Surgical outcomes of gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection performed for patients with unfavorable clinical conditions

Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (≥65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72-1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62-1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74-2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75-4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in patients with resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer (GC) generally has a better prognosis than microsatellite-stable (MSS) GC and has been associated with nonsurvival benefit with the addition of chemotherapy (CMT) compared with surgery alone. However, patients with MSI have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between patients with MSI GC and those with MSS GC. In addition, this study analyzed the survival outcomes of patients with MSI GC who received CMT.

METHODS

This study reviewed all patients with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy. Patients were divided into MSI group and the MSS group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match clinicopathological factors.

RESULTS

Among the 378 patients enrolled, 78 (20.6%) had MSI. Older age (P < .001), subtotal gastrectomy (P = .008), pN0 (P = .020), and earlier pTNM stage (P = .012) were associated with MSI GC. Survival analysis showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the MSI group (P = .012 and P = .019, respectively). After PSM, 78 patients were matched to each group. All variables assigned to the scores were well matched, and both groups became equivalent. After the matching, the differences in DFS and OS according to MSI/MSS status were estimated to be larger than before (DFS: 63.3% vs 41.4%; P = .002; OS: 65.8% vs 42.5%; P = .002). Regarding patients referred for CMT, there was no difference in DFS and OS between patients with MSI GC who underwent CMT and those who underwent surgery alone (P = .255 and P = .178, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Even after controlling for clinicopathological characteristics, MSI was identified as a prognostic factor for patient survival. MSI GC showed no significant survival benefit with the addition of CMT.

RATIO OF METASTATIC LYMPH NODES VS. RESECTED LYMPH NODES (N-RATIO) HAS PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS IN GASTRIC CANCER

BACKGROUND

Lymph node status is vital for gastric cancer (GC) prognosis, but the conventional pN stage may be limited by variations in lymphadenectomy and stage migration. The N-Ratio, which assesses the ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes, emerges as a promising prognostic tool.

AIMS

To assess N-Ratios prognostic value in GC, particularly in patients with <25 resected lymph nodes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent for GC were retrospectively evaluated. The N-Ratio categories were determined using the ROC curve method, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used as a measure of performance in predicting recurrence/death.

RESULTS

A total of 561 GC patients were included in the study, 57% had pN+ status, and 17.5% had <25 resected lymph nodes. N-Ratio, with a mean of 0.12, predicted survival with 74% accuracy (AUC=0.74; 95%CI 0.70-0.78, p<0.001). N-Ratio categories included: N-Ratio 0 (43%); N-Ratio 1 (12.3%); N-Ratio 2 (31.6%); and N-Ratio 3 (13.2%). Disease-free survival (DFS) varied among all N-Ratio groups, with N-Ratio 3 showing worse survival than pN3 cases (DFS=21.8 vs. 11 months, p=0.022, p<0.05). In cases with <25 resected lymph nodes, DFS was not significantly worse in N-Ratio 0 (68.8 vs. 81.9%, p=0.061, p>0.05) and N-Ratio 1 (66.2 vs. 50%, p=0.504, p>0.05) groups. The DFS of N-Ratio-0 cases with <25 lymph nodes was similar to N-Ratio 1 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

N-Ratio influenced survival in GC patients, especially in advanced lymph node disease (N-Ratio 3). Considering that N-Ratio does not impact pN0 cases, individualized prognosis assessment is essential for patients with <25 resected lymph nodes.

Textbook outcome for evaluating the surgical quality of gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The textbook outcome (TO) is an indicator to evaluate surgical quality based on clinical, pathological, and surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the frequency, factors associated with achievement, and the prognostic impact of TO in gastric cancer treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with gastric cancer operated with curative intent from 2009 to 2022 in a reference Cancer Center.

RESULTS

During the period, 681 patients were included and 444 (65.2%) achieved TO. Major surgical complications were the most common not-achieved outcome (16.4%) and intraoperative complications were the most achieved (96.2%). Most of the patients have failed in only 1 outcome (n = 105, 44.3%). Failure to achieve TO was associated with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index ≥1 (46.4% vs 34.7%, p = 0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III/IV (40.1% vs 24.1%, p < 0.001), higher mean neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (2.7 vs 3.3, p = 0.024), D1 lymphadenectomy (26.2% vs 15.8%, p = 0.001), and elective postoperative Intensive Care Unit admission (46.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.046). Disease-free and overall survival (both p < 0.001) were higher in the TO group even after the exclusion of cases with surgical mortality (p = 0.013 and p = 0.024, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

TO was achieved in most of the cases and its failure was associated with poor clinical performance and it impacts both early surgical results as well as long-term survival.

THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX IN GASTRIC CANCER AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION

BACKGROUND

Predicting short- and long-term outcomes of oncological therapies is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. Malnutrition and the host immune status significantly affect outcomes in major surgeries.

AIMS

To assess the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting outcomes in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2020. PNI was calculated as follows: PNI=(10 x albumin [g/dL])+(0.005 x lymphocytes [nº/mm3]). The optimal cutoff value was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (PNI cutoff=52), and patients were grouped into low and high PNI.

RESULTS

Of the 529 patients included, 315 (59.5%) were classified as a low-PNI group (PNI<52) and 214 (40.5%) as a high-PNI group (PNI≥52). Older age (p=0.050), male sex (p=0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) III/IV (p=0.001), lower hemoglobin level (p<0.001), lower body mass index (p=0.001), higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p<0.001), D1 lymphadenectomy, advanced pT stage, pN+ and more advanced pTNM stage were related to low-PNI patient. Furthermore, 30-day (1.4 vs. 4.8%; p=0.036) and 90-day (3.3 vs. 10.5%; p=0.002) mortality rates were higher in low-PNI compared to high-PNI group. Disease-free and overall survival were worse in low-PNI patients compared to high-PNI (p<0.001 for both). ASA III/IV score, low-PNI, pT3/T4, and pN+ were independent risk factors for worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PNI can predict short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Low PNI is an independent factor related to worse disease-free and overall survival.

Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for high-risk gastric cancer stratified by a national clinical database risk calculator

BACKGROUND

For patients with gastric cancer, a well-balanced treatment that considers both oncological aspects and surgical risk is demanded. This study aimed to explore the optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for patients with gastric cancer according to surgical risk, stratified by the risk calculator system produced by the Japan National Clinical Database (NCD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 187 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Using the median predicted anastomotic leak rate obtained by the NCD risk calculator as the cutoff value, we classified 97 and 90 patients as having high and low risks, respectively.

RESULTS

In low-risk patients, although limited LND reduced the postoperative intraabdominal infectious complications (IAIC), multivariate analysis revealed standard LND as an independent prognostic factor that improved Relapse-free survival (RFS). In high-risk patients, the rates of postoperative IAIC and RFS were similar between standard and limited LND. Pancreatic fistula was not observed in the limited dissection group.

CONCLUSION

Limited LND might be the optimal treatment strategy for patients with gastric cancer with high surgical risk.

PALLIATIVE GASTRECTOMY VERSUS GASTRIC BYPASS FOR SYMPTOMATIC CLINICAL STAGE IV GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Patients with clinical stage IV gastric cancer may require palliative procedures to manage complications such as obstruction. However, there is no consensus on whether performing palliative gastrectomy compared to gastric bypass brings benefits in terms of survival.

AIMS

To compare the overall survival of patients with distal obstructive gastric cancer undergoing palliative surgical treatment, using propensity score matching analysis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent palliative bypass surgery (gastrojejunostomy or partitioning) and resection between the years 2009 and 2023 were retrospectively selected. Initial and postoperative clinicopathological variables were collected.

RESULTS

150 patients were initially included. The derived group (n=91) presented more locally invasive disease (p<0.01), greater degree of obstruction (p<0.01), and worse clinical status (p<0.01), while the resected ones (n= 59) presented more distant metastasis (p<0.01). After matching, 35 patients remained in each group. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, but the derived group had higher 90-day mortality (p<0.01). Overall survival was 16.9 and 4.5 months for the resected and derived groups, respectively (p<0.01). After multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia (hazard ratio - HR=2.02, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 1.17-3.48; p=0.01), absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=5.97; 95%CI 3.03-11.7; p<0.01), and gastric bypass (HR=3,28; 95%CI 1.8-5.95; p<0.01) were associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative gastrectomy was associated with greater survival and lower postoperative morbidity compared to gastric bypass. This may be due to better local control of the disease, with lower risks of complications and better effectiveness of chemotherapy.

Association of high-risk comorbidity with overall survival among patients with gastric cancer and its sex-specific differences in China: a retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Concomitant diseases often occur in cancer patients and are important in decision-making regarding treatments. However, information regarding the prognostic relevance of comorbidities for mortality risk is still limited among Chinese gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study aimed to investigate the association between comorbidities and 3-year mortality risk.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 376 GC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from January 2011 to December 2019. Demographic and clinicopathological information and treatment outcomes were collected. Patients were divided into low-, moderate- and high-risk comorbidity groups based on their Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) scores. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were used to examine 3-year overall survival (OS) and mortality risk for each group.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 43.5 months, and 40.2% (151/376) of GC patients had died at the last follow-up. There were significant differences in OS rates between ACCI-based comorbidity groups (76.56; 64.51; 54.55%, log-rank P = 0.011) but not between CCI-based comorbidity groups (log-rank P = 0.16). The high-risk comorbidity group based on the ACCI remained a significant prognostic factor for 3-year OS in multivariate analysis, with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15-3.44). Subgroup analysis revealed that this pattern only held for male GC patients but not for female patients.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggested that high-risk comorbidities were significantly associated with a higher mortality risk, particularly in Chinese male GC patients. Moreover, the ACCI score was an independent prognostic factor of long-term mortality.

Preoperative albumin-bilirubin score is a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is an indicator of liver dysfunction and is useful for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinomas. Currently, this liver function index has been used to predict prognosis in other neoplasms. However, the significance of ALBI score in gastric cancer (GC) after radical resection has not been elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic value of the preoperative ALBI status in patients with GC who received curative treatment.

METHODS

Patients with GC who underwent curative intended gastrectomy were retrospectively evaluated from our prospective database. ALBI score was calculated as follows: (log10 bilirubin × 0.660) + (albumin × -0.085). The receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC) was plotted to evaluate the ability of ALBI score in predicting recurrence or death. The optimal cutoff value was determined by maximizing Youden’s index, and patients were divided into low and high-ALBI groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival, and the log-rank test was used for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 361 patients (235 males) were enrolled. The median ALBI value for the entire cohort was -2.89 (IQR -3.13; -2.59). The AUC for ALBI score was 0.617 (95%CI: 0.556-0.673, P < 0.001), and the cutoff value was -2.82. Accordingly, 211 (58.4%) patients were classified as low-ALBI group and 150 (41.6%) as high-ALBI group. Older age (P = 0.005), lower hemoglobin level (P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III/IV (P = 0.001), and D1 lymphadenectomy P = 0.003) were more frequent in the high-ALBI group. There was no difference between both groups in terms of Lauren histological type, depth of tumor invasion (pT), presence of lymph node metastasis (pN), and pathologic (pTNM) stage. Major postoperative complication, and mortality at 30 and 90 days were higher in the high-ALBI patients. In the survival analysis, the high-ALBI group had worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with low-ALBI (P < 0.001). When stratified by pTNM, the difference between ALBI groups was maintained in stage I/II and stage III CG for DFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively); and for OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.063, respectively). In multivariate analysis, total gastrectomy, advanced pT stage, presence of lymph node metastasis and high-ALBI were independent factors associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative ALBI score is able to predict the outcomes of patients with GC, where high-ALBI patients have worse prognosis. Also, ALBI score allows risk stratification of patients within the same pTNM stages, and represents an independent risk factor associated with survival.

Prognostic Performance of Three Lymph-Node Staging Systems on Gastric Signet-Ring-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The lymph-node staging system can predict the prognosis of gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma (SRCC). However, there are significant differences in lymph-node status between early SRCC and advanced SRCC. Additionally, the optimal system for early and advanced SRCC remains unknown.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 693 SRCC patients who underwent radical resection in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The predicted performance of three lymph-node staging systems, including pN staging, lymph-node metastasis rate (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), was compared using the receiver characteristic operating curve (ROC) and c-index. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test analyzed the overall survival of patients. The Cox risk regression model identified independent risk factors associated with patient outcomes. The nomogram was made by R studio.

RESULTS

The 693 SRCC included 165 early SRCC and 528 advanced SRCC. ROC showed that LODDS had better predictive performance than pN and LNR in predicting prognosis regardless of early or advanced SRCC. LODDS can be used to predict the prognosis of early and advanced SRCC and was an independent risk factor associated with patient outcomes (p = 0.002, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the nomogram constructed by LODDS and clinicopathological features had good predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS showed clear prognostic superiority over both pN and LNR in early and advanced SRCC.

Risk factors for blood transfusion and its prognostic implications in curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is still a prevalent neoplasm around the world and its main treatment modality is surgical resection. The need for perioperative blood transfusions is frequent, and there is a long-lasting debate regarding its impact on survival.

AIM

To evaluate the factors related to the risk of receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and its influence on surgical and survival outcomes of patients with GC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative resection for primary gastric adenocarcinoma at our Institute between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological and surgical characteristics data were collected. The patients were divided into transfusion and non-transfusion groups for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 718 patients were included, and 189 (26.3%) patients received perioperative RBC transfusion (23 intraoperatively, 133 postoperatively, and 33 in both periods). Patients in the RBC transfusions group were older (P < 0.001), and had more comorbidities (P = 0.014), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III/IV (P < 0.001), and lower preoperative hemoglobin (P < 0.001) and albumin levels (P < 0.001). Larger tumors (P < 0.001) and advanced tumor node metastasis stage (P < 0.001) were also associated with the RBC transfusion group. The rates of postoperative complications (POC) and 30-d and 90-d mortality were significantly higher in the RBC transfusion group than in the non-transfusion group. Lower hemoglobin and albumin levels, total gastrectomy, open surgery, and the occurrence of POC were factors associated with the RBC transfusion. Survival analysis demonstrated that the RBC transfusions group had worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients who did not receive transfusion (P < 0.001 for both). In multivariate analysis, RBC transfusion, major POC, pT3/T4 category, pN+, D1 lymphadenectomy, and total gastrectomy were independent risk factors related to worse DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative RBC transfusion is associated with worse clinical conditions and more advanced tumors. Further, it is an independent factor related to worse survival in the curative intent gastrectomy setting.

Surgical and oncological outcomes of distal gastrectomy compared to total gastrectomy for middle‑third gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Distal gastrectomy (DG) and total gastrectomy (TG) are the most common types of radical surgery for patients with middle-third gastric cancer (MTGC). However, the indications and benefits of the two procedures still remain controversial. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of DG and TG in the treatment of MTGC. A rigorous literature review was performed in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese BioMedical Literature to retrieve studies published up to February 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 12 retrospective studies performing comparisons of DG and TG were included in the present meta-analysis. For patients who underwent DG, a lower rate of overall post-operative complications, anastomosis leakage and intro-abdominal infection was determined. No significant difference was observed between DG and TG in the 5-year overall survival when the proximal resection margin ranged from 3 to 5 cm. Although DG was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival rate when compared to TG, there was no significant difference in the stratified analyses by TNM stage. In conclusion, the prognosis of MTGC did not depend on the extent of gastrectomy. With lower complications and acceptable oncological outcomes, DG was a safe and feasible surgical procedure for MTGC when a negative proximal margin was confirmed.

Gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: A propensity score-matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Although D2-gastrectomy is the most effective treatment for resectable gastric cancer (GC), it is unclear whether elderly patients have increased risk of morbidity and worse survival. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of older age (OA) patients with those of less advanced age (LAA).

METHODS

GC patients undergoing curative gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups: OA (>75 years) and LAA (<75 years). Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis using seven variables was conducted to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

Among 586 patients, 494 (84.3%) were classified as LAA and 92 (15.7%) as OA. OA patients had worse clinical status, higher rates of D1-lymphadenectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, and Lauren type; higher mortality and worse survival. No difference in pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage was observed between groups. Preoperative chemotherapy was performed more frequently in the LAA group. After PSM (92 OA: 92 LAA), all variables included in PSM were matched, and mortality rates and survival became similar between groups. In multivariate analysis, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score III/IV was an independent factor associated with a 90-day mortality after PSM.

CONCLUSION

Gastrectomy in elderly GC patients has similar outcomes compared with younger ones. Clinical status and disease stage are more important than the patient's age.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been recognized as one of the most serious public health crises. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of the pandemic on the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer (GC) in addition to their clinicopathological characteristics. We also verified adherence to the COVID-19 screening protocol adopted in the institution.

METHODS

All patients with GC who underwent surgical treatment between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups according to the time period: control group (2015-2019) and COVID group (2020-2021). The institutional protocol recommends that patients referred for surgery undergo RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were classified into the COVID group and 535 into the control group. The number of surgical procedures performed in the control group was 107 (SD±23.8) per year. Diagnostic procedures (p=0.005), preoperative chemotherapy (p<0.001), and adenocarcinomas without Lauren's subtype (p=0.009) were more frequent in the COVID group than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the pathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of curative GC between the two groups. Evaluation of protocol compliance showed that of 83 patients with GC in the COVID group, 19 (22.9%) were not tested for COVID-19 before surgery. Two patients tested positive for COVID-19 (one preoperative and one postoperative).

CONCLUSION

A decrease in the average number of surgeries and a higher frequency of diagnostic procedures occurred during the pandemic than in the previous time period. Tumor/node/metastasis classification, morbidity rates, and mortality rates in patients with GC during the pandemic did not differ from those in the previous time period. Accordingly, GC surgical treatment with acceptable screening protocol compliance could be safely performed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer in a western center: a propensity score-matched analysis

The employment of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in the management of gastric cancer (GC) is increasing. Despite recent results from randomized trials, its effectiveness and oncological results in different scenarios remain controversial, especially in western centers. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes and survival of LG with open gastrectomy (OG) for GC. We reviewed all GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy from a prospective database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis including 10 variables was conducted to reduce patient selection bias using a 1:1 case-control match. A total of 530 GC were eligible for inclusion (438 OG and 92 LG). Older age, lower hemoglobin levels, total gastrectomy, larger tumor size, greater depth of tumor invasion and advanced pTNM stage was more frequent in the OG group. After PMS analysis, 92 patients were matched in each group. All variables assigned in the score were well matched. LG group had a slightly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (42.3 vs 37.6), however, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.072). No differences were recorded about the frequency of major postoperative complications (POC) and mortality rates between OG and LG groups (12% vs 15.2%, p = 0.519, respectively). In survival analysis, after matching, there was no difference in survival between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that only ASA and pN stage were independent factor associated with survival after PSM. In conclusion, laparoscopic gastrectomy was a safe and effective surgical technique for gastric cancer, with short-term and oncological outcomes comparable to open surgery.

Is Sarcopenic Obesity an Indicator of Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Surgery? A Cohort Study in a Western Population

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of sarcopenic obesity in gastric cancer surgery remains debated. We aimed to evaluate the impact on outcomes of body composition and sarcopenic obesity after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Skeletal muscle mass and visceral adipose tissue were evaluated by preoperative computed tomography to define sarcopenia and obesity. Patients were classified in body composition groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia and obesity. Prognostic factors for survival were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 198 patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer, 90 (45.4%) patients were sarcopenic, 130 (67.7%) obese, and in the subclassification for body composition categories: 33 (17%) nonsarcopenic nonobesity, 75 (38%) non sarcopenic obesity, 35 (17%) sarcopenic nonobesity, and 55 (28%) sarcopenic obesity. No category of body composition was a predictor of postoperative complications and worse overall and disease-free survival outcomes. Multivariable analysis identified ASA III classification, preoperative weight loss > 10%, postoperative surgical re-intervention, and advanced tumor stage as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and patients aged 75 years or older, preoperative weight loss > 10%, elevated netrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and advanced tumor stage as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, obesity, and sarcopenic obesity were not associated with worse outcomes after gastric cancer surgery.

Utility of a modified age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index in predicting cause-specific survival among patients with gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The current study aimed to evaluate the ability of a modified version of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (mACCI) in predicting cause-specific survival (CSS) among patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy and compared it with the conventional ACCI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 2007 to 2016 (n = 2885) were included. A mACCI was established by excluding scores for other malignancies, such as other cancers, leukemia, and lymphoma. After determining the optimal cutoff ACCI and mACCI values for CSS, clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were assessed according to the ACCI and mACCI.

RESULTS

Both ACCI and mACCI were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, only mACCI was identified as an independent prognostic factor for CSS (p < 0.001). The present study suggested that mACCI was a better indicator of CSS in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy than ACCI.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the mACCI was a strong predictor of CSS in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. We believe that the mACCI will become a novel marker that would guide treatment decisions for patients with gastric cancer suffering from comorbidities.

GASTRECTOMY IN OCTOGENARIANS WITH GASTRIC CANCER: IS IT FEASIBLE?

BACKGROUND

The octogenarian population is expanding worldwide and demand for gastrectomy due to gastric cancer in this population is expected to grow. However, the outcomes of surgery with curative intent in this age group are poorly reported and it is unclear what matters most to survival: age, clinical status, disease´s stage, or the extent of the surgery performed.

AIM

Evaluate the results of gastrectomy in octogenarians with gastric cancer and to verify the factors related to survival.

METHODS

From prospective database, patients aged 80 years or older with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy with curative intent were selected. Factors related to postoperative complications and survival were studied.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 70.5% received subtotal gastrectomy and in 72.5% D1 lymphadenectomy was performed. Twenty-five (49%) had complications, in eleven major complications occurred (seven of these were clinical complications). Hospital length of stay was longer (8.5 vs. 17.8 days, p=0.002), and overall survival shorter (median of 1.4 vs. 20.5 months, p=0.009) for those with complications. D2 lymphadenectomy and the presence of postoperative complications were independent factors for worse overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent have high risk for postoperative clinical complications. D1 lymphadenectomy should be the standard of care in these patients.

IMPACT OF AGING IN THE SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

As age advances, a higher burden of comorbidities and less functional reserve are expected, however, the impact of aging in the surgical outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) patients is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical outcomes of GC patients according to their age group.

METHODS

Patients submitted to gastrectomy with curative intent due to gastric adenocarcinoma were divided in quartiles. Each group had 150 patients and age limits were: ≤54.8, 54.9-63.7, 63.8-72, >72. The outcomes assessed were: postoperative complications (POC), 90-day postoperative mortality, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Major surgical complications were 2.7% in the younger quartile vs 12% for the others (P=0.007). Major clinical complications raised according to the age quartile: 0.7% vs 4.7% vs 5.3% vs 7.3% (P<0.042). ASA score and age were independent risk factors for major POC. The 90-day mortality progressively increased according to the age quartile: 1.3% vs 6.0% vs 7.3% vs 14% (P<0.001). DFS was equivalent among quartile groups, while OS was significantly worse for those >72-year-old. D2 lymphadenectomy only improved OS in the three younger quartiles. Age >72 was an independent risk factor for worse OS (hazard ratio of 1.72).

CONCLUSION

Patients <55-year-old have less surgical complications. As age progresses, clinical complications and 90-day mortality gradually rise. OS is worse for those above age 72, and D2 lymphadenectomy should be individualized after this age.

The efficacy of treating patients with non-metastatic gastric linitis plastica using surgery with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy

Background

To explore the efficacy of treatment strategies for non-metastatic gastric linitis plastica (GLP).

Methods

Patients with non-metastatic GLP from 2004 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We compared overall survival (OS) of those patients who received different treatments, including surgery alone, a combination of surgery with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (S + C/R), chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (C/R), and no treatment.

Results

The cohort included 474 patients with non-metastatic GLP. Overall, the median survival was significantly different among four groups (13.90 months in S + C/R, 8.38 months in surgery alone, 8.94 months in C/R and 2.50 months in no treatment). Then, we compared the efficacy of surgery alone and surgery with postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (S + post C/R). When the tumor size was greater than 8 cm in stage III patients, S + post C/R was associated with a better survival benefit than surgery alone. S + post C/R also conferred an obvious survival advantage compared to surgery alone for R0 patients with positive lymph nodes and patients with positive margins.

Conclusions

Surgery plays the fundamental role in improving the OS of patients with non-metastatic GLP. S + post C/R would benefit patients in stage III with large-sized tumors (>8 cm), patients with negative margins and positive lymph nodes, and/or patients with positive margins.

Oncologic feasibility of D1+ gastrectomy for patients with cT1N1, cT2N0-1, or cT3N0 gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

D2 gastrectomy has shown a survival benefit in patients with highly advanced gastric cancer; however, it remains unclear whether D2 gastrectomy is required for patients with early-stage advanced gastric cancer or early gastric cancer with limited lymph node metastasis. This analysis aimed to clarify the oncologic feasibility of D1+ gastrectomy in patients with cT1N1, cT2N0-1, or cT3N0 gastric cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis included 466 patients with cT1N1, cT2N0-1, or cT3N0 gastric cancer who received curative gastrectomy with either D2 or D1+ dissection. Surgical outcomes were compared between the D2 group (n = 406) and the D1+ group (n = 60).

RESULTS

The number of patients with higher age and higher comorbidity index was greater in the D1+ group than in the D2 group. Postoperative complications were significantly lower in the D1+ group than in the D2 group (10.0% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.004). No statistically significant difference in 5-year overall survival (p = 0.146) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.807) between the groups was noted. The incidence of local recurrences (p = 0.500) and that of lymph node recurrences (p = 1.000) were also similar between the groups. Multivariable analysis for overall survival identified age, clinical node-positive status, high Charlson score (≥3), advanced pathological stage (≥III), and postoperative complication (grade ≥ II) as independent prognostic factors. The propensity score-matched analysis showed very similar survival outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

D1+ gastrectomy may be oncologically feasible for patients with cT1N1, cT2N0-1, or cT3N0 stage gastric cancer.

Predictive Value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for Outcomes After Hepatic Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) on outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We assessed 763 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC. The ACCI scores were categorized as follows: ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7.

RESULTS

A multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratios for postoperative complications in ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 0.71 (p = 0.41) and 4.15 (p < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival of ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 1.52 (p = 0.023) and 2.45 (p < 0.001), respectively. The distribution of deaths due to HCC-related, liver-related, and other causes was 68.2%, 11.8%, and 20% in ACCI ≤ 5 group, 47.2%, 13.9%, and 38.9% in ACCI = 6 group, and 27.3%, 9.1%, and 63.6% in ACCI ≥ 7 group (p = 0.053; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. = 6, p = 0.19; ACCI = 6 vs. ≥ 7, p < 0.001; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. ≥ 7). In terms of the treatment for HCC recurrence in ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, adaptation rate of surgical resection was 20.1%, 7.3%, and 11.1% and the rate of palliative therapy was 4.3%, 12.2%, and 22.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACCI predicted the short-term and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection of HCC. These findings will help physicians establish a treatment strategy for HCC patients with comorbidities.

Prediction scores for complication and recurrence after multivisceral resection in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Multivisceral resection (MVR) is indicated in T4b gastric cancer (GC) when R0 can be achieved. Patient's selection for MVR is imperative, since it carries an increased risk for postoperative complications (POC) and disease recurrence. This study aims to elaborate prediction scores for POC and recurrence after MVR for cT4b GC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MVR with curative intent due to cT4b gastric adenocarcinoma were selected from our prospective database. Scoring models were based on the variables identified as risk factors for the studied outcome. Through binary regression the model that best predicted the outcome was created.

RESULTS

From 237 MVRs, 58 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Males were 70.7%, mean age was 61.8 years. A pT4b was confirmed in 34 patients, 29 had 2 or more adjacent organs removed. Major POC occurred in 25.9%, mortality was 8.6%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar for pT4b and non-pT4b. DFS was worse for pN+ and when >2 adjacent organs were removed. Scoring models included 5 and 6 parameters for POC and recurrence, respectively, and their accuracy was 80.6% (95%CI = 0.69-0.92) and 78% (95%CI = 0.66-0.90). The POC and recurrence rates in low- and high-score groups were statistically different (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with high-risk for POC had lower OS (p = 0.036) and DFS was worse in the high-recurrence risk group (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The proposed scoring systems accurately predict POC and recurrence in GC patients undergoing MVR. These models are easy to use and can assist in the adoption of an individualized approach.

Return to Intended Oncologic Treatment (RIOT) in Resected Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative chemotherapy (CMT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is commonly recommended for gastric cancer (GC) patients in order to improve survival. However, some factors that prevent patients from return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) may increase the risk of recurrence and decrease the survival benefits achieved with curative resection. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and factors associated with inability to RIOT and their impact on survival.

METHODS

This retrospective study included stage II/III GC patients treated with potentially curative gastrectomy. Patients who could return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT group) and those who could not (inability to RIOT group) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 313 eligible GC patients, 89 (28.4%) and 85 (27.2%) patients receive CRT and CMT, respectively, representing a RIOT rate of 55.6%. The main reason was attributed to general poor performance status (30.2%), followed by surgical postoperative complications (POC) (20.1%). Older age, higher ASA, D1 lymphadenectomy, and major POC were related to inability to RIOT. Older age, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and major POC were independent risk factors for inability to RIOT. Five-year DFS and OS were worse for the inability to RIOT group than for the RIOT group (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively). In multivariate analyses, absence of neoadjuvant therapy, total gastrectomy, pT3/T4, pN+, and inability to RIOT were associated with worse DFS. Type of gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, pN status, Rx resection, and RIOT group were associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Older age, high NLR, and major POC were risk factors for inability to RIOT. RIOT was an independent predictor of survival.

Expression Profile of Markers for Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Patients: HER-2, Microsatellite Instability and PD-L1

BACKGROUND

The assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), microsatellite instability (MSI) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is relevant for the selection and effectiveness of targeted therapy in gastric cancer (GC).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of GC patients according to these profiles.

METHODS

GC patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were eligible. HER2, MSI status and PD-L1 expression were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients were grouped as follows: HER2+ group, immunotherapy (IT) group (MSI and/or PD-L1+), and non-targeted therapy (NTT) group (stable microsatellite and HER2/PD-L1-).

RESULTS

Among 282 patients, 50 (17.7%) were HER2+ and 79 (28%) MSI/PD-L1+. Fifteen had HER2+ and MSI/PD-L1+, while 168 (59.6%) were in the NTT group. HER2+ GCs were related to male gender (p = 0.007), intestinal type (p = 0.001) and less advanced pTNM stage (p = 0.029). Older age (p = 0.003), subtotal gastrectomy (p = 0.025), intestinal type (p = 0.008), pN0 status (p = 0.002) and less advanced pTNM stage (p = 0.001) were associated with the IT group. IT GC had better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival than the NTT group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.027, respectively). Concerning patients eligible for the standard adjuvant therapy, the treatment impacted positively on DFS for HER2+ and NTT groups (p = 0.003 and p = 0.042, respectively). No difference in DFS was seen between IT patients who received perioperative/adjuvant therapy and those treated only with surgery (p = 0.160).

CONCLUSIONS

GC patients who exhibited markers that can serve as an indication for known targeted therapy represent 40.4% of cases. The IT group was associated with a better prognosis. No benefit with standard adjuvant treatment appears to be achieved in MSI/PD-L1+ GCs.

Gastric cancer in young adults: a worse prognosis group?

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics and survival of young patients with gastric cancer, regardless of the intention of treatment.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective analysis of all gastric cancer patients undergoing any surgical treatment between 2008 and 2017. We considered patients under 45 years old as young adults and those over 45 years old, as of advanced age.

RESULTS

of the 875 patients evaluated, 84 (9.6%) were young adults and 791 (90.4%) were older. Younger patients were associated with female gender (p<0.001), lower Charlson score (p=0.002), ASA I/II (p<0.001), diffuse Lauren type (p<0.001) and poorly differentiated tumors (p<0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding treatment intention (palliative versus curative) (p=0.267) and cTNM clinical stage (p=0.120). Disease-free survival was worse in younger individuals (p=0.049), but overall survival was similar between groups (p=0.578). Multivariate analysis identified total gastrectomy, pT3/T4, pN+, and diffuse Lauren type as prognostic factors associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival. Age was not an independent factor associated with worse prognosis.

CONCLUSION

although younger patients had lower disease-free survival, overall survival was similar between groups, and age was not a significant independent prognostic factor.