Survival benefit of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with portal vein invasion

Conditional survival after liver resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Conditional survival (CS) is a measure of prognosis of patients who have already survived several years since diagnosis. However, few studies have investigated the CS of patients who underwent liver resection (LR) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We enrolled 942 consecutive patients who underwent LR for HCC with pathology-defined American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition stage 1 or 2 disease. The three-year CS was calculated as CS = S(x + 3)/S(x) and represented the probability of surviving an additional three years, given that the patient had already survived x years. The one-, three-, and five-year survival rates were 97.1%, 86.7%, and 76.1%, respectively, and were lower in cases with AJCC stage 2 disease, alpha-fetoprotein level of ≥ 20 ng/ml, presence of cirrhosis, anti-hepatitis C virus positivity, age > 65 years, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of > 9. However, the three-year CS indicated that these variables were associated with shortened survival only in the first two years. From the third year after LR, the probability of survival of patients was similar between subgroups. CS is useful for providing a dynamic evaluation of survival during postoperative follow-up.

Induction hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma with massive portal vein tumor thrombosis: a case series of 20 patients

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis is very poor, and the optimal treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study is to examine the safety and feasibility of our multimodal treatment.

METHODS

This was a single-institution, retrospective case series. From 2013 to 2018, induction hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy was given to 20 consecutive Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma harboring portal vein tumor thrombosis in the main portal trunk or first branch, even with intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis. When the cancers including thrombus and metastatic disease were well controlled, surgical resection was considered. When macroscopic complete resection was achieved, two courses of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy were added as adjuvant therapy, whereas patients who had remnant disease after surgery were provided treatment according to the type of lesion.

RESULTS

No treatment-related deaths were noted. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 35.0% and 65.0%, respectively. After induction treatment, 10 of 20 patients underwent surgery. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or more) were observed in three cases, and median postoperative hospital stay was 15.5 days. Median survival time of all 20 patients was 14.5 months and that in patients who underwent surgery was significantly longer than that in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (19.5 months versus 9.0 months, p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSION

Induction treatment followed by surgery was safe and feasible for hepatocellular carcinoma with massive portal vein tumor thrombosis. Surgical resection might be oncologically appropriate for selected patients after induction treatment even with advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC - B and - C: an Italian multicentric analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent papers report significant survival gain after liver resection in BCLC-B and -C HCC patients. The results of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in such patients have not been widely investigated so far.

METHODS

Data regarding patients undergoing MILS or open liver resection (OLR) for HCC staged BCLC -B and -C were extracted from the HERCOLES database. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was adopted to balance the confounders. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint including post-hepatectomy liver failure, severe postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

627 patients were included (459 undergoing OLR and 168 receiving MILS). After IPTW, no difference was found in the composite endpoint between MILS and OLR (OR 0.86 [95%CI 0.46-1-60]; p = 0.62). MILS reduced the risk of receiving intra-operative transfusions (OR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.58]; p < 0.001) and of developing postoperative ascites (OR 0.56 [95%CI 0,32-0,98]; p = 0.039), with reduced length of stay (OR 0.82 [95%CI 0.66-1.01]; p = 0.045). The survival analysis showed no differences between MILS and OLR for both OS (p = 0.13) and DFS (p = 0.491).

CONCLUSION

MILS was shown to be safe and feasible for selected non-metastatic HCC patients staged BCLC B and C, reducing the risk of perioperative transfusions and postoperative ascites, and shortening the length of stay.

Multivariable prognostic models for post-hepatectomy liver failure: An updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

Partial hepatectomy continues to be the primary treatment approach for liver tumors, and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains the most critical life-threatening complication following surgery.

AIM

To comprehensively review the PHLF prognostic models developed in recent years and objectively assess the risk of bias in these models.

METHODS

This review followed the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Three databases were searched from November 2019 to December 2022, and references as well as cited literature in all included studies were manually screened in March 2023. Based on the defined inclusion criteria, articles on PHLF prognostic models were selected, and data from all included articles were extracted by two independent reviewers. The PROBAST was used to evaluate the quality of each included article.

RESULTS

A total of thirty-four studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Nearly all of the models (32/34, 94.1%) were developed and validated exclusively using private data sources. Predictive variables were categorized into five distinct types, with the majority of studies (32/34, 94.1%) utilizing multiple types of data. The area under the curve for the training models included ranged from 0.697 to 0.956. Analytical issues resulted in a high risk of bias across all studies included.

CONCLUSION

The validation performance of the existing models was substantially lower compared to the development models. All included studies were evaluated as having a high risk of bias, primarily due to issues within the analytical domain. The progression of modeling technology, particularly in artificial intelligence modeling, necessitates the use of suitable quality assessment tools.

Precision surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma arises in the setting of cirrhosis in most cases, requiring multidisciplinary input to define resectability. In this regard, more precise surgical management considers patient factors and anatomical states, including resection margins, tumour biology, and perioperative therapy. Together with advances in surgical techniques, this integrated approach has resulted in considerable improvements in patient morbidity and oncological outcomes. Despite this, recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma remain high. As the systemic treatment landscape in hepatocellular carcinoma continues to evolve and locoregional options are increasingly used, we review current and future opportunities to individualise the surgical management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy

The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by several prognostic factors, mainly tumor stage, patient's health, liver function and specific characteristics of each intervention. The interplay between these factors should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board. To support this, the novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy" (MTH) concept has been recently proposed. This review will present the main features of available surgical treatments for HCC (liver transplantation, liver resection, ablation). Strengths and weaknesses are reported in the light of clinical decision making and of treatment allocation, with a special focus on the collocation of each treatment in the MTH framework and on how MTH may be useful in supporting clinical decision. Sequential treatments and their role to allow further surgical treatments will also be analyzed.

Consensus of Chinese Experts on Neoadjuvant and Conversion Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy in China, with high recurrence rate and low resection rate among patients first diagnosed. Preoperative treatments including neoadjuvant and conversion therapy have the potential to overcome these challenges. In December 2021, Chinese expert consensus on neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma was published. With the emersion of new evidence regarding the neoadjuvant and conversion therapies for HCC, the cooperative group brought together multidisciplinary researchers and scholars with experience in related fields to update the new edition (2023 Edition) for reference in China, including principle of the treatment strategies, the potential populations selection, treatment methods, multidisciplinary team, and future research for preoperative treatments. The new consensus aims to provide guidance for clinical application. Through the use of neoadjuvant therapy and conversion therapy, we can enhance the resection rate and reduce the recurrence of intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients, thereby improving survival outcomes.

Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma combined with type I/II portal vein tumor thrombus

BACKGROUND

Despite the expanding indications for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains unclear. The aim of the current study is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes following LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for HCC with PVTT.

METHODS

All HCC patients with PVTT registered for surgery between April 2015 and May 2022 were enrolled. Patients were divided into LLR and OLR groups, and postoperative recovery and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients in the LLR group and one hundred seventeen patients in the OLR group were included for comparison. The blood loss was less and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in LLR group compared to OLR group both before and after propensity score matching. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) time did not significantly differ between the two groups (8.0 months [95% CI 3.1-13.0] vs. 7.5 months [95% CI 6.0-9.1]; P = 0.845). In stratified analysis, both the recurrence pattern and the median RFS time were comparable between the LLR group and the OLR group in type I PVTT (7.23 [95% CI 0.35-14.12] vs. 7.17 months [95% CI 3.49-10.85]; P = 0.794) and type II PVTT (8.96 [95% CI 0-19.56] vs. 7.60 months [95% CI 5.98-9.22], P = 0.651), respectively. The multivariate regression analysis showed that the tumor size ≥ 10 cm, AFP > 200 ng/ml, and HBV-DNA > 1000 copies/ml were independent risk factors for RFS.

CONCLUSION

LLR for HCC patients with type I/II PVTT could be safely performed with superior short-term recovery and similar long-term survival compared to OLR. Larger tumor size, higher AFP, and elevated HBV-DNA levels contribute to worse RFS.

Adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors improve recurrence and survival outcomes in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent malignancy in China, with liver resection recognized as the primary curative intervention. However, HCC patients face an elevated risk of recurrence, thereby significantly impacting prognosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the impact of adjuvant programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors on survival outcomes in patients with HCC who are at high risk for postoperative recurrence following curative hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 199 study participants, 77 received adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline differences between patients who received adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors and those who did not. Assessment of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, while Cox regression analysis was employed to identify prognostic factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

After PSM, the 1-year and 2-year RFS were 87.1% and 74.2% in the PD-1 inhibitors group and 44.6% and 37.8% in non-PD-1 inhibitors group (p < 0.001). The 1-year and 2-year OS were 98.5% and 95.7% in the PD-1 inhibitors group compared with 90.7% and 77.0% in non-PD-1 inhibitors group (p = 0.004). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that the use of adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors was significantly associated with improved RFS and OS. Subgroup analysis indicated that adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors group achieved longer RFS than the non-PD-1 inhibitors group in patients without adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

CONCLUSION

The administration of adjuvant PD-1 inhibitors may effectively reduce the risk of tumor recurrence and improve survival in HCC patients with high risk of recurrence after curative hepatectomy.

Prognostic factors and clinical significance of preoperative systemic therapy in patients with borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A JSHBPS project study 2023, Part 2

PURPOSE

To explore factors influencing the prognosis in patients with borderline-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (BR-HCC) undergoing surgery.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with BR-HCC according to the definition in the Expert Consensus Statement 2023 were collected from board-certified HPB training centers and analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

Data of a total of 1509 patients with BR-HCC (BR1, n = 718 and BR2, n = 791) who underwent surgery were collected. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate (DSS) and 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) were determined as 40.8% and 19.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the oncological resectability category (i.e., BR2 vs. BR1) as a significant prognostic factor, and also the number of criteria fulfilled for classification into BR2 disease as being predictive of the DSS (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: one factor: 1.32 [1.13-1.54]; two to three factors: 1.51 [1.15-1.96]). Preceding systemic therapy was significantly correlated with a longer DSS (HR, 0.41: 95% CI, 0.18-0.91) and RFS (HR, 0.80: 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) in the patients with BR1 disease, while its clinical significance was unclear in the patients with BR2 disease.

CONCLUSION

Multicenter data confirm the clinical relevance of the oncological resectability category and the potential advantage of preceding systemic therapy in a specific group of BR-HCC.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery with intraoperative radiotherapy and postoperative PVC for hepatocellular carcinoma with mPVTT

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanied by main portal vein tumor thrombosis (mPVTT) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel triple therapy approach combining surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVC) for HCC with mPVTT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 56 patients diagnosed with HCC and mPVTT. Patients were divided into two groups: the surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) and the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) group (n = 35). Baseline characteristics, treatment procedures, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The surgery-IORT-PVC group (n = 21) demonstrated superior median overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 7 months, P < 0.05 4.99(2.543-9.792)) and median progression-free survival (PFS) (not reached vs. 4 months, P < 0.05 5.268(2.765-10.03)) compared to the TACE-HAIC group (n = 35). Additional, the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS (75.6 %, 60.5 %, 60.5 % vs 28.8 %, 8.2 %, 8.2 %) and PFS (73.3 %, 64.1 %, 64.1 % vs 9.5 %, 9.5 %, 9.5 %) of the surgery-IORT-PVC group significantly superior to that of the TACE-HAIC group. Multivariate analysis identified the treatment modality as an independent factor influencing both OS and PFS. Postoperative complications in the surgery-IORT-PVC group were manageable. No severe adverse events were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this novel treatment modality offers a potential effective therapy modality for patients with HCC and mPVTT who previously had limited therapeutic options.

Assessment of Macrovascular Invasion in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Implications and Treatment Outcomes with Systemic Therapy

Introduction

Macrovascular invasion (MVI) is a strong prognostic factor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current criteria for radiological assessment are unclear in evaluating the impact of MVI on systemic therapy. In this study, we standardized the assessment of MVI and validated its clinical relevance.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from patients with advanced HCC and MVI who received first-line systemic therapy at four medical centers in Japan. First, we used MVI progressive disease (MVI-PD) to track MVI progression and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 progressive disease (RECIST v1.1-PD) to evaluate tumor enlargement other than MVI and the appearance of new lesions. Next, we assessed the prognostic value of MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD.

Results

Of the 207 advanced HCC patients with MVI, 189 received appropriate imaging evaluation. Forty (21.2%) patients had MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD, 51 (27.0%) had prior MVI-PD, and 61 (32.3%) had prior RECIST v1.1-PD. In a landmark analysis, the prognosis of 163 patients who survived more than 3 months was analyzed based on the assessment of imaging response during the first 3 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.4 months in those who had MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD, 7.4 months in those who had RECIST v1.1-PD only, 7.2 months in those who had MVI-PD only, and 19.7 months in patients who had neither (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between progression-free survival and OS in patients with appropriate imaging assessments were similar for MVI-PD (0.515) and RECIST v1.1-PD (0.498).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate the link between MVI progression and poor OS in systemic therapy for advanced HCC, emphasizing the importance of an accurate method for assessing MVI progression.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with coexisting portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor patient outcomes. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC with PVTT remain a subject of debate. In the present study, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), with complication rates as a secondary outcome. A total of six studies comprising 750 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The neoadjuvant therapy group exhibited significantly superior OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; P<0.001] and RFS (HR, 0.31; P<0.001) compared with the primary hepatectomy control group. Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.34; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 0.24; P=0.004). While the neoadjuvant intervention subgroup exhibited an improved OS compared with controls (HR, 0.37; P=0.001), no significant difference in RFS was observed (HR, 0.11; P=0.095). Geographical analysis revealed that the Chinese subgroup demonstrated a significantly improved OS and RFS (HR, 0.41 for both; P<0.001), compared with the control group. However, the Japanese and Korean subgroups showed no improvement in OS (HR, 0.25; P=0.057) compared with the control group, and the results did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood transfusion, blood loss, operation time, bile leakage, ascites, peritoneal infection, postoperative bleeding, complications or mortality (all P>0.05). Overall, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT without increasing complication rates, supporting its efficacy and manageable safety profile.

A concise review of updated global guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2017-2024

Many guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been published and are regularly updated worldwide. HCC management involves a broad range of treatment options and requires multidisciplinary care, resulting in significant heterogeneity in management practices across international communities. To support standardized care for HCC, we systematically appraised 13 globally recognized guidelines and expert consensus statements, including five from Asia, four from Europe, and four from the United States. These guidelines share similarities but reveal notable discrepancies in surveillance strategies, treatment allocation, and other recommendations. Geographic differences in tumor biology (e.g., prevalence of viral hepatitis, alcohol-related liver disease, or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and disparities in available medical resources (e.g., organ availability, healthcare infrastructure, and treatment accessibility) complicate the creation of universally applicable guidelines. Previously, significant gaps existed between Asian and Western guidelines, particularly regarding treatment strategies. However, these differences have diminished over the years. Presently, variations are often more attributable to publication dates than to regional differences. Nonetheless, Asia-Pacific experts continue to diverge from the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system, particularly with respect to surgical resection and locoregional therapies, which are viewed as overly conservative in Western guidelines. Advancements in systemic therapies have prompted ongoing updates to these guidelines. Given that each set of guidelines reflects distinct regional characteristics, strengths, and limitations, fostering collaboration and mutual complementarity is essential for addressing discrepancies and advancing global HCC care.

Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Compared with Surgical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Macrovascular Invasion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) are recommended to receive systemic therapy according to guidelines. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery are increasingly used in this patient population. This study compares outcomes from these local treatments.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HCC with MVI and treated with surgery or SBRT between 1999 and 2022 were included. Propensity score matching minimized bias from confounders. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method,. and local, regional, and distant recurrences were assessed via competing risk methods. Univariable and multivariable analyses adjusted by the Lasso method evaluated OS predictors.

RESULTS

Among 175 patients, 38 underwent surgery and 137 received SBRT. The median age was 61 years, tumor volume was 158.6 cc, and α-fetoprotein level was 197 IU/mL. Most surgical patients had major resection (74%) via an open approach (97%). The median biologically effective dose (BED) for SBRT was 53.7 Gy. After matching, 35 patients per group had a median OS of 16 months. Local failure was higher in the SBRT group (20%) than in the surgery group (12%) at 1 year (p = 0.028). Distant failure was more frequent in surgery (54%) compared with SBRT (17%) [p = 0.003]. Excluding SBRT patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy did not change the results. In-hospital mortality was 9% post-surgery and 14% experienced post-SBRT liver impairment.

CONCLUSION

Both surgery and SBRT offer good long-term OS and control. Surgery provides better local control, while SBRT had lower distant relapse. While SBRT has acceptable toxicity, surgery carries a significant mortality risk.

The potential efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macroscopic portal vein tumor thrombus

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in the first-order or main trunk/contralateral branches (Vp3/4) is poor. The present study aimed to clarify the real-world data of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment (Ate/bev) for HCC patients with Vp3/4 PVTT.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 22 consecutive HCC patients with Vp3/4 PVTT, who were treated with Ate/bev. Survival rates and radiological responses were evaluated based on the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade [mALBI 1 + 2a (1/2a) versus 2b + 3 (2b/3)] using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

The median survival time of the 22 patients was 15.0 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 62.7% and 49.3%, respectively. The objective response (OR) rates of patients with mALBI 1/2a and 2b/3 were 91.7% (11/12) and 10.0% (1/10), respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The 2-year survival rates of patients with mALBI 1/2a and 2b/3 were 78.6% and 20.0%, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.0041).

CONCLUSION

Ate/bev was effective for treating HCC patients with Vp3/4 PVTT. OR rate and MST were favorable, particularly for patients with preserved liver function (mALBI 1/2a), suggesting its great potential for the treatment of HCC in patients with Vp3/4 PVTT.

Radiotherapy with targeted and immunotherapy improved overall survival and progression-free survival for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is still unclear. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of RT combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy in HCC with PVTT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-two patients with HCC with PVTT treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor with or without RT from December 2019 to December 2023 were included. After propensity score matching (PSM) for adjusting baseline differences, 32 pairs were identified in RT + TKI + PD-1 group (n = 32) and TKI + PD-1 group (n = 32). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

Median OS (mOS) in RT + TKI + PD-1 group was significantly longer than TKI + PD-1 group (15.6 vs. 8.2 months, P = .008). Median PFS (mPFS) in RT + TKI + PD-1 group was dramatically longer than TKI + PD-1 group (8.1 vs. 5.2 months, P = .011). Patients in TKI + PD-1 + RT group showed favorable ORR and DCR compared with TKI + PD-1 group (78.1% vs. 56.3%, P = .055; 93.8% vs. 81.3%, P = .128). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a remarkable OS and PFS benefit with TKI + PD-1 + RT for patients with main PVTT (type III/IV) and those of Child-Pugh class A. Multivariate analysis confirmed RT + TKI + PD-1 as an independent prognostic factor for longer OS (HR 0.391, P = .024) and longer PFS (HR 0.487, P = .013), with no mortality or severe TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

RT combined with TKI and PD-1 inhibitor could significantly improve mOS and mPFS without inducing severe TRAEs or mortality.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: updates on epidemiology, surveillance, diagnosis and treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major global burden, ranking as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. HCC due to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or C virus (HCV) infection has decreased due to universal vaccination for HBV and effective antiviral therapy for both HBV and HCV, but HCC related to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease is increasing. Biannual liver ultrasonography and serum α-fetoprotein are the primary surveillance tools for early HCC detection among high-risk patients (e.g., cirrhosis, chronic HBV). Alternative surveillance tools such as blood-based biomarker panels and abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are being investigated. Multiphasic computed tomography or MRI is the standard for HCC diagnosis, but histological confirmation should be considered, especially when inconclusive findings are seen on cross-sectional imaging. Staging and treatment decisions are complex and should be made in multidisciplinary settings, incorporating multiple factors including tumor burden, degree of liver dysfunction, patient performance status, available expertise, and patient preferences. Early-stage HCC is best treated with curative options such as resection, ablation, or transplantation. For intermediate-stage disease, locoregional therapies are primarily recommended although systemic therapies may be preferred for patients with large intrahepatic tumor burden. In advanced-stage disease, immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy is the preferred treatment regimen. In this review article, we discuss the recent global epidemiology, risk factors, and HCC care continuum encompassing surveillance, diagnosis, staging, and treatments.

A case of hepatocellular carcinoma arising from the intraductal hepatic bile duct without parenchymal lesion

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rarely presents as an intraductal tumor with no parenchymal lesions. Here, we present a case of HCC arising from an intrahepatic bile duct. A 74-year-old man who had been treated with direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection was referred to our hospital because of elevated serum prothrombin levels induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II). Initial imaging revealed no findings suspicious of HCC; however, repeat CT six months later revealed dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts in the lateral segment of the liver. Cholangiography revealed a significant stricture of B3, and biopsy suggested adenocarcinoma. A left hepatectomy was performed with a preoperative diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Although a surface nodule on the lateral segment of the liver, suspicious for intrahepatic metastasis, was found intraoperatively, radical resection was performed. Histopathological examination revealed a tumor filling the intrahepatic bile duct from the stump to the peripheral bile duct, with no infiltration into the liver parenchyma. The surface nodule is a dilated peripheral bile duct filled with a tumor with no extrabiliary invasion. Immunohistochemistry suggested HCC. No tumor lesions were observed in the hepatic parenchyma, and the tumor was finally diagnosed as HCC stemming from the biliary epithelium.

Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatic resection has long been considered the preferred treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when feasible, but its role, as well as the outcomes is evolving rapidly. This article explores the impact of the changing demographics of HCC, reviews current criteria for resection, considers the roles of liver transplantation and nonsurgical locoregional therapies vis-a-vis resection, highlights the potential of new systemic therapies (particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors) to improve outcomes, details the common complications associated with resection, and discusses recurrence of HCC after resection and its management.

Prognosis predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy following conversion therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the optimal treatment for less than 20 % patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A combination of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and systemic therapy-based conversion therapy provides a chance of resection for those with unresectable HCC. Yet, the prognosis for those successfully conversion resection is still unknown. The study is to determine the factors predicted prognosis of patients after conversion hepatic resection.

METHODS

A total of 343 HCC patients underwent hepatectomy following conversion therapy from August 2018 to April 2023. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to screen for independent factors affecting patients' prognosis.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven (45.8 %) patients developed recurrence or metastasis at a median time of 16.7 months (95 % CI 12.4-21.0 months) from hepatectomy. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified tumor number, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) response, tumor response, and successful downstaging were independent recurrent-free survival related predictors. Albumin bilirubin (ALBI) score and AFP response were independent death related predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical parameters reflecting the depth of conversion therapy response, were promising in predicting prognosis for HCC patients after conversion hepatic resection.

Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health burden. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the curative treatment of HCC, and recent years have witnessed notable advancements aimed at refining surgical techniques and improving patient outcomes. This review presents a detailed examination of the recent innovations in HCC surgery, highlighting key developments in both surgical approaches and adjunctive therapies. Advanced imaging technologies have revolutionized preoperative assessment, enabling precise tumour localization and delineation of vascular anatomy. The use of three-dimensional rendering has significantly augmented surgical planning, facilitating more accurate and margin-free resections. The advent of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgical techniques has ushered in an era of minimal access surgery, offering patients the benefits of shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times, while enabling equivalent oncological outcomes. Intraoperative innovations such as intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and fluorescence-guided surgery have emerged as valuable adjuncts, allowing real-time assessment of tumour extent and aiding in parenchyma preservation. The integration of multimodal therapies, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, has allowed for 'bio-selection' and shown the potential to optimize patient outcomes. With the advent of augmented reality and artificial intelligence (AI), the future holds immense potential and may represent significant strides towards optimizing patient outcomes and refining the standard of care.

Treatment outcomes of hepatectomy and systemic chemotherapy based on oncological resectability criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim

The oncological resectability criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have recently been established (R/BR1/BR2), and validating the outcomes is an urgent issue. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of hepatectomy and systemic chemotherapy based on the oncological resectability criteria.

Methods

A total of 931 patients in the hepatectomy group and 273 in the systemic chemotherapy group who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab, lenvatinib, or durvalumab plus tremelimumab were recruited.

Results

The median survival times (MST) in the hepatectomy group were R, 107.2 mo; BR1, 44.4 mo; and BR2, 18.4 mo (p < 0.0001). The MSTs in the systemic chemotherapy group were R, 16.3 mo; BR1, 24.5 mo; and BR2, 16.1 mo (p = 0.3598). A comparison of survival of patients in the BR2 category revealed no significant difference between the two groups for those with modified albumin‐bilirubin grade 1 + 2a (p = 0.7343) and grade 2b + 3 (p = 0.6589). The BR2 definition comprised three tumor factors, and the MST of patients with only one BR2‐defining factor tended to be better in the hepatectomy group than in the systemic chemotherapy group (22.9 vs 20.2 mo, p = 0.0977). Meanwhile, the MST tended to be better in the systemic chemotherapy group than in the hepatectomy group (16.5 vs 12.6 mo) for those with two to three BR2‐defining factors, although the difference was insignificant (p = 0.4252).

Conclusion

The oncological resectability criteria for HCC effectively stratified the prognosis after hepatectomy. Treatment outcomes of hepatectomy in patients with two to three BR2‐defining factors are limited, suggesting the need for multidisciplinary treatment.

Update on Resection Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, the incidence of which is rising globally. Despite recent advancements in immunotherapeutic and surgical treatment modalities, the prognosis for HCC remains poor. The surgical treatment strategy for HCC comprises a multimodal effort that ranges from ablative therapy and surgical resection to liver transplantation. Thanks to collective efforts from the surgical society, there have been rapid advances in resection strategies, such as 3D printing for surgical planning and minimally invasive techniques to minimize surgical trauma. This review examines recent advancements in surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and perioperative management for HCC resection. The purpose of this review was to provide clinicians and researchers with an up-to-date perspective on the evolving role of surgical resection in HCC treatment, and to identify key areas for future investigation to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2), and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in population 1. In population 2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, p = 0.023) and curative-intent conversion surgery (BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%, p = 0.056) after lenvatinib therapy, and was also predictive of the OS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.38 for BR2 [vs. BR1]) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.17 for BR2 [vs. BR1]).

CONCLUSION

The resectability classification based on the novel oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.

Liver resection and transplantation in the era of checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated efficacy, establishing a new standard of care for advanced HCC. Neoadjuvant studies have shown promising results with high response rates, increasing research into ICIs' role. In the peri-operative setting, in addition to adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies, strategies for "downstaging" and "bridging" patients to liver transplantation (LT) are being investigated, broadening the eligible candidate pool. Furthermore, therapeutic advances have reshaped conversion strategies for hepatic resection, with emerging evidence indicating a role for adjuvant immunotherapy in patients at high risk of postoperative recurrence. In LT, concerns have arisen over the potential conflict between immunosuppression needs and the immune-enhancing effects of ICIs, with reports of severe rejection. However, liver-specific factors may lessen rejection risks, prompting exploration into the safety of pre-transplant ICI administration. Moreover, ongoing trials must prioritise patient selection and vigilant management protocols. Despite the remarkable progress in immunotherapy, the intricate molecular interactions within the tumour microenvironment and their implications on oncogenic pathways remain incompletely understood. This highlights the need for specialised expertise to effectively integrate immunotherapy into the surgical management of HCC. Key challenges include ensuring safety, optimising oncological outcomes, managing the risk of graft rejection in transplant recipients, and refining patient selection criteria. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving role of immunotherapy in the surgical management of HCC, discussing the rationale for its application in both pre- and post-surgical contexts, leveraging current clinical experience, identifying potential limitations, and envisioning future applications. By integrating existing knowledge and highlighting areas for further investigation, this review seeks to inform clinical practice and guide future research endeavours.

Perioperative Tislelizumab plus intensity modulated radiotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a phase II trial

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI) have dismal prognosis and there are no standard perioperative therapies. This phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2000036385) aimed to investigate the activity and safety of perioperative tislelizumab plus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for resectable HCC with MVI. Thirty treatment-naïve patients with MVI received 3 cycles of tislelizumab intravenously (200 mg, every three weeks) and concurrent IMRT (45 Gray in 15 fractions). Primary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a complete or major pathological response (pCR or MPR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and safety. Of patients enrolled, 15 (50%) underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant tislelizumab. The ORR was 30.0% (90% CI 16.6%-46.5%) and the median OS was 18.7 months. Of the 15 patients underwent surgical resection, 10 (66.7%) achieved pCR or MPR and 8 (53.3%) remained recurrence-free. The median RFS were not reached with a median follow-up of 21.77 months (95% CI 12.50-31.03) post-surgery. 4 (13.3%) patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events. The most common events were thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia. The trial has met the pre-specified endpoints, and these results support further studies of perioperative immunotherapy plus radiotherapy in HCC.

Prognosis of Neoadjuvant HAIC and Lenvatinib Followed by Surgery versus Direct Resection for Resectable or Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study

Purpose

This research aims to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib (Len) to direct liver resection (LR) in patients with resectable or borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This retrospective study included 154 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated at the a large-scale hepatocellular carcinoma Research Center between March 2019 and June 2023. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 63 received neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with Lenvatinib followed by liver resection (HAIC+Len→LR), while 91 received direct liver resection (LR). The primary outcomes assessed were median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Patients in the HAIC+Len→LR group demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) (40.1 months vs 35.9 months, P=0.001) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) (32.8 months vs 23.8 months, P=0.0023) compared to the LR group. Preoperative complete response (CR) to HAIC was associated with better median duration of response (mDOR) and mOS compared to partial response (PR) (not reached vs 28.9 months, P=0.006; 40.0 vs 29.1 months, P=0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in OS or PFS between the HAIC+Len→LR and LR groups in early Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. However, in late BCLC stages, the HAIC+Len→LR group exhibited significantly improved OS and PFS (HR 0.471, P=0.016; HR 0.551, P=0.022). Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

For patients with resectable or marginally resectable HCC in the intermediate to advanced stages of BCLC, surgery after neoadjuvant HAIC+Len may offer improved long-term prognosis.

c-Met inhibitor upregulates E-cadherin, which is lost in portal vein tumor thrombus of hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an essential therapeutic and prognostic factor. E-cadherin plays a crucial role in adhesive properties and intercellular interaction in various cancer tissues, including HCC, but the expression profile and functional contribution of E-cadherin in PVTT remain unknown. This study aimed to analyze the expression of E-cadherin in the main tumor tissue and PVTT tissue of HCC, and evaluate the functional roles of E-cadherin in PVTT formation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using the medical records of patients who underwent liver resection for HCC with PVTT, analyzing tissue specimens from 1995 to 2016. E-cadherin expression is evaluated using immunohistochemistry and western blot. The study also uses a c-Met inhibitor to explore its impact on E-cadherin expression in vitro and in vivo using cell lines and a tumor xenograft mouse model.

RESULTS

The results revealed a reduced E-cadherin expression in PVTT tissue than in the main tumor tissue. The inhibition of c-Met activation, frequently detected in HCC, upregulated E-cadherin expression in HCC cell lines. Furthermore, treatment with c-Met inhibitors induced changes in epithelial morphology, and inhibited migration and invasion of HCC cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the downregulation of E-cadherin in PVTT, and underscores the potential of c-Met inhibition in upregulating E-cadherin and inhibiting metastatic behavior. Understanding the significance of E-cadherin and c-Met in HCC progression provides a foundation for future clinical investigations into the therapeutic effects of c-Met inhibitors on PVTT in HCC patients.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with high tumor burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).

METHODS

This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

Efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a single-center retrospective analysis

Objective The influence of macrovascular invasion on the therapeutic efficacy of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients has not been previously reported. This study primarily examines the therapeutic effect of ALPPS in treating HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods 89 patients who underwent ALPPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from December 2016 to December 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on macrovascular invasion status: pure HCC, HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and HCC with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT). Outcome measures such as postoperative complications, liver hyperplasia rates, and survival times were compared across the groups. Results The study comprised 44 patients without macrovascular invasion and 45 cases with it, including 37 PVTT and 8 HVTT cases. Patients with PVTT or HVTT had a higher rate of complications and liver failure after the first ALPPS stage compared to those without macrovascular invasion (P = 0.018, P = 0.036). This trend was also observed in the stratified analysis of severe complications. However, no significant differences were found in these outcomes after the second ALPPS stage among the groups. The volume and rate of future liver remnant proliferation between the two stages of ALPPS were not statistically different among the groups, with median overall survival times of 42, 39, and 33 months, and progression-free survival times of 30, 24, and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.412 and P = 0.281). Conclusion ALPPS for HCC with macrovascular invasion was considered safe, feasible, and effective, as it achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in cases without macrovascular invasion.

A classification model for resectability in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

AIM

Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC.

METHODS

We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n = 409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n = 285) and UR-HCC classes (n = 68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n = 295).

RESULTS

Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.

Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: Is it the end?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent form of cancer globally and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The incidence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) in HCC patients is 21% at one year and 46% at three years. The presence of PVTT has consistently been associated with a poor prognosis for HCC patients over the past decades. Notably, HCC prognosis is influenced not only by the presence of PVTT but also by the degree or extent of PVTT. Currently, there is a lack of global consensus or established protocols regarding the optimal management of HCC with associated PVTT. The Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer classifies HCC patients with PVTT as stage C, indicating an advanced stage, and limiting treatment recommendations for these patients to systemic therapy. In recent years, there has been an increase in the availability of therapeutic options for HCC patients with PVTT. Treatment modalities include systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization, surgical resection, stereotactic body radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization, and liver transplantation. An ideal therapy for each patient necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. This review article presents the latest updates in managing HCC patients with PVTT.

A contemporary view on vascular resections and reconstruction during hepatectomies

Oncological hepatic surgery carries the possibility to perform vascular reconstructions for advanced tumours with vessel invasion since surgery often represents the only potentially curative approach for these tumours. An extended review was conducted in an attempt to understand and clarify the latest trends in hepatectomies with vascular resections. We searched bibliographic databases including PubMed, Scopus, references from bibliographies and Cochrane Library. Information and outcomes from worldwide clinical trials were collected from qualified institutions performing hepatectomies with vascular resection and reconstruction. Careful patient selection and thorough preoperative imaging remain crucial for correct and safe surgical planning. A literature analysis shows that vascular resections carry different indications in different diseases. Despite significant advances made in imaging techniques and technical skills, reports of hepatectomies with vascular resections are still associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality. The trend of complex liver resection with vascular resection is constantly on the increase, but more profound knowledge as well as further trials are required. Recent technological developments in multiple fields could surely provide novel approaches and enhance a new era of digital imaging and intelligent hepatic surgery.

A simple model to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have reported models for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection (LR). However, these models are too complex to use in daily practice. We aimed to develop a simple model.

METHOD

We enrolled 1133 patients with newly diagnosed HCC undergoing LR. The Kaplan - Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify prognostic factors associated with early recurrence (i.e., recurrence within two years after LR).

RESULTS

Early recurrence was identified in 403 (35.1%) patients. In multivariate analysis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 20-399 vs. < 20 ng/ml (HR = 1.282 [95% confidence interval = 1.002-1.639]; p = 0.048); AFP ≥ 400 vs. < 20 ng/ml (HR = 1.755 [1.382-2.229]; p < 0.001); 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 2 vs. 1 (HR = 1.958 [1.505-2.547]; p < 0.001); AJCC stage 3 vs. 1 (HR = 4.099 [3.043-5.520]; p < 0.001); and pathology-defined cirrhosis (HR = 1.46 [1.200-1.775]; p < 0.001) were associated with early recurrence. We constructed a predictive model with these variables, which provided three risk strata for recurrence-free survival (RFS): low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk, with two-year RFS of 79%, 57%, and 35%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We developed a simple model to predict early recurrence risk for patients undergoing LR for HCC.

Artificial intelligence in liver cancer - new tools for research and patient management

Liver cancer has high incidence and mortality globally. Artificial intelligence (AI) has advanced rapidly, influencing cancer care. AI systems are already approved for clinical use in some tumour types (for example, colorectal cancer screening). Crucially, research demonstrates that AI can analyse histopathology, radiology and natural language in liver cancer, and can replace manual tasks and access hidden information in routinely available clinical data. However, for liver cancer, few of these applications have translated into large-scale clinical trials or clinically approved products. Here, we advocate for the incorporation of AI in all stages of liver cancer management. We present a taxonomy of AI approaches in liver cancer, highlighting areas with academic and commercial potential, and outline a policy for AI-based liver cancer management, including interdisciplinary training of researchers, clinicians and patients. The potential of AI in liver cancer is immense, but effort is required to ensure that AI can fulfil expectations.

Impact of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in preventing early-phase local recurrence after surgery

BACKGROUND

The superiority of anatomical liver resection (AR) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over nonanatomical liver resection (NR) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of AR in preventing local and early HCC recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 280 patients who underwent initial liver resection for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter were categorized into the AR and NR groups and compared using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

Between the matched pairs (n = 87 in each group), the incidence rates of local and early (recurrence within 2 years after surgery) recurrences in the AR group were significantly lower than those in the NR group (13.8% vs. 28.7%, p = .025; 20.7% vs. 35.6%, p = .028, respectively). The overall survival in the AR group was better than that in the NR group (median: 13.4 vs. 7.6 years, p = .003). NR was among independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6, p = .023) and prognostic factors for local recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.4-4.4, p = .003).

CONCLUSION

AR is superior in controlling local and early recurrence postoperatively for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter compared with NR.

Textbook outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy in the context of precision surgery: A single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has become a common surgery for the treatment of liver tumor. To evaluate the surgical quality of laparoscopic hepatectomy under the context of precision surgery with Textbook outcome (TO), a comprehensive and holistic assessment approach.

METHODS

A total of 1056 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy from May 2016 and December 2022 were enrolled in the study. All the patients were performed hepatectomy. The rate of TO and factors associated with achieving TO were examined.

RESULTS

Among the 1056 patients, 75 % patients achieved TO. The main reason limited patients achieving textbook outcomes was prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). The univariate analysis indicated that age>65, ASA classification ≥3, liver cirrhosis, tumor size > 3 cm, tumor number ≥2, type of primary cancer, and IWATE DSS were significantly associated with non-achievement of TO. The multivariate analysis indicated that the ASA classification ≥3 and advanced difficulty level in IWATE DSS independent factors associated with achieving TO. Reaching TO can significantly prolong the postoperative recurrence time and overall survival time of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

CONCLUSION

In the context of precision surgery, 75 % patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy achieved a TO. Patients who achieved TO had significantly improved survival.

Novel concept of "sequential particle radiotherapy" with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Owing to the high objective response rate of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the concept of sequential conversion to local treatment has recently become mainstream. The conversion concept is mainly applied to Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B cases, and radiotherapy is rarely considered as a conversion local treatment. We herein report three patients who were treated with the novel concept of "sequential particle radiotherapy," consisting of Atez/Bev therapy followed by particle radiotherapy (PRT) for HCC with advanced portal vein tumor thrombus (Vp3/4 PVTT). All patients achieved partial response radiologically and were switched to PRT. All patients were recurrence free at 1 year after the introduction of Atez/Bev therapy without any additional treatment. This upcoming combination strategy includes the advocacy of sequential concepts for BCLC stage C cases and the introduction of PRT as a local treatment after Atez/Bev.

Lnc-PIK3R1, transcriptionally suppressed by YY1, inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the Lnc-PIK3R1/miR-1286/GSK3β axis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant threat due to its highly aggressive and high recurrence characteristics, necessitating urgent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Long non-coding RNAs exert vital roles in HCC tumorigenesis, however the mechanisms of their expression regulation and functions are not fully elucidated yet. Herein, we identify that a novel tumor suppressor 'lnc-PIK3R1' was significantly downregulated in HCC tissues, which was correlated with poor prognosis. Functionally, lnc-PIK3R1 played tumor suppressor roles to inhibit the proliferation and mobility of HCC cells, and to impede the distant implantation of xenograft in mice. Mechanistic studies revealed that lnc-PIK3R1 interacted with miR-1286 and alleviated the repression on GSK3B by miR-1286. Notably, pharmacological inhibition of GSK3β compromised the tumor suppression effect by lnc-PIK3R1, confirming their functional relevance. Moreover, we identified that oncogenic YY1 acts as a specific transcriptional repressor to downregulate the expression of lnc-PIK3R1 in HCC. In summary, this study highlights the tumor-suppressive effect of lnc-PIK3R1, and provides new insights into the regulation of GSK3β expression in HCC, which would benefit the development of innovative intervention strategies for HCC.

Improved survival outcome of curative liver resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

AIM

This study was undertaken to evaluate the outcome of curative liver resection, (LR) of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC-C HCC) after tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) became approved as a treatment option for recurrent lesions.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with BCLC-C HCC who underwent curative LR were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified into two groups according to whether LR was performed before (n = 24) or after (n = 43) TKI approval ("beforeTKI" and "afterTKI" group, respectively).

RESULTS

There was no difference in the median disease-free survival time after LR between the beforeTKI and afterTKI groups (5.6 and 7.1 months, respectively; p = 0.435). However, the median survival time after LR was longer in the afterTKI than beforeTKI group (42.7 and 14.9 months, respectively; p = 0.022). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the date of LR was the only independent factor affecting postresection survival. When the patients were limited to those with recurrence, there were no differences in the recurrence pattern or progression of HCC at the time of recurrence between the two groups. The only difference in the treatment distribution was the administration of TKIs (14 of 34 patients in afterTKI group and only 1 of 19 patients in beforeTKI group, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that TKI therapy for recurrent BCLC-C HCC is associated with improved overall survival. Thus, LR could be a promising option for BCLC-C HCC in the current era of TKI therapy.

Evaluation and Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multidisciplinary Indian Consensus Statements from a Delphi Panel

Background India, like many parts of Asia, likely faces a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), though large-scale data on etiology, presentation, and outcomes are lacking. There appears to be a predominance of unresectable, advanced-stage HCC at presentation in India with variable level of expertise in India to manage these scenarios. This publication summarizes the latest evidence with cognizance of the unique challenges faced in India by treating clinicians.

Methods A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncologists, gastroenterologists, hepatologists, interventional radiologists, and hepatobiliary surgical oncologists held a meeting in June 2022 and reviewed the evidence available for management of HCC. The meeting concentrated on the recognition and management of HCC not amenable to surgical approaches in the Indian context. A literature review of these aspects of management was conducted and consensus statements with level of evidence and grades of recommendation were prepared by individual specialists in each field. Statements were evaluated by the modified Delphi method.

Key Content and Findings The panel comprising 22 experts formulated 40 consensus statements with regard to defining unresectable HCC, optimization of underlying conditions prior to management, rationale use of various liver-directed therapies (LDTs) in unresectable HCC, and systemic therapeutic options in this group of patients.

Conclusion Our consensus statements offer practical, yet evidence-based management guidelines for treating unresectable HCC in the Indian context. There is an emphasis on the crucial need for combining available approaches for LDT, even if less well studied though possibly effective, with standard systemic therapy.

The Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

Vascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma involves tumor plugs in the main trunk of the portal vein, bile ducts, and veins, and it indicates poor prognosis. It is often associated with portal hypertension, which requires evaluation and management. Treatment includes hepatic resection, systemic pharmacotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Recurrence rates post-hepatic resection are high, and systemic drug therapy often has limited therapeutic potential in patients with a poor hepatic reserve. Single therapies are generally inadequate, necessitating combining multiple therapies with adjuvant and systemic pharmacotherapy before and after hepatectomy. This narrative review will provide an overview of the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion.

Overcome intraoperative difficulties of ALPPS procedure: a single-center outcomes and technical experience

Backgrounds/aims

Recently, the ALPPS (Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) has become widely known to achieve hepatic resection by rapid future liver remnant hypertrophy, but it comes with intraoperative difficulties, followed by increased complications. This study aimed to report the outcomes of an oncology center in a low-income and middle-income country with ALPPS in patients with liver tumors and its technical variants, which were invented to overcome intraoperative difficulties of the ALPPS procedure.

Patients and methods

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ALPPS from September 2022 to December 2023 was performed.

Results

A total of 25 patients underwent the ALPPS procedure: 21 procedures for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 3 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), and 1 for small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC). The mean postoperative stay was 29.6 ± 9.3 days (range 16-58 days). After stage 1, we counted 8 complications, all of grade II; after stage 2, the number of complications was decreased to 3:2 were of grade I and 1 were of grade IIIB. 3 (12%) patients failed to proceed to ALPPS stage 2. After a median follow-up of 9 months (range 2-25), disease recurrence has been recorded in 3 patients (12%), while 1 patient (4%) died, affected by HCC. The entire group's 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 83.3% and 82.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

The ALPPS procedure is an approach for large liver tumors with small future liver remnant with acceptable OS and DFS in a low-income and middle-income country.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.

AIM

To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS.

RESULTS

The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as neoadjuvant therapy before liver transplantation (LT) for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the prognostic factors.

AIM

To determine whether DEB-TACE before LT is superior to LT for advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS

A total of 99 individuals diagnosed with advanced HCC were studied retrospectively. The participants were categorized into the following two groups based on whether they had received DEB-TACE before LT: DEB-TACE group (n = 45) and control group (n = 54). The participants were further divided into two subgroups based on the presence or absence of segmental portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The DEB-TACE group consisted of two subgroups: Group A (n = 31) without PVTT and group B (n = 14) with PVTT. The control group also had two subgroups: Group C (n = 37) without PVTT and group D (n = 17) with PVTT. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, therapy response, and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the parameters that were independently related to OS and RFS.

RESULTS

The DEB-TACE group exhibited an overall response rate of 86.6%. Following therapy, there was a significant decrease in the median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (275.1 ng/mL vs 41.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The main AE was post-embolization syndrome. The 2-year rates of RFS and OS were significantly higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the control group (68.9% vs 38.9%, P = 0.003; 86.7% vs 63.0%, P = 0.008). Within the subgroups, group A had higher 2-year rates of RFS and OS compared to group C (71.0% vs 45.9%, P = 0.038; 83.8% vs 62.2%, P = 0.047). The 2-year RFS rate of group B was markedly superior to that of group D (64.3% vs 23.5%, P = 0.002). Results from multivariate analyses showed that pre-LT DEB-TACE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-5.14, P = 0.04], overall target tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm (HR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.05-3.75, P = 0.035), and AFP level ≤ 400 ng/mL (HR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.30-4.19, P = 0.009) were significant risk factors for RFS. Additionally, pre-LT DEB-TACE (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.43-6.96, P = 0.004) was identified as a significant risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced-stage HCC and also enhances patient survival after LT.

TACE combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab versus TACE alone in efficacy and safety for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study

BACKGROUNDS

To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab (TLC) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with those of TACE alone .

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 222 patients with uHCC who were treated between September 2013 and Jun 2023. One group received TACE + lenvatinib + camrelizumab (TLC) (n = 97) and another group received TACE alone (n = 151). Efficacy and safety were compared after propensity score matching between the TLC and TACE groups.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, the TLC group had higher objective response rate (ORR) (88.6% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.001), disease control rate (DCR) (94.3%% vs. 72.9%, P < 0.001), and conversion rates before and after propensity matching were 44.1% and 41.4%, respectively, compared with the TACE group. The median progression free survival (PFS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (12.7 vs. 6.1 months, P = 0.005). The median overall survival (OS) was longer in the TLC group than in the TACE group (19.4 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.023). Cox multivariate analysis with different modes of adjustment showed that treatment was an independent influencing factor of PFS and OS. The interaction analysis showed that cirrhosis and Child-Pugh stage an interactive role in the PFS of different treatment. Decreased AFP after treatment portends higher ORR and DCR.

CONCLUSION

TACE combined Lenvatinib plus Camrelizumab regimen was safe and superior to TACE alone in improving PFS, OS, and tumor response rates for unresectable recurrent HCC patients.

Conversion therapy of a giant hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombus and inferior vena cava thrombus: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) combined with portal and hepatic vein cancerous thrombosis is poor, for unresectable patients the combination of targeted therapy and immune therapy was the first-line recommended treatment for advanced HCC, with a median survival time of only about 2.7-6 months. In this case report, we present the case of a patient with portal and hepatic vein cancerous thrombosis who achieved pathologic complete response after conversion therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

In our center, a patient with giant HCC combined with portal vein tumor thrombus and hepatic vein tumor thrombus was treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and was continuously given icaritin soft capsules for oral regulation. After 7 months of conversion therapy, the patient's tumor shrank and the tumor thrombus subsided significantly. The pathology of surgical resection was in complete remission, and there was no progression in the postoperative follow-up for 7 months, which provided a basis for the future strategy of combined conversion therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this case, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, icaritin soft capsules combined with radiotherapy and TACE had a good effect. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with hepatic vein/inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, adopting a high-intensity, multimodal proactive strategy under the guidance of multidisciplinary team (MDT) is an important attempt to break through the current treatment dilemma.

Proposal for Prognosis-Oriented Definition of Borderline Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Owing to advances in the multidisciplinary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a conceptualization and definition for borderline resectable (BR) HCC, which carries a high risk of recurrence, is warranted. In this study, we aimed to define BR-HCC using a prognosis-oriented approach.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included an original cohort of 221 patients and an independent validation cohort of 181 patients who had undergone primary hepatic resection for HCC. To define biological BR-HCC, we evaluated the risk factors for early recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year after hepatic resection using multivariable logistic regression models. Subsequently, we developed high-risk scores using the identified risk factors and defined BR-HCC. The utility of high-risk score was validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the original cohort (hepatitis B virus:hepatitis C virus = 20%:29%), recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year was observed in 28 patients (13%), with a 5-year survival rate of 25%. Multivariable analysis identified risk factors for recurrence beyond the Milan criteria within 1 year, including serum alpha-fetoprotein levels of 12 ng/mL or more (p = 0.02), tumor diameters less than 5 cm (p = 0.02), tumor number 3 or more (p = 0.001), and macrovascular invasion (p = 0.04). BR-HCC was defined as a tumor with 2 or more identified risk factors, and 42 patients (19%) were diagnosed with BR-HCC, with a 5-year survival rate of 51%. In the validation cohort, 45 (25%) patients had BR-HCC, with a 5-year survival rate of 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis-oriented definition of BR-HCC enabled us to identify patients who are susceptible to early unresectable recurrence and have poor survival after hepatic resection for HCC. For patients with BR-HCC, preoperative systemic therapy may be a viable option to improve postresection outcomes.