1
|
Bregni G, Adams R, Bale R, Bali MA, Bargellini I, Blomqvist L, Brown G, Cremolini C, Demetter P, Denecke T, Dohan A, Dopazo C, Elez E, Evrard S, Feakins R, Guckenberger M, Guren MG, Hawkins M, Hoorens A, Huguet E, Intven M, Koessler T, Kunz WG, Lordick F, Lucidi V, Mahnken AH, Malik H, Martinive P, Mauer M, Romero AM, Nagtegaal I, Orsi F, Oyen WJ, Pellerin O, Rengo M, Ricke J, Ricoeur A, Riddell A, Ronot M, Scorsetti M, Seligmann J, Sempoux C, Sheahan K, Stättner S, Svrcek M, Taieb J, West N, Wyrwicz L, Zech CJ, Moehler M, Sclafani F. EORTC consensus recommendations on the optimal management of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cancer Treat Rev 2025; 136:102926. [PMID: 40179590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.102926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2025] [Revised: 03/22/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
Patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases have long represented a unique and thoroughly investigated population. Nevertheless, the optimal management of these is still controversial with a number of open questions which are only partially addressed by available studies and existing guidelines. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group (GITCG) sought to fill this knowledge gap and promoted the development of a European consensus on this subject. By using the Delphi methodology and leveraging a multidisciplinary team of 43 international experts, including gastrointestinal oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, interventional radiologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and pathologists from 12 European countries, 34 practical recommendations and two consensus statements were proposed. These cover varying aspects of the optimal management of colorectal cancer liver metastases such as baseline imaging, selection criteria for liver-directed therapies, treatment strategies, assessment of treatment response, follow-up, care delivery, clinical research and future perspectives. This roadmap document is intended to complement national and international guidelines, and to provide practical guidance for clinicians and multidisciplinary teams, ultimately promoting practice standardisation, optimal management and better patient outcomes across Europe. Also, it provides a unique opportunity to highlight grey areas and unmet needs, and to give a strategic direction to future research in the field by identifying topics where there is no consensus among experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Bregni
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard Adams
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Reto Bale
- Interventional Oncology, Stereotaxy and Robotics, Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria A Bali
- Department of Radiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Nuclear Medicine/Hospital Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Chiara Cremolini
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pieter Demetter
- Cerba Path, Division CMP, Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory for Experimental Gastroenterology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, University Cancer Center (UCCL), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Cristina Dopazo
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Elez
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Marianne Gronlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Hawkins
- University College London, Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Emmanuel Huguet
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Martijn Intven
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pulmonology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, University Cancer Center (UCCL), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Valerio Lucidi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Philippe Martinive
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Murielle Mauer
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Franco Orsi
- IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Wim Jg Oyen
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Milan, Italy; Rijnstate, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Arnhem, the Netherlands; Radboudumc, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Pellerin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital SIRIC-CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Jens Ricke
- University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexis Ricoeur
- Radiology Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maxime Ronot
- Beaujon University Hospital, APHP Nord, Clichy, AND Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jenny Seligmann
- Division of Oncology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds UK
| | - Christine Sempoux
- Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kieran Sheahan
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, and UCD School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Magali Svrcek
- Saint-Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital SIRIC-CARPEM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nick West
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds UK
| | - Lucjan Wyrwicz
- Maria Sklodowska Curie National Cancer Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Francesco Sclafani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen L, Jiang Y, Wu Y, Li C, Zeng Q, Lin L, Wang Y, Chen S, Cao F, Nuerhashi G, Zhang S, Zhou Z, An C, Du Z, Fan W. The Value of no Evidence of Disease (NED) in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After TACE: A Real-World Study. Liver Int 2025; 45:e70101. [PMID: 40231897 DOI: 10.1111/liv.70101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2025] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS One-third of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can achieve imaging-based no evidence of disease (NED) during treatment after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sequential therapies; however, its temporal dynamics, contributing factors and prognostic value remain unknown. METHODS The longitudinal data of 1665 intermediate-stage HCC patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were included as a derivation cohort; 414 patients from three external medical centers served as the validation cohort. Image-Only NED is defined as no evidence of disease based on imaging exams while having a serum level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) above the upper limit; Image-Bio NED pertains to an additional achievement of a normal level of AFP. A semi-Markov multistate model was adopted to identify the transitions between intermediate states, which included NED unreached, Image-Only NED, Image-Bio NED, recurrence after NED and death. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival (OS) was utilised to evaluate the dynamic prognostic value of NED states. RESULTS The percentage of patients who reached Image NED and Image-Bio NED was 35.2% and 24.7% in the derivation cohort, and 37.4% and 31.4% in the validation cohort. The proportion of Image-Only NED and Image-Bio NED peaked by the end of the second year since initial treatment and declined gradually. Patients with Image-Only NED had a higher risk of recurrence compared to the Image-Bio NED subgroup (p < 0.05). With the subgroup of NED unreached as reference, the multivariate time-dependent Cox model showed Image-Only NED (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.33-0.59) and Image-Bio NED (HR 0.26; 0.20-0.33) were significant intermediate states that predict distinct OS for patients with intermediate-stage HCC, which was further confirmed in the multi-centre validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights the clinical course of NED states and demonstrates its dynamic prognostic significance in patients with intermediate-stage HCC after TACE. The Image-Bio NED is recommended to serve as an important endpoint during the dynamic management of intermediate-stage HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lujun Shen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yiquan Jiang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yueqian Wu
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qi Zeng
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
| | - Letao Lin
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yujia Wang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuanggang Chen
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Cao
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gulijiayina Nuerhashi
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sen Zhang
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China
| | - Zhongguo Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chao An
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhicheng Du
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weijun Fan
- Department of Minimally Invasive Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Tang W, Ye L, Miao G, Zeng M, Liu L. Estimating Efficacy of Conversion Therapy on Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases by using MRI: Development of a Predictive Score. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:4478-4487. [PMID: 38734578 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The conversion success rate (CSR) has crucial implication for clinical outcomes of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) following conversion therapy. This study aimed to develop a simple predictive scoring model for identifying CSR according to baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, and confirm its performance and prognostic significance in a validation cohort. METHODS A total of 155 consecutive patients with initially unresectable CRLM were retrospectively reviewed in the study. A simple MRI-based predictive scoring model for identifying CSR was developed in the development cohort (n = 104) by using multivariable logistic regression analyzes. The diagnostic performance was evaluated for the predictive score. Thereafter, patients in the validation cohort (n = 51) were stratified into groups with predicted high CSR or low CSR according to the score. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS The predictive score of CSR, named mrNISE, incorporated the number of CRLM ≥ 10, the largest size ≥ 50 mm, poorly defined tumor-liver interface, and peritumoral enhancement. The AUC of the mrNISE score was 0.845 for the development cohort and 0.776 for the validation cohort. According to the score, patients with predicted high CSR had better PFS and OS than those with low CSR in both development and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION The predictive score demonstrated great performance for identifying CSR of initially unresectable CRLM. Stratifying patients by the score, personalized treatment goals can be formulated before conversion therapy to improve clinical prognosis and reduce adverse events caused by ineffective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Liu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lechi Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gengyun Miao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Liheng Liu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dawood ZS, Brown ZJ, Munir MM, Waqar U, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Endo Y, Gajjar A, Schenk A, Pawlik TM. Outcomes of liver transplant for colorectal liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:1943-1950. [PMID: 39271001 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 08/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) for nonresectable colorectal liver metastasis (NRCRLM) has become accepted for select patients meeting strict inclusion criteria. Advancements in patient selection and understanding of cancer biology may expand benefits to patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). In this meta-analysis, we sought to assess survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, and quality of life (QoL) after LT for CRLM. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates and to compare QoL from baseline. Continuous data were analyzed, and standardized mean differences were reported. RESULTS Overall, 16 studies (403 patients, 58.8% male sex) were included. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS after LT for NRCRLM was 96% (95% CI: 92%-99%), 77% (95% CI: 62%-89%), and 53% (95% CI: 45%-61%), respectively. Moreover, the pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS was 58% (95% CI: 43%-72%), 33% (95% CI: 9%-61%), and 13% (95% CI: 4%-27%), respectively. Overall, 201 patients (49.8%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period with the lungs being the most common site (45.8%). There was no significant differences in physical and emotional functioning, fatigue, and pain components of QoL at 6 months after LT compared with baseline (all P > .05). CONCLUSION LT for NRCRLM demonstrated good OS outcomes with no differences in the QoL at 6 months after transplantation. Transplantation may represent a viable treatment option for NRCRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zachary J Brown
- Department of Surgery, Long Island School of Medicine, New York University, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Usama Waqar
- Medical College, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszynski
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Aryan Gajjar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Austin Schenk
- Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Y, Lu T, Zhang Y, Li H, Xu J, Li M. Baseline hepatobiliary MRI for predicting chemotherapeutic response and prognosis in initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:2585-2594. [PMID: 39034308 PMCID: PMC11300495 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of hepatobiliary MRI parameters as predictors of clinical response to chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS Eighty-five patients with initially unresectable CRLM were retrospectively enrolled from two hospitals and scanned using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI before treatment. Therapy response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Conventional parameters (i.e., signal intensity [SI]) and radiomics features of portal venous phase (PVP) and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images were analyzed between the responders and non-responders. Next, the combined model was constructed, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated. The relationship between the combined model and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS Of the 85 patients from two hospitals, 42 were in the response group, and 43 were in the non-response group. Upon conducting five-fold cross-validation, the normalized relative enhancement (NRE) of CRLM during the PVP yielded an AUC of 0.625. Additionally, a radiomics feature derived from the tumor area in the HBP achieved an AUC of 0.698, while a separate feature extracted from the peritumoral region in the HBP recorded an AUC of 0.709. The model that integrated these three features outperformed the individual features, achieving an AUC of 0.818. Furthermore, the combined model exhibited a significant correlation with PFS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The combined model, based on baseline hepatobiliary MRI, aids in predicting chemotherapeutic response and PFS in patients with initially unresectable CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazheng Chen
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 32, West Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Tao Lu
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 32, West Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Yongchang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610213, Sichuan, China
| | - Hang Li
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 32, West Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China
| | - Jingxu Xu
- Department of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Hangzhou Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mou Li
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 32, West Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michiel Zeeuw J, Wesdorp NJ, Ali M, Bakker AJJJ, Voigt KR, Starmans MPA, Roor J, Kemna R, van Waesberghe JHTM, van den Bergh JE, Nota IMGC, Moos SI, van Dieren S, van Amerongen MJ, Bond MJG, Chapelle T, van Dam RM, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, van Gulik TM, Hermans JJ, de Jong KP, Klaase JM, Kok NFM, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Quintus Molenaar I, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, de Wilt JHW, Verpalen IM, Stoker J, Grunhagen DJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Verhoef C, Kazemier G. Prognostic value of total tumor volume in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A secondary analysis of the randomized CAIRO5 trial with external cohort validation. Eur J Cancer 2024; 207:114185. [PMID: 38924855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of total tumor volume (TTV) for early recurrence (within 6 months) and overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), treated with induction systemic therapy followed by complete local treatment. METHODS Patients with initially unresectable CRLM from the multicenter randomized phase 3 CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) who received induction systemic therapy followed by local treatment were included. Baseline TTV and change in TTV as response to systemic therapy were calculated using the CT scan before and the first after systemic treatment, and were assessed for their added prognostic value. The findings were validated in an external cohort of patients treated at a tertiary center. RESULTS In total, 215 CAIRO5 patients were included. Baseline TTV and absolute change in TTV were significantly associated with early recurrence (P = 0.005 and P = 0.040, respectively) and OS in multivariable analyses (P = 0.024 and P = 0.006, respectively), whereas RECIST1.1 was not prognostic for early recurrence (P = 0.88) and OS (P = 0.35). In the validation cohort (n = 85), baseline TTV and absolute change in TTV remained prognostic for early recurrence (P = 0.041 and P = 0.021, respectively) and OS in multivariable analyses (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.012, respectively), and showed added prognostic value over conventional clinicopathological variables (increase C-statistic, 0.06; 95 % CI, 0.02 to 0.14; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION Total tumor volume is strongly prognostic for early recurrence and OS in patients who underwent complete local treatment of initially unresectable CRLM, both in the CAIRO5 trial and the validation cohort. In contrast, RECIST1.1 did not show prognostic value for neither early recurrence nor OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michiel Zeeuw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nina J Wesdorp
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mahsoem Ali
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Joëlle J J Bakker
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kelly R Voigt
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P A Starmans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joran Roor
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, the Netherlands
| | - Ruby Kemna
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Irene M G C Nota
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shira I Moos
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Theo M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Inez M Verpalen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Huiskens
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ohira G, Endo S, Imanishi S, Tochigi T, Maruyama T, Hayano K, Maruyama M, Matsubara H. Prognosis and predictive factors of conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:182. [PMID: 38860986 PMCID: PMC11166789 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03374-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced colorectal cancer and to identify factors that enable successful conversion surgery. METHODS We compared the outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer with distant metastases, including extrahepatic metastases, who underwent upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, conversion surgery, and chemotherapy only at our department from 2007 to 2020. In addition, factors influencing the achievement of conversion surgery in patients who were initially unresectable were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Of 342 colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases treated during the study period, 239 were judged to be initially unresectable, and 17 (conversion rate: 7.1%) underwent conversion surgery. The prognosis for the conversion surgery group was better than that of the chemotherapy only group but worse than that of the upfront surgery group. In the conversion surgery group, the recurrence-free survival after resection was significantly shorter than that upfront surgery group and neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, and no patients have been cured. Among patients who were initially unresectable, left-sided primary cancer and normal CA19-9 level were identified as independent factors contributing to the achievement of conversion surgery in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Although relapse after conversion surgery is common, and no patients have been cured thus far, overall survival was better in comparison to patients who received chemotherapy only. Among unresectable cases, patients with left-sided primary cancer and normal CA19-9 levels are likely to be candidates for conversion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaku Ohira
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Endo
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Imanishi
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Toru Tochigi
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Maruyama
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Koichi Hayano
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Michihiro Maruyama
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hisahiro Matsubara
- Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba university graduate school of medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuuou-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Popescu I, Dudău AM, Dima S, Herlea V, Croitoru VM, Dinu IM, Miron M, Lupescu I, Croitoru-Cazacu IM, Dumitru R, Croitoru AE. Multimodal Treatment of Metastatic Rectal Cancer in a Young Patient: Case Report and Literature Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:696. [PMID: 38792879 PMCID: PMC11123219 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach. Herein, we reported the case of a young woman diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer who received an individualized multimodal treatment strategy that resulted in a remarkable survival. There were several particular aspects of this case, such as the early onset of the disease, the successful use of conversion therapy, the application of liquid biopsy to guide treatment, and the specific nature of the bone metastasis. To offer more insights for navigating such challenges in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, we have conducted a literature review to find more data related to the particularities of this case. The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer is on the rise. Data suggests that it differs from older-onset colorectal cancer in terms of its pathological, epidemiological, anatomical, metabolic, and biological characteristics. Conversion therapy and surgical intervention provide an opportunity for cure and improve outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to approach each case individually, as every patient with limited liver disease should be considered as a candidate for secondary resection. Moreover, liquid biopsy has an important role in the individualized management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it offers additional information for treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ionuț Popescu
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
| | - Ana-Maria Dudău
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Simona Dima
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Herlea
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Pathology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad M. Croitoru
- Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (V.M.C.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Ioana Mihaela Dinu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Monica Miron
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
| | - Ioana Lupescu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Radiology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina M. Croitoru-Cazacu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
| | - Radu Dumitru
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
- Radiology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adina Emilia Croitoru
- Medical Oncology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania; (I.M.D.); (M.M.); (I.M.C.-C.); (A.E.C.)
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (S.D.); (V.H.); (I.L.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moretto R, Germani MM, Borelli B, Conca V, Rossini D, Boraschi P, Donati F, Urbani L, Lonardi S, Bergamo F, Cerma K, Ramondo G, D'Amico FE, Salvatore L, Valente G, Barbaro B, Giuliante F, Di Maio M, Masi G, Cremolini C. Predicting early recurrence after resection of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: the role of baseline and pre-surgery clinical, radiological and molecular factors in a real-life multicentre experience. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102991. [PMID: 38631269 PMCID: PMC11027482 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in surgical techniques and systemic treatments have increased the likelihood of achieving radical surgery and long-term survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Nonetheless, roughly half of the patients resected after an upfront systemic therapy experience disease relapse within 6 months from surgery, thus leading to the question whether surgery is actually beneficial for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A real-world dataset of mCRC patients with initially unresectable liver-limited disease treated with conversion chemotherapy followed by radical resection of CRLMs at three high-volume Italian institutions was retrospectively assessed with the aim of investigating the association of baseline and pre-surgical clinical, radiological and molecular factors with the risk of relapse within 6 or 12 months from surgery. RESULTS Overall, 268 patients were included in the analysis and 207 (77%) experienced recurrence. Ninety-six (46%) of them had disease relapse within 6 months after CRLM resection and in spite of several variables associated with early recurrence at univariate analyses, only primary tumour resection at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.89, P = 0.02] remained significant in the multivariable model. Among patients with resected primary tumours, pN+ stage was associated with higher risk of disease relapse within 6 months (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.23-7.41, P = 0.02). One hundred and forty-nine patients (72%) had disease relapse within 12 months after CRLMs resection but none of the analysed variables was independently associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS Clinical, radiological and molecular factors assessed before and after conversion chemotherapy do not reliably predict early recurrence after secondary resection of initially unresectable CRLMs. While novel markers are needed to optimize the cost/efficacy balance of surgical procedures, CRLM resection should be offered as soon as metastases become resectable during first-line chemotherapy to all patients eligible for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Moretto
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - M M Germani
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - B Borelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - V Conca
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - D Rossini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Pisa
| | - P Boraschi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - F Donati
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - L Urbani
- General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa
| | - S Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - F Bergamo
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - K Cerma
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - G Ramondo
- Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua
| | - F E D'Amico
- General Surgery 2, Department of Surgical Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua
| | - L Salvatore
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - G Valente
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome; Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - B Barbaro
- Diagnostic and General Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome
| | - F Giuliante
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome
| | - M Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - G Masi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - C Cremolini
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa; Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chávez-Villa M, Ruffolo LI, Line PD, Dueland S, Tomiyama K, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Emerging Role of Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1098-1101. [PMID: 38408289 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Chávez-Villa
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Luis I Ruffolo
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Experimental Transplantation and Malignancy Research Group, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Diseases and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Koji Tomiyama
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
- Division of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kuemmerli C, Hess V, Dutkowski P, Sinz S, Kessler U, Hess GF, Billeter AT, Müller-Stich BP, Kollmar O, Müller PC. Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Primary and Secondary Malignancies of the Liver: State of the Art and Current High-Level Evidence. Pharmacology 2024; 109:86-97. [PMID: 38368862 PMCID: PMC11008720 DOI: 10.1159/000537887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAI) has been proposed as a valuable adjunct for multimodal therapy of primary and secondary liver malignancies. This review provides an overview of the currently available evidence of HAI, taking into account tumor response and long-term oncologic outcome. SUMMARY In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), HAI in combination with systemic therapy leads to high response rates (85-90%) and conversion to resectablity in primary unresectable disease in up to 50%. HAI in combination with systemic therapy in CRLM in the adjuvant setting shows promising long-term outcomes with up to 50% 10-year survival in a large, non-randomized single-center cohort. For hepatocellular carcinoma patients, response rates as high as 20-40% have been reported for HAI and long-term outcomes compare well to other therapies. Similarly, survival for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 3 years after treatment with HAI is reported as high as 34%, which compares well to trials of systemic therapy where 3-year survival is usually below 5%. However, evidence is mainly limited by highly selected, heterogenous patient groups, and outdated chemotherapy regimens. The largest body of evidence stems from small, often non-randomized cohorts, predominantly from highly specialized single centers. KEY MESSAGE In well-selected patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, HAI might improve response rates and, possibly, long-term survival. Results of ongoing randomized trials will show whether a wider adoption of HAI is justified, particularly to increase rates of resectability in advanced malignant diseases confined to the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Viviane Hess
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Sinz
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Kessler
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Centre des Maladies Digestives, Clinique Cecil, Hirslanden, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel F. Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian T. Billeter
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat P. Müller-Stich
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis – University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wesdorp NJ, Zeeuw JM, Postma SCJ, Roor J, van Waesberghe JHTM, van den Bergh JE, Nota IM, Moos S, Kemna R, Vadakkumpadan F, Ambrozic C, van Dieren S, van Amerongen MJ, Chapelle T, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, Grunhagen D, van Gulik TM, Hermans JJ, de Jong KP, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Marquering HA, Stoker J, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Kazemier G. Deep learning models for automatic tumor segmentation and total tumor volume assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur Radiol Exp 2023; 7:75. [PMID: 38038829 PMCID: PMC10692044 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00383-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed models for tumor segmentation to automate the assessment of total tumor volume (TTV) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS In this prospective cohort study, pre- and post-systemic treatment computed tomography (CT) scans of 259 patients with initially unresectable CRLM of the CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. In total, 595 CT scans comprising 8,959 CRLM were divided into training (73%), validation (6.5%), and test sets (21%). Deep learning models were trained with ground truth segmentations of the liver and CRLM. TTV was calculated based on the CRLM segmentations. An external validation cohort was included, comprising 72 preoperative CT scans of patients with 112 resectable CRLM. Image segmentation evaluation metrics and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS In the test set (122 CT scans), the autosegmentation models showed a global Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.96 (liver) and 0.86 (CRLM). The corresponding median per-case DSC was 0.96 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.95-0.96) and 0.80 (IQR 0.67-0.87). For tumor segmentation, the intersection-over-union, precision, and recall were 0.75, 0.89, and 0.84, respectively. An excellent agreement was observed between the reference and automatically computed TTV for the test set (ICC 0.98) and external validation cohort (ICC 0.98). In the external validation, the global DSC was 0.82 and the median per-case DSC was 0.60 (IQR 0.29-0.76) for tumor segmentation. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning autosegmentation models were able to segment the liver and CRLM automatically and accurately in patients with initially unresectable CRLM, enabling automatic TTV assessment in such patients. RELEVANCE STATEMENT Automatic segmentation enables the assessment of total tumor volume in patients with colorectal liver metastases, with a high potential of decreasing radiologist's workload and increasing accuracy and consistency. KEY POINTS • Tumor response evaluation is time-consuming, manually performed, and ignores total tumor volume. • Automatic models can accurately segment tumors in patients with colorectal liver metastases. • Total tumor volume can be accurately calculated based on automatic segmentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina J Wesdorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J Michiel Zeeuw
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sam C J Postma
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joran Roor
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V, Huizen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke E van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Irene M Nota
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shira Moos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ruby Kemna
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fijoy Vadakkumpadan
- Department of Computer Vision and Machine Learning, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA
| | - Courtney Ambrozic
- Department of Computer Vision and Machine Learning, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Theo M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Huiskens
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Y, Zhu D, Chen M, Xu Y, Ye Q, Wang X, Xu P, Feng Q, Ji M, Wei Y, Fan J, Xu J. Impact of Surgical Management for Relapse After Conversion Hepatectomy for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:464-473.e5. [PMID: 37730473 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (IU-CRLM) receiving conversion therapy, disease relapse after conversion hepatectomy is common. However, few studies have focused on the assessment and management of relapse following conversion hepatectomy for IU-CRLM. METHODS In the retrospective cohort study, 255 patients with IU-CRLM received conversion therapy and underwent subsequent R0 resection. The treatment effects of repeated liver-directed treatment (RLDT) versus non-RLDT for liver relapse were examined. Survival analysis was evaluated with the use of Cox proportional hazards methods. The importance of RLDT was further confirmed in the propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analyses. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate after conversion hepatectomy was 34.9%. Liver relapse was observed in 208 patients. Of these patients, 106 underwent RLDT (65 underwent repeated hepatectomy and the remainder underwent ablation treatment), while 102 received only palliative chemotherapy. The relapse patients who underwent RLDT had a significantly longer OS than those who did not (hazard ratio (HR): 0.382, 95% CI: 0.259-0.563; P<0.001). In a multivariable analysis, RLDT was independently associated to prolonged survival (HR: 0.309, 95%CI: 0.181-0.529; P<0.001). In the PSM and subgroup analyses, RLDT consistently showed evidence of prolonging OS significantly. CONCLUSION For IU-CRLM patients with liver relapse following conversion hepatectomy, the RLDT is essential for cure and prolonged survival. To avoid missing the opportunity for RLDT, intensive disease surveillance should be proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijiao Chen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dexiang Zhu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Chen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuqiu Xu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qinghai Ye
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pingping Xu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive
| | - Qingyang Feng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meiling Ji
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive
| | - Ye Wei
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jianmin Xu
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Minimally Invasive; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tang F, Zhong Q, Ni T, Xue Y, Wu J, Deng R, Zhang Q, Li Y, He X, Yang Z, Zhang Y. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with systemic therapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis: A propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Med 2023; 12:21985-21995. [PMID: 38032013 PMCID: PMC10757091 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remains a challenging obstacle that often prevents curative treatment. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as a local adjuvant therapy for systemic chemotherapy for patients with unresectable CRLM. HIFU is a noninvasive method previously demonstrated as efficacious for various solid malignancies. METHODS Propensity score matching was used for the combination therapy group (HIFU group, n = 59) and the observation group receiving systemic therapy only (No-HIFU group, n = 59). In addition, the survival benefit, adverse effects, and factors affecting prognosis following HIFU were evaluated. RESULTS The disease control rate was 77.9% and 62.7%, and the objective remission rate was 18.9% and 6.8% in the HIFU and non-HIFU groups, respectively. The survival analysis showed that median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 12.0 months and 11.0 months for the HIFU and non-HIFU groups, respectively (p = 0.002). The univariate and multivariate analysis showed that pre-treatment colorectal cancer liver metastasis lesion size was significantly associated with mPFS. In addition, patients that received a combination treatment for CRLM lesions <5.0 cm had a longer mPFS when compared to those receiving systemic therapy alone (13.0 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.001). In the HIFU group, patients with lesions <5.0 cm had a longer mPFS than patients with lesions ≥5.0 cm (13.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.04) (Figure 3B,C). Most treatment-related adverse events observed in both groups were grade 1-2. Only four cases (6.8%) of grade 1-2 skin burns were observed in patients in the HIFU group; no other statistically significant adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that HIFU ablation targeting unresectable CRLM alongside systemic therapy safely and significantly improved local control rates and prolonged mPFS, especially for lesions smaller than 5.0 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Tang
- Department of Cancer Center, Second Affiliated HospitalChongqing Medical UniversityChongqingChina
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Qin Zhong
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Tingting Ni
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Yingbo Xue
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Jing Wu
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Rong Deng
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Xuanlu He
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| | - Zhenzhou Yang
- Department of Cancer Center, Second Affiliated HospitalChongqing Medical UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
- National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Immune‐Related DiseasesGuizhou Province People's HospitalGuiyangChina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Verheij FS, Kuhlmann KFD, Silliman DR, Soares KC, Kingham TP, Balachandran VP, Drebin JA, Wei AC, Jarnagin WR, Cercek A, Kok NFM, Kemeny NE, D'Angelica MI. Combined Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump and Systemic Chemotherapy in the Modern Era for Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7950-7959. [PMID: 37639032 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14073-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have been the best responders to hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) therapy. The current treatment paradigm has drifted away from HAI in the first-line setting. We aimed to analyze outcomes of combined first-line systemic therapy with HAI therapy (HAI+SYS) in the modern era. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable CRLM who received HAI+SYS between 2003 and 2019. Patients were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes included radiological response rate, conversion to resection (CTR) rate, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Fifty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients were identified out of 546 patients with unresectable CRLM managed with HAI. After induction treatment, 4 patients (7%) had a complete radiological response, including two durable responses. In total, 32 patients (55%) underwent CTR. CTR or complete response without resection was achieved after seven cycles of systemic therapy and four cycles of HAI therapy. Median OS for the whole cohort was 53.0 months (95% confidence interval 23.0-82.9). Three- and 5-year OS in patients who achieved CTR or complete response versus patients who did not was 88% and 72% versus 27% and 0% respectively. Of patients who underwent CTR, complete and major pathological response (no and <10% viable tumor cells, respectively) was observed in 7 (22%) and 12 patients (38%). CONCLUSIONS Combined HAI+SYS in chemotherapy-naive patients resulted in durable and substantial response in a large proportion of patients. Nearly two-thirds of patients achieved a complete response or proceeded to conversion surgery, which was associated with prolonged survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R Silliman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vinod P Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Drebin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fernández Montes A, Alonso V, Aranda E, Élez E, García Alfonso P, Grávalos C, Maurel J, Vera R, Vidal R, Aparicio J. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2718-2731. [PMID: 37133732 PMCID: PMC10425293 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Spain. Metastatic disease is present in 15-30% of patients at diagnosis and up to 20-50% of those with initially localized disease eventually develop metastases. Recent scientific knowledge acknowledges that this is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease. As treatment options increase, prognosis for individuals with metastatic disease has steadily improved over recent decades. Disease management should be discussed among experienced, multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate systemic treatment (chemotherapy and targeted agents) and to integrate surgical or ablative procedures, when indicated. Clinical presentation, tumor sidedness, molecular profile, disease extension, comorbidities, and patient preferences are key factors when designing a customized treatment plan. These guidelines seek to provide succinct recommendations for managing metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, Ourense (CHUO), C/ Ramón Puga, 56, 32005, Ourense, Spain.
| | - Vicente Alonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - Enrique Aranda
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Elena Élez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Grávalos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kimchy AV, Singh H, Parikh E, Rosenberg J, Sanghavi K, Lewis JH. The predictive value of liver tests for the presence of liver metastases. Hepat Oncol 2023; 10:HEP48. [PMID: 37885607 PMCID: PMC10599222 DOI: 10.2217/hep-2023-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To analyze the predictive value of biochemical liver tests in patients with malignant melanoma, breast, colorectal or lung cancers at the time of diagnosis of liver metastases. Methods A retrospective review of patients with the above-mentioned solid tumors at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital from 2016-2020. Results The highest optimal cutoff according to sensitivity and specificity for the presence of liver metastases was for AST ≥1.5 × ULN for melanoma, lung, and breast cancers and ≥2 × ULN for colorectal cancer, ALT ≥1.25 × ULN for melanoma, breast and colorectal cancers and ≥1.5 × ULN for lung cancer, and ALP ≥1.5 × ULN for melanoma, breast and colorectal cancers. Conclusion Using thresholds of liver enzymes above the ULN may improve the diagnostic accuracy for the presence of liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra V Kimchy
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Harjit Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Esha Parikh
- Department of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Jessica Rosenberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Kavya Sanghavi
- MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA
| | - James H Lewis
- Department of Gastroenterology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bond MJG, Kuiper BI, Bolhuis K, Komurcu A, van Amerongen MJ, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik T, Hermans JJ, de Jong KP, Klaase JM, Kok NFM, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, Neumann UP, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Kazemier G, May AM, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. Intersurgeon Variability in Local Treatment Planning for Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Analysis of the Liver Expert Panel of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5376-5385. [PMID: 37118612 PMCID: PMC10409679 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13510-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus on resectability criteria for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is lacking, resulting in differences in therapeutic strategies. This study evaluated variability of resectability assessments and local treatment plans for patients with initially unresectable CRLM by the liver expert panel from the randomised phase III CAIRO5 study. METHODS The liver panel, comprising surgeons and radiologists, evaluated resectability by predefined criteria at baseline and 2-monthly thereafter. If surgeons judged CRLM as resectable, detailed local treatment plans were provided. The panel chair determined the conclusion of resectability status and local treatment advice, and forwarded it to local surgeons. RESULTS A total of 1149 panel evaluations of 496 patients were included. Intersurgeon disagreement was observed in 50% of evaluations and was lower at baseline than follow-up (36% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). Among surgeons in general, votes for resectable CRLM at baseline and follow-up ranged between 0-12% and 27-62%, and for permanently unresectable CRLM between 3-40% and 6-47%, respectively. Surgeons proposed different local treatment plans in 77% of patients. The most pronounced intersurgeon differences concerned the advice to proceed with hemihepatectomy versus parenchymal-preserving approaches. Eighty-four percent of patients judged by the panel as having resectable CRLM indeed received local treatment. Local surgeons followed the technical plan proposed by the panel in 40% of patients. CONCLUSION Considerable variability exists among expert liver surgeons in assessing resectability and local treatment planning of initially unresectable CRLM. This stresses the value of panel-based decisions, and the need for consensus guidelines on resectability criteria and technical approach to prevent unwarranted variability in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Babette I Kuiper
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bond MJG, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. ASO Author Reflections: Towards Consensus on Resectability Assessments and Local Treatment Planning for Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5386-5387. [PMID: 37085656 PMCID: PMC10409823 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13513-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
He J, Li W, Zhou J, Sun H, Zhou C, Liu Y, Quan T, Fan W, Pan Z, Lin J, Peng J. Evaluation of total tumor volume reduction ratio in initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases after first-line systemic treatment. Eur J Radiol 2023; 165:110950. [PMID: 37437437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Total tumor volume (TTV) may play an essential role in the estimation of tumor burden. This study is aimed to investigate the clinical value of the reduction ratio of TTV as a valuable indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS A total of 240 initially unresectable CRLM patients who underwent first-line systemic treatment were enrolled in this study. TTV at baseline and at the end of first-line treatment were assessed using a three-dimensional reconstruction system according to CT or MRI images. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS A total of 212 (88.3%) patients achieved tumor regression with a median reduction ratio of TTV of 86.0%. An increasing reduction ratio of TTV was associated with a gradually ascending successful conversion outcome. Patients with a reduction ratio >86.0% had better survival than those with a reduction ratio 0-86.0% or <0 (5-year overall survival (OS) rates, 64.4% vs. 44.9% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates, 36.3% vs. 28.2% vs. 6.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the reduction ratio of TTV ≤ 86.0% (OR [95%CI]: 4.956 [2.654-9.253], P < 0.001) was an independent factor for conversion failure outcome. Cox analyses revealed that the reduction ratio of TTV ≤ 86.0% was an independent factor for both unfavorable OS (HR [95%CI]: 2.216 [1.332-3.688], P = 0.002) and PFS (HR [95%CI]: 2.023 [1.376-2.974], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The reduction ratio of TTV was an effective indicator for conversion outcome and long-term prognosis in patients with initially unresectable CRLM after first-line systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiarui He
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Weihao Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, PR China; South China Hospital, Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518116, PR China.
| | - Hui Sun
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Chi Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| | - Yujun Liu
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Tingting Quan
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, PR China.
| | - Wenhua Fan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| | - Zhizhong Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| | - Junzhong Lin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| | - Jianhong Peng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bond MJG, Bolhuis K, Loosveld OJL, de Groot JWB, Droogendijk H, Helgason HH, Hendriks MP, Klaase JM, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, Rijken AM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, de Jong KP, Gerhards MF, van Amerongen MJ, Engelbrecht MRW, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, de Valk B, Haberkorn BCM, Kerver ED, Erdkamp F, van Alphen RJ, Mathijssen-van Stein D, Komurcu A, Lopez-Yurda M, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA. First-line systemic treatment strategies in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CAIRO5): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study from the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:757-771. [PMID: 37329889 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00219-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases might qualify for local treatment with curative intent after reducing the tumour size by induction systemic treatment. We aimed to compare the currently most active induction regimens. METHODS In this open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study (CAIRO5), patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, known RAS/BRAFV600E mutation status, WHO performance status of 0-1, and initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were enrolled at 46 Dutch and one Belgian secondary and tertiary centres. Resectability or unresectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases was assessed centrally by an expert panel of liver surgeons and radiologists, at baseline and every 2 months thereafter by predefined criteria. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation technique via a masked web-based allocation procedure. Patients with right-sided primary tumour site or RAS or BRAFV600E mutated tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (group A) or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (group B). Patients with left-sided and RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (group C) or FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus panitumumab (group D), every 14 days for up to 12 cycles. Patients were stratified by resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, choice of irinotecan versus oxaliplatin, and BRAFV600E mutation status (for groups A and B). Bevacizumab was administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg. Panitumumab was administered intravenously at 6 mg/kg. FOLFIRI consisted of intravenous infusion of irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 with folinic acid at 400 mg/m2, followed by bolus fluorouracil at 400 mg/m2 intravenously, followed by continuous infusion of fluorouracil at 2400 mg/m2. FOLFOX consisted of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 intravenously together with the same schedule of folinic acid and fluorouracil as in FOLFIRI. FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan at 165 mg/m2 intravenously, followed by intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 with folinic acid at 400 mg/m2, followed by continuous infusion of fluorouracil at 3200 mg/m2. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis, excluding patients who withdrew consent before starting study treatment or violated major entry criteria (no metastatic colorectal cancer, or previous liver surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02162563, and accrual is complete. FINDINGS Between Nov 13, 2014, and Jan 31, 2022, 530 patients (327 [62%] male and 203 [38%] female; median age 62 years [IQR 54-69]) were randomly assigned: 148 (28%) patients to group A, 146 (28%) patients to group B, 118 (22%) patients to group C, and 118 (22%) patients to group D. Groups C and D were prematurely closed for futility. 521 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (147 in group A, 144 in group B, 114 in group C, and 116 in group D). The median follow-up at the time of this analysis was 51·1 months (95% CI 47·7-53·1) in groups A and B and 49·9 months (44·5-52·5) in in groups C and D. Median progression-free survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 7·7-10·5) in group A versus 10·6 months (9·9-12·1) in group B (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·60-0·98]; p=0·032), and 10·8 months (95% CI 9·9-12·6) in group C versus 10·4 months (9·8-13·0) in group D (stratified HR 1·11 [95% CI 0·84-1·48]; p=0·46). The most frequent grade 3-4 events in groups A and B were neutropenia (19 [13%] patients in group A vs 57 [40%] in group B; p<0·0001), hypertension (21 [14%] vs 20 [14%]; p=1·00), and diarrhoea (five [3%] vs 28 [19%]; p<0·0001), and in groups C and D were neutropenia (29 [25%] vs 24 [21%]; p=0·44), skin toxicity (one [1%] vs 29 [25%]; p<0·0001), hypertension (20 [18%] vs eight [7%]; p=0·016), and diarrhoea (five [4%] vs 18 [16%]; p=0·0072). Serious adverse events occurred in 46 (31%) patients in group A, 75 (52%) patients in group B, 41 (36%) patients in group C, and 49 (42%) patients in group D. Seven treatment-related deaths were reported in group B (two due to multiorgan failure, and one each due to sepsis, pneumonia, portal vein thrombosis, septic shock and liver failure, and sudden death), one in group C (multiorgan failure), and three in group D (cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, and abdominal sepsis). INTERPRETATION In patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases, FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab was the preferred treatment in patients with a right-sided or RAS or BRAFV600E mutated primary tumour. In patients with a left-sided and RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumour, the addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI showed no clinical benefit over bevacizumab, but was associated with more toxicity. FUNDING Roche and Amgen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Helga Droogendijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, Netherlands
| | - Helgi H Helgason
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Koert P de Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bart de Valk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
| | | | - Emile D Kerver
- Department of Medical Oncology, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Robbert J van Alphen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | | | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marta Lopez-Yurda
- Biometrics Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bolhuis K, Bond MJG, Van Amerongen MJ, Komurcu A, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik TM, Hermans JJ, De Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Kok NFM, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, Neumann UP, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, May AM, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. The role of tumour biological factors in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases following induction systemic treatment: An analysis of the Dutch CAIRO5 trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:49-59. [PMID: 36801606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large inter-surgeon variability exists in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) following induction systemic therapy. We evaluated the role of tumour biological factors in predicting resectability and (early) recurrence after surgery for initially unresectable CRLM. METHODS 482 patients with initially unresectable CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial were selected, with two-monthly resectability assessments by a liver expert panel. If no consensus existed among panel surgeons (i.e. same vote for (un)resectability of CRLM), conclusion was based on majority. The association of tumour biological (sidedness, synchronous CRLM, carcinoembryonic antigen and RAS/BRAFV600E mutation status) and technical anatomical factors with consensus among panel surgeons, secondary resectability and early recurrence (<6 months) without curative-intent repeat local treatment was analysed by uni- and pre-specified multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS After systemic treatment, 240 (50%) patients received complete local treatment of CRLM of which 75 (31%) patients experienced early recurrence without repeat local treatment. Higher number of CRLM (odds ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15]) and age (odds ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 1.00-1.07]) were independently associated with early recurrence without repeat local treatment. In 138 (52%) patients, no consensus among panel surgeons was present prior to local treatment. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without consensus were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Almost a third of patients selected by an expert panel for secondary CRLM surgery following induction systemic treatment experience an early recurrence only amenable to palliative treatment. Number of CRLM and age, but no tumour biological factors are predictive, suggesting that until there are better biomarkers; resectability assessment remains primarily a technical anatomical decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marinde J G Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John J Hermans
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Koert P De Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Theo M Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anne M May
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang B, Tang H, Wang N, Gu J, Wang Q. Targeted DNA demethylation of the ZNF334 promoter inhibits colorectal cancer growth. Cell Death Dis 2023; 14:210. [PMID: 36966142 PMCID: PMC10039945 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-023-05743-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Aberrant regulation of DNA methylation in promoters of tumor suppressor genes or proto-oncogenes is one of the fundamental processes driving the initiation and progression of CRC. Zinc-finger proteins (ZNFs) are one of the most abundant groups of proteins and function in many important biological processes related to tumorigenesis. Herein, we detected abnormal hypermethylation of the ZNF334 gene in CRC tissues compared with normal tissues, and this modification downregulated the expression of ZNF334. Furthermore, ten-eleven translocation 1 (TET1) was identified to be involved in regulating the methylation level of ZNF334. Next, a dCas9-multiGCN4/scFv-TET1CD-sgZNF334-targeted demethylation system was constructed to reverse the expression of ZNF334 through sgRNA targeting the ZNF334 promoter. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated the targeted demethylation system upregulated ZNF334 expression and inhibited CRC growth. Collectively, targeted DNA demethylation of the ZNF334 promoter sheds light on the precise treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Yang
- School of Pharmacy, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China
| | - Haiyu Tang
- School of Pharmacy, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China
| | - Nan Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China
| | - Jian Gu
- School of Pharmacy, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China
| | - Qin Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610225, Sichuan, China.
- BMI Center for Biomass Materials and Nanointerfaces, College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wensink GE, Bolhuis K, Elferink MAG, Fijneman RJA, Kranenburg O, Borel Rinkes IHM, Koopman M, Swijnenburg RJ, Vink GR, Hagendoorn J, Punt CJA, Roodhart JML, Elias SG. Predicting early extrahepatic recurrence after local treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2023; 110:362-371. [PMID: 36655278 PMCID: PMC10364507 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who develop early extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) may not benefit from local treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to develop a prediction model for early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs using a national data set. METHODS A Cox regression prediction model for EHR was developed and validated internally using data on patients who had local treatment for CRLMs with curative intent. Performance assessment included calibration, discrimination, net benefit, and generalizability by internal-external cross-validation. The prognostic relevance of early EHR (within 6 months) was evaluated by landmark analysis. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 35 months, 557 of the 1077 patients had EHR and 249 died. Median overall survival was 19.5 (95 per cent c.i. 15.6 to 23.0) months in patients with early EHR after CRLM treatment, compared with not reached (45.3 months to not reached) in patients without an early EHR. The EHR prediction model included side and stage of the primary tumour, RAS/BRAFV600E mutational status, and number and size of CRLMs. The range of 6-month EHR predictions was 5.9-56.0 (i.q.r. 12.9-22.0) per cent. The model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination. The C-index through 6 and 12 months was 0.663 (95 per cent c.i. 0.624 to 0.702) and 0.661 (0.632 to 0.689) respectively. The observed 6-month EHR risk was 6.5 per cent for patients in the lowest quartile of predicted risk compared with 32.0 per cent in the highest quartile. CONCLUSION Early EHR after local treatment of CRLMs can be predicted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G E Wensink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Onno Kranenburg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Impact of Preoperative Chemotherapy Features on Patient Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A LiverMetSurvey Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174340. [PMID: 36077874 PMCID: PMC9454829 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prognostic factors have been extensively reported after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, specific analyses of the impact of preoperative systemic anticancer therapy (PO-SACT) features on outcomes is lacking. Methods: For this real-world evidence study, we used prospectively collected data within the international surgical LiverMetSurvey database from all patients with initially-irresectable CLM. The main outcome was Overall Survival (OS) after surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and hepatic-specific relapse-free survival (HS-RFS) were secondary outcomes. PO-SACT features included duration (cumulative number of cycles), choice of the cytotoxic backbone (oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based), fluoropyrimidine (infusional or oral) and addition or not of targeted monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF). Results: A total of 2793 patients in the database had received PO-SACT for initially irresectable diseases. Short (<7 or <13 cycles in 1st or 2nd line) PO-SACT duration was independently associated with longer OS (HR: 0.85 p = 0.046), DFS (HR: 0.81; p = 0.016) and HS-RFS (HR: 0.80; p = 0.05). All other PO-SACT features yielded basically comparable results. Conclusions: In this international cohort, provided that PO-SACT allowed conversion to resectability in initially irresectable CLM, surgery performed as soon as technically feasible resulted in the best outcomes. When resection was achieved, our findings indicate that the choice of PO-SACT regimen had a marginal if any, impact on outcomes.
Collapse
|
26
|
Huang Y, Bao Y, Xu D, Liu L. Gingival metastasis from primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221113408. [PMID: 35883281 PMCID: PMC9340352 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221113408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide;
however, cases with metastasis to the oral cavity are extremely rare. Herein, we report a
68-year-old man who was diagnosed with HCC. Ten months after surgical removal of the right
half of his liver, the patient developed gingival metastasis. Unfortunately, the patient
died 4 months after the diagnosis. We discuss treatment options, pathological results, and
disease prognosis. When a mandibular gingival mass is found, metastatic tumors should be
considered in the differential diagnosis. In this regard, the patient’s medical history
and physical examination are valuable indicators for the diagnosis of mandibular gingival
metastasis. This case provides a basis for the clinical diagnosis of metastatic HCC
involving the oral cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yanbian University Hospital, Jilin, China
| | - Yanqiu Bao
- Department of Pathology, Yanbian University Hospital, Jilin, China
| | - Dongyuan Xu
- Department of Pathology, Yanbian University Hospital, Jilin, China
| | - Lan Liu
- Department of Pathology, Yanbian University Hospital, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tautenhahn HM, Nickel S, Kindler EM, Settmacher U. [Multimodal therapy for liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma in curative intention]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 93:652-658. [PMID: 35771270 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01665-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Depending on the patient's constitution, the biological conditions of the primary tumor, the metastases and the liver function and perfusion, a variety of therapeutic options are available. The basis of metastatic surgery of the liver is partial liver resection. Multimodal therapies with local and systemic approaches are used in functionally or oncologically borderline situations. They are intended to improve long-term success and allow curative treatment in more patients. In recent years, for isolated lesions that cannot be removed by partial liver resection, an R0 situation is achieved in selected patients by liver transplantation with good long-term success. The large number of treatment options and the increasing individualization of therapy require treatment planning in the interdisciplinary tumor board. Also, in view of promising studies, for example, in the field of liver transplantation as well as regional therapy methods, the range of treatment options has not yet been exhausted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Michael Tautenhahn
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.
| | - Sandra Nickel
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Eva Maria Kindler
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
- Else Kröner Graduate School for Medical Students "JSAM", Jena University Hospital, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bolhuis K, Wensink GE, Elferink MAG, Bond MJG, Dijksterhuis WPM, Fijneman RJA, Kranenburg OW, Rinkes IHMB, Koopman M, Swijnenburg RJ, Vink GR, Hagendoorn J, Punt CJA, Elias SG, Roodhart JML. External Validation of Two Established Clinical Risk Scores Predicting Outcome after Local Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases in a Nationwide Cohort. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2356. [PMID: 35625968 PMCID: PMC9139295 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimized surgical techniques and systemic therapy have increased the number of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) eligible for local treatment. To increase postoperative survival, we need to stratify patients to customize therapy. Most clinical risk scores (CRSs) which predict prognosis after CRLM resection were based on the outcome of studies in specialized centers, and this may hamper the generalizability of these CRSs in unselected populations and underrepresented subgroups. We aimed to externally validate two CRSs in a population-based cohort of patients with CRLM. A total of 1105 patients with local treatment of CRLM, diagnosed in 2015/2016, were included from a nationwide population-based database. Survival outcomes were analyzed. The Fong and more recently developed GAME CRS were externally validated, including in pre-specified subgroups (≤70/>70 years and with/without perioperative systemic therapy). The three-year DFS was 22.8%, and the median OS in the GAME risk groups (high/moderate/low) was 32.4, 46.7, and 68.1 months, respectively (p < 0.005). The median OS for patients with versus without perioperative therapy was 47.6 (95%CI [39.8, 56.2]) and 54.9 months (95%CI [48.8, 63.7]), respectively (p = 0.152), and for below/above 70 years, it was 54.9 (95%CI [49.3−64.1]) and 44.2 months (95%CI [37.1−54.3]), respectively (p < 0.005). The discriminative ability for OS of Fong CRS was 0.577 (95%CI [0.554, 0.601]), and for GAME, it was 0.596 (95%CI [0.572, 0.621]), and was comparable in the subgroups. In conclusion, both CRSs showed predictive ability in a population-based cohort and in predefined subgroups. However, the limited discriminative ability of these CRSs results in insufficient preoperative risk stratification for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (K.B.); (W.P.M.D.)
| | - G. Emerens Wensink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (G.E.W.); (M.K.); (G.R.V.); (S.G.E.)
| | - Marloes A. G. Elferink
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Marinde J. G. Bond
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.J.G.B.); (C.J.A.P.)
| | - Willemieke P. M. Dijksterhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (K.B.); (W.P.M.D.)
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Remond J. A. Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Onno W. Kranenburg
- Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.H.M.B.R.); (J.H.)
| | - Inne H. M. Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.H.M.B.R.); (J.H.)
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (G.E.W.); (M.K.); (G.R.V.); (S.G.E.)
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Geraldine R. Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (G.E.W.); (M.K.); (G.R.V.); (S.G.E.)
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.H.M.B.R.); (J.H.)
| | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.J.G.B.); (C.J.A.P.)
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (G.E.W.); (M.K.); (G.R.V.); (S.G.E.)
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.J.G.B.); (C.J.A.P.)
| | - Jeanine M. L. Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands; (G.E.W.); (M.K.); (G.R.V.); (S.G.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liang Y, Xu Y, Tong Y, Chen Y, Chen X, Wu S. Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Markers. Front Chem 2022; 10:883627. [PMID: 35464224 PMCID: PMC9024117 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.883627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a group of highly lethal malignant tumors that seriously threaten human health. The main way to improve the survival quality and reduce the mortality of HCC is early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, it will be of great significance to explore new quantitative detection methods for HCC markers. With the rapid development of electrochemical biosensors and nanomaterials, electrochemical sensors based on graphene can detect tumor markers, with the advantages of simple operation, high detection sensitivity, and specificity. Combined with the published literature in recent years, the article briefly reviews the application of graphene-based electrochemical biosensors in the detection of HCC markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Golgi protein-73 (GP73), exosomes, and microRNA-122 (miR-122).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Liang
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuan Xu
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, Wuhan Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Yaoyao Tong
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Xilu Chen
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Shimin Wu
- Center for Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan Brain Hospital, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Shimin Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR, Hawkins AT, Langenfeld SJ, Shaffer VO, Thorsen AJ, Weiser MR, Chang GJ, Lightner AL, Feingold DL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:148-177. [PMID: 34775402 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amy J Thorsen
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wesdorp NJ, Bolhuis K, Roor J, van Waesberghe JHTM, van Dieren S, van Amerongen MJ, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, Grunhagen D, van Gulik TM, Hermans JJ, de Jong KP, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Kazemier G. The Prognostic Value of Total Tumor Volume Response Compared With RECIST1.1 in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Systemic Treatment. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e103. [PMID: 37637880 PMCID: PMC10455281 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Compare total tumor volume (TTV) response after systemic treatment to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and assess the prognostic value of TTV change and RECIST1.1 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM). Background RECIST1.1 provides unidimensional criteria to evaluate tumor response to systemic therapy. Those criteria are accepted worldwide but are limited by interobserver variability and ignore potentially valuable information about TTV. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM receiving systemic treatment from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. TTV response was assessed using software specifically developed together with SAS analytics. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to calculate RECIST1.1 and TTV response to systemic therapy. Different thresholds (10%, 20%, 40%) were used to define response of TTV as no standard currently exists. RFS was assessed in a subgroup of patients with secondarily resectable CRLM after induction treatment. Results A total of 420 CT scans comprising 7820 CRLM in 210 patients were evaluated. In 30% to 50% (depending on chosen TTV threshold) of patients, discordance was observed between RECIST1.1 and TTV change. A TTV decrease of >40% was observed in 47 (22%) patients who had stable disease according to RECIST1.1. In 118 patients with secondarily resectable CRLM, RFS was shorter for patients with less than 10% TTV decrease compared with patients with more than 10% TTV decrease (P = 0.015), while RECIST1.1 was not prognostic (P = 0.821). Conclusions TTV response assessment shows prognostic potential in the evaluation of systemic therapy response in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina J. Wesdorp
- From the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joran Roor
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Hein T. M. van Waesberghe
- Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. van Amerongen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc R. W. Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael F. Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John J. Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Koert P. de Jong
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P. van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A. Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H. W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Huiskens
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- From the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bolhuis K, Grosheide L, Wesdorp NJ, Komurcu A, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik TM, Huiskens J, De Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. Short-Term Outcomes of Secondary Liver Surgery for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Modern Induction Systemic Therapy in the Dutch CAIRO5 Trial. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e081. [PMID: 37635815 PMCID: PMC10455233 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To present short-term outcomes of liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy plus targeted agents. Background The increase of complex hepatic resections of CRLM, technical innovations pushing boundaries of respectability, and use of intensified induction systemic regimens warrant for safety data in a homogeneous multicenter prospective cohort. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM, who underwent complete resection after induction systemic regimens with doublet or triplet chemotherapy, both plus targeted therapy, were selected from the ongoing phase III CAIRO5 study (NCT02162563). Short-term outcomes and risk factors for severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien Dindo grade ≥ 3) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 173 patients underwent resection of CRLM after induction systemic therapy. The median number of metastases was 9 and 161 (93%) patients had bilobar disease. Thirty-six (20.8%) 2-stage resections and 88 (51%) major resections (>3 liver segments) were performed. Severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality was 15.6% and 2.9%, respectively. After multivariable analysis, blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4], P = 0.03), major resection (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03), and triplet chemotherapy (OR 2.6 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03) were independently correlated with severe postoperative complications. No association was found between number of cycles of systemic therapy and severe complications (r = -0.038, P = 0.31). Conclusion In patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing modern induction systemic therapy and extensive liver surgery, severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were 15.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Triplet chemotherapy, blood transfusion, and major resections were associated with severe postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodi Grosheide
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina J. Wesdorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koert P. De Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Department of Epidemiology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bolhuis K, van 't Erve I, Mijnals C, Delis-Van Diemen PM, Huiskens J, Komurcu A, Lopez-Yurda M, van den Broek D, Swijnenburg RJ, Meijer GA, Punt CJA, Fijneman RJA. Postoperative circulating tumour DNA is associated with pathologic response and recurrence-free survival after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. EBioMedicine 2021; 70:103498. [PMID: 34333237 PMCID: PMC8340125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrence rates after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) are high and correlate with worse survival. Postoperative circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker. Focusing on patients with resected CRLM, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the detection of postoperative ctDNA, pathologic response and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Methods Twenty-three patients were selected from an ongoing phase-3 trial who underwent resection of RAS-mutant CRLM after induction systemic treatment. CtDNA analysis was performed by droplet digital PCR using blood samples collected at baseline, before and after resection. Pathologic response of CRLM was determined via the Tumour Regression Grading system. Findings With a median follow-up of 19.6 months, the median RFS for patients with detectable (N = 6, [26%]) and undetectable (N = 17, [74%]) postoperative ctDNA was 4.8 versus 12.1 months, respectively. Among 21 patients with available tumour tissue, pathologic response in patients with detectable compared to undetectable postoperative ctDNA was found in one of six (17%) and 15 of 15 (100%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In univariable Cox regression analyses both postoperative detectable ctDNA (HR = 3.3, 95%CI = 1.1–9.6, p = 0.03) and pathologic non-response (HR = 4.6, 95%CI = 1.4–15, p = 0.01) were associated with poorer RFS and were strongly correlated (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). After adjusting for clinical characteristics in pairwise multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status remained associated with RFS. Interpretation The detection of postoperative ctDNA after secondary resection of CRLM is a promising prognostic factor for RFS and appeared to be highly correlated with pathologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris van 't Erve
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Clinton Mijnals
- Department of Pathology, Amphia hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Pien M Delis-Van Diemen
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | | | - Aysun Komurcu
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Lopez-Yurda
- Biometrics Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases.
Collapse
|
35
|
Wesdorp NJ, van Goor VJ, Kemna R, Jansma EP, van Waesberghe JHTM, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Kazemier G. Advanced image analytics predicting clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the literature. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101578. [PMID: 33866191 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To better select patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) for an optimal selection of treatment strategy (i.e. local, systemic or combined treatment) new prognostic models are warranted. In the last decade, radiomics has emerged as a field to create predictive models based on imaging features. This systematic review aims to investigate the current state and potential of radiomics to predict clinical outcomes in patients with CRLM. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, according to PRISMA guidelines. Original studies reporting on radiomics predicting clinical outcome in patients diagnosed with CRLM were included. Clinical outcomes were defined as response to systemic treatment, recurrence of disease, and survival (overall, progression-free, disease-free). Primary outcome was the predictive performance of radiomics. A narrative synthesis of the results was made. Methodological quality was assessed using the radiomics quality score. RESULTS In 11 out of 14 included studies, radiomics was predictive for response to treatment, recurrence of disease, survival, or a combination of outcomes. Combining clinical parameters and radiomic features in multivariate modelling often improved the predictive performance. Different types of individual features were found prognostic. Noticeable were the contrary levels of heterogeneous and homogeneous features in patients with good response. The methodological quality as assessed by the radiomics quality score varied considerably between studies. CONCLUSION Radiomics appears a promising non-invasive method to predict clinical outcome and improve personalized decision-making in patients with CRLM. However, results were contradictory and difficult to compare. Standardized prospective studies are warranted to establish the added value of radiomics in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Wesdorp
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - V J van Goor
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - R Kemna
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - E P Jansma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - J H T M van Waesberghe
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - R J Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - C J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Epidemiology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J Huiskens
- SAS Institute B.V., Flevolaan 69, Huizen, the Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Villard C, Habib M, Nordenvall C, Nilsson PJ, Jorns C, Sparrelid E. Conversion therapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2038-2045. [PMID: 33640172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) impairs prognosis, yet long-term survival can be achieved by enabling liver resection. This study aims to describe factors associated with conversion therapy leading to liver surgery and treatment outcome. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with CRLM discussed at multidisciplinary team conference at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2013 to 2018. Factors associated with conversion therapy and outcome following conversion therapy were analysed with logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS Out of 1023 patients with CRLM, 100 patients (10%) received conversion chemotherapy, out of whom 31 patients (31%) subsequently underwent liver resection. Patients in whom conversion chemotherapy resulted in liver resection were younger (median age 61 vs. 66 years, p = .024), less likely to have a KRAS/NRAS-mutated primary tumours (25% vs. 53%, p = .039) and more likely to have received anti-EGFR agents (32% vs. 4%, p = .001) than patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy. The median OS for patients treated with conversion chemotherapy leading to liver resection was 24 months, compared to 14 months for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy, p < .001. The OS for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy was similar to patients given palliative chemotherapy, approximately 13 months. CONCLUSION Conversion therapy offers a survival benefit in selected patients. Despite treatment advances, the majority of patients undergoing conversion chemotherapy never become eligible for curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Villard
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Habib
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Equipe Recherche, Chronothérapie, Cancers et Transplantation, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Jorns
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|