Compliance with a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) impacts patient outcome

Process mapping as a framework to define critical care delivery steps in massive transfusion in trauma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to use process mapping to identify the critical process steps for executing massive transfusion in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock in an academic emergency department. Understanding the relationships and complexity of care delivery steps in massive transfusion is needed to inform the development of performance metrics and improve care delivery.

METHODS

This process mapping exercise was conducted in the academic emergency department of a verified trauma center using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework. Interviews were conducted with emergency department staff members, including nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and blood bank staff. Data collection included structured stakeholder interviews and real-time observation of massive transfusion protocol deployment.

RESULTS

Seventeen interviews and real-time observations yielded 87 pages of interview text and 533 objects mapped. Two key clinical decision points were identified: the decision to transfuse and the decision to image. The process was segmented into initial protocol-based care and subsequent physician-driven care. High-level and mid-level process maps, incorporating swim lanes, were created to highlight the process steps to deliver of massive transfusion to trauma patient in our academic emergency department.

CONCLUSION

Process mapping resulted in the creation of an agreed upon standard process that outlines critical steps and distinct phases of care in delivery of the massive transfusion protocol. These findings provide benchmarks for future improvement work and performance measurement efforts.

Massive transfusion policy in the Netherlands, a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) guide the physician in optimizing transfusion strategies. Although international guidelines on massive transfusion exist, it is unknown whether all Dutch hospitals adhere to these guidelines. The main objective of this study was to create an overview of the massive transfusion strategies of Dutch hospitals and to evaluate if logistical factors, for example, the unavailability of thawed plasma, influence transfusion practices. Furthermore, this study was initiated to evaluate the interest in a ready-to-use plasma product.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A questionnaire on transfusion strategy, available resources, and yearly usage/wastage of transfusion products was distributed to all hospitals in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine hospitals were approached, of which 58 responded (response rate 84%). The majority of hospitals (67%) strived for a 1:1 erythrocyte/plasma ratio. Five percent of the hospitals used an erythrocyte/plasma ratio >2:1, which did not meet (inter)national guidelines. No relation was found between the clinical strategy described in the MTP and available resources; moreover, direct plasma availability did not increase plasma wastage. Hospitals for which it takes longer to have plasma available for transfusion generally are more interested in a ready-to-use plasma product (n = 55, 75.0% vs. 57%).

CONCLUSION

This was the first nationwide survey on massive transfusion practices in the Netherlands. There is clear uniformity when it comes to using an MTP. Logistics surrounding plasma availability or plasma thawing capacity did not influence MTPs. Nevertheless, there seems to be substantial interest in a ready-to-use plasma product, especially in hospitals with limited plasma use.

Beyond American College of Surgeons Verification: Quality Metrics Associated with High Performance at Level I and II Trauma Centers

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma has established a framework for trauma center quality improvement. Despite efforts, recent studies show persistent variation in patient outcomes across national trauma centers. We aimed to investigate whether risk-adjusted mortality varies at the hospital level and if high-performing centers demonstrate better adherence to ACS Verification, Review, and Consultation (VRC) program quality measures.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed data from the 2018 to 2021 ACS TQIP Participant Use Files, focusing on adult admissions at ACS-verified level I or II trauma centers for blunt, penetrating, or isolated traumatic brain injury. We used mixed-effects models to assess center-specific risk-adjusted mortality and identified high-performing centers (HPTCs), defined as those with the lowest decile of overall risk-adjusted mortality. We compared patient and hospital characteristics, outcomes, and adherence to ACS-VRC quality measures between HPTC and non-HPTC.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1,498,602 patients across 442 level I and II trauma centers met inclusion criteria: 65.3% presenting with blunt injury, 9.3% with penetrating injury, and 25.4% with isolated TBI. Management at HPTC was associated with lower odds of major complications, failure to rescue, and takeback. Additionally, HPTC status was associated with increased odds of adherence to several ACS-VRC quality measures, including balanced resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.51), appropriate pediatric admissions (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.68), and substance abuse screening (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation in risk-adjusted mortality persists across trauma centers. Given the association between adherence to quality measures and high performance, multidisciplinary efforts to refine and implement guidelines are warranted.

Fluid resuscitation in trauma: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

There have been numerous changes in resuscitation strategies for severely injured patients over the last several decades. Certain strategies, such as aggressive crystalloid resuscitation, have largely been abandoned because of the high incidence of complications and worsening of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Significant emphasis has been placed on restoring a normal coagulation profile with plasma or whole blood transfusion. In addition, the importance of the lethal consequences of trauma-induced coagulopathy, such as hyperfibrinolysis, has been easily recognized by the use of viscoelastic testing, and its treatment with tranexamic acid has been extensively studied. Furthermore, the critical role of early intravenous calcium administration, even before blood transfusion administration, has been emphasized. Other adjuncts, such as fibrinogen supplementation with fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate and prothrombin complex concentrate, are being studied and incorporated in some of the institutional massive transfusion protocols. Finally, balanced blood component transfusion (1:1:1 or 1:1:2) and whole blood have become commonplace in trauma centers in North America. This review provides a description of recent developments in resuscitation and a discussion of recent innovations and areas for future investigation.

A comprehensive approach to continuous quality improvement of massive transfusion by developing key performance indicators

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To develop key performance indicators (KPI) for use in quality assessment of our institutional goal-directed massive transfusion (GDMT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A team comprising our transfusion and emergency medicine departments carried out a cross-sectional data analysis of GDMT in adult patients from January 2021 to December 2022. The study was rooted in the Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control (DMAIC) approach. Features of KPIs were (a) importance, (b) scientific soundness and (c) feasibility. Study parameters were defined and analysed using measures of central tendencies and benchmark comparison.

RESULTS

Ninety-two massive transfusion events occurred and 1405 blood components were used. Trauma was the leading cause, followed by postpartum haemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Appropriate GDMT activation was observed only in 43.47% of events. The turnaround time (TAT) was within the benchmark in 85.8% of events with an average of 16 ± 10 min. The average utilization of blood components was 20.5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 11.3) in the appropriate group and 5.5 (IQR = 4.25) in the inappropriate group with a wastage rate of 3.5%. Duration of activation was 6.19 ± 4.59 h, and the adherence to thromboelastography was 66.3%. Overall mortality was 45.65%, and the average duration of hospital stay was 6.1 ± 5.9 days.

CONCLUSION

The KPIs developed were easy to capture, and the analysis provided a comprehensive approach to the quality improvement of the GDMT protocol.

Polytrauma in Children—Epidemiology, Acute Diagnostic Evaluation, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Inadequate clinical experience still causes uncertainty in the acute diagnostic evaluation and treatment of polytrauma in children (with or without coagulopathy). This review deals with the main aspects of the acute care of severely injured children in the light of current guidelines and other relevant literature, in particular airway control, volume and coagulation management, acute diagnostic imaging, and blood coagulation studies in the shock room.

METHODS

This review is based on literature retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, Medline (OVIDSP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Epistemonikos covering the period January 2001 to August 2023. Review articles and the updated S2k clinical practice guideline on polytrauma management in childhood were considered.

RESULTS

Most accidents in childhood occur at home and in the child's free time, with varying mechanisms and patterns of injury depending on age. The outcome of treatment depends largely on the presence or absence or traumatic brain injury, which affects 66% of children with polytrauma and is thus the most common type of injury in this group, and of hemorrhagic shock with or without coagulopathy. Acute care follows the ABCDE algorithms with attention to special features in children, including age-specific reference values. According to a registry study, coagulopathy and hypovolemic shock are associated with 22% and 17% mortality, respec - tively. Treatment in a pediatric trauma reference center of the trauma network is recommended. Computed tomography (CT) should be carried out in children in accordance with defined criteria (PECARN), as a team decision and with the use of age-specific low-dose CT protocols. In children as in adults, viscoelasticity-based point-of-care tests enable the prompt diagnosis of relevant coagulopathies and their treatment in consideration of age-specific target values. The administration of tranexamic acid remains controversial.

CONCLUSION

4% of polytrauma patients are children. Because children differ from adults both anatomically and physiologically, the diagnostic evaluation and management of polytrauma in children presents a special challenge. The evidence base for pediatric polytrauma management is still inadequate; current recommendations are based on consensus, in consideration of the special features of children compared to adults.

Performance Improvement Program Review of Institutional Massive Transfusion Protocol Adherence: An Opportunity for Improvement

BACKGROUND

Given the acuity of patients who receive MTPs and the resources they require, MTPs are a compelling target for performance improvement. This study evaluated adherence with our MTP's plasma:red blood cell ratio (FFPR) of 1:2 and platelet:red blood cell ratio (PLTR) of 1:12, to test the hypothesis that ratio adherence is associated with lower inpatient mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The registry of an urban level I trauma center was queried for adult patients who received at least 6 units of packed red blood cells within 4 hours of presentation. Patients were excluded for interfacility transfer, cardiac arrest during the prehospital phase or within one hour of arrival, or for head AIS ≥5. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify variables associated with early transfusion protocol noncompliance and the effect on inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty-three patients were included, with mean ISS of 25.9 ± 13.3 and inpatient mortality of 28.5%. Increasing age, ISS, INR, and total units of blood product transfused were associated with increased odds of mortality, while an increase in revised trauma score was associated with a decreased odds ratio of mortality. Achieving our goal ratios were protective against mortality, with OR of .451 (P = .013) and .402 (P=.003), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Large proportions of critically injured patients were transfused fewer units of plasma and platelets than our MTP dictated; failure to achieve intended ratios at 4 hours was strongly associated with inpatient mortality. MTP processes and outcomes should be critically assessed on a regular basis as part of a mature performance improvement program to ensure protocol adherence and optimal patient outcome.

Guidelines in trauma-related bleeding and coagulopathy: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and treatment of patients with severe traumatic bleeding and subsequent trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still inconsistent, although the implementation of standardized algorithms/treatment pathways was repeatedly linked to improved outcome. Various evidence-based guidelines for these patients now exist, three of which have recently been updated.

RECENT FINDINGS

A synopsis of the three recently updated guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of seriously bleeding trauma patients with TIC is presented: (i) AWMF S3 guideline 'Polytrauma/Seriously Injured Patient Treatment' under the auspices of the German Society for Trauma Surgery; (ii) guideline of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) on the management of perioperative bleeding; and (iii) European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy after trauma in its 6th edition (EU-Trauma).

SUMMARY

Treatment of trauma-related bleeding begins at the scene with local compression, use of tourniquets and pelvic binders and rapid transport to a certified trauma centre. After arrival at the hospital, measures to record, monitor and support coagulation function should be initiated immediately. Surgical bleeding control is carried out according to 'damage control' principles. Modern coagulation management includes individualized treatment based on target values derived from point-of-care viscoelastic test procedures.

Transfusion futility thresholds and mortality in geriatric trauma: Does frailty matter?

BACKGROUND

Data on massive transfusion (MT) in geriatric trauma patients is lacking. This study aims to determine geriatric transfusion futility thresholds (TT) and TT variations based on frailty.

METHODS

Patients from 2013 to 2018 TQIP database receiving MT were stratified by age and frailty. TTs and outcomes were compared between geriatric and younger adults and among geriatric adults based on frailty status.

RESULTS

The TT was lower for geriatric than younger adults (34 vs 39 units; p ​= ​0.03). There was no difference in TT between the non-frail, frail, and severely frail geriatric adults (37, 30 and 25 units, respectively, p ​> ​0.05). Geriatric adults had higher mortality than younger adults (63.1% vs 45.8%, p < 0.01). Non-frail geriatric adults had the highest mortality (69.4% vs 56.5% vs 56.2%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatric patients have a lower TT than younger adults, irrespective of frailty. This may help improve outcomes and optimize MT utilization.

Standardizing vitamin D supplementation to minimize deficiency in children with intestinal failure

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D deficiency is present in 40%-70% of children with intestinal failure (IF), yet there are no published guidelines for repleting and maintaining vitamin D levels in this population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a standardized vitamin D algorithm in reducing the incidence of deficiency.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed in children with IF who had at least one serum vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D3 ) measurement. Vitamin D levels were compared prealgorithm (2014-2016) and during active-algorithm use (2018-2020). Vitamin D levels were classified as severe deficiency (<12.5 nmol per L), mild deficiency (12.5-39 nmol/L), insufficiency (40-74 nmol/L), optimal (75-224 nmol/L), or toxicity (>225 nmol/L). Descriptive and comparative statistics were calculated using a linear mixed-effects model, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight children with IF were enrolled, which included 157 vitamin D measurements (58 in the prealgorithm group and 98 in the active-algorithm group). Algorithm compliance was 4% in the prealgorithm group and 61% in the active-algorithm group. Active-algorithm patients had improved vitamin D levels in all categories compared with those of prealgorithm patients (mild deficiency: 8% vs 9%; insufficiency: 41% vs 72%; optimal: 50% vs 19%). Algorithm use was found to have a statistically significant effect on serum vitamin D levels (β = 21.58; 95% confidence interval, 14.11-29.05; P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with IF are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency. Use of a standardized vitamin D supplementation algorithm was associated with increased serum vitamin D levels.

Transfusion practice in Central Norway - a regional cohort study in patients suffering from major haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

In patients with major hemorrhage, balanced transfusions and limited crystalloid use is recommended in both civilian and military guidelines. This transfusion strategy is often applied in the non-trauma patient despite lack of supporting data. The aim of this study was to describe the current transfusion practice in patients with major hemorrhage of both traumatic and non-traumatic etiology in Central Norway, and discuss if transfusions are in accordance with appropriate massive transfusion protocols.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, data from four hospitals in Central Norway was collected from 01.01.2017 to 31.12.2018. All adults (≥18 years) receiving massive transfusion (MT) and alive on admission were included. MT was defined as transfusion of ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) within 24 hours, or ≥ 5 units of PRBC during the first 3 hours after admission to hospital. Clinical data was collected from the hospital blood bank registry (ProSang) and electronic patient charts (CareSuite PICIS). Patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were included in the study, of which 85.1% were non-trauma patients. Seventy-six per cent of all patients received plasma:PRBC in a ratio ≥ 1:2 (high ratio) and 59.2% of patients received platelets:PRBC in a ratio ≥ 1:2 (high ratio). 32.2% received a plasma:PRBC-ratio ≥ 1:1, and 23.6% platelet:PRBC-ratio ≥ 1:1. Median fluid infusion of crystalloids in all patients was 5750 mL. Thirty-seven per cent of all patients received tranexamic acid, 53.4% received calcium and fibrinogen concentrate was administered in 9.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients had a non-traumatic etiology. The majority was transfused with high ratios of plasma:PRBC and platelet:PRBC, but not in accordance with the aim of the local protocol (1:1:1). Crystalloids were administered liberally for both trauma and non-trauma patients. There was a lower use of hemostatic adjuvants than recommended in the local transfusion protocol. Awareness to local protocol should be increased.

Clinical decision support versus a paper-based protocol for massive transfusion: Impact on decision outcomes in a simulation study

BACKGROUND

Management of major hemorrhage frequently requires massive transfusion (MT) support, which should be delivered effectively and efficiently. We have previously developed a clinical decision support system (CDS) for MT using a multicenter multidisciplinary user-centered design study. Here we examine its impact when administering a MT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized simulation trial to compare a CDS for MT with a paper-based MT protocol for the management of simulated hemorrhage. A total of 44 specialist physicians, trainees (residents), and nurses were recruited across critical care to participate in two 20-min simulated bleeding scenarios. The primary outcome was the decision velocity (correct decisions per hour) and overall task completion. Secondary outcomes included cognitive workload and System Usability Scale (SUS).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in decision velocity for CDS-based management (mean 8.5 decisions per hour) compared to paper based (mean 6.9 decisions per hour; p .003, 95% CI 0.6-2.6). There was no significant difference in the overall task completion using CDS-based management (mean 13.3) compared to paper-based (mean 13.2; p .92, 95% CI -1.2-1.3). Cognitive workload was statistically significantly lower using the CDS compared to the paper protocol (mean 57.1 vs. mean 64.5, p .005, 95% CI 2.4-12.5). CDS usability was assessed as a SUS score of 82.5 (IQR 75-87.5).

DISCUSSION

Compared to paper-based management, CDS-based MT supports more time-efficient decision-making by users with limited CDS training and achieves similar overall task completion while reducing cognitive load. Clinical implementation will determine whether the benefits demonstrated translate to improved patient outcomes.

National Assessment of Opportunities for Improvement in Preventable Trauma Deaths: A Mixed-Methods Study

Trauma is a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly affecting economically active age groups. Quality management of trauma care at the national level is crucial to improve outcomes of major trauma. In Korea, a biennial nationwide survey on preventable trauma death rate is conducted. Based on the survey results, we analyzed opportunities for improving the trauma treatment process. Expert panels reviewed records of 8282 and 8482 trauma-related deaths in 2017 and 2019, respectively, identifying 258 and 160 cases in each year as preventable deaths. Opportunities for improvement were categorized into prehospital, interhospital, and hospital stages. Hemorrhage was the primary cause of death, followed by sepsis/multiorgan failure and central nervous system injury. Delayed hemostatic procedures and transfusions were common areas for improvement in hospital stage. Interhospital transfers experienced significant delays in arrival time. This study emphasizes the need to enhance trauma care by refining treatment techniques, centralizing patients in specialized facilities, and implementing comprehensive reviews and performance improvements throughout the patient transfer system. The findings offer valuable insights for addressing trauma care improvement from both clinical and systemic perspectives.

Adherence to protocols for the use of reversal agents in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the adherence to protocols for the use of reversal agents in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users in Dutch hospitals.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Treatment protocols for bleeding and (urgent) procedures in patients on DOAC were collected from each hospital. All patient data on the use of reversal agents were retrospectively collected from September 2021 to April 2022 and compared to the protocols. The degree of per-protocol adherence (compliance score) was categorized into four levels as follows: poor (<45%), moderate (45-79%), high (80-89%), and full (> 90%) adherence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients were included in our study. In patients with bleeding under DOAC, the protocol adherence for prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) was "moderate" (61%). In the remaining cases (39%), non-adherence was mainly caused by underdosing (68%), overdosing (12%), and a lack of indication (14%). Furthermore, idarucizumab was administered for bleeding with "full" adherence (96%). For andexanet alfa, adherence to the hospital bleeding protocol was "moderate" (67%), with a lack of indication being the only reason for non-adherence. In case of reversal for an urgent procedure, the protocol adherence for PCC was "low" (45%), with underdosing, a lack of indication, and missing lab data being the main reasons for non-adherence. Missing lab data on dabigatran plasma concentration before reversal was the main reason for "low" adherence (26%) in idarucizumab. The adherence for andexanet alfa was also "low" (0%).

CONCLUSION

In case of reversal for bleeding under DOAC, overall adherence to the protocol was "moderate"; however, in patients needing an urgent procedure, it was "low." The major reasons for non-adherence were underdosing, off-label use, and a lack of specific lab testing. The results of this study can assist in improving the implementation of hospital protocols.

Development of a national out-of-hospital transfusion protocol: a modified RAND Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Early resuscitation with blood components or products is emerging as best practice in selected patients with trauma and medical patients; as a result, out-of-hospital transfusion (OHT) programs are being developed based on limited and often conflicting evidence. This study aimed to provide guidance to Canadian critical care transport organizations on the development of OHT protocols.

METHODS

The study period was July 2021 to June 2022. We used a modified RAND Delphi process to achieve consensus on statements created by the study team guiding various aspects of OHT in the context of critical care transport. Purposive sampling ensured representative distribution of participants in regard to geography and relevant clinical specialties. We conducted 2 written survey Delphi rounds, followed by a virtual panel discussion (round 3). Consensus was defined as a median score of at least 6 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Definitely should not include") to 7 ("Definitely should include"). Statements that did not achieve consensus in the first 2 rounds were discussed and voted on during the panel discussion.

RESULTS

Seventeen subject experts participated in the study, all of whom completed the 3 Delphi rounds. After the study process was completed, a total of 39 statements were agreed on, covering the following domains: general oversight and clinical governance, storage and transport of blood components and products, initiation of OHT, types of blood components and products, delivery and monitoring of OHT, indications for and use of hemostatic adjuncts, and resuscitation targets of OHT.

INTERPRETATION

This expert consensus document provides guidance on OHT best practices. The consensus statements should support efficient and safe OHT in national and international critical care transport programs.

Massive Transfusion Protocol Adherence: Relationship to Trauma Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Ongoing evaluation of massive transfusion protocol adherence is critical to ensure better trauma patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement initiative aimed to determine provider adherence to a recently revised massive transfusion protocol and its relationship to clinical outcomes among trauma patients requiring massive transfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, correlational design was used to determine the association between provider adherence to a recently revised massive transfusion protocol and clinical outcomes in trauma patients with hemorrhage treated at a Level I trauma center from November 2018 to October 2020. Patient characteristics, provider massive transfusion protocol adherence, and patient outcomes were assessed. Patient characteristics and massive transfusion protocol adherence associations with 24-hr survival and survival to discharge were determined using bivariate statistical methods.

RESULTS

A total of 95 trauma patients with massive transfusion protocol activation were evaluated. Of the 95, 71 (75%) survived the initial 24 hr following massive transfusion protocol activation and 65 (68%) survived to discharge. Based on protocol applicable items, the median massive transfusion protocol overall adherence rate per patient was 75% (IQR = 57.1-85.7) for the 65 survivors and 25% (IQR = 12.5-50.0) for the 21 nonsurvivors to discharge whose death occurred at least 1 hr after massive transfusion protocol activation (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate the importance of ongoing evaluations of adherence to massive transfusion protocols in hospital trauma settings to target areas for improvement.

[Intrahospital trauma flowcharts : Cognitive support for optimization and acceleration of resuscitation room management of patients with severe injuries and polytrauma]

Morbidity and mortality after severe injury remain high despite substantial improvements in management and care over the past two decades, especially in the early phase of treatment. This is mainly due to still existing and insufficient adherence to evidence-based guidelines. The latter are considered the backbone of optimum treatment of the severely injured; however, the complexity and format often still preclude their clinical acceptance and immediate use in the resuscitation room. As a result of a close colaboration between two French medical societies a series of user-friendly flowcharts were developed as cognitive aids to support early acute diagnosis and treatment for the resuscitation room management of severely injured patients. These have been translated and adapted to the current "S3 Guideline on the Clinical Management of Severe Injuries and Polytrauma" coordinated by the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF).

Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Management of bleeding trauma patients is still a difficult challenge. Massive transfusion (MT) requires resources to ensure the safety and timely delivery of blood products. Early prediction of MT need may be useful to shorten the time process of blood product preparation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of shock index to predict the need for MT in adult patients with trauma. For the same population, we also assessed the accuracy of SI to predict mortality.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 2022. Studies were included if they reported MT or mortality with SI recorded at arrival in the field or the emergency department. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, for a total of 670,728 patients. For MT the overall sensibility was 0.68 [0.57; 0.76], the overall specificity was 0.84 [0.79; 0.88] and the AUC was 0.85 [0.81; 0.88]. Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR+; LR-) were 4.24 [3.18-5.65] and 0.39 [0.29-0.52], respectively. For mortality the overall sensibility was 0.358 [0.238; 0.498] the overall specificity 0.742 [0.656; 0.813] and the AUC 0.553 (confidence region for sensitivity given specificity: [0.4014; 0.6759]; confidence region for specificity given sensitivity: [0.4799; 0.6332]). LR+ and LR- were 1.39 [1.36-1.42] and 0.87 [0.85-0.89], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that SI may have a limited role as the sole tool to predict the need for MT in adult trauma patients. SI is not accurate to predict mortality but may have a role to identify patients with a low risk of mortality.

CAB versus ABC approach for resuscitation of patients following traumatic injury: Toward improving patient safety and survival

INTRODUCTION

Though a circulation-airway-breathing (CAB) resuscitation sequence is now widely accepted in administering CPR over the airway-breathing-circulation (ABC) sequence following cardiac arrest, current evidence and guidelines vary considerably for complex polytraumas, with some prioritizing management of the airway and others advocating for initial treatment of hemorrhage. This review aims to evaluate existing literature comparing ABC and CAB resuscitation sequences in adult trauma patients in-hospital to direct future research and guide evidence-based recommendations for management.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar until September 29, 2022. Articles were assessed for comparison between CAB and ABC resuscitation sequences, adult trauma patients, in-hospital treatment, patient volume status, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Two studies compared the CAB and ABC sequences specifically in hypotensive trauma patients, one study evaluated the sequences in trauma patients with hypovolemic shock, and one study in patients with all types of shock. Hypotensive trauma patients who underwent rapid sequence intubation before blood transfusion had a significantly higher mortality rate than those who had blood transfusion initiated first (50 vs 78% P < 0.05) and a significant drop in blood pressure. Patients who subsequently experienced post-intubation hypotension (PIH) had increased mortality over those without PIH. overall mortality was higher in patients that developed PIH (mortality, n (%): PIH = 250/753 (33.2%) vs 253/1291 (19.6%), p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that hypotensive trauma patients, especially those with active hemorrhage, may benefit more from a CAB approach to resuscitation, as early intubation may increase mortality secondary to PIH. However, patients with critical hypoxia or airway injury may still benefit more from the ABC sequence and prioritization of the airway. Future prospective studies are needed to understand the benefits of CAB with trauma patients and identify which patient subgroups are most affected by prioritizing circulation before airway management.

Overtransfusion of packed red blood cells during massive transfusion activation: a potential quality metric for trauma resuscitation

Objectives

The goal of this study was to explore the incidence of overtransfusion in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation and identify modifiable risk factors. We hypothesized that overtransfusion is common after MTP activation.

Methods

Patients admitted to a level I trauma center from July 2016 to December 2019 and who required MTP activation were selected. The primary outcome was overtransfusion, defined as a hemoglobin (Hg) ≥11 g/dL at 24 hours (±2 hours). A Cox regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for overtransfusion.

Results

140 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 39.0 years, with the majority (74.3%) being male. The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 24.0 (58.0) and 38.4% had a penetrating mechanism. The median (IQR) admission Hg was 12.6 (11.7) g/dL. Overall, 71.4% of patients were overtransfused by the conclusion of MTP, 43.6% 24 hours later, and 29.5% at discharge. Overtransfusion did not correlate with the number of units of blood transfused nor with the duration of MTP. Overtransfused patients at 24 hours after the conclusion of MTP were significantly more likely to present with a penetrating injury (52.5% vs. 27.3%, p=0.003) and have a significantly lower ISS (median (IQR) 18.5 (44.0) vs. 26.0 (58.0), p=0.035.) In a Cox regression model, penetrating mechanism (adjusted HR (AHR): 2.93; adjusted p=0.004) and admission base excess (BE) (AHR: 1.15; adjusted p=0.001) were the only variables independently associated with overtransfusion.

Conclusions

Overtransfusion of trauma patients requiring MTP activation is highly common, leading to overutilization of a limited resource. Penetrating trauma and BE may be modifiable risk factors that can help limit overtransfusion. Overtransfusion should be tracked as a data point by blood banks and trauma centers and be further studied as a potential quality metric for the resuscitation of massively transfused trauma patients.

Level of evidence

III.

The regional whole blood program in San Antonio, TX: A 3-year update on prehospital and in-hospital transfusion practices for traumatic and non-traumatic hemorrhage

Low titer type O Rh-D + whole blood (LTO + WB) has become a first-line resuscitation medium for hemorrhagic shock in many centers around the World. Showing early effectiveness on the battlefield, LTO + WB is used in both the pre-hospital and in-hospital settings for traumatic and non-traumatic hemorrhage resuscitation. Starting in 2018, the San Antonio Whole Blood Collaborative has worked to provide LTO + WB across Southwest Texas, initially in the form of remote damage control resuscitation followed by in-hospital trauma resuscitation. This program has since expanded to include pediatric trauma resuscitation, obstetric hemorrhage, females of childbearing potential, and non-traumatic hemorrhage. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a three-year update on the successes and expansion of this system and outline resuscitation challenges in special populations.

Blood Transfusion Reactions-A Comprehensive Review of the Literature including a Swiss Perspective

Blood transfusions have been the cornerstone of life support since the introduction of the ABO classification in the 20th century. The physiologic goal is to restore adequate tissue oxygenation when the demand exceeds the offer. Although it can be a life-saving therapy, blood transfusions can lead to serious adverse effects, and it is essential that physicians remain up to date with the current literature and are aware of the pathophysiology, initial management and risks of each type of transfusion reaction. We aim to provide a structured overview of the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic approach and management of acute transfusion reactions based on the literature available in 2022. The numbers of blood transfusions, transfusion reactions and the reporting rate of transfusion reactions differ between countries in Europe. The most frequent transfusion reactions in 2020 were alloimmunizations, febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions and allergic transfusion reactions. Transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion-associated circulatory overload and septic transfusion reactions were less frequent. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the healthcare system with decreasing blood donations and blood supplies, as well as rising concerns within the medical community but also in patients about blood safety and transfusion reactions in COVID-19 patients. The best way to prevent transfusion reactions is to avoid unnecessary blood transfusions and maintain a transfusion-restrictive strategy. Any symptom occurring within 24 h of a blood transfusion should be considered a transfusion reaction and referred to the hemovigilance reporting system. The initial management of blood transfusion reactions requires early identification, immediate interruption of the transfusion, early consultation of the hematologic and ICU departments and fluid resuscitation.

Effectiveness of massive transfusion protocol activation in pre-hospital setting for major trauma

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhage in major trauma is life-threatening and the activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) was found to reduce the time to transfusion and mortality. The purpose was (i) to verify whether MTP activation identifies patients that require massive transfusions once admitted to the Emergency Department (ED), (ii) to establish whether pre-hospital MTP activation reduces the time to transfusion on arrival at the ED, (iii) to identify the variable that best predicts MTP activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study. The MTP was implemented at the end of 2012; it was activated for major trauma in pre-hospital setting on the basis on established criteria. Pre-hospital MTP activation aimed to make blood products available prior to the patients' arrival at the ED. The blood products are transfused when the patient arrives at the hospital.

RESULTS

The MTP was activated in pre-hospital setting in 219 patients. On arrival at the hospital, the Trauma Team Leader confirmed MTP activation in 146 (66.7%) patients. Patients with MTP criteria received a higher amount of blood products than the patients without MTP criteria, median 7 (IQR 2-13) units versus 2 (0-6) units, respectively (P < 0.001). At the same time, patients with a Shock Index ≥ 0.9 received more transfusions (5.5 [2-13] units) compared with patients characterized by a lower SI (2 [0-7.25] units, P = 0.009). 146 patients were transfused in the first hour of ED admission. Poisson's multiple regression shows that the SI is the variable that better predicted MTP activation compared to age, gender and the number of injured sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-hospital MTP activation is useful to identify patients that require an urgent blood transfusion on arrival at the ED. Further analysis should be considered to evaluate the implementation of the Shock Index as a criterion to activate MTP.

Cresting Mortality: Defining a Plateau in Ongoing Massive Transfusion

BACKGROUND

Blood-based balanced resuscitation is a standard of care in massively bleeding trauma patients. No data exists as to when this therapy no longer significantly affects mortality. We sought to determine if there is a threshold beyond which further massive transfusion will not affect in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement database was queried for all adult patients registered between 2013 and 2017 who received at least one unit of blood (PRBC) within 4 hours of arrival. In-hospital mortality was evaluated based on the total transfusion volume (TTV) at 4 and 24 hours in the overall cohort (OC) and in a balanced transfusion cohort (BC), composed of patients who received transfusion at a ratio of 1:1-2:1 PRBC-to-plasma. A bootstrapping method in combination with multivariable Poisson regression (MVR) was used to find a cutoff after which additional transfusion no longer affected in-hospital mortality. MVR was used to control for age, sex, race, highest abbreviated injury score in each body region, comorbidities, advanced directives limiting care, and the primary surgery performed for hemorrhage control.

RESULTS

The OC consisted of 99,042 patients of which 28,891 and 30,768 received a balanced transfusion during the first 4 and 24 hours, respectively. The mortality rate plateaued after a TTV of 40.5 units (95% CI, 40-41) in the OC at 4 hours and after a TTV of 52.8 units (95% CI, 52-53) at 24 hours following admission. In the BC, mortality plateaued at a TTV of 39 units (95% CI, 39-39) and 53 units (95% CI, 53-53) at 4- and 24-hours following admission, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion thresholds exist beyond which ongoing transfusion is not associated with any clinically significant change in mortality. These TTVs can be used as markers for resuscitation timeouts in order to assess the plan of care moving forward.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, prognostic and epidemiological.

Resuscitation Patterns and Massive Transfusion for the Critical Bleeding Dog-A Multicentric Retrospective Study of 69 Cases (2007-2013)

Objective: To describe resuscitation patterns of critically bleeding dogs, including those receiving massive transfusion (MT). Design: Retrospective study from three universities (2007-2013). Animals: Critically bleeding dogs, defined as dogs who received ≥ 25 ml/kg of blood products for treatment of hemorrhagic shock caused by blood loss. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-nine dogs were included. Sources of critical bleeding were trauma (26.1%), intra/perioperative surgical period (26.1%), miscellaneous (24.6%), and spontaneous hemoabdomen (23.1%). Median (range) age was 7 years (0.5-18). Median body weight was 20 kg (2.6-57). Median pre-transfusion hematocrit, total protein, systolic blood pressure, and lactate were 25% (10-63), 4.1 g/dl (2-7.1), 80 mm Hg (20-181), and 6.4 mmol/L (1.1-18.2), respectively. Median blood product volume administered was 44 ml/kg (25-137.4). Median plasma to red blood cell ratio was 0.8 (0-4), and median non-blood product resuscitation fluid to blood product ratio was 0.5 (0-3.6). MT was given to 47.8% of dogs. Survival rate was 40.6%. The estimated odds of survival were higher by a factor of 1.8 (95% CI: 1.174, 3.094) for a dog with 1 g/dl higher total protein above reference interval and were lower by a factor of 0.6 (95% CI: 0.340, 0.915) per 100% prolongation of partial thromboplastin time above the reference interval. No predictors of MT were identified. Conclusions: Critical bleeding in dogs was associated with a wide range of resuscitation patterns and carries a guarded to poor prognosis.

Infrastructure, logistics and clinical practice management of acute trauma hemorrhage and coagulopathy: a survey across German trauma centers

PURPOSE

Early detection and management of acute trauma hemorrhage and coagulopathy have been associated with improved outcomes, but local infrastructure, logistics and clinical strategies may differ.

METHODS

To assess local differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical management of acute trauma hemorrhage and coagulopathy we have conducted a web-based survey amongst clinicians working in DGU^®-certified supraregional, regional and local trauma centers.

RESULTS

137/1875 respondents completed the questionnaire yielding a response rate of 7.3%. The majority specified to work as head of department or senior consultant (95%) in trauma/orthopedic surgery (80%) of supraregional (38%), regional (34%) or local (27%) trauma centers. Conventional coagulation assays are most frequently used to monitor bleeding trauma patients. Only half of the respondents (53%) rely on extended coagulation tests, e.g. viscoelastic hemostatic assays. Tests to assess preinjury use of direct oral anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors are still not widely available and vary according to level of care. Conventional blood products are widely available but there remain differences between trauma centers of different level of care to access other hemostatic therapies, e.g. coagulation factor concentrates. Trauma centers of higher level of care are more likely to implement treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

This survey confirms still existing differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical practice management for the detection of acute trauma hemorrhage and coagulopathy amongst DGU^®-certified supraregional, regional and local trauma centers. Further work is recommended to locally implement diagnostics, therapies and treatment algorithms compliant to current guidelines to ensure the best possible outcomes in bleeding trauma patients.

Vorbereitung auf eine differenzierte Hämotherapie nach Trauma – Ergebnisse einer Befragung deutscher Kliniken

Hintergrund

Die unkontrollierte Blutung ist weiterhin eine führende potenziell vermeidbare Todesursache im Rahmen schwerer Verletzungen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Arbeit hat zum Ziel, die Vorbereitung für eine differenzierte Hämotherapie im Rahmen der Schwerstverletztenbehandlung in Kliniken verschiedener Versorgungsstufen innerhalb der Struktur des TraumaNetzwerks der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)® zu evaluieren.

Material und Methoden

Anhand einer Online-Umfrage wurden gezielt Diagnose- und Therapiestrategien sowie vorhandene Ressourcen innerhalb der Kliniken erfragt. Im Rahmen einer Subgruppenanalyse sollte festgestellt werden, ob es Unterschiede in Bezug auf infrastrukturelle Voraussetzungen und diagnostisches bzw. therapeutisches Vorgehen innerhalb der Versorgungsstufen des TraumaNetzwerks DGU® gibt.

Ergebnisse

Massivtransfusionsprotokolle (MTP) bestehen in 75 % der Kliniken. Die Aktivierung erfolgt i. d. R. durch den Trauma-Leader (62 %). In 63 % erfolgt die Aktivierung aufgrund einer Anforderung aus der Präklinik. Als Transfusionstrigger werden ein positives FAST (80 %) und ein Pulsdruck < 45 mm Hg (60 %) angegeben. In 50 % der Kliniken existiert kein starres Transfusionsverhältnis der einzelnen Blutkomponenten. Überregionale Traumazentren (ÜTZ) bekommen im Vergleich zu regionalen Traumazentren (RTZ) und lokalen Traumazentren (LTZ) angeforderte Blutprodukte frühzeitiger (p 0,025).

Diskussion

Der massive Blutverlust ist ein seltenes Ereignis, welches mit einer hohen Letalität vergesellschaftet sein kann. MTP bilden die Grundlage für eine frühe Therapie der traumainduzierten Koagulopathie und tragen zur Verbesserung der Überlebenschancen der Patienten bei. Es existiert ein deutlicher Unterschied in den diagnostischen und therapeutischen Möglichkeiten in den einzelnen Versorgungsebenen. ÜTZ verfügen mehrheitlich über die umfangreichsten Optionen, gefolgt von RTZ und LTZ.

Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread institution of modern massive transfusion protocols with balanced blood product ratios, survival for patients with traumatic hemorrhage receiving ultramassive transfusion (UMT) (defined as ≥20 U of packed red blood cells [RBCs]) in 24 hours) remains low and resource consumption remains high. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with mortality in trauma patients receiving UMT in the modern resuscitation era.

METHODS

An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter retrospective study of 461 trauma patients from 17 trauma centers who received ≥20 U of RBCs in 24 hours was performed (2014-2019). Multivariable logistic regression and Classification and Regression Tree analysis were used to identify clinical characteristics associated with mortality.

RESULTS

The 461 patients were young (median age, 35 years), male (82%), severely injured (median Injury Severity Score, 33), in shock (median shock index, 1.2; base excess, -9), and transfused a median of 29 U of RBCs, 22 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 24 U of platelets (PLT). Mortality was 46% at 24 hours and 65% at discharge. Transfusion of RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 or RBC/PLT ≥1.5:1 was significantly associated with mortality, most pronounced for the 18% of patients who received both RBC/PLT and RBC/FFP ≥1.5:1 (odds ratios, 3.11 and 2.81 for mortality at 24 hours and discharge; both p < 0.01). Classification and Regression Tree identified that age older than 50 years, low initial Glasgow Coma Scale, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy were associated with low likelihood of survival (14-26%), while absence of these factors was associated with the highest survival (71%).

CONCLUSION

Despite modern massive transfusion protocols, one half of trauma patients receiving UMT are transfused with either RBC/FFP or RBC/PLT in unbalanced ratios ≥1.5:1, with increased associated mortality. Maintaining focus on balanced ratios during UMT is critical, and consideration of advanced age, poor initial mental status, thrombocytopenia, and resuscitative thoracotomy can aid in prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Massive transfusion prediction in patients with multiple trauma by decision tree: a retrospective analysis

Early initial massive transfusion protocol and blood transfusion can reduce patient mortality, however accurately identifying the risk of massive transfusion (MT) remains a major challenge in severe trauma patient therapy. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of severe trauma patients with and without MT. Based on analysis results, we established a MT prediction model of clinical and laboratory data by using the decision tree algorithm in patients with multiple trauma. Our results demonstrate that shock index, injury severity score, international normalized ratio, and pelvis fracture were the most significant risk factors of MT. These four indexes were incorporated into the prediction model, and the model was validated by using the testing dataset. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under curve values of prediction model for MT risk prediction were 60%, 92%, 90% and 0.85. Our study provides an easy and understandable classification rules for identifying risk factors associated with MT that may be useful for promoting trauma management.

Reducing Hospitalization in Mild Acute Pancreatitis: Results of Long-term Follow-up

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common emergency department (ED) diagnosis, amounting to enormous costs. Our previous pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of reducing hospitalization using an ED-based observation pathway. In this follow-up study, we hypothesize that the pathway is durable in clinical practice, outside of research supervision, and patients can safely be managed without hospitalization.

STUDY

We reviewed patients prospectively enrolled in the observation pathway after the end of the pilot study. We compared outcomes to patients enrolled in our pilot study and with a historic cohort of patients admitted with mild AP. Our primary outcome was hospitalization rate during the enrollment period and secondary outcomes included length of stay, 30-day readmissions, mortality, and health care utilization.

RESULTS

Over a 2-year period 165 patients met criteria for AP with 118 (71.5%) having mild AP. Fifty-four of 118 patients (45.8%) were enrolled in the observation pathway and of these, 45 patients were discharged from the ED, reducing hospitalization by 31.2%, compared with pilot study (22.2%) and historic cohort (0%) (P<0.05). Median length of stay was shorter [19.9 (observation) vs. 72.0 h (historic cohort), P<0.01]. There were fewer radiographic examinations in the observation cohorts (pilot and current study) than in the historic cohort (P<0.05), with similar 30-day readmissions, and no reported deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This follow-up study demonstrates the durability of an observation-based pathway to manage mild AP outside of a research protocol and maintain its ability to reduce hospitalizations without affecting readmission rates or mortality.

The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy after Trauma: Summary of the 2019 Updated European Guideline

Non-controlled hemorrhage with accompanying trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) remains the most common cause of preventable death after multiple injury. Rapid identification followed by aggressive treatment is the key for improved outcomes. Treatment of trauma hemorrhage begins at the scene, with manual compression, the use of tourniquets and (non) commercial pelvic slings, and rapid transfer to an adequate trauma center. Upon hospital admission, coagulation monitoring and support are to be initiated immediately. Bleeding is controlled surgically following damage control principles. Modern coagulation management includes goal-oriented, individualized therapies, guided by point-of-care viscoelastic assays. Idarucizumab can be used as an antidote to the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, andexanet alpha as an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors. This review summarizes the key recommendations of the 2019 updated European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma. These evidence-based recommendations may form the backbone of algorithms adapted to local logistics and infrastructure.

Management of pelvic injuries in hemodynamically unstable polytrauma patients - Challenges and current updates

Pelvic injuries are notorious for causing rapid exsanguination, and also due to concomitant injuries and complications, they have a relatively higher mortality rate. Management of pelvic fractures in hemodynamically unstable patients is a challenging task and has been variably approached. Over the years, various concepts have evolved, and different guidelines and protocols were established in regional trauma care centers based mainly on their previous experience, outcomes, and availability of resources. More recently, damage control resuscitation, pelvic angioembolization, and acute definitive internal fixation are being employed in the management of these unstable injuries, without clear consensus or guidelines. In this background, we have performed a computerized search using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed databases on studies published over the past 30 years. This comprehensive review aims to consolidate available literature on the current epidemiology, diagnostics, resuscitation, and management options of pelvic fractures in polytraumatized patients with hemodynamic instability with particular focus on damage control resuscitation, pelvic angioembolization, and acute definitive internal fixation.

Quality Improvement Project of a Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) to Reduce Wastage of Blood Components

Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) facilitate the organized delivery of blood components for traumatically injured patients. MTPs vary across institutions, and ratios of blood components can change during clinical management. As a result, significant amounts of components can be wasted. We completed a review of all MTP activations from 2015 to 2018, providing an in-depth analysis of waste in our single Level 1 trauma center. An interdepartmental group analyzed patterns of blood component wastage to guide three quality improvement initiatives. Specifically, we (1) completed a digital timeline for each MTP activation and termination, (2) improved communications between departments, and (3) provided yearly training for all personnel about MTP deployment. The analysis identified an association between delayed MTP deactivations and waste (RR = 1.48, CI 1.19–1.85, p = 0.0005). An overall improvement in waste was seen over the years, but this could not be attributed to increased closed-loop communication as determined by the proportion of non-stop activations (F(124,3) = 0.98, not significant). Delayed MTP deactivations are the primary determinant of blood component waste. Our proactive intervention on communications between groups was not sufficient in reducing the number of delayed deactivations. However, implementing a digital timeline and regular repetitive training yielded a significant reduction in wasted blood components.

How well does your massive transfusion protocol perform? A scoping review of quality indicators

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with major haemorrhage often requires urgent administration of multiple blood products, commonly termed a massive transfusion (MT). Clinical practice in these scenarios is supported in part by evidence-based MT guidelines, which typically recommend use of an MT protocol (MTP). MTPs aim to provide practical and specific interpretation of MT guidelines for local institutional use, outlining tasks and pre-configuration of blood product packs to be transfused to provide efficient and evidence-based transfusion management. Institutions can support this aim by the measurement of MTP performance and patient outcomes through collection of quality indicators (QI). Many international guidelines now recommend the routine collection of a range of QIs relating to MT/MTP; however, there is significant variation in procedures and no benchmarks or minimal evidence to guide practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to document and evaluate reported QIs for MTP. We conducted a search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published studies from inception until May 14, 2020, that reported at least one MTP QI and use of an MTP or equivalent protocol. Included studies were evaluated using a QI classification system based on current MT QI guidelines and the Donabedian QI framework.

RESULTS

We identified 107 eligible studies. Trauma patients were the most commonly evaluated group, and total blood products transfused and in-hospital mortality were the most commonly reported QIs. Reflecting the lack of international consensus and benchmarks, we found significant variability in the reporting of QIs, which often did not reflect guideline recommendations.

DISCUSSION

Our review highlights the importance of establishing international consensus on prioritised QIs with quantifiable targets that are important to the process of MT.

Massive Transfusion Protocol and Subsequent Development of Venous Thromboembolism: Statewide Analysis

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) are a routine component of any major trauma center's armamentarium in the management of exsanguinating hemorrhages. Little is known about the potential complications of those that survive a MTP. We sought to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following MTP. We hypothesized that MTP would be associated with a higher risk of VTE when compared with a risk-adjusted control population without MTP.

METHODS

The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was retrospectively queried from 2015 to 2018 for trauma patients who developed VTE and survived until discharge at accredited trauma centers in Pennsylvania. Patient demographics, injury severity, and clinical outcomes were compared to assess differences in VTE development between MTP and non-MTP patients. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed the adjusted impact of MTP on VTE development.

RESULTS

176 010 patients survived until discharge, meeting inclusion criteria. Of those, 1667 developed a VTE (pulmonary embolism [PE]: 662 [0.4%]; deep vein thrombosis [DVT]: 1142 [0.6%]; PE and DVT: 137 [0.1%]). 1268 patients (0.7%) received MTP and, of this subset of patients, 171 (13.5%) developed a VTE during admission. In adjusted analysis, patients who had a MTP and survived until discharge had a higher odds of developing a VTE (adjusted odds ratio: 2.62; 95% CI: 2.13-3.24; P < .001).

DISCUSSION

MTP is a harbinger for higher risk of VTE in those patients who survive. This may, in part, be related to the overcorrection of coagulation deficits encountered in the hemorrhagic event. A high index of suspicion for the development of VTE as well as aggressive VTE prophylaxis is warranted in those patients who survive MTP.

Massive transfusion protocol in adult trauma population

BACKGROUND

Acute blood loss in trauma requires quick identification and action to restore circulating volume and save the patient. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) have become standard at Trauma Centers, in order to rapidly deliver blood products to bleeding patients. This literature review presents current standards of transfusion ratios, as well as insights into adjuncts during massive transfusions.

METHODS

PubMED was searched for articles from 2005 to 2020 on MTPs, the article were assessed for single vs. multi-institutional, mechanism of injury, type of MTP, timing in which blood products should be administered, timing of delivery of blood products to trauma bay, pre-hospital treatment and adjuncts, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Eleven studies addressed transfusion ratios. Seven studies looked at timing of blood products. Nine studies addressed MTP pre-hospital treatment and adjuncts. Prior to 2015, studies supported the benefits of a balanced transfusion ratio, which was then confirmed by the PROPPR randomized controlled trial. The shorter the time to blood product delivery the better the outcomes. New advances in technology have allowed us to measure different patterns of coagulation, allowing more individualized approaches to the bleeding patient.

CONCLUSION

Current massive transfusion protocols should utilize between 1:1:1 and 1:1:2 ratios of the 3 main products; plasma, platelets, and red blood cells. Massive transfusion protocols are effective in decreasing mortality. Better resuscitation efforts were seen when blood products were readily available in the trauma bay when the patient arrived and the faster the replacement of blood, the better the outcomes.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Traumatic Bleeding and Coagulopathy

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled bleeding with trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still the most common avoidable cause of death in multiple trauma. The aging of the population has led to an increasing number of bleeding trauma patients with pre-existing anticoagulation. Such patients are not treated uniformly, even in major trauma centers.

METHODS

This review is based on a selective search of the literature (Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Reviews) and summarizes current treatment recommendations, including those of the newly revised European trauma guidelines.

RESULTS

The treatment of traumatic hemorrhage begins at the site of the accident, with compression, tourniquets, pelvic binders, and rapid transport to a certified trauma center. The early use of tourniquets was shown to lessen the trans- fusion requirement (packed red blood cells: 2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 9.3 ± 0.6; p < 0.001; fresh frozen plasma concentrates: 1.4 ± 0.08 vs. 6.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001), while external pelvic stabilization was shown to reduce mortality (19.1% vs. 33.3%). Upon the patient's arrival in the hospital, steps are taken to measure, monitor, and support clotting function. Bleeding is controlled surgically according to the principles of damage control. Modern clotting management consists of goal-oriented, individualized therapy, including the use of point-of-care viscoelastic test procedures. Idarucizumab can be used as an antidote to the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, andexanet alpha as an antidote to factor Xa inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The evidence-based treatment of patients with hemorrhage from severe trauma, in accordance with the existing guidelines, can improve the clinical outcome. Corresponding algorithms, adapted to local logistics and infrastructure, must be developed and implemented.

Hypocalcemia and Massive Blood Transfusions: A Pilot Study in a Level I Trauma Center

Trauma is a leading cause of death in the United States, and uncontrolled hemorrhage is often the primary cause of mortality. Massive transfusions provide lifesaving treatment for the bleeding trauma patient; yet, this is not a benign intervention. Calcium levels can be significantly decreased with rapidly transfused blood products due to the citrate preservative that is added. Citrate binds to the patient's endogenous calcium when blood products are administered, rendering calcium inactive. As a result, undesirable physiological effects can occur. Although there is a plethora of evidence reporting the negative effects of hypocalcemia during resuscitation, the research for standardization of calcium monitoring and replacement during a massive transfusion event is less robust. Consequently, monitoring and replacement of this vital electrolyte are often overlooked. Trauma department employees at an urban academic hospital were given a pretest to assess their knowledge of calcium monitoring and replacement during a massive transfusion. On the basis of test results and a need for staff education, a short, animated video was designed and distributed for viewing. Following the educational video, a posttest was administered and yielded higher scores when compared with the pretest (p = .001). Lack of knowledge and national standards may be root causes for hypocalcemia. Educational interventions such as innovative, brief videos can be effective for enhancing staff members' knowledge and improving patient care.

Challenges to improving patient outcome following massive transfusion in severe trauma

Introduction: Uncontrolled hemorrhage with trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) still represents the most common cause of preventable death after trauma. Timely diagnosis and treatment including bleeding control and hemostatic resuscitation to correct TIC are important, as death from exsanguination occurs rapidly. Recognizing who requires an early massive transfusion together with the initiation of corresponding massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) is key to outcome.Areas covered: This expert review summarizes the current state of MT including the activation and termination of MTPs, complications of MT, and strategies for refinement in the administration of blood products in order to avoid harmful over-transfusion.Expert opinion: MTPs should be initiated and continued until normal physiologic parameters are reached and definitive control of bleeding is achieved. Hospitals should develop their own MTPs, guided by evidence, and according to local infrastructure, logistics, needs and patient populations. Massive transfusion, defined as > 10 units of packed red blood cell concentrates (pRBCs) within the first 24 hours of hospital admission, can be life-saving, but is not without complications. MTPs are currently being refined through targeted and early goal-directed approaches which include functional coagulation testing assays to better guide the administration of blood products and hemostatic agents once the patient is stabilized.

The TRAAGIC score: early predictors of inpatient mortality in adult trauma patients

Background

Scoring systems are important in prognostication and decision-making in the management of trauma patients. However, they often include an extensive list of factors not easily recalled by clinicians on admission. Additionally, multivariable analyses examining predictors of mortality in these patients is lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a mortality prediction score for adult trauma inpatients. The intention was to create a scoring tool that could be easily remembered and implemented by clinicians.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 5175 adult trauma patients treated at a level 1 trauma centre in Hamilton, Ontario, from 2002 to 2013. For derivation of the score, logistic regression was applied to data collected from 2002 to 2006 to identify potential predictors. Variables with p ≤ 0.10 identified from univariable analysis were entered in the multivariable logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at a value of 0.05. The prediction performance of the score was then assessed and validated on data for trauma patients treated from 2007 to 2013. The discrimination ability and calibration of the validation model were assessed. Frequencies, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and C-statistics were reported.

Results

The TRAAGIC prediction score (transfusion, age, airway, hyperglycemia, international normalized ratio, creatinine) showed a C-index of 0.85 (95% CI 0.83–0.87) in the derivation cohort. The TRAAGIC score had high discrimination and good calibration when applied to the validation cohort.

Conclusion

The TRAAGIC score is an easily remembered and straightforward toolthat can reasonably predict inpatient mortality for adult trauma patients.

Intraoperative Resuscitation by Specialized Trauma Nurse Clinicians Improves Adherence to Massive Transfusion Protocol

A massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was implemented at a Level I trauma center in 2007 for patients with massive blood loss. A goal ratio of plasma to pheresed platelets to packed red blood cells (PRBCs) of 1:1:1 was established. From 2007 to 2014, trauma nurse clinicians (TNCs) administered the MTP during initial resuscitation and anesthesia personnel administered the MTP intraoperatively. In 2015, TNCs began administering the MTP intraoperatively. This study evaluates intraoperative blood product ratios and crystalloid volume administered by anesthesia personnel or TNCs. A retrospective review of trauma registry patients requiring MTP from 2007 to 2017 was performed. Patient data were stratified according to MTP administration by either anesthesia personnel (2007–2015) or TNCs (2015–2017). Ninety-seven patients were included with 54 anesthesia patients and 44 TNC patients. Patients undergoing resuscitation by MTP administered by TNCs received less median crystalloid (3000 mL vs 1500 mL, P < 0.001). The ratio of plasma:PRBC (0.75 vs 0.93, P = 0.027) and platelets:PRBC (0.75 vs 1.04, P = 0.003) was found to be significantly closer to 1:1 for TNC patients. MTP intraoperative blood product administration by TNCs reduced the amount of infused crystalloid and improved adherence to MTP in achieving a 1:1:1 ratio of blood products.

Ten-year evolution of a massive transfusion protocol in a level 1 trauma centre: have outcomes improved?

Background

We aimed to evaluate the evolution and implementation of the massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in an urban level 1 trauma centre. Most data on this topic comes from trauma centres with high exposure to life‐threatening haemorrhage. This study examines the effect of the introduction of an MTP in an Australian level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed over a 14‐year period. Three groups of trauma patients, who received more than 10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), were compared: a pre‐MTP group (2002–2006), an MTP‐I group (2006–2010) and an MTP‐II group (2010–2016) when the protocol was updated. Key outcomes were mortality, complications and number of blood products transfused.

Results

A total of 168 patients were included: 54 pre‐MTP patients were compared to 47 MTP‐I and 67 MTP‐II patients. In the MTP‐II group, fewer units of PRBC and platelets were administered within the first 24 h: 17 versus 14 (P = 0.01) and 12 versus 8 (P < 0.001), respectively. Less infections were noted in the MTP‐I group: 51.9% versus 31.9% (P = 0.04). No significant differences were found regarding mortality, ventilator days, intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay.

Conclusion

Introduction of an MTP‐II in our level 1 civilian trauma centre significantly reduced the amount of PRBC and platelets used during damage control resuscitation. Introduction of the MTP did not directly impact survival or the incidence of complications. Nevertheless, this study reflects the complexity of real‐life medical care in a level 1 civilian trauma centre.

A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique

BACKGROUND

A massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) enables rapid delivery of blood components in a patient who is exsanguinating pending definitive hemorrhage control, but there is variability in MHP implementation rates, content and compliance owing to challenges presented by infrequent activation, variable team performance and patient acuity. The goal of this project was to identify the key evidence-based principles and quality indicators required to develop a standardized regional MHP.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus technique was performed in the spring and summer of 2018. Panellists used survey links to independently review and rate (on a 7-point Likert scale) 43 statements and 8 quality indicators drafted by a steering committee composed of transfusion medicine specialists and technologists, and trauma physicians. External stakeholder input from all hospitals in Ontario was sought.

RESULTS

Three rounds were held with 36 experts from diverse clinical backgrounds. Consensus was reached for 42 statements and 8 quality indicators. Additional modifications from external stakeholders were incorporated to form the foundation for the proposed MHP.

INTERPRETATION

This MHP template will provide the basis for the design of an MHP toolkit, including specific recommendations for pediatric and obstetrical patients, and for hospitals with limited availability of blood components or means to achieve definitive hemorrhage control. We believe that harmonization of MHPs in our region will simplify training, increase uptake of evidence-based interventions, enhance communication, improve patient comfort and safety, and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Massive hemorrhage protocol survey: Marked variability and absent in one-third of hospitals in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Massive hemorrhage protocols (MHP) are critical to standardized delivery of timely, safe, and resource-effective coordinated care for patients with life-threatening bleeding.

METHODS

A standardized MHP survey was sent to all hospitals (n = 150) in Ontario with a transfusion service. This study aim was to determine the proportion of hospitals with an MHP and assess for variability.

RESULTS

The overall survey completion rate was 133 of 150 hospitals (89%) (remaining 17 providing negative affirmation that they did not have an MHP). An MHP was in place at 97 of 150 (65%) hospitals (60% of small (<5000 red cell units/year) vs. 91% of medium/large). A total of 10 different names of protocols were reported, with "Massive Transfusion Protocol" (68%) predominating. Activation criteria were present in 82 of 97 (85%); commonly activated based on volume of blood loss (70%). Blood work was drawn at the discretion of the physician (37%) or at predefined intervals (31%; majority every 60 min). Common routine laboratory tests performed were CBC (87%) and INR (84%). Fibrinogen testing was available at 88 (66%) of 133 reporting hospitals and part of the standard testing at 73 of 97 (75%) hospitals with an MHP. Median targets of hemostatic resuscitations, stated in the protocol at 49% of hospitals with an MHP, were: platelets >50 × 10⁹/L, INR < 1.8, fibrinogen >1.5 g/L, and hemoglobin >70 g/L. Protocol required patient temperature monitoring in 65% and specified a reversal plan for patients on anticoagulants in 59%. At 36% of sites all patients are initially managed with O RhD negative blood. Overall, 61% of sites issue blood in predefined packs (vs. on demand). Hemostatic agents in protocols included: tranexamic acid (70%), prothombin complex concentrate (14%), fibrinogen concentrate (13%), and recombinant FVIIa (4%). Quality metrics were tracked in 32% of hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of hospitals lack formal MHPs, with the majority lacking in smaller hospitals. The survey results indicate that there is marked variability in all key aspects of the reported MHPs. This may be due to differences in hospital resources and personnel, lack of supporting evidence to dictate requirements, and differences in knowledge base of the individuals involved in protocol setting.

Evaluation of massive transfusion protocol practices by type of trauma at a level I trauma center

PURPOSE

To evaluate massive transfusion protocol practices by trauma type at a level I trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a sample of 76 trauma patients with MTP activation between March 2010 and January 2015 at a regional trauma center. Patient demographics, transfusion practices, and clinical outcomes were compared by type of trauma sustained.

RESULTS

Penetrating trauma patients who required MTP activation were significantly younger, had lower injury severity score (ISS), higher probability of survival (POS), decreased mortality, and higher Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) compared to blunt trauma patients. Overall, the mortality rate was 38.16%. The most common injury sustained among blunt trauma patients was head injury (36.21%), whereas the majority of the penetrating trauma patients sustained abdominal injuries (55.56%). Although the admission coagulation parameters and timing of coagulopathy were not significantly different between the two groups of patients, a significantly higher proportion of penetrating trauma patients received high plasma content therapy relative to blunt trauma patients (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite the use of the same MTP for all injured patients requiring massive transfusion, significant differences existed between blunt trauma patients and penetrating trauma patients. These differences in transfusion characteristics and outcomes following MTP activation underscore the complexity of implementing MTPs and warrant vigilant transfusion practices to improve outcomes in trauma patients.

Blood transfusion management in the severely bleeding military patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hemorrhage remains the primary cause of preventable death on the battlefield and in civilian trauma. Hemorrhage control is multifactorial and starts with point-of-injury care. Surgical hemorrhage control and time from injury to surgery is paramount; however, interventions in the prehospital environment and perioperative period affect outcomes. The purpose of this review is to understand concepts and strategies for successful management of the bleeding military patient. Understanding the life-threatening nature of coagulopathy of trauma and implementing strategies aimed at full spectrum hemorrhage management from point of injury to postoperative care will result in improved outcomes in patients with life-threatening bleeding.

RECENT FINDINGS

Timely and appropriate therapies impact survival. Blood product resuscitation for life-threatening hemorrhage should either be with whole blood or a component therapy strategy that recapitulates the functionality of whole blood. The US military has transfused over 10 000 units of whole blood since the beginning of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The well recognized therapeutic benefits of whole blood have pushed this therapy far forward into prehospital care in both US and international military forces. Multiple hemostatic adjuncts are available that are likely beneficial to the bleeding military patient; and other products and techniques are under active investigation.

SUMMARY

Lessons learned in the treatment of combat casualties will likely continue to have positive impact and influence and the management of hemorrhage in the civilian trauma setting.