Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) for Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases: Initial Report of the Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA and Update of the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer GPA Including the Effect of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Other Prognostic Factors

Distinct characteristics of brain metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: development of high-confidence cell lines

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with brain metastasis occurring in approximately 30-55% of patients, particularly in lung adenocarcinoma. Due to the challenges in obtaining genuine brain metastasis tumor cells, researchers commonly use nude mouse models to establish brain metastasis cell lines, though traditional methods have limitations such as high costs, lengthy timeframes, and the need for specialized imaging equipment. To address these issues, we developed an improved approach by performing low cell number circulating intracranial injections (500-4000 cells) in nude mice, successfully establishing the H1975-BM1, BM2, and BM3 cell lines. Through RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analyses, we identified transcriptomic differences among these cell lines, revealing that H1975-BM1 cells primarily exhibit stem cell function and migration characteristics, while H1975-BM3 cells display enhanced chemotaxis, cell adhesion, and cytokine secretion associated with interactions. Experimental validation, including Transwell assays, CCK8, cell adhesion assays, and subcutaneous tumor implantation in nude mice, further confirmed these findings, with H1975-BM3 forming larger tumors and a more pronounced secretion cystic cavity. In conclusion, our improved methodology successfully established high-confidence brain metastasis lung adenocarcinoma cell lines, elucidating distinct transcriptomic and functional characteristics at different stages of brain metastasis progression.

Outcomes in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Real-World Data Study from a Resource-Limited Country

BACKGROUND

Real-world data provide insights into populations underrepresented in clinical trials such as non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). Despite global survival improvement due to novel drug employment, their impact in resource-limited settings like Serbia remains underexplored. This study analyzes the overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients with BMs treated in routine clinical practice, considering patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors amid restricted access to novel drugs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 267 NSCLC patients diagnosed with BMs from 2018 to 2022 at a single Serbian clinical center. Inclusion required histologically confirmed NSCLC, radiologically verified BMs and complete clinical data. OS was defined as the time from BM verification to death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Median OS (mOS) was 5.0 months. Univariate analysis linked age < 65 years, female gender, single BM, asymptomatic BMs, ECOG PS 0-1, BM verification at diagnosis and combined systemic and local therapy to better OS. Combined therapy offered the best survival rates (mOS: 9.0 months), while best supportive care and local-only therapy both resulted in a poor mOS of 2.0 months. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy were associated with the highest mOS, outperforming chemotherapy alone (13.0 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed younger age, single BM, early BM verification and combined therapy as independent predictors of improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

limited access to novel therapies remains associated with poor patient survival, highlighting the need for better global availability.

Local recurrence and radionecrosis after single-isocenter multiple targets stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is frequently used to treat brain metastases (BMs). The single-isocenter for multiple targets (SIMT) technique allows for faster treatment of large numbers of BMs, but may adversely affect planning target volume (PTV) coverage due to possible increased positioning uncertainties with an increased isocenter to tumor distance (ITD). This study aims to investigate the association of ITD with local recurrence (LR) and radionecrosis (RN). Patients treated with SRT using a single isocenter for multiple BMs were retrospectively analyzed. Previous cranial radiotherapy and inability to undergo MR imaging were exclusion criteria. Patients were irradiated using a Versa HD LINAC with 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) energy and a 6D robotic couch. A non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc technique was used and plans were delivered using 6MV FFF energy. Associations between potential risk factors and LR/RN were investigated with Cox regression analyses. Seventy-five patients with a total of 357 BMs were included. Median survival after SRT was nine months. LR occurred in 7 (9%) patients and 10 (13%) had RN. After 18 months, LR-free survival was 89% and RN-free survival was 85%, respectively. ITD was not significantly associated with LR and RN. GTV was significantly associated with both LR (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P 0.0079) and RN (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, P 0.020). LINAC-based SIMT SRT is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with multiple BMs. We found no increased risk of LR or RN for BMs located further away from the isocenter.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Before and After Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases-A Prospective Cohort Study of 239 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) is a frequently offered treatment option for brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study presents patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a cohort of NSCLC with BMs treated with RT. This study researched how PRO scores at the start of RT may be useful in survival estimates and how PROs change over time after RT. Methods: NSCLC patients with first-time BMs treated with RT were identified in a prospective observational study. PROs were collected at the start of RT and monthly for up to 1 year. Differences in PRO mean scores at the start of RT (M0) and at month 2 (M2) after treatment are reported. Prognostic values of PROs were analyzed in a stepwise adjusted Cox model. Results: Of 294 patients identified, 239 (81%) responded at M0; 105/239 (44%) responded at both M0 and M2. High scores for weakness of legs at M0 were associated with short survival when adjusting for performance status and status of extracranial metastases. Those responding at M0 only had worse mean scores for overall QoL and PF but similar scores for fatigue and dyspnea compared to patients responding over time. At M2, patients with <6 months survival after RT reported worse scores for overall QoL, PF, fatigue, and dyspnea; long-term survivors reported stable scores. Conclusions: NSCLC patients diagnosed with BMs and expected survival < 6 months should be offered optimal palliative care rather than RT.

Neurological Manifestations of Patients With CNS Metastases: Experience From a Single Center in an Upper-Middle-Income Country

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the neurological manifestations of patients with CNS metastases (CNSm) and to determine their association with survival in patients with brain metastases (BrMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with CNSms (BrMs or neoplastic meningitis) seen at two referral centers between 2010 and 2022. The neurological manifestations and their association with survival were measured and presented.

RESULTS

Among 822 patients with CNSms, the most common neurological manifestations were headache, focal weakness, visual disorders, nausea/vomiting, seizures, and altered mental status (53%, 35%, 24%, 23%, 22%, and 18%, respectively). In patients with BrMs, neurological manifestations associated with survival were asymptomatic (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.73]; P = .001), focal weakness (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.54]; P = .027), or visual disorders (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.58]; P = .045).

CONCLUSION

Neurological manifestations in patients with BrMs are associated with survival and can aid in prognostic stratification.

Multidisciplinary management strategies for recurrent brain metastasis after prior radiotherapy: An overview

As cancer patients with intracranial metastatic disease experience increasingly prolonged survival, the diagnosis and management of recurrent brain metastasis pose significant challenges in clinical practice. Prior to deciding upon a management strategy, it is necessary to ascertain whether patients have recurrent/progressive disease vs adverse radiation effect, classify the recurrence as local or distant in the brain, evaluate the extent of intracranial disease (size, number and location of lesions, and brain metastasis velocity), the status of extracranial disease, and enumerate the interval from the last intracranially directed intervention to disease recurrence. A spectrum of salvage local treatment options includes surgery (resection and laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT]) with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in the forms of external beam radiotherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. Nonoperative salvage local treatments also range from single fraction and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS) to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Optimal integration of systemic therapies, preferably with central nervous system (CNS) activity, may also require reinterrogation of brain metastasis tissue to identify actionable molecular alterations specific to intracranial progressive disease. Ultimately, the selection of the appropriate management approach necessitates a sophisticated understanding of patient, tumor, and prior treatment-related factors and is often multimodal; hence, interdisciplinary evaluation for such patients is indispensable.

External Validation of an Extended Prognostic Assessment Model in Patients With Brain Metastases from Small-cell Lung Cancer

Background/Aim

Recently, the small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) grade model for patients with brain metastases was developed by a Japanese group. It includes sex, performance status, number of brain metastases, primary tumor control and presence of extracranial metastases. The aim of the present study was to validate this prognostic score in a European cohort of patients.

Patients and Methods

The retrospective validation study included 189 patients from two centers in Germany and Norway. Survival according to the SCLC grade score was evaluated. Additional prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

Median survival was 7.5 months. The 3-tiered SCLC grade score based on the sum of adverse prognostic features was significantly associated with survival (p<0.001): A higher point sum resulted in shorter survival. However, in our validation cohort, age affected survival to the same degree as several parameters that were part of the score.

Conclusion

This validation study supports the international applicability of the SCLC grade model. Age, which has also been identified as a relevant prognostic factor in other previous studies (including the SCLC Graded Prognostic Assessment), may deserve consideration when trying to optimize survival prediction. Given that different studies identified different age limits, e.g., 70 or 75 years, merged databases are needed to provide definitive conclusions.

Brain metastases from lung cancer: recent advances and novel therapeutic opportunities

Metastatic intracranial progression drastically impacts prognosis, therapeutic considerations and quality of life. The increasing incidence of lung cancer patients developing brain metastases (BM) parallels the incorporation of more effective systemic agents and improved surveillance. Our evolving knowledge of BM pathophysiology, along with advancements in surgical, radiotherapy and systemic therapy options, is rapidly changing prognostication and treatment paradigms. Optimal management of BM in the modern era is patient-specific, dependent on performance status, comorbidities, intracranial and extracranial disease burden, leptomeningeal disease, and the presence of targetable mutations. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the detection, prognostication, and multidisciplinary, management of BM arising from non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. We discuss contemporary evidence and active clinical trials supporting a wide array of treatment options, including surgery, radiosurgery, memory-avoidance whole brain radiation, craniospinal irradiation, chemotherapy, targeted agents and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary paradigms will continue to evolve as currently accruing randomized trials evaluating these promising treatments options mature.

Prognostication of Brain-Metastasized Patients Receiving Subsequent Systemic Therapy: A Single-Center Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with brain metastases (BMs) is poor. It has become clear that targeted therapy has an effect on BMs and patient' prognosis. The question remains which patients benefit from additional systemic therapy. This assumption was evaluated in a large single-center cohort.

METHODS

Patients consecutively planned to undergo local radiotherapy for their BMs in 2006-2017 were selected (n = 200). Prognosis, using CERENAL, disease-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA), and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG RPA), was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-three (46.5%) patients received at least one additional line of systemic therapy subsequent to the diagnosis of their BMs. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months. Having received subsequent systemic therapy resulted in a more favorable OS (10.4 versus 3.9 months). Interestingly, using dichotomized scores, CERENAL showed prognostic properties in all patients for disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis, whereas RTOG RPA and DS-GPA were not withheld in the model. Lastly, only having a favorable DS-GPA resulted in prolonged progression-free survival for first systemic therapy following BM diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving subsequent systemic therapy has a profound influence on outcome in patients with BMs, indicating the effect of systemic therapy on BMs. Use of the CERENAL brain prognostic score shows potential for further prognostication of patients with more favorable outcomes.

Effects of EGFR-TKIs combined with intracranial radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are prone to developing brain metastases (BMs), particularly those with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. In clinical practice, treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with asymptomatic BMs tend to choose EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy and defer intracranial radiotherapy (RT). However, the effectiveness of upfront intracranial RT remains unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 217 patients from two institutions between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical data of NSCLC patients with BMs who received EGFR-TKIs were collected. The patients were assigned to one of the three groups according to the therapeutic modality used: the upfront TKI + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) / fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRS) group (upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS ), the upfront TKI + whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) group (upfront TKI + WBRT) and the upfront TKI group.

RESULTS

As of March 8, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 37.3 months (95% CI, 32.5-42.1). The median overall survival (OS) for the upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS, upfront TKI + WBRT, and upfront TKI groups were 37.8, 20.7, and 24.1 months, respectively (p = 0.015). In subgroup analysis, the upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS group demonstrated longer OS compared to the upfront TKI + WBRT and upfront TKI groups in patients treated with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs (p = 0.021) and patients with L858R mutation (p = 0.017), whereas no survival benefit was observed in three-generation EGFR-TKIs or 19del subgroup. In the multivariable analysis, metachronous BMs, EGFR L858R mutation and nonclassic EGFR mutation were identified as independent risk factors for OS, while a DS-GPA score of 2.0-4.0 was the only independent protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that upfront addition of SRS/fSRS to EGFR-TKIs was associated with longer OS compared to upfront WBRT or upfront TKI alone in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs. This improvement was more significant in patients with L858R mutation and those treated with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Further research with a larger sample size is warranted.

Targeting CNS Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Evolving Approaches Using Molecular Markers: A Review

Importance

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases presenting as either brain parenchymal metastases or leptomeningeal metastases are diagnosed in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during their disease course. While historically associated with a poor prognosis due to limited treatment options, the availability of an increasing number of targeted therapies with good CNS penetration has significantly improved clinical outcomes for these patients. This has occurred in parallel with a more nuanced understanding of prognostic factors.

Observations

Multiple clinical trials have reported that disease control can be observed with targeted therapies with adequate CNS penetration, particularly for patients with molecular alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and RET. For these tumors, systemic targeted therapy may be used first for the management of CNS metastases, prior to considering radiation therapy (RT). At the time of isolated progression in the CNS, RT may be considered for the progressing lesions with continuation of the same systemic therapy. For other molecular alterations as well as for patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, data are not yet clear if systemic therapy is sufficient for untreated CNS metastases, and early RT may need to be integrated into the treatment planning. An increasing number of studies investigate the role that emerging techniques, such as the sequencing of tumor DNA from resected brain metastases tissue or cerebrospinal fluid or radiomics-based analysis of CNS imaging, can play in guiding treatment approaches.

Conclusions and Relevance

With multiple generations of targeted therapies now available, the treatment for CNS metastases should be tailored to the patients with consideration given to molecular testing results, CNS penetrance of systemic therapy, patient characteristics, and multidisciplinary review. More research is needed in understanding the clonal evolution of CNS metastases, and the development of novel therapeutics with CNS efficacy.

The Efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Multiple Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of anlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with that of WBRT alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with NSCLC and multiple BMs who received WBRT between 2019 and 2022 were collected. The patients were assigned to anlotinib plus WBRT group and WBRT group according to the treatment used.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were eligible for analysis; 21 were treated with anlotinib plus WBRT, and 43 were treated with WBRT. The anlotinib plus WBRT group had a greater proportion of patients who were young and had a better performance status and adenocarcinoma histology than did the WBRT group. The median follow-up time was 18.0 months. The median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was significantly longer in the anlotinib plus WBRT group than in the WBRT group (12.9 months vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months in the anlotinib plus WBRT group and 9.4 months in the WBRT group (p = 0.039). Considering death as a competing risk to intracranial progression, the 1-year cumulative incidence of intracranial progression in the anlotinib plus WBRT group (26.7%) was significantly lower than that in the WBRT group (64.3%) (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference in treatment-related toxicity between the anlotinib plus WBRT group and the WBRT group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with WBRT alone, anlotinib plus WBRT might confer superior intracranial PFS for NSCLC patients with multiple BMs without increasing treatment-related toxicity.

Validation of the graded prognostic assessment and recursive partitioning analysis as prognostic tools using a modern cohort of patients with brain metastases

Background

Prognostic indices for patients with brain metastases (BM) are needed to individualize treatment and stratify clinical trials. Two frequently used tools to estimate survival in patients with BM are the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA). Given recent advances in therapies and improved survival for patients with BM, this study aims to validate and analyze these 2 models in a modern cohort.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with BM were identified via our institution's Tumor Board meetings. Data were retrospectively collected from the date of diagnosis with BM. The concordance of the RPA and GPA was calculated using Harrell's C index. A Cox proportional hazards model with backwards elimination was used to generate a parsimonious model predictive of survival.

Results

Our study consisted of 206 patients diagnosed with BM between 2010 and 2019. The RPA had a prediction performance characterized by Harrell's C index of 0.588. The DS-GPA demonstrated a Harrell's C index of 0.630. A Cox proportional hazards model assessing the effect of age, presence of lung, or liver metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 3/4 on survival yielded a Harrell's C index of 0.616. Revising the analysis with an uncategorized ECOG demonstrated a C index of 0.648.

Conclusions

We found that the performance of the RPA remains unchanged from previous validation studies a decade earlier. The DS-GPA outperformed the RPA in predicting overall survival in our modern cohort. Analyzing variables shared by the RPA and DS-GPA produced a model that performed analogously to the DS-GPA.

Tumor-Infiltrating B Cells and Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells as Prognostic Indicators in Brain Metastases Derived from Gastrointestinal Cancers

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Tumor-infiltrating B cells (TIBs) and tissue-resident memory T cells (TRMs) play significant roles in antitumor immunity. However, their prognostic relevance in brain metastases (BMs) derived from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of TIBs and TRMs in GI cancer-derived BMs (GIBMs).

METHODS

Retrospective histopathological analyses were performed on surgically resected GIBM tissues from 13 patients. The densities of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) subsets (TIBs, CD4+ T cells, CD8+CD103+ TRMs, and CD8+CD103- non-TRMs) were quantified and correlated with clinical parameters and overall survival (OS) including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA).

RESULTS

TIBs and CD4+ T cells were predominantly accumulated in the tumor stroma, particularly around blood vessels, where they formed lymphocyte clusters without characteristics of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). In contrast, TRMs more deeply infiltrated into the tumor epithelium than their counterpart non-TRMs. Positive correlations were found between TIB density and both the prognostic prediction of GPA and overall survival (OS) after BM diagnosis or surgery. Furthermore, increased densities of TIBs and TRMs were associated with enhanced survival after BM diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TIB and TRM densities in BM tissues could serve as reliable prognostic indicators for survival in patients with GIBMs. This study provides crucial insights for the development of novel immunotherapeutic strategies against this lethal disease.

Evaluating the atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease risk score in patients with brain metastases: Associations with overall survival and high-value care outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Brain metastases (BM) constitute the most common intracranial tumor in adults. Prior literature indicates the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score is associated with increased risk of cancer, potentially attributable to shared risk factors. Understanding the role of ASCVD risk scores in BM may help optimize their care and inform clinical decision-making. Our aim was to explore associations between ASCVD risk score in BM patients and their overall survival, hospital charges, and non-routine discharge disposition.

METHODS

Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical data for BM patients undergoing surgery at a single institution (2017-2021). Regression analyses were performed accordingly and maximally selected rank statistics were employed to identify an optimal cutoff for ASCVD risk scores. The random survival forest (RSF) machine learning technique identified the most important variable associated with survival outcomes in BM patients.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included with average age 62.93±9.29 years, 48.2 % male, 25.2 % with high hospital charges, and 23.7 % experiencing non-routine discharge. Among these patients, 32.3 % had prior history of an ASCVD event, while 67.7 % did not. Overall, this cohort had an average 10-year ASCVD risk score of 12.51±12.98, indicating intermediate risk of ASCVD among all BM patients. On multivariate logistic regression, prior history of ASCVD was associated with higher odds of high hospital charges (OR=3.670, p=0.018), and higher ASCVD risk scores were associated with greater odds of non-routine discharge (OR=1.059, p=0.012). On the multivariate Cox regression model, higher ASCVD risk scores correlated with worse overall survival (HR=1.031, p=0.014). A threshold of 25.1 was identified for high-risk ASCVD scores. Patients with ASCVD scores >25.1 exhibited reduced overall survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.015) and multivariate Cox regression (HR: 2.811, p=0.016). Notably, ASCVD risk scores were found to be the most important variable in predicting worse survival outcomes in BM patients compared to other established frailty indices.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates higher ASCVD risk scores in BM patients are associated with worse overall survival. Integrating ASCVD assessment into clinical workflow may facilitate more informed risk-based decision-making.

Five-year outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus 4 cycles of chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the randomized CheckMate 9LA trial

BACKGROUND

We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from CheckMate 9LA in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and exploratory analyses in key patient subgroups.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (n = 361) or chemotherapy (n = 358). Outcomes were assessed in all randomized patients and subgroups.

RESULTS

With 57.3 months' minimum follow-up, patients continued to derive overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.85; 5-year OS rates, 18% vs. 11%), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 < 1%, 22% vs. 8%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 18% vs. 11%), histology (squamous, 18% vs. 7%; non-squamous, 19% vs. 12%), or presence of baseline brain metastases (20% vs. 6%). Five-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 19% versus 8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, with consistent benefit across subgroups. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events had a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Five-year progression-free survival and DOR rates in 5-year survivors were 55% versus 38% and 59% versus 46%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in 5-year survivors, regardless of the number of ipilimumab doses received.

CONCLUSION

This 5-year update supports the long-term, durable OS benefit and improved 5-year survivorship with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT03215706.

Patterns of Care for Brain Metastases in Asia: A Real-World Survey Conducted by the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE

To report the patterns of care for brain metastases (BMs) in the Federation of Asian Organizations for Radiation Oncology (FARO).

METHODS

Overall, 37 questions were prepared. The survey was conducted online using Google Forms, and the URL was distributed to members of the FARO research committee. Radiation oncologists associated with FARO responded to the questionnaire between May 2023 and June 2023, and their answers were analyzed.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 32 radiation oncologists in 13 countries participating in FARO. Twenty-six physicians (81.3%) were affiliated with academic centers, and 22 (68.8%) were able to perform stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for BMs at their institution. The most typically used prognostic index for BM was the recursive partitioning analysis classification (17 physicians, 53.1%). The maximum number of BMs indicated for SRT/SRS was ≤three (11 physicians, 34.4%), whereas eight (25.0%) physicians answered for 6-10 BMs. The maximum size of BMs considered for SRS/fSRT was ≤3 cm (14 physicians, 43.8%), whereas nine (28.1%) answered that SRS/fSRT was preferred if the maximum size was >4 cm. When whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) was indicated, hippocampal avoidance and memantine usage were limited to 50.0% and 25.0% of patients, respectively. The most typical RT modality after BM resection was SRS/fSRT alone, regardless of whether the margin was positive (19 physicians, 59.4%) or negative (13 physicians, 40.6%).

CONCLUSION

We report the survey results of the patterns of care for BMs in the FARO. This survey was conducted only among a limited number of FARO members. Since many respondents were affiliated with relatively large-scale academic centers, large-scale surveys, including community hospitals, are warranted for future initiatives.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

STATE OF THE ART

NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

PERSPECTIVES

The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Outcomes with non-small cell lung cancer and brain-only metastasis

Background

We evaluated outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who presented with brain-only metastatic (BOM) disease overall and by EGFR/ALK mutation status.

Methods

We analyzed clinico-demographic, treatment and survival data for all NSCLC patients who presented to our center between 2014 and 2016 with BOM as their first presentation of metastatic disease. Differences in overall survival (OS) were evaluated using log-rank tests for NSCLC wildtype (NSCLCwt) versus NSCLC with an ALK-rearrangement/EGFR-mutation (NSCLCmut+).

Results

Of 109 patients with BOM, median age was 68 years; 51 % were female; 69 % Caucasian; 76 % ever-smoker; 76 % adenocarcinoma; and 25 % NSCLCmut+. While 41 patients (38 %) had subsequent brain-only progressive disease (PD), 22 (20 %) developed extracranial metastases. A higher proportion of NSCLCmut+ (vs -wt) subsequently progressed outside the brain (37 % vs 15 %, p = 0.03). Median time-to-first-extracranial-metastases was 8.5 (NSCLCmut+) vs 21.0 months (NSCLCwt; p = 0.23).With 17.7 months median follow-up, median-OS was 15.9 months [95%CI: 11.5-21.3; all patients]; 12.3 [7.4-18.4; NSCLCwt] and 38.9 [21.3-not reached (NR); NSCLCmut+] (p = 0.09). In 33 of 80 patients with de novo BOM, the primary tumor was treated with surgery or radiotherapy. In patients with NSCLCwt, there was no OS benefit associated with local lung tumor treatment (p = 0.68), whereas in NSCLCmut + pts, local lung tumor treatment correlated with greater OS (median-OS NR vs 21.5 months; p = 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with NSCLCwt with BOM, we observed a -predominant pattern of brain-only secondary progression, however patients with NSCLCmut + more often progressed extracranially. In patients with NSCLCmut+ and BOM, definitive primary tumor treatment correlated with improved survival.

Validity test of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment and proposal of a new index for patients with brain metastases from SCLC

Background and purpose

We performed a validity test of a recently-reported, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system for SCLC patients with brain metastases (BMs). Thereafter, we created a new prognostic index, the SCLC Grade, for such patients.

Materials and methods

We studied 508 SCLC patients selected from among nearly 7000 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife SRS for BMs since 1998.

Results

In the SCLC GPA, there were no median survival time (MST) differences among pairs of the neighboring subgroups. Therefore, the 508 patients were randomly divided into the two series, i.e., a test (340 patients) and a validity (168) series. In the test series, five factors were identified by univariable analyses as favoring longer survival (rounded lower 95 % CI of the HR was at least 1.3): Sex, Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor numbers, primary tumor status and extracerebral metastases. This new index is the sum of scores (0 and 1) of these five factors: SCLC-Grade 4-6 (score of 4, 5 or 6), 2-3 (2 or 3), and 0-1 (0 or 1). This new system showed highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses. Next, this SCLC-Grade was applied to the verification series. Consistent results were obtained, i.e., there were highly statistically significant MST differences among subclasses.

Conclusions

Our validity test results for the SCLC GPA demonstrated this system to not precisely reflect the outcomes of SCLC patients with BMs. Our results suggest the herein-proposed SCLC-Grade to have superior prognostic value.

External validation of the lung-molGPA to predict survival in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In the era of personalized medicine, individualized prognostic models with tumor characteristics are needed to inform patients about survival. Before clinical use, external validation of such models by an independent group is needed. An updated version of the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) estimates survival in patients with brain metastases (BMs) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the first external validation of the updated Lung-molGPA in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for one or more BMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with SRT for BMs from NSCLC adenocarcinoma were retrospectively included. GPA score was calculated for each patient based on six prognostic factors including age, Karnofsky Performance Status, number of BMs, extracranial metastases, EGFR/ALK status, and PD-L1 expression. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated survival probability. Impact of individual prognostic factors on survival was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model. Predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (Brier test).

RESULTS

The cohort (n = 241) was divided into four prognostic groups. Overall median survival was 15 months. Predicted and observed median survival were similar between the original and validation cohorts, apart from the most favorable prognostic group. With adequate C-statistics and Brier scores, the Lung-molGPA provided accurate survival predictions.

CONCLUSION

The Lung-molGPA accurately predicted survival in our European population, except for an overestimation of survival in the small most favorable prognostic group. This prognostic model was externally validated and is therefore useful for counseling of patients with BMs of NSCLC adenocarcinoma.

PD-L1 deglycosylation promotes its nuclear translocation and accelerates DNA double-strand-break repair in cancer

Resistance to radiotherapy is a major barrier during cancer treatment. Here using genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 screening, we identify CD274 gene, which encodes PD-L1, to confer lung cancer cell resistance to ionizing radiation (IR). Depletion of endogenous PD-L1 delays the repair of IR-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and PD-L1 loss downregulates non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) while overexpression of PD-L1 upregulates NHEJ. IR induces translocation of PD-L1 from the membrane into nucleus dependent on deglycosylation of PD-L1 at N219 and CMTM6 and leads to PD-L1 recruitment to DSBs foci. PD-L1 interacts with Ku in the nucleus and enhances Ku binding to DSB DNA. The interaction between the IgC domain of PD-L1 and the core domain of Ku is required for PD-L1 to accelerate NHEJ-mediated DSB repair and produce radioresistance. Thus, PD-L1, in addition to its immune inhibitory activity, acts as mechanistic driver for NHEJ-mediated DSB repair in cancer.

Long-term survival in patients with brain-only metastatic non-small cell lung cancer undergoing upfront intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery and definitive treatment to the thoracic primary site

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate modern clinical outcomes for patients with brain-only metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without definitive treatment of the primary site.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with synchronously diagnosed NSCLC and brain-only metastatic disease treated with intracranial SRS at a single institution were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified based on whether they did (A) or did not (B) receive definitive primary site treatment. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2022, 103 patients were identified, 53 of whom received definitive primary site treatment. Median follow-up was 2.1 y (A) and 0.8 y (B) (p < 0.001). 28 (53 %) patients in Group A received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy versus 19 (38 %) in Group B (p = 0.13) and there were no other statistically significant baseline or treatment characteristic differences between the groups. 5-year local-PFS was 34.5 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year regional-PFS was 33.0 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year distant body-PFS was 34.0 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p < 0.001). 5-year CNS-PFS was 14.7 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.12). 5-year OS was 40.2 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.001). 5-year CSS was 67.6 % (A) versus 0 % (B) (p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, lack of definitive treatment to the primary site (HR = 2.40), AJCC T3-4 disease (HR = 2.73), and lack of ICI therapy (HR = 2.86) were significant predictors of death.

CONCLUSION

Definitive treatment to the thoracic primary site in patients with brain-only metastatic NSCLC after intracranial radiosurgery was associated with slower progression of disease and improved survival.

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival in small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a SEER population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

To develop prognostic nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).

METHODS

SCLC patients with BM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015) were randomly allocated to training (n=1771) and validation (n=757) cohorts. Independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in the training cohort, and prognostic nomograms for OS and CSS were constructed based on these factors. The efficacy of the nomograms was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), with the TNM staging model as a comparator.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox analysis identified age, sex, race, tumor size, N staging, and presence of liver/bone/lung metastases, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Prognostic nomograms were developed based on these factors. In both the training and validation cohorts, the AUC values of the nomograms for OS and CSS were significantly above 0.7, surpassing those for TNM staging. Calibration curves demonstrated a high degree of concordance between predicted and actual survival. The constructed nomograms showed superior clinical utility compared to the TNM staging system, as evidenced by NRI, IDI, and DCA.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study successfully developed and validated prognostic nomograms for SCLC patients with BM, providing valuable tools for oncologists to enhance prognosis evaluation and guide clinical decision-making.

Determinants of Symptomatic Intracranial Progression After an Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery Course

Purpose

Clinical and imaging surveillance of patients with brain metastases is important after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) because many will experience intracranial progression (ITCP) requiring multidisciplinary management. The prognostic significance of neurologic symptoms at the time of ITCP is poorly understood.

Methods and Materials

This was a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2020, including all patients with brain metastases completing an initial course of SRS. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by presence of neurologic symptoms at ITCP. OS, freedom from ITCP (FF-ITCP), and freedom from symptomatic ITCP (FF-SITCP) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models tested parameters impacting FF-ITCP and FF-SITCP.

Results

Among 1383 patients, median age was 63.4 years, 55% were female, and common primaries were non-small cell lung (49%), breast (15%), and melanoma (9%). At a median follow-up of 8.72 months, asymptomatic and symptomatic ITCP were observed in 504 (36%) and 194 (14%) patients, respectively. The majority of ITCP were distant ITCP (79.5%). OS was worse with SITCP (median, 10.2 vs 17.9 months, P < .001). SITCP was associated with clinical factors including total treatment volume (P = .012), melanoma histology (P = .001), prior whole brain radiation therapy (P = .003), number of brain metastases (P < .001), interval of 1 to 2 years from primary and brain metastasis diagnosis (P = .012), controlled extracranial disease (P = .042), and receipt of pre-SRS chemotherapy (P = .015). Patients who were younger and received post-SRS chemotherapy (P = .001), immunotherapy (P < .001), and targeted or small-molecule inhibitor therapy (P < .026) had better FF-SITCP.

Conclusions

In this cohort study of patients with brain metastases completing SRS, neurologic symptoms at ITCP is prognostic for OS. This data informs post-SRS surveillance in clinical practice as well as future prospective studies needed in the modern management of brain metastases.

Integrating Overall Survival and Tumor Control Probability Models to Predict Local Progression After Brain Metastasis Radiosurgery

Purpose

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is frequently prescribed to the maximum tolerated dose to minimize the probability of local progression. However, many patients die from extracranial disease prior to local progression and may not require maximally aggressive treatment. Recently, improvements in models of SRS tumor control probability (TCP) and overall survival (OS) have been made. We predicted that by combining models of OS and TCP, we could better predict the true risk of local progression after SRS than by using TCP modeling alone.

Methods and Materials

Records of patients undergoing SRS at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. Using established TCP and OS models, for each patient, the probability of 1-year survival [p ( O S ) ] was calculated, as was the probability of 1-year local progression [p ( L P ) ]) for each treated lesion. Joint-probability was used to combine the models [p ( L P , O S ) = p ( L P ) * p ( O S ) ]. Analyses were conducted at the individual metastasis and whole-patient levels. Fine-Gray regression was used to model p ( L P ) or p ( L P , O S ) on the risk of local progression after SRS, with death as a competing risk.

Results

At the patient level, 1-year local progression was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03-0.15), median p ( L P , O S ) was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.2), and median p ( L P ) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22-0.38). At the metastasis level, 1-year local progression was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04), median p ( L P , O S ) was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.07), and median p ( L P ) was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.13). p ( L P , O S ) was found to be significantly associated with the risk of local progression at the patient level (P = .048) and metastasis level (P = .007); however, p ( L P ) was not (P = .16 and P = .28, respectively).

Conclusions

Simultaneous modeling of OS and TCP more accurately predicted local progression than TCP modeling alone. Better understanding which patients with brain metastases are at risk of local progression after SRS may help personalize treatment to minimize risk without sacrificing efficacy.

Outcomes of initial therapy for synchronous brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a propensity for brain metastases, which is associated with poor prognosis. We sought to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival (bPFS) in SCLC patients with synchronous brain metastases at the time of initial SCLC diagnosis. A total of 107 SCLC patients with synchronous brain metastases treated at a single institution were included in this retrospective analysis. These patients had brain lesions present on initial staging imaging. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Factors predictive of OS and bPFS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Median OS for the entire cohort was 9 months (interquartile range, 4.2-13.8 months) and median bPFS was 7.3 months (interquartile range, 3.5-11.1 months). OS was 30.3% at 1 year and 14.4% at 2 years, while bPFS was 22.0% at 1 year and 6.9% at 2 years. The median number of brain lesions at diagnosis was 3 (interquartile range, 2-8), and the median size of the largest metastasis was 2.0 cm (interquartile range, 1.0-3.3 cm). Increased number of brain lesions was significantly associated with decreased OS. Patients who received both chemotherapy and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) had improved OS (P=0.02) and bPFS (P=0.005) compared to those who had either chemotherapy or WBRT alone. There was no significant difference in OS or bPFS depending on the sequence of therapy or the dose of WBRT. Thirteen patients underwent upfront brain metastasis resection, which was associated with improved OS (P=0.02) but not bPFS (P=0.09) compared to those who did not have surgery. The combination of chemotherapy and WBRT was associated with improved OS and bPFS compared to either modality alone. Upfront brain metastasis resection was associated with improved OS but not bPFS compared to those who did not have surgery.

Evaluating the heterogeneity of hippocampal avoidant whole brain radiotherapy treatment effect: A secondary analysis of NRG CC001

BACKGROUND

Hippocampal avoidant whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) is the standard of care for patients needing WBRT for brain metastases. This study, using existing data from NRG Oncology CC001 including baseline tumor characteristics and patient-reported MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) scores, sought to identify subgroups of patients that demonstrate differential neuroprotective treatment response to HA-WBRT.

METHODS

An exploratory analysis of NRG CC001, a phase 3 trial in which 518 patients were randomly assigned to WBRT plus memantine or HA-WBRT plus memantine, was performed. Rates of neurocognitive function failure (NCFF) were estimated between subgroups and stratified by arm. Covariate and subgroup interaction with differential treatment response were calculated.

RESULTS

The benefit of HA-WBRT on decreasing NCFF was seen in patients living ≥ 4 months (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.97, P = .03), whereas patients living < 4 months derived no significant neurocognitive benefit. A significant association between baseline MDASI-BT cognitive factor and treatment response (interaction P = .03) was identified. Patients with lower MDASI-BT scores (less patient-reported cognitive impairment) derived significantly greater benefit (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.85, P = .002) compared to those with highest MDASI-BT scores (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.76-2.04, P = .39). Tumor histology also had a significant interaction (P = .01) with treatment response. Primary lung histology patients derived cognitive failure risk reduction (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77, P = .0007) from HA-WBRT, in contrast to nonlung primary histology patients (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.78-1.50, P = .48).

CONCLUSIONS

Differential neuroprotective response to HA-WBRT was identified in this analysis. Patients surviving ≥ 4 months derived benefit from HA-WBRT. There is evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect for patients with less severe patient-reported cognitive impairment at baseline and those with primary lung histology.

Overall Survival after Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases According to ECOG Status-A Prospective Study of 294 NSCLC Patients

Up to 40% of non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop brain metastases (BMs). The potential benefits of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with poor performance status (PS) are questionable, with considerable risk for futile treatment. We analyzed overall survival after initial radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with BMs, focusing on the relationship between PS and survival after RT. This study reports a prospective observational study including consecutive 294 NSCLC patients with first-time BMs. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of RT to death or last follow-up (1 June 2023). Overall, in the 294 included patients (median age 69 years), the median OS was 4.6 months; 2.5 months after WBRT (n = 141), and 7.5 months after SRT (n = 153). After WBRT, mOS was equally poor for patients with ECOG 2 (1.9 months) and ECOG 3-4 (1.2 months). After SRT, mOS for patients with ECOG 2 was 4.1 months; for ECOG 3 patients, mOS was 4 1.6 months. For NSCLC patients with ECOG 2 diagnosed with BMs who are not candidates for surgery or SRT, WBRT should be questioned due to short survival.

MRI radiomics for predicting intracranial progression in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

AIM

To identify clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics predictors specialised for intracranial progression (IP) after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with a total of 212 BMs who received first-line EGFR-TKI therapy were enrolled. Radiomics features were extracted from the BM regions on the pretreatment contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, and the radiomics score (rad-score) of each BM was established based on the selected features. Furthermore, the mean rad-score derived from the average rad-score of all included BMs in each patient was calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of IP. Prediction models based on different predictors and their combinations were constructed, and nomogram based on the optimal prediction model was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (47.1 %) patients developed IP, and the remaining 37 (52.9 %) patients were IP-free. EGFR-19del mutation (OR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.05-0.69), third-generation TKI treatment (OR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.16-0.67) and mean rad-score (OR 5.71, 95 % CI 1.65-19.68) were found to be independent predictive factors. Models based on these three predictors alone and in combination (combined model) achieved AUCs of 0.64, 0.64, 0.74, and 0.86 and 0.64, 0.64, 0.75, and 0.84 in the training and validation sets, respectively, and the combined model demonstrated optimal performance for predicting IP.

CONCLUSIONS

The model integrating EGFR-19del mutation, third-generation TKI treatment and mean rad-score had good predictive value for IP after EGFR-TKI treatment in NSCLC patients with BM.

Combining Dual Checkpoint Immunotherapy with Ablative Radiation to All Sites of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toxicity and Efficacy Results of a Phase 1b Trial

PURPOSE

Ablative local treatment of all radiographically detected metastatic sites in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) increases progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prior studies demonstrated the safety of combining stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with single-agent immunotherapy. We investigated the safety of combining SBRT to all metastatic tumor sites with dual checkpoint, anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4), and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) immunotherapy for patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a phase 1b clinical trial in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC with up to 6 sites of extracranial metastatic disease. All sites of disease were treated with SBRT to a dose of 30 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Dual checkpoint immunotherapy was started 7 days after completion of radiation using anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) and anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) immunotherapy for a total of 4 cycles followed by durvalumab alone until progression or toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients enrolled in this study, 15 patients received at least 1 dose of combination immunotherapy per protocol. The study was closed early (17 of planned 21 patients) due to slow accrual during the COVID-19 pandemic. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were observed in 6 patients (40%), of which only one was possibly related to the addition of SBRT to immunotherapy. Median PFS was 42 months and median OS has not yet been reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivering ablative SBRT to all sites of metastatic disease in combination with dual checkpoint immunotherapy did not result in excessive rates of toxicity compared with historical studies of dual checkpoint immunotherapy alone. Although the study was not powered for treatment efficacy results, durable PFS and OS results suggest potential therapeutic benefit compared with immunotherapy or radiation alone in this patient population.

Validation of the Lung-Mol Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) System for the Prognosis of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Brain Metastasis From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The Lung-mol graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system predicts the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) separately for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to validate the Lung-molGPA system using a cohort of patients in our institution who received radiotherapy for BM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with NSCLC who received their first course of radiotherapy for BM were included in the analysis. Among them, 65 received their second course of radiotherapy for BM. Data on sex, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extracranial metastases (ECM), number of BM, histological type, and gene mutations were collected according to the Lung-molGPA system. We examined the validity of the scores assigned to the factors included in the Lung-molGPA system, separately for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma. In addition, we validated the Lung-molGPA system to predict survival during both the first and second courses of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The factors in the Lung-molGPA were significantly associated with survival, except for age in non-adenocarcinoma with marginal significance. Regarding discrimination ability, the C-indices were 0.65 and 0.69 for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma, respectively, in the first course of radiotherapy for BM, while those in the second course were 0.62 and 0.74, respectively. Survival prediction by Lung-molGPA was almost consistent with actual survival in the first course of radiotherapy, except for the score of 0-1.0 in both histologies and 2.5-3.0 in non-adenocarcinoma. In the second course of radiotherapy, median survival could be predicted for some patients with adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the validity of Lung-molGPA for the estimation of median survival based on patient characteristics at the time of initiation of radiotherapy for patients in the first course of radiotherapy and shows that it may be applicable to patients with adenocarcinoma in the second course of radiotherapy.

Can we predict overall survival using machine learning algorithms at 3-months for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer after gamma knife radiosurgery?

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GRKS) is widely used for patients with brain metastases; however, predictions of overall survival (OS) within 3-months post-GKRS remain imprecise. Specifically, more than 10% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients died within 8 weeks of post-GKRS, indicating potential overtreatment. This study aims to predict OS within 3-months post-GKRS using machine learning algorithms, and to identify prognostic features in NSCLC patients. We selected 120 NSCLC patients who underwent GKRS at Chungbuk National University Hospital. They were randomly assigned to training group (n = 80) and testing group (n = 40) with 14 features considered. We used 3 machine learning (ML) algorithms (Decision tree, Random forest, and Boosted tree classifier) to predict OS within 3-months for NSCLC patients. And we extracted important features and permutation features. Data validation was verified by physician and medical physicist. The accuracy of the ML algorithms for predicting OS within 3-months was 77.5% for the decision tree, 72.5% for the random forest, and 70% for the boosted tree classifier. The important features commonly showed age, receiving chemotherapy, and pretreatment each algorithm. Additionally, the permutation features commonly showed tumor volume (>10 cc) and age as critical factors each algorithm. The decision tree algorithm exhibited the highest accuracy. Analysis of the decision tree visualized data revealed that patients aged (>71 years) with tumor volume (>10 cc) were increased risk of mortality within 3-months. The findings suggest that ML algorithms can effectively predict OS within 3-months and identify crucial features in NSCLC patients. For NSCLC patients with poor prognoses, old age, and large tumor volumes, GKRS may not be a desirable treatment.

Radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancer

Metastatic lung cancer classically portends a poor prognosis. The management of metastatic lung cancer has dramatically changed with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy and due to a better understanding of the oligometastatic process. In metastatic lung cancers, radiation therapy which was only used with palliative intent for decades, represents today a promising way to treat primary and oligometastatic sites with a curative intent. Herein we present through a literature review the role of radiotherapy in the management of synchronous metastatic lung cancers.

Survival Predictive Nomograms for Non-Surgical Brain Metastases Patients From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVE

A high number of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis who have not had surgery often have a negative outlook. Radiotherapy remains a most common and effective method. Nomograms were developed to forecast the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC individuals with nonoperative brain metastases who underwent radiotherapy.

METHODS

Information was gathered from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database about patients diagnosed with NSCLC who had brain metastases not suitable for surgery. Nomograms were created and tested using multivariate Cox regression models to forecast CSS and OS at intervals of 1, 2, and 3 years.

RESULTS

The research involved 3413 individuals diagnosed with NSCLC brain metastases who had undergone radiotherapy but had not experienced surgery. These participants were randomly divided into two categories. The analysis revealed that gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, tumor location, tumor laterality, tumor grade, histology, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, tumor size, lung metastasis, bone metastasis, and liver metastasis were significant independent predictors for OS and CSS. The C-index for the training set for predicting OS was .709 (95% CI, .697-.721), and for the validation set, it was .705 (95% CI, .686-.723), respectively. The C-index for predicting CSS was .710 (95% CI, .697-.722) in the training set and .703 (95% CI, .684-.722) in the validation set, respectively. The nomograms model, as suggested by the impressive C-index, exhibits outstanding differentiation ability. Moreover, the ROC and calibration curves reveal its commendable precision and distinguishing potential.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, highly accurate and reliable nomograms were developed to predict OS and CSS in NSCLC patients with non-surgical brain metastases, who have undergone radiotherapy treatment. The nomograms may assist in tailoring counseling strategies and choosing the most effective treatment method.

Perilesional edema diameter associated with brain metastases as a predictive factor of response to radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Different prognostic scales exist in patients with brain metastasis, particularly in lung cancer. The Graded Prognostic Assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA index) for brain metastases is a powerful prognostic tool that effectively identifies patients at different risks. However, these scales do not include perilesional edema diameter (PED) associated with brain metastasis. Current evidence suggests that PED might compromise the delivery and efficacy of radiotherapy to treat BM. This study explored the association between radiotherapy efficacy, PED extent, and gross tumor diameter (GTD).

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracranial response (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and overall survival (OS) according to the extent of PED and GT.

Methods

Out of 114 patients with BM at baseline or throughout the disease, 65 were eligible for the response assessment. The GTD and PED sum were measured at BM diagnosis and after radiotherapy treatment. According to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, cutoff values were set at 27 mm and 17 mm for PED and GT, respectively.

Results

Minor PED was independently associated with a better iORR [78.8% vs. 50%, OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.26-10.99); p = 0.018] to brain radiotherapy. Median iPFS was significantly shorter in patients with major PED [6.9 vs. 11.8 months, HR 2.9 (95% CI 1.7-4.4); p < 0.001] independently of other prognostic variables like the Lung-molGPA and GTD. A major PED also negatively impacted the median OS [18.4 vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.3); p = 0.001].

Conclusion

Higher PED was associated with an increased risk of intracranial progression and a lesser probability of responding to brain radiotherapy in patients with metastatic lung cancer. We encourage prospective studies to confirm our findings.

Diabetes Mellitus Is a Strong Independent Negative Prognostic Factor in Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) cause relevant morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The presence of cerebrovascular diseases can alter the tumor microenvironment, cellular proliferation and treatment resistance. However, it is largely unknown if the presence of distinct cerebrovascular risk factors may alter the prognosis of patients with BM.

METHODS

Patients admitted for the radiotherapy of BM at a large tertiary cancer center were included. Patient and survival data, including cerebrovascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking, arterial hypertension, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, hypercholesterolemia and smoking) were recorded.

RESULTS

203 patients were included. Patients with DM (n = 39) had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (HR 1.75 (1.20-2.56), p = 0.003, log-rank). Other vascular comorbidities were not associated with differences in OS. DM remained prognostically significant in the multivariate Cox regression including established prognostic factors (HR 1.92 (1.20-3.06), p = 0.006). Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed a prognostic role of DM in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, both in univariate (HR 1.68 (0.97-2.93), p = 0.066) and multivariate analysis (HR 2.73 (1.33-5.63), p = 0.006), and a trend in melanoma patients.

CONCLUSION

DM is associated with reduced survival in patients with BM. Further research is necessary to better understand the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of this important interaction.

Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer

The improved survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely owing to the improved control of systemic disease provided by immune-checkpoint inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, have highlighted the challenges posed by central nervous system (CNS) metastases as a devastating yet common complication, with up to 50% of patients developing such lesions during the course of the disease. Early-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide robust systemic disease control in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLCs, although these agents are usually unable to accumulate to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the CNS owing to an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, the past few years have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of several novel or later-generation TKIs with improved CNS penetrance. Such agents have promising levels of activity against brain metastases, as demonstrated by data from preclinical and clinical studies. In this Review, we describe current preclinical and clinical evidence of the intracranial activity of TKIs targeting various oncogenic drivers in patients with NSCLC, with a focus on newer agents with enhanced CNS penetration, leptomeningeal disease and the need for intrathecal treatment options. We also discuss evolving assessment criteria and regulatory considerations for future clinical investigations.

Impact of first-line immunotherapy on survival and intracranial outcomes in a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Although brain metastases (BM) at diagnosis are common in non-squamous NSCLC patients (ns-NSCLC), they have been mostly excluded from randomized trials. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate real-word outcomes of frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in these patients.

METHODS

Our study assess the intracranial and overall efficacy of first-line ICI-based therapy compared to chemotherapy (CT) in ns-NSCLC patients diagnosed with BM, showing no targetable alterations. Patients were divided according to systemic therapy: CT, ICI, or CT-ICI. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. Secondary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (icPFS).

RESULTS

Between 01 and 2018 and 05-2021, 118 patients were included (52 CT, 38 ICI and 28 CT-ICI). Median follow-up was 30.0 months. Intracranial radiotherapy was delivered for 75.0%, 68.4% and 67.9% of patients for CT, ICI and CT-ICI groups (p = 0.805). After adjustment, ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a better OS compared to CT (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.89, and HR = 0.52, 95 %CI: 0.27-1.01, respectively). ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intracranial progression by 54% (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.25-0.84) and 59% (HR = 0.41, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.77) compared to CT. Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with an increased icPFS compared to systemic therapy alone (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.92), whereas whole-brain was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life ns-NSCLC patients with BM at diagnosis treated frontline with ICI presented OS and icPFS benefit compared to CT alone. A prospective assessment of the ideal type and sequence of systemic and local therapy should be conducted.

Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.

MRI radiomics for brain metastasis sub-pathology classification from non-small cell lung cancer: a machine learning, multicenter study

The objective of this study is to develop a machine-learning model that can accurately distinguish between different histologic types of brain lesions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when it is not safe or feasible to perform a biopsy. To achieve this goal, the study utilized data from two patient cohorts: 116 patients from Xiangya Hospital and 35 patients from Yueyang Central Hospital. A total of eight machine learning algorithms, including Xgboost, were compared. Additionally, a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network was trained using transfer learning to further evaluate the performance of these models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was developed to determine the most important features in the best-performing model after hyperparameter optimization. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for the classification of brain lesions as either lung adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma ranged from 0.60 to 0.87. The model based on single radiomics features extracted from contrast-enhanced T1 MRI and utilizing the Xgboost algorithm demonstrated the highest performance (AUC: 0.85) in the internal validation set and adequate performance (AUC: 0.80) in the independent external validation set. The SHAP values also revealed the impact of individual features on the classification results. In conclusion, the use of a radiomics model incorporating contrast-enhanced T1 MRI, Xgboost, and SHAP algorithms shows promise in accurately and interpretably identifying brain lesions in patients with NSCLC.

Comparison of first-line radiosurgery for small-cell and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (CROSS-FIRE)

INTRODUCTION

Historical reservations regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases include concerns for short-interval and diffuse central nervous system (CNS) progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established.

METHODS

Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively collected (n = 892 SCLC, n = 4785 NSCLC). Data from the prospective Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK0901) clinical trial of first-line SRS were analyzed as a comparison cohort (n = 98 SCLC, n = 814 NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable adjustment for cofactors including age, sex, performance status, year, extracranial disease status, and brain metastasis number and volume. Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive NSCLC, mutation-negative NSCLC, and SCLC.

RESULTS

OS was superior for patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median OS = 10.5 vs 8.6 months; P < .001) and in the JLGK0901 dataset. Hazard estimates for first CNS progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached statistical significance in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.73 to 0.92, P = .001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC patients (median OS = 23.7 [EGFR and ALK positive NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise P values < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences in CNS progression were observed in the matched cohorts. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal progression was increased in patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.26, P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

After SRS, SCLC histology was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC patients overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline factors. SCLC was not associated with increased neurological mortality, number of lesions at CNS progression, or leptomeningeal progression compared to NSCLC. These findings may better inform clinical expectations and individualized decision making regarding SRS for SCLC patients.

Real-world data on patterns and outcomes of radiation therapy for brain metastases in a population-based cohort of lung cancer patients in Victoria

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated real-world data on the patterns and outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM) in a population-based cohort of patients with lung cancer (LC) in Victoria.

METHODS

The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data set (VRMDS) and the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) were linked to identify patients with LC who underwent RT for BM between 2013 and 2016. We determined: (i) proportion of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); (ii) overall survival (OS); and (iii) 30-day mortality (30M) following RT for BM.

RESULTS

Of the 1001 patients included in the study, 193 (19%) had SRS. There was no significant increase in SRS use over time - from 18% in 2013 to 21% in 2016 (P-trend = 0.8). In multivariate analyses, increased age (P = 0.03) and treatment in regional centres (P < 0.001) were independently associated with lower likelihood of SRS treatment. The median OS following RT for BM was 3.6 months. Patients who had SRS had better OS than those who did not have SRS (median OS 8.9 months vs. 3 months, P < 0.01). SRS use, age, sex and year of treatment were independently associated with OS in multivariate analyses. A total of 184 (18%) patients died within 30 days of RT for BM, and the proportion was higher in older (P = 0.001) and male patients (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

One-in-five LC patients who received RT for BM had SRS. The improved OS with SRS is likely confounded by patient selection. It is important to reduce 30M by better selecting patients who may not benefit from RT for BM.

Survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for brain metastasis from lung cancer and utility of different prognostic scales

Brain metastases (BM) from lung cancer are among the most common intracranial tumors. Several studies have published scales to estimate the survival of patients with BM. Routine access to molecular diagnostics and modern oncologic treatments, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); therefore, incorporating them into recent prognostic scales may diminish the reliability of the scales in LMICs. This retrospective study aimed to determine the survival of 55 patients who were surgically treated for BM from lung cancer at a Brazilian public tertiary teaching hospital between 2012 and 2022. We determined clinical factors associated with survival, and compared observed survival rates with the estimated survival on prognostic scales. The mean overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (range:0.2-76.5). At univariate analysis, female sex and improved postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score were associated with longer survival. The median survival did not differ between groups when classified using the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA)-2008, Lung-molecular GPA-2017, and Lung-GPA-2021 scales. According to the Diagnosis-Specific (DS)-GPA-2012 scale, there was a significant difference between the groups. In the multivariate Cox regression survival analysis, a higher DS-GPA-2012 and improved postoperative KPS score remained significantly associated with longer survival. In conclusion, this cohort showed a mean OS of < 1 year. Improved KPS score after surgery was associated with increased survival. This cohort DS-GPA scale demonstrated the highest concordance with observed survival, indicating its potential as a valuable tool for patient stratification in surgical treatment decision-making in LMICs.

Optimizing treatment of brain metastases in an era of novel systemic treatments: a single center consecutive series

BACKGROUND

The multidisciplinary management of patients with brain metastases consists of surgical resection, radiation treatment and systemic treatment. Tailoring and timing these treatment modalities is challenging. This study presents real-world data from consecutively treated patients and assesses the impact of all treatment strategies and their relation with survival. The aim is to provide new insights to improve multidisciplinary decisions towards individualized treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective consecutive cohort study was performed. Patients with brain metastases were included between June 2018 and May 2020. Brain metastases of small cell lung carcinoma were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed in multivariable models.

RESULTS

676 patients were included in the study, 596 (88%) received radiotherapy, 41 (6%) awaited the effect of newly started or switched systemic treatment and 39 (6%) received best supportive care. Overall survival in the stereotactic radiotherapy group was 14 months (IQR 5-32) and 32 months (IQR 11-43) in patients who started or switched systemic treatment and initially did not receive radiotherapy. In patients with brain metastases without options for local or systemic treatment best supportive care was provided, these patients had an overall survival of 0 months (IQR 0-1). Options for systemic treatment, Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70 and breast cancer were prognostic for a longer overall survival, while progressive extracranial metastases and whole-brain-radiotherapy were prognostic for shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing prognosis in light of systemic treatment options is crucial after the diagnosis of brain metastasis for the consideration of radiotherapy versus best supportive care.

Retrospective non-inferiority study of stereotactic radiosurgery for more than ten brain metastases

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with > 10 brain metastases (BM) compared to patients with 2-10 BM.

METHODS

The study included multiple BM patients who underwent SRS between 2014 and 2022, excluding patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy, had a Karnofsky Performance Status score < 60, suspected leptomeningeal disease, or a single BM lesion. Patients were divided into two groups (2-10 and > 10 BM groups) and matched 2:1 based on propensity scores. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the matched dataset, with intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoint. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the adjusted hazard ratio was below 1.3.

RESULTS

Of the 1042 patients identified, 434 met eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (160 in the BM 2-10 group and 80 in the > 10 BM group). The median OS was 18.2 months in the 2-10 BM group and 19.4 months in the > 10 BM group (P = 0.60). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.59-1.24), indicating non-inferiority. PFS was not significantly different between the groups (4.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.94). The number of BM did not significantly impact OS or PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS for selected patients with > 10 BM was non-inferior in terms of OS compared to those with 2-10 BM in a propensity score-matched dataset.

Intracranial and Extracranial Progression and Their Correlation With Overall Survival After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Multi-institutional Cohort With Brain Metastases

Importance

Clinical trials for metastatic malignant neoplasms are increasingly being extended to patients with brain metastases. Despite the preeminence of progression-free survival (PFS) as a primary oncologic end point, the correlation of intracranial progression (ICP) and extracranial progression (ECP) events with overall survival (OS) is poorly understood for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Objective

To determine the correlation of ICP and ECP with OS among patients with brain metastases completing an initial SRS course.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. We included patients who completed an initial course of SRS for brain metastases during the study period, including receipt of single and/or multifraction SRS, prior whole-brain radiotherapy, and brain metastasis resection. Data analysis was performed on November 15, 2022.

Exposures

Non-OS end points included intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, PFS, time to ICP, time to ECP, and any time to progression. Progression events were radiologically defined, incorporating multidisciplinary clinical consensus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was correlation of surrogate end points to OS. Clinical end points were estimated from time of SRS completion via the Kaplan-Meier method, while end-point correlation to OS was measured using normal scores rank correlation with the iterative multiple imputation approach.

Results

This study included 1383 patients, with a mean age of 63.1 years (range, 20.9-92.8 years) and a median follow-up of 8.72 months (IQR, 3.25-19.68 months). The majority of participants were White (1032 [75%]), and more than half (758 [55%]) were women. Common primary tumor sites included the lung (757 [55%]), breast (203 [15%]), and skin (melanoma; 100 [7%]). Intracranial progression was observed in 698 patients (50%), preceding 492 of 1000 observed deaths (49%). Extracranial progression was observed in 800 patients (58%), preceding 627 of 1000 observed deaths (63%). Irrespective of deaths, 482 patients (35%) experienced both ICP and ECP, 534 (39%) experienced ICP (216 [16%]) or ECP (318 [23%]), and 367 (27%) experienced neither. The median OS was 9.93 months (95% CI, 9.08-11.05 months). Intracranial PFS had the highest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85]; median, 4.39 months [95% CI, 4.02-4.92 months]). Time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.42 [95% CI, 0.34-0.50]) and the longest median time to event (median, 8.76 months [95% CI, 7.70-9.48 months]). Across specific primary tumor types, correlations of intracranial PFS and extracranial PFS with OS were consistently high despite corresponding differences in median outcome durations.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study of patients with brain metastases completing SRS suggest that intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, and PFS had the highest correlations with OS and time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS. These data may inform future patient inclusion and end-point selection for clinical trials.

Brain Metastases: Is There Still a Role for Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy?

Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has commonly been prescribed to palliate symptoms from brain metastases, to reduce the risk of local relapse after surgical resection, and to improve distant brain control after resection or radiosurgery. While targeting micrometastases throughout the brain can be considered advantageous, the simultaneous exposure of healthy brain tissue might cause adverse events. Attempts to mitigate the risk of neurocognitive decline after WBRT include the selective avoidance of the hippocampi, among others. Besides selective dose reduction, dose escalation to boost volumes, for example, simultaneous integrated boost, aiming at increased tumor control probability is technically feasible. While up-front radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases often employs radiosurgery or other techniques targeting visible lesions only, sequential (delayed) salvage treatment with WBRT might still become necessary. In addition, the presence of leptomeningeal tumors or very widespread parenchymatous brain metastases might prompt clinicians to prescribe early WBRT.

Re-Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: How to Evaluate an Outcome of Repeat Treatment When Its First Use Is Debatable

Recently, a review on a pertinent issue of repeat whole-brain radiotherapy (re-WBRT) for recurring brain metastases was published [...]