1
|
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:276-331. [PMID: 35430783 PMCID: PMC9013624 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
2
|
Duvoux C, Belli LS, Fung J, Angelico M, Buti M, Coilly A, Cortesi P, Durand F, Féray C, Fondevila C, Lebray P, Martini S, Nevens F, Polak WG, Rizzetto M, Volpes R, Zoulim F, Samuel D, Berenguer M. 2020 position statement and recommendations of the European Liver and Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA): management of hepatitis B virus-related infection before and after liver transplantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:583-605. [PMID: 34287994 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence is critical after liver transplantation in HBV patients. Despite new prophylactic schemes, most European LT centres persist on a conservative approach combining hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogues (NA). AIM This setting prompted the European Liver Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA) to look for a consensus on the prevention of HBV recurrence. METHODS Based on a 4-round Delphi process, ELITA investigated 16 research questions and established 50 recommendations. RESULTS Prophylaxis should be driven according to 3 simplified risk groups: Low and high virological risk patients, with undetectable and detectable HBV DNA pre-LT, respectively, and special populations (HDV, HCC, poorly adherent patients). In low-risk patients, short-term (4 weeks) combination of third-generation NA+ HBIG, or third generation NA monotherapy can be considered as prophylactic options. In high-risk patients, HBIG can be discontinued once HBV DNA undetectable. Combined therapy for 1 year is advised. HBV-HCC patients should be treated according to their virological risk. In HDV/HBV patients, indefinite dual prophylaxis remains the gold standard. Full withdrawal of HBV prophylaxis following or not HBV vaccination should only be attempted in the setting of clinical trials. Organs from HBsAg+ve donors may be considered after assessment of risks, benefits, and patient consent. They should not be used if HDV is present. In poorly adherent patients, dual long-term prophylaxis is recommended. Budget impact analysis should be taken into account to drive prophylactic regimen. CONCLUSIONS These ELITA recommendations should stimulate a more rational and homogeneous approach to HBV prophylaxis across LT programs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Orfanidou A, Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E. Antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: Current concepts. Liver Int 2021; 41:1448-1461. [PMID: 33656809 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The advance in treatment against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with the development of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with high genetic barrier to resistance, including entecavir and tenofovir, has improved clinical outcomes of patients transplanted for HBV infection, by preventing HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) effectively. Currently, after LT, the combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and a high-barrier NA is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence. However, because of the high cost of intravenous high-dose HBIG, other routes of HBIG administration, such as intramuscular or subcutaneous, have come to the foreground. In addition, several transplant centres tend to use a NA as monoprophylaxis, following a short post-LT period of HBIG and NA combination. Lately, studies using HBIG-free prophylactic regimens with entecavir or tenofovir have shown promising outcomes in preventing HBV recurrence, mostly regarding patients with undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT. Although vaccination against HBV has been an attractive prophylactic approach, its efficacy has been controversial. Moreover, further studies are needed regarding long-term outcomes of complete withdrawal anti-HBV prophylaxis. For patients transplanted for HBV/HDV co-infection, combined regimen should be administered for a longer period post-LT. Finally, the use of grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is safe for HBV-negative recipients, with the administration of lifelong antiviral prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Orfanidou
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George V Papatheodoridis
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Cholongitas
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manini MA, Bruce M, Whitehouse G, Mazzarelli C, Considine A, Agarwal K, Suddle A, Fagiuoli S, Heaton N, Heneghan M. A Very Short Course of HBIg+NA Followed by Entecavir or Tenofovir Monotherapy Prevents HBV Recurrence in Low-Risk Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:207-214. [PMID: 32605776 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.04.1822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoprophylaxis with third-generation nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) can be safely adopted in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, liver transplantation (LT) patients after at least 6 months of HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg)+NA. We investigated the efficacy of earlier initiation of post-LT entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF) monoprophylaxis. METHODS Between September 2011 and January 2017, all consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive transplanted patients were scheduled to receive HBIg with ETV or TDF for a period related to the risk for HBV reinfection: 1. low-risk patients (HBeAg-negative and HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL before LT) were due to withdraw from HBIg once HBsAg had become negative after a minimum of 7 days of HBIg+NA; 2. high-risk patients were due to receive HBIg for at least 6 months, after which they continued with third-generation NA monotherapy, only. RESULTS Twenty patients with a median interquartile range (IQR) follow-up of 46 (64-39) months were enrolled in the study (40% receiving ETV, 60% receiving TDF). Two low-risk patients refused early HBIg withdrawal and were therefore treated and analyzed along with the high-risk group. Eventually, there were 2 groups: group A, which included 12 low-risk patients, and group B, which included 8 patients (six high-risk, 2 low-risk). After transplantation, group A and B patients received HBIg+NA for a median (IQR) time of 7 (9-7) days and 9 (13-5) months, respectively. All 20 recipients demonstrated HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL and stable graft function during follow-up. Two patients (10%), 1 from each group, had HBsAg relapse. Notably, both patients who relapsed had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed before LT and showed very low levels (< 0.25 IU/mL) of HBsAg after recurrence. CONCLUSION In low-risk HBsAg-positive recipients, HBIg may be safely discontinued within 2 weeks of LT and replaced by ETV or TDF monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo A Manini
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Transplant Unit, Department of Specialty and Transplant Medicine, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
| | - Matthew Bruce
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin Whitehouse
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Mazzarelli
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ASST Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Aisling Considine
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kosh Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abid Suddle
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stefano Fagiuoli
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Transplant Unit, Department of Specialty and Transplant Medicine, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Heneghan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brancaccio G, Gaeta GB. Prophylaxis of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Re-Infection in Liver Transplantation: Is the Reappearance of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Significant? Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e920969. [PMID: 32231174 PMCID: PMC7146063 DOI: 10.12659/aot.920969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was in the past a primary cause of organ loss or mortality. Currently, post-OLT prophylaxis with anti-HBs immunoglobulins plus a nucleos(t)ide analogue has virtually abolished the risk of re-infection. Some studies have proposed to simplify prophylaxis by discontinuing immunoglobulins while continuing the analogue alone. This review analysed the available studies, focusing on the recurrence of HBsAg in serum and its biological effects. In all, 16 studies were retrieved, mainly observational or retrospective, each enrolling 14 to 80 patients. Our review of the literature found that HBsAg re-appeared in 0% to 24% of the patients, generally with HBV DNA undetectable in plasma. One study measured HBsAg using a new ultra-sensitive method, which could allow a reappraisal of the incidence of recurrence. This review discusses the role of HBV surface proteins in inducing hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly when mutations in the C-terminal occur that induce stop-codons that cause defects of secretion and retention of truncated protein S, resulting in direct cell toxicity and cancer. The data on the suspension of immunoglobulins in the prophylaxis regimes of post-transplant re infection do not appear sufficiently robust for an extensive and safe application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Brancaccio
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Gaeta
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Infectious Disease Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee WC, Chou HS, Wu TH, Cheng CH, Lee CF, Wang YC, Wu TJ, Chan KM. Low-dose anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimen as prophylaxis for hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21:e13190. [PMID: 31587427 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination of anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside is the most common regimen for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, what the optimal regimen is for HBIg administration remains subject to debate. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-two HBV patients who had liver transplantation were included in this study. According to the decline rate of HBIg, the patients were divided into quick (group Q, n = 95) and slow decline groups (group S, n = 137). Quick HBIg decline was defined as anti-HBs titer <200 IU/mL at postoperative month (POM) 1, when 24 000 IU of HBIg was given perioperatively. HBV recurrence was defined as reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). RESULTS After a mean (range) follow-up of 42.2 (24.1-76.8) months, the HBV recurrence rate was 12.1% for all 232 patients. The median (interquartile) HBIg titer was 96.2 (41.0-158.0) IU in group Q patients, compared to 418.0 (298.8-692.8) IU in group S patients at POM 1 (P < .001). For the patients in group Q, 18 patients (18.9%) had HBV recurrence; this was higher than the 10 (7.3%) patients in group S (P = .013). Multivariate analysis showed that quick HBIg decline and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence were the risk factors for HBV recurrence. CONCLUSION Perioperative low-dose HBIg and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients with slow HBIg decline. For patients with quick HBIg decline, the idealized HBIg and antiviral agent regimen should be adjusted to establish an effective regimen as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/virology
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Drug Therapy, Combination/methods
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood
- Hepatitis B Antibodies/immunology
- Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/immunology
- Hepatitis B virus/immunology
- Hepatitis B virus/isolation & purification
- Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology
- Hepatitis B, Chronic/immunology
- Hepatitis B, Chronic/prevention & control
- Hepatitis B, Chronic/virology
- Humans
- Immunization, Passive/methods
- Immunoglobulins/administration & dosage
- Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Liver Neoplasms/surgery
- Liver Neoplasms/virology
- Liver Transplantation/adverse effects
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/virology
- Prospective Studies
- Recurrence
- Secondary Prevention/methods
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Chen Lee
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Shiue Chou
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Han Wu
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hsien Cheng
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Fang Lee
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chao Wang
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Jung Wu
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Division of Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang-Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chien RN, Kao JH, Peng CY, Chen CH, Liu CJ, Huang YH, Hu TH, Yang HI, Lu SN, Ni YH, Chuang WL, Lee CM, Wu JC, Chen PJ, Liaw YF. Taiwan consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B. J Formos Med Assoc 2019; 118:7-38. [PMID: 30527436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The experts of Taiwan Association for the Study of Liver (TASL) have actively participated and led the guidelines on hepatitis B virus (HBV) management by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) which is the first international association for the study of liver to publish the statement on HBV management before. However, there are more and more new data on the natural history and treatment of HBV infection in the past decade. These include new application of an old biomarker (quantitative HBsAg), clinical significance of HBV genotype and naturally occurring mutations, the role of non-invasive examination in evaluating severity of hepatic fibrosis, clinical significance of outcome calculators, new drug or new combination strategies towards more effective therapy and organ transplantation including liver and non-liver transplantation. It is time to publish the guidelines on HBV management of Taiwan. Hence, TASL have conducted an expert meeting to review, to discuss and to debate the relevant literatures, followed by draft the manuscript of HBV management guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines include general management, indications for fibrosis assessment, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patient receiving immune suppression or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong-Nan Chien
- Liver Research Unit, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Jia-Horng Kao
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Yuan Peng
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hung Chen
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Jen Liu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatitis Research Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsiang Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hui Hu
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hwa-I Yang
- Department of Genomic Research Center, Sinica Academia, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Nan Lu
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Hsuan Ni
- Department of Pediatrics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Children's Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Won-Long Chuang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Mo Lee
- Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Chin Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Jer Chen
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Fan Liaw
- Liver Research Unit, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vasudevan A, Ardalan ZS, Ahmed N, Apostolov R, Gow PJ, Testro AG, Gane EJ, Angus PW. Long-term safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate substitution for hepatitis B immunoglobulin following liver transplantation. JGH Open 2018; 2:288-294. [PMID: 30619939 PMCID: PMC6308096 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Limitations to the use of long-term Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin (HBIg) following liver transplantation for hepatitis B (HBV) have led to the substitution of HBIg with oral nucleo(s)tide analogue prophylaxis. We prospectively assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from HBIg. METHODS An open-label, multicenter switch study was conducted to evaluate the substitution of TDF for HBIg whilst continuing lamivudine (LAM) therapy in preventing the recurrence of HBV in patients who had been maintained as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative posttransplantation for at least 12 months. RESULTS Eighteen patients were enrolled (median age 66 years, range 42-78 years); 84% were male, and 78% on calcineurin inhibitors. Median time after transplantation was 14 years (range 5-19), and median duration of HBIg/LAM prior to the switch was 10 years (range 1-14). Median follow-up was 5 years (range 5-8). Of 18 patients, 16 (89%) remained HBsAg and HBV DNA negative at the end of follow-up. Two patients had re-emergence of HBsAg without a detectable HBV DNA and no clinical sequelae. Creatinine clearance significantly reduced (median 59 mL/min to 51 mL/min, P = 0.03), necessitating dose reduction of TDF in six (33%) participants, with two eventually ceasing TDF. One patient switched back to HBIg by choice. All patients who changed therapy maintained an undetectable HBsAg. CONCLUSION Substitution of HBIg with TDF in patients on LAM is well tolerated and effective for the long-term prevention of HBV recurrence posttransplantation. Renal dysfunction occurs frequently in the posttransplant setting and can require dose adjustment of TDF or change of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zaid S Ardalan
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Navera Ahmed
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Ross Apostolov
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Paul J Gow
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Adam G Testro
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Ed J Gane
- New Zealand Liver Transplant UnitAuckland City HospitalNew Zealand
| | - Peter W Angus
- Liver Transplant Unit VictoriaAustin HealthMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Manini MA, Whitehouse G, Bruce M, Passerini M, Lim TY, Carey I, Considine A, Lampertico P, Suddle A, Heaton N, Heneghan M, Agarwal K. Entecavir or tenofovir monotherapy prevents HBV recurrence in liver transplant recipients: A 5-year follow-up study after hepatitis B immunoglobulin withdrawal. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:944-953. [PMID: 29735294 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Revised: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data suggest that oral third-generation nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) monoprophylaxis following hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) withdrawal may be effective to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 01/2010 and 03/2012, all HBV monoinfected and HBV/HDV co-infected LT patients followed in our centre withdrew HBIg ± NA and were commenced on either ETV or TDF as monotherapy. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were included in the study (55% TDF, 45% ETV). Group A comprised 69 HBV monoinfected patients and Group B 8 HBV/HDV co-infected patients. After HBIg withdrawal, Groups A and B patients were followed for 69 (range 13-83) months and 61 (range 31-78) months, respectively. No Group B patients had HBsAg or HBV DNA recurrence, while 6 (9%) Group A patients became HBsAg-positive after a median of 18 (range 1-40) months. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HBsAg recurrence was 9%. All 6 patients demonstrated undetectable HBV-DNA levels and stable graft function during 30 months of additional follow-up. In 3/6 patients, seroconversion was transitory, while the remaining 3 showed HBsAg levels <0.13 IU/mL over the entire period of observation. Pre-LT HCC emerged as the strongest predictor of HBsAg recurrence. CONCLUSION HBIG can be safely discontinued in HBsAgpositive LT recipients and replaced by ETV or TDF monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo A Manini
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; A.M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS CA' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gavin Whitehouse
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Bruce
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Passerini
- A.M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS CA' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiong Y Lim
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ivana Carey
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aisling Considine
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- A.M. and A. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS CA' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Abid Suddle
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Heneghan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kosh Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chauhan R, Lingala S, Gadiparthi C, Lahiri N, Mohanty SR, Wu J, Michalak TI, Satapathy SK. Reactivation of hepatitis B after liver transplantation: Current knowledge, molecular mechanisms and implications in management. World J Hepatol 2018; 10:352-370. [PMID: 29599899 PMCID: PMC5871856 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i3.352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Revised: 01/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem affecting an estimated 350 million people with more than 786000 individuals dying annually due to complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation (LT) is considered gold standard for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure and HCC. However, post-transplant viral reactivation can be detrimental to allograft function, leading to poor survival. Prophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and anti-viral drugs have achieved remarkable progress in LT by suppressing viral replication and improving long-term survival. The combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus HBIG has been for many years the most widely used. However, life-long HBIG use is both cumbersome and costly, whereas long-term use of LAM results in resistant virus. Recently, in an effort to develop HBIG-free protocols, high potency nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as Entecavir or Tenofovir, have been tried either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose HBIG with excellent results. Current focus is on novel antiviral targets, especially for covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), in an effort to eradicate HBV infection instead of viral suppression. However, there are several other molecular mechanisms through which HBV may reactivate and need equal attention. The purpose of this review is to address post-LT HBV reactivation, its risk factors, underlying molecular mechanisms, and recent advancements and future of anti-viral therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Chauhan
- Molecular Virology and Hepatology Research Group, Division of BioMedical Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Shilpa Lingala
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States
| | - Chiranjeevi Gadiparthi
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States
| | - Nivedita Lahiri
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Smruti R Mohanty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary Disease, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, United States
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Fudan University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Tomasz I Michalak
- Molecular Virology and Hepatology Research Group, Division of BioMedical Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN 38104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saab S, Chen PY, Saab CE, Tong MJ. The Management of Hepatitis B in Liver Transplant Recipients. Clin Liver Dis 2016; 20:721-736. [PMID: 27742010 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplant (LT) is now an established indication for patients with chronic hepatitis B, mainly because of the development and use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral antivirals for prophylaxis. The combination of low-dose HBIG and antivirals has been considered the standard prophylaxis regimen to prevent post-LT recurrence of hepatitis B. The important remaining issues are related to the long-term cost of HBIG and the risk of escape hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants. Strategies for prevention of HBV after LT are constantly improving. With the availability of new nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, new post-LT strategies also should emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sammy Saab
- Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Ping-Yu Chen
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Clara E Saab
- Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Myron J Tong
- Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lenci I, Baiocchi L, Tariciotti L, Di Paolo D, Milana M, Santopaolo F, Manzia TM, Toti L, Svicher V, Tisone G, Perno CF, Angelico M. Complete hepatitis B virus prophylaxis withdrawal in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive liver transplant recipients after longterm minimal immunosuppression. Liver Transpl 2016; 22:1205-1213. [PMID: 27272189 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Revised: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Tailored approaches have been attempted to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection in antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive liver transplantation (LT) recipients in order to minimize the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogues (NAs). We report the results of complete HBV prophylaxis withdrawal after a follow-up of at least 6 years in LT recipients with undetectable serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA at LT. We included 30 HBsAg positive, hepatitis B e antigen-negative recipients, 6 with hepatitis C virus and 7 with hepatitis D virus coinfection, who had received HBIG plus NA for at least 5 years after LT. Stepwise HBIG and NA withdrawal was performed in two 6-month periods under strict monitoring of HBV virology. All patients underwent a clinical, biochemical, and virological follow-up at 3-6 month intervals. HBV recurrence (HBsAg seroreversion ± detectable HBV DNA) occurred in 6 patients: in 1 patient after HBIG interruption and in 5 after both HBIG and NA cessation. Only 3 patients required reinstitution of HBV prophylaxis because of persistent HBV replication, and all achieved optimal control of HBV infection and did not experience clinical events. The other who recurred showed only short-lasting HBsAg positivity, with undetectable HBV DNA, followed by spontaneous anti-HBs seroconversion. An additional 15 patients mounted an anti-HBs titer, without previous serum HBsAg detectability. At the end of follow-up, 90% of patients were still prophylaxis-free, 93.3% were HBsAg negative, and 100% were HBV DNA negative; 60% had anti-HBs titers >10 IU/L (median, 143; range, 13-1000). This small series shows that complete prophylaxis withdrawal is safe in patients transplanted for HBV-related disease at low risk of recurrence and is often followed by spontaneous anti-HBs seroconversion. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding. Liver Transplantation 22 1205-1213 2016 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca Toti
- Liver Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Svicher
- Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Akcam AT, Ulku A, Rencuzogullari A, Eray IC, Okoh A, Kuran S, Dalcı K, Yalav O, Parsak CK, Sakman G, Demiryurek H. Antiviral Combination Therapy With Low-Dose Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin for the Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2016; 47:1445-9. [PMID: 26093739 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study presents the overall long-term hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate with possible associated factors after hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was given in combination with 4 different antiviral (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir) drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 2000 and October 2013, the medical records of 42 adult patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Cukurova University Medical Hospital for chronic liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) secondary to chronic HBV were reviewed retrospectively. The analyses of risk factors for recurrence were performed based on the efficacy of hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), HBV DNA, preoperative prophylaxis, and the presence of HCC. Posttransplantation HBV recurrence was defined as persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity after orthotopic liver transplantation, or the reappearance of HBsAg and HBV DNA after initial HBsAg undetectability despite prophylaxis. RESULTS The mean follow-up of 28 patients having HBIG and lamivudine prophylaxis was 73.25 ± 37.5 months with a recurrence rate of 3.5%. The mean follow-up of 2 patients having HBIG and adefovir prophylaxis was 90 ± 46.6 months with a 50% recurrence rate. The mean follow-up of each 6 patients who received prophylaxis with entecavir and tenofovir groups were 27.5 ± 16.1 and 16.17 ± 5.3 respectively, with no posttransplantation recurrence for both groups. On univariate analysis, preoperative factors such as anti-HBc, HBV DNA, preoperative prophylaxis, and the presence of HCC did not show any correlation with recurrence. However, HBeAg showed statistical significance for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose HBIG in combination with antiviral agents (lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir) is efficacious in preventing recurrence of HBV in posttransplantation patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Akcam
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey.
| | - A Ulku
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Rencuzogullari
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - I C Eray
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - A Okoh
- Department of General Surgery, Ankara University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - S Kuran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - K Dalcı
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - O Yalav
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - C K Parsak
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - G Sakman
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| | - H Demiryurek
- Department of General Surgery, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Sarıcam, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol 2016; 22:18-75. [PMID: 27044762 PMCID: PMC4825166 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2016.22.1.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
15
|
Veerappan A, VanWagner LB, Mathew JM, Huang X, Miller J, Lapin B, Levitsky J. Low incidence of acute rejection in hepatitis B virus positive liver transplant recipients and the impact of hepatitis B immunoglobulin. Hum Immunol 2016; 77:367-74. [PMID: 26924082 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Revised: 08/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Historically, hepatitis B virus (HBV) liver transplantation (LT) recipients have less acute cellular rejection (ACR) than those without HBV. We questioned whether this has persisted in an era of decreased Hepatitis B immunoglobulin use (HBIG) given its in vitro immunoregulatory effects. We compared the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of ACR among 40,593 primary LT recipients with HBV, hepatitis C, steatohepatitis, and immune liver disease (OPTN 2000-2011). We also assessed the in vitro effect of HBIG on alloimmune lymphoproliferation and regulatory T cell generation using mixed lymphocyte reactions. In multivariate analysis, HBV status remained a strong independent predictor of freedom from ACR (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 1.5-2.1). Patient (67.7% vs 72.3%) and graft (60.8% vs 69.1%) survival were significantly lower in patients with ACR versus no ACR for all causes except HBV. HBIG use had no statistical association with ACR. In vitro, HBIG at concentrations equivalent to clinical dosing did not inhibit lymphoproliferation or promote regulatory T cell development. In summary, the incidence and impact of ACR is lower now for HBV LT and does not appear to be secondary to HBIG by our in vitro and in vivo analyses. Rather, it may be due to the innate immunosuppressive properties of chronic HBV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annapoorani Veerappan
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 251 East Huron Street Galter Suite 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Lisa B VanWagner
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 251 East Huron Street Galter Suite 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Preventive Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - James M Mathew
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Microbiology-Immunology, 303 East Chicago Ave Ward 8-296, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Xuemei Huang
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Joshua Miller
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Brittany Lapin
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Josh Levitsky
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 251 East Huron Street Galter Suite 3-150, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, 676 N. St. Clair 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jiménez-Pérez M, González-Grande R, Mostazo Torres J, González Arjona C, Rando-Muñoz FJ. Management of hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12083-12090. [PMID: 26576093 PMCID: PMC4641126 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is responsible for up to 30% of cases of liver cirrhosis and up to 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver failure caused by HBV. The success of transplantation, though, depends on receiving prophylactic treatment against post-transplant viral reactivation. In the absence of prophylaxis, liver transplantation due to chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with high rates of viral recurrence and poor survival. The introduction of treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) during the 1990s and later the incorporation of oral antiviral drugs have improved the prognosis of these patients. Thus, LT for CHB is now a universally accepted option, with an estimated 5 years survival of around 85% vs the 45% survival seen prior to the introduction of HBIG. The combination of lamivudine plus HBIG has for many years been the most widely used prophylactic regimen. However, with the appearance of new more potent oral antiviral agents associated with less resistance (e.g., entecavir and tenofovir) for the treatment of CHB, new prophylactic strategies are being designed, either in combination with HBIG or alone as a monotherapy. These advances have allowed for more personalized prophylaxis based on the individual risk profile of a given patient. In addition, the small pool of donors has required the use of anti-HBc-positive donors (with the resulting possibility of transmitting HBV from these organs), which has been made possible by suitable prophylactic regimens.
Collapse
|
17
|
Song ZL, Cui YJ, Zheng WP, Teng DH, Zheng H. Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12091-12100. [PMID: 26576094 PMCID: PMC4641127 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 08/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients' condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.
Collapse
|
18
|
Dantas LC, Genzini T, de Miranda MP, dos Santos RG, de Siqueira NG, Weirich J, Lobato CMDO. Liver transplantation in a patient with hepatitis B, C and D coinfection associated with hepatocellular carcinoma: a management strategy for a rare condition. Case report. SAO PAULO MED J 2015; 133:525-30. [PMID: 26176835 PMCID: PMC10496563 DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2015.8881501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2014] [Revised: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease. Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C infection is the leading indication for liver transplantation worldwide. However, patients who are given transplants because of viral liver diseases often present clinical coinfections, including hepatitis B together with hepatitis D. Currently, different strategies exist for patient management before and after liver transplantation, and these are based on different protocols developed by the specialized transplantation centers. CASE REPORT We present a rare case of a 58-year-old man with chronic hepatitis B, C and D coinfection. The patient developed cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. His treatment comprised antiviral therapy for the three viruses and OLT. The patient's outcome was satisfactory. CONCLUSION OLT, in association with antiviral therapy using entecavir, which was administered before and after transplantation, was effective for sustained clearance of the hepatitis B and D viruses. A recurrence of hepatitis C infection after transplantation responded successfully to standard treatment comprising peginterferon alfa-2A and ribavirin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Carvalho Dantas
- MD. Physician, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil
| | - Tércio Genzini
- MSc. Physician, Director and Founder, Liver Transplantation Group, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Perosa de Miranda
- MSc. Physician, Director and Founder, Liver Transplantation Group, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Regina Gomes dos Santos
- MD. Physician, Liver Transplantation Group, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - Judith Weirich
- MD, MSc. Physician, Hepatology and Tropical Diseases Unit, Hospital das Clínicas do Acre, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fernández I, Loinaz C, Hernández O, Abradelo M, Manrique A, Calvo J, Manzano M, García A, Cambra F, Castellano G, Jiménez C. Tenofovir/entecavir monotherapy after hepatitis B immunoglobulin withdrawal is safe and effective in the prevention of hepatitis B in liver transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2015; 17:695-701. [PMID: 26257166 DOI: 10.1111/tid.12434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2015] [Revised: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and a nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) is considered the standard of care for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, use of lifelong HBIG has significant limitations. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) after withdrawal of HBIG in patients who had been under HBIG-regimen prophylaxis post LT. METHODS Patients at low risk of recurrence were eligible for HBIG discontinuation (fulminant HBV hepatitis, co-infection with hepatitis D virus, and hepatitis B e antigen-negative cirrhotic patients with HBV DNA levels <300 copies/mL). All patients had received HBIG, with or without NA, for at least 12 months after LT. After HBIG discontinuation, they continued with ETV or TDF monotherapy. Patients were followed up with HBV serum markers and evaluation of renal function. RESULTS Between September 2011 and June 2014, 58 liver transplant recipients were converted to TDF (31, 53%) or ETV (27, 47%). Mean follow-up after conversion was 28 ± 5 months (range 13-36 months). Five patients (8.6%) developed detectable hepatitis B surface antigen at 7, 9, 13, 15, and 22 months after HBIG discontinuation. However, in every case seroconversion was transitory, serum HBV DNA was undetectable, with no clinical manifestations of HBV recurrence. No adverse effects were observed or dose reductions required associated with ETV or TDF. CONCLUSIONS Maintenance therapy with newer NAs, after discontinuation of HBIG prophylaxis, was safe and effective, with a low rate of serological recurrence and no evident clinical, biochemical, or virological consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Fernández
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - C Loinaz
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - O Hernández
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - M Abradelo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - A Manrique
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - J Calvo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - M Manzano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - A García
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - F Cambra
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - G Castellano
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| | - C Jiménez
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Khemichian S, Hsieh MJ, Zhang SR, Limurti J, Kim J, Fong TL. Nucleoside-Nucleotide Analog Combination Therapy Is Effective in Preventing Recurrent Hepatitis B After Liver Transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:2807-12. [PMID: 25939541 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3671-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) in combination with a nucleos(t)ide analog is the mainstay of prophylactic regimen to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). HBIg therapy is costly and inconvenient for the patients. There is a growing experience converting HBIg/nucleos(t)ide to combination nucleotide/nucleoside analogs from. METHODS Twenty-six patients that underwent OLT between March 2001 and July 2011 who had received at least 12 months of HBIg and single nucleos(t)ide were enrolled. HBsAg and HBV DNA were undetectable, and anti-HBs were detectable at the time of switch. HBV DNA and HBsAg were measured every 3 months following discontinuation of HBIg and addition of nucleos(t)ide. RESULTS Patients included 23 Asians/3 Caucasian, 21 males/5 females. Mean time of conversion from HBIg/nucleos(t)ide to nucleoside/nucleotide combination was 77.5 (range 11-132) months after OLT. Mean duration of follow-up after conversion was 31.9 (range 14-70) months. All patients had undetectable HBV DNA, and 24 patients remained HBsAg negative during follow-up. Two patients recurred 7 and 9 months later, respectively, with detectable HBsAg. Both patients continued to have undetectable HBV DNA and normal ALT. HBsAg was neutralized by reinfusion of HBIg. CONCLUSION Nucleoside/nucleotide combination is an effective alternative to HBIg/nucleos(t)ide to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B after OLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saro Khemichian
- Liver Transplantation Program, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
A new scheme with infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with entecavir for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence among liver transplant recipients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:901-6. [PMID: 26011237 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Liver transplantation significantly increases recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) among high-risk patients. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antiviral nucleotide analogues are effective prophylaxis reagents in preventing HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs with these treatments. METHODS To explore a more cost-effective prophylaxis protocol in patients after liver transplantation, we treated patients with an initial high dose of 10 000 IU HBIG during the anhepatic phase and a second high dose of HBIG at an optimal time point during surgery. The patients were treated with the traditional European protocol as a control, in which one dose of 10 000 IU HBIG was infused during the anhepatic phase and multiple doses of 10 000 IU HBIG were administered daily for 1 week after liver transplantation. RESULTS There were two mortalities among 50 patients treated with the new protocol and nine mortalities among 52 patients treated with the European protocol within 3 years after liver transplantation. The new prophylaxis method markedly improved the 3-year survival without HBV recurrence in 50 treated patients. However, there were five recurrences in 52 patients treated with the European protocol. High-risk factors such as HBV DNA+, positive hepatitis B e antigen, and hepatocellular carcinoma were all detected among five patients with HBV recurrence. The suppressed HBV recurrence was associated with significantly lower serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in the new protocol-treated patients tested at 1 month and 1 week after liver surgery compared with those treated with the European protocol. CONCLUSION Infusion of two high doses of HBIG during surgery in combination with entecavir significantly prevented HBV recurrence and improved the 3-year survival after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Molecular Mechanisms to Control Post-Transplantation Hepatitis B Recurrence. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:17494-513. [PMID: 26263973 PMCID: PMC4581205 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160817494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Revised: 07/25/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B often progresses to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although newer nucleos(t)ide analogues result in >90% viral and hepatitis activity control, severely decompensated patients still need OLT because of drug-resistant virus, acute exacerbation, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute hepatitis B is also an indication for OLT, because it can progress to fatal acute liver failure. After OLT, the hepatitis B recurrence rate is >80% without prevention, while >90% of transplant recipients are clinically controlled with combined hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost; therefore, several treatment protocols with low-dose HBIG, combined with nucleos(t)ide analogues, have been investigated. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using an HBV envelope (HBs) antigen vaccine. Patients who are not HBV carriers, such as those with acutely infected liver failure, are good candidates for vaccination. For chronic HBV carrier liver cirrhosis patients, a successful vaccine response can only be achieved in selected patients, such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols. The present protocol for post-OLT HBV control and the future prospects of newer treatment strategies are reviewed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Cholongitas E, Tziomalos K, Pipili C. Management of patients with hepatitis B in special populations. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:1738-1748. [PMID: 25684938 PMCID: PMC4323449 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of effective nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has improved the outcome of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This review updates issues related to the management of CHB patients included in special populations. Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) represent the currently recommended first-line NAs in patients with HBV decompensated cirrhosis. The combination of HBV immunoglobulin (usually for a finite duration) and NA is considered the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. TDF is the best choice for hemodialysis patients and in patients with chronic kidney disease with nucleoside resistance. ETV and telbivudine are the preferred options in naïve renal transplant recipients and with low viremia levels, respectively. All hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive candidates should be treated with NAs before renal transplantation to achieve undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation. Conventional interferon or NAs can also be used in children, on the basis of well-established therapeutic indication. Pregnant women at high risk of perinatal transmission could be treated with lamivudine, telbivudine or TDF in the last trimester of pregnancy. HBsAg-positive patients under immunosuppression should receive NA pre-emptively (regardless of HBV DNA levels) up to 12 mo after its cessation. In HBsAg negative, anti-HBc positive patients under immunosuppression, further studies are needed to form a final conclusion; however, it seems that anti-HBV prophylaxis is justified in such patients with hematological diseases and/or for those receiving rituximab-containing regimens, regardless of their anti-HBs or serum HBV DNA status.
Collapse
|
24
|
Takaki A, Yagi T, Yamamoto K. Safe and cost-effective control of post-transplantation recurrence of hepatitis B. Hepatol Res 2015; 45:38-47. [PMID: 24905970 PMCID: PMC4309460 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Revised: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUC) is the current standard of care for controlling hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost, and thus several protocols for treatment with low-dose HBIG combined with NUC or HBIG-free regimens have been developed. This article reviews recent advances in post-OLT hepatitis B virus (HBV) control and future methodological directions. New NUC such as entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil combinations induce a very low frequency of viral resistance. The withdrawal of HBIG after several months of OLT under new NUC continuation also has permissible effects. Even after HBV reactivation, NUC can usually achieve viral control when viral markers are strictly followed up. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-HBV antibodies via vaccination with a hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine. However, HBV vaccination is not sufficiently effective in patients to treat liver cirrhosis type B after OLT because immune tolerance to the virus has already continued for several decades. Trials of its safety and cost-effectiveness are required. This review advocates a safe and economical approach to controlling post-OLT HBV recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinobu Takaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan,Correspondence: Dr Akinobu Takaki, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Takahito Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Transplant and Surgical Oncology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harmancı Ö, Selçuk H, Haberal M. Prophylaxis against Recurrence in Liver Transplantation Patients with Hepatitis B Virus: What is New? J Clin Transl Hepatol 2014; 2:259-65. [PMID: 26356785 PMCID: PMC4521236 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2014.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes an endemic infection that affects nearly 2 billion patients worldwide. It is one of the leading causes of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver transplantation (LT). Recurrence of HBV infection after LT is due to specific HBV-host genome interactions. Although hepatitis B immunoglobulin treatment constituted the backbone of HBV recurrence, use of the nucleoside and nucleotide analogs (especially the ones with a higher genetic barrier to resistance), either alone or in combination, offer us new and powerful options in overcoming this serious issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Özgür Harmancı
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Correspondence to: Özgür Harmancı, Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Mareşal Fevzi çakmak Cad. No:45 Bahçelievler, 06490, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: +90-312-212-6868, Fax: +90-312-215-0835. E-mail:
| | - Haldun Selçuk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Haberal
- Department of General Surgery, Başkent University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fung J, Lai CL, Yuen MF. Management of chronic hepatitis B in severe liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:16053-16061. [PMID: 25473157 PMCID: PMC4239491 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Revised: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past few decades, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has evolved from a disease that was untreatable and progressive, to one that can be easily controlled with antiviral therapy. However, patients with severe liver disease still remain difficult to treat despite the availability of highly potent nucleos(t)ide analogs. These include those with underlying cirrhosis, severe flares of CHB, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and for those undergoing liver transplantation. For those with established cirrhosis, antiviral therapy should be considered for all, as unpredictable flares can still occur, which can be fatal for those with advanced chronic liver disease. However, even with effective viral suppression, the development of HCC can still occur. For patients with severe flares of CHB, although the use of antiviral can improve long term outcomes, a significant proportion may still die without liver transplantation. The short term prognosis of these patients is dependent on both the severity of flare and underlying pre-existing liver disease. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, liver failure secondary to severe flares, or those with HCC, liver transplantation may be curative. After liver transplantation, long term antiviral therapy is required to prevent graft loss from recurrent hepatitis B infection. The use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) in combination with an oral antiviral agent has been the mainstay of post-transplant antiviral regimen for over a decade. With newer and more potent antiviral agents such as tenofovir and entecavir, use of these agents along with HBIG have demonstrated to be effective in preventing significant recurrence in the long term.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ghaziani T, Sendi H, Shahraz S, Zamor P, Bonkovsky HL. Hepatitis B and liver transplantation: molecular and clinical features that influence recurrence and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:14142-55. [PMID: 25339803 PMCID: PMC4202345 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that about 350 million people throughout the world are chronically infected with HBV. Some of these people will develop hepatic cirrhosis with decompensation and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. For such patients, liver transplantation may be the only hope for cure or real improvement in quality and quantity of life. Formerly, due to rapidity of recurrence of HBV infection after liver transplantation, usually rapidly progressive, liver transplantation was considered to be contraindicated. This changed dramatically following the demonstration that hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), could prevent recurrent HBV infection. HBIG has been the standard of care for the past two decades or so. Recently, with the advent of highly active inhibitors of the ribose nucleic acid polymerase of HBV (entecavir, tenofovir), there has been growing evidence that HBIG needs to be given for shorter lengths of time; indeed, it may no longer be necessary at all. In this review, we describe genetic variants of HBV and past, present, and future prophylaxis of HBV infection during and after liver transplantation. We have reviewed the extant medical literature on the subject of infection with the HBV, placing particular emphasis upon the prevention and treatment of recurrent HBV during and after liver transplantation. For the review, we searched PubMed for all papers on the subject of "hepatitis B virus AND liver transplantation". We describe some of the more clinically relevant and important genetic variations in the HBV. We also describe current practices at our medical centers, provide a summary and analysis of comparative costs for alternative strategies for prevention of recurrent HBV, and pose important still unanswered questions that are in need of answers during the next decade or two. We conclude that it is now rational and cost-effective to decrease and, perhaps, cease altogether, the routine use of HBIG during and following liver transplantation for HBV infection. Here we propose an individualized prophylaxis regimen, based on an integrated approach and risk-assessment.
Collapse
|
28
|
Contradictory immune response in post liver transplantation hepatitis B and C. Int J Inflam 2014; 2014:814760. [PMID: 25215259 PMCID: PMC4158295 DOI: 10.1155/2014/814760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B and C often progress to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). After OLT, hepatitis B recurrence is clinically controlled with a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using a HBV envelope antigen vaccine. Patients who had not been HBV carriers such as acutely infected liver failure or who received liver from HBV self-limited donor are good candidate. For chronic HBV carrier patients, a successful response can only be achieved in selected patients such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols or received an anti-HBV adaptive memory carrying donor liver. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfects transplanted livers at a rate of >90%. HCV reinfected patients show different severities of hepatitis, from mild and slowly progressing to severe and rapidly progressing, possibly resulting from different adaptive immune responses. More than half the patients require interferon treatment, although the success rate is low and carries risks for leukocytopenia and rejection. Managing the immune response has an important role in controlling recurrent hepatitis C. This study aimed to review the adaptive immune response in post-OLT hepatitis B and C.
Collapse
|
29
|
Wang P, Tam N, Wang H, Zheng H, Chen P, Wu L, He X. Is hepatitis B immunoglobulin necessary in prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation? A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e104480. [PMID: 25102072 PMCID: PMC4125198 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims Application of nucleoside analogues and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) has reduced hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate after liver transplantation (LT) dramatically. Recent data suggests therapy without HBIG is also effective. We sought to evaluate the necessity of HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT. Methods A meta-analysis was performed. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge and other databases were searched for eligible literatures. The major end points were recurrence rate, patient survival, and YMDD mutant. Risk difference (RD) or risk ratio (RR) was calculated to synthesize the results. Results Nineteen studies with a total of 1484 patients were included in this analysis. Application of HBIG was helpful to reduce HBV recurrence [P<0.001; RD = 0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI)(0.12, 0.20)] and virus mutants [P<0.001; RR = 3.13; 95%CI (1.86–5.26)], it also improved patients' 1-year [P = 0.03; RD = 0.08; 95%CI (0.01, 0.15)] and 3-year survival rates [P = 0.005; RD = 0.17; 95%CI(0.05, 0.28)]. No significant difference was found for patients' 5-year survival [P = 0.46; RD = −0.06; 95%CI (−0.21, 0.10)]. Sub-group analysis showed that in patients with positive pre-operative HBV DNA status, HBIG was necessary to reduce HBV recurrence rate (P<0.001; RD = 0.42; 95%CI (0.32, 0.52)). In patients with negative HBV DNA, combined therapy gained no significant advantages (P = 0.18; RD = 0.06; 95%CI (−0.03, 0.14)). Non-Lamivudine (non-LAM) antiviral drugs performed as well as combination therapy in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT (P = 0.37; RD = 0.06; 95%CI (−0.02, 0.14)). Conclusions HBIG with nucleoside analogues is helpful to reduce HBV recurrence and virus mutants. The necessity of HBIG in prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LT when using new potent nucleoside analogues, especially for patients with negative pre-transplant HBV DNA status remains to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peijie Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ngalei Tam
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, the University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Haochen Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanwei Zheng
- Liver Disease Department, Shijiazhuang Fifth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- Clinical Center for Liver Disease, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Philip Chen
- Nephrology Department, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Linwei Wu
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Xiaoshun He
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Verna EC. Hepatitis viruses and liver transplantation: evolving trends in antiviral management. Clin Liver Dis 2014; 18:575-601. [PMID: 25017077 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Viral hepatitis is both a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) and an important cause of posttransplant graft loss and mortality. Treatment and prevention of hepatitis B virus in LT recipients, with the observed corresponding improvement in post-LT outcomes, is among the great success stories in transplantation. By comparison, treatment of hepatitis C virus with safe and effective regimens is only just becoming a reality. Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in LT recipients represents a newly described phenomenon that can also lead to graft loss; early diagnosis and treatment may be key in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Verna
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Cholongitas E, Goulis I, Antoniadis N, Fouzas I, Imvrios G, Papanikolaou V, Akriviadis E. New nucleos(t)ide analogue monoprophylaxis after cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin is effective against hepatitis B recurrence. Transpl Int 2014; 27:1022-8. [PMID: 24909714 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Revised: 04/21/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
New nucleos(t)ide agents (NAs) [entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF)] have made hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-sparing protocols an attractive approach against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Twenty-eight patients transplanted for HBV cirrhosis in our centre were prospectively evaluated. After LT, each patient received HBIG (1000 IU IM/day for 7 days and then monthly for 6 months) plus ETV or TDF and then continued with ETV or TDF monoprophylaxis. All patients had undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT, and they were followed up with laboratory tests including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after LT. All patients (11 under ETV and 17 under TDF) remained HBsAg/HBV DNA negative during the follow-up period [median: 21 (range 9-43) months]. GFR was not different between TDF and ETV groups of patients at 6 and 12 months and last follow-up (P value >0.05 for all comparisons). The two groups of patients were similar regarding their ratio of maximum rate of tubular phosphate reabsorption to the GFR (TmP/GFR). In conclusion, in this prospective study, we showed for the first time that maintenance therapy with ETV or TDF monoprophylaxis after 6 months of low-dose HBIG plus ETV or TDF after LT is highly effective and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Cholongitas
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School of Aristotle University, Hippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kasraianfard A, Watt KD, Lindberg L, Alexopoulos S, Rezaei N. HBIG Remains Significant in the Era of New Potent Nucleoside Analogues for Prophylaxis Against Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation. Int Rev Immunol 2014; 35:312-324. [PMID: 24911598 DOI: 10.3109/08830185.2014.921160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
34
|
Congly SE, Doucette KE, Coffin CS. Outcomes and management of viral hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:414-424. [PMID: 24574710 PMCID: PMC3923016 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2013] [Revised: 10/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients with viral hepatitis co-infection is increasingly offered in many North American and European liver transplant centers. Prior studies have demonstrated acceptable post-transplant outcomes and no increased risk of HIV complications in patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, liver transplantation in HIV positive patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has poorer outcomes overall, requiring careful selection of candidates. This review aims to summarize the published literature on outcomes after transplant in HIV patients with HBV or HCV related end-stage liver disease and recommendations for management. In particular the pre-transplant factors impacting outcomes in HCV/HIV co-infected candidates and importance of multidisciplinary management will be discussed.
Collapse
|