Testing for myositis specific autoantibodies: Comparison between line blot and immunoprecipitation assays in 57 myositis sera

Nanostructured aptasensors for ricin detection and tumor therapy: exploring aptamer-protein interactions and conformational stability in biological complexities

Aptamers are distinctive single-stranded oligonucleotides derived through in vitro evolution, and exhibit exceptional ability in binding to target proteins. Structural modifications of aptamers can profoundly regulate their interactions with proteins, thereby influencing associated cellular behavior. Recent research focused on modulating aptamer-protein interaction in complex biological environments to regulate various biological processes. However, in such crowded conditions, aptamer conformation and stability are susceptible to nuclease degradation, which can impair stable binding to target. Ricin is recognized as a significant biological toxin protein, distinguished by its widespread availability, remarkable dissemination, and resilience including wide pH tolerance, remarkable thermostability, and solubility. RTA is an enzymatic subunit of ricin, that can inactivate approximately 2000 ribosomes per minute, rapidly halting protein synthesis, making it a powerful candidate for tumor therapy. By leveraging the potent cytotoxicity of ricin, coupled with the targeting precision of aptamers and the versatility of nanomaterials, a powerful approach emerges for both targeted tumor therapy and highly sensitive detection of ricin. Although there have been some insightful reports on aptamers applied in ricin detection, a systematic discussion remains limited. In this context, we provide an in-depth overview of techniques used to analyze aptamer-ricin interactions and explore the potential of ricin-aptamer interactions in clinical diagnosis.

Clinical Characteristics of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome: Analysis From the Classification Criteria for Anti-Synthetase Syndrome Project

OBJECTIVE

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a rare systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) with significant heterogeneity and no shared classification criteria. We aimed to identify clinical and serological features associated with ASSD that may be suitable for inclusion in the data-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

METHODS

We used a large, international, multicenter "Classification Criteria for Anti-synthetase Syndrome" (CLASS) project database, which includes both patients with ASSD and controls with mimicking conditions, namely, SARDs and/or interstitial lung disease (ILD). The local diagnoses of ASSD and controls were confirmed by project team members. We employed univariable logistic regression and multivariable Ridge regression to evaluate clinical and serological features associated with an ASSD diagnosis in a randomly selected subset of the cohort.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 948 patients with ASSD and 1,077 controls. Joint, muscle, lung, skin, and cardiac involvement were more prevalent in patients with ASSD than in controls. Specific variables associated with ASSD included arthritis, diffuse myalgia, muscle weakness, muscle enzyme elevation, ILD, mechanic's hands, secondary pulmonary hypertension due to ILD, Raynaud phenomenon, and unexplained fever. In terms of serological variables, Jo-1 and non-Jo-1 anti-synthetase autoantibodies, antinuclear antibodies with cytoplasmic pattern, and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies were associated with ASSD. In contrast, isolated arthralgia, dysphagia, electromyography/magnetic resonance imaging/muscle biopsy findings suggestive of myopathy, inflammatory rashes, myocarditis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension did not differentiate between patients with ASSD and controls or were inversely associated with ASSD.

CONCLUSION

We identified key clinical and serological variables associated with ASSD, which will help clinicians and offer insights into the development of data-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

Anti-FHL1 autoantibodies in adult patients with myositis: a longitudinal follow-up analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence and clinical associations of anti-Four-and-a-half-LIM-domain 1 (FHL1) autoantibodies in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and to evaluate autoantibody levels over time.

METHODS

Sera at the time of diagnosis from patients with IIM (n = 449), autoimmune disease controls (DC, n = 130), neuromuscular diseases (NMDs, n = 16) and healthy controls (HC, n = 100) were analysed for anti-FHL1 autoantibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients with IIM FHL1+ and FHL1- were included in a longitudinal analysis. Serum levels were correlated to disease activity.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies to FHL1 were more frequent in patients with IIM (122/449, 27%) compared with DC (autoimmune DC and NMD, 13/146, 9%, P < 0.001) and HC (3/100.3%, P < 0.001). Anti-FHL1 levels were higher in IIM [median (IQR)=0.62 (0.15-1.04)] in comparison with DC [0.22 (0.08-0.58)], HC [0.35 (0.23-0.47)] and NMD [0.48 (0.36-0.80)] P < 0.001. Anti-FHL1+ patients with IIM were younger at the time of diagnosis compared with the anti-FHL1- group (P = 0.05) and were seronegative for other autoantibodies in 25%.In the first follow-up, anti-FHL1+ sample 20/33 (60%) positive at baseline had turned negative for anti-FHL1 autoantibodies. Anti-FHL1 autoantibodies rarely appeared after initiating treatment. Anti-FHL1 autoantibody levels correlated with CK (r = 0.62, P= 0.01), disease activity measured using the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MYOACT) (n = 14, P = 0.004) and inversely with Manual Muscle Test-8 (r = -0.59, P = 0.02) at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Anti-FHL1 autoantibodies were present in 27% of patients with IIM; of these, 25% were negative for other autoantibodies. Other autoimmune diseases had lower frequencies and levels. Anti-FHL1 levels often decreased with immunosuppressive treatment, correlated with disease activity measures at diagnosis and rarely appeared after start of treatment.

An update on autoantibodies in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) have become pivotal biomarkers for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and have revolutionized understanding of the heterogeneous disease spectrum that affects both adults and children. The discovery and characterization of MSAs have substantially enhanced patient stratification based on clinical phenotype, thereby facilitating more precise diagnosis and ultimately improving management strategies. Advances in immunoassay technologies in the past 20 years have further propelled the field forward, enabling the detection of a growing repertoire of autoantibodies with high specificity and sensitivity; however, evolving research over the past decade has revealed that even within antibody-defined subsets, considerable clinical diversity exists, suggesting a broader spectrum of disease manifestations than previously acknowledged. Challenges persist, particularly among patients who are seronegative, where the failure to identify certain rare MSAs stems from the use of diverse detection methodologies and inadequate consensus-guided standardization and validation protocols. Bridging these diagnostic gaps is crucial for optimizing patient care and refining prognostic stratification in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Autoantibody-Based Clinicoradiopathologic Phenotyping of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: An Indian Cohort

OBJECTIVES

We aim to characterize the clinical, pathological, laboratory and imaging features of various antibody defined IIM subgroups in Indian population.

METHODOLOGY

103 patients who satisfied 2017 ACR/ EULAR Classification criteria for IIM, and tested seropositive for myositis antibodies using Immunoblot technique were retrospectively identified. Patients were classified into following subgroups - Mi2B group, SRP group, Anti RNA Synthetase antibody group (Jo 1, PL 7, PL 12, OJ), multiple MSA, only MAA group (U1RNP, Ro 52, SS-A, SS-B, PM Scl 75, PM Scl 100). Clinical, laboratory, histopathology and imaging parameters were compared among different groups.

RESULTS

Ro52 (n = 31; 22.46%) was the most common autoantibody seen in our cohort followed by Mi2B (n = 26; 18.84%) and SRP (n = 20; 14.49%). Skin manifestations (p = 0.053) and joint involvement (p = 0.023) were seen more frequently among Mi2B and MAA sub groups. Three out of 4 patients with persisting antibody positivity on serial measurements developed clinical relapse between 2 and 3 years after the initial episode. Remaining 2 patients showed declining titres of antibodies and developed no clinical relapses during follow up period of 5 and 6 years. Among histopathology features, perifascicular atrophy was found to be more prevalent among Mi2B (55.6%) and MAA subgroups (31.3%) (p value = 0.037). In thigh muscle MRI, Mi2B group showed a pattern of diffuse involvement of affected muscles without regional preference, with sparing of hamstring group. SRP group showed characteristic pattern of edema involving peripheral regions of Quadriceps femoris and central regions of Adductor group along with severe atrophy involving hamstring and adductor compartment muscles. ILD was seen in 27.5% of patients who underwent CT Chest. 3 patients were found to have underlying malignancy at the time of diagnosis of myositis (Mi2B = 2 and PM Scl = 1).

CONCLUSION

Classification of IIM patients based on myositis antibodies yields subgroups with certain differences in clinical, laboratory, histopathological and imaging features.

Anti-sulfatide antibodies in neurological disorders: should we test?

OBJECTIVE

Neurological autoimmune peripheral and central nervous system disorders can be associated with anti-sulfatide antibodies. These antibodies are considered potential diagnostic biomarkers, although their additional diagnostic value in neurological fields has been increasingly questioned. Given the little evidence of anti-sulfatide antibodies' frequency and diagnostic value in neurology, we aimed to fill this knowledge gap by investigating 10 years of data.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the results of the anti-ganglioside dot kits (GA Generic Assays GmbH) from 1318 serum samples and 462 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples for the frequency, sensitivity, and specificity of anti-sulfatide antibodies in neurological disorders.

RESULTS

Although anti-sulfatide antibodies are rarely present in neurological autoimmune disorders (serum IgM 2.5%, IgG 4.6%), they are also present in non-autoimmune diseases (serum IgM 1.2%, IgG 2.5%) and lack sensitivity and specificity towards being a diagnostic marker. Furthermore, anti-sulfatide antibodies are rarely found in CSF (e.g., no positive results for IgM), and including so-called borderline results ((+)) increases sensitivity and the false-positive rate in serum and CSF.

DISCUSSION

While anti-sulfatide antibodies appear more frequently in neurological autoimmune diseases, they are rare overall and provide very limited diagnostic value in determining specific neurological diseases and-more importantly-if a neurological disease has a potential autoimmune etiology.

Myositis -specific and -associated antibodies in neurological disorders - A retrospective study of 727 patients

OBJECTIVE

Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are assessed in clinical neurology, serving as a non-invasive tool for the differential diagnosis of autoimmune myopathies. However, the presence of MSAs and MAAs in neurological disorders remains uncertain.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted on 878 serum samples from the neurological laboratory of the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany. The EUROLINE Myositis Profil 3 (IgG) Line Blot was used for antibody evaluation (anti-Mi2, -Ku, -PM-Scl100, -PM-Scl75, -Jo1, -SRP, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, -OJ, and -Ro52). Samples were categorized into 19 disease groups, with consideration for myositis-linked and non-myositis-linked diseases. Then, the distribution of positive findings and the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 727 included line blots, 84 could be assigned to myositis-linked diseases (thereof 44 positive for MAA/MSA). MAA and MSA taken together were more frequently positive for the main group of myositis-linked disease (52.4 %) compared to the non-myositis-linked group (14.6 %, overall specificity 85.4 %). However, individual antibodies were specific, ranging above 97.5 %. False positive antibody results can also occur in neurological differential diagnoses such as muscle dystrophy or cramp fasciculation syndrome. Furthermore, the concurrent presence of more than one MAA/MSA does not show a significant association with the presence of a myositis-linked disease for antibody-positive samples (p = 0.136).

DISCUSSION

Testing MSA and MAA simultaneously may not be suitable as a primary screening method for myositis-linked diseases in clinical neurological groups. However, MSAs and MAAs may offer valuable diagnostic support, particularly in cases where myositis is strongly considered.

Comparison of Lineblot and Immunoprecipitation Methods in the Detection of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Consistency with Clinical Diagnoses

Background: the reference method for detection of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) is considered immunoprecipitation (IP), but it is routinely replaced by semi-automated methods, like lineblot (LB). Few data are available on the consistency with clinical diagnoses; thus, we aim at analysing these aspects. Methods: sixty-nine patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) were studied via LB (Myositis Antigens Profile 3 EUROLINE, Euroimmun) and IP (RNA and protein antigens). The degree of concordance between methods was calculated using Cohen's coefficient. Results: a substantial concordance was found for anti-Ku and anti-PM/Scl and a moderate concordance was found for anti-Jo1 and anti-Mi-2, while a fair concordance was found for anti-EJ, anti-SRP, and anti-Ro52 antibodies. The concordance could not be calculated for anti-OJ, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-NXP2, anti-TIF1ɣ, and anti-MDA5, because they were only detected with one method. Multiple MSAs were found only with LB in 2/69 sera. Anti-MDA5, TIF1ɣ, NXP2 (detected via IP), and anti-Jo1 in anti-synthetase syndrome (both LB and IP) had the best concordance with clinical diagnosis. Conclusions: LB and IP show substantial concordance for PM/Scl and Ku, and moderate concordance for Jo1 and Mi-2, with a good concordance with clinical diagnoses. IP shows a high performance for DM-associated MSAs. LB seems to be more sensitive in detecting anti-Ro52 antibodies, but it identified multiple MSAs, unlike IP.

Autoantibodies, cutaneous subset and immunosuppressants contribute to the cancer risk in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with an increased risk of cancer. We aimed to assess the prevalence of cancer in our cohort and to explore possible associations with clinical, immunological and treatment characteristics.

METHODS

Our retrospective monocentric cohort study of patients with SSc recorded prevalent and incident cases of malignancy, including those diagnosed within 3 years of the SSc onset (defined as cancer-associated scleroderma) and sought associations with the clinical characteristics and the serum autoantibody profiling performed using RNA and protein immunoprecipitation, Western-blot, immunoblot and ELISA at the time of SSc diagnosis, prior to any specific treatment.

RESULTS

Among 290 patients with SSc, the overall prevalence of cancer was 20%, with 8% of cases being cancer-associated scleroderma. Both conditions were more frequent in elderly patients and in patients with positive anti-Ro52 or anti-U3-RNP. Cancer-associated scleroderma was significantly more prevalent among patients negative for both anti-centromere (ACA) and anti-topoisomerase-1 (TOPO1) antibodies, especially in the case of diffuse SSc. Immunosuppressants were not significantly associated with cancer. Patients triple negative for ACA, TOPO1 and anti-RNA polymerase III antibodies had a significantly higher risk of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer surveillance should be particularly careful in patients with diffuse SSc, increased age at disease onset and without classical SSc-related autoantibodies.

Anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies showing the discrepancy between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RNA-immunoprecipitation

Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies are myositis-specific antibodies associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD). Some patients are positive for anti-ARS antibodies on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) but negative on RNA-immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) (the gold standard method). Whether these patients should be considered truly positive for anti-ARS antibodies remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the clinical characteristics of these patients and verified the authenticity of their anti-ARS positivity. Patients who were positive for anti-ARS antibodies on ELISA were divided into the non-discrepant (positive on RNA-IP, n = 52) and discrepant (negative on RNA-IP, n = 8) groups. Patient clinical characteristics were compared between the groups. For each positive individual, the authenticity of anti-ARS antibody positivity on ELISA was cross-examined using protein-IP and western blotting. All patients in the discrepant group had lung involvement, including five (63%) with interstitial lung disease. The overall survival time was significantly lower in the discrepant group than in the non-discrepant group (p < 0.05). Validation tests confirmed the presence of anti-ARS antibodies in the sera of the discrepant group but indicated different reactivity from typical anti-ARS antibodies. In conclusion, some anti-ARS antibodies are detected by ELISA but not RNA-IP. Such anti-ARS antibody discrepancies need further elucidation to attain validation of the diagnostic process in ASSD.

Issues in autoantibody tests used in the classification criteria for autoimmune rheumatic diseases: the laboratory autoimmunologist's perspective

Classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases are an important means to define homogenous groups of patients that can be compared across studies for clinical trials and research purposes. The measurement of autoantibodies is a relevant aspect in the definition of classification criteria, with a significant weight in the scores necessary to classify patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The impact of autoantibodies has gradually increased over the years, contributing to the evolution and improvement of the classification criteria. However, these criteria often do not take into consideration how autoantibodies are measured, i.e. differences in diagnostic accuracy of the methods. This is a critical point especially when obsolete analytical methods that are no longer used in many clinical laboratories are taken into consideration. In this review we have critically examined assays and methods for the determination of autoantibodies that are (or could be) included among the classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in light of more recent evidence and technology evolution.

Severe finger necrosis in antisynthetase syndrome with positive anti-OJ antibodies

Key Clinical Message

In a patient with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibody and anti-OJ antibody syndrome, interventions likes warming, prostaglandins, and antiplatelets failed. However, prednisolone pulse treatment rapidly halted disease progression. Patients with mild interstitial pneumonia, myositis, and extremity necrosis should be promptly considered for anti-synthetase syndrome and receive immunosuppression after ruling out other causes.

Abstract

Anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) autoantibodies are myositis-specific, and patients who test positive for ARS and have common clinical features are usually diagnosed with antisynthetase antibody syndrome (antisynthetase syndrome). Anti-ARS antibodies include histidyl-tRNA synthetase-1 (Jo-1), anti-threonyl (PL-7), anti-alanyl (PL-12), anti-glycyl (EJ), anti-asparaginyl (KS), anti-tyrosyl (Ha), and anti-phenylalanyl (Zo) tRNA synthetases. Among these, anti-isoleucyl tRNA synthetase (OJ) autoantibodies are extremely rare, and patients with these are frequently complicated by interstitial pneumonia. We report the case of an older man with ARS antibody syndrome who tested positive for anti-OJ and anti-Sjögren's-syndrome-related antigen A (Ro-52) antibodies. He had muscle weakness due to myositis and unparalleled rapid and severe finger necrosis. Pulsed prednisolone effectively treated the myositis symptoms and terminated the progression of finger necrosis.

Positive predictive value of myositis antibody line blot testing in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Line blot (LB) is in widespread use for myositis antibody detection. Yet, studies of its positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), which would be of particular relevance to neuromuscular clinicians, are lacking. We aimed to determine the PPV of myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM, and examine whether PPV was significantly impacted by intensity of antibody positivity.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent myositis antibody LB testing for suspected IIM between March 2019 and August 2022.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients who underwent testing for suspected IIM and had positive myositis antibody LB results, 43 (61%) were female and the median age was 61 years (range: 10-83 years). Forty-four were classified as true-positives, yielding a PPV of 63%. The PPV of patients with weak-positive myositis antibody results (14/30, 47%) was significantly lower than the PPV of patients with moderate-positive or strong-positive myositis antibody results (30/40, 75%) (p = .02).

DISCUSSION

Our study found that myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM had a modest PPV, underscoring the need for antibody interpretation in the context of all available clinical and ancillary test data to avoid misdiagnosis. The significantly lower PPV in patients with weak-positive results emphasizes the particular importance of clinical correlation in such patients. Further study into the diagnostic performance of various LBs for myositis antibody detection is needed to inform their interpretation in clinical practice.

Autoantibody evaluation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), generally referred to as myositis is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by muscle inflammation and/or skin involvement, diverse extramuscular manifestations with variable risk for malignancy and response to treatment. Contemporary clinico-serologic categorization identifies 5 main clinical groups which can be further stratified based on age, specific clinical manifestations and/or risk for cancer. The serological biomarkers for this classification are generally known as myositis-specific (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies. Based on the use of these antibodies, IIM patients are classified into anti-synthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, and overlap myositis. The current classification criteria for IIM requires clinical findings, laboratory measurements, and histological findings of the muscles. However, the use MSAs and myositis-associated autoantibodies as an adjunct for disease evaluation is thought to provide a cost-effective personalized approach that may not only guide diagnosis but aid in stratification and/or prognosis of patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary autoantibodies that are specific or associated myositis. In addition, it highlights possible pathways for the detection and interpretation of these antibodies with limitations for routine clinical use.

Diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: caution required in the use of myositis autoantibodies

Detection of myositis autoantibodies (MAs) has utility in both the diagnosis and subtyping of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Multiplex assays such as the Euroimmun line immunoassay (LIA) have significant limitations in rare diseases like IIM. A retrospective cohort study was performed on positive MA detected on LIA in 171 patients using the manufacturer's recommended cut-off. Only 16.7% were deemed true positive after clinical correlation. Autoantibody-specific cut-offs were created and applied to the original cohort, along with generically applied higher cut-offs. Positive predictive value (PPV) improved, but there was variable increase in false negatives. False positive MA results are common using LIA, but locally derived cut-offs can improve performance. Clinicians must be aware of the limitations of LIA, which is the commonest method for MA detection in Australasia.

Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy (IMNM): A Story of Antibodies

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare and severe disease that corresponds to a specific entity of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Patients with IMNM suffer from proximal muscle weakness, and present high levels of creatine kinase and necrotic myofibers. Anti-Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) and anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase autoantibodies (HMGCR) have recently been identified in two thirds of patients with IMNM and are used as a hallmark of the disease. In this review, we provide a detailed description of these antibodies and the tests used to detect them in the serum of patients. Based on in vitro studies and mouse models of IMNM, we discuss the role of autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of the disease. Finally, in the light of the latest knowledge, we conclude with a review of recent therapeutic approaches in IMNM.

Prevalence of cutaneous manifestations and myositis-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients and Anti-PL7 antibodies association with pulmonary radiological severity: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic immune-mediated myopathy, and may involve many organs, including muscles, skin and lungs. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are a useful aid in diagnosis DM and identifying its clinical subtype. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies found clinical similarities regarding lung involvement in both COVID-19 and DM. Such similarities have prompted speculation of a common pathogenetic mechanism. Indeed, viral infections are well-known triggers of autoimmune diseases. This prompted us to investigate whether circulating MSAs could be markers of the severity of lung involvement and of clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we investigated the presence of cutaneous signs of DM in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 178 hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19. The diagnosis was confirmed by naso-pharyngeal swab positivity for SARS-CoV-2. The severity of lung involvement was assessed by assigning to each patient a radiological score ranging from 1 to 4, based on chest imaging (chest X-rays or CT scans). Serum samples were tested for MSAs.

RESULTS

Anti-PL-7 antibodies were detected in 10.1% of patients and were found to be associated with an increased risk of severe pulmonary involvement (p = 0.019) and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Cutaneous lesions were observed in 26.4% of patients. However, none were cutaneous manifestations of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of anti-PL7 antibodies might predict severe pulmonary involvement and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

Analytic and Clinical Validity of Myositis-Specific Antibodies by Line-Blot Immunoassay Is Essential

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the concordance between line blot (LB) and immunoprecipitation (IP) assays for detecting myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and their association with IIM subtypes.

METHODS

One hundred patients with IIM were enrolled, and MSA was detected using LB and IP. The IIM subtypes, including immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy-like, anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome-like, and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis-like, were clinically diagnosed. The validity and reliability of the LB compared with the IP were evaluated. Optimal cutoff levels for LB were determined using various statistical methods including Cohen κ, Gwet's AC, diagnostic odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Line blot exhibited lower specificity and accuracy than IP in predicting IIM subtypes. Some MSAs performed better at higher LB cutoff values. Anti-signal recognition particle antibodies showed poor performance in predicting the immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy-like subtype using LB. Raising the cutoffs improved the reliability of anti-threonyl-tRNA synthetase and anti-signal recognition particle antibodies. Anti-histidyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies performed well at lower positivity, whereas diagnostic odds ratios increased for anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 with higher cutoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconsistencies between LB and IP have been observed in patients with IIM. Individual optimal cutoffs for MSA by LB correlating with IP were determined. Rheumatologists should consider the differences between LB and IP results when classifying IIM subtypes.

Aptamer-Protein Interactions: From Regulation to Biomolecular Detection

Serving as the basis of cell life, interactions between nucleic acids and proteins play essential roles in fundamental cellular processes. Aptamers are unique single-stranded oligonucleotides generated by in vitro evolution methods, possessing the ability to interact with proteins specifically. Altering the structure of aptamers will largely modulate their interactions with proteins and further affect related cellular behaviors. Recently, with the in-depth research of aptamer-protein interactions, the analytical assays based on their interactions have been widely developed and become a powerful tool for biomolecular detection. There are some insightful reviews on aptamers applied in protein detection, while few systematic discussions are from the perspective of regulating aptamer-protein interactions. Herein, we comprehensively introduce the methods for regulating aptamer-protein interactions and elaborate on the detection techniques for analyzing aptamer-protein interactions. Additionally, this review provides a broad summary of analytical assays based on the regulation of aptamer-protein interactions for detecting biomolecules. Finally, we present our perspectives regarding the opportunities and challenges of analytical assays for biological analysis, aiming to provide guidance for disease mechanism research and drug discovery.

Paraneoplastic myopathy-related rhabdomyolysis and pancreatic cancer: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyolysis is a life-threatening condition, often leading to progressive renal failure and death. It is caused by destruction of skeletal muscle and the release of myoglobin and other intracellular contents into the circulation. The most frequent cause of this condition is "crush syndrome", although several others have been described and paraneoplastic inflammatory myopathies associated with various types of cancer are repeatedly reported.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe a rare case of a patient with pancreatic cancer who developed rhabdomyolysis early on, possibly due to paraneoplastic myositis leading to acute renal failure and eventually to rapid death. A 78-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to our hospital for obstructive jaundice and weight loss due to a lesion in the pancreatic head. She presented increasingly severe renal insufficiency with anuria, a dramatic increase in creatine phosphokinase (36000 U/L, n.v. 20-180 U/L) and myoglobin (> 120000 μg/L, n.v. 12-70 μg/L). On clinical examination, the patient showed increasing pain in the lower limbs associated with muscle weakness which was severe enough to immobilize her. Paraneoplastic myopathy linked to the malignant lesion of the pancreatic head was suspected. The patient was treated with hemodialysis and intravenous methylprednisolone. Despite all the efforts to prepare the patient for surgery, her general condition rapidly deteriorated and she eventually died 30 d after hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

The possible causes of rhabdomyolysis in this patient with pancreatic cancer are discussed, the development of paraneoplastic myopathy being the most likely. Clinicians should bear in mind that these syndromes may become clinically manifest at any stage of the cancer course and their early diagnosis and treatment could improve the patient's prognosis.

Distinct HLA associations with autoantibody-defined subgroups in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

BACKGROUND

In patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), autoantibodies are associated with specific clinical phenotypes suggesting a pathogenic role of adaptive immunity. We explored if autoantibody profiles are associated with specific HLA genetic variants and clinical manifestations in IIM.

METHODS

We included 1348 IIM patients and determined the occurrence of 14 myositis-specific or -associated autoantibodies. We used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify autoantibody-defined subgroups and logistic regression to estimate associations with clinical manifestations, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 alleles, and amino acids imputed from genetic information of HLA class II and I molecules.

FINDINGS

We identified eight subgroups with the following dominant autoantibodies: anti-Ro52, -U1RNP, -PM/Scl, -Mi2, -Jo1, -Jo1/Ro52, -TIF1γ or negative for all analysed autoantibodies. Associations with HLA-DRB1∗11, HLA-DRB1∗15, HLA-DQA1∗03, and HLA-DQB1∗03 were present in the anti-U1RNP-dominated subgroup. HLA-DRB1∗03, HLA-DQA1∗05, and HLA-DQB1∗02 alleles were overrepresented in the anti-PM/Scl and anti-Jo1/Ro52-dominated subgroups. HLA-DRB1∗16, HLA-DRB1∗07 alleles were most frequent in anti-Mi2 and HLA-DRB1∗01 and HLA-DRB1∗07 alleles in the anti-TIF1γ subgroup. The HLA-DRB1∗13, HLA-DQA1∗01 and HLA-DQB1∗06 alleles were overrepresented in the negative subgroup. Significant signals from variations in class I molecules were detected in the subgroups dominated by anti-Mi2, anti-Jo1/Ro52, anti-TIF1γ, and the negative subgroup.

INTERPRETATION

Distinct HLA class II and I associations were observed for almost all autoantibody-defined subgroups. The associations support autoantibody profiles use for classifying IIM which would likely reflect underlying pathogenic mechanisms better than classifications based on clinical symptoms and/or histopathological features.

FUNDING

See a detailed list of funding bodies in the Acknowledgements section at the end of the manuscript.

Severe rhabdomyolysis due to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, a wary manifestation of a heterogenous pathology

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are historically classified by The Bohan and Peter criteria. The presentation of IIM is versatile and clinical-serological findings can aid in diagnosing the underlying form of IIM. Over the past years, the discovery and the use of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA) have led to a more heterogeneous classification by the European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR).This paper describes a case of dermatomyositis sine dermatitis. A 70-year -old woman presented with complaints of muscle weakness and was admitted because of severe oliguric renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis. Despite treatment with hemodialysis and initial recovery, her clinic worsened again. The disease course in combination with electromyography findings, PET-scan results, and positive myositis-specific autoantibodies, that is, anti-NXP-2 antibodies, ultimately led to the diagnosis.Today, commercial kits based on line immunoassay and dot blot have mostly replaced the labor-intensive immunoprecipitation of RNA and/or proteins for detecting MSA. Though it makes routine testing of multiple MSA easy to implement in clinical practice, more validation studies are required and clinicians should be aware of its limitations, including false-positive results. When clinical suspicion for IIM is high, a negative screening for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) result does not exclude IIM and the first test of choice remains a multi-specific immunoassay for the whole spectrum of MSA.In this paper, we want to underline that there is no shortcut in diagnosing IIM. Caution is required in interpreting different EMG, PET-scan, histological, and laboratory findings. Especially in the case of rhabdomyolysis, as this is a severe and wary manifestation of myositis.

Anti-signal recognition particle positive necrotizing myopathy-sjogren’s syndrome overlap syndrome: a descriptive study on clinical and myopathology features

Background and objective

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical and myopathological characteristics of patients with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) positive immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) overlap Sjogren’s syndrome (SS).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of anti-SRP positive IMNM patients admitted in the Neurology Department of Tongji Hospital between January 2011 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: anti-SRP IMNM overlap SS group and anti-SRP IMNM control group. The clinical features, laboratory results, histological features, treatment, and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 30 patients with anti-SRP IMNM were included, including six anti-SRP IMNM overlap SS patients (two males, four females), with a median age of 39 years, and 24 anti-SRP IMNM patients (ten males, fourteen females), with a median age of 46 years. The anti-SRP IMNM overlap SS group had a lower prevalence of muscle atrophy (0 vs 50%, p = 0.019), and a higher prevalence of extramuscular manifestations, including cardiac abnormalities and ILD (Interstitial lung disease). CD4 + and CD68 + inflammatory infiltrations were significantly increased in anti-SRP IMNM overlap SS patients, with an increased presence of CD4 + cells in both necrotic(p = 0.023) and endomysial areas (p = 0.013), and more CD68 + cells (p = 0.016) infiltrated the endomysial area. Deposition of membrane attack complex (MAC) on sarcolemma (p = 0.013) was more commonly seen in the anti-SRP IMNM overlap SS group.

Conclusion

Our data revealed that anti-SRP IMNM-SS overlap patients may present with milder muscular manifestation, but worse extramuscular manifestations compared to anti-SRP IMNM patients without SS. CD4 + and CD68 + inflammatory infiltrations and MAC deposition were remarkably increased in anti-SRP IMNM-SS overlap patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06354-5.

Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Prospective Study

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common rheumatologic disorder characterised by widespread muscular pain. Myalgia is also a common clinical feature in Connective Tissue Disease (CTD), and FM should be studied for the concomitant presence of a CTD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies (MSA/MAA) in a cohort of FM patients. We enrolled 233 consecutive FM patients (defined according to the 2016 criteria) that did not report clinical signs of autoimmune disorders and followed them for at least one year. The patients were tested for MSA/MAA with immunoblotting. FM patients were seropositive for Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) in 24% of cases, for MSA in 9%, and for MAA in 6%. A specific diagnosis of CTD was made in 12 patients (5.2%), namely, 5 cases of primary Sjögren’s Syndrome and 7 of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Seropositive patients showed clinical features similar to those who were seronegative at baseline. A CTD diagnosis was associated with ANA positivity (p = 0.03, X2 4.9), the presence of a speckled pattern (p = 0.02, X2 5.3), positivity for MAA (p = 0.004, X2 8.1), and MSA (p = 0.003, X2 9.2). In conclusion, a non-negligible proportion of FM patients may be seropositive for MSA/MAA, and that seropositivity might suggest a diagnosis of CTD.

Myositis autoantibodies detected by line blot immunoassay: clinical associations and correlation with antibody signal intensity

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between myositis specific (MSA) and myositis associated (MAA) antibodies and diagnosis (including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM] and other systemic autoimmune diseases [SAID]), and to explore the impact of antibody signal intensity in diagnostic accuracy. We retrospectively reviewed all the serum samples obtained from patients tested for MSA/MAA by line immunoassay (LIA) between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2020 in Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Spain). Clinical true positive (CTP) MSAs and MAAs were defined as those patients with IIM or SAID with phenotypes expected of that MSA/MAA. Patients who did not have a phenotype compatible with that antibody were classified as clinical false positive (CFP). One hundred and thirty positive samples were analysed. Forty-six patients (33.38%) were classified as IIM, forty-two (32.3%) as SAID and forty-two (32.3%) as non-IIM/SAID. Among these 130 patients, 164 MSA/MAA were detected. Eighty-five (51.8%) positive MSA/MAA were classified as CTP, and seventy-nine (48.2%) as CFP. Strongly positive antibodies were more frequently CTP (35/47, 74.5%) than weak positives (54/68, 36.8%), (p ˂ 0.001). Antibodies classified as CTP had a higher signal intensity than CFP (36.77 AU vs 20.00 AU, CI95% 7.79-22.09, p ˂ 0.001). The probability of a CFP was associated to negative ANA, low ANA titer, and multiple positive MSA/MAA (p ˂ 0.001). In this study, we confirmed that CFP results using LIA are frequent, and are associated with low signal intensity MSA/MAA, negative ANA, lower titer ANA, and with multiple positive samples.

Deciphering the Autoantibody Response to the OJ Antigenic Complex

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) are important diagnostic biomarkers. Among the rarest and most challenging MSA are anti-OJ antibodies which are associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). In contrast to the other tRNA synthetases that are targets of ASS autoantibodies (e.g Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, KS, Zo), OJ represents a macromolecular complex with several ribonucleoprotein subunits. Therefore, the choice of the antigen in autoantibody assays can be challenging. (2) Methods: We collected two independent cohorts with anti-OJ antibodies, one based on a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) (n = 39), the second based on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) (n = 15). Samples were tested using a particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) system that allows for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to various autoantigens. For the detection of anti-OJ antibodies, two different antigens were deployed (KARS, IARS) on PMAT. The reactivity to the two antigens KARS and IARS was analyzed individually and combined in a score (sum of the median fluorescence intensities). (3) Results: In the cohort selection based on LIA, 3/39 (7.7%) samples were positive for anti-KARS and 7/39 (17.9%) for anti-IARS and 14/39 (35.9%) when the two antigens were combined. In contrast, in samples selected by IP the sensitivity of anti-KARS was higher: 6/15 (40.0%) samples were positive for anti-KARS, 4/15 (26.7%) for anti-IARS and 12/15 (80.0%) for the combination of the two antigens. 18/39 (46.2%) of the LIA samples generated a cytoplasmic IIF pattern (compatible with anti-synthetase antibodies), but there was no association with the antibody levels, neither with LIA nor with PMAT. (4) Conclusions: The combination of IARS and KARS might represent a promising approach for the detection of anti-OJ antibodies on a fully automated platform.

Leflunomide-Induced Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a subtype of inflammatory myopathy that is characterized by proximal muscle weakness, markedly elevated serum creatine kinase, myopathic electromyographic findings, and muscle biopsies revealing necrosis or regeneration with sparse inflammatory infiltrate. IMNM tends to be idiopathic but has been associated with certain medications. This supports the possibility for other pharmacotherapies to induce IMNM-particularly leflunomide. Leflunomide is used in the treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and has been shown to induce autoimmune diseases-including autoimmune hepatitis and polymyositis. After an extensive review of history and workup of muscle weakness, we conclude that leflunomide induced an IMNM in our patient. As this is the first case of leflunomide-induced IMNM, it is important for clinicians to suspect an inflammatory myopathy in the setting of myositis while on leflunomide.

A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome

Antisynthetase syndrome is a subtype of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, strongly associated with the presence of interstitial lung disease. Diagnosis is made by identifying myositis-specific antibodies directed against aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, and relevant clinical and radiologic features. Given the multisystem nature of the disease, diagnosis requires the careful synthesis of subtle clinical and radiological features with the interpretation of specialized autoimmune serological testing. This is provided in a multidisciplinary environment with input from rheumatologists, respiratory physicians, and radiologists. Differentiation from other idiopathic interstitial lung diseases is key; treatment and prognosis differ between patients with antisynthetase syndrome and idiopathic interstitial lung disease. In this review article, we look at the role of the multidisciplinary team and its individual members in the initial diagnosis of the antisynthetase syndrome, including the role of physicians, radiologists, and the wider team.

Clinical Heterogeneity of Patients With Antinuclear Matrix Protein 2 Antibody-Positive Myositis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China

OBJECTIVE

Heterogeneity exists among patients with myositis who have antinuclear matrix protein 2 (anti-NXP2) antibodies, although they usually present with severe muscle weakness. This study aimed to investigate the differences in phenotypes and prognoses among adult patients with myositis who have anti-NXP2 antibodies.

METHODS

Adult patients with myositis who have anti-NXP2 antibodies were enrolled from January 2010 to December 2019. Their clinical features and laboratory data were recorded retrospectively. We followed up on their survival status until June 30, 2020. A hierarchical cluster analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, and classification and regression trees were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 70 adult patients with myositis who have anti-NXP2 antibodies were enrolled. All patients experienced muscle weakness. A total of 11 patients did not present with rashes during disease progression, and 43 patients developed dysphagia. In total, 21 patients had interstitial lung disease (ILD), whereas no patients had rapidly progressive ILD. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified 2 clusters. Patients in cluster 1 were younger at disease onset, had a higher incidence of subcutaneous calcification, and had a lower incidence of V sign and shawl sign. Patients in cluster 2 had a higher frequency of ILD, accompanied by lower levels of lymphocytes and higher levels of serum ferritin. Moreover, patients in cluster 2 had worse prognoses.

CONCLUSION

Patients with myositis who have anti-NXP2 antibodies may present with different phenotypes that are characterized by unique features and prognoses.

A Multianalyte Assay for the Detection of Dermatomyositis-Related Autoantibodies Based on Immunoprecipitation Combined With Immunoblotting

OBJECTIVE

To develop a multianalyte assay for the detection of dermatomyositis (DM)-related autoantibodies using immunoprecipitation (IP) combined with immunoblotting (IB).

METHODS

Sera from 116 DM patients were subjected to RNA and protein immunoprecipitation assays as well as commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, anti-melanoma differentiation antigen 5 (MDA5), anti-Mi-2, anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1γ (TIF-1γ), and anti-U1 ribonucleoprotein antibodies. The IP/IB assay was developed by immunoprecipitation of autoantigens from HeLa cell extracts using patient sera, followed by immunoblotting with an antibody against Mi-2, TIF-1γ, OJ, nuclear matrix protein (NXP)-2, MDA5, PM/Scl, small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE), or Ku. A multianalyte assay was designed by mixing primary antibodies in the IP/IB assay.

RESULTS

IP assays identified any DM-related autoantibodies in 100 patients (86%), of which 82% were covered by commercial ELISAs, with a false-positive result in two sera and a false-negative result in one. The results obtained from the multianalyte IP/IB assay and 'gold-standard' IP assays were concordant in terms of the presence or absence of anti-MDA5, anti-TIF-1γ, anti-OJ, anti-NXP-2, anti-PM/Scl, anti-SAE, anti-Mi-2, and anti-Ku antibodies.

CONCLUSION

This multianalyte IP/IB assay combined with commercial ELISAs is an alternative to 'gold-standard' IP assays for the detection of DM-related autoantibodies.

ELISA, protein immunoprecipitation and line blot assays for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibody detection in cancer-associated dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVES

Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies can be detected with immunoprecipitation (IP), line blot (LB) and ELISA. We compared assay performance in patients with DM and the potential of these assays to detect anti-TIF1-gamma positive cancer-associated DM (CADM).

METHODS

We included sera from 131 patients with DM followed at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and 82 healthy controls. Serum samples taken at DM diagnosis were tested for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies with IP, two ELISAs (in-house and commercial) and LB. Cancer diagnosis and dates were obtained from the Swedish national cancer register. CADM was defined as a malignancy that developed within 3 years of DM diagnosis.

RESULTS

Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies were detected in 19/101 (18.8%), 15/113 (13.2%), 34/131 (26%) and 45/131 (34.4%) of the patients with IP, LB, in-house and commercial ELISA, respectively. The anti-TIF1-gamma results from the in-house ELISA were confirmed with IP in 93 of 101 (92%) cases, κ = 0.76, with a commercial ELISA in 110 of 131 (84%) cases, κ = 0.63, and with LB in 101 of 113 (89.3%) cases, κ = 0.67. Anti-TIF1-gamma results with IP were confirmed with LB in 85 of 92 (92.4%) cases, κ = 0.73. For detecting CADM, the anti-TIF1-gamma in-house ELISA had a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 86%, the commercial ELISA had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 82%, IP had a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 92%, LB had a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 96%.

CONCLUSION

The two anti-TIF1-gamma ELISA assays had advantages both for autoantibody detection and to identify anti-TIF1-gamma-positive CADM.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases: On Anti-Synthetase Syndrome and Beyond

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting one of several aminoacyl t-RNA synthetases (aaRSs) along with clinical features including interstitial lung disease, myositis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, arthritis, mechanic’s hands, and fever. The family of aaRSs consists of highly conserved cytoplasmic and mitochondrial enzymes, one for each amino acid, which are essential for the RNA translation machinery and protein synthesis. Along with their main functions, aaRSs are involved in the development of immune responses, regulation of transcription, and gene-specific silencing of translation. During the last decade, these proteins have been associated with cancer, neurological disorders, infectious responses, and autoimmune diseases including ASSD. To date, several aaRSs have been described to be possible autoantigens in different diseases. The most commonly described are histidyl (HisRS), threonyl (ThrRS), alanyl (AlaRS), glycyl (GlyRS), isoleucyl (IleRS), asparaginyl (AsnRS), phenylalanyl (PheRS), tyrosyl (TyrRS), lysyl (LysRS), glutaminyl (GlnRS), tryptophanyl (TrpRS), and seryl (SerRS) tRNA synthetases. Autoantibodies against the first eight autoantigens listed above have been associated with ASSD while the rest have been associated with other diseases. This review will address what is known about the function of the aaRSs with a focus on their autoantigenic properties. We will also describe the anti-aaRSs autoantibodies and their association to specific clinical manifestations, and discuss their potential contribution to the pathogenesis of ASSD.

A New Method for the Assessment of Myalgia in Interstitial Lung Disease: Association with Positivity for Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies

In this study, it was found that myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) improved the recognition of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objective of this study is to propose a clinical method to evaluate myalgia in respiratory settings as a possible tool for the recognition of MSA/MAA positivity in ILD patients. We prospectively enrolled 167 ILD patients with suspected myositis, of which 63 had myalgia evoked at specific points (M+ILD+). We also enrolled in a 174 patients with only myalgia (M+ILD-) in a rheumatological setting. The patients were assessed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists and were tested for autoantibodies. M+ILD+ patients were positive for at least one MAA/MSA in 68.3% of cases, as were M-ILD+ patients in 48.1% of cases and M+ILD- patients in 17.2% of cases (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). A diagnosis of IIM was made in 39.7% of M+ILD+ patients and in 23.1% of the M-ILD+ group (p = 0.02). Myalgia was significantly associated with positivity for MSA/MAAs in ILD patients (p = 0.01, X2: 6.47). In conclusion, myalgia in ILD patients with suspected myositis is associated with MSA/MAA positivity, and could support a diagnosis of IIM. A significant proportion of M+ILD- patients also had MSA/MAA positivity, a phenomenon warranting further study to evaluate its clinical meaning.

Performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in anti-MDA5 associated idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in a cohort of anti-MDA5 associated IIM patients.

METHODOLOGY

Consecutive adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of anti-MDA5 associated IIM from 10 hospitals in Hong Kong were recruited retrospectively. Clinical characteristics were collected by reviewing the electronic medical records. A commercial line-blot immunoassay was used to detect the myositis specific antibodies (MSA). Performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria was examined. Incorporation of the anti-MDA5 antibody in the EULAR/ACR criteria and the MSA-based criteria recently proposed by Casal-Dominguez et al. were also evaluated. Lastly, a new set of phenotypic-serological classification criteria specific for anti-MDA5 was proposed.

RESULTS

A hundred and twenty patients with anti-MDA5 associated IIM were recruited. The subgroups were exclusively DM (31.7%) and CADM (68.3%). Eight-six (71.7%) and 49 (40.8%) patients fulfilled the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and the Bohan/Peter criteria respectively. With the addition of Sontheimer's criteria for CADM, 76.7% the patients could be classified by the Bohan and Peter criteria. The sensitivity of the EULAR/ACR criteria could be improved to 98.3% if anti-MDA5 antibody was considered one of the criteria. The criteria by Casal-Dominguez et al. had 100% sensitivity in this cohort. Our newly proposed criteria for "anti-MDA5 syndrome" could also classify 97.5% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost 30% of patients with clinical anti-MDA5 associated IIM could not be classified by the EULAR/ACR criteria. Modification of the existing criteria incorporating anti-MDA5 antibody or development of a new specific set of criteria for "anti-MDA5 syndrome" are suggested.

Assessment of a Line Immunoassay for the Detection of Mi-2 Antibodies: Results From a Single Academic Center Investigation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance characteristics of a line immunoassay (LIA) for the detection of Mi-2 antibodies associated with dermatomyositis (DM).

METHODS

In total, 432 consecutive patient specimens were tested for Mi-2 antibodies concurrently by LIA (Mi-2α or Mi-2β) or immunoprecipitation (IP) test and antinuclear antibody by indirect immunofluorescence assay using HEp-2 substrate. Following antibody evaluation, results for patients positive in any of the assays for Mi-2 antibody had a retrospective chart review for diagnostic categorization. The performance of all tests was evaluated based on the extracted clinical data.

RESULTS

Forty patients were positive in at least one of the Mi-2 assays. The frequency of Mi-2β antibody by LIA was highest (75.0%), followed by Mi-2 by IP (35.0%) and Mi-2α by LIA (20.0%), respectively. Mi-2 by IP had the best total percent agreement for DM (95.0%) compared with 70.0% and 25.0% for the LIA Mi-2α and Mi-2β, respectively. Positivity of the Mi-2β antibody was significantly associated with non-DM diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement for DM with assays for detecting Mi-2 is variable. Additional studies are required to validate Mi-2 immunoassays for routine patient evaluation.

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Is Involved in Muscular Pathogenesis in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Objectives: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress plays pivotal roles in the regulation of skeletal muscle damage and dysfunction in multiple disease conditions. We postulate the activation of ER stress in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Methods: Thirty-seven patients with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), 21 patients with dermatomyositis (DM), 6 patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), and 10 controls were enrolled. The expression of ER stress-induced autophagy pathway was detected using histological sections, Western blot, and real-time quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Results: ER stress-induced autophagy pathway was activated in biopsied muscle of patients with IMNM, DM, and ASS. The ER chaperone protein, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78)/BiP expression in skeletal muscle correlated with autophagy, myofiber atrophy, myonecrosis, myoregeneration, and disease activity in IMNM.

Conclusion: ER stress was involved in patients with IIM and correlates with disease activity in IMNM. ER stress response may be responsible for skeletal muscle damage and repair in IIM.

Concordance between myositis autoantibodies and anti-nuclear antibody patterns in a real-world, Australian cohort

OBJECTIVES

Myositis autoantibodies (MAs) were traditionally used as diagnostic biomarker for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Its clinical utility had recently expanded to include interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnosis. Depending on the patient cohort, MAs false positives can be common. Correlation between anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) pattern and MAs may improve its positive predictive value (PPV). The aim of our study was to determine the PPV of MAs in IIM and ILD in a real-world patient cohort. We also assessed whether concordance between MAs and ANA IIF pattern can improve the PPV of positive MA results.

METHODS

Patients with positive MAs and corresponding ANA IIF pattern were identified from Sutherland Centre of Immunology, New South Wales Health Pathology, Australia. The corresponding health records were reviewed to identify each patient's primary diagnosis. Chi-square test was used to compare the PPV between MA-ANA concordant and discordant groups.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and July 2019, 118 patients were positive for at least one MA (mean age 66.7 years, 55% female). The most frequently detected autoantibodies were Ro52, anti-synthetase antibodies, and PM-Scl. The PPV of MAs for IIM or ILD was 47.4%. The overall concordance rate of MAs and ANA IIF pattern was 70.2%. Patients with concordant MA-ANA results were more likely to have true clinical disease (64.1% vs 17.8%, p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Myositis autoantibodies have a low PPV for IIM and ILD in a real-world patient cohort. A positive concordance with ANA IIF pattern can improve MA test accuracy.

An Italian Multicenter Study on Anti-NXP2 Antibodies: Clinical and Serological Associations

The identification of anti-NXP2 antibodies is considered a serological marker of dermatomyositis (DM), with calcinosis, severe myositis and, in some reports, with cancer. Historically, these associations with anti-NXP2 antibodies have been detected by immunoprecipitation (IP), but in the last few years commercial immunoblotting assays have been released. The aim of this collaborative project was to analyse the clinical features associated to anti-NXP2 antibodies, both with commercial line blot (LB) and IP. Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies were detected in single centres by commercial line blot (LB); available sera were evaluated in a single centre by protein and RNA immunoprecipitation (IP), and IP-Western blot. Sixty patients anti-NXP2+ (NXP2+) positive by LB were compared with 211 patients anti-NXP2 negative with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). NXP2+ showed a younger age at IIM onset (p = 0.0014), more frequent diagnosis of dermatomyositis (p = 0.026) and inclusion-body myositis (p = 0.009), and lower rate of anti-synthetase syndrome (p < 0.0001). As for clinical features, NXP2+ more frequently develop specific skin manifestations and less frequently features related with overlap myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome. IP confirmed NXP2 positivity in 31 of 52 available sera (62%). Most clinical associations were confirmed comparing NXP2 LB+/IP+ versus NXP2-negative myositis, with the following exceptions: inclusion-body myositis diagnosis was not detected, whilst dysphagia and myositis were found more frequently in NXP2 LB+/IP+ patients. The 21 LB+ /IP-myositis patients did not show differences in clinical features when compared with the NXP2-myositis patients and more frequently displayed multiple positivity at LB. Risk of developing cancer-associated myositis was similar between NXP2-positive and NXP2-negative myositis patients, either when detected by LB or IP. Protein-IP confirmed NXP2 antibodies in nearly 60% of sera positive for the same specificity with commercial assay. Double-positive cases rarely occurred in myositis patients with a clinical diagnosis other than dermatomyositis. Patients only positive by LB (LB+/IP-) did not display clinical features typical of NXP2. NXP2 positivity by LB should be confirmed by other methods in order to correctly diagnose and characterize patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myositis.

A Comparison of Line Blots, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent, and RNA-immunoprecipitation Assays of Antisynthetase Antibodies in Serum Samples from 44 Patients

Objective To determine the differences between anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies among line blots, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) anti-ARS tests, and RNA-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays. Methods Sera from patients with confirmed or suspected antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) that were positive for either the anti-ARS test or the line-blot assay were used to perform an RNA-IP assay and ELISA to detect individual anti-ARS antibodies. Results Among the 44 patients, 10 were positive only in line-blot assays, 6 were positive only in the anti-ARS test, and 28 were positive in both assays. We compared the accuracy of these assays against the gold standard RNA-IP assay. The κ coefficient was 0.23 in the line-blot assay, but this increased to 0.75 when the cut-off was increased from 1+ to 2+. The κ coefficient was 0.73 in the anti-ARS test. The κ coefficient was 0.85 for positivity in both assays. Patients with ASS that was positive in an RNA-IP assay more frequently had mechanic's hand (62.1% vs. 20%: p=0.031), myositis (51.7 vs. 10%: p=0.028) and more ASS symptoms than those who were positive only in line-blot assays (3.48 vs. 2.2: p=0.019). Conclusions Clinicians need to understand the features of each assay and determine diagnoses by also considering clinical presentations. Diagnoses should not be judged based only on the results of line-blot assays due to the risk of a misdiagnosis from false positives.

Severe muscle damage with myofiber necrosis and macrophage infiltrates characterize anti-Mi2 positive dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate clinical and histopathological findings in adult DM patients positive for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2+) antibodies compared with DM patients negative for anti-Mi2 (anti-Mi2-).

METHODS

Clinical data of adult DM patients, who fulfilled EULAR/ACR 2017 classification criteria, were gathered from electronic medical records of three tertiary Rheumatology Units. Histopathological study was carried out on 12 anti-Mi2+ and 14 anti-Mi2- muscle biopsies performed for diagnostic purpose. Nine biopsies from immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) patients were used as control group.

RESULTS

Twenty-two anti-Mi2+ DM [90.9% female, mean age 56.5 (15.7) years] were compared with 69 anti-Mi2- DM patients [71% female, mean age 52.4 (17) years]. Anti-Mi2+ patients presented higher levels of serum muscle enzymes than anti-Mi2- patients [median (IQR) creatine-kinase fold increment: 16 (7-37)vs 3.5 (1-9.9), P <0.001] before treatment initiation. Moreover, a trend towards less pulmonary involvement was detected in anti-Mi2+ DM (9.1% vs 30.4%, P =0.05), without any case of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. At muscle histology, anti-Mi2+ patients showed more necrotic/degenerative fibres than anti-Mi2- patients [mean 5.3% (5) vs 0.8% (1), P <0.01], but similar to IMNM [5.9% (6), P >0.05]. In addition, the endomysial macrophage score was similar between anti-Mi2+ and IMNM patients [mean 1.2 (0.9) vs 1.3 (0.5), P >0.05], whereas lower macrophage infiltration was found in anti-Mi2- DM [mean 0.4 (0.5), <0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Mi2+ patients represent a specific DM subset with high muscle damage. Histological hallmarks were a higher prevalence of myofiber necrosis, endomysial involvement and macrophage infiltrates at muscle biopsy.

Performance of myositis-specific antibodies detected on myositis line immunoassay to diagnose and sub-classify patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, a retrospective records-based review

AIM

To evaluate myositis line immunoassay (LIA) for diagnosis and sub-classification of suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). To investigate if test performance is improved by increasing signal strength cut-off for myositis-specific antibody (MSA) or combining MSA with indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

METHODS

A retrospective, consecutive case series of patients investigated for MSAs from June 2013 to June 2020 for suspected IIM. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with 95% confidence intervals for diagnosis of IIM. Association of IIM diagnosis with increased signal strength and presence of an expected IIF pattern on Hep-2 cells was assessed by Fisher's exact test in MSA-positive patients.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients were evaluated. IIM was diagnosed in 32/195 (16.4%) patients. MSAs were detected in 41/195 (21%) patients, 18/41 (43.9%) patients with an MSA had a diagnosis of IIM. The probability of an IIM diagnosis was increased in MSA-positive patients with high compared with low signal strength (83.3% vs 43.5%; P = 0.01) and an expected compared with unexpected IIF pattern (61.5% vs 23.8%; P = 0.04). Specificity for IIM was not significantly improved by increasing signal strength cut-off (85.9% vs 93.8%). Positive predictive value of myositis LIA was only modest and not significantly improved by either increasing signal strength cut-off or requiring an expected IIF pattern for determination of MSA positivity (43.9% vs 60% vs 61.5%). Sub-classification of IIM correlated closely for respective MSAs (88.9%).

CONCLUSION

Increased MSA signal strength on myositis LIA and the presence of an expected IIF pattern were associated with IIM diagnosis. Test performance was non-significantly improved by these methods. Prevalence of IIM in this patient cohort was low; it is not excluded that LIA performance could be improved by these methods in a higher prevalence cohort.

The Clinicopathological Distinction Between Seropositive and Seronegative Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy in China

Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the clinicopathological features of patients with seronegative immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and those positive for anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme-a reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with IMNM treated in the Neurology Department of Tongji Hospital from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. Results: Among the 117 patients with IMNM, 30.8% (36/117) were positive for anti-SRP antibodies, 6.0% (7/117) were positive for anti-HMGCR antibodies, and 13.7% (16/117) were seronegative. Myalgia at presentation (62.5 vs. 23.3%, p = 0.0114) was more commonly observed in patients with seronegative IMNM than in those with seropositive IMNM. Subclinical cardiac involvement was more frequently detected in seronegative IMNM than in seropositive IMNM (6/13 vs. 5/33, p = 0.0509, echocardiogram; 7/7 vs. 12/24, p = 0.0261, cardiac MRI). Deposition of membrane attack complex (MAC) on the sarcolemma of myofibers in biopsied muscle was less commonly observed in patients with seronegative IMNM than in patients with seropositive IMNM (16.7 vs. 68.2%, p = 0.0104). The rate of marked improvement following immunotherapy tended to be higher in patients with seronegative IMNM than in those with seropositive IMNM (87.5 vs. 61%, p = 0.0641). Conclusions: Patients with seronegative IMNM more frequently present with myalgia at onset, exhibit more subclinical cardiac involvement and uncommon MAC deposition on myofibers, and experience better outcomes than those with seropositive IMNM.

Intravenous immunoglobulins as first-line treatment in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

We explored efficacy and safety of IVIg as first-line treatment in patients with an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated phase 2 open-label study, we included 20 adults with a newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, and a disease duration of less than 9 months. Patients with IBM and prior use of immunosuppressants were excluded. The standard treatment regimen consisted of IVIg (Privigen) monotherapy for 9 weeks: a loading dose (2 g/kg body weight) and two subsequent maintenance doses (1 g/kg body weight) with a 3-week interval. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least moderate improvement on the 2016 ACR/EULAR Total Improvement Score. Secondary outcomes included time to improvement, the number of patients requiring rescue medication and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

We included patients with DM (n = 9), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (n = 6), non-specific myositis/overlap myositis (n = 4) and anti-synthetase syndrome (n = 1). One patient was excluded from analyses because of minimal weakness resulting in a ceiling effect. Eight patients (8/19 = 42.0%; Clopper-Pearson 95% CI: 19.6, 64.6) had at least moderate improvement by 9 weeks. Of these, six reached improvement by 3 weeks. Seven patients required rescue medication due to insufficient efficacy and prematurely ended the study. Three serious adverse events occurred, of which one was pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

First-line IVIg monotherapy led to at least moderate improvement in nearly half of patients with a fast clinical response in the majority of responders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register identifier, NTR6160.