unenhanced images (r=-0.268-0.506), four parameters on arterial phase (r=-0.365-0.508), and six parameters on venous phase (r=-0.343-0.481) imaging correlated significantly with malignancy risk of GISTs, respectively (all p<0.05). For identifying GISTs at low/very low malignancy risk, three parameters on unenhanced images (area under ROC curve [AUC], 0.676-0.802), four parameters on arterial phase (AUC, 0.637-0.811), and six parameters on venous phase (AUC, 0.636-0.791) imaging showed significant diagnostic performance, respectively (all p<0.05), especially maximum frequency on both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images (AUC, 0.791-0.811).

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis of CT images holds great potential to predict the malignancy risk of GISTs preoperatively.

Lack of microsatellite instability in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype may constitute an important biomarker for patient response to immunotherapy, particularly to anti-programmed death-1 inhibitors. MSI is a type of genomic instability caused by a defect in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, which is present mainly in colorectal cancer and its hereditary form, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) development is associated with activating mutations of KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), which are oncogenes that predict the response to imatinib mesylate. In addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutations, other molecular alterations are important in GIST development. In GISTs, the characterization of the MSI phenotype is scarce and the results are not consensual. The present study aimed to assess MSI in a series of 79 GISTs. The evaluation of MSI was performed by pentaplex polymerase chain reaction comprising five markers, followed by capillary electrophoresis. The expression of MMR proteins was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Regarding the KIT/PDGFRA/B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase molecular profile of the 79 GISTs, 83.6% of the tumors possessed KIT mutations, 10.1% had PDGFRA mutations and 6.3% were triple wild-type. The mutated-PDGFRA cases were associated with gastric location and a lower mitotic index compared with KIT-mutated and wild-types, and these patients were more likely to be alive and without cancer. MSI analysis identified 4 cases with instability in one marker, however, additional evaluation of normal tissue and immunohistochemical staining of MMR proteins confirmed their microsatellite-stable nature. The results of the present study indicated that MSI is not involved in GIST tumorigenesis and, therefore, cannot serve as a biomarker to immunotherapy response in GIST.

Appropriate Follow-Up Strategies for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Based on the Analysis of Recurrent Interval and Patterns

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Previous studies have proposed risk classifications for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after resection and have contributed to the prediction of its prognosis. However, optimal postoperative surveillance has not yet been established.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 115 GIST patients who experienced recurrence after complete resection. The relationships between clinicopathological characteristics and the first recurrence sites, or time to recurrence (TTR), were investigated. We also compared the characteristics between 2 subgroups based on a TTR of ≤5 or >5 years.

RESULTS

The first recurrence occurred in the abdomen in 114 of 115 patients (99.1%); one case of esophageal GIST recurred in the lung. Gastric and small intestinal GISTs recurred most frequently in the liver or peritoneum, while the most common recurrences of colorectal GISTs were found to be local. Fourteen patients (12.2%) experienced recurrence after >5 years. Smaller tumors and those categorized as lower risk were significantly more frequent in the TTR >5 years group than in the TTR ≤5 years group. In the TTR >5 years group, local recurrence was the most frequent type of recurrence (42.9%).

CONCLUSION

Based on abdominal examination, postoperative surveillance after complete resection for primary GISTs may be recommended for >5 years.

Impact of a risk-based follow-up in patients affected by gastrointestinal stromal tumour

BACKGROUND

Follow-up aims to precociously identify recurrences, metastases or treatment-related adverse events so as to undertake the appropriate therapy. Guidelines admit lack of knowledge on optimal surveillance schedule, but suggest follow-up based on experts' opinion and risk stratification. To identify the impact, if any, of regular follow-up, we interrogated our prospectively collected database whether early detection of recurrences affected both clinical management and, likely, the outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We required information to be available on primary surgery and ≥3°years of follow-up for non-recurring patients. We analysed recurrence characteristics (asymptomatic versus symptomatic, low- versus high tumour burden) and computed tomography (CT) scan counts to detect one recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS), post-recurrence progression-free survival (PR-PFS), and disease-specific overall survival (OS). Comparisons used Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariate analyses employed the Cox proportional hazards model. All tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Between 01/2001 and 12/2012 we found 233 study-eligible patients. Estimated 5- and 10-year RFS were 61.8% and 50.4%, respectively. After a 68-month median follow-up, we observed 94 (40.3%) recurrences [73/94 (77.7%) asymptomatic versus 21/94 (22.3%) symptomatic and 45/94 (47.9%) low- versus 49/94 (52.1%) high tumour burden]. Multivariate analysis revealed that symptomatic and high tumour burden recurrences were highly predictive of both worse PR-PFS (HR:3.19, P < 0.001; HR:2.80, P = 0.003, respectively) and OS (HR:3.65, P < 0.001; HR:2.38, P = 0.026, respectively). Finally, 29 second (primary) cancers were detected during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular follow-up detects recurrences at an earlier stage and may be associated with a better PR-PFS and OS for these patients. In the absence of randomised trials, these evidences support follow-up effort and cost.

UK clinical practice guidelines for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the commonest STS and arises within the wall of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. While most GISTs occur in the stomach they do occur in all parts of the GI tract. As with other STS, it is important that GISTs are managed by expert teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, as well as recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further knowledge of the disease. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field.

METHODOLOGY

British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially developed by a panel of physicians experienced in the management of GIST. This current version has been updated and amended with reference to other European and US guidance. We have received input from representatives of all diagnostic and treatment disciplines as well as patient representatives. Levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by ESMO adapted from those published by the Infectious Disease Society of America.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines cover aetiology, genetics and underlying molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and initial investigations, staging and risk stratification, surgery, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, the management of advanced disease and follow-up. The importance of mutational analysis in guiding treatment is highlighted, since this can indicate the most effective treatment and avoid administration of ineffective drugs, emphasising the need for management in specialist centres.

How best to manage gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare but most common nonepithelial tumor of gastrointestinal tract. They are often found incidentally on computed tomography and endoscopic investigations. Increasing knowledge of the pathogenesis of GISTs and the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors revolutionized the management of GISTs. The newer advanced endoscopic techniques have challenged the conventional surgery although the true efficacy and safety of endoscopic approach is not clear at this time. This review article focuses on pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of GISTs.

Genetic progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: mechanisms and molecular interventions

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcomas in humans. Constitutively activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the initiating oncogenic events. Most metastatic GISTs respond dramatically to therapies with KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors. Asymptomatic and mitotically-inactive KIT/PDGFRA-mutant "microGISTs" are found in one third of adults, but most of these small tumors never progress to malignancy, underscoring that a progression of oncogenic mutations is required. Recent studies have identified key genomic abnormalities in GIST progression. Novel insights into the genetic progression of GISTs are shedding new light on therapeutic innovations.

GEIS guidelines for gastrointestinal sarcomas (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal sarcomas (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours originating in the digestive tract. They have a characteristic morphology, are generally positive for CD117 (c-kit) and are primarily caused by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes(1). On rare occasions, they occur in extravisceral locations such as the omentum, mesentery, pelvis and retroperitoneum. GISTs have become a model of multidisciplinary work in oncology: the participation of several specialties (oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, molecular biologists, radiologists…) has forested advances in the understanding of this tumour and the consolidation of a targeted therapy, imatinib, as the first effective molecular treatment in solid tumours. Following its introduction, median survival of patients with advanced or metastatic GIST increased from 18 to more than 60months. Sunitinib and Regorafenib are two targeted agents with worldwide approval for second- and third-line treatment, respectively, in metastatic GIST.