Natural history of acute kidney disease in patients with cirrhosis

Validation and expansion of Baveno VII recompensation criteria in patients with cirrhosis and curable liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Baveno-VII consensus recently defined recompensation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis achieving etiological cure. However, incidence, predictors and clinical significance of recompensation are poorly known. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prognostic impact of recompensation in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Outpatients with cirrhosis and curable etiologies (alcohol, HCV, HBV) were consecutively included and followed up. Recompensation was defined according to Baveno VII criteria. Additionally, expanded recompensation criteria were evaluated for patients on low dose diuretics and/or lactulose/rifaximin for ≥12 months. In 160 patients, inflammatory cytokines (IL-6,IL-1β, IL-10) were measured in serum samples. An external cohort was used to validate study findings.

RESULTS

298 out of 525 decompensated cirrhotic outpatients achieved an effective etiological treatment and 21 (7%) achieved recompensation (Baveno-VII criteria), while 112 patients achieved expanded recompensation criteria (37.6%). MELD score (sHR=0.89; p<0.001), BMI (sHR=0.93; p=0.020), hemoglobin (sHR=1.14; p=0.010) and further decompensation (sHR=0.50; p=0.001) were independent predictors of recompensation. In multivariable analysis, mortality risk was not significantly different between patients achieving recompensation and compensated patients (HR=0.97; p=0.947), while decompensated patients had the highest mortality risk (HR=4.96; p<0.001). Mortality risk was not significantly different between patients meeting expanded recompensation criteria and Baveno-VII criteria (HR=0.97; p=0.938). Serum IL-6, IL-1beta and IL-10 were significantly higher in decompensated patients than in compensated and recompensated patients.

CONCLUSION

Baveno-VII criteria identify cirrhotic patients with a good prognosis, but fewer than 10% of decompensated patients achieve recompensation. Expanding these criteria to include patients receiving minimal decompensation treatment identifies those with similarly low mortality risk.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

In recent years, growing evidence has shown that achieving an etiological cure can significantly improve the prognosis of decompensated patients, leading to the development of the concept of recompensation. Baveno VII recently proposed a definition for recompensation; however, data on the clinical impact of this condition remain limited. In this study we evaluated Baveno VII criteria and developed and validated expanded Baveno VII criteria for recompensation. Our findings demonstrates that recompensation is associated with improved survival, reduced hyperdynamic circulation and decreased systemic inflammation in outpatients with decompensated cirrhosis. These results are valuable for hepatologists and researchers aiming to refine patient management strategies and risk stratification in cirrhosis care.

Transition from acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease in liver cirrhosis patients: Current perspective

In liver cirrhosis patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality, often leading to chronic kidney disease (CKD). This progression reflects a complex interplay of renal and hepatic pathophysiology, with AKI acting as an initiator through maladaptive repair mechanisms. These mechanisms-such as tubular cell cycle arrest, inflammatory cascades, and fibrotic processes-are exacerbated by the hemodynamic and neurohormonal disturbances characteristic of cirrhosis. Following AKI episodes, persistent kidney dysfunction or acute kidney disease (AKD) often serves as a bridge to CKD. AKD represents a critical phase in renal deterioration, characterized by prolonged kidney injury that does not fully meet CKD criteria but exceeds the temporal scope of AKI. The progression from AKD to CKD is further influenced by recurrent AKI episodes, impaired renal autoregulation, and systemic comorbidities such as diabetes and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, which compound kidney damage. The clinical management of AKI and CKD in cirrhotic patients requires a multidimensional approach that includes early identification of kidney injury, the application of novel biomarkers, and precision interventions. Recent evidence underscores the inadequacy of traditional biomarkers in predicting the AKI-to-CKD progression, necessitating novel biomarkers for early detection and intervention.

Mortality of Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 5 Million Patients Across Different Clinical Settings

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a commonly seen condition in the natural course of cirrhosis associated with unfavourable outcomes.

AIMS

To evaluate and compare the pooled mortality rates of patients with cirrhosis, with versus without AKI, across different clinical settings and diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

A systematic search of several databases was performed up to Oct 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effects model for all calculations.

RESULTS

A total of 59 studies comparing patients with cirrhosis, with and without AKI, were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 1,153,193 individuals with AKI and 4,630,814 without AKI. AKI development predisposed to significantly higher short (in-hospital and 30-days)-, intermediate (90-days)- and long (1-year)-term mortality rates in both inpatients and outpatients. Remarkably, patients with AKI admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) or diagnosed with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) experienced the higher short-term mortality rates, reaching 76% [95% confidence interval (CI): 73%-79%] and 54% (95%CI: 33%-73%), respectively. AKI staging correlated with mortality risk, with higher stages indicating higher mortality rates, while the timing of AKI development, whether community-acquired or hospital-acquired, plays a crucial role in patient prognosis, with distinct mortality patterns observed in each group. The selection of diagnostic criteria for AKI may also impact its association with the short-term mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI substantially affects the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis, especially those in ICU and/or with ACLF. Prognosis is also greatly influenced by the AKI stage, timing of onset and diagnostic criteria.

Update on Hepatorenal Syndrome: From Pathophysiology to Treatment

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) occurs in the setting of advanced chronic liver disease, portal hypertension, and ascites. HRS-AKI is found in ∼20% of patients presenting to the hospital with AKI, but it may coexist with other causes of AKI and/or with preexisting chronic kidney disease, thereby making the diagnosis challenging. Novel biomarkers such as urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin may be useful. While HRS-AKI is a functional form of AKI related to circulatory and neurohormonal dysfunction, there is increasing recognition of the importance of systemic inflammation and the renal microenvironment. Early diagnosis and initiation of HRS-AKI-specific treatment can improve outcomes. The mainstay of therapy is a vasoconstrictor (terlipressin or norepinephrine) combined with albumin, which achieves resolution of HRS in 40-50% of cases. Liver transplantation is the only option for patients failing to respond to medical therapies.

AKI in ACLF: navigating the complex therapeutic puzzle

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is driven by the severity of systemic inflammation, acute portal hypertension driving circulatory dysfunction, hyperbilirubinemia, and toxicity of bile acids. The spectrum is mostly structural, associated with reduced response to vasoconstrictors. The progression is rapid, and need of renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal therapies may be required for the management. The development of renal failure is usually considered when defining the syndrome of ACLF.

AREAS COVERED

In the current review we discuss the pathophysiological basis, natural course, and response to the current therapeutic modalities and challenges in assessing and managing AKI in patients with ACLF. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using keywords like lactate, NGAL, and PHTN, as well as CRRT, PLEX, ACLF, and AKI phases for our review. Peer-reviewed English papers that addressed our issue were considered.

EXPERT OPINION

The difficulties and specific management strategies for AKI in ACLF patients are discussed emphasizing the importance of customized protocols, risk assessment guided by biomarkers, and investigation of extracorporeal therapies that target bile acids.

Editorial: Solving the acute kidney injury puzzle in alcohol-associated hepatitis-Challenges and insights

This article is linked to Ma et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18158

Hematological abnormalities in liver cirrhosis

Hematological abnormalities are common in cirrhosis and are associated with various pathophysiological mechanisms. Studies have documented a prevalence of thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia in patients with compensated cirrhosis of 77.9%, 23.5%, and 21.1%, respectively. These abnormalities carry significant clinical implications, including considerations for invasive procedures, infection risk, bleeding risk, and prognosis. Previously, cirrhosis was believed to predispose patients to bleeding due to alterations observed in classical coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, and thrombocytopenia. However, this understanding has evolved, and cirrhosis patients are now also acknowledged as being at a high risk for thrombotic events. Hemostasis in cirrhosis patients presents a complex phenotype, with procoagulant and anticoagulant abnormalities offsetting each other. This multifactorial phenomenon is inadequately reflected by routine laboratory tests. Thrombotic complications are more prevalent in decompensated cirrhosis and may correlate with disease severity. Bleeding is primarily associated with portal hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, mechanical vessel injury, disseminated intravascular coagulation, endotoxemia, and renal injury. This review comprehensively outlines hematologic index abnormalities, mechanisms of hemostasis, coagulation, and fibrinolysis abnormalities, limitations of laboratory testing, and clinical manifestations of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

T1 mapping combined with arterial spin labeling MRI to identify renal injury in patients with liver cirrhosis

Purpose

We investigated the capability and imaging criteria of T1 mapping and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI to identify renal injury in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Methods

We recruited 27 patients with cirrhosis and normal renal function (cirrhosis-NR), 10 with cirrhosis and renal dysfunction (cirrhosis-RD) and 23 normal controls (NCs). All participants were examined via renal T1 mapping and ASL imaging. Renal blood flow (RBF) derived from ASL was measured from the renal cortex, and T1 values were measured from the renal parenchyma (cortex and medulla). MRI parameters were compared between groups. Diagnostic performances for detecting renal impairment were statistically analyzed.

Results

Cortical T1 (cT1) and medullary T1 (mT1) were significantly lower in the NCs than in the cirrhosis-NR group. The cortical RBF showed no significant changes between the NCs and cirrhosis-NR group but was markedly decreased in the cirrhosis-RD group. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for discriminating cirrhosis-NR from NCs were 0.883 and 0.826 by cT1 and mT1, respectively. Cortical RBF identified cirrhosis-RD with AUC of 0.978, and correlated with serum creatinine (r = -0.334) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = 0.483). A classification and regression tree based on cortical RBF and cT1 achieved 85% accuracy in detecting renal impairment in the cirrhosis.

Conclusion

Renal T1 values might be sensitive predictors of early renal impairment in patients with cirrhosis-NR. RBF enabled quantifying renal perfusion impairment in patients with cirrhosis-RD. The diagnostic algorithm based on cortical RBF and T1 values allowed detecting renal injury during cirrhosis.

Unveiling the enigma of acute kidney disease: predicting prognosis, exploring interventions, and embracing a multidisciplinary approach

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a critical transitional period between acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The incidence of AKD following acute kidney injury is approximately 33.6%, and it can occur without identifiable preceding acute kidney injury. The development of AKD is associated with increased risks of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and mortality. Biomarkers and subphenotypes are promising tools to predict prognosis in AKD. The complex clinical situations in patients with AKD necessitate a comprehensive and structured approach, termed "KAMPS" (kidney function check, advocacy, medications, pressure, sick day protocols). We introduce "MAND-MASS," an acronym devised to summarize the reconciliation of medications during episodes of acute illness, as a critical component of the sick day protocols at AKD. A multidisciplinary team care, consisting of nephrologists, pharmacists, dietitians, health educators, and nurses, is an optimal model to achieve the care bundle in KAMPS. Although the evidence for patients with AKD is still lacking, several potential pharmacological agents may improve outcomes, including but not limited to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In conclusion, accurate prognosis prediction and effective treatment for AKD are critical yet unmet clinical needs. Future studies are urgently needed to improve patient care in this complex and rapidly evolving field.

Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting

Patients with cirrhosis are prone to developing acute kidney injury (AKI), a complication associated with a markedly increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, along with a risk of progression to chronic kidney disease. Whereas patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of developing any phenotype of AKI, hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a specific form of AKI (HRS-AKI) in patients with advanced cirrhosis and ascites, carries an especially high mortality risk. Early recognition of HRS-AKI is crucial since administration of splanchnic vasoconstrictors may reverse the AKI and serve as a bridge to liver transplantation, the only curative option. In 2023, a joint meeting of the International Club of Ascites (ICA) and the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) was convened to develop new diagnostic criteria for HRS-AKI, to provide graded recommendations for the work-up, management and post-discharge follow-up of patients with cirrhosis and AKI, and to highlight priorities for further research.

Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury in cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,202,232 outpatients, inpatients, and ICU-admitted patients

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly seen condition in the natural course of cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled incidence and risk factors of AKI in different clinical stages and situations in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Search was conducted on 13 December 2023 across MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane databases. Meta-analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

In total, 73 studies with 5,202,232 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. AKI commonly occurs among hospitalized cirrhotics experiencing any decompensation event (29%) as well as among stable outpatients (28%) throughout a 1-year follow-up period. On admission, patients with infection or sepsis/septic shock had the highest AKI rate (47%), followed by those with hepatic encephalopathy (41%). Furthermore, the severity of liver disease proved to be a substantial driver for AKI development, while patients at intensive care unit had the greatest AKI incidence (61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both hospitalized patients and stable outpatients with cirrhosis exhibited an elevated susceptibility to AKI. Patients at intensive care unit and those with severe liver disease, infection, sepsis/septic shock, hepatic encephalopathy, or acute on chronic liver failure upon admission are at higher risk for AKI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, registered 09/12/23, CRD42023487736.

APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome that is characterized by the rapid development of organ failures predisposing these patients to a high risk of short-term early death. The main causes of organ failure in these patients are bacterial infections and systemic inflammation, both of which can be severe. For the majority of these patients, a prompt liver transplant is still the only effective course of treatment. Kidneys are one of the most frequent extrahepatic organs that are affected in patients with ACLF, since acute kidney injury (AKI) is reported in 22.8-34% of patients with ACLF. Approach and management of kidney injury could improve overall outcomes in these patients. Importantly, patients with ACLF more frequently have stage 3 AKI with a low rate of response to the current treatment modalities. The objective of the present position paper is to critically review and analyze the published data on AKI in ACLF, evolve a consensus, and provide recommendations for early diagnosis, pathophysiology, prevention, and management of AKI in patients with ACLF. In the absence of direct evidence, we propose expert opinions for guidance in managing AKI in this very challenging group of patients and focus on areas of future research. This consensus will be of major importance to all hepatologists, liver transplant surgeons, and intensivists across the globe.

Recent Update on Acute Kidney Injury-to-Chronic Kidney Disease Transition

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterized by an abrupt decline of excretory kidney function. The incidence of AKI has increased in the past decades. Patients diagnosed with AKI often undergo diverse clinical trajectories, such as early or late recovery, relapses, and even a potential transition from AKI to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although recent clinical studies have demonstrated a strong association between AKI and progression of CKD, our understanding of the complex relationship between AKI and CKD is still evolving. No cohort study has succeeded in painting a comprehensive picture of these multi-faceted pathways. To address this lack of understanding, the idea of acute kidney disease (AKD) has recently been proposed. This presents a new perspective to pinpoint a period of heightened vulnerability following AKI, during which a patient could witness a substantial decline in glomerular filtration rate, ultimately leading to CKD transition. Although AKI is included in a range of kidney conditions collectively known as AKD, spanning from mild and self-limiting to severe and persistent, AKD can also occur without a rapid onset usually seen in AKI, such as when kidney dysfunction slowly evolves. In the present review, we summarize the most recent findings about AKD, explore the current state of biomarker discovery related to AKD, discuss the latest insights into pathophysiological underpinnings of AKI to CKD transition, and reflect on therapeutic challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Hepatorenal Syndrome in Cirrhosis

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a form of kidney dysfunction that characteristically occurs in liver cirrhosis. It is characterized by a marked impairment of kidney function in response to circulatory and hemodynamic alterations that occur in advanced stages of liver cirrhosis, aggravated by systemic inflammation and bacterial translocation. The classical definitions of the types of HRS have been recently revisited and 2 forms of HRS have been redefined: the acute form, referred to as acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI), and the chronic form, referred to as chronic kidney disease. HRS-AKI is one of the most severe forms of AKI in patients with cirrhosis and it consists of an abrupt impairment of kidney function, frequently triggered by an infection, appearing in the setting of advanced decompensated cirrhosis. Differential diagnosis with other causes of AKI is crucial because HRS-AKI requires a specific treatment. Differential diagnosis with AKI-acute tubular necrosis may be challenging and kidney biomarkers may be useful in this setting. Treatment of HRS-AKI is based on the administration of vasoconstrictor drugs in combination with volume expansion with albumin. Prognosis of HRS-AKI is poor, and the ideal definitive treatment consists of liver transplantation or simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. HRS-AKI has a big impact on patients' quality of life. Management of HRS-AKI remains challenging in specific situations such as alcohol-associated hepatitis or metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease cirrhosis. Developing preventive measures for HRS-AKI, improving its early identification, discovering new biomarkers for differential diagnosis, and improving the response to therapy are some of the unmet needs in the field of HRS-AKI.

Everolimus Mitigates the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation

To obtain long-term data on the use of everolimus in patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, we conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult recipients transplanted between 2013 and 2021. Patients on everolimus-incorporating immunosuppression were matched with those on tacrolimus using an inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology. Two propensity-matched groups of patients were thus compared: 233 (45.6%) receiving everolimus versus 278 (54.4%) on tacrolimus. At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.4 (3.8) years after transplantation, everolimus patients showed a reduced risk of recurrence versus tacrolimus (7.7% versus 16.9%; RR = 0.45; p = 0.002). At multivariable analysis, microvascular infiltration (HR = 1.22; p < 0.04) and a higher tumor grading (HR = 1.27; p < 0.04) were associated with higher recurrence rate while being within Milan criteria at transplant (HR = 0.56; p < 0.001), a successful pre-transplant downstaging (HR = 0.63; p = 0.01) and use of everolimus (HR = 0.46; p < 0.001) had a positive impact on the risk of post-transplant recurrence. EVR patients with earlier drug introduction (≤30 days; p < 0.001), longer treatment duration (p < 0.001), and higher drug exposure (≥5.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001) showed lower recurrence rates versus TAC. Based on our experience, everolimus provides a reduction in the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, especially for advanced-stage patients and those with earlier drug administration, higher drug exposure, and longer time on treatment. These data advocate for early everolimus introduction after liver transplantation to reduce the attrition rate consequent to chronic immunosuppression.

How to manage hemostasis in patients with liver disease during interventions

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD) often need procedures to both treat and prevent complications of portal hypertension such as ascites or gastrointestinal bleeding. Abnormal results for hemostatic tests, such as prolonged prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and/or thrombocytopenia, are commonly encountered, raising concerns about increased bleeding risk and leading to transfusion to attempt to correct prior to interventions. However hemostatic markers are poor predictors of bleeding risk in CLD, and routine correction, particularly with fresh frozen plasma and routine platelet transfusions, should be avoided. This narrative review discusses the hemostatic management of patients with CLD using 2 case descriptions.

Renal damage in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A still unsolved issue

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of cirrhosis, burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates and progression to chronic kidney disease. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a peculiar type of functional AKI observed in cirrhotic patients with ascites. HRS diagnosis is still clinical, once pre-renal azotemia and intrinsic kidney damage have been excluded by applying well-established and internationally adopted criteria. HRS is considered reversible because of the absence of intrinsic renal damage. However, HRS reversibility has been questioned, due to the lack of response to treatment with vasoconstrictors plus albumin in a relevant percentage of patients and to the persistence of renal dysfunction in HRS patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT). Indeed, LT is the only ultimate treatment, as it solves both liver failure and portal hypertension. Thus, the presence of renal damage in HRS can be hypothesized. In this scenario, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), one of the most promising biomarkers, may help in characterizing the type of renal injury, distinguishing between HRS and acute tubular necrosis. This review gathers the available evidence in favor and against the presence of structural lesions in HRS in terms of either renal histology and urinary biomarkers with a particular focus on NGAL. The ability to properly characterize which component of renal dysfunction prevails - functional rather than structural - entails a relevant clinical impact for the treatment of these patients, both in terms of medical therapy and liver vs. combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Looking ahead to potential incretin combination therapies for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with diabetes

INTRODUCTION

There are no drugs approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); incretin combination therapies are being developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes and research has moved to test their usefulness in NAFLD.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the literature on the effectiveness of dual and triple peptides combining receptor agonists of the glucagon-like peptide 1, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, and glucagon to treat NAFLD and its associated metabolic diseases, and/or the cardiovascular risk intimately connected with the cluster of the metabolic syndrome. Other combination peptides involved the glucagon-like peptide 2 receptor, the fibroblast growth factor 21, the cholecystokinin receptor 2, and the amylin receptor.

EXPERT OPINION

Both dual and triple agonists are promising, based on animal, pharmacokinetic and proof-of concept studies, showing effectiveness both in the presence and the absence of diabetes on a few validated surrogate NAFLD biomarkers, but the majority of studies are still in progress. Considering the long natural history of NAFLD, final proof of their efficacy on primary clinical liver outcomes might be also derived from the analysis of large databases of National Healthcare Systems or Insurance companies, when used in diabetes for improving glycemic control, after careful propensity-score matching.

Haemostasis in cirrhosis: Understanding destabilising factors during acute decompensation

Hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis are in a rebalanced haemostatic state due to a parallel decline in both pro- and anti-haemostatic pathways. However, this rebalanced haemostatic state is highly susceptible to perturbations and may easily tilt towards hypocoagulability and bleeding. Acute kidney injury, bacterial infections and sepsis, and progression from acute decompensation to acute-on-chronic liver failure are associated with additional alterations of specific haemostatic pathways and a higher risk of bleeding. Unfortunately, there is no single laboratory method that can accurately stratify an individual patient's bleeding risk and guide pre-procedural prophylaxis. A better understanding of haemostatic alterations during acute illness would lead to more rational and individualised management of hospitalised patients with decompensated cirrhosis. This review will outline the latest findings on haemostatic alterations driven by acute kidney injury, bacterial infections/sepsis, and acute-on-chronic liver failure in these difficult-to-treat patients and provide evidence supporting more tailored management of bleeding risk.

Risk factors and 180-day mortality of acute kidney disease in critically ill patients: A multi-institutional study

Background

Critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) have a poor prognosis. Recently, the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) proposed to define acute kidney disease (AKD) as acute or subacute damage and/or loss of kidney function post AKI. We aimed to identify the risk factors for the occurrence of AKD and to determine the predictive value of AKD for 180-day mortality in critically ill patients.

Methods

We evaluated 11,045 AKI survivors and 5,178 AKD patients without AKI, who were admitted to the intensive care unit between 1 January 2001 and 31 May 2018, from the Chang Gung Research Database in Taiwan. The primary and secondary outcomes were the occurrence of AKD and 180-day mortality.

Results

The incidence rate of AKD among AKI patients who did not receive dialysis or died within 90 days was 34.4% (3,797 of 11,045 patients). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AKI severity, underlying early CKD, chronic liver disease, malignancy, and use of emergency hemodialysis were independent risk factors of AKD, while male gender, higher lactate levels, use of ECMO, and admission to surgical ICU were negatively correlated with AKD. 180-day mortality was highest among AKD patients without AKI during hospitalization (4.4%, 227 of 5,178 patients), followed by AKI with AKD (2.3%, 88 of 3,797 patients) and AKI without AKD (1.6%, 115 of 7,133 patients). AKI with AKD had a borderline significantly increased risk of 180-day mortality (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00-1.78; p = 0.047), while patients with AKD but no preceding AKI episodes had the highest risk (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.71-2.97; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The occurrence of AKD adds limited additional prognostic information for risk stratification of survivors among critically ill patients with AKI but could predict prognosis in survivors without prior AKI.

Outcomes associated with acute kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney disease (AKD) defines the period after kidney damage and it is a critical period of both repair and fibrotic pathways. However, the outcomes of patients with AKD have not been well-defined.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on July 31,2022. We excluded studies including patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy at enrollment. The data was used to conduct a random-effects model for pool outcomes between patients with AKD and non-AKD (NKD). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD 42021271773.

FINDINGS

The search generated 739 studies of which 21 studies were included involving 1,114,012 patients. The incidence rate of community-acquired AKD was 4.60%, 2.11% in hospital-acquired AKD without a prior AKI episode, and 26.11% in hospital-acquired AKD with a prior AKI episode. The all-cause mortality rate was higher in the AKD group (26.54%) than in the NKD group (7.78%) (odds ratio [OR]: 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.64 to 4.95, p < 0.001, I² = 99.11%). The rate of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was higher in the AKD group (1.3%) than in the NKD group (0.14%) (OR: 6.58, p < 0.001, I² = 94.95%). The incident rate of CKD and progressive CKD was higher in the AKD group (37.2%) than in the NKD group (7.45%) (OR:4.22, p < 0.001, I² = 96.67%). Compared to the NKD group, patients with AKD without prior AKI had a higher mortality rate (OR: 3.00, p < 0.001, I² = 99.31%) and new-onset ESKD (OR:4.96, 95% CI, p = 0.002, I² = 97.37%).

INTERPRETATION

AKD is common in community and hospitalized patients who suffer from AKI and also occurs in patients without prior AKI. The patients with AKD, also in those without prior AKI had a higher risk of mortality, and new-onset ESKD than the NKD group.

FUNDING

This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [grant number, MOST 107-2314-B-002-026-MY3, 108-2314-B-002-058, 110-2314-B-002-241, 110-2314-B-002-239], National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) [grant number, NSTC 109-2314-B-002-174-MY3, 110-2314-B-002-124-MY3, 111-2314-B-002-046, 111-2314-B-002-058], National Health Research Institutes [PH-102-SP-09], National Taiwan University Hospital [109-S4634, PC-1246, PC-1309, VN109-09, UN109-041, UN110-030, 111-FTN0011] Grant MOHW110-TDU-B-212-124005, Mrs. Hsiu-Chin Lee Kidney Research Fund and Chi-mei medical center CMFHR11136. JAN is supported, in part, by grants from the National Institute of Health, NIDDK (R01 DK128208 and P30 DK079337) and NHLBI (R01 HL148448-01).

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation and Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update is to review the available published evidence and expert advice regarding the clinical management of patients with suspected acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

This article provides practical advice for the management of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury based on the best available published evidence. This best practice document is not based on a formal systematic review. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through the standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Since systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Acute kidney injury (AKI) should be diagnosed when the serum creatinine increases by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or is ≥50% from baseline or when the urine output is reduced below 0.5 mL/kg/h for >6 hours. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Preventive measures against the development of AKI in cirrhosis include (1) avoidance of potentially nephrotoxic medications like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), (2) avoidance of excessive or unmonitored diuretics or nonselective beta-blockade, (3) avoidance of large-volume paracentesis without albumin replacement, and (4) counseling patients to avoid alcohol use. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: (A) Investigation is directed to determining the cause of AKI, which can be due to hypovolemic causes (volume responsive, and the most common cause of AKI in patients with cirrhosis); acute tubular necrosis; hepatorenal syndrome with AKI (HRS-AKI) (a functional renal failure that persists despite volume repletion); HRS with acute kidney disease, a type of functional renal failure of <3 months- duration in which criteria for HRS-AKI are not met; or postrenal, which occurs only rarely. (B) The specific type of AKI should be identified through a careful history, physical examination, blood biochemistry, urine microscopic examination, urine chemistry (Na+ and urea) and selected urinary biomarkers, and renal ultrasound. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: A rigorous search for infection is required in all patients with AKI. A diagnostic paracentesis should be carried out to evaluate for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; blood and urine cultures and chest radiograph are also required. There is no role for routine prophylactic antibiotics in patients with AKI, but broad-spectrum antibiotics should be started whenever infection is strongly suspected. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: When AKI is diagnosed, diuretics and nonselective beta-blockers should be held, NSAIDs discontinued, the precipitating cause of AKI treated, and fluid losses replaced, administering albumin 1 g/kg/d for 2 days if the serum creatinine shows doubling from baseline. Urine output, vital signs, and when indicated, echocardiography or CVP (if there is a pre-existing central line) should be used to monitor fluid status. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: When the serum creatinine remains higher than twice the baseline value despite these measures, treatment of HRS-AKI should be initiated with albumin at a dose of 1 g/kg intravenously on day 1 followed by 20-40 g daily along with vasoactive agents (terlipressin; if terlipressin is not available, either a combination of octreotide and midodrine; or norepinephrine, depending on institutional preferences) and continued either until 24 hours following the return of the serum creatinine level to within ≤0.3 mg/dL of baseline for 2 consecutive days or for a total of 14 days of therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Terlipressin should be initiated as a bolus dose of 1 mg every 4-6 hours (total 4-6 mg/d). The dose should be increased to a maximum of 2 mg every 4-6 hours (total 8-12 mg/d) if there is no reduction in serum creatinine at day 3 of therapy by at least 25% compared to the baseline value. Alternatively, clinicians can administer terlipressin by continuous intravenous infusion at a lower starting dose of 2 mg/d, which may reduce ischemic side effects and increase the dose gradually every 24-48 hours up to a maximum dose of 12 mg/d, or reversal of HRS. As per Food and Drug Administration restrictions, terlipressin should not be used in patients with a serum creatinine ≥5 mg/dL, or oxygen saturation of <90%. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Oral midodrine when used should be initiated at doses of 7.5 mg and titrated upward to 12.5 mg 3 times daily with octreotide (starting with 100 μg and titrating upward to 200 μg subcutaneously 3 times daily). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Norepinephrine should be used as a continuous intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 0.5 mg/h and the dose increased every 4 hours by 0.5 mg/h to a maximum of 3 mg/h with the goal of increasing the mean arterial pressure by ≥10 mm Hg and/or the urine output to >50 mL/h for at least 4 hours. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: The risks of ischemic side effects of terlipressin and norepinephrine include angina and ischemia of fingers, skin, and intestine. These side effects may be lowered by starting at the lowest dose and gradually titrating upward. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Fluid status should be closely monitored because of the risk of pulmonary edema with excessive use of albumin. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) may be used in the management of (A) AKI secondary to acute tubular necrosis; (B) HRS-AKI in potential candidates for liver transplantation (that is, RRT should not be used in patients with HRS-AKI who are not candidates for liver transplantation); and (C) AKI of uncertain etiology in which the need for RRT may be considered on an individual basis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts should not be used as a specific treatment of HRS-AKI. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for HRS-AKI. Pharmacotherapy for HRS-AKI before proceeding with liver transplantation may be associated with better post-liver transplantation outcomes. Selected patients with HRS-AKI may require simultaneous liver kidney transplantation based on updated Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network listing criteria.

Update on prognosis driven classification of pediatric AKI

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects a large proportion of hospitalized children and increases morbidity and mortality in this population. Initially thought to be a self-limiting condition with uniformly good prognosis, we now know that AKI can persist and progress to acute kidney disease (AKD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). AKI is presently categorized by stage of injury defined by increase in creatinine, decrease in eGFR, or decrease in urine output. These commonly used biomarkers of acute kidney injury do not change until the injury is well established and are unable to detect early stage of the disease when intervention is likely to reverse injury. The kidneys have the ability to compensate and return serum creatinine to a normal or baseline level despite nephron loss in the setting of AKI possibly masking persistent dysfunction. Though these definitions are important, classifying children by their propensity for progression to AKD and CKD and defining these risk strata by other factors besides creatinine may allow for better prognosis driven discussion, expectation setting, and care for our patients. In order to develop a classification strategy, we must first be able to recognize children who are at risk for AKD and CKD based on modifiable and non-modifiable factors as well as early biomarkers that identify their risk of persistent injury. Prevention of initial injury, prompt evaluation and treatment if injury occurs, and mitigating further injury during the recovery period may be important factors in decreasing risk of AKD and CKD after AKI. This review will cover presently used definitions of AKI, AKD, and CKD, recent findings in epidemiology and risk factors for AKI to AKD to CKD progression, novel biomarkers for early identification of AKI and AKI that may progress to CKD and future directions for improving outcome in children with AKI.

Acute kidney disease predicts chronic kidney disease in pediatric non-kidney solid organ transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is defined as impaired kidney function present for <90 days with or without an acute kidney injury (AKI) event. Adults with AKD have an increased risk for progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality. There are no data on the epidemiology of AKD in children after transplant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for AKI, AKD, and CKD in children after transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all children undergoing non-kidney solid organ transplant between 2011 and 2019 at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. AKI and AKD were defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Patients with a new estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73m² persisting for >3 months met criteria for new CKD. Variables associated with AKI, AKD, and CKD were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 338 patients, 37.9% met criteria for severe AKI, 13% for AKD, and 8% for a new diagnosis of CKD. Stage 3 AKI was independently associated with AKD (OR: 5.35; 95% CI: 2.23-12.86). Severe AKI was not associated with new-onset CKD, whereas AKD was associated with new-onset CKD (OR: 29.74; CI: 11.22-78.82).

CONCLUSION

AKD may be superior to AKI in predicting risk of CKD in children after non-kidney solid organ transplantation.

Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome - chronic kidney disease: Impact on renal function

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) ameliorates renal function in type-2 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Available evidence is based on 'old' HRS diagnostic criteria, and not on the current definition of HRS - chronic kidney disease (HRS-CKD). Among patients who underwent TIPS for refractory ascites over the last 12 years, we investigated clinical and renal function evolution of those with HRS-CKD.

METHODS

among 212 patients, 41 with HRS-CKD were included. Renal function was evaluated for 12 months after TIPS, along with management of ascites and transplant-free survival (TFS).

RESULTS

renal function significantly improved already one week after TIPS [serum creatinine (sCr): 1.37 ± 0.23 vs 1.94 ± 0.54 mg/dl, p< 0.001]; the amelioration was maintained during the whole follow-up and was observed in every CKD stage, defined according to baseline estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). sCr and eGFR became comparable between different CKD stages after only one week, whilst significantly different at baseline. TIPS led to a remarkable improvement in the control of ascites in all CKD stages and no significant differences in TFS were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS led to an early, substantial and persistent improvement in renal function in patients with HRS-CKD, irrespective of their baseline CKD stage.

Acute kidney disease is common and associated with poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is the persistence of acute kidney injury (AKI) for up to 3 months, which is proposed to be the time-window where critical interventions can be initiated to alter downstream outcomes of AKI. In cirrhosis, AKD and its impact on outcomes have been scantly investigated. We aimed to define the incidence and outcomes associated with AKD in a nationwide US cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI in the Cerner-Health-Facts database from 1/2009-09/2017 (n = 6,250) were assessed for AKD and were followed-up for 180 days. AKI and AKD were defined based on KDIGO and ADQI AKD and renal recovery consensus criteria, respectively. The primary outcome measure was mortality, and the secondary outcome measure was de novo chronic kidney disease (CKD). Competing-risk multivariable models were used to determine the independent association of AKD with primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

AKD developed in 32% of our cohort. On multivariable competing-risk analysis adjusting for significant confounders, patients with AKD had higher risk of mortality at 90 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.66; p = 0.001) and 180 (sHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.14-1.64; p = 0.001) days. The incidence of de novo CKD was 37.5%: patients with AKD had higher rates of de novo CKD (64.0%) compared to patients without AKD (30.7%; p <0.001). After adjusting for confounders, AKD was independently associated with de novo CKD (sHR 2.52; 95% CI 2.01-3.15; p <0.001) on multivariable competing-risk analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

AKD develops in 1 in 3 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and AKI and it is associated with worse survival and de novo CKD. Interventions that target AKD may improve outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and AKI.

LAY SUMMARY

In a nationwide US cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury, acute kidney disease developed in 1 in 3 patients and was associated with worse survival and chronic kidney disease. Interventions that target acute kidney disease may improve outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney injury.

Characteristics of acute kidney injury and its impact on outcome in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and life-threatening complication of liver failure. The purpose of this study is to construct a nomogram and online calculator to predict the development of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), which may contribute to the prognosis of ACLF.

METHODS

574 ACLF patients were evaluated retrospectively. AKI was defined by criteria proposed by International Club of Ascites (ICA) and divided into community-acquired and hospital-acquired AKI (CA-AKI and HA-AKI). The difference between CA-AKI and HA-AKI, factors associated with development into and recovered from AKI periods. The risk factors were identified and nomograms were developed to predict the morbidity of HA-AKI in patients with ACLF.

RESULTS

Among 574 patients, 217(37.8%) patients had AKI, CA-AKI and HA-AKI were 56 (25.8%) and 161 (74.2%) respectively. The multivariate logistic regression model (KP-AKI) for predicting the occurrence of HA-AKI were age, gastrointestinal bleeding, bacterial infections, albumin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen and prothrombin time. The AUROC of the KP-AKI in internal and external validations were 0.747 and 0.759, respectively. Among 217 AKI patients, 81(37.3%), 96(44.2%) and 40(18.4%) patients were with ICA-AKI stage progression, regression and fluctuated in-situ, respectively. The 90-day mortality of patients with AKI was 55.3% higher than non-AKI patients 21.6%. The 90-day mortality of patients with progression of AKI was 88.9%, followed by patients with fluctuated in-situ 40% and regression of AKI 33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram constructed by KP-AKI can be conveniently and accurately in predicting the development of HA-AKI, and AKI can increase the 90-day mortality significantly in ACLF patients. Trial registration Chinese clinical trials registry: ChiCTR1900021539.

Prognosis of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and acute kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of acute kidney disease (AKD), defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or a rise in serum creatinine (sCr) of <50% for <3 months, is not clearly known.

AIM

To study the prevalence, predictive factors and clinical outcomes in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with AKD.

METHODS

The North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease prospectively enrolled hospitalized decompensated cirrhotic patients. Patients were separated into those with normal renal function (controls or C), AKD or stage 1 AKI as their worst renal dysfunction per International Club of Ascites definition and compared. Parameters assessed included demographics, laboratory data, haemodynamics, renal and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

1244 patients with cirrhosis and ascites (C: 704 or 57%; AKD: 176 or 14%; stage 1 AKI: 364 or 29%) with similar demographics were enrolled. AKD patients had similar baseline sCr but higher hospital admission in the previous 6 months, and higher peak sCr, compared to controls, with their peak sCr being lower than that in stage 1 AKI patients (all P < .0001). The in-hospital and 30-day survival for AKD patients were intermediary between that for controls and stage 1 AKI patients (96% vs 91% vs 86%, P < .0001). The strongest predictors for AKD development while in hospital were the presence of a second infection (OR: 2.44) and diabetes (OR: 1.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AKD had intermediate outcomes between stage 1 AKI and controls. AKD patients, especially those with diabetes and a second infection, need careful monitoring and prompt treatment for AKD to prevent negative outcomes.

Incidence and mortality of acute kidney disease following coronary angiography: a cohort study of 9223 patients

PURPOSE

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is an important state in the evolving kidney diseases. However, there is limited data on the incidence and prognosis of AKD following coronary angiography (CAG). Therefore, we aim to characterize the incidence and prognosis of AKD across a large population of CAG patients.

METHODS

The consecutive patients with baseline and following measurement of serum creatinine (Scr) between 7 and 90 days after CAG procedure were included. The AKD was defined as a decrease in glomerular filtration rate by > 35%, or an increase in Scr of > 50% (from 7 to 90 days). Survival curves, univariate and multivariable cox regressions were used to assess the association between AKD and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 9223 patients (male, 60.3%, mean age, 61.7 ± 9.6), 1540 had AKD. During a median follow-up of 5.4 (IQR 2.2-8.6) years, 1562 (16.9%) patients died. The mortality among the patients with AKD was higher than the non-AKD group (24.8% vs. 15.4%, p < 0.001). AKD was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.57; 95% CI 1.39-1.78; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that AKD is commonly observed after CAG and increased half mortality risk than those without AKD. More attention needs to be paid to patients suffering from AKD.

Role of Novel Kidney Biomarkers in Patients With Cirrhosis and After Liver Transplantation

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are important drivers of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation (LT). In this review, we examine the role of novel kidney biomarkers for early recognition of kidney injury. Studies are limited by lack of reference standards, heterogeneous definitions of outcomes and biomarker cutoffs, and inconsistent diagnostic performance. Overall, a change in biomarker is more relevant than an absolute cutoff. Cystatin C and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) are the most studied candidate biomarkers and identify AKI or progression of AKI earlier than serum creatinine (sCr). Kidney injury molecule 1 and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) also show potential. NGAL and interleukin 18 may play a role in differentiating acute tubular necrosis from other forms of AKI. Combining novel biomarkers with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score may assist prognosis. Persistent elevations in select markers (eg, NGAL) can portend irreversible injury. Several pretransplantation markers (including sCr) predict posttransplantation kidney dysfunction. Pretransplantation assessment of clinical factors (eg, age, diabetes) and novel markers (osteopontin and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 [TIMP-1]) may predict renal kidney recovery after LT. Intraoperative changes in biomarkers predict early post-LT AKI. Prediction of CKD remains difficult, although a combination of biomarkers (eg, beta-2 microglobulin, CD40) is promising. Novel biomarkers have yet to replace sCr in guideline-based evaluation and management of kidney dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. We propose a theoretical framework for practical incorporation of these biomarkers that considers patient characteristics (risk for irreversible injury), markers of functional and structural change, and assessment of the AKI-CKD continuum to identify patients at the highest risk for progressive kidney disease before and after LT.

Risk and protective factors of acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhotic patients with ascites on tolvaptan

Background and Aim

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a life‐threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. Here, we evaluated the risk factors and characteristics of AKI in cirrhosis.

Patients/Methods

This was a single‐center retrospective study. A total of 199 Japanese patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (104 men, median age 61 years) were enrolled and received tolvaptan orally. Survival rates and new onset of AKI were monitored, and risk factors were evaluated.

Results

Forty‐six patients (23.1%) suffered an AKI complication and exhibited significantly poorer survival (P < 0.01). The rates of hepatic encephalopathy (P < 0.01) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; P = 0.02) were significantly increased in patients with AKI. The rate of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/H2 blocker treatment (P = 0.04) was significantly lower, whereas that of ascites drainage was significantly higher in the AKI cases (P < 0.01). The AKI risk was significantly increased in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HR 4.18, 95% CI 1.618–10.771). In contrast, the incidence of AKI was significantly lower in patients with a higher serum albumin level (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.142–0.914, P = 0.03). Treatment with PPI/H2 blockers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.126–0.711, P < 0.01) or kanamycin/rifaximin (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.075–0.929, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of AKI development.

Conclusions

AKI incidence was increased in patients with decreased liver function and was associated with poor survival. PPI/H2 blocker or kanamycin/rifaximin treatment may reduce the risk of AKI.

Liver Impairment-The Potential Application of Volatile Organic Compounds in Hepatology

Liver diseases are currently diagnosed through liver biopsy. Its invasiveness, costs, and relatively low diagnostic accuracy require new techniques to be sought. Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human bio-matrices has received a lot of attention. It is known that a musty odour characterises liver impairment, resulting in the elucidation of volatile chemicals in the breath and other body fluids such as urine and stool, which may serve as biomarkers of a disease. Aims: This study aims to review all the studies found in the literature regarding VOCs in liver diseases, and to summarise all the identified compounds that could be used as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. The literature search was conducted on ScienceDirect and PubMed, and each eligible publication was qualitatively assessed by two independent evaluators using the SANRA critical appraisal tool. Results: In the search, 58 publications were found, and 28 were kept for inclusion: 23 were about VOCs in the breath, one in the bile, three in urine, and one in faeces. Each publication was graded from zero to ten. A graphical summary of the metabolic pathways showcasing the known liver disease-related VOCs and suggestions on how VOC analysis on liver impairment could be applied in clinical practice are given.

Harmonizing acute and chronic kidney disease definition and classification: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference

Kidney disease is an important public health problem. Both acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease have been well defined and classified, leading to improved research efforts and subsequent management strategies and recommendations. For those patients with abnormalities in kidney function and/or structure who meet neither the definition of AKI nor chronic kidney disease, there remains a gap in research, care, and guidance. The term acute kidney diseases and disorders, abbreviated to acute kidney disease (AKD), has been introduced as an important construct to address this. To expand and harmonize existing definitions and to ultimately better inform research and clinical care, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organized a consensus workshop. Multiple invitees from around the globe, representing both acute and chronic kidney disease researchers and experts, met virtually to examine existing data, and discuss key concepts related to AKD. Despite some remaining unresolved questions, conference attendees reached general consensus on the definition and classification of AKD, management strategies, and research priorities. AKD is defined by abnormalities of kidney function and/or structure with implications for health and with a duration of ≤3 months. AKD may include AKI, but, more importantly, also includes abnormalities in kidney function that are not as severe as AKI or that develop over a period of >7 days. The cause(s) of AKD should be sought, and classification includes functional and structural parameters. Management of AKD is currently based on empirical considerations. A robust research agenda to enable refinement and validation of definitions and classification systems, and thus testing of interventions and strategies, is proposed.

Advances in management of hepatorenal syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is encountered frequently in patients with end-stage liver disease and remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. This review will focus and provide updates on pathophysiology, assessment of kidney function, new definitions, and treatment and prevention of HRS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathophysiology of HRS has been elucidated more recently and in addition to hemodynamic changes, the role of systemic inflammatory response contributes significantly to this process. Assessment of kidney function in patients with liver cirrhosis remains challenging. Novel glomerular filtration rate equations have been developed in patients with liver disease to better estimate kidney function and changes made in the definition of acute kidney injury (AKI), which are more aligned with KDIGO criteria for AKI. Vasoconstrictors, especially terlipressin, along with albumin remain the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of HRS-AKI. Biomarkers have been useful in differentiating ATN from HRS at an early stage.

SUMMARY

HRS remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with end-stage liver disease. Newer understanding of mechanisms in development and pathophysiology of HRS have helped with elucidation of the disease process.

End-stage liver disease: Management of hepatorenal syndrome

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a serious complication of cirrhosis with high morbidity and mortality rates. Recently, the definition of HRS type 1 has been updated and is now called HRS-AKI. This new definition reduces the risk of delaying HRS treatment and eliminates the need to establish a minimum creatinine cut-off for the diagnosis of HRS-AKI. From a pathophysiological point of view, newly identified mechanisms involved in the development of HRS are related to the inflammatory response, conditioning the development of extrahepatic organ dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. One of the main challenges for the diagnosis of HRS is the validation of new biomarkers to obtain an early and differential diagnosis of kidney injury (eg HRS vs. ATN). Treatment of HRS is based on the use of vasoconstrictive agents in combination with albumin and terlipressin is the most widely used vasoconstrictor drug, with a high response rate. The effects of a continuous infusion of terlipressin at a dose of 2-12 mg/day was similar to bolus administration, but with lower rates of adverse events. Finally, MELD/MELD-Na which includes creatinine as one of its main determinants gives AKI-HRS patients priority on the waiting list (WL) for liver transplant (LT). However, the MELD and MELD-Na scores are reduced in responding patients, resulting a longer waiting time in these patients than in non-responders. Thus, the initial MELD/MELD-Na score (pre-treatment value) should be used to prioritize patients on the WL for LT in these cases.