Global quality assessment of liver allograft C4d staining during acute antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue

Serum and tissue biomarkers of plasma cell-rich rejection in liver transplant recipients

The distinction between autoimmune and alloimmune reactions in liver transplant recipients can be challenging. Plasma cell-rich rejection (PCRR), previously known as de novo autoimmune hepatitis or plasma cell hepatitis, is an atypical and underrecognized form of allograft rejection observed post-liver transplantation, often in conjunction with features of T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection. If PCRR is not recognized and treated with prompt immunosuppressive augmentation, patients can develop advanced hepatic fibrosis, necroinflammation, and allograft failure. Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with PCRR, there exists a need to develop noninvasive biomarkers which can be used in screening, diagnosis, and treatment monitoring of PCRR. This study is a literature review of candidate serum-based and tissue-based biomarkers in adult and pediatric liver transplant PCRR. We also discuss biomarkers from plasma cell-rich processes observed in other disease states and other organ transplant recipients that might be tested in liver transplant PCRR. We conclude with proposed future directions in which biomarker implementation into clinical practice could lead to advances in personalized management of PCRR.

Consecutive disruption of intrahepatic bile ducts after ABO-incompatible living-donor re-liver transplantation: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Hyperacute rejection leading to hepatic necrosis or intrahepatic bile duct stricture in ABO incompatible living-donor liver transplant (ABO-i LDLT) has been reported many times. With the advent of rituximab, the incidence of these complications has decreased significantly. However, consecutive biliary disruption after ABO-i LDLT has rarely been reported.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A female in her 50s with blood type A was admitted to our hospital for ABO-i LDLT due to failure of a graft (refractory ascites [Child-Pugh C(10), MELD 9]) that had been primarily transplanted 20 years ago from her ABO-identical father. Since the living donor was her husband with blood type B, rituximab was administered for ABO-i re-LDLT. After the LDLT, the patient recovered quickly despite bile leakage at the biliary anastomosis. Subsequently, the bile duct of the graft liver was serially disrupted with a bile lake, which required multiple instances of biliary drainage. A liver biopsy was performed and did not show any C4d staining on 195 post-transplant days. The patient ultimately developed sepsis due to cholangitis and expired at 11 months after the re-LDLT and finally C4d was positive on post-mortem biopsy.

DISCUSSION

Advances in ABO-i LDLT, particularly with rituximab, have reduced complications, but consecutive bile duct disruption remains challenging. Despite positive donor-specific antibody, early rejection markers were absent, suggesting complex mechanisms of complication.

CONCLUSION

We herein report a rare case as an important observation that may aid in preventing and treating potentially fatal complications after ABO-i LDLT.

Accurate Visualization of C4d Complement Fragment in Immunohistochemistry by C-Terminal Linear Neoepitope-Specific Antibodies

C4d is the end degradation product of activated complement component C4b that appears during the early steps of the classical and lectin complement pathways. Within the primary sequence of C4d, there is a reactive thioester group that binds covalently to nearby surfaces, thus labeling the locations of complement activation. This feature makes C4d a target for immunohistochemical staining aimed to aid the diagnosis of, among others, the antibody-mediated rejection of transplanted organs, membranous glomerulonephritis, bullous pemphigoid, or inflammatory myopathies. However, the credibility of C4d immunostaining is debatable, as a high background in surrounding tissues and body fluids and diffused patterns of deposits in target structures are experienced with some of the available anti-C4d antibodies. Herein, we present an improved version of a rabbit anti-C4d antibody, originally raised against the C-terminal linear neoepitope of this complement fragment. Minor cross-reactivity with C4b and native C4 proteins, measured by ELISAs, as well as relatively low concentrations necessary for obtaining a specific signal in immunohistochemical analyses of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material, makes the improved antibody superior to commercially available rabbit monoclonal anti-C4d antibody SP91 dedicated to ex vivo diagnostics, as demonstrated by the staining of a panel of kidney transplant biopsies.

Treatment of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies-mediated rejection after liver transplantation: A French nationwide retrospective study

The deleterious effect of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) has been increasingly recognized during the past decade. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents a rare but severe complication in the presence of DSA. However, little is known concerning the treatment of AMR after LT. The nationwide French study aimed to describe LT recipients who received specific treatment of AMR. We performed a multicenter retrospective study on 44 patients who were treated with B-cell targeting agents from January 2008 to December 2020. Median patient age at the time of AMR treatment was 51.6 years (range: 17.9-68.0). AMR was classified as acute (n = 19) or chronic (n = 25). The diagnosis of AMR was made after a median time of 16.8 months (range: 0.4-274.2) after LT. The main therapeutic combination was plasma exchange/rituximab/IVIG (n = 25, 56.8%). The median follow-up after the treatment of AMR was 32 months (range: 1-115). After the treatment, 1-, 5- and 10-year patient and graft survivals were 77%, 55.9%, and 55.9%, and 69.5%, 47.0%, and 47.0%, respectively. Initial total bilirubin (Q1-Q3 vs. Q4) was significantly associated with patient survival (log-rank test, p = 0.005) and graft survival (log-rank test, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 21 months (range: 12-107), DSA became undetectable in 15/38 patients (39.5%) with available DSA monitoring. In conclusion, specific treatment of AMR in LT recipients has slowly emerged in France during the past decade and has probably been considered in the most severe patients; this explains the global poor outcome, even if the outcome was favorable in some cases.

Detailed Analysis of Simultaneous Renal and Liver Allografts in the Presence of DSA

Liver allografts protect renal allografts from the same donor from some, but not all, preformed donor specific alloantibodies (DSA). However, the precise mechanisms of protection and the potential for more subtle alterations/injuries within the grafts resulting from DSA interactions require further study.

Methods

We reevaluated allograft biopsies from simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients who had both allografts biopsied within 60 d of one another and within 30 d of DSA being positive in serum (positive: mean florescence intensity ≥5000). Routine histology, C4d staining, and specialized immunohistochemistry for Kupffer cells (KCs; CD163) and a C4d receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-4 were carried out in 4 patients with 6 paired biopsies.

Results

Overt antibody-mediated rejection was found in 3 of 4 renal and liver allografts. One patient had biopsy-confirmed renal and liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection despite serum clearance of DSA. All biopsies showed KC hypertrophy (minimal: 1; mild: 2; moderate: 1; severe: 2) and cytoplasmic C4d KC staining was easily detected in 2 biopsies from 2 patients; minimal and negative in 2 biopsies each. Implications of which are discussed. Control 1-y protocol liver allograft biopsies from DSA- recipients showed neither KC hypertrophy nor KC C4d staining (n = 6).

Conclusions

Partial renal allograft protection by a liver allograft from the same donor may be partially mediated by phagocytosis/elimination of antibody and complement split products by KCs, as shown decades ago in controlled sensitized experimental animal experiments.

Morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluation of liver allograft biopsies with contemporaneous serum DSA measurements

BACKGROUND

Acute antibody mediated rejection is increasingly identified in liver allografts as a unique form of alloimmune injury associated with donor specific antibodies (DSA). This manifests pathologically as microvascular injury and C4d uptake. Despite the liver allograft's relative resistance to alloimmune injury, liver allografts are not impervious to cellular and antibody-mediated rejection.

METHODS

In this blinded control study, we evaluated CD163 immunohistochemistry and applied the Banff 2016 criteria for diagnosis of acute AMR on a group of indication allograft liver biopsies from DSA positive patients and compared them to indication biopsies from DSA negative controls.

RESULTS

Most DSA positive patients were females (75%, p = .027), and underwent transplantation for HCV infection. Significant histopathological predictors of serum DSA positivity were Banff H-score (p = .01), moderate to severe cholestasis (p = .03), and CD163 score > 2 (p = .029). Other morphologic features that showed a trend with DSA positivity include Banff portal C4d-score (p = .06), bile ductular reaction (p = .07), and central perivenulitis (p = .07). The odds of DSA sMFI ≥5000 was 12.5 times higher in those with a C4d score >1 than those with a C4d score ≤ 1 (p = .04). Incidence of definite for aAMR in the DSA positive cohort was 25% (n = 5), and 0% in the DSA negative cohort. A group of 5 DSA positive cases were not classifiable by the current scheme.

CONCLUSION

Sinusoidal CD163, Banff H-score, and diffuse C4d are predictors of serum DSA, and facilitate recognition of histopathological features associated with serum DSA and tissue-antibody interaction.

Evidence for Alloimmune Sinusoidal Injury in De Novo Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia After Liver Transplantation

Posttransplant nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) mostly remains unexplained. Microvascular injury due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is suspected, but lack of donor specific antibody (DSA) testing makes it difficult to prove. Centered around a 1-year period of routine DSA testing, concomitant protocol, and indicated posttransplant liver biopsies (LB), recipients with NRH (n = 18) were compared with a matched control group (n = 36). All index, previous, and subsequent LB were reviewed. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, timing of index LB, and DSA. In the index LB, the NRH group had higher sinusoidal C4d positivity (p = 0.029) and perisinusoidal fibrosis (p = 0.034), both independently associated with NRH (p = 0.038 and 0.050, respectively). Features of "possible" chronic AMR were detected in 28.5% of the NRH group without a known cause and 0% of the control group (p = 0.009). The NRH group had more preceding indicated LB with increased incidence of rejection and biliary obstruction pattern. In the follow-up histology, overall, sinusoidal and portal C4d positivity, sinusoidal microvasculitis, and perisinusoidal fibrosis were also higher (all p < 0.050). In conclusion, we provide evidence towards the hypothesis that some cases of posttransplant NRH are related to preceding active and persistent AMR. Large multicenter studies with protocol DSA testing are required to confirm.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplant Recipients with Autoimmune Liver Disease: A Clinical and Pathologic Study of 4 Cases

Background: Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon complication after ABO-compatible liver transplantation (LT). This case series investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of acute AMR in LT recipients with autoimmune liver disease (ALD). Patients and Methods: Among 809 patients who underwent LT from January 2014 to December 2020, four ALD patients developed AMR, which was confirmed based on clinical features, histopathology of liver biopsy, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or panel reactive antibody (PRA) level. Therapies were individualized based on clinical manifestations. Results: The incidence of acute AMR was 0.49%, and the incidence of acute AMR with ALD and non-ALD recipients was 11.1% and 0%, respectively. Three patients had strongly positive HLA class II DSA, and one patient was with the PRA class I and II sensitivities, which were >80%; complement component 4d (C4d) staining was negative in all patients. The first patient underwent re-LT, and the other three patients had good prognoses with treatments. Conclusions: ALD patients are prone to acute AMR after LT, thus should be kept vigilant against the occurrence of acute AMR.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplantation: Impact and Applicability of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology 2016 Criteria

This study was aimed to examine the clinical utility and impact of the 2016 Banff criteria for acute antibody-mediated rejection (acute AMR) in patients with liver transplantation. Among adult patients with donor-specific antibody (DSA) assays performed between 2015 and 2020, cases with proved DSA (mean fluorescent index >2000) and matched liver biopsy available were reviewed. Among 55 patients identified, 28 (51%) had class I DSA, 45 (82%) had class II DSA and 18 (33%) had both. Mild, moderate and severe microvasculitis were observed in 11 (20%), 2 (4%) and 1 (2%) case, respectively. Diffuse immunoreactivity to C4d on portal microvascular endothelia was confirmed in 5 cases (9%), which met the criteria of definite (n=2) or suspicious for acute AMR (n=3). Cases of acute AMR more commonly had class I DSA (100% vs. 46%; p=0.027) or both class I and II DSA (80% vs. 28%; p=0.018) than cases of non-acute AMR. One case of pure acute AMR with veno-occlusion was successfully treated with plasma exchange. The remaining 4 cases had features of combined acute AMR/T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and two progressed to ductopenic rejection within 3 weeks. In conclusion, only 9% of DSA-positive patients met the Banff criteria for acute AMR, necessitating careful morphological and immunohistochemical assessments of the allograft biopsies according to the proposed standards. Combined acute AMR/TCMR was more common than isolated acute AMR, and additional AMR in TCMR cases may be associated with rapid progression to ductopenic rejection.

Recurrent Liver Allograft Injury in Patients With Donor-Derived Malignancy Treated With Immunosuppression Cessation and Retransplantation

OBJECTIVES

Donor-derived malignancy of the liver allograft is a rare but serious condition in the setting of necessary immunosuppression. Retransplantation after abrupt immunosuppression cessation has been performed with durable cancer-free survival.

METHODS

We present 2 cases of patients with donor-derived malignancy who were treated with complete immunosuppression cessation, which induced rapidly progressive liver allograft rejection and failure, with a need for subsequent retransplantation. We reviewed all serial liver biopsies and explants from both patients and performed C4d immunostaining.

RESULTS

Initial explants of both patients showed severe allograft rejection, with unusual features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and C4d positivity. Malignant tumors in the explants were necrotic, related to rejection of donor-derived cancer cells and tissue. Follow-up of both patients has shown long-term cancer-free survival but issues with recurrent allograft failure requiring a third transplant. The reasons for retransplantation in both cases were related to allograft failure from antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of a potentially increased risk of rejection and recurrent allograft failure when strategizing treatment of donor-derived malignancy with immunosuppression cessation and retransplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

Is ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation Really a Good Alternative for Pediatric Recipients?

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been proposed to compensate for donor shortage. To date, few studies have reported detailed ABOi LDLT results in large series of pediatric patients. C4d complement deposition in graft capillaries has been reported to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted, comparing clinical outcomes of each of 34 consecutive pediatric ABOi LDLT recipients with those of 2 non-ABOi pairs (n = 68), matched according to pre-transplant diagnostic criteria, age, and date of transplantation. In addition, we studied the C4d immunostaining pattern in 22 ABOi and in 36 non-ABOi recipients whose liver biopsy was performed within the first 4 post-transplant weeks for suspected acute rejection.

RESULTS

The incidence of biliary complications was higher in ABOi recipients (p < 0.05), as were the incidence of acute humoral rejection (p < 0.01) and the incidence of retransplantation (p < 0.05). All children who required retransplantation were older than 1 year at the time of ABOi LDLT. Positive C4d immunostaining was observed in 13/22 (59%) ABOi recipients versus 3/36 (8.3%) non-ABOi recipients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ABOi LDLT is a feasible option for pediatric end-stage liver disease but carries increased risks for the recipient, especially for children older than 1 year, even with a specific preparation protocol. C4d immunostaining may be a hallmark of acute humoral rejection in ABOi liver transplantation.

Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring

Traditional histopathological allograft biopsy evaluation provides, within hours, diagnoses, prognostic information, and mechanistic insights into disease processes. However, proponents of an array of alternative monitoring platforms, broadly classified as "invasive" or "noninvasive" depending on whether allograft tissue is needed, question the value proposition of tissue histopathology. The authors explore the pros and cons of current analytical methods relative to the value of traditional and illustrate advancements of next-generation histopathological evaluation of tissue biopsies. We describe the continuing value of traditional histopathological tissue assessment and "next-generation pathology (NGP)," broadly defined as staining/labeling techniques coupled with digital imaging and automated image analysis. Noninvasive imaging and fluid (blood and urine) analyses promote low-risk, global organ assessment, and "molecular" data output, respectively; invasive alternatives promote objective, "mechanistic" insights by creating gene lists with variably increased/decreased expression compared with steady state/baseline. Proponents of alternative approaches contrast their preferred methods with traditional histopathology and: (1) fail to cite the main value of traditional and NGP-retention of spatial and inferred temporal context available for innumerable objective analyses and (2) belie an unfamiliarity with the impact of advances in imaging and software-guided analytics on emerging histopathology practices. Illustrative NGP examples demonstrate the value of multidimensional data that preserve tissue-based spatial and temporal contexts. We outline a path forward for clinical NGP implementation where "software-assisted sign-out" will enable pathologists to conduct objective analyses that can be incorporated into their final reports and improve patient care.

Pathology of liver disease: advances in the last 50 years

Liver disease has been recognized in various forms for centuries. Incredible advances, however, have been made especially in the last 50 years, driven by improvements in histology, the development of immunostains, the development of high resolution imaging methods, improved biopsy and resection methods, and the emergence of the molecular era. With these tools, pathologists and their clinical and basic science colleagues moved from classifying liver disease using an observational, pattern-based approach to a refined classification of disease, one based on etiology for medical disease and tumor classification for neoplastic disease. Examples of liver specific diseases are used to illustrate these exciting advances. These impressive advances of the past provide the foundation for hope in the future, as liver pathology continues to play an important role in improving patient care through disease identification and classification and emerging roles in guiding therapy for cures.

Recurrent Idiopathic Liver Allograft Failure

OBJECTIVES

Many transplant programs have had patients who develop idiopathic recurrent liver allograft failure, necessitating serial transplants, and are deemed to have refractory or recurrent rejection. The frequency and the etiology of this immunologic dysfunction have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Herein, we illustrate the case of a patient who required three retransplants over a period of 20 years for recurrent liver allograft failure. By extensively compiling the patient's many liver biopsy specimens and explants over time, we demonstrate that antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was a major contributing factor from the outset. We conducted a review of the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients database to estimate the potential frequency of AMR.

RESULTS

As illustrated by this case, AMR has varied histologic findings in the setting of elevated donor-specific antibody titers.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of recurrent allograft failure in this patient was likely a combination of acute cellular rejection and AMR, manifestations of likely underlying immune dysregulation. Pathologists and transplant physicians should recognize the variable histologic presentations of AMR, which is imperative for its timely intervention. This case demonstrates how difficult the diagnosis of AMR can be to make, highlighting the need for strong clinical suspicion in patients having difficult-to-treat rejection and recurrent allograft failure.

The Landscape of Digital Pathology in Transplantation: From the Beginning to the Virtual E-Slide

BACKGROUND

Digital pathology has progressed over the last two decades, with many clinical and nonclinical applications. Transplantation pathology is a highly specialized field in which the majority of practicing pathologists do not have sufficient expertise to handle critical needs. In this context, digital pathology has proven to be useful as it allows for timely access to expert second-opinion teleconsultation. The aim of this study was to review the experience of the application of digital pathology to the field of transplantation.

METHODS

Papers on this topic were retrieved using PubMed as a search engine. Inclusion criteria were the presence of transplantation setting and the use of any type of digital image with or without the use of image analysis tools; the search was restricted to English language papers published in the 25 years until December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

Literature regarding digital transplant pathology is mostly about the digital interpretation of posttransplant biopsies (75 vs. 19), with 15/75 (20%) articles focusing on agreement/reproducibility. Several papers concentrated on the correlation between biopsy features assessed by digital image analysis (DIA) and clinical outcome (45/75, 60%). Whole-slide imaging (WSI) only appeared in recent publications, starting from 2011 (13/75, 17.3%). Papers dealing with preimplantation biopsy are less numerous, the majority (13/19, 68.4%) of which focus on diagnostic agreement between digital microscopy and light microscopy (LM), with WSI technology being used in only a small quota of papers (4/19, 21.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, published studies show good concordance between digital microscopy and LM modalities for diagnosis. DIA has the potential to increase diagnostic reproducibility and facilitate the identification and quantification of histological parameters. Thus, with advancing technology such as faster scanning times, better image resolution, and novel image algorithms, it is likely that WSI will eventually replace LM.