Twenty-two Year Multicentre Experience of Late Open Conversions after Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Two-Decade Single-Center Experience with Graft Infections After Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

To study the incidence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) graft infections and to examine the results of treatment at a single institution, where the mainstay of treatment has for 20 years been to explant the infected grafts and to reconstruct in situ with biological materials.

METHODS

All standard EVAR patients treated from January 2000 to December 2022 at our institution were extracted from a prospective vascular surgery database, and post-EVAR infections were identified through a chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Primary endpoints were short-term (30-day and 90-day) mortality and mid-term survival. Secondary endpoints were freedom from reinfections and freedom from reinterventions.

RESULTS

A total of 29 EVAR grafts in 1,274 patients became infected during a mean total follow-up of 6.36 years (range 4.4 months-23.3 years). The cumulative rate of infections was 1.7%, and the incidence rate was 2.69 cases per 1,000 patient-years in the patient group where the primary EVAR was performed in an elective setting. The median time to infection was 8.4 months (range: 9 days-11.4 years). With 3 additional patients from other institutions, a total of 32 patients underwent treatment for an EVAR graft infection. Only 2 patients (6.3%) were female. Nine patients (28.1%) were treated conservatively, 1 patient was operated with a graft preservation strategy and the rest (n = 22, 69%) underwent graft explantation and in situ reconstruction. In these 22 reconstructions, the graft material used was an autologous femoral vein in 19 (86.4%) patients, a cryopreserved allogenous femoral vein in 2 (9.1%) patients, and a rifampicin-soaked dacron prosthesis in 1 (4.5%) patient. The early postoperative mortality was 19.0% (n = 4 of 21) at 30 days and 23.8% (n = 5 of 21) at 90 days for the patients with explanted grafts with in-situ reconstruction, while survival at 1 year was 76.2% (n = 16 of 21) for the group treated with biological reconstruction and 44.4% (n = 4 of 9) for the conservatively treated patients. Similarly, in Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 3-year survival was 68.2% and 22.2%, respectively (P = 0.002). During a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range: 3 days-12.4 years), there were no reinfections among patients with biological reconstructions, and none of the patients required late graft reinterventions.

CONCLUSION

EVAR graft explantation and in situ biological aortic reconstruction offers a viable, infection-resistant and durable solution for the treatment of EVAR infection.

Endotension following endovascular aortic repair: systematic review and meta-analysis on occurrence rate, treatment approaches and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Endotension is still a poorly understood phenomenon in terms of occurrence rate, treatment indications and outcomes. The aim of this study was to report incidence, different treatment approaches and outcomes of patients affected by endotension after EVAR.

EVIDENCE AQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature (database searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library) was undertaken until June 2024. Articles reporting data about occurrence rate, strategy of treatment and outcomes of patients affected by endotension, including at least five cases of endotension were included. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using a random-effects model.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirteen non-randomized studies published between 2005 and 2024 were examined, with a total of 22,118 patients undergoing EVAR due to abdominal aortic aneurysm. Among them, 209 patients developed endotension during follow-up, resulting in an estimated occurrence rate of 1.6% (95% CI 0.9-2.3). Four approaches to treat endotension were reported in literature. Estimated rates were: open surgical conversion (OSC) in 37.3% (95% CI 10.5-64.0), conservative approach in 25.9% (95% CI -4.4-56.2), endovascular relining in 23.3% (95% CI 11.4-35.2) and semi-conversions in 19.5% (95% CI 4.9-34.2). The technical success (TS) in OSC, relining and semi-conversion subgroups were respectively: 93.4% (95% CI 85.7-101), 80.7% (95% CI 60.5-101) and 94.5% (95% CI 85.2-103.8).

CONCLUSIONS

OSC is the most used method, achieving high TS rate. OSC and semi-conversion presented a high CS during follow-up, while relining had lower "durability" compared to surgical treatments. Data about conservative treatment are scarce but in can be considered for selected cases.

Rupture after previous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of factors influencing perioperative mortality

OBJECTIVE

To document the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of patients presenting with late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to investigate which factors may influence the perioperative mortality.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies was undertaken to February 2024 in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. We included studies reporting on either EVAR or open surgical repair (OSR) of late rupture (>30 days) after previous EVAR. The primary end point was perioperative (in-hospital or 30-day) mortality. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted and a meta-regression was subsequently performed to examine the impact of several variables on perioperative mortality.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (743 patients, 746 ruptures) were included. The cumulative incidence of rupture after EVAR during a mean 5-year follow-up was 1.5%. The mean time from the index EVAR to rupture was 48 months (range, 16-81 months). The mean compliance with follow-up was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58-77) and 32% (95% CI, 24-40) of the cases had at least one previous aneurysm-related reintervention. Type I and III endoleaks were the predominant causes of rupture (88%). Approximately one-third of the patients (37%; 95% CI, 28-47) were hemodynamically unstable. Of those undergoing an operation, 247 patients (38%) were managed endovascularly and 409 (62%) by OSR. The pooled perioperative mortality was 29.5% (30 studies; 95% CI, 23.8-35.8) and was significantly lower in the endovascular subgroup (20 studies; risk ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86). Meta-regression demonstrated that perioperative mortality seems to fall in recent years (-0.0545; P = .04), to decrease in larger series in the endovascular subgroup (-0.0375; P = .01), and to be significantly higher when total endograft explantation is required in the OSR subgroup (0.0121; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Late rupture after previous EVAR is a devastating event with a considerable risk for death. EVAR is associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality and should be preferred whenever feasible. When OSR is required, total endograft explantation carries a higher mortality and, therefore, preserving functional parts of the endograft should be encouraged.

Long-term results of late open conversions with partial or total removal of noninfected stent grafts after failed endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Open surgical conversion after failed EVAR has become more common. Our aim was to compare the short- and long-term results of late open conversions for noninfectious indications with partial or total stent graft removal.

METHODS

Our study is a retrospective, multicenter observational study of late open conversions performed in five hospitals between January 1997 and June 2024. Patients who underwent a partial or total removal of a stent graft more than 30 days after EVAR for noninfectious indications were included in the analysis and divided into two groups: partial conversion (PC) and total conversion (TC). The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, 5-year survival, and freedom from late complications. The secondary outcomes were perioperative cardiovascular complications, length of hospital stay, and 5-year freedom from reinterventions and from aneurysm-related death.

RESULTS

The analysis included 97 patients: 57 (58.8%) in the PC group and 40 (41.2%) in the TC group. The 30-day mortality in the PC group was lower compared with the TC group (14.3% vs 24.3%; odds ratio, 0.52; P = .220), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The estimated 5-year overall survival was similar in the PC and TC groups (58.8% vs 59.8%; P = .726). The patients in the PC group had no infections or thrombosis and a similar freedom from late complications compared with the TC group (81.2% vs 84.0%; P = .788). A subgroup analysis comparing the preoperative CTA scans and intraoperative observations revealed an occult endoleak in 22 patients (22.7%), and in the 12 patients (12.4%) who underwent surgery for a suspected endoleak, none were identified during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

PC seems to be noninferior to TC and possibly even safer, with a trend toward lower mortality in the short term. No differences in mortality or complications were found between the groups during long-term follow-up.

Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Isolated Type 2 Endoleak Refractory to an Embolization Procedure

Introduction: A type 2 endoleak (EL2) remains the most prevalent complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis, including patients who underwent embolization for an isolated EL2 after EVAR. The study population was stratified into two groups: Group A, consisting of patients whose EL2 resolved after the first embolization procedure, and Group B, consisting of those with refractory EL2 (rEL2). The indication for EL2 treatment was aneurysmal sac growth amounting to >10 mm from the index EVAR. The indications for endograft explantation were the absence of high comorbidities and persisting aneurysmal sac expansion. Those with high comorbidities were subjected to another endovascular procedure or a conservative approach, the latter being preferred. The primary endpoint was EL2 resolution. The secondary endpoints were mid-term outcomes in terms of aneurysmal sac shrinkage, stability and expansion rates, and aneurysm-related complications. Results: Among 57 patients, 19 patients (33.3%) showed signs of EL2 after the first embolization, whereas 38 (66.6%) presented rEL2. Of these, 14 (36.8%) presented significant aneurysmal sac expansion: 8 patients underwent a secondary embolization, while an open conversion was performed in the remaining 6 patients (42.8%), 4 of whom, in an elective setting, showed a complete resolution of EL2, while 2 patients treated in an urgent setting died from a ruptured aneurysm. Among the patients treated with a secondary embolization, only 2 patients presented EL2 resolution, while the other 6 patients (75%) showed rEL2. Out of the 38 patients with rEL2, 24 patients did not undergo further interventions; of these, 11 (45.8%) presented sac expansion, and 16% developed type IA EL. Conclusions: A strict follow-up and possibly a more aggressive treatment should be considered in an elective setting for patients with rEL2.

Twenty-Five Year Multicentre Experience of Explantation of Infected Abdominal Aortic Endografts

We report a multicenter experience of open conversions (OC) for aortic endograft infections (AEI). We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent OC for AEI after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), from 1997 to 2021 in 12 Italian centers. The endpoints were as follows: mortality (30-days, in-hospital), major postoperative complications. Follow-up data included: survival, aortic-related complications, infection persistence or reoccurrence. Fifty-eight patients (mean age: 73.8 ± 6.6 years) were included. Median time from EVAR to OC was 14 months (interquartile range 7-45). Thirty-five patients (60.3%) were symptomatic at presentation. Aortic reconstruction was anatomic in 32 patients (55.2%), extra-anatomic in 26 (44.8%). Thirty-day mortality was 31% (18/58). Six additional patients died after 30 days during the same hospitalization (in-hospital mortality: 41.4%). Most common post-operative complications included respiratory failure (38.6%) and renal insufficiency (35.1%). During 28.1 ± 4 months follow-up, 4 aneurysm-related deaths were recorded. Infection re-occurred in 29.4% of the patients. Estimated survival was 50% at 1 year, and 30% at 5 years, and was significantly lower for patients who underwent extra-anatomic reconstructions (37 vs 61% at 1 year, 16 vs 45% at 5 years; log-rank P = .021). OC for AEI is associated with high early mortality. The poor mid-term survival is influenced by aortic complications and infection re-occurrence.

Endograft Thrombosis as an Indication for Open Conversion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in a Multicenter Experience over 25 Years

BACKGROUND

To describe the outcomes of aortic endograft thrombosis (AET) as an indication for open conversion (OC) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a multicenter experience.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed cases of OC for AET following EVAR across 12 Italian Vascular Surgery centers from 1997 to September 2022. The end points were as follows: 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications. Follow-up data included survival and aortic-related complications.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 8.5 years) were included. The median elapsed time between EVAR and OC was 26.46 months (interquartile range: 13.8-45.9). Proximal aortic cross-clamping site was supraceliac in 8 out of 16 (50%) patients, and complete removal of the stentgraft was achieved in 75% of cases (12/16 patients). Reconstructions were aorto-bi-iliac grafts in 8 cases (50%), 7 aortobifemoral bypass grafts (43.8%), and 1 aortoaortic tube graft (6.3%). All patients were symptomatic at presentation (68.7% unilateral acute limb ischemia, 25% bilateral acute limb ischemia, 1 patient had chronic severe claudication). Thirty-day mortality was 12.5% (2/16 patients). The overall morbidity rate was 43.8% (7 of 16 patients). No specific risk factors for early mortality were found. The overall estimated survival rate was 80.4% at 1 year, 62.5% at 2 years, and 41.7% at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

OC for AET is typically reserved for complex cases that are not amenable to endovascular solutions. The frequent need for suprarenal clamping and complete endograft removal seems to be associated with high short-term mortality.

Indication and Outcome of Late Open Conversion after Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms over the last 2 decades. Endograft technology and treatment of complications like endoleaks, graft migration, or graft occlusion developed over time. However, sometimes open surgical conversion maybe required. Our aim was to analyze the indications, the technical aspects and outcomes in patients who underwent open conversion after EVAR with different types and generations of endografts.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study reviewed all patients who underwent EVAR from 2004 to 2020. Open surgical conversions >1 month post EVAR were identified. Conversions for graft infection were excluded. Indications for conversion and operative technique were analyzed. Primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-interventions and follow-up mortality.

RESULTS

During 2004 and 2020, 443 consecutive EVARs were performed, and 28 patients required open surgical conversion, with an additional 3 referred from other hospitals (N = 31). The median age was 75 (range 58-93); 94% were male. Conversion was performed after a median time of 55 months (range 16-209). Twenty patients underwent elective and 11 emergency conversion. Indications for open conversion were graft migration, respectively, disease progression with endoleak type Ia and/or Ib in 52% (16/31) and sac expansion due to endoleak type II in 26% (8/31). Of the 31 patients, 17 (55%) had at least one previous endovascular re-intervention. All patients met the device-specific instructions for use for each implanted endograft. In-hospital intervention rate was 16% (5/31). Thirty-day mortality rate was 3% (1/31) with one patient died due to multiorgan failure after rupture with complete endograft replacement. Five patients (16%) died during follow-up. Mid-term follow-up was 47.5 months (range 24-203) with estimated cumulative survival rates of 97%, 89%, and 84%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Late open conversion remains a valuable treatment option and can be performed safely in elective and emergency setting with a low early mortality. Lifelong surveillance and prompt intervention when necessary are essential in ensuring optimal outcomes after EVAR and preventing the need for emergent conversions.

The Role of Narrow Aortic Bifurcation in Affecting EVAR Treatment and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered a risk factor for endograft thrombosis after aorto-biiliac endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for aortic or iliac aneurysm. Nowadays, no consensus on the threshold diameter for the definition of NAB is reached and other aortic bifurcation features are rarely considered. The aim of the study is to assess the EVAR outcomes using bifurcated endograft according to anatomical characteristics of aortic bifurcation.

METHODS

The study included patients treated with primary EVAR from 2016 to 2022. A retrospective analysis of single-center prospectively collected database was performed. Patients were classified in standard aortic bifurcation (SAB) (aortic bifurcation diameter >20 mm), NAB (≤20 mm and >16 mm), and extremely NAB (eNAB) (≤16 mm). The 3 groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, risk factors, procedure setting (elective or urgent/emergent), and type of deployed endograft. In NAB and eNAB groups, severe calcification (SC) and length of stenotic aortic bifurcation >10 mm (long-NAB) were assessed from preoperative imaging. In SAB, NAB, and eNAB groups, following outcomes were evaluated: rate of intraoperative iliac endograft stenting (unilateral or kissing stenting), primary patency (PP), freedom from endograft-related reintervention, and overall survival during follow-up.

RESULTS

The total number of deployed aorto-biiliac endografts was 365 (mean age: 76.6 ± 7.4 years; male 89.3%): SAB 298 (81.6%), NAB 57 (15.6%), and eNAB 10 (2.7%) cases. Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers were more frequent in patients with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.002, 0.039, and 0.010, respectively). In NAB and eNAB groups, SC was reported in 18/67 cases (26.9%) and long-NAB in 15/67 cases (25.4%). Patients with eNAB have more frequent SC of aortic bifurcation (60% vs. NAB 21.1%, P = 0.018) and long-NAB (50% vs. NAB 17.5%, P = 0.023). In SAB, NAB, and eNAB, intraoperative iliac endograft stenting was performed in 34/298 (11.4%), 9/57 (15.8%), and 5/10 (50%), respectively (P = 0.001). Kissing stenting was performed more frequently in groups with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.010). Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 21.5 months. At 1, 3, and 5 years, PP was 98.5%, 96.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. eNAB had lower rate of PP compared to NAB group (P = 0.030). Long-NAB had lower rate of PP (P = 0.035). At 1, 3, and 5 years, endograft-related reintervention was 96.8%, 86.7%, and 76.7%, respectively, with no differences between 3 groups (P = 0.423). At 1, 3, and 5 years, survival was 92.5%, 77.6%, and 58.1%, respectively, with no difference between SAB, NAB, and eNAB (P = 0.673).

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers have more frequently smaller aortic bifurcation diameter. eNAB patients have more challenging anatomical characteristics compared with NAB group, requiring higher rate of intraoperative stenting, especially kissing stenting. Mid-term PP seems to be negatively influenced by aortic bifurcation ≤16 mm and long-NAB.

Nationwide analysis of EVAR explantation outcomes in Korea: A comprehensive dataset study

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms, constituting 70%-80% of interventions. Despite initial benefits, long-term studies show increased mortality. Using nationwide data, this study assesses outcomes of EVAR, open aortic repair (OAR), and EVAR explantation (EE) in Korea, while exploring characteristics of late open conversion, including the rising EE incidence.

METHODS

Employing the National Health Insurance Service database, covering health-related data for nearly 50 million Koreans, the study spanned from 2002 to 2020. Patients with AAA diagnoses (I71.3 or I71.4) were categorized into OAR, EVAR, and EE groups based on procedural codes. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, Cox proportional hazard models, and multivariate Cox regression, assessed baseline characteristics, mortality risks, and factors within the EE group.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed 26,195 patients, with 66.19% in the EVAR group, 31.87% in the OAR group, and 1.94% in the EE group. EVAR cases steadily increased from 2002 to 2018. Survival rates favored EVAR, followed by OAR and EE. 30-day survival was lower in EE than EVAR. Multivariate analysis for EE revealed no risk factors for 30-days survival but identified age, chronic kidney disease, high Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and less than 6 months since EVAR as risk factors for overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

Rising EE trends with increased EVAR adoption, particularly evident in the Korean dataset, underscore inferior outcomes. This highlights the critical need for strategic initial treatment decisions and timely interventions to enhance overall results and mitigate the unfavorable EE incidence.

Understanding Type II Endoleak: A Harmless Imaging Finding or a Silent Threat?

Type II endoleak (T2EL) represents a challenging clinical entity following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although several studies have suggested that T2ELs are related to an increased risk of aneurysm sac growth and subsequent rupture, the exact role that T2ELs play in long-term outcomes remains debatable. Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and management options of T2ELs is important for patients' safety and proper resource utilization. While conservative management may be suitable for asymptomatic patients with a stable aneurysm size, interventional approaches, including transarterial embolization, direct sac puncture embolization and open conversion have been described for patients with persistent T2EL associated with sac expansion. However, more research is needed to better determine the clinical benefit of such interventions. A thorough evaluation of all endoleak types before T2EL treatment would be reasonable for patients with T2ELs associated with sac expansion. Further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies aimed at minimizing T2EL-related complications. Collaborative efforts among vascular specialists, radiologists, and researchers are of paramount importance to address this ongoing clinical challenge.

Open Conversion with Explantation of Stent Grafts After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is widely used worldwide, the fact that it is associated with increased rates of reintervention has been considered a problem. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of primary open AAA repair and open conversion with explantation of stent grafts after EVAR.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 1,120 patients (open repair, n = 664; EVAR, n = 456) who underwent AAA repair at Kobe University from 1999 to 2019. Of the 664 patients who underwent open repair, 121 (patients who underwent primary open repair (POR) as a concomitant procedure and patients with ruptured AAA) were excluded from the study. The outcomes of POR were compared with those of open conversion with explantation of stent grafts.

RESULTS

Of the 543 patients who underwent open repair, 513 underwent POR and 30 underwent open conversion with explantation of stent grafts. The operation time for POR was significantly less than that for open conversion with explantation. During surgery, patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required significantly more transfusions of red cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate than those who underwent POR. Overall, 30 patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required a total of 48 reinterventions before surgery. Hospital mortality rates were 0.7% and 0% in the POR and open conversion with explantation groups, respectively (P = 0.62). Although overall survival at 5 years in the POR group was significantly better than that in the open conversion with explantation group (89.3 ± 1.7% vs. 79.5 ± 9.6%; P = 0.01), there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the freedom from aortic event (hospital death, reintervention, and aortic death). According to the multivariate analysis, open conversion with explantation was not an independent risk factor for late death. There were 20 patients who were hesitant to undergo OCE, although we recommended OCE. In a subgroup analysis, the overall mean cost borne by patients who underwent EVAR was approximately 2.3 times higher compared with that borne by patients who underwent POR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although demanding, both early and long-term outcomes of OCE have been favorable in our present study. OCE is highly recommended in patients with persistent sac enlargement after EVAR.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, indications, and outcomes of early open conversions after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to report incidence, indications, and outcomes of early open conversions (EOC) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), defined as surgical conversion performed within 30 days from the initial EVAR.

EVIDENCE AQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature was performed (database searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library; last search April 2023). Articles reporting EOC after EVAR comprising at least five patients were included. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using a random-effects model.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seventeen non-randomized studies, published between 1999 and 2022, were included. A total of 35,970 patients had previously undergone EVAR, of these 438 patients underwent EOC. Estimated incidence of EOC was 1.4% (95% CI 1.1-1.4; I2=81.66%). Specifically, in the works published before 2010 the incidence was 1.8% (95% CI 1.3-2.4; I2=74.25) while for subsequent ones it was 0.9% (95% CI 0.6-1.1; I2=69.82). Weighted mean age was 74.91 years (95% CI 72.42-77.39; I2=83.11%). Estimated rate of cause determining EOC were: access issue in 27.7% of patients (95% CI 13.8-41.6; I2=88.14%), incorrect placement of the endograft in 20.1% (95% CI 10.2-30.0; I2=76,9%), problems with "delivery system" in 9.0% (95% CI 4.9-13.1; I2=0%), aorto-iliac rupture in 8.6% (95% CI 4.5-12.6; I2=0%), endoprosthesis migration in 7.9% of cases (95% CI 3.3-12.4; I2=22.96%), failure in engaging the contralateral gate in 4.8% (95% CI 1.6-8; I2=0%), "kinking" or "twisting" of endoprosthesis in 3.3% (95% CI 0.6-5.9; I2=0%), graft thrombosis in 3.2% (95% CI 0.6-5.7; I2=0%), type Ia endoleak in 2.9% (95% CI 0.4-5.4; I2=0%), type III endoleak in 2.8% (95% CI 0.3-5.3; I2=0%) and endograft infection in 2.7% (95% CI 0.3-5.2; I2=0%). Intraoperative conversion rate was 91.1% (95% CI 85.8-96.4; I2=66.01%). Early mortality rate after EOC was 14.5% (95% CI 9.1-19.9; I2=48.31%). Mean length of stay (LOS) was 11.94 days (95% CI 6.718-17.172; I2=92.34%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of EOC seems to decrease over time. Causes of EOC were mainly related to access problems and incorrect positioning of the endograft. Most of the EOC were performed intraoperatively carrying a high mortality rate.

Reducing aneurysm sac growth and secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by preemptive coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries

OBJECTIVE

Type II endoleak (EL-2) is the most common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), leading to continued sac growth and potential rupture. In this study, we examined the association between patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar arteries (LAs) with respect to sac growth. The effect of preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LAs on the need for secondary interventions for sac growth post-EVAR was also evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for non-ruptured, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) from January 2012 to December 2020. A select group of patients underwent preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Patients with any types I, III, or IV endoleaks were excluded. Patency of the IMA and LA on preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) was evaluated on TeraRecon workstation. All secondary interventions to treat EL-2 were recorded. Sac growth was defined as centerline axial diameter increase of ≥5 mm on follow-up CTA.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients (mean age, 74 ± 8.5 years; 83.7% male) underwent EVAR. Ninety-nine patients had preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Mean follow-up of the cohort was 59.3 ± 30.5 months. Thirty-six patients (12%) demonstrated sac growth on follow-up; 12 of these (33.3%) had preemptive embolization. The median time until detection of sac growth was 28.8 months (interquartile range, 15.2-46.5 months), with a mean growth of 10.1 ± 6.4 mm. Sac growth was significantly associated with presence of EL-2: 27 of 36 (75%) with EL-2 vs 9 of 36 (25%) without EL-2 (P < .001). Patients with sac growth had a higher mean total number (2.6 ± 1.5) of patent lower LAs (L3, L4) compared with those without (2.0 ± 1.4; P = .03). Patency of L1, L2, and L3 LAs were not associated with sac growth. However, patency of at least one L4 LA was significantly associated with sac growth (14.8% vs 7.7%; P = .04). The highest incidence of sac growth (17.6%) was seen when both IMA and L4 LA were patent; significantly different from the lowest incidence (5.3%) when both were occluded preoperatively (P = .018). Preemptive coiling of the IMA and/or LA significantly reduced the need for post-EVAR secondary intervention for sac growth. Freedom from post-EVAR secondary intervention was achieved in 92 of 99 (92.9%) pre-EVAR coiled patients vs 163 of 201 (81.5%) patients who did not undergo pre-EVAR coiling (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive coil embolization of the IMA and LAs, especially L4 LA, reduces the need for secondary interventions for sac growth, potentially improving the long-term durability of EVAR.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Elective Open Conversion versus Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Repair for Previous Non-Infected Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of patients electively undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F/B-EVAR) or open conversion for failed previous non-infected endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHOD

The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023404091). The review followed the PRISMA guidelines; certainty was assessed through the GRADE and quality through MINORS tools. Outcomes data were pooled separately for F/B-EVAR and open conversion. A random effects meta-analysis of proportions was conducted; heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Thirty eight studies were included, for a total of 1 645 patients of whom 1 001 (60.9%) underwent an open conversion and 644 (39.1%) a F/B-EVAR. The quality of evidence was generally limited. GRADE certainty was judged low for 30 day death (in both groups) and F/B-EVAR technical success, and very low for the other outcomes. Pooled 30 day death was 2.3% (I2 33%) in the open conversion group and 2.4% (I2 0%) in the F/B-EVAR conversion group (p = .36). Technical success for F/B-EVAR was 94.1% (I2 23%). The pooled 30 day major systemic complications rate was higher in the open conversion (21.3%; I2 74%) than in the F/B-EVAR (15.7%; I2 78%) group (p = .52). At 18 months follow up, the pooled re-intervention rate was 4.5% (I2 58%) in the open conversion and 26% (I2 0%) in the F/B-EVAR group (p < .001), and overall survival was 92.5% (I2 59%) and 81.6% (I2 68%), respectively (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

In the elective setting, and excluding infections, the early results of both open conversion and F/B-EVAR after failed EVAR appear satisfactory. Although open conversion presented with higher complication rates in the first 30 days after surgery, at follow up it seemed to be associated with fewer re-interventions and better survival compared with F/B-EVAR.

Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy.

METHODS

The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.

Multicenter Comparative Analysis of Late Open Conversion in Patients With Adherence and Nonadherence to Instructions for Use Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

PURPOSE

The widespread adoption of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as preferred treatment modality for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has enlarged the number of patients needing open surgical conversion (OSC). The relationship between adherence to Instructions For Use (IFU) and EVAR long-term outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare preoperative differences and postoperative outcomes between EVAR patients not adjusted to IFU and adjusted to IFU who underwent OSC.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study reviewed 33 explanted EVARs between January 2003 and December 2019 at 14 Vascular Units. Patients were included if OSC occurred >30 days after implantation and excluded if explantation was performed to treat an endograft infection, aortic dissection, or traumatic transections. Variables analyzed included baseline characteristics, adherence to IFU, implant and explant procedural details, secondary reinterventions, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen explanted patients (15/33, 45.5%) were identified not accomplished to IFU (out-IFU) at initial EVAR vs 18 explanted patients adjusted (in-IFU). During follow-up, a mean of 1.73±1.2 secondary reinterventions were performed, with more type I endoleaks treated in the subgroup out-IFU: 16.7% vs 6.3% in-IFU patients and more type III endoleaks (8.3% vs 0%). Patients out-IFU had shorter mean interval from implant to explant: 47.60±28.8 months vs 71.17±48. Type II endoleak was the most frequent indication for explantation. Low-flow endoleaks (types II, IV, V) account for 44% of indications for OSC in subgroup of patients in-IFU, compared with 13.3% in patients out-IFU and high-flow endoleaks (types I and III) were the main indication for patients out-IFU (33.3% vs 16.7% in-IFU). Total endograft explantation was performed in 57.5% of cases (19/33) and more suprarenal clamping was required in the subgroup out-IFU. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 12.1% (4/33): 20% for patients out-IFU and 5.6% in-IFU.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, type II endoleak is the most common indication for conversion and differences have been found between patients treated outside IFU with explantation taking place earlier during follow-up, mainly due to high-flow endoleaks and with higher mortality in comparison with patients adjusted to IFU. Ongoing research is required to delve into these differences.

Editor's Choice - The VASCUNExplanT Project: An International Study Assessing Open Surgical Conversion of Failed Non-Infected Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The need for open surgical conversion (OSC) after failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) persists, despite expanding endovascular options for secondary intervention. The VASCUNExplanT project collected international data to identify risk factors for failed EVAR, as well as OSC outcomes. This retrospective cross sectional study analysed data after OSC for failed EVAR from the VASCUNET international collaboration.

METHODS

VASCUNET queried registries from its 28 member countries, and 17 collaborated with data from patients who underwent OSC (2005 - 2020). Any OSC for infection was excluded. Data included demographics, EVAR, and OSC procedural details, as well as post-operative mortality and complication rates.

RESULTS

There were 348 OSC patients from 17 centres, of whom 33 (9.4%) were women. There were 130 (37.4%) devices originally deployed outside of instructions for use. The most common indication for OSC was endoleak (n = 143, 41.1%); ruptures accounted for 17.2% of cases. The median time from EVAR to OSC was 48.6 months [IQR 29.7, 71.6]; median abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter at OSC was 70.5 mm [IQR 61, 82]. A total of 160 (45.6%) patients underwent one or more re-interventions prior to OSC, while 63 patients (18.1%) underwent more than one re-intervention (range 1 - 5). Overall, the 30 day mortality rate post-OSC was 11.8% (n = 41), 11.1% for men and 18.2% for women (p = .23). The 30 day mortality rate was 6.1% for elective cases, and 28.3% for ruptures (p < .0001). The predicted 90 day survival for the entire cohort was 88.3% (95% CI 84.3 - 91.3). Multivariable analysis revealed rupture (OR 4.23; 95% CI 2.05 - 8.75; p < .0001) and total graft explantation (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.34; p = .04) as the only statistically significant predictive factors for 30 day death.

CONCLUSION

This multicentre analysis of patients who underwent OSC shows that, despite varying case mix and operative techniques, OSC is feasible but associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates, particularly when performed for rupture.

[Late Open Semi-conversion with Endograft Preservation for (Type II) Endoleaks with Late Aneurysm Sac Enlargement after EVAR - Indications, Method and Results in Our Own Patient Collective]

EVAR (endovascular aortic repair) is the most common method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, but according to the latest findings it carries the risk of subsequent complications. These can be caused by (late) aneurysm sac growth. If conservative and surgical therapies fail to treat the aneurysm sac growth, open conversion is necessary to prevent aneurysm rupture. There are several options for open conversion, in which the EVAR prosthesis can be completely preserved or is (partially) removed. Late open semi-conversion with complete in-situ preservation of the EVAR-prosthesis and gathering of the aneurysm sac are a less invasive method than complete conversion and may be performed instead for selected patients. The aim of the present work is to present the surgical method, including indications and technical information, as well as the presentation of the results in our recent patient collective.All patients semi-converted in our department of vascular surgery and phlebology due to (type II) endoleak were included. All data are presented as n (%) or median (range).Between 6/2019 and 3/2023, 13 patients underwent semi-conversion 6 (2-12) years (median, range) after the initial EVAR. The aneurysm sac diameter at the time of semi-conversion was 69 mm (58-95 mm), the operating time was 114 min (97-147 min), the blood loss was 100 ml (100-1500 ml). Five (38%) patients received blood transfusion intraoperatively and 2 (15%) postoperatively. The stay in the intensive care unit lasted 1 (1-5) days, the hospitalisation time was 8 (6-11) days. Postoperative complications were intestinal atony (3 [23%], 1 [8%] with nausea/emesis and gastric tube insertion), anaemia (2 [15%]), hyponatraemia (2 [15%]), delirium (1 [8%]), COVID-19 infection (1 [8%]) and 1 [8%] intra-abdominal postoperative bleeding with the indication for surgical revision and the transfusion of 8 erythrocyte concentrates.Semi-conversion is a safe and practicable surgical method with few severe complications for a selected group of patients, which should be considered as an alternative to more invasive methods with (partial) removal of the EVAR-prosthesis. Further long-term studies comparing semi-conversion to full conversion are needed to demonstrate its benefits.

Early and Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Zenith Alpha Abdominal Stent-Graft: Results From a Multicenter Retrospective Tuscany Registry

PURPOSE

Zenith Alpha Abdominal (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) is one of the new-generation low-profile stent-grafts with demonstrated satisfactory early and midterm clinical outcomes for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The aim was to evaluate early and midterm results of this device in the framework of a multicenter regional retrospective registry, with the analysis of morphological factors affecting outcomes, including different limb configurations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and November 2021, 202 patients with AAA underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with implantation of a Zenith Alpha Abdominal in 7 centers. Early (30 day) outcomes in terms of technical and clinical success were assessed. Estimated 5 year outcomes were evaluated in terms of survival, freedom from type I/III endoleak, freedom from surgical conversion, freedom from limb graft occlusion, freedom from any device-related reintervention, and graft infection evaluation by life-table analysis (Kaplan-Meier test). A comparative analysis between different limb configurations (Zenith Spiral Z AAA iliac legs, codes ZISL vs ZSLE) was performed in terms of limb graft occlusion.

RESULTS

The 30 day technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 99.5%, respectively. Median follow-up period was 25.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 12-43.25). The 5 year survival rate was 73.6%. The estimated 5 year outcomes in terms of freedom from type I/III endoleak, freedom from surgical conversion, freedom from limb graft occlusion, freedom from any device-related reintervention, and freedom from graft infection were 88.6% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 83.4%-93.1%), 95.8% (95% CI: 92.7%-97.1%), 93.6% (95% CI: 90.2%-96.8%), 87% (95% CI: 83.3%-91.6%), and 97.7% (95% CI: 95.1%-98.9%), respectively. About limb configuration, no differences were found in terms of 5 year freedom from limb graft occlusion (ZSLE 93.4% [95% CI: 89.8%-95.5%] vs ZISL 94.3% [95% CI: 90.1%-95.9%], p=0.342; log-rank 0.903).

CONCLUSION

Zenith Alpha Abdominal in elective EVAR offered satisfactory early and 5 year outcomes with low complication rates. Limb graft occlusion continued to be an issue. Limb configuration did not affect outcomes.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The authors describe satisfactory early and 5 year outcomes of Zenith Alpha Abdominal in elective endovascular aortic repair in the framework of a multicenter regional retrospective registry. At 5 years freedom from type I endoleak was 88.6%, and rate of endograft infections and conversions to open repair were very low. in the present study. Hot topic about about Zenith stent-graft still remains the limb graft occlusion with a 30-day overall rate of 2%, and estimated 5-year freedom from limb graft occlusion of 93.6%. Limb graft configuration did not affect limb graft occlusion rate. A standardized protocol including iliac stenting should be adopted to reduce kimb graft occlusion.

The Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Ongoing Challenge

BACKGROUND

despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of elective AAAs, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) continue to cause a substantial number of deaths. The choice between an open or endovascular approach remains a challenge, as does postoperative complications in survivors. The aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview of the contemporary management of RAAA patients, with a focus on preoperative and intraoperative factors that could help surgeons provide more appropriate treatment.

METHODS

we performed a search on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 1 January 1985 to 1 May 2023 and reviewed SVS and ESVS guidelines. A total of 278 articles were screened, but only those with data available on ruptured aneurysms' incidence and prevalence, preoperative scores, and mortality rates after emergency endovascular or open repair for ruptured AAA were included in the narrative synthesis. Articles were not restricted due to the designs of the studies.

RESULTS

the centralization of RAAAs has improved outcomes after both surgical and endovascular repair. Preoperative mortality risk scores and knowledge of intraoperative factors influencing mortality could help surgeons with decision-making, although there is still no consensus about the best treatment. Complications continue to be an issue in patients surviving intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

RAAA still represents a life-threatening condition, with high mortality rates. Effective screening and centralization matched with adequate preoperative risk-benefit assessment may improve outcomes.

European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated-branched ENDOvascular Stent Grafting After Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: The EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry

OBJECTIVE

To report the mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) following a failed previous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) or previous open aneurysm repair (pOAR).

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients who underwent F-BEVAR for pEVAR or pOAR from 2006 to 2021 from 17 European vascular centers were analyzed. Endpoints included technical success, major adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 5-year estimates of survival, target vessel primary patency, freedom from reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks, and sac growth >5 mm.

BACKGROUND

Treatment of a failed previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a complex undertaking. F-BEVAR is becoming an increasingly attractive option, although comparative data are limited regarding associated risk factors, indications for treatment, and various outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 526 patients included, 268 pOAR and 258 pEVAR. The median time from previous repair to F-BEVAR was 7 (interquartile range, 4-12) years, 5 (3-8) for pEVAR, and 10 (6-14) for pOAR, P <0.001. Predominant indication for treatment was type Ia endoleak for pEVAR and progression of the disease for pOAR. Technical success was 92.8%, pOAR (92.2%), and pEVAR (93.4%), P =0.58. The 30-day mortality was 6.5% overall, 6.7% for pOAR, and 6.2% for pEVAR, P =0.81. There were 1853 treated target vessels with 5-year estimates of primary patency of 94.4%, pEVAR (95.2%), and pOAR (94.4%), P =0.03. Five-year estimates for freedom from type I/III endoleaks were similar between groups; freedom from reintervention was lower for pEVAR (38.3%) than for pOAR (56.0%), P =0.004. The most common indication for reinterventions was for type I/III endoleaks (37.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of a failed pEVAR or pOARis safe and feasible with comparable technical success and survival rates. While successful treatment can be achieved, significant rates of reintervention should be anticipated, particularly for issues related to instability of target vessels/bridging stents.

Clinical presentation, operative management, and long-term outcomes of rupture after previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presentation trends, intervention, and survival of patients who had been treated for late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (LAR) after open repair (OR) or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data from a single-center, retrospective database for patients treated for LAR from 2000 to 2020. The end points were the 30-day mortality, major postoperative complication, and survival. The outcomes between LAR managed with EVAR (group I) vs OR were compared (group II).

RESULTS

Of 390 patients with infrarenal aortic rupture, 40 (10%) had experienced aortic rupture after prior aortic repair and comprised the LAR cohort (34 men; age 78 ± 8 years). LAR had occurred before EVAR in 30 and before OR in 10 patients. LAR was more common in the second half of the study with 32 patients after 2010. LAR after prior OR was secondary to ruptured para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. After initial EVAR, LAR had occurred despite reintervention in 17 patients (42%). The time to LAR was shorter after prior EVAR than after OR (6 ± 4 vs 12 ± 4 years, respectively; P = .003). Treatment for LAR was EVAR for 25 patients (63%; group I) and OR for 15 (37%, group II). LAR after initial OR was managed with endovascular salvage for 8 of 10 patients. Endovascular management was more frequent in the latter half of the study period. In group I, fenestrated repair had been used for seven patients (28%). Salvage for the remaining cases was feasible with EVAR, aortic cuffs, or limb extensions. The incidence of free rupture, time to treatment, 30-day mortality (8% vs 13%; P = .3), complications (32% vs 60%; P = .1), and disposition were similar between the two groups. Those in group I had had less blood loss (660 vs 3000 mL; P < .001) and less need for dialysis (0% vs 33%; P < .001) than those in group II. The median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range, 6-45 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 76%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, and was similar between groups (28 vs 22 months; P = .48). Late mortality was not related to the aorta.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been encountered more frequently in clinical practice, likely driven by the frequency of EVAR. However, most LARs, including those after previous OR, can now be salvaged with endovascular techniques with lower morbidity and mortality.

Explant of the Aortic Endograft: Today's Solutions, Tomorrow's Problems

Type 2 endoleaks remain the Achilles heel of abdominal aortic endografting. They drive imaging costs and repeat intervention. We believe that after two endovascular interventions, patients should be considered for either graft explantation or graft salvage through an open abdominal exploration. Graft explantation has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality but remains necessary in the face of non-correctible type 1a endoleaks, graft failure, or graft infection. In the majority of cases AAA expansion due to persistent type 2 endoleak is the culprit. In this situation, open repair, with oversewing of the lumbar or inferior mesenteric arteries, can be accomplished providing the seal zones and component overall zones are adequate. This approach does not require aortic clamping. We provide detailed descriptions and videos to facilitate the surgeon in performing these complex procedures.

Open Repair of a Complicated Late Endoleak Induced by Another Endoleak

A 66-year-old man had an enlarging aortic aneurysm sac after an endovascular aortic replacement procedure that had been performed at another institution 4 years previously; it was without any endoleak but was complicated by the occlusion of the left limb, requiring cross-femoral bypass. Current computed tomography revealed dilatation of the proximal neck and the right common iliac artery. A type Ib endoleak was found from the distal end of the right limb of the endograft, possibly secondary to the dilatation of the artery around it; it then pressurized and caused the dilatation of the juxtarenal aorta around the proximal landing zone and induced a concomitant type Ia endoleak. The patient was operated on owing to the risk of rupture. Pelvic ischemia was a concern during decision-making. The patient underwent removal of the endograft and replacement of a bifurcated aortoiliac and femoral graft with good outcome. Midline laparotomy and a supraceliac clamping approach enable the removal of endografts with suprarenal fixation and revascularization of internal iliac arteries. Open repair offers a definitive solution for complicated endoleaks when endovascular options could be risky and ineffective.

Occult endoleaks revealed during open conversions after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

An occult endoleak (OE) may be the underlying cause of aneurysm sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study is to describe intraoperative findings of OE during surgical endograft explantations.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicenter analysis of all open conversions (OC) after EVAR from 1997 to 2020 in 12 vascular centers. We excluded patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endograft infection, endograft thrombosis, and thoracic-EVAR. An OE was defined as an endoleak revealed during OC not shown on preoperative imaging, which was likely the real cause for sac enlargement. We reported the number of OE, and we described the type of OE in relation to the initial alleged or associated endoleak. A separate analysis of patients with an initial diagnosis of endotension was also performed.

RESULTS

An OE was found in 32/255 patients (12.5%). In the 78.1% of the cases (25/32) a type II endoleak hid a type I or III endoleak. Endotension was the initial diagnosis of 26/255 patients (10.2%). In 4/26 cases (15.4%), a type I or II OE was revealed. In 5/26 cases (19.2%) an endograft infection was found intraoperatively. In 2/26 cases we found an angiosarcoma. Fifteen cases of endotension (57.7%) remained unexplained.

CONCLUSIONS

OE represent a not negligible cause of EVAR failure. A type II endoleak associated with sac enlargement may actually conceal a higher-flow endoleak. In most of the cases, the initial diagnosis of endotension remains unexplained. However, endotension sometimes conceals severe underlying pathologies such as infections.

Two decades of experience in explantation and graft preserving strategies following primary endovascular aneurysm repair and lessons learned

Objectives

We aim to scrutinize our evolving re-intervention strategies following primary endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) - EVAR GORE SalvAge Fabric Technique (ARAFAT), aortic sac double breasting with endograft preservation, and stent-graft explantation.

Methods

We performed 1,555 aortic interventions over the study period, including 910 EVARs. Factors associated with the need for reintervention and the likelihood of chronic fabric fatigue failure (CFFF) were investigated. Using conventional and innovative diagnostic modalities with Prone contrASt enHanced computed tomography Angiography (PASHA), 136 endoleaks (ELs) were identified (15 type I, 98 type II; 18 type III; 5 type IV).

Results

Forty-four (4.84%) patients underwent re-intervention post-primary EVAR; 18 ARAFATs, 12 double breastings, and 14 explantations. Choice of re-intervention was based on patient fitness and mode of failure. Mean EL detection duration following primary EVAR was 53.3 ± 6.82 months, while mean time to re-intervention was 70.20 ± 6.98 months. The mean sac size before the primary EVAR and re-intervention was 6.00 ± 1.75 cm and 7.51 ± 1.94 cm, respectively. Polyester (61.40%) was the most commonly employed stent-graft material. Use of more than three modular stent-graft components (3.42 ± 1.31, p = 0.846); with the proximal stent-graft diameter of 31.6 ± 3.80 cm (p = 0.651) and the use of iliac limbs more than 17 mm (p = 0.364), all added together are contributing factors. We had one peri-operative mortality following explantation due to sepsis-induced multiorgan failure.

Conclusions

Our re-intervention strategies matured from stent graft explantation to graft preservation with endovascular relining of the stent-graft. Graft preservation with aortic sacotomy and double breasting were used to manage concealed ELs due to aortic hygroma.

Peri-Operative Management of Patients Undergoing Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Juxtarenal, Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Preventing, Recognizing and Treating Complications to Improve Clinical Outcomes

The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient's quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.

Multicentre Comparison between Open Conversions and Semi-Conversions for Late Endoleaks after EVAR

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare early and follow-up outcomes of late open conversions (LOC, with complete or partial endograft explantation) and semi-conversions (SC, with endograft preservation) after EVAR in a multicentre experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All-LOC and SC performed from 1997 to 2020 in 11 vascular centres were compared. Endograft infections or thrombosis were excluded. Primary endpoints were early mortality, and long-term survival estimates. Secondary endpoints were differences in: postoperative complication rates, conversion-related complications during follow-up.

RESULTS

In the considered period, 347 patients underwent surgery for EVAR complications. Among these, 270 were operated on for endoleaks (222 LOC, 48 SC). The 2 groups were homogeneous in terms of ASA score (3.2±0.7 LOC, 3±0.5 SC; P=.128) and main endograft characteristics (suprarenal fixation, bifurcated/aorto-uni-iliac configuration). Mean age was 75±8 at LOC and 79±7 at SC (P=.009). Reasons for LOC were: 62.2% (138/222) type I endoleak, 21.6% (48/222) type II, 7.7% (17/222) type III, 8.5% (19/222) endotension. Indications for SC were: 64.6% (31/48) type II endoleak, 33.3% (16/48) type I, 2.1% (1/48) type III. Thirty-day mortality was 12.2% (27/222) in the LOC group, and 10.4% (5/48) in the SC group (P=.73). Postoperative complication rate was higher in the LOC group (45.5% vs. 29.2%, P=.04). The estimated survival rate after LOC was 80% at 1 year and 64% at 5 years; after SC 72% at 1 year and 37% at 5 years (log-rank P=.01). During the median follow-up of 21.5 months (inter-quartile range 2.4-61), an endoleak after SC was found in the 38.3% of the cases; sac growth was recorded in the 27.7% of SC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SC have an early benefit over LOC in terms of reduced postoperative complications, but a significantly inferior mid-term survival. The high rates of persistent and/or recurrent endoleaks reduce SC durability.

Open surgical conversion and management of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous endovascular aneurysm repair

Introduction/Objective. The objective was to present the results and technical considerations from high-volume center when performing late open surgical conversion (LOSC) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) patients. Methods. This was a single center retrospective study. LOSC was performed whenever eventual endovascular reintervention failed, was not feasible due to hostile anatomy and unavailability of specific endograft materials, or when patient was hemodynamically unstable necessitating emergent surgery. Results. All previously implanted EVARs had bimodular configuration with suprarenal fixation. Total endograft explantation was performed in 40% of patients. Hospital mortality was 20%. Both patients who died had total endograft explantation with supraceliac clamp lasting more than 30 minutes. 30-day mortality was 30%, with one more patient who died from pulmonary embolism after hospital discharge and two hospital deaths were due to myocardial infarction. Conclusion. LOSC due to RAAA after previous EVAR carries greater mortality for the patient, suggesting multifactorial impacts on the outcome. The appropriate choice of surgical method and technical success are of ultimate importance, with total graft explantation having negative impact on patient?s survival.

Comparison of Early and Mid-Term Outcomes After Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients With or Without Prior Infrarenal Repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare short- and mid-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal (PRAA)/thoracoabdominal (TAAA) aortic aneurysms in patients with or without prior endovascular/open (EVAR/OAR) infrarenal aortic repair.

METHODS

Data from consecutive F-BEVAR (2010-2019) at two high-volume aortic centers were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoints were technical success, 30-day mortality, and overall survival. Secondary endpoints included 30-day major adverse events (MAE), freedom from type I/III endoleaks, reinterventions, sac expansion, and target vessel (TV) primary patency.

RESULTS

A total of 222 consecutive patients were included for analysis; of these 58 (26.1%) had prior infrarenal repair (EVAR=33, OAR=25) and 164 (73.9%) had native PRAA/TAAA. At baseline, patients with prior infrarenal repair were older (mean age=75.1 vs 71.6 years, p=.005) and the proportion of females was lower (8.6% vs 29.3%, p=.002). Technical success was 97.8% (n=217) in the entire cohort, without any significant differences between study groups (94.8% vs 98.8%, p=.08). At 30 days, there were no significant differences between patients with prior infrarenal repair as compared with those without in rate of MAE (44.8% vs 54.9%, p=.59). The 5-year estimate of survival for those who underwent native aortic repair was 61.6%, versus 61.3% for those who had a previous repair (p=.67). The 5-year freedom from endoleaks I/III estimates were significantly lower in patients who had prior infrarenal repair as compared with patients undergoing treatment of native aneurysms (57.1% vs 66.1%, p=.03), mainly owing to TV-related endoleaks (ie, type IC and/or IIIC endoleaks). No significant differences were found between study groups in rates of reinterventions and TV primary patency. Five-year estimates of freedom from sac increase >5mm were significantly lower in patients who received F-BEVAR after previous infrarenal repair as compared with those who underwent treatment of native aneurysms (48.6% vs 77.5%, p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

F-BEVAR is equally safe and feasible for treatment of patients with prior infrarenal repair as compared with those undergoing treatment for native aneurysms. Increased rates of TV-related endoleaks were observed which could lead to lower freedom from aneurysm sac shrinkage during follow-up. Nevertheless, the 5-year rates of reinterventions and TV patency were similar, thereby indicating that overall effectiveness of treatment remained satisfactory at mid-term.

Impact of proximal neck anatomy on short-term and mid-term outcomes after treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with new-generation low-profile endografts. Results from the multicentric "ITAlian north-east registry of ENDOvascular aortic repair with the BOltOn Treo endograft (ITA-ENDOBOOT)"

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term and mid-term technical and clinical outcomes of the Bolton Treo endograft in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requiring endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and assess if presence of hostile proximal neck would represent a risk factor for increased failure rates.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone elective or non-elective EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft at five institutions located in the North-East of Italy (January 2016-December 2020) was performed. The main exposure variable for this study was presence of hostile (HAN) or friendly (FAN) aortic neck.

RESULTS

A total of 137 consecutive patients were treated with the Bolton Treo endograft at participating institutions; of these 63 (46%) presented HAN while 74 (54%) had FAN. At baseline, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of demographics and comorbidities between study groups. Two type Ia endoleaks (EL) were detected at completion angiography, all in patients with HAN but none in patients with FAN (3% vs 0%, p=.04), but no type III EL were identified in the whole cohort. The median duration of follow-up in the study cohort was 30 months (IQR 22-34 months) and was similar between study groups (p=.87). At three-years, survival estimates were 89% and 91% (p=.82) in patients with HAN and FAN, respectively. At three years, patients with HAN had significantly lower freedom from type IA endoleak as compared with patients with FAN (87% vs 94%, p=.02). No significant differences were found between study groups in the three-year estimates of freedom from reinterventions (80% vs 86%, p=.28). Using cox proportional hazards, presence of type II EL (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.18-8.5, p=.02) and presence of type IA EL (HR 4.22, 95%CI 1.39-12.85, p=.01) were found as independent predictors for reinterventions in univariate analysis, although they were no longer significant in the multivariate model. Freedom from sac increase >5mm at three years were not significantly different between study groups (92% vs 91%, p=.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Within a contemporary multicentric real-world experience, EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft shows a satisfactory safety profile in the immediate postoperative phase and acceptable outcomes during mid-term follow-up. Presence of HAN is correlated with development of type Ia EL (either early following stent-graft implantation or late after EVAR) which, in turn, may represent a significant factor leading to reinterventions.

Deep Femoral Vein Reconstruction for Abdominal Aortic Graft Infections is Associated with Low Aneurysm Related Mortality and a High Rate of Permanent Discontinuation of Antimicrobial Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Aortic prosthesis infection is a devastating complication of aortic surgery. In situ reconstruction with the neo-aorto-iliac system (NAIS) bypass technique has become increasingly used and is recommended in recent treatment guidelines. The main aim was to evaluate NAIS procedural outcomes when undertaken after previous open or endovascular aortic repair in Sweden.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, The National Quality Registry for Vascular Surgery (Swedvasc) was used to identify Swedish centres that offered the NAIS bypass procedure for aortic prosthesis infection between 2008 and 2018. Variables of special interest were procedural details, short and long term survival, renal and other complications, and the durtion of antimicrobial treatment.

RESULTS

Forty patients (36 males, four females [mean age 69 years], 32 open repairs, seven endovascular aortic repairs [EVAR] and one fenestrated EVAR; 21 presented with aorto-enteric fistula) operated on with NAIS bypass were reviewed. The median time from the primary aortic intervention to the NAIS bypass procedure was 32 months (range 0 - 252 months). Mean ± standard deviation operating time was 645 ± 160 minutes, mean blood loss was 6 277 ± 6 525 mL, mean length of intensive care unit stay was 5.3 ± 3.7 days, and mean length of overall hospital stay was 21.2 ± 11.4 days. Thirty-five patients (88%) had a positive microbial culture; the most commonly isolated pathogen was Candida spp. The majority of patients survived for 30 days (n = 35 [88%]), and 33 (83%) and 32 (80%) patients survived for 90 days and one year, respectively. The number of surviving patients free from antimicrobial treatment at 90 days, six months, and one year was 19 (58%), 29 (88%), and 30 (94%). After a mean long term follow up of 69.9 ± 44.7 months, 20 patients were still alive.

CONCLUSION

The NAIS bypass procedure offered reasonable survival and functional outcomes, and was associated with a high cure rate, defined as freedom from any antimicrobial treatment.

Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Combined Type IIIb and Type Ia Endoleak with the Endurant II Endograft: A Case Report

We report a case of combined types IIIb and Ia endoleak that developed 6 years after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Endurant II® endograft for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The patient presented with post-EVAR AAA rupture and underwent emergency open repair. We observed types IIIb and Ia endoleak and successfully performed felt banding to preserve the stent graft. Type IIIb endoleak with the Endurant® endograft is rare, and treatments have not been fully established. We summarized the case reports regarding type IIIb endoleak with the Endurant® endograft and mainly discussed the treatments.

Early and mid-term outcomes following open surgical conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair from the "Italian North-easT RegIstry of surgical Conversion AfTer Evar" (INTRICATE)

OBJECTIVE

To report the early and mid-term outcomes following open surgical conversion (OSC) after failed endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) using data from a multicentric registry.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on consecutive patients undergoing OSC after failed EVAR at eight tertiary vascular units from the same geographic area in the North-East of Italy, from April 2005 to November 2019. Study endpoints included early and follow-up outcomes.

RESULTS

144 consecutive patients were included in the study. Endoleaks were the most common indication for OSC (50.7%), with endograft infection (24.6%) and occlusion (21.9%) being the second most prevalent causes. The overall rate of 30-day all-cause mortality was 13.9% (n=20); 32 patients (22.2%) experienced at least one major complication. Mean length of stay (LoS) was 13 ± 12.7 days. On multivariate logistic regression, age (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1-19, p= .02), renal clamping time (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13, p= .01), and suprarenal/celiac clamping (OR 6.66, 95% CI 1.81-27.1, p= .005) were identified as independent predictors of peri-operative major complications. Age was the only factor associated with peri-operative mortality at 30 days. Renal clamping time > 25 minutes had sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 70% in predicting the occurring of major adverse events (AUC 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.82). At 5 years, estimated survival was significantly lower for patients treated due to aortic rupture/dissection (28%, 95% CI 13-61), compared to patients in whom the indication for treatment was endoleak (54%, 95% CI 40-73), infection (53%, 95% CI 30-94), or thrombosis (82%, 95% CI 62-100; p= .0019). 5-year survival rates were significantly lower in patients who received emergent treatment (28%, 95% CI 14-55) as compared with those who were treated in urgent (67%, 95% CI 48-93) or elective setting (57%, 95% CI 43-76; p= .00026). Subjects who received suprarenal/celiac (54%, 95% CI 36-82) or suprarenal (46%, 95% CI 34-62) aortic cross-clamping had lower survival rates at 5 years than those whose aortic-cross clamp site was infrarenal (76%, 95% CI 59-97; p= .041). Using multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard, older age and emergency setting were independently associate with higher risk for overall 5 years mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

OSC after failed EVAR was associated with relatively high rates of early morbidity and mortality, particularly for emergency setting surgery. Endoleaks with secondary sac expansion were the main indication for OSC and suprarenal aortic cross-clamping was frequently required. Endograft infection and emergent treatment remained associated with poorer short-term and long-term survival.

A morphovolumetric analysis of aneurysm sac evolution after elective endovascular abdominal aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac shrinkage after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been regarded as positive marker of EVAR success durability. The purpose of this study was to describe the morphovolumetric changes of the AAA sac during follow-up after elective EVAR and to analyze sac shrinkage-related variables.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study from a tertiary referral university hospital. All patients treated with EVAR between January 2013 and December 2018 were identified. Inclusion criteria were elective EVAR for AAA, preoperative computed tomography angiography within 6 months before EVAR and at least one postoperative computed tomography angiography during the follow-up, using a standardized protocol. Aneurysm sac shrinkage was defined as diameter decrease of 1 cm or more, volume shrinkage threshold was identified by a 16% decrease compared with the preoperative value. Primary outcomes were early (≤30 days) and late survival, and freedom from aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), and aortic reintervention.

RESULTS

There were 149 of the 325 patients (45.8%) who met the inclusion criteria: 133 (89.3%) were male and 16 (10.7%) female. The mean age was 74 ± 7 years (range, 55-87 years); the median AAA diameter was 56 mm (interquartile range, 50.0-61.2 mm) and the median volume was 138.8 cm³ (range, 99.0-178.3 cm³). Primary technical success was achieved in 145 patients (97.3%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.3%. The median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range, 22.5-58.0 months). Both AAA diameter and volume decreased (P = .001 and P = .035, respectively) compared with preoperative measurements. Diameter shrinkage was adjudicated in 27 patients (18.1%), volume shrinkage was observed in 42 patients (28.2%). A Cox regression analysis demonstrated an association between the AAA diameter shrinkage and the preoperative diameter (P = .002; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011-1.052). The presence of a persistent endoleak predicted the absence of volume shrinkage (P = .001; hazard ratio, 7.75; 95% CI, 2.282-26.291). The estimated freedom from ARM was 97.5 ± 1.0% (95% CI, 93-99) at 12 months, and 96 ± 2% (95% CI, 90-98) at both 36 and 60 months. Aortic reintervention during the follow-up period was necessary in 7 patients (4.7%). ARM was only observed in the group characterized by the concomitant absence of diameter and volume shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric analysis showed to have higher sensitivity than the simple two-dimensional measurement of the diameter to study AAA sac changes after EVAR. Although no predictor was found to be associated with AAA volume shrinkage, ARM occurred only in the group of AAAs with the absence of volume shrinkage.

A Canadian multicenter experience describing outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair stent graft explantation

BACKGROUND

Most studies describing the outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) explantation have been from single, high-volume, centers. We performed a multicenter cross-Canadian study of outcomes after EVAR stent graft explantation. Our objectives were to describe the outcomes after late open conversion and EVAR graft explantation at various Canadian centers and the techniques and outcomes stratified by the indication for explant.

METHODS

The Canadian Vascular Surgery Research Group performed a retrospective multicenter study of all cases of EVAR graft explantation at participating centers from 2003 to 2018. Data were collected using a standardized, secure, online platform (RedCap [Research Electronic Data Capture]). Univariate statistical analysis was used to compare the techniques and outcomes stratified the indication for graft explantation.

RESULTS

Patient data from 111 EVAR explants collected from 13 participating centers were analyzed. The mean age at explantation was 74 years, the average aneurysm size was 7.5 cm, and 28% had had at least one instructions for use violation at EVAR. The average time between EVAR and explantation was 42.5 months. The most common indication for explantation was endoleak (n = 66; type Ia, 46; type Ib, 2; type II, 9; type III, 2; type V, 7), followed by infection in 20 patients; rupture in 18 patients (due to type Ia endoleak in 10 patients, type Ib in 1, type II in 1, type III in 2, and type V in 1), and graft thrombosis in 7 patients. The overall 30-day mortality was 11%, and 45% of the patients had experienced at least one major perioperative complication. Mortality was significantly greater for patients with rupture (33.3%) and those with infection (15%) compared with patients undergoing elective explantation for endoleak (4.5%; P = .003). The average center volume during the previous 15 years was 8 cases with a wide range (2-19 cases). A trend was seen toward greater mortality for patients treated at centers with fewer than eight cases compared with those with eight or more cases (19% vs 9%). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .23). Overall, 41% of patients had undergone at least one attempt at endovascular salvage before explantation, with the highest proportion among patients who had undergone EVAR explantation for endoleak (51%). Only 22% of patients with rupture had undergone an attempt at endovascular salvage before explantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of EVAR graft explantation has increasing in Canada. Patients who had undergone elective explantation for endoleak had lower mortality than those treated for either infection or rupture. Thus, patients with an indication for explanation should be offered surgery before symptoms or rupture has occurred. A trend was seen toward greater mortality for patients treated at centers with lower volumes.

Open Conversion After Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing: Technical Features and Clinical Outcomes in 44 Patients

Purpose

To evaluate the technical features and clinical results after open conversion for complications following endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS).

Materials and Methods

From July 2013 to February 2020, 44 patients (mean age 72±8 years; 36 men) underwent an open conversion due to EVAS complications in a single center. Data were collected on patient characteristics, reasons for conversion, characteristics and duration of the procedure, condition of the polymer, blood loss, time in the intensive care unit (ICU), and intra/postoperative complications. The main outcome measure was mortality at 30 days and in follow-up. Data are presented as the median (IQR) and absolute range.

Results

On average, the open conversion took place 3 years after the initial EVAS implantation [median 37 months (IQR 23, 50); range 0–64]. Most patients were converted due migration (82%), aneurysm growth (77%), and/or endoleak (75%), with 21 patients (48%) having all 3 events. Less frequent diagnoses were aneurysm rupture (n=7), aortic infection (n=3), technical failure during implantation (n=2), and graft thrombosis (n=1). The majority of patients (n=26) were asymptomatic and converted electively, but 9 were operated on urgently and 9 emergently (7 late rupture and 2 due to technical failure). The median procedure duration was 178 minutes (IQR 149, 223; range 87–417), the median blood loss was 1100 mL (IQR 600, 2600; range 300–5000). Polymer degradation was mentioned in the operative reports of 18 cases (41%). Patients stayed a median of 3 days (IQR 2, 7; range 1–35) in the ICU, while the median length of stay in the hospital was 14 days (IQR 10, 20; range 0–93). The 30-day mortality was 23% (n=10). During a median follow-up of 3 months (IQR 0, 11; range 0–38), no additional deaths occurred, but 12 patients suffered from an adverse event. There were 3 cases of wound dehiscence after laparotomy, 2 cases of leg ischemia, 2 cases of renal failure, and individual cases of urinary obstruction, urinoma, paralytic ileus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and postoperative delirium. A non-elective setting was associated with a significantly increased mortality of 33% in urgent cases and 56% in emergent cases (p=0.007). Based on these results an algorithm for the management of EVAS complications was developed.

Conclusion

The significantly increased mortality associated with nonelective conversions highlights the need for active surveillance. The presented algorithm offers a structured tool to avoid emergency conversions.

Lessons Learned from Open Surgical Conversion after Failed Previous EVAR

BACKGROUND

Delayed open conversion (OpC) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is becoming increasingly common worldwide. We reviewed our experience to characterize the perioperative spectrum of OpC repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained institutional database to identify patients who underwent late OpC after failed EVAR was performed. Patient and aneurysm baseline characteristics, mechanism of failure, perioperative details, including type of repair/complications/survival, and late outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to January 2020, 38 male patients (mean age, 75 ± 7 years; range, 60-90) required late OpC. Interval time from initial EVAR to OpC was 63.6 ± 33.8 months (range, 17-120). Mean diameter of the aneurysms was 82.2 ± 22.1 mm before OpC compared with 62.9 ± 13 mm before endograft implantation. Mechanisms of failure were type Ia, Ib, II, and III endoleaks in 14 (36.8%), 9 (23.7%), 4 (10.5%), and 1 (2.6%) patient(s), respectively; infection in 3 (7.9%), leg ischemia in 2 (5.3%), and multiple causes in 5 (13.2%) patients. We observed 4 (10.5%) asymptomatic, 16 (42.1%) symptomatic, and 18 (47.3%) ruptured aneurysms. Four patients (10.5%) had stable contained ruptures, whereas the remaining 13 (34.2%) and 1 additional patient (2.6%) with aortoenteric fistula presented with hemorrhagic shock (class ≥II). Total endograft explantation, endograft preservation, or proximal/distal partial graft removal was performed in 16 (42.1%), 10 (26.3%), and 2 (5.2%)/9 (23.7%) of patients, respectively. Technical success was 100%, excluding an early postaortic clamping death. Overall, 30-day mortality was 21.1% (8 of 38) and significantly higher in patients with hemorrhagic shock or hemodynamic instability at presentation (P = 0.04 and P = 0.009, respectively) and in patients who had endografts with hooks/barbs or experiencing higher postoperative complication rate (P = 0.02 and P = 0.006, respectively). By definition, procedure success was 81.1%. Mean follow-up was 37.6 ± 39.8 months. By the end of the study, we recorded 11 deaths (2 were aneurysm related).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high technical success, OpC has a significant mortality in patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock and had active fixation endografts or experiencing high complication rate. Many other confounding factors may play a role.