Integrated analysis of the prognostic role of the lymph node ratio in node-positive gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pN classification system

BACKGROUND

Current pathological nodal (pN) classification exhibits limitations in prognostic stratification of pT3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer (GC) patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a new lymph nodal staging based on the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR).

METHODS

Data from 7883 pT3-4N0-2M0 GC patients were collected from the SEER database and Zhejiang Cancer Provincial Hospital. Optimal cutoff values for ELNs and LNR were determined using X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier methods, Log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were employed in this study. Patients were categorized into three new pN stages: new pN0 (pN0 with ELNs >16), new pN1 (pN0 with ELNs ≤16 or pN1-2 with LNR ≤0.15), and new pN2 (pN1-2 with LNR >0.15). The prognostic predictive power of both the current and new pN staging was evaluated using Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Concordance index (C-index), and the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The new pN classification exhibited excellent performance in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. After adjusting for confounding factors, the new pN staging emerged as an independent prognostic indicator in GC patients. In the SEER cohort, the new pN staging demonstrated enhanced prognostic prediction accuracy over the AJCC pN staging (AIC: 75578.85 vs 75755.06; C-index: 0.642 vs 0.630, P < 0.001). Similar findings were validated in the China cohort.

CONCLUSION

This study developed and validated an improved pN classification for pT3-4N0-2M0 GC patients. It is advisable for surgeons to consider ELNs and LNR when assessing postoperative prognosis in GC patients.

Diagnostic performance of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for regional lymph node staging of gastric cancer by CT

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic performance of imaging for regional lymph node assessment in gastric cancer is still limited, and there is a lack of consensus on radiological evaluation. At the same time, there is an increasing demand for structured reporting using Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) to standardize oncological imaging. We aimed at investigating the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS compared to the use of various individual criteria for assessing regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer using histopathology as reference.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, consecutive 91 patients (median age, 66 years, range 33-91 years, 54 men) with CT scans and histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were assessed using Node-RADS assigning scores from 1 to 5 for the likelihood of regional lymph node metastases. Additionally, different Node-RADS criteria as well as subcategories of altered border contour (lobulated, spiculated, indistinct) were assessed individually. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were calculated for Node-RADS scores, and all criteria investigated. Interreader agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

Among all criteria, best performance was found for Node-RADS scores ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 with a sensitivity/specificity/Youden's index of 56.8%/90.7%/0.48 and 48.6%/98.1%/0.47, respectively, both with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.73 and 0.67, p < 0.01). Among individual criteria, the best performance was found for short-axis diameter of 10 mm with sensitivity/specificity/Youden's index of 56.8%/87.0%/0.44 (κ = 0.65, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that structured reporting of combined size and configuration criteria of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer slightly improves overall diagnostic performance compared to individual criteria including short-axis diameter alone. The results show an increase in specificity and unchanged sensitivity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The results of this study suggest that Node-RADS may be a suitable tool for structured reporting of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Assessment of lymph nodes in gastric cancer is still limited, and there is a lack of consensus on radiological evaluation. • Node-RADS in gastric cancer improves overall diagnostic performance compared to individual criteria including short-axis diameter. • Node-RADS may be a suitable tool for structured reporting of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer.

How to identify early complications in patients undergoing distal gastrectomy?

In this editorial we comment on the article by Zhang et al published in a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Gastrectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection is still standard curative treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Several studies point out that gastric cancer surgery is a complex procedure that leads to a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Many factors can contribute to the onset of complications with consequent effects on prognosis and increased mortality. The complications can be divided in complications related to anastomosis, to motility and to surgical site infection. The study presented by Zhang B et al represent an interesting analysis on the possibility to prevent postoperative morbidity. The study was performed on 131 patients with distal gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Of these patients, 16% developed early postoperative complications. The univariate analysis showed that prealbumin level, hypertension, diabetes, history of abdominal surgery, R0 resection, and blood transfusion were factors influencing early postoperative complications after distal gastrectomy. Moreover, the inclusion of the above significant variables in the logistic regression analysis revealed that hypertension, diabetes, a history of abdominal surgery, and blood transfusion were independent predictors of postoperative complications. In conclusion, preoperative and intraoperative factors can be used to establish an early postoperative nomogram model. The results of the study presented by Zhang et al suggest that the prediction model can be used to guide the detection of postoperative complications and has clinical reference value.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio for thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) has been proved in several cancers. However, the potential of LNR to be a prognostic factor for thyroid cancer has not been validated so far. This article evaluated the prognostic value of LNR for thyroid cancer through a meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted for eligible publications that study the prognostic values of LNR for thyroid cancer in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science up until October 24, 2023. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated by The Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale of Cohort Study. The effect measure for meta-analysis was Hazard Ratio (HR). Random effect model was used to calculate the pooled HR and 95% confidence intervals. A sensitivity analysis was applied to assess the stability of the results. Subgroup analysis and a meta-regression were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. And a funnel plot, Begg's and Egger's tests were used to evaluate publication bias.

Results

A total of 15,698 patients with thyroid cancer from 24 eligible studies whose quality were relatively high were included. The pooled HR was 4.74 (95% CI:3.67-6.11; P<0.05) and a moderate heterogeneity was shown (I2 = 40.8%). The results of meta-analysis were stable according to the sensitivity analysis. Similar outcome were shown in subgroup analysis that higher LNR was associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS). Results from meta-regression indicated that a combination of 5 factors including country, treatment, type of thyroid cancer, year and whether studies control factors in design or analysis were the origin of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Higher LNR was correlated to poorer disease free survival in thyroid cancer. LNR could be a potential prognostic indicator for thyroid cancer. More effort should be made to assess the potential of LNR to be included in the risk stratification systems for thyroid cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=477135, identifier CRD42023477135.

Development and evaluation of the Newstage system: integrating tumor regression grade and lymph node status for improved prognostication in neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The predictive correlation of tumor depth of invasion changes after neoadjuvant therapy, and the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) ypTNM system for gastric cancer may not accurately predict patient prognosis following neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 258 patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. The Newstage system was established based on tumor regression grade and pathological lymph node status. The 3-year survival rates of patients classified by the Newstage system were compared with those classified by the AJCC ypTNM system.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 258 patients, the 3-year overall survival rates based on the Newstage system were: (I) 94.6%, (II) 79.3%, (III) 54.5%, and (IV) 30.2%. The Newstage system exhibited a lower Akaike information criterion value (902.57 vs. 912.03). Additionally, the area under the ROC curve (0.756 vs. 0.733) and the C-index (0.731 vs. 0.718) was higher than the AJCC ypTNM system. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis indicated that the Newstage system was an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The Newstage system exhibits superior predictive performance in estimating survival rates for neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer. It also functions as an independent prognostic factor.

Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in surgically treated stage III colorectal cancer patients with high numbers of harvested lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

The lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the number of positive lymph nodes (LN) divided by the total number of harvested LN, has been demonstrated to be an independent factor in the prognosis of surgically treated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This study aims to establish the prognostic value of LNR in stage III CRC patients with high numbers of LN removed.

METHODS

Stage III CRC patients who underwent curative resections over an 8-year period were included to the study. Demographics, clinicopathological features, surgical as well as recurrence and survival outcomes were recorded and statistically analyzed. Calculations for LNR were carried out as a function of percentage rates and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine its effect on disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Among a total of 493 surgically treated CRC cases, 104 patients were included to the study consisting of 68 (65.4%) men and 36 (34.6%) women with a median age of 64 (inter-quartile range: 55-74) years. The mean number of harvested LN was 31.6 ± 21.0 (range: 12-103). Multivariate Cox regression analyses proved LNR to be a significant factor in both disease-free and overall survival (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003, respectively). Forward elimination analyses showed that a 1% increase in LNR resulted with a 2% increase in both the risks of recurrence and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR may be assessed as an adjunct to the current staging systems for the prediction of oncological outcomes and survival of surgically treated stage III CRC patients.

Role of radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive and clinically heterogeneous tumor, and better risk stratification of lymph node metastasis (LNM) could lead to personalized treatments. The role of radiomics in the prediction of nodal involvement in GC has not yet been systematically assessed. This study aims to assess the role of radiomics in the prediction of LNM in GC.

Methods

A PubMed/MEDLINE systematic review was conducted to assess the role of radiomics in LNM. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i. original articles, ii. articles on radiomics, and iii. articles on LNM prediction in GC. All articles were selected and analyzed by a multidisciplinary board of two radiation oncologists and one surgeon, under the supervision of one radiation oncologist, one surgeon, and one medical oncologist.

Results

A total of 171 studies were obtained using the search strategy mentioned on PubMed. After the complete selection process, a total of 20 papers were considered eligible for the analysis of the results. Radiomics methods were applied in GC to assess the LNM risk. The number of patients, imaging modalities, type of predictive models, number of radiomics features, TRIPOD classification, and performances of the models were reported.

Conclusions

Radiomics seems to be a promising approach for evaluating the risk of LNM in GC. Further and larger studies are required to evaluate the clinical impact of the inclusion of radiomics in a comprehensive decision support system (DSS) for GC.

Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: a Western-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging is the central gastric cancer (GC) staging system, but it has some disadvantages. However, the lymph node ratio (LNR) can be used regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy and is considered an important prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients who underwent curative GC surgery.

METHODS

All patients who underwent radical gastric surgery between January 2014 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological features of tumors, TNM stage, and survival rates were analyzed. LNR was defined as the ratio between metastatic lymph nodes and total lymph nodes removed. The LNR groups were classified as follows: LNR0 = 0, 0.01 < LNR1 ≤ 0.1, 0.1 < LNR2 ≤ 0.25 and LNR3 > 0.25. Tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the patients were compared between LNR groups.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 333 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 62 ± 14 years. According to the LNR classification, no difference was found between groups regarding age and sex. However, TNM stage III disease was significantly more common in LNR3 patients. Most patients (43.2%, n = 144) were in the LNR3 group. In terms of tumor characteristics (lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion), the LNR3 group had significantly poorer prognostic factors. The Cox regression model defined LNR3, TNM stage II-III disease, and advanced age as independent risk factors for survival. Patients with LNR3 demonstrated the lowest 5-year OS rate (35.7%) (estimated mean survival was 30 ± 1.9 months) compared to LNR 0-1-2.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that a high LNR was significantly associated with poor OS in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. LNR can be used as an independent prognostic predictor in GC patients.

Positive lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients: Is it going to supersede positive lymph node number in guidelines?

Gastric malignancies constitute the sixth most common cancer with regards to incidence and have the fifth most mortality rates. Extended lymph-node dissection is the surgical modality of choice while treating advanced stage gastric cancer. It is yet a topic of debate, whether or not the amount of positive lymph nodes after a pathological examination following the surgical intervention is of prognostic value. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive lymph nodes following the surgery. A total of 193 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2011 and December 2015 have been considered for a retrospective data collection. The cases with R1-R2 resections, palliative or emergent surgeries are excluded. Metastatic to total number of lymph nodes, corresponded a ratio which was analyzed in this survey and practiced as a predictive parameter of disease outcome. This survey includes 138 male (71.5%) and 55 female (28.5%) patients treated between 2011 and 2015 in our clinic. The survey follow-up duration of the cases range between 0, 2, and 72 months, corresponding an average of 23.24 ± 16.99 months. We calculated cutoff value of 0.09 with, sensitivity is 76.32% for positive to total number of lymph nodes ratio, whereas specivity applies for 64.10%, positive predictive value for 58% and negative predictive value for 80.6%. Positive lymph node ratio has a prognostic value in terms of predicting the prognosis of the patients with gastric adenocarcinoma following a curative gastrectomy. This might in long term contribute to the prognostic analysis of patients if integrated in the current staging system.

Tumor budding in gastric cancer

The tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) staging system has long been the gold standard for the classification and prognosis of solid tumors. However, the TNM staging system is not without limitations. Prognostic heterogeneity exists within patients at the same stage. Therefore, the pursuit of other biomarkers with the potential to classify patients with cancer has never stopped. One of them, tumor budding (TB), has gained much success in colorectal cancer. In recent years, TB in gastric cancer has attracted much attention from researchers, beginning to reveal the molecular and biological aspects of this phenomenon in gastric cancer, and has emerged as a promising prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer, predicting disease progression and unfavorable survival. Therefore, it is time and essential to provide a holistic overview of TB in gastric cancer, which has not been achieved and is the aim of this review.

Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in stage IA to IIB cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is a prognostic factor in the existing TNM classification system. The present meta-analysis assessed the role of LVSI in predicting the prognosis of stage IA to IIB cervical cancer (CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched to determine relevant articles published in the English language. Our search deadline was May 2022. Critical Appraisal of Prognostic Studies was used to assess the quality for each article. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were used to evaluate the performance of LVSI in prognosis prediction.

RESULTS

We enrolled 8 studies involving 25,352 patients published after 2010. Thus, high LVSI was an unfavorable factor in predicting overall survival (HR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-2.66; P = .006) and disease-free survival (HR, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-2.70; P = .000) for patients with CC. However, the disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly different on univariate analysis based on the subgroup analysis stratified by analysis method, but no obvious heterogeneity was found across diverse articles.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that LVSI predicts the poor prognostic outcome of stage IA to IIB CC. However, well-designed clinical articles should further assess the independent prognosis prediction performance of LVSI in CC.

Systemic inflammation score as a preoperative prognostic factor for patients with pT2-T4 resectable gastric cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation has been reported to be associated with cancer progression and metastasis. Systemic inflammation score (SIS), calculated from preoperative serum albumin level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, has been shown to be a novel prognostic factor for several types of tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the SIS in patients with pT2-4 resectable gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Total 97 patients with pT2-4 GC who underwent curative surgery from 322 cases between 2009 and 2015 in Fukushima Medical University Hospital were included. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative SIS and other prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The higher SIS score was associated with undifferentiated cancer and recurrence. Univariate analysis of RFS identified deeper tumor invasion and higher SIS were significant risk factors and multivariate analysis revealed that both of them were independent prognostic factors for RFS. As for OS, age, tumor invasion, SIS and LNR were significantly correlated with RFS. In multivariate analysis, tumor invasion, SIS and LNR were independent prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SIS was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in pT2-4 resectable gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy.

A novel nomogram based on the prognostic nutritional index for predicting postoperative outcomes in patients with stage I-III gastric cancer undergoing robotic radical gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The inflammation and nutrition status are crucial factors influencing the outcome of patients with gastric cancer. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with stage I-III gastric cancer undergoing robotic radical gastrectomy combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS), and further to create a clinical prognosis prediction model.

STUDY

525 patients with stage I-III gastric cancer who underwent ERAS combined with RRG from July 2010 to June 2018 were included in this work, and were divided randomly into training and validating groups in a 7-to-3 ratio. The association between PNI and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Independent risk factors impacting postoperative survival were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram for predicting OS was constructed based on multivariate analysis, and its predictive performance was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, ROC curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and time-dependent ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Survival analyses revealed the presence of a significant correlation between low preoperative PNI and shortened postoperative survival (P = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, postoperative complications (P < 0.001), pTNM stage (II: P = 0.007; III: P < 0.001), PNI (P = 0.048) and lymph node ratio (LNR) (P = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors in patients undergoing ERAS combined with RRG. The nomogram constructed based on PNI, pTNM stage, complications, and LNR was superior to the pTNM stage model in terms of predictive performance. The C-indexes of the nomogram model were respectively 0.765 and 0.754 in the training and testing set, while AUC values for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 0.68, 0.71, and 0.74 in the training set and 0.60, 0.67, and 0.72 in the validation set.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PNI is an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage I-III gastric cancer undergoing ERAS combined with robotic radical gastrectomy. Based on PNI, we constructed a nomogram for predicting postoperative outcomes of gastric cancer patients, which might be utilized clinically.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in the existing tumor node metastasis classification system should be verified as one of the prognosis prediction factors. This work evaluated LNR's performance in predicting cervical cancer (CC) prognosis through a meta-analysis.

METHOD

Related studies were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The language was restricted to English. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) were utilized to analyze the prognostic value of LNR.

RESULTS

Our study included 8 articles with 3325 subjects published after 2015. Based on our analysis, high LNR was the adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS, HR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.23-1.73; P = .238) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.98-3.66; P = .597) among the CC cases. Furthermore, as revealed by subgroup analysis, in CC patients, median LNR of about 0.0625 and 0.066 served as the prominent risk factor for DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The current work illustrates that elevated LNR is related to the dismal prognosis of CC. More well-designed clinical studies are warranted for assessing whether LNR is a factor independently predicting the prognosis of CC.

Lymph node ratio predicts overall survival in patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based SEER analysis

BACKGROUND

In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are many factors that affect prognosis, and the lymph node ratio (LNR) may play a significant role. Our study aimed to confirm the value of the LNR in the prognosis of patients with stage II NSCLC.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The classification for the LNR was best determined using the X-tile method. The correlation between the LNR and overall survival (OS) was validated after the Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. To determine the correlation between the LNR and survival, stratification and the Cox regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

In our study, 14,183 stage II NSCLC patients were included. Among them, 8303 patients had N1 disease. According to the X-tile analysis, the optimal critical points for the LNR in N1 patients with NSCLC was 0.21 and 0.38. We categorized the cohorts as low (LNR-L ≤ 0.21; n = 5158, 62.1%), medium (0.21 < LNR-M ≤ 0.38; n = 1736, 20.9%), and high (LNR-H > 0.38; n = 1409, 17.0%). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the patients with a high LNR were considerably worse than those with a medium or low LNR (P < 0.001), which was also proven by stratified and multivariate analyses. The value of the LNR was reflected in all the subgroup analyses, especially in patients ages < 60 years. The multivariate competing risks regression analysis revealed that younger age, female sex, T1 disease, adenocarcinoma and N0 disease was associated with a better prognosis after controlling for potential confounders (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage II NSCLC, the LNR is valuable for assessing prognosis. A higher LNR indicates a worse prognosis.

Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives

Traditionally, lymph node metastases (LNM) evaluation is essential to the staging of colon cancer patients according to the TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) system. However, in recent years evidence has accumulated regarding the role of emerging pathological features, which could significantly impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS) have been shown to predict patients’ prognosis more accurately than traditional nodal staging and it has been suggested that their implementation in existing classification could help stratify further patients with overlapping TNM stage. Tumor deposits (TD) are currently factored within the N1c category of the TNM classification in the absence of lymph node metastases. However, studies have shown that presence of TDs can affect patients’ survival regardless of LNM. Moreover, evidence suggest that presence of TDs should not be evaluated as dichotomic but rather as a quantitative variable. Extranodal extension (ENE) has been shown to correlate with presence of other adverse prognostic features and to impact survival of colorectal cancer patients. In this review we will describe current staging systems and prognostic/predictive factors in colorectal cancer and elaborate on available evidence supporting the implementation of LNR/LODDS, TDs and ENE evaluation in existing classification to improve prognosis estimation and patient selection for adjuvant treatment.

Is there a survival difference between older adult and younger adult patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with the same lymph node ratio?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic value of the pathological lymph node ratio for older adult and younger adult gastric cancer patients and to evaluate whether there is a difference in the survival of patients with the same lymph node ratio (LNR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 222 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent upfront gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had negative surgical margins were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age. Clinicopathological properties of the two groups were compared. Potential prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed. Subsequently, the effect of lymphadenectomy and LNR on survival in both groups was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with perioperative mortality were excluded and 192 patients were analyzed. Significant differences were detected in terms of hemoglobin and albumin levels between older adult patients and younger adult patients (p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in older adult patients (22 months vs. 67 months, p < 0.001). The survival rates in older adult patients were significantly lower from those of younger adult in the subgroup LNR Stage 2 (12.1% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.004) and LNR Stage 3 classification (9.1% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.039). LNR was found to be significant for OS with a cut-off point of 0.18.

CONCLUSION

A survival difference was found between the older adult and younger adult patients with the same LNR. LNR was found to be an independent factor for survival especially in older adult patients. Survival was found to be further decreased in older adult patients compared to younger adult patients with increasing LNR.

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: unicentric analysis of 199 patients

INTRODUCTION

In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test.

RESULTS

The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tRN2 (HR2.87) and tRN3 (HR7.29); LODDS 2 (HR1.55), LODDS3 (HR2.6) and LODDS4 (HR4.9); pN2 (HR1.84) and pN3 (HR2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8%, 61.4%, 25.8%, and 3.84% for tRN0, tRN1, tRN2 and tRN3; 72.4%, 60%, 29.1% and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6%, 59.4%, 28.8% and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75.

CONCLUSION

tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

Directly applying the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system to evaluate the prognosis of patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG) might lead to under-staging, when insufficient lymph nodes were retrieved during surgery. The prognostic value of 4 lymph nodes staging systems, 8th AJCC TNM N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and negative lymph nodes (NLN), in AEG patients having ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes were compared.

METHODS

869 AEG patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the association of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with 8th AJCC TNM N stage, LNR, LODDS, and NLN respectively. Predictive survival ability was assessed and compared using linear trend χ2 score, likelihood ratio (LR) test, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Harrell concordance index (C-index), and Receiver Operative Curve (ROC).

RESULTS

The N stage, LNR, LODDS, and NLN were all independent prognostic predictors for CSS and OS in multivariate Cox models. Comparatively, LODDS demonstrated higher linear trend χ2 score, LR test score, C-index and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) value, and lower AIC in CSS compared to the other three systems. Moreover, for patients without regional lymph node metastasis, NLN showed higher C-index and lower AIC.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS showed better predictive performance than N, LNR, and NLN among patients with node-positive patients while NLN performed better in node-negative patients. A combination of LODDS and NLN has the potential to provide more prognostic information than the current AJCC TNM classification.

Postoperative mortality and morbidity after D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgery for gastric cancer is a complex procedure and lymphadenectomy is often mandatory. Postoperative mortality and morbidity after curative gastric cancer surgery is not insignificant.

AIM

To evaluate the factors determining mortality and morbidity in a population of patients undergoing R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical data and pathological characteristics (age, sex, primary site of the tumor, Lauren histotype, number of positive lymph nodes resected, number of negative lymph nodes resected, and depth of invasion as defined by the standard nomenclature) was conducted in patients with gastric cancer. For each patient we calculated the Kattan’s score. We arbitrarily divided the study population of patients into two groups based on the nomogram score (< 100 points or ≥ 100 points). Prespecified subgroups in these analyses were defined according to age (≤ 65 years or > 65 years), and number of lymph nodes retrieved (≤ 35 lymph nodes or > 35 lymph nodes). Uni- and multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological findings were performed to identify the factors affecting postoperative mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eighty-six patients underwent a curative R0 resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Perioperative mortality rate was 3.8% (7 patients); a higher mortality rate was observed in patients aged > 65 years (P = 0.002) and in N+ patients (P = 0.04). Following univariate analysis, mortality was related to a Kattan’s score ≥ 100 points (P = 0.04) and the presence of advanced gastric cancer (P = 0.03). Morbidity rate was 21.0% (40 patients). Surgical complications were observed in 17 patients (9.1%). A higher incidence of morbidity was observed in patients where more than 35 lymph nodes were harvested (P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Mortality and morbidity rate are higher in N+ and advanced gastric cancer patients. The removal of more than 35 lymph nodes does not lead to an increase in mortality.

Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio compared to the TNM classification in stage III gastric cancer

Background

We aimed to evaluate a comparative analysis of the prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) and pN (TNM) in stage III gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

A total of 159 stage III gastric cancer patients with curative gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Cutoff values for LNR were designated according to 25%, 50% and 75% percentiles, 0.07, 0.20 and 0.44 respectively. The LNR was divided into four groups as 0 > LNR1 ≤ 0.07; 0.07 > LNR2 ≤0.20; 0.20 > LNR3 ≤0.44; 0.44 > LNR4 ≤1.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 61.1 ± 11.3 years. Male predominance was apparent (73.6%). The 1-year overall survival and recurrence rates were 73.6% and 33.6%, respectively. The univariate cox regression analysis demonstrated age and LNR were the main variables that affected overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). Harvested lymph nodes less than 16 did not affect OS (p = 0.255). The results of the multivariate cox regression analysis revealed that only LNR was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001), while pN was not (p > 0.05). Similar results, as with overall survival, could not be revealed clearly for disease free survival (DFS).

Conclusions

LNR was an independent significant prognostic factor and superior to pN staging in predicting OS but not for DFS in stage III gastric cancer patients. The high LNR levels in our research were found to be associated with poor survival rates. The percentile system we used to determine cutoff values may be considered as a reliable method. Similarly, LNR also provides a reliable prognostic parameter in future staging systems to help guide treatment algorithm plans.

Pathologic Lymph Node Staging of Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The TNM classification is the main tool for lymph node (LN) staging in gastric cancer (GC). However, alternative LN staging systems have been proposed, and the role of features other than the number of metastatic LNs is being investigated. Our aim is to discuss the main challenges of LN assessment in GC.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of the literature on alternative LN staging systems, examined LNs, sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy, LN micrometastases (LNMIs), extracapsular extension (ECE), and tumor deposits (TDs) in GC.

RESULTS

Many controversies exist regarding LN assessment in GC. The TNM classification shows excellent prognostic performance, but alternative prognostic methods such as the LN ratio or log odds of positive LNs have demonstrated to be better than the TNM system in terms of prognostic accuracy. The value of SLN biopsy and LNMIs in GC is still unclear, and several challenges concerning their clinical impact and pathologic analysis must be overcome before their introduction in clinical practice. Most authors have identified ECE and TDs as independent prognostic factors for survival in GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies should be performed to evaluate the impact of these features on the TNM classification and patient outcomes, as well as to standardize alternative LN staging systems.

Assessment on the Prognostic Validity of Dissected and Positive Lymph Node Counts and Lymph Node Ratio in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Multi-central Cohort Study

Background: Adequate treatment for all resectable early gastric cancers (EGCs) is gastrectomy with regional lymphadenectomy. The number of positive resected lymph nodes during lymphadenectomy can be a reliable predictor of survival of GC. Objectives: We aimed at assessing the prognostic significance of Dissected Lymph Node Count (DLNC), positive LNC (PLNC), and Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) in patients with EGC. Methods: In the current retrospective cohort, 201 patients with resectable EGC were included. Demographic variables, clinicopathological characteristics of tumors (including numbers of total dissected nodes and positive, negative nodes), history of receiving adjuvant cancer therapies, and 1- and 5-year survivals were noted. Results: DLNC, PLNC, and LNR were associated with differentiation and depth of tumor, lymph node status, and risk of death (P-value for all < 0.05). There was no correlation between either of these measures with preoperative symptoms, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrence. DLNC, PLNC, and LNR showed prognostic significance only in patients, who did not receive comprehensive therapy (P-value < 0.001 for all). A significantly higher LNR was seen in patients with more than 1-year survival compared to others (P-value = 0.011). A significantly lower DLNC and higher PLNC were seen in patients, who survived over 5 years (P-value of 0.002 and 0.047, respectively). Conclusions: LNR, DLNC, and PLNC are significant prognostic factors for EGC. According to our findings, choosing the optimal approach, through which fewer negative lymph nodes are dissected, is crucial in increasing overall survival and extended lymphadenectomy cannot necessarily benefit patients.

Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in node-positive cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA).

DESIGN

A registry-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients diagnosed with node-positive CGA in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1038 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (7:3) to the training set (n=723) or validating set (n=315).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the training and validation sets were similar. Based on the optimal cut-off values, LNR was classified into low (<0.09), medium (0.09~0.33) and high (>0.33) groups; LODDS was also classified into low (<-2.09), medium (-2.09~-0.65) and high (>-0.65) groups. CSS was significantly different across LNR and LODDS subgroups. The Harrell concordance index of the N stage was lower than that of the LNR or LODDS. The Akaike information criterion of the N stage was higher than that of the LNR or LODDS. Independent predictors included race, T stage, M stage and LNR (or LODDS), and they were incorporated into nomograms for 1-year, 2-year and 5-year CSS prediction. Calibration plots showed satisfactory results for internal and external validity of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR and LODDS staging methods have better prognostic efficacy than the traditional N staging method in CGA with node metastasis. Moreover, the two values are promising substitutes for N staging in nomogram development when other independent prognostic factors are incorporated.

Optimal Cut-Off Values of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio and the Number of Removed Nodes for Patients Receiving Resection of Bronchopulmonary Carcinoids: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the SEER Database

Background

Although lymph node dissection (LND) has been commonly used for patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoids (PCs), the prognostic values of the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) and the number of removed nodes (NRN) remain unclear.

Methods

Patients with resected PCs were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010–2015). The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN were determined by X-tile. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce the selection bias. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients in different PLNR and NRN groups.

Results

The study included 1622 patients. The optimal cut-off values of the PLNR and NRN for survival were 13% and 13, respectively. In both Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before IPTW, a PLNR ≥13% was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 3.364, P<0.001) and worse CSS (HR = 7.874, P<0.001). These findings were corroborated by the IPTW-adjusted Cox analysis OS (HR = 2.358, P = 0.0275) and CSS (HR = 8.190, P<0.001) results. An NRN ≥13 was not significantly associated with worse OS in either the Kaplan-Meier or Cox analysis before or after IPTW adjustment. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis before and after IPTW adjustment, an NRN ≥13 was significantly associated with worse CSS (non-IPTW: HR = 2.216, P=0.013; IPTW-adjusted: HR = 2.162, P=0.024).

Conclusion

A PLNR ≥13% could predict worse OS and CSS in patients with PCs and might be an important complement to the present PC staging system. Extensive LND with an NRN ≥13 might have no therapeutic value for OS and may even have an adverse influence on CSS. Its application should be considered on an individual basis.

A novel risk score system for prognostic evaluation in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a large population study from the SEER database and our center

Background

The incidence rate of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG) has significantly increased over the past decades, with a steady increase in morbidity. The aim of this study was to explore a variety of clinical factors to judge the survival outcomes of AEG patients.

Methods

We first obtained the clinical data of AEG patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression models were used to build a risk score system. Patient survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The specificity and sensitivity of the risk score were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Finally, the internal validation set from the SEER database and external validation sets from our center were used to validate the prognostic power of this model.

Results

We identified a risk score system consisting of six clinical features that can be a good predictor of AEG patient survival. Patients with high risk scores had a significantly worse prognosis than those with low risk scores (log-rank test, P-value < 0.0001). Furthermore, the areas under ROC for 3-year and 5-year survival were 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. We also found that the benefits of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were limited to stage III/IV AEG patients in the high-risk group. Using the validation sets, our novel risk score system was proven to have strong prognostic value for AEG patients.

Conclusions

Our results may provide new insights into the prognostic evaluation of AEG.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08558-1.

Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment-Oncological and Surgical Perspective

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Therefore, further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the major oncological challenges on a global scale. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in GC is to downstage primary tumour, eliminate potential micrometastases, and increase the chance for radical resection. Although systemic treatment prolongs the survival in advanced GC, persistent lymph node (LN) metastases indicate poor prognosis. Further identification of prognostic factors after NAC is urgent and could positively influence clinical outcomes. This article aimed to review the actual trends and future perspectives in multimodal therapy of advanced GC, with a particular interest in the post-neoadjuvant pathological nodal stage. A favourable prognostic impact for ypN0 patients is observed, either due to truly negative LN before the start of therapy or because preoperative therapy achieved a pathologically complete nodal response. Ongoing trials investigating the extent of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy will standardise the LN dissection from the multimodal therapy perspective. Since downstaged and primarily node-negative patients show a similar prognosis, the main target for NAC in advanced GC should be nodal clearance. Adequate staging and personalised perioperative therapy seem to be of great importance in the multimodal treatment of GC.

Retrieval of 30 Lymph Nodes Is Mandatory for Selected Stage II Gastric Cancer Patients

Background

According to the 8th edition AJCC staging manual, a least of 16 lymph nodes retrieval (LNRs) is the minimal requirement for lymph nodes (LNs) dissection of gastric cancer surgery. Previous studies have shown that increasing the number of LNRs (≥30) prolongs survival for selected patients. However, the necessity of retrieving 30 or more LN for stage II gastric cancer patients is still under debate.

Aim

This study aims to explore the impact of retrieving 30 or more lymph nodes on the survival of stage II cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 1,177 patients diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological parameters and the impact of different LNRs (<30 or ≥30) and positive lymph node ratio (NR) on overall survival (OS) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The mean number of LNRs was 34 ± 15. A total of 44% (518/1,177) of patients had an LNRs <30, while 56% (659/1,177) of patients had an LNRs ≥30. The 5-year survival rate was 81% for all patients, 76% for the LNRs <30 group, and 86% for LNRs ≥30 group, respectively (P = 0.003). The survival benefit of retrieving 30 lymph nodes was significant in certain subgroups: age >60 years/male/underwent total gastrectomy/stage IIB. For N+ patients, higher NR was significantly correlated with poor survival.

Conclusion

The survival benefit of retrieving 30 LNs varies in different subgroups. An LNRs of 30 is mandatory for selected stage II gastric cancer patients.

The Prognostic Value of Postoperative Lymph Node Ratio in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Objective

In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of postoperative lymph node ratio (LNR)in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods

LNR was calculated as the ratio of positive LNs to the total LNs removed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to estimate the cut-off value of LNR for recurrence. The area under the curve of LNR was 0.714 (95% CI: 0.604-0.825, p<0.001) with 60% sensitivity and >0.255 with 76% specificity. Patients were grouped as group I (≤0.255) and group II (>0.255).

Results

In this study, 157 GC patients were included (39.5% female and 60.5% male). Of the patients, 97 (61.8%) were in group I and 60 (38.2%) were in group II. Disease‑free survival (DFS) was not reached in group I, and it was 16 months in group II (p<0.001). Overall survival (OS) was 58 months in group I and 28 months in group II (p>0.001). In multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, neoadjuvant response, adjuvant treatment, and LNR were found to be the factors associated with DFS and OS (p<0.05).

Conclusion

In our study, it was observed that LNR can predict survival rates better than LN staging.

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: Unicentric analysis pf 199 patients

INTRODUCTION

In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test.

RESULTS

The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tNR2 (HR 2.87) and tNR 3 (HR 7.29); LODDS 2 (HR 1.55), LODDS3 (HR 2.6) and LODDS4 (HR 4.9); pN2 (HR 1.84) and pN3 (HR 2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8, 61.4, 25.8 and 3.84% for tNR0, tNR1, tNR2 and tNR3; 72.4, 60, 29.1 and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6, 59.4, 28.8 and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75.

CONCLUSION

tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy is as effective as open surgery in terms of long-term survival: a single-institution study on gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has been widely accepted to treat early-stage gastric cancer. However, it is still controversial to perform laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. We performed the present study to compare the long-term outcomes of patients after laparoscopic or open gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of 182 gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2011 and December 2015 at Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were retrospectively retrieved. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of these 182 patients were compared. Then, the prognostic significance of positive lymph node ratio (LNR) was assessed.

RESULTS

As a whole, OS (P = 0.789) and DFS (P = 0.672) of patients receiving laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy were not significantly different from those of patients receiving open surgery. For stage I patients, laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy was not significantly different from open surgery in terms of OS (P = 0.573) and DFS (P = 0.157). Similarly, for stage II patients, laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy was not significantly different from open surgery in terms of OS (P = 0.567) and DFS (P = 0.830). For stage III patients, laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy was not significantly different from open surgery in terms of OS (P = 0.773) and DFS (P = 0.404). Laparoscopic or open gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy was not proven by Cox regression analysis to be an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. High LNR was significantly associated with worse OS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P < 0.001). Surgical type did not significantly affect prognosis of patients with low LNR or survival of patients with high LNR.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with gastric cancer, laparoscopic gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy was not inferior to open surgery in terms of long-term outcomes. LNR is a useful prognostic marker for GC patients.

Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In N0 disease, increasing total evaluated LN (ELN) correlates with improved outcomes suggesting patients may be understaged when LNs are undersampled. We aim to assess the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) following pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Data from 1837 patients undergoing surgery were prospectively collected. The binomial probability law was utilized to analyze the minimum number of examined LNs (minELN) and accurately characterize each histopathologic stage. LN ratio (LNR) was compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines.

RESULTS

As ELN total increased, the likelihood of finding node positive disease increased. An evaluation based upon the binomial probability law suggested an optimal minELN of 12 for accurate AJCC N staging. As the number of ELNs increased, the discriminatory capacity of alternative strategies to characterize LN disease exceeded that offered by AJCC N stage.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study dedicated to optimizing histopathologic staging in PDAC using models of minELN informed by the binomial probability law. This study highlights two separate cutoffs for ELNs depending upon prognostic goal and validates that 12 LNs are adequate to determine AJCC N stage for the majority of patients.

Towards standardization of lymph-node ratio classifications: Validation and comparison of different lymph node ratio classifications for predicting prognosis of patients with resected gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

The TNM staging system is the main prognostic tool for GC, but the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) can be affected by surgical, pathological, tumor or host factors. Several authors have shown that lymph node ratio (LNR) may be superior to TNM staging in GC. However, cut-off values vary between studies and LNR assessment is not standardized.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of all GC resected in a western tertiary center (N = 377). Clinical features were collected and pathological features were assessed by two independent pathologists. Eight LNR classifications were selected and applied to our patients. Statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

315 patients were included. Most tumors were T3 (49.2%) N+ (59.3%). During follow-up, 36.7% of patients progressed and 27.4% died due to tumor. All LNR classifications were significantly associated with clinicopathological features such as Laurén subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural infiltration, T stage, tumor progression or death. All LNR classifications were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS, and ROC analyses calculated similar AUC values for all staging systems. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications stratified patients better into three (Pedrazzani) or four categories. These classifications tended to downstage TNM N2 and N3 tumors. In cases with less than 16 LNs resected, Pedrazzani and Wang classifications showed the best prognostic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pedrazzani, Wang, Liu and Huang classifications showed good prognostic performance in western GC patients. Larger studies in other cohorts are needed to identify the most consistent LNR classification for GC.

A Novel Approach for Gastric Cancer Staging in Elderly Patients Based on the Lymph Node Ratio

Purpose

To date, no studies have been performed on staging based on the lymph node ratio (LNR) in elderly patients with gastric cancer who may require limited lymph node (LN) dissection due to morbidity and tissue fragility. We aimed to develop a new N staging system using the LNR in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

The present study included patients aged over 75 years who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 1989 and December 2018. Clinicopathological data including the number of retrieved and metastatic LNs were collected and the LNR values were obtained (LNR = the number of metastatic LNs/the number of retrieved LNs). Eleven LNR groups with intervals of 0.1 were divided into four stages based on the inflection points at which the hazard ratio (HR) increased. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR.

Results

The four LNR stages included LNR0 (n=364), LNR1 (n=128), LNR2 (n=103), and LNR3 (n=10). In the multivariate analysis, both N staging and LNR staging exhibited significant prognostic values for predicting survival outcomes. However, the incremental change in the hazard ratio (HR) between consecutive stages was greater for the LNR staging than for the N staging (HRs: 1.607, 2.758, and 3.675 for N staging; 1.583, 3.514, and 10.261 for LNR staging).

Conclusions

LNR staging is more useful than N staging in predicting the prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer and may be used as a complement or alternative to N staging.

The Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively enrolled gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and curative surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from 2004 to 2015 as the study cohort. Patients with the same inclusion criteria treated in 2016–2017 were enrolled as the validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves were assessed using the log-rank test to analyze the differences in overall survival (OS). Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ypN and LNR categories for predicting the actual 3-year OS were compared.

Results

A total of 265 patients were included in the proposal cohort. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes (rLNs) was 32. The number of positive lymph nodes (pLNs) increased as rLN increased (P=0.037), but the LNR remained relatively constant (P=0.462). The LNR was categorized into 4 groups according to the prognosis: ypNr0, node-negative with rLN>25; ypNr1, node-negative with rLN≤25 or 0<LNR≤0.1; ypNr2, 0.1<LNR≤0.3; and ypNr3, LNR>0.3. In the validation cohort of 43 enrolled patients, there was a clear distinction in OS that significantly (P<0.001) varied depending on the LNR values and LNR was the only independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P<0.001).

Conclusions

LNR was an independent prognostic factor for survival of patients with gastric cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and might be an alternative predictor for ypN stage.

Which Lymph Node Staging System Better Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma? A Comparative Study Between 3 Different Lymph Node Classifications for Resected Gastric Cancer in a Western Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive disease with high mortality rates. Lymph node (LN) staging of GC is a major source of controversy. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of 3 different LN classifications for patients with resected GC: the eighth TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR, ratio between positive and total LN) and a new anatomic-based classification (Choi classification).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of all cases of GC resected in a tertiary hospital in Spain (n=377). Clinical data were collected; histologic slides were reviewed; and univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.

RESULTS

In all, 315 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis showed that all classifications were significantly associated with tumor death and progression (P<0.001). All staging systems were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.738, 0.730, and 0.735, respectively. TNM and LNR classifications were independent prognosticators for OS, while Choi classification was an independent factor only in patients with ≥16 LN resected. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.707, 0.728, and 0.732, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves depending on LNR classification showed the best patient stratification for both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-staging systems had similar prognostic performance, but LNR-based classification stratified patients better. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the number of LN examined, cutoff values, and anatomic extent of LN disease in GC.

Development of a simplified tumor-lymph node ratio classification system for patients with resected gastric cancer: A western study

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) shows high recurrence and mortality rates. The AJCC TNM staging system is the best prognostic predictor, but lymph node assessment is a major source of controversy. Recent studies have found that lymph node ratio (LNR) may overcome TNM limitations. Our aim is to develop a simplified tumor-LNR (T-LNR) classification for predicting prognosis of resected GC.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all GC resected in a tertiary center in Spain (N = 377). Clinicopathological features were assessed, LNR was classified into N0:0%, N1:1-25%, N2:>25%, and a T-LNR classification was developed. Statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

317 patients were finally included. Most patients were male (54.6%) and mean age was 72 years. Tumors were intestinal (61%), diffuse (30.8%) or mixed (8.1%). During follow-up, 36.7% and 27.4% of patients progressed and died, respectively. T-LNR classification divided patients into five prognostic categories (S1-S5). Most cases were S1-S4 (26.2%, 19.9%, 22.6% and 23.6%, respectively). 7.6% of tumors were S5. T-LNR classification was significantly associated with tumor size, depth, macroscopical type, Laurén subtype, signet ring cells, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural infiltration, infiltrative growth, patient progression and death. Kaplan-Meier curves for OS showed an excellent patient stratification with evenly spaced curves. As for DFS, T-LNR classification also showed good discriminatory ability with non-overlapping curves. T-LNR classification was independently related to both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

T-LNR classifications can successfully predict prognosis of GC patients. Larger studies in other geographic regions should be performed to refine this classification and to validate its prognostic relevance.

Lymph Node Ratio-Based Staging System for Gallbladder Cancer With Fewer Than Six Lymph Nodes Examined

Purpose

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for gallbladder cancer (GBC) recommended that at least six lymph nodes (LNs) should be examined. But most patients with GBC had fewer than six LNs resected. This study aimed to establish an alternative index for assessing the LN status during the staging system for GBC patients with fewer than six LNs retrieved.

Patients and Methods

Patient data was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (cases between 2004 and 2013). X-tile software was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for lymph node ratio (LNR) and a concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the discriminatory powers of the two staging systems.

Results

The majority of GBC patients in our cohort (1353, 78.5%) had fewer than six LNs examined. Among patients with inadequate LN examination, the higher number of LNs examined correlated with a lower proportion of patients. Using the TNM staging system, the C-index for patients with fewer than six LNs and patients with six or more LNs screened were 0.636 and 0.704, respectively. Using the staging system based on LNR (TNrM), the C-index for patients with fewer than six LNs retrieved and patients with six or more LNs retrieved were 0.649 and 0.694, respectively. Similar results were observed in patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA).

Conclusion

TNrM might be superior to the 8th AJCC TNM staging system for stratifying GBC patients with fewer than six LNs examined, and it can complement TNM for more accurate risk stratification. Future prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Critical number of lymph node involvement in esophageal and gastric cancer and its impact on long-term survival-A single-center 8-year study

BACKGROUND

Nodal disease in esophageal and gastric cancer is associated with poor survival.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the critical level of lymph node involvement where survival becomes significantly compromised.

METHODS

Survival analyses using multivariable Cox regression and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were undertaken to determine what number of positive lymph nodes were most sensitive and specific in predicting survival.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients underwent esophagectomy (n = 190, 59.9%) and gastrectomy (n = 127, 40.1%) for adenocarcinoma. At multivariable analyses, four nodes positivity (irrespective of T-category) was associated with nearly a fivefold increased risk of mortality when compared to node-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; interquartile range 2.0-11.5; P < .001). A positive ratio of up to 50.0% was not associated with worse survival than having four nodes positive (HR, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-8.1; P < .001). ROC analysis demonstrated four lymph nodes positive to have a sensitivity of 80.5%, a specificity of 60.1%, and an accuracy of 77.8 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The absolute number of nodes positive for cancer is more important than the proportion of positive nodes in predicting survival in esophageal/gastric cancer. Four positive lymph nodes are associated with a fivefold increase in mortality. Beyond this, increasing numbers of positive lymph nodes make no appreciable difference to survival.

Lymph node ratio as a predictor for outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter population-based cohort study

Objectives

Recently, multiple studies addressed the importance of lymph node ratio (LNR) in specifying patients’ risk of disease recurrence in various malignancies. The present study examines the prognostic significance of LNR in predicting outcome of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients after surgical treatment with curative intent.

Methods

Here, we describe a retrospective population-based cohort with 717 patients previously diagnosed with OSCC. Histopathologically verified lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in 290 patients. Among these patients, we evaluated the impact of LNR on overall survival (OAS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in uni- as well as multivariate analysis.

Results

A median cutoff (0.055) in LNR was found to significantly predict outcome in OSCC patients. Five-year OAS was 54.1% in patients with a low LNR, whereas a high LNR was associated with a 5-year OAS of 33.3% (p < 0.001). Similar results were detected for RFS with a 5-year survival rate of 49.8% (LNR low) and 30.3% (LNR high) (p = 0.002). Results were confirmed in multivariate Cox regression which substantiated the importance of LNR in predicting survival in OSCC patients.

Conclusions

LNR was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for outcome of OSCC in a population-based cohort in uni- as well as multivariate analysis. Hereby, a LNR ≥ 0.055 predicted a shorter OAS and RFS in our cohort.

Clinical relevance

Besides established histopathological factors, LNR can be used as a reliable predictor of outcome in OSCC and might therefore be further applied in evaluating adjuvant treatment after resection in curative intention.

Evaluation of lymph node ratio and lymph node yield as prognosticators of locoregional recurrence in p16-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR), or the ratio of number of metastatic LNs to total number dissected, has not been well established in p16-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated locoregional disease-free survival (LRDFS) in 82 patients with p16+ OPSCC who underwent neck dissection at a single institution from 2009 to 2017. LNR and LNY cutoffs were estimated using time-dependent receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Prognostic significance of these cutoffs was compared with Eighth Edition AJCC Nodal Staging.

RESULTS

An increased LNR ≥ 0.129 was associated with worse 2-year LRDFS (66.9% vs 96.8%, P = .005). LNY was not significantly associated with LRDFS (P = .304). An LNR-based risk model was a better prognosticator than Eighth Edition AJCC Nodal Staging (Harrell's C, 0.9065 vs 0.7668).

CONCLUSIONS

LNR has good prognostic utility in predicting LRDFS in p16+ OPSCC, but further evaluation of this measure is warranted.

The Role of the Lymph Node Ratio in Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

The ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to the total LN harvest is called the LN ratio (LNR). It is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the LNR (ypLNR) in patients with advanced GC. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with advanced GC, who underwent gastrectomy with N1 and N2 (D2) lymphadenectomy between August 2011 and January 2019 in the Department of Surgical Oncology at the Medical University of Lublin. The exclusion criteria were a lack of preoperative NAC administration, suboptimal lymphadenectomy (<D2 and/or removal of less than 15 lymph nodes), and a lack of data on tumor regression grading (TRG) in the final pathological report. A total of 95 patients were eligible for the analysis. A positive correlation was found between the ypLNR and tumor diameter (p < 0.001), post treatment pathological Tumour (ypT) stage (p < 0.001), Laurén histological subtype (p = 0.0001), and the response to NAC (p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the ypLNR was an independent prognostic factor in patients with intestinal type GC (p = 0.0465) and in patients with no response to NAC (p = 0.0483). In the resection specimen, tumor diameter and depth of infiltration, Laurén histological subtype, and TRG may reflect the impact of NAC on LN status, as quantified by ypLNR in advanced GC.

Construction of a nomogram for the prediction of prognosis in patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing fewer than sixteen lymph node biopsies

Background

Lymph node metastases evaluation is important for assessing gastric cancer prognosis. In patients not undergoing adequate lymph node biopsy, lymph node stage migration occurs with the use of the existing staging system. This study established a prediction model to improve prognostication in patients undergoing fewer than 16 lymph nodes biopsy.

Patients and methods

In total, 3036 eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database were evaluated. They were randomized into development and validation sets in a 1:1 ratio (n=1520 and 1516, respectively). To avoid model overfitting and loss of important factors, prognostic factors related to overall survival (OS) were screened according to the Akaike information criterion. The nomogram was assessed using discrimination and consistency tests in the development and validation sets; the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also evaluated. Comparison with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system was based on Kaplan–Meier curves, ROC, risk stratification, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Age, race, degree of differentiation, invasion depth, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors in OS. C-indices of the development and validation sets were 0.759 (95% CI: 0.741–0.777) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.713–0.771), respectively; calibration curves were approximately 45° diagonal, indicating good predictive ability of the nomogram. In contrast to the 7th AJCC staging system, the Kaplan–Meier curves and risk stratification of the nomogram had better discrimination ability, the ROC curves of the nomogram achieved more predictive accuracy, and the DCA indicated that the nomogram conferred higher net benefit.

Conclusion

Our constructed nomogram predicts the prognosis of patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing biopsy of fewer than 16 lymph nodes more precisely and has better clinical applicability than the 7th AJCC staging system.

Tumor‑suppressive miR‑299‑3p inhibits gastric cancer cell invasion by targeting heparanase

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer‑associated mortality globally. Emerging evidence suggests that microRNAs (miRs) function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, contributing to various aspects of cancer progression, including invasion and metastasis. In the present study, the specific role of miR‑299‑3p in the invasion of GC cells was investigated. The expression level of miR‑299‑3p was measured using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and in situ hybridization in human GC tissues. Effects of miR‑299‑3p on GC cell invasion were determined by Transwell assay. Bioinformatics and luciferase reporter assays were performed to identify and verify the downstream effectors of miR‑299‑3p. miR‑299‑3p expression analysis in clinical GC samples revealed a significant downregulation of miR‑299‑3p compared with non‑tumor tissues. Inhibition of miR‑299‑3p promoted the invasive abilities of GC cells, whereas its overexpression significantly suppressed cell invasion. Bioinformatics and luciferase reporter assays identified heparanase (HPSE) as a direct target of miR‑299‑3p, the ectopic expression of which reversed the impairment in cell invasion induced by miR‑299‑3p upregulation. Furthermore, HPSE expression was negatively associated with miR‑299‑3p levels in human GC tissues. Overall, the present study indicated that miR‑299‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting HPSE, highlighting its potential as a target for the treatment of GC.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of cT1N0M1 Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background

Distant metastasis of early gastric cancer is a rare subgroup and poorly understood. The present study is aimed at summarizing the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and management of clinical T1N0M1 (cT1N0M1) gastric cancer.

Method

Between 2004 and 2015, patients diagnosed with cT1N0M1 gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Results

A total of 1093 cT1N0M1 gastric cancer patients were identified. 49 patients (4.5%) received cancer-directed surgery, and 113 patients (10.4%) were managed with radiotherapy. Compared with the other stage IV diseases, a relatively high proportion of black population (19.9% vs. 15.8%), patients older than 60 years (63.1% vs. 57.8%), and adenocarcinoma (59.5% vs. 55.9%) were observed in the cT1N0M1 gastric cancer subgroup. Besides that, patients with cT1N0M1 had the characteristics of less poor differentiated or undifferentiated (54.3% vs. 61.7%). Patients with cT1N0M1 had worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) as compared to the other metastatic gastric cancer patients (CSS: p = 0.002, OS: p = 0.001 for log-rank test). Intriguingly, patients with cT1N0M1 had poor prognosis as compared to patients with cT1N+M1 (CSS: p = 0.015, OS: p = 0.007 for log-rank test). The 3-year and 5-year CSS for patients with cT1N0M1 were 5.7% and 4.0%, respectively. The addition of surgery resulted in improved CSS (p < 0.001 for log-rank test) while radiotherapy was not associated with CSS (p = 0.756 for log-rank test) in patients with cT1N0M1. A multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgery (HR = 0.378, 95% CI: 0.255-0.562) and patients younger than 60 (HR = 0.745, 95% CI: 0.647-0.858) years were independent protective factors for these subgroup patients.

Conclusion

Patients with cT1N0M1 gastric cancer had distinctive clinicopathological characteristics and presented poor prognosis. Knowledge of these differences contributes to guiding clinical evaluation for metastatic gastric cancer patients. More aggressive therapeutic strategy should be highlighted for this subgroup.