1
|
Knechtle SJ, Ladowski JM, Kwun J. A pig kidney supporting human physiology. Kidney Int 2024; 105:921-922. [PMID: 38642988 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Because of the global shortage of donor kidneys, xenotransplantation emerges as a potential solution for individuals with kidney failure who face challenges in securing a suitable donor kidney. A study featured in this month's issue of Kidney International assesses the kidney physiology of a porcine kidney transplanted into a brain-dead human with kidney failure, demonstrating life-sustaining physiological function for 7 days. Together with preclinical nonhuman primate studies, decedent models provide complementary data for development of clinical kidney xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Joseph M Ladowski
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwun J, Kirk AD, Knechtle SJ. The Emerging Era of Organ Transplantation and Anti-CD154mAb. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00279-X. [PMID: 38643943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, NC 27710.
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, NC 27710
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellamy COC, O'Leary JG, Adeyi O, Baddour N, Batal I, Bucuvalas J, Del Bello A, El Hag M, El-Monayeri M, Farris AB, Feng S, Fiel MI, Fischer SE, Fung J, Grzyb K, Guimei M, Haga H, Hart J, Jackson AM, Jaeckel E, Khurram NA, Knechtle SJ, Lesniak D, Levitsky J, McCaughan G, McKenzie C, Mescoli C, Miquel R, Minervini MI, Nasser IA, Neil D, O'Neil MF, Pappo O, Randhawa P, Ruiz P, Fueyo AS, Schady D, Schiano T, Sebagh M, Smith M, Stevenson HL, Taner T, Taubert R, Thung S, Trunecka P, Wang HL, Wood-Trageser M, Yilmaz F, Zen Y, Zeevi A, Demetris AJ. Banff 2022 Liver Group Meeting report: Monitoring long-term allograft health. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00204-1. [PMID: 38461883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology met in September 2022. Participants included hepatologists, surgeons, pathologists, immunologists, and histocompatibility specialists. Presentations and discussions focused on the evaluation of long-term allograft health, including noninvasive and tissue monitoring, immunosuppression optimization, and long-term structural changes. Potential revision of the rejection classification scheme to better accommodate and communicate late T cell-mediated rejection patterns and related structural changes, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, were discussed. Improved stratification of long-term maintenance immunosuppression to match the heterogeneity of patient settings will be central to improving long-term patient survival. Such personalized therapeutics are in turn contingent on a better understanding and monitoring of allograft status within a rational decision-making approach, likely to be facilitated in implementation with emerging decision-support tools. Proposed revisions to rejection classification emerging from the meeting include the incorporation of interface hepatitis and fibrosis staging. These will be opened to online testing, modified accordingly, and subject to consensus discussion leading up to the next Banff conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher O C Bellamy
- Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland and Department of Pathology, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, Scotland.
| | - Jacqueline G O'Leary
- Dallas VA Medical Center & University of Texas, Southwestern, Department of Medicine, Dallas Texas, USA
| | - Oyedele Adeyi
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Pathology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nahed Baddour
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Pathology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alton B Farris
- Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sandy Feng
- UCSF Health, Department of Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maria Isabel Fiel
- Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - John Fung
- Uchicago Medicine, Department of Surgery, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Maha Guimei
- Armed Forces College of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - John Hart
- Uchicago Medicine, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Nigar A Khurram
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Drew Lesniak
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rosa Miquel
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marta I Minervini
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Imad Ahmad Nasser
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Desley Neil
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Maura F O'Neil
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Orit Pappo
- Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Phillip Ruiz
- University of Miami Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas Schiano
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Maxwell Smith
- Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Timucin Taner
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard Taubert
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Swan Thung
- Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pavel Trunecka
- Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czechia
| | - Hanlin L Wang
- Pathology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michelle Wood-Trageser
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Funda Yilmaz
- Pathology, University of Ege, Imir, Bornova, Turkey
| | - Yoh Zen
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
DeLaura I, Zikos J, Anwar IJ, Yoon J, Ladowski J, Jackson A, Van Rompay K, Magnani D, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. The impact of IdeS (imlifidase) on allo-specific, xeno-reactive, and protective antibodies in a sensitized rhesus macaque model. Xenotransplantation 2024; 31:e12833. [PMID: 37864433 PMCID: PMC10999173 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Highly sensitized patients face many barriers to kidney transplantation, including higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection after HLA-incompatible transplant. IdeS, an endopeptidase that cleaves IgG nonspecifically, has been trialed as desensitization prior to kidney transplant, and successfully cleaves donor-specific antibody (DSA), albeit with rebound. METHODS IdeS was generated and tested (2 mg/kg, IV) in two naïve and four allosensitized nonhuman primates (NHP). Peripheral blood samples were collected at regular intervals following IdeS administration. Total IgG, total IgM, and anti-CMV antibodies were quantified with ELISA, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) and anti-pig antibodies were evaluated using flow cytometric crossmatch. B cell populations were assessed using flow cytometry. RESULTS IdeS successfully cleaved rhesus IgG in vitro. In allosensitized NHP, robust reduction of total, DSA, anti-pig, and anti-CMV IgG was observed within one day following IdeS administration. Rapid rebound of all IgG antibody populations was observed, with antibody levels returning to baseline around day 14 post-infusion. Total IgM level was not affected by IdeS. Interestingly, a comparable reduction in antibody populations was observed after the second dose of IdeS. However, we have not observed any significant modulation of B cell subpopulations after IdeS. CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated efficacy of IdeS in the allosensitized NHP in IgG with various specificities, mirroring antibody kinetics in human patients. The efficacy of IdeS on preexisting anti-pig antibodies may be useful in clinical xenotransplantation. However, given the limitation of IdeS on its durability as a monotherapy, optimization of IdeS with other agents targeting the humoral response is further needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joanna Zikos
- MassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Imran J Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Ladowski
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Koen Van Rompay
- California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Diogo Magnani
- MassBiologics of University of Massachusetts Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doby BL, Knechtle SJ, Locke JE. HRSA's Patient-Centric Approach to Modernizing the US Transplant System. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1239-1241. [PMID: 37755865 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the benefits of modernization efforts for the US transplant system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna L Doby
- Positive Rhetoric, Bowling Green, Kentucky
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health, Education, and Social Transformation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jayme E Locke
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chapman WC, Barbas AS, D'Alessandro AM, Vianna R, Kubal CA, Abt P, Sonnenday C, Barth R, Alvarez-Casas J, Yersiz H, Eckhoff D, Cannon R, Genyk Y, Sher L, Singer A, Feng S, Roll G, Cohen A, Doyle MB, Sudan DL, Al-Adra D, Khan A, Subramanian V, Abraham N, Olthoff K, Tekin A, Berg L, Coussios C, Morris C, Randle L, Friend P, Knechtle SJ. Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Donor Livers for Transplantation in the United States: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e912-e921. [PMID: 37389552 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare conventional low-temperature storage of transplant donor livers [static cold storage (SCS)] with storage of the organs at physiological body temperature [normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)]. BACKGROUND The high success rate of liver transplantation is constrained by the shortage of transplantable organs (eg, waiting list mortality >20% in many centers). NMP maintains the liver in a functioning state to improve preservation quality and enable testing of the organ before transplantation. This is of greatest potential value with organs from brain-dead donor organs (DBD) with risk factors (age and comorbidities), and those from donors declared dead by cardiovascular criteria (donation after circulatory death). METHODS Three hundred eighty-three donor organs were randomized by 15 US liver transplant centers to undergo NMP (n = 192) or SCS (n = 191). Two hundred sixty-six donor livers proceeded to transplantation (NMP: n = 136; SCS: n = 130). The primary endpoint of the study was "early allograft dysfunction" (EAD), a marker of early posttransplant liver injury and function. RESULTS The difference in the incidence of EAD did not achieve significance, with 20.6% (NMP) versus 23.7% (SCS). Using exploratory, "as-treated" rather than "intent-to-treat," subgroup analyses, there was a greater effect size in donation after circulatory death donor livers (22.8% NMP vs 44.6% SCS) and in organs in the highest risk quartile by donor risk (19.2% NMP vs 33.3% SCS). The incidence of acute cardiovascular decompensation at organ reperfusion, "postreperfusion syndrome," as a secondary outcome was reduced in the NMP arm (5.9% vs 14.6%). CONCLUSIONS NMP did not lower EAD, perhaps related to the inclusion of lower-risk liver donors, as higher-risk donor livers seemed to benefit more. The technology is safe in standard organ recovery and seems to have the greatest benefit for marginal donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Chapman
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis
| | | | | | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine
| | | | - Peter Abt
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
| | | | - Rolf Barth
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago School of Medicine
| | | | - Hasan Yersiz
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Devin Eckhoff
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School
| | - Robert Cannon
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC
| | - Linda Sher
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC
| | | | - Sandy Feng
- Department of Surgery, UCSF School of Medicine
| | | | - Ari Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Ochsner Clinic
| | - Maria B Doyle
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - David Al-Adra
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Adeel Khan
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis
| | | | - Nader Abraham
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Kim Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
| | - Akin Tekin
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine
| | - Lynn Berg
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | | | - Chris Morris
- Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Lucy Randle
- Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Peter Friend
- Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anand RP, Layer JV, Heja D, Hirose T, Lassiter G, Firl DJ, Paragas VB, Akkad A, Chhangawala S, Colvin RB, Ernst RJ, Esch N, Getchell K, Griffin AK, Guo X, Hall KC, Hamilton P, Kalekar LA, Kan Y, Karadagi A, Li F, Low SC, Matheson R, Nehring C, Otsuka R, Pandelakis M, Policastro RA, Pols R, Queiroz L, Rosales IA, Serkin WT, Stiede K, Tomosugi T, Xue Y, Zentner GE, Angeles-Albores D, Chris Chao J, Crabtree JN, Harken S, Hinkle N, Lemos T, Li M, Pantano L, Stevens D, Subedar OD, Tan X, Yin S, Anwar IJ, Aufhauser D, Capuano S, Kaufman DB, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J, Shanmuganayagam D, Markmann JF, Church GM, Curtis M, Kawai T, Youd ME, Qin W. Design and testing of a humanized porcine donor for xenotransplantation. Nature 2023; 622:393-401. [PMID: 37821590 PMCID: PMC10567564 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06594-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Recent human decedent model studies1,2 and compassionate xenograft use3 have explored the promise of porcine organs for human transplantation. To proceed to human studies, a clinically ready porcine donor must be engineered and its xenograft successfully tested in nonhuman primates. Here we describe the design, creation and long-term life-supporting function of kidney grafts from a genetically engineered porcine donor transplanted into a cynomolgus monkey model. The porcine donor was engineered to carry 69 genomic edits, eliminating glycan antigens, overexpressing human transgenes and inactivating porcine endogenous retroviruses. In vitro functional analyses showed that the edited kidney endothelial cells modulated inflammation to an extent that was indistinguishable from that of human endothelial cells, suggesting that these edited cells acquired a high level of human immune compatibility. When transplanted into cynomolgus monkeys, the kidneys with three glycan antigen knockouts alone experienced poor graft survival, whereas those with glycan antigen knockouts and human transgene expression demonstrated significantly longer survival time, suggesting the benefit of human transgene expression in vivo. These results show that preclinical studies of renal xenotransplantation could be successfully conducted in nonhuman primates and bring us closer to clinical trials of genetically engineered porcine renal grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Takayuki Hirose
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grace Lassiter
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel J Firl
- eGenesis, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ahmad Karadagi
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Feng Li
- eGenesis, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Rudy Matheson
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ryo Otsuka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ivy A Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Toshihide Tomosugi
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Imran J Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David Aufhauser
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Saverio Capuano
- Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Dixon B Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - James F Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George M Church
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Wyss Institute of Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Tatsuo Kawai
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
O’Leary JG, Farris AB, Gebel HM, Asrani SK, Askar M, Garcia V, Snipes GJ, Lo DJ, Knechtle SJ, Klintmalm GB, Demetris AJ. Detailed Analysis of Simultaneous Renal and Liver Allografts in the Presence of DSA. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1500. [PMID: 37456590 PMCID: PMC10348731 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver allografts protect renal allografts from the same donor from some, but not all, preformed donor specific alloantibodies (DSA). However, the precise mechanisms of protection and the potential for more subtle alterations/injuries within the grafts resulting from DSA interactions require further study. Methods We reevaluated allograft biopsies from simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients who had both allografts biopsied within 60 d of one another and within 30 d of DSA being positive in serum (positive: mean florescence intensity ≥5000). Routine histology, C4d staining, and specialized immunohistochemistry for Kupffer cells (KCs; CD163) and a C4d receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript-4 were carried out in 4 patients with 6 paired biopsies. Results Overt antibody-mediated rejection was found in 3 of 4 renal and liver allografts. One patient had biopsy-confirmed renal and liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection despite serum clearance of DSA. All biopsies showed KC hypertrophy (minimal: 1; mild: 2; moderate: 1; severe: 2) and cytoplasmic C4d KC staining was easily detected in 2 biopsies from 2 patients; minimal and negative in 2 biopsies each. Implications of which are discussed. Control 1-y protocol liver allograft biopsies from DSA- recipients showed neither KC hypertrophy nor KC C4d staining (n = 6). Conclusions Partial renal allograft protection by a liver allograft from the same donor may be partially mediated by phagocytosis/elimination of antibody and complement split products by KCs, as shown decades ago in controlled sensitized experimental animal experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Howard M. Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sumeet K. Asrani
- Annette C. & Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | - Medhat Askar
- Annette C. & Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | - Vanessa Garcia
- Annette C. & Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | - George J. Snipes
- Department of Pathology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | - Denise J. Lo
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Goran B. Klintmalm
- Annette C. & Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perakslis ED, Knechtle SJ, McCourt B, Lynch R, Doby BL. Doing it right: Caring for and protecting patient information for US organ donors and transplant recipients. Patterns 2023; 4:100734. [PMID: 37123437 PMCID: PMC10140603 DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
In the current US organ transplantation system, there are no regulations defining how organ procurement organizations must manage personal data and protect the privacy of donors and recipients. In response to the recent announcement of a major overhaul of the US transplantation system, we describe a practical approach to improving transplant data quality and protecting the autonomy of patients interacting with the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D. Perakslis
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
- Corresponding author
| | | | - Brian McCourt
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
| | - Raymond Lynch
- Departments of Surgery and Public Health, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Brianna L. Doby
- Department of Public Health Sciences, New Mexico State University, College of Health Education, and Social Transformation, Las Cruces, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scalzo RE, Sanoff SL, Rege AS, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ, Barisoni L, Byrns JS. Daratumumab Use Prior to Kidney Transplant and T Cell-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report. Am J Kidney Dis 2023; 81:616-620. [PMID: 36623683 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in daratumumab in the solid organ transplant realm owing to the potential immunomodulatory effects on CD38-expressing cells, primarily plasma cells, as they have a key role in antibody production. In particular there is interest in use of daratumumab for desensitization and potential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. However, ongoing investigation with daratumumab has shown potential immunologic concerns in vitro, with a significant increase in populations of CD4-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD8-positive helper T cells in both peripheral blood and bone marrow that could lead to acute T cell-mediated rejection in the solid organ transplant patient. To date, there are no published reports of an association with daratumumab use and T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. In this case report we present what is to our knowledge the first documented case of an early severe T cell-mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley E Scalzo
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott L Sanoff
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Aparna S Rege
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Laura Barisoni
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer S Byrns
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Perakslis E, Knechtle SJ. Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:5-10. [PMID: 36695621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, an arm of the Health Resources and Services Administration, has a contract with the United Network for Organ Sharing since 1986 to provide central oversight of organ donation and transplants in the United States. The United Network for Organ Sharing has recently come under scrutiny, prompting a review by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as summarized in its recent report and also by the US Senate Finance Committee. The national news services have opined about organ donation ethics, access to transplantation particularly for medically underserved populations, and management of organ transplantation data. These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best response as a transplant community. Broadly, we suggest that the data management approach of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network be replaced with a patient-centric omnichannel network in which all donor and recipient data exist in a single longitudinal record that can be used by all applications. A more comprehensive and standardized approach to donor data collection would drive quality improvement across organ procurement organizations and help address inequities in transplantation. Finally, a substantial increase in organ donation would be prompted by considering organ donors as a public health resource, meriting transparent publicly available data collection with respect to organ donor referral, screening, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Perakslis
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Population Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
DeLaura I, Schroder PM, Yoon J, Ladowski J, Anwar IJ, Ezekian B, Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. A novel method for in vitro culture and expansion of nonhuman primate B cells. J Immunol Methods 2022; 511:113363. [PMID: 36174734 PMCID: PMC10486248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2022.113363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the role of B cells in sensitization and antibody-mediated rejection pathogenesis, the ability to identify, isolate, and study B cells in vitro is critical for understanding these processes and developing novel therapeutics. While in vivo nonhuman primate models have been used to this end, an in vitro nonhuman primate model of B cell activation and proliferation has not been developed. METHODS CD20+ B cells and CD3+ T cells were isolated using magnetic bead separation from the peripheral blood of naive and skin allograft sensitized nonhuman primates. Allogeneic B and T cells were co-cultured in plates pre-coated with murine stromal cells engineered to express human CD40L and stimulated with cytokines. Cells and supernatants were harvested every 2 days for immune phenotyping and donor specific antibody quantification by flow cytometry. RESULTS The optimized culture system consisted of MS40L cells co-cultured with B and allogenic T cells and stimulated with cytokines. This culture system resulted in increased memory cells and plasmablasts over time compared to other culture systems. Comparison of culture of naïve and sensitized nonhuman primate samples revealed faster B cell exhaustion and marginally increased plasmablast differentiation in sensitized culture. Donor-specific antibody production was not observed in either culture group. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the first in vitro nonhuman primate model of B cell activation and proliferation using both naïve and allosensitized samples. This model provides an opportunity for exploration of B cell mechanisms and novel therapeutics and is a preliminary step in the development of an in vitro germinal center model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Ladowski
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Imran J Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anwar IJ, Ezekian B, DeLaura I, Manook M, Schroder P, Yoon J, Curfman V, Branum E, Messina J, Harnois M, Permar SR, Farris AB, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Addition of interleukin-6 receptor blockade to carfilzomib-based desensitization in a highly sensitized nonhuman primate model. Am J Transplant 2022; 22 Suppl 4:1-11. [PMID: 36239200 PMCID: PMC9722597 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Sensitized patients, those who had prior exposure to foreign human leukocyte antigens, are transplanted at lower rates due to challenges in finding suitable organs. Desensitization strategies have permitted highly sensitized patients to undergo kidney transplantation, albeit with higher rates of rejection. This study assesses targeting plasma cell and interleukin (IL)-6 receptor for desensitization in a sensitized nonhuman primate kidney transplantation model. All animals were sensitized using two sequential skin transplants from maximally major histocompatibility complex-mismatched donors. Carfilzomib (CFZ)/tocilizumab (TCZ) desensitization (N = 6) successfully decreased donor-specific antibody (DSA) titers and prevented the expansion of B cells compared to CFZ monotherapy (N = 3). Dual desensitization further delayed, but did not prevent humoral rebound, as evidenced by a delayed increase in post-kidney transplant DSA titers. Accordingly, CFZ/TCZ desensitization conferred a significant survival advantage over CFZ monotherapy. A trend toward increased T follicular helper cells was also observed in the dual therapy group along the same timeline as an increase in DSA and subsequent graft loss. Cytomegalovirus reactivation also occurred in the CFZ/TCZ group but was prevented with ganciclovir prophylaxis. In accordance with prior studies of CFZ-based dual desensitization strategies, the addition of IL-6 receptor blockade resulted in desensitization with further suppression of posttransplant humoral response compared to CFZ monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran J Anwar
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Isabel DeLaura
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Paul Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Verna Curfman
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Evelyn Branum
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Julia Messina
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Melissa Harnois
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Sallie R. Permar
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anwar IJ, DeLaura I, Ladowski J, Gao Q, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. Complement-targeted therapies in kidney transplantation-insights from preclinical studies. Front Immunol 2022; 13:984090. [PMID: 36311730 PMCID: PMC9606228 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.984090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aberrant activation of the complement system contributes to solid-organ graft dysfunction and failure. In kidney transplantation, the complement system is implicated in the pathogenesis of antibody- and cell-mediated rejection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and vascular injury. This has led to the evaluation of select complement inhibitors (e.g., C1 and C5 inhibitors) in clinical trials with mixed results. However, the complement system is highly complex: it is composed of more than 50 fluid-phase and surface-bound elements, including several complement-activated receptors-all potential therapeutic targets in kidney transplantation. Generation of targeted pharmaceuticals and use of gene editing tools have led to an improved understanding of the intricacies of the complement system in allo- and xeno-transplantation. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the role of the complement system as it relates to rejection in kidney transplantation, specifically reviewing evidence gained from pre-clinical models (rodent and nonhuman primate) that may potentially be translated to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Manook M, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Olaso D, Yoon J, Bae Y, Shaw BI, Song M, Kuchibhatla M, Farris AB, Kirk A, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Belatacept-Based Maintenance Immunosuppression Controls the Post-Transplant Humoral Immune Response in Highly Sensitized Nonhuman Primates. Kidney360 2022; 3:2116-2130. [PMID: 36591367 PMCID: PMC9802566 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0001732022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to MHC antigens increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized transplant recipients and reduces graft survival. Pretransplant desensitization with costimulation blockade and proteasome inhibition has facilitated transplantation in our preclinical nonhuman primate (NHP) model. However, long-term graft survival is limited by rebound of DSA after transplantation. In this study, we performed kidney transplants between highly sensitized, maximally MHC-mismatched NHPs (n=14). At kidney transplantation, primates received T cell depletion with rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin (rhATG; n=10) or monoclonal anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies (n=4). Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of belatacept and tacrolimus (n=5) or belatacept and rapamycin (n=9) with steroids. Rebound of DSA post-kidney transplantation was significantly reduced compared with maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Protocol lymph node biopsy specimens showed a decrease in germinal center activity, with low frequencies of T follicular helper cells and class-switched B cells after kidney transplantation. Combined belatacept and rapamycin was superior in controlling viral reactivation, enabling weaning of ganciclovir prophylaxis. Tacrolimus was associated with increased morbidity that included cytomegalovirus and parvovirus viremia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. All primates in the tacrolimus/belatacept group failed discontinuation of antiviral therapy. Overall, belatacept-based immunosuppression increased AMR-free graft survival by controlling post-transplant humoral responses in highly sensitized NHP recipients and should be further investigated in a human clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary W. Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Miriam Manook
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul M. Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ashley Y. Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Danae Olaso
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian I. Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mingqing Song
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Maragatha Kuchibhatla
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Allan Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anwar IJ, Srinivas TR, Gao Q, Knechtle SJ. Shifting Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation: The Rise of Composite Endpoints and Machine Learning to Refine Prognostication. Transplantation 2022; 106:1558-1564. [PMID: 35323161 PMCID: PMC10900533 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The measurement of outcomes in kidney transplantation has been more accurately documented than almost any other surgical procedure result in recent decades. With significant improvements in short- and long-term outcomes related to optimized immunosuppression, outcomes have gradually shifted away from conventional clinical endpoints (ie, patient and graft survival) to surrogate and composite endpoints. This article reviews how outcomes measurements have evolved in the past 2 decades in the setting of increased data collection and summarizes recent advances in outcomes measurements pertaining to clinical, histopathological, and immune outcomes. Finally, we discuss the use of composite endpoints and Bayesian concepts, specifically focusing on the integrative box risk prediction score, in conjunction with machine learning to refine prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran J Anwar
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Qimeng Gao
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anwar IJ, DeLaura IF, Gao Q, Ladowski J, Jackson AM, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Harnessing the B Cell Response in Kidney Transplantation - Current State and Future Directions. Front Immunol 2022; 13:903068. [PMID: 35757745 PMCID: PMC9223638 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite dramatic improvement in kidney transplantation outcomes over the last decades due to advent of modern immunosuppressive agents, long-term outcomes remain poor. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), a B cell driven process, accounts for the majority of chronic graft failures. There are currently no FDA-approved regimens for ABMR; however, several clinical trials are currently on-going. In this review, we present current mechanisms of B cell response in kidney transplantation, the clinical impact of sensitization and ABMR, the B cell response under current immunosuppressive regimens, and ongoing clinical trials for ABMR and desensitization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fitch ZW, Kang L, Li J, Knechtle SJ, Turek JW, Kirk AD, Markert ML, Kwun J. Introducing thymus for promoting transplantation tolerance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:549-556. [PMID: 35690492 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Establishing tolerance remains a central, if elusive, goal of transplantation. In solid-organ transplantation, one strategy for inducing tolerance has been cotransplantation of various forms of thymic tissue along with another organ. As one of the biological foundations of central tolerance, thymic tissue carries with it the ability to induce tolerance to any other organ or tissue from the same donor (or another donor tissue-matched to the thymic tissue) if successfully transplanted. In this review, we outline the history of this approach as well as work to date on its application in organ transplantation, concluding with future directions. We also review our experience with allogeneic processed thymus tissue for the treatment of congenital athymia, encompassing complete DiGeorge syndrome and other rare genetic disorders, and consider whether allogeneic processed thymic tissue implantation may offer a novel method for future experimentation with tolerance induction in organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lillian Kang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Joseph W Turek
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - M Louise Markert
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jelly ET, Kwun J, Schmitz R, Farris AB, Steelman ZA, Sudan DL, Knechtle SJ, Wax A. Optical coherence tomography of small intestine allograft biopsies using a handheld surgical probe. J Biomed Opt 2021; 26:JBO-210108R. [PMID: 34561973 PMCID: PMC8461564 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.26.9.096008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE The current gold standard for monitoring small intestinal transplant (IT) rejection is endoscopic visual assessment and biopsy of suspicious lesions; however, these lesions are only superficially visualized by endoscopy. Invasive biopsies provide a coarse sampling of tissue health without depicting the true presence and extent of any pathology. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) presents a potential alternative approach with significant advantages over traditional white-light endoscopy. AIM The aim of our investigation was to evaluate OCT performance in distinguishing clinically relevant morphological features associated with IT graft failure. APPROACH OCT was applied to evaluate the small bowel tissues of two rhesus macaques that had undergone IT of the ileum. The traditional assessment from routine histological observation was compared with OCT captured using a handheld surgical probe during the days post-transplant and subsequently was compared with histophaology. RESULTS The reported OCT system was capable of identifying major biological landmarks in healthy intestinal tissue. Following IT, one nonhuman primate (NHP) model suffered a severe graft ischemia, and the second NHP graft failed due to acute cellular rejection. OCT images show visual evidence of correspondence with histological signs of IT rejection. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that OCT imaging has significant potential to reveal morphological changes associated with IT rejection and to improve patient outcomes overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan T. Jelly
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, United States
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, United States
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Emory University, Department of Pathology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Zachary A. Steelman
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Debra L. Sudan
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, United States
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Durham, United States
| | - Adam Wax
- Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song S, Manook M, Kwun J, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kelsoe G. Allo-Specific Humoral Responses: New Methods for Screening Donor-Specific Antibody and Characterization of HLA-Specific Memory B Cells. Front Immunol 2021; 12:705140. [PMID: 34326847 PMCID: PMC8313870 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR) causes more kidney transplant failure than any other single cause. AMR is mediated by antibodies recognizing antigens expressed by the graft, and antibodies generated against major histocompatibility complex (MHC) mismatches are especially problematic. Most research directed towards the management of clinical AMR has focused on identifying and characterizing circulating donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) and optimizing therapies that reduce B-cell activation and/or block antibody secretion by inhibiting plasmacyte survival. Here we describe a novel set of reagents and techniques to allow more specific measurements of MHC sensitization across different animal transplant models. Additionally, we have used these approaches to isolate and clone individual HLA-specific B cells from patients sensitized by pregnancy or transplantation. We have identified and characterized the phenotypes of individual HLA-specific B cells, determined the V(D)J rearrangements of their paired H and L chains, and generated recombinant antibodies to determine affinity and specificity. Knowledge of the BCR genes of individual HLA-specific B cells will allow identification of clonally related B cells by high-throughput sequence analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and permit us to re-construct the origins of HLA-specific B cells and follow their somatic evolution by mutation and selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengli Song
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Miriam Manook
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Annette M. Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Garnett Kelsoe
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Schroder PM, Choi AY, Jackson AM, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes? Transpl Int 2021; 33:30-40. [PMID: 31705678 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the role of B cells in organ transplantation remains incomplete and continues to grow. The majority of research has focused on the detrimental role of antibodies that drive the development of pathogenesis of the transplanted organ. However, it has been shown that not all donor-specific antibodies are harmful and in some circumstances can even promote tolerance through the mechanism of accommodation. Furthermore, B cells can have effects on transplanted organs through their interaction with T cells, namely antigen presentation, cytokine production, and costimulation. More recently, the role and importance of Bregs was introduced to the field of transplantation. Due to this functional and ontogenetic heterogeneity, targeting B cells in transplantation may bring undesired immunologic side effects including increased rejection. Therefore, the selective control of B cells that contribute to the humoral response against donor antigens will continue to be an important and challenging area of research and potentially lead to improved long-term transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annette M Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Halpern SE, Moris D, Shaw BI, Kesseli SJ, Samoylova ML, Manook M, Schmitz R, Collins BH, Sanoff SL, Ravindra KV, Sudan DL, Knechtle SJ, Ellis MJ, McElroy LM, Barbas AS. Definition and Analysis of Textbook Outcome: A Novel Quality Measure in Kidney Transplantation. World J Surg 2021; 45:1504-1513. [PMID: 33486584 PMCID: PMC8281331 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05943-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Textbook outcome" (TO) is a novel composite quality measure that encompasses multiple postoperative endpoints, representing the ideal "textbook" hospitalization for complex surgical procedures. We defined TO for kidney transplantation using a cohort from a high-volume institution. METHODS Adult patients who underwent isolated kidney transplantation at our institution between 2016 and 2019 were included. TO was defined by clinician consensus at our institution to include freedom from intraoperative complication, postoperative reintervention, 30-day intensive care unit or hospital readmission, length of stay > 75th percentile of kidney transplant patients, 90-day mortality, 30-day acute rejection, delayed graft function, and discharge with a Foley catheter. Recipient, operative, financial characteristics, and post-transplant patient, graft, and rejection-free survival were compared between patients who achieved and failed to achieve TO. RESULTS A total of 557 kidney transplant patients were included. Of those, 245 (44%) achieved TO. The most common reasons for TO failure were delayed graft function (N = 157, 50%) and hospital readmission within 30 days (N = 155, 50%); the least common was mortality within 90 days (N = 6, 2%). Patient, graft, and rejection-free survival were significantly improved among patients who achieved TO. On average, patients who achieved TO incurred approximately $50,000 less in total inpatient charges compared to those who failed TO. CONCLUSIONS TO in kidney transplantation was associated with favorable post-transplant outcomes and significant cost-savings. TO may offer transplant centers a detailed performance breakdown to identify aspects of perioperative care in need of process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha E Halpern
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Brian I Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Samuel J Kesseli
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Mariya L Samoylova
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Miriam Manook
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Bradley H Collins
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Scott L Sanoff
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kadiyala V Ravindra
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Matthew J Ellis
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa M McElroy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Knechtle SJ, Niedfeldt D, Sudan D, Jackson A, Jamieson I, Hartwig M, Milano C. Another Step Toward Becoming a Transplant Community. Ann Surg 2021; 273:e149-e150. [PMID: 33086314 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Debra Sudan
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Annette Jackson
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ian Jamieson
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew Hartwig
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carmelo Milano
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Moris D, Shaw BI, Gloria J, Kesseli SJ, Samoylova ML, Schmitz R, Manook M, McElroy LM, Patel Y, Berg CL, Knechtle SJ, Sudan DL, Barbas AS. Textbook Outcomes in Liver Transplantation. World J Surg 2021; 44:3470-3477. [PMID: 32488663 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TO) is an emerging concept within multiple surgical domains, which represents a novel effort to define a standardized, composite quality benchmark based on multiple postoperative endpoints that represent the ideal "textbook" hospitalization. We sought to define TO for liver transplantation (LT) using a cohort from a high procedural volume center. METHODS Patients who underwent LT at our institution between 2014 and 2017 were eligible for the study. The definition of TO was determined by clinician consensus at our institution to include freedom from: mortality within 90 days, primary allograft non-function, early allograft dysfunction (EAD), rejection within 30 days, readmission with 30 days, readmission to the ICU during index hospitalization, hospital length of stay > 75th percentile of all liver transplant patients, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement greater than the 75th percentile for all liver transplant patients, Clavien-Dindo Grade III complication (re-intervention), and major intraoperative complication. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-one liver transplants with complete data were performed within the study period. Of those, 71 (31%) achieved a TO. Overall, the most likely event to lead to failure to achieve TO was readmission within 30 days (n = 57, 37%) or reoperation (n = 49, 32%). Overall and rejection-free survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Interestingly, patients who achieved TO incurred approximately $60,000 less in total charges than those who did not. When we limit this to charges specifically attributable to the transplant episode, the difference was approximately $50,000 and remained significantly less for those that achieved TO. CONCLUSIONS Here, we present the first definition of TO in LT. Though not associated with long-term outcomes, TO in LT is associated with a significantly lower charges and costs of the initial hospitalization. A multi-institutional study to validate this definition of TO is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Brian I Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jared Gloria
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Samuel J Kesseli
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Mariya L Samoylova
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Miriam Manook
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Lisa M McElroy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Yuval Patel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carl L Berg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Debra L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3512, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schroder PM, Schmitz R, Fitch ZW, Ezekian B, Yoon J, Choi AY, Manook M, Barbas A, Leopardi F, Song M, Farris AB, Collins B, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Preoperative carfilzomib and lulizumab based desensitization prolongs graft survival in a sensitized non-human primate model. Kidney Int 2020; 99:161-172. [PMID: 32898569 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Sensitized patients are difficult to transplant due to pre-formed anti-donor immunity. We have previously reported successful desensitization using carfilzomib and belatacept in a non-human primate (NHP) model. Here we evaluated selective blockade of the co-stimulatory signal (CD28-B7) with Lulizumab, which preserves the co-inhibitory signal (CTLA4-B7). Five maximally MHC-mismatched pairs of NHPs were sensitized to each other with two sequential skin transplants. Individuals from each pair were randomized to either desensitization with once-weekly Carfilzomib (27mg/m2 IV) and Lulizumab (12.5mg/kg SC) over four weeks, or no desensitization (Control). NHPs then underwent life-sustaining kidney transplantation from their previous skin donor. Rhesus-specific anti-thymocyte globulin was used as induction therapy and immunosuppression maintained with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone. Desensitized subjects demonstrated a significant reduction in donor-specific antibody, follicular helper T cells (CD4+PD-1+ICOS+), and proliferating B cells (CD20+Ki67+) in the lymph nodes. Interestingly, regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25+CD127lo) frequency was maintained after desensitization in addition to increased frequency of naïve CD4 T cells (CCR7+CD45RA+) and naïve B cells (IgD+CD27-CD20+) in circulation. This was associated with significant prolongation in graft survival (MST = 5.8 ± 4.0 vs. 64.8 ± 36.3; p<0.05) and lower antibody-mediated rejection scores compared to control animals. However, all desensitized animals eventually developed AMR and graft failure. Desensitization with CFZ and Lulizumab improves allograft survival in allosensitized NHPs, by transient control of the germinal center and shifting of the immune system to a more naive phenotype. This regimen may translate into clinical practice to improve outcomes of highly sensitized transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary W Fitch
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Y Choi
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Barbas
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frank Leopardi
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mingqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Bradley Collins
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tamas JW, Kim CY, Tang L, Knechtle SJ, Suhocki PV. Percutaneous Splenorenal Shunt Creation in a Patient with Chronic Portomesenteric Thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:1408-1409. [PMID: 32868015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James W Tamas
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Charles Y Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Linnan Tang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul V Suhocki
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Knechtle SJ, Shaw JM, Hering BJ, Kraemer K, Madsen JC. Translational impact of NIH-funded nonhuman primate research in transplantation. Sci Transl Med 2020; 11:11/500/eaau0143. [PMID: 31292263 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has long supported using nonhuman primate (NHP) models for research on kidney, pancreatic islet, heart, and lung transplantation. The primary purpose of this research has been to develop new treatments for down-modulating or preventing deleterious immune responses after transplantation in human patients. Here, we discuss NIH-funded NHP studies of immune cell depletion, costimulation blockade, regulatory cell therapy, desensitization, and mixed hematopoietic chimerism that either preceded clinical trials or prevented the human application of therapies that were toxic or ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Julia M Shaw
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Bernhard J Hering
- Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Kristy Kraemer
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Joren C Madsen
- Center for Transplantation Sciences and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kwun J, Li J, Rouse C, Park JB, Farris AB, Kuchibhatla M, Turek JW, Knechtle SJ, Kirk AD, Markert ML. Cultured thymus tissue implantation promotes donor-specific tolerance to allogeneic heart transplants. JCI Insight 2020; 5:129983. [PMID: 32352934 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.129983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Eighty-six infants born without a thymus have been treated with allogeneic cultured thymus tissue implantation (CTTI). These infants, who lack T cells and are profoundly immunodeficient at birth, after CTTI from an unmatched donor develop T cells similar to those of recipient that are tolerant to both their own major histocompatibility antigens and those of the donor. We tested use of CTTI with the goal of inducing tolerance to unmatched heart transplants in immunocompetent rats. We thymectomized and T cell-depleted Lewis rats. The rats were then given cultured thymus tissue from F1 (Lewis × Dark Agouti ) under the kidney capsule and vascularized Dark Agouti (DA) heart transplants in the abdomen. Cyclosporine was administered for 4 months. The control group did not receive CTTI. Recipients with CTTI showed repopulation of naive and recent thymic emigrant CD4 T cells; controls had none. Recipients of CTTI did not reject DA cardiac allografts. Control animals did not reject DA grafts, due to lack of functional T cells. To confirm donor-specific unresponsiveness, MHC-mismatched Brown Norway (BN) hearts were transplanted 6 months after the initial DA heart transplant. LW rats with LWxDA CTTI rejected the third-party BN hearts (mean survival time 10 days); controls did not. CTTI recipients produced antibody against third-party BN donor but not against the DA thymus donor, demonstrating humoral donor-specific tolerance. Taken together, F1(LWxDA) CTTI given to Lewis rats resulted in specific tolerance to the allogeneic DA MHC expressed in the donor thymus, with resulting long-term survival of DA heart transplants after withdrawal of all immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Clay Rouse
- Division of Laboratory Animal Resources, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jae Berm Park
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Joseph W Turek
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - M Louise Markert
- Department of Immunology, and.,Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sawitzki B, Harden PN, Reinke P, Moreau A, Hutchinson JA, Game DS, Tang Q, Guinan EC, Battaglia M, Burlingham WJ, Roberts ISD, Streitz M, Josien R, Böger CA, Scottà C, Markmann JF, Hester JL, Juerchott K, Braudeau C, James B, Contreras-Ruiz L, van der Net JB, Bergler T, Caldara R, Petchey W, Edinger M, Dupas N, Kapinsky M, Mutzbauer I, Otto NM, Öllinger R, Hernandez-Fuentes MP, Issa F, Ahrens N, Meyenberg C, Karitzky S, Kunzendorf U, Knechtle SJ, Grinyó J, Morris PJ, Brent L, Bushell A, Turka LA, Bluestone JA, Lechler RI, Schlitt HJ, Cuturi MC, Schlickeiser S, Friend PJ, Miloud T, Scheffold A, Secchi A, Crisalli K, Kang SM, Hilton R, Banas B, Blancho G, Volk HD, Lombardi G, Wood KJ, Geissler EK. Regulatory cell therapy in kidney transplantation (The ONE Study): a harmonised design and analysis of seven non-randomised, single-arm, phase 1/2A trials. Lancet 2020; 395:1627-1639. [PMID: 32446407 PMCID: PMC7613154 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30167-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of cell-based medicinal products (CBMPs) represents a state-of-the-art approach for reducing general immunosuppression in organ transplantation. We tested multiple regulatory CBMPs in kidney transplant trials to establish the safety of regulatory CBMPs when combined with reduced immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS The ONE Study consisted of seven investigator-led, single-arm trials done internationally at eight hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and the USA (60 week follow-up). Included patients were living-donor kidney transplant recipients aged 18 years and older. The reference group trial (RGT) was a standard-of-care group given basiliximab, tapered steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Six non-randomised phase 1/2A cell therapy group (CTG) trials were pooled and analysed, in which patients received one of six CBMPs containing regulatory T cells, dendritic cells, or macrophages; patient selection and immunosuppression mirrored the RGT, except basiliximab induction was substituted with CBMPs and mycophenolate mofetil tapering was allowed. None of the trials were randomised and none of the individuals involved were masked. The primary endpoint was biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 60 weeks after transplantation; adverse event coding was centralised. The RTG and CTG trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01656135, NCT02252055, NCT02085629, NCT02244801, NCT02371434, NCT02129881, and NCT02091232. FINDINGS The seven trials took place between Dec 11, 2012, and Nov 14, 2018. Of 782 patients assessed for eligibility, 130 (17%) patients were enrolled and 104 were treated and included in the analysis. The 66 patients who were treated in the RGT were 73% male and had a median age of 47 years. The 38 patients who were treated across six CTG trials were 71% male and had a median age of 45 years. Standard-of-care immunosuppression in the recipients in the RGT resulted in a 12% BCAR rate (expected range 3·2-18·0). The overall BCAR rate for the six parallel CTG trials was 16%. 15 (40%) patients given CBMPs were successfully weaned from mycophenolate mofetil and maintained on tacrolimus monotherapy. Combined adverse event data and BCAR episodes from all six CTG trials revealed no safety concerns when compared with the RGT. Fewer episodes of infections were registered in CTG trials versus the RGT. INTERPRETATION Regulatory cell therapy is achievable and safe in living-donor kidney transplant recipients, and is associated with fewer infectious complications, but similar rejection rates in the first year. Therefore, immune cell therapy is a potentially useful therapeutic approach in recipients of kidney transplant to minimise the burden of general immunosuppression. FUNDING The 7th EU Framework Programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Sawitzki
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul N Harden
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petra Reinke
- BeCAT, BCRT, and Department of Nephrology & Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aurélie Moreau
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - James A Hutchinson
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - David S Game
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Qizhi Tang
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eva C Guinan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Manuela Battaglia
- Diabetes Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - William J Burlingham
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ian S D Roberts
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mathias Streitz
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Régis Josien
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France; Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Cimna, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France
| | - Carsten A Böger
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Cristiano Scottà
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James F Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanna L Hester
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karsten Juerchott
- BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cecile Braudeau
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France; Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Cimna, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nantes, France
| | - Ben James
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Jeroen B van der Net
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tobias Bergler
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rossana Caldara
- Transplant Medicine, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - William Petchey
- Oxford Transplantation Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthias Edinger
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Regensburg Center for Interventional Immunology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Dupas
- Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Immunotech, Marseille, France
| | | | - Ingrid Mutzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Natalie M Otto
- BeCAT, BCRT, and Department of Nephrology & Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité Campus Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria P Hernandez-Fuentes
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fadi Issa
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Norbert Ahrens
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Ulrich Kunzendorf
- Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Christian Albrechts University, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Josep Grinyó
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Barcelona University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter J Morris
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Leslie Brent
- St Mary's Hospital Transplant Unit, Paddington, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bushell
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Laurence A Turka
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Bluestone
- UCSF Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert I Lechler
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maria C Cuturi
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - Stephan Schlickeiser
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter J Friend
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tewfik Miloud
- Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Immunotech, Marseille, France
| | - Alexander Scheffold
- Institute for Immunology, Christian Albrechts University, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Antonio Secchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Kerry Crisalli
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Mass General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sang-Mo Kang
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Hilton
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes Université, Inserm, Nantes, France; Institute of Transplantation Urology Nephrology, Nantes, France
| | - Hans-Dieter Volk
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giovanna Lombardi
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kathryn J Wood
- Transplantation Research and Immunology Group, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edward K Geissler
- Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany; Regensburg Center for Interventional Immunology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ezekian B, Schroder PM, Mulvihill MS, Barbas A, Collins B, Freischlag K, Yoon J, Yi JS, Smith F, Olaso D, Saccoccio FM, Permar S, Farris AB, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Pretransplant Desensitization with Costimulation Blockade and Proteasome Inhibitor Reduces DSA and Delays Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Highly Sensitized Nonhuman Primate Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:2399-2411. [PMID: 31658991 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2019030304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with broad HLA sensitization have poor access to donor organs, high mortality while waiting for kidney transplant, and inferior graft survival. Although desensitization strategies permit transplantation via lowering of donor-specific antibodies, the B cell-response axis from germinal center activation to plasma cell differentiation remains intact. METHODS To investigate targeting the germinal center response and plasma cells as a desensitization strategy, we sensitized maximally MHC-mismatched rhesus pairs with two sequential skin transplants. We administered a proteasome inhibitor (carfilzomib) and costimulation blockade agent (belatacept) to six animals weekly for 1 month; four controls received no treatment. We analyzed blood, lymph node, bone marrow cells, and serum before desensitization, after desensitization, and after kidney transplantation. RESULTS The group receiving carfilzomib and belatacept exhibited significantly reduced levels of donor-specific antibodies (P=0.05) and bone marrow plasma cells (P=0.02) compared with controls, with a trend toward reduced lymph node T follicular helper cells (P=0.06). Compared with controls, carfilzomib- and belatacept-treated animals had significantly prolonged graft survival (P=0.02), and renal biopsy at 1 month showed significantly reduced antibody-mediated rejection scores (P=0.02). However, four of five animals with long-term graft survival showed gradual rebound of donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection. CONCLUSIONS Desensitization using proteasome inhibition and costimulation blockade reduces bone marrow plasma cells, disorganizes germinal center responses, reduces donor-specific antibody levels, and prolongs allograft survival in highly sensitized nonhuman primates. Most animals experienced antibody-mediated rejection with humoral-response rebound, suggesting desensitization must be maintained after transplantation using ongoing suppression of the B cell response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John S Yi
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | | | - Danae Olaso
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center
| | - Frances M Saccoccio
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sallie Permar
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center,
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. Parallels between antibody-mediated rejection and ischemic kidney injury with respect to B cell activation. Ann Transl Med 2019; 7:S151. [PMID: 31576358 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kwun J, Yoon J, Clark A, Chen DF, Knechtle SJ, Jackson AM. P153 Utilizing single HLA antigen beads to sensitized nonhuman primate model. Hum Immunol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.07.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
33
|
Moris D, Kostakis ID, Machairas N, Prodromidou A, Tsilimigras DI, Ravindra KV, Sudan DL, Knechtle SJ, Barbas AS. Comparison between liver transplantation and resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220527. [PMID: 31365594 PMCID: PMC6668826 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with R0 resection being currently the only option for long-term survival. With the improvement in the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT), the indications for LT have expanded to include other malignant tumors, such as hCCA. The aim of the present analysis is to demonstrate and critically evaluate the outcomes of LT compared to resection with curative intent in patients with hCCA. METHODS We systematically searched the literature for articles published up to May 2018. The following algorithm was applied ((hilar cholangiocarcinoma) OR (perihilar cholangiocarcinoma) OR klatskin$ OR (bile duct neoplasm) OR cholangiocarcinoma) AND (transplant$ OR graft$). RESULTS Neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiation therapy was far more common in the LT group, with very few patients having received preoperative therapy in the resection group (p = 0.0005). Moreover, length of hospital stay was shorter after LT than after resection (p<0.00001). In contrast, no difference was found between the two treatment methods concerning postoperative mortality (p = 0.57). There was a trend towards longer overall survival after LT in comparison with resection. This was not obvious in the first year postoperatively, however, the advantage of LT over resection became obvious at 3 years after the operation (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In non-disseminated unresectable tumors, LT seems to have a non-inferior survival. In the same patients, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and/or strict selection criteria may contribute to superior survival outcomes compared to curative-intent resection. Due to the scarcity of level 1 evidence, it remains unclear whether LT should be increasingly considered for technically resectable early stage hCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Ioannis D. Kostakis
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolaos Machairas
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Prodromidou
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
- Third Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- * E-mail:
| | - Kadiyala V. Ravindra
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Debra L. Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Andrew S. Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fitch Z, Schmitz R, Kwun J, Hering B, Madsen J, Knechtle SJ. Transplant research in nonhuman primates to evaluate clinically relevant immune strategies in organ transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:115-129. [PMID: 31027947 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Research in transplant immunology using non-human primate (NHP) species to evaluate immunologic strategies to prevent rejection and prolong allograft survival has yielded results that have translated successfully into human organ transplant patient management. Other therapies have not proceeded to human translation due to failure in NHP testing, arguably sparing humans the futility and risk of such testing. The NHP transplant models are ethically necessary for drug development in this field and provide the closest analogue to human transplant patients available. The refinement of this resource with respect to colony MHC typing, reagent and assay development, and availability to the research community has greatly enhanced knowledge about transplant immunology and drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Fitch
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Center for Transplantation Sciences, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 510c, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robin Schmitz
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Bernhard Hering
- Schulze Diabetes Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Joren Madsen
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Burghuber CK, Manook M, Ezekian B, Gibby AC, Leopardi FV, Song M, Jenks J, Saccoccio F, Permar S, Farris AB, Iwakoshi NN, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Dual targeting: Combining costimulation blockade and bortezomib to permit kidney transplantation in sensitized recipients. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:724-736. [PMID: 30102844 PMCID: PMC7185755 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Previous evidence suggests that a homeostatic germinal center (GC) response may limit bortezomib desensitization therapy. We evaluated the combination of costimulation blockade with bortezomib in a sensitized non-human primate kidney transplant model. Sensitized animals were treated with bortezomib, belatacept, and anti-CD40 mAb twice weekly for a month (n = 6) and compared to control animals (n = 7). Desensitization therapy-mediated DSA reductions approached statistical significance (P = .07) and significantly diminished bone marrow PCs, lymph node follicular helper T cells, and memory B cell proliferation. Graft survival was prolonged in the desensitization group (P = .073). All control animals (n = 6) experienced graft loss due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation, compared to one desensitized animal (1/5). Overall, histological AMR scores were significantly lower in the treatment group (n = 5) compared to control (P = .020). However, CMV disease was common in the desensitized group (3/5). Desensitized animals were sacrificed after long-term follow-up with functioning grafts. Dual targeting of both plasma cells and upstream GC responses successfully prolongs graft survival in a sensitized NHP model despite significant infectious complications and drug toxicity. Further work is planned to dissect underlying mechanisms, and explore safety concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher K. Burghuber
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adriana C. Gibby
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Frank V. Leopardi
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Minqing Song
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Jenks
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Frances Saccoccio
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sallie Permar
- Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alton B. Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Neal N. Iwakoshi
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jean Kwun
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ezekian B, Mulvihill MS, Schroder PM, Gilmore BF, Leraas HJ, Gulack BC, Jane Commander S, Mavis AM, Kreissman SG, Knechtle SJ, Tracy ET, Barbas AS. Improved contemporary outcomes of liver transplantation for pediatric hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pediatr Transplant 2018; 22:e13305. [PMID: 30341782 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Improvement in outcomes of LT for pediatric HB and HCC has been reported in small series. We analyzed national outcomes and changes in donor, recipient, and perioperative factors over time that may contribute to survival differences. METHODS The UNOS database was queried for patients age <21 years that underwent LT for a primary diagnosis of HB or HCC (1987-2017). Subjects were divided into historic (transplant before 2010) and contemporary (transplant after 2010) cohorts. Baseline characteristics were compiled and examined. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS In total, 599 children with HB received LT (320 historic vs 279 contemporary). Concurrently, 141 children with HCC received LT (92 historic vs 49 contemporary). For both tumors, waitlist time decreased (HB 56.2 days historic vs 33.2 days contemporary, P = 0.017; HCC 189.3 days historic vs 71.7 days contemporary, P = 0.012). In the historic cohorts, patients with HB had a 1-year and 5-year OS of 84.6% and 75.1%, respectively. Survival for HCC was 84.4% and 59.9%, respectively. Outcomes improved in the contemporary era to 89.1% and 82.6% for HB, and 94.7% and 80.8% for HCC, respectively (both log-rank test P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Outcomes of LT have improved significantly, with contemporary survival now equivalent between these tumors and exceeding 80% 5-year OS. Future studies are needed to explore whether offering LT in patients that are resectable is justifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ezekian
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael S Mulvihill
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul M Schroder
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian F Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Harold J Leraas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian C Gulack
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Alisha M Mavis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Susan G Kreissman
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Elisabeth T Tracy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kwun J, Park J, Yi JS, Farris AB, Kirk AD, Knechtle SJ. IL-21 Biased Alemtuzumab Induced Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection Is Reversed by LFA-1 Costimulation Blockade. Front Immunol 2018; 9:2323. [PMID: 30374350 PMCID: PMC6196291 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite its excellent efficacy in controlling T cell mediated acute rejection, lymphocyte depletion may promote a humoral response. While T cell repopulation after depletion has been evaluated in many aspects, the B cell response has not been fully elucidated. We tested the hypothesis that the mechanisms also involve skewed T helper phenotype after lymphocytic depletion. Post-transplant immune response was measured from alemtuzumab treated hCD52Tg cardiac allograft recipients with or without anti-LFA-1 mAb. Alemtuzumab induction promoted serum DSA, allo-B cells, and CAV in humanized CD52 transgenic (hCD52Tg) mice after heterotopic heart transplantation. Additional anti-LFA-1 mAb treatment resulted in reduced DSA (Fold increase 4.75 ± 6.9 vs. 0.7 ± 0.5; p < 0.01), allo-specific B cells (0.07 ± 0.06 vs. 0.006 ± 0.002 %; p < 0.01), neo-intimal hyperplasia (56 ± 14% vs. 23 ± 13%; p < 0.05), arterial disease (77.8 ± 14.2 vs. 25.8 ± 20.1%; p < 0.05), and fibrosis (15 ± 23.3 vs. 4.3 ± 1.65%; p < 0.05) in this alemtuzumab-induced chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) model. Surprisingly, elevated serum IL-21 levels in alemtuzumab-treated mice was reduced with LFA-1 blockade. In accordance with the increased serum IL-21 level, alemtuzumab treated mice showed hyperplastic germinal center (GC) development, while the supplemental anti-LFA-1 mAb significantly reduced the GC frequency and size. We report that the incomplete T cell depletion inside of the GC leads to a systemic IL-21 dominant milieu with hyperplastic GC formation and CAMR. Conventional immunosuppression, such as tacrolimus and rapamycin, failed to reverse AMR, while co-stimulation blockade with LFA-1 corrected the GC hyperplastic response. The identification of IL-21 driven chronic AMR elucidates a novel mechanism that suggests a therapeutic approach with cytolytic induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Kwun
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jaeberm Park
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - John S Yi
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Patel YA, Henson JB, Wilder JM, Zheng J, Chow SC, Berg CL, Knechtle SJ, Muir AJ. The impact of human leukocyte antigen donor and recipient serotyping and matching on liver transplant graft failure in primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cholangitis. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13388. [PMID: 30136315 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) serotyping is not considered to have significant impact on liver graft survival and does not factor into U.S. organ allocation. Immune-related liver diseases such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been speculated to represent a disease subgroup that may have significantly different graft outcomes depending on HLA donor/recipient characterization. The aim of this study was to investigate whether HLA serotyping/matching influenced post-transplant graft failure for immune-related liver diseases using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. From 1994 to 2015, 5665 patients underwent first-time liver-only transplants for PSC, AIH, and PBC with complete graft survival and donor/recipient HLA data. Graft failure was noted in 38.6% (2188/5665), and all groups had comparable 5-year graft survival (75.1%-78.8%, P = 0.069). The overall degree of, and loci-specific mismatch level, did not influence outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression noted increased graft failure risk for recipient HLA-B7, HLA-B57, HLA-B75, HLA-DR13 and donor HLA-B55, HLA-B58, and HLA-DR8 for PSC patients, protective effects for recipient HLA-DR1 and HLA-DR3 for AIH patients, and increased risk for HLA-DR7 for AIH patients. These findings warrant further investigation to evaluate the impact of HLA serotyping on post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval A Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Julius M Wilder
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jiayin Zheng
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Schein-Chung Chow
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carl L Berg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew J Muir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ezekian B, Schroder PM, Freischlag K, Yoon J, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Contemporary Strategies and Barriers to Transplantation Tolerance. Transplantation 2018; 102:1213-1222. [PMID: 29757903 PMCID: PMC6059978 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to discuss immunologic tolerance as it applies to solid organ transplantation and to identify barriers that hinder the achievement of this long-term goal. First, the definition of tolerance and an introduction of mechanisms by which tolerance exists or can be achieved will be discussed. Next, a review of contemporary attempts at achieving transplant tolerance will be described. Finally, a discussion of the humoral barriers to transplantation tolerance and potential ways to overcome these barriers will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Paul M. Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Kyle Freischlag
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Janghoon Yoon
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schroder PM, Ezekian B, Ford M, Knechtle SJ, Kwun J. Commentary: Belatacept Does Not Inhibit Follicular T Cell-Dependent B-Cell Differentiation in Kidney Transplantation. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1615. [PMID: 29218048 PMCID: PMC5704107 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Schroder
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brian Ezekian
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Mandy Ford
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jean Kwun
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ezekian B, Mulvihill MS, Freischlag K, Yerokun BA, Davis RP, Hartwig MG, Knechtle SJ, Barbas AS. Elevated HbA1c in donor organs from patients without a diagnosis of diabetes portends worse liver allograft survival. Clin Transplant 2017; 31. [PMID: 28667782 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Recipients of liver allografts from diabetic donors have decreased graft survival. However, limited data exist on the effects of donor HbA1c. We hypothesized that allografts from nondiabetic donors with elevated HbA1c would be associated with decreased survival. Liver transplant recipients from the UNOS database from nondiabetic donors were stratified into two groups: euglycemic (HbA1c<6.5) and hyperglycemic (HbA1c≥6.5). Propensity score matching (10:1) was used to adjust for donor and recipient characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Donors of hyperglycemic allografts were older (49 vs 36, P<.001), were more likely to be non-white, had a higher BMI (29.8 vs 26.2, P<.001), were more likely to engage in heavy cigarette use (1.5% vs 1.3%, P=.004), had higher serum creatinine levels (1.3 vs 1.0, P=.002), and were more likely to be an expanded-criteria donor (35.8% vs 14.4%, P<.001). After propensity matching to account for these differences, allograft survival was significantly decreased in the recipients of hyperglycemic allografts (P=.049), and patient survival showed a trend toward reduction (P=.082). These findings suggest that HbA1c may be a simple and inexpensive test with potential utility for better organ risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ezekian
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Kyle Freischlag
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert P Davis
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew G Hartwig
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrew S Barbas
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Xing M, Sakaria S, Dhanasekaran R, Parekh S, Spivey J, Knechtle SJ, Zhang D, Kim HS. Bridging Locoregional Therapy Prolongs Survival in Patients Listed for Liver Transplant with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 40:410-420. [PMID: 27900445 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-016-1505-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS To evaluate the long-term survival benefit of bridging locoregional therapy (LRT) prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria. METHODS Our transplant center registry was studied for all HCC patients within the Milan criteria who were listed for OLT from 1998 to 2013. Baseline clinical characteristics and median overall survival (OS) were calculated and stratified by LRT, OLT status, and wait times. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank test. RESULTS Of 265 listed, 205 underwent OLT (mean follow-up 7.6 years). Of 205, 111 received bridging LRT (A), and 94 did not (B). Both were similar in demographics and tumor characteristics (p > 0.05). Median OS from HCC for A/B were 86.4 vs. 68.9 months (p = 0.01). Median OS from OLT for A/B were 74.6 vs. 63.6 months (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors for survival from HCC were bridging LRT (p = 0.002) and high wait time (p = 0.008); independent predictors for survival from OLT were bridging LRT (p = 0.005) and high wait time (p = 0.005). Of 60 who were listed but did not undergo transplant, 44 received LRT (C) and 16 received best supportive care (D). Median OS from HCC for C/D were 37.1 vs. 24.8 months (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Bridging LRT and high wait times were independent positive prognostic factors for survival from HCC diagnosis and OLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minzhi Xing
- Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Sonali Sakaria
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Renumathy Dhanasekaran
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Samir Parekh
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - James Spivey
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208042, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. .,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Barbas AS, Knechtle SJ. Expanding the Donor Pool With Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion: The Future Is Now. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:3075-3076. [PMID: 27402131 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A S Barbas
- Toronto General Hospital, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S J Knechtle
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Affiliation(s)
- S J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - R L Fairchild
- Department of Immunology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ludwig JM, Knechtle SJ, Kim HS. Reply to: "Percutaneous Management of Benign Biliary Strictures: Is It Time to Focus on Reducing Procedure Invasiveness?". J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27:936-7. [PMID: 27287980 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Ludwig
- Division of Interventional Radiology , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT 06510
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, 330 Cedar Street, TE 2-224, New Haven, CT 06510
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Burghuber CK, Kwun J, Page EJ, Manook M, Gibby AC, Leopardi FV, Song M, Farris AB, Hong JJ, Villinger F, Adams AB, Iwakoshi NN, Knechtle SJ. Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Sensitized Nonhuman Primates: Modeling Human Biology. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:1726-38. [PMID: 26705099 PMCID: PMC4874845 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 12/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We have established a model of sensitization in nonhuman primates and tested two immunosuppressive regimens. Animals underwent fully mismatched skin transplantation, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) response was monitored by flow cross-match. Sensitized animals subsequently underwent kidney transplantation from their skin donor. Immunosuppression included tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone. Three animals received basiliximab induction; compared with nonsensitized animals, they showed a shorter mean survival time (4.7 ± 3.1 vs. 187 ± 88 days). Six animals were treated with T cell depletion (anti-CD4/CD8 mAbs), which prolonged survival (mean survival time 21.6 ± 19.0 days). All presensitized animals showed antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In two of three basiliximab-injected animals, cellular rejection (ACR) was prominent. After T cell depletion, three of six monkeys experienced early acute rejection within 8 days with histological evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy and AMR. The remaining three monkeys survived 27-44 days, with mixed AMR and ACR. Most T cell-depleted animals experienced a rebound of DSA that correlated with deteriorating kidney function. We also found an increase in proliferating memory B cells (CD20(+) CD27(+) IgD(-) Ki67(+) ), lymph node follicular helper T cells (ICOS(+) PD-1(hi) CXCR5(+) CD4(+) ), and germinal center (GC) response. Depletion controlled cell-mediated rejection in sensitized nonhuman primates better than basiliximab, yet grafts were rejected with concomitant DSA rise. This model provides an opportunity to test novel desensitization strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher K. Burghuber
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jean Kwun
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eugenia J Page
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Miriam Manook
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adriana C Gibby
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Frank V Leopardi
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Minqing Song
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jung Joo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- National Primate Research Center (NPRC), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Ochang, Korea
| | - Francois Villinger
- Department of Pathology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrew B. Adams
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Neal N Iwakoshi
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Emory Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ludwig JM, Webber GR, Knechtle SJ, Spivey JR, Xing M, Kim HS. Percutaneous Management of Benign Biliary Strictures with Large-Bore Catheters: Comparison between Patients with and without Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27:219-225.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
49
|
Halazun KJ, Mathur AK, Rana AA, Massie AB, Mohan S, Patzer RE, Wedd JP, Samstein B, Subramanian RM, Campos BD, Knechtle SJ. One Size Does Not Fit All--Regional Variation in the Impact of the Share 35 Liver Allocation Policy. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:137-42. [PMID: 26561981 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Revised: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Allocation policies for liver transplantation underwent significant changes in June 2013 with the introduction of Share 35. We aimed to examine the effect of Share 35 on regional variation in posttransplant outcomes. We examined two patient groups from the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset; a pre-Share 35 group composed of patients transplanted between June 17, 2012, and June 17, 2013 (n = 5523), and a post-Share group composed of patients transplanted between June 18, 2013, and June 18, 2014 (n = 5815). We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable analyses to compare survival. There were significant increases in allocation Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, laboratory MELD scores, and proportions of patients in the intensive care unit and on mechanical, ventilated, or organ-perfusion support at transplant post-Share 35. We also observed a significant increase in donor risk index in this group. We found no difference on a national level in survival between patients transplanted pre-Share 35 and post-Share 35 (p = 0.987). Regionally, however, posttransplantation survival was significantly worse in the post-Share 35 patients in regions 4 and 10 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04), with no significant differences in the remaining regions. These results suggest that Share 35 has been associated with transplanting "sicker patients" with higher MELD scores, and although no difference in survival is observed on a national level, outcomes appear to be concerning in some regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Halazun
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - A K Mathur
- Department of Surgery and Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - A A Rana
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - A B Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Mohan
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | - R E Patzer
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - J P Wedd
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - B Samstein
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - R M Subramanian
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - B D Campos
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - S J Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Knechtle SJ, Sudan DL. Surgical technique in transplantation: how much does it matter? Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2791-2. [PMID: 26484836 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 08/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - D L Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|