Prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation for sudden death in selected high risk patients with structural heart disease and preserved systolic function

Programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification in patients with myocardial scarring and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are recommended in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below or equal to 35%. However, no recommendation exists to guide the use of prophylactic ICD in patients with less altered LVEF and myocardial scarring, even though they represent the majority of sudden cardiac deaths (SCD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF.

METHODS

Patients who underwent PVS with myocardial scarring and LVEF ≥ 40% were included. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely SCD, ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation, and appropriate ICD therapy.

RESULTS

168 patients were included (mean age 62 ± 13 years, LVEF 54 ± 9 %). Indication for PVS was mostly non-sustained VT and/or syncope (83%). Post-myocardial infarction patients represented about half of the cases (52%). Inducibility during PVS was observed in 21 patients (13%). Over a mean follow-up of 46 ± 38 months, a MAE occurred in 9 patients with positive PVS (43%), versus 4 patients (2.7%) with negative PVS. Inducibility during PVS provided high rule-out performance with a 97% negative predictive value for the prediction of MAE and a fair rule-in performance with a 43% positive predictive value (sensitivity 69%, specificity 92%).

CONCLUSION

PVS is a useful tool to discriminate patients with myocardial scar and LVEF ≥ 40% at increased arrhythmic risk. Effective utilization of ICD may be anticipated in case of positive PVS, while non-inducible patients are at lower MAE risk.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Severe Aortic Stenosis Prior to Aortic Valve Replacement: A Literature Review

Background and Objectives: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a frequent valvular disease characterized by the obstruction of left ventricular outflow. The resulting hemodynamic and structural changes create an arrhythmogenic substrate, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) often caused by ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) being a feared complication. This review examines the relationship between severe AS and VA, detailing the epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, and management approaches prior to aortic valve replacement (AVR). Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the historical and contemporary literature investigating ventricular arrhythmias in severe aortic stenosis. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using keywords, including "aortic stenosis", "ventricular arrhythmia", "sudden cardiac death", and "aortic valve replacement". Both landmark historical studies and modern investigations utilizing advanced monitoring techniques were included to provide a complete evolution of the understanding. Results: The prevalence of ventricular ectopy and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia increases with AS severity and symptom onset. Left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, altered electrophysiological properties, and ischemia create the arrhythmogenic substrate. Risk factors include the male sex, concomitant aortic regurgitation, elevated filling pressures, and syncope. Diagnostic approaches range from standard electrocardiography to continuous monitoring and advanced imaging. Management centers on timely valve intervention, with medical therapy serving primarily as a bridge to AVR. Conclusions: Ventricular arrhythmias represent a consequence of valvular pathology in severe AS rather than an independent entity. Their presence signals advanced disease and a heightened risk for adverse outcomes. Multidisciplinary management with vigilant monitoring and prompt surgical referral is essential. Understanding this relationship enables clinicians to better identify high-risk patients requiring urgent intervention before life-threatening arrhythmic events occur.

The Uncertain Benefit from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: How to Guide Clinical Decision-Making?

Life-threatening dysrhythmias remain a significant cause of mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) effectively reduce mortality in patients who have survived a life-threatening arrhythmic event. The evidence for survival benefit of primary prevention ICD for patients with high-risk NICM on guideline-directed medical therapy is not as robust, with efficacy questioned by recent studies. In this review, we summarize the data on the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in NICM, the recommendations, and the evidence supporting the efficacy of primary prevention ICD, and highlight tools that may improve the identification of patients who could benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.

Imagenetics for Precision Medicine in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common heart muscle disorder of nonischemic etiology associated with heart failure development and the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. A tailored approach to risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death is required in genetic DCM given its variable presentation and phenotypic severity. Currently, advances in cardiogenetics have shed light on disease mechanisms, the complex genetic architecture of DCM, polygenic contributors to disease susceptibility and the role of environmental triggers. Parallel advances in imaging have also enhanced disease recognition and the identification of the wide spectrum of phenotypes falling under the DCM umbrella. Genotype-phenotype associations have been also established for specific subtypes of DCM, such as DSP (desmoplakin) or FLNC (filamin-C) cardiomyopathy but overall, they remain elusive and not readily identifiable. Also, despite the accumulated knowledge on disease mechanisms, certain aspects remain still unclear, such as which patients with DCM are at risk for disease progression or remission after treatment. Imagenetics, that is, the combination of imaging and genetics, is expected to further advance research in the field and contribute to precision medicine in DCM management and treatment. In the present article, we review the existing literature in the field, summarize the established knowledge and emerging data on the value of genetics and imaging in establishing genotype-phenotype associations in DCM and in clinical decision making for DCM patients.

Incidence, risk assessment and prevention of sudden cardiac death in cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, mainly due to the development of heart failure and increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Despite improvement in survival with contemporary treatment, SCD remains an important cause of mortality in cardiomyopathies. It occurs at a rate ranging between 0.15% and 0.7% per year (depending on the cardiomyopathy), which significantly surpasses SCD incidence in the age- and sex-matched general population. The risk of SCD is affected by multiple factors including the aetiology, genetic basis, age, sex, physical exertion, the extent of myocardial disease severity, conduction system abnormalities, and electrical instability, as measured by various metrics. Over the past decades, the knowledge on the mechanisms and risk factors for SCD has substantially improved, allowing for a better-informed risk stratification. However, unresolved issues still challenge the guidance of SCD prevention in patients with cardiomyopathies. In this review, we aim to provide an in-depth discussion of the contemporary concepts pertinent to understanding the burden, risk assessment and prevention of SCD in cardiomyopathies (dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, hypertrophic, arrhythmogenic right ventricular, and restrictive). The review first focuses on SCD incidence in cardiomyopathies and then summarizes established and emerging risk factors for life-threatening arrhythmias/SCD. Finally, it discusses validated approaches to the risk assessment and evidence-based measures for SCD prevention in cardiomyopathies, pointing to the gaps in evidence and areas of uncertainties that merit future clarification.

Risk assessment of post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction using 45-min short resting Holter electrocardiographic recordings

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients remains a challenging task. Several electrocardiographic noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) have been associated with adverse outcomes and were used to refine risk assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of NIRFs extracted from 45-min short resting Holter ECG recordings (SHR), in predicting ventricular tachycardia inducibility with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in post-MI patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

We studied 99 post-MI ischemia-free patients (mean age: 60.5 ± 9.5 years, 86.9% men) with LVEF ≥40%, at least 40 days after revascularization. All the patients underwent PVS and a high-resolution SHR. The following parameters were evaluated: mean heart rate, ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular complexes, couplets, tachycardias), QTc duration, heart rate variability (HRV), deceleration capacity, heart rate turbulence, late potentials, and T-wave alternans.

RESULTS

PVS was positive in 24 patients (24.2%). HRV, assessed by the standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN), was significantly decreased in the positive PVS group (42 ms vs. 51 ms, p = .039). SDNN values <50 ms were also associated with PVS inducibility (OR 3.081, p = .032 in univariate analysis, and 4.588, p = .013 in multivariate analysis). No significant differences were identified for the other NIRFs. The presence of diabetes, history of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and LVEF <50% were also important predictors of positive PVS.

CONCLUSIONS

HRV assessed from SHR, combined with other noninvasive clinical and echocardiographic variables (diabetes, STEMI history, LVEF), can provide an initial, practical, and rapid screening tool for arrhythmic risk assessment in post-MI patients with preserved LVEF.

The Uncertain Benefit from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: How to Guide Clinical Decision-Making?

Life-threatening dysrhythmias remain a significant cause of mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) effectively reduce mortality in patients who have survived a life-threatening arrhythmic event. The evidence for survival benefit of primary prevention ICD for patients with high-risk NICM on guideline-directed medical therapy is not as robust, with efficacy questioned by recent studies. In this review, we summarize the data on the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in NICM, the recommendations, and the evidence supporting the efficacy of primary prevention ICD, and highlight tools that may improve the identification of patients who could benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.

OUP accepted manuscript

More than 40 years after the first implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, sudden cardiac death (SCD) still accounts for more than five million deaths worldwide every year. Huge efforts in the field notwithstanding, it is now increasingly evident that the current strategy of long-term prevention based on left ventricular ejection fraction as the key selection criterion is actually of very limited impact, also because the largest absolute numbers of SCD are encountered in the general population not known to be at risk. It has been recently reemphasized that SCD is often not so sudden, with almost half of the victims experiencing typical warning symptoms preceding the event. Importantly, heeded and prompt medical attention can dramatically improve survival. Essentially, such timely action increases the chances of the SCD event being witnessed by emergency medical services and provides the opportunity for early intervention. In addition, newer technologies incorporating digital data acquisition, transfer between interconnected devices, and artificial intelligence, should allow dynamic, real-time monitoring of diverse parameters and therefore better identification of subjects at short-term SCD risk. Along with warning symptoms, these developments allow a new approach of near-term prevention based on the hours and minutes preceding SCD. In the present review, we challenge the current paradigm of mid- and long-term prevention using ICD in patients at the highest risk of SCD, and introduce a complementary concept applicable to the entire population that would aim to pre-empt SCD by timely detection and intervention within the minutes or hours prior to the event.

Unexplained Syncope: The Importance of the Electrophysiology Study

Syncope of cardiac origin may be associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death if not treated in a timely and appropriate manner. The diagnostic approach of syncope imposes a significant economic burden on society. The investigation and elucidation of the pathogenetic mechanism of syncope are of great clinical importance, as both prognosis and appropriate therapeutic approaches depend on these factors. The responsible mechanism of presyncope or syncope can only be revealed through the patient history, baseline clinical examination and electrocardiogram. The percentage of patients who are diagnosed with these tests alone exceeds 50%. In patients with a history of organic or acquired heart disease or/and the presence of abnormal findings on the electrocardiogram, a further diagnostic electrophysiology inclusive approach should be followed to exclude life threatening arrhythmiological mechanism. However, if the patient does not suffer from underlying heart disease and does not show abnormal electrocardiographic findings in the electrocardiogram, then the probability in the electrophysiology study to find a responsible cause is small but not absent. The role of a two-step electrophysiology study inclusive risk stratification approach for the effective management of the former is thoroughly discussed in this review.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure mid-range ejection fraction patients with a non-invasive guiding to programmed ventricular stimulation two-step approach

BACKGROUND

Although some post myocardial infarction (post-MI) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients with mid-range ejection fraction heart failure (HFmrEF/40%-49%) face an increased risk for arrhythmic sudden cardiac death (SCD), current guidelines do not recommend an implantable cardiac defibrilator (ICD). We risk stratified hospitalized HFmrEF patients for SCD with a combined non-invasive risk factors (NIRFs) guiding to programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) two-step approach.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients (male = 83%, age = 64 ± 14 years, LVEF = 45 ± 5%, CAD = 69%, DCM = 31%) underwent a NIRFs screening first-step with electrocardiogram (ECG), SAECG, Echocardiography and 24-hour ambulatory ECG (AECG). Thirty-two patients with presence of one of three NIRFs (SAECG ≥ 2 positive criteria for late potentials, ventricular premature beats ≥ 240/24 hours, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia [VT] episode ≥ 1/24 hours) were further investigated with PVS. Patients were classified as either low risk (Group 1, n = 16, NIRFs-), moderate risk (Group 2, n = 18, NIRFs+/PVS-), and high risk (Group 3, n = 14, NIRFs+/PVS+). All in Group 3 received an ICD.

RESULTS

After 41 ± 18 months, 9 of 48 patients, experienced the major arrhythmic event (MAE) endpoint (clinical VT/fibrillation = 3, appropriate ICD activation = 6). The endpoint occurred more frequently in Group 3 (7/14, 50%) than in Groups 1 and 2 (2/34, 5.8%). Logistic regression model adjusted for PVS, age, and LVEF revealed that PVS was an independent MAE predictor (OR: 21.152, 95% CI: 2.618-170.887, P = .004). Kaplan-Meier curves diverged significantly (log rank, P < .001) while PVS negative predictive value was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized HFmrEF post-MI and DCM patients, a NIRFs guiding to PVS two-step approach efficiently detected the subgroup at increased risk for MAE.

Temporal changes of noninvasive electrocardiographic risk factors for sudden cardiac death in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PRESERVE-EF study

BACKGROUND

Several noninvasive risk factors (NIRFs) have been proposed for sudden cardiac death risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction (post-MI) patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). However, it remains unclear if these factors change over time.

METHODS

We evaluated seven electrocardiographic NIRFs as they were described in the PRESERVE-EF trial in 80 post-MI patients with EF ≥ 40%, at least 40 days after revascularization and 1 year later.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 56 ± 10 years, and 88% were men. Mean EF was 50 ± 5%. The prevalence of (a) positive late potentials (27.5% vs. 28.8%, p = .860), (b) >30 premature ventricular complexes/hour (8.8% vs. 11.3%, p = .598), (c) nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (8.8% vs. 5%, p = .349), (d) standard deviation of normal RR intervals <75 ms (3.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000), (e) QTc derived from 24-hr electrocardiography >440 ms (men) or >450 ms (women) (17.5% vs. 17.5%, p = 1.000), (f) deceleration capacity ≤4.5 ms and heart rate turbulence onset ≥0% and slope ≤2.5 ms (2.5% vs. 3.8%. p = 1.000), and (g) ambulatory T-wave alternans ≥65 μV in two Holter channels (6.3% vs. 6.3%, p = 1.000) were similar between the two measurements. However, five patients (6.3%) without any NIRFs during the first assessment had at least one positive NIRF at the second assessment and six patients (7.5%) with at least one NIRF at baseline had no positive NIRFs at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

While the prevalence of the examined electrocardiographic NIRFs between the two examinations was similar on a population basis, some patients without NIRFs at baseline developed NIRFs at 1 year and vice versa, highlighting the need for risk factor reassessment during follow-up.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction: the PRESERVE EF study

AIMS

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) annual incidence is 0.6-1% in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)≥40%. No recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use exist in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We introduced a combined non-invasive/invasive risk stratification approach in post-MI ischaemia-free patients, with LVEF ≥ 40%, in a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Patients with at least one positive electrocardiographic non-invasive risk factor (NIRF): premature ventricular complexes, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, late potentials, prolonged QTc, increased T-wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence, were referred for programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS), with ICDs offered to those inducible. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation or SCD. We screened and included 575 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years, LVEF 50.8%). Of them, 204 (35.5%) had at least one positive NIRF. Forty-one of 152 patients undergoing PVS (27-7.1% of total sample) were inducible. Thirty-seven (90.2%) of them received an ICD. Mean follow-up was 32 months and no SCDs were observed, while 9 ICDs (1.57% of total screened population) were appropriately activated. None patient without NIRFs or with NIRFs but negative PVS met the primary endpoint. The algorithm yielded the following: sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.8%, positive predictive value 22%, and negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSION

The two-step approach of the PRESERVE EF study detects a subpopulation of post-MI patients with preserved LVEF at risk for MAEs that can be effectively addressed with an ICD.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02124018.

Management of asymptomatic arrhythmias: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the Heart Failure Association (HFA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA), and Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

Asymptomatic arrhythmias are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Although studies specifically dedicated to these asymptomatic arrhythmias are lacking, many arrhythmias still require proper diagnostic and prognostic evaluation and treatment to avoid severe consequences, such as stroke or systemic emboli, heart failure, or sudden cardiac death. The present document reviews the evidence, where available, and attempts to reach a consensus, where evidence is insufficient or conflicting.

Recommendations for the use of electrophysiological study: Update 2018

The field of cardiac electrophysiology has greatly developed during the past decades. Consequently, the use of electrophysiological studies (EPSs) in clinical practice has also significantly augmented, with a progressively increasing number of certified electrophysiology centers and specialists. Since Zipes et al published the Guidelines for Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiology and Catheter Ablation Procedures in 1995, no official document summarizing current EPS indications has been published. The current paper focuses on summarizing all relevant data of the role of EPS in patients with different types of cardiac pathologies and provides up-to-date recommendations on this topic. For this purpose, the PubMed database was screened for relevant articles in English up to December 2018 and ESC and ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines, and EHRA/HRS/APHRS position statements related to the current topic were analyzed. Current recommendations for the use of EPS in clinical practice are discussed and presented in 17 distinct cardiac pathologies. A short rationale, evidence, and indications are provided for each cardiac disease/group of diseases. In conclusion, because of its capability to establish a diagnosis in patients with a variety of cardiac pathologies, the EPS remains a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders and is capable of establishing indications for cardiac device implantation and guide catheter ablation procedures.

Signal-averaged electrocardiography: Past, present, and future

Signal-averaged electrocardiography records delayed depolarization of myocardial areas with slow conduction that can form the substrate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. This technique has been examined mostly in patients with coronary artery disease, but its use has been declined over the years. However, several lines of evidence, derived from hitherto clinical data in patients with healed myocardial infarction, indicate that signal-averaged electrocardiography remains a valuable tool in risk stratification, especially when incorporated into algorithms encompassing invasive and noninvasive indices. Such an approach can aid the more precise identification of candidates for device therapy, in the context of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This article reappraises the value of signal-averaged electrocardiography as a predictor of arrhythmic outcome in patients with ischemic heart disease and discusses potential future indications.

Blunted cyclic variation of heart rate predicts mortality risk in post-myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, and chronic heart failure patients

Aims

Cyclic variation of heart rate (CVHR) associated with sleep-disordered breathing is thought to reflect cardiac autonomic responses to apnoeic/hypoxic stress. We examined whether blunted CVHR observed in ambulatory ECG could predict the mortality risk.

Methods and results

CVHR in night-time Holter ECG was detected by an automated algorithm, and the prognostic relationships of the frequency (F_CV) and amplitude (A_CV) of CVHR were examined in 717 patients after myocardial infarction (post-MI 1, 6% mortality, median follow-up 25 months). The predictive power was prospectively validated in three independent cohorts: a second group of 220 post-MI patients (post-MI 2, 25.5% mortality, follow-up 45 months); 299 patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis (ESRD, 28.1% mortality, follow-up 85 months); and 100 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF, 35% mortality, follow-up 38 months). Although CVHR was observed in ≥96% of the patients in all cohorts, F_CV did not predict mortality in any cohort. In contrast, decreased A_CV was a powerful predictor of mortality in the post-MI 1 cohort (hazard ratio [95% CI] per 1 ln [ms] decrement, 2.9 [2.2–3.7], P < 0.001). This prognostic relationship was validated in the post-MI 2 (1.8 [1.4–2.2], P < 0.001), ESRD (1.5 [1.3–1.8], P < 0.001), and CHF (1.4 [1.1–1.8], P = 0.02) cohorts. The prognostic value of A_CV was independent of age, gender, diabetes, β-blocker therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction, sleep-time mean R-R interval, and F_CV.

Conclusion

Blunted CVHR detected by decreased A_CV in a night-time Holter ECG predicts increased mortality risk in post-MI, ESRD, and CHF patients.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

BACKGROUND

Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death by means of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators constitutes the holy grail of arrhythmology. However, current risk stratification algorithms lead to suboptimal outcomes, by both allocating ICDs to patients not deriving any meaningful survival benefit and withholding them from those erroneously considered as low-risk for arrhythmic mortality.

METHODS

In the present review article we will attempt to present shortcomings of contemporary guidelines regarding sudden death prevention in ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy patients and present available data suggesting encouraging results following implementation of multifactorial approaches, by using multiple modalities, both noninvasive and invasive. Invasive electrophysiological testing, namely programmed ventricular stimulation, will be discussed in greater length to highlight both its potential usefulness and currently ongoing multicenter studies aiming to provide evidence necessary to make the next step in sudden death risk stratification.

RESULTS

Promising findings have been reported by multiple study groups regarding novel strategies for both negative selection of low and positive selection of relatively preserved ejection fraction patients as candidates for ICD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The era of ejection fraction as the sole risk stratifier for arrhythmic risk in heart failure appears to be drawing to an end, especially if current underway large studies validate previous findings.

Comparison of Ventricular Inducibility with Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Myocardial Inflammation in Endomyocardial Biopsy in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy remains a matter of debate in the era of device implantation.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated associations between histopathological findings, contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI and the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) in programmed ventricular stimulation.

METHODS

56 patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤50%, mean 36.6±10.5%) due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent cardiac MRI, programmed ventricular stimulation, and endomyocardial biopsy and were retrospectively investigated. Inducibility was defined as sustained mono- or polymorphic VT or unstable VT/VF requiring cardioversion/defibrillation. Primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of hemodynamically relevant VT/VF and/or adequate ICD-therapy during follow-up.

RESULTS

Endomyocardial biopsy detected cardiac fibrosis in 18 (32.1%) patients. Cardiac MRI revealed 35 (62.5%) patients with positive late gadolinium enhancement. VT/VF was induced in ten (17.9%) patients during programmed ventricular stimulation. Monomorphic VT was inducible in 70%, while 20% of patients showed polymorphic VT. One patient (10%) presented with VF. Inducibility correlated significantly with the presence of positive late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac MRI (p<0.01). We could not find a significant association between inducibility and the degree of cardiac inflammation and fibrosis in non-site directed routine right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. During a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, nine (16.1%) patients reached the primary endpoint. Monomorphic VTs were found in 66.7% patients and were terminated by antitachycardia pacing therapy. One patient with polymorphic VT and two patients with VF received adequate therapy by an ICD-shock. However, inducibility did not correlate with the occurrence of endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Inducibilty during programmed ventricular stimulation is associated with positive late gadolinium enhancement in cardiac MRI of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The presence of myocardial fibrosis or inflammation in undirected endomyocardial biopsy does not seem to be sufficient to predict future ventricular arrhythmias.

Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be a major public health problem and is thought to account for almost half of all cardiac deaths. Cardiac arrest and SCD are most commonly due to ventricular arrhythmias. Most patients who suffer cardiac arrest have underlying structural heart disease, with coronary artery disease (CAD) being the most common. In the setting of CAD, ventricular arrhythmias can result due to acute ischemia in the absence of preexisting myocardial scarring or in the presence of established scar from prior infarction without clinically significant ischemia. LV systolic dysfunction is an important predictor of risk for SCD in ischemic heart disease and in most nonischemic disorders, although other factors such as ventricular hypertrophy also play a role. Cardiac arrest and SCD can also occur due to primary electrical disorders in the absence of major structural abnormalities.

[Indications for implantable loop recorders in patients with channelopathies and ventricular tachycardias]

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) do not play a pivotal role in the current guidelines on ventricular arrhythmias except in identifying rhythm-symptom correlations if ventricular arrhythmias are assumed. Before a decision for a pure diagnostic implantable device is made, a thorough arrhythmic risk assessment is of major importance due to the potential lethal outcome of ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, some clinical circumstances exist where long-term monitoring by an ILR may add significant information in electrical heart diseases, in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, or structural heart diseases and a potential risk of ventricular arrhythmias. As medical therapy (β-blocker therapy) plays an important role in long QT syndrome (LQTS) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardias (cpVT), the ILR can be used to control therapy in patients at risk. In electrical diseases without pharmacologic therapeutic options (e. g., Brugada syndrome), the ILR may be used in low-risk patients with atypical syncope as benign faints may occur without association to the underlying disease. Evidence on cardiomyopathies with preserved left ventricular function and nonsustained VT or premature ventricular complexes is scarce. The ILR may also add long-term information on the individual risk in these circumstances. In very rare diseases like infiltrative disease or muscular dystrophies, the ILR may also provide evidence on risk stratification. In summary, ILR in electrical heart diseases and in patients with ventricular tachycardia remains a very individual decision taking into account various clinical, electrocardiographic, and genetic parameters. The following review aims at highlighting possible indications and clinical scenarios for ILR in ventricular tachycardias and electrical heart diseases with-probably debatable-case presentations.

Prevalence of late potentials on signal-averaged ECG in patients with psychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) occurs three times more often in psychiatric patients than in the general population. QRS fragmentation (QRSfr) and signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) are simple, inexpensive, readily available tools for detecting the presence of abnormal depolarization and late potentials (LPs) in these patients, a result of either the underlying disease or treatment.

METHODS

Frequency of LP detection by SAECG and QRSfr was studied in 52 psychiatric patients and compared with 30 healthy (without known structural heart disease or occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia) controls. Patients were then prospectively followed up and incidence of SCD was recorded.

RESULTS

LP prevalence was significantly higher in patients than in controls (16/52-31% vs 2/30-7%, p=0.012), while QRSfr was similar between these two groups (p=0.09). Of the LP presence criteria, the root mean square value at terminal 40msec of the QRS (RMS40) was significantly lower in patients (32μV, SD=19μV, vs 46μV, SD=32μV, p=0.015). Among patients, no differences were noted between the LP positive and negative groups regarding age, sex, number of medications, class of antipsychotics and defined daily doses. Mean follow-up was 46months (SD=11) and during it 3 patients suffered SCD. Although 2 SCD victims had both LPs and QRSfr concurrently present, neither of them, nor their simultaneous presence could definitely account for the events.

CONCLUSIONS

LP prevalence in psychiatric patients was significantly higher than in controls. SAECG performance was feasible in all cases and constitutes a readily available tool for assessing myocardial electrophysiological alterations in this patient group.

Deceleration Capacity of Heart Rate Predicts Arrhythmic and Total Mortality in Heart Failure Patients

BACKGROUND

Deceleration capacity (DC) of heart rate proved an independent mortality predictor in postmyocardial infarction patients. The original method (DCorig) may produce negative values (9% in our analyzed sample). We aimed to improve the method and to investigate if DC also predicts the arrhythmic mortality.

METHODS

Time series from 221 heart failure patients was analyzed with DCorig and a new variant, the DCsgn, in which decelerations are characterized based on windows of four consecutive beats and not on anchors. After 41.2 months, 69 patients experienced sudden cardiac death (SCD) surrogate end points, while 61 died.

RESULTS

(SCD+ vs SCD-group) DCorig: 3.7 ± 1.6 ms versus 4.6 ± 2.6 ms (P = 0.020) and DCsgn: 4.9 ± 1.7 ms versus 6.1 ± 2.2 ms (P < 0.001). After Cox regression (gender, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, filtered QRS, NSVT≥1/24h, VPBs≥240/24h, mean 24-h QTc, and each DC index added on the model separately), DCsgn (continuous) was an independent SCD predictor (hazard ratio [H.R.]: 0.742, 95% confidence intervals (C.I.): 0.631-0.871, P < 0.001). DCsgn ≤ 5.373 (dichotomous) presented 1.815 H.R. for SCD (95% C.I.: 1.080-3.049, P = 0.024), areas under curves (AUC)/receiver operator characteristic (ROC): 0.62 (DCorig) and 0.66 (DCsgn), P = 0.190 (chi-square). Results for deceased versus alive group: DCorig: 3.2 ± 2.0 ms versus 4.8 ± 2.4 ms (P < 0.001) and DCsgn: 4.6 ± 1.4 ms versus 6.2 ± 2.2 ms (P < 0.001). In Cox regression, DCsgn (continuous) presented H.R.: 0.686 (95% C.I. 0.546-0.862, P = 0.001) and DCsgn ≤ 5.373 (dichotomous) presented an H.R.: 2.443 for total mortality (TM) (95% C.I. 1.269-4.703, P = 0.008).

AUC/ROC

0.71 (DCorig) and 0.73 (DCsgn), P = 0.402.

CONCLUSIONS

DC predicts both SCD and TM. DCsgn avoids the negative values, improving the method in a nonstatistical important level.

Electrophysiologic testing guided risk stratification approach for sudden cardiac death beyond the left ventricular ejection fraction

Sudden cardiac death threats ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Anti- arrhythmic protection may be provided to these patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD), after an efficient risk stratification approach. The proposed risk stratifier of an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction has limited sensitivity meaning that a significant number of victims will remain undetectable by this risk stratification approach because they have a preserved left ventricular systolic function. Current risk stratification strategies focus on combinations of non invasive methods like T wave alternans, late potentials, heart rate turbulence, deceleration capacity and others, with invasive methods like the electrophysiologic study. In the presence of an electrically impaired substrate with formed post myocardial infarction fibrotic zones, programmed ventricular stimulation provides important prognostic information for the selection of the patients expected to benefit from an ICD implantation, while due to its high negative predictive value, patients at low risk level may also be detected. Clustering evidence from different research groups and electrophysiologic labs support an electrophysiologic testing guided risk stratification approach for sudden cardiac death.