Impact of Female Sex on Clinical Presentation and Ablation Outcomes in the CIRCA-DOSE Study

Different impact of female gender on the outcome of catheter ablation between paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The impacts of gender on the outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have been studied previously with contradictory results. Given the heterogeneities in clinical and pathophysiological characteristics between paroxysmal and persistent AF, gender impacts on post-ablation recurrence might differ depending on the type of AF.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the differing impacts of female gender on catheter ablation outcomes between paroxysmal and persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 857 patients (537 (62.7%) males and 320 (37.3%) females) undergoing de novo catheter ablation of AF were included in this retrospective study. Gender differences in ablation outcomes for different types of AF were compared. Of all patients, 476 were diagnosed with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and 381 with persistent AF (PeAF). Compared to male patients, female patients were older (64.0 ± 8.9 vs. 59.5 ± 10.7 years, P < 0.001), and more likely to have PAF (64.4% vs. 50.3%, P < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 53 [37-72] months, the total atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence rate after a single procedure was 35.4%, with no difference between male and female patients (34.5% vs. 36.9%, P = 0.473). For PAF, the recurrence was slightly higher in males than in females (37.4% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.096). On the contrary, for PeAF, females had a significantly higher risk of recurrence than males (49.1% vs. 31.5%, P = 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that female gender was an independent predictor of post-ablation recurrence only in PeAF (HR = 1.686; 95% CI 1.196-2.377, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The female gender had different impacts on the outcome of catheter ablation between PAF and PeAF. The ATa recurrence was significantly higher in females than males only for PeAF.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sex inequality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to cardiovascular disease has been observed. This study examined the proportion of women enrolled in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation RCTs and the potential risks of underrepresentation of women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for AF ablation RCTs published from 2015 to 2022. Participant characteristics were compared among trials with higher and lower proportions of women. Of 147 AF ablation RCTs (30,055 participants), only 10 trials had enrolled women ≥50% of the total participants. Additionally, 42 trials (28.57%) excluded pregnant/breastfeeding women; 6 (4.1%) excluded reproductive-age women without reliable birth control. The proportion of women in AF RCTs ranged from 9% to 71% (median 31.5%), whereas the median proportion of men was 67.7%. The rate of women included in the trials was stable from 2015 to 2022 (P=0.49). Study characteristics, including funding source, showed no correlation with the rate of inclusion of women. RCTs with a higher proportion of female participants enrolled older patients with AF, had a higher prevalence of hypertension but less persistent AF, and smaller left atrium size (P<0.05 for all). Biological sex was evaluated as a risk factor or in a subgroup analysis in 28 RCTs; 10.7% of these trials observed the implication of sex on their results.

CONCLUSION

Women were underrepresented in contemporary AF ablation RCTs. Additionally, women enrolled in AF RCTs were likely to have more comorbidities but less advanced AF, limiting the applicability of the results to women with AF.

Safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes of pulsed field ablation in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the PULSED AF trial

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a novel treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), has yet to be evaluated in a Japanese cohort.

METHODS

In this sub-analysis of the PULSED AF trial, 12-month outcomes of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PsAF) patients treated with PFA in four Japan centers were assessed. After a 90-day blanking period, primary efficacy was determined via freedom from a composite endpoint of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic drug escalation over 1 year. Patient improvement was evaluated via two quality of life (QoL) surveys (AFEQT and EQ-5D) at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

The analysis included 32 patients, 16 PAF and 16 PsAF, with PAF patients averaging 61.1 ± 10.6 years and PsAF patients averaging 62.8 ± 11.5 years of age. Females made up 31% of PAF and 25% of PsAF cohorts. Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of both cohorts. The primary efficacy success rate at 12 months was 75.0% for PAF and 56.3% for PsAF patients. No primary safety events occurred. The mean AFEQT score significantly increased for both PAF (25.9 points, p < 0.0001) and PsAF (13.2 points, p = 0.0002) patients, while the EQ-5D-5L score improved significantly for PAF (0.12 points, p = 0.048) patients but not for PsAF (0.04 points, p = 0.08) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to outcomes in the global cohort, ablation with the PulseSelect™ PFA catheter was efficient, effective, and safe in a Japanese population, resulting in improved QoL for PAF and PsAF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198701.

Predictors and incidence of health status deterioration in patients with early atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Various treatment approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) have demonstrated improved health status, yet the significance of these therapeutic interventions in individual patients remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate health status changes in patients with early AF, focusing on those who experience clinically significant deterioration after treatment initiation.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a multicenter, prospective registry of newly diagnosed patients with AF. One-year changes in health status across different treatment strategies were assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life Overall Summary (AFEQT-OS) score. Clinically relevant deterioration and improvement in health status were defined as ≥5-point decrease and increase in AFEQT-OS score, respectively; no change was -5 to 5 points.

RESULTS

Overall, 1960 patients with AF were evaluated. Mean AFEQT-OS scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up were 76.7 ± 17.7 and 85.4 ± 14.8, respectively. Although most patients (53.9%) experienced clinically important improvement, a considerable proportion had no change (28.7%) or deterioration (17.4%) in their health status. Proportions of patients with no change or deterioration varied by treatment strategy: 59.9%, 53.9%, and 32.0% in rate control, antiarrhythmic drug, and catheter ablation groups, respectively. The multivariable model identified older age, female sex, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and higher baseline AFEQT-OS score as independent predictors of worsening health status, regardless of treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with early AF experience worsening or no change in health status irrespective of treatment strategy. Standardizing patients' health status assessment, especially for patients with comorbidities, may aid in patients' selection and their outcomes.

Sex-specific outcomes after catheter ablation for persistent AF

BACKGROUND

Sex-specific outcomes after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have reported conflicting findings.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the impact of female sex on outcomes in patients with persistent AF (PsAF) from the Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicentre Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs PVI with Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation (CAPLA) randomized trial.

METHODS

A total of 338 patients with PsAF were randomized to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI with posterior wall isolation (PWI). The primary outcome was arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months. Clinical and electroanatomical characteristics, arrhythmia recurrence, and quality of life were compared between women and men.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine women (23.4%; PVI 37; PVI + PWI 42) and 259 men (76.6%; PVI 131; PVI + PWI 128) underwent AF ablation. Women were older {median age 70.4 (interquartile range [IQR] 64.8-74.6) years vs 64.0 (IQR 56.7-69.7) years; P < .001} and had more advanced left atrial electroanatomical remodeling. At 12 months, arrhythmia-free survival was lower in women (44.3% vs 56.8% in men; hazard ratio 1.44; 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.04; log-rank, P = .036). PWI did not improve arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.40; log-rank, P = .711). The median AF burden was 0% in both groups (women: IQR 0.0%-2.2% vs men: IQR 0.0%-2.8%; P = .804). Health care utilization was comparable between women (36.7%) and men (30.1%) (P = .241); however, women were more likely to undergo a repeat procedure (17.7% vs 6.9%; P = .007). Women reported more severe baseline anxiety (average Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] anxiety score 7.5 ± 4.9 vs 6.3 ± 4.3 in men; P = .035) and AF-related symptoms (baseline Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life Questionnaire [AFEQT] score 46.7 ± 20.7 vs 55.9 ± 23.0 in men; P = .002), with comparable improvements in psychological symptoms (change in HADS anxiety score -3.8 ± 4.6 vs -3.0 ± 4.5; P = .152 (change in HADS depression score -2.9 ± 5.0 vs -2.6 ± 4.0; P = .542) and greater improvement in AFEQT score compared with men at 12 months (change in AFEQT score +45.9 ± 23.1 vs +39.2 ± 24.8; P = .048).

CONCLUSION

Women undergoing CA for PsAF report more significant symptoms and poorer quality of life at baseline than men. Despite higher arrhythmia recurrence and repeat procedures in women, the AF burden was comparably low, resulting in significant improvements in quality of life and psychological well-being after CA in both sexes.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Research status of internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy in cancer patients

The latest global cancer burden data released by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization in 2020 shows that there were 19.29 million new cancer cases worldwide, with 4.57 million in China, ranking first. The number of cancer survivors is increasing, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 85%, but there are emotional disorders. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can improve negative emotions and has significant effects on patients. However, there is a limited number of physicians and high costs, so internet interventions have become a solution. The feasibility of web-based interventions for breast cancer patients has been proven. Research on internet-delivered CBT is also increasing. The purpose of this study was to review the concept of web-based CBT and its application status in cancer survivors, in order to provide relevant intervention for scholars and provide reference and supplement for patients to provide psychological therapy.

Sex differences in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: A difference-in-difference propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether male and female patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) differ in their risk of recurrence after catheter ablation remains controversial. Large differences in baseline characteristics between males and females often affect study results.

METHODS

Patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who received their first catheter ablation procedure between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for age, body mass index, and AF duration. Our main concerns were sex differences in comorbidities, procedures, arrhythmia recurrences, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

For this study, 352 patients (176 pairs) were matched, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Intraprocedural sex differences were apparent as more male patients received cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (55.00% vs. 31.43%, p = .005). Full follow-up, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year AF recurrence rates were comparable between male and female groups. Multivariable Cox regression showed that the recurrence risk of paroxysmal AF was similar between male and female patients. AF duration was the only potential risk factor and occurred for only male patients. There were no significant differences in the subgroup analyses. Procedure-related complications were comparable between the male and female groups.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe differences in baseline characteristics, arrhythmia recurrences, or procedure-related complications between male and female patients. Sex differences were reflected mainly in the finding that male patients received more cavotricuspid isthmus ablations, and atrial fibrillation duration was the only potential risk factor for recurrence and only for male patients.

Sex differences in atrial fibrillation ablation in-hospital outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample database 2016-2019

Background

Research has shown mixed results when comparing in-hospital complications following atrial fibrillation ablation in women compared to men.

Objectives

To better quantify sex differences and in-hospital outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation procedures and identify factors associated with poorer outcomes.

Methods

We queried the NIS database from 2016 to 2019 for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation ablation and excluded patients with any other arrhythmias, ICD/pacemaker placement. We assessed demographics, in-hospital mortality, and complications of women compared to men.

Results

Admissions for atrial fibrillation were more common in females than males (849 050 vs. 815 665; p < .001). However, females were less likely to receive ablation (1.65% vs. 2.71%, OR: 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.64, p < .001), which persisted after adjusting for cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.65, p < .001). The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality was not statistically different in univariate analysis (0.39% vs. 0.36%, OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.44-2.72, p = .84), finding that did not change when adjusted for comorbidities (adjusted OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.36-2.49). The complication rate in hospitalized patients following ablation was 8.08%. The total unadjusted complication rate was higher for females than males (9.58% vs. 7.09%, p = .001); however, it was not significant when adjusted for risks (adjusted OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99-1.53, p = .06).

Conclusion

Female sex is not associated with increased complications or death in a real-world study of catheter ablation when results are adjusted for risks. However, females admitted with atrial fibrillation receive ablation less often than males during hospital admission.

Sex Difference in Effectiveness of Early Rhythm- over Rate-Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: This study aimed to investigate the associations between sex and the relative effect of rhythm control over rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: We used the National Health Insurance Service database to select patients treated for atrial fibrillation within one year after diagnosis. The primary composite outcome comprised cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or acute myocardial infarction. Results: During the mean follow-up (4.9 ± 3.2 years), the benefit of rhythm control over rate control on the primary composite outcome became statistically insignificant after 3 months from atrial fibrillation diagnosis in women while remained steadily until 12 months in men. The risk of primary composite outcome for rhythm control was lower than that for rate control in both sexes if it was initiated within 6 months (men: HR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.79–0.94; women: HR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.78–0.93; P for interaction = 0.844). However, there was significant interaction between sex and the relative effect of rhythm control if it was initiated after 6 months (men: HR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.52–0.99; women: HR = 1.32, 95%CI = 0.92–1.88; P for interaction = 0.018). Conclusion: Rhythm control resulted in lower risk of primary composite outcome than rate control in both sexes; however, the treatment initiation at an earlier stage might be considered in women.

Sex Differences in the Outcomes of Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The literature data on the outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in women are contradictory.

Aim

To determine and compare the outcomes and complications of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (cryo-PVI) in men vs. women, and to identify predictors of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence.

Methods

We included all consecutive patients having undergone cryo-PVI for the treatment of symptomatic AF in our center since 2012. Peri-operative complications were documented. All patients were prospectively monitored for the recurrence of ATa, and predictors were assessed.

Results

A total of 733 patients were included (550 men (75%) and 183 (25%) women). Paroxysmal AF was recorded in 112 (61%) female patients and 252 male patients (46%; p < 0.001). Female patients were older (p < 0.001) and had a greater symptom burden (p = 0.04). Female patients were more likely to experience complications (p = 0.02). After cryo-PVI for paroxysmal AF, 66% of the female patients and 79% of the male patients were free of ATa at 24 months (p = 0.001). Female sex was the only independent predictive factor for ATa recurrence (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.87 [1.28; 2.73]; p = 0.001). After cryo-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF, 37% of the male patients and 39% of the female patients were free of ATa at 36 months (p = 0.73). Female patients were less likely than male patients to undergo repeat ablation after an index cryo-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

A single cryo-PVI procedure for paroxysmal AF was significantly less successful in female patients than in male patients. Overall, the complication rate was higher in women than in men.

Nationwide study of sex differences in incident heart failure in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a leading complication of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and the presence of both conditions worsens prognosis. Sex-specific associations between NVAF and outcomes focus on stroke; less is known about HF. We evaluated sex differences in incident HF in NVAF.

Methods

We identified adults age ≥ 65 years hospitalized for incident NVAF without prior HF from April 2010 to March 2018 in Canada. The primary outcome was incident HF hospitalization, with a secondary composite outcome of incident HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard regression models were constructed for the association between sex and outcomes, adjusting for age, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, cardioversion, and medications.

Results

Of 68,909 NVAF patients, 53.8% were women. Women had a higher rate of the primary outcome (30.0% vs 25.6%, P < 0.001) and the composite outcome (39.5% vs 36.6%, P < 0.001) than men. In multivariable analysis without adjusting for medications, there was an 8% increase risk of HF (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.11, P < 0.001) for women, which was attenuated when accounting for medication (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.04). After full adjustment, women age ≥ 75 years were at higher risk of the primary outcome (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.13, P < 0.001) and the composite outcome (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P < 0.001), compared with men, whereas there was a significantly lower risk for those age 65-75 years.

Conclusions

In this nationwide study of incident NVAF without HF, women age ≥ 75 years were more likely to develop HF or die than men. Strategies to prevent HF in older women with NVAF are needed.

The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance Atlas on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 5: Sex- and Gender-Unique Manifestations of Cardiovascular Disease

This Atlas chapter summarizes sex- and some gender-associated, and unique aspects and manifestations of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women. CVD is the primary cause of premature death in women in Canada and numerous sex-specific differences related to symptoms and pathophysiology exist. A review of the literature was done to identify sex-specific differences in symptoms, pathophysiology, and unique manifestations of CVD in women. Although women with ischemic heart disease might present with chest pain, the description of symptoms, delay between symptom onset and seeking medical attention, and prodromal symptoms are often different in women, compared with men. Nonatherosclerotic causes of angina and myocardial infarction, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection are predominantly identified in women. Obstructive and nonobstructive coronary artery disease, aortic aneurysmal disease, and peripheral artery disease have worse outcomes in women compared with men. Sex differences exist in valvular heart disease and cardiomyopathies. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is more often diagnosed in women, who experience better survival after a heart failure diagnosis. Stroke might occur across the lifespan in women, who are at higher risk of stroke-related disability and age-specific mortality. Sex- and gender-unique differences exist in symptoms and pathophysiology of CVD in women. These differences must be considered when evaluating CVD manifestations, because they affect management and prognosis of cardiovascular conditions in women.

Representation of Females in Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in males and females worldwide, and its prevalence is increasing. Management of AF is guided by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines which provide recommendations based on available evidence. The extent of sex-specific data in the AF literature used to provide guideline recommendations has not been investigated. Therefore, using the 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation Management Guidelines as example, the purpose of this study was to review female representation and the reporting of sex-disaggregated data in the studies referenced in AF guidelines.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohorts, were screened to calculate the proportion of study participants who were female and to establish whether studies provided sex disaggregated analyses. The participant prevalence ratio (PPR), a quotient of the female participant rate and the prevalence of females in the AF population, was calculated for each study.

RESULTS

A total of 885 studies included in the CCS guidelines were considered. Of those, 467 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, females represented 39.1% of the population in all studies and RCTs had the lowest proportions of females (33.8%, PPR: 0.70). Of studies with sex-disaggregated analyses (n=140 (29.9%)), single centered RCTs, and retrospective cohorts had the lowest and highest rate of sex-specific analyses respectively (11.5% vs 32.5%).

CONCLUSION

The evidence used to derive guideline recommendations may be inadequate for sex-specific recommendations. Until enough data can support female specific guidelines, increased inclusion of females in AF studies, may aid in the precision of recommendations.

Sex-Related Differences in Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Relationship to Ablation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Population studies have demonstrated a range of sex differences including a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in men and a higher risk of AF recurrence in women. However, the underlying reasons for this higher recurrence are unknown. This study evaluated whether sex-based electrophysiological substrate differences exist to account for worse AF ablation outcomes in women.

METHODS

High-density electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium was performed in 116 consecutive patients with AF. Regional analysis was performed across 6 left atrium segments. High-density maps were created using a multipolar catheter (Biosense Webster) during distal coronary sinus pacing at 600 and 300 ms. Mean voltage and conduction velocity was determined. Complex fractionated signals and double potentials were manually annotated.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 (36%) were female, mean age was 61±8 years and AF was persistent in 52%. Global mean voltage was significantly lower in females compared with males at 600 ms (1.46±0.17 versus 1.84±0.15 mV, P<0.001) and 300 ms (1.27±0.18 versus 1.57±0.18 mV, P=0.013) pacing. These differences were seen uniformly across the left atrium. Females demonstrated significant conduction velocity slowing (34.9±6.1 versus 44.1±6.9 cm/s, P=0.002) and greater proportion of complex fractionated signals (9.9±1.7% versus 6.0±1.7%, P=0.014). After a median follow-up of 22 months (Q1-Q3: 15-29), females had significantly lower single-procedure (22 [54%] versus 54 [75%], P=0.029) and multiprocedure (24 [59%] versus 60 [83%], P=0.005) arrhythmia-free survival. Female sex and persistent AF were independent predictors of single and multiprocedure arrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients demonstrated more advanced atrial remodeling on high-density electroanatomic mapping and greater post-AF ablation arrhythmia recurrence compared with males. These changes may contribute to sex-based differences in the clinical course of females with AF and in part explain the higher risk of recurrence.

Safety and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation according to sex in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited data on the outcomes of AF ablation according to sex. The purpose of this study was to evaluate gender differences in the actual outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Of 801,710 patients with AF in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we identified 9175 patients without valvular heart disease who underwent AF ablation between 2006 and 2015 and assessed 30-day safety and one-year effectiveness outcomes according to sex.

RESULTS

Of the 9175 patients who underwent AF ablation, 2206 (24%) were female. Women, compared to men, were older (60.8 ± 10.2 vs. 56.0 ± 10.5 years), had higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc (3.5 ± 1.7 vs. 2.0 ± 1.6), higher HAS-BLED (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2), and higher Charlson comorbidity index scores (3.8 ± 2.6 vs. 3.1 ± 2.5) (p < 0.001 for all). Following ablation, there was no significant difference in the risk of 30-day complications, including hemorrhage and tamponade, between women and men. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.22, p = 0.489) and AF rehospitalization (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.96-1.40, p = 0.135). Women were less likely to undergo cardioversion (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.84, p < 0.001) but were more likely to be re-hospitalized for heart failure (adjusted HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.11-3.11, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Women who underwent AF ablation did not differ from men in terms of the risk of complications and all-cause hospitalization in this study. The small increased risk in women reported in previous studies may be related to residual confounding, particularly from insufficient control for age and comorbidities.

Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study

Background

The natural history of autonomic alterations following catheter ablation of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is poorly defined, largely because of the historical reliance on non‐invasive intermittent rhythm monitoring for outcome ascertainment.

Methods and Results

The study included 346 patients with drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using contemporary advanced‐generation ablation technologies. All patients underwent insertion of a Reveal LINQ (Medtronic) implantable cardiac monitor before ablation. The implantable cardiac monitor continuously recorded physical activity, heart rate variability (measured as the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal), daytime heart rate, and nighttime heart rate. Longitudinal autonomic data in the 2‐month period leading up to the date of ablation were compared with the period from 91 to 365 days following ablation. Following ablation there was a significant decrease in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (mean difference versus baseline of 19.3 ms; range, 12.9–25.7; P<0.0001), and significant increases in daytime and nighttime heart rates (mean difference versus baseline of 9.6 bpm; range, 7.4–11.8; P<0.0001, and 7.4 bpm; range, 5.4–9.3; P<0.0001, respectively). Patients free of arrhythmia recurrence had significantly faster daytime (11±11 versus 8±12 bpm, P=0.001) and nighttime heart rates (8±9 versus 6±8 bpm, P=0.049), but no difference in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (P=0.09) compared with those with atrial fibrillation recurrence. Ablation technology and cryoablation duration did not influence these autonomic nervous system effects.

Conclusions

Pulmonary vein isolation results in significant sustained changes in the heart rate parameters related to autonomic function. These changes are correlated with procedural outcome and are independent of the ablation technology used.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01913522.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.