Loss of p16 expression and copy number changes of CDKN2A in a spectrum of spitzoid melanocytic lesions

Restrospective reappraisal of the prognostic classification of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms after BRAF and NRAS mutation characterisation: a single institution experience

AIMS

The current WHO classification of melanocytic tumours excludes neoplasms showing BRAF or NRAS mutations from the Spitz category. This study aimed to review and reclassify atypical melanocytic tumours with spitzoid morphological features diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 in our hospital after expanding the molecular profile, including BRAF and NRAS mutations in all cases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 71 neoplasms showing spitzoid features (Spitz-like) and atypia were included. The risk of progression of tumours was first studied by integrating the morphology, immunohistochemistry (p16, Ki67, HMB45 and PRAME) and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) results (melanoma multiprobe and 9p21). In a second step, after expanding the molecular study, including BRAF and NRAS mutational status, the neoplasms were finally classified into four subgroups: atypical Spitz tumour (AST, n = 45); BRAF-mutated naevus/low-grade melanocytoma with spitzoid morphology (BAMS, n = 2); Spitz melanoma (SM, n = 14); and BRAF or NRAS mutated melanoma with spitzoid features (MSF, n = 10). Follow-up of patients revealed uneventful results for AST and BAMS. Only one SM presented lymph node metastasis after 134 months. Conversely, patients with MSF showed an unfavourable outcome: three developed lymph node metastases after a mean time of 22 months, with one patient presenting distant metastasis and dying of the disease 64 months from diagnosis. The progression-free survival showed significant differences between the four groups of spitzoid tumours (P < 0.001) and between both melanoma subtypes (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The classification and prognostication of atypical neoplasms with spitzoid features requires the integration of histomorphology with the molecular investigation of tumours, which should include BRAF and NRAS mutational status.

Combined WNT-activated deep-penetrating/plexiform melanocytoma: insights into clinicopathological and molecular characterization

BACKGROUND

A combined deep-penetrating tumour redefined as WNT-activated deep-penetrating/plexiform melanocytoma (DPM), may pose challenging clinical and histological diagnoses.

OBJECTIVES

To review the clinicopathological characteristics of combined DPMs and characterize the molecular profile of atypical and malignant forms.

METHODS

The study included 51 patients with combined DPMs diagnosed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and the University of Florence between 2012 and 2020. Clinical data, dermoscopy images (when available) and histological characteristics were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for β-catenin, LEF1, HMB45, Ki67, p16 and PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma) was performed. Atypical forms underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel analysis, including driver genes implicated in DPMs, TERT-promoter (p) mutations and the investigation of the 9p21 locus via fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Among the 51 patients (32 females and 19 males, age range 4-74 years), 68% with available clinical data (15/22) were initially suspected of having melanoma. Except for one patient, complete excision resulted in no recurrences or metastases. One patient who had an incompletely excised combined DPM developed a lymph node melanoma metastasis 10 years later. In the 51 patients, 10 samples (20%) showed atypical histological features; 7 (14%) exhibited a significant loss of p16 expression; and 2 (4%) showed a high-proliferative index (Ki67 over 5%). NGS analysis in 11 patients revealed a double mutation BRAFV600E and exon 3 CTNNB1; no TERTp mutations were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical suspicion of melanoma is common in combined DPMs, but malignant progression is infrequent in tumours lacking high-grade atypia or proliferation. These findings are congruent with the consideration of these lesions as intermediate-grade tumours or melanocytomas.

Atypical Spitz tumor with SQSTM1::NTRK2 fusion: Report of a case with unique spindled cell features

A host of signature genetic alterations have been demonstrated in Spitz neoplasms, most notably fusions of kinase genes (including BRAF, ALK, ROS1, NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, MET, MAP3K8) or variants in HRAS. While there are multiple reports of rearrangements involving NTRK1 and NTRK3 in Spitz tumors, there are very few reports of NTRK2-rearranged Spitz nevi in the literature. This report presents an NTRK2-rearranged atypical Spitz tumor with spindled cell features. The patient was a 6-year-old female with a growing pigmented papule on the back. Histopathological evaluation revealed an asymmetric, biphasic, compound proliferation of melanocytes featuring an epithelioid cell population arranged as variably sized nests and single cells along the basal layer with extension down adnexa, as well as a population of spindled melanocytes with desmoplastic features and loss of Melan-A expression in the dermis. There was partial loss of p16 expression in the epidermal component and diffuse loss in the dermal component. Immunohistochemistry for PRAME, ALK, NTRK1, HRAS Q61R, p53, and BRAF V600E were negative. A SQSTM1::NTRK2 fusion was identified by RNA sequencing. No TERT promoter hotspot variants were detected. This case report expands the known histopathologic spectrum of genetic alterations in Spitz neoplasms.

Immunophenotypic p14 and p16 correlations with CDKN2A mutations in primary multiple and familial melanoma: An observational study

Melanoma represents an aggressive malignant tumor, encapsulating frequent loss of differentiation markers, with familial melanoma constituting a relatively commonly encountered entity, in direct relationship with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). The present study aims to identify the association between the immunohistochemical p14-p16 profile, the molecular CDKN2A findings and clinically diagnosed familial or multiple primary melanomas (MPM). We conducted a 5-year retrospective cross-sectional study, on patients diagnosed with familial or MPM. P14 and p16 immunohistochemical staining has been applied on the selected surgical specimens simultaneously with the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) CDKN2A testing. 13 out of the 23 included cases displayed p14 and/or p16 immunohistochemical absence and the main positive relationships were encountered between CDKN2A homozygous deletion and p14 ± p16 negative immunoreactions. Cases with exclusive p16 absent reaction (n = 7) were more frequently associated with the presence of distant metastases (85.71%), while samples with exclusive p14 immunohistochemical loss exhibited more favorable histopathological prognostic markers. The average percentage of p16-stained nuclei in the superficial dermis and the deep dermis were equal (29.54% for each), therefore infirming its potential predictive and/or prognostic utility. The present study is the first of its type to approach the clinical, evolutionary and immunophenotypic correlations between p14-p16 immunohistochemical testing, CDKN2A molecular biology pattern, familial melanoma and spontaneous MPM in a cohort of Romanian patients. This analysis highlighted the value of singular p16 immunohistochemical absence as a predictor for aggressive biological behavior and unfavorable prognosis in familial melanoma and/or MPM, in comparison with the exclusive loss of p14, indifferent to the histopathological subtype. The present study emphasizes the utility of immunohistochemistry as a less expensive method of complementing the current testing arsenal and could represent the starting point for the elaboration of tailored diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, based on the discovered p14-p16-CDKN2A significant correlation.

Ancillary testing for melanoma: current trends and practical considerations

The diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is aided by ancillary testing, but clinical inspection with the histomorphological assessment on biopsy remains sufficient in most cases. Immunohistochemistry and molecular studies have proven useful for diminishing the pool of histomorphologically borderline lesions, and sequential testing may further improve overall diagnostic performance, but these assays should be used in a stepwise fashion if at all. Ancillary tests vary based on their technology, performance, and practical considerations, including but not limited to the specific diagnostic question, cost, and turn-around time, which impact test selection. This review examines currently used ancillary tests for the purpose of characterizing melanocytic lesions. Both scientific and practical considerations are discussed.

A Novel Method to Detect Copy Number Variation in Melanoma: Droplet Digital PCR for Quantitation of the CDKN2A Gene, a Proof-of-Concept Study

ABSTRACT

A definitive diagnosis of nevus or melanoma is not always possible for histologically ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms. In such cases, ancillary molecular testing can support a diagnosis of melanoma if certain chromosomal aberrations are detected. Current technologies for copy number variation (CNV) detection include chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Although CMA and fluorescence in situ hybridization are effective, their utilization can be limited by cost, turnaround time, and inaccessibility outside of large reference laboratories. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a rapid, automated, and relatively inexpensive technology for CNV detection. We investigated the ability of ddPCR to quantify CNV in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A ( CDKN2A ), the most commonly deleted tumor suppressor gene in melanoma. CMA data were used as the gold standard. We analyzed 57 skin samples from 52 patients diagnosed with benign nevi, borderline lesions, primary melanomas, and metastatic melanomas. In a training cohort comprising 29 randomly selected samples, receiver operator characteristic curve analysis revealed an optimal ddPCR cutoff value of 1.73 for calling CDKN2A loss. In a validation cohort comprising the remaining 28 samples, ddPCR detected CDKN2A loss with a sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 90%, respectively. Significantly, ddPCR could also identify whether CDKN2A losses were monoallelic or biallelic. These pilot data suggest that ddPCR can detect CDKN2A deletions in melanocytic tumors with accuracy comparable with CMA. With further validation, ddPCR could provide an additional CNV assay to aid in the diagnosis of challenging melanocytic neoplasms.

Combined utility of p16 and BRAF V600E in the evaluation of spitzoid tumors: Superiority to PRAME and correlation with FISH

BACKGROUND

Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are diagnostically challenging; criteria for malignancy continue to evolve. The ability to predict chromosomal abnormalities with immunohistochemistry (IHC) could help select cases requiring chromosomal evaluation.

METHODS

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-tested spitzoid neoplasms at our institution (2013-2021) were reviewed. p16, BRAF V600E, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) IHC results were correlated with FISH.

RESULTS

A total of 174 cases (1.9F:1M, median age 28 years; range, 5 months-74 years) were included; final diagnoses: Spitz nevus (11%), atypical Spitz tumor (47%), spitzoid dysplastic nevus (9%), and spitzoid melanoma (32%). Sixty (34%) were FISH positive, most commonly with absolute 6p25 gain (RREB1 > 2). Dermal mitotic count was the only clinicopathologic predictor of FISH. Among IHC-stained cases, p16 was lost in 55 of 134 cases (41%); loss correlated with FISH positive (p < 0.001, Fisher exact test). BRAF V600E (14/88, 16%) and PRAME (15/56, 27%) expression did not correlate with FISH alone (p = 0.242 and p = 0.359, respectively, Fisher exact test). When examined together, however, p16-retained/BRAF V600E-negative lesions had low FISH-positive rates (5/37, 14%; 4/37, 11% not counting isolated MYB loss); all other marker combinations had high rates (56%-75% of cases; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

p16/BRAF V600E IHC predicts FISH results. "Low-risk" lesions (p16⁺ /BRAF V600E^- ) uncommonly have meaningful FISH abnormalities (11%). PRAME may have limited utility in this setting.

Modern Concepts in Melanocytic Tumors

The advent of molecular pathology has fueled unprecedented advances in the diagnosis and understanding of melanocytic tumors. These advances, however, have also generated concepts that may be difficult to grasp for clinical practitioners, who are not always conversant with the array of genetic techniques employed in the laboratory. These same practitioners, however, are being increasingly called on to provide treatments that are often based on the latest molecular findings for melanocytic tumors. We review the most recent concepts in the pathway classification of melanocytic tumors, including intermediate lesions known as melanocytomas. We examine the genetic and molecular techniques used to study these tumors, look at where they overlap, and discuss their limitations and some of the most difficult-to-interpret results.

Immunophenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in atypical Spitzoid tumors according to the risk of progression

The aims of the study were to investigate and compare the immunophenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 expression in a series of benign, intermediate and malignant Spitzoid lesions showing marked inflammatory lymphoid component, to find out its possible relation with the prognosis of these lesions. Six out of 97 Spitz nevus (SN) (6 %), five out of 26 atypical Spitz tumors (AST) (16 %) and seven out of 37 Spitzoid melanomas (SM) (19 %) showed diffuse, intense inflammatory component and were included in the study. The biological risk of the tumors was assessed in all AST through the melanoma 4 probe-FISH assay and the 9p21 locus exploration. TILs were quantitatively immunophenotyped using CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, TIA1, FOXP3 and PD1 antibodies. PD-L1 was assessed in tumoral cells and inflammatory cells adjacent to the tumor. No significant differences of TILs immunophenotype were found between SN, AST and SM. However, the classification of tumors according to the biological risk showed that grouped SN plus low-risk AST had a significantly higher number of T-cells CD8+ and TIA-1+, as well as a lower CD4/CD8 relation and B- lymphocyte number than high-risk of progression tumors (grouped high-risk AST plus SM). Immunoregulatory T-cell markers PD1 and FOXP3 only correlated with each other and with PD-L1 expression. In conclusion, The TILs immunoprofile differences between low-risk and high-risk of progression Spitzoid tumors, especially regarding CD8 and the cytotoxic immune response, can add prognostic information about these challenging tumors and impact the clinical management of patients.

Comparative Analysis of PRAME Expression in 127 Acral and Nail Melanocytic Lesions

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma), a cancer testis antigen expressed in low levels in gonadal, endometrial, and adrenal gland tissues, has been recently considered a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. The aim of the current study is to perform PRAME immunostaining on a large series of benign and malignant acral lesions to evaluate the reproducibility of data reported in the literature and to validate PRAME as an affordable tool in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant acral melanocytic tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis for PRAME was performed in 127 benign and malignant acral and nail melanocytic lesions. To better correlate PRAME expression with the nature (benign vs. malignant) of the lesions, we categorized PRAME tumor cells percentage positivity and intensity in a cumulative score obtained by adding the quartile of positive tumor cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+) to PRAME expression intensity in tumor cells (0, 1+, 2+, 3+). Adopting an arbitrary PRAME expression score of < 5 versus ≥5 resulted in a correct identification of 82.5% of benign and 87.1% of malignant lesions. PRAME immunohistochemistry demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of acral melanocytic lesions, however, in line with the previous literature, we identified a subset of challenging cases such as acral Spitz nevi, in situ melanomas, and small, thin, invasive melanomas in which PRAME did not correlate with morphologic features. This suggests that PRAME can be a valid tool to be incorporated in a diagnostic clinicopathologic algorithm, subject to morphologic characteristics.

Impact of Next-generation Sequencing on Interobserver Agreement and Diagnosis of Spitzoid Neoplasms

Atypical Spitzoid melanocytic tumors are diagnostically challenging. Many studies have suggested various genomic markers to improve classification and prognostication. We aimed to assess whether next-generation sequencing studies using the Tempus xO assay assessing mutations in 1711 cancer-related genes and performing whole transcriptome mRNA sequencing for structural alterations could improve diagnostic agreement and accuracy in assessing neoplasms with Spitzoid histologic features. Twenty expert pathologists were asked to review 70 consultation level cases with Spitzoid features, once with limited clinical information and again with additional genomic information. There was an improvement in overall agreement with additional genomic information. Most significantly, there was increase in agreement of the diagnosis of conventional melanoma from moderate (κ=0.470, SE=0.0105) to substantial (κ=0.645, SE=0.0143) as measured by an average Cohen κ. Clinical follow-up was available in all 70 cases which substantiated that the improved agreement was clinically significant. Among 3 patients with distant metastatic disease, there was a highly significant increase in diagnostic recognition of the cases as conventional melanoma with genomics (P<0.005). In one case, none of 20 pathologists recognized a tumor with BRAF and TERT promoter mutations associated with fatal outcome as a conventional melanoma when only limited clinical information was provided, whereas 60% of pathologists correctly diagnosed this case when genomic information was also available. There was also a significant improvement in agreement of which lesions should be classified in the Spitz category/WHO Pathway from an average Cohen κ of 0.360 (SE=0.00921) to 0.607 (SE=0.0232) with genomics.

Morphologic features in a series of 352 Spitz melanocytic proliferations help predict their oncogenic drivers

Spitz nevi are indolent melanocytic tumors arising preferentially during and after childhood. Over the last decades, recurrent oncogenic drivers, sparsely detected in melanoma, were identified in Spitz melanocytic proliferations. Therefore, the detection of such drivers appears as a relevant diagnostic tool to distinguish both entities. Interestingly, morphologic features might correlate with the oncogenic drivers. Thus, the goal of this study was to assess the performances of previously identified morphological criteria to predict the presence of specific drivers. In total, 352 Spitz melanocytic proliferations either with a genetically identified oncogenic driver or investigated for ALK, ROS1, and NTRK1 overexpression by immunohistochemistry were enrolled in the present study. The microscopic features of the cases were assessed blindly with regards to the molecular status and, performances of previously described morphological criteria to predict the molecular status were assessed applying the likelihood-ratio test (LHR). Overall, an oncogenic driver was identified in 76% of the cases (n = 268/352). No microscopic features allowed the reliable prediction of ROS1- and NTRK1-overexpressing cases. By contrast, a plexiform pattern can contribute to the recognition of ALK-overexpressing cases (LHR(+) = 6.14). Importantly, the pseudo-schwannoma variant was highly suggestive of NTRK3-rearranged cases (LHR(+) = 43). Moreover, atypical/malignant tumor (LHR(+) = 5.18), severe cellular atypia (LHR(+) = 5.07), and p16 loss (LHR(+) = 14) contribute to the recognition of MAP3K8-rearranged cases, while the presence of a sheet-like architecture (LHR(+) = 5.39) and a marked fibrosis of the stroma (LHR(+)=5.06) were predictive of BRAF-fused tumors. To conclude, our study confirms ALK-overexpressing, NTRK3-, MAP3K8-, and BRAF-rearranged cases harbored distinct morphologic features allowing their microscopic recognition.

Histopathologic classification and prognostic factors of melanoma: a 2021 update

Despite the rapid recent advances in molecular analysis of tumors, which allow large-scale and high-resolution genomics, the "gold standard" for melanoma diagnosis continues to be histopathology, in conjunction with clinical characteristics and sometimes with important support of immunohistochemistry. Observations, where postulated that cutaneous melanomas may arise through two distinct pathways, discoveries such as that BRAF^V600E mutations were mostly common in melanomas on sun-exposed skin with little solar elastosis and seminal works for melanoma progression and evolution set the groundwork for the new WHO Classification of Melanoma: a classification of melanoma that not only encompasses histologic but also clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic characteristics. The melanomas were divided into those etiologically related to sun exposure and those that are not, based on their mutational signatures, anatomic site, and epidemiology. On the basis of degree of associated solar elastosis melanomas on the sun exposed skin were further divided by the histopathologic degree of cumulative solar damage (CSD) of the surrounding skin, into low and high CSD. On the low-CSD group of melanomas are included superficial spreading melanomas, while the high-CSD melanomas encompasses lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanomas. The "non-CSD" classification includes acral melanomas, some melanomas in congenital nevi, melanomas in blue nevi, Spitz melanomas, mucosal melanomas, and uveal melanomas. Nodular and nevoid melanoma may occur in any pathway. A group of intermediate tumors termed melanocytoma is proposed for tumors that in addition to mutations that activate the MAPK pathway, harbor multiple driver mutations, and they are either low-grade or high-grade, to indicate that they may carry a higher risk of malignant transformation. In this review a summary of the most recent WHO classification of melanoma is provided. A short analysis of essential histopathologic prognostic parameters is also provided. The new classification of melanoma discriminates distinct types of melanoma based on their clinicopathologic, and genomic characteristics. Undoubtedly, melanoma research will continue to evolve as new clinical, pathological, molecular data accumulates. The challenge of the forthcoming years is to better characterize the intermediate category of melanocytic lesions.

Second Diagnostic Opinion by Experienced Dermatopathologists in the Setting of a Referral Regional Melanoma Unit Significantly Improves the Clinical Management of Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

The diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and melanocytic neoplasms in general is one of the most challenging fields in pathology, and the reported interobserver diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions is poor. Nevertheless, a correct histopathological diagnosis is crucial to ensure a good clinical management of the patients. The institution of multidisciplinary teams has recently modified the approach to the patients with cutaneous melanoma. Patients referred to a multidisciplinary melanoma unit after receiving a diagnosis of melanoma elsewhere are encouraged to have their histopathological diagnosis confirmed by a second opinion from the experienced pathologist of the team before any treatment is initiated. We performed a retrospective analysis on a series of 121 histopathological revisions required for melanocytic neoplasms in the context of a multidisciplinary team, in order to evaluate the effects of second diagnostic opinion (SDO) on the clinical management of the patients. We defined three types of diagnostic discrepancies between the first diagnosis and the second opinion, according to the greatness of their clinical impact. Overall, the incidence of diagnostic discrepancies of any type was quite high in our series (56%). Interestingly, the SDO determined relevant changes in the clinical management of the patients in 33 out of 121 (27.3%) cases. This study confirms that SDO by expert pathologists significantly affects the course of treatment of melanoma patients and helps improving the diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcome.

ESP, EORTC, and EURACAN Expert Opinion: practical recommendations for the pathological diagnosis and clinical management of intermediate melanocytic tumors and rare related melanoma variants

The recent WHO classification of skin tumors has underscored the importance of acknowledging intermediate grade melanocytic proliferations. A multistep acquisition of oncogenic events drives the progressive transformation of nevi into melanomas. The various pathways described are modulated by the initial oncogenic drivers that define the common, blue, and Spitz nevi groups. Intermediate lesions are most often the result of a clonal evolution within such nevi. Based on this established classification, we have suggested for each pathway a practical diagnostic approach, benefiting from the recently developed molecular tools, both in the setting of general pathology labs and expert centers. Moreover, recommendations regarding the re-excision and clinical follow-up are given to support decision-making in multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Spitz Tumors With ROS1 Fusions: A Clinicopathological Study of 6 Cases, Including FISH for Chromosomal Copy Number Alterations and Mutation Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Spitz tumors represent a heterogeneous group of melanocytic neoplasms with a spectrum of biological behavior ranging from benign (Spitz nevus) to malignant (spitzoid melanoma). Prediction of the behavior of these lesions based on their histological presentation is not always possible. Recently, mutually exclusive activating kinase fusions, involving ALK, NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, MET, ROS1, and BRAF, have been found in a subset of spitzoid lesions. Some of these genetic alterations were associated with specific morphological features. Here, we report the histological presentation of 6 Spitz tumors with ROS1 fusion. The age of the patients ranged from 6 to 34 years, with strong female prevalence (5:1). All neoplasms were compound melanocytic proliferations with a predominant dermal growth but a conspicuous junctional component displaying atypical microscopic features qualifying them as atypical Spitz tumor. FIP1L1 and CAPRIN1 were identified as 2 novel 5'-fusion partners of ROS1 along with the known PWWP2A-ROS1 fusion. FISH for copy number changes of 9p21, 6p25, and 11q13 was negative in all but 1 neoplasm harboring isolated gain of 8q24. TERT-promoter hotspot mutation analysis was negative in all tumors. All patients are disease-free after a mean follow-up period of 30 months. It is concluded that ROS1-fused spitzoid neoplasms seem to have no distinctive histopathological features although consistent findings were spindled melanocytes arranged in confluent whorling nests, prominent transepidermal elimination of melanocytic nests, and myxoid/mucinous changes.

A sixteen-year single-center retrospective chart review of Spitz nevi and spitzoid neoplasms in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Spitzoid neoplasms in pediatric patients pose an interesting challenge for clinicians. More data on the clinical, histologic, and molecular characteristics of these lesions are necessary to distinguish features that may portend recurrence or malignant behavior to help determine future treatment guidelines in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from Children's Hospital of Wisconsin to conduct a retrospective analysis of spitzoid neoplasms. Patients with biopsied or excised spitzoid neoplasms between 01/01/2000 and 08/01/2016 were included. Pertinent clinical and histologic data were collected. Atypical, unusual, or diagnostically uncertain lesions were selected for re-review.

RESULTS

266 lesions from 264 patients were included. 243 were classified as benign (91.35%), 22 as atypical (8.27%), and 1 as spitzoid melanoma (0.38%). No clinical or histologic variables were found to be statistically significant between the benign Spitz, atypical Spitz, and spitzoid melanoma cohorts. No known deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the extreme variability of spitzoid neoplasms clinically and histologically. Importantly, this study demonstrates that the vast majority of spitzoid neoplasms in pediatric populations are benign and supports conservative management of spitzoid lesions in children.

Pathology-based Biomarkers Useful for Clinical Decisions in Melanoma

The dramatic recent advances in therapy of melanoma require a more personalized and precise diagnostic approach to aid in clinical decisions. Tissue-based biomarkers in pathology have diagnostic, prognostic and predictive relevance. Herein we review the most commonly used pathology-based biomarkers in melanoma. Most of these biomarkers are evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE), and are widely available in clinical pathology laboratories. We describe the utility of MART1/Ki67, p16, PRAME, markers of lymphovascular invasion (D2-40, CD31, D2-40/MITF, CD31/SOX-10), BRAF V600E, NRAS, KIT, BAP1, ALK, NTRK, PD-L1, TERT, PTEN, iNOS, and MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in the evaluation of melanoma specimens. Correct interpretation and awareness of the significance of these biomarkers is crucial for pathologists, dermatologists, and oncologists who take care of melanoma patients.

A Clinicopathological Study of 29 Spitzoid Melanocytic Lesions With ALK Fusions, Including Novel Fusion Variants, Accompanied by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis for Chromosomal Copy Number Changes, and Both TERT Promoter and Next-Generation Sequencing Mutation Analysis

ALK-fused spitzoid neoplasms represent a distinctive group of melanocytic lesions. To date, few studies addressed genetic and chromosomal alterations in these lesions beyond the ALK rearrangements. Our objective was to study genetic alterations, including ALK gene fusions, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (TERT-p) mutations, chromosomal copy number changes, and mutations in other genes. We investigated 29 cases of Spitz lesions (11 Spitz nevi and 18 atypical Spitz tumors), all of which were ALK immunopositive. There were 16 female and 13 male patients, with age ranging from 1 to 43 years (mean, 18.4 years). The most common location was the lower extremity. Microscopically, all neoplasms were polypoid or dome shaped with a plexiform, predominantly dermally located proliferation of fusiform to spindled melanocytes with mild to moderate pleomorphism. The break-apart test for ALK was positive in 17 of 19 studied cases. ALK fusions were detected in 23 of 26 analyzable cases by Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor Kit. In addition to the previously described rearrangements, 3 novel fusions, namely, KANK1-ALK, MYO5A-ALK, and EEF2-ALK, were found. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for copy number changes yielded one case with the loss of RREB1 among 21 studied cases. TERT-p hotspot mutation was found in 1 of 23 lesions. The mutation analysis of 271 cancer-related genes using Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel was performed in 4 cases and identified in each case mutations in several genes with unknown significance, except for a pathogenic variant in the BLM gene. Our study confirms that most ALK fusion spitzoid neoplasms can be classified as atypical Spitz tumors, which occurs in young patients with acral predilection and extends the spectrum of ALK fusions in spitzoid lesions, including 3 hitherto unreported fusions. TERT-p mutations and chromosomal copy number changes involving 6p25 (RRB1), 11q13 (CCND1), 6p23 (MYB), 9p21 (CDKN2A), and 8q24 (MYC) are rare in these lesions. The significance of mutation in other genes remains unknown.

p16 Range of expression in dermal predominant benign epithelioid and spindled nevi and melanoma

BACKGROUND

Screening borderline Spitz tumors with p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has known utility. The applicability to other melanocytic neoplasms is not well defined.

METHODS

Cases (N = 104) of blue, cellular blue, epithelioid blue, congenital pattern, deep penetrating, desmoplastic, desmoplastic Spitz, acral, "epithelioid" nevi, nevoid melanoma, melanoma with a precursor nevus, and non-nevoid melanoma with Breslow thickness > 0.5 mm were stained for p16.

RESULTS

Lesions showed either a single uniform pattern of expression (single/homogeneous pattern: positive, checkerboard, rare, or lost) or multiple regionally distributed patterns (multiple/heterogeneous pattern). Most cases (78%, n = 81) showed single pattern expression. Within single pattern cases, total loss was restricted to melanoma (7/81/9%). Multiple patterns were more common in melanoma (12/23, 52%). Within multiple pattern (22%, n = 23) lesions, those with a total loss component (7/23; 30%) were malignant. Total p16 loss (diffuse or regional) was not seen in a subset of nevoid melanomas (1/8; 12.5%), melanomas arising in nevi (2/6; 33%), and non-nevoid melanomas (6/9; 66%). Total p16 loss (single pattern or part of multiple patterns) captured 61% (14/23) of melanomas and no nevi.

CONCLUSION

p16 IHC may be useful in dermal-based melanocytic lesions. Total p16 loss is seen only in melanoma. Multiple pattern expression should prompt careful evaluation.

A digital mRNA expression signature to classify challenging Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms

Spitzoid neoplasms are a challenging group of cutaneous melanocytic proliferations. They are characterized by epithelioid and/or spindle-shaped melanocytes and classified as benign Spitz nevi (SN), atypical Spitz tumors (AST), or malignant Spitz tumors (MST). The intermediate AST category represents a diagnostically challenging group since on purely histopathological grounds, their benign or malignant character remains unpredictable. This results in uncertainties in patient treatment and prognosis. The molecular properties of Spitzoid lesions, especially their transcriptomic landscape, remain poorly understood, and genomic alterations in melanoma-associated oncogenes are typically absent. The aim of this study was to characterize their transcriptome with digital mRNA expression profiling. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (including 27 SN, 10 AST, and 14 MST) were analyzed using the NanoString nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel. The number of significantly differentially expressed genes in SN vs. MST, SN vs. AST, and AST vs. MST was 68, 167, and 18, respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed upregulation of pathways related to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immunomodulatory-, angiogenesis-, hormonal-, and myogenesis-associated processes in AST and MST. A molecular signature of SN vs. MST was discovered based on the top-ranked most informative genes: NRAS, NF1, BMP2, EIF2B4, IFNA17, and FZD9. The AST samples showed intermediate levels of the identified signature. This implies that the gene signature can potentially be used to distinguish high-grade from low-grade AST with a larger study cohort in the future. This combined histopathological and transcriptomic methodology is promising for prospective diagnostics of Spitzoid neoplasms and patient management in dermatological oncology.

The 2018 World Health Organization Classification of Cutaneous, Mucosal, and Uveal Melanoma: Detailed Analysis of 9 Distinct Subtypes Defined by Their Evolutionary Pathway

CONTEXT.—

There have been major advances in the understanding of melanoma since the last revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2006.

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss development of the 9 distinct types of melanoma and distinguishing them by their epidemiology, clinical and histologic morphology, and genomic characteristics. Each melanoma subtype is placed at the end of an evolutionary pathway that is rooted in its respective precursor, wherever appropriate and feasible, based on currently known data. Each precursor has a variable risk of progression culminating in its fully evolved, invasive melanoma.

DATA SOURCES.—

This review is based on the "Melanocytic Tumours" section of the 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Skin Tumours, published in 2018.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Melanomas were divided into those etiologically related to sun exposure and those that are not, as determined by their mutational signatures, anatomic site, and epidemiology. Melanomas on the sun-exposed skin were further divided by the histopathologic degree of cumulative solar damage (CSD) of the surrounding skin, into low and high CSD, on the basis of degree of associated solar elastosis. Low-CSD melanomas include superficial spreading melanomas and high-CSD melanomas incorporate lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanomas. The "nonsolar" category includes acral melanomas, some melanomas in congenital nevi, melanomas in blue nevi, Spitz melanomas, mucosal melanomas, and uveal melanomas. The general term melanocytoma is proposed to encompass "intermediate" tumors that have an increased (though still low) probability of disease progression to melanoma.

A Review of Key Biological and Molecular Events Underpinning Transformation of Melanocytes to Primary and Metastatic Melanoma

Melanoma is a major public health concern that is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in countries such as New Zealand and Australia where it is the commonest cause of cancer death in young adults. Until recently, there were no effective drug therapies for patients with advanced melanoma however significant advances in our understanding of the biological and molecular basis of melanoma in recent decades have led to the development of revolutionary treatments, including targeted molecular therapy and immunotherapy. This review summarizes our current understanding of the key events in the pathway of melanomagenesis and discusses the role of genomic analysis as a potential tool for improved diagnostic evaluation, prognostication and treatment strategies. Ultimately, it is hoped that a continued deeper understanding of the mechanisms of melanomagenesis will lead to the development of even more effective treatments that continue to provide better outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Expression of p15 in a spectrum of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Accurate classification of spitzoid melanocytic lesions is difficult due to overlapping clinical and histopathologic features between Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors (ASTs), and spitzoid melanomas. Expression of p16 (CDKN2A) has been used as a marker of spitzoid lesions. However, its expression may be variable. p15 is a tumor suppressor encoded by CDKN2B, loss of which has been recently shown to promote transition from nevus to melanoma. We sought to determine whether p15 is a useful immunohistochemical marker to distinguish Spitz nevi from spitzoid melanomas and to compare p15 and p16 staining in this population.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for p15 and p16 was performed on Spitz nevi (n = 19), ASTs (n = 41), and spitzoid melanomas (n = 17). Immunoexpression was categorized by a four-tiered system: 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate), 3+ (strong).

RESULTS

3+/strong p15 staining was observed in 68.4% of Spitz nevi, 34.2% of ASTs, and 17.7% of spitzoid melanomas. By contrast, we observed 3+ p16 staining in roughly equivalent percentages of Spitz nevi (57.9%), ASTs (56.1%), and spitzoid melanomas (58.8%).

CONCLUSION

These data illustrate that p15 may be more useful than p16 as a biomarker to help distinguish benign from malignant spitzoid lesions.

Molecular testing of borderline cutaneous melanocytic lesions: SNP array is more sensitive and specific than FISH

Melanocytic lesions with borderline features are diagnostically challenging. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, which detect genomic copy number alterations (CNAs), can be helpful in distinguishing between nevi and melanoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used as a more rapid, less expensive alternative to SNP array, using a panel of probes that are often gained or lost in melanoma. We used SNP array data from 63 borderline cutaneous melanocytic lesions and 44 definitive melanomas to predict the performance of FISH testing. Lesions were considered positive by "virtual FISH" if 1 or more of the 5 FISH-probed loci demonstrated appropriate CNAs by SNP array. Cases were classified as positive by SNP array if ≥3 CNAs were present, based on internal validation studies, or if FISH criteria were met. Conventional FISH was performed in 33 cases (17 borderline lesions, 16 melanomas). Of the 63 borderline cases, 44 (70%) were positive by SNP array and 30 (48%) were positive by virtual FISH. A higher proportion of melanomas were positive by SNP array (41/44, 93% sensitivity) and virtual FISH (36/44, 82% sensitivity). Virtual FISH had 61% sensitivity in the borderline group using SNP array as the gold standard, whereas specificity was 84%. There was good correlation between conventional and virtual FISH, with agreement in 30 of 33 (91%) cases. Although FISH is highly effective in distinguishing between nevi and melanoma in cases where the histological diagnosis is straightforward, it is not nearly as sensitive or specific as SNP array when applied to borderline lesions.

Genomic Landscape of Spitzoid Neoplasms Impacting Patient Management

Spitzoid neoplasms are a distinct group of melanocytic proliferations characterized by epithelioid and/ or spindle shaped melanocytes. Intermediate forms that share features of both benign Spitz nevi (SN) and Spitz melanoma, i.e., malignant Spitz tumor (MST) represent a diagnostically and clinically challenging group of melanocytic lesions. A multitude of descriptive diagnostic terms exist for these ambiguous lesions with atypical Spitz tumor (AST) or Spitz tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) just naming two of them. This diagnostic gray zone creates confusion and high insecurity in clinicians and in patients. Biological behavior and clinical course of this intermediate group still remains largely unknown, often leading to difficulties with uncertainties in clinical management and prognosis. Consequently, a better stratification of Spitzoid neoplasms in benign and malignant forms is required thereby keeping the diagnostic group of AST/STUMP as small as possible. Ancillary diagnostic techniques such as immunohistochemistry, comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, next generation sequencing, micro RNA and mRNA analysis as well as mass spectrometry imaging offer new opportunities for the distinct diagnosis, thereby allowing the best clinical management of Spitzoid neoplasms. This review gives an overview on these additional diagnostic techniques and the recent developments in the field of molecular genetic alterations in Spitzoid neoplasms. We also discuss how the recent findings might facilitate the diagnosis and stratification of atypical Spitzoid neoplasms and how these findings will impact the diagnostic work up as well as patient management. We suggest a stepwise implementation of ancillary diagnostic techniques thereby integrating immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology findings in the diagnosis of challenging ambiguous Spitzoid neoplasms. Finally, we will give an outlook on pending future research objectives in the field of Spitzoid melanocytic lesions.

p16

The p16 gene belongs to INK4 family of genes and is made up of four members: p16 ^INK4A , p15 ^INK4B , p18 ^INK4C and p19 ^INK4D , all of which share biological properties, namely, inhibition of cell growth and tumour suppression. After p53, p16 is the second most common tumour suppressor gene. It has been regarded as the familial melanoma gene. Immunohistochemistry for p16 has a well-defined role in distinct pathological scenarios. It is used to distinguish desmoplastic melanoma from reactive fibrous proliferation, with former showing strong nuclear positivity. In other types of melanoma, p16 protein expression is lost. Spitz nevi show retention of nuclear staining for p16. Benign mesothelial proliferations tend to retain nuclear p16 immunoreactivity, while malignant mesotheliomas lose expression. However, p16 fluorescent in-situ hybridisation analysis is recommended in the workup of malignant mesothelioma. Another common application of p16 immunohistochemistry is as an indicator for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and p16 protein is overexpressed in HPV-associated tumours. In this context, p16 immunopositivity should be strong, diffuse, nuclear or nuclear and cytoplasmic in location. Another use for p16 is demonstration of p16 immunopositivity in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Common and not so Common Melanocytic Lesions in Children and Adolescents

The acquired melanocytic nevus is the most common lesion encountered by pediatric pathologists and dermatopathologists in their daily practice. In most cases, there are few difficulties in histopathologic diagnosis. However, it is the acquired melanocytic lesion known as the Spitz nevus, with its intrinsic atypical features which becomes the challenge since it exists along a histopathologic and biologic continuum from the atypical Spitz tumor to spitzoid melanoma. The frustration with some of these spitzoid lesions is that even the "experts" cannot agree as to the differentiation of one from the other even at the level of molecular genetics. Other melanocytic lesions are discussed including the congenital melanocytic nevus with its proliferative nodule(s) and melanoma as the ultimate complication. Although uncommon, cutaneous melanoma in the first 2 decades is emerging as a clinical problem especially in young women in the second decade of life. These are ultraviolet-associated neoplasms whose histopathologic and prognostic features are identical to the adult experience. Considerable progress has been made over the past 15 to 20 years in our understanding of cutaneous melanocytic lesions, but gaps still exist in the important group of spitzoid lesions. It can also be anticipated that more cutaneous melanomas in children will be seen in the future based upon epidemiologic studies.

Immunohistochemical Detection of p16 in Clinical Samples

P16 immunohistochemical expression, a surrogate marker of the retinoblastoma pathway, has become a major adjunct in the routine practice mostly of cervical and head/neck pathology, but with other indications too. In this chapter, a detailed immunohistochemical technique for the detection of p16 is described, followed by indications and interpretation of its expression in uterine, ovarian, vulvar, penile, head-and-neck, melanocytic, and other pathologies.