Socioeconomic and Racial Disparity in Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) Therapy Access

Evolving CAR T-Cell Therapy to Overcome the Barriers in Treating Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors

SIGNIFICANCE

CNS tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related death in children, highlighting the dire need for new treatment strategies. CAR T cells represent a unique approach, distinct from the cytotoxic chemotherapies and small-molecule inhibitors that have dominated the clinical trial space for decades. Phase I CAR T-cell trials have shown feasibility and possible efficacy against pediatric CNS tumors; however, many challenges must be overcome if these therapeutics are going to be beneficial to most affected children. Although rapid translational development and early-phase trials have quickly evolved our understanding, the pediatric CNS CAR T-cell community now yearns for critical assessments and open dialogue about overcoming the remaining obstacles ahead.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | The Current State of CAR T-Cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibodies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

MCL remains incurable, and patients who relapse post BTK inhibitors have poor outcomes. BsAbs and CAR T cell therapy are novel strategies to treat patients with R/R MCL. These therapies exhibit favorable outcomes and side effect profiles in a previously dismal space. This review looks to detail the current data available for BsAbs and CAR T cell therapy in R/R MCL, and how are current treatment paradigm is shifting to incorporate these novel agents.

Access to CARe: A Narrative of Real-World Medical Decision-Making to Access Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a potentially life-saving treatment for children with relapsed/refractory B-cell hematologic malignancies, and remains an important investigational therapy for other childhood cancers. Yet, access to this class of therapies remains suboptimal through both commercial use and clinical trials, especially in children, adolescents, and young adults. Using a series of case-based discussions, we outline guidance on real-world medical decision-making, and offer potential solutions to enhancing access to CAR T-cell therapy as a treatment modality.

CAR T access and outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma according to ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation in the UK

Data on the impact of ethnic and socioeconomic factors on Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (access and outcomes are limited, but key to understand whether results from the registration trials are generalizable to real-world patient populations. Here, we analysed ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and referral patterns in a cohort of 314 large B-cell lymphoma patients approved for third-line CD19 CAR-T across three large UK CAR-T centres. Patients from deprived areas had a lower infusion rate compared to low deprivation areas (73% vs. 86%, p = 0.04). CAR-T response rates, toxicities, progression-free survival or non-relapse mortality were similar with respect to ethnicity or deprivation. We did not find evidence of referral barriers according to ethnicity, but potential regional barriers for socioeconomically deprived patients in two of three centres. Intention-to-treat overall survival was significantly inferior in patients from deprived areas (1-year OS 44.5% vs. 58% for high vs. low deprivation; p = 0.02), likely reflecting general health disparities and higher drop-out rates in this group. Our data suggest similar outcomes of CD19 CAR-T-treated patients across a socioeconomically and ethnically heterogeneous real-world population. Results demonstrate broad access to CAR-T within the UK national delivery system, but the high drop-out rate and potential regional referral barriers for deprived communities should be further investigated.

Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Healthcare Resource Availability on Survival in Older (≥66 years) Non-Hispanic Black Patients Versus Non-Hispanic White Patients With Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Several factors contribute to the known disparities in overall survival (OS) between non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To explore whether socioeconomic status (SES) and healthcare resource (HCR) availability impacts OS, this retrospective study used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare claims and Area Health Resource Files to identify NHB and NHW patients aged ≥66 years with MM (newly diagnosed 6/1/2013-12/31/2017). Continuous Medicare A and B enrollment until 12/31/2019 or preceding death was required.

RESULTS

In total, 6,609 patients were identified; 15.6% were NHB. At baseline, NHB patients were younger, more likely to be female, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and were more likely to live in census tracts with lower education attainment and higher poverty percentages than NHW patients. Unadjusted median OS by race/ethnicity for NHB patients versus NHW patients was 2.76 versus 3.01 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; P = .063). In the adjusted model, older age at diagnosis (P < .001), male sex (P = .02), and higher CCI (P < .001) increased risk of death. Poverty (P = .02) and number of active medical doctors per 100,000 (P = .003) were significant but not clinically meaningful. OS HR by race reversed directionality when adjusted for demographics, SES and HCR availability (HR: 0.92; P = .12).

CONCLUSION

Several factors, including SES and HCR availability, significantly influenced OS and may drive disparities in care for patients with MM. Further research on larger datasets is needed.

The current understanding of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has changed treatment landscape of relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and more older patients have been treated with curative intent for R/R disease, including patients previously deemed unfit for autologous stem-cell transplant with a broader application of CAR T-cell therapy. Due to the unique CAR T-cell-related toxicity and special attention needed in treating older patients, optimal patient selection and management of CAR T-cell therapy in older patients are becoming more critical. More data are emerging in the field; multiple approaches, such as geriatric and frailty assessment and multi-disciplinary work with geriatrics, are being studied for CAR T-cell therapy application. Studies support the safe use of CAR T-cell therapy in older patients, however, application of geriatric assessment tools and maximizing multi-disciplinary approach to tailor supportive care are critical to reduce morbidity and improve outcomes in older patients.

Gerotherapeutics: aging mechanism-based pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions to reduce cancer racial and ethnic disparities

The central premise of this article is that a portion of the established relationships between social determinants of health and racial and ethnic disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality is mediated through differences in rates of biological aging processes. We further posit that using knowledge about aging could enable discovery and testing of new mechanism-based pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions ("gerotherapeutics") to differentially improve the health of cancer survivors from minority populations and reduce cancer disparities. These hypotheses are based on evidence that lifelong differences in adverse social determinants of health contribute to disparities in rates of biological aging ("social determinants of aging"), with individuals from minoritized groups experiencing accelerated aging (ie, a steeper slope or trajectory of biological aging over time relative to chronological age) more often than individuals from nonminoritized groups. Acceleration of biological aging can increase the risk, age of onset, aggressiveness, and stage of many adult cancers. There are also documented negative feedback loops whereby the cellular damage caused by cancer and its therapies act as drivers of additional biological aging. Together, these dynamic intersectional forces can contribute to differences in cancer outcomes between survivors from minoritized vs nonminoritized populations. We highlight key targetable biological aging mechanisms with potential applications to reducing cancer disparities and discuss methodological considerations for preclinical and clinical testing of the impact of gerotherapeutics on cancer outcomes in minoritized populations. Ultimately, the promise of reducing cancer disparities will require broad societal policy changes that address the structural causes of accelerated biological aging and ensure equitable access to all new cancer control paradigms.

Impact of Real-World Clinical Factors on an Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of "Immediate CAR-T" Versus "Late CAR-T" as Second-Line Treatment for DLBCL Patients

While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) targeting CD19 as second-line therapy for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a promising strategy, the high costs and limited access to CAR-T pose significant challenges. When assessing the cost-effectiveness of CAR-T, we need to consider not only individual outcomes but also how to effectively integrate CAR-T into the overall treatment approach for relapsed DLBCL. We conducted a cost-effective analysis for patients with DLBCL in early relapse or primary refractory, to compare "immediate CAR-T," which proceeds directly to CAR-T, and "late CAR-T," which initially aims at ASCT and quickly switches to third-line CAR-T if non-responsive. The primary analysis used a patient age of 60 years, and it also examined variations from 40 to 70 years. The analysis was performed for both Japanese and US settings using a Markov model incorporating life expectancy in both countries, with extensive sensitivity analysis including factors such as age, the choice of CAR-T (lisocabtagene maraleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel), and the opportunity to receive third-line CAR-T, to reflect real-world situations. The length of a Markov cycle was defined to be 1 month, and patients in the model were assumed to age 1 year every 12 Markov cycles. The analysis was made over a lifetime horizon, and the outcome was measured based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of ¥7,500,000 and $150,000 per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) in Japan and the US, respectively, with an annual discount rate of 3%. Compared with "late CAR-T," the "immediate CAR-T" strategy gained QALYs of 0.97 and 0.89 with an incremental cost of ¥5,998,354 and $88,440 in Japan and the US, respectively. The ICERs were ¥6,170,058/QALY in Japan and $99,596/QALY in the US. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis for patients aged 60, "immediate CAR-T" was cost-effective in 54.8% and 61.7% of the 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations in Japan and the US, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that "immediate CAR-T" was not cost-effective when patients were over 68.4 in Japan, when the standardized mortality ratio of CAR-T and ASCT survivors was close, and when utility during treatment-free remission was low. Incorporating various clinical factors, the analysis showed that "immediate CAR-T" is more cost-effective than "late CAR-T." However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution, as the ICERs were very close to the WTP thresholds, and the results were highly sensitive to parameter changes.

CAR-T cell therapy for breast cancer: Current status and future perspective

Within the expanding therapeutic landscape for breast cancer (BC), metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains virtually incurable and tend to develop resistance to conventional treatments ultimately leading to metastatic progression and death. Cellular immunotherapy (CI), particularly chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T (CAR-T) cells, has emerged as a promising approach for addressing this challenge. In the wake of their striking efficacy against hematological cancers, CAR-T cells have also been used where the clinical need is greatest - in patients with aggressive BCs. Unfortunately, current outcomes fall considerably short of replicating that success, primarily owing to the scarcity of tumor-specific antigens and the immunosuppressive microenvironment within BC. Herein, we provide an up-to-date overview of both preclinical and clinical data concerning the application of CAR-T cell therapy in BC. By surveying the existing literature, we discuss the prevailing constrains of this therapeutic approach and overview possible strategies to advance it in the context of breast malignancies. Possible approaches include employing synthetic biology to refine antigen targeting and mitigate off-target toxicity, utilizing logic-gated CAR constructs to enhance specificity, and leveraging armored CARs to remodel the tumor micro-environment. Temporal and spatial regulation of CAR-T cells using inducible gene switches and external triggers further improves safety and functionality. In addition, promoting T cell homing through chemokine receptor engineering and enhancing manufacturing processes with universal CAR platforms expand therapeutic applicability. These innovations not only address antigen escape and T cell exhaustion but also optimize the efficacy and safety profile of CAR-T cell therapy. We, therefore, outline a trajectory wherein CAR-T cells may evolve from a promising experimental approach to a standard modality in BC therapy.

Pharmacoequity measurement framework: A tool to reduce health disparities

Pharmacoequity is a health system and policy goal of ensuring equitable access to high-quality medications for all individuals, regardless of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or resource availability to reduce health disparities. Although measurement frameworks have been widely used in health equity contexts, a focused framework for pharmacoequity remains a critical gap. In this article, we introduce a novel pharmacoequity measurement framework anchored in the patient medication-use journey. The framework includes the following domains: (1) access to health care services, (2) prescription generation, (3) primary medication nonadherence, (4) secondary medication nonadherence, and (5) medication monitoring. For each domain, we provide examples of outcome measures and potential data sources that can be used for evaluation. We also outline an implementation workflow of the pharmacoequity measurement framework that population health stakeholders can use across various settings (eg, health systems, health plans). The framework provides a structured approach to identify existing gaps in the path toward achieving pharmacoequity and lay the foundation for targeted interventions. Additionally, it enables ongoing monitoring of progress toward achieving pharmacoequity while identifying interventions that are effective, scalable, and sustainable.

Advances in cellular therapies for children and young adults with solid tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adoptive immunotherapy brings hope to children and young adults diagnosed with high-risk solid tumors. Cellular (cell) therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell, CAR natural killer (NK) cell, and T cell receptor (TCR) T cell therapy are potential avenues of targeted therapy with limited long-term toxicities. However, development of cell therapies for solid tumors is in its nascent stages. Here, we will review the current clinical experience, barriers to efficacy, and strategies to improve clinical response and patient access.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cell therapies are shown to be generally safe and well tolerated. Strategies to optimize antitumor activity have now moved into early-phase trials. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment remains a major barrier to efficacy, and efforts are underway to gain better understanding. This will inform future treatment strategies to enhance the antitumor activity of cell therapies.

SUMMARY

Clinical experiences to date provide important insights on how to leverage cell therapies against solid tumors. Key factors in advancing the field include a better understanding of immune cell biology, tumor cell behavior, and the tumor microenvironment. Lastly, improving access to novel cell therapies remains an important consideration in the conduct of clinical trials and for future implementation into standard practice.

Sociodemographic Factors Influencing Access to Chimeric Antigen T-Cell Receptor Therapy for Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are available for patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL); however, their use has been limited in accessibility due to nondisease factors.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the influence of sociodemographic factors on access and outcomes after CAR-T therapy for adult patients with B-cell NHL in our institution treated between 2016 and 2023.

RESULTS

Among 154 patients treated with CAR-T, 43% were older than 65 years, 68% male, and 14% non-White (including Hispanic). Of those under 65, 66% had private insurance, while 82% over 65 had Medicare. Most patients (85%) were from in-state, 29% from areas below the national poverty level and 18% from nonmetropolitan areas. Distance to the treatment center was greater than 30, 60 or 120 miles for 52%, 40% and 29% of patients, respectively. No significant differences were found in the use of commercial versus investigational products among racial/ethnic minorities or those living >60 miles from the center. However, patients from nonmetropolitan areas and those below the national poverty level were less likely to receive commercial products. With a median follow-up of 11 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 63.2% (95th CI 59.9%-66.8%). Poverty was associated with lower 1-year OS (HR 0.4, 95th CI 0.17-0.90, P = .031).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that CAR-T therapy can be delivered across sociodemographic barriers and underscores the importance of considering social determinants of health to optimize access for all patients.

Access barriers to anti-CD19+ CART therapy for NHL across a community transplant and cellular therapy network

ABSTRACT

We analyzed access barriers to anti-CD19+ chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) within a community-based transplant and cell therapy network registry. A total of 357 intended recipients for approved anti-CD19+ CARTs were identified between 2018 to 2022. The median age at referral was 61 years; referral years were 2018 (4%), 2019 (14%), 2020 (18%), 2021 (26%), and 2022 (38%). Diagnoses included diffuse large B cell (69%), follicular (13%), follicular/large (7%), mantle cell (4%), or other (7%). Axicabtagene ciloleucel (62%), tisagenlecleucel (16%), brexucabtagene autoleucel (13%), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (9 %) were infused into 182 patients. The median durations between referral to consultation, consultation to apheresis, and collection to infusion were 11, 107, and 32 days, respectively. The median duration from consultation to CART infusion declined steadily from 207 days in 2019 to 108 days in 2022 (P < .0001). A total of 124 patients (41%) did not receive CART, mostly for disease progression (34%) or poor health (15%). Multivariable logistic regression showed no significant differences in demographic, financial, or social determinants compared with those receiving CART. Notably, the proportion of ineligible patients declined from 53% in 2018-2020 to 34% by 2021-2022 (P = .001). In conclusion, 41% of community patients were unable to access timely CART therapy, mostly due to attrition from disease-related causes, and the overall time to infusion exceeded 4 months. Time to infusion and the proportion receiving CARTs improved over time. Reducing time to apheresis, early referral, and attention to salvage/bridging strategies are necessary.

Pharmacoequity measurement framework: A tool to reduce health disparities

Pharmacoequity is a health system and policy goal of ensuring equitable access to high-quality medications for all individuals, regardless of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or resource availability to reduce health disparities. Although measurement frameworks have been widely used in health equity contexts, a focused framework for pharmacoequity remains a critical gap. In this article, we introduce a novel pharmacoequity measurement framework anchored in the patient medication-use journey. The framework includes the following domains: (1) access to health care services, (2) prescription generation, (3) primary medication nonadherence, (4) secondary medication nonadherence, and (5) medication monitoring. For each domain, we provide examples of outcome measures and potential data sources that can be used for evaluation. We also outline an implementation workflow of the pharmacoequity measurement framework that population health stakeholders can use across various settings (eg, health systems, health plans). The framework provides a structured approach to identify existing gaps in the path toward achieving pharmacoequity and lay the foundation for targeted interventions. Additionally, it enables ongoing monitoring of progress toward achieving pharmacoequity while identifying interventions that are effective, scalable, and sustainable.

Evolving strategies for addressing CAR T-cell toxicities

The field of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has grown from a fully experimental concept to now boasting a multitude of treatments including six FDA-approved products targeting various hematologic malignancies. Yet, along with their efficacy, these therapies come with side effects requiring timely and thoughtful interventions. In this review, we discuss the most common toxicities associated with CAR T-cells to date, highlighting risk factors, prognostication, implications for critical care management, patient experience optimization, and ongoing work in the field of toxicity mitigation. Understanding the current state of the field and standards of practice is critical in order to improve and manage potential toxicities of both current and novel CAR T-cell therapies as they are applied in the clinic.

CAR T Cells and T-Cell Therapies for Cancer: A Translational Science Review

Importance

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are T lymphocytes that are genetically engineered to express a synthetic receptor that recognizes a tumor cell surface antigen and causes the T cell to kill the tumor cell. CAR T treatments improve overall survival for patients with large B-cell lymphoma and progression-free survival for patients with multiple myeloma.

Observations

Six CAR T-cell products are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for 6 hematologic malignancies: B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Compared with standard chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplant, CAR T cells improved 4-year overall survival in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (54.6% vs 46.0%). Patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia achieved durable remission after CAR T-cell therapy. At 3-year follow-up, 48% of patients were alive and relapse free. In people with multiple myeloma treated previously with 1 to 4 types of non-CAR T-cell therapy, CAR T-cell therapy prolonged treatment-free remissions compared with standard treatments (in 1 trial, CAR T-cell therapy was associated with progression-free survival of 13.3 months compared with 4.4 months with standard therapy). CAR T-cell therapy is associated with reversible acute toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome in approximately 40% to 95% of patients, and neurologic disorders in approximately 15% to 65%. New CAR T-cell therapies in development aim to increase efficacy, decrease adverse effects, and treat other types of cancer. No CAR T-cell therapies are FDA approved for solid tumors, but recently, 2 other T lymphocyte-based treatments gained approvals: 1 for melanoma and 1 for synovial cell sarcoma. Additional cellular therapies have attained responses for certain solid tumors, including pediatric neuroblastoma, synovial cell sarcoma, melanoma, and human papillomavirus-associated cancers. A common adverse effect occurring with these T lymphocyte-based therapies is capillary leak syndrome, which is characterized by fluid retention, pulmonary edema, and kidney dysfunction.

Conclusions and Relevance

CAR T-cell therapy is an FDA-approved therapy that has improved progression-free survival for multiple myeloma, improved overall survival for large B-cell lymphoma, and attained high rates of cancer remission for other hematologic malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. Recently approved T lymphocyte-based therapies demonstrated the potential for improved outcomes in solid tumor malignancies.

The current socioeconomic and regulatory landscape of immune effector cell therapies

Immune cell effector therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, T-cell receptor (TCR) T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophage-based therapies, represent a transformative approach to cancer treatment, harnessing the immune system to target and eradicate malignant cells. CAR-T cell therapy, the most established among these, involves engineering T cells to express CARs specific to cancer cell antigens, showing remarkable efficacy in hematologic malignancies like leukemias, B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. Similarly, TCR-modified therapies, which reprogram T cells to recognize intracellular tumor antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, offer promise for a range of solid tumors. NK-cell therapies leverage NK cells' innate cytotoxicity, providing an allogeneic approach that avoids some of the immune-related complications associated with T-cell-based therapies. Macrophage-based therapies, still in early stages of the development, focus on reprogramming macrophages to stimulate an immune response against cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment. Despite their promise, socioeconomic and regulatory challenges hinder the accessibility and scalability of immune cell effector therapies. These treatments are costly, with CAR-T therapies currently exceeding $400,000 per patient, creating significant disparities in access based on socioeconomic status and geographic location. The high manufacturing costs stem from the personalized, labor-intensive processes of harvesting, modifying, and expanding patients' cells. Moreover, complex logistics for manufacturing and delivering these therapies limit their reach, particularly in low-resource settings. Regulatory pathways further complicate the landscape. In the United States., the Food and Drug Administrations' (FDA) accelerated approval processes for cell-based therapies facilitate innovation but do not address cost-related barriers. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) offers adaptive pathways, yet decentralized reimbursement systems create uneven access across member states. Additionally, differing regulatory standards for manufacturing and quality control worldwide pose hurdles for global harmonization and access. To expand the reach of immune effector cell therapies, a multipronged approach is needed-streamlined regulatory frameworks, policies to reduce treatment costs, and international collaborations to standardize manufacturing. Addressing these socioeconomic and regulatory obstacles is essential to make these life-saving therapies accessible to a broader patient population worldwide. We present a literature review on the current landscape of immune effector cell therapies and barriers of access to currently approved standard of care therapy at various levels.

Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment- Focus on CAR-T and Bispecific Antibody Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent studies show that unresolved disparities hinder enrollment to clinical trials, equitable distribution of treatments, and impact the generalizability of trials, compromising health outcomes across different populations. This review aims to examine the persistent disparities noted in clinical trial enrollment, with particular focus on lymphoid malignancies, CAR-T cell and bispecific antibody therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeted interventions can enhance recruitment of underrepresented groups in clinical trials and address the complex barriers hindering participation, which are essential for achieving healthcare access equity and treatment outcomes. Improvement must be multifaceted, addressing socioeconomic, geographic, and biologic factors contributing to underrepresentation. This includes more lenient eligibility criteria, improving outreach and education, as well as using technology to diversify trial participation.

Optimizing the post-CAR T monitoring period in recipients of axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel

ABSTRACT

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showcasing significant efficacy but also highlighting toxicity risks such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The US Food and Drug Administration has mandated patients remain close to the treatment center for 4 weeks as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, although cautious, may add to cost of care, be burdensome for patients and their families, and present challenges related to patient access and socioeconomic disparities. This retrospective study across 9 centers involving 475 patients infused with axi-cel, tisa-cel, and liso-cel from 2018 to 2023 aimed to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in real-world CAR T recipients. Although differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS and ICANS between CAR T products, new-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after 2 weeks after infusion (0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). No new cases of CRS occurred after 2 weeks and a single case of new-onset ICANS occurred in the third week after infusion. NRM is driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28) and then by infection through 3 months after infusion (1.2%). This study provides valuable insights into optimizing CAR T therapy monitoring, and our findings may provide a framework to reduce physical and financial constraints for patients.

In Pursuit of Optimal Outcomes: A Framework for Quality Standards in Immune Effector Cell Therapy

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapy represents a transformative advancement in oncology, leveraging the immune system to combat various malignancies. This article outlines a comprehensive framework for establishing and maintaining quality standards in IEC therapy amidst rapid scientific and clinical advancements. We emphasize the integration of structured process measures, robust quality assurance, and meticulous outcome evaluation to ensure treatment efficacy and safety. Key components include multidisciplinary expertise, stringent accreditation protocols, and advanced data management systems, which facilitate standardized reporting and continual innovation. The collaborative effort among stakeholders-ranging from patients and healthcare providers to regulatory bodies-is crucial in delivering high-quality IEC therapies. This framework aims to enhance patient outcomes and cement the role of IEC therapy as a cornerstone of modern oncology, promoting continuous improvement and adherence to high standards across the therapeutic spectrum.

Development of a conceptual framework for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system measuring symptoms and impacts of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with haematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is associated with potentially severe toxicities that create a substantial burden for patients. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer valuable insights into symptoms, functioning, and other complex constructs of interest. In this Review, we aimed to identify symptom and impact concepts important to patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy, construct a conceptual framework for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system, and identify timepoints to capture PRO data for CAR T-cell therapies. We searched MEDLINE (OVID) and Web of Science (Clarivate) for articles in English published from Aug 30, 2017, to March 2, 2023. No restrictions on study design were applied. 178 symptoms or constructs were extracted from 44 articles reporting PRO collection in adults with haematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Six health-care professionals and 11 patients and caregiver partners verified construct relevance to clinical management and lived experience, respectively. 109 constructs were sorted according to the four domains of conceptual framework: symptom burden, impact of disease and treatment, tolerability, and health-related quality of life. The identification of concepts beyond symptom burden underscores the importance of PRO measurement for long-term monitoring, to align outcomes with patient concerns. The framework will facilitate PRO measure selection for systematic gathering of PROs from individuals with haematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cell therapies.

Timing of Toxicities and Non-Relapse Mortality Following CAR T Therapy in Myeloma

BCMA-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering remarkable efficacy with hallmark toxicity risks of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The FDA mandates a 4-week monitoring period at the treatment center as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, while prudent, may add unnecessary challenges related to access and socioeconomic disparities. We sought to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in real-world BCMA CAR T recipients in order to better inform future changes to the monitoring guidelines for CAR T recipients. This is a retrospective study across four academic centers that examined 129 ide-cel and cilta-cel recipients that received CAR T cell infusions from May 2021 to June 2023. Infusion and toxicities were managed per institutional guidelines in accordance with previously published guidelines. While differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS/ ICANS between ide-cel and cilta-cel, late-onset CRS and ICANS were rare after 2 weeks following infusion (0% and 1.6%, respectively). NRM was driven by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and infections in the early follow-up period (1.1% until Day 29), then by infections through three months post-infusion (1.2%). Our findings suggest that 25% of patients had to relocate for 4 weeks due to distance from the treatment center. With the low risk of CRS and ICANS after 2 weeks, a flexible shorter monitoring period may be reasonable, emphasizing collaboration with referring oncologists to improve NRM.

Management of bone disease with concurrent chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma

In the intricate landscape of multiple myeloma, a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells, bone disease presents a pivotal and often debilitating complication. The emergence of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has marked a pivotal shift in the therapeutic landscape, offering novel avenues for the management of MM, particularly for those with relapsed or refractory disease. This innovative treatment modality not only targets malignant cells with precision but also influences the bone microenvironment, presenting both challenges and opportunities in patient care. In this comprehensive review, we aim to examine the multifaceted aspects of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma and concurrent CAR-T therapy, highlighting its clinical ramifications and the latest advancements in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic interventions. The article aims to synthesize current understanding of the interplay between myeloma cells, CAR-T cells, and the bone microenvironment in the context of current treatment strategies in this challenging and unique patient population.

Disparities in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from an interprofessional consensus panel

Many studies have documented racial, socioeconomic, geographic, and other disparities for United States (US) patients with multiple myeloma pertaining to diagnosis and frontline management. In contrast, very little is known about disparities in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) despite a plethora of novel treatment options. In this review, we discuss the manifestations of disparities in RRMM and strategies to mitigate their impact. Immunomodulatory drugs can create disparities on many axes, for example inappropriately low dosing due to Duffy-null status as well as time toxicity and financial toxicity from logistical hurdles for socioeconomically vulnerable patients. Access to myeloma expertise at high-volume centers is a critical consideration given the disconnect between how drugs like carfilzomib and dexamethasone are prescribed in trials versus optimized in real-world practice to lower toxicities. Disparities in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody therapy span across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines in large part due to their limited availability outside of high-volume centers. Another insidious source of disparities is supportive care in RRMM, ranging from inadequate pain control in Black patients to limited primary care provider access in rural settings. We discuss the rationales and evidence base for several solutions aimed at mitigating these disparities: for example, (1) bidirectional co-management with community-based oncologists, (2) screening for risk factors based on social determinants of health, (3) strategies to build patient trust with regard to clinical trials, and (4) longitudinal access to a primary care provider. As the treatment landscape for RRMM continues to expand, these types of efforts by the field will help ensure that this landscape is equally accessible and traversable for all US patients.

The impact of race and ethnicity on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcomes within the veterans health administration (VHA)

We performed a retrospective chart review of 6266 randomly selected DLBCL patients treated in the VHA nationwide between 1/1/2011 and 12/31/2021. The 3178 patients who met inclusion criteria were predominantly male (97%) and white (75%). Median age of diagnosis for Black patients was 63 years vs 69 years for the entire cohort (p < 0.001). However, patients in each race/ethnicity subgroup presented with similar rates of stage I/II and III/IV disease, IPI score, cell of origin and HIT status. Outcomes analysis revealed similar treatment, response rates, median overall survival, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival across all subgroups. Hispanic patients had a 21% lower risk of death (HR = 0.79) than white patients, and Black patients had no significant difference in survival (HR = 0.98). This large retrospective study shows that when standard of care therapy is given within an equal access system, short-term treatment and survival outcomes are the same for all races.

Consensus guidelines and recommendations for the management and response assessment of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in clinical practice for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group Immunotherapy Committee

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promise in patients with late-line refractory multiple myeloma, with response rates ranging from 73 to 98%. To date, three products have been approved: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada (ide-cel only), and Brazil ANVISA (cilta-cel only); and equecabtagene autoleucel (eque-cel), which was approved by the Chinese National Medical Products Administration. CAR T-cell therapy is different from previous anti-myeloma therapeutics with unique toxic effects that require distinct mitigation strategies. Thus, a panel of experts from the International Myeloma Working Group was assembled to provide guidance for clinical use of CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma. This consensus opinion is from experts in the field of haematopoietic cell transplantation, cell therapy, and multiple myeloma therapeutics.

Obstacles to global implementation of CAR T cell therapy in myeloma and lymphoma

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are transforming the treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and multiple myeloma, yet global access challenges and barriers for their implementation persist. Global access disparities persist, particularly for persons living in low and middle-income countries and for underserved populations in high income countries. In this review we address patient-related factors including age, comorbidities, fitness, race and ethnicity, and geographic location for CAR-T access. Also, we review disease-related and health system barriers like disease biology, potential for short and long-term toxicity, insurance access, referrals, supply and manufacturing, regulation, costs and treatment center capacity. Lastly, alternatives for overcoming these barriers exemplified by research efforts worldwide are discussed, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach from all stakeholders to improve global accessibility and ensure equitable access and improved outcomes for patients worldwide.

Sequencing of Anti-CD19 Therapies in the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Several second- and third-line immunotherapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant are directed against the B-cell antigen cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19). The anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab, paired with the immunomodulator lenalidomide, mediates antibody-dependent cellular toxicity and phagocytosis; the antibody-drug conjugate loncastuximab tesirine delivers the DNA cross-linking agent tesirine via CD19 binding and internalization; and CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) products are engineered from autologous T cells. Although CD19 expression is assessed at diagnosis, clinically relevant thresholds of CD19 expression-which may not be detectable using current routine methodologies-have not been defined and may vary between CD19-directed treatment modalities. Determining optimal treatment sequencing strategies for CD19-directed therapy is hampered by the exclusion of patients who have received prior CD19-directed therapies from major clinical trials. Antigen escape, which is attributed to mechanisms including epitope loss and defective cell surface trafficking of CD19, is an important cause of CAR-T failure. Limited data suggest that CD19 expression may be maintained after non-CAR-T CD19-directed therapy, and retrospective analyses indicate that some patients with disease relapse after CAR-T may benefit from subsequent CD19-directed therapy. To date, clinical evidence on the effect of anti-CD19 therapy prior to CAR-T has been limited to small case series. Prospective studies and detailed analyses are needed to understand how pretreatment and posttreatment CD19 expression correlates with clinical responses to subsequent CD19-directed therapy to fully maximize treatment strategies.

Trends in volumes and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation in racial/ethnic minorities

ABSTRACT

There has been an increase in volume as well as an improvement in overall survival (OS) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic disorders. It is unknown if these changes have affected racial/ethnic minorities equally. In this observational study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research of 79 904 autologous (auto) and 65 662 allogeneic (allo) HCTs, we examined the volume and rates of change of autoHCT and alloHCT over time and trends in OS in 4 racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic African Americans (NHAAs), and Hispanics across 5 2-year cohorts from 2009 to 2018. Rates of change were compared using Poisson model. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox proportional hazards models examined trends in mortality in the 4 racial/ethnic groups over 5 study time periods. The rates of increase in volume were significantly higher for Hispanics and NHAAs vs NHW for both autoHCT and alloHCT. Adjusted overall mortality after autoHCT was comparable across all racial/ethnic groups. NHAA adults (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22; P = .004) and pediatric patients (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.3-2.03; P < .001) had a higher risk of mortality after alloHCT than NHWs. Improvement in OS over time was seen in all 4 groups after both autoHCT and alloHCT. Our study shows the rate of change for the use of autoHCT and alloHCT is higher in NHAAs and Hispanics than in NHWs. Survival after autoHCT and alloHCT improved over time; however, NHAAs have worse OS after alloHCT, which has persisted. Continued efforts are needed to mitigate disparities for patients requiring alloHCT.

Perspectives of pediatric oncologists on referral for CAR-T therapy: a mixed methods pilot study

BACKGROUND

Receipt of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy at an institution different from the primary oncologist's institution is a complex, multistep process. Referral by oncologists plays an important role in the process but may be susceptible to bias.

METHODS

Oncologists who previously referred patients for CAR-T therapy at 5 pediatric hospitals were sent surveys by email exploring their CAR-T referral practices. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariate analyses examined associations among oncologist characteristics, familiarity with CAR-T therapy, and referral practices. We conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of participants and used thematic analysis to code transcripts.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight oncologists completed the survey; 77% expressed being "very familiar" with CAR-T therapy. Hispanic oncologists and oncologists at institutions with 50 or fewer new diagnoses per year were more likely to identify as less familiar with CAR-T therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 64.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.45 to 10 452.50, P = .04 and OR = 24.5, 95% CI = 3.3 to 317.3, P = .005, respectively). In total, 38% of respondents considered nonclinical features (compliance, social support, resources, insurance, language, education, and race or ethnicity) influential in referral decisions. Oncologists who were Hispanic and oncologists who had been practicing for 20 or more years were more likely to consider these features significantly influential (OR = 14.52, 95% CI = 1.49 to 358.66, P = .04 and OR = 6.76, 95% CI = 1.18 to 50.5, P = .04). Nine oncologists completed in-depth interviews; common themes included barriers and concerns regarding CAR-T therapy referral, the value of an established relationship with a CAR-T therapy center, and poor communication after CAR-T therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 40% of oncologists consider nonclinical features significantly influential when deciding to refer patients for CAR-T therapy, raising concern for bias in the referral process. Establishing formal partnerships with CAR-T therapy centers may help address physician barriers in referral.

Real-world and clinical trial outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel across race and ethnicity

ABSTRACT

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Despite extensive data supporting its use, outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity groups are limited. Here, we report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in patients with R/R LBCL by race and ethnicity in both real-world and clinical trial settings. In the real-world setting, 1290 patients who received axi-cel between 2017 and 2020 were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database; 106 and 169 patients were included from the ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 trials, respectively. Overall survival was consistent across race/ethnicity groups. However, non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had lower overall response rate (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63) and lower complete response rate (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97) than NH White patients. NH Black patients also had a shorter progression-free survival vs NH White (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90) and NH Asian patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59). NH Asian patients had a longer duration of response than NH White (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) and Hispanic patients (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). There was no difference in cytokine release syndrome by race/ethnicity; however, higher rates of any-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in NH White patients than in other patients. These results provide important context when treating patients with R/R LBCL with CAR T-cell therapy across different racial and ethnic groups. ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: #NCT02348216 and #NCT03391466, respectively) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Exploring the Latest Advances and Gaps in Disparities, Psychosocial and Symptom Management Interventions, and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Care

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potential for cure for many patients with advanced hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure or immunodeficiency syndromes, it is an intensive treatment and accompanied by short- and long-term physical and psychological symptoms requiring specialized care. With substantial advances in therapeutic approaches for HCT and supportive care, HCT survivors experience less morbidity and mortality. However, disparities in both HCT access and outcomes persist, and HCT survivors and their caregivers often lack access to much-needed psychosocial care. Additionally, more medical and psychosocial resources are needed to holistically care for HCT survivors with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Hence, this chapter focuses on three areas pertaining to advances and gaps in HCT care: disparities in access to and outcomes of HCT, psychosocial and physical symptom management with supportive care interventions, and GVHD prevention and management.

Disparity in hematological malignancies: From patients to health care professionals

In the recent few decades, outcomes in patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies have been steadily improving. However, the improved prognosis does not distribute equally among patients from different backgrounds. Besides cancer biology, demographic and geographic disparities have been found to impact overall survival significantly. Specifically, patients from underrepresented minorities including Black and Hispanics, and those with uninsured status, having low socioeconomic status, or from rural areas have had worse outcomes historically, which is uniformly true across all major subtypes of hematological malignancies. Similar discrepancy is also seen in the health care professional field, where a gender gap and a disproportionally low representation of health care providers from underrepresented minorities have been long existing. Thus, a comprehensive strategy to mitigate disparity in the health care system is needed to achieve equity in health care.

Taking a BiTE out of Lymphoma: Bispecific Antibodies in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) refers to a heterogenous group of diseases, all of which have a wide range of treatment strategies and patient outcomes. There have been multiple novel, immune-based therapies approved in NHL in the last decade, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T). With a host of new therapies, an important next step will be determining how these therapies should be sequenced in contemporary management strategies. This review seeks to offer a framework for the ways in which BsABs can be incorporated into the current management paradigm for NHL, with special attention paid to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

High-Specificity CRISPR-Mediated Genome Engineering in Anti-BCMA Allogeneic CAR T Cells Suppresses Allograft Rejection in Preclinical Models

Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies hold the potential to overcome many of the challenges associated with patient-derived (autologous) CAR T cells. Key considerations in the development of allogeneic CAR T cell therapies include prevention of graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) and suppression of allograft rejection. Here, we describe preclinical data supporting the ongoing first-in-human clinical study, the CaMMouflage trial (NCT05722418), evaluating CB-011 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. CB-011 is a hypoimmunogenic, allogeneic anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T cell therapy candidate. CB-011 cells feature 4 genomic alterations and were engineered from healthy donor-derived T cells using a Cas12a CRISPR hybrid RNA-DNA (chRDNA) genome-editing technology platform. To address allograft rejection, CAR T cells were engineered to prevent endogenous HLA class I complex expression and overexpress a single-chain polyprotein complex composed of beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) tethered to HLA-E. In addition, T-cell receptor (TCR) expression was disrupted at the TCR alpha constant locus in combination with the site-specific insertion of a humanized BCMA-specific CAR. CB-011 cells exhibited robust plasmablast cytotoxicity in vitro in a mixed lymphocyte reaction in cell cocultures derived from patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, CB-011 cells demonstrated suppressed recognition by and cytotoxicity from HLA-mismatched T cells. CB-011 cells were protected from natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo due to endogenous promoter-driven expression of B2M-HLA-E. Potent antitumor efficacy, when combined with an immune-cloaking armoring strategy to dampen allograft rejection, offers optimized therapeutic potential in multiple myeloma. See related Spotlight by Caimi and Melenhorst, p. 385.

Real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by line of therapy

BACKGROUND

Although initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) can be effective, up to 50% of patients will develop refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease. This study aimed to provide contemporary data on characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for R/R-DLBCL.

METHODS

Patients with incident (January 2016 to March 2021) DLBCL age ≥18 years who initiated first-line (1L) therapy were identified from the COTA real-world database. Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes, including time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), were assessed for the study population and by line of therapy (LOT).

RESULTS

A total of 1347 eligible DLBCL patients were identified. Of these, 340 (25.2%) proceeded to receive 2L, of whom 141 (41.5%) proceeded to receive 3L, of whom 51 (36.2%) proceeded to receive 4L+. Most common treatments were R-CHOP in 1L (63.6%), stem cell transplant (SCT) in 2L (17.9%), polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, and rituximab (Pola-BR) in 3L (9.9%), and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) in 4L (11.8%). Treatment patterns were more variable in later LOTs. One- and 3-year rwOS from 1L initiation were 88.5% and 78.4%, respectively. Patients who received later LOTs experienced numerically lower 1- and 3-year rwOS (from 2L initiation: 62.4% and 46.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world analysis, 25.2% of patients experienced R/R-DLBCL after 1L with poor outcomes. Given the findings of this study, there is a high unmet need for novel, safe, and effective treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL.

Influence of Income, Education, and Medicaid Expansion on Palliative Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using the National Cancer Database

Palliative care is integral to symptom management, and we examined its relationship with income, education, and Medicaid expansion in acute myeloid leukemia. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Cancer Database that included patients with acute myeloid and monocytic leukemias > 18 years of age treated at Commission on Cancer facilities from 2004 to 2016. Univariate and multivariate models were adjusted for demographic variables and facility characteristics. There were 124,988 patients, but only 106,495 had palliative care data, and of this 4111 (3%) received palliative care. The most educated had the highest odds of receiving palliative care (odds ratio, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41; P = 0.002), but the highest income bracket (≥ $63,333) had the lowest odds (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93; P = 0.003). Residence in states with Medicaid expansion (January 2014 onward) had greater palliative care utilization. Palliative care use was associated with higher education but underutilized with higher incomes. Increased access with Medicaid expansion suggests the importance of public insurance.

The preclinical discovery and clinical development of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) for the treatment of multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Despite remarkable therapeutic advances over the last two decades, which have resulted in dramatic improvements in patient survival, multiple myeloma (MM) is still considered an incurable disease. Therefore, there is a high need for new treatment strategies. Genetically engineered/redirected chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells may represent the most compelling modality of immunotherapy for cancer treatment in general, and MM in particular. Indeed, unprecedented response rates have led to the recent approvals of the first two BCMA-targeted CAR T cell products idecabtagene-vicleucel ('Ide-cel') and ciltacabtagene-autoleucel ('Cilta-Cel') for the treatment of heavily pretreated MM patients. In addition, both are emerging as a new standard-of-care also in earlier lines of therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article briefly reviews the history of the preclinical development of CAR T cells, with a particular focus on Cilta-cel. Moreover, it summarizes the newest clinical data on Cilta-cel and discusses strategies to further improve its activity and reduce its toxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

Modern next-generation immunotherapy is continuously transforming the MM treatment landscape. Despite several caveats of CAR T cell therapy, including its toxicity, costs, and limited access, prolonged disease-free survival and potential cure of MM are finally within reach.

CAR T-Cell Immunotherapy in Minority Patients with Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Administration of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART19) immunotherapy for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs), a subset of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), involves high costs and access to specialized tertiary care centers. We investigated whether minority health populations (MHPs) have equal access to CART19 and whether their outcomes are similar to those of non-MHPs.

METHODS

We analyzed the prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients treated with commercial CART19 at two geographically and socioeconomically different institutions: the Abramson Cancer Center (ACC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and the Knight Cancer Institute (KCI, Portland, Oregon).

RESULTS

In the ACC catchment area, 8956 patients were diagnosed with NHL between 2015 and 2019 (latest available data from the state registry), including 17.9% MHPs. In the ACC, between 2018 and 2022 (CART became available in 2018), 1492 patients with LBCL were treated, and 194 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 15.7% for the entire LBCL cohort but only 6.7% for the CART19 cohort. During the same time, in the KCI catchment area, 4568 patients were diagnosed with NHL, including 4.2% MHPs. In the KCI, 396 patients with LBCL were treated, and 47 received CART19. The proportion of MHPs was 6.6% for the entire LBCL cohort and 4.2% for the CART19 cohort. The 3-month response, survival, and toxicities after CART19 infusion showed similar results, although the number of patients who were treated was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the access of MHPs to tertiary centers for LBCL care was preserved but appeared reduced for commercial CART19 immunotherapy. Although clinical outcomes of MHPs seemed similar to those of non-MHPs, the small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions. Further studies are needed. (Funded by the Laffey McHugh Foundation and others.).

Geographic and Racial Disparities in Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells and Bispecific Antibodies Trials Access for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

We investigate the geographical and racial disparities in accessing CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials for DLBCL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ClinicalTrials.gov was searched, and 75 trials with at least 1 open site in the US were included. 2020 US Census Bureau data was used to obtain data on race and ethnicity. SPSS version 26 was used for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 62 CAR-T and 13 bispecific antibodies trials with 6221 enrolled or expected to enroll patients. Eighty-five percent of the clinical trials were only open in the US, and the majority 64% were pharmaceutical-funded. There were 126 unique study sites distributed over 31 states with 11 (0-51) mean number of trials per state and 4.5 (1-26) and 4.4 (1-24) mean number of CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials per site, respectively. Southern states had the most number of trials 31%, followed by Midwestern 25%, Northeastern 24%, and Western 20%. The highest number of study locations were in California 13, New York 9, and Pennsylvania 9, while the highest number of open studies were in California 51, Texas 32, and New York 23. Twenty states had no open CAR-T or bispecific antibodies trials. Only 33% of African Americans (AA) lived in a county with a trial, and 7 out of 10 states with the highest proportion of AA residents (18.6%-41.4%) have no or less than 4 trial sites. Of the 62 counties analyzed, 92% were White predominant, while only 8% were AA predominant (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies should be framed to address the observed disparities and to improve access.

Racial and ethnic differences in clinical outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The clinical outcomes of standard of care (SOC) ide-cel in racially and ethnically diverse populations have been understudied. This study pooled data from 207 patients with RRMM (28% patients of racial and ethnic minority groups) treated with SOC ide-cel across 11 institutions to examine racial and ethnic differences in the incidence of toxicities and adverse events, response to ide-cel, and survival. This study included 22 (11%) Hispanic, 36 (17%) non-Hispanic Black, and 149 (72%) non-Hispanic White patients with RRMM. Compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher median levels of C-reactive protein (1.0, 0.8, and 3.5 mg/dL, respectively; P = .02) and baseline ferritin (362.0 vs 307.0 vs 680.5, respectively; P = .08) and were more likely to develop cytokine release syndrome (77%, 85%, and 97%, respectively; P = .04). Although best overall response rate was lower among Hispanic patients (59%) than among non-Hispanic Black (86%) and White patients (86%; P = .01), there were no racial and ethnic differences in progression-free or overall survival. We provide, to our knowledge, the first and largest investigation of clinical outcomes of SOC ide-cel by race and ethnicity. Despite differences in safety and response to ide-cel, our findings encourage the use of ide-cel in all patients with RRMM. These findings should be confirmed in larger samples of diverse patients with RRMM, with longer follow-up time.

Access to CAR T-cell therapy: Focus on diversity, equity and inclusion

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies in patients with relapsed or refractory disease without other treatment options. However, only a very small proportion of patients with an indication for CAR T-cell can access the treatment. The imbalance between supply and demand is magnified in minority and vulnerable populations. Limited access is multifactorial and in part a result of factors directly related to the cellular product such as cost, complex logistics and manufacturing limitations. On the other hand, the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and their social and structural context are also key to understanding access barriers in cellular therapy and health care in general. CAR T-cell therapy provides us with a new opportunity to better understand and prioritize this gap, a key step towards proactively and strategically addressing access. The aim of this review is to provide an analysis of the current state of access to CAR T therapy with a focus on the influence of DEI. We will cover aspects related to the cellular product and the inseparable context of social and structural determinants. Identifying and addressing barriers is necessary to ensure equitable access to this and all future novel therapies.