Risk factors for recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Development, validation, and clinical utility of risk prediction models for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A retrospective and prospective cohort study

Objectives

This study aims to develop cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) risk prediction models using survival machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods

This study employed a double-cohort study design (retrospective and prospective). The retrospective cohort (n ​= ​1036) was used as training set (70.0%, n ​= ​725) and internal validation set (30.0%, n ​= ​311); while the prospective cohort (n ​= ​321) was used as external validation set. Seven survival ML algorithms, including COX regression, classification, regression and survival tree, random survival forest, gradient boosting survival machine tree, extreme gradient boosting survival tree, survival support vector analysis, and survival artificial neural network, were applied to train CA-VTE models.

Results

Univariate analysis and LASSO-COX regression both selected five predictors: age, previous VTE history, ICU/CCU, CCI, and D-dimer. The seven survival ML models (C-index: 0.709-0.760; Brier Score: 0.212-0.243) all outperformed Khorana Score (C-index: 0.632; Brier Score: 0.260) in external validation set. Among all models, the COX_DD model (COX regression ​+ ​D-dimer) performed best. However, ML models and Khorana Score predicted CA-VTE risk on ≥ 7 days of hospitalization with an increase in Brier Score ≥ 0.25, showing poor calibration.

Conclusions

In this study, the CA-VTE risk prediction models developed in seven survival ML algorithms outperformed Khorana Score. Combining with D-dimer can improve model performance. Applying the nomogram based on the optimal COX_DD model allows oncology nurse to reassess CA-VTE risk once a week. The prediction models developed using survival ML algorithms in this study may contribute to the dynamic and accurate risk assessment of CA-VTE for cancer survivors.

Direct oral anticoagulant failure in patients with venous thromboembolism-why and what next?

Management of recurrent thrombotic events in patients taking a direct oral anticoagulant can be challenging. In this review, we consider causes of so-called direct oral anticoagulant failure, from poor adherence, malabsorption, and drug interactions to the presence of undiagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome, cancer-associated thrombosis, severe thrombophilia, vasculitis, and other rare causes. We discuss the known or potential pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism recurrence in these situations and provide practical guidance to assist clinicians faced with these challenging cases.

The critical role of platelets in venous thromboembolism: Pathogenesis, clinical status, and emerging therapeutic strategies

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a complex vascular disorder with high morbidity and mortality, driven by Virchow's Triad: blood stasis, hypercoagulability, and endothelial injury. VTE is now recognized as an inflammatory process involving multiple components. Platelets are involved in the process of VTE, contributing to thrombosis initiation, progression, resolution and recurrence through coagulation activation, and interactions with immune and endothelial cells. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone of VTE treatment; however, antiplatelet agents like aspirin have demonstrated therapeutic potential, particularly following major orthopedic surgeries. Furthermore, emerging platelet-targeted therapies and biomarkers offer new opportunities for improving VTE diagnosis and treatment. This review explores the evolving role of platelets in VTE pathophysiology, assesses current antiplatelet strategies, and highlights novel therapeutic approaches. Advancing platelet research in VTE may lead to safer, more effective interventions, optimizing outcomes for patients with this life-threatening condition.

Derivation and validation of the Caravaggio score for the risk stratification for recurrence in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism (CAT), risk factor-based scores for recurrence could drive clinical management. The aim of this study in patients with CAT was to develop and validate a risk score for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulation: the Caravaggio score.

METHODS

The Caravaggio score was developed in patients included in the Caravaggio trial and then externally validated in patients included in the TESEO registry. Potential predictors (univariate p-value ≤ 0.1) for recurrence were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model with death unrelated to VTE as competing event. Candidate predictors were identified and scored based on clinical relevance and β-coefficient. Patients were then categorized in three risk classes. The performance of the Caravaggio score was assessed by discrimination (c-statistics), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Symptomatic VTE, ovarian and/or uterine cancer, pancreatic cancer, metastatic cancer, adenocarcinoma histological subtype, and pharmacological anticancer treatment were included in the score. In the derivation cohort, the incidence of recurrent VTE in the high, intermediate and low-risk groups was 11.6, 7.7 and 2.5 %, respectively. Incidences in the validation cohort were 8.0, 3.5 and 1.7 %, respectively. c-statistics in derivation and validation cohorts were 0.641 (95 % CI 0.584-0.698) and 0.606, (95 % CI 0.557-0.653), respectively. The NPV for low vs. intermediate/high-risk group was 98 % (95 % CI 95-99) in the derivation and 98 % (95 % CI 97-99) in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The Caravaggio score is simple and able to stratify patients with CAT for the risk for VTE recurrence.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with cancer

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and malignancy share a complex relationship, significantly complicating patient management. Patients with cancer, particularly those with lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic malignancies, are at increased risk of AF due to cancer-related hypercoagulability, proinflammatory cytokines, and treatment-related factors. This population faces unique thrombotic and bleeding risks, challenging standard management approaches. Anticoagulation is often complicated by drug-drug interactions with cancer therapies and heightened bleeding risks, including thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) offers an alternative stroke prevention strategy for patients unable to tolerate long-term anticoagulation. By isolating the left atrial appendage, LAAO reduces thromboembolic risk while minimizing bleeding complications. Indications include patients with elevated stroke risk with contraindications to anticoagulation due to nonreversible causes, such as recurrent bleeding or significant drug interactions. Surgical LAAO may also be considered during cardiac surgery in patients with AF and high thromboembolic risk, with previous studies showing reduced risk of thromboembolic complications. Outcomes of LAAO in cancer patients are generally favorable, with studies showing comparable stroke rates, bleeding risks, and mortality to non-cancer populations. However, malignancy-specific complications, such as device-related thrombus, require further investigation. LAAO provides a promising option for stroke prevention in this complex population, but further research is needed to refine patient selection and optimize outcomes.

Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cancer

The hemostatic system and cancer display a tight interconnection, and hemostatic imbalance frequently occurs in patients with cancer. While extensive knowledge about thrombotic risk has been generated, less is known about bleeding risk and associated risk factors. However, bleeding risk is of high significance as patients with cancer frequently receive therapeutic anticoagulation for various indications and/or are candidates for primary thromboprophylaxis. The risk of bleeding in patients with cancer is variable and difficult to assess in clinical practice. Certain clinical settings such as hospitalization, specific underlying risk factors (e.g., tumor type), and medications (e.g., anticoagulation) can contribute to the individual bleeding risk of a patient with cancer. In addition, some dynamic factors such as platelet count or kidney function have an impact. Particularly, data on baseline risk of bleeding are lacking to allow for risk assessment in cancer patients without anticoagulation. In contrast, risk assessment models for the prediction of bleeding events in cancer patients receiving anticoagulation have been developed; however, these have yet to be validated. The recognition of the importance of bleeding risk in cancer patients is growing, leading to an increasing number of studies investigating and reporting bleeding complications. As study designs and reporting of bleeding events vary, it is challenging to offer a clear synthesis of evidence. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of currently available data about incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of bleeding events in patients with cancer, and critically review risk assessment models for bleeding in cancer patients during anticoagulant therapy.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: what is new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The life expectancy of patients suffering from thrombosis associated with cancer has improved significantly, making them a chronic disease. Patients with thrombosis and cancer are fragile. Treated with anticoagulants, they remain at risk of complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consequently, news issues emerge for clinical practice: anticoagulation therapy personalization is required to optimize the benefit ratio, involving patient characteristics and cancer characteristics. During follow-up, prediction score are designed and investigated to help identify and discriminate patients at risk of venous thromboembolism recurrences and major bleedings. Considering the improved prognosis of patients with cancer and cancer-associated thrombosis, the question of extended treatment arises, representing a major unmet need to date. Finally, new strategies, in particular anti-XI agents that appear attractive options, are currently being evaluated in the treatment of thrombosis associated with cancer.

SUMMARY

The improved prognosis of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis is accompanied by new therapeutic strategies to improve the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment in these fragile patients, at risk of both venous thromboembolic recurrence and haemorrhagic complication.

Occurrence and management of thrombosis recurrence and bleeding in low-molecular-weight heparin-treated patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: a French nationwide cohort study

Background

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding remain high in patients with cancer who are prescribed anticoagulants (ACs) such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) after an initial VTE event.

Objectives

To identify patient characteristics associated with VTE recurrence and bleeding in patients receiving LMWH for cancer-associated VTE and to explore secondary AC management and clinical outcomes in these patients.

Methods

An observational study was conducted using nationwide French data for adults with active cancer who were hospitalized with VTE in 2013-2018 and were reimbursed for LMWH ≤ 30 days after hospital discharge. The main outcomes were VTE recurrence and bleeding. For both outcomes, the proportions of patients who experienced the outcome were calculated for different patient characteristics. AC switching following VTE recurrence and bleeding was tracked using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes.

Results

A total of 31,771 patients received LMWH, of whom 1925 (6.1%) experienced VTE recurrence and 1804 (5.7%) bleeding. Most recurrent VTE and bleeding events occurred within 6 months after the initial VTE event. The proportion of patients with VTE recurrence and bleeding varied between cancer types. Most patients who experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding continued to receive LMWH. Eleven percent of patients with VTE recurrence experienced a further recurrent VTE event within 3 months.

Conclusion

More than 10% of patients who received LMWH for cancer-associated VTE experienced VTE recurrence or bleeding. AC management options in this patient population should be prospectively assessed in clinical trials.

Relevance of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to location of metastasis in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Risk of VTE recurrence (VTEr) in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is high. Cancer-related risk factors for VTEr have been studied, but information about the importance of location of metastasis is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

1) Evaluate rate of VTEr in CAT patients according to location of metastasis, and 2) Identify variables associated to VTEr during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center, non-interventional study of consecutives patients with CAT conducted between 2007 and 2022. Haematological neoplasms were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 1248 patients with CAT (age 64.1 ± 12.8 years; 48.2 % female) followed-up for 13.19 months (p25-75, 5.6-26.9) there were 141 VTEr. The rate of VTE recurrence in patients without and with metastasis were 4.72 per 100 patient-years (95%CI: 3.66-6) and 10.05 per 100 patient-years (95 % CI: 7.89-12.61), respectively. The metastases locations associated with VTEr, compared to those without metastasis, were lung (rate ratio [RR]: 2.21; 95 % CI: 1.42-3.43), liver (RR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.26-3.24), pancreas (RR: 6.21; 95 % CI: 1.52-25.35), pleura (RR: 2.93; 95%CI: 1.58-5.41), bone (RR: 2.16; 95 % CI: 1.29-3.64) and adrenal (RR: 6.18; 95%CI: 2.97-12.86). Multivariate analysis of variables associated with VTEr beyond 12 months were male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.54, 95%CI: 1.08-2.19), ECOG performance status >1 (HR 1.74, 95%CI: 1.03-2.94), metastasis in 1-2 locations (HR 2.38, 95%CI: 1.68-3.37) and metastasis in >2 locations (HR 3.88, 95%CI: 1.68-8.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of VTEr differs according to the location of metastasis. We identified variables related to VTEr during long-term follow-up which may help clinicians decide whether to continue anticoagulation.

Treatment of VTE in the thrombocytopenic cancer patient

Thrombocytopenia is a frequent complication in patients with cancer, mostly due to the myelosuppressive effects of antineoplastic therapies. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is increased despite low platelet counts. The management of cancer-associated VTE in patients with thrombocytopenia is challenging, as the risk of both recurrent VTE and bleeding complications is high. Moreover, the time-dependent nature of thrombocytopenia over the course of antineoplastic therapies further complicates the management of patients in clinical practice. In the absence of evidence from high-quality studies, the management of anticoagulation therapy for VTE must be personalized, balancing the individual risk of VTE progression and recurrence against the risk of hemorrhage. In the present case-based review, we highlight the clinical challenges that arise upon managing cancer-associated VTE in the setting of present or anticipated thrombocytopenia, summarize the available evidence, and provide a comparative overview of available guidelines.

Incidence and clinical course of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with or without a history of venous thromboembolism in Denmark

BACKGROUND

A considerable number of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) lack a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the annual incidence and prevalence of CTEPH in Denmark and to compare the rates of VTE, bleeding, and mortality between CTEPH patients with and without a history of VTE.

METHODS

The Danish National Patient Registry covering all Danish hospitals was used to identify all CTEPH cases between 2009 and 2018, based on combinations of discharge diagnoses using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for CTEPH and relevant diagnostic and/or therapeutic interventions. Incidence rates of CTEPH per 100 000 person-years, rates of VTE and bleeding, and 5-year survival estimates were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 509 CTEPH patients were identified, of whom 82% had a history of VTE. The yearly incidence rate of CTEPH was 0.5 to 0.8 per 100 000 person-years during the study period. Patients with a history of VTE experienced a 2.5-fold rate of VTE compared with those without prior VTE (2571 vs 980 per 100 000 person-years), while the rate of bleeding events was lower (5008 vs 7139 per 100 000 person-years). The 5-year survival of CTEPH patients with a VTE history was 65% (95% CI, 58%-71%) compared with 45% (95% CI, 31%-58%) in patients without a history of VTE.

CONCLUSION

The Danish incidence rate of CTEPH was comparable with that of other European countries. We identified notable differences in the prognosis of patients with CTEPH with or without a history of VTE. These findings may support generation of hypotheses regarding the pathophysiology of CTEPH and inform current patient care.

Bleeding events in patients with cancer: incidence, risk factors, and impact on prognosis in a prospective cohort study

ABSTRACT

Hemostatic imbalances are frequent in patients with cancer. Although cancer-associated thrombotic complications have been well characterized, data on bleeding events in patients with cancer are sparse. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and impact on prognosis of bleeding events in patients with cancer initiating systemic anticancer therapies in a prospective cohort study, the Vienna Cancer, Thrombosis, and Bleeding Study. The primary study outcome was defined as clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), comprising major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. In total, 791 patients (48% female), with median age of 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-70), with various cancer types, 65.5% stage IV, were included. Over a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR, 8.7-24.0), we observed 194 CRB events in 139 (17.6%) patients, of which 42 (30.0%) were tumor related, 64 (46.0%) gastrointestinal, and 7 (5.0%) intracerebral. The 12-month cumulative incidence of first CRB and MB was 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7-19.6) and 9.1% (95% CI, 6.8-11.3), respectively, in the whole cohort, and 14.4% (95% CI, 11.2-17.5) and 7.0% (95% CI, 4.7-9.2), respectively, in those without anticoagulation. Patients with head and neck cancer had the highest risk of CRB. Lower baseline hemoglobin and albumin were associated with bleeding in patients without anticoagulation. Seven (5.0%) bleeding events were fatal, of which 6 occurred in patients without anticoagulation. Patients with CRB were at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (multivariable transition hazard ratio, 5.80; 95% CI, 4.53-7.43). In patients with cancer, bleeding events represent a frequent complication and are associated with increased mortality.

Impact of Residual Vein Venous Thrombosis in Consecutive Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Treated with Tinzaparin-A Cohort Study

Background: The role of residual venous thrombosis (RVT) as a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remains controversial. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on consecutive patients with CAT treated with tinzaparin recruited between 2007 and 2022. Primary outcome: RVT. Secondary outcomes: identification of variables associated with RVT and the role of RVT in VTE recurrences or clinically relevant bleeding (CRB). Results: Among 511 patients with CAT (age 64.1 years ± 13.4 years; 53.5% males) followed for 17.6 months (p25-75: 7.9-34), 35.8% (n = 183) presented RVT (at 6 months, 55.5%). Variables identified as being associated with RVT were ECOG performance status > 1, metastasis, and cancer location. Within 5 years, there were 57 CRB (11.2%; 95% CI: 8.6-14.2) and 67 VTE recurrences (13.1%, 95%CI: 10.3-16.4). Competing risk analysis identified that RVT at 6 months was associated with VTE recurrence within 5 years (sub-hazard ratio: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7; p = 0.006), but not with CRB. Multivariate analysis confirmed that RVT at 6 months (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7) and metastases (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9) were associated with VTE recurrence within 5 years. Conclusions: RVT is high in patients with CAT. The presence of RVT at 6 months was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE over 5 years.

Novel horizons in anticoagulation: the emerging role of factor XI inhibitors across different settings

Anticoagulants have long been fundamental in preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders, with a recent shift of focus towards direct oral anticoagulants, thanks to their ease of use, efficacy, and safety. Despite these advancements, bleeding complications remain a major concern with any anticoagulant, highlighting the need for safer drugs. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors have emerged as promising agents in this regard, offering a novel approach by targeting upstream factors in the coagulation system. Phase II trials have shown encouraging outcomes, indicating a reduced bleeding risk compared to that associated with traditional anticoagulants, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease management when combined with antiplatelet therapy. However, the variability in findings and limited efficacy data call for a cautious interpretation pending insights from phase III trials. These trials are essential for validating the potential of FXI inhibitors to balance bleeding risk reduction and maintain anticoagulant efficacy. This review explores the pharmacology, potential indications, clinical data, and future directions of FXI inhibitors, providing a perspective on their evolving role in anticoagulant therapy. It also provides a detailed analysis of data from published clinical trials on FXI inhibitors in various indications. Preliminary data from ongoing trials are also outlined. As the field moves forward, a cautiously optimistic outlook can be expected, focusing on comprehensive data from phase III trials to define the role of FXI inhibitors in various clinical scenarios.

Letter to the editor regarding the paper by A. Boileve et al.: Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving anti‑VEGF agents: a retrospective study

Concomitant direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (anti-VEGF TKI) have been associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Nevertheless, concomitant administration seems frequent in clinical practice in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and appears to be safe according to the retrospective study by Boileve A. et al. But the risk of an additional pharmacokinetic interaction between anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs must be considered, in case of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition by the TKI. We describe a case report with a major bleeding event in a renal metastatic cancer patient treated with cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. This case highlights the difficult therapeutic decision in a complex patient with cancer-associated thrombosis, who refused the anticoagulant subcutaneous route. Accumulation of bleeding risk factors (genito-urinary tumor localization) was additive to several pharmacodynamic interactions (acetylsalicylic acid, venlafaxine) and a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between cabozantinib and rivaroxaban. Indeed, cabozantinib-related P-glycoprotein inhibition could have led to a supratherapeutic level of rivaroxaban, contributing partly to the bleeding event. Before combining an anti-VEGF TKI and DOACs, a multidisciplinary pretherapeutic assessment seems crucial to evaluate the patient's bleeding risk factors, pharmacodynamic interactions, and the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions mediated by P-gp.

Direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely used for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, DOAC-associated bleeding complications remain challenging, especially in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. This study aimed to compare the bleeding outcomes between patients with upper or lower GI cancers and those without GI cancer.

METHODS

Using the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 database, which is a multicenter registry enrolling 5197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020, we identified 1149 active cancer patients with DOACs (upper GI cancer: N = 88; lower GI cancer: N = 114; non-GI cancer: N = 947). The primary outcome was major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy, which was evaluated in the competing risk regression model.

RESULTS

The upper GI cancer group had a lower mean body weight, and most often had anemia. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding was higher in the upper GI cancer group (upper GI cancer: 22.4 %, lower GI cancer: 15.4 %, and non-GI cancer: 11.6 %, P = 0.015). The most frequent major bleeding site in the upper GI cancer group was the upper GI (53 %), followed by the lower GI (24 %). After adjusting for the confounders, the excess risk in upper GI cancer relative to non-GI cancer remained significant for major bleeding (adjusted subhazard ratio, 2.25; 95 %CI, 1.31-3.87, P = 0.003), but that in lower GI cancer was insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper GI cancer, but not lower GI cancer, as compared to non-GI cancer was associated with a higher risk for major bleeding during anticoagulation therapy with DOACs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm Unique identifier: UMIN000044816.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism"]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least 6months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly, and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond 6months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first 6months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Risk Factors for Bleeding in Cancer Patients Treated with Conventional Dose Followed by Low-Dose Apixaban for Venous Thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

 Incidence of and risk factors for bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated with apixaban are poorly described.

METHODS

 We analyzed data from the prospective CAP study where 298 cancer patients with any type of VTE received 5 mg apixaban twice daily for 6 months, and then 2.5 mg apixaban twice daily for 30 months. For most analyses, major bleedings and clinically relevant nonmajor bleedings were merged to "clinically relevant bleedings." Risk factors were estimated by odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

 The incidence of clinically relevant bleedings was 38% per person-year during the first 6 months of treatment, 21% per person-year from 7 to 12 months, and between 4 and 8% per person-year from 13 to 36 months. Clinically relevant bleedings were associated with age above 74 years (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.1), body mass index (BMI) below 21.7 (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1-4.8), and hemoglobin at baseline below 10.5 for females (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.1-7.3) and 11.1 for males (OR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.3-8.4) during the first 6 months. Gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital cancer was not associated with clinically relevant bleedings compared with other cancers. Among patients with luminal GI cancer, nonresected cancer had increased risk of bleeding (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.0-11.6) compared with resected GI cancer.

CONCLUSION

 There were very few bleedings while patients were on low-dose apixaban. Factors associated with bleeding in patients treated with full-dose apixaban were high age, low BMI, and low hemoglobin, and probably nonresected luminal GI cancer.

Outcomes of Patients With Cancer With Myocardial Infarction-Associated Cardiogenic Shock Managed With Mechanical Circulatory Support

Background

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is managed with temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in advanced cases. Patients with cancer are at high risk of AMI and CS. However, outcomes of patients with cancer and AMI-CS managed with tMCS have not been rigorously studied.

Methods

Adult patients with AMI-CS managed with tMCS from 2006 to 2018 with and without cancer were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for variables associated with cancer. Primary outcome was in-hospital death, and secondary outcomes were major bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Results

After PSM, 1287 patients with cancer were matched with 12,870 patients without cancer. There was an increasing temporal trend for prevalence of cancer among patients admitted with AMI-CS managed with tMCS (P trend < .001). After PSM, there was no difference in in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.13) or thrombotic complications (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.91-1.34) between patients with and without cancer. Patients with cancer had a higher risk of major bleeding (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.46).

Conclusions

Among patients with AMI-CS managed with tMCS, cancer is becoming increasingly frequent and associated with increased risk of major bleeding, although there was no difference in in-hospital death. Further studies are needed to further characterize outcomes, and inclusion of patients with cancer in trials of tMCS is needed.

Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment-related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least six months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond six months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first six months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Validation of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED Models to Assess 3-Month Bleeding Risk in Anticoagulated Patients Diagnosed with Venous Thromboembolic Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the discriminative ability and calibration of the RIETE, Kuijer, and HAS-BLED models for predicting 3-month bleeding risk in patients anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

External validation study of a prediction model based on a retrospective cohort of patients with VTE seen at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá (Colombia) between July 2021 and June 2023. The calibration of the scales was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the ratio of observed to expected events (ROE) within each risk category. Discriminatory ability was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of a ROC curve.

RESULTS

We analyzed 470 patients (median age 65 years, female sex 59.3%) with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in most cases (57.4%), 5.7% bleeding events were observed. Regarding calibration, adequate calibration cannot be ruled out given the limited number of events. The discriminatory ability was limited with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.48 (CI 0.37-0.59) for Kuijer Score, 0.58 (CI 0.47-0.70) for HAS-BLED and 0.64 (CI 0.51-0.76) for RIETE.

CONCLUSION

The Kuijer, HAS-BLED, and RIETE models in patients with VTE generally do not adequately estimate the risk of bleeding at three months, with a low ability to discriminate high-risk patients. Cautious interpretation is recommended until further evidence is available.

Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Thromboembolic Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer and COVID-19

Importance

Systematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking.

Objective

To assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022.

Exposure

Treatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up.

Results

Of 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19-related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Cancer Patients-A Review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important aspect in cancer patients. There are various pharmacological methods used for thrombotic event treatment. DOACs (direct-acting oral anticoagulants) are gaining popularity among both physicians and researchers and are slowly starting to replace VKAs (vitamin K antagonists), thus becoming a substitute or alternative option for LMWHs (low-molecular-weight heparins). In this article, we present DOACs' main therapeutic advantages and disadvantages in patients with cancer. The only major concern with using DOACs is the higher risk of bleeding; however, there are discrepancies in this matter. There are still some types of cancer for which DOACs are not recommended. Specific cancer types may influence the efficacy of DOAC therapy. Additionally, race and ethnicity may affect therapy in cancer patients with DOACs. A sizeable number of clinical trials are focused on comparing DOACs with other anticoagulants. The current guidelines of different scientific associations are not unanimous in their DOAC assessments. There is still a need for more evidence of DOACs' potential advantages over other methods of anticoagulation in cancer patients to facilitate their position in this recommendation. This literature review presents the current state of knowledge about the use of DOACs in patients with neoplastic growth.