Agreement between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal pressure in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on extrahepatic abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis and advanced chronic liver disease

Extrahepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis of the liver represents a growing clinical challenge due to the increasing prevalence of chronic liver disease and improved long-term survival of these patients. The presence of cirrhosis significantly increases the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality following abdominal surgery. Advances in preoperative risk stratification, surgical techniques, and perioperative care have led to better outcomes, yet integration of these improvements into routine clinical practice is needed. These clinical practice guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for the assessment and perioperative management of patients with cirrhosis undergoing extrahepatic surgery. An individualised patient-centred risk assessment by a multidisciplinary team including hepatologists, surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and other support teams is essential.

Beta-Blockers Lower First Decompensation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Enduring Portal Hypertension After Etiological Treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) can lower the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (identified by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) with active etiology. Our aim was to examine the effect of NSBBs on first decompensation occurrence in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

METHODS

Patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinical evidence of CSPH (gastroesophageal varices [GEVs] and/or spontaneous portosystemic collaterals [SPSSs]) after 2 years from etiological treatment. The primary endpoint was first decompensation (occurrence of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients on NSBBs vs off NSBBs.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 406 patients. Baseline characteristics of patients on NSBBs (n = 187) and off NSBBs (n = 219) were comparable, except for signs of portal hypertension that were more pronounced in the on-NSBBs group. During a mean follow-up of 32 months, 127 (31%) patients decompensated, with ascites being the most common (77%) decompensating event. Decompensation rates were lower in patients on NSBBs (16% vs 44%; P < .0001). The benefit of NSBBs on decompensation was maintained in patients with small GEVs (17% vs 43%; P < .0001), in those with spontaneous portosystemic shunt only (8% vs 43%; P = .003), and in each different etiology, including hepatitis C virus-cured cirrhosis (9% vs 32%; P < .0001). At Cox regression analysis, hemoglobin, Child-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium, diabetes at baseline, and previous bacterial infections were independent predictors of decompensation, while NSBBs use had a protective effect (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.49; P < .0001). NSBBs use significantly reduced bacterial infection rates (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.58; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

NSBBs decrease the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

The new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: the role of ultrasound and elastography

In 2023, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was renamed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease by the American and European liver associations. This new nomenclature recognizes metabolic dysfunction as the central driver of the disease, and the diagnostic criteria now require the presence of hepatic steatosis plus at least one of five cardiometabolic risk factors. B-mode ultrasonography remains the most common and practical method for detecting hepatic steatosis, although newer ultrasound techniques based on attenuation, backscatter, and speed of sound have gained traction as tools to diagnose and quantify hepatic steatosis. Additionally, ultrasound elastography is increasingly used in routine clinical practice to assess liver fibrosis, diagnose cirrhosis, and identify clinically significant portal hypertension.

Prognostic Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Direct Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement in Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disorder

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HVPG is the gold standard for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), a condition associated with the risk of developing hepatic decompensation events. However, HVPG is an indirect method to measure portal pressure, and its application in the pre-sinusoidal form of portal hypertension (PH), as in porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD), is hindered by low accuracy. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement, which allows direct measurement of portal pressure, is emerging as a safe method and may overcome the limitation of HVPG. However, data in patients with CSPH and the pre-sinusoidal form of PH are still missing. This study aims to evaluate the safety and usefulness of EUS-PPG compared to HVPG in a cohort of patients with PSVD and CSPH.

METHODS

In this prospective single center study, patients with a diagnosis of PSVD who presented a clinical suspicion of CSPH underwent HVPG and EUS-PPG baseline measurements. A second EUS-PPG measurement was performed in patients naïve to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) to evaluate haemodynamic response to therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled and a total of 26 HVPG and 35 EUS-PPG measurements were performed, without any adverse events. Mean EUS-PPG was significantly higher than mean HVPG value (16.7 ± 5.5 mmHg versus 5.5 ± 2.8 mmHg). At logistic multivariate regression analysis, EUS-PPG value was the only variable associated with hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-PPG measurement is safe and might have a prognostic role in patients with PSVD and CSPH, outperforming HVPG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ID5486.

Fine-Needle Portosystemic Pressure Gradient as a Reference for Portal Hypertension in Patients with Intrahepatic Venovenous Shunt: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the consistency and agreement between portal venous pressure measured by a fine needle (FN-PVP), direct portal vein catheterization (D-PVP), and wedged hepatic vein balloon occlusion (W-HVP) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and intrahepatic venovenous shunts (IHVSs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty-six consecutive patients planning to receive a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the authors' center were screened for study participation. The FN-PVP, D-PVP, and W-HVP were assessed for consistency by Pearson coefficient (r), linear regression coefficient (R2), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and for disagreement (error exceeding 20% of D-PVP) by the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Of 92 eligible patients, FN-PVP was successfully obtained in 37 (40.2%) with IHVS, with no puncture-related adverse events. In these patients, there were significant differences between W-HVP and D-PVP (-14.3 mm Hg; P < .001) with poor consistency (r = 0.410; R2 = 0.168; ICC, 0.105) but only minor differences between FN-PVP and D-PVP (-0.5 mm Hg; P = .134) with good consistency (r = 0.951; R2 = 0.904; ICC, 0.944). This pattern did not change when pressure gradients were compared (R2 = 0.083/0.767) and adjusted by stiffness measurements and platelet counts (R2 = 0.196/0.789). The W-HVP/D-PVP and FN-PVP/D-PVP disagreement occurred in 47.8% (34 with IHVS, 91.9%) and 0.0% of patients, respectively. In multivariate linear regression, only the presence of portal vein thrombosis (P = .045) was an independent predictor for the lower FN-PVP/D-PVP ratio. Portosystemic pressure gradient of FN-PVP showed greater ability to stratify that of D-PVP of 16 mm Hg (area under the curve, 1.000 vs 0.574; P < .001) and 20 mm Hg (0.974 vs 0.662; P = .001) than that of W-HVP.

CONCLUSIONS

FN-PVP measurement may be a valid and safe approach to reflect the severity of sinusoidal portal hypertension in patients with IHVS.

Future of Endoscopy in Surveillance of Esophageal Varices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

tTo assess the evolving role of endoscopy assessment for esophageal varices in cirrhosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The approach to screening endoscopy for varices has significantly changed in the last 10 years with the refinement of non-diagnostic tests. Non-invasive diagnostic methods have reduced the need of upper endoscopies for variceal screening in patients with compensated cirrhosis, focusing primarily on those with ambiguous risk assessments or contraindications to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs). In contrast, decompensated cirrhosis patients require more frequent endoscopic evaluations due to their heightened risk of complications and the potential benefit of combination therapy (NSBBs + variceal ligation). In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) the performance of non-invasive tests is suboptimal and most patients require endoscopy. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence (AI) can assist in patient triage and the interpretation of endoscopic findings, potentially improving care. Further research is essential to validate these technologies within clinical practice and optimize their integration into patient management strategies.

Multicenter analysis on the correlation between the anatomical characteristics of hepatic veins and hepatic venous wedge pressure

BACKGROUND

Wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) is a crucial variable for accurately assessing the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and is vital for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of patients with portal hypertension (PH).

AIM

To investigate the anatomical characteristics of balloon-occluded hepatic venous angiography in patients with PH and analyze the relationship between the WHVP and portal venous pressure (PVP).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 877 patients with PH who met the inclusion criteria from January 2020 to June 2024. Routine and innovative hepatic venous angiography was performed during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures to measure hepatic venous and PVPs. All patients' angiographic images were collected for analysis. The associations between WHVP and PVP in each group were analyzed via linear regression analysis, and a predictive model was established.

RESULTS

The 877 patients had a mean age of 52.6 ± 13.0 years, with 582 males and 295 females. Patients were categorized into four groups on the basis of their anatomical structure. All groups showed strong correlations between WHVP and PVP. The regression coefficient between the WHVP and PVP in the hepatic right vein-portal venous angiography group was 0.884 (P < 0.05); in the hepatic right vein-accessory hepatic venous angiography group, it was 0.721 (P < 0.05); in the hepatic right vein-middle hepatic venous angiography group, it was 0.344 (P < 0.05); and in the hepatic right vein-nonangiography group, it was 0.293 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence and anatomical classification of hepatic venous collaterals are key factors influencing the relationship between WHVP with and PVP. Based on the different anatomical classifications of hepatic veins, WHVP can be used to estimate PVP, improving the accuracy of PVP prediction.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with (compensated and decompensated) advanced chronic liver disease - A comparison of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with alcohol-associated liver disease: A retrospective view

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a strong surrogate of severity and outcome but its relative prognostic value in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is yet to be clarified. We compared HVPG in MASLD with ALD and other etiologies according to cirrhosis complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In our cirrhosis registry RH7, we identified patients with data on HVPG and scrutinized them against the etiology of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) (MASLD, ALD, Other) and specific complications of ACLD such as variceal bleeding or ascites. We excluded patients with advanced malignancies and less than 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

We enrolled 220 patients with ALD, MASLD, and Other etiology in 128, 52, and 40 cases, respectively; te median age was 57, 60, and 52 years (P = 0.09); the proportion of females was 31, 67, and 55%, respectively (P < 0.01). Median MELD scores in ALD, MASLD, and Other etiologies were 16.0, 13.0, and 12.0 (P < 0.01), and the median HVPG was 18.0, 14.0, and 11.5 mmHg (P < 0.001). In 19, 30, and 25 compensated patients, the median HVPG was 10.0, 11.5, and 11.0 mmHg (P = 0.97). In 109, 22, and 15 decompensated patients, the median HVPG was 19.0, 15.5 and 14 mmHg (P = 0.01 for trend, difference ALD vs. other P < 0.01, ALD vs. MASLD, P = 0.295). Between decompensated MASLD and ALD patients, we observed no differences in the proportion of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (>10 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

In our cirrhosis registry study of hospitalized patients with ACLD, baseline HVPG measured for accepted indications differed according to the etiology of dACLD: patients with ALD had the highest values followed by MASLD and Other etiologies. Importantly, when looked at from the point of view of complications, the treshold for clinically significant portal hypertension remained fixed at the level recommended by BAVENO Consensus - 10 mm Hg irrespective of etiology.

Non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension: Liver stiffness and beyond

Portal hypertension (PH) leads to life-threatening clinical manifestations such as bleeding from gastro-oesophageal varices, ascites and its complications, and portosystemic encephalopathy. It can develop because of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) or due to rarer causes such as vascular liver disease. Reference standard methods to assess PH in ACLD include the measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and endoscopy, which have limitations due to their high resource utilisation and invasiveness. Non-invasive tests (NITs) have entered clinical practice and allow invasive procedures to be reserved for patients with indeterminate findings on NITs or for specific clinical questions. In this review, we present an update on the role of NITs, and in particular ultrasound elastography, to diagnose PH in ACLD and vascular liver disease, and to stratify the risk of liver-related events. We also provide insights into the open research questions and design of studies in this field.

Exploring algorithms to select candidates for non-selective beta-blockers in cirrhosis: A post hoc analysis of the PREDESCI trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Whether non-invasive tests (NITs) can accurately select patients with cirrhosis requiring non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and prevention of decompensation is unclear. Our aim was to test the performance of NIT-based algorithms for CSPH diagnosis using the prospective PREDESCI cohort. We investigated whether a new algorithm combining NITs with endoscopy could improve performance.

METHODS

We included patients with compensated cirrhosis and available liver elastography who were screened during the trial. The performance of models based on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and platelet count was evaluated. An algorithm considering endoscopy for patients with inconclusive results (the "grey zone") was then developed and validated in an independent cohort of 195 patients in whom spleen stiffness was also available.

RESULTS

We included 170 patients from the PREDESCI cohort. An LSM ≥25 kPa alone (Baveno VII criteria) or combined with an LSM >20 kPa plus thrombocytopenia (AASLD criteria) ruled-in CSPH with positive predictive values of 88% and 89%, respectively. However, 37%-47% patients fell into the grey zone while at high risk of decompensation or death. Performing endoscopy in inconclusive cases identified patients with varices that, when reclassified as high-risk for CSPH, significantly reduced the grey zone to 22%. In this algorithm, 86% of patients with CSPH were correctly classified as high risk. The diagnostic performance was confirmed in the external validation cohort, where combining Baveno VII criteria with spleen stiffness showed similar accuracy to the model using endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithms based only on LSM and platelet count are suboptimal to identify NSBB treatment candidates. Performing endoscopy in patients with indeterminate findings from NITs improved diagnostic performance and risk stratification. Endoscopy may be substituted by spleen stiffness for stratifying risk in the grey zone.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

The PREDESCI trial demonstrated that non-selective beta-blockers prevent decompensation in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Still, it is unclear whether we can select treatment candidates using non-invasive tests to assess the presence of CSPH without measuring HVPG (hepatic venous pressure gradient). In the prospective cohort of patients screened during the PREDESCI trial, we showed that algorithms based on liver stiffness and platelet count had suboptimal performance, mainly due to a high rate of indeterminate results. Performing endoscopy on patients in the grey zone significantly increased the number correctly characterized as having CSPH and improved the risk stratification for decompensation or death on long-term follow-up. These findings were validated in an independent cohort. In addition, a model using spleen stiffness instead of endoscopy showed similar diagnostic performance in the external validation cohort, suggesting that adequate risk stratification to select treatment candidates can be achieved with a fully non-invasive algorithm.

EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement for evaluating the severity of portal hypertension: A retrospective analysis

Background and Objectives

EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement has been proposed as a novel direct manometry to quantify portal hypertension. This study aimed to explore the ability of EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate the severity of portal hypertension.

Methods

The clinical features of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease who underwent EUS-PPG measurement at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The correlations between the clinical features of portal hypertension and the EUS-PPG measurements were analyzed, and then receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of the EUS-PPG measurements to evaluate disease severity.

Results

A total of 197 patients were included in this study. The EUS-PPG measurements varied significantly among patients categorized by gastroesophageal varices, red signs, variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hypoproteinemia, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, or Child-Pugh grade (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 0.919, 0.847, 0.813, and 0.804, respectively (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the optimal EUS-PPG cutoff values for gastroesophageal varices, decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and recent variceal bleeding were 11.5 mm Hg (sensitivity = 80.3%, specificity = 89.5%), 12.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 76.7%), 15.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.1%), and 16.75 mm Hg (sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 70.1%), respectively.

Conclusions

EUS-PPG measurement seems to be an effective technique for assessing disease severity and risk of variceal bleeding in patients with diagnosed cirrhosis or chronic liver disease.

Role of noninvasive tests in the prognostication of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

In managing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, which affects over 30% of the general population, effective noninvasive biomarkers for assessing disease severity, monitoring disease progression, predicting the development of liver-related complications, and assessing treatment response are crucial. The advantage of simple fibrosis scores lies in their widespread accessibility through routinely performed blood tests and extensive validation in different clinical settings. They have shown reasonable accuracy in diagnosing advanced fibrosis and good performance in excluding the majority of patients with a low risk of liver-related complications. Among patients with elevated serum fibrosis scores, a more specific fibrosis and imaging biomarker has proved useful to accurately identify patients at risk of liver-related complications. Among specific fibrosis blood biomarkers, enhanced liver fibrosis is the most widely utilized and has been approved in the United States as a prognostic biomarker. For imaging biomarkers, the availability of vibration-controlled transient elastography has been largely improved over the past years, enabling the use of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for accurate assessment of significant and advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Combining LSM with other routinely available blood tests enhances the ability to diagnose at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and predict liver-related complications, some reaching an accuracy comparable to that of liver biopsy. Magnetic resonance imaging-based modalities provide the most accurate quantification of liver fibrosis, though the current utilization is limited to research settings. Expanding their future use in clinical practice depends on factors such as cost and facility availability.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Correlates with Clinical Parameters and Liver Histology

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided portosystemic pressure gradient measurement (EUS-PPG) is a novel technique to evaluate for portal hypertension (PH), a diagnosis that can prognosticate and guide therapy for patients. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of EUS-PPG and correlation with clinical parameters and liver histology.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-PPG from January 2020 to December 2022 for suspected liver disease or PH. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between EUS-PPG and clinical parameters of PH, and the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test described correlation with liver biopsy histology and noninvasive markers of fibrosis (Fibrosis-4, APRI [aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index]). Logistic regression was performed to identify the strongest predictor of histologic cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Across 8 centers, 385 patients were enrolled and 373 had successful EUS-PPG (technical success 97%). Higher median PPGs were observed in patients with than without esophageal varices (11.6 mm Hg vs 4.1 mm Hg), portal hypertensive gastropathy (10.5 mm Hg vs 3.3 mm Hg), and thrombocytopenia (7.6 mm Hg vs 4.4 mm Hg) (P < .001). Individuals with PH and clinically significant PH (PPG ≥10) were 6.7 and 3.8 times more likely to have cirrhosis on histology, respectively. EUS-PPG was the best overall predictor of biopsy-proven cirrhosis (area under the curve 0.84) compared with Fibrosis-4 (0.72), and APRI (0.54). There were 2 minor adverse events related to PPG (postprocedural pain).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-PPG measurement was technically feasible and safe and demonstrated a strong correlation with clinical parameters of PH and liver histology. The strongest predictor of cirrhosis was EUS-PPG >5 mm Hg, which outperformed noninvasive markers of fibrosis.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Centre for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of CSPH and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Portal hypertension: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Consensus document sponsored by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) and the Biomedical Research Network Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd)

Portal hypertension is a hemodynamic abnormality that complicates the course of cirrhosis, as well as other diseases that affect the portal venous circulation. The development of portal hypertension compromises prognosis, especially when it rises above a certain threshold known as clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). In the consensus conference on Portal Hypertension promoted by the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver and the Hepatic and Digestive diseases area of the Biomedical Research Networking Center (CIBERehd), different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension caused by cirrhosis or other diseases were discussed. The outcome of this discussion was a set of recommendations that achieved varying degrees of consensus among panelists and are reflected in this consensus document. The six areas under discussion were: the relevance of clinically significant portal hypertension and the non-invasive methods used for its diagnosis and that of cirrhosis, the prevention of the first episode of decompensation and its recurrence, the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and other complications of portal hypertension, the indications for the use of TIPS, and finally, the diagnosis and treatment of liver vascular diseases.

Predicting Portal Pressure Gradient in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Non-invasive Deep Learning Model

BACKGROUND

A high portal pressure gradient (PPG) is associated with an increased risk of failure to control esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage and refractory ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, direct measurement of PPG is invasive, limiting its routine use in clinical practice. Consequently, there is an urgent need for non-invasive techniques to assess PPG.

AIM

To develop and validate a deep learning model that predicts PPG values for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and identifies those with high-risk portal hypertension (HRPH), who may benefit from early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) intervention.

METHODS

Data of 520 decompensated cirrhosis patients who underwent TIPS between June 2014 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Laboratory and imaging parameters were used to develop an artificial neural network model for predicting PPG, with feature selection via recursive feature elimination for comparison experiments. The best performing model was tested by external validation.

RESULTS

After excluding 92 patients, 428 were included in the final analysis. A series of comparison experiments demonstrated that a three-parameter (3P) model, which includes the international normalized ratio, portal vein diameter, and white blood cell count, achieved the highest accuracy of 87.5%. In two distinct external datasets, the model attained accuracy rates of 85.40% and 90.80%, respectively. It also showed notable ability to distinguish HRPH with an AUROC of 0.842 in external validation.

CONCLUSION

The developed 3P model could predict PPG values for decompensated cirrhosis patients and could effectively distinguish HRPH.

MASH to cirrhosis: bridging the gaps in MASLD management

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) represents a critical stage in the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), significantly increasing the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver-related mortality. Despite the rising global prevalence of MASLD, gaps in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms driving MASH to cirrhosis persist, leading to challenges in early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This review explores the current knowledge on MASH, focusing on its pathophysiology, clinical management, and treatment strategies in the advanced stages. The role of metabolic dysfunction, portal hypertension, decompensation, and HCC occurrence is highlighted, alongside an evaluation of therapeutic options including lifestyle intervention, bariatric surgery, pharmacological therapies and liver transplantation. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for a multidisciplinary care approach to improve patient outcomes and address the complex metabolic and hepatic interplay in MASLD. Bridging these gaps will require an integrated effort combining advanced diagnostic tools, novel treatments, and comprehensive care strategies.

Stratified analysis of the correlation between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure in patients with portal hypertension

To evaluate the differences in the agreement between wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and portal venous pressure (PVP) at different hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) levels to identify specific HVPG thresholds where WHVP can reliably estimate PVP, thus enhancing the accuracy of risk stratification and treatment decision-making for portal hypertension (PHT) patients. A multicenter study of 616 patients with PHT from three centers was stratified into five groups by their HVPG: HVPG < 12 (group A), 12 ≤ HVPG < 16 mmHg (group B), 16 ≤ HVPG < 20 mmHg (group C), 20 ≤ HVPG < 24 mmHg (group D), HVPG ≥ 24 mmHg (group E). Concordance was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland‒Altman analysis in each HVPG stratum. Correlation and agreement between WHVP and PVP varied by HVPG group. Highest agreement was observed in the range of 20 ≤ HVPG < 24 mmHg. (R = 0.55, ICC = 0.68). The proportion of patients with a discrepancy between WHVP and PVP that was greater than 10% of the PVP value was highest in group A (95.7%) and lowest in group D (48.4%). Overestimation of PVP was more common in group E (44.5%), and underestimation of PVP was more common in group A (94.6%). This study does not confirm the usefulness of hepatic vein pressure measurements to predict the PVP and PPG. The means of WHVP and PVP were significantly different in ranges A, B, C, and E.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts risk of hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality in patients with MASLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a leading cause of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Portal hypertension drives hepatic decompensation and is best diagnosed by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of HVPG in MASLD-related compensated ACLD (MASLD-cACLD).

METHODS

This European multicentre study included patients with MASLD-cACLD characterised by HVPG at baseline. Hepatic decompensation (variceal bleeding/ascites/hepatic encephalopathy) and liver-related mortality were considered the primary events of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 340 patients with MASLD-cACLD (56.2% male; median age 62 [55-68] years, median MELD 8 [7-9], 71.2% with diabetes) were included. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH: i.e., HVPG ≥10 mmHg) was found in 209 patients (61.5%). During a median follow-up of 41.5 (27.5-65.8) months, 65 patients developed hepatic decompensation with a cumulative incidence of 10.0% after 2 years (2Y) and 30.7% after 5 years (5Y) in those with MASLD-cACLD with CSPH, compared to 2.4% after 2Y and 9.4% after 5Y in patients without CSPH. Variceal bleeding did not occur without CSPH. CSPH (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 5.13; p <0.001) was associated with an increased decompensation risk and a higher HVPG remained an independent risk factor in the multivariable model (adjusted SHR per mmHg: 1.12, p <0.001). Liver-related mortality occurred in 37 patients at a cumulative incidence of 3.3% after 2Y and 21.4% after 5Y in CSPH. Without CSPH, the incidence after 5Y was 0.8%. Accordingly, a higher HVPG was also independently associated with a higher risk of liver-related death (adjusted SHR per mmHg: 1.20, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

HVPG measurement is of high prognostic value in MASLD-cACLD. In patients with MASLD-cACLD without CSPH, the short-term risk of decompensation is very low and liver-related mortality is rare, while the presence of CSPH substantially increases the risk of both.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

While the incidence of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing worldwide, insights into the impact of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) on the risk of liver-related events in MASLD-cACLD remain limited. Based on the findings of this European multicentre study including 340 MASLD-cACLD patients, we could show that increasing HVPG values and the presence of CSPH in particular were associated with a significantly higher risk of first hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality. In contrast, the short-term incidence of decompensation in patients with MASLD-cACLD without CSPH was low and the risk of liver-mortality remained negligible. Thus, HVPG measurements can provide important prognostic information for individualised risk stratification in MASLD-cACLD and may help facilitate the study of novel and promising treatment possibilities for MASLD.

A roadmap for clinical trials in MASH-related compensated cirrhosis

Although metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is rapidly becoming a leading cause of cirrhosis worldwide, therapeutic options are limited and the number of clinical trials in MASH-related compensated cirrhosis is low as compared to those conducted in earlier disease stages. Moreover, designing clinical trials in MASH cirrhosis presents a series of challenges regarding the understanding and conceptualization of the natural history, regulatory considerations, inclusion criteria, recruitment, end points and trial duration, among others. The first international workshop on the state of the art and future direction of clinical trials in MASH-related compensated cirrhosis was held in April 2023 at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona (Spain) and was attended by a group of international experts on clinical trials from academia, regulatory agencies and industry, encompassing expertise in MASH, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and regulatory affairs. The presented Roadmap summarizes important content of the workshop on current status, regulatory requirements and end points in MASH-related compensated cirrhosis clinical trials, exploring alternative study designs and highlighting the challenges that should be considered for upcoming studies on MASH cirrhosis.

Persistent varices in cured patients: Understanding the role of hepatic venous pressure gradient

Background & Aims

Etiologic factor removal (ER) drives recompensation and improves portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Esophageal varices (EV) and portosystemic shunts (PSS) have been found in patients despite hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) dropping below 10 mmHg after ER, questioning HVPG accuracy in reflecting true portal pressure in the setting of ER. We aim to evaluate the correlation of HVPG with direct portal pressure (DPP) in patients with persistence of EV after ER despite HVPG <10 mmHg.

Methods

This is a bicentric 'proof of concept' study evaluating HVPG and ultrasound-guided percutaneous DPP in patients with HCV or alcohol-related cirrhosis with persistent varices and HVPG <10 mmHg after at least 5 years of ER.

Results

Seven patients with HCV and three with alcohol-related cirrhosis with persistent varices and HVPG <10 mmHg after at least 5 years of ER were included. At evaluation, all patients had a patent portal vein and were compensated. The median platelet count was 129.5 (IQR 95-145) × 109/ml, and the median liver stiffness measurement was 16.15 (IQR 14.4-22.3) kPa. In five patients, EV remained the same size (two large and three small), and five downsized to small after ER. Wedge hepatic vein pressure (median 19 [IQR 16.5-20] mmHg) and portal pressure (median 18 [IQR 15-19.5] mmHg) had an excellent correlation (R = 0.93, p <0.0001). Portal pressure gradient (PPG) confirmed the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension as identified by HVPG across all the patients.

Conclusions

HVPG accurately reflects PPG in the context of HCV and alcohol-related cirrhosis regression. After ER, EV may persist despite HVPG <10 mmHg. The benefit of prophylaxis in patients with EV and HVPG <10 mmHg is unknown. Future studies with clinical endpoints are needed to validate our findings.

Impact and implications

Despite a favorable evolution after the removal of the etiologic factor, varices persist in some patients, and there is a lack of concise guidelines for the evaluation and management of portal hypertension in this population. Our research underscores the persistence of varices in the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension and significantly demonstrates the accuracy of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in reflecting portal vein pressure in this specific patient group. These findings emphasize the crucial role of HVPG in the assessment of portal hypertension after etiologic factor removal and lay the groundwork for further investigation into clinical outcomes and the necessity of non-selective beta-blockers in individuals with persistent varices after the removal of etiologic factor.

A hemodynamic study of the relationship between the left and right liver volumes and the blood flow distribution in portal vein branches

BACKGROUND

Cirrhosis patients often exhibit clinical symptoms such as right liver atrophy, portal hypertension, spleen enlargement and increased blood supply, which exhibit considerable variation between the left and right liver sections. These differences are hypothesized to stem from disparities in blood flow within the left and right portal vein (PV) branches. However, rigorous quantitative evidence remains scarce.

PURPOSE

We mainly aim at quantitatively revealing the relationship between the blood flow rates of two PV branches and liver volumes, and providing quantitative evidence and theoretical support for the diagnosis and treatment of cirrhosis from the perspective of hemodynamics.

METHODS

Five cirrhotic patients and two healthy volunteers from Beijing Friendship Hospital are investigated. Their PV blood flow models are established based on computed tomography (CT) images and finite volume simulations. The volume of the left and right liver lobes are measured in 3-matic. The distributions of blood source in the PV branches are tracked by streamline analysis. The blood flow rates are quantitatively counted by integrating the blood source velocities. Linear analysis is performed to build the relationship between liver volumes and PV blood flow distributions.

RESULTS

Streamline analysis reveals significant differences in blood distribution between the left and right PV branches. The majority of blood from the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) flowed into the right portal vein (RPV), while most blood from the splenic vein (SV) entered the left portal vein (LPV). The main PV pressure drop linearly increases with the SV blood velocity for all PV structures of patients and healthy volunteers. The flow rate ratio QRPV/QLPV demonstrates an increase in tandem with the volume ratio VR/VL, exhibiting a linear correlation with the Pearson correlation coefficient being 0.93.

CONCLUSION

The differences in the blood distributions are consistent with the clinicians' knowledge and validate our simulations. We demonstrated a linear increase in PV pressure with elevated SV blood velocity. Additionally, the volumes of the left and right hepatic lobes exhibited a positive correlation with blood flow rates in the corresponding PV branches.

Reduced risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy and death after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with hepatic venovenous communications

PURPOSE

Hepatic venovenous communications (HVVC) is detectable in more than one-third of cirrhotic patients, where portal hypertension (PHT) tends to present more severely. We aimed to explore the prognostic implications of HVVC in patients with sinusoidal PHT treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHOD

The multicenter data of patients (2020-2022) undergoing balloon-occluded hepatic venography during TIPS were retrospectively analyzed. Pre-TIPS total bile acids (TBA) levels in portal, hepatic and peripheral veins were compared between groups. The primary endpoint was the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) within one year after TIPS.

RESULTS

183 patients were eligible and classified by the presence (n = 69, 37.7 %) or absence (n = 114, 62.3 %) of HVVC. The agreement between wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure was poor in HVVC group (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]: 0.141, difference: 13.4 mmHg, p < 0.001), but almost perfect in non-HVVC group (ICC: 0.877, difference: 0.4 mmHg, p = 0.152). At baseline, patients with HVVC had lower Model for end-stage liver disease scores (p < 0.001), blood ammonia levels (p < 0.001), TBA concentrations in the hepatic (p = 0.011) and peripheral veins (p = 0.049) rather than in the portal veins (p = 0.516), and a higher portosystemic pressure gradient (p = 0.035), suggesting more effective intrahepatic perfusion in this group. Within 1-year post-TIPS, HVVC group had a lower incidence of overt HE (11.7 % vs. 30.5 %, p = 0.004, HR: 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.74, absolute risk difference [ARD]: -17.4) and an improved liver transplantation-free survival rate (97.1 % vs. 86.8 %, p = 0.021, HR: 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.05-0.91, ARD: -10.3).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with sinusoidal PHT treated by TIPS, the presence of HVVC was associated with a reduced risk of overt HE and a potential survival benefit.

Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient: Measurement and Pitfalls

Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) effectively mirrors the severity of portal hypertension (PH) and offers valuable insights into prognosis of liver disease, including the risk of decompensation and mortality. Additionally, HVPG offers crucial information about treatment response to nonselective beta-blockers and other medications, with its utility demonstrated in clinical trials in patients with PH. Despite the widespread dissemination and validation of noninvasive tests, HVPG still holds a significant role in hepatology. Physicians treating patients with liver diseases should comprehend the HVPG measurement procedure, its applications, and how to interpret the results and potential pitfalls.

Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic measurement of portal venous pressure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The measurement of portal venous pressure (PVP) has been extensively studied, primarily through indirect methods. However, the potential of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic PVP measurement as a direct method has been largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy, safety, and feasibility of this approach.

METHODS

In vitro, the experiment aimed to select a needle that could accurately transmit pressure, had a small inner diameter and was suitable for liver puncture, and performed on 20 healthy New Zealand white rabbits. An ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic portal vein puncture was undertaken to measure PVP. Additionally, free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) and wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) were measured under digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The correlation between the two methods was assessed. Enroll study participants from October 18, 2023 to November 11, 2023 with written informed consent. Five patients were measured the PVP under ultrasound guidance before surgery to determine the feasibility of this measurement method.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the results obtained using 9 different types of needles (P > 0.05). This demonstrated a great repeatability (P < 0.05). The 22G chiba needle with small inner diameter, allowing for accurate pressure transmission and suitable for liver puncture, was utilized for percutaneous transhepatic PVP measurement. There were positive correlations between PVP and HVPG (r = 0.881), PVP and WHVP (r = 0.709), HVPG and WHVP (r = 0.729), IVCP and FHVP (r = 0.572). The PVP was accurately and safely measured in 5 patients with segmental hepatectomy. No complications could be identified during postoperative ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous transhepatic portal venous puncture under ultrasound guidance is accurate, safe and feasible to measure portal venous pressure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2300076751.

Portal hypertension in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Current knowledge and challenges

Portal hypertension (PH) has traditionally been observed as a consequence of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in advanced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, recent studies have provided evidence that PH may develop in earlier stages of NAFLD, suggesting that there are additional pathogenetic mechanisms at work in addition to liver fibrosis. The early development of PH in NAFLD is associated with hepatocellular lipid accumulation and ballooning, leading to the compression of liver sinusoids. External compression and intra-luminal obstacles cause mechanical forces such as strain, shear stress and elevated hydrostatic pressure that in turn activate mechanotransduction pathways, resulting in endothelial dysfunction and the development of fibrosis. The spatial distribution of histological and functional changes in the periportal and perisinusoidal areas of the liver lobule are considered responsible for the pre-sinusoidal component of PH in patients with NAFLD. Thus, current diagnostic methods such as hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement tend to underestimate portal pressure (PP) in NAFLD patients, who might decompensate below the HVPG threshold of 10 mmHg, which is traditionally considered the most relevant indicator of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). This creates further challenges in finding a reliable diagnostic method to stratify the prognostic risk in this population of patients. In theory, the measurement of the portal pressure gradient guided by endoscopic ultrasound might overcome the limitations of HVPG measurement by avoiding the influence of the pre-sinusoidal component, but more investigations are needed to test its clinical utility for this indication. Liver and spleen stiffness measurement in combination with platelet count is currently the best-validated non-invasive approach for diagnosing CSPH and varices needing treatment. Lifestyle change remains the cornerstone of the treatment of PH in NAFLD, together with correcting the components of metabolic syndrome, using nonselective beta blockers, whereas emerging candidate drugs require more robust confirmation from clinical trials.

The effect of endoscopic gastric plication on portosystemic pressure gradient in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and compensated advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

 The goals of therapy for patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and compensated advanced chronic liver disease include weight loss and reduction of the portosystemic pressure gradient (PPG) to decrease the risk of hepatic decompensation. Endoscopic gastric plication (EGP) is an effective endoscopic weight loss procedure. This study aimed to assess the effect of EGP on PPG.

METHODS

 In this prospective pilot study, patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and compensated advanced chronic liver disease underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided PPG measurement prior to and at 6 months following EGP. Primary outcomes were the change in PPG and proportion of patients experiencing ≥ 20 % reduction in PPG at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included percent total weight loss (TWL) and changes in noninvasive tests of fibrosis.

RESULTS

 20 patients were included. Baseline median body mass index and liver stiffness measurement were 40.2 kg/m2 (range 30.1-56.7) and 14.7 kPa (range 8.2-36), respectively. At 6 months, median PPG decreased from 5.4 mmHg (range 0.7-19.6) to 1.8 mmHg (range 0.4-17.6) (P = 0.002), with 79 % (11/14) experiencing ≥ 20 % reduction. Patients experienced 12.5 % (6.5 %-26.1 %) TWL (P < 0.001) at 6 months, with 89 % (17/19) achieving ≥ 7 % and 68 % (13/19) achieving ≥ 10 % TWL. There were significant improvements in noninvasive tests of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

 EGP appeared to be effective at reducing PPG in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and compensated advanced chronic liver disease.

Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cancer: Evidence gaps for prevention and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Portal hypertension (PHT) and HCC are 2 major complications of cirrhosis that often coexist in the same patient and impact the prognosis, especially in patients with acute variceal bleeding. In this review, we aim to discuss the best strategy for PHT screening and primary prophylaxis, as well as the management of acute variceal bleeding, to improve the management of PHT in HCC patients.

RESULTS

Recent therapeutic advances observed in the management of HCC, notably through the advent of immunotherapy, have led to a clear improvement in the survival of patients. The prevention of complications related to underlying cirrhosis, such as PHT and acute variceal bleeding, is now part of the management of HCC patients. The Baveno VII conference recently redefined screening and prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis. However, data regarding the applicability of these criteria in patients with HCC have been sparse. From our point of view, the Baveno criteria are not appropriate to exclude high-risk esophageal varices (EV) in HCC patients, and endoscopy should be performed except in HCC patients with a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥25 kPa, who should benefit from nonselective beta-blockers (NSSBs) without performing endoscopy. We are also in favor of using NSBBs as primary prophylaxis in patients with EV regardless of the size and with gastric varices since these patients display clinically significant PHT.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate evaluation and treatment of PHT remain major issues in improving the outcomes of HCC patients. Many questions remain unanswered, opening the field to many areas of research.

Development of a Direct Non-Puncture Device for Measuring Portal Venous Pressure during Liver Transplantation-A Swine Model

Portal hypertension-related complications pose a significant risk for liver failure post-transplantation. Thus, accurate monitoring of intraoperative portal venous pressure (PVP) is crucial. However, current PVP monitoring techniques requiring direct percutaneous puncture carry the risk of graft damage. In this study, we present an innovative non-puncture PVP monitoring device (PVPMD) using a 3D-printed prototype. PVPMD design is inspired by the sphygmomanometer principle, and strategically encompasses the portal vein and enables precise PVP measurement through blood flow ultrasonography after temporary occlusion. By a series of mini-pig experiments, the prototype PVPMD demonstrated a strong correlation with invasive catheter measurements in the main trunk of the portal vein (rs = 0.923, p = 0.000). There was a significant repeatability and reproducibility between the prototype PVPMD- and invasive catheter-measured PVP. This indicates that the PVPMD holds immense potential for direct application in liver transplantation and surgery. Moreover, it has the potential to replace catheter-based central venous pressure (CVP) measurements, thereby mitigating catheter-related complications during many surgeries. In conclusion, our innovative device represents a significant advancement in PVP monitoring during liver transplantation, with comprehensive validation from principle exploration to successful animal experiments. We anticipate that this groundbreaking PVPMD will attract the attention of researchers and clinicians, propelling the noninvasive measurement of PVP or other venous/arterial pressures into a new era of clinical practice.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient: Inaccurately estimates portal venous pressure gradient in alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension (PHT) in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis causes a range of clinical symptoms, including gastroesophageal varices and ascites. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), which is easier to measure, has replaced the portal venous pressure gradient (PPG) as the gold standard for diagnosing PHT in clinical practice. Therefore, attention should be paid to the correlation between HVPG and PPG.

AIM

To explore the correlation between HVPG and PPG in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and PHT.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and June 2020, 134 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and PHT who met the inclusion criteria underwent various pressure measurements during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures. Correlations were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient to estimate the correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (R2). Bland-Altman plots were constructed to further analyze the agreement between the measurements. Disagreements were analyzed using paired t tests, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In this study, the correlation coefficient (r) and determination coefficient (R2) between HVPG and PPG were 0.201 and 0.040, respectively (P = 0.020). In the 108 patients with no collateral branch, the average wedged hepatic venous pressure was lower than the average portal venous pressure (30.65 ± 8.17 vs. 33.25 ± 6.60 mmHg, P = 0.002). Hepatic collaterals were identified in 26 cases with balloon occlusion hepatic venography (19.4%), while the average PPG was significantly higher than the average HVPG (25.94 ± 7.42 mmHg vs 9.86 ± 7.44 mmHg; P < 0.001). The differences between HVPG and PPG < 5 mmHg in the collateral vs no collateral branch groups were three cases (11.54%) and 44 cases (40.74%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In most patients, HVPG cannot accurately represent PPG. The formation of hepatic collaterals is a vital reason for the strong underestimation of HVPG.

Methods for assessing portal hypertension

Many researchers and clinicians have taken the value of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as an essential prognostic factor in subjects with chronic liver diseases. HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg indicates the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, the main predictor of the risk of variceal bleeding, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. However, HVPG measurement is invasive and requires high expertise, so its routine use outside tertiary care centers or clinical trials is limited. Clinically significant portal hypertension also might be detected using non-invasive options such as ultrasonography, elastography, magnetic resonance imaging, and indices derived from laboratory parameters. Our review aims to present the feasibility and applicability of HVPG in modern clinical practice in patients with liver cirrhosis, including invasive and non-invasive methods, based on literary sources from the MEDLINE database.

Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure gradient in patients with autoimmune cirrhotic portal hypertension and collateral branches of the hepatic vein

AIM

To assess the correlation and agreement between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and portal pressure gradient (PPG) in patients with autoimmune liver diseases (ALD) and portal hypertension, and to investigate the extent to which hepatic vein collateralization affects the accuracy of this assessment.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with ALD between 2017 and 2021 who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with conventional and innovative 15 mL pressurized contrast were selected to measure wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and portal venous pressure and to calculate the HVPG and PPG. Pearson's correlation was used for correlation analysis between the two groups. Bland-Altman plots were plotted to estimate the agreement between paired pressures.

RESULTS

The r values of PPG and HVPG in the early, middle, late, and portal venous visualization were 0.404, 0.789, 0.807, and 0.830, respectively, and the R2 values were 0.163, 0.622, 0.651, and 0.690, respectively. The p value for the r and R2 values in the early group was 0.015, and the p values in the remaining groups were less than 0.001. Bland-Altman plots showed that patients in the portal venous visualization group had the narrowest 95% limits of agreement. The mean value of the difference was close to the zero-scale line.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ALD, the correlation between the HVPG and PPG was good, and the later the collateral development, the better the correlation. Hepatic vein collateral was an essential factor in underestimating WHVP and HVPG, and the earlier the collateral appeared, the more obvious the underestimation.

Treating NASH by targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

The pathophysiology of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) encompasses a complex set of intra- and extrahepatic driving mechanisms, involving numerous metabolic, inflammatory, vascular and fibrogenic pathways. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) α, β/δ and γ belong to the nuclear receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Activated PPARs modulate target tissue transcriptomic profiles, enabling the body's adaptation to changing nutritional, metabolic and inflammatory environments. PPARs hence regulate several pathways involved in NASH pathogenesis. Whereas single PPAR agonists exert robust anti-NASH activity in several preclinical models, their clinical effects on histological endpoints of NASH resolution and fibrosis regression appear more modest. Simultaneous activation of several PPAR isotypes across different organs and within-organ cell types, resulting in pleiotropic actions, enhances the therapeutic potential of PPAR agonists as pharmacological agents for NASH and NASH-related hepatic and extrahepatic morbidity, with some compounds having already shown clinical efficacy on histological endpoints.

Portal Hypertension in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Challenges and Paradigms

Portal hypertension in cirrhosis is defined as an increase in the portal pressure gradient (PPG) between the portal and hepatic veins and is traditionally estimated by the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), which is the difference in pressure between the free-floating and wedged positions of a balloon catheter in the hepatic vein. By convention, HVPG≥10 mmHg indicates clinically significant portal hypertension, which is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common disorder with a heterogeneous clinical course, which includes the development of portal hypertension. There is increasing evidence that portal hypertension in NAFLD deserves special considerations. First, elevated PPG often precedes fibrosis in NAFLD, suggesting a bidirectional relationship between these pathological processes. Second, HVPG underestimates PPG in NAFLD, suggesting that portal hypertension is more prevalent in this condition than currently believed. Third, cellular mechanoresponses generated early in the pathogenesis of NAFLD provide a mechanistic explanation for the pressure-fibrosis paradigm. Finally, a better understanding of liver mechanobiology in NAFLD may aid in the development of novel pharmaceutical targets for prevention and management of this disease.

Letter: NSBB for fatty liver disease-Still a long way to go. Authors' reply

This article is linked to Paternostro et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17653 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17692

The impact of transmembrane 6 superfamily 2 (TM6SF2) rs58542926 on liver-related events in patients with advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Genetic factors such as the transmembrane 6 superfamily 2 (TM6SF2) rs58542926 single nucleotide variant(SNV) modulate the susceptibility for (advanced) chronic liver disease ([A]CLD). However, the impact of this variant in patients who have already progressed to ACLD is unknown.

METHODS

The association between TM6SF2-rs58542926 genotype and liver-related events was evaluated in 938 ACLD patients undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement.

RESULTS

Mean HVPG was 15±7 mmHg and mean UNOS MELD (2016) 11±5 points. Viral hepatitis (n = 495, 53%) was the most common cause of ACLD, followed by alcohol-related (ARLD; n = 342, 37%) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD; n = 101, 11%). While 754 (80%) patients harboured the TM6SF2 wild-type (C/C), 174 (19%) and 10 (1%) patients had one or two T-alleles. At baseline, patients with at least one TM6SF2 T-allele had more pronounced portal hypertension (HVPG: 16±7 vs. 15±7 mmHg; p = 0.031), higher gamma-glutamyl transferase levels (123 [63-229] vs. 97 [55-174] UxL-1; p = 0.002), and more commonly hepatocellular carcinoma (17% vs. 12%; p = 0.049). Harbouring the TM6SF2 T-allele was associated with the composite endpoint hepatic decompensation/liver transplantation/liver-related death (SHR: 1.44 [95%CI: 1.14-1.83]; p = 0.003). This was confirmed in multivariable competing risk regression analyses that were adjusted for severity of portal hypertension and hepatic dysfunction at baseline.

CONCLUSION

The TM6SF2 variant modulates liver disease progression beyond the development of ACLD, as it modifies the risks of hepatic decompensation and liver-related death, independently of baseline liver disease severity.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient and rebleeding risk of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis after variceal bleeding

Background and aims

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) has a strong predictive value for variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients, but the accuracy of HVPG may be compromised in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of HVPG and portal pressure gradient (PPG) for predicting rebleeding in NASH cirrhosis after acute variceal bleeding.

Patients and methods

Thirty-eight NASH cirrhosis patients and 82 hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding were included in this study. All patients recived transjugular intrahepatic portalsystemic shunt (TIPS). The prognostic value of HVPG and PPG for variceal rebleeding was evaluated.

Results

Compared with HBV cirrhosis, NASH cirrhosis demonstrated a lower HVPG (15.3 ± 3.8 vs. 18.0 ± 4.8; p = 0.003) and lower PPG (18.0 ± 3.7 vs. 20.0 ± 3.4; p = 0.005). HVPG (AUC = 0.82; p = 0.002) and PPG (AUC = 0.72; p = 0.027) had promising prognostic value among NASH cirrhosis patients. The optimal threshold of HVPG and PPG for predicting rebleeding in NASH cirrhosis was 17 mmHg and 20 mmHg. At multivariate analysis, HVPG ≥17 mmHg was a significant predictor of variceal rebleeding (HR 9.40; 95% CI 1.85-47.70; p = 0.007).

Conclusion

In the patients with cirrhosis and vairceal bleeding, the levels of HVPG and PPG were found to be low in NASH cirrhosis than HBV cirrhosis. However, the prevalence of rebleeding was similar between two groups. HVPG measurement is still an accurate way to assess the risk of variceal rebleeding in NASH cirrhosis.

Carvedilol as the new non-selective beta-blocker of choice in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Portal hypertension (PH) is the most common complication ofcirrhosis and represents the main driver of hepatic decompensation. The overarching goal of PH treatments in patients with compensated cirrhosis is to reduce the risk of hepatic decompensation (i.e development of ascites, variceal bleeding and/or hepatic encephalopathy). In decompensated patients, PH-directed therapies aim at avoiding further decompensation (i.e. recurrent/refractory ascites, variceal rebleeding, recurrent encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or hepatorenal syndrome) and at improving survival. Carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) acting on hyperdynamic circulation/splanchnic vasodilation and on intrahepatic resistance. It has shown superior efficacy than traditional NSBBs in lowering PH in patients with cirrhosis and may be, therefore, the NSBB of choice for the treatment of clinically significant portal hypertension. In primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, carvedilol has been demonstrated to be more effective than endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL). In patients with compensated cirrhosis carvedilol achieves higher rate of hemodynamic response than propranolol, resulting in a decreased risk of hepatic decompensation. In secondary prophylaxis, the combination of EVL with carvedilol may prevent rebleeding and non-bleeding further decompensation better than that with propranolol. In patients with ascites and gastroesophageal varices, carvedilol is safe and may improve survival, as long as no impairment of the systemic hemodynamic or renal dysfunction occurs, with maintained arterial blood pressure as suitable safety surrogate. The target dose of carvedilol to treat PH should be 12.5 mg/day. This review summarizes the evidence behind Baveno-VII recommendations on the use of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis.

Innovative angiography: a new approach to discover more hepatic vein collaterals in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamics of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are complex and variable. We aimed to investigate differences in venous pressures determined by innovative angiography and conventional angiography using balloon occlusion of the hepatic veins in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 134 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis who fulfilled the inclusion criteria from June 2017 to June 2020 were included. During transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, conventional and innovative angiography were performed, and venous pressures were measured. A paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Conventional and innovative hepatic angiography detected lateral branches of the hepatic vein in 26 (19.4%) and 65 (48.5%) cases, respectively (P < 0.001). Innovative angiography detected a total of 65 patients with lateral shunts, of whom 37 (56.9%) had initial shunts. The average wedged hepatic venous pressure and portal venous pressure of the initial lateral branches were 21.27 ± 6.66 and 35.84 ± 7.86 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.342 (P < 0.05) and 0.117, respectively. The mean hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal pressure gradient were 9.59 ± 7.64 and 26.86 ± 6.78 mmHg, respectively, with correlation and determination coefficients of 0.292 (P = 0.079) and 0.085, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovative angiography reveals collateral branches of the hepatic veins more effectively than conventional angiography. Hepatic vein collateral branches are the primary factors leading to underestimation of wedged hepatic venous pressures and hepatic venous pressure gradients, with the initial hepatic vein collateral branches resulting in the most severe underestimations.

Computed tomography perfusion in differentiating portal hypertension: A correlation study with hepatic venous pressure gradient

BACKGROUND

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH), invasiveness and potential risks in the process of measurement limited its widespread use.

AIM

To investigate the correlation of computed tomography (CT) perfusion parameters with HVPG in PH, and quantitatively assess the blood supply changes in liver and spleen parenchyma before and after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

METHODS

Twenty-four PH related gastrointestinal bleeding patients were recruited in this study, and all patients were performed perfusion CT before and after TIPS surgery within 2 wk. Quantitative parameters of CT perfusion, including liver blood volume (LBV), liver blood flow (LBF), hepatic arterial fraction (HAF), spleen blood volume (SBV) and spleen blood flow (SBF), were measured and compared before and after TIPS, and the quantitative parameters between clinically significant PH (CSPH) and non-CSPH (NCSPH) group were also compared. Then the correlation of CT perfusion parameters with HVPG were analyzed, with statistical significance as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

For all 24 PH patients after TIPS, CT perfusion parameters demonstrated decreased LBV, increased HAF, SBV and SBF, with no statistical difference in LBF. Compared with NCSPH, CSPH showed higher HAF, with no difference in other CT perfusion parameters. HAF before TIPS showed positive correlation with HVPG (r = 0.530, P = 0.008), while no correlation was found in other CT perfusion parameters with HVPG and Child-Pugh scores.

CONCLUSION

HAF, an index of CT perfusion, was positive correlation with HVPG, and higher in CSPH than NCSPH before TIPS. While increased HAF, SBF and SBV, and decreased LBV, were found after TIPS, which accommodates a potential non-invasive imaging tool for evaluation of PH.

Endovascular Assessment of Liver Hemodynamics in Patients with Cirrhosis Complicated by Portal Hypertension

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently considered the gold standard to assess portal hypertension (PH) in patients with cirrhosis. A meticulous technique is important to achieve accurate and reproducible results, and values obtained during measurement are applied in risk stratification of patients with PH, allocating treatment options, monitoring follow-up, and deciding management options in surgical patients. The use of portosystemic pressure gradients in patients undergoing placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts has been studied extensively and has great influence on decisions on shunt diameter. The purpose of this study was to describe the recommended technique to measure HVPG and portosystemic pressure gradient and to review the existing literature describing the importance of these hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice.

Non-invasive tools for compensated advanced chronic liver disease and portal hypertension after Baveno VII - an update

Non-invasive tests (NITs) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in particular, have entered clinical practice over 20 years ago as point-of-care tests to diagnose liver fibrosis in patients with compensated chronic liver disease. Since then, NITs use has evolved thanks to a large number of studies in all major etiologies of liver disease, and they have become important tools to stratify the risk of portal hypertension and liver-related events. The Baveno VII consensus workshop provided several novel recommendations regarding the use of well-established and novel NITs in the specific setting of portal hypertension screening, diagnosis and follow-up. The Baveno VII expert panels paid special attention to summarizing the existing data into simple clinical rules able to guide clinicians in their practice. The "rule of five" for LSM is a tool to stratify the risk of liver-related events, and LSM alone or in combination with platelet count, can be used now to rule-in and rule-out compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension, as well as to rule-out high-risk varices. Use of NITs in obese subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and patients with viral hepatitis C that has been successfully treated, require specific knowledge. This review will update the reader on these aspects.

Outcomes of Patients with Severe Obesity and Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Thus far, little attention has been paid to bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with severe obesity (SO) and cirrhosis with portal hypertension (PH). To address this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the available literature and evidence about BS in patients with SO and cirrhosis with PH. We inform on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of this intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Articles were identified in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, LILACS, and SCIELO, and included if they analyzed SO patients with clinically significant PH and reported the characteristics and outcomes of BS.

RESULTS

Six articles, including 32 patients, were included. The most frequent type of BS was sleeve gastrectomy performed in 27 patients. Perioperative transfusions were often not required, with only one case report describing the use of 1 unit of packed red blood cells post-operatively. Neither intraoperative nor post-op deaths were reported. All patients reported significant weight loss with improvements in comorbidities during the follow-up periods. Overall, 27 out of 29 patients had T2DM resolution, and 13 out of 23 had arterial hypertension resolution. One study reported improvements in the parameters of fibroscan.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review described the outcomes of BS among patients with SO with cirrhosis and PH. Performing this kind of surgery among these patients appears safe and associated with acceptable perioperative and long-term outcomes. However, further studies are required to provide evidence-based, strong recommendations.

Agreement between Wedged Hepatic Venous Pressure and Portal Pressure in Hepatic Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome

Background: Wedge hepatic vein pressure (WHVP) accurately estimates the portal pressure (PP) in chronic sinusoidal portal hypertension patients. Whether this applies to patients with acute portal hypertension due to hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) is unclear. Our aim was to assess the agreement between WHVP and PP in patients with HSOS by comparing them to decompensated cirrhosis patients. Methods: From December 2013 to December 2021, patients with pyrrolidine alkaloid-induced HSOS (PA-HSOS) receiving hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and transjugular intrahepatic portosystem shunt (TIPS) were retrospectively collected and matched with those of patients with virus- or alcohol-related cirrhosis as a cirrhosis group. Pearson’s correlation (R), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), scatter plots, and the Bland−Altman method were performed for agreement evaluation. Results: A total of 64 patients were analyzed (30 PA-HSOS and 34 cirrhosis groups). The correlation between WHVP and PP was moderate in the PA-HSOS group (R: 0.58, p = 0.001; ICC: 0.68, p = 0.002) but good in the cirrhosis group (R: 0.81, p < 0.001; ICC: 0.90, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with inconsistent WHVP and PP in the two groups was 13 (43.3%) and 15 (26.5%) (p = 0.156), respectively, and an overestimation of PP was more common in the PA-HSOS group (33.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.004). HVPG and portal pressure gradient (PPG) consistency was poor in both groups (R: 0.51 vs. 0.26; ICC: 0.65 vs. 0.41; p < 0.05). Conclusions: WHVP in patients with PA-HSOS did not estimate PP as accurately as in patients with virus- or alcohol-related cirrhosis, which was mainly due to PP overestimation.