Interleukin-6 blockade for prophylaxis and management of immune-related adverse events in cancer immunotherapy

Dermatologic toxicities related to cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, offering significant survival superiority for advanced malignancies. However, immunotherapy is associated with various immune-related adverse events, one of the most common of them being dermatologic toxicities. Previous studies have reported dermatologic adverse events in almost half of the cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. The spectrum of dermatologic toxicities ranges from mild, self-limiting reactions to severe, life-threatening conditions, and includes maculopapular rash, pruritus, vitiligo-like depigmentation, psoriasiform eruption, lichenoid eruption, bullae, photosensitivity, hair loss, nail changes, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The management strategies are based on personalized treatment plans, multidisciplinary approaches, and timely therapeutic interventions aimed at addressing dermatologic toxicities while preserving immunotherapy efficacy. Based on the latest findings, this paper offers a novel perspective and provides an evidence-based review of the pathogenesis, manifestations, incidence, grading, clinical management, and prognostic significance of these toxicities, underlining the importance of balancing the efficacy of immunotherapy with timely and proactive management of their dermatological toxicities to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

Harm-Benefit Balance of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

The benefits and harms of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for lung cancer vary across groups, including those typically underrepresented in randomized clinical trials.

Objective

To quantify the harms and benefits of ICI-containing regimens in individuals with non-small cell lung cancer and assess heterogeneity across priority subgroups.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study conducted in 2024 used 2013 to 2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare data of individuals 66 years or older with non-small cell lung cancer who were exposed to any ICI.

Exposures

ICI + chemotherapy, single ICI (reference group).

Main Outcomes

Severe immune-related adverse events (irAE; harm) and mortality (when delayed mortality was the benefit). Severe irAEs were defined using validated diagnosis and medication codes. Mortality was ascertained from Medicare data. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated and 95% CIs were stratified by whether an ICI was used as the first or second or later systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) and in subgroups defined by preexisting autoimmune disease, sex, and age. The harm-benefit tradeoff was described as excess severe irAEs per year of life gained in which the gain in survival time was assessed using restricted mean survival time.

Results

Of 17 681 Medicare beneficiaries, 8797 (49.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 74 (6.0) years. Compared with a single ICI (14 249 [80.6%]), individuals treated with ICI + chemotherapy (3432 [19.4%]) had an elevated risk of severe irAE in the first SACT setting (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30) but not in the second or later SACT setting (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.19); there was a decreased risk of mortality in the first SACT setting (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.72) but not in the second or later SACT setting (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.68-1.03). In the first SACT setting, ICI + chemotherapy delayed mortality more among patients with (vs without) autoimmune disease at baseline. For each 1 year of life gained, the risk of severe irAEs was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.09-0.53) and the tradeoff was also statistically significant in men and patients without autoimmune disease.

Conclusions

The results of this cohort study suggest that given both treatment-related harms and benefits, ICI + chemotherapy use in the first SACT setting requires informed decision-making; the potential benefits of ICI + chemotherapy vs single ICI in high-risk subgroups is encouraging.

The Current and Future of Biomarkers of Immune Related Adverse Events

With their groundbreaking clinical responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have ushered in a new chapter in cancer therapeutics. However, they are often associated with life-threatening or organ-threatening autoimmune/autoinflammatory phenomena, collectively termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this review, we will first describe the mechanisms of action of ICIs as well as irAEs. Next, we will review biomarkers for predicting the development of irAEs or stratifying risks.

Navigating Stomatologic Complications Secondary to Antineoplastic Agents-A Comprehensive Review

This review systematically examines the oral complications associated with conventional and novel anti-cancer therapies. It highlights that while molecularly targeted agents including monoclonal antibodies targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, the epidermal growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors tend to exhibit a lower overall toxicity profile compared to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, they are nonetheless linked to significant oral adverse events. These complications encompass inflammatory mucosal reactions known as mucositis, salivary gland dysfunction leading to a sensation of dryness in the mouth, taste alterations referred to as dysgeusia, and, critically, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. In particular, bone-modifying agents such as bisphosphonates and denosumab disrupt bone remodeling and the formation of new blood vessels, thereby increasing the susceptibility to osteonecrosis of the jaw, especially following invasive dental procedures. The review delineates the multifactorial pathogenesis underlying these toxicities, which involves direct cell toxicity, impaired wound healing, and secondary infections. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of pre-treatment dental evaluation and preventive strategies including patient education, prophylactic dental care, and the integration of adjunctive therapies such as laser therapy and autologous platelet concentrates to mitigate these adverse effects. The analysis advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists and dental professionals to optimize management protocols, enhance treatment adherence, and ultimately improve the quality of life for oncology patients undergoing anti-cancer therapy.

Prediction, prevention, and precision treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor neurological toxicity using autoantibodies, cytokines, and microbiota

Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized oncology, significantly improving survival across multiple cancer types. ICIs, such as anti-PD-1 (e.g. nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (e.g. atezolizumab, avelumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (e.g. ipilimumab), enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses but can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurological irAEs (n-irAEs), affecting 1-3% of patients, predominantly involve the peripheral nervous system; less commonly, n-irAEs can present as central nervous system disorders. Although irAEs suggest a possible correlation with treatment efficacy, their mechanisms remain unclear, with hypotheses ranging from antigen mimicry to cytokine dysregulation and microbiome alterations. Identifying patients at risk for n-irAEs and predicting their outcome through biomarkers would be highly desirable. For example, patients with high-risk onconeural antibodies (such as anti-Hu or Ma2), and elevated neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels often respond poorly to irAE treatment. However, interpreting neuronal antibody tests in the diagnosis of n-irAEs requires caution: positive results must align with the clinical context, as some cancer patients (e.g., SCLC) may have asymptomatic low antibody levels, and false positive results are common without tissue-based confirmation. Also, the use of biomarkers (e.g. IL-6) may lead to more targeted treatments of irAEs, minimizing adverse effects without compromising the anti-tumor efficacy of ICIs. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest findings on n-irAEs associated with ICIs, with a focus on their prediction, prevention, as well as precision treatment using autoantibodies, cytokines, and microbiota. The most interesting data concern neuronal antibodies, which we explore in their pathogenic roles and as biomarkers of neurotoxicity. Most of the available data on cytokines, both regarding their role as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and their role in supporting therapeutic decisions for toxicities, refer to non-neurological toxicities. However, in our review, we mention the potential role of CXCL10 and CXCL13 as biomarkers of n-irAEs and describe the current evidence, as well as the need for further studies, on the use of cytokines in guiding selection of second-line therapies for n-irAEs. Finally, no specific microbiome-related microbial signature has been proven to be linked to n-irAEs specifically, leading to the need of more future research on the topic.

Immune-mediated colitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to improved outcome in patients with various types of cancer. Due to inhibition of physiological anti-inflammatory mechanisms, patients treated with ICIs may develop autoimmune inflammation of the colon, associated with morbidity, decreased quality of life (QoL), and mortality. In this review, we summarize clinical and pathophysiological aspects of immune-mediated colitis (ImC), highlighting novel treatment options. In the colon, ICIs trigger resident and circulating T cell activation and infiltration of myeloid cells. In addition, the gut microbiota critically contribute to intestinal immune dysregulation and loss of barrier function, thereby propagating local and systemic inflammation. Currently available therapies for ImC include corticosteroids, antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)- and anti-integrin α4β7 antibodies. Given that systemic immunosuppression might impair antitumor immune responses, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed.

Prognostic Biomarkers in Evolving Melanoma Immunotherapy

Melanoma, a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, has seen significant advancements in treatment through the introduction of immunotherapy. However, the variability in patient responses underscores the need for reliable biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. This article reviews key biomarkers in melanoma immunotherapy, such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and gene expression profiles (GEPs). It also explores emerging biomarkers, including LAG-3 expression, immune cell phenotyping in tissue and blood, gut microbiota, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Notably, ctDNA may offer valuable insights into the efficacy of T cell-engaging bispecific molecules, such as tebentafusp. The review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of melanoma biomarkers, their role in personalizing treatment, and future research directions, including neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition.

Expert Clinical Management of Inflammatory Immune-Related Arthritis in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Treatment guidelines for immune-related inflammatory arthritis (irAE-IA) in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are vague with respect to the use of specific agents. Patients are usually referred to rheumatologists for treatment. We conducted a survey of expert rheumatologists to determine current practices. We also assessed experts' views on the potential deleterious effects of various agents on tumor progression.

Methods

We conducted a survey of international experts in the treatment of irAE-IA, identified as members of collaborative scientific workgroups in this area. Experts were presented with a case of a patient with moderate irAE-IA and were asked about their preferred management including glucocorticoids, timing and initial choice of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and perception of the deleterious effects of different agents on tumor progression.

Results

We approached 25 experts, of whom 19 (76%) responded. Most experts (63%) agreed on 20 mg or less of prednisone as initial dose. Experts selected methotrexate (41%) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (23%) as the initial DMARD if there was no improvement with corticosteroids; most experts (42%) would initiate DMARDs after 4 weeks. For patients whose initial DMARD therapy failed, the second choice was either a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (38%) or interleukin-6 receptor antagonist (IL6ri) (33%). Experts were most concerned about the potential deleterious effects on tumor progression of abatacept and prednisone at doses of 20 mg or higher.

Conclusion

There was substantial heterogeneity in the initial management of irAE-IA. Further understanding of the pathophysiology of this immunotoxicity can assist in the classification of different presentations, selection of relevant outcomes, and planning of clinical trials to establish optimal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing potential deleterious effects of treatment on immune tumor responses.

Immune-Mediated Liver Injury From Checkpoint Inhibitor: An Evolving Frontier With Emerging Challenges

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of cancer, though they come with the risk of immune-related adverse (irAEs) events such as hepatotoxicity or Immune-mediated Liver Injury from Checkpoint Inhibitors (ILICI). ILICI is a serious irAE that, when severe, requires cessation of ICI and initiation of immunosuppression. Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTLs) play a central role in ILICI; however, they are just part of the picture as immunotherapy broadly impacts all aspects of the immune microenvironment and can directly and indirectly activate innate and adaptive immune cells. Clinically, as our understanding of this entity grows, we encounter new challenges. The presentation of ILICI is heterogeneous with respect to latency, pattern of injury (hepatitis vs. cholangitis) and severity. This review focuses on our knowledge regarding risk factors, presentation and treatment of ILICI including ILICI refractory to steroids. An emerging topic, the possibility of rechallenge while accepting some risk, in patients who experience ILICI but require immunotherapy, is also discussed. This review provides an update on the current knowns and unknowns in ILICI and highlights several knowledge gaps where studies are needed.

Targeting molecular pathways to control immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment but are frequently associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This article offers a novel synthesis of findings from both preclinical and clinical studies, focusing on the molecular mechanisms driving irAEs across diverse organ systems. It examines key immune cells, such as T cell subsets and myeloid cells, which are instrumental in irAE pathogenesis, alongside an in-depth analysis of cytokine signaling [interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17, IL-4), interferon γ (IFN-γ), IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)], integrin-mediated interactions [integrin subunits αITGA)4 and ITGB7], and microbiome-related factors that contribute to irAE pathology. This exploration of modifiable pathways uncovers new opportunities to mitigate irAEs by using available antibodies (Abs) that target key inflammatory molecules across tumor types, while ideally preserving the antitumor efficacy of ICIs.

Impact of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents on tumor outcome in the context of cancer immunotherapy with highlight on melanoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

The impact of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents (SSIAs) for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on tumor outcome is not well-known. This systematic review evaluates tumor outcomes for corticosteroid (CS) monotherapy versus CS with SSIA (CS-SSIA) for irAE treatment with a focus on melanoma.

Methods

Search was conducted through 1/5/23 using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We included case series, retrospective/prospective observational studies and interventional clinical trials. Individual-level data was analyzed using KM curves and Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Time to SSIA was treated as a time-varying exposure using landmark analysis (landmark timepoint=3 months after irAE) to account for immortal time bias. For group-level data, meta-analysis compared the use of SSIA to No SSIA for irAEs.

Results

Of twenty-two publications with individual-level data, 147 patients with any cancer (57 CS, 90 CS-SSIA) and 65 with melanoma (18 CS, 47 CS-SSIA) underwent landmark analysis. Twenty-two publications underwent group-level evaluation and four were included in the meta-analysis. CS-SSIA versus CS showed higher risk of all-cause mortality and progression (HR 2.75, 95%CI: 1.44-5.27, p<0.01 and HR 1.75, 95%CI: 1.07-2.85, p=0.03, respectively). Melanoma showed worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus CS (HR 5.68, 95%CI: 1.31-24.67, p=0.02 and HR 2.68, 95%CI: 1.12-6.40, p=0.03, respectively). In the meta-analysis of group-level data (n=2558), we found worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus No SSIA (HR 1.58, 95%CI: 1.25; 2.01, p<0.01 and 1.70, 95%CI: 1.25-2.33, p<0.01). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) were the most common SSIA. In the melanoma cohort, TNFi had worse OS and PFS versus CS (HR 6.46, 95%CI: 1.43-29.19, p = 0.02 and HR 7.49, 95%CI: 2.29-24.48, p<0.01, respectively). TNFi versus Other SSIAs showed a trend toward worse OS and worse PFS (HR 6.96, 95%CI: 0.90-53.65, p=0.06 and HR 21.5, 95%CI: 2.63-175.8, p<0.01, respectively). Meta-analysis showed a concern for TNFi compared to Other SSIA (HR 1.56, 95%CI: 1.17-2.09, p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusions

While our results raise concern about the effects of CS-SSIA and TNFi for irAE therapy on tumor outcomes, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively assess the effect of SSIAs on tumor outcomes.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myopathy: The Double-Edged Sword of Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of several malignancies, with improved survival. These monoclonal antibodies target immune checkpoints, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (ipilimumab and tremelimumab), programmed death 1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and dostarlimab), programmed death ligand 1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (relatlimab), and effectively augment the immune response against tumor cells. Releasing the brakes on the immune system has consequences, however, in the form of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect any organ. Neurologic irAEs represent 1%-3% of all irAEs, with immune-mediated myopathy (ICI myopathy) being the most common manifestation. Recent large patient series and systematic reviews have established the key features and highlighted new insights into ICI myopathy. ICI myopathy is characterized by an acute or subacute onset of oculobulbar and/or proximal limb weakness, with or without associated respiratory insufficiency and myocarditis. Creatine kinase elevation is common. Oculobulbar presentations with or without respiratory failure may be misattributed to neuromuscular junction disorders, particularly because acetylcholine receptor antibodies are present in up to 40% of patients; however, an electrodiagnostic evidence of a defect of neuromuscular transmission is often absent even in patients with severe weakness, highlighting that the myopathic process is the driving force behind these presentations. Muscle histopathology commonly demonstrates a unique signature of multifocal clusters of necrotic and regenerating fibers, differentiating ICI myopathy from other autoimmune myopathies. Transcriptomic analysis has uncovered distinct subgroups within ICI myopathy, revealing varying degrees of type 1 and type 2 interferon pathway activation alongside notable upregulation of the interleukin (IL)-6 pathway in affected muscle tissue. This discovery presents a promising avenue for intervention through the use of therapies that suppress the interferon pathway and target IL-6 or its receptor. Despite clinical improvements with immunomodulatory therapy, with corticosteroids the mainstay of treatment, mortality remains high, particularly in those with associated myocarditis or respiratory failure requiring intubation, where mortality occurs in up to 50%. ICI withdrawal can lead to cancer progression and death, highlighting a need for improved approaches to ICI rechallenge, performed in limited patients with variable success to date.

Factors inducing cutaneous adverse reactions in cancer patients treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors: a machine-learning algorithm approach

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise in cancer treatment but can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), notably affecting the skin. Understanding the factors behind these skin reactions is crucial for effective management during treatment. Hence, the aim of this study was to uncover associations between patient characteristics and cutaneous adverse reactions among cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment.

METHODS

The study involved 209 cancer patients receiving ICIs. Statistical methods, including the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariable logistic regression, were employed to analyze variables such as hypertension, antihistamine use, cancer metastasis, diabetes, and opioid usage. Additionally, machine learning techniques, including logistic regression, elastic net, random forest, and support vector machines (SVM), were utilized to develop predictive models anticipating skin-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Results highlighted significant associations between specific patient attributes and the incidence of skin reactions post-ICI treatment. Notably, patients using antihistamines or with cancer metastasis exhibited higher rates of skin adverse reactions, while those with diabetes or using opioids displayed lower incidence rates. Robust performance in forecasting these adverse events was observed, particularly in the predictive models employing logistic regression and elastic net.

CONCLUSIONS

This pioneering study contributes crucial insights into predictive modeling for ICI-induced skin reactions, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment strategies. By identifying risk factors and utilizing tailored predictive models, healthcare providers can proactively manage adverse events, optimizing the benefits of ICIs while mitigating potential side effects.

Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for immune-related adverse events: Interim analysis of a prospective two-arm study

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced steroid-refractory (sr) and steroid-dependent (sd) immune-related adverse events (irAE) account for about 11 % of irAE. Although these patients face worse outcomes due to irAE mortality and/or sustained immunosuppression, which impairs anti-tumor response, there is no established second-line treatment based on prospective trial data.

METHODS

This prospective comparative study investigates outcomes of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulating therapy, versus second-line immunosuppressants (SLI) in sr/sd-irAE. The primary endpoint was longitudinal change in immunophenotype; secondary endpoints were outcome of irAE and tumor response. Patient demographics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30; global health status (GHS/QoL)) and longitudinal blood samples were analyzed at baseline; in weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12.

RESULTS

At interim analysis, 21 patients (11 ECP, 10 SLI) with 7 different sr/sd-irAE were included. Compared with the SLI group, the ECP group demonstrated a higher clinical response rate of irAE (93 % vs. 80 %; 95 % CI 0.83-1.92; P = 0.54) and a better GHS/QoL score throughout all follow-up visits. ECP patients showed a numerically higher overall survival (23 vs. 12 months; 95 % CI 0.02-3.02; P = 0.27) and lower cancer progression rates (33 % vs. 67 %; 95 % CI 0.09-1.60; P = 0.52). Immunophenotyping revealed changes in immune cell populations and the regulation of immune checkpoints. There were no significant safety issues in either treatment group.

CONCLUSION

This prospective comparative study supports the clinical efficacy of ECP in the treatment of sr/sd-irAE in comparison to the SLI cohort. Thus, ECP represents a potential treatment option for this indication, given its good safety profile while maintaining anti-tumor response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05700565, https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05700565.

A targetable type III immune response with increase of IL-17A expressing CD4+ T cells is associated with immunotherapy-induced toxicity in melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are standard-of-care for the treatment of advanced melanoma, but their use is limited by immune-related adverse events. Proteomic analyses and multiplex cytokine and chemokine assays from serum at baseline and at the adverse event onset indicated aberrant T cell activity with differential expression of type I and III immune signatures. This was in line with the finding of an increase in the proportion of CD4+ T cells with IL-17A expression at the adverse event onset in the peripheral blood using flow cytometry. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and spatial transcriptomics on immunotherapy-induced skin rash and colitis showed an increase in the proportion of CD4+ T cells with IL-17A expression. Anti-IL-17A was administered in two patients with mild myocarditis, colitis and skin rash with resolution of the adverse events. This study highlights the potential role of type III CD4+ T cells in adverse event development and provides proof-of-principle evidence for a clinical trial using anti-IL-17A for treating adverse events.

Unravelling the Acute, Chronic and Steroid-Refractory Management of High-Grade Neurological Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Call to Action

Rare side effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are known as neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). Typically, n-irAEs affect the peripheral nervous system, primarily presenting as myositis, polyradiculoneuropathy, or cranial neuropathy. Less commonly, they impact the central nervous system, resulting in encephalitis, meningitis, or myelitis. High-grade n-irAEs managing and recognizing remains challenging, considering the risk of mortality and long-term disability. To date, strong scientific data are lacking to support the management of high-grade clinical forms. We performed a systematic literature search, selecting all articles describing high-grade steroid-resistance n-irAEs. and we reported them in a practical review. Specifically, current recommendations advise stopping ICI use and beginning corticosteroid treatment. Our findings highlighted that in steroid-resistant n-irAEs, it should be recommended to quickly escalate to plasma exchange (PLEX) and/or intravenously immunoglobulins (IVIg), usually in association with other immunosuppressants. Furthermore, newer evidence supports the use of drugs that may specifically block inflammation without reducing the anti-tumour effect of ICIs. In this practical review, we provide new evidence regarding the therapeutic approach of high-grade n-irAEs, particularly in steroid-resistant cases. We would also stress the importance of informing the scientific community of the discrepancy between current guidelines and clinical evidence in these rare forms of pathology.

Sequential severe immune-related adverse events induced by PD-1 inhibitor: a case report and literature review

In a variety of cancers, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated substantial survival advantages. Nevertheless, the widespread use of ICIs in the clinic has resulted in a growing interest in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their treatment methods. This paper reports a case in which a patient with three sequential severe irAEs was successfully treated. After undergoing two regimens of sintilimab in conjunction with chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer, the patient developed myocarditis combined with hepatitis. Subsequently, the patient developed pneumonia following remission from treatment. We also discuss the mechanism of irAEs, principles of treatment, and progress in the study of biomarkers for early prediction of irAEs by reviewing the literature.

Cytokines in PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor adverse events and implications for the treatment of uveitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as Programmed cell Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have improved cancer treatment by enhancing the immune system's ability to target malignant cells. Their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including uveitis. The profile of pro-inflammatory cytokines underlying Anti-PD-1-induced uveitis shares significant overlap with that of non-infectious uveitis. Current corticosteroid treatments for uveitis while effective are fraught with vision threatening side effects. The cytokine profile in ICI-related uveitis has a large overlap with that of noninfectious uveitis, this overlap strongly supports the potential for therapy that activates the PD-1 axis in the eye to treat uveitis. Indeed, ICI related uveitis often resolves with cessation of the ICI, restoring the endogenous PD-1 axis. The potential benefit of targeting many pro-inflammatory cytokines via local PD-1 axis activation is mitigating ocular inflammation while minimizing adverse effects.

MOG Antibody-Associated Disease in the Setting of Metastatic Melanoma Complicated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Use

OBJECTIVES

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease rarely associated with malignancy. We report the clinical, MRI, immunopathology, and treatment response in a person with MOGAD and melanoma.

METHODS

This is a case report of a person with a multidisciplinary evaluation at a tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

A 52-year-old man presented with progressive encephalomyelitis that led to identification of metastatic melanoma. Investigations revealed positive MOG-IgG at high titers in serum (1:1,000; normal, <1:20) and CSF (1:4,096; normal, <1:2). MRI demonstrated multifocal T2 lesions with enhancement in the brain and spine. Brain biopsy showed demyelination and inflammation. MOG immunostaining was not present in the tumor tissue. He initially improved with methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis, prolonged oral steroid taper, and cancer-directed treatment with BRAF and MEK 1/2 inhibitors, but then developed bilateral optic neuritis. IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) was initiated. Five months later, he developed metastases and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment was started, which precipitated optic neuritis and myelitis despite IVIG and prednisone. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor blocker, was started with excellent and sustained clinical and radiologic response.

DISCUSSION

This case revealed a presentation of MOGAD concurrent with melanoma without tumor MOG immunostaining. We highlight tocilizumab as a dual-purpose treatment of MOGAD and the neurologic immune-related adverse effect of ICI.

The Role of Aging and Senescence in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Toxicity

Cellular senescence accumulates with age and has been shown to impact numerous physiological and pathological processes, including immune function. The role of cellular senescence in cancer is multifaceted, but the impact on immune checkpoint inhibitor response and toxicity has not been fully evaluated. In this review, we evaluate the impact of cellular senescence in various biological compartments, including the tumor, the tumor microenvironment, and the immune system, on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and toxicity. We provide an overview of the impact of cellular senescence in normal and pathological contexts and examine recent studies that have connected aging and cellular senescence to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in both the pre-clinical and clinical contexts. Overall, senescence plays a multi-faceted, context-specific role and has been shown to modulate immune-related adverse event incidence as well as immune checkpoint inhibitor response.

Nonclinical Investigation of Cytokine Mitigation Strategies for T-cell-Engaging Bispecifics in the Cynomolgus Macaque

SUMMARY

T-cell-directed cancer therapies such as T-cell-engaging bispecifics (TCBs) are commonly associated with cytokine release syndrome and associated clinical signs that can limit their tolerability and therapeutic benefit. Strategies for reducing cytokine release are therefore needed. Here, we report on studies performed in cynomolgus monkeys to test different approaches for mitigating cytokine release with TCBs. A "priming dose" as well as subcutaneous dosing reduced cytokine release compared with intravenous dosing but did not affect the intended T-cell response to the bispecific. As another strategy, cytokines or cytokine responses were blocked with an anti-IL-6 antibody, dexamethasone, or a JAK1/TYK2-selective inhibitor, and the effects on toxicity as well as T-cell responses to a TCB were evaluated. The JAK1/TYK2 inhibitor and dexamethasone prevented CRS-associated clinical signs on the day of TCB administration, but the anti-IL-6 had little effect. All interventions allowed for functional T-cell responses and expected damage to target-bearing tissues, but the JAK1/TYK2 inhibitor prevented the upregulation of activation markers on T cells, suggesting the potential for suppression of T-cell responses. Our results suggest that short-term prophylactic dexamethasone treatment may be an effective option for blocking cytokine responses without affecting desired T-cell responses to TCBs.

Effect of glucocorticoids for the management of immune-related adverse events on outcome in melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy-a retrospective and biomarker study

Background

Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are common, and their management sometimes requires glucocorticoids (GCs). Predictors for development of IRAEs and data about the impact of GCs on clinical outcome are missing. We evaluated the impact of GCs to treat IRAEs on clinical outcome, and plasmatic inflammatory proteins as predictors for IRAEs.

Patients and methods

Patients with melanoma (n = 98) treated with ICIs at Karolinska University Hospital were included. Clinical information and data regarding prescription of systemic GCs were collected. Baseline plasma samples (n = 57) were analyzed for expression of 92 inflammatory proteins.

Results

Forty-four patients developed at least one IRAE requiring systemic GCs and the most common was hypocortisolemia (n = 11). A median overall survival of 72.8 months for patients developing IRAEs requiring GCs, 17.7 months for those who did not, and 1.4 months for individuals receiving GCs at baseline was observed in Kaplan-Meier curves (P = 0.001). In immortal time bias adjusted analysis, patients receiving steroids to treat IRAE survived slightly longer, even though this time trend was not statistically significant. The median overall survival was 29 months for those treated with GCs within 60 days after ICIs start and was not reached for patients receiving GCs later. The number of ICI cycles was higher in subjects receiving GCs after 60 days (P = 0.0053). Hypocortisolemia occurred mainly in males (10/11) and correlated with favorable outcome. Male patients with hypocortisolemia had lower expression of interleukin 8, transforming growth factor-α, and fibroblast growth factor 5 and higher expression of Delta/Notch-like epidermal growth factor-related receptor.

Conclusions

GCs may be used to treat IRAEs without major concern. GCs early during ICIs may, however, impact clinical outcome negatively. The prognostic value of hypocortisolemia and inflammation proteins as biomarkers should be further investigated.

Impact of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Glucocorticoids, and Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cancer Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced malignancies often leads to off-target adverse events. Rheumatic immune-related adverse events can often linger beyond the duration of ICI therapy and sometimes requires the use of immunomodulator therapy. A key question, therefore, is if the commonly used therapies affect cancer outcomes. In this review, the authors summarize the state of the data as it currently stands, taking into consideration the limitations of the various source studies. The most information is known about glucocorticoids, which appear to be harmful especially when used early and at high doses.

The Current and Future of Biomarkers of Immune Related Adverse Events

With their groundbreaking clinical responses, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have ushered in a new chapter in cancer therapeutics. However, they are often associated with life-threatening or organ-threatening autoimmune/autoinflammatory phenomena, collectively termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this review, we will first describe the mechanisms of action of ICIs as well as irAEs. Next, we will review biomarkers for predicting the development of irAEs or stratifying risks.

A phase I trial of autologous RAK cell immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains a challenge worldwide. Here, we introduced a phase I trial of autologous RAK cell therapy in patients with mRCC whose cancers progressed after prior systemic therapy. Although RAK cells have been used in clinic for many years, there has been no dose-escalation study to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I trial with a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to investigate the dose-related safety and efficacy of RAK cells in patients with mRCC whose cancers have failed to response to systemic therapy (ChiCTR1900021334).

RESULTS

Autologous RAK cells, primarily composed of CD8+ T and NKT cells, were infused intravenously to patients at a dose of 5 × 109, 1 × 1010 or 1.5 × 1010 cells every 28 days per cycle. Our study demonstrated general safety of RAK cells in a total of 12 patients. Four patients (33.3%) showed tumor shrinkage, two of them achieved durable partial responses. Peripheral blood analysis showed a significant increase in absolute counts of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells after infusion, with a greater fold change observed in naive CD8+ T cells (CD8+CD45RA+). Higher peak values of IL-2 and IFN-γ were observed in responders after RAK infusion.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that autologous RAK cell immunotherapy is safe and has clinical activity in previously treated mRCC patients. The improvement in peripheral blood immune profiling after RAK cell infusion highlights its potential as a cancer treatment. Further investigation is necessary to understand its clinical utility.

Fine-tuning tumor- and allo-immunity: advances in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients

Cancer is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a 2- to 4-fold higher risk of developing cancer compared to the general population and post-transplant malignancy is the third most common cause of death in KTR. Moreover, it is well known that certain cancer types are overrepresented after transplantation, especially non-melanoma skin cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, with remarkable survival benefit in a subgroup of patients. ICI are monoclonal antibodies that block the binding of specific co-inhibitory signaling molecules. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the main targets of ICI. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about tumor response, allo-immunity, and risk of transplant rejection. Indeed, graft rejection has been estimated as high as 48% and represents an emerging problem. The underlying mechanisms of organ rejection in the context of treatment with ICI are poorly understood. The search for restricted antitumoral responses without graft rejection is of paramount importance. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the use of ICI in KTR, the potential mechanisms involved in kidney graft rejection during ICI treatment, potential biomarkers of rejection, and how to deal with rejection in clinical practice.

Inhibition of IL-25/IL-17RA improves immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors and reveals antitumor activity

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes and extended patient survival in several tumor types. However, ICIs often induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that warrant therapy cessation, thereby limiting the overall effectiveness of this class of therapeutic agents. Currently, available therapies used to treat irAEs might also blunt the antitumor activity of the ICI themselves. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify treatments that have the potential to be administered alongside ICI to optimize their use.

METHODS

Using a translationally relevant murine model of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies-induced irAEs, we compared the safety and efficacy of prednisolone, anti-IL-6, anti-TNFɑ, anti-IL-25 (IL-17E), and anti-IL-17RA (the receptor for IL-25) administration to prevent irAEs and to reduce tumor size.

RESULTS

While all interventions were adequate to inhibit the onset of irAEs pneumonitis and hepatitis, treatment with anti-IL-25 or anti-IL-17RA antibodies also exerted additional antitumor activity. Mechanistically, IL-25/IL-17RA blockade reduced the number of organ-infiltrating lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that IL-25/IL-17RA may serve as an additional target when treating ICI-responsive tumors, allowing for better tumor control while suppressing immune-related toxicities.

Nivolumab + Tacrolimus + Prednisone ± Ipilimumab for Kidney Transplant Recipients With Advanced Cutaneous Cancers

PURPOSE

Cancer-related mortality rates among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are high, but these patients have largely been excluded from trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors because of immunosuppression and risk of treatment-related allograft loss (TRAL). We conducted a prospective clinical trial testing nivolumab (NIVO) + tacrolimus (TACRO) + prednisone (PRED) ± ipilimumab (IPI) in KTR with advanced cutaneous cancers.

METHODS

Adult KTR with advanced melanoma or basal, cutaneous squamous, or Merkel cell carcinomas were eligible. Immunosuppression was standardized to TACRO (serum trough 2-5 ng/mL) + PRED 5 mg once daily. Patients then received NIVO 480 mg IV once every 4 weeks. The primary composite end point was partial or complete (tumor) response (CR) or stable disease per RECIST v1.1 without allograft loss at 16W. Patients with progressive disease (PD) could receive IPI 1 mg/kg IV + NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels were measured approximately once every 2 weeks as a potential predictor of allograft rejection.

RESULTS

Among eight evaluable patients, none met the trial's primary end point. All eight patients experienced PD on NIVO + TACRO + PRED; TRAL occurred in one patient. Six patients then received IPI + NIVO + TACRO + PRED. Best overall responses: two CR (one with TRAL) and four PD (one with TRAL). In total, 7 of 8 pre-NIVO tumor biopsies contained a paucity of infiltrating immune cells. In total, 2 of 5 on-NIVO biopsies demonstrated moderate immune infiltrates; both patients later experienced a CR to IPI + NIVO. In 2 of 3 patients with TRAL, dd-cfDNA elevations occurred 10 and 15 days before increases in serum creatinine.

CONCLUSION

In most KTR with advanced skin cancer, TACRO + PRED provides insufficient allograft protection and compromises immune-mediated tumor regression after administration of NIVO ± IPI. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels can signal treatment-related allograft rejection earlier than rises in serum creatinine.

Seasonal patterns of toxicity in melanoma patients treated with combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are frequently associated with the development of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs). The exact etiology, including the role of environmental factors, remains incompletely understood.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 394 melanoma patients from three centers (northern and southern hemisphere). Patients had received at least one cycle of anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. We study the distribution and time to irAEs onset throughout the calendar year.

RESULTS

764 irAEs were recorded; the most frequent were skin rash (35%), hepatitis (32%) and colitis (30%). The irAEs incidence was the highest in autumn and winter, and the ratio for the 'number of irAEs' per 'therapies commenced' was the highest in winter and lowest in summer (2.4 and 1.7, respectively). Season-specific patterns in the time of irAEs onset were observed for pneumonitis (shorter time to onset in autumn, p = 0.025), hepatitis (shorter time to onset in spring, p = 0.016) and sarcoid-like immune reaction (shorter time to onset in autumn, p = 0.041). Season-specific patterns for early-onset irAEs were observed for hepatitis (spring, p = 0.023) and nephritis (summer, p = 0.017). Early-onset pneumonitis was more frequent in autumn-winter (p = 0.008) and early-onset nephritis in spring-summer (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Environmental factors that are associated with particular seasons may contribute to the development of certain irAEs and suggest the potential effect of environmental triggers. The identification of these factors may enhance preventive and therapeutic strategies to reduce the morbidity of irAEs.

Concentrations of S100B and neurofilament light chain in blood as biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor-induced CNS inflammation

BACKGROUND

Cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) can cause immune-related adverse events in the central nervous system (CNS irAE). There are no blood biomarkers to detect CNS irAE. We investigated if concentrations of S100-calcium-binding protein B (S100B) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in blood can be used as biomarkers for CNS irAE and assessed the incidence of CNS irAE in a cohort of ICI-treated patients.

METHODS

In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, we examined medical records and laboratory data of 197 consecutive patients treated with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition (ipilimumab; ipi + nivolumab; nivo) for metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. CNS irAE was diagnosed using established criteria. Concentrations of S100B and NfL in blood were measured in patients with CNS irAE and in 84 patients without CNS irAE.

FINDINGS

Nine of 197 patients (4.6%) fulfilled criteria for CNS irAE. S100B and NfL in blood increased during CNS inflammation and normalized during immunosuppression. CNS irAE was detected with a sensitivity of 100% (S100B) and 79% (NfL) and a specificity of 89% (S100B) and 74% (NfL). Patients with CNS irAE had simultaneous increased concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) (9/9) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in blood (8/9).

INTERPRETATION

Analysis of S100B, NfL and CRP in blood facilitates the diagnosis of CNS irAE. CNS irAE may be more common than previously reported. There may be shared immune mechanisms between CNS and hepatitis irAE.

FUNDING

Supported by funding from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the ALF-agreement, and Jubileumsklinikens Cancerfond.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Detectable ctDNA at the time of treatment cessation of ipilimumab and nivolumab for toxicity predicts disease progression in advanced melanoma patients

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has led to unprecedented outcomes for melanoma patients but is associated with toxicity. ICI resumption after high grade irAEs poses a significant challenge in the clinical management of melanoma patients and there are no biomarkers that can help identify patients that might benefit from resuming treatment. This study aims to determine if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels at the time of treatment-limiting irAE could guide treatment decisions in this clinical context.

Methods

This is a retrospective exploratory biomarker study from 34 patients treated with combination ICI for stage IV melanoma. Patients had a treatment-limiting toxicity and a baseline plasma collection prior to commencing ICI and within 6 weeks of stopping therapy. Blood samples were tested for ctDNA at baseline and cessation therapy.

Results

Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached (24-month PFS rate 54% and OS rate 72.3%). PD occurred in 47% (16/34) of patients. Median PFS with detectable ctDNA from plasma collected at the time of toxicity was 6.5 months while not reached (NR) with undetectable levels (HR: 4.0, 95% CI 0.95-17.5, p=0.0023). Median OS with detectable ctDNA at cessation for toxicity was 19.4 months and NR for undetectable ctDNA (HR: 3.9, 95%CI 20.8-18.6, p=0.024). Positive ctDNA at the time of cessation was highly specific (specificity 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-0.99, PPV 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-0.99). However, ctDNA negativity has low sensitivity as a predictor of ongoing disease control (sensitivity 0.437, 95% CI 0.23-0.67). Notably, 4/9 (44%) ctDNA negative patients who had disease progression had brain only disease progression.

Conclusions

Undetectable ctDNA and CR on imaging after stopping immunotherapy for toxicity results in high rates of long-term durable control. For patients with immunotherapy related toxicity, who have persistent ctDNA at 8 - 12 weeks, the risk of disease progression is significant.

Re-challenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab with concurrent tocilizumab after prior grade 3 pneumonitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which are unique compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. For life-threatening adverse events including grade 3 or more, permanent discontinuation of the ICIs is recommended, albeit without much robust evidence. Safe re-challenge of ICIs with concurrent immunosuppression has been reported with irAEs like gastrointestinal toxicity and arthritis. Here we present a case of a lady with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with programmed death ligand1 expression, who showed a complete response to pembrolizumab used as third-line therapy. However, it had to be stopped after 22 doses when the patient developed grade 3 pneumonitis. In view of progression off pembrolizumab, and lack of other effective alternatives, pembrolizumab was re-challenged with concurrent interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade using tocilizumab. This was based on preliminary evidence on the role of IL-6 in mediating the irAEs, especially pneumonitis. The patient re-attained a complete response with pembrolizumab. There was no recurrence of the pneumonitis after rechallenging, and there was partial radiographic resolution of the ICI-interstitial lung disease after the combination therapy.

Pathogenesis, pathological characteristics and individualized therapy for immune-related adverse effects

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a class of antitumor medications that target immune checkpoints, which induce the activation of lymphocytes. These treatments effectively prolong the survival of patients with advanced tumors, especially lung cancer. However, in addition to tumor killing effects, ICIs may also cause an imbalance between immune tolerance and immunity. Over-activated lymphocytes may cause various types of damage to multiple organs throughout the body, called immune-related adverse events. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis, pathological characteristics, biomarkers, and therapeutic agents for immune-related adverse events.

Immune mediators as predictive biomarkers for anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in urothelial carcinoma

Introduction: This study aimed to identify immune mediators, including cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, in the plasma for predicting treatment efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We enrolled 57 patients with aUC who were treated with the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between February 2018 and December 2020. Plasma levels of 73 soluble immune mediators were measured before and 6 weeks after initiating pembrolizumab therapy. The association of estimated soluble immune mediators with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), anti-tumor responses, and irAEs, were statistically evaluated. Results: In the multivariate analysis, levels of 18 factors at baseline and 12 factors during treatment were significantly associated with OS. Regarding PFS, baseline levels of 17 factors were significantly associated with PFS. Higher levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1), and IL-12 (p40), both at baseline and post-treatment, were significantly associated with worse OS. Conversely, low IL-6 and high TWEAK levels at baseline were associated with irAEs. Among identified factors, interferon (IFN) γ and IL-12 (p40) were repeatedly identified; high baseline levels of these factors were risk factors for worse OS and PFS, as well as progressive disease. Notably, using correlation and principal component analysis, factors significantly associated with clinical outcomes were broadly classified into three groups exhibiting similar expression patterns. Discussion: Measuring plasma levels of soluble immune mediators, such as IL-6, IL-8, sTNF-R1, IFNγ, and IL-12 (p40), could be recommended for predicting prognosis and irAEs in ICI-treated patients with aUC.

New perspectives in cancer immunotherapy: targeting IL-6 cytokine family

Chronic inflammation has been recognized as a canonical cancer hallmark. It is orchestrated by cytokines, which are master regulators of the tumor microenvironment (TME) as they represent the main communication bridge between cancer cells, the tumor stroma, and the immune system. Interleukin (IL)-6 represents a keystone cytokine in the link between inflammation and cancer. Many cytokines from the IL-6 family, which includes IL-6, oncostatin M, leukemia inhibitory factor, IL-11, IL-27, IL-31, ciliary neurotrophic factor, cardiotrophin 1, and cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1, have been shown to elicit tumor-promoting roles by modulating the TME, making them attractive therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.The development of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapies has radically changed the outcome of some cancers including melanoma, lung, and renal, although not without hurdles. However, ICB shows limited efficacy in other solid tumors. Recent reports support that chronic inflammation and IL-6 cytokine signaling are involved in resistance to immunotherapy. This review summarizes the available preclinical and clinical data regarding the implication of IL-6-related cytokines in regulating the immune TME and the response to ICB. Moreover, the potential clinical benefit of combining ICB with therapies targeting IL-6 cytokine members for cancer treatment is discussed.

Safety and effectiveness of combination versus monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases

Patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (pAID) are generally excluded from clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for cancer due to concern of flaring pAID. In this multi-center, retrospective observational study, we compared safety of ICI combination (two ICI agents) versus monotherapy in cancer patients with pAIDs. The primary outcome was time to AEs (immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and/or pAID flares), with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Sixty-four of 133 patients (48%) received ICI combination and 69 (52%) monotherapy. Most had melanoma (32%) and lung cancer (31%). Most common pAIDs were rheumatic (28%) and dermatologic (23%). Over a median follow-up of 15 months (95%CI, 11-18 mo), the cumulative incidence of any-grade irAEs was higher for combination compared to monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.27, 95%CI 1.35-3.82). No statistically significant difference was observed in high-grade irAEs (sHR 2.31 (0.95-5.66), P = .054) or the cumulative incidence of pAID flares. There was no statistically significant difference for melanoma PFS between combination versus monotherapy (23.2 vs. 17.1mo, P = .53). The combination group was more likely to discontinue or hold ICI, but > 50% of the combination group was still able to continue ICI therapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In our cohort with pAIDs, patients had a tolerable toxicity profile with ICI combination therapy. Our results support the use of ICI combination if deemed necessary for cancer therapy in patients with pAIDs, since the ICI toxicities were comparable to monotherapy, able to be effectively managed and mostly did not require ICI interruption.

Effects of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their treatment on antitumor immune responses

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are potentially life-saving cancer therapies that can trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs can impact any organ and range in their presentation from mild side effects to life-threatening complications. The relationship between irAEs and antitumor immune responses is nuanced and may depend on the irAE organ, the tumor histology, and the patient. While some irAEs likely represent an immune response against antigens shared between tumor cells and healthy tissues, other irAEs may be entirely unrelated to antitumor immune responses. Clinical observations suggest that low-grade irAEs have a positive association with responses to ICIs, but the correlation between severe irAEs and clinical benefit is less clear. Currently, severe irAEs are typically treated by interrupting or permanently discontinuing ICI treatment and administering empirically selected systemic immunosuppressive agents. However, these interventions could potentially diminish the antitumor effects of ICIs. Efforts to understand the mechanistic relationship between irAEs and the tumor microenvironment have yielded meaningful insights and nominated therapeutic targets for irAE management that may preserve or even boost ICI efficacy. We explore the clinical and molecular relationship between irAEs and antitumor immunity as well as the role that irAE treatments may play in shaping antitumor immune responses.

Immune-related adverse events after immune check point inhibitors: Understanding the intersection with autoimmunity

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies act through blockade of inhibitory molecules involved in the regulation of T cells, thus releasing tumor specific T cells to destroy their tumor targets. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can also lead to a breach in self-tolerance resulting in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that include tissue-specific autoimmunity. This review addresses the question of whether the mechanisms that drive ICI-induced irAEs are shared or distinct with those driving spontaneous autoimmunity, focusing on ICI-induced diabetes, ICI-induced arthritis, and ICI-induced thyroiditis due to the wealth of knowledge about the development of autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. It reviews current knowledge about role of genetics and autoantibodies in the development of ICI-induced irAEs and presents new studies utilizing single-cell omics approaches to identify T-cell signatures associated with ICI-induced irAEs. Collectively, these studies indicate that there are similarities and differences between ICI-induced irAEs and autoimmune disease and that studying them in parallel will provide important insight into the mechanisms critical for maintaining immune tolerance.

Corticosteroids and Cancer Immunotherapy

Despite revolutionizing cancer management, immunotherapies dysregulate the immune system, leading to immune-mediated adverse events. These common and potentially dangerous toxicities are often treated with corticosteroids, which are among the most prescribed drugs in oncology for a wide range of cancer and noncancer indications. While steroids exert several mechanisms to reduce immune activity, immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are designed to enhance the immune system's inherent antitumor activity. Because ICI requires an intact and robust immune response, the immunosuppressive properties of steroids have led to a widespread concern that they may interfere with antitumor responses. However, the existing data of the effect of systemic steroids on immunotherapy efficacy remain somewhat conflicted and unclear. To inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes, we review the impact of steroids on antitumor immunity, recent advances in the knowledge of their impact on ICI efficacy in unique populations and settings, associated precautions, and steroid-sparing treatment approaches.

Updates in toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a pillar of treatment for numerous cancers with increasing use in combination with other ICIs and in earlier stages of disease treatment. Although effective, ICI use is accompanied by a milieu of potentially bothersome or even life-threatening toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating careful monitoring and early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances surrounding toxicity pathophysiology and treatment in the context of relevant organ systems. An emphasis on current treatments by toxicity, as well as updates on steroid-refractory toxicities, chronic toxicities, and biomarkers will be a focus of this update on the current understanding of irAEs.

EXPERT OPINION

ICI toxicities are a major limitation on the deployment of multi-agent ICI regimens and are thus a major priority to understand, treat, and prevent. Recent developments have led to greater understanding of the pathophysiology of these events, which may lead to improved prevention or mitigation strategies. Further, early studies have also suggested steroid-sparing approaches that may be useful. Ultimately, preventing and managing irAEs will be a key goal toward successful ICI treatment across a broader range of patients with cancer.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors, IL6 inhibitors and methotrexate for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA).

METHODS

The retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors: maximizing benefit whilst minimizing toxicity

INTRODUCTION

The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer; anti-tumor efficacy has been observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in ~20 different cancer types with durable responses in some cases. However, the risk of toxicity in the form of immune-related adverse events (irAE) partially counterbalances these benefits, and there are no FDA-approved biomarkers to categorize patients by likelihood of response or risk of irAEs.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a thorough review of the literature of clinical studies regarding ICI and their toxicities. In this review, we synthesize the current body of literature about ICI treatment and irAE by summarizing the classes and uses of ICI, how to identify patients at risk for irAE, present the current understanding of irAE development, describe ongoing research into biomarkers of irAE, examine opportunities for irAE prevention, described management of steroid refractory irAE, and highlight future directions for development of prevention and management strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

While ongoing biomarker studies are promising, it is unlikely that there will be a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to categorizing irAE risk. In contrast, improved management and irAE prophylaxis are potentially in reach, and ongoing trials will help elucidate best practices.

Abdominal pain accompanied by elevated serum inflammatory markers and biliary enzymes for diagnosing immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced sclerosing cholangitis

Immune-related sclerosing cholangitis (irSC) is relatively rare and its clinical characteristics are not well known. In this study, we aimed to summarize the clinical features of irSC. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from 1,393 patients with advanced malignancy treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between August 2014 and October 2021. We analyzed patients with immune-related adverse events of liver injury (liver-irAEs) and compared irSC and non-irSC groups. Sixty-seven patients (4.8%) had a liver-irAE (≥ grade 3) during the follow-up period (median, 262 days). Among these, irSC was observed in eight patients (11.9%). All patients in the irSC group were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Compared with the non-irSC group, the irSC group showed mainly non-hepatocellular liver injury (87.5 % vs 50.8 %, P = 0.065), and had elevated serum inflammatory markers (e.g., CRP and NLR) and biliary enzymes (e.g., GGTP and ALP) at the onset of liver-irAEs. Furthermore, most patients with irSC had abdominal pain. In the non-irSC group, the liver injury of 23 patients improved only with the discontinuation of ICIs, and 22 patients improved with medication including prednisolone (PSL). Conversely, almost all patients (n=7) in the irSC group were treated with PSL, but only two patients experienced an improvement in liver injury. We found that irSC is characterized by a non-hepatocellular type of liver injury with abdominal pain and a high inflammatory response and is refractory to treatment. Further examination by imaging is recommended to detect intractable irSC in cases with these characteristics.

Selective immune suppression using interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors for management of immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).

Functionally Masked Antibody to Uncouple Immune-Related Toxicities in Checkpoint Blockade Cancer Therapy

Of the existing immunotherapy drugs in oncology, monoclonal antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint axis are preferred because of the durable responses observed in selected patients. However, the associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs), causing uncommon fatal events, often require specialized management and medication discontinuation. The study aim was to investigate our hypothesis that masking checkpoint antibodies with tumor microenvironment (TME)-responsive polymer chains can mitigate irAEs and selectively target tumors by limiting systemic exposure to patients. We devised a broadly applicable strategy that functionalizes immune checkpoint-blocking antibodies with a mildly acidic pH-cleavable poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) shell to prevent inflammatory side effects in normal tissues. Conjugation of pH-sensitive PEG to anti-CD47 antibodies (αCD47) minimized antibody-cell interactions by inhibiting their binding ability and functionality at physiological pH, leading to prevention of αCD47-induced anemia in tumor-bearing mice. When conjugated to anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, double checkpoint blockade-induced colitis was also ameliorated. Notably, removal of the protective shell in response to an acidic TME restored the checkpoint antibody activities, accompanied by effective tumor regression and long-term survival in the mouse model. Our results support a feasible strategy for antibody-based therapies to uncouple toxicity from efficacy and show the translational potential for cancer immunotherapy.

Immunosuppression for immune-related adverse events during checkpoint inhibition: an intricate balance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed perspectives for patients with cancer, but come with severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To prevent fatality or chronicity, these irAEs are often promptly treated with high-dose immunosuppressants. Until recently, evidence on the effects of irAE management on ICI efficacy has been sparse. As a result, algorithms for irAE management are mostly expert-opinion based and barely consider possible detrimental effects of immunosuppressants on ICI efficacy. However, recent growing evidence suggests that vigorous immunosuppressive management of irAEs comes with unfavourable effects on ICI efficacy and survival. With expansion of the indications of ICIs, evidence-based treatment of irAEs without hampering tumour control becomes more and more important. In this review, we discuss novel evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies on the effects of different irAE management regimens including corticosteroids, TNF inhibition and tocilizumab on cancer control and survival. We provide recommendations for pre-clinical research, cohort studies and clinical trials that can help clinicians in tailored irAE management, minimising patients' burden while maintaining ICI efficacy.

Pathogenesis of Oral Toxicities Associated with Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy

Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have redefined cancer treatment. While they have enhanced tumor response and improved survival rates in many cancer types, toxicities continue to occur, and these often involve the oral cavity. Broadly reported as "mucositis" or "stomatitis," oral toxicities induced by targeted therapies differ clinically and mechanistically from those associated with conventional chemotherapy. Manifesting primarily as mucosal lesions, salivary gland hypofunction, or orofacial neuropathies, these oral toxicities may nonetheless lead to significant morbidity and impact patients' quality of life, thereby compromising clinical outcomes. We conclude that familiarity with the spectrum of associated toxicities and understanding of their pathogenesis represent important areas of clinical research and may lead to better characterization, prevention, and management of these adverse events.

Steroid-Refractory Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitors

The occurrence, second-line management and outcome of sr/sd-irAEs was investigated in patients with skin cancer. All skin cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between 2013 and 2021 at a tertiary care center were analyzed retrospectively. Adverse events were coded by CTCAE version 5.0. The course and frequency of irAEs were summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 406 patients were included in the study. In 44.6% (n = 181) of patients, 229 irAEs were documented. Out of those, 146 irAEs (63.8%) were treated with systemic steroids. Sr-irAEs and sd-irAEs (n = 25) were detected in 10.9% of all irAEs, and in 6.2% of ICI-treated patients. In this cohort, infliximab (48%) and mycophenolate mofetil (28%) were most often administered as second-line immunosuppressants. The type of irAE was the most important factor associated with the choice of second-line immunosuppression. The Sd/sr-irAEs resolved in 60% of cases, had permanent sequelae in 28% of cases, and required third-line therapy in 12%. None of the irAEs were fatal. Although these side effects manifest in only 6.2% of patients under ICI therapy, they impose difficult therapy decisions, especially since there are few data to determine the optimal second-line immunosuppression.

Advances in treatments of patients with classical and emergent neurological toxicities of anticancer agents

The neurotoxicity associated to the anticancer treatments has received a growing body of interest in the recent years. The development of innovating therapies over the last 20years has led to the emergence of new toxicities. Their diagnosis and management can be challenging in the clinical practice and further research is warranted to improve the understanding of their pathogenic mechanisms. Conventional treatments as radiation therapy and chemotherapy are associated to well-known and under exploration emerging central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) toxicities. The identification of the risk factors and a better understanding of their pathogeny through a "bench to bedside and back again" approach, are the first steps towards the development of toxicity mitigation strategies. New imaging techniques and biological explorations are invaluable for their diagnosis. Immunotherapies have changed the cancer treatment paradigm from tumor cell centered to immune modulation towards an efficient anticancer immune response. The use of the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) lead to an increase in the incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and new challenges in the neurological patient's management. The neurological ICI-related adverse events (n-irAE) are rare but potentially severe and may present with both CNS and PNS involvement. The most frequent and well characterized, from a clinical and biological standpoint, are the PNS phenotypes: myositis and polyradiculoneuropathy, but the knowledge on CNS phenotypes and their treatments is expanding. The n-irAE management requires a good balance between dampening the autoimmune toxicity without impairing the anticancer immunity. The adoptive cell therapies as CAR-T cells, a promising anticancer strategy, trigger cellular activation and massive production of proinflammatory cytokines inducing frequent and sometime severe toxicity known as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome. Their management requires a close partnership between oncologist-hematologists, neurologists, and intensivists. The oncological patient's management requires a multidisciplinary clinical team (oncologist, neurologist and paramedical) as well as a research team leading towards a better understanding and a better management of the neurological toxicities.